﻿FN Clarivate Analytics Web of Science
VR 1.0
PT J
AU Han, S
   Wang, HM
   Ao, YB
   Wang, B
   Chen, B
   Martek, I
AF Han, Shan
   Wang, Huaming
   Ao, Yibin
   Wang, Bo
   Chen, Bin
   Martek, Igor
TI Resilient city construction efficiency and its influencing factors in
   China's Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle: Considering both construction
   input and resilience level of the city
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient city construction efficiency; Urban resource consumption;
   urban resilience level; Influencing factors; Chengdu-Chongqing Economic
   Circle (CCEC)
ID URBAN RESILIENCE
AB The growing expansion of urban centers combined with a deteriorating climatic environment raises the likelihood and severity of urban disasters. Thus, there is an urgent need to accelerate the resilient city construction. Here, we use efficiency theory to structure an assessment indicator system of the resilient city construction efficiency to examine the actual correlation of urban resilience enhancement and urban resource consumption. Specifically, 16 key cities in the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle (CCEC) are investigated using the superefficient SBM and GTWR models. The findings reveal that the resilient city construction efficiency varies greatly among cities in the region, but most cities have relatively low resilient city construction efficiency, showing high resource consumption and low resilience levels. Also, the lower efficiency of regional resilient city construction is mainly due to the serious ineffectiveness of technical and resource inputs, insufficient outputs of ecological resilience and engineering resilience, and is also greatly influenced by factors such as the economic level and the technological innovation level. Upon this basis, we suggest the development strategies for resilient city construction in CCEC. This study broadens the perspective and scope of urban resilience research, and also provides a realistic reference for accelerating the construction of resilient cities.
C1 [Han, Shan] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Huaming] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China.
   [Ao, Yibin] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Bo] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Bin] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Bin] Hebei Univ Engn, Innovat Ctr Water Pollut Control & Water Ecol Reme, Handan 056038, Peoples R China.
   [Martek, Igor] Deakin Univ, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Geelong 3220, Australia.
C3 Chongqing Jiaotong University; Southwest University of Science &
   Technology - China; Chengdu University of Technology; Southwest
   University of Science & Technology - China; Beijing Normal University;
   Hebei University of Engineering; Deakin University
RP Wang, HM (corresponding author), Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China.
EM wanghuaming@swust.edu.cn
RI Martek, Igor/HCH-6448-2022; Han, Shan/KJL-9072-2024
OI Martek, Igor/0000-0001-6573-1291; Han, Shan/0009-0003-0024-1584
CR Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Ding R, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710969
   Ebi KL, 2021, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V42, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105026
   Feng XH, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11060898
   Gao MY, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19148837
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Hunter RF, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
   Jiang X, 2022, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V199, P1120, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.142
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Khan M, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000749
   Li D, 2022, ENERGIES, V15, DOI 10.3390/en15134785
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Liu LN, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107186
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Ma L, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104402
   Ma XF, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052899
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meyer N, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195514
   Mishra V, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104352
   Mouratidis K, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105855
   Oktari RS, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102823
   Pu XY, 2022, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V31, P5207, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/151111
   Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
   Saikia P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103497
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Shammi M, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04063
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   Wan JJ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182111629
   Wang B, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12070962
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   Wang Y, 2014, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V8, P44, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2014.3
   Xu WP, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102784
   Xu X, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20010413
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yan Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.013
   Yan Y, 2017, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V189, DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-5814-9
   Yang T, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104069
   Yao FG, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0273559
   You XT, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V113, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05368-x
   Yuan YL, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151813319
   Zhai CH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103453
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhou Y, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P55816, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-19630-z
   Zhu QS, 2023, AIMS MATH, V8, P12239, DOI 10.3934/math.2023617
NR 50
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 85
U2 113
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD NOV 1
PY 2024
VL 114
AR 105726
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105726
EA AUG 2024
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA D7F2T
UT WOS:001297797000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, WD
   Zhang, L
   Peng, T
AF Wang, Weidong
   Zhang, Lei
   Peng, Ting
TI Evaluation of a safe resilient City: A comparison of Hangzhou and
   Shaoxing, China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient city; Triangle model of urban safety resilience; Evaluation
   index; Empirical studies; Hangzhou and Shaoxing
ID URBAN RESILIENCE
AB The relationship between people, environment, and infrastructure is an important issue that must be solved in the construction of resilient cities in the future, which can be derived from four dimensions, such as safe resilience of urban personnel, safe resilience of urban facilities, the level of urban risk control, and urban safety investment. This paper conducted an empirical study on this issue by selecting two Chinese cities of different sizes, one megacity being Hangzhou, the capital of Zhejiang Province, and the other being Shaoxing, a small prefecture-level city. Referring to the triangle theory of safe resilience, and National Standard of China "Guide for safe resilient city evaluation" (GB/T 40947-2021), an evaluation index system for safe resilient cities is established. The following conclusions are drawn: The three factors of human-environment-infrastructure must be considered as a whole in the construction of resilient cities; Small cities should pay more attention to the development of people-oriented "soft resilience"; Urban infrastructure resilience is more important for megacities than for small cities; It is the optimal strategy to construct the safe resilient cities by strengthening urban emergency management system in a holistic manner, whether for megacities or small cities.
C1 [Wang, Weidong] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Modern Scitech, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Lei] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Ting] China Jiliang Univ, Sch Humanities & Foreign Language, Dept Publ Adm, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
C3 China Jiliang University; Zhejiang Sci-Tech University; China Jiliang
   University
RP Wang, WD (corresponding author), China Jiliang Univ, Coll Modern Scitech, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
EM wwdn2002@cjlu.edu.cn
OI Wang, Weidong/0000-0002-7729-5148
FU National Social Sciences Foundation of China [20BGL294]; Key Projects of
   Soft Sciences Research in Zhe-jiang Province [2023C25005]; Major
   Humanities and Social Sciences Research Projects in Zhejiang Higher
   Education In-stitutions [2021QN059]
FX Acknowledgment The authors are grateful to the editors and the anonymous
   reviewers for their valuable and insightful comments, and acknowledge
   the financial support from National Social Sciences Foundation of China
   (Grant No. 20BGL294) , Key Projects of Soft Sciences Research in
   Zhe-jiang Province (Grant No. 2023C25005) and Major Humanities and
   Social Sciences Research Projects in Zhejiang Higher Education
   In-stitutions (Grant No.2021QN059) .
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Asprone D., 2014, SAFETY RELIABILITY R, P4069, DOI 10.1201/b16387-591
   Bloomberg M.R., 2013, STRONGER MORE RESILI
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Bruneau M., 2007, SCI TECHNICAL AEROSP, V45
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chen W., 2020, RES TEMPORAL SPATIAL
   Chen X., 2020, LABOR PROTECTION, V03, P24
   Chen XQ, 2020, IEEE SENS J, V20, P14317, DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3007809
   Fan W., 2020, LABOR PROTECTION, P20
   Feng Y., 2020, CHINA INVESTIGATION, V06, P28
   Furda A, 2011, IEEE INTEL TRANSP SY, V3, P4, DOI 10.1109/MITS.2011.940472
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goldstein BE, 2008, HUM ECOL, V36, P15, DOI 10.1007/s10745-007-9133-6
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Hangzhou Committee & Hangzhou Municipal Government, 2022, HANGZH CHIN HANGZH
   He J., 2018, STUDY PRACTICE, V9, P84
   Heeks R, 2019, INFORM SYST J, V29, P70, DOI 10.1111/isj.12177
   International Organization for Standardization, ISODIS371232020
   Janku J, 2022, SOIL WATER RES, V17, P1, DOI 10.17221/136/2021-SWR
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jhaak M., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL
   Lamond JE, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P63, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
   Li Ruiqi, 2020, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V60, P1, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.21.039
   [马超 Ma Chao], 2020, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V44, P65
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nickson A., 2011, MANAGING RISK INCREA
   Official Portal of Shaoxing, SHAOX
   Ouyang M, 2014, STRUCT SAF, V48, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001
   Patel RB, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.003
   Polesie S, 2020, BRIT J DERMATOL, V183, P159, DOI 10.1111/bjd.18875
   Premakumara D.G.J., ISAP 2014 23 JULY YO
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2019, RUP CIT RES IND
   Saaty T.L., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
   SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Shao YW, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V36, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.09.022
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Su Q., 2020, URBAN RURAL PLANNING, V04, P28
   Sun L., 2020, BEIJING PLANNING REV, V04, P128
   Walkerb S., 2006, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Wang M., 2020, ARCHITECTURAL SCI, V36, P115
   Wang Y, 2020, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2019.100003
   Webster Andrea B., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, P143
   Wu X., 2018, TIANJIN SOCIAL SCI, V3, P87
   [夏兰芳 Xia Lanfang], 2021, [测绘地理信息, Journal of Geomatics], V46, P107
   Xiao W., 2019, SE ACAD RES, V2, P246
   [许婵 Xu Chan], 2020, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V44, P106
   Zhai G., 2020, URBAN PLAN, V2, P77
   Zhang MD., 2018, J Zhengzhou Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed), V51, P59
   Zhang Y., 2020, FUTURE DEV, V44, P13
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   [周倩 Zhou Qian], 2020, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V27, P286
   Zou X., 2020, BEIJING PLANNING REV, V02, P40
NR 54
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 59
U2 223
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 98
AR 104798
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104798
EA AUG 2023
PG 10
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA P7NK3
UT WOS:001052502200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Roberts, D
   Douwes, J
   Sutherland, C
   Sim, V
AF Roberts, Debra
   Douwes, Joanne
   Sutherland, Catherine
   Sim, Vicky
TI Durban's 100 Resilient Cities journey: governing resilience from within
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE 100 Resilient Cities; Durban; Southern urbanism; urban governance; urban
   resilience
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; THINKING
AB Urban resilience is the focus of a global policy discourse that is being mobilized by a wide range of organizations to reduce urban risk and respond to the shocks and stresses facing cities. This paper explores the process of "governing for resilience" through Durban's resilience journey as part of the 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) programme. From an insider perspective, it presents both 100RC and Durban's approaches to developing a resilience strategy. It reflects on the contestations that emerged as Durban and 100RC struggled over the meaning and practice of urban resilience. The paper develops a continuum of urban resilience approaches to analyse the conflicts that emerged as the global programme of urban resilience travelled to, and landed in, a South African city. The paper argues that a global framing of urban resilience needs to be responsive to a world of cities that share common risk trajectories but have different contexts and vulnerabilities.((1))
C1 [Roberts, Debra] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, Durban, South Africa.
   [Sutherland, Catherine] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Built Environm & Dev Studies, Shepstone Bldg, ZA-4041 Durban, South Africa.
   [Sim, Vicky] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Built Environm & Dev Studies, Durban, South Africa.
C3 University of Kwazulu Natal; University of Kwazulu Natal; University of
   Kwazulu Natal
RP Sutherland, C (corresponding author), Univ KwaZulu Natal, Built Environm & Dev Studies, Shepstone Bldg, ZA-4041 Durban, South Africa.
EM debra.roberts@durban.gov.za; Joanne.Douwes@durban.gov.za;
   sutherlandc@ukzn.ac.za; vsim@vodamail.co.za
CR [Anonymous], RISK RESILIENCE RESP
   [Anonymous], 100 Resilient Cities
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Berkes J., 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change
   Blaikie P., 1994, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters
   Cook I R, 2012, CITIES SOCIAL CHANGE
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   DeVerteuil G., 2016, CITY, V20, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714, https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714]
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   eThekwini Municipality, 2017, DURB RES STRAT 2017
   EThekwini Municipality, 2016, 2016 2017 SPAT DEV F
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Harrison P., 2014, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Harvey David., 1996, JUSTICE NATURE GEOGR
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Martel P., 2018, Urban Forum, V29, P397
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review Bellagio Initiative
   McSweeney K, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P5203, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014123108
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miraftab F., 2004, Wagadu, V1
   Peck J, 2010, GEOFORUM, V41, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Robinson J., 2017, The Routledge handbook on cities in the global south
   Rockefeller Foundation and Arup, 2014, CIT RES FRAM RES REP
   RUTTER M, 1987, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V57, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   Sim V, 2018, URBAN FORUM, V29, P351
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Sutherland C., 2018, Urban Forum, V29, P333, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12132-018-9353-4
   Sutherland C., 2019, Human Geography, V12, P33, DOI DOI 10.1177/194277861901200103
   Swyngedouw Erik., 2006, SCI CULT-UK, V15, P105, DOI [10.1080/09505430600707970, DOI 10.1080/09505430600707970]
   Urban Institute, 2018, I URB RES MIDT MON E
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker B., 2012, RESILIENCE PRACTICE
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 42
TC 35
Z9 36
U1 8
U2 106
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 32
IS 2
BP 547
EP 568
AR 0956247820946555
DI 10.1177/0956247820946555
EA AUG 2020
PG 22
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA NV7SM
UT WOS:000562443100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yang, QY
   Yang, D
   Li, P
   Liang, SL
   Zhang, ZH
AF Yang, Qiaoyun
   Yang, Dan
   Li, Peng
   Liang, Shilu
   Zhang, Zhenghu
TI Resilient City: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization
SO DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Review
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; URBAN RESILIENCE; ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; CITIES; ADAPTATION; ROTTERDAM; FRAMEWORK; METAPHOR;
   TRENDS
AB Resilient city has attracted global attentions as a new concept for cities to deal with risks and challenges in recent years. Numerous researchers have successively conducted in-depth studies on the resilient city from different perspectives. To acquire an overview of resilient city and grasp the current research hotspots, a bibliometric analysis and visualization of the past decade of research on the resilient city was made. The data were collected from 1249 articles published in the Web of Science database from 2010 to 2019. As the widely used bibliometric analysis tools, CiteSpace and VOSviewer were adopted in this study. The temporal distribution of resilient city research, including annual publication outputs and high-cited papers, was symmetrically analyzed. Then, the spatial distribution of resilient city research, including countries, categories, institutions, co-citation journals, author collaboration network, and author co-citation network, was investigated. Hot topics and evolution trends of resilient city were revealed. The results show that the research of resilient city experienced three periods, namely, germination, rapid diffusion, and reflection and innovation periods. Current research focuses on four aspects, including psychological resilience at the microcommunity and group levels, assessment of urban disaster resilience, multiple theoretical frameworks of urban resilience, and urban resilience promotion strategy. Therefore, this study helps scholars and practitioners to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current research progress and evolution trends of the resilient city field.
C1 [Yang, Qiaoyun; Yang, Dan; Li, Peng; Liang, Shilu] Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Zhenghu] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.
C3 Dalian University of Technology; Dalian University of Technology
RP Li, P (corresponding author), Dalian Univ Technol, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.; Zhang, ZH (corresponding author), Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.
EM qiaoyunyang@dlut.edu.cn; 18847130748@163.com; lipeng@dlut.edu.cn;
   838754685@qq.com; zhenghuzhang@dlut.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Zhenghu/JMQ-6933-2023
OI Zhang, Zhenghu/0000-0003-2141-9997; li, peng/0000-0001-5915-4985
FU National Social Science Foundation of China [17CGL048, 19BZZ043];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [51909026]; Major Research
   Project of Dalian Academy of Social Sciences [2020dlskyzz001]
FX This study was financially supported by the National Social Science
   Foundation of China (nos. 17CGL048 and 19BZZ043), National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (no. 51909026), and Major Research Project
   of Dalian Academy of Social Sciences (no. 2020dlskyzz001).
CR Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Bonanno GA, 2006, PSYCHOL SCI, V17, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01682.x
   Camfield L, 2012, SOC INDIC RES, V107, P393, DOI 10.1007/s11205-011-9860-3
   Chan J, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005
   Chen CM, 2018, CHIIR'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CONFERENCE ON HUMAN INFORMATION INTERACTION & RETRIEVAL, P369, DOI 10.1145/3176349.3176897
   Chen CM, 2006, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V57, P359, DOI 10.1002/asi.20317
   Coaffee J, 2009, TERRORISM, RISK AND THE GLOBAL CITY: TOWARDS URBAN RESILIENCE, P1
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davic RD, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P405, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130116
   Davis-Street J., 2018, SPE INT C EXH HLTH S
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Diao KG, 2016, WATER RES, V106, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.011
   Ding X, 2022, ELECTRON COMMER RES, V22, P787, DOI 10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
   Fergus S, 2005, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V26, P399, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357
   Fletcher D, 2013, EUR PSYCHOL, V18, P12, DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Guo YM, 2021, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V116, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2020.10.023
   Henstra D, 2012, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V14, P175, DOI 10.1080/13876988.2012.665215
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jennings Barbara J., 2013, Environment Systems & Decisions, V33, P184, DOI 10.1007/s10669-013-9440-y
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Kim D, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040405
   Lee AV, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P29, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000075
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   León J, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
   Li LL, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V80, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11192-008-1939-5
   Liu X., 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V1
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Marana P, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.011
   McGlade J, 2006, COMPLEXITY AND CO-EVOLUTION: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, P147
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   한상미, 2017, [Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association, 한국지역개발학회지], V29, P1
   NAJJAR W, 1990, IEEE T COMPUT, V39, P174, DOI 10.1109/12.45203
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Price D.J.S., 1963, Little Science, Big Science
   Shamout S, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V25, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.015
   Silva J.D., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stumpp EM, 2013, CITIES, V32, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.003
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van Eck NJ, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Yu YT, 2020, ANN TRANSL MED, V8, DOI 10.21037/atm-20-4235
   Zhi W, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V441, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.064
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 59
TC 21
Z9 23
U1 40
U2 420
PU HINDAWI LTD
PI LONDON
PA ADAM HOUSE, 3RD FLR, 1 FITZROY SQ, LONDON, W1T 5HF, ENGLAND
SN 1026-0226
EI 1607-887X
J9 DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC
JI Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc.
PD MAY 4
PY 2021
VL 2021
AR 5558497
DI 10.1155/2021/5558497
PG 17
WC Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Mathematics; Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA SX0SL
UT WOS:000664922600002
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Guo, NL
   Wu, F
   Sun, DQ
   Shi, CC
   Gao, X
AF Guo, Naliang
   Wu, Feng
   Sun, Dongqi
   Shi, Chenchen
   Gao, Xing
TI Mechanisms of resilience in cities at different development phases: A
   system dynamics approach
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient cities; Urban complex system; System dynamics model
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY
AB Ecological degradation, environmental pollution, and lack of resources have brought challenges to sustainable urban development, whereas the concept of resilience provides a new normative and analytical tool to investigate urban responses to changes. To explore the mechanisms of resilience in cities at different development phases, this study employs a system dynamics approach to simulate and compare the evolutionary state of different resilient subsystems, including economic, social, ecological and infrastructure modules within cities. Then taking Beijing, Fuzhou, and Urumqi in China, three cities at different development stages as examples, the evolution of urban resilience systems from 2000 to 2035 is simulated under the socioeconomic development scenario. The results show urban resilience in the three case study cities evolves in different trajectories with distinctive features showcasing different development phase. This study constructs a resilient city system dynamics model, which provides references for future quantitative resilience simulations and can be adapted and applied to resilience simulations of cities in different contexts. In addition, the case study provides distinct policy recommendations for resilience building in cities at various stages of development and points out key areas for resilience building in different cities.
C1 [Guo, Naliang; Wu, Feng; Sun, Dongqi; Gao, Xing] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Naliang; Wu, Feng; Sun, Dongqi; Gao, Xing] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Chenchen] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Adm, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Feng; Gao, Xing] 11A Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural
   Resources Research, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of
   Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS; Capital University of Economics &
   Business
RP Wu, F; Gao, X (corresponding author), 11A Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM wufeng@igsnrr.ac.cn; gxing@igsnrr.ac.cn
RI Gao, Xing/AAW-3123-2021; Shi, Chenchen/JMC-4424-2023; Wu,
   Feng/ABB-9233-2022
OI Shi, Chenchen/0000-0002-8608-668X
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41971233, 72104149];
   NSFC-Yunnan Joint Fund Key Support Project [U2102208]; Key Project of
   Innovation LREIS [KPI007]; R&D Program of Beijing Municipal Education
   Commission [SM202310038007]
FX <B>Acknowledgment</B> This work is supported by the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41971233 and 72104149) , the
   NSFC-Yunnan Joint Fund Key Support Project (Grant No. U2102208) , the
   Key Project of Innovation LREIS (Grant No. KPI007) , and R&D Program of
   Beijing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. SM202310038007) .
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Alliance R., 2010, Workb. Pract. Version 2
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Anderies JM, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P130, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   Angeler DG, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P617, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12649
   Batty M., 2009, Cities as Complex Systems: Scaling, Interaction, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69]
   Boston M., 2014, Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, P11
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Brzezina N, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8100971
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Datola G, 2019, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V11622, P108, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_9
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Fagerholm N, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1038/s42949-022-00068-8
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Hallegatte S., 2014, Policy Research and Working Paper, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-0289.1930.tb00792.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0289.1930.TB00792.X]
   Herrera H., 2020, ENVIRON SYST DECIS, V40, P342, DOI [10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jiao LD, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101543
   Kashef M, 2016, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V5, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2016.03.003
   Kutty AA, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V378, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Links JM, 2018, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V12, P127, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.39
   Lynch C., 2018, CityStrength Diagnostic: Methodological Guidebook
   Machado CP, 2019, SYST PRACT ACT RES, V32, P663, DOI 10.1007/s11213-019-9480-4
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P141, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv012
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   OConnell D., 2015, J Canberra Csiro
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Pagano A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.005
   Rockefeller Foundation Arup, 2014, City Resilience Index
   Serbanica C, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104177
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Simonovic S. P., 2013, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V3, P378, DOI 10.9734/BJECC/2013/2504
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Wang ZX, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P1228, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2021.1872779
   Xu L, 2015, SUSTAIN SCI, V10, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11625-014-0274-4
   Zhang L, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11020201
NR 51
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 36
U2 79
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 53
AR 101793
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101793
EA DEC 2023
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA IJ0Y1
UT WOS:001165852100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Silva, AMD
   Lazaro, LLB
   Andrade, JCS
   Prado, AFR
   Ventura, AC
   Campelo, A
   Tridello, V
AF de Andrade Silva, Angela Marcia
   Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz
   Silveira Andrade, Jose Celio
   Rodrigues Prado, Angelica Fabiola
   Ventura, Andrea Cardoso
   Campelo, Adriana
   Tridello, Valentina
TI Examining the Urban Resilience Strategy of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil: A
   Comparative Assessment of Predominant Sectors Within the Resilient
   Cities Network
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience strategy; Salvador; Bahia; Brazil; Resilient Cities
   Network; Shocks; Stresses; Actions
ID TRANSNATIONAL MUNICIPAL NETWORKS; CLIMATE RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE;
   POLITICS; EQUITY
AB Several cities around the world have been developing specific strategic plans to foster urban resilience. These plans, which are known as urban resilience strategies, do not follow a default format; however, they do follow similar patterns when they are designed by cities within a given collaborative network, such as the Resilient Cities Network (R-Cities). This study will identify the predominant sectors considered by the Brazilian city of Salvador's resilience strategy, based on actions, shocks, and stresses, and will compare these with the sectors considered the most by other cities within the R-Cities. The results demonstrate that when urban resilience increases, the resilience strategies of the cities studied, which include Salvador, place particular importance on the social and urban planning sectors. The predominance of both sectors reveals the importance of maintaining a broad view when developing strategic urban plans and acts as an alert for urban planners on the importance of analyzing urban resilience holistically, beyond building safe infrastructure. In addition, this study will highlight the importance of including resilience as a guiding theme in urban planning agendas and when developing public policies to prevent risk and develop infrastructure plans. All aspects and sectors of social and urban planning that are fundamental to building urban resilience must be involved.
C1 [de Andrade Silva, Angela Marcia] Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Ave Euclides da Cunha 730,AP 302, BR-40150122 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Environm Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Av Dr Arnaldo 715, BR-03178200 Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz] Univ Durham, Dept Anthropol, Stockton Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
   [Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz] Univ Durham, Durham Energy Inst, Stockton Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
   [Silveira Andrade, Jose Celio] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Adm, Ave Reitor Miguel Calmon,S-N 3 ANDAR, BR-40110903 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Rodrigues Prado, Angelica Fabiola] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Civil Engn, Polytech Sch, Ladeira Fonte 14, BR-40080020 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Ventura, Andrea Cardoso] Univ Fed Bahia, Sch Adm, Alameda Mar del Plata 414,Cond Alameda Village, BR-41601000 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Campelo, Adriana] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Otago, New Zealand.
   [Campelo, Adriana] Rua Martins de Almeida 73-704, BR-40155060 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Tridello, Valentina] Aiye Consultores, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Tridello, Valentina] Delft Univ Technol, Univ Venice, IUAV, Mekelweg 5, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands.
   [Tridello, Valentina] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
   [Tridello, Valentina] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Rua Minas Gerais 383, BR-41803002 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Durham
   University; Durham University; Universidade Federal da Bahia;
   Universidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Federal da Bahia; University
   of Otago; Delft University of Technology; KU Leuven
RP Silva, AMD (corresponding author), Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Ave Euclides da Cunha 730,AP 302, BR-40150122 Salvador, BA, Brazil.
EM angela.marcia.andrade@gmail.com; lbenites@usp.br;
   jcelio.andrade@gmail.com; angelicafah@outlook.com;
   andreaventurassa@gmail.com; campelo2@hotmail.com; tridellov@gmail.com
RI Andrade, Celio/AAJ-5654-2020; Ventura, Andréa/AAP-2160-2020; Benites
   Lazaro, Lira Luz/M-8642-2017
OI Andrade, Celio/0000-0002-6794-8686; Prado, Angelica/0000-0003-2649-8794;
   Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz/0000-0001-6587-1497
FU Bahia Research Foundation (FAPESB); SAo Paulo Research Foundation
   (FAPESP) [2017/17796-3, 2019-24479-0, 2015/03804-9]
FX Angela Marcia de Andrade Silva acknowledges the financial support
   received from Bahia Research Foundation (FAPESB). Lira Luz Benites
   Lazaro acknowledges the financial support received from SAo Paulo
   Research Foundation (FAPESP), Grant 2017/17796-3 and 2019-24479-0, and
   Process: 2015/03804-9.
CR Abramo P., 2007, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, V9, P25, DOI [10.22296/2317-1529, DOI 10.22296/2317-1529]
   Acuto M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1758, DOI 10.1177/0042098020929261
   Admiraal H, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
   Agarwal, 2020, THESIS U WATERLOO
   Amaral MH, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125829
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 100 Resilient Cities
   [Anonymous], 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   [Anonymous], 2020, Policy Brief: COVID-19 in an Urban World
   Archer D, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.007
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Braga R, 2012, 6 ENC NAC ANPP BEL, P1
   Broto VC, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031
   Cerqueira E.D.C., 2020, SECRETARIA SUSTENTAB, P177
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Colucci A, 2012, TEMA, V5, P101, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/921
   de Oliveira JAP, 2021, REV ADM PUBL-RIO JAN, V55, P243, DOI 10.1590/0034-761220200501
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Etikan I., 2016, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.11648/J.AJTAS.20160501.11, 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11]
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Fragkias M, 2016, ROUT INT HANDB, P9
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   GIDDENS Anthony., 2010, A politica da mudanca climatica
   Gillard R, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P251, DOI 10.1002/wcc.384
   Girardi G., 2020, BRUNO COVAS PREFEITO, V1
   Haupt W, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P123, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1583235
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   IBGE, 2018, de risco no Brasil
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moench M, 2014, DEV PRACT, V24, P447, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2014.909385
   PMS (Prefeitura Municipal de Salvador), 2019, SALV RES
   PMS (Prefeitura Municipal de Salvador). 2020a, PLAN MIT AD MUD CLIM
   PMS (Prefeitura Municipal de Salvador). 2020b, INV EM GAS EF EST GE
   Qin H, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.05.003
   Ramos M.C, 2015, THESIS U PRESBITERIA
   Rashidi K, 2018, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V23, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11027-017-9747-y
   Resilient Cities Network, 2020, URBAN RESILIENCE
   Roser M., 2019, HUMAN DEV INDEX HDI
   Silva A.M.A., 2019, 21 ENC INT GEST EMPR
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   UN, 2015, UNGA Resolution 70/1
   United Nations, 2019, ONU PREV QUE CID ABR
   United Nations, 2018, SDG IND
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Zangalli P.C, 2018, THESIS UNESP
NR 47
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 24
U2 111
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD JUN 1
PY 2022
VL 148
IS 2
AR 05022002
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000818
PG 11
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 0N1RQ
UT WOS:000782624000008
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rodríguez-Izquierdo, E
   Cid, A
   García-Meneses, PM
   Peña-Sanabria, KA
   Lerner, AM
   Matus-Kramer, A
   Escalante, AE
AF Rodriguez-Izquierdo, Emilio
   Cid, Abril
   Garcia-Meneses, Paola M.
   Pena-Sanabria, Karla A.
   Lerner, Amy M.
   Matus-Kramer, Arnoldo
   Escalante, Ana E.
TI From resilience attributes to city resilience
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Resilience attributes; Mexico City; 100 Resilient
   Cities Program
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; PRINCIPLES; ROTTERDAM; NETWORKS; CITIES; WORLD
AB Resilience challenges for cities require bridging the gap between theorized concepts, such as resilience attributes, and its application to urban planning. Resilience attributes have been used by international policy initiatives to guide urban resilience without paying attention to how these attributes are represented in public policies. We present an analytical approach to examine the application of resilience attributes in resilience public policy. We apply our approach to evaluate the design of the Resilience Strategy developed for Mexico City under the 100 Resilient Cities Program. We find that creating tangible, meaningful action in government for urban resilience is hampered by concepts that cannot easily be translated into urban planning. Our analytical approach allows a practical and systematic assessment of the representation of resilience attributes, offering an opportunity to adjust and reframe the design of resilience policies balancing scientific knowledge with what is meaningful for decision-makers.
C1 [Rodriguez-Izquierdo, Emilio; Garcia-Meneses, Paola M.; Pena-Sanabria, Karla A.; Escalante, Ana E.] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Lab Nacl Ciencias Sostenibilidad LANCIS, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
   [Rodriguez-Izquierdo, Emilio; Cid, Abril; Matus-Kramer, Arnoldo] Ithaca Environm, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
   [Lerner, Amy M.] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
C3 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico; University of California
   System; University of California San Diego
RP Escalante, AE (corresponding author), Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Lab Nacl Ciencias Sostenibilidad LANCIS, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
EM aescalante@iecologia.unam.mx
RI Escalante, Ana/D-5479-2011; Garcia, Paola/JRW-9253-2023
OI Rodriguez-Izquierdo, Emilio/0000-0001-7674-9032; Cid,
   Abril/0000-0003-2578-3657; Garcia-Meneses, Paola
   Massyel/0000-0001-8065-399X
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allen CR, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P898, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0401-4
   Arup International Development, 2015, City Resilience Index
   Berbs-Blzquez M., 2021, Resilient Urban Futures, P113, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_8]
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke Carl, 2016, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389414.013.8, 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389414.013.8]
   Gadgil M., 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957, 10.1017/ CBO9780511541957]
   GIZ, 2013, DTSCH GESELLSCHAFT I
   González-Quintero C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11216073
   Grafton RQ, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P907, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0376-1
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Jann W, 2007, PUBLIC ADM PUBLIC PO, V125, P43
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P571, DOI [10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.004]
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121224
   Saadatpour A, 2013, METHODS, V62, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.10.012
   Sabatier P.A., 2019, Theories of the policy process, P3
   Samuelsson K, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V187, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.015
   SEDEMA. Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, 2016, ESTR RES CDMX
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Sterk M, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V28, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.003
   Stone D, 2004, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V11, P545, DOI 10.1080/13501760410001694291
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   United Nations (Habitat III), 2017, NEW URB AG
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
NR 40
TC 23
Z9 25
U1 75
U2 446
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 226
AR 104485
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
EA MAY 2022
PG 7
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA 4I1PJ
UT WOS:000850348000003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, N
   Guo, HX
   Xiang, H
AF Chen, Na
   Guo, Hongxia
   Xiang, Hui
TI Evaluation of urban resilience level and analysis of obstacle factors: A
   case study of Hunan Province, China
SO FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient city; sustainable development; entropy method;
   spatial-temporal evolution; obstacle factors
ID SUSTAINABILITY
AB Resilient city is an ideal goal and model of urban development proposed in response to today's complex and dynamic environmental changes. In this study, a resilient city evaluation framework of "social resilience-economic resilience-urban infrastructure and service-urban governance " was built upon the multi-dimensionality of the urban system; the entropy weight method was used to measure the level of urban resilience in Hunan Province while an obstacle degree model was used to identify any obstacle factor restricting to the development of resilience. The results show that the level of urban resilience in Hunan Province has grown slowly over the past 10 years, and there is an obvious regional difference in it. There are more and more highly resilient cities, but medium/low-resilience cities still dominate the province, forming a spatial process of evolution from "medium/high-level dispersion " to "medium/high-level aggregation " in the Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan Urban Agglomeration. The level of urban resilience is predominantly hindered by the social and economic systems; at the index layer, most obstacle factors are moving from the economic system to the social-economic-urban infrastructure and service system.
C1 [Chen, Na; Guo, Hongxia; Xiang, Hui] Hunan Univ, Sch Architecture, Changsha, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Na; Xiang, Hui] Hunan Univ, Hunan Key Lab Sci Urban & Rural Human Settlements, Changsha, Peoples R China.
C3 Hunan University; Hunan University
RP Chen, N (corresponding author), Hunan Univ, Sch Architecture, Changsha, Peoples R China.; Chen, N (corresponding author), Hunan Univ, Hunan Key Lab Sci Urban & Rural Human Settlements, Changsha, Peoples R China.
EM chenna825@hnu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51908202]
FX Funding This work was supported partially by the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (No. 51908202). All opinions are the
   responsibility of the authors alone.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   [Arup Ove Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation], 2014, City Resilience Framework, City Resilience Index
   Brakman S, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P225, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv005
   Coaffee J, 2009, TERRORISM, RISK AND THE GLOBAL CITY: TOWARDS URBAN RESILIENCE, P1
   Colten CE, 2008, ENVIRONMENT, V50, P36, DOI 10.3200/ENVT.50.5.36-47
   Cui S. H., 2010, URBAN STUD, V3, P19, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2010.03.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-3862.2010.03.004]
   Cumming GS, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P899, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DOVERS SR, 1992, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V2, P262, DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90044-8
   [方叶林 Fang Yelin], 2022, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V42, P203
   Gebre-Egziabher Axumite, 2004, Ann N Y Acad Sci, V1023, P62, DOI 10.1196/annals.1319.016
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Jenks G. F., 1967, Int Yearbook Cartogr, V7, P186
   Kanuri C., 2016, Getting Started with the SDGs in Cities: A Guide for Stakeholders
   Klein B., 2017, Informatik-Spektrum, V40, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S00287-016-1005-2, 10.1007/s00287-016-1005-2]
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Levin S., 1998, Environment and Development Economics, V3, P221, DOI [10.1017/s1355770x98240125, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X98240125]
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   [李艳 Li Yan], 2019, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V38, P1694
   Li Zhengzhao, 2022, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V62, P266, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.22.037
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Pestel Institut, 2010, REG KRIS IND BEST EB
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   POLESE M., 2010, The resilient city: on the determinants of successful urban economics
   SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Shen L. N., 2021, URBAN PROBL, V8, P45, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.210805, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.210805]
   Toumi O, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V78, P878, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.013
   Unep, 2019, ENV OUTL GEO 6
   Waley P, 2005, GEOGR J, V171, P190
   [魏石梅 Wei Shimei], 2021, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V76, P1394
   Wilson D, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1265, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1452873
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   Xu J., 2002, Mathematical methods in contemporary geography, VSecond
   [张明斗 Zhang Mingdou], 2019, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V26, P82
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   [郑艳 Zheng Yan], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P31
NR 37
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 17
U2 102
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-6463
J9 FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ
JI Front. Earth Sci.
PD JAN 16
PY 2023
VL 10
AR 1033441
DI 10.3389/feart.2022.1033441
PG 11
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA 8G8MC
UT WOS:000920595800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhu, SY
   Li, DZ
   Feng, HB
AF Zhu, Shiyao
   Li, Dezhi
   Feng, Haibo
TI Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Smart city; AHP-TOPSIS method; Infrastructure;
   Regression analysis
ID DISASTER RESILIENCE; URBAN RESILIENCE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; NATURAL
   DISASTERS; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; CONTEXT;
   SYSTEMS
AB Smart city is originally aimed at dealing with various urban problems due to rapid urbanization, like energy shortage, congestion, and environmental pollution. The Chinese government has been devoting to the promotion of smart cities for many years. However, it is unconfirmed whether the city is more resilient with all the modern technologies provided when unexpected predicaments like climate changes or disasters occur. Therefore, it is urgent to consider resilience in the smart city. This paper provides a MCDM approach to assess and rank the resilience of 187 smart cities in China. The results demonstrate that the overall resilience of smart cities is at a relatively low level. There is also a significant unbalance of resilience between smart cities due to different infrastructural, economic, social, institutional, and environmental conditions. The potential links between urban smartness and resilience were also explored, and the results showed significant positive relationship between the smartness of a city and its resilience. Evidence also proved that developing smartness is more or less useful for improving urban resilience. Suggestions such as strengthening the development of infrastructure and economy, and enhancing the multi-stakeholders' cooperation are proposed to further promote the smart and resilient development in China.
C1 [Zhu, Shiyao; Li, Dezhi] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Dezhi] Southeast Univ, Engn Res Ctr Bldg Equipment Energy & Environm, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Feng, Haibo] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, 1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada.
C3 Southeast University - China; Southeast University - China; University
   of British Columbia
RP Li, DZ (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM crystal.zhusy@gmail.com; njldz@seu.edu.cn; fongkwt@yahoo.com
RI ZHU, SHIYAO/GZB-0532-2022
OI Li, Dezhi/0000-0001-7123-0493; Feng, Haibo/0000-0002-3048-7169; Zhu,
   Shiyao/0000-0002-3738-2001
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD1100202]; MOE Project of
   Humanities and Social Sciences [17YJAZH038]; Social Science Project of
   Jiangsu Province [18GLB002]; Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation
   Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0203]; Fundamental Research Funds
   for the Central Universities [2242017520044]
FX This project is funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (No.
   2018YFD1100202), the MOE Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No.
   17YJAZH038), the Social Science Project of Jiangsu Province (No.
   18GLB002), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of
   Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX18_0203), and the Fundamental Research Funds
   for the Central Universities (No. 2242017520044). The contents of this
   paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the
   facts and accuracy of the data presented herein.
CR Adamy A, 2021, INT J CONSTR MANAG, V21, P56, DOI 10.1080/15623599.2018.1506903
   Ajibade I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.029
   Alshehri SA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P2221, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1423-x
   Angelidou M, 2014, CITIES, V41, pS3, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
   [Anonymous], 2021, INT J ARCHITECTURE E, V10, DOI [10.7492/ijaec.2021.004, DOI 10.7492/IJAEC.2021.004]
   [Anonymous], CHIN CIT STAT YB 200
   Arup, 2014, CIT RES IND
   Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Bansal N, 2017, SPR TRANS CIV ENV EN, P109, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-2141-1_8
   Bibria SE, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V29, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.11.004
   Boyd C., 2014, SMART CITIES WORLD
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Chen C, 2018, INT J BIFURCAT CHAOS, V28, DOI 10.1142/S0218127418500128
   Chen Y.M., 2017, Chinese Public Administration, V1, P137, DOI DOI 10.3782/J.ISSN.1006-0863.2017.01.23
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Cutter S. L., 2016, SOCIAL SCI Q, V84, P242
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Dall'O' G, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V34, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.021
   Fang YP, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004
   Feofilovs M, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V113, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.012
   Fernandez-Anez V, 2018, CITIES, V78, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004
   Garau C, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030575
   Gunawardhana M. R., 2013, INT J CLIMATE CHANGE, V4
   HAN H, 2018, CITY CULTURE SOC, V12, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2017.12.003
   Hatuka T, 2018, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V19, P160, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2018.1455216
   HWANG CL, 1993, COMPUT OPER RES, V20, P889, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
   ICCA, 2016, ASS REP SMART CIT CH
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kabir MH, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.143
   Khalili S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.009
   Kummitha RKR, 2017, CITIES, V67, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010
   LAI YJ, 1994, EUR J OPER RES, V76, P486, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Lyu HM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P1012, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Moghim S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.090
   Moraci F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030755
   NDRC, 2018, BAS SIT NAT DIS 2017
   Oliva S., 2018, City, Culture and Society, V15, P53, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2018.05.005
   Palomo-Navarro A, 2018, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V42, P872, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.10.002
   Papa R, 2015, TEMA, V8, P19, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/2883
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Ruhlandt RWS, 2018, CITIES, V81, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Saaty T.L., 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI [10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
   Saaty TL, 2007, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V46, P1041, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.010
   Sabatino M, 2019, INT REV ECON FINANC, V61, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2019.02.011
   Saja AMA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096
   González DS, 2016, CUAD GEOGR, V55, P85
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shen LY, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V200, P667, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.281
   The State Council of the PRC, 2014, NAT NEW URB PLANN
   United Nations D. E. S. A., 2014, DAT BAS
   Vaidya OS, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V169, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Wang YC, 2018, J URBAN MANAG, V7, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2018.11.004
   Wu YZ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V173, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.047
   XIE Q, 2017, SCI DECISION MAKING, V6, P60, DOI DOI 10.3773/J.ISSN.1006-4885.2017.04.060
   Yigitcanlar T, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V73, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.034
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhou Y., 2018, BEIJING BECAME 1 CIT
NR 63
TC 147
Z9 151
U1 40
U2 506
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD OCT
PY 2019
VL 50
AR 101636
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA IV4PU
UT WOS:000484255800018
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yuan, ZH
   Hu, WY
AF Yuan, Zhihang
   Hu, Wanyang
TI Urban resilience to socioeconomic disruptions during the COVID-19
   pandemic: Evidence from China
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; Socioeconomic disruptions; Urban resilience; Text mining;
   Topic modeling
ID EARTHQUAKE; RECOVERY; CITIZENS; SPREAD
AB The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated restrictions have raised the awareness of building pandemic-resilient cities. Prior studies often evaluated the resilience of one type of urban system while lacking a comparison across various urban subsystems. This study fills this gap by measuring and comparing the adaptive resilience to the pandemic of various urban subsystems in Chinese cities. We propose a novel outcome measurement of the pandemic's socioeconomic impacts on cities, i.e., the citizens' complaints data, and use its temporal changes to measure cities' adaptive resilience to the pandemic. We find a wide range of urban subsystems were severely shocked by the pandemic, including the urban economy, construction-and-housing sector, welfare system, and education system. Different urban subsystems exhibit divergent degrees of adaptive resilience to the pandemic. Using cluster analysis, we also identify three types of cities with different patterns of adaptive resilience: cities whose general economies were the least resilient, cities whose construction-and-housing system was the least resilient, and cities that were mostly affected by restriction measures. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the pandemic's socioeconomic costs and help identify the divergent resilience of different urban subsystems so as to develop targeted policy interventions to improve cities' resilience to the pandemic.
C1 [Yuan, Zhihang; Hu, Wanyang] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Hu, Wanyang] Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 City University of Hong Kong
RP Hu, WY (corresponding author), Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM wanyanhu@cityu.edu.hk
RI Hu, Wanyang/HLW-3879-2023
OI YUAN, Zhihang/0000-0003-4776-4000
CR Adam MG, 2021, ATMOS RES, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105823
   Ager P, 2020, EXPLOR ECON HIST, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.eeh.2020.101342
   Albalawi R, 2020, FRONT ARTIF INTELL, V3, DOI 10.3389/frai.2020.00042
   Ali H.H., 2017, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), V6, P1577
   Amirzadeh M., 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993
   Callaway E, 2021, NATURE, V600, P197, DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-03614-z
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Contreras D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.048
   Cui P, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191710532
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Drake TM, 2020, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V2, pE385, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30134-5
   Feigenbaum J.J., 2018, Capital Destruction and Economic Growth: The Effects of Sherman's March, 1850-1920
   Fekete A, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Foster KA, 2012, URBAN AND REGIONAL POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS: BUILDING RESILIENT REGIONS, VOL 4, P24
   Ghodousi M, 2016, CITIES, V55, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.015
   Glaeser E, 2017, J ECON PERSPECT, V31, P93, DOI 10.1257/jep.31.1.93
   Glaeser EL, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P3, DOI 10.1177/00420980211052230
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Goodchild MF, 2007, GEOJOURNAL, V69, P211, DOI 10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
   Grimmer J, 2013, POLIT ANAL, V21, P267, DOI 10.1093/pan/mps028
   Harrison CJ, 2021, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01347-1
   Haug N, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-01009-0
   Hoffman MD, 2013, J MACH LEARN RES, V14, P1303
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jelodar H, 2019, MULTIMED TOOLS APPL, V78, P15169, DOI 10.1007/s11042-018-6894-4
   Ji XP, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18189674
   Kakderi C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116486
   Kaye AD, 2021, BEST PRAC RES-CL ANA, V35, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.009
   Lazer David, 2021, NATURE, V595, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03660-7, 10.1038/s41586-021-03660-7]
   Li F, 2019, TELEMAT INFORM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2019.06.001
   Li X, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V81, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.021
   Liu XY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102106
   Ma YJ, 2017, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V6, DOI 10.3390/ijgi6050128
   McCartney G, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103130
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miles SB, 2011, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V38, P36, DOI 10.1559/1523040638136
   Mishra SV, 2020, HABITAT INT, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102230
   Mitic P, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P13667, DOI 10.1007/s00500-019-04466-6
   Mo P., 2020, CLIN INFECT DIS, DOI DOI 10.1093/CID/CIAA270
   Nouvellet P, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-21358-2
   Osman T, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103372
   Paul A, 2018, CITIES, V74, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.015
   Pedregosa F, 2011, J MACH LEARN RES, V12, P2825
   Peters DJ, 2020, J RURAL HEALTH, V36, P446, DOI 10.1111/jrh.12477
   Rahimi-Golkhandan A, 2021, J MANAGE ENG, V37, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000872
   Ritchie H, 2024, Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19), DOI DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2016.2614803
   Roy KC, 2019, EPJ DATA SCI, V8, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0196-6
   Saunders WSA, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.013
   Sharifi A, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105297
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148018
   State S., 2020, FIGHT COVID 19 CHIN
   Suleimany M, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103248
   Tierney K., 2007, Conceptualizing and measuring resilience: A key to disaster loss reduction, V250
   Tran B.R., 2021, LOCAL EC IMPACT NATU
   Vosoughi S, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P1146, DOI 10.1126/science.aap9559
   Wang JJ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18147561
   Wang Y, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000782
   Yu P, 2019, ADV CIV ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/7654683
   Zarghami SA, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102496
   Zha JP, 2022, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V25, P261, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2021.1947992
   Zhang C, 2021, J APPL PSYCHOL, V106, P797, DOI 10.1037/apl0000933
   Zhang YH, 2020, TRANSPORT POLICY, V94, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.012
   Zhao HZ, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102920
   Zhu CY, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111281
NR 71
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 9
U2 68
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JUN 1
PY 2023
VL 91
AR 103670
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103670
EA APR 2023
PG 16
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA F3VK3
UT WOS:000981653800001
PM 37041883
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fastenrath, S
   Coenen, L
   Davidson, K
AF Fastenrath, Sebastian
   Coenen, Lars
   Davidson, Kathryn
TI Urban Resilience in Action: the Resilient Melbourne Strategy as
   Transformative Urban Innovation Policy?
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; urban innovation strategy; resilience practice; action
   research; governance experimentation; city networks; urban
   sustainability; governance innovation; Melbourne
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; PERSPECTIVE; INSIGHTS; SYSTEMS; CITIES
AB More and more cities are developing strategies and implementing actions to increase their resilience to a diversity of environmental, social and economic challenges. International networks such as 100 Resilient Cities, established by the Rockefeller Foundation, are supporting cities to find and implement solutions to shocks and stresses.' This new approach to urban governance, often initiated by philanthropic organizations, is debated. On the one hand, these initiatives are celebrated as catalysts for transformational change through collaboration' and co-design' in contexts such as mobility, energy, green space or housing. On the other hand, urban resilience initiatives have been criticized for prioritizing private sector agendas and top-down approaches and hollowing out public sector tasks and democratic participation. However, little is known how urban resilience strategies are actually implemented in practice. Embedded action research on the implementation of the Resilient Melbourne strategy provides the opportunity to have a closer look at this highly contested topic. This paper provides first insights into the research project Urban Resilience in Action, using the Resilient Melbourne strategy to assess the implementation of selected actions. It shows that a reconceptualization and new analytical dimensions are needed to understand urban resilience as an urban innovation strategy.
C1 [Fastenrath, Sebastian; Coenen, Lars] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
   [Davidson, Kathryn] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne; University of Melbourne
RP Fastenrath, S (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
EM sebastian.fastenrath@unimelb.edu.au; lars.coenen@unimelb.edu.au;
   davidson.k@unimelb.edu.au
RI Coenen, Lars/ABE-5947-2020; Davidson, Kathryn/F-3769-2013; Fastenrath,
   Sebastian/P-1603-2018
OI Coenen, Lars/0000-0002-5671-3988; Davidson, Kathryn/0000-0003-3521-3535;
   Fastenrath, Sebastian/0000-0001-5621-8082
FU City of Melbourne; University of Melbourne
FX S.F. and L.C. gratefully acknowledge funding of this research project
   through the City of Melbourne Chair in Resilient Cities-a collaboration
   between City of Melbourne and the University of Melbourne.
CR [Anonymous], 2017, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU9030419
   [Anonymous], URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
   [Anonymous], 2016, EXPT CITY
   Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2017, REG POP GROWTH
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Bulkeley H., 2011, Cities and the low carbon transition
   Chandler D, 2014, RESILIENCE, V2, P47, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   City of Melbourne, 2016, RES MELB STRAT
   Davidson K, 2018, URBAN POLICY RES, V36, P230, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1354848
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Diercks G, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P880, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fastenrath S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072434
   Fastenrath S, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V90, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.004
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Frantzeskaki N, 2018, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V29, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001
   Fuenfschilling L, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P219, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977
   Grillitsch M, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1048, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004
   Hay I, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P635, DOI 10.1177/0309132513500893
   Karvonen A, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P379, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Kernaghan S, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.10.008
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Martin C., 2018, MIDTERM MONITORING E
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moore T, 2018, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4792-3
   Preller B, 2017, PROF GEOGR, V69, P214, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208104
   Rogers P, 2015, RESILIENCE, V3, P55, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2014.988914
   Smeds E, 2018, GLOB POLICY, V9, P549, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12587
   Star SL, 2010, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V35, P601, DOI 10.1177/0162243910377624
   United Nations Development Program (UNDP), 2018, GOAL 11 SUST CIT COM
   United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2017, TRENDS URB RES
   von Wirth T, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P229, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
   Weber KM, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P1037, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
NR 35
TC 49
Z9 49
U1 5
U2 82
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD FEB 1
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 3
AR 693
DI 10.3390/su11030693
PG 10
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HL7NY
UT WOS:000458929500138
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Silva, AMD
   Lazaro, LLB
   Andrade, JCS
   Monteiro, BAL
   Prado, AFR
AF Silva, Angela Marcia de Andrade
   Lazaro, Lira Luz Benites
   Andrade, Jose Celio Silveira
   Monteiro, Bianca Alighieri Luz
   Prado, Angelica Fabiola Rodrigues
TI Salvador: Profile of a resilient city?
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient city approach; Urban inequalities; social vulnerabilities;
   Shocks; stresses; Global south; Climate change; Salvador-Bahia-Brazil
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBAN RESILIENCE; CITIES; POLITICS; GOVERNANCE
AB We present how the city of Salvador in Brazil, has applied the resilience approach to its long-term urban planning agenda to both overcome past sequelae and face new challenges such as the increasing urbanization and climate change. Salvador launched its Resilience Strategy, which placed it at the forefront of cities investing in resilience to face their shocks and stresses. Salvador faces various economic and social vulnerabilities, which have been ongoing since the city was established in the 16th century. The lessons learned throughout the city's experience are that resilience plan and climate agendas must be carried out together with adaptation and mitigation actions and include: i) the need to develop a resilience strategy both to ensure disaster risk prevention and address all social and environmental aspects that are fundamental to building a resilient city, especially in contexts of poverty and inequality; ii) the significance of both engaging multiple stakeholders and thinking about inclusive resilience, as a complex and ongoing process of learning. We conclude that urban resilience policies should not only focus on disaster risk prevention by developing brown infrastructure plans but also need to address social and environmental-natural aspects as fundamental to building a resilient city.
C1 [Silva, Angela Marcia de Andrade] Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Ind Engn Program, Management & Environm Technol Prod Proc, Ave Euclides Cunha,730, Graca,, BR-40150122 Salvador, Bahi, Brazil.
   [Lazaro, Lira Luz Benites] Univ Durham, Durham Energy Inst, Dept Anthropol, Durham, England.
   [Lazaro, Lira Luz Benites] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Ave Dr Arnaldo,715, BR-03178 Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Andrade, Jose Celio Silveira] Univ Fed Bahia, Sch Adm, Ave Reitor Miguel Calmon S-N,Andar,, BR-40110 Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
   [Monteiro, Bianca Alighieri Luz] Social Sci Univ Stavanger, PhD Fellow Inst Media, Bretlandsgata 73, Stavanger, Norway.
   [Prado, Angelica Fabiola Rodrigues] Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Interdisiciplinar Bachelors Degree Sci & Technol, Undergrad Civil Engn, Ladeira Fonte,14, BR-40080020 Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal da Bahia; Durham University; Universidade de Sao
   Paulo; Universidade Federal da Bahia; Universidade Federal da Bahia
RP Silva, AMD (corresponding author), Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Ind Engn Program, Management & Environm Technol Prod Proc, Ave Euclides Cunha,730, Graca,, BR-40150122 Salvador, Bahi, Brazil.
EM angela.marcia.andrade@gmail.com
RI Andrade, Celio/AAJ-5654-2020; Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz/M-8642-2017
OI Benites Lazaro, Lira Luz/0000-0001-6587-1497; Andrade,
   Celio/0000-0002-6794-8686; Monteiro, Bianca/0000-0001-5337-8638
FU Bahia Research Support Foundation (FAPESB) -Brazil, Scholarship
   [BOL0423/2018]; Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) -Brazil
   [2017/17796-3, 2019-24479-0, 2015/03804-9]
FX Angela Marcia de Andrade Silva acknowledges the financial support
   received from Bahia Research Support Foundation (FAPESB) -Brazil,
   Scholarship. Granting Term (T.O.B.) -No. BOL0423/2018. Lira Luz Benites
   Lazaro acknowledges the financial support received from Sao Paulo
   Research Foundation (FAPESP) -Brazil, Grant: 2017/17796-3 and
   2019-24479-0, and Process: 2015/03804-9.
CR Abramo P., 2007, Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, V9, P25, DOI [10.22296/2317-1529, DOI 10.22296/2317-1529]
   Acuto M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1758, DOI 10.1177/0042098020929261
   Agarwal, 2020, THESIS U WATERLOO
   Amaral MH, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125829
   Amartya Sen., 1999, DEV FREEDOM
   Andrade AdrianoBittencourt., 2009, GEOGRAFIA SALVADOR, V2
   [Anonymous], 2016, SEA LEVEL RISE RISK
   [Anonymous], 2010, 1 I DEV STUDIES
   [Anonymous], 2014, POPULATION DIVISION
   [Anonymous], 2016, Human Development Indicators-South Africa
   [Anonymous], 2016, Deadline 2020: How cities will get the job done
   Bahia, 2019, PESQ EMPR DES REG ME
   Bahia, 2015, EST IMPL PLAN EST HA
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Boyd D, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103563
   Broto VC, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031
   Broto VC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
   Brunetta G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031113
   Bulkeley H, 2005, ENVIRON POLIT, V14, P42, DOI 10.1080/0964401042000310178
   Bulkeley H, 2010, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V35, P229, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   CARVALHO Inaia Maia Moreira de, 2008, Como anda Salvador e sua Regiao Metropolitana, V2
   CODESAL, 2018, LANDSL VULN COMM SAL
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Silva AMD, 2022, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V148, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000818
   de Peixe Photografias, 2018, FLOODING PUBLIC STRE
   de Soares A. M., 2009, REV GEOGR, P83
   Leao EBD, 2021, CITIES, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103270
   Dias, 2014, NEW TRENDS TOURISM R
   Fitzgibbons J, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102997
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   FJP IPEA & PNUD., 2020, ATL DES HUM BRAS
   Folke C, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P1774, DOI 10.1007/s13280-020-01487-6
   Foundation, 2019, RES CIT RES LIV LEAR
   Giddens A, 2015, POLICY POLIT, V43, P155, DOI 10.1332/030557315X14290856538163
   Girardi G., 2020, BRUNO COVAS PREFEITO, V1
   GOMES Laurentino., 2019, Escravidao: do primeiro leilao de cativos em Portugal ate a morte de Zumbi dos Palmares
   Gordilho-Souza Angela., 2008, LIMITES HABITAR SEGR, V2a
   Hallegatte S., 2016, SHOCK WAVES MANAGING, DOI [DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5, 10.1017/S0022112081001535]
   IBGE, 2010, DISTR DOM SEG FAIX R
   IBGE, 2021, POP RES EST
   IBGE, 2018, de risco no Brasil
   IBGE-Instituo Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2010, Censo Demografico
   IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2019, DES SOC COR RAC BRAS
   IPEA, 2019, ATL VIOL MUN BRAS 20
   Iturriza M, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102688
   Jabareen Y, 2015, GEOFORUM, V63, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.05.017
   Lammy D., 2021, THERE IS NO CLIMATE
   Leck H., 2015, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, V13, P61, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.COSUST.2015.02.004
   Marengo J., 2016, Relatorio Especial do Painel Brasileiro de Mudancas Climaticas (PBMC), P184
   Marengo J.A., 2019, Climate Change in Santos Brazil: Projections, Impacts and Adaptation Options, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-96535-2_1, 10.1007/978-3-319-96535-2, 10.1007/978-3-031-59431-15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-59431-15]
   Marengo JA, 2020, FRONT CLIM, V2, DOI 10.3389/fclim.2020.00003
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, BELLAGIO INITIATIVE, V1, P4
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Metaxas T, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5040078
   Mi ZF, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.034
   Monteiro, 2021, INTERSECTIONALITY SU
   Morales de Los Rios, 1894, PLANTA CIDADE SAO SA
   Naser M. M., 2021, Global report on human settlements: Cities and climate change
   Nussbaum M. C., 2011, CREATING CAPABILITIE
   Orlandi EP, 2011, CAD ESTUD LINGUIST, V53, P101
   Papa R, 2015, TEMA, V8, P19, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/2883
   Reckien D, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V191, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
   Reckien D, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0135597
   Resilient Cities Network, 2021, HOM RES CIT NETW
   Rosenzweig C, 2010, NATURE, V467, P909, DOI 10.1038/467909a
   Salvador, 2020, PLAN MIT AD MUD CLIM, P1
   Salvador, 2020, INV EM GAS EF EST GE
   Salvador, 2018, SALV RES REL AV PREL
   Salvador, 2015, UPDATED MUNICIPAL PR
   Salvador, 2019, THESIS
   Salvador, IND RISC CLIM SALV
   Santos M., 2008, O centro da cidade do Salvador, V2a
   Sarzynski A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002
   Andrade JCS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P795, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.163
   Sousa F., 2016, Revista Brasileira de Geografia Fisica, V9, P430, DOI [10.26848/rbgf.v9.2.p430-439, DOI 10.26848/RBGF.V9.2.P430-439]
   Souza, 2018, SOCIO SPATIAL SEGREG
   Taylor Z, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P831, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1760235
   UN, 2015, UNGA Resolution 70/1
   UN-Habitat, 2019, SUSTAINABLE CITIES C, DOI [10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0054, DOI 10.1002/9781118786352.WBIEG0054]
   United Nations, 2018, SDG IND
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   van der Heijden J, 2019, EARTH SYST GOV-NETH, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
NR 85
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 8
U2 62
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD AUG
PY 2022
VL 127
AR 103727
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103727
EA JUN 2022
PG 13
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 2D9WG
UT WOS:000811887300001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Amirzadeh, M
   Sobhaninia, S
   Buckman, ST
   Sharifi, A
AF Amirzadeh, Melika
   Sobhaninia, Saeideh
   Buckman, Stephen T.
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
TI Towards building resilient cities to pandemics: A review of COVID-19
   literature
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban resilience; Post-COVID urban planning; Anti -virus urban design;
   Pandemics; Resilient design principles
ID URBAN; FRAMEWORK; TRANSMISSION; VENTILATION; ENVIRONMENT
AB With the global prevalence of COVID-19 disease, the concept of urban resilience against pandemics has drawn the attention of a wide range of researchers, urban planners, and policymakers. This study aims to identify the major dimensions and principles of urban resilience to pandemics through a systematic review focused on lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and comparing different perspectives regarding resilient urban environ-ments to such diseases. Based on the findings, the study proposes a conceptual framework and a series of principles of urban resilience to pandemics, consisting of four spatial levels: housing, neighborhoods, city, and the regional and national scales, and three dimensions of pandemic resilience: pandemic-related health re-quirements, environmental psychological principles, and general resilience principles. The findings show that resilient cities should be able to implement the pandemic-related health requirements, the psychological prin-ciples of the environment to reduce the stresses caused by the pandemic, and the general principles of resilience in the smart city context. This framework provides scholars and policymakers with a comprehensive under-standing of resilience on different scales and assists them in making better-informed decisions.
C1 [Amirzadeh, Melika] Univ Art, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, 24 Arghavan Alley, Laleh St, Artesh Blvd, Tehran, Iran.
   [Sobhaninia, Saeideh] Clemson Univ, Planning Design & Built Environm Dept, 511 Roper Mt Rd, Greenville, SC 29615 USA.
   [Buckman, Stephen T.] Clemson Univ, Dept City Planning & Real Estate Dev, One North Main St, Greenville, SC 29601 USA.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.
C3 Clemson University; Clemson University; Hiroshima University; Hiroshima
   University
RP Amirzadeh, M (corresponding author), Univ Art, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, 24 Arghavan Alley, Laleh St, Artesh Blvd, Tehran, Iran.
EM melika.amirzadeh@gmail.com
RI Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013; AMIRZADEH, MELIKA/HIR-9975-2022;
   Sobhaninia, Saeideh/KFY-5918-2024
OI Sobhaninia, Saeideh/0000-0003-1425-3060; Amirzadeh,
   Melika/0000-0002-5223-818X
CR AbouKorin SAA, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324
   Afrin S, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.668263
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Akat M., 2020, Turkish Studies, V15, P1, DOI [10.7827/TurkishStudies.44336, DOI 10.7827/TURKISHSTUDIES.44336]
   Allam Z, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE181, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6
   Allam Z, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104805
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   Amirzadeh M., 2019, J ENV SCI TECHNOL, DOI [10.22034/JEST.2019.43822.4637, DOI 10.22034/JEST.2019.43822.4637]
   Amirzadeh M., 2019, J ENV STUD, V44, P763, DOI [10.22059/JES.2019.269819.1007777, DOI 10.22059/JES.2019.269819.1007777]
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Amirzadeh M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102599
   Arden MA, 2020, BRIT J HEALTH PSYCH, V25, P231, DOI 10.1111/bjhp.12414
   Atalan A, 2020, ANN MED SURG, V56, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.010
   Bakici T, 2013, J KNOWL ECON, V4, P135, DOI 10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
   Balletto G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020593
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Barak N, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V793, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148626
   Baser O, 2021, HEALTH POLICY, V125, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.003
   Bhadra A, 2021, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V7, P623, DOI 10.1007/s40808-020-00984-7
   Biggs EN, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.617976
   Bish A, 2010, BRIT J HEALTH PSYCH, V15, P797, DOI 10.1348/135910710X485826
   Block P, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, P588, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6
   Buckman S., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY 21 CE, P129
   Buckman Stephen T., 2022, J SUSTAINABLE REAL E, V14, P4, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/19498276.2022.2095699, DOI 10.1080/19498276.2022.2095699]
   Carozzi F, 2020, IZA Discussion Papers, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3643204
   Chen Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104003
   Davic RD, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P405, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130116
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dhar BK, 2020, GLOB CHALL, V4, DOI 10.1002/gch2.202000038
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Eltarabily S., 2020, Archit. Res, V10, P75
   Engemann K, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P5188, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1807504116
   Feldman J. M., 2020, PREPRINT, DOI 10.04.20206318
   Fernández-Prados JS, 2021, EUR SOC, V23, pS111, DOI 10.1080/14616696.2020.1818113
   Gaisie E, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103838
   Gao XL, 2009, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V18, P205, DOI 10.1177/1420326X09104141
   Giezen M, 2015, TRANSPORT POLICY, V44, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.006
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gu DL, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10113949
   Guo C, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V789, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147876
   Gupta M, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2004.09246
   Guzman LA, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V24, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Harris P, 2022, CITIES, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103767
   Hartig T, 2003, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V23, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
   Hatef E, 2020, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.571808
   Helbich M, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V764, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142866
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong S, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13094679
   Hubbard G, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18083869
   Hynes William, 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, P174, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x
   Inn TL., 2020, Smart city technologies take on COVID-19, P1
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jaiswal R, 2020, IET SMART CITIES, V2, P82, DOI 10.1049/iet-smc.2020.0043
   Jenkins A, 2020, CITIES HLTH, P1, DOI [10.1080/23748834.2020.1789821.2374-8834, DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1789821, 10.1080/23748834.2020.1789821]
   Johnson TF, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V789, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148123
   Kadi Nadjat, 2020, Bull Natl Res Cent, V44, P138, DOI 10.1186/s42269-020-00393-x
   Keenan Jesse M., 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, P216, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09773-0
   Khavarian-Garmsir AR, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102911
   Killgore WDS, 2020, PSYCHIAT RES, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113216
   Kummitha RKR, 2020, GOV INFORM Q, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101481
   Kunzmann KR, 2020, DISP, V56, P20, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2020.1794120
   Lai KY, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V46, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.008
   Lak Azadeh, 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, P71, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.34.71
   Lee W, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V779, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146334
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li Y, 2007, INDOOR AIR, V17, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00445.x
   2020, [No title captured]
   Liu ZL, 2021, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V23, P204, DOI 10.1080/13876988.2021.1873703
   Ludwig D., 1997, CONSERV ECOL, V1, P7, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00012-010107
   Majewska A, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105904
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Megahed NA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
   Melone MRS, 2020, TEMA, P333, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6923
   Miao J, 2021, CHINESE SOCIOL REV, V53, P1, DOI 10.1080/21620555.2020.1820860
   Mitra P, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182312493
   Moher D, 2009, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V62, P1006, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Nitschke JP, 2021, BRIT J HEALTH PSYCH, V26, P553, DOI 10.1111/bjhp.12485
   Orioli R, 2019, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V127, DOI [10.1289/EHP2854, 10.1289/ehp2854]
   Pan JY, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127182
   Pimm S.L., 1991, BALANCE NATURE ECOLO
   Pisano C, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155883
   Polo G, 2022, PUBLIC HEALTH, V206, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.02.007
   Poortinga W, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104092
   Pozoukidou G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020928
   Rahman M. M., 2020, P IEEE INT IOT ELECT, P1
   Reed SO, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P393, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501136
   Russette H, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111195
   Sakurai M, 2020, EUR J INFORM SYST, V29, P585, DOI 10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814171
   Salama A.M., 2020, EMERALD OPEN RES, V2, P14, DOI DOI 10.35241/EMERALDOPENRES.13561.1
   Samuelsson K., 2020, Urban nature as a source of resilience during social distancing amidst the coronavirus pandemic, DOI [10.31219/osf.io/3wx5a, DOI 10.31219/OSF.IO/3WX5A]
   Shakil MH, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V745, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141022
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148018
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_9
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sharifi A, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V75, P2904, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.586
   Sharma A, 2021, J BUS RES, V122, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.011
   Slater SJ, 2020, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V17, DOI 10.5888/pcd17.200204
   Sobhaninia S, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102738
   Soga M, 2021, ECOL APPL, V31, DOI 10.1002/eap.2248
   Sonn JW, 2020, INT J URBAN SCI, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2020.1764207
   Sukhwani V., 2022, Global Pandemic and Human Security: Technology and Development Perspective, P147
   Sy KTL, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0249271
   Syal S, 2021, J URBAN MANAG, V10, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2021.05.004
   Tanner T., 2009, Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities
   Tee ML, 2020, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V277, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.043
   Teixeira JF, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100166
   Thakur V, 2020, BRAIN BEHAV IMMUN, V88, P952, DOI 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.062
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, Technical report
   Tokazhanov G, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208732
   Toseroni F, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V95, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.074
   Tricco AC, 2018, ANN INTERN MED, V169, P467, DOI 10.7326/M18-0850
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Ugolini F, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105437
   van Doremalen N, 2020, NEW ENGL J MED, V382, P1564, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc2004973, 10.1101/2020.03.09.20033217]
   Velarde M. D., 2007, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V6, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
   Venter ZS, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104175
   Wells K, 2020, J R SOC INTERFACE, V17, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2020.0775
   WHO, 2018, Managing epidemics: key facts about major deadly diseases
   Wong DWS, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0242398
   World Health Organization, 2020, WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard
   Zabaniotou Anastasia, 2020, Glob Transit, V2, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.002
NR 127
TC 59
Z9 60
U1 19
U2 121
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 89
AR 104326
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
EA DEC 2022
PG 12
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA 6T1UB
UT WOS:000893465900002
PM 36467253
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Meng, X
   Ding, T
   Wang, HS
AF Meng, Xia
   Ding, Tao
   Wang, Haisen
TI Urban resilience under local government competition: A new perspective
   on industrial resilience
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Industrial resilience; Local government competition;
   Market segmentation; Industrial structure distortion
ID RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC RESILIENCE; CITIES; PRODUCTIVITY;
   REGIONS; SHOCKS
AB Enhancing industrial development and building a modern economic system are vital components for constructing resilient cities. This study constructs a theoretical model based on a decentralization model that integrates factor markets and industrial structure to examine the relationship between local government competition and urban industrial resilience. The relevant theoretical hypotheses are then tested empirically with city-level data in China from 2007 to 2020. This study reveals several intriguing findings. First, local government competition significantly inhibits urban industrial resilience, primarily through market segmentation and distortions in industrial structure, thus impeding the construction of resilient cities. Second, producer service agglomeration and intellectual property protection are identified as critical factors that mitigate the inhibitory effects of local government competition on urban industrial resilience. Finally, heterogeneity analysis indicates that local government competition hinders only the enhancement of industrial resilience in resource-based cities without significantly affecting nonresource-based cities. This study not only provides a theoretical foundation and empirical evidence for understanding the impact of local government competition on urban industrial resilience but also offers policy insights for reforming official assessment systems and actively promoting industrial development and resilient urban construction.
C1 [Meng, Xia] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Ding, Tao] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Govt, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Haisen] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Studies Informat Resources, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Haisen] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences; University of International Business &
   Economics; Wuhan University; Wuhan University
RP Wang, HS (corresponding author), 299 Bayi Rd, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China.
EM mengxia@cug.edu.cn; dingtao@uibe.edu.cn; hswang@whu.edu.cn
FU Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China
   (CN) [23ZD222]
FX This study was supported by the Major Program of National Fund of
   Philosophy and Social Science of China (CN) NO. 23&ZD222). We would like
   to thank the editor and the anonymous referees for their highly
   constructive suggestions.
CR Acemoglu D, 2015, AM ECON REV, V105, P2364, DOI 10.1257/aer.20140044
   Agénor PR, 2018, B ECON RES, V70, P313, DOI 10.1111/boer.12166
   Appiah M, 2023, PORT ECON J, V22, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10258-022-00207-0
   Bian Y., 2021, FINANCE TRADE EC, V42, P120, DOI [10.19795/j.cnki.cn11-1166/f.20210107.008, DOI 10.19795/J.CNKI.CN11-1166/F.20210107.008]
   Bravo-Ortega C, 2011, WORLD DEV, V39, P1090, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.11.006
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Canello J, 2020, J REGIONAL SCI, V60, P653, DOI 10.1111/jors.12480
   Castro R, 2004, Q J ECON, V119, P1131, DOI 10.1162/0033553041502171
   Chacon-Hurtado D, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102695
   Chen A., 2022, J. World Econ, V1, P158
   Combes PP, 2012, ECONOMETRICA, V80, P2543, DOI 10.3982/ECTA8442
   Courvisanos J, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P629, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1034669
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Deng KB, 2020, REG STUD, V54, P1136, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1681586
   Du T., 2020, EC RES J, V46, P93, DOI DOI 10.16538/J.CNKI.JFE.20200616.402
   [杜宇 Du Yu], 2020, [中国软科学, China Soft Science], P84
   Duan WQ, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121944
   Feng P, 2016, CHINA ECON REV, V41, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.10.003
   Fingleton B, 2013, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V43, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.04.005
   Fingleton B, 2012, J REGIONAL SCI, V52, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x
   Gao L., 2021, Journal of Management World., V37, P67, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2021.0036, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2021.0036]
   Gennaioli N, 2013, Q J ECON, V128, P105, DOI 10.1093/qje/qjs050
   Giannakis E, 2020, REG STUD, V54, P1200, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720
   Han Y, 2015, REV REG STUD, V45, P131
   Hasan R, 2021, J DEV ECON, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102621
   Holm JR, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P95, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2013.787159
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Hu XH, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P3466, DOI 10.1177/0042098018817223
   Huang Q. H., 2022, China Industrial Economics, V3, P20, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.03.002, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2022.03.002]
   Hundt C, 2020, GROWTH CHANGE, V51, P180, DOI 10.1111/grow.12356
   Jiang MR, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119974
   Jiao Y., 2019, FINANCE TRADE RES, V30, P1
   Jin P., 2019, JWORLD EC, V42, P99
   Keen M, 1997, J PUBLIC ECON, V66, P33, DOI 10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00035-2
   Lavopa A, 2023, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V67, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.06.004
   Liu R., 2021, CONT FINANCE EC, V11, P16
   Lu RC, 2024, APPL ECON, V56, P3920, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2023.2208852
   Lv CC, 2021, ENERG ECON, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105237
   Ma Caoyuan., 2021, Econ. Res. J., V56, P141
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Mesagan EP, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103517
   Montes MF, 2020, J ASIA PAC ECON, V25, P16, DOI 10.1080/13547860.2019.1577207
   Qunhui H., 2017, CHINA IND EC, V09, P5, DOI 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2017.09.001
   Razzaq A, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121050
   Reggiani A., 2002, Networks and Spatial Economics, V2, P211, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1015377515690, 10.1023/A:1015377515690]
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Sensier M, 2016, SPAT ECON ANAL, V11, P128, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2016.1129435
   Squicciarini MP, 2015, Q J ECON, V130, P1825, DOI 10.1093/qje/qjv025
   Su RG., 2022, EC MANAGEMENT, V36, P48
   Sui J., 2024, Manag. World, V40, P16
   Sun Y, 2023, CITIES, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104458
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Tóth G, 2022, ECON GEOGR, V98, P355, DOI 10.1080/00130095.2022.2035715
   Wang W., 2020, EC RES J, V55, P49
   Wang YY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109859
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Xiaolin M., 2017, Econ. Res. J., V52, P52
   Xiaoyong D., 2021, J. World Econ., V86, P86
   Xu J., 2019, EC RES J, V4, P33
   Xu Y., 2023, Finance & Economics., V6, P71
   Ye GG., 2022, Chinese industrial economy, P74, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.01.012, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2022.01.012]
   Young A, 2000, Q J ECON, V115, P1091, DOI 10.1162/003355300555024
   Yu Y., 2018, Finance & Trade Economics., V39, P23
   Yu Y. Z., 2022, China Industrial Economics, V417, P108, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.12.011, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2022.12.011]
   [曾艺 Zeng Yi], 2019, [数量经济技术经济研究, Quantitative & Technical Economics], V36, P83
   Zhan X., 2020, J Manag World, V36, P23, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2020.0032, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2020.0032]
   Zhang H., 2022, Statistical Research., V39, P3, DOI [10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2022.11.001, DOI 10.19343/J.CNKI.11-1302/C.2022.11.001]
   Zhou Li'an., 2004, Econ Res, V6, P33
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
NR 71
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 39
U2 51
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 155
AR 105409
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105409
EA SEP 2024
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA G0H0O
UT WOS:001313516600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cheek, W
   Chmutina, K
AF Cheek, Wesley
   Chmutina, Ksenia
TI Measuring Resilience in the Assumed City
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE City planning and design; Disaster governance; Resilience frameworks;
   Urban theory
ID DISASTER RISK REDUCTION; URBAN; IMPLEMENTATION; CITIES
AB The malleable nature of both the idea of a city and the idea of resilience raises an important question-why measure? Resilience is assumed to be located in the physical infrastructure of specific places or as a quality of the people located there. For disasters, we are often trying to conceptualize, measure, or render legible resilience in physical structures. But what is it that we are trying to measure, and is the idea of a city reflected in these measurements? If cities are organized around something other than resilience, is resilience their natural by-product? What is necessitating the need for increased-and measured-resilience? Using interpretive policy analysis, we explored five well known disaster resilience frameworks (UNDRR's Making Cities Resilient Campaign, UN-Habitat's City Resilience Profiling Programme, The World Bank and GFDRR's Resilient Cities Program, Arup and The Rockefeller Foundation's City Resilience Index, and The Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities) to identify the working definition of "city" and of "resilience." We conclude that if the demand for cities to become more resilient is an acknowledgment of the risk produced by globalized urbanization, then the call itself is an indictment of the current state of our cities.
C1 [Cheek, Wesley] Edge Hill Univ, Dept Geog & Geol, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England.
   [Chmutina, Ksenia] Loughborough Univ, Sch Architecture Bldg & Civil Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England.
C3 Edge Hill University; Loughborough University
RP Chmutina, K (corresponding author), Loughborough Univ, Sch Architecture Bldg & Civil Engn, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England.
EM k.chmutina@lboro.ac.uk
RI Chmutina, Ksenia/C-7600-2014
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Amo-Agyemang C, 2021, INT J AFR RENAISS ST, V16, P4, DOI 10.1080/18186874.2021.1962725
   Arup, 2013, RES CIT IND
   Barnett C, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P87, DOI 10.1177/0956247815621473
   Bevir M., 2003, Interpreting British governance, DOI [10.4324/9780203352311, DOI 10.4324/9780203352311]
   Bonilla Y, 2020, POLIT GEOGR, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102181
   Bosher L, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P240, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.858203
   Bottomore T., 2002, FRANKFURT SCH ITS CR, DOI [10.4324/9780203407110, DOI 10.4324/9780203407110]
   Bracke Sarah., 2016, VULNERABILITY RESIST, P52, DOI [DOI 10.1215/9780822373490-004, DOI 10.2307/J.CTV11VC78R.8]
   Brenner N, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P349, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Brenner Neil., 2012, Afterlives of Neoliberalism
   Brenner Neil., 2011, CITIES PEOPLE NOT PR
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Castells M., 1977, URBAN QUESTION MARXI
   Chandler D, 2020, CONTEMP SECUR POL, V41, P195, DOI 10.1080/13523260.2019.1659574
   Cheek W, 2022, DISASTERS, V46, P589, DOI 10.1111/disa.12502
   Chmutina K, 2021, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V30, P149, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2020-0232
   Chmutina K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V10, P283, DOI 10.1007/s13753-019-00232-2
   Chmutina K, 2016, CITIES, V58, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   City of Berkeley, 2018, CIT BERK DEM EC PROF
   Cuppini N., 2018, icinde, The Urban Political: Ambivalent spaces of late neoliberalism, s, P65, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64534-6_4
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Gaillard J.C., 2016, 11 RES DEV I
   Garcia E J., 2017, Unravelling Sustainability and Resilience in the Built Environment, V1st, DOI [10.4324/9781315629087, DOI 10.4324/9781315629087]
   Goldsmith W., 2012, MILITARY ENG, V104, P50
   HARVEY D, 1989, GEOGR ANN B, V71, P3, DOI 10.2307/490503
   Harvey D., 1996, CITY, V1, P38, DOI [10.1080/13604819608900022, DOI 10.1080/13604819608900022]
   Harvey David., 2001, Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography
   Hayek F. A., 1948, INDIVIDUALISM EC ORD
   Humbert C, 2019, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V7, P215, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2019.1613738
   Joseph J., 2021, VARIATIONS GOVERNMEN, DOI [10.4324/9781003044727-4, DOI 10.4324/9781003044727-4]
   Lefebvre Henri., 2003, The Urban Revolution
   Levine S., 2014, Assessing resilience: why quantification misses the point
   Lizarralde G, 2020, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V29, P909, DOI 10.1108/DPM-01-2020-0011
   Logan J.R., 2007, Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Marlow EC, 2023, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V14, P332, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2021-0076
   Marx C., 2015, COMMUNIST MANIFESTO
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Merriam-Webster, Dictionary by Merriam-Webster: America's most-trusted online dictionary.
   Merrifield Andy., 2002, Metromarxism: A Marxist Tale of the City
   Mirowski P., 2013, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown
   Morrison S, 2020, COMMUNICATION   0114
   Obama B, 2015, COMMUNICATION   0827
   OKEEFE P, 1976, NATURE, V260, P566, DOI 10.1038/260566a0
   Oliver-Smith T., 1986, MARTYRED CITY DEATH
   Park RobertE., 1984, The City: Suggestions for the Study of Human Nature in the Urban Environment
   Peck Jamie., 2010, CONSTRUCTIONS NEOLIB
   Purcell M., 2002, GEOJOURNAL, V58, P99, DOI [10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f, DOI 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8F]
   Rivera DZ, 2022, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V46, P126, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12950
   Robin E, 2019, URBAN RES PRACT, V12, P137, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2017.1414870
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2013, 100 Resilient Cities: Centennial Challenge
   Rodin Judith., 2014, RESILIENCE DIVIDEND
   Rogers P, 2015, RESILIENCE, V3, P55, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2014.988914
   Roy A, 2016, URBAN GEOGR, V37, P810, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2015.1105485
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Sassen Saskia., 2011, CITIES WORLD EC
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   Schumpeter JA., 1942, CAPITALISM SOCIALISM
   Schwartz J., 2018, The New York Times
   Sheller Mimi., 2018, MOBILITY JUSTICE POL
   Simone A, 2004, PUBLIC CULTURE, V16, P407, DOI 10.1215/08992363-16-3-407
   Sou G, 2022, GEOGR J, V188, P14, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12413
   The Data Center, 2020, WHO LIV NEW ORL METR
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2016, 100 RES CIT ROCK FDN
   Un Human Settlements Programme [Un-Habitat], 2018, CIT RES PROF PROGR
   UNDRR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction), 2010, MAK CIT RES CAMP
   United States Census Bureau, 2019, Population estimates show aging across race groups differs
   Vogelpohl A., 2018, URBAN POLITICAL, P171, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-64534-6_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64534-6_9]
   Wachsmuth David., 2014, Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, P353
   Wakefield S, 2022, CULT GEOGR, V29, P389, DOI 10.1177/14744740211029278
   Wang Y, 2020, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2019.100003
   Wikipedia, 2022, CITY
   Williams N.E, 2020, WASH POST
   World Bank and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, 2006, RES CIT PROGR
   Zebrowski C, 2020, NEW PERSPECT, V28, P71, DOI 10.1177/2336825X20906315
NR 76
TC 18
Z9 20
U1 8
U2 106
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 2095-0055
EI 2192-6395
J9 INT J DISAST RISK SC
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci.
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 13
IS 3
BP 317
EP 329
DI 10.1007/s13753-022-00410-9
EA APR 2022
PG 13
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA 2P0HD
UT WOS:000788995000001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Moraci, F
   Errigo, MF
   Fazia, C
   Burgio, G
   Foresta, S
AF Moraci, Francesca
   Errigo, Maurizio Francesco
   Fazia, Celestina
   Burgio, Gianluca
   Foresta, Sante
TI Making Less Vulnerable Cities: Resilience as a New Paradigm of Smart
   Planning
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient urban and architectural design; smart planning; climate
   change; resilient regional laws; pleasant public space
AB Previous studies have investigated how resilience can play a pivotal role in strategic urban design in the Netherlands and in some regional and municipal planning laws in Italy. Here, we have analysed several European projects that utilised the resilience approach successfully. Dutch policies already include resilience and climate adaptation in urban strategies. Moreover, they share those strategies with urban communities, making the innovation of the city real and cutting-edge. In Italy, on the other hand, the concept of resilience is present only in some regional laws and is still not used as an urban tool. In this paper, we aim to demonstrate how resilience can become the new paradigm of smart planning. Furthermore, we demonstrate how resilience is fundamental at all levels of urban intervention, involving municipal authorities, architects and urban planners, firms and enterprises, citizens and communities. The urban governance must establish specific goals and objectives to create a smart and sustainable city. Resilience should be one of these main aims, in order to achieve an innovative city design. A climate strategy should also be part of urban smart planning, enabling the implementation of a safer and resilient city.
C1 [Moraci, Francesca; Fazia, Celestina] Mediterranea Univ Reggio Calabria, DARTE Dept, I-89124 Reggio Di Calabria, Italy.
   [Errigo, Maurizio Francesco; Burgio, Gianluca] Kore Univ Enna, Fac Engn & Architecture, I-94100 Enna, Italy.
   [Foresta, Sante] Mediterranea Univ Reggio Calabria, PAU Dept, I-89124 Reggio Di Calabria, Italy.
C3 Universita Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria; Universita Kore di ENNA;
   Universita Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria
RP Errigo, MF (corresponding author), Kore Univ Enna, Fac Engn & Architecture, I-94100 Enna, Italy.
EM fmoraci@unirc.it; maurizio.errigo@unikore.it; celestina.fazia@unirc.it;
   gianluca.burgio@unikore.it; sante.foresta@unirc.it
RI Errigo, Maurizio/MVV-3814-2025
OI MORACI, Francesca/0000-0002-9967-0092; ERRIGO, MAURIZIO
   FRANCESCO/0000-0002-6565-7295; Burgio, Gianluca/0000-0002-0051-2685
CR [Anonymous], 2017, Global Status Report 2017
   [Anonymous], 2017, CIT TAK ACT 100RC NE
   [Anonymous], 2014, Fifth assessment report
   Biesbroek GR, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
   Bohigas J., 2016, QUADERNS ARQUITECTUR
   Caragliu A, 2011, J URBAN TECHNOL, V18, P65, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
   Chappin EJL, 2014, UTIL POLICY, V31, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2014.07.003
   City of Rotterdam, 2013, ROTT CLIM CHANG AD S
   City of Rotterdam, 2008, ROTT URB VIS SPAT DE
   City of Rotterdam, 2010, ROTT CIT FUT BUILD C
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Deakin M, 2013, SMART CITIES GOVERNI
   Denig S., 2013, TOOLKIT RESILIENT CI
   Eger J.M., 2009, I-Ways Journal of E-Government Policy and Regulation, V32, P47, DOI DOI 10.3233/IWA-2009-0164
   European Environment Agency, 2012, CLIM CHANG IMP VULN, DOI [DOI 10.2800/66071, 10.2800/66071]
   Galderisi A., 2012, TEMA J LAND USE MOBI, P5
   Giffinger R., 2008, P 11 EURA C MIL IT 9
   Giordano F., 2010, STATE ART REV GUIDEL
   Giordano S., 2012, INT J ANAL HIERARCHY, V4, P27
   Guenther B., 2009, URBAN GOVERNANCE ADA
   Holland R., 2008, City, V12, P302
   Hoyle B.S., 1998, DOCK HARBOUR AUTHOR, V79, P46
   International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2007, P WORLD C DIS RED KO
   Johnson David L., 2006, Service Assessment: Hurricane Katrina, August 23-31, 2005
   Komninos N, 2013, J KNOWL ECON, V4, P119, DOI 10.1007/s13132-012-0083-x
   Legambiente, 2015, ASS STOP EOL OFF SHO
   Meyer H., 1999, CITY PORT URBAN PLAN
   Moraci F, 2013, TRIA, V6, P145, DOI 10.6092/2281-4574/2001
   Moraci F, 2013, TEMA, V6, P35, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/1459
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Ruby I., 2002, LACATON VASSAL 2G, V21, P4
   Russo M., 2014, Urbanistica per una diversa crescita. Progettare il territorio contemporaneo
   Sennet R., 2014, WHY CLIMATE CHANGE S
   Sharifi A., P 2014 INT C UT EXH, P1
   Swart R., 2013, MEDIATION and the Adaptation Challenge: Indentifying appropriate methods and tools to support climate change adaptation decision-making
   United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2017, EV URB RES CLIM CHAN
   Wilson G., 2011, P LEDDRA RGS IBG INT
NR 37
TC 52
Z9 53
U1 13
U2 104
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 3
AR 755
DI 10.3390/su10030755
PG 18
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GA8DA
UT WOS:000428567100182
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, SB
   Lei, J
   Zhang, XL
   Tong, YJ
   Lu, DN
   Fan, LQ
   Duan, ZL
AF Zhang, Shubao
   Lei, Jun
   Zhang, Xiaolei
   Tong, Yanjun
   Lu, Danni
   Fan, Liqin
   Duan, Zuliang
TI Assessment and optimization of urban spatial resilience from the
   perspective of life circle: A case study of Urumqi, NW China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban spatial resilience; Resilient city; Life circle; Urban spatial
   structure; Urumqi
ID SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES; ECOLOGY; AREAS; INDEX
AB This paper presents an original framework for assessing and enhancing urban resilience from the perspective of the life circle that emphasizes the daily activity spaces of residents, using Urumqi, a major city in northwest China 's arid oasis region, as a case study. Based on multi -source urban geographic big data, we introduce Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve to analyze the spatial matching relationship between urban spatial pressure and urban spatial resilience, and divided the priority of planning intervention by priority index. Our findings for the case study Urumqi reveal a strong "center -periphery" structure of urban resilience and spatial pressures. Based on the findings, we proposed targeted planning interventions prioritized by a resilience index that considers the life circle to address disparities and improve urban resilience. Our study advocates for urban planning to focus on the life circle, aiming to develop a multi -center and cluster -type resilient urban spatial structure to foster a "peopleoriented" resilient city.
C1 [Zhang, Shubao; Lei, Jun; Lu, Danni; Fan, Liqin; Duan, Zuliang] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Key Lab Ecol Safety & Sustainable Dev Arid Lands, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Shubao; Lei, Jun; Zhang, Xiaolei; Lu, Danni; Fan, Liqin] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Xiaolei] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geol & Geophys, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Tong, Yanjun] Xinjiang Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Econ, Urumqi 830012, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Xinjiang Institute of Ecology & Geography,
   CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of
   Sciences, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geology &
   Geophysics, CAS; Xinjiang University of Finance & Economics
RP Lei, J (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Key Lab Ecol Safety & Sustainable Dev Arid Lands, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China.; Lei, J (corresponding author), Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
EM leijun@ms.xjb.ac.cn
RI Zhang, Xiaolei/AAQ-5284-2021
FU Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program [2021xjkk0900]
FX This study was supported by the Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition
   Program (Grant No. 2021xjkk0900) .
CR Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Al-Dahash H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102870
   Allam Z, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE181, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6
   Allan P, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P242, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772881
   Althoff T, 2017, NATURE, V547, P336, DOI 10.1038/nature23018
   An S, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P5411, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14432
   Atik M, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V83, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.004
   Benitez-Avila C, 2023, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1057/s41599-023-02217-5
   Bimonte S., 2023, Life satisfaction in the time of COVID-19. The frog effect, V142
   Caparros-Midwood D, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V54, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.08.003
   [柴彦威 Chai Yanwei], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1961
   [柴彦威 Chai Yanwei], 2019, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V26, P1
   Champlin C, 2023, CITIES, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104220
   Chandan S, 2019, J URBAN MANAG, V8, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2019.05.001
   Chen Q, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V203, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.316
   Chen Y, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104266
   Cumming GS, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P899, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Du MY, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101868
   Feng DY, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11226276
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Ferrer-Ortiz C, 2022, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V5, P146, DOI 10.3390/smartcities5010010
   Forrest SA, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102843
   Gao T, 2020, CLIM DYNAM, V54, P631, DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-05022-6
   Geneletti D, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V165, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.013
   Gokcin Ozuyar P., 2020, Sustainable Cities and Communities, P628, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-95717-3-28, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95717-3-28]
   Goldenberg R, 2018, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V29, P3607, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3083
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grossi E, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104437
   Halkos GE, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110981
   Hämäläinen RP, 2016, OPER RES PERSPECT, V3, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.orp.2016.03.001
   Hernández JRE, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
   Hinojos S, 2023, APPL GEOGR, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103017
   Hosseiny B, 2022, REMOTE SENS APPL, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100843
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Huang H, 2023, J SAF SCI RESIL, V4, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.10.003
   Huang ZR, 2023, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V17, P592, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2022.2076633
   Hunter M., 2021, Urban Gov, V1, P115, DOI [10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.004, DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2021.11.004]
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, P1
   Jiang C, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P6072, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2021.1933214
   Jupîneant AC, 2024, AREA, V56, DOI 10.1111/area.12910
   Kabisch N, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V122, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016
   Kagan S., 2018, City, Culture and Society, V13, P32, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2017.09.005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.005]
   Kärrholm M, 2014, CITIES, V36, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.012
   Khavarian-Garmsir AR, 2023, CITIES, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104101
   Khodakarami L, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104725
   Kleemann J, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106849
   Kolte R, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104142
   Kucuk Matci Dilek, 2023, Advances in Space Research, P4677, DOI 10.1016/j.asr.2023.08.058
   Li CJ, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P27, DOI 10.1007/s11769-021-1174-z
   Li CR, 2023, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113764
   Li GJ, 2021, CITIES, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103206
   Li H, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104807
   Li JG, 2019, CITIES, V86, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.008
   [李萌 Li Meng], 2017, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P111
   Li W., 2023, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, V92
   Lin LJ, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V744, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140264
   Liu TB, 2015, HABITAT INT, V50, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.038
   Liu Y, 2020, EXPERT SYST APPL, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738
   [刘焱序 Liu Yanxu], 2020, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V75, P891
   Liu Y, 2018, ENRGY PROCED, V153, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.076
   Liu YB, 2019, ENRGY PROCED, V157, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.196
   Logan TM, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103924
   Logan TM, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101590
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Lu YW, 2021, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V27, P921, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2020.1788918
   Maragno D, 2018, ECOL MODEL, V386, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.08.002
   McCormick K, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.003
   Miao L., 2022, China. Sustainable Cities and Society, V78
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Nadrian H, 2020, J TRANSP HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100923
   Nadrian H, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.100587
   Nations U, 2015, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, V1, P41
   Noszczyk T, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105925
   Ntakana K, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16391
   Ortiz-Fernández J, 2023, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V20, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2023.100307
   Peng JD, 2023, J URBAN MANAG, V12, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2023.07.004
   Qin Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104978
   Rapport DJ, 2007, SUSTAIN SCI, V2, P77, DOI 10.1007/s11625-006-0016-3
   Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
   Ronsivalle D., 2022, Resilient Communities and the Peccioli Charter: Towards the Possibility of an Italian Charter for Resilient Communities, P23
   Ruan JE, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102578
   Sacco PL, 2019, CITIES, V89, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.013
   Sajjad M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850
   Schindler M, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103256
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Shi Y, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102919
   Sikorska D, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127838
   Song L, 2024, CITIES, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104637
   [孙道胜 Sun Daosheng], 2017, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V24, P7
   Sun HH, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V765, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144567
   Sun HH, 2019, HABITAT INT, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.05.002
   Tang T, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145067
   Tian YS, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.005
   [王女杰 Wang Nujie], 2010, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V30, P6646
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   Wing OEJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2
   Wu YY, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103754
   Xia F, 2023, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102896
   Xie HL, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20130
   [辛儒鸿 Xin Ruhong], 2023, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V78, P762
   Xing LJ, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105049
   Xu H, 2017, J BUILD ENG, V12, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.06.018
   Xu Y., 2024, Natural Hazards Research
   Xu YZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111283
   Yang GC, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.134
   Yang WY, 2022, CITIES, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103855
   Ye CS, 2022, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V3, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.004
   Zhang DH, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101657
   Zhang MM, 2022, ECOL ENG, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106786
   Zhang YC, 2022, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102942
   [张中浩 Zhang Zhonghao], 2022, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V42, P622
   [赵鹏军 Zhao Pengjun], 2021, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V40, P541
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao YQ, 2021, CITIES, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103075
   [郑洪晗 Zheng Honghan], 2019, [地理与地理信息科学, Geography and Geo-information Science], V35, P25
   Zheng SW, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104292
   Zheng ZC, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102310
   Zhou N, 2022, J KING SAUD UNIV SCI, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101887
   Zhou YX, 2000, URBAN GEOGR, V21, P205, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.21.3.205
   Zhou ZY, 2023, APPL ACOUST, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.apacoust.2023.109708
   [邹思聪 Zou Sicong], 2021, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V40, P580
NR 124
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 55
U2 113
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD AUG 15
PY 2024
VL 109
AR 105527
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105527
EA MAY 2024
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA UF2N8
UT WOS:001246581600001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Godschalk, DR
AF Godschalk, David R.
TI Urban Hazard Mitigation: Creating Resilient Cities
SO NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
AB Cities are complex and interdependent systems, extremely vulnerable to threats from both natural hazards and terrorism. This paper proposes a comprehensive strategy of urban hazard mitigation aimed at the creation of resilient cities, able to withstand both types of threats. The paper reviews hazard mitigation practice, defines a resilient city, considers the relationship between resilience and terrorism, and discusses why resilience is important and how to apply its principles to physical and social elements of cities. Contending that current hazard mitigation policy, practice, and knowledge fail to deal with the unique aspects of cities under stress, the paper recommends a major resilient cities initiative, including expanded urban systems research, education and training, and increased collaboration among professional groups involved in city building and hazard mitigation.
C1 Care of Dr Stephen Baxter, Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
C3 University of North Carolina; University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
RP Godschalk, DR (corresponding author), Care of Dr Stephen Baxter, Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
EM dgod@email.unc.edu
CR [Anonymous], 2002, MAK NAT SAF ROL SCI, DOI DOI 10.17226/10415
   Beatley T., 1998, Cooperating with nature: Confronting natural hazards with land-use planning for sustainable communities, P233
   Bell M., 2002, GARTNER NEWSLETT FEB
   Berke PhilipR., 1995, J PLAN LIT, V9, P370, DOI DOI 10.1177/088541229500900404
   Bolin R., 1998, NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAK
   Brail R.K., 2001, PLANNING SUPPORT SYS
   Burby R., 2002, FEMA HIGHER ED COURS
   Burby R.J., 2001, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, V16, P45
   Chakos A., 2002, Natural Hazards Review, V3, P55, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2002)3:2(55)
   Comfort L., 1999, Shared Risk: Complex Systems in Seismic Response
   Conrad D.R., 1998, HIGHER GROUND REPORT
   Duany A., 2000, Suburban Nation. The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream
   *FEMA, 2000, PLANN SUST FUT LINK
   FEMA, 2000, REB MOR SUST FUT OP
   Foster H., 1997, OZYMANDIAS PRINCIPLE
   Geis D.E., 2000, NAT HAZARDS REV, P151, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:3(151)
   Godschalk D., 1999, Natural Hazard Mitigation
   Godschalk DR, 2001, FACING OUR FUTURE: HURRICANE FLOYD AND RECOVERY IN THE COASTAL PLAIN, P271
   JAY M, 2001, Habitat Debate, V7, P1
   Katz Peter., 1994, The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community
   Kennedy D, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P405, DOI 10.1126/science.295.5554.405
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTER DESIGN
   Munich Re Group, 2001, ANN REP MUCH RISK CA
   National Emergency Management Association, 2001, INV OUR FUT 2001 REP
   North Carolina Division of Emergency Management (NC DEM), 1999, HAZ MIT SUCC STAT N
   Olshansky R.B., 1998, COOPERATING NATURE, P167
   Patton A., 1993, HARMS WAY FLOOD HAZA
   Prieto D., 2002, BRIDGE, V32
   Schwab J., 1998, 483484 PAS AM PLANN
   Tierney K., 2002, ORG COMMUNITY RESILI
   Tobin G., 1999, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V1, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(99)00002-9, 10.3763/ehaz.1999.0103]
   U.N. Commission on Sustainable Development, 2002, BACKGR DOC WORLD SUM
   Vale L., 2002, RESILIENT CITY TRAUM
   van Vliet W., 2001, HABITAT DEBATE, V7, P3
   Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2002, TDM ENCY
   Zimmerman R., 2002, RES THEME NEW YORK U
NR 36
TC 872
Z9 903
U1 56
U2 659
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 1527-6988
EI 1527-6996
J9 NAT HAZARDS REV
JI Nat. Hazards Rev.
PD AUG
PY 2003
VL 4
IS 3
BP 136
EP 143
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
PG 8
WC Engineering, Civil; Environmental Studies; Geosciences,
   Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA V25SD
UT WOS:000208496800004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Datola, G
AF Datola, Giulia
TI Implementing urban resilience in urban planning: A comprehensive
   framework for urban resilience evaluation
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Comprehensive evaluation framework; Resilient cities;
   Multidimensional system
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; CITIES; CLIMATE; CAPACITY; ADAPTATION; COMPLEXITY;
   ROTTERDAM; METAPHOR; RISK
AB Urban resilience as a transformative approach has become a central paradigm to define urban policy for making cities resilient. This implementation has multifaceted implications, ranging from the employment of the correct resilience approach for urban systems to the definition of the appropriate assessment framework to address all urban resilience features. This paper addresses the implications concerning the new requirements and open research questions of urban resilience assessment for resilient development for cities. According to this purpose, this paper provides three literature reviews to explore and critically analyse the different approaches of resilience and the several definitions of urban resilience in academic and operative fields, to address the dimensions, multifaceted characteristics, and key factors to being evaluated within an urban resilience enhancement perspective. The result is a comprehensive framework that identifies the five dimensions of urban resilience (economy, society, environment, nature, and governance), the relative urban components, and nine urban resilience capacities that have to be included in the evaluation of urban resilience as a transformative approach. The main novelty and contribution of the proposed research is the obtained framework that can be used as a guideline to define a comprehensive evaluation approach to assess urban resilience in its implementation in urban planning as a transformative approach. The final aim of the proposed research is to support in an operational manner the development of suitable evaluation methods to investigate strategic strategies within the aim of urban resilience enhancement, through a complex and multidimensional perspective.
C1 [Datola, Giulia] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies DAStU, Via Bonardi 3, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
C3 Polytechnic University of Milan
RP Datola, G (corresponding author), Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies DAStU, Via Bonardi 3, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM giulia.datola@polimi.it
RI Datola, Giulia/AAQ-9019-2020
OI Datola, Giulia/0000-0002-5522-3573
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   [Anonymous], 2005, Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Assumma V, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010003
   Ayda Eraydin T. T.-K, 2012, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Bahadur AdityaV., 2010, The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters
   Batty M, 2012, CITIES COMPLEX SYSTE
   Batty M, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P571, DOI 10.1068/b4004ed
   Bhamra R, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5375, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
   Bonanno GA, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P20, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Brown M, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V94, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.038
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burby RaymondJ., 2000, Natural Hazards Review, V1, P99, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)]
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Caprioli C, 2023, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101955
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Coutu DL, 2002, HARVARD BUS REV, V80, P46
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Da Silva J., 2014, ARUP
   Da Silva J., 2015, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Datola G, 2021, ENVIRON CLIM TECHNOL, V25, P1270, DOI 10.2478/rtuect-2021-0096
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Douglas Ian., 1981, Progress in Physical Geography, V5, P315, DOI [10.1177/030913338100500301, DOI 10.1177/030913338100500301]
   Du Plessis C., 2014, DESIGNING HOPE PATHW
   Ebrahimi AH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103884
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Fiksel J, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P5330, DOI 10.1021/es0344819
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Forrester J.W., 1979, URBAN DYNAMICS
   Fu Xin, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P367, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9693-6
   Gaillard JC, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P218, DOI 10.1002/jid.1675
   Galderisi A., 2014, Z Magazine (Boston, V11, P36
   Gencer E. A., 2017, A handbook for local government leaders
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gunderson LanceH., 2010, FDN ECOLOGICAL RESIL
   Hamilton WAH, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P109, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.109
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hollnagel E., 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
   Ilmola L, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_11
   Jamali MB, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104598
   Johnston R.B., 2016, ARSENIC RES GLOBAL S, P12, DOI DOI 10.1201/B20466-7
   Kim D, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040405
   Kolers A, 2016, ETHICS POLICY ENV, V19, P91, DOI 10.1080/21550085.2016.1173283
   Lara DVR, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104411
   Lazarevic EV, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V158, P1130, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.005
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li W, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104631
   Liang J., 2020, Watershed Ecology and the Environment, V2, P6, DOI [10.1016/j.wsee.2020.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.WSEE.2020.06.001]
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Luthans F., 2006, HUM RESOUR DEV REV, V5, P25, DOI [10.1177/1534484305285335, DOI 10.1177/1534484305285335]
   Mackay J, 2019, CITIES ACTION CITIES, DOI [10.1016/C2013-0-02329-8, DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-02329-8]
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   McLellan B., 2012, Challenges, V3, P153, DOI [DOI 10.3390/CHALLE3020153, 10.3390/challe3020153]
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Melissa P., 2012, CITY RESILIENCE AFRI, P64
   Miles S. B., 2007, EARTHQUAKE ENG, V130
   Molin Valds H., 2013, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V4, P5, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299035, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299035]
   Napoli G, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102214
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Odum E. P., 2007, Fundamentos de Ecologia, V5th edition
   ODUM EP, 1968, AM ZOOL, V8, P11
   Oppio A, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104678
   Ostadtaghizadeh Abbas, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed
   Ouyang M, 2014, STRUCT SAF, V48, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001
   Peck A, 2019, METHODOLOGY ASSESSIN
   PIMM SL, 1984, NATURE, V307, P321, DOI 10.1038/307321a0
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Scheffer M, 2009, PRINCETON STUDIES
   Schwind N, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P239, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_12
   Sellberg M. M., 2012, RESILIENCE ASSESSMEN, V20
   Sharifi A., 2017, APN Science Bulletin, V7, DOI [DOI 10.30852/SB.2017.182, 10.30852/sb.2017.182]
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharma M, 2023, NAT HAZARDS REV, V24, DOI 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1523
   Sharma SVS, 2018, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V9, P79, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2017.1408705
   Simonovic S. P., 2013, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V3, P378, DOI 10.9734/BJECC/2013/2504
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stanganelli M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101920
   Tanner T., 2009, Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-Habitat, 2017, HABITAT, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9]
   UNISDR, 2012, MAK CIT RES REP 2012, DOI [10.1177/0956247814522154, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154]
   UNISDR, 2012, MAK CIT MOR RES
   Wagner Iwona, 2013, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker B., 2006, BIBLIOVAULT OAI REPO
   Walker B, 2010, Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: Workbook for Practitioners
   Walker J, 2011, SECUR DIALOGUE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0967010611399616
   Wardekker J., 2018, Solutions, V9
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   World Economic Forum, 2013, GLOB RISKS REP 2018, DOI [10.1007/978-1-944835-15-6, DOI 10.1007/978-1-944835-15-6]
   Wu J., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P211, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_10, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_10]
   Yamagata Y, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9
   Yang ZY, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020606
   Zeng Y, 2013, MATH PROBL ENG, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/372368
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhu JM, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V122, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.052
NR 129
TC 69
Z9 70
U1 438
U2 956
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 98
AR 104821
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
EA AUG 2023
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA P8GC1
UT WOS:001052990300001
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chiroli, DMD
   Menezes, MG
   Zola, FC
   Aragao, FV
   de Almeida, RD
   Tebcherani, SM
AF Chiroli, Daiane Maria De Genaro
   Menezes, Maria Gabriela
   Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli
   Aragao, Franciely Veloso
   de Almeida, Rafael Dezotti
   Tebcherani, Sergio Mazurek
TI Integrating resilience and sustainability: A systematic analysis of
   resilient cities using ISO 37123
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Disasters; ISO 37123; Resilience; Sustainability tripod
ID TRIPLE BOTTOM-LINE; URBAN RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS; CITY
   RESILIENCE; SMART; POLICY; PRINCIPLES; DISASTERS; FRAMEWORK; GROWTH
AB Integrating resilience into governance policies has facilitated disaster prevention and recovery strategies, as urbanization and climate change have led to various environmental mishaps. This study aims to answer the following questions through a systematic review of the literature on resilient cities, disaster resilience, and the impact of resilience on urban structures, using the ISO 37123 technical standard and the sustainability tripod: (1) How has the landscape of research surrounding resilient cities evolved? (2) Which axis of the sustainability tripod receives the most focus in research on resilient cities? The findings suggest that research on resilient cities is focused on developing both practical and theoretical definitions for the term, with a particular emphasis on finding solutions to human influences such as urbanization and environmental disasters. It is noted that the definition of resilience remains ambiguous, and each group of researchers can interpret or find the meaning of resilience. More investment is needed to develop resilience, particularly in disaster prevention and recovery, highlighting the social and environmental axes of the sustainability tripod and encouraging the population's participation in public decisions.
C1 [Chiroli, Daiane Maria De Genaro; Menezes, Maria Gabriela; Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli] Fed Univ Tecnol Parana UTFPR, Apucarana, Parana, Brazil.
   [Chiroli, Daiane Maria De Genaro; de Almeida, Rafael Dezotti] State Univ Maringa UEM, Grad Program Urban Engn PEU, Maringa, Parana, Brazil.
   [Aragao, Franciely Veloso] Fed Univ Santa Catarina UFSC, Blumenau, SC, Brazil.
   [Tebcherani, Sergio Mazurek] Fed Univ Tecnol Parana UTFPR, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil.
   [Tebcherani, Sergio Mazurek] State Univ Ponta Grossa Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Estadual de Maringa
RP Chiroli, DMD (corresponding author), Fed Univ Tecnol Parana UTFPR, Apucarana, Parana, Brazil.
EM daianechiroli@utfpr.edu.br; mariagabimenezes@hotmail.com;
   fzola@utfpr.edu.br; fran-aragao@hotmail.com; pg403925@uem.br;
   sergio@nanoita.com.br
RI ZOLA, Fernanda/IAR-2201-2023; CHIROLI, DAIANE/K-2761-2018; Tebcherani,
   Sergio/X-6764-2018
OI CHIROLI, Daiane Maria De Genaro/0000-0002-9088-406X
CR A.D.R. Center, 2015, SEND FRAM DIS RISK R
   Adedeji T, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081699
   Admiraal H, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
   Aghajani Y, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P2067, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2271
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Aragao FV, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15086695
   Aragao FV, 2023, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V35, P1250, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2021.1999405
   Aria M, 2017, J INFORMETR, V11, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
   Ataman C, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103462
   Casaus MA, 2018, OBETS-REV CIENC SOC, V13, P229, DOI 10.14198/OBETS2018.13.1.09
   Bail RD, 2021, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V20, P493, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2020.1867493
   Balsells M, 2015, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V168, P57, DOI 10.1680/wama.14.00051
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Bautista-Puig N., 2022, Cities, V126, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2022.103715]
   Bazbauers AR, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P689, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1974331
   Beck DF, 2021, HUMANID INOV, V8, P141
   Bigger P, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P36, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1749023
   Bozza A, 2017, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V32, P527, DOI 10.1111/mice.12275
   Bruzzone M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147824
   Bueno S, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102588
   Cai H, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
   CAI Z, 2021, URBAN PLAN, P276, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICPEE54380.2021.9662548
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Cheng HT, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061751
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Chuang MT, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101494
   Cowell M, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103946
   de Mello VG, 2024, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V36, P619, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2022.2046725
   Dieleman H, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.027
   Domingues T.N., 2022, REV GESTAO SUSTENTAB, V11, P104, DOI DOI 10.19177/RGSA.V11-02022104-123
   DuPuis EM, 2019, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V9, P352, DOI 10.1007/s13412-019-0538-5
   Elkhidir E, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104243
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Equere E, 2020, J REG CITY PLAN, V31, P164, DOI 10.5614/jpwk.2020.31.2.4
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Fleischman RB, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P1578, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2230
   FONSECA X, 2019, EUR J SOC SCI RES, V32, P231, DOI DOI 10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480
   Frantzeskaki N, 2022, BIOSCIENCE, V72, P113, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biab105
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Fu L, 2021, CHIN J URBAN ENV STU, V09, DOI 10.1142/S2345748121500056
   Gimenez R, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.001
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Haeri SM, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P1658, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2237
   Hammond MJ, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P14, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
   Hemmati M, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1e3c
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Ilgen S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050983
   ISO37123, 2019, ISO 37123:2019(en)
   Kachba Y, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072621
   Kamruzzaman M, 2015, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V12, P3463, DOI 10.1007/s13762-015-0771-8
   Kankaala K, 2018, TECHNE, P108, DOI 10.13128/Techne-23569
   Khatibi H, 2022, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V12, P5, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-07-2020-0122
   Kiss T, 2018, ECOL ECON, V144, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.004
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Krellenberg K, 2021, POLITICS GOV, V9, P200, DOI 10.17645/pag.v9i1.3607
   Kumar V, 2020, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V22, P1531, DOI 10.1007/s10098-020-01895-y
   Labaka L, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V103, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.005
   Labuschagne C, 2005, J CLEAN PROD, V13, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.007
   Laeni N, 2019, CITIES, V90, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.002
   Landman K., 2022, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, V15, P442
   Lazzeretti L., 2015, City Cult. Soc, V6, P83, DOI [10.1016/j.ccs.2015.02.004, DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.02.004]
   Lee YJ, 2017, INT REV SPAT PLAN SU, V5, P35, DOI 10.14246/irspsd.5.2_35
   Liang ZF, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18042082
   Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
   Mabrouk M, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118260
   Makhoul N, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.007
   Mancebo F, 2018, ENVIRONMENTS, V5, DOI 10.3390/environments5030038
   Martine George, 2015, Rev. bras. estud. popul., V32, P433
   Martins VWB, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.354
   Matusik A, 2020, ACE-ARCHIT CITY ENVI, V15, DOI 10.5821/ace.15.43.9211
   McGrail S, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P8649, DOI 10.3390/su7078649
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Michalina D, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13169348
   Mierzejewska L, 2018, QUAEST GEOGR, V37, P7, DOI 10.2478/quageo-2018-0018
   Moghim S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.090
   Moore JW, 2017, J PEASANT STUD, V44, P594, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   Oke AE, 2020, CONSTR ECON BUILD, V20, P45, DOI 10.5130/AJCEB.v20i2.6647
   Okunola OH, 2019, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V11, P71, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2019-0024
   Oliva S., 2019, ROLE ART CULTURE REG, P67
   Ortega AD, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103621
   Paidakaki A, 2017, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V8, P275, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2015-0052
   Palumbo R, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126622
   Pirlone F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124825
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Prain G, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN FOOD S, V6, DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2022.965011
   Ragheb SA, 2018, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V226, P667, DOI 10.2495/SDP170581
   Renald A, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V227, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.079
   Reynard D, 2021, LOCAL ENVIRON, V26, P448, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2021.1892046
   Roberts D, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN, V32, P547, DOI 10.1177/0956247820946555
   Roggema R, 2018, ARCHIT SCI REV, V61, P349, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2018.1502153
   Rogov M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124431
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Salat S, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P107, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2016.1277227
   Salata KD, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12145548
   Schiappacasse P., 2015, URBANI IZZIV, V26, pS13
   Schibuola L, 2020, APPL THERM ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115390
   Sebestyén V, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101557
   Serbanica C, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104177
   Shamout S, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V25, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.015
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Su YS, 2017, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V8, P110, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2015-0055
   Sun Y, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V8, P121, DOI 10.1007/s13753-017-0128-7
   Sutherland C., 2019, Human Geography, V12, P33, DOI DOI 10.1177/194277861901200103
   Svensson G, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P972, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.226
   Tadano YS, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115920
   Takeuchi K, 2016, J DISASTER RES, V11, P1190, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2016.p1190
   Therrien MC, 2020, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V28, P83, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12283
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   U.N. Habitat, 2020, RES RISK RED
   van der Waldt G, 2018, LOCAL ECON, V33, P694, DOI 10.1177/0269094218809316
   Vedeld T, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, pS173, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1875-7
   Visvizi A, 2017, J SCI TECHNOL POLICY, V8, P227, DOI 10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0020
   Wada A, 2018, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V17, P677, DOI 10.1007/s11803-018-0468-3
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Waltman L, 2016, J INFORMETR, V10, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
   Wang CH, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN B, V42, P730, DOI 10.1068/b130152p
   Wang JX, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V146, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.010
   Wang JX, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127180
   Wei YX, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101813
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Wu KJ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P908, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.264
   Yigitcanlar T., 2016, Technology and the City: Systems, applications and implications, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315739090
   Yigitcanlar T, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V45, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033
   Zebrowski C, 2020, NEW PERSPECT, V28, P71, DOI 10.1177/2336825X20906315
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhai W, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101611
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 137
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 11
U2 41
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD OCT 1
PY 2023
VL 96
AR 103960
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103960
EA AUG 2023
PG 16
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA R9WW1
UT WOS:001067790700001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xie, ZY
   Peng, BH
AF Xie, Zhenyu
   Peng, Benhong
TI A Framework for Resilient City Governance in Response to Sudden Weather
   Disasters: A Perspective Based on Accident Causation Theories
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient city; urban resilience; climate change; extreme weather
   events; disaster governance; accident causation
ID URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT; SPONGE CITY; RISK-MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   IMPLEMENTATION; CONSTRUCTION; CITIES
AB With climate change, urban resilience is becoming a critical concept for helping cities withstand disasters and accidents. However, current research often focuses on concept identification, leaving a gap between concept and implementation. This study aims to investigate the lack of urban resilience in the face of sudden weather disasters, with a focus on the inadequate capacity of urban systems to effectively govern such events. The Zhengzhou subway flooding accident on 20 July 2021, serves as a case study for this research, and the accident causation theories, such as the Swiss cheese model, Surry's accident model, and trajectory intersection theory are used to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the accident's causes. Through this analysis, the paper identifies vulnerabilities in the natural, technical, and man-made systems of the urban system, and reveals deficiencies in four aspects of urban resilience: natural, technological, institutional, and organizational. Based on this analysis, the study proposes a resilient city governance framework that integrates the "Natural-Technical-Man-made" systems, offers relevant recommendations for urban resilience governance, and discusses potential challenges to urban resilience implementation.
C1 [Xie, Zhenyu; Peng, Benhong] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Binjiang Coll, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuxi University
RP Xie, ZY; Peng, BH (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Binjiang Coll, Wuxi 214105, Peoples R China.
EM zhenyu.xie@alumni.york.ac.uk; 002426@nuist.edu.cn
RI Xie, Zhenyu/AAA-5933-2021
OI BENHONG, PENG/0000-0002-8624-1782
FU China Meteorological Soft Science Project [2022ZZXM24]
FX This research was funded by China Meteorological Soft Science Project
   (Grant No. 2022ZZXM24).
CR [Anonymous], 2018, Sustainable development goals report 2018
   [Anonymous], AMAP ZHENGZHOU METRO
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Borsekova K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.012
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P99, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00251-y
   Chan FKS, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Silva AMD, 2022, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V148, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000818
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   [傅贵 Fu Gui], 2005, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science], V15, P21
   Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), 2020, NAT DIS CHALL CHIN K
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Heinimann HR, 2017, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_5
   Heinrich H. W., 1941, Industrial Accident Prevention. A Scientific Approach.
   Henan Government, 2021, NIAN ZHENGZH GUOM JI
   Henan Government, 2021, NIAN HEN SHENG GUOM
   Henan Government, ZHENGZH DIT 5 HAO XI
   Jiang Y, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016
   Ke KY, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17155357
   Levin S., 1998, Environment and Development Economics, V3, P221, DOI [10.1017/s1355770x98240125, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X98240125]
   Li Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024
   Liang CM, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106810
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Lu Y, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V104, P853, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04194-3
   Luan B, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V223, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.028
   Maroufi H, 2022, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V65, P675, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2021.1902790
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Mei C, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V639, P1394, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.199
   MEM, 2022, INVESTIGATION REPORT
   Naef P, 2022, POLIT GEOGR, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102603
   Naef P, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208469
   NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2022, CHIN STAT YB 2021
   Orsetti E, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19031355
   Pan J., ZHENGZHOU DITIE 5 HA
   Pirlone F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124825
   Pursiainen C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.08.006
   Reason J., 1991, HUMAN ERROR
   Rod B, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000795
   Saikia P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103497
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sui P.C., 1982, YEJIN ANQUAN, P1
   Surry J., 1969, Industrial Accident Research: A Human Engineering Appraisal
   Tang B., 2019, J RISK ANAL CRISIS R, V9, P101, DOI [10.2991/jracr.k.190703.006, DOI 10.2991/JRACR.K.190703.006]
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   Torabi E, 2022, URBAN RES PRACT, V15, P561, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2020.1846771
   Valdes HM., 2013, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V4, P5, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299035, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299035]
   Wang F, 2022, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V31, P1018, DOI 10.1177/1420326X211048537
   Wang H, 2018, SCI CHINA TECHNOL SC, V61, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11431-017-9170-5
   Wang J., HONGSH HEYI GUANJ ZH
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   WMO, 2021, WMO report no.1267
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Wu Y.F., ANIMATION RESTORES W
   Xu H, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18073677
   Xu WP, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14121942
   Yang YH, 2015, SAFETY SCI, V79, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.006
   Yin DK, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124963
   Zuo L., BAOYU ZHONG TAMEN ME
NR 63
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 16
U2 97
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 3
AR 2387
DI 10.3390/su15032387
PG 20
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 8V6FP
UT WOS:000930725100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, SL
   Peng, L
AF Chen, Silu
   Peng, Liang
TI Road to Resilient Cities: The Power of Education Investment from China's
   Cities
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE education investment; urban resilience; technology innovation; industry
   upgrading
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; PRODUCTIVITY; TRANSITION; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; IMPACT
AB Educational investment is important for resilient city shaping. Based on the perspective of education resource input, this paper empirically examines the effect and mechanism of urban education investment on urban resilience construction with a sample of 280 prefecture-level cities in China from 2011 to 2023. The study finds that urban education investment can significantly promote urban resilience governance. In terms of the effect mechanism, urban education investment mainly enhances urban resilience through two paths: science and technology innovation and industry upgrading. The heterogeneity test reveals that the differences in economic level, administrative level, education input preferences, and geographic location of cities lead to the heterogeneous performance of the incentive effect of education investment on resilience shaping. Based on this, policy recommendations are put forward in terms of strengthening the stability and continuity of urban education investment; improving the level of innovation and industrial structure; and emphasizing the problem of unbalanced education development.
C1 [Chen, Silu] Nanjing Univ, Sch Philosophy, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Liang] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Econ, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing University; Nanjing Audit University
RP Peng, L (corresponding author), Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Econ, Nanjing 211815, Peoples R China.
EM pengliangnnu@163.com
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Andersson R, 2009, J URBAN ECON, V66, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2009.02.004
   Annabi N, 2017, J POLICY MODEL, V39, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.03.003
   Antoniucci V, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V59, P580, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.004
   Bai XJ, 2020, TECHNOL SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101332
   Ben Mimoun M, 2010, B ECON RES, V62, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8586.2009.00317.x
   Blundell R., 1999, Fiscal Studies, V20, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1475-5890.1999.tb00001.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1475-5890.1999.TB00001.X]
   Bosworth D, 2008, EDUC ECON, V16, P127, DOI 10.1080/09645290701306341
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Caughman L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218796
   Ciric Z., 2021, P 14 ANN INT C ED RE, P7055, DOI [10.21125/iceri.2021.1590, DOI 10.21125/ICERI.2021.1590]
   Collier F, 2014, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V167, P79, DOI 10.1680/udap.13.00019
   Comunian R, 2016, INT J CULT POLICY, V22, P58, DOI 10.1080/10286632.2015.1101085
   Corti F., 2022, Ital. Labour Law e-J, V15, P15, DOI [10.6092/issn.1561-8048/15706, DOI 10.6092/ISSN.1561-8048/15706]
   Cremin P, 2012, INT J EDUC DEV, V32, P499, DOI 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.02.015
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Dehghani A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141911798
   Dossani R.K., 2008, Preparing for a Services Economy: An Evaluation of Higher Education in India
   Doytch N, 2016, ECON SYST, V40, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.02.005
   Fleisher BM, 2011, J DEV ECON, V94, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.01.001
   Ganegodage KR, 2011, ECON EDUC REV, V30, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.08.001
   Gilead T, 2009, STUD PHILOS EDUC, V28, P555, DOI 10.1007/s11217-009-9146-2
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Govindarajulu D, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101549
   Green C, 2020, INT REV EDUC, V66, P857, DOI 10.1007/s11159-020-09878-3
   Herrendorf B, 2014, HBK ECON, P855, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53540-5.00006-9
   Hong T, 2022, MATH PROBL ENG, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/7339005
   Ilmola L, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_11
   Indrawati SM, 2021, B INDONES ECON STUD, V57, P29, DOI 10.1080/00074918.2021.1909692
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Joerin J, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P226, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2012.689248
   Kucel A, 2016, EUR J EDUC, V51, P73, DOI 10.1111/ejed.12161
   Liu YQ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P642, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.028
   Liu ZJ, 2024, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101800
   Majnouni-Toutakhane A., 2019, J. Eng. Res, V7, P1
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Masik G, 2021, CITIES, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103381
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Mayunga J.S., 2007, SUMMER ACAD SOCIAL V, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV.ENERGY.32.051807.090348
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meng X, 2024, CITIES, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105409
   Miningou ÉW, 2020, J APPL ECON, V23, P583, DOI 10.1080/15140326.2020.1797337
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Nguyen H.T., 2024, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan, V19, P3213, DOI [10.18280/ijsdp.190833, DOI 10.18280/IJSDP.190833]
   Nicaise I, 2012, EUR J EDUC, V47, P327, DOI 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2012.01528.x
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pirlone F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124825
   Poege F, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aay7323
   Qiu D, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031285
   Rehman A., 2013, Int. J. Econ. Financ. Manag, V2, P462
   Runco M.A., 2003, SCAND J EDUC RES, V47, P317, DOI [10.1080/00313830308598, DOI 10.1080/00313830308598]
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Salvati L, 2017, LETT SPAT RESOUR SCI, V10, P177, DOI 10.1007/s12076-016-0180-8
   Samarakkody A, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151512036
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shutters ST, 2015, PALGR COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1057/palcomms.2015.10
   Solga H, 2014, SOCIO-ECON REV, V12, P269, DOI 10.1093/ser/mwu014
   Sun HP, 2018, PETROL SCI, V15, P657, DOI 10.1007/s12182-018-0235-0
   Teles VK, 2008, J ECON STUD, V35, P352, DOI 10.1108/01443580810895635
   Therias A, 2023, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V16, P4164, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2023.2264827
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Wang L, 2018, ADV CIV ENG, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/2073968
   Wu N, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120400
   Xu B, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119782
   Xu Q, 2024, CITIES, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105397
   Yang Y, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12280-260220
   Yu TH, 2024, SCI REP-UK, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-67364-4
   Zatonatska T, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152115473
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhang FF, 2022, COMPLEXITY, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/7353462
   Zhang JM, 2024, CITIES, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105294
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
NR 73
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR 4
PY 2025
VL 17
IS 7
AR 3213
DI 10.3390/su17073213
PG 24
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 1IL0L
UT WOS:001465782300001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Derr, V
   Corona, Y
   Gülgönen, T
AF Derr, Victoria
   Corona, Yolanda
   Gulgonen, Tuline
TI Children's Perceptions of and Engagement in Urban Resilience in the
   United States and Mexico
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE participation; resilience; urban planning; children's rights;
   sustainability; 100 Resilient Cities
ID POLITICS
AB Resilience planning is increasingly employed as a means for cities to anticipate and plan for environmental and social challenges. Children's perspectives are underrepresented in this domain. Through drawings, murals, photographs, videos, and dialogues, children shared their perspectives on resilience in two disparate cities-Boulder, Colorado, USA, and Mexico City, Mexico. Elements that support and negate resilience were consistent between cities. However, the negative aspects of physical and social safety were more acutely felt in Mexico City. While children were clear about what composes a resilient city, integration of these ideas into resilience planning was more challenging, especially in Mexico City.
C1 [Derr, Victoria] Calif State Univ Monterey Bay, Environm Studies Program, Seaside, CA USA.
   [Corona, Yolanda] Metropolitan Autonomous Univ Xochimilco, Educ & Commun Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
   [Gulgonen, Tuline] Ctr Mexican & Cent Amer Studies, Mexico City, DF, Mexico.
C3 California State University System; California State University Monterey
   Bay; Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana - Mexico; University Autonoma
   Metropolitana Xochimilco
RP Derr, V (corresponding author), Calif State Univ Monterey Bay, Chapman Sci Ctr, Sch Nat Sci, Environm Studies, 100 Campus Ctr, Seaside, CA 93955 USA.
EM vderr@csumb.edu
FU University of Colorado Office of Outreach and Engagement; University of
   Colorado, Boulder
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:
   Participatory research in Boulder was supported with a grant from the
   University of Colorado Office of Outreach and Engagement. The
   Boulder-Mexico City exchange was funded through a Children, Youth and
   Environments Participatory Research grant from the University of
   Colorado, Boulder.
CR [Anonymous], 2016, REINVENCION ESPACIO
   [Anonymous], DISTRITO FEDERAL SOC
   [Anonymous], INF CUENT 2014
   [Anonymous], Adiba Jaigirdar on growing up in Ireland
   [Anonymous], CHILDREN YOUNG PEOPL
   [Anonymous], CARNETS GEOGRAPHES
   [Anonymous], BOULD COUNT TRENDS R
   Berkes F, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P967, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0140-4
   Blanchet-Cohen N., 2015, CHILDREN YOUTH ENV, V25, P16, DOI [10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.2.0016, DOI 10.7721/CHILYOUTENVI.25.2.0016]
   Braun V, 2021, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V18, P328, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   CHAWLA L., 2002, GROWING URBANIZING W
   Christensen P., 2002, Children in the city: Home neighbourhood and community
   Cordera Rolando., 2008, Pobreza, desigualdad y exclusion social en la ciudad del Siglo XXI
   Davis D., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster, P255
   Derr V., 2017, Beyond Playgrounds and Skateparks: Designing for Kids in the City, P24
   Derr V, 2013, BUILDINGS, V3, P482, DOI 10.3390/buildings3030482
   Fletcher S., 2016, Children, Youth and Environments, V26, P148
   Freeman C., 2011, CHILDREN THEIR URBAN
   Gill Holloway Sarah Valentine, 2000, CHILDRENS GEOGRAPHIE
   Gulgonen T., 2016, Jugar la ciudad: Reimaginar los espacios publicos urbanos de juego para la infancia en la Ciudad de Mexico
   Gulgonen T., 2015, Children, Youth and Environments, V25, P208, DOI [DOI 10.7721/CHILYOUTENVI.25.2.0208, 10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.2.0208]
   Hart R., 1979, Meeting with Mr. Hart
   Hart R, 2014, EDUCATION, CHILDHOOD AND ANARCHISM: TALKING COLIN WARD, P123
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holt L, 2011, GEOGRAPHIES OF CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE, P1
   Hordyk SR, 2015, CHILD GEOGR, V13, P571, DOI 10.1080/14733285.2014.923814
   Kindon S, 2007, ROUTL STUD HUM GEOGR, V22, P9
   Kraftl P, 2013, EMOT SPACE SOC, V9, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.emospa.2013.01.004
   Lefebvre Henri, 1991, The Production of Space
   Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674
   MASTEN A. S., 2014, Ordinary Magic: Resilience in Development
   Masten AS, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Pearson Leonie J., 2014, Resilient Sustainable Cities: A future, P242, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602]
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Van der Hoeven R, 2015, Human Development Report 2019: Human Development for Everyone
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
NR 37
TC 11
Z9 13
U1 5
U2 30
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0739-456X
EI 1552-6577
J9 J PLAN EDUC RES
JI J. Plan. Educ. Res.
PD MAR
PY 2019
VL 39
IS 1
BP 7
EP 17
DI 10.1177/0739456X17723436
PG 11
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA HI4XS
UT WOS:000456456300002
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, BB
   Liu, YZ
   Liu, Y
   Lyu, S
AF Zhang, Beibei
   Liu, Yizhi
   Liu, Yan
   Lyu, Sainan
TI Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors for Urban Resilience in
   China: A Provincial Analysis
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; spatial correlation; influencing factors; spatial
   cold-hot spot
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; HETEROGENEITY
AB In the current era, as modern cities increasingly face environmental disasters and inherent challenges, the creation and enhancement of resilient cities have become critical. China's urban resilience exhibits significant imbalances and inadequacies at the provincial level. This study delves into the evolution of urban resilience in various Chinese provinces, offering valuable insights for building and nurturing resilient cities. Initially, a comprehensive evaluation system for China's urban resilience was established, incorporating 24 indicators across three key resilience aspects: resistance, adaptability, and recovery. The entropy weight method was used to develop an urban resilience evaluation model, and the Moran index and spatial cold-hot-spot analysis were applied to examine the spatiotemporal dynamics of urban resilience across China's 31 provinces from 2012 to 2021. Moreover, the geographically and temporally weighted regression model was employed to analyze the spatial distribution of factors affecting urban resilience. The results show a general upward trend in urban resilience across Chinese provinces, with notable regional differences and concentrations. A significant decrease in urban resilience is observed from southeastern coastal cities to inland regions. The regression model highlights spatial variations in the impact of different factors, with the same factor having varying effects in different provinces. This research provides a thorough understanding of the factors influencing urban resilience in China, contributing to both theoretical and practical discussions on the topic. It lays a strong scientific groundwork for the development and advancement of resilient cities in China.
C1 [Zhang, Beibei; Liu, Yizhi; Liu, Yan] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China.
   [Lyu, Sainan] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China.
C3 Anhui Jianzhu University; Hefei University of Technology
RP Liu, Y (corresponding author), Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hefei 230022, Peoples R China.
EM zhangbeibei@ahjzu.edu.cn; 17356585911@163.com; lyly2023@ahjzu.edu.cn;
   sainan.lyu@hfut.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Beibei/JMP-9315-2023
FU Anhui Jianzhu University
FX No Statement Available
CR Abdillah A, 2023, COGENT FOOD AGR, V9, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2023.2216484
   Afriyanie D, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V145, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012120
   Ba R, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.08.004
   Bodea CN, 2018, JURID TRIB, V8, P63
   Cao FF, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110643
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Chu HJ, 2015, ATMOS ENVIRON, V102, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.062
   Dehghani A, 2023, URBAN SCI, V7, DOI 10.3390/urbansci7010023
   Esteban TAO, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103604
   Fu HY, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104385
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Guo XS, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104625
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Huang B, 2010, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V24, P383, DOI 10.1080/13658810802672469
   Jiang FM, 2023, ENVIRON RES, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115775
   Jones L, 2019, WORLD DEV, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104632
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Li YL, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1070652
   Liu LN, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107186
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu YJ, 2023, ENVIRON RES, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115874
   Liu YM, 2022, ECOL ENG, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106665
   Liu ZZ, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.12.003
   Luo X, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14071083
   Ma XB, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110409
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Mitrovic S, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12101939
   Montrimas A, 2023, INZ EKON, V34, P593, DOI 10.5755/j01.ee.34.5.35515
   Nikpour A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104590
   Obasi O, 2023, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2023.100249
   Pan SC, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14812
   Peng KJ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15032702
   Rezaei H, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15118777
   Rezvani SMHS, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103612
   Saikia P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103497
   Sensier M, 2016, SPAT ECON ANAL, V11, P128, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2016.1129435
   Shamsuddin S, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152215907
   Song Q, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15021538
   Subramaniam RC, 2023, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V33, P1129, DOI 10.1007/s11160-023-09788-1
   Tang DC, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104621
   Tommaso MRD, 2023, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101448
   Verhoog R, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V81, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.011
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang B, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12070962
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   Wang J, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118133
   Wang KL, 2023, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101607
   Wang X, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103828
   Wang ZR, 2023, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106912
   Wernli D, 2023, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V7, pE630, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00128-6
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Xie WL, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101461
   Yang GG, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14042225
   Yao YR, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103442
   Ye CS, 2022, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V3, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.004
   Yu SY, 2023, HABITAT INT, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102783
   Yu ZH, 2023, FINANC RES LETT, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103920
   Zakaria NH, 2023, INT J SUSTAIN CONSTR, V14, P145, DOI 10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.05.011
   Zhang HN, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P21455, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11789-7
   Zhang T, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118129
   Zhao KW, 2022, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V361, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129650
   Zhao ML, 2023, J HAZARD MATER, V446, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130613
   Zhu SY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109959
NR 68
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 40
U2 83
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 2
AR 502
DI 10.3390/buildings14020502
PG 21
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA JA3P0
UT WOS:001170393100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kochskaemper, E
   Glass, LM
   Haupt, W
   Malekpour, S
   Grainger-Brown, J
AF Kochskaemper, Elisa
   Glass, Lisa-Maria
   Haupt, Wolfgang
   Malekpour, Shirin
   Grainger-Brown, Jarrod
TI Resilience and the Sustainable Development Goals: a scrutiny of urban
   strategies in the 100 Resilient Cities initiative
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; sustainable development; urban governance; city
   transformation index; comparative analysis
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; TRANSFORMATION;
   FRAMEWORK; AGENDA
AB In the last decades, discourse and practice on urban transformation have centered around the concepts of sustainability and resilience. However, resilience in a narrow understanding - i.e. protecting the status quo - can contradict sustainable development. The 100 Resilient Cities exemplify a network in which cities actively pursued adaptation to future challenges in a way that could link resilience and sustainability. In this article, we analyze the resilience strategies of cities in this network against the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to understand the extent to which they consider sustainable development simultaneously. Overall, we find a positive trend towards resilience and sustainable development in urban strategies, particularly in the Global South. However, cities' resilience efforts often prioritize economic goals over social and environmental objectives. This contrasts with the call for transformative actions to achieve the SDGs.
C1 [Kochskaemper, Elisa; Haupt, Wolfgang] Leibniz Inst Res Soc & Space, Res Grp Urban Sustainabil Transformat, Berlin, Germany.
   [Glass, Lisa-Maria] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Inst Sustainabil Governance, Luneburg, Germany.
   [Malekpour, Shirin; Grainger-Brown, Jarrod] Monash Univ, Monash Sustainable Dev Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
C3 Leibniz Association; Leibniz Institut fur Raumbezogene Sozialforschung
   (IRS); Leuphana University Luneburg; Monash University
RP Kochskaemper, E (corresponding author), Leibniz Inst Res Soc & Space, Res Grp Urban Sustainabil Transformat, Berlin, Germany.
EM elisa.kochskaemper@leibniz-irs.de
RI Haupt, Wolfgang/AET-1139-2022
OI Glass, Lisa-Maria/0000-0003-0461-3878
CR Allen C, 2023, SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P1250, DOI 10.1002/sd.2495
   [Anonymous], 2022, World Bank country and lending groups
   [Anonymous], 2018, Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
   Araos M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009
   Bahadur A., 2015, Resilience in the SDGs: developing an indicator for Target 1.5 that is fit for purpose
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Bellinson R, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P76, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1493916
   Berglund O, 2022, POLICY POLIT, V50, P302, DOI 10.1332/030557322X16546739608413
   Betsill M, 2007, LOCAL ENVIRON, V12, P447, DOI 10.1080/13549830701659683
   Biermann F, 2022, NAT SUSTAIN, V5, P795, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5
   Biermann F, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V26-27, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
   Biermann M, 2016, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V4, P59, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1094170
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Coenen J, 2022, SUSTAIN SCI, V17, P1489, DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-01007-9
   Coppola Alessandro., 2020, RISK RESILIENCE SOCI, P113
   Croese S, 2021, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V13, P435, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2021.1958335
   Croese S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020550
   Davoudi S, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P360, DOI 10.1068/c12269
   Dehghani A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141911798
   Dilling L, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P572, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0539-0
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke Carl, 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC, P352, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511541957.020, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020]
   Forestier O, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P1269, DOI 10.1002/sd.2082
   G-77 (The Group of 77), 2022, MEMBER STATES GROUP
   Galderisi A., 2020, City Territ Archit, V7, P16, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40410-020-00123-W
   Glass LM, 2019, EARTH SYST GOV-NETH, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.esg.2019.100031
   Gollata JAM, 2021, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V64, P2593, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2021.1876002
   Grainger-Brown J, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103928
   Haupt W, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P123, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1583235
   Heikkinen M, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P90, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1473151
   Holler J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041657
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Kern K, 2009, JCMS-J COMMON MARK S, V47, P309, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00806.x
   Koch F, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7120464
   Kochskämper E, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V181, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.007
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Malekpour S, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102866
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Newig J, 2018, POLICY STUD J, V46, P269, DOI 10.1111/psj.12209
   Nielsen AB, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V39, P667, DOI 10.1177/2399654420945332
   Novalia W, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V112, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.009
   Nuchter V, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052735
   Olazabal M, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P277, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1583234
   Otto A, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V167, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03142-9
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pelling M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0
   Resilient Cities Network, 2022, OUR MEMBER CITIES
   Rockstrom J., 2016, How food connects all the SDGs
   Rodriguez RS, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P181, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0098-9
   Sachs J., 2017, SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2017: Compact Edition: Global Responsibilities: International Spillovers in Achieving the Goals
   SDSN, 2016, Getting Started with the SDGs in Cities: A Guide for Stakeholders
   Shamout Sameh., 2021, ADV STUDIES EFFICIEN, P267, DOI DOI 10.6082/UCHICAGO.3148
   Sharifi A, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642
   Smyth I., 2015, Gender Development, V23, P405
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Sutherland C., 2019, Human Geography, V12, P33, DOI DOI 10.1177/194277861901200103
   Taylor Z, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P831, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1760235
   UN (United Nations), 2023, VOLUNTARY LOCAL REV
   UNHSP, 2022, World cities report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities
   United Nations, 2015, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL
   Valencia SC, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P4, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Wilson RS, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P200, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0691-6
   Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
   Wolfram M, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P1, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1558848
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Zinkernagel R, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093201
NR 73
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 25
U2 53
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0964-0568
EI 1360-0559
J9 J ENVIRON PLANN MAN
JI J. Environ. Plan. Manag.
PD JUN 7
PY 2025
VL 68
IS 7
BP 1691
EP 1717
DI 10.1080/09640568.2023.2297648
EA JAN 2024
PG 27
WC Development Studies; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Public Administration
GA 1DR1K
UT WOS:001147673000001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Suárez, M
   Gómez-Baggethun, E
   Benayas, J
   Tilbury, D
AF Suarez, Marta
   Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
   Benayas, Javier
   Tilbury, Daniella
TI Towards an Urban Resilience Index: A Case Study in 50 Spanish Cities
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; sustainability indicators; urban resilience index;
   Spanish province capitals
ID SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; SYSTEMS; ADAPTABILITY; PERSPECTIVE;
   ENVIRONMENT; ADAPTATION; DISASTERS; FRAMEWORK; CITY
AB Urbanization is a major driver of land use change and global environmental decline. With accelerated urbanization worldwide, it is essential to put in place new policies to conserve urban ecosystems, species and the services these provide in order to secure more sustainable, resilient and livable cities for the 21st century. In urban planning, the concept of resilience has broadly replaced the word sustainability. In recent years, resilience indicators have been gradually developed, but few address urban resilience from a social-ecological systems perspective. We develop a methodological framework to measure urban resilience, define an urban resilience index and apply it to Spanish province capitals as a case study. Results show that most Spanish province capitals are far from being resilient. We conclude that increased efforts to measure urban resilience should be in place, and we offer the urban resilience index as a theoretical framework for measuring resilience in urban social-ecological systems that can be gradually improved as more data become available.
C1 [Suarez, Marta; Benayas, Javier] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Biol Fac 2, Campus Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain.
   [Gomez-Baggethun, Erik] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies Noragr, POB 5003, N-1432 As, Norway.
   [Gomez-Baggethun, Erik] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway.
   [Tilbury, Daniella] Univ Gibraltar, Europa Point Campus, Gibraltar GX11 1AA, Gibraltar.
C3 Autonomous University of Madrid; Norwegian University of Life Sciences;
   Norwegian Institute Nature Research
RP Suárez, M (corresponding author), Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Biol Fac 2, Campus Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain.
EM martasuarez26@gmail.com; erik.gomez@nmbu.no; javier.benayas@uam.es;
   daniella.tillbury@unigib.edu.gi
RI Gomez-Baggethun, Erik/LSL-9726-2024; Suarez Casado, Marta/V-1339-2017;
   Benayas Del Alamo, Fco. Javier/E-5663-2017
OI Suarez Casado, Marta/0000-0002-1230-3004; Benayas Del Alamo, Fco.
   Javier/0000-0002-5906-9569
FU Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
FX This research has been partly supported through the Grant for
   Post-graduate Students of the Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
CR Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Ainuddin S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0201-x
   Andersson E, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   [Anonymous], POLIS REV U BOLIV
   [Anonymous], ECOL EC
   [Anonymous], OBR SOC
   [Anonymous], 12 UWE EUR COMM DG E
   [Anonymous], CIUDAD TERRITORIO
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], TRANSITION HDB OIL D
   [Anonymous], SOST LOC APR URB RUR
   [Anonymous], SUST DEV GOALS SDGS
   [Anonymous], 2002, REV GALEGA EC
   [Anonymous], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
   [Anonymous], ANN REV ENV RESOUR
   [Anonymous], 2010, LIV PLAN REP 2010
   [Anonymous], SEARCHING RESILIENC
   [Anonymous], ECOSYSTEMS IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], CAP CIUD 100 INF EST
   [Anonymous], CIUDAD EMERGENTE SUS
   [Anonymous], 2007, AN HUELL EC ESP
   Berkes J., 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change
   Biggs R, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/ES-03411-150209
   Bolund P, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Bossel H., 1999, Indicators for sustainable development theory, method, applications
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Briassoulis H., 2001, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V44, P409, DOI 10.1080/09640560120046142
   CAMAGNI R., 2003, Investigaciones Regionales, Vn˚2, P31
   Carpenter SR, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P3248, DOI 10.3390/su4123248
   Chan SL, 2014, SOC INDIC RES, V115, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0225-3
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Doughty MRC, 2004, BUILD ENVIRON, V39, P1223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.03.008
   Elmqvist T, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P488, DOI 10.2307/3868116
   Elmqvist Thomas, 2013, P719
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Folke C, 1997, AMBIO, V26, P167
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Goldstein BE, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Gomez-Baggethun Erik, 2013, P175
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.005
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hezri AA, 2006, ECOL ECON, V60, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.019
   Hiete M, 2012, OR SPECTRUM, V34, P971, DOI 10.1007/s00291-011-0269-9
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kim D, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040405
   Krausmann F, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2696, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007
   Kusumastuti RD, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007
   Kuznecova T, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P780, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01002-8
   Levin S, 1999, Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Mendez R., 2015, Atlas de la crisis. Impactos socioeconomicos y territorios vulnerables en Espana
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   MULGAN G., 2007, Social Innovation: what it is, why it matters, how it can be accelerated
   Nardo M., 2005, OECD STAT WORKING PA, V2005
   Pickett STA, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Pimm S.L., 1991, BALANCE NATURE ECOLO
   Prashar S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1609, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0320-4
   Pretty J, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1912, DOI 10.1126/science.1090847
   Rees W, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
   Rueda S., 2011, El urbanismo ecologico
   Sameer DAB, 2011, INT J URBAN SCI, V15, P1, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2011.580148
   Sastre S, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P2262, DOI 10.1021/es504438p
   Scarelli A, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P948, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01022-3
   Scheffer M, 2001, NATURE, V413, P591, DOI 10.1038/35098000
   Schuschny A., 2009, Guia metodologica: diseno de indicadores compuestos de desarrollo sostenible
   Sharifi A, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V75, P2904, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.586
   Siebeneck L, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P955, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1886-4
   Singh RK, 2009, ECOL INDIC, V9, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.011
   Spanish_National_Ecosystem_Assessment, 2013, EC BIOD HUM WELLB SY
   Tonmoy FN, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P775, DOI 10.1002/wcc.314
   UN, 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van den Bergh JCJM, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P61, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00032-4
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wickes R, 2015, SOC SCI QUART, V96, P330, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12144
   Wiedmann TO, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P6271, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1220362110
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
NR 88
TC 136
Z9 146
U1 22
U2 289
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD AUG
PY 2016
VL 8
IS 8
AR 774
DI 10.3390/su8080774
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DU8HC
UT WOS:000382452900074
OA gold, Green Published, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tong, BR
   Liu, H
   Zhu, JJ
   Wang, YX
   Mei, T
   Kou, MY
AF Tong, Bingrui
   Liu, Hui
   Zhu, Junjie
   Wang, Yuxuan
   Mei, Ting
   Kou, Mengyao
TI Exploring Safety Research Progress and Prospects for the Sustainable
   Development of Resilient Cities
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient cities; safety; sustainable development; prospects;
   bibliometric analysis
ID HAZARD MITIGATION; URBAN RESILIENCE; INFRASTRUCTURE; STRATEGIES;
   FRAMEWORK; IMPACT; RISK
AB In the context of global climate change and accelerated urbanization, the construction of resilient and safe cities has become key to addressing both natural and human-made disasters. This literature review systematically analyzes relevant data from resilient city studies published in the SCIE and SSCI databases from 2000 to 2023, focusing on the risk and safety perspectives. Using bibliometric tools, the spatial-temporal distribution, collaboration networks, and knowledge foundations of the literature are examined, revealing the current state, core topics, and emerging trends in resilient city research. The findings indicate that contemporary research on resilient cities primarily focuses on disaster response, infrastructure resilience, community engagement, and the application of big data technologies, reflecting a trend toward interdisciplinary integration. This review not only provides a comprehensive theoretical framework for the academic community but also offers data-driven decision support for governments. The results highlight key directions for future research, contributing to the enhancement of urban resilience in managing complex risks and promoting sustainable urban development globally.
C1 [Tong, Bingrui; Liu, Hui; Zhu, Junjie; Wang, Yuxuan; Mei, Ting; Kou, Mengyao] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Energy Environm & Safety Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
C3 China Jiliang University
RP Liu, H (corresponding author), China Jiliang Univ, Coll Energy Environm & Safety Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
EM tongbingrui@163.com; hui.liu@cjlu.edu.cn; zhujunjie0316@163.com;
   p23060857045@cjlu.edu.cn; 18768539203@163.com; koumengyao1103@163.com
RI Wang, Yuxuan/KYQ-2308-2024; Zhu, Junjie/G-5867-2012; LIU,
   Hui/K-2142-2015
OI LIU, Hui/0000-0002-4265-7241
FU Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China; Key Project of
   the Hangzhou Municipal Advisory Committee [HZZX202413]; Fundamental
   Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [2023YW111,
   2023YW114];  [LY22E040001]
FX This work was supported, in part, by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural
   Science Foundation of China (No. LY22E040001), the Key Project of the
   Hangzhou Municipal Advisory Committee (No. HZZX202413) and the
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang
   (Nos. 2023YW111 and 2023YW114).
CR Ahern J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Almulhim AI, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105172
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cao XW, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152416547
   Cascella L, 2022, ANN RHEUM DIS, V81, P1718, DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3732
   Chen CM, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P5303, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0307513100
   Chen R, 2017, AGRO FOOD IND HI TEC, V28, P3204
   Chen S, 2023, QUANT IMAG MED SURG, V13, DOI 10.21037/qims-22-1219
   Chen XL, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109469
   Garrido CIC, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151914566
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   de Magalhaes RF, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101296
   Ding X, 2022, ELECTRON COMMER RES, V22, P787, DOI 10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
   Faivre N, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032
   Fassoulaki A, 2020, EUR J ANAESTH, V37, P944, DOI 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001208
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gong YF, 2024, HUM VACC IMMUNOTHER, V20, DOI 10.1080/21645515.2024.2312599
   Hammond MJ, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P14, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
   Hassan-Montero Y, 2022, PROF INFORM, V31, DOI 10.3145/epi.2022.sep.02
   He F, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20021340
   Huang YH, 2013, KSII T INTERNET INF, V7, P767, DOI 10.3837/tiis.2013.04.009
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jia GL, 2019, MATH PROBL ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/5735702
   Jia LZ, 2019, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V20, P2020
   Jiang F, 2024, HELIYON, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31744
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kalla M, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152215895
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Kawane T, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16041550
   Kholidah H, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11512
   Kolar K, 2015, INT J QUAL METH, V14, P13, DOI 10.1177/160940691501400302
   Kutty AA, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V378, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li C, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16072648
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liu L, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12101918
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu WS, 2019, SCIENTOMETRICS, V121, P1815, DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03238-1
   Luthar SS, 2007, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL, V19, P931, DOI 10.1017/S0954579407000454
   Lyu P, 2023, J INF SCI, DOI 10.1177/01655515231191233
   Mamat M, 2024, ANAT SCI EDUC, V17, P722, DOI 10.1002/ase.2405
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nairn JA, 2018, ENG FRACT MECH, V203, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.05.047
   Nandiyanto ABD, 2021, J ENG RES-KUWAIT, V9, DOI 10.36909/jer.ASSEEE.16037
   Okaiyeto SA, 2023, INT J AGR BIOL ENG, V16, P269, DOI 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231604.8584
   Orduña-Malea E, 2021, SCIENTOMETRICS, V126, P8153, DOI 10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y
   Pather N, 2020, ANAT SCI EDUC, V13, P284, DOI 10.1002/ase.1968
   Qu FL, 2024, HUM VACC IMMUNOTHER, V20, DOI 10.1080/21645515.2024.2335728
   Schäffler A, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.008
   Selvaraju RR, 2020, INT J COMPUT VISION, V128, P336, DOI [10.1109/ICCV.2017.74, 10.1007/s11263-019-01228-7]
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Singh PP, 2021, FIRE-BASEL, V4, DOI 10.3390/fire4030038
   Song L, 2024, ENERGIES, V17, DOI 10.3390/en17112450
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Thomaz FR, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15020255
   Tsilika K, 2023, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/math11224703
   Valentino NA, 2018, J POLIT, V80, P757, DOI 10.1086/694845
   Rettig PV, 2015, ESTUD FILOL-VALDIVIA, P161
   van Eck NJ, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   Viitanen J, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P803, DOI 10.1068/a46242
   Wang F, 2024, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109851
   Wang HX, 2024, FRONT AGING NEUROSCI, V16, DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1409155
   Wang JJ, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P2133, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05259-1
   Wang LH, 2024, ENERGY, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130778
   Wang Y, 2024, HELIYON, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23720
   Wang YD, 2024, J DERMATOL TREAT, V35, DOI 10.1080/09546634.2024.2346282
   Wei Z, 2024, FLUID PHASE EQUILIBR, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.fluid.2024.114117
   Whitehead JC, 2009, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V14, P655, DOI 10.1007/s11027-009-9189-2
   Woodruff S, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100354
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Wu BH, 2012, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V17, P355, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2011.628330
   Yan L, 2022, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102279
   Yu CW, 2024, REV PSICOL DEPORTE, V33, P243
   Yu H, 2008, J ASIAN ARCHIT BUILD, V7, P263, DOI 10.3130/jaabe.7.263
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhai GF, 2015, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V21, P1206, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2014.955385
   Zhao SH, 2024, CELL MOL NEUROBIOL, V44, DOI 10.1007/s10571-024-01484-3
   Zhou L, 2024, MED EDUC ONLINE, V29, DOI 10.1080/10872981.2024.2358610
NR 83
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 16
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 15
IS 3
AR 505
DI 10.3390/buildings15030505
PG 31
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA W5X0Z
UT WOS:001419289900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Admiraal, H
   Cornaro, A
AF Admiraal, Han
   Cornaro, Antonia
TI Future cities, resilient cities - The role of underground space in
   achieving urban resilience
SO UNDERGROUND SPACE
LA English
DT Article
DE Underground space; Urban planning; Urban resilience
AB The need for future cities to be resilient stems from the fact that now more than ever in history, both natural and human-made hazards are threatening cities in the forms of shocks and stresses. The ability of cities to resist or restore themselves following these events is dependent on their resilience.
   As we now firmly enter the Anthropocene, the geological epoch in which human activity, for the first time in history is directly influencing the Earth's systems, we need to develop resilient cities that can cope with the increase in hazards. Although climate change is one factor influencing urban resilience, it is not the only one. A lack of understanding of the subsurface can also influence a city's resilience, as can the unplanned use of its underground spaces. In planning and developing our cities of the future, a deep understanding of the geology that supports the city is required not only to be able to determine the possibilities of future use but also to determine whether there are natural processes that could threaten human existence over time. The destruction of ecosystem services through unchecked human activities could be one of these activities. In this paper, the authors will investigate how the subsurface and use of underground spaces can influence urban resilience. The role that underground spaces can play in achieving urban resilience for our future cities will be described.
C1 [Admiraal, Han] Enprodes Management Consultancy BV, Marshalllaan 2, NL-2625 GZ Delft, Netherlands.
   [Cornaro, Antonia] Amberg Engn AG, Trockenloostr 21, CH-8105 Regensdorf Watt, Switzerland.
   [Admiraal, Han; Cornaro, Antonia] ITA Comm Underground Space ITACUS, Int Environm House MIE2,Chemin Balexart 9, CH-1219 Chatelaine Geneva, Switzerland.
RP Admiraal, H (corresponding author), Enprodes Management Consultancy BV, Marshalllaan 2, NL-2625 GZ Delft, Netherlands.
EM han.admiraal@enprodes.nl; acornaro@amberg.ch
OI Admiraal, Han/0000-0001-8869-9335
FU International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (ITA)
FX The authors would like to acknowledge the continuing support of the
   International Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (ITA). The
   authors would also like to recognize the work of the ITA Committee on
   Underground Space and the recently launched Activity Group on Urban
   Resilience.
CR Admiraal H, 2018, Underground Spaces Unveiled: Planning and creating the cities of the future
   [Anonymous], 2015, A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   [Anonymous], 2014, SLIMME STEDEN OPGAVE
   Bartak J., 2007, UNDERGROUND CONSTRUC
   Bloomberg Michael., 2017, Climate of Hope
   BOBYLEV N., 2013, Advances in Underground Space Development
   Hunt DVL, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.015
   Renner R., 2018, Urban being: Anatomy identity of the city
   Sterling R, 2013, ADV UNDERGROUND SPAC
NR 11
TC 61
Z9 65
U1 29
U2 238
PU KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
PI BEIJING
PA 16 DONGHUANGCHENGGEN NORTH ST, BEIJING, DONGHENG DISTRICT 100717,
   PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 2096-2754
EI 2467-9674
J9 UNDERGR SPACE
JI Undergr. Space
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 5
IS 3
BP 223
EP 228
DI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
PG 6
WC Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA NK5PL
UT WOS:000566784400003
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Khatibi, H
   Wilkinson, S
   Sweya, LN
   Baghersad, M
   Dianat, H
AF Khatibi, Hamed
   Wilkinson, Suzanne
   Sweya, Lukuba N.
   Baghersad, Mostafa
   Dianat, Heiman
TI Navigating Climate Change Challenges through Smart Resilient Cities: A
   Comprehensive Assessment Framework
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; smart resilient cities; urban resilience; smart city;
   assessment tools; assessment framework
ID DISASTER RESILIENCE; URBAN RESILIENCE; SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; INDICATORS;
   CITY
AB The rapid increase in the global population is contributing to the urgent challenges we face in ensuring the sustainability of our planet. This demographic shift, which gained momentum in the 1990s, is closely linked to a surge in natural disasters, both in terms of their frequency and severity. The quest for resources and improved quality of life, including the need for housing and essential services, has compounded these challenges. With the world's population projected to double by 2050, and approximately two-thirds of this population expected to reside in urban areas, we are facing a complex web of interconnected issues that will significantly magnify the impacts of climate change-induced disasters. It is imperative that we build resilient cities capable of withstanding and adapting to these changes. However, the growing complexity of urban services and the necessity for integrated management raise questions about the preparedness of these resilient cities to comprehend and address the multifaceted challenges posed by climate change. In response to these critical concerns, this study endeavors to address the intersection of resilience and climate change. We propose the development of a Smart Resilient City Assessment Framework, comprising two core components: resilience re-evaluation and smartness evaluation. Each component consists of eight essential steps. The culmination of these steps results in a semi-quantitative index that accurately reflects the city's position regarding resilience and smartness in the face of climate change-related disasters. To demonstrate the framework's practicality and suitability, we present results from a hypothetical scenario focusing on water supply management, a critical aspect of climate change adaptation. The framework equips city managers with the necessary tools to re-evaluate their cities' resilience, evaluate their capacity to address climate change-induced challenges, and make informed decisions on integrating resilience and smart solutions to pave the way for a more sustainable and climate-resilient future.
C1 [Khatibi, Hamed; Baghersad, Mostafa] Univ Auckland, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
   [Wilkinson, Suzanne] Massey Univ, Coll Sci, Sch Built Environm, Auckland 0745, New Zealand.
   [Sweya, Lukuba N.] Ardhi Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Technol, Dar Es Salaam 16103, Tanzania.
   [Dianat, Heiman] Univ Newcastle, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
C3 University of Auckland; Massey University; University of Newcastle
RP Khatibi, H (corresponding author), Univ Auckland, Fac Engn, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
EM h.khatibi@auckland.ac.nz; s.wilkinson@massey.ac.nz;
   lukuba.sweya@aru.ac.tz; m.baghersad@auckland.ac.nz;
   heiman.dianat@newcastle.edu.au
RI Khatibi, Hamed/AAS-5181-2021; Sweya, Lukuba/AAX-1478-2021
OI Khatibi, Hamed/0000-0002-4486-1342
CR Alawadhi Suha, 2012, Electronic Government. Proceedings of the 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2012, P40, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_4
   Albino V, 2015, J URBAN TECHNOL, V22, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
   Alshamaila Y, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103521
   Amegavi GB, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104313
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   [Anonymous], 2007, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing
   Arroub A, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS NETWORKS AND MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (WINCOM), pP180
   Baghersad M, 2021, ADV CIV ENG, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/2360759
   Balaei B, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102077
   Balaei B, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000292
   Baron M., 2012, Journal of Economics & Management, V10
   Bibri SE, 2024, ENVIRON SCI ECOTECH, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cabell JF, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04666-170118
   Cai H, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
   Chourabi H., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P2289, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514
   Cohen B., 2013, Smart City Wheel Retrieved from SMART CIRCLE.
   Conrado SP, 2016, J DECIS SYST, V25, P171, DOI 10.1080/12460125.2016.1187396
   Cox RS, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P220, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550297
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   D'Lima M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.017
   DAMERI R.P., 2013, International Journal of Computers and Technology, V11, P2544, DOI [10.24297/ijct.v11i5.1142, DOI 10.24297/IJCT.V11I5.1142]
   Dastjerdi MS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100794
   DesRoches R., 2018, The Bridge, V48
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Dianat H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102561
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities (FG-SSC), 2014, Smart Sustainable Cities: An Analysis of Definitions.
   Gan XY, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V81, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068
   Giffinger R., 2007, SMART CITIES RANKING
   Gkontzis AF, 2024, FUTURE INTERNET, V16, DOI 10.3390/fi16020047
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grabisch M, 2008, I S INTELL SYST INFO, P17, DOI 10.1109/SISY.2008.4664901
   Gracias JS, 2023, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V6, P1719, DOI 10.3390/smartcities6040080
   Guenduez A A., 2024, Urban Governance, V4, P80, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2024.01.003
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hughes JamesF.K. Healy., 2014, MEASURING RESILIENCE
   Ismagilova E, 2019, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V47, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004
   Ji MD, 2021, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V46, P38612, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.142
   Jiang NN, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107298
   Jiang YH, 2013, HABITAT INT, V38, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.06.003
   Jovanovic A, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P285, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_17
   Kang SM, 2002, ECOL ECON, V43, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00207-0
   Khatibi H, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1556, DOI 10.1177/23998083221092422
   Khatibi H, 2021, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V11, P493, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-03-2020-0049
   Khatibi H, 2022, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V12, P5, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-07-2020-0122
   Langroudi B., 2011, Int. J. Archit. Civ. Constr. Sci, V5, P255, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.1332336, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1332336]
   Lee JH, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Lilli G, 2024, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109609
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Negre E, 2015, P ANN HICSS, P2317, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2015.279
   Odiase O, 2020, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V11, P188, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12190
   OECD, 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-EN, 10.1787/9789264043466-EN]
   Oktari RS, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100057
   Pandya S, 2023, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102987
   Papa R, 2015, TEMA, V8, P19, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/2883
   Paracchini M., 2008, Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes, V1, P349
   Perry H., 2013, Ph.D. Dissertation
   Prior T., 2015, CSS Risk Resil. Rep, V9
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Saltelli A., 2007, PAMM: Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, P2140013
   Schipper E.L. F., 2015, A comparative overview of resilience measurement frameworks. Analyzing Indicators and Approaches, P422
   Seo W, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000835
   Shah MN, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, P111, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-0855-9_10
   Sharifi A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P1269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stamopoulos D, 2024, CITIES, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104612
   Sun J, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105058
   Sweya L., 2019, Global Business and Organizational Excellence, V39, P6, DOI DOI 10.1002/JOE.21985
   Sweya LN, 2021, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V13, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.860
   Sweya LN, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000783
   Sweya LN, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106165
   Sweya LN, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.063
   Tabibian M, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P1699, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2240
   Tangian A, 2007, EUR J OPER RES, V181, P468, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.038
   Taques FH, 2021, J INNOV KNOWL, V6, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2019.12.001
   Ul Huda N, 2024, EXPERT SYST APPL, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122380
   Vugrin ED, 2010, SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS: SIMULATION, MODELING, AND INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING, P77, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-11405-2_3
   Wang HH, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107333
   Willis H. H., 2015, Measuring the Resilience of Energy Distribution Systems
   Wilsont MV, 2017, J CHEM EDUC, V94, P44, DOI 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00515
   Wolfram M., 2012, P REAL CORP 2012
   Yigitcanlar T, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16020671
   Yovanof GS, 2009, WIRELESS PERS COMMUN, V49, P445, DOI 10.1007/s11277-009-9693-4
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 90
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 27
U2 48
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 3
AR 266
DI 10.3390/land13030266
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MI1Y4
UT WOS:001192914500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU de Magalhaes, RF
   Danilevicz, ADF
   de Souza, JS
   Echeveste, ME
AF de Magalhaes, Ruane Fernandes
   Danilevicz, Angela de Moura Ferreira
   de Souza, Joana Siqueira
   Echeveste, Marcia Elisa
TI The risk management tools?role for urban infrastructure resilience
   building
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change risks; Risk management tools; Resilient urban
   infrastructure planning; Resilient capacity; Urban resilience building
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; SUSTAINABILITY; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEMS; CITIES;
   GOVERNANCE; INDICATORS
AB The climate change effects have become increasingly intense and frequent, impacting the cities' fundamental functions. In this context, resilience-building represents a relevant challenge for urban managers, mainly due to the barriers to integrating diverse infrastructure subsystems at different governance levels. Thus, this study aims to analyze risk management tools' contribution to urban infrastructure services' resilient planning. The research developed risk management tools that were incorporated into the decision-making process of resilient urban planning. The tools were applied to a case study in Porto Alegre, in the south of Brazil, relating characteristics of its infrastructure to operationalization principles of urban resilience in the literature. The results revealed that the risk management tools could promote a comprehensive analysis of the opportunities and threats of the infrastructure network under climate risks, based on the technical experience and engagement of multiple stakeholders in decision making. Local management experiences demonstrate no single way to strengthen resilient characteristics in cities. Instead, the analyses developed supported a greater understanding of the risk management tools' potential for resilient planning, admitting uncertainties in the transition to responsive and adaptive urban ecosystems.
C1 [de Magalhaes, Ruane Fernandes; Echeveste, Marcia Elisa] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Grad Program Ind Engn, Av Osvaldo Aranha 99, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
   [Danilevicz, Angela de Moura Ferreira; de Souza, Joana Siqueira] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Ind Engn, Av Osvaldo Aranha 99, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
   [Echeveste, Marcia Elisa] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Inst Math & Stat, Av Bento Goncalves 9500, BR-91509900 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
   [de Magalhaes, Ruane Fernandes] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Grad Program Ind Engn, Av Osvaldo Aranha 99,5th Floor, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Universidade Federal do Rio
   Grande do Sul; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Universidade
   Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
RP de Magalhaes, RF (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Grad Program Ind Engn, Av Osvaldo Aranha 99,5th Floor, BR-90035190 Porto Alegre, Brazil.
EM ruane.magalhaes@ufrgs.br
RI de Souza, Joana/IZQ-1291-2023; Fernandes de Magalhaes, Ruane/S-1260-2017
OI Fernandes de Magalhaes, Ruane/0000-0002-7058-1790
CR Adger W.N., 2004, New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M.Marina., 2016, CITIES THINK PLANETS
   [Anonymous], 2021, PMBOK GUIDE, V6th
   Baklanov A, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100610
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Birkmann J, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.01.006
   Birkmann J, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0111-3
   Blackmore JM, 2008, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V134, P224, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(224)
   Borsekova K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.012
   Bostick TP, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P1181, DOI 10.1111/risa.12737
   Broto VC, 2017, WORLD DEV, V93, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.031
   BSI - British Standards Institution, 2014, PAS, V181, P2014
   Carter JG, 2018, CITIES, V77, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.014
   CEEE-D - Companhia Estadual de Distribuicao de Energia Eletrica, 2016, 2016002 CEEED REL
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Creutzig F, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1054, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3169
   de Magalhaes RF, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.023
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dong L, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V128, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.020
   Dorigon LP, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100461
   Farias A.R., 2017, IDENTIFICACAO MAPEAM
   Francesch-Huidobro M, 2017, PROG PLANN, V114, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2015.11.001
   Giordano R, 2020, CLIM SERV, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.04.004
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huston S, 2015, CITIES, V48, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.005
   Ibrahim NA, 2022, ENERGY, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124471
   INMET - Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia, 2016, TECHN NOT TEMP OC PO
   IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,, 2014, 50 ASS REP INT PAN C
   Kettle NP, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V4-5, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2014.07.001
   Keys PW, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P667, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0327-x
   Koliou M, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P131, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547
   Leite C., 2014, CIDADES SUSTENTAVEIS
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Luo FH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mendizabal M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V94, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.003
   Mikellidou CV, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.022
   Pandit A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS19, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.010
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Ramsey MM, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.013
   Rochedo PRR, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P695, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0213-y
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, DESK STUD RES REP, V1/6
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2015, CIT RES IND CRI
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2016, MEAS GUID RES REP, V6/6
   Roelich K, 2015, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V92, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.008
   Romero-Lankao P, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P754, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0
   SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Sefton C, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100390
   Shen LY, 2011, J CONSTR ENG M, V137, P441, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000315
   Sun T, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105771
   UN, 2015, UNGA Resolution 70/1
   UN-HABITAT - United Nations Habitat, 2011, CIT CLIM CHANG GLOB
   United Nation, 2009, UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Williams C, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P82, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2476
   Xu H, 2017, J BUILD ENG, V12, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.06.018
   Xu JC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V124, P93, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1090-7
   Xu WP, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104699
   Yuan XC, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P1169, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.209
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhang XL, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V107, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.068
NR 67
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 14
U2 77
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 46
AR 101296
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101296
EA SEP 2022
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 6C1JX
UT WOS:000881779200005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Marcus, L
   Colding, J
AF Marcus, Lars
   Colding, Johan
TI Placing Urban Renewal in the Context of the Resilience Adaptive Cycle
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; urban renewal; the adaptive renewal cycle; compressed
   resilience; space syntax theory; spatial morphology
ID REGIME SHIFTS; SYSTEMS; CITIES; GENTRIFICATION; THINKING
AB Resilience thinking provides valuable insights into the dynamics of complex adaptive systems. To achieve resilience in urban systems, it can be fruitful to delve into the intricacies of resilience processes. This paper theorizes about how the specific characteristics of resilient systems can be integrated into the spatial design of cities. Emphasizing the importance of the built form and spatial systems in maintaining order within urban processes, we focus on how adaptive renewal cycles can be applied to various systems and dimensions where urban change, adaptation, and renewal occur. The paper identifies key resilient system characteristics applicable to urban spatial form and contextualizes urban renewal within the adaptive renewal cycle-a framework originally developed to capture temporal and spatial ecosystem dynamics. We integrate insights within 'space syntax theory', theorizing about how cities renew themselves over space and time. We discuss instances of 'compressed resilience' and the challenges posed by the 'tyranny of small decisions' in urban planning and development. In conclusion, we identify future research directions in the theory of spatial morphology and resilient urban systems, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of the interplay between urban processes, urban form, resilience, and adaptive renewal.
C1 [Marcus, Lars] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
   [Marcus, Lars; Colding, Johan] Univ Gavle, Dept Bldg Engn Energy Syst & Sustainabil Sci, Kungsbacksvagen 47, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden.
   [Colding, Johan] Royal Swedish Acad Sci, Beijer Inst Ecol Econ, S-10405 Stockholm, Sweden.
C3 Chalmers University of Technology; University of Gavle; Royal Swedish
   Academy of Sciences; Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics
RP Marcus, L (corresponding author), Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Civil Engn, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.; Marcus, L (corresponding author), Univ Gavle, Dept Bldg Engn Energy Syst & Sustainabil Sci, Kungsbacksvagen 47, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden.
EM lars.marcus@chalmers.se; johan.colding@hig.se
RI Colding, Johan/AAB-7047-2019
OI Colding, Johan/0000-0001-7644-7448
FU Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of
   Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
FX No Statement Available
CR Abercrombie Michael, 2017, DICT BIOL
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Al-Kodmany K, 2014, BUILDINGS, V4, P683, DOI 10.3390/buildings4040683
   Alberti M, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P8951, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1606034114
   [Anonymous], 2015, Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316014240
   Batty M., 2005, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals
   Bennett E.M., 2014, SOLUTIONS J, V5, P65, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2012.02145.X
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Berkes F., 2001, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems
   BERTALANFFY LV, 1972, ACAD MANAGE J, V15, P407, DOI 10.5465/255139
   Blok A, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2803, DOI 10.1177/0042098019891050
   Bouzarovski S, 2018, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V42, P845, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12634
   Clements FE, 1936, J ECOL, V24, P252, DOI 10.2307/2256278
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Colding J, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9050162
   Colding J, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102761
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Comes T., 2014, P 11 INT ISCRAM C U
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Elmqvist T, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P488, DOI 10.2307/3868116
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Folke C., 2009, Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world, P103, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2_5, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2]
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Glass Ruth., 2010, GENTRIFICATION DEBAT, P19
   Gratton C., 2008, International Journal of the History of Sport, V25, P1922, DOI 10.1080/09523360802439023
   Gren Å, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P580, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1087-y
   Grote G., 2008, Resilience Engineering Perspectives, VVolume 1
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hanna Susan., 1996, RIGHTS NATURE ECOLOG
   HANSON J, 1989, EKISTICS, V56, P22
   Hillier B., 2009, P 7 INT SPAC SYNT S, DOI 10.1016/0022-2860(82)85250-2
   Hillier B., 1976, Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des, V3, P147, DOI [DOI 10.1068/B030147, 10.1068/b030147]
   Hillier B., 2012, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, P129, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_8
   Hillier B., 1984, DESIGNING BUILDING U, P61
   Hillier Bill., 2007, Progressin Planning, V67, P205
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Holling CS, 1996, CONSERV BIOL, V10, P328, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x
   HOLLING CS, 1971, J AM I PLANNERS, V37, P221, DOI 10.1080/01944367108977962
   Iglesias V, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001795
   Jane J., 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   KAHN AE, 1966, KYKLOS, V19, P23, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1966.tb02491.x
   Kii M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12176919
   LEITNER H, 1990, POLIT GEOGR QUART, V9, P146, DOI 10.1016/0260-9827(90)90016-4
   Marcus L, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06939-190455
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Massey D, 1999, T I BRIT GEOGR, V24, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.0020-2754.1999.00261.x
   MAY RM, 1972, NATURE, V238, P413, DOI 10.1038/238413a0
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Munn R. E., 1986, Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, P292
   Nyström M, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P413, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01948-0
   Olazabal M, 2017, Urban Regions Now Tomorrow: Between Vulnerability, Resilience and Transformation, P73, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-16759-2_4
   Ostrom E, 2005, UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY, P1
   Pearsall H, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P1013, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.714762
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Rice JL, 2020, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V44, P145, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12740
   Samuelsson K, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V171, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009
   Scheffer M, 2003, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V18, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002
   Schultze P., 1996, Engineering Within Ecological Constraints
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   van der Leeuw SE, 2000, WAY THE WIND BLOWS: CLIMATE, HISTORY, AND HUMAN ACTION, P357
   Villagra P, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V48, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.010
NR 63
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 33
U2 91
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 1
AR 8
DI 10.3390/land13010008
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GG0O5
UT WOS:001151396500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Desouza, KC
   Flanery, TH
AF Desouza, Kevin C.
   Flanery, Trevor H.
TI Designing, planning, and managing resilient cities: A conceptual
   framework
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Cities; Stressors; Decline; Disruption; Disaster; Urban
   planning; Urban networks; Technology
ID NEW-YORK-CITY
AB To what must cities be resilient? How can cities, as complex systems, be resilient? Building a capacity for resilience might be a daunting task when one considers the multitude of components, processes, and interactions that take place within and beyond a city's physical, logical (i.e. legal), and virtual (cyber-space) boundaries. Planning for resilience to the impacts of stressors within cities requires an evaluation of the vulnerable components of cities, an understanding of the key processes, procedures, and interactions that organize these components and develop the capacity to address various structuring of components and their interactions with the ultimate goal of achieving resilience. This paper provides a deeper look at resilience in cities, proposes a conceptual resilience framework, and includes a discussion and analysis of the framework. The proposed framework is meant to serve as a more holistic approach to designing, planning, and managing for resilience by including an evaluation of cultural and process dynamics within cities as well as their physical elements. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Desouza, Kevin C.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Coll Publ Programs, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA.
   [Flanery, Trevor H.] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Downtown Phoenix;
   Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
RP Desouza, KC (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Coll Publ Programs, 411 N Cent Ave, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA.
EM kev.desouza@gmail.com; tflanery@vt.edu
OI Desouza, Kevin/0000-0002-4734-3081
CR Alfasi N, 2004, CITIES, V21, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2003.10.007
   [Anonymous], 2005, BBC NEWS
   [Anonymous], 2012, REUTERS
   [Anonymous], COMPLEXITY THEORIES
   [Anonymous], WEEK
   [Anonymous], 2012, ECONOMIST
   [Anonymous], 2013, Boston Globe
   [Anonymous], URB POP DEV ENV
   [Anonymous], 2011, When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor
   Arizona State University, 2013, DEC CTR DES CIT WATE
   Axelrod R, 1999, HARNESSING COMPLEXIT
   Batty M., 2012, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come to Age. An Overview with implications to Urban Planning and Design
   Batty M., 2005, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals
   Benfield Kaid., 2012, ATLANTIC CITIES
   Boyd E., 2012, Adapting institutions: governance, complexity, and socialecological resilience
   Burnside WR, 2012, BIOL REV, V87, P194, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00192.x
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Changizi M. A., 2009, COMPLEXITY
   Colten CE, 2008, ENVIRONMENT, V50, P36, DOI 10.3200/ENVT.50.5.36-47
   Cumming GS, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P899, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
   Desouza K.C., 2005, Managing Information in Complex Organizations: Semiotics and Signals, Complexity and Chaos
   Desouza K. C., 2012, PLANATIZEN
   Desouza K. C., 2012, PLANAETIZEN PLANNING
   Desouza K. C., 2012, PRACTICING PLANNER, V10
   Eisinger P, 2007, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V31, P875, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00762.x
   George R., 2013, US TODAY
   Harrigan J., 2002, Economic Policy Review - Federal Reserve Bank of New York, V8, P97
   Hellström T, 2007, SAFETY SCI, V45, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.007
   Hurlston L.-A., 2012, ADAPTING I GOVERNANC, P171
   Innes JudithEleanor., 2010, Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy
   Irons Meghan E., 2013, Boston Globe
   Klein Joe, 2010, Times Magazine
   [Madarame Haruki Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC) Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC)], NATL DIET JAPAN FEBR, DOI 10.3327/jaesjb.55.3146
   Marshall Stephen., 2012, COMPLEXITY THEORIES, P191, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_11, 10.1007/978-3-642-24544-2_11]
   MITROFF II, 1988, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V29, P15
   Neal ZP, 2013, METROP MOD LIFE, P1
   Perrow C., 2008, NORMAL ACCIDENTS LIV
   Pickett STA, 2001, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V32, P127, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
   Plodinec M.J., 2009, Definitions of resilience: An analysis
   Portugali J, 2011, UNDERST COMPLEX SYST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19451-1
   Rahn R. W., 2006, WASHINGTON TIMES, pA18
   Rinaldi S. M., 2004, P 37 ANN HAW INT C J
   Ruback RB, 1997, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V28, P23, DOI 10.1177/0022022197281002
   Rubinkam M., 2012, CENTRALIA PENNSYLVAN
   Safford S., 2009, WHY GARDEN COULDNT S
   Sassen Saskia., 2000, CITIES WORLD EC, V2nd
   Wallace R, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.07.006
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   WJLA, 2012, DC STROM 2012 POW OU
NR 49
TC 342
Z9 399
U1 30
U2 659
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2013
VL 35
SI SI
BP 89
EP 99
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 250IY
UT WOS:000326847700010
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Feng, XH
   Xiu, CL
   Bai, LM
   Zhong, YX
   Wei, Y
AF Feng, Xinghua
   Xiu, Chunliang
   Bai, Limin
   Zhong, Yexi
   Wei, Ye
TI Comprehensive evaluation of urban resilience based on the perspective of
   landscape pattern: A case study of Shenyang city
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Scale-density-morphology; Urban resilience; Comprehensive evaluation;
   Geo-detector; Shenyang city
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINTS; SPATIAL
   HETEROGENEITY; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; HUMAN HEALTH; FORM; SUSTAINABILITY;
   URBANIZATION; CHINA
AB Urban resilience is a new path for the sustainable development of cities in the future. However, recognizing and quantifying urban resilience is still in the conceptual and exploratory stage. In this study, we present a "scale-density-morphology" resilience framework as well as an index model to investigate the evolution of urban resilience based on theories of landscape ecology and evolutionary resilience. We find that spatial development is a major factor affecting scale resilience; population distribution is significantly related to density resilience; urban growth boundaries and ecological infrastructure are factors for optimizing morphology resilience; and an excellent balance of "scale-density-morphology" fosters the development of resilient urban areas. We give large cities recommendations for developing resilience, including-preventing urban sprawl and controlling the scale of construction land, reducing population and building density to promote low-carbon green production and lifestyles, strengthening ecological networks, and controlling urban growth boundaries, etc. This study hopes to provide a scientifically based spatial guide that could implement resilient urban planning and could serve as a case study for quantitative research on urban resilience.
C1 [Feng, Xinghua; Zhong, Yexi] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
   [Xiu, Chunliang] Northeastern Univ, Jangho Architecture Coll, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China.
   [Bai, Limin] Jilin Jianzhu Univ, Sch Architecture & Planning, Changchun 130018, Peoples R China.
   [Bai, Limin; Wei, Ye] Northeast Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China.
C3 Jiangxi Normal University; Northeastern University - China; Jilin
   Jianzhu University; Northeast Normal University - China
RP Xiu, CL (corresponding author), Northeastern Univ, Jangho Architecture Coll, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China.
EM fengxh372@nenu.edu.cn; xiuchunliang@mail.neu.edu.cn; weiy742@nenu.edu.cn
OI WEI, YE/0000-0001-8931-0926
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471141, 41561025]
FX This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (grant number 41471141, 41561025).
CR Ahern J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Albers M, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P1598, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.722961
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   [Anonymous], BYU L REV
   [Anonymous], HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
   [Anonymous], 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING
   [Anonymous], 2008, WORKING PAPER
   [Anonymous], YINGYONG SHENGTAI XU
   [Anonymous], VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Balsas CJL, 2014, CITIES, V36, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.002
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2014, CITIES, V36, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.007
   Bloom DE, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P772, DOI 10.1126/science.1153057
   Bn C., 2012, IDS WORKING PAPERS, V2012, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X, 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brody S.D., 2013, Disaster resiliency : Interdisciplinary perspectives, P160
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Campbell-Lendrum D., 2003, Climate change and health: risks and responses
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   [陈利顶 CHEN LiDing], 2006, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V26, P1444
   Cobbinah PB, 2018, FUTURES, V101, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.005
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Creutzig F, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1054, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3169
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   dos Santos FT, 2011, EUR PLAN STUD, V19, P1517, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.533515
   Engle NL, 2014, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V19, P1295, DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9475-x
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Freilich R.H., 2010, From sprawl to sustainability : smart growth, new urbanism, green development, and renewable energy, V2nd
   Galderisi A., 2014, Z Magazine (Boston, V11, P36
   Gasper R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.009
   Gencer E.A., 2013, Mediterranean Studies, V7, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-29470-9_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29470-9_2]
   Geng Y, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V75, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.082
   Gleeson B, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P2653, DOI 10.1177/0042098008098198
   Gleeson B, 2012, GEOGR RES-AUST, V50, P242, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00728.x
   Goddard MA, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016
   Graugaard JD, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P243, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.660908
   Harrison P., 2014, Urban Resilience Thinking for Municipalities, DOI DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.991329
   Herold M, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P286, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0
   Herold M, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN A, V34, P1443, DOI 10.1068/a3496
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Hu XS, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jayawardena HMIDP, 2017, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V12, P964, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2017.100
   Kilcullen David., 2012, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, V36, P19
   Lee S, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V68, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.024
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   León J, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P826, DOI 10.1177/0265813515597229
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Li HL, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V82, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.032
   Ling C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.006
   Liu ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Lohrey S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V45, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.004
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Luo FH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
   Luo W, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P692, DOI 10.1002/2015GL066941
   McGarigal K., 1995, USDA FOREST SERVICE, DOI [10.2737/PNW-GTR-351, DOI 10.2737/PNW-GTR-351]
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTER DESIGN
   Moffatt I, 2000, ECOL ECON, V32, P359
   Mörtberg U, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V100, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.031
   Ng E, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V101, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.004
   O'Brien K, 2004, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V14, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001
   O'Brien KL, 2000, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V10, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2
   Olazabal M, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_11
   Pont M.B., 2010, SPACEMATRIX SPACE DE
   Pu B., 2016, Current Urban Studies, P36, DOI DOI 10.4236/cus.2016.41004
   Rees W, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
   Schlee MB, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P2054, DOI 10.3390/su4092054
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_9
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   Silva M, 2017, J PLAN LIT, V32, P346, DOI 10.1177/0885412217706900
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Ultramari C., 2007, CITY TIME, V2, P47
   Wallace D, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Walmsley A, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V76, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.036
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wu J., 2007, Landscape ecology: Pattern, process, scale and hierarchy], V2nd
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   Xu JC, 2008, ENVIRON INT, V34, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2007.08.004
   Zhang YS, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10114334
NR 92
TC 124
Z9 132
U1 122
U2 668
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 104
AR 102722
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
PG 15
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA LZ3TV
UT WOS:000541151900003
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lowe, M
   Bell, S
   Ferguson, P
   Morley, M
   Morrice, H
   Foster, S
AF Lowe, Melanie
   Bell, Sarah
   Ferguson, Peter
   Morley, Merrick
   Morrice, Hannah
   Foster, Sarah
TI Building back healthier? The transformative potential and reality of
   city planning responses to COVID-19 in Melbourne, Australia
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Healthy cities; Urban resilience; COVID-19; City planning; Urban policy;
   Melbourne
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; DETERMINANTS
AB The COVID-19 pandemic was one of the most significant public health and urban planning challenges that cities have faced in recent times. From an evolutionary resilience perspective, the disruption caused by the pandemic was a potential opportunity to create more resilient urban environments that reduce infectious and noncommunicable disease risks. This paper examines whether and how city planning policy responses to COVID19 in Melbourne, Australia, supported evolutionary urban resilience and transformation towards healthy built environments. Content analysis was undertaken of relevant City of Melbourne and Victorian state government policy documents adopted between January 2020 and October 2022, to identify and evaluate city planning responses to COVID-19 against evolutionary resilience and healthy cities frameworks. Policy changes included public space adjustments, supporting walking and cycling, and addressing housing affordability and homelessness. Most policy actions in response to COVID-19 were consistent with evidence on planning healthy and resilient cities. However, Melbourne's city planning responses to the pandemic prioritised recovery more than positive urban transformation in response to disruption. The findings illustrate the challenges of realising evolutionary urban resilience in practice. We develop recommendations for city planning that prepares for future pandemics and builds resilience to other shocks and stresses.
C1 [Lowe, Melanie; Foster, Sarah] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
   [Lowe, Melanie; Bell, Sarah; Morley, Merrick] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne Ctr Cities, Melbourne, Australia.
   [Ferguson, Peter] Deakin Univ, Fac Arts & Educ, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Geelong, Australia.
   [Morrice, Hannah] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Disaster Climate & Advers Unit, Melbourne, Australia.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT); University of Melbourne;
   Deakin University; University of Melbourne
RP Lowe, M (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Sch Global Urban & Social Studies, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
EM melanie.lowe@rmit.edu.au
OI Ferguson, Peter/0000-0002-1518-3466; Bell, Sarah/0000-0001-5289-4358
FU City of Melbourne; ARC Future Fellowship [FT210100899]; Australian
   Research Council [FT210100899] Funding Source: Australian Research
   Council
FX ML is supported by AXA Research Fund, SB is supported by City of
   Melbourne, and SF is supported by an ARC Future Fellowship (FT210100899)
   .
CR Abo YN, 2021, J PAEDIATR CHILD H, V57, P1886, DOI 10.1111/jpc.15601
   AbouKorin SAA, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324
   Adlakha D, 2020, Cities Health, P1, DOI [10.1080/23748834.2020.1783479, DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1783479]
   Afrin S, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.668263
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Andres L, 2021, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V8, P167, DOI 10.1007/s40572-021-00314-8
   Arundel J., 2017, CREATING LIVEABLE CI
   Astell-Burt T, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18052757
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Melbourne, 2021 all persons quick stats online
   Badland H, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V111, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.003
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Bell S., 2024, Empowering smart cities through community-centred public private partnerships and innovations, P131
   Bolleter J, 2022, PLAN PRACT RES, V37, P13, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2021.1905991
   Buzási A, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P616, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01817-w
   C40 Cities & Arup, 2021, Green and thriving neighbourhoods: A pathway to net zero, featuring the '15-minute city'
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Choi J., 2021, Air Quality and Climate Change, V55, P16
   City of Melbourne, 2021, Health and wellbeing action plan 2021-2025
   City of Melbourne, 2021, Emissions reduction plan for council operations 2021-2026
   City of Melbourne, 2022, Inclusive Melbourne strategy 2022-2032
   City of Melbourne, 2021, City of Melbourne city of possibility: Council plan 2021-2025
   City of Melbourne, 2022, United Nations sustainable development goals: City of Melbourne voluntary local review 2022
   City of Melbourne, 2020, COVID-19 reactivation and recovery plan: City of the future
   City of Melbourne, 2020, Affordable housing strategy 2020-2030
   Convery S., 2023, The Guardian Australia
   Currie G, 2021, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V153, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2021.09.009
   De-Toledo KP, 2024, TRANSPORT RES F-TRAF, V100, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.trf.2023.11.010
   Department of Environment Land Water and Planning, 2017, Plan Melbourne 2017-2050
   Department of Health, 2023, Victorian public health and wellbeing plan 2023-2027
   El Khateeb S, 2022, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100065
   Fastenrath S, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P138, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1744551
   Ferguson P., 2021, The Palgrave handbook of climate resilient societies
   Finucane ML, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104264
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Frumkin H, 2021, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V129, DOI 10.1289/EHP8888
   Fu F, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11111189
   Gaisie E, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103838
   Geneletti D, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104319
   Gibson T., 2016, Journal of Extreme Events, V3, DOI [10.1142/S2345737616710020, DOI 10.1142/S2345737616710020]
   Giles-Corti B, 2023, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V3, DOI 10.1038/s42949-023-00107-y
   Giles-Corti B, 2016, LANCET, V388, P2912, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6
   Graveline MH, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V13, P330, DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00419-0
   Guzman LA, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V24, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008
   Hamidi S, 2021, AM J PREV MED, V60, P614, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.11.016
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Hernández JRE, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
   Honey-Roses Jordi, 2021, CITIES HLTH, V5, P263, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074, 10.31219/osf.io/rf7xa, DOI 10.31219/OSF.IO/RF7XA]
   Hoy ZX, 2024, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V26, P1537, DOI 10.1007/s10098-023-02508-0
   Infrastructure Victoria, 2021, Victoria's infrastructure strategy 2021-2051
   Isaksson K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030840
   Jamei E, 2022, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100963
   Kakderi C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116486
   Kakderi C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063158
   Khavarian-Garmsir AR, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102911
   Kolte R, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104142
   Kopp M, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105137
   Lai KY, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V46, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.008
   Lak Azadeh, 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, P71, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.34.71
   Lowe M., 2021, Urban resilience for local government: Concepts, definitions and qualities
   Lowe M, 2024, LOCAL ENVIRON, V29, P886, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2024.2318571
   Lowe M, 2022, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V10, pE882, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00069-9
   Marquet O, 2025, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V91, P117, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2024.2346596
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mell I, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18041527
   Mesfin BG, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19137665
   Moloney S, 2021, CITIES, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103017
   Moosa IA, 2021, INT J HEALTH PLAN M, V36, P1575, DOI 10.1002/hpm.3189
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Mouratidis K, 2022, CITIES, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103491
   Naseri M, 2023, J TRANSP GEOGR, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103510
   Nguyen TMP, 2023, CITIES, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104500
   Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106850
   Nikitas A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13094620
   Nohrstedt D, 2022, POLICY POLIT, V50, P425, DOI 10.1332/030557321X16508834302815
   Nunn G., 2022, The Guardian Australia30 October
   O'Donoghue B, 2022, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V56, P811, DOI 10.1177/00048674211053578
   Pozoukidou G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020928
   Rolnik DL, 2021, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, V58, P677, DOI 10.1002/uog.23743
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Shamshiripour A, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Spennemann DHR, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5040093
   Tortajada C, 2021, J HYDROL, V599, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126345
   Venter ZS, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104175
   Victorian Government, 2021, Apartment design guidelines for Victoria
   Victorian Planning Authority, 2022, Project list online
   Victorian Planning Authority, 2021, Precinct structure planning guidelines: new communities in Victoria
   Walter M., 2010, SOCIAL RES METHODS
   Wang Q, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102629
   White I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P934, DOI 10.1068/c12117
   WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2021, Healthy cities for building back better: Political statement of the WHO European Healthy Cities Network
   Zhang JY, 2021, TRANSPORT POLICY, V110, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.013
NR 94
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 11
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 155
AR 105479
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105479
EA OCT 2024
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA J0N2V
UT WOS:001334120600001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Huizenga, S
   Oldenhof, L
   van de Bovenkamp, H
   Bal, R
AF Huizenga, Sabrina
   Oldenhof, Lieke
   van de Bovenkamp, Hester
   Bal, Roland
TI Governing the resilient city: An empirical analysis of governing
   techniques
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Resilient cities; Urban governance; Governmentality;
   Governing techniques
ID POLITICAL-ECONOMY; GOVERNMENTALITY; UNCERTAINTY; ECOLOGY; AGENDA; CITIES
AB Resilience is increasingly used as a new discourse for dealing with future shocks, crises and transition in urban governance. Although embraced in policy and academia, resilience is also severely critiqued as a continuation of neo-liberal thinking. To avoid the trap of imposing a meta-narrative on resilience, we argue that resilience should be treated as a 'matter of empirics'. Using a governmentality lens, we empirically investigate how the resilient city is governed in practice. Based on a multi-sited ethnography of resilience within the city of Rotterdam that joined the 100-RC initiative pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation, we identify five governing techniques: anticipating, transcending, laboratizing, monitoring and responsibilizing. Our analysis shows that resilience discourse has the potential to be both progressive and cruel, depending on the techniques used and the interactions between them. Hence, how resilience is shaped not only depends on the individual techniques but also on their entanglements in practice.
C1 [Huizenga, Sabrina; Oldenhof, Lieke; van de Bovenkamp, Hester; Bal, Roland] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management ESHPM, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
C3 Erasmus University Rotterdam; Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl
   Erasmus MC
RP Huizenga, S (corresponding author), Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management ESHPM, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
EM huizenga@eshpm.eur.nl; oldenhof@eshpm.eur.nl;
   vandebovenkamp@eshpm.eur.nl; r.bal@eshpm.eur.nl
OI Huizenga, Sabrina/0000-0001-8276-8272; van de Bovenkamp, Hester
   M./0000-0002-6412-2707
CR Alvesson M, 2000, HUM RELAT, V53, P1125, DOI 10.1177/0018726700539002
   Berlant Lauren., 2011, CRUEL OPTIMISM
   Bovens M., 2005, OXFORD HDB PUBLIC MA, P182
   Bracke S., 2016, VULNERABILITY RESIST
   Bulkeley H, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
   Chandler D, 2014, RESILIENCE, V2, P47, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Davoudi S., 2016, GOVT NEOLIBERALISM, P152
   DEAN M., 2010, GOVT POWER RULE MODE
   Doff W., 2017, VEERKRACHT LOKALE GE
   Evans B, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P83, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.770703
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Fainstein SS, 2014, INT J URBAN SCI, V18, P1
   Gemeente Rotterdam, 2016, ROTT RES STRAT READ
   Halpern Orit, 2017, HOPEFUL RESILIENCE
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hommels A., 2018, The Sociotechnical Constitution of Resilience: A New Perspective on Governing Risk and Disaster, P265, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_12, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_12]
   Howell A, 2015, POLITICS-OXFORD, V35, P67, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12080
   Joseph J, 2018, VARIETIES OF RESILIENCE, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781316551028
   Joseph J, 2016, MILLENNIUM-J INT ST, V44, P370, DOI 10.1177/0305829816638166
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Karvonen A, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P379, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   King H, 2021, SOCIOL REV, V69, P920, DOI 10.1177/0038026120986108
   Lemke Thomas., 2011, Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction
   Lorey Isabell., 2015, STATE INSECURITY GOV
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Miller P., 2008, Governing the Present: Administering Economic, Social, and Personal Life
   Neocleous M, 2013, RADICAL PHILOS, P2
   O'Malley P, 2010, ECON SOC, V39, P488, DOI 10.1080/03085147.2010.510681
   Oldenhof L., 2020, PARTNERSHIPS LIVABLE, P293
   Osborne Thomas., 1997, FOUCAULT, P173, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203005347
   Peeters R, 2019, SOC POLICY SOC, V18, P51, DOI 10.1017/S147474641700046X
   Pitidis V, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102934
   Reid Julian., 2012, DEV DIALOGUE, V58, P67
   Rose N., 1996, Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9780470696569.CH23, 10.1002/9780470696569.CH23]
   Rose N, 2006, ANNU REV LAW SOC SCI, V2, P83, DOI 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
   Rose N, 2017, COMPETING RESPONSIBILITIES, P27
   Rose Nikolas., 1996, Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Rationalities of Government, P37, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446263082
   Schinkel W, 2011, ANTIPODE, V43, P1911, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00831.x
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Walker J, 2011, SECUR DIALOGUE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0967010611399616
   Walklate S, 2014, ARMED FORCES SOC, V40, P408, DOI 10.1177/0095327X12465419
   Wallenburg I, 2021, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V74, P153, DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X20210000074032
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Willis P., 2000, Ethnography, V1, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1177/14661380022230679, 10.1177/153270860200200309, DOI 10.1177/153270860200200309, 10.1177/14661380022230679]
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Woolgar S., 2013, Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability
NR 49
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 14
U2 57
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 135
AR 104237
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104237
EA FEB 2023
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 9O8XL
UT WOS:000943879400001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yu, JZ
   Hu, WZ
   Hou, LC
AF Yu, Junzhou
   Hu, Wenzheng
   Hou, Lingchun
TI Towards more resilient cities-analyzing the impact of new-type
   urbanization on urban resilience: Considering spatial spillover
   boundaries
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE New-type urbanization pilot policy; Urban resilience; Economic
   agglomeration; Urban technology innovation; Spatial effect; Spatial
   boundary
ID SMART CITY; CHINA; PERSPECTIVE; POLICY; GROWTH; INNOVATION; NETWORKS
AB This paper examines the New-type Urbanization pilot policy (NTUP) and its influence on urban resilience, offering insights into how NTUP fosters a human-centric, sustainably coordinated, and inclusive model of urban development distinct from traditional approaches. This model plays a key role in enhancing urban capacities to confront economic, social, and environmental challenges, aiding in building more resilient cities. Notably, existing literature scarcely explores the relationship between NTUP and urban resilience, marking a significant gap this research aims to fill. Utilizing a multi-period DID model to examine panel data across 281 Chinese cities from 2006 to 2020, this study delves into NTUP's direct effects on urban resilience, its mechanisms, and spatial spillover boundaries. Findings reveal that: (1) NTUP enhances urban resilience, confirmed by a series of robustness tests. (2) NTUP significantly improves economic, infrastructure, and institutional resilience, while its influence on social resilience is minimal, and it detrimentally impacts ecological resilience. (3) Urban technology innovation and economic agglomeration are the primary mechanisms through which NTUP promotes urban resilience. (4) NTUP has a positive spatial spillover effect on the resilience of neighboring cities up to 350 km, with this effect shifting from a "radiation effect" to a "siphoning effect" as geographical distance increases.
C1 [Yu, Junzhou; Hu, Wenzheng] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
   [Hou, Lingchun] Chongqing Univ, Sch Management Sci & Real Estate, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China.
C3 Sichuan University; Chongqing University
RP Yu, JZ (corresponding author), Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
EM yujunzhou0705@163.com
OI Hou, Lingchun/0000-0002-2031-7174; Yu, Junzhou/0009-0006-6141-7776
FX This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies
   in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Ali IMA, 2022, SOC INDIC RES, V161, P29, DOI 10.1007/s11205-021-02812-6
   Allam Z, 2019, CITIES, V89, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Bracaglia V, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V132, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.011
   Brenner Neil., 2004, New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood
   Bristow G, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6
   Brock WA, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P1749
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cardullo P, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P813, DOI 10.1177/0263774X18806508
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chai J, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113389
   Chen MX, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V80, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.031
   Chen MX, 2018, CITIES, V78, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.012
   Chen MX, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V55, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.025
   Chen WX, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104429
   Cheng ZH, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118150
   Chien SS, 2010, ASIAN J POLIT SCI, V18, P69, DOI 10.1080/02185371003669379
   Christaller W., 1966, CENTRAL PLACES SO GE
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Coad A, 2019, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V50, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2019.06.008
   Cui HY, 2023, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V42, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2023.09.011
   Daamen Tom., 2010, Strategy as Force: Towards Effective Strategies for Urban Development: The Case of Rotterdam CityPorts
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Dewan AM, 2009, APPL GEOGR, V29, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.005
   Dosi G, 2018, SOCIO-ECON REV, V16, P687, DOI 10.1093/ser/mwx054
   Dragan A, 2024, AREA, V56, DOI 10.1111/area.12902
   Du JT, 2023, ENERG ECON, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106595
   Duranton G, 2005, J URBAN ECON, V57, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.002
   Evers G, 2020, ENERG POLICY, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111577
   Fajardo M, 2021, LAT AM RES REV, V56, P720, DOI 10.25222/larr.1611
   Feng R, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121298
   Feng YD, 2023, ENERG ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106752
   Ferreira JJM, 2024, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123086
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Ge T, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.910668
   Ghanem DL, 2014, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V68, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.05.003
   Glaeser EL, 2016, PAP REG SCI, V95, P17, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12216
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Goodman-Bacon A, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V225, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jiang NN, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107298
   Jiang YT, 2024, ENVIRON RES, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117668
   Jiboye A.D., 2011, Journal of Sustainable Development, V4, P211, DOI DOI 10.5539/JSD.V4N6P211
   Kitchin R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P131, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu027
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kocabas A, 2013, HABITAT INT, V37, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.016
   Koh HJ, 2013, J URBAN ECON, V75, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2012.11.004
   Kou P, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101215
   KRUGMAN P, 1991, J POLIT ECON, V99, P483, DOI 10.1086/261763
   Lee JH, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.020
   LeSage JamesP., 2014, Handbook of Regional Science, P1535
   Lhomme S., 2012, Urban Technical Networks Resilience Assessment
   Li SS, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106709
   Lin BQ, 2021, ENERG ECON, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105292
   Liu HM, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V845, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157333
   Liu JL, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106445
   Liu LN, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107186
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu YJ, 2024, HELIYON, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23772
   Lobo J, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P819, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-0970-3
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Mallick SK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103196
   Diaz-Sarachaga JM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P971, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.061
   Marshall A., 1920, Priciples of economics
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Mok KH, 2013, POLICY SOC, V32, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.polsoc.2013.02.002
   Montresor S, 2020, REG STUD, V54, P1354, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1648784
   Ha NM, 2019, J RISK FINANC MANAG, V12, DOI 10.3390/jrfm12030146
   Ouyang ZT, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-31558-z
   Pang SL, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V89, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.014
   Ran R, 2013, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V15, P17, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2012.752186
   Rentschler J, 2023, NATURE, V622, P87, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06468-9
   Shao J, 2023, ENERGY, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125499
   Shao S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107286
   Shen LY, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106692
   Singh SK, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119762
   Tang DC, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104621
   Timmerman P., 1981, ENV MONOGRAPH, P1
   TOBLER WR, 1970, ECON GEOGR, V46, P234, DOI 10.2307/143141
   Vanolo A, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P883, DOI 10.1177/0042098013494427
   Vesalon L, 2019, J URBAN REG ANAL, V11, P19
   Wang HH, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107333
   Wang JX, 2022, ECON ANAL POLICY, V73, P574, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.006
   Wang KL, 2023, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101607
   Wang XR, 2024, APPL ENERG, V357, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122457
   Wang ZH, 2019, ENERG ECON, V80, P917, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.017
   Weber A.J., 1929, Alfred Weber's theory of the location of industries
   Wu XP, 2019, J REGUL ECON, V55, P307, DOI 10.1007/s11149-019-09384-x
   Wu YY, 2023, PLOS ONE, V18, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0283183
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yao F, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103113
   Ye C, 2017, HABITAT INT, V66, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.013
   Yu BB, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110239
   Yu JZ, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V448, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141687
   Yu MZ, 2022, RES INT BUS FINANC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101791
   Zhang B, 2018, ENERGY, V150, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.004
   Zhang SS, 2024, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V26, P23613, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-03614-1
   Zhao N, 2022, MAR POLICY, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104938
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu QS, 2023, AIMS MATH, V8, P12239, DOI 10.3934/math.2023617
NR 107
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 97
U2 147
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD NOV 1
PY 2024
VL 114
AR 105735
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105735
EA AUG 2024
PG 17
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA D3Y8S
UT WOS:001295584300001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cheng, YR
   Liu, JH
AF Cheng, Yaru
   Liu, Jinhua
TI Evaluation of urban resilience in the post-COVID-19 period: A case study
   of the Yangtze delta city group in China
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Post-pandemic period; Urban resilience; TOPSIS; Yangtze river delta
   urban agglomeration
ID OF-THE-ART; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SMART CITY; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK
AB The coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak poses a new test for improving the resilience of cities in the face of public health emergencies, and a scientific evaluation of urban resilience is a key step towards improving such resilience. This study uses the post-pandemic period as the research per-spective to establish an evaluation index system comprising six dimensions, namely infrastruc-ture, ecological, social, economic, information elements and technology environment. The study also uses a combination of weighting and grey correlation Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution comprehensive evaluation method to empirically analyse the urban resilience of 27 cities in the Yangtze River Delta city group. The study found that significant spa-tial distribution differences exist in urban resilience. Moreover, the higher-, high-and medium -resilient cities are mostly located on the eastern coast of the Yangtze River Delta in Jiangsu and Zhejiang Province, whereas the lower-and low-resilient cities are mainly located in the inland area of Anhui Province. In addition, different aspects of resilience exist, which are shortcomings for each city. The above results indicate that the model is valuable for evaluating urban resilience in the post-pandemic period, and thus, the model can help policymakers formulate proposals to effectively improve urban resilience.
C1 [Cheng, Yaru; Liu, Jinhua] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Management & Engn, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jinhua] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Jinan, Peoples R China.
C3 Shandong Jianzhu University; Shandong Jianzhu University
RP Liu, JH (corresponding author), Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Jinan, Peoples R China.
EM liujinhua@sdjzu.edu.cn
RI TY, C/KXR-8865-2024; Liu, Jinhua/GVR-9070-2022
CR Adil M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103311
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Aka B., 2021, Cities, V118, P1
   Amir Reza Khavarian-Garmsir A.S., 2021, Sustain. Cities Soc., V70, P1
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   [Anonymous], 1988, Searching for Safety, V10
   Bakici T, 2013, J KNOWL ECON, V4, P135, DOI 10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
   Behzadian M, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P13051, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
   Boccia S, 2020, JAMA INTERN MED, V180, P927, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.1447
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Buckman S., 2020, The Resilient City: Combating Uncertainty within an Urban Context, V3, P129
   Buckman Stephen T., 2022, J SUSTAINABLE REAL E, V14, P4, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/19498276.2022.2095699, DOI 10.1080/19498276.2022.2095699]
   Burbules NC, 2020, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V1, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Ding JD, 2011, SCIENTOMETRICS, V86, P285, DOI 10.1007/s11192-010-0268-7
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Gracceva F, 2014, APPL ENERG, V123, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.018
   Gulcin B.O., 2022, Sustain. Cities Soc., V77, P1
   Guo MJ, 2016, CHINA COMMUN, V13, P203, DOI 10.1109/CC.2016.7489987
   Hassankhani M, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18157736
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Ji YP, 2020, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V8, pE480, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30068-1
   Jm V.N, 2015, NYU Envtl LJ, V23
   Kasai S, 2015, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V4, P154, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-07-2014-0038
   Khan H, 2021, 3 BIOTECH, V11, DOI 10.1007/s13205-020-02581-y
   Klimek P, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V113, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.017
   Krasny ME, 2009, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V15, P465, DOI 10.1080/13504620903003290
   Kuo Y, 2008, COMPUT IND ENG, V55, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.002
   Kusumastuti RD, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007
   Lankao PR, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P157, DOI 10.1177/0956247809362636
   Li WW, 2022, TROP MED INFECT DIS, V7, DOI 10.3390/tropicalmed7030045
   Li X, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186712
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Mahsa M., 2019, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduc., V35, P1
   Majewska A, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105904
   McCartney G, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103130
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Megahed NA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
   Melika Amirzadeh S.S., 2023, Sustain. Cities Soc., V89, P1
   Moslem I., 2021, Agriculture, V11, P2
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Na W, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P9308, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-01025-0
   Pisano C, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155883
   Qian Y.F., 2020, Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil., V68, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RSSM.2020.100522
   Rostila M, 2012, SOC SCI MED, V74, P1091, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.027
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Ssy A., 2021, Sustain. Cities Soc., V70, P1
   Tabibian M, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P2081, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2273
   Tang J, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16020256
   Truszkowska A, 2022, J URBAN HEALTH, V99, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11524-022-00623-9
   Wang XL, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101806
   Wang Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.128
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wu P, 2025, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V27, P409, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-03087-2
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang T., 2021, Sustain. Cities Soc., V70, P1
   Yao Y, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127451
   Zhang JF, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18179375
   Zhang J, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084208
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhou R, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1133595
   Zhu HY, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103791
   Zhu SY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102355
   Zhu ZY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104274
NR 75
TC 12
Z9 13
U1 12
U2 58
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD OCT 15
PY 2023
VL 97
AR 104028
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104028
EA OCT 2023
PG 17
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA U7UO9
UT WOS:001086821500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liang, ZF
AF Liang, Zifeng
TI Assessment of the Construction of a Climate Resilient City: An Empirical
   Study Based on the Difference in Differences Model
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate resilient cities; multi-level grey system evaluation method;
   assessment; difference in differences model
AB Facing climate risks has become a common problem for mankind and a topic of great importance for the Chinese government. To thoroughly implement the overall requirements for the construction of an ecological civilization and effectively improve the capacity of cities to adapt to climate change, China launched the pilot construction of "Climate Resilient Cities" in 2017. In this paper, 16 prefecture level cities in Anhui Province of China were selected as the research objects, and the multi-level grey system evaluation method was used to measure the climate resilience of these regions. We used the difference in differences method to evaluate the effect of the pilot policy of "Climate Resilient Cities." The pilot policies of the "Climate Resilient Cities" showed a significant contribution to the regional climate resilience, and, after isolating the impact of other factors on the regional climate resilience, the pilot policies of the "Climate Resilient Cities" increased the climate resilience of the pilot cities by four percentage points. The pilot policies of the "Climate Resilient Cities" had a significant contribution to the urban infrastructure development and ecological space optimization, as well as non-significant impacts to the urban water security, emergency management capacity-building, and science and technology innovation initiatives.
C1 [Liang, Zifeng] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
C3 Tsinghua University
RP Liang, ZF (corresponding author), Tsinghua Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
EM liangzf19@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], 1996, ENG RESILIENCE VERSU
   [Anonymous], 1995, Stat. Res
   ASHENFELTER O, 1978, REV ECON STAT, V60, P47, DOI 10.2307/1924332
   Bai YT, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17010360
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Clò S, 2019, ENERG ECON, V81, P754, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.008
   Deng J, 1982, HUAZHONG U SCI TECHN, P11
   Du D., 2008, Modern comprehensive evaluation method and case selection
   Eissa N, 1996, Q J ECON, V111, P605, DOI 10.2307/2946689
   [方华军 Fang Huajun], 2003, [干旱区资源与环境, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment], V17, P65
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, DATA BRIEF, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104328
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Han ZQ, 2017, HEALTH SECUR, V15, P575, DOI 10.1089/hs.2017.0025
   Haun J., 2017, P KOR ARCH SOC AC PU, V37
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Johnson JL, 2004, SUBST USE MISUSE, V39, P657, DOI 10.1081/JA-120034010
   Kim H, 2014, P 10 ANN C INT I INF
   Leeuw S.V, 2017, LONG TERM PERSPECTIV
   Li H., 2020, Environ. Prot, V48, P17, DOI [10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2020.13.003, DOI 10.14026/J.CNKI.0253-9705.2020.13.003]
   Liang ZF, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15071473
   Moser P, 2009, SSRN ELECT J, V102, P1, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1313867, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1313867]
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Sim T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041137
   Stantongeddes Z, 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL
   Vale L.J, 2005, RESILENT CITY MODERN
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Waller MA, 2001, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V71, P290, DOI 10.1037/0002-9432.71.3.290
   Wang E, 2008, TOUR TRIB, V11, P31
   Wei JC, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V64, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.027
   Wei JC, 2014, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V20, P537, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2013.767065
   Wei JC, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V113, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.040
   Wu Bohong, 2018, Science & Technology Review, V36, P94, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.16.011
   Xie X., 2016, URBAN ENV STUD, V4, P50
   Xu QW, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17113790
   Zheng X., 2011, Manage. World, V8, P34, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2011.08.005, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2011.08.005]
   [郑艳 Zheng Yan], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P31
   Zhou LA., 2005, EC RES J, V8, P44
NR 40
TC 16
Z9 17
U1 25
U2 220
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 4
AR 2082
DI 10.3390/ijerph18042082
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA QP1WV
UT WOS:000623628500001
PM 33669915
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bruzzone, M
   Dameri, RP
   Demartini, P
AF Bruzzone, Monica
   Dameri, Renata Paola
   Demartini, Paola
TI Resilience Reporting for Sustainable Development in Cities
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; reporting; urban sustainability; smart city; accountability
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; PUBLIC-SECTOR; LOCAL-GOVERNMENTS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS;
   DEVELOPMENT GOALS; CITY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; CHALLENGES
AB Recently, a new paradigm has emerged-the resilient city. It is an evolutionary concept rooted in recent-but more consolidated-city visions, such as a smart city or a sustainable city, from which it inherits the interweaving of different dimensions. This paper investigates the factors behind effective resilience reporting, as well as how a city should draw up an urban resilience strategy report to be accountable to its citizens. We first highlighted the main factors to design and implement reporting for the achievement of strategic resilience goals, by combining research on a resilient city and accountability practices. These factors could be organized following two different perspectives: political and sociotechnical. Then, we applied our framework to four pioneering municipalities selected as paradigmatic case studies. A qualitative content analysis applied to the city resilience reports has provided depth to our framework. We found that the "weak factor" is the ability to embed the resilience strategy in rooted connections and transform itself into an ecosystem that crosscuts different sectoral urban processes. Our exploratory research claims could be used for future research in this field, as cities are becoming increasingly complex systems, where the quality of life and well-being of a larger population depends.
C1 [Bruzzone, Monica; Dameri, Renata Paola] Univ Genoa, DIEC Dept Econ & Business Studies, I-16126 Genoa, Italy.
   [Demartini, Paola] Univ Roma Tre, Dept Business Studies, I-00145 Rome, Italy.
C3 University of Genoa; Roma Tre University
RP Dameri, RP (corresponding author), Univ Genoa, DIEC Dept Econ & Business Studies, I-16126 Genoa, Italy.
EM monica.bruzzone@economia.unige.it; paola.demartini@uniroma3.it;
   dameri@economia.unige.it
RI Bruzzone, Marco/AAE-7591-2019; DAMERI, RENATA/AAD-6635-2021
OI Demartini, Paola/0000-0001-8301-7665; Bruzzone,
   Monica/0009-0000-1008-6141
CR Acuti D, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102608
   Adams CA, 2014, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V5, P46, DOI 10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2012-0018
   Alcaraz-Quiles FJ, 2015, INT REV ADM SCI, V81, P79, DOI 10.1177/0020852314541564
   [Anonymous], 2018, INDICATORS RESILIENT
   Appel A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052643
   Baumgartner RJ, 2010, SUSTAIN DEV, V18, P76, DOI 10.1002/sd.447
   Bellringer A, 2011, SUSTAIN ACCOUNT MANA, V2, P126, DOI 10.1108/20408021111162155
   Besley T, 1997, Q J ECON, V112, P85, DOI 10.1162/003355397555136
   Biondi L, 2020, CITIES, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102459
   Biondi L, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093112
   Boeri A, 2018, TECHNE, V15, P193, DOI 10.13128/Techne-22103
   Bonsón E, 2015, GOV INFORM Q, V32, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001
   Bracci E., 2019, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, V31, P103, DOI [10.1108/jpbafm-07-2018-0077, DOI 10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2018-0077]
   Broadbent J., 2008, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, V21, P129, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570810854383
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Brusca I, 2016, ONLINE INFORM REV, V40, P497, DOI 10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0161
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Capra F, 2015, COSM HIST, V11, P242
   Catasus B., 2007, Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal, V20, P505, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513570710762566
   Catasús B, 2006, J INTELLECT CAP, V7, P187, DOI 10.1108/14691930610661854
   Catasús B, 2016, EUR ACCOUNT REV, V25, P403, DOI 10.1080/09638180.2016.1147369
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Cohen S, 2015, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V28, P449, DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-11-2014-0140
   Colding J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V164, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.191
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Crotty M., 1998, FDN SOCIAL RES
   Crowe PR, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.007
   Cuganesan S., 2009, Accounting Auditing Accountability Journal, V22, P1161, DOI [10.1108/09513570910999274, DOI 10.1108/09513570910999274]
   Curtin D., 2006, Information Polity, V11, P109
   Da Silva J., 2010, KEY CONSIDERATIONS P
   DAMERI R.P., 2013, International Journal of Computers and Technology, V11, P2544, DOI [10.24297/ijct.v11i5.1142, DOI 10.24297/IJCT.V11I5.1142]
   Dameri RP, 2015, J INTELLECT CAP, V16, P860, DOI 10.1108/JIC-02-2015-0018
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Del Bello A, 2006, J INTELLECT CAP, V7, P440, DOI 10.1108/14691930610709103
   Del Gesso Carla., 2020, INT J BUSINESS ADM, V11, P1, DOI [10.5430/ijba.v11n2p1, DOI 10.5430/IJBA.V11N2P1]
   DEMARTINI P., 2020, Management, Participation and Entrepreneurship in the Cultural and Creative Sector
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dumay J., 2014, PUBLIC VALUE MANAGEM
   Dumay J, 2010, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V12, P531, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2010.496266
   Durand M, 2015, REV INCOME WEALTH, V61, P4, DOI 10.1111/roiw.12156
   Fazlagic J, 2018, AMFITEATRU ECON, V20, P732, DOI 10.24818/EA/2018/49/732
   Feleki E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V243, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118432
   Fernandez-Anez V, 2018, CITIES, V78, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004
   Francini M., 2018, Territorio, V85, P125, DOI [10.3280/TR2018-085015, DOI 10.3280/TR2018-085015]
   García-Sánchez IM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120194
   Giacomini D, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010131
   Gibson P.D., 2005, Innovation Journal, V10, P1
   Giffinger R, 2010, ACE-ARCHIT CITY ENVI, V4, P7
   Gond JP, 2012, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES, V23, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003
   Gorica K., 2012, ACTA U DANUBIUS ACON, V8
   Goswami K, 2014, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE, V34, P273, DOI 10.1080/09540962.2014.920200
   Graneheim UH, 2017, NURS EDUC TODAY, V56, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
   Greco G, 2012, LOCAL GOV STUD, V38, P681, DOI 10.1080/03003930.2012.679932
   Grossi G, 2020, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V22, P633, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2020.1733056
   Guthrie J, 2017, MEDITARI ACCOUNT RES, V25, P553, DOI 10.1108/MEDAR-06-2017-0155
   Hassler U, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P119, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.873593
   He XN, 2020, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V20, P444, DOI 10.4209/aaqr.2019.11.0568
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Horn F, 2018, J HYDROL, V564, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.001
   Hossain MM, 2018, LOCAL GOV STUD, V44, P577, DOI 10.1080/03003930.2018.1471397
   ICLEI, 2019, RESILIENT CITIES T
   Ilmola L, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_11
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Jordan M, 2016, SOC SCI J, V53, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.soscij.2016.04.007
   Kahan JH, 2009, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V6
   Klein B., 2017, Informatik-Spektrum, V40, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S00287-016-1005-2, 10.1007/s00287-016-1005-2]
   Kotilainen J, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P53, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.820086
   Krellenberg K, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11041116
   Kuckarts U, 2014, MIXED METHODS METHOD
   Lamond JE, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P63, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Liao L, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P60, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2019.1667262
   Lin CP, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030676
   Manes-Rossi F., 2019, QUALITATIVE RES INTA, P13
   Manes-Rossi F, 2020, J PUBLIC BUDGET ACC, V32, P639, DOI 10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2020-0037
   Marcuccio M, 2005, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V7, P155, DOI 10.1080/14719030500090444
   Masik G, 2020, MISC GEOGR, V24, P30, DOI 10.2478/mgrsd-2019-0028
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Matos F, 2017, J INTELLECT CAP, V18, P693, DOI 10.1108/JIC-12-2016-0141
   Mazzara L, 2010, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V12, P493, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2010.496264
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mussari R, 2010, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V12, P487, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2010.496262
   Navarro-Galera A, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072161
   Newberry S, 2015, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE, V35, P371, DOI 10.1080/09540962.2015.1061180
   Newman PWG, 1999, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V44, P219, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00009-2
   Niemann L, 2018, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V20, P201, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2017.1293149
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V244, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.027
   Olawumi TO, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162
   Oliver TH, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009
   Paulsson G, 2006, FINANC ACCOUNT MANAG, V22, P47, DOI 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00392.x
   Piber M, 2019, J MANAG GOV, V23, P435, DOI 10.1007/s10997-018-9435-7
   Razniak P, 2020, ACTA GEOGR SLOV, V60, P95, DOI 10.3986/AGS.7416
   Razniak P, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0850-5
   Roller M.R., 2019, FORUM QUAL SOZ FORUM, V20, P3385
   Roller MR., 2015, APPL QUALITATIVE RES
   Ryan B., 2002, Research Method Methodology in Finance Accountin, V2nd
   Sallis JF, 2016, LANCET, V387, P2207, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
   Sargiacomo M, 2011, ACCOUNT HIST, V16, P253, DOI 10.1177/1032373211407043
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Smith A, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stark A, 2014, AUST J POLIT SCI, V49, P300, DOI 10.1080/10361146.2014.899966
   Steccolini I., 2004, Financial Accountability Management, V20, P327, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.0267-4424.2004.00389.X
   Suri H, 2011, QUAL RES J, V11, P63, DOI 10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Tommasetti A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12051909
   United Nations (UN), 2015, SEND FRAM DISS RISK SEND FRAM DISS RISK
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Williams BR, 2015, ASIAN REV ACCOUNT, V23, P186, DOI 10.1108/ARA-12-2013-0079
   Yigitcanlar T, 2013, CITIES, V31, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.005
   Yusuf JE, 2013, PUBLIC BUDG FINANC, V33, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12003.x
   Zeemering ES, 2018, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V20, P136, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2017.1293148
   Zhang Y., 2009, Qualitative analysis of content
   Zygiaris S, 2013, J KNOWL ECON, V4, P217, DOI 10.1007/s13132-012-0089-4
NR 115
TC 18
Z9 19
U1 9
U2 64
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 14
AR 7824
DI 10.3390/su13147824
PG 24
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA TO4NP
UT WOS:000676890800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Spaans, M
   Waterhout, B
AF Spaans, Marjolein
   Waterhout, Bas
TI Building up resilience in cities worldwide - Rotterdam as participant in
   the 100 Resilient Cities Programme
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Rockefeller Foundation; European cities; Governance
ID COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; URBAN; FRAMEWORK; STRATEGY
AB Cities worldwide are challenged by a high complexity of acute and chronic problems, including challenges related to economic development, social polarisation and segregation as well as climate change and ecological degradation. While all of these problems are complex in themselves, they are also interrelated. Addressing them in a meaningful way requires governance systems with systemic capacities to deal with complexity. In order to create resilience in urban systems, cities need to be able to learn, adapt and transform across sectors and levels. One definition of urban resilience is the capacity of individuals, communities, institutions, businesses, and systems within a city to survive, adapt, and grow regardless of the kinds of chronic stress and acute shocks they experience. This is the definition the Rockefeller Foundation adopts in its mission to promote the well-being of humanity throughout the world by facilitating the building of resilience in cities worldwide through its 100 Resilient Cities Programme, launched in 2013. Rotterdam is one of the first cities to participate in this programme. The city has been a front-runner in preparing for climate change and striving for urban sustainability. This paper assesses the concept of urban resilience, introduces the Rockefeller Foundation's effort in building city resilience worldwide and illustrates this with the Rotterdam case. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Spaans, Marjolein] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands.
   Council Environm & Infrastruct, The Hague, Netherlands.
C3 Delft University of Technology
RP Spaans, M (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, NL-2600 AA Delft, Netherlands.
EM M.Spaans@tudelft.nl; bas.waterhout@rli.nl
RI Spaans, Marjolein/ABD-4261-2021
CR Allmendinger P, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P617, DOI 10.1068/a40208
   [Anonymous], 2013, PLANNING SUSTAINABIL
   [Anonymous], 2007, URBAN COMPLEXITY SPA
   [Arup Ove Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation], 2014, City Resilience Framework, City Resilience Index
   BONNES M, 1990, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V10, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80023-4
   City of Rotterdam, 2013, ROTT CLIM CHANG AD S
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dike9 M., 2007, BADLANDS REPUBLIC SP
   Fisher DanaR., 2009, The Ecological Modernisation Reader: Environmental Reform in Theory and Practice
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hajer MaartenA., 2009, AUTHORITATIVE GOVERN
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Hillier B, 2012, COMM COM INF SC, V242, P24
   HOLLAND JH, 1992, DAEDALUS, V121, P17
   Holland JH., 1998, Emergence: From Chaos to Order
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hutter G, 2006, NATO SCI S SS IV EAR, V67, P229
   Innes JE, 1999, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V65, P412, DOI 10.1080/01944369908976071
   Kennedy C, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P1965, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022
   Kilcullen David., 2012, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, V36, P19
   Lansing JS, 2003, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V32, P183, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   MacLeod G, 1999, PROG HUM GEOG, V23, P503, DOI 10.1191/030913299669861026
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, BELL IN
   Mileti Dennis S., 1999, DISASTERS BY DESIGN
   OTHENGRAFEN F., 2015, SOFT SPACES EUROPE R, P215, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315768403
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Rotterdam G., 2015, RESILIENT ROTTERDAM
   Rotterdam G., 2001, INVESTEREN DUURZAME
   Short JohnRennie., 2006, Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment
   Spaans M., 2015, SOFT SPACES EUROPE R
   Tasan-Kok T., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P39
   Wacquant U. D., 2008, URBAN OUTCASTS COMP
   WILDAVSKY A, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P127, DOI 10.1007/BF01405729
NR 36
TC 234
Z9 261
U1 58
U2 444
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN
PY 2017
VL 61
BP 109
EP 116
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
PG 8
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA EJ1WN
UT WOS:000393001100012
OA Green Published
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cobbinah, PB
AF Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful
TI Urban resilience in climate change hotspot
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban planning; Climate change; Urbanization; Urban resilience; Africa
ID GHANA; URBANIZATION; CITIES
AB Past and ongoing research shows that African cities remain one of the vulnerable zones of climate change, yet the least prepared. With an expected increase in climate change impacts coupled with rapid urbanization in African cities, this paper inquires: what if more attention is devoted to urban planning in the efforts towards addressing climate change issues and building resilient urban futures in Africa? Using available and relevant literature and Ghana as a case study, it argues that it is about time African cities begin to address climate change through urban planning. This paper anayzes the unexplored potentials of urban planning in addressing issues of climate change in the continent, and makes recommendations for the engagement of urban planning in developing resilient African cities.
C1 [Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne
RP Cobbinah, PB (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
EM patrick.cobbinah@unimelb.edu.au
RI Cobbinah, Patrick/ABH-9950-2020
CR Adarkwa KK, 2012, AFR REV ECON FINANC-, V4, P1
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberton M, 2012, STUD TERRIT CULT DIV, V1, P1
   Alfasi N., 2007, PLAN THEOR, V6, P164
   [Anonymous], 2019, WASHINGTON POST
   [Anonymous], 2013, WHY WORLD NEEDS URB
   [Anonymous], 2010, [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2019, Climate Change
   [Anonymous], 2013, Healthy urban planning
   [Anonymous], 2009, REGIONAL STUDY PREPA
   [Anonymous], Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers 2013
   [Anonymous], 2012, Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Urban Resilience: A Workshop Report
   Beltrao G., 2013, A report prepared for Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation
   Broto VC, 2014, INT DEV PLANN REV, V36, P257, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2014.23
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cartwright A., 2012, MITIGATION ADAPTATIO
   Cobbinah P.B., 2019, The Geography of Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Africa
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, AFR GEOGR REV, V36, P262, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2016.1208770
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.050
   Cobbinah PB, 2016, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V8, P93, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2015.1074581
   Cobbinah PB, 2015, CITIES, V47, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.013
   Dahir A.L., 2018, AFRICAS FASTEST GROW
   Darkwah RM, 2018, GEOFORUM, V94, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.05.023
   DAVIDOFF P, 1965, J AM I PLANNERS, V31, P331, DOI 10.1080/01944366508978187
   de Roo G., 2010, A Planners Encounter with Complexity, P19
   Diaw K., 2002, Planning Practice and Research, V17, P337
   Dodman D., 2012, ADAPTING CITIES CLIM
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forester J., 2001, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
   Fuseini I, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.020
   Gough KV., 2019, Journal of the British Academy, V7, P155, DOI [10.5871/jba/007s2.155, DOI 10.5871/JBA/007S2.155, 10]
   Habitat Agenda, 1996, 2 UN C HUM SETTL HAB
   Henderson JV, 2017, J DEV ECON, V124, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.09.001
   Hewston R, 2018, 84% of world's fastest growing cities face 'extreme' climate change risks
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jain A., 2014, Final Issue Paper
   Jenkins MW, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P131, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2013.180
   Korah PI, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P1113, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9731-1
   Levy J.M., 2016, CONT URBAN PLANNING
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Lwasa S., 2012, URBAN DEV, P3
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti Dennis S., 1999, DISASTERS BY DESIGN
   Njoh A., 2003, Planning in Contemporary Africa
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Pravettoni R., 2011, UNEP GRID ARENDAL
   Quagraine VictorK., 2011, Future of the tree: Towards growth and development of Kumasi, P212
   Quarcoopome S.S., 1993, Research Review, V9, P20
   Roberts D, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P521, DOI 10.1177/0956247808096126
   Simon D, 2014, INT DEV PLANN REV, V36, pV, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2014.9
   The Economic Commission for Europe, 1986, HUM SETTL SIT ECE RE
   UN Habitat, 2009, GLOB HUM SETTL REP P
   Wallace D, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Wheeler S. M., 2009, PROGR PLANNING, V72, P210, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PR0GRESS.2009.09.001
NR 55
TC 31
Z9 32
U1 11
U2 70
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 100
AR 104948
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104948
PG 7
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PF2SH
UT WOS:000598910300009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fastenrath, S
   Coenen, L
AF Fastenrath, Sebastian
   Coenen, Lars
TI Future-proof cities through governance experiments? Insights from the
   Resilient Melbourne Strategy (RMS)
SO REGIONAL STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; governance experimentation; resilience action;
   transformational change; JEL; O21; O35
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; CRITICAL GEOGRAPHIES; ROBUST ACTION; CLIMATE;
   TRANSITIONS; TRANSFORMATION; UNCERTAINTY; CHALLENGES; THINKING; LESSONS
AB Established urban policy and planning approaches are ill-equipped to deal with the wicked nature of urban resilience problems and challenges. To break down bureaucratic silos and foster transformative change, 'governance experiments' are heralded as promising platforms for testing new ways of collaboration and urban innovation. This paper introduces an analytical framework to unpack the organizational principles and institutional structures of governance experimentation. It applies this framework on urban resilience actions in Melbourne as part of the Rockefeller 100 Resilient Cities Network. The case studies illustrate that governance experimentation requires active stakeholder and boundary management and acceptance to learn from failure.
C1 [Fastenrath, Sebastian; Coenen, Lars] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Coenen, Lars] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Mohn Ctr Innovat & Reg Dev, Bergen, Norway.
C3 University of Melbourne; Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
RP Fastenrath, S (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
EM sebastian.fastenrath@unimelb.edu.au; lars.coenen@hvl.no
RI Coenen, Lars/ABE-5947-2020; Fastenrath, Sebastian/P-1603-2018
OI Coenen, Lars/0000-0002-5671-3988; Fastenrath,
   Sebastian/0000-0001-5621-8082
CR 100RC, 2019, 100 RES CIT
   Acuto M., 2018, SCI AM
   Albrechts L, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P743, DOI 10.1068/b3065
   [Anonymous], 2019, Enhancing Innovation Capacity in City Government, DOI DOI 10.1787/F10C96E5-EN
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   Arup, 2019, AR CIT RES IND
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Bos JJ, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1340, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Bulkeley H, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P317, DOI 10.1177/0969776418787222
   Bulkeley H, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P1471, DOI 10.1177/0042098013500089
   Bulkeley H, 2013, T I BRIT GEOGR, V38, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Bulkeley H, 2011, ROUTL STUD HUM GEOGR, V35, P29
   Burch S, 2014, CLIM POLICY, V14, P467, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.876342
   Caprotti F, 2017, URBAN GEOGR, V38, P1441, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1265870
   Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Coenen L, 2010, TECHNOL SOC, V32, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Davidson K, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P3540, DOI 10.1177/0042098018816010
   Davidson K, 2018, URBAN POLICY RES, V36, P230, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1354848
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Duit A, 2016, PUBLIC ADMIN, V94, P364, DOI 10.1111/padm.12182
   Duit A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Evans J, 2016, ROUT RES SUSTAIN URB, P1
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Ferraro F, 2015, ORGAN STUD, V36, P363, DOI 10.1177/0170840614563742
   Flick U., 2004, A companion to qualitative research
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Frantzeskaki N, 2017, ROU STUD SUST TRANS, P1
   Fuenfschilling L, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P219, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977
   Garud R, 2001, LEAS ORG MAN SERIES, P1
   Garud R, 2010, J MANAGE STUD, V47, P760, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Hay I, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P635, DOI 10.1177/0309132513500893
   Hodson M., 2017, SUSTAINABILITY, V2017, P9
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2018, SUMM URB POL MAK WHA
   Kythreotis A, 2018, ROUT INT HANDB, P589
   Kythreotis AP, 2017, REG STUD, V51, P1530, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1200719
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McGuirk P, 2015, GEOGR RES-AUST, V53, P39, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12098
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moore T, 2018, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4792-3
   Nevens F, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   PADGETT JF, 1993, AM J SOCIOL, V98, P1259, DOI 10.1086/230190
   Padgett JF, 2012, EMERGENCE OF ORGANIZATIONS AND MARKETS, P1
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P593, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
   Raven R, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P258, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047
   Resilient Melbourne, 2019, ANN REP 2018 19
   Resilient Melbourne, 2016, RES MELB STRAT
   Resilient Melbourne, 2019, LIV MELB
   Rogers P, 2015, RESILIENCE, V3, P55, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2014.988914
   Schwanen T., 2016, City, V20, P152, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125718, 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125718]
   Sengers F, 2016, ROUT RES SUSTAIN URB, P15
   Shaw K., 2013, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V28, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0952076711432578, 10.1177/0952076711432578]
   Shaw K, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P308
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Smeds E, 2018, GLOB POLICY, V9, P549, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12587
   Turnheim B., 2018, Innovating climate governance: Moving beyond experiments, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781108277679, 10.1017/9781108277679]
   VIC Government, 2016, STAT GOV VICT PLAN M
   Webb R, 2018, AMBIO, V47, P57, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Yin R. K., 2014, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
NR 77
TC 32
Z9 33
U1 5
U2 110
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0034-3404
EI 1360-0591
J9 REG STUD
JI Reg. Stud.
PD JAN 2
PY 2021
VL 55
IS 1
SI SI
BP 138
EP 149
DI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1744551
EA APR 2020
PG 12
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography;
   Public Administration
GA PS1PR
UT WOS:000528468600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Habib, A
   Habib, M
   Bashir, B
   Bachir, H
AF Habib, Ahed
   Habib, Maan
   Bashir, Bashar
   Bachir, Hussein
TI Exploring the Sustainability Benefits of Digital Twin Technology in
   Achieving Resilient Smart Cities During Strong Earthquake Events
SO ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Digital twin technology; Urban earthquake resilience; Smart cities;
   Sustainable development goals; Seismic disaster management
ID BIG DATA; MANAGEMENT; INTERNET; THINGS
AB In recent years, the increasing frequency and intensity of earthquakes have highlighted the need for resilient urban planning, particularly in the context of smart cities. Despite advancements in technology and infrastructure, there remains a significant gap in understanding and effectively adopting digital twin technology for enhancing urban resilience against such seismic events. This study aims to conduct a critical assessment of using digital twin technology for seismic resilience in smart cities and to perform a systematic sustainability analysis to understand how digital twin technology can be utilized to build resilient smart cities that can better withstand and adapt to strong earthquake events. The research is motivated by the critical need to enhance urban earthquake resilience and the potential of digital twin technology as a transformative tool in urban planning and disaster management. By exploring the implementation of a digital twin model and performing a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis, the study provides comprehensive insights into the dynamics of urban areas under seismic stress. It leverages real-time data and advanced simulation techniques to assess, predict, and strategize responses to earthquake scenarios, enhancing urban resilience and sustainability. In addition, this research demonstrates how digital twin technology can help in achieving several United Nations sustainable development goals, particularly those related to sustainable cities and communities, industry, innovation, and infrastructure, as well as climate action, which are represented in goals 9, 11, and 13. Ultimately, the study findings highlight the importance of integrating advanced technological solutions, such as digital twins, in urban development strategies to build smarter, more resilient cities capable of withstanding future seismic challenges.
C1 [Habib, Ahed] Univ Sharjah, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates.
   [Habib, Maan] Damascus Univ, Fac Engn, Damascus, Syria.
   [Bashir, Bashar] King Saud Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, POB 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
   [Bachir, Hussein] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Arcisstr 21, D-80333 Munich, Germany.
C3 University of Sharjah; Damascus University; King Saud University;
   Technical University of Munich
RP Habib, A (corresponding author), Univ Sharjah, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates.
EM ahabib@sharjah.ac.ae
RI Bachir, Hussein/AEZ-7252-2022; Bashir, Bashar/AAE-1238-2021; Habib,
   Ahed/AAK-1987-2020
OI Bashir, Bashar/0000-0003-0384-9061; Habib, Ahed/0000-0001-5607-9334
FU King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [RSP2024R296]
FX This research was supported by the Researchers Supporting Project, grant
   number (RSP2024R296), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
CR al Houri A., 2024, J. Soft Comput. Civ. Eng, P145
   Al Houri A, 2020, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V6, P591, DOI 10.28991/cej-2020-03091494
   Al-Sehrawy R, 2021, J INF TECHNOL CONSTR, V26, P832, DOI 10.36680/j.itcon.2021.045
   Albahri AS, 2024, COMPUT ELECTR ENG, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109409
   Alibrandi U, 2022, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V8, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001238
   Sanchez-Vaquerizo JA, 2025, ETHICS INF TECHNOL, V27, DOI 10.1007/s10676-024-09812-3
   Ariyachandra MRMF, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151511910
   Barni A, 2018, 2018 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IS), P706, DOI 10.1109/IS.2018.8710554
   Barricelli BR, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P167653, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2953499
   Batty M, 2024, NAT COMPUT SCI, V4, P192, DOI 10.1038/s43588-024-00606-7
   Bhandal R, 2022, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V27, P182, DOI 10.1108/SCM-01-2021-0053
   Bibri SE, 2024, ENVIRON SCI ECOTECH, V20, DOI 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100433
   Boschert S., 2018, P 12 INT S TOOLS MET, P7, DOI [10.17560/atp.v60i10.2371, DOI 10.17560/ATP.V60I10.2371]
   Botín-Sanabria DM, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14061335
   Cao Y, 2025, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105882
   Caprari G, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14106263
   Çetin S, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116348
   Charitonidou M, 2022, INT J ARCHIT COMPUT, V20, P238, DOI 10.1177/14780771211070005
   Chaudhary G., 2021, Digital Twin Technology
   Diner AE., 2024, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct, V110, P104647, DOI [10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104647, DOI 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2024.104647]
   Du A, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V233, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109104
   Erol T., 2020, 2020 4 INT S MULT ST, P1
   Esposito M, 2022, SENSORS-BASEL, V22, DOI 10.3390/s22062124
   Evangeline P, 2020, ADV COMPUT, V117, P35, DOI 10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.10.009
   Fan C, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000745
   Fan C, 2021, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102049
   Farsi M., 2020, Digital Twin Technologies and Smart Cities
   Ford DN, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000779
   Freddi F, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102267
   Fuller A, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P108952, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358
   Gkontzis AF, 2024, FUTURE INTERNET, V16, DOI 10.3390/fi16020047
   Habib A., 2024, J. Earthq. Eng, V29, P1
   Habib A, 2024, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108732
   Habib A, 2024, ARAB J SCI ENG, DOI 10.1007/s13369-024-09497-2
   Habib A, 2024, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-12-2023-0376
   Habib A, 2023, MULTIDISCIP MODEL MA, DOI 10.1108/MMMS-08-2022-0158
   Habib A, 2022, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V21, P899, DOI 10.1007/s11803-022-2127-y
   Habib A, 2023, J EARTHQ TSUNAMI, V17, DOI 10.1142/S1793431123500021
   Habib A, 2023, INT J STRUCT STAB DY, V23, DOI 10.1142/S0219455423500608
   Habib A, 2021, LAT AM J SOLIDS STRU, V18, DOI 10.1590/1679-78256467
   Habib A, 2021, ARAB J SCI ENG, V46, P4825, DOI 10.1007/s13369-020-05191-1
   Habib M, 2024, DISCOV SUSTAIN, V5, DOI 10.1007/s43621-024-00500-2
   Habib M, 2024, ARAB J SCI ENG, V49, P13709, DOI 10.1007/s13369-024-08776-2
   Habib M, 2023, MULTIDISCIP MODEL MA, V19, P966, DOI 10.1108/MMMS-12-2022-0290
   Habib M, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09384
   Habib M, 2021, ADV CIV ENG, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/3311912
   Hasanuzzaman M., 2023, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technologies and Innovations, V1, P533
   Hashem IAT, 2016, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V36, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002
   Hayat P, 2016, INDIA Q, V72, P177, DOI 10.1177/0974928416637930
   He B, 2021, ADV MANUF, V9, P1, DOI 10.1007/s40436-020-00302-5
   He R, 2019, ISA T, V95, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.05.011
   Hu J, 2024, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2024.105920
   Jena R, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15092248
   Jiang F, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V469, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143097
   Jiang F, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103645
   Jones D, 2020, CIRP J MANUF SCI TEC, V29, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
   Kaewunruen S, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13042051
   Kaewunruen S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197873
   Kaewunruen S, 2018, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V4, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00077
   Kaewunruen S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P1537, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.156
   Kaewunruen S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010159
   Khajavi SH, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P147406, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946515
   Khan A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101642
   Khan SA, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V303, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127027
   Kliestik T., 2022, Geopolit. History Int. Relat, V14, P9, DOI [10.22381/GHIR14120221, DOI 10.22381/GHIR14120221]
   Lehtola VV, 2022, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102915
   Li ZS, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103730
   Ling M., 2022, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Big Data Anal, V5, P24
   Liu C, 2025, EXPERT SYST APPL, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125458
   Luo JJ, 2025, CITIES, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105473
   Madni AM, 2019, SYSTEMS-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/systems7010007
   Malkawi AB, 2020, INT J GEOMATE, V18, P132, DOI 10.21660/2020.65.89948
   Malykhina G. F., 2018, EUR P SOC BEH SCI, V51
   Mashaly M, 2021, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V184, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.03.039
   Menna C, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103556
   Demirel HO, 2021, J COMPUT INF SCI ENG, V21, DOI 10.1115/1.4050684
   Ortiz B, 2020, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2005.14212
   Park J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219186
   Pavón RM, 2025, EXPERT SYST APPL, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125696
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Piras G, 2024, ENERGIES, V17, DOI 10.3390/en17020436
   Pirlone F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124825
   Qi QL, 2021, J MANUF SYST, V58, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001
   Ray PP, 2017, IEEE ACCESS, V5, P18818, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2752174
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Samaei S.R., 2023, 13 INT C ADV RES SCI
   Samarakkody A, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151512036
   Sepasgozar SME, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11040151
   Shah SA, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P91885, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928233
   Shahat E, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063386
   Tagliabue LC, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020480
   Tahmasebinia F, 2023, APPL SCI-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/app13158814
   Tao F, 2022, J MANUF SYST, V64, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.015
   Tao F, 2019, IEEE T IND INFORM, V15, P2405, DOI 10.1109/TII.2018.2873186
   Toprak S, 2024, ENG GEOL, V340, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107681
   VanderHorn E, 2021, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2021.113524
   Wang KJ, 2020, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V107, P4687, DOI 10.1007/s00170-020-05314-w
   Wang Z., 2020, IND 40 IMPACT INTELL
   Weil C, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104862
   White G, 2021, CITIES, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103064
   Xie YZ, 2020, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V36, P1769, DOI 10.1177/8755293020919419
   Xu G, 2024, STRUCTURES, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105738
   Yang S., 2021, Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev, V12, P363, DOI DOI 10.22712/SUSB.20210030
   Yu DY, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05190-x
   Yu W, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112407
   Zhang XX, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.663269
   Zhao TY, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103777
   Zhu SY, 2020, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V10, DOI 10.1002/widm.1388
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 109
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 16
U2 16
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 2193-567X
EI 2191-4281
J9 ARAB J SCI ENG
JI Arab. J. Sci. Eng.
PD 2025 FEB 3
PY 2025
DI 10.1007/s13369-025-10017-z
EA FEB 2025
PG 15
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA U4Q1I
UT WOS:001411649600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Leitner, H
   Sheppard, E
   Webber, S
   Colven, E
AF Leitner, Helga
   Sheppard, Eric
   Webber, Sophie
   Colven, Emma
TI Globalizing urban resilience
SO URBAN GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; urban governance; global resilience complex;
   Rockefeller 100 Resilient Cities Program
AB Urban resilience, a new urban development and governance agenda, is being rolled out from the top down by a network of public, private, non-profit sector actors forming a global urban resilience complex: producing norms that circulate globally, creating assessment tools rendering urban resilience technical and managerial, and commodifying urban resilience such that private sector involvement becomes integral to urban development planning and governance. The Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilience Cities Program is at the center of this complex, working with the World Bank, global consultants, NGOs, and private sector service providers to enroll cities, develop and circulate urban resilience assessment tools, and create a market catalyzed by the notion of a resilience dividend. Notwithstanding the claim of this program being open and inclusive, aspects of its initial operationalization in Jakarta suggest that urban resilience assessment tools preempt alternative understandings of urban resilience and marginalizing voices of the city's most vulnerable populations.
C1 [Leitner, Helga; Sheppard, Eric; Colven, Emma] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Geog, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
   [Webber, Sophie] Univ Sydney, Dept Geog, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
C3 University of California System; University of California Los Angeles;
   University of Sydney
RP Leitner, H (corresponding author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Geog, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
EM hleitner@geog.ucla.edu
RI Colven, Emma/N-2582-2019; Sheppard, Eric/U-4097-2019
OI Webber, Sophie/0000-0002-7597-4622; Colven, Emma/0000-0002-4072-6303
FU National Science Foundation, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and
   Economic Sciences [BCS-1636437]
FX This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, Directorate
   for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences [BCS-1636437];
CR [Anonymous], 2015, CIT RES FRAM
   Arup, 2015, ARUP
   Bond Craig., 2017, Resilience Dividend Valuation Model
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Derickson K.D., 2016, City, V20, P161, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125713
   DeVerteuil G., 2016, CITY, V20, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714, https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714]
   Evans Brad, 2013, PRACTICES DISCOURSES, V1, P8398
   FAINSTEIN SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGRAPHY
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mitchell K, 2016, ANTIPODE, V48, P724, DOI 10.1111/anti.12203
   Nelson SH, 2014, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V2, P1, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2014.872456
   Peck Jamie, 2017, SHORE EXPLORING WORL
   Reid J, 2013, INT POLIT SOCIOL, V7, P353, DOI 10.1111/ips.12028
   Rodin Judith., 2014, RESILIENCE DIVIDEND
   Tanner T., 2015, Interim Policy Note
   Tierney K, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P1327, DOI 10.1177/0002764215591187
   Watts M, 2015, GEOGR RES-AUST, V53, P288, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12131
   Webber Sophie, 2018, WHEELING OUT GLOBAL
NR 21
TC 119
Z9 127
U1 75
U2 445
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0272-3638
EI 1938-2847
J9 URBAN GEOGR
JI Urban Geogr.
PY 2018
VL 39
IS 8
BP 1276
EP 1284
DI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
PG 9
WC Geography; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography; Urban Studies
GA GU1FX
UT WOS:000445004400009
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Vale, LJ
AF Vale, Lawrence J.
TI The politics of resilient cities: whose resilience and whose city?
SO BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster recovery; equity; resilience; resilient cities; social justice;
   urban planning and design; urban politics
AB It is vital to acknowledge the socio-political complexity of the deployment of the term resilience' and to develop a more unified set of expectations for the professions and disciplines that use it. Applied to cities, resilience is particularly problematic, yet also retains promise. Like resilience, the term city' is also subject to multiple contending definitions, depending on the scale and on whether the focus is on physical spaces or social communities. Due to cities and city-regions being organized in ways that both produce and reflect underlying socio-economic disparities, some parts are much more resilient than others and therefore vulnerability is often linked to both topography and income. Uneven resilience threatens the ability of cities as a whole to function economically, socially and politically. Resilience can only remain useful as a concept and as progressive practice if it is explicitly associated with the need to improve the life prospects of disadvantaged groups. This dimension is often lost in definitions of resilience drawn from engineering and ecology, but remains central to conceptualizations linked to social psychology. To improve the prospects of cities proactively (and reactively), there is a need to unify the insights from the multiple professions and disciplines that use resilience'.
C1 MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
C3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
RP Vale, LJ (corresponding author), MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Room 10-485,77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
EM ljvale@mit.edu
RI Vale, Lawrence/LBH-2812-2024
CR Aldrich D.P., 2012, Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery, P1, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226012896.001.0001
   [Anonymous], 1996, National Survey of Environmental Attitudes
   [Anonymous], 2006, Resilience Engineering
   Blakely EdwardJ., 2012, RESILIENT COASTAL CI
   Chernick H., 2005, Resilient City: The Economic Impact of 9/11
   Coaffee J, 2008, NEW SECUR CHALL, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230583337
   Coyle S., 2011, SUSTAINABLE RESILIEN
   Dudley M., 2012, Public Libraries and Resilient Cities, V1
   Ginzburg K. R., 2006, PARENTS GUIDE BUILDI
   Goldstein BE, 2010, COLLABORATIVE RESILIENCE: MOVING THROUGH CRISIS TO OPPORTUNITY, P1
   Hartman Chester., 2006, THERE IS NO SUCH THI
   Hill S, 2013, BUILD RES INF, V41, P8, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.736201
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Janda KB, 2013, BUILD RES INF, V41, P39, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.743396
   Klein N, 2009, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
   Meyerowitz J, 2002, CITY RESILIENT
   Mitchell W. J., 2005, RESILIENT CITY
   Newman P., 2006, RESILIENT CITIES RES
   Pasman H., 2008, RESILIENCE CITIES TE
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P329
   Prasad N, 2009, CLIMATE RESILIENT CITIES: A PRIMER ON REDUCING VULNERABILITIES TO DISASTERS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7766-6
   Schon D., 1971, Beyond the Stable State
   Shaw K, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P308
   Spence R, 2004, BUILD RES INF, V32, P391, DOI 10.1080/0961321042000221043
   Spence R, 2004, BUILD RES INF, V32, P364, DOI 10.1080/0961321042000244129
   Steinberg Ted., 2006, Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disasters in America, V2nd
   UNISDR, 2012, MAK CIT RES
   Vale L. J., 2011, SUSTAINABLE URBANISM, P22
   Vale L. J., 2012, DISCUSSION COMMUNITY
   Vale LJ, 2006, CITY 21ST CENTURY, P149
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Valikangas L., 2010, RESILIENT ORG ADAPTI
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
NR 34
TC 263
Z9 301
U1 6
U2 177
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0961-3218
EI 1466-4321
J9 BUILD RES INF
JI Build. Res. Informat.
PD MAR 4
PY 2014
VL 42
IS 2
SI SI
BP 191
EP 201
DI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
PG 11
WC Construction & Building Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology
GA 290RP
UT WOS:000329776300007
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Huck, A
   Monstadt, J
   Driessen, P
AF Huck, Andreas
   Monstadt, Jochen
   Driessen, Peter
TI Mainstreaming resilience in urban policy making? Insights from
   Christchurch and Rotterdam
SO GEOFORUM
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Mainstreaming; Christchurch; Rotterdam; 100RC
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE-ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE; IMPLEMENTATION; PARTICIPATION;
   MULTILEVEL; CHALLENGE; LESSONS; ECOLOGY; RISK
AB Despite the burgeoning popularity of resilience as an urban policy narrative, we know little about how policymakers and planners approach the challenge of operationalising urban resilience or what problems they face. Although their ultimate goal is presumably to integrate resilience goals into sectoral policy and decision-making as well as to dissolve policy silos, the concept of mainstreaming has received relatively little attention in urban resilience literature so far. To address this void, we use the concept of mainstreaming to analyse the two cities of Christchurch and Rotterdam, both participants in the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities Programme. We identify three main challenges that are apparent in both cities despite their contextual differences. The first is to make resilience a top priority for policymaking and planning because it competes with other urban development agendas for political commitment. Secondly, institutionalising cross-sector governance constitutes a challenge because participation in 100 Resilient Cities brings few incentives for institutional reforms. The third challenge - to actively engage decision-makers from public and private sectors - arises because urban policymakers and planners are not sufficiently equipped to convince them to invest additional resources in terms of personnel, time and money and to dissolve conflicts of interest between them. In the light of these challenges, we argue that participating in 100 Resilient Cities is a relevant but not sufficient first step towards mainstreaming urban resilience in Christchurch and Rotterdam. In addition to developing a resilience strategy and appointing a Chief Resilience Officer, formal changes (for instance in procedural law and national policymaking) are required, to address the challenges identified.
C1 [Huck, Andreas] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Res Training Grp KRITIS, Dolivostr 15, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
   [Huck, Andreas; Monstadt, Jochen] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Driessen, Peter] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
C3 Technical University of Darmstadt; Utrecht University; Utrecht
   University
RP Huck, A (corresponding author), Tech Univ Darmstadt, Res Training Grp KRITIS, Dolivostr 15, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
EM huck@kritis.tu-darmstadt.de; j.monstadt@uu.nl; p.driessen@uu.nl
RI Monstadt, Jochen/AAE-5440-2022; Driessen, Peter/M-6751-2013
OI Driessen, Peter/0000-0002-0724-6666; Monstadt,
   Jochen/0000-0001-9146-1571
FU German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Research Training Group
   KRITIS at TU Darmstadt [GRK 2222]
FX This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within
   the Research Training Group KRITIS at TU Darmstadt [grant number GRK
   2222].
CR 100RC, 2016, RES ACT EARL INS CIT
   100RC, 2019, HOM 100 RES CIT
   Adelle C, 2013, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V23, P1, DOI 10.1002/eet.1601
   Amin M., 2002, J INFRASTRUCTURE SYS, V8, P67, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:3(67)
   Amir S, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P8, DOI 10.1111/risa.12816
   [Anonymous], 2007, GREAT CHRISTCH URB D
   [Anonymous], 2007, CRITICAL THINKING MO
   [Anonymous], 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE
   [Anonymous], 2012, RISK INTERDEPENDENCI
   [Anonymous], 2016, RES GREAT CHRISTCH H
   Arup and RF, 2015, CIT RES IND UND MEAS
   Baggio JA, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07484-200202
   Bauer A, 2014, GEOFORUM, V51, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.006
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bennett B., 2014, Once in a lifetime: city building after disaster in Christchurch
   Berkowitz Michael, 2014, Rockefeller Foundation
   Borger Guus J., 1998, Journal of Coastal Conservation, V4, P109, DOI 10.1007/BF02806502
   Bourgon J., 2009, Public Policy and Administration, V24, P309, DOI DOI 10.1177/0952076709103813
   Boyd E, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1234, DOI 10.1177/0042098014527483
   Britton N.R., 2000, NAT HAZARDS REV, V1, P145, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:3(145), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:3(145)]
   Brouwer S, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN C, V31, P134, DOI 10.1068/c11134
   Brunetta G, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_3
   Chandler David., 2017, The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Coaffee J, 2009, TERRORISM, RISK AND THE GLOBAL CITY: TOWARDS URBAN RESILIENCE, P1
   Coaffee J., 2016, URBAN RESILIENCE PLA
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Davoudi S., 2017, RESILIENCE MACHINE
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   de Bruijne M., 2007, J CONTINGENCIES CRIS, V15, P18, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00501.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00501.X]
   Dewulf A, 2015, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2014.000
   Dunn G, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V73, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.013
   Dunn-Cavelty M, 2009, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V2, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.08.006
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Frazier TG, 2010, APPL GEOGR, V30, P506, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.007
   Friend R, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.001
   Fünfgeld H, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P324
   Glaser J., 2013, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, V14, P1, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-14.2.1886
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Hennink M., 2020, Qualitative research methods
   Hommels A., 2018, The Sociotechnical Constitution of Resilience: A New Perspective on Governing Risk and Disaster, P265, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_12, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_12]
   Huck A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008
   Huq S, 2004, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V35, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00129.x
   Hutter G, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9901-x
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Klein RJT, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V84, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9268-x
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Marana P, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.011
   Massey E, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0341-2
   McConnell A., 2006, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, V14, P59, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2006.00482.X
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mikulewicz M, 2019, GEOFORUM, V104, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.010
   Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, 2016, NAT AD STRAT
   Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, 2018, DELT PROGR 2019 CONT
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Municipality of Rotterdam, 2016, Rotterdam resilience strategy: ready for the 21st century
   Normandin JM, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_2
   NZ Government, 2019, NAT DIS RES STRAT RA
   Oels A, 2013, GEOFORUM, V45, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.007
   Pearce L, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P211, DOI 10.1023/A:1022917721797
   Prior T, 2014, J RISK RES, V17, P281, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2013.808686
   Rauken T., 2013, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P408
   Restemeyer B, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P920, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403
   Rotterdam Climate Initiative, 2013, ROTT CLIM CHANG AD S
   Saito N, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P825, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9392-4
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Sharma D, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P451, DOI 10.1177/0956247810377390
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tschakert P, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Uittenbroek C., 2014, How mainstream is mainstreaming?: The integration of climate adaptation into urban policy
   Uittenbroek C.J., 2015, J ENV PLANN POLICY M, V18, P161
   Uittenbroek CJ, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P1043, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2014.920563
   Urban Institute, 2018, I URB RES MIDT MON E
   Valdes HM., 2013, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V4, P5, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299035, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299035]
   Vallance S, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1287, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1361-7
   Vasileiadou E, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P475, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2012.717376
   Vedeld T, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, pS173, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1875-7
   Wakefield S, 2019, GEOFORUM, V107, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.016
   Walker J, 2011, SECUR DIALOGUE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0967010611399616
   Wamsler C, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V137, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1660-y
   Watts RH, 2011, CHRISTCHURCH WATERWA
   Wejs A, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P490, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.854967
   White I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P934, DOI 10.1068/c12117
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
NR 89
TC 8
Z9 10
U1 2
U2 34
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0016-7185
EI 1872-9398
J9 GEOFORUM
JI Geoforum
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 117
BP 194
EP 205
DI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.10.001
PG 12
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA OW5FL
UT WOS:000592912200021
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, D
   Chen, SW
AF Wang, Di
   Chen, Shiwei
TI The effect of pilot climate-resilient city policies on urban climate
   resilience: Evidence from quasi-natural experiments
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate-resilient cities; Urban climate resilience; Fine-grained policy
   effects assessment; Spatial spillovers; Dual machine learning
ID CITIES; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK
AB The climate-resilient city model is designed as a blueprint for urban development that aims to reduce climate risks and enhance climate resilience. This paper evaluates the implementation of pilot policies for climateresilient cities and establishes an in-depth evaluation index system to measure urban climate resilience effectively. By integrating insights from urban systems and management studies, this framework comprises aspects such as protection, recovery, adaptation, and organizational strength. Employing panel data that spans 286 cities at the prefectural level and above in China, from 2005 to 2021, our research utilizes a variety of quantitative methods. These include the kernel density method, quasi-experimental approaches such as Difference-inDifferences (DID) and Spatial Difference-in-Differences (SDID), K-means clustering, and dual machine learning (DML). Our objective is to thoroughly assess the effect of the climate-resilient city pilot (CRCP) policy across multiple facets, ranging from local and spatial considerations to overall and specific, as well as from static to dynamic perspectives. Our findings indicate a generally uneven progression in the climate resilience levels among the cities under study. The CRCP's introduction has markedly improved climate resilience in pilot cities, alongside significant spatial spillover effects. These diffusion and polarisation effects had positive and negative impacts on neighbouring non-pilot cities, respectively. In addition, the CRCP's effectiveness varies, indicating higher success rates in cities experiencing high temperatures and medium levels of rainfall, as well as in cities identified as "MMLL" types, which are particularly climate-sensitive and vulnerable. In addition, we emphasize the importance of upgrading infrastructure, especially in areas such as water supply and drainage, energy and gas provision, and logistics and transportation. These improvements are crucial strategies to enhance the effectiveness of the CRCP. In conclusion, our study offers critical insights for policymakers in China as well as international efforts, aiming to foster urban development that is inclusive, secure, resilient, and sustainable.
C1 [Wang, Di] Peking Univ, Sch Govt, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Di] Peking Univ, Inst Publ Governance, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Shiwei] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; Beijing Institute of Technology
RP Wang, D (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Sch Govt, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM surpassyourself@vip.163.com
RI chen, shiwei/KTH-8038-2024
FU Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education
   of the People's Republic of China [22YJC790120]; National Social Science
   Fund Major Special Project [22VMG016]; Beijing Municipal Social Science
   Foundation [20GLC050]
FX This research was funded by the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth
   Foundation, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China,
   Award number: 22YJC790120; National Social Science Fund Major Special
   Project, Award Number: 22VMG016; Beijing Municipal Social Science
   Foundation, Award Number: 20GLC050.
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Albert C, 2021, NATURE, V596, P486, DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-02309-9
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Anelli D, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133496
   Anhui Shengzhihuanlong Conservation Association, 2023, Typical cases of cities responding to climate change in Anhui Province
   [Anonymous], 2009, Asian J. Environ. Disaster Manag. (AJEDM), V1, P101, DOI [10.3850/S179392402009000088, DOI 10.3850/S179392402009000088]
   Argyroudis SA, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100387
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Bahadur AdityaV., 2010, The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters
   Baho DL, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09427-220317
   Bartram SM, 2022, J FINANC ECON, V143, P668, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.06.015
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Bulkeley H, 2013, LOCAL ENVIRON, V18, P646, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2013.788479
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Carrico AR, 2021, CURR OPIN BEHAV SCI, V42, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.025
   Chen XL, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109469
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   China Climate Change Information Network, 2017, National climate adaptive city pilot construction in Huaibei City fully launched
   Clare A, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.001
   Cumming GS, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P975, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
   Department of Ecology and Environment of Shandong Province, 2022, Jinan Lixia District's big push for climate investment and financing development
   Doorn N, 2019, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V4, P112, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2018.1428162
   Du YD, 2013, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V4, P1, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1248.2013.001
   Engle NL, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.019
   Fang DL, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aav4707
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Gao XL, 2024, ENVIRON RES, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117912
   General Office of Jinan Municipal People's Government, 2022, Notice on the issuance of Jinan Meteorological Disaster Emergency Response Plan
   Greenstone M, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P3038, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.10.3038
   Grossman Gene M., 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy
   Han BL, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V318, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.015
   Hayes S, 2019, TRANSPORT REV, V39, P677, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1612480
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holland S.P., 2010, Spillovers from climate policy
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C. S., 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature
   [黄寰 Huang Huan], 2023, [资源科学, Resources Science], V45, P1044
   Huimin L, 2020, Environmental Protection, V48
   Ji J, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V425, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138955
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Khan MTI, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132937
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kong F, 2019, Yangtze River Basin Resources and Environment, V28, P2262
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li GZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110667
   Li T.Y., 2017, Urban Plan. Int, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Lomba-Fernández C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11174727
   Ma XB, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110409
   Marschütz B, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100223
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review Bellagio Initiative
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Myrdal G., 1957, EC THEORY UNDER DEV
   [裴孝东 Pei Xiaodong], 2022, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V29, P39
   Pelling M, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P617, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1956411
   Rudel TK, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P74, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-01143-0
   Sajjad M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850
   Shang H, 2022, ENERG ECON, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106307
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Sun T, 2014, Modern Urban Research, V04, P67
   Sun TY, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V412, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137372
   Thomalla F, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang KW, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104783
   Wang S, 2023, Journal of Geography, V78, P2591
   Wang XR, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V425, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138859
   Wang Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.128
   Wardekker A, 2023, Urban Resilience: Methodologies, Tools and Evaluation: Theory and Practice, P17
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Wu G, 2013, FRONT BEHAV NEUROSCI, V7, DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00010
   Wu S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107030
   Xing L, 2023, FINANC RES LETT, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2023.104502
   Yue W, 2021, Yangtze River Basin Resources and Environment, V30, P407
   Zhang L, 2021, ECOL COMPLEX, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100893
   Zhang T, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118129
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   [赵煊 Zhao Xuan], 2021, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V40, P681
   Zhao YH, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P11335, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-01114-0
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 85
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 80
U2 117
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 153
AR 105316
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105316
EA JUL 2024
PG 23
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA A9V9I
UT WOS:001285954100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Restemeyer, B
   Woltjer, J
   van den Brink, M
AF Restemeyer, Britta
   Woltjer, Johan
   van den Brink, Margo
TI A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities
   - A Hamburg case study
SO PLANNING THEORY & PRACTICE
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient cities; flood risk management; urban planning; resilience
   strategies
ID RISK-MANAGEMENT
AB Climate change and continuous urbanization contribute to an increased urban vulnerability towards flooding. Only relying on traditional flood control measures is recognized as inadequate, since the damage can be catastrophic if flood controls fail. The idea of a flood-resilient city - one which can withstand or adapt to a flood event without being harmed in its functionality - seems promising. But what does resilience actually mean when it is applied to urban environments exposed to flood risk, and how can resilience be achieved? This paper presents a heuristic framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities, for scientists and policy-makers alike. It enriches the current literature on flood resilience by clarifying the meaning of its three key characteristics - robustness, adaptability and transformability - and identifying important components to implement resilience strategies. The resilience discussion moves a step forward, from predominantly defining resilience to generating insight into "doing" resilience in practice. The framework is illustrated with two case studies from Hamburg, showing that resilience, and particularly the underlying notions of adaptability and transformability, first and foremost require further capacity-building among public as well as private stakeholders. The case studies suggest that flood resilience is currently not enough motivation to move from traditional to more resilient flood protection schemes in practice; rather, it needs to be integrated into a bigger urban agenda.
C1 [Restemeyer, Britta; Woltjer, Johan; van den Brink, Margo] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, Groningen, Netherlands.
C3 University of Groningen
RP Restemeyer, B (corresponding author), Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, Groningen, Netherlands.
EM b.restemeyer@rug.nl
OI Woltjer, Johan/0000-0003-3179-6294; van den Brink,
   Margo/0000-0001-8247-3044; Restemeyer, Britta/0000-0001-6643-0087
FU NWO [406-11-207]
FX Britta Restemeyer's research is funded by NWO (the Netherlands
   Organisation for Scientific Research) grant number 406-11-207.
CR Alexander D.E, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, P1257, DOI [10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013, DOI 10.5194/NHESS-13-2707-2013, DOI 10.5194/NHESSD-1-1257-2013, DOI 10.5194/nhessd-1-1257-2013]
   [Anonymous], 2004, ECOLOGY SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   Burgerschaft der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg, 1997, HAMB STAND HAF 21 JA
   Daschkeit A., 2009, KLIMAANDERUNG KLIMAF, P1
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   De Bruijn K.M., 2005, THESIS TU DELFT DELF
   Douven W, 2012, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V55, P1289, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2011.644848
   FHH, 2012, HAUSH 2013 2014 EINZ
   FHH, INF FLUTSCH BER HAFE, P1
   FHH, 2004, ELV BAR UNT HOCHW HA, P1
   FHH, 2003, SPR UB DIE ELB
   FHH, 2005, SPRUNG ELB HAMB WEG, P1
   FHH, 2007, HOCHW HAMB BAUPR 200, P1
   FHH, 2005, KAT HAMB HAMB, P1
   FHH, 2008, STRUMFL HAMB HAMB TI, P1
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   GALDERISI A., 2010, 24 AESOP ANN C HELS
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gonnert G., 2004, COASTLINE REPORTS, V1, P119
   Gupta J, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
   Healey P, 1998, ENVIRON PLANN A, V30, P1531, DOI 10.1068/a301531
   Healey P., 1999, Futura, V18, P117
   HEINRICHS H, 2009, KLIMAWANDEL GESELLSC
   Helmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam, 2009, RIMAX RISIKOMANAGEME
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hooijer A, 2004, RIVER RES APPL, V20, P343, DOI 10.1002/rra.781
   Hutter G, 2006, NATO SCI S SS IV EAR, V67, P229
   IBA Hamburg GmbH, 2009, IBA LAB KLIM HER WAS
   IBA Hamburg GmbH, 2011, IBA MACHB DEICHP ELB
   Jonkman SN, 2003, J HAZARD MATER, V99, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00283-2
   Khakee A., 2002, PLANNING THEORY PRAC, V3, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14649350220117807, 10.1080/14649350220117807]
   KlimaCampus, 2010, KLIM METR HAMB AUSZ
   Knieling J., 2009, COASTLINE REPORTS, V14, P1
   Kuhlicke C, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P114
   Langseth H, 2008, ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICAL MODELING FOR RELIABILITY, P1
   Meijerink S, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P499, DOI 10.1080/07900620801921363
   Menzl M., 2010, POSTSUBURBANISIERUNG
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Pasche E., 2007, SCI ALLEMAGNE, V2006
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Scott M, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P103, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.761904
   van Herk S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Vis M., 2003, International Journal of River Basin Management, V1, P33, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2003.9635190, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2003.9635190]
   von Storch H, 2008, SUSTAIN SCI, V3, P33, DOI 10.1007/s11625-008-0044-2
   White I, 2010, NAT BUILT ENVIRON SE, P1
   Woltjer J, 2007, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V73, P211, DOI 10.1080/01944360708976154
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00010.x
NR 49
TC 85
Z9 103
U1 12
U2 108
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1464-9357
EI 1470-000X
J9 PLAN THEORY PRACT
JI Plan. Theory Pract.
PY 2015
VL 16
IS 1
BP 45
EP 62
DI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
PG 18
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA V69KI
UT WOS:000211437500005
OA Green Published, Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, XK
   He, BJ
AF Chen, Xueke
   He, Bao-Jie
TI Planning for heat-resilient 15 min-cities: Opportunities, measurement,
   mechanism, and pathways
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban heat; 15-min city; Anthropogenic heat; Cooling communities;
   Walkability and workability; Heat resilience
ID MORTALITY; ENVIRONMENTS; THRESHOLDS; HEALTHY; ENERGY; IMPACT
AB A 15-min city (FMC) which is expected to provide citizens with convenient, comfortable and healthy living environments has been piloted in many cities worldwide. However, the question of how to mitigate and adapt to urban heat- a critical weather-related problem has environmental, social and economic consequences within an FMC- is rarely discussed. Such a research gap has significantly limited the satisfaction of inclusive, resilient and safe requirements, especially in (sub)tropical cities. To overcome this gap, this study aims to systematically elucidate a heat-resilient FMC that can enhance urban resilience to extreme heat. In particular, this paper clarifies opportunities, measurement, and mechanism of a heat-resilient FMC. Afterwards, this paper proposes the recommendation on high-resolution heat assessment, heat-prone area identification, heat mitigation measures, and heat adaptation measures for improving FMC heat resilience. Overall, this paper is important to broaden FMC theories and practices tailoring to increasingly severe urban heat challenges and to provide imperative implications for urban planners, designers and managers to implement heat preparation, mitigation and adaptation under a promising sustainable initiative.
C1 [Chen, Xueke; He, Bao-Jie] Chongqing Univ, Ctr Climate Resilient & Low Carbon Cities, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
   [He, Bao-Jie] Chongqing Univ, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
   [He, Bao-Jie] CMA Key Open Lab Transforming Climate Resources Ec, Chongqing 401147, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing University; Chongqing University
RP He, BJ (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Ctr Climate Resilient & Low Carbon Cities, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
EM baojie.unsw@gmail.com
RI He, Baojie/J-4430-2019
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42301339]; Fundamental
   Research Funds for the Central Universities [QNMS202211]; CMA Key Open
   Laboratory of Transforming Climate Resources to Economy [GD22XGL02]; The
   2022 Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science Foundation [2022GZQN14];
   Guangzhou Philosophy and Social Science Planning 2022 Annual Project
   [2023CDJXY-008];  [2023018]
FX This project is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (No: 42301339) , the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
   Universities (Grant No. 2023CDJXY-008) , and CMA Key Open Laboratory of
   Transforming Climate Resources to Economy (No. 2023018) . Special thanks
   to the projects of 2022 Guangdong Philosophy and Social Science
   Foundation (grant no. GD22XGL02) , Guangzhou Philosophy and Social
   Science Planning 2022 Annual Project (grant no. 2022GZQN14) , and the
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no.
   QNMS202211).
CR Allam Z, 2022, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01145-0
   Allam Z, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE181, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6
   Åström DO, 2011, MATURITAS, V69, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.03.008
   Broadbent AM, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V811, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151326
   Bruse M, 1998, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V13, P373, DOI 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00042-5
   Buyantuyev A, 2010, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V25, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9402-4
   Carr LJ, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V39, P460, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.007
   [柴彦威 Chai Yanwei], 2015, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P61
   Chen B, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V768, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145052
   Chen Xueke, 2022, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1122/1/012005
   Cheng R., 2018, Planners, V34, P115, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2018.05.019
   de Freitas CR, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P487, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1228-6
   Denton F., 2014, Global and Sectoral Aspects, V1
   Denton F, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1101
   Ding L., 2019, MICROCLIMATE URBAN H
   Gaglione F., 2022, New Scenarios for Safe Mobility in Urban areas, V60, P378, DOI [10.1016/j.trpro, DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO, DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2021.12.049, 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.049]
   Gago EJ, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.057
   Gao YJ, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103431
   Grundstein A, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V56, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.10.014
   Guardaro M, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100415
   He B.-J., 2023, Smart Buildings and Technologies for Sustainable Cities in China
   He BJ, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112976
   He BJ, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112306
   He BJ, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112350
   He BJ, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103685
   He BJ, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101145
   Hoedl S, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V39, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.005
   Hsieh CM, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P3125, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.029
   Huang BZ, 2024, NAT HAZARDS, V120, P2005, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06266-6
   Huang ZL, 2022, FORESTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/f13081268
   Ji F, 2022, APPL ENERG, V318, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119207
   Jiang YF, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228684
   Jochem P., 2008, Multi Agent Simulation in Transport Assessing Impacts of Policy Instruments to Reduce CO2 Emissions in Germany
   Kim J, 2023, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V31, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.002
   Koohsari MJ, 2021, PREV MED REP, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101393
   Kotharkar R, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103487
   Kumar P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103366
   Lau KKL, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108333
   Li B, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12081094
   Lowe D, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P4623, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8124623
   Lowe SA, 2016, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V56, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.004
   Lund H., 2008, Util. Policy, V16, P59, DOI [10.1016/j.jup.2007.11.002, DOI 10.1016/J.JUP.2007.11.002]
   Lwin KK, 2011, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V35, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.05.002
   Manente G, 2022, J ENERGY STORAGE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2022.104411
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Nabipour M, 2022, TRANSPORT POLICY, V129, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.024
   Pascal M, 2013, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V57, P21, DOI 10.1007/s00484-012-0530-1
   Pikora T, 2003, SOC SCI MED, V56, P1693, DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00163-6
   Pozoukidou G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020928
   Qi JD, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106420
   Qi JD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103377
   Qiao Z, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12050794
   Rana IA, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106820
   Sharifi E, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V180, P944, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.254
   Shooshtarian S, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V115, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.022
   Spickett JT, 2011, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V31, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.07.001
   Staricco L, 2022, J URBAN MOBIL, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100030
   Sun RH, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P601, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.153
   Takane Y, 2019, NPJ CLIM ATMOS SCI, V2, DOI 10.1038/s41612-019-0096-2
   Titze S., 2012, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, V15, pS29, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JSAMS.2012.11.071
   Tong SL, 2021, BIOMED ENVIRON SCI, V34, P379, DOI 10.3967/bes2021.050
   Wang K, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103443
   Wang L., 2005, China Real Estate, V02, P33
   Wang SQ, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107176
   Wang Y., 2022, Urban Architect, V19, P58, DOI [10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2022.03.13, DOI 10.19892/J.CNKI.CSJZ.2022.03.13]
   Wang Y., 2022, Frontiers in Public Health, V10
   Weng M, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V13, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2019.05.005
   Winters M., 2016, J. Transp. Health, V3, pS72, DOI [10.1016/j.jth.2016.05.021, DOI 10.1016/J.JTH.2016.05.021]
   Xie YX, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V216, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109039
   Xiong K, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104203
   Yang J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103045
   Yao F, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103582
   Yazdani M, 2023, EXPERT SYST APPL, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120224
   Young M., 2022, The Future of Building Science Education with the US Department of Energy Solar Decathlon
   Zahoor A, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107139
   Zawadzka JE, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104163
   Zeng P, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104490
   [周春山 Zhou Chunshan], 2021, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V40, P1495
   Zhu Y., 2021, World Architect, V03, DOI [10.16414/j.wa.2021.03.009,42-45+126, DOI 10.16414/J.WA.2021.03.009,42-45+126]
NR 80
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 11
U2 29
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 105
AR 107406
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107406
EA DEC 2023
PG 15
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA II6V9
UT WOS:001165745900001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pitidis, V
   Tapete, D
   Coaffee, J
   Kapetas, L
   de Albuquerque, JP
AF Pitidis, Vangelis
   Tapete, Deodato
   Coaffee, Jon
   Kapetas, Leon
   de Albuquerque, Joao Porto
TI Understanding the Implementation Challenges of Urban Resilience
   Policies: Investigating the Influence of Urban Geological Risk in
   Thessaloniki, Greece
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE geohazards; urban resilience; implementation; 100 Resilient Cities;
   Thessaloniki
ID INTERFEROMETRIC SAR DATA; SUBSIDENCE
AB Urban Resilience has recently emerged as a systematic approach to urban sustainability. The malleable definition of resilience has rendered its operationalisation an intriguing task for contemporary cities trying to address their organisational problems and confront uncertainty in a holistic manner. In this article we investigate the implementation challenges emerging for Resilient Strategies by the inattention paid to urban geological risk. We conceptualise urban geological risk as the combination of urban geohazards, geological vulnerability and exposure of the built environment and focus on the case study of Thessaloniki, Greece, a city that joined the 100 Resilient Cities initiative in 2014 and published its "Resilience Strategy 2030" (RS) in 2017. After a review of the RS, historical records of natural hazard events and with evidence gathered through interviews with city officials, we emphasize on earthquakes and surface flooding as the most relevant geohazards for Thessaloniki to tackle in its journey towards urban resilience. First, we examine geological vulnerability to earthquakes in conjunction with exposure of the built environment, as an outcome of ageing building stock, high building densities and the urban configuration, in Acheiropoietos neighbourhood, within the historic centre of the city. Then, we explore geological risk to surface flooding in Perea, in Thermaikos Municipality, with a particular focus on flash floods, by demonstrating how limited consideration of local geomorphology as well as semi-regulated urban expansion and its limited connection with emergency planning increase exposure of the built environment to surface flooding. Finally, we come up with the major implementation challenges Thessaloniki's RS faces with regard to urban geohazards.
C1 [Pitidis, Vangelis; Coaffee, Jon; de Albuquerque, Joao Porto] Univ Warwick, Warwick Inst Sci Cities, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.
   [Tapete, Deodato] Italian Space Agcy ASI, I-00133 Rome, Italy.
   [Tapete, Deodato] British Geol Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, England.
   [Coaffee, Jon] Univ Warwick, Dept Polit & Int Studies, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.
   [Kapetas, Leon] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England.
   [de Albuquerque, Joao Porto] Univ Warwick, Ctr Interdisciplinary Methodol, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.
C3 University of Warwick; Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI); UK Research &
   Innovation (UKRI); Natural Environment Research Council (NERC); NERC
   British Geological Survey; University of Warwick; University of
   Cambridge; University of Warwick
RP Pitidis, V (corresponding author), Univ Warwick, Warwick Inst Sci Cities, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England.
EM V.Pitidis@warwick.ac.uk; deodato.tapete@asi.it; J.Coaffee@warwick.ac.uk;
   lk411@cam.ac.uk; J.Porto@warwick.ac.uk
RI Pitidis, Vangelis/AAP-6894-2021; de Albuquerque, Joao/O-2972-2019;
   Tapete, Deodato/K-9606-2016; Porto de Albuquerque, Joao/E-6374-2011
OI Tapete, Deodato/0000-0002-7242-4473; Porto de Albuquerque,
   Joao/0000-0002-3160-3168; Pitidis, Vangelis/0000-0003-2410-4528;
   KAPETAS, LEON/0000-0001-7818-8224
FU EPSRC [EP/L016400/1]; EPSRC [EP/P004431/1, EP/P004180/1] Funding Source:
   UKRI; NERC [bgs05200] Funding Source: UKRI
FX This research was funded by EPSRC grant number EP/L016400/1.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Anastasiadis A, 2001, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V158, P2597, DOI 10.1007/PL00001188
   [Anonymous], BBC NEWS
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Boin A, 2013, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V15, P429, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2013.769856
   Bourgon J., 2009, Public Policy and Administration, V24, P309, DOI DOI 10.1177/0952076709103813
   Bricker S., 2012, GROUND CITIES SHOULD
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Cao C, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090948
   Charles J.A., 2015, BUILDING FILL GEOTEC
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Crowe PR, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.007
   Da Silva J., 2014, ARUP
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Diakakis M, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V62, P485, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0090-z
   Duit A, 2016, PUBLIC ADMIN, V94, P364, DOI 10.1111/padm.12182
   E - POZOUKIDOU V ERANI., 2015, Spatium, V1, P8, DOI DOI 10.2298/SPAT1533008V
   Galderisi A, 2012, TEMA, V5, P69, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/936
   Gaume E, 2009, J HYDROL, V367, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.028
   Gospodini A., 2012, P 1 INT C ARCH URB D, P685
   Kappos AJ, 2008, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V28, P836, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.017
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Makedon T, 2009, ENG GEOL, V104, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.10.002
   Manos G., 1994, INT HDB EARTHQUAKE E
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nikolaidou M., 2014, 10 INT GEOGRAPHICAL, P662
   Papagiannaki K, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P727, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-727-2013
   Penelis G., 1989, P 9 WORLD C EARTHQUA, VVII, P187
   Pitilakis K., 2007, P 4 INT C EARTHQ GEO, P1
   Raspini F, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V83, pS155, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2341-x
   Raspini F, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2425, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2425-2013
   Raspini F, 2014, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V28, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2013.11.010
   Riga E, 2017, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V92, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.043
   Taleb N. N., 2007, The black swan
   Tapete D, 2016, CITIES, V56, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.005
   Theilen-Willige B, 2012, GEOSCIENCES, V2, P203, DOI 10.3390/geosciences2040203
   Thessaloniki Resilience Team, 2016, THESS PREL RES ASS
   Thessaloniki Resilience Team, 2017, RES THESS STRAT 2030
   United Nations General Assembly, 2017, REP OP END INT EXP W
   Vayona A, 2011, CITIES, V28, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.05.007
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Yamamoto K, 2017, J RISK FINANC MANAG, V10, DOI 10.3390/jrfm10030014
NR 45
TC 10
Z9 12
U1 0
U2 29
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 10
AR 3573
DI 10.3390/su10103573
PG 24
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GY4UB
UT WOS:000448559400215
OA gold, Green Accepted, Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Moloney, S
   Doyon, A
AF Moloney, Susie
   Doyon, Andreanne
TI The Resilient Melbourne experiment: Analyzing the conditions for
   transformative urban resilience implementation
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience implementation; Urban governance conditions; Resilient
   cities; 100RC Melbourne
AB This paper examines the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) initiative in Melbourne and frames this as an experiment in urban resilience governance and planning. We respond to the call from urban resilience scholars to consider the 5Ws (who, what, where, when and why?) of resilience and consider what this means for reframing urban resilience implementation. Melbourne is one of the first wave of 33 cities involved in 100RC and the release of the 2016 Strategy is the first attempt at urban resilience governance and planning in this city. We examine its role in mobilizing urban resilience reflecting on the 5Ws and also the 'how', as a governance experiment. With no metropolitan mandate and within a highly fragmented governing context, we develop an analytical framework to assess the 100RC Melbourne initiative identifying a set of conditions for transformative urban resilience implementation incorporating four dimensions - governance and institutional settings (how); inclusions/exclusions (who); framing and purpose (why and what); and system boundaries and interventions (where and when). We reflect on how urban resilience has been framed and adapted within this initiative and the extent to which this process of urban resilience implementation may have the capacity to influence, disrupt or change mainstream urban policy and planning frameworks. We highlight the institution building role the 100RC is playing by mediating between, and connecting, actors, sectors, and interests. We discuss the prospects for shaping a more integrated and inclusive mode of urban governance and resilience planning, a need which has become particularly acute in the context of the shock and ongoing stressor of COVID 19. We conclude by arguing that while experiments such as the 100RC initiative can demonstrate new ways of working collaboratively, explicit attention must be paid to the sets of conditions required to mobilize transformative change in urban resilience implementation.
C1 [Moloney, Susie] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Doyon, Andreanne] Simon Fraser Univ, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT); Simon Fraser University
RP Moloney, S (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
EM Susie.moloney@rmit.edu.au
OI Moloney, Susie/0000-0002-3177-3618
CR ABS Australian Bureau of Statistic, 2014, AUSTR DEM STAT
   Anguelovski I., 2018, City, V22, P417, DOI [10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126]
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2016, J CLEAN PROD
   [Anonymous], 2016, PLANNING MELBOURNE: LESSONS FOR A SUSTAINABLE CITY
   [Anonymous], Planning Theory & Practice, V13, P299
   Breese E, 2018, STAT AUSTR CIT C 201
   Bulkeley H, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   City of Melbourne, 2018, DAIL POP EST FOR
   Climate Council, 2020, SUMM CRIS REP
   Coenen L, 2020, AUST PLAN, V56, P144, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2020.1740286
   Connolly JJT, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P8, DOI 10.1111/cico.12282
   Cumming GS, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10021-004-0075-1
   Davidson K, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100666
   Davidson K, 2018, URBAN POLICY RES, V36, P230, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1354848
   Davies A, 2017, CRIKEY
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DELWP, 2017, PLAN MELB METR PLANN
   Doyon A., 2018, Enabling Eco-Cities: Defining, Planning, and Creating a Thriving Future, P65, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-7320-5_5., DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7320-5_5, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7320-55]
   Doyon A, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P2042, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1702512
   Evans J, 2016, ROUT RES SUSTAIN URB, P1
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fastenrath S, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P138, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1744551
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Flannery T., 2020, THE GUARDIAN 0731
   Gleeson B., 2010, Metropolitan governance for the Australian city: The case for reform
   Gleeson B, 2012, AUSTRALIA'S UNINTENDED CITIES: THE IMPACT OF HOUSING ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT, P117
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Henstra D, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN
   Hitch Georgia., 2020, ABC NEWS
   Hodson M, 2010, RES POLICY, V39, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Horne R, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P336, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1472745
   Luque-Ayala A., 2018, Rethinking Urban Transitions. Politics in the Low Carbon City
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moloney S, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P2437, DOI 10.3390/su7032437
   Moore T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103469
   Moore T, 2016, CITIES, V56, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.010
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Mulligan M., 2016, RESILIENT MELBOURNE
   Pimm S.L., 1991, BALANCE NATURE ECOLO
   Resilient Cities, 2018, 100 RES CIT
   Resilient Melbourne, 2016, RES MELB VIABL LIV P
   Resilient Melbourne, 2017, ANN REP 2016 17
   Resilient Melbourne, 2016, PORT PHILL CIT COUNC
   Resilient Melbourne, 2015, PREL RES
   Resilient Melbourne, 2018, ANN REP 2017 18
   Sengers F, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Simpson-Young A, 2018, THESIS U SYDNEY
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   VCOSS Victorian Council of Social Service, 2019, CLIM FAIRN MAK VICT
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Wilkinson C., 2010, Critical Planning, P25
NR 56
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 11
U2 71
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 110
AR 103017
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103017
EA FEB 2021
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA QH8SY
UT WOS:000618544000002
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cai, Y
   Zong, WK
   Jiao, S
   Wang, Z
   Ou, LZ
AF Cai, Yong
   Zong, Wenke
   Jiao, Sheng
   Wang, Zhu
   Ou, Linzhi
TI Land-Use Assessment and Trend Simulation from a Resilient Urban
   Perspective: A Case Study of Changsha City
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban scale; system dynamics; FLUS
ID MODEL; GROWTH; SPRAWL
AB As the challenges of globalization and climate change intensify, the importance of urban resilience in city planning is becoming increasingly evident. To adapt to this trend, innovations and improvements are essential in traditional urban land-use patterns to better fulfill the requirements of resilient urban development. In this context, this study constructs an urban resilience evaluation index system from four perspectives: social resilience, engineering resilience, ecological resilience, and security resilience to evaluate the urban resilience of Changsha City. A thorough assessment of the resilience mechanisms in Changsha's urban layout was conducted, employing the SD-FLUS model. A resilient urban scenario is also established to restrict the conversion of high-resilience land into other land types and to predict urban land-use structures under a resilience-oriented directive. The findings indicate that areas with high ecological and safety resilience in Changsha are primarily located in the western Weishan mountain system, along with eastern mountain systems like Jiuling, Lianyun, and Mufu, forming the "green veins". The central areas are characterized by "blue veins", mainly represented by rivers such as the Xiangjiang, Weishui, Longwanggang, Jinjiang, Liuyang, and Laodao. Within the central urban area, high-resilience regions are primarily distributed along a framework consisting of "one ring (the city's three-ring line), two mains (Xiangjiang and Liuyang rivers), one heart (urban green core), and six wedges", specifying various green corridors. Under the resilience-oriented scenario, the model predicts that by 2025, the total built-up area in Changsha will be 1416.79 km(2). Areas with high social and engineering resilience are mainly concentrated in the central urban areas of Changsha, as well as Ningxiang and Liuyang, aligning closely with the objectives of Changsha's latest round of national spatial planning. The built-up area layout should complement Changsha's topography and water systems, expanding in a wedge-like manner. Overall, Changsha's planning has successfully integrated social, engineering, ecological, and safety resilience, enhancing its adaptability and long-term sustainability. This research proposes a land-use simulation method guided by the concept of urban resilience, providing valuable insights for resilience-oriented city planning in Changsha and other cities facing similar challenges.
C1 [Cai, Yong; Zong, Wenke; Jiao, Sheng; Ou, Linzhi] Hunan Univ, Sch Architecture & Planning, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Zhu] Hunan Architectural Design Inst Grp Co Ltd, Changsha 410012, Peoples R China.
C3 Hunan University
RP Jiao, S (corresponding author), Hunan Univ, Sch Architecture & Planning, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China.
EM caiyong@126.com; zwkkk@hnu.edu.cn; jiaosheng2008@163.com;
   13677313132@163.com; oulinzhi567@163.com
OI Yong, Cai/0009-0003-4694-3450
CR [陈国建 Chen Guojian], 2002, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Valley], V11, P403
   Chen W., 2007, Pract. Recognit. Math, V1, P17
   Chen YM, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V152, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.011
   [丛沛桐 CONG Peitong], 2008, [地理与地理信息科学, Geography and Geo-information Science], V24, P75
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Dai W., 2017, Urban Plan, V41, P26
   David R., 2015, Int. Urban Plan, V30, P22
   Ewing R, 2003, TRANSPORT RES REC, P175, DOI 10.3141/1831-20
   Galster G, 2001, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V12, P681, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426
   Geng S., 2023, J. Earth Sci. Environ, V45, P806
   Gu ML, 2022, T GIS, V26, P2932, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12986
   [郭杰 GUO Jie], 2009, [资源科学, Resources Science], V31, P1355
   Hasse JE, 2003, APPL GEOGR, V23, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.002
   He J., 2022, Disaster Sci, V37, P148
   Li A., 2009, Bull. Surv. Mapp, V53, P26
   Li A., 2009, Ph.D. Thesis
   Li G., 2018, Masters Thesis
   Li Y., 2011, Ph.D. Thesis
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Liang X, 2018, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V32, P2294, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1502441
   [刘柯 LIU Ke], 2007, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V26, P129
   Liu XP, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V168, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
   [刘小平 LIU XiaoPing], 2007, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V27, P2391
   Portela R, 2001, ECOL MODEL, V143, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00359-3
   Qiao L., 2010, Resour. Ind, V12, P100
   Rahim F.H.A., 2017, International Journal of Supply Chain Management, V6, P234
   Seto KC, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P943, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf7439
   Shao Y., 2015, Urban Plan. Int, V30, P48
   [王璐 WANG Lu], 2009, [地理与地理信息科学, Geography and Geo-information Science], V25, P74
   Wang Q., 1995, Systems Engineering Theory Methodology Applications, V4, P6
   Wang X, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11769-021-1229-1
   Wei X., 2007, Ph.D. Thesis
   Xie X., 2016, Urban Environ. Res, V5, P50
   Yang X., 2007, Geomat. Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ, V12, P64
   Yang X., 2019, Planner, V35, P63
   Yu K., 2004, City Plan. Rev, V28, P62
   Zhang J.Y., 2023, Disaster Sci, V38, P7
   Zhang L., 2014, Geogr. Geo-Inf. Sci, V30, P50
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   Zhang XJ, 2020, CELL METAB, V32, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.06.015
   Zhang Y., 2019, Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin, V4, P757
   Zhu M., 2015, J. Southwest Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed, V40, P74
NR 42
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 18
U2 94
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 18
AR 13890
DI 10.3390/su151813890
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA S9KH8
UT WOS:001074277100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, WW
   Wang, JG
   Jin, HK
AF Zhang, Wenwu
   Wang, Jinguo
   Jin, Hongkui
TI Digital finance, innovation transformation, and resilient city growth
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Digital finance; Resilient cities; Innovation transformation; Digital
   governance
AB Digital finance is a pivotal catalyst for a contemporary economic system and assumes a significant auxiliary function in the establishment of resilient urban centers. This study empirically examines the enabling influence of digital finance on resilient cities using panel data from 287 prefecture-level cities and above in China between 2011 and 2020. The analysis is based on the mechanisms of innovation and transformation. The importance of digital finance in facilitating the development of resilient cities has been observed, with a specific emphasis on its impact on enhancing the adaptive capacity and growth resilience of urban areas. The utilization of digital finance has the potential to expedite the process of transforming urban industrial structures, invigorating innovation and entrepreneurial activities, and serving as a significant catalyst for the development of resilient cities. The analysis of heterogeneity reveals that various aspects of digital finance have varying degrees of influence on urban resilience. Specifically, the depth of utilization of digital finance exerts the most significant impact, followed by the level of digitalization, while the extent of coverage has the least effect. Furthermore, when considering regional distribution, the promotion effect of digital finance on resilient cities diminishes gradually from the eastern to the central and western regions.
C1 [Zhang, Wenwu; Wang, Jinguo] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Long Pan Rd 159, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Jin, Hongkui] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing Forestry University; Nanjing University of Finance & Economics
RP Wang, JG (corresponding author), Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Long Pan Rd 159, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.; Jin, HK (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
EM wjg1707@163.com; jhk@nufe.edu.cn
RI Zhang, WenWu/MBV-9831-2025
FU Beijing University Digital Finance Research Center
FX The Beijing University Digital Finance Research Center was acknowledged
   by the author for its data and other forms of assistance.
CR Acemoglu D, 2019, J ECON PERSPECT, V33, P3, DOI 10.1257/jep.33.2.3
   Amore MD, 2013, J FINANC ECON, V109, P835, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.04.006
   Berg T, 2020, REV FINANC STUD, V33, P2845, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhz099
   Bian Y., 2019, J Financial Res, V468, P132, DOI DOI 10.1111/PIRS.12641
   Bianchi M, 2010, SMALL BUS ECON, V34, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11187-009-9197-3
   Briguglio L, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P229, DOI 10.1080/13600810903089893
   Bristow G, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Cheng Z., 2022, Urban Probl, V327, P93
   Comin D, 2019, IMF ECON REV, V67, P395, DOI 10.1057/s41308-019-00078-0
   Crespo J, 2014, J ECON GEOGR, V14, P199, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbt006
   Demertzis M, 2018, J FINANC REGUL, V4, P157, DOI 10.1093/jfr/fjx012
   Du ZW, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1662-6
   Feng X., 2022, Urban Probl, V10, P55
   Fu Q, 2018, Journal of Financial Research, V11, P68
   Glaeser EL, 2005, J ECON GEOGR, V5, P119, DOI 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh058
   Gong Q.L., 2023, Journal of Yunnan Finance and Trade Institute, V39, P68
   Guo F., 2020, Q J Econ, V19, P1401, DOI DOI 10.13821/J.CNKI.CEQ.2020.03.12
   Guowei C., 2013, China Econ. Q, V3, P869
   Huang R., 2021, China Econ. Stud., P52
   Jack W, 2013, AM ECON REV, V103, P356, DOI 10.1257/aer.103.3.356
   Kapoor A, 2014, FUTURES, V56, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2013.10.007
   Karlan D, 2010, REV FINANC STUD, V23, P433, DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhp092
   Li L., 2019, China Econ. Q, V52, P855
   Li S., 2022, Econ. Geogr, V10, P19
   Li Y., 2022, China Economic Quarterly, V22, P1805
   Lin C., 2019, Urban Probl, V289, P94
   Lin Y. F., 2010, China Economic Quarterly, V01, P1, DOI [DOI 10.13821/J.CNKI.CEQ.2011.01.014, 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2011.01.014]
   Lu L., 2018, Bank. Fin.L.Rev., V33, P317
   Lv JS., 2015, J. Financ. Res, V11, P115
   Ma L., 2021, Economist, V05, P65, DOI [DOI 10.16158/J.CNKI.51-1312/F.2021.05.008, 10.16158/j.cnki.51-1312/f.2021.05.008]
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Ozili PK, 2018, BORSA ISTANB REV, V18, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
   Park C.-Y., 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2558936, 10.2139/ssrn.2558936]
   Pierrakis Y., 2014, J. Econ. Perspect, V31, P45
   Reggiani A., 2002, Networks and Spatial Economics, V2, P211, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1015377515690, 10.1023/A:1015377515690]
   Rocchetta S, 2019, REG STUD, V53, P1421, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1577552
   Sarma M, 2011, J INT DEV, V23, P613, DOI 10.1002/jid.1698
   Sun Jianwen, 2022, Expert Systems with Applications, V32, P1
   [孙久文 Sun Jiuwen], 2017, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V37, P1
   Teng L., 2020, Statistical Research, V37, P80, DOI 10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2020.11.007
   Wang P., 2021, URBAN PROBLEMS, V8, P63
   Wang X., 2023, Econ. Perspect, V2, P88
   [汪亚楠 Wang Yanan], 2020, [数量经济技术经济研究, Quantitative & Technical Economics], V37, P92
   Wu Y., 2023, CHINA BUS MARK, V37, P97, DOI [https://doi.org/10.14089/j.cnki.cn11-3664/f.2023.03.008, DOI 10.14089/J.CNKI.CN11-3664/F.2023.03.008]
   Yao S., 2023, Stat. Decis., V39, P143
NR 47
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 53
U2 136
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD MAR 25
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 1
AR 7056
DI 10.1038/s41598-024-56998-z
PG 17
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA MB6D5
UT WOS:001191196900071
PM 38528011
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, XL
   Li, SJ
   Xu, X
   Luo, JS
AF Liu, Xinli
   Li, Sijia
   Xu, Xian
   Luo, Jingshu
TI Integrated natural disasters urban resilience evaluation: the case of
   China
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban natural disasters resilience; Regional characteristics; China
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; HAZARDS
AB China is one of the countries affected most by natural hazards. With the rapid urbanization process, the susceptibility of Chinese cities to natural disasters increases. In this paper, we propose an integrated natural disaster urban resilience evaluation framework for Chinese cities. We aggregate city-level economic, social, infrastructural, and environmental indicators of 39 major Chinese cities from 2002 to 2017 and convert them to a multi-dimensional resilience index using factor analysis. We validate our measure by showing that cities with larger resilience indices have lower natural disaster losses. We further investigate the regional characteristics of our urban resilience index and find that Chinese cities improved their resilience to natural hazards across the years. Although cities in the eastern coastal area tend to be more resilient than cities in other regions, the gap has been narrowed. Our paper provides some insights into how cities may measure and improve their urban resilience system.
C1 [Liu, Xinli; Li, Sijia] Peking Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Xian] Fudan Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China.
   [Luo, Jingshu] Le Moyne Coll, Madden Sch Business, Syracuse, NY 13078 USA.
C3 Peking University; Fudan University
RP Liu, XL (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM liuxinli@pku.edu.cn
RI liu, xinli/MHQ-8850-2025
OI Liu, Xinli/0000-0003-4444-9064
FU National Social Science Foundation of China [18ZDA105]; National Key
   Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1508803]; National
   Natural Science Foundations of China [71673050]
FX Supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No.
   18ZDA105), the National Key Research and Development Program of China
   (No. 2018YFC1508803), and the National Natural Science Foundations of
   China (No. 71673050).
CR [Anonymous], 2017, J GUANGZHOU U
   Bell M., 2002, 5 PRINCIPLES ORG RES
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Khazai B, 2018, NEPAL INTER J DISAST, V31, P614
   Kusumastuti RD, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Liu Jun, 2014, Tobacco Science & Technology, P82
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Qin WM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P331, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2967-3
   Ren Xuefei., 2013, Urban China
   Shi P., 2011, ATLAS MAGAZINE
   Sim T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041137
   Simpson DM, 2006, RES REPORT
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Vugrin ED, 2011, PROCESS SAF PROG, V30, P280, DOI 10.1002/prs.10437
   WANG XL, 2018, VIRUSES-BASEL, V10, DOI DOI 10.3390/V10010027
   World Bank, 2014, RES REP
   XU H, 2017, CHINA POPUL RESOUR E, V26
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
   Zhou Y, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V71, P2165, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-1003-5
NR 26
TC 57
Z9 57
U1 35
U2 288
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 107
IS 3
SI SI
BP 2105
EP 2122
DI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
EA JAN 2021
PG 18
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA TB9ES
UT WOS:000608080300001
OA Bronze
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cobbinah, PB
   Poku-Boansi, M
AF Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful
   Poku-Boansi, Michael
TI Towards resilient cities in Ghana: Insights and strategies
SO FUTURES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Risks; Urban planning; Urban population growth;
   Hazards; Climate change
ID GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   URBAN RESILIENCE; AFRICAN CITIES; URBANIZATION; POOR; KUMASI; ACCRA;
   POLITICS
AB This article reports on a research conducted in major Ghanaian cities of Accra and Kumasi that explored urban planners' perspectives on the urban resilience philosophy, and evaluated the available strategies for absorbing disturbances (e.g., floods, rapid population growth, and slum development) while retaining the identity, structure and functionality of Ghanaian cities. Using social science research methods including in-depth interviews with urban planners, and document reviews, findings indicate that despite global urgency towards urban resilience and some level of understanding amongst urban planning professionals, there is no consideration for resilience philosophy in urban planning practice in Ghana. The policy implications of these findings are further presented.
C1 [Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful; Poku-Boansi, Michael] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Art & Built Environm, Dept Planning, Kumasi, Ghana.
   [Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful] Charles Sturt Univ, Inst Land Water & Soc, POB 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
C3 Kwame Nkrumah University Science & Technology; Charles Sturt University
RP Cobbinah, PB (corresponding author), Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Art & Built Environm, Dept Planning, Kumasi, Ghana.
EM pcobbinah@csu.edu.au; mpoku-boansi.cap@knust.edu.gh
RI Poku-Boansi, Michael/AGZ-8640-2022; Cobbinah, Patrick/ABH-9950-2020
OI Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful/0000-0003-2522-9293; Poku-Boansi,
   Michael/0000-0003-4929-0961
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberton M, 2012, STUD TERRIT CULT DIV, V1, P1
   Amankwaa E.F., 2014, J. Soc. Sci. Policy Implicat, V2, P69
   Amoako C., 2011, Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, V13
   Amoako C, 2015, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V7, P109, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2014.984720
   Amoako C, 2016, GEOFORUM, V77, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.003
   [Anonymous], 2003, IHDP UPDATE NEWSLETT
   [Anonymous], 2010, MAK CIT RES MY CIT I
   [Anonymous], 2012, WORLD URB PROSP 2011
   [Anonymous], RESILIENCE MOVING BU
   [Anonymous], 2014, 2010 POP HOUS CENS D
   [Anonymous], 2010, 1 I DEV STUDIES
   [Anonymous], GEOJOURNAL
   [Anonymous], URBAN FORUM
   [Anonymous], 2015, Ghana Urbanization Review Overview Report
   [Anonymous], Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers 2013
   [Anonymous], 2010, URB LAND MARK EC CON
   [Anonymous], 2012, INT J SOCIAL HUMAN S
   [Anonymous], 2003, Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education
   [Anonymous], J BUILDING ROAD RES
   [Anonymous], 2012, RESILIENT PEOPLE RES
   [Anonymous], 2012, Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Urban Resilience: A Workshop Report
   Beichler SA, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06583-190304
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Burgess RobertG., 1994, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT
   Cain A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P561, DOI 10.1177/0956247814526544
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Campion BB, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P1895, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0452-6
   Chelleri Lorenzo, MULTIDISCIPLINARY PE
   Chirisa I, 2016, DEV SO AFR, V33, P113, DOI 10.1080/0376835X.2015.1113122
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, AFR GEOGR REV, V36, P262, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2016.1208770
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, ENVIRON DEV, V23, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2017.05.001
   Cobbinah PB, 2016, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V8, P93, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2015.1074581
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P1229, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9750-y
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V61, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.047
   Cobbinah PB, 2015, ENVIRON DEV, V13, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.001
   Cohen B, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Darkwah RhodaM., 2014, International Journal of Environmental, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering, V8, P671, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.1096905
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dodman D, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.029
   Douglas I, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P187, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089156
   Ernstson H, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P1563, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.892573
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Fiasorgbor A., 2013, J TOXICOLOGY ENV HLT, V5, P23, DOI [10.5897/jtehs12.054, DOI 10.5897/JTEHS12.054]
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Frigerio A., 2016, International Planning History Society Proceedings, V17, P67, DOI [10.7480/iphs.2016.6.1323, DOI 10.7480/IPHS.2016.6.1323]
   Fuseini I, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.020
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Harrison P, 2016, S AFR GEOGR J, V98, P483, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2016.1208588
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   ICLEI, 2012, C IN NUMB
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Janssen R, 2005, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V20, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.12.020
   Jenkins MW, 2014, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V4, P131, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2013.180
   Korah PI, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P1113, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9731-1
   Korea S., 2022, Population and Housing Census General Report
   Lawhon M, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P497, DOI 10.1111/anti.12051
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti Dennis S., 1999, DISASTERS BY DESIGN
   Nelson KC, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01599.x
   Obeng-Odoom F., 2010, HOUSING STUDIES, V25
   Owusu G, 2016, CRIME SCI, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40163-016-0053-x
   Owusu G, 2015, CRIME PREV COMMUNITY, V17, P249, DOI 10.1057/cpcs.2015.8
   Parnell S, 2007, AREA, V39, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00760.x
   Pelling M., 2012, Disaster risk reduction: Cases from urban Africa
   Perrings C, 2006, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V11, P417, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X06003020
   Pieterse Edgar., 2013, Rogue Urbanism: Emergent African Cities
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Potts D, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P253, DOI 10.1177/0956247809103026
   Prasad N, 2009, CLIMATE RESILIENT CITIES: A PRIMER ON REDUCING VULNERABILITIES TO DISASTERS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7766-6
   Quagraine VictorK., 2011, Future of the tree: Towards growth and development of Kumasi, P212
   Rain D., 2011, Global Report on Human Settlements, May, P21
   Rubin J.R., 2005, QUALITATIVE INTERVIE, V2nd, DOI 10.4135/9781452226651
   Siiba A, 2018, CITIES, V73, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.015
   Simon D., 2008, WU WIDER WORKSH TIPP, P26
   Simon D., 2007, CONSTITUTION, V7, P3
   Songsore Jacob, 2008, J INT I, V16
   UN-HABITAT, 2011, GLOB REP HUM SETTL 2
   UN-HABITAT, 2004, SCP DOCUMENTATION SE, V2
   Walker B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Wallace D, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Watson V, 2009, URBAN STUD, V46, P2259, DOI 10.1177/0042098009342598
   World Economic & Social Survey, 2013, SUST DEV CHANG
   Yirenkyi J. A., 2014, THESIS
NR 89
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 3
U2 40
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0016-3287
EI 1873-6378
J9 FUTURES
JI Futures
PD AUG
PY 2018
VL 101
BP 55
EP 66
DI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.005
PG 12
WC Economics; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Public Administration
GA GO1CS
UT WOS:000439683600006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yang, GL
   Zhang, P
   Yu, F
   Zhu, XY
AF Yang, Guiling
   Zhang, Ping
   Yu, Fang
   Zhu, Xinyu
TI A review on resilient cities research from the perspective of
   territorial spatial planning: a bibliometric analysis
SO FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
LA English
DT Review
DE resilient cities; spatial planning; urbanization process; bibliometrics;
   bibliometrix
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; URBAN
AB With the rapid progression of urbanization, cities are increasingly confronted with multifaceted challenges encompassing climate change, population expansion, and resource constraints. Consequently, fostering the development of resilient cities has emerged as a pivotal imperative within future territorial spatial planning. In this paper, we searched the Web of Science Core Collection database for data related to resilient cities in the perspective of territorial spatial planning from 2004 to 2022, and conducted a bibliometric analysis using the Bibliometrix R software package. The results show that: (1) From 2004 to 2022, the number of papers in the field of resilient cities research in the perspective of land spatial planning totaled 933, with a fluctuating upward trend of annual publications. The top three journals in terms of publication are Sustainability, Cities and Landscape and Urban Planning. (2) There are 2,651 researchers from 71 countries or regions contributing to the field,with the top three authors being SHARIFI A, BRUNETTA G, and BARTHEL S, but most of the authors (90.49%) have published only one paper. In addition, developed countries have strong research strength in this field. (3) The top ten keywords in the field of resilient cities research from the perspective of territorial spatial planning are Cities/City, Resilience, Management, Ecosystem services, Climate-change, Urban, Framework, Adaptation, Governance and Space. These keywords reflect the fact that topics related to resilience management and sustainable development of urban areas are hot topics in the field. Water, Health, Geography, Demand, Decision-Making and Built Environment are the research directions of resilient cities from the perspective of future territorial spatial planning.
C1 [Yang, Guiling; Zhang, Ping; Yu, Fang; Zhu, Xinyu] Shangqiu Normal Univ, Henan Engn Technol Res Ctr Ecol Protect & Manageme, Shangqiu, Peoples R China.
C3 Shangqiu Normal University
RP Zhu, XY (corresponding author), Shangqiu Normal Univ, Henan Engn Technol Res Ctr Ecol Protect & Manageme, Shangqiu, Peoples R China.
EM zhuxinyu@sqnu.edu.cn
RI Zhu, Xinyu/C-1479-2017
OI Zhu, Xinyu/0009-0009-4469-1898
FU The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research,
   authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was
   supported by Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and
   Universities in Henan Province, study on the planning path [23B560008];
   Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan
   Province, study on the planning path of the old Yellow River pastoral
   complex in East Henan Province [21HASTIT015]; program for Science amp;
   Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province
   [232102320347]; Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and
   Universities in Henan Province
FX The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research,
   authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was
   supported by Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and
   Universities in Henan Province, study on the planning path of the old
   Yellow River pastoral complex in East Henan Province under the
   background of rural revitalization (Grant No. 23B560008), program for
   Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan
   Province (Grant No. 21HASTIT015) and the Key Scientific Research Project
   of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (Grant No. 232102320347).
CR Arfanuzzaman M, 2021, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2021.100127
   Aria M, 2017, J INFORMETR, V11, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
   Auzins A, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8110163
   Chang HJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102786
   Evans R, 2014, EUR PLAN STUD, V22, P1259, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.778958
   Gao D, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103332
   Gao WC, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V233, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/233/5/052046
   Gonçalves LAPJ, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102727
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jennings Barbara J., 2013, Environment Systems & Decisions, V33, P184, DOI 10.1007/s10669-013-9440-y
   Kabisch S, 2019, GEOGR TECH, V14, P98, DOI 10.21163/GT_2019.141.23
   Lee H, 2021, LANDSC ECOL ENG, V17, P427, DOI 10.1007/s11355-021-00458-7
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   [李翅 Li Chi], 2020, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V27, P54
   Li JF, 2022, FOODS, V11, DOI 10.3390/foods11233915
   Li SC, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15123035
   Li SC, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12010210
   Liang ZF, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18042082
   Liu YQ, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.029
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Pontrandolfi P, 2020, TEMA, P315, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6854
   Rousseau D., 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Evidence Based Management, DOI 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.001.0001
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Schauppenlehner-Kloyber E, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070664
   Shaker RR, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3020044
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Sheng S., 2022, Front. Chin. Mechanical Eng. Technol, V1, P17, DOI [10.48014/fcmet.20221209002, DOI 10.48014/FCMET.20221209002]
   Sheng S., 2023, Chongqing Architecture, V4), P21, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1671-9107.2023.04.21, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1671-9107.2023.04.21]
   Sheng SQ, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11111968
   [陶希东 Tao Xidong], 2022, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V46, P28
   Wang L, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104048
   Wang WH, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P8173, DOI 10.1007/s00500-019-04384-7
   Wang YC, 2018, J URBAN MANAG, V7, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2018.11.004
   Wu SS, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11050694
   Xie HL, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9010028
   Xu Z, 2020, HABITAT INT, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102145
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Ye X, 2023, J PLAN LIT, V38, P187, DOI 10.1177/08854122221137861
   Yu H, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12010213
   Zhang XR, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104476
NR 42
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 22
U2 95
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 2296-701X
J9 FRONT ECOL EVOL
JI Front. Ecol. Evol.
PD NOV 6
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1300764
DI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1300764
PG 13
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA Y2TS6
UT WOS:001103847700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ye, XY
   Yigitcanlar, T
   Xu, YY
   Head, M
   Hang, Y
   Sanchez, T
   Gong, WJ
   Niyogi, D
AF Ye, Xinyue
   Yigitcanlar, Tan
   Xu, Yangyang
   Head, Monique
   Hang, Yun
   Sanchez, Tom
   Gong, Wenjing
   Niyogi, Dev
TI Urban planning and IPCC-like city assessments integration for
   climate-resilient cities
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Editorial Material; Early Access
DE Urban planning; climate resilience; social justice; sustainable
   development goals; IPCC
AB The rapidly intensifying effects of climate change on urban settlements demand that cities move to the forefront of resilience planning. Climate extremes, from heatwaves to flooding, are increasingly testing the adaptability limits of urban systems and the vulnerability of their populations. Recognizing the unique position of cities, the IPCC's seventh assessment cycle has prioritized urban areas in its upcoming Special Report on Climate Change and Cities. The IPCC report underscores the potential of cities to act as agents of climate adaptation and provides a framework for cities to build climate-resilient systems. Cities are positioned to pioneer practical, integrative solutions that blend climate sciences with urban planning, establishing frameworks that align economic growth, health equity, environmental sustainability, social justice, and effective governance. This opinion piece explores how cities, by positioning themselves as hubs for innovation, policy reform, and community collaboration, can transform climate vulnerabilities into opportunities for community resilience and sustainability, especially by becoming more-than-human cities, setting examples on the global stage.
C1 [Ye, Xinyue; Xu, Yangyang; Sanchez, Tom; Gong, Wenjing] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA.
   [Yigitcanlar, Tan] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia.
   [Head, Monique] Univ Delaware, Delaware, OH USA.
   [Hang, Yun] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Brownsville, TX USA.
   [Niyogi, Dev] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station;
   Queensland University of Technology (QUT); University of Delaware;
   University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin
RP Ye, XY (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, College Stn, TX 77840 USA.; Ye, XY (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Ctr Geospatial Sci Applicat & Technol, College Stn, TX 77840 USA.; Niyogi, D (corresponding author), Univ Texas Austin, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Austin, TX 78712 USA.; Niyogi, D (corresponding author), Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
EM xinyue.ye@tamu.edu; dev.niyogi@jsg.utexas.edu
RI HEAD, MONIQUE/U-9018-2019; ye, xinyue/A-7677-2011; Yigitcanlar,
   Tan/J-1142-2012
FU National Science Foundation [2232533, 2324744, 2401860, 2430700]; NASA
   [80NSSC22KM0052]; Texas A&M University Harold Adams Interdisciplinary
   Professorship Research Fund
FX This material is partially based upon work supported by the National
   Science Foundation under 2232533, 2324744, 2401860, and 2430700, NASA
   under 80NSSC22KM0052, as well as Texas A&M University Harold Adams
   Interdisciplinary Professorship Research Fund. Any opinions, findings,
   and conclusions or recom- mendations expressed in this material are
   those of the author and the funders have no role in the study design,
   data collection, analysis, or preparation of this article.
CR [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2015, Lancet Commission
   IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2024, Special Report on Climate Change and Cities
   Kelley G., 2023, Structure
   Maller C, 2021, CITIES, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103155
   Scott M, 2016, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V17, P267, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2016.1158907
   Shaamala A, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105182
   Solecki W, 2024, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V14, P685, DOI 10.1038/s41558-024-02060-9
   Steele W, 2019, GEOFORUM, V106, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.007
   Ye XY, 2022, COMPUT URBAN SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s43762-022-00035-0
   Yigitcanlar T., 2018, International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, V9, P337
   Yigitcanlar T, 2019, J URBAN TECHNOL, V26, P147, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2018.1524249
NR 12
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD 2025 MAR 28
PY 2025
DI 10.1177/23998083251330940
EA MAR 2025
PG 8
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA 0UN1G
UT WOS:001456334400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Han, S
   Wang, B
   Ao, YB
   Bahmani, H
   Chai, BB
AF Han, Shan
   Wang, Bo
   Ao, Yibin
   Bahmani, Homa
   Chai, Beibei
TI The coupling and coordination degree of urban resilience system: A case
   study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban climate disaster; Urban resilience system; Coupling degree;
   Coordination degree; Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration
ID ECONOMIC RESILIENCE; URBANIZATION; EVOLUTION; HAZARDS; MODEL
AB The continuous deterioration of global climate is escalating the disaster risk for cities in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, and studying urban resilience is crucial for regional cities to prevent urban climate disasters and ensure sustainable urban development. However, few scholars discuss the mutual effects of urban social, economic and ecological resilience from the internal perspective of urban system. Therefore, this study puts forward the concept of urban resilience system, aims to measure the interaction effect between the rsubsystems' resilience of cities in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration by coupling degree, and to measure the coordinated development effect between the rsubsystems' resilience of cities in the region by coordinating degree. Based on CRITIC-TOPSIS weighted evaluation model and revised coupling coordination method, the results suggest that (1) most cities have a low coupling degree of urban resilience system and are in the "Runningin stage"; (2) most cities have a low coordination degree of urban resilience system and are in the "Bare coordination" stage; (3) the coupling degree and coordination degree of urban resilience system are increasing in all cities with the development; (4) cities in the east and west of the region have better coupling degree and coordination degree than cities in the north and south; (5) the development of economic resilience and social resilience lags behind ecological resilience in most cities. The results could provide theoretical references for the practice of resilient city construction and urban resilience research.
C1 [Han, Shan; Wang, Bo] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China.
   [Ao, Yibin; Bahmani, Homa] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Chai, Beibei] Hebei Univ Engn, Hebei Collaborat Innovat Ctr Regulat & Comprehens, Handan 056038, Peoples R China.
   [Chai, Beibei] Hebei Univ Engn, Innovat Ctr Water Pollut Control & Water Ecol Reme, Handan 056038, Peoples R China.
C3 Southwest University of Science & Technology - China; Chengdu University
   of Technology; Hebei University of Engineering; Hebei University of
   Engineering
RP Wang, B (corresponding author), Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621010, Peoples R China.; Ao, YB (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
EM hanshan2020@mails.swust.edu.cn; boy@swust.edu.cn;
   aoyibin10@mail.cdut.edu.cn
RI Han, Shan/KJL-9072-2024; Bahmani, Homa/IVH-5392-2023; Beibei,
   Chai/GOP-0430-2022
OI Han, Shan/0009-0003-0024-1584; Bahmani, Homa/0000-0002-9212-5163;
   Beibei, Chai/0000-0001-5317-1442; Ao, Yibin/0000-0001-7288-638X
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72171028, 72091510]
FX Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (72171028, 72091510) .
CR Al Nasiri N, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V11, P10, DOI 10.1177/0975425320906307
   [Anonymous], 2021, CHINA NEWS NET
   Ao YB, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P1287, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04632-w
   [白帅 Bai Shuai], 2022, [水土保持通报, Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation], V42, P308
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Cardoso MA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062349
   Chen PY, 2021, EXPERT SYST APPL, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114186
   Chen Q, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18157947
   Chen WX, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106964
   Chen YZ, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V812, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151510
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   China Government Net, 2021, CENTR COMM COMM PART
   China Government Net, 2022, INVESTIGATION REPORT
   China Government Net. Ministry of Emergency Management of the People"s Republic of China, 2022, MIN EM MAN REL BAS S
   China Ministry of Emergency Management Net, 2022, TOP 10 INT NAT DIS E
   Chongqing Emergency Management Bureau Net, 2023, B NAT DIS CIT 2022
   Das S, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P950, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01241-7
   DIAKOULAKI D, 1995, COMPUT OPER RES, V22, P763, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Fiksel J., 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, V2, P14
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gambe TR, 2019, RESILIENCE, V7, P83, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2018.1534333
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grantham Theodore E., 2019, Water Security, V8, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2019.100049
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong T, 2022, MATH PROBL ENG, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/7339005
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Javadpoor M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102609
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Khan M, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000749
   Lam NSN, 2014, J COASTAL RES, P473, DOI 10.2112/SI70-080.1
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Li MJ, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106467
   Li WJ, 2022, ECOL ENG, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106607
   Li YF, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V98, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
   Liao KC, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072320
   Liu K, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P6898, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11051-0
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu LYQ, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P104039, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2999501
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   [刘彦平 Liu Yanping], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P93
   Luo D, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107858
   Luo X, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14071083
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   Ma XF, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052899
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moradi A, 2021, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V18, P2441, DOI 10.1007/s13762-021-03377-0
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   Nop S, 2019, ECOL SOC, V24, DOI 10.5751/ES-10860-240223
   Opach T, 2020, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V74, P181, DOI 10.1080/00291951.2020.1753236
   Qiao H, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010038
   Qin WM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P331, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2967-3
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Shen LY, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106692
   Shi CC, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11060921
   Shi T, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118739
   Sichuan Emergency Management Department Net, 2023, SICH EM MAN DEP REL
   Sim T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041137
   Song QJ, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V121, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.037
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Su F, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106507
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Tan JT, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P471, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0878-6
   Tian Y, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0243459
   Tomal M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102992
   Wang B, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12070962
   [王成 Wang Cheng], 2018, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V37, P1100
   Wang H, 2021, J URBAN MANAG, V10, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.006
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   [王淑佳 Wang Shujia], 2021, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V36, P793
   Wei D, 2022, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029390
   Wei D, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103535
   Xiong YN, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14105889
   Xu WT, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V116, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.023
   Xu WP, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102784
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang LC, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103571
   Yang LC, 2023, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104931
   Yuan Y, 2022, ECOL ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106486
   Zanotti L, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11642-250304
   Zhang MD, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0260214
   Zhang W., 2013, Geogr. Sci, V33, P562, DOI [10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2013.05.007, DOI 10.13249/J.CNKI.SGS.2013.05.007]
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 87
TC 55
Z9 55
U1 248
U2 555
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 101
AR 107145
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
EA MAY 2023
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA I9UL8
UT WOS:001006158900001
HC Y
HP Y
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhao, RD
   Fang, CL
   Liu, J
   Zhang, LF
AF Zhao, Ruidong
   Fang, Chuanglin
   Liu, Jing
   Zhang, Lifang
TI The evaluation and obstacle analysis of urban resilience from the
   multidimensional perspective in Chinese cities
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Multidimension; Comprehensive evaluation; Obstacle
   factor; China
ID DISASTER RESILIENCE; COMMUNITIES; MODEL
AB Evaluation of urban resilience is essential for ensuring the health and security of cities in China. This paper describes creating a multi-dimensional index system that evaluates urban resilience across economic, social, institutional, ecological, and infrastructure dimensions. The results show that the urban resilience in China slowly increased over the study period and tended to be balanced across the dimensions, although urban environmental resilience and institutional resilience were generally higher, and economic, social and infrastructure resilience were lower. The spatial heterogeneity of urban resilience was significant, and resilience in eastern China was greater than in the central or western regions of the country. The degree of urban resilience corresponded to city size: larger cities showed more resilience than smaller cities. Analysis of factors that were obstacles to resilience showed that these factors changed dynamically from being factors of infrastructure-economy dimensions to factors of society-institution-ecology dimensions. Carrying out the multidimensional evaluation of China's urban resilience can identify the weaknesses of resilience in different dimensions, and to enable the factual decision-making and resource allocation of resilient cities at national and sub-dimensional levels.
C1 [Zhao, Ruidong] Taiyuan Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Jinzhong 030619, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Ruidong; Fang, Chuanglin; Zhang, Lifang] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Geog & Remote Sensing Sci, Urumqi 800017, Peoples R China.
   [Fang, Chuanglin] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jing] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Urumqi 800046, Peoples R China.
C3 Taiyuan Normal University; Xinjiang University; Chinese Academy of
   Sciences; Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research,
   CAS; Xinjiang University
RP Fang, CL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM zhaord@stu.xju.edu.cn; fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn
RI Fang, Chuanglin/ABF-2458-2020
OI Liu, jing/0000-0001-6353-9490
FU Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [42121001]
FX Acknowledgments This study is supported by the Innovative Research Group
   Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no.
   42121001) .
CR Alliance R., 2007, Assessing and managing resilience in social-ecological systems: A practitioners workbook
   Aoki N, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.025
   Barnes DF, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P894, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.014
   Bruneau M, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P41, DOI 10.1193/1.2431396
   Chen Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106771
   Contreras D, 2016, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V43, P115, DOI 10.1080/15230406.2015.1029520
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010, Measuring resilience: A concept note on the resilience tool
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Joerin J, 2014, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V15, P117
   Kahan JH, 2009, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V6
   Korhonen J, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.006
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Liu HM, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V165, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.127
   Lu C., 2011, CHINA LAND SCI, V25, P27
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Mol JM., 2021, Behavioural Public Policy, P1
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Nathwani J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
   National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2015, DISASTER RESILIENCE
   Nikkhah A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V665, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.170
   O'Brien K, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P667, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425767
   Paganini Z, 2019, GEOFORUM, V104, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.003
   Parsons M, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P20
   Qiu G, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V651, P1114, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.219
   [Rao Naveen Managing Director Health The Rockefeller Foundation Managing Director Health The Rockefeller Foundation], 2018, [No title captured]
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   UN, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2
   UN-Habitat, 2020, World Cities Report. The Value of Sustainable Urbanization
   Vallance S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.010
   Wing OEJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2
   Wu Q, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102075
   [杨莹 Yang Ying], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P266
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
NR 37
TC 125
Z9 127
U1 278
U2 946
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD NOV
PY 2022
VL 86
AR 104160
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
EA SEP 2022
PG 13
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA 5A5RJ
UT WOS:000862944400005
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sun, JY
   Zhou, LY
   Deng, JY
   Zhang, CY
   Xing, HG
AF Sun, Jia-Ying
   Zhou, Lang-Yu
   Deng, Jun-Yuan
   Zhang, Chao-Yong
   Xing, Hui-Ge
TI Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Urban Emergency Response Resilience During
   Public Health Crises: A Case Study of Wuhan
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; emergency response capacity; public health
   emergencies; Wuhan city
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; MODEL
AB In recent years, public health emergencies have severely disrupted city functions and endangered residents' health and lives, enhancing the emergency response capacity, a crucial aspect of building resilient cities. Based on the Wuhan Statistical Yearbook and local economic and social big data, this study constructed a resilience assessment system that covers resistance, adaptability, and resilience. Evaluate the resilience level of each region and analyze its spatiotemporal characteristics using the entropy weight method, Theil index, and natural breakpoint method. The central area exhibited higher resilience levels, while peripheral areas showed lower resilience, owing to location advantage and developmental disparities. The obstacle degree model revealed that scientific and technological innovation, social rescue capabilities, and population size are the primary weak links in building urban emergency response capacity. Based on these findings, this study aims to provide policy recommendations and improvement measures for multiple stakeholders, guide the construction of resilient cities, enhance the ability to respond to public health crises and recovery speed, and ensure urban functions and residents' well-being.
C1 [Sun, Jia-Ying] Sinopec Grp Tendering Co Ltd, Business Dept 1, Wuhan Branch, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China.
   [Sun, Jia-Ying; Zhou, Lang-Yu; Xing, Hui-Ge] Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China.
   [Deng, Jun-Yuan] Chinese Univ Hong Kong CUHK Shenzhen, Sch Sci & Engn, Shenzhen 518172, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Chao-Yong] Jiaxing Nanhu Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Jiaxing 314000, Peoples R China.
C3 Sichuan University; The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen;
   Jiaxing Nanhu University
RP Xing, HG (corresponding author), Sichuan Univ, Coll Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China.; Zhang, CY (corresponding author), Jiaxing Nanhu Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Jiaxing 314000, Peoples R China.
EM sunjy13233@sinopec.com; zhoulangyu@stu.scu.edu.cn;
   junyuandeng@link.cuhk.edu.cn; 220028@jxnhu.edu.cn; hgxing@scu.edu.cn
RI Sun, Jiaying/HJH-7365-2023; Zhang, Chaoyong/U-4668-2017
OI Xing, Hui-ge/0000-0002-8640-4502
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; National key R D Program
   [2022YFC3080100];  [U20A20111]
FX This work was funded by [National Natural Science Foundation of China]
   grant number [U20A20111] and [National key R & D Program] grant number
   [2022YFC3080100].
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
   Ali S.H., 2020, J. Contingencies Crisis Manag, V28, P125
   Alizadeh T., 2021, J. Urban Manag, V10, P157
   [Anonymous], 2019, Making Cities Resilient Report 2019: A Snapshot of how local governments progress in reducing disaster risks in alignment with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
   [Anonymous], 100 resilient cities
   Ayyoob M., 2021, Sustain. Cities Soc, V64, P102542
   Baibarac C, 2019, CODESIGN, V15, P91, DOI 10.1080/15710882.2017.1399145
   Boin A., 2014, Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events
   Brewer CA, 2002, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V92, P662, DOI 10.1111/1467-8306.00310
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bruneau M, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P41, DOI 10.1193/1.2431396
   Cai XL, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152416668
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Carneiro J, 2024, WATER-SUI, V16, DOI 10.3390/w16182611
   Chang S. E., 2009, BRIDGE, V39, P36
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chen JL, 2024, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijgi13050167
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Chen Y., 2006, Ecol. Econ, V58, P1
   China, Economic and Social Big Data Research Platform
   Coaffee J., 2013, Urban Stud, V50, P499
   Conceicao P., 2000, Eastern Economic Journal, V26, P61
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Fan VY, 2018, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V96, P129, DOI 10.2471/BLT.17.199588
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forman R, 2022, HEALTH POLICY, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.12.001
   FOTHERINGHAM AS, 1991, ENVIRON PLANN A, V23, P1025, DOI 10.1068/a231025
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Guo Y, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1007/s13753-012-0006-2
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu H, 2024, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V32, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12604
   Hubei Provincial Bureau of Statistics, 2020, Hubei Statistical Yearbook
   Jenks G. F., 1967, Int Yearbook Cartogr, V7, P186
   Kawachi I., 2000, SOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, P174, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED/9780195377903.003.0008
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Le XY, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16072926
   [李梦杰 Li Mengjie], 2022, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V32, P144
   Li YP, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V93, P742, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2024.05.027
   Liao ZJ, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-33342-5
   Lindell MK, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P616, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
   McKibbin W, 2021, ASIAN ECON PAP, V20, P1, DOI 10.1162/asep_a_00796
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miao X, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P1389, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0753-4
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Qu WR, 2022, ENTROPY-SWITZ, V24, DOI 10.3390/e24070849
   Quarantelli E., 1998, WHAT IS DISASTER PER
   Rui Y., 2019, Nat. Hazards, V98, P451
   SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   [史晨辰 Shi Chenchen], 2023, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V43, P1726
   SILVER WE, 1967, OPER RES QUART, V18, P328, DOI 10.2307/3006993
   Wang HY, 2023, PLOS ONE, V18, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0283559
   Wang Z., 2022, Cities, V120, P103445
   who, WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard | WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard with vaccination data
   World Resources Institute, 2017, Urban Community Resilience Assessment
   Wu J., 2017, Sustainability, V9, P1442
   Wuhan Municipal Health Commission, 2020, Wuhan Statistical Yearbook
   Xu Z., 2021, Cities, V110, P103084
   Yazdani M, 2023, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2023.100975
   Yazdani M, 2023, PROG DISASTER SCI, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100288
   Yin J., 2020, Sustain. Cities Soc, V60, P102
   You XT, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V113, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05368-x
   Zhao D., 2018, Sustain. Cities Soc, V36, P122
   Zhao MJ, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13040563
   Zhao ZL, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16167090
   Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
   Zhou Y, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P83401, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-28049-z
   Zou B., 2006, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens, V72, P373
NR 71
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 19
U2 19
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 20
AR 9091
DI 10.3390/su16209091
PG 25
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA K1O2J
UT WOS:001341638100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shamsuddin, S
AF Shamsuddin, Shomon
TI Urban in Question: Recovering the Concept of Urban in Urban Resilience
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE city planning; resilient cities; sustainability; urbanism; urban
   resilience
ID CLIMATE RESILIENCE; CITIES; CITY; POLICY; SCALE; SUSTAINABILITY;
   TRANSFORMATION; ECOLOGY; POVERTY; RISK
AB Existential threats from climate change, weather-related disasters, and other crises have drawn increasing attention to urban resilience. Prior work has focused on explicating resilience and proposing various definitions of it. But the emphasis on describing resilience might overlook what urban means in discussions of urban resilience. This paper investigates how urban resilience scholarship conceptualizes and defines the term urban. I conduct a literature review and content analysis of recently published urban resilience articles. The results reveal how urban is prominently featured, but its conceptual use is not identified, and the term is left undefined. The findings suggest serious concerns about the applicability and generalizability of urban resilience to different contexts. The paper contributes to the literature by showing how conceptualizing urban alternately as a shared subject of study, influential condition, or measurement category has far-reaching implications for urban resilience planning, implementation, and assessment. Drawing upon the idea of simulated annealing, the paper suggests that taking a few conceptual steps backward may help our understanding of urban resilience-and cities to bounce back better.
C1 [Shamsuddin, Shomon] Tufts Univ, Dept Urban & Environm Policy & Planning, Medford, MA 02155 USA.
C3 Tufts University
RP Shamsuddin, S (corresponding author), Tufts Univ, Dept Urban & Environm Policy & Planning, Medford, MA 02155 USA.
EM shomon.shamsuddin@tufts.edu
RI Shamsuddin, Shomon/KEH-9744-2024
CR Abbott A, 1997, SOC FORCES, V75, P1149, DOI 10.2307/2580667
   Aguilar-Barajas I, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.021
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Al-Humaiqani MM, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103797
   Allen Adriana., 2017, Environmental Justice and Urban Resilience in the Global South New York, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-47354-76
   Allen P.M., 1997, Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems
   [Anonymous], 2018, Department of economic and social affairs
   [Anonymous], 2016, Investing in Urban Resilience: Protecting and Promoting Development in a Changing World
   [Anonymous], 2002, World Urbanization Prospects
   [Anonymous], 2012, Redefining Urban: A new way to Measure Metropolitan Areas
   Assarkhaniki Z, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101840
   Assumma V, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010003
   Ayub B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102925
   BATTY M, 1994, ENVIRON PLANN B, V21, pS31, DOI 10.1068/b21s031
   Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419
   Beceiro P, 2022, ECOL ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106489
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Del Pozo PB, 2020, GEOGR REV, V110, P322, DOI 10.1080/00167428.2019.1684195
   Blecic I, 2020, PLAN THEOR, V19, P172, DOI 10.1177/1473095219873365
   BOGGS SL, 1965, AM SOCIOL REV, V30, P899, DOI 10.2307/2090968
   Bozza A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010103
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brenner N., 2009, CITY ANAL URBAN TREN, V13, P198, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604810902996466
   Brenner N, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P731, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12115
   Bristow DN, 2020, J IND ECOL, V24, P300, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12919
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brueckner Jan., 2011, Lectures on Urban Economics
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082331
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Capolongo S, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15122698
   Cardoni A, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103540
   Cariolet JM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V615, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.334
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   CASTELLS M, 1968, SOCIOL TRAV, V10, P72, DOI 10.3406/sotra.1968.1380
   Castells M., 1977, URBAN QUESTION MARXI
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chmutina K, 2016, CITIES, V58, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
   Coaffee J., 2017, Urban Resilience: Planning for Risk, Crisis and Uncertainty
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Dastjerdi MS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100794
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Della Corte V, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212632
   DEWEY R, 1960, AM J SOCIOL, V66, P60, DOI 10.1086/222824
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   Duranton G, 2003, Handbook of regional and urban economics, V9931, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1, 10.3386/w9931]
   Eidelson R.J., 1997, Review of General Psychology, V1, P42, DOI DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.42
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Errigo MF, 2018, TEMA, V11, P51, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/5402
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Fujita M, 1996, J JPN INT ECON, V10, P339, DOI 10.1006/jjie.1996.0021
   Gernay T, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V161, P1801, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.782
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Graham L, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.001
   Gutman R, 1963, AM BEHAV SCI, V6, P9, DOI 10.1177/000276426300600603
   Handayani W, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073
   Harvey D., 1985, Consciousness and the Urban Experience
   Harvey David., 2000, Spaces of Hope
   HOLLAND JH, 1992, DAEDALUS, V121, P17
   Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
   Huck A, 2020, CITIES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102573
   Huff Emily S., 2020, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V46, P185
   Iturriza M, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100613
   Iturriza M, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102688
   Iturriza M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062168
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jiménez-Medina P, 2021, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V44, P170, DOI 10.1177/0160017620925130
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Keen M, 2019, URBAN POLICY RES, V37, P324, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2019.1626710
   Koren D, 2017, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V245, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/245/6/062011
   Kurth MH, 2019, BUILD RES INF, V47, P480, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2018.1452489
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Lak A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103410
   Lak A, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P2194, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2020.1714561
   Lee DS, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10020289
   Lefebvre Henri., 2003, The Urban Revolution
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Levin S, 2013, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V18, P111, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X12000460
   Logan TM, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1538, DOI 10.1111/risa.13492
   Marshall A., 1890, PRINCIPLES EC
   MATTINGLY M, 1994, CITIES, V11, P201, DOI 10.1016/0264-2751(94)90060-4
   McClymont K, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Miller J.H., 2016, CRUDE LOOK WHOLE SCI
   Mills EdwinS., 1972, URBAN EC
   Moglia M, 2021, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100052
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Moya J, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19095746
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Nguyen HL, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197896
   Normandin JM, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_2
   O'Sullivan A., 1996, URBAN EC, V3rd
   Ottenburger SS, 2020, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100354
   Parizi SM, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P725, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04855-x
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pitidis V, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103573
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   POPENOE D, 1965, URBAN AFFAIRS Q, V1, P17, DOI 10.1177/107808746500100102
   Potts D, 2017, WORLD DEV, V97, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.036
   Rahimi-Golkhandan A, 2021, J MANAGE ENG, V37, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000872
   Reiss A., 1955, The Metropolis in Modern Life
   Rezvani SMHS, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103612
   Robinson J, 2002, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V26, P531, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00397
   Robinson Jennifer., 2006, Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, City Resilience Framework100 Resilient Cities
   Rodina L, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1334
   Roy A, 2016, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V40, P200, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12274
   Roy A, 2011, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V35, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
   Satterthwaite D, 1997, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V28, P9, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1997.mp28002002.x
   Satterthwaite D., 2010, UNU-WIDER Working Paper, No. 2010/28
   Schwind N, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P239, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_12
   Scott AJ, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P1, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12134
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shen LY, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104616
   Shirgir E, 2019, TEMA, V12, P227, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6250
   Simmel Georg., 1903, SOCIOLOGY G SIMMEL
   Smith N., 2003, URBAN REVOLUTION
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   STAR SL, 1989, SOC STUD SCI, V19, P387, DOI 10.1177/030631289019003001
   STRASZHEIM MR, 1973, REV ECON STAT, V55, P1, DOI 10.2307/1927988
   Stren R., 1993, Cities, V10, P125, DOI DOI 10.1016/0264-2751(93)90044-J
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Taylor FE, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103771
   Therrien MC, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102931
   Torabi E, 2022, URBAN RES PRACT, V15, P561, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2020.1846771
   U.S. Census Bureau, 2021, 2010 Census urban and rural classification and urban area criteria
   U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, How Do Households Describe Where They Live?
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   Urquiza A, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001508
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Voghera A, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104377
   Voghera A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102726
   WALDINGER R, 1989, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V15, P211
   Wang L, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102181
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Wirth L, 1938, AM J SOCIOL, V44, P1, DOI 10.1086/217913
   Woolston HB, 1912, AM J SOCIOL, V17, P602, DOI 10.1086/212011
   Xia Q, 2022, ENERGY REP, V8, P4695, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.168
   Xu WP, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13152022
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 156
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 55
U2 130
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 22
AR 15907
DI 10.3390/su152215907
PG 18
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA Z7BI8
UT WOS:001113585400001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hardoy, J
   Gencer, E
   Winograd, M
AF Hardoy, Jorgelina
   Gencer, Ebru
   Winograd, Manuel
TI Participatory planning for climate resilient and inclusive urban
   development in Dosquebradas, Santa Ana and Santa Tome
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Argentina; climate resilience; Colombia; disaster risk reduction; El
   Salvador; inclusive urban development; Latin America; participatory
   planning
AB Urban governments need to take actions to reduce disaster risks and incorporate climate resilience into their development strategies and plans. But most local governments, particularly small- and medium-sized cities in the global South, lack the knowledge and capacity to do so. This paper presents the findings from a project that engaged local governments and other key stakeholders to develop a participatory planning process for climate resilient and inclusive urban development. The project took place in three small- to medium-sized Latin American cities: Dosquebradas, Colombia; Santa Ana, El Salvador; and Santo Tome, Argentina. By engaging government officials and politicians, academics, technical specialists, and representatives of civil society organizations in interviews, workshops and focus group discussions, this project sought to identify a range of feasible options for climate resilient and inclusive urban development. In each city, this process provided rich, context-specific details to identify strategies and plan projects with the buy-in of city government and other key actors. The overall goal was to bring in a resilience lens to assess current and planned urban development projects in each city and reach a consensus on feasible and inclusive resilience options for development.
C1 [Hardoy, Jorgelina] Inst Int Medio Ambiente & Desarrollo Amer Latina, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.
   [Gencer, Ebru] CUDRR R, New York, NY USA.
   [Gencer, Ebru] Columbia Univ, Architecture Planning & Preservat, New York, NY USA.
   [Winograd, Manuel] Wageningen Environm Res WEnR ALTERRA, Wageningen, Netherlands.
C3 Columbia University; Wageningen University & Research
RP Winograd, M (corresponding author), POB 47, NL-6700 AC Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM jhardoy@iied-al.org.ar; ebru.gencer@cudrr.org; manuel.winograd@wur.nl
FU Climate and Development Knowledge Network (CDKN); International
   Development Research Centre (IDRC); Fundacion Futuro Latinoamericano
   (FFLA)
FX This project was part of the Climate Resilient Cities in Latin America
   Initiative (CRC) and funded by the Climate and Development Knowledge
   Network (CDKN), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC),
   and the Fundacion Futuro Latinoamericano (FFLA).
CR Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Fraser, 2016, CITIES FINITE PLANET, P17
   Gencer E, 2013, FEEM NOTA DI LAVORO
   Hardoy J, 2018, MEDIO AMBIENTE URBAN, V88
   Hardoy J, PARTICIPATORY UNPUB
   Hardoy J, 2018, INFORM POLITICAS PLA
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   UN-Habitat, 2018, CIT RES PROF TOOL
   United Nation, 2009, UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), 2018, 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects
   Velasquez E, 2018, CIUDADES RESILIENTES
NR 11
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 4
U2 30
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD APR
PY 2019
VL 31
IS 1
BP 33
EP 52
DI 10.1177/0956247819825539
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA HU1DK
UT WOS:000465012100003
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Keen, M
   Connell, J
AF Keen, Meg
   Connell, John
TI Regionalism and Resilience? Meeting Urban Challenges in Pacific Island
   States
SO URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Pacific; urbanisation; policy; regionalism; sustainable cities; island
   states; resilience
ID LAND; URBANIZATION; SETTLEMENTS; KIRIBATI
AB Urbanisation in PICs is rapid. Urban planning and management capacity are limited. Economic and environmental pressures are mounting and eroding urban resilience and livelihoods. Because urban planning and regulatory frameworks are weak, national politics and elite interests strongly influence urban development, and inequities in cities are growing. No regional organisation has responsibility for urban issues, urban resilience frameworks are poorly defined, so fragmented and ineffective urban strategies persist, while national policies and practices are resolutely anti-urban. Concerted regional action could enable sharing of knowledge and successful strategies, coordinate urban action to build resilience, and enable a more proactive political and policy agendas for more sustainable and resilient cities.
C1 [Keen, Meg] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Pacific Affairs, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Connell, John] Univ Sydney, Sch Geosci, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
C3 Australian National University; University of Sydney
RP Connell, J (corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
EM john.connell@sydney.edu.au
CR Aiafi PR, 2017, ASIA PAC POLICY STUD, V4, P451, DOI 10.1002/app5.196
   Asian Development Bank, 2016, The emergence of Pacific urban villages: Urbanization trends in the Pacific Islands
   Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2013, MOV RISK RES SUST UR
   Aswani S, 2010, CONSERV BIOL, V24, P520, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01377.x
   Bahadur A., 2016, Reimagining Resilience: Bringing Resilience, Transformation And Vulnerability Closer For Tackling Climate Change
   Bai XM, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V23, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.010
   Barbara J., 2017, Development Bulletin, V78, P16
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Brewer T., 2011, Coral reef fish value chains in Solomon Islands: market opportunities and market effects on fish stocks
   Brown P, 2017, CLIM DEV, V9, P493, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2016.1174656
   Butcher-Gollach C., 2018, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC, P43
   Cocklin C, 2000, ENVIRON CONSERV, V27, P392, DOI 10.1017/S0376892900000448
   Commonwealth Local Government Forum (CLGF), 2018, CLGF PAC URB FOR PRE
   Connell J., 2013, ISLANDS RISK
   Connell J., 1993, 11 ANU NAT CTR DEV
   Connell J, 2011, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V52, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8373.2011.01445.x
   Connell John., 2002, URBANISATION ISLAND
   Connell John., 2003, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, V44, P243, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8373.2003.00213.X
   Foukona J, 2015, J PAC HIST, V50, P504, DOI 10.1080/00223344.2015.1110328
   Foukona JD, 2017, STATE SOC GOV MELANE, P85
   Gewertz Deborah., 1991, TWISTED HIST ALTERED
   Gooden I., 2017, Development Bulletin, P87
   International Labour Organization (ILO), 2017, STUD FUT WORK PAC
   Jones P., 2017, DEV B, V78, P11
   Jones P, 2007, PAC AFF, V80, P473, DOI 10.5509/2007803473
   Jones P, 2012, URBAN POLICY RES, V30, P145, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2012.664930
   Keen M., 2017, Urban Development in Honiara: Harnessing Opportunities, Embracing Change
   Keen M., URBAN RESILIENCE ASI
   Kiddle GL, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101878
   Koczberski G, 2001, URBAN STUD, V38, P2017, DOI 10.1080/00420980120080916
   Kolshus T., 2018, MOBILITIES RETURN PA, P171
   Lal BV, 2014, J PAC HIST, V49, P457, DOI 10.1080/00223344.2014.977518
   McDonnell S, 2017, STATE SOC GOV MELANE, P283
   McDougall D., 2017, Journal de la Societe des Oceanistes, V1, P63, DOI DOI 10.4000/JSO.7764
   McEvoy D., CLIMATE DEV, V11
   Mecartney S, 2017, STATE SOC GOV MELANE, P57
   Monsell-Davis M., 1993, Canberra Anthropology, V16, P45
   Numbasa G, 2012, AUST GEOGR, V43, P143, DOI 10.1080/00049182.2012.682293
   Overton J., 2019, Aid, Ownership and Development: The Inverse Sovereignty Effect in the Pacific Islands
   Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS), 2017, 48 PAC ISL FOR COMM
   Petrou K., 2017, J SOC DES OCEANISTES, V144, P51
   Phillips T., 2016, 20166 ANU STAT SOC G
   PIFS, 2017, STAT PAC REG REP 201
   de Oliveira JAP, 2017, ROUT ADV CLIMATE, P1
   Rees WE., 1992, Environment and Urbanization, V4, P121, DOI DOI 10.1177/095624789200400212
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2015, CIT RES IND UND MEAS
   Storey D., 2005, 20057 ANU SSGM
   Storey D., 2003, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, V44, P259
   Storey D, 2010, AUST GEOGR, V41, P167, DOI 10.1080/00049181003742294
   Talbot J., 2007, The Round Table, V96, P319
   Trundle A., 2018, LOCAL ACTION CLIMATE, P35
   Trundle A., 2016, HONIARA URBAN RESILI
   Trundle A., 2015, Climate change vulnerability assessment: Greater Port Vila
   UN Habitat and Commonwealth Local Government Forum (CLGF), 2015, PAC URB FOR 2015 P
   UNDP, 1996, STAT HUM SETTL URB P
   UNESCAP, 2007, PAC URB AG
   UNESCAP, 2004, SPEC BOD PAC ISL DEV
   World Bank, 2015, UNS WAT SAN URB SETT
   World Bank, 2000, CIT SEAS STORMS MAN, V2
   World Bank, 2017, URB FLOOD RISK MAN P
NR 60
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 2
U2 29
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0811-1146
EI 1476-7244
J9 URBAN POLICY RES
JI Urban Policy Res.
PD JUL 3
PY 2019
VL 37
IS 3
BP 324
EP 337
DI 10.1080/08111146.2019.1626710
EA JUN 2019
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA IM6JF
UT WOS:000473112400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hu, R
   Zhou, KL
   Yang, JN
   Yin, H
AF Hu, Rong
   Zhou, Kaile
   Yang, Jingna
   Yin, Hui
TI Management of resilient urban integrated energy system: State-of-the-art
   and future directions
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Review
DE Integrated energy system; Energy system resilience; Energy management;
   Resilient city
ID GRID VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS; POWER-SYSTEMS; ELECTRIC-POWER; MICROGRIDS;
   STRATEGIES; NETWORKS; FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; IDENTIFICATION;
   RELIABILITY
AB The urban integrated energy system (UIES) is the fundamental infrastructure supporting the operation of resilient cities. The resilience of UIES plays a critical role in effectively responding to extreme events. We provide a comprehensive review on the management of resilient UIES. Firstly, we examine the existing studies on the resilience of UIES through quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Secondly, it points out that the coupling characteristics of UIES have a dual impact on resilience. The definition of UIES resilience can be understood from three perspectives, namely partial resilience versus total resilience, physical resilience versus digital resilience, and current resilience versus future resilience. Thirdly, this review summarizes the strategies for improving the resilience of UIES across three distinct stages, namely before, during, and after extreme events. The resilience of UIES can be enhanced by effective measures to prediction, adaptation, and assessment. Finally, the challenges faced by management of resilient UIES are presented and discussed, in terms of mitigating compound risks, modeling complex systems, addressing data collection and quality issue, and collaborating within multi stakeholders.
C1 [Hu, Rong; Zhou, Kaile; Yang, Jingna; Yin, Hui] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Kaile; Yin, Hui] Hefei Univ Technol, Key Lab Proc Optimizat & Intelligent Decis Making, Minist Educ, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China.
   [Hu, Rong; Zhou, Kaile; Yang, Jingna] Hefei Univ Technol, Anhui Prov Key Lab Philosophy & Social Sci Smart M, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China.
C3 Hefei University of Technology; Hefei University of Technology; Hefei
   University of Technology
RP Zhou, KL (corresponding author), Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Management, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China.
EM zhoukaile@hfut.edu.cn
RI Zhou, Kaile/AAR-7395-2020
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72242103, 72271071];
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2022HGPB0305]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Nos. 72242103 and 72271071) , and the Fundamental Research Funds
   for the Central Universities (No. JZ2022HGPB0305) .
CR Abedi A, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V183, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.019
   Adhikari S, 2019, IEEE T SUSTAIN ENERG, V10, P1152, DOI 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2862351
   Afgan N.H, 2016, Resilience of Sustainable Power Plant Systems in Catastrophic Events
   Ahmad M, 2023, CHEM ENG J, V453, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2022.139846
   Ahmad M, 2022, CHEM ENG J, V433, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134361
   Ahmad T, 2022, ENERGY REP, V8, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.256
   Ahmadi S, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110988
   Al-Abayechi YF, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P2554, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-10-013
   [Anonymous], 2016, Large-scale electricity interconnection: Technology and prospects for cross-regional networks
   Anvari M, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-31942-9
   Arif SM, 2023, Eng Sci J, V7, P808, DOI [10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-011, DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-03-011]
   Bao ML, 2020, APPL ENERG, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115136
   Bao ZJ, 2020, J MOD POWER SYST CLE, V8, P961, DOI 10.35833/MPCE.2019.000455
   Bennett JA, 2021, NAT ENERGY, V6, P240, DOI 10.1038/s41560-020-00758-6
   Beyza J, 2018, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V12, P5753, DOI 10.1049/iet-gtd.2018.5799
   Bohman AD, 2022, RISK ANAL, V42, P544, DOI 10.1111/risa.13765
   Bompard E, 2009, IEEE T SYST MAN CY A, V39, P1074, DOI 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2020687
   Brinkerink M, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V107, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.003
   Browning T. R., 2002, Systems Engineering, V5, P180, DOI 10.1002/sys.10023
   Buldyrev SV, 2010, NATURE, V464, P1025, DOI 10.1038/nature08932
   Cao M, 2023, CHEM ENG J, V475, DOI 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146048
   Carli R, 2017, IEEE T AUTOM SCI ENG, V14, P505, DOI 10.1109/TASE.2016.2593101
   Causevic S, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P300, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2019.1666341
   Chen H, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V347, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119151
   Chen MZ, 2023, ENERGY, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127203
   Cheng MX, 2016, INT J ELEC POWER, V82, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.045
   Chi LX, 2023, ENERGY, V263, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125740
   Correa GJ, 2013, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V101, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2013.04.003
   Cortés JAMB, 2015, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V11, P1352, DOI 10.1080/15732479.2014.964732
   Crucitti P, 2005, FLUCT NOISE LETT, V5, pL201, DOI 10.1142/S0219477505002562
   Dai YY, 2014, PHYSICA A, V395, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2013.10.029
   Daraz A, 2024, SCI REP-UK, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-60028-3
   Diao XX, 2024, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109699
   Ding ZY, 2024, ENERGY, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2023.129634
   Doostan M, 2017, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V152, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2017.07.005
   Dunn S, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000267
   Erenoglu AK, 2022, IEEE T SMART GRID, V13, P3118, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2022.3155438
   Fan B, 2023, IEEE SYST J, V17, P4874, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3227632
   Fang RM, 2017, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V42, P20269, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.039
   Fang YP, 2013, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V116, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.021
   Faramondi L, 2019, IEEE T SYST MAN CY-S, V49, P2036, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.2018.2790438
   Feng KR, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32018-4
   Ferrario E, 2022, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108040
   Ferrario E, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V155, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.007
   Forsberg S, 2023, PHYSICA A, V626, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2023.129072
   Forum W.E, 2023, The Global Risks Report 2023
   Gao HX, 2017, P IEEE, V105, P1214, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2666548
   Groch M, 2022, WIND ENG, V46, P102, DOI 10.1177/0309524X211010758
   Grossi P, 2005, HUEBNER INT SER RISK, V25, P23
   Grubler A, 2018, NAT ENERGY, V3, P515, DOI 10.1038/s41560-018-0172-6
   Guo LQ, 2021, IEEE T POWER SYST, V36, P4152, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3068048
   Guo LQ, 2021, IEEE T POWER SYST, V36, P4140, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3066336
   Hamzah H, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020813
   Hao ZC, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104689
   He HQ, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104993
   Hiebl MRW, 2023, ORGAN RES METHODS, V26, P229, DOI 10.1177/1094428120986851
   Holmgren AJ, 2007, IEEE T POWER SYST, V22, P76, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.889080
   Holmgren ÅJ, 2006, RISK ANAL, V26, P955, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00791.x
   Huang G, 2017, IEEE T POWER SYST, V32, P4451, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2685640
   Huang WJ, 2022, IEEE T POWER SYST, V37, P2906, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3123074
   Hussain A, 2019, APPL ENERG, V240, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.055
   Hussain A, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P75495, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2883418
   Hussain A, 2018, INT J ELEC POWER, V96, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2017.10.003
   IPCC, 2023, Clim. Chang. 2022-Impacts, Adapt. Vulnerability, P197, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009325844.004
   Jasiunas J, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476
   Jesse BJ, 2019, ENERGY SUSTAIN SOC, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13705-019-0210-7
   Ji CY, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1, DOI 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.52
   Jiang T, 2022, IEEE T SMART GRID, V13, P2744, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2022.3157856
   Kiehbadroudinezhad M, 2023, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103485
   Kong JJ, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P1141, DOI 10.1111/risa.13222
   Krueger EH, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2d
   Kumar D, 2020, ENERG EXPLOR EXPLOIT, V38, P1968, DOI 10.1177/0144598720937529
   Leite JB, 2019, IEEE T POWER SYST, V34, P4249, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2913090
   Li X, 2022, APPL ENERG, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118455
   Li Y, 2021, IEEE POW ENER SOC GE, DOI 10.1109/PESGM46819.2021.9637836
   Liu TH, 2023, ENERGY, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127697
   Liu XM, 2022, PHYS REP, V971, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.04.002
   Mahajan S, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103942
   Manshadi SD, 2015, IEEE T SMART GRID, V6, P2283, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2015.2397318
   Matos MA, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P594, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2065818
   Moazami A, 2019, APPL ENERG, V238, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.085
   Mohammadian M, 2021, IEEE T POWER SYST, V36, P4906, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3086031
   Molyneaux L, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V59, P1068, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.063
   Moslehi S, 2018, APPL ENERG, V228, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.075
   Nasiruzzaman A.B.M., 2011, 2011 N AM POW S, P1
   Nik VM, 2021, NATL SCI REV, V8, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nwaa134
   Noebels M, 2022, IET GENER TRANSM DIS, V16, P181, DOI 10.1049/gtd2.12287
   Oughton EJ, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P2012, DOI 10.1111/risa.13291
   Ouyang M, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.011
   Ouyang M, 2014, PHYSICA A, V396, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2013.10.041
   Panteli M, 2017, IEEE T POWER SYST, V32, P4732, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2664141
   Panteli M, 2017, P IEEE, V105, P1202, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2691357
   Paul S, 2022, IEEE SYST J, V16, P2367, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3123904
   Perera ATD, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113038
   Perera ATD, 2019, APPL ENERG, V243, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.202
   Raman G, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-30848-w
   Raymond C, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P611, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0790-4
   Rosales-Asensio E, 2019, ENERGY, V172, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.043
   Ruben C, 2020, IET SMART GRID, V3, P445, DOI 10.1049/iet-stg.2019.0272
   Sabah N, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P3108, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-010
   Salman AM, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V144, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.028
   Schäfer B, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-32917-6
   Schneider KP, 2017, IEEE T SMART GRID, V8, P687, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2015.2494867
   Sen Biswas R, 2021, IEEE T POWER SYST, V36, P5734, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3076973
   Senkel A, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107447
   Shandiz SC, 2020, ENERGY, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117856
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Si FY, 2020, ENERGY, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117827
   Siegenfeld AF, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/6105872
   Siskos E, 2022, EUR J OPER RES, V298, P611, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.026
   Smith O, 2022, SCI ADV, V8, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abj6734
   Stekli J, 2022, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100940
   Stodle K, 2023, RISK ANAL, V43, P2644, DOI 10.1111/risa.14128
   Sun CH, 2020, APPL ENERG, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114062
   Sun MY, 2019, IEEE T SMART GRID, V10, P5007, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2018.2873001
   Sun QR, 2022, ENERGY, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122834
   Tang DG, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V235, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109212
   Tao R, 2023, IEEE T SMART GRID, V14, P183, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2022.3197626
   Tao YC, 2023, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V24, P12614, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2023.3287529
   Ti BZ, 2022, IEEE T SMART GRID, V13, P783, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2021.3114512
   Umunnakwe A, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111252
   Vahedipour-Dahraie M, 2020, IEEE T IND APPL, V56, P1882, DOI 10.1109/TIA.2019.2959549
   Wang AS, 2011, IEEE T POWER SYST, V26, P442, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2052291
   Wang H, 2022, APPL ENERG, V315, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118824
   Wang HZ, 2019, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111799
   Wang H, 2023, ENERG ECON, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106751
   Wang JW, 2023, IEEE T SUSTAIN ENERG, V14, P1230, DOI 10.1109/TSTE.2022.3194728
   Wang SL, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107313
   Wang SL, 2017, PHYSICA A, V473, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2017.01.003
   Wang YW, 2023, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.109111
   Wang YZ, 2016, IEEE T POWER SYST, V31, P1604, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2429656
   Webster M, 2022, NAT ENERGY, V7, P163, DOI 10.1038/s41560-021-00958-8
   Wender B, 2017, ENGINEERING-PRC, V3, P580, DOI 10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.022
   Werho T, 2016, IEEE T POWER SYST, V31, P4945, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2515368
   Xi Zhu, 2011, Proceedings 2011 International Conference on Mechatronic Science, Electric Engineering and Computer (MEC 2011), P118
   Xu L, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103775
   Xu S, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108830
   Xu Y, 2014, PHYSICA A, V401, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.035
   Yabe T, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2111997119
   Yan MY, 2019, IEEE T SMART GRID, V10, P4881, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2018.2870358
   Yang FF, 2023, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V37, P4291, DOI 10.1007/s00477-023-02508-y
   Yazdanie M, 2023, ENERGY CLIM CHANG-UK, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.egycc.2023.100097
   Ye JA, 2023, RENEW ENERG, V211, P1024, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.020
   Yodo N, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P42, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2019.1710074
   Zechman EM, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P758, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01564.x
   Zeng LT, 2022, APPL ENERG, V324, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119688
   Zhang C, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V242, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.001
   Zhang HJ, 2020, IEEE T POWER SYST, V35, P3682, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2020.2973699
   Zhang L, 2023, IEEE T NETW SCI ENG, V10, P1722, DOI 10.1109/TNSE.2023.3234152
   Zhang Y, 2021, IEEE T SMART GRID, V12, P623, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2020.3010510
   Zhao Q, 2021, INT J ELEC POWER, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107211
   Zheng L, 2022, APPL ENERG, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118362
   Zhou YK, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112649
   Zhuo ZY, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-30747-0
   Zia MF, 2018, APPL ENERG, V222, P1033, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.103
NR 157
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 56
U2 95
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 363
AR 121318
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121318
EA JUN 2024
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA UZ6Y8
UT WOS:001251938700001
PM 38852414
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Laeni, N
   van den Brink, M
   Arts, J
AF Laeni, Naim
   van den Brink, Margo
   Arts, Jos
TI Is Bangkok becoming more resilient to flooding? A framing analysis of
   Bangkok's flood resilience policy combining insights from both insiders
   and outsiders
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood resilience; Flood risk management; Bangkok; Developing country;
   Framing
ID GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; URBAN POLITICAL ECOLOGY; PLANNING-THEORY;
   CITIES; CHALLENGES; ROTTERDAM
AB The rapidly urbanizing cities in Southeast Asia experience increasing flood impacts due to the consequences of climate change. In these cities, policy efforts to build flood resilience are gaining momentum. The aim of this paper is to understand and assess flood resilience policy development, particularly in cities in developing countries. Bangkok is one of the cities that participates in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme (100RC) - the international policy platform for building resilient cities. In 2017, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) launched the 'Bangkok Resilience Strategy' to translate the resilience concept to its urban context. A framing perspective is adopted to reconstruct the strategy, process and anticipated outcome of Bangkok's flood resilience policy. We studied data obtained from 'insiders' (involved policy makers, experts and consultants) and 'outsiders' (local communities, civil society organizations and news media). Findings indicate that the economic growth frame is prevailing in the development of Bangkok's flood resilience policy, prioritizing structural flood protection with little attention for flood adaptation measures and related social impacts among vulnerable communities. The role of local communities and civil society in the formulation of Bangkok's flood resilience policy is limited. This paper therefore recommends cities in developing countries and cities in the 100RC Programme to organize a more inclusive resilience building process for addressing social problems regarding urban poor communities along with increasing flood safety and protection.
C1 [Laeni, Naim; van den Brink, Margo; Arts, Jos] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands.
C3 University of Groningen
RP Laeni, N (corresponding author), Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, POB 800, NL-9700 AV Groningen, Netherlands.
EM n.laeni@rug.nl
RI Laeni, Naim/GQI-0621-2022
OI Laeni, Naim/0000-0003-1683-589X; Arts, Jos/0000-0002-6896-3992; van den
   Brink, Margo/0000-0001-8247-3044
CR Aerts JCJH, 2011, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1227, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06074.x
   [Anonymous], 2007, ECOL SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-02037-120205
   [Anonymous], 2010, CLIM RISKS AD AS COA
   [Arup Ove Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation], 2014, City Resilience Framework, City Resilience Index
   Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, 2015, ANN BANGK WAT MAN RE
   Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, 2015, BANGK STAT 2015
   Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, 2017, BANGK RES STRAT
   Berquist M, 2015, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V58, P1711, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2014.945995
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters CRED, 2016, 2015 DIS NUMB INT DI
   Chandler D, 2014, RESILIENCE, V2, P47, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   Chmutina K, 2016, CITIES, V58, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Dahiya B, 2011, URBAN WORLD, V4, P18
   Dahiya B, 2012, LANDSCAPE ARCHIT, V3, P180
   Dahiya B, 2012, CITIES, V29, pS44, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.013
   Dai LP, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P652, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1372273
   Dai LP, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P578, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1373637
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, 2015, NAT DIS RISK MAN PLA
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Duit A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   ENTMAN RM, 1993, J COMMUN, V43, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Folke C., 2010, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Fordham M., 2003, NATURAL DISASTERS GL, P73, DOI [10.4324/9780203402375, DOI 10.4324/9780203402375-15]
   Grove K, 2017, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V5, P79, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2016.1241476
   Hegger D, 2016, ECOLOGY SOC, V21
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hutter G, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P294, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787706
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kamolvej T., 2014, Journal of Politics and Governance, V4, P103
   Keil R, 2005, URBAN GEOGR, V26, P640, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.26.7.640
   Lazzeretti L., 2015, City Cult. Soc, V6, P83, DOI [10.1016/j.ccs.2015.02.004, DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.02.004]
   Lebel L, 2009, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT, P125
   Lebel L, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0118-4
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Marks D., 2016, RES REPORT
   Marks D, 2015, PAC AFF, V88, P623, DOI 10.5509/2015883623
   Marks D, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.024
   Meijerink S, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P499, DOI 10.1080/07900620801921363
   Mullenite J, 2016, GEOGR COMPASS, V10, P378, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12279
   Nair S, 2014, J FUTURES STUD, V19, P87
   National Water Resource Committee, 2015, NAT WAT RES MAN STRA
   Nicholls R.J., 2008, OECD ENV WORKING PAP, DOI DOI 10.1787/011766488208
   Parnell S, 2007, AREA, V39, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00760.x
   Patankar Archana, 2012, APN E-Lib
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P593, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
   Restemeyer B, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P920, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Roachanakanan T., 2012, WORLD FLOOD PROTECTI, P1
   Roachanakanan T, 2013, AS FLOOD C BANGK THA
   Rosenzweig B.R, 2018, PLUVIAL FLOOD RISK O, P1302
   Saito N, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V9, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.07.006
   Scott M, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P103, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.761904
   Shaw K, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P308
   Shaw K, 2012, LOCAL GOV STUD, V38, P281, DOI 10.1080/03003930.2011.642869
   Sintusingha S., 2006, URBAN DESIGN INT, V11, P151, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000174, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000174]
   Sörensen J, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8080332
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Swyngedouw E, 2003, ANTIPODE, V35, P898, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x
   Termeer CJAM, 2013, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V15, P43, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2012.664014
   Thaitakoo D, 2010, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V2, P35, DOI 10.1108/S2040-7262(2010)0000002006
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van Hulst M, 2016, AM REV PUBLIC ADM, V46, P92, DOI 10.1177/0275074014533142
   Veesakul S., 2016, RES REPORT
   White I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P934, DOI 10.1068/c12117
   World Bank, 2012, Thai Flood 2011: Rapid Assessment for Resilient Recovery and Reconstruction Planning
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00010.x
NR 70
TC 41
Z9 43
U1 8
U2 99
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUL
PY 2019
VL 90
BP 157
EP 167
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.002
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA ID5TC
UT WOS:000471737900015
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Abdulkareem, M
   Elkadi, H
AF Abdulkareem, Mohanad
   Elkadi, Hisham
TI From engineering to evolutionary, an overarching approach in identifying
   the resilience of urban design to flood
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Ecological resilience; Evolutionary; Urban design; Pluvial flood;
   Accessibility
ID RISK; CITIES
AB Resilient urban design has become an essential theme for cities to withstand the rapidly escalating natural and human-induced disasters, yet cities and their infrastructure are becoming vulnerable and more threatened as the flood protection measures are still following the same line of thinking of flood control structures. There is an urgent need for new approach for resilience steaming from the urban form itself, beyond the focus on construction-based infrastructure like dams, levees and or channelization.
   This paper is presenting an introductory sense of urban form resilience building on the resilience definition of maintaining the minimum functionality of a system and how this conception can systemically corresponds with resilience perspectives. The aim is to develop a measurable sense of urban design resilience. Hence, the paper carried out theoretical investigation into two complementary domains; the urban design and resilience thinking. Finding out the urban form most essential commodity and to which one of resilience perspectives it could possibly associate to achieve resilient urban form. The paper is aiming at establishing a common ground where the two domains can possibly congregate. It also suggests possible effective future approaches using the principles of ecological and evolutionary resilience.
C1 [Abdulkareem, Mohanad] Univ Salford, Sch Built Environm, UPRISE, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England.
   [Elkadi, Hisham] Univ Salford, Sch Built Environm, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England.
C3 University of Salford; University of Salford
RP Abdulkareem, M (corresponding author), Univ Salford, Sch Built Environm, UPRISE, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England.
EM myveritas74@yahoo.co.uk
CR Adams BJ, 2011, J INSECT SCI, V11, DOI 10.1673/031.011.17101
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alcántara-Ayala I, 2002, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V47, P107, DOI 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00083-1
   [Anonymous], BLUCHER DES P
   [Anonymous], P STOCKH WAT S AUG S
   [Anonymous], 2005, RESILIENT CITY
   [Anonymous], J DIS RESIL BUILT EN
   [Anonymous], 2013, ENCY CRIS MANAG
   [Anonymous], 1993, Natural Disasters
   [Anonymous], SCI SALAMANDERS REGE
   [Anonymous], LIB C WASH
   [Anonymous], P 32 MAFF C RIV COAS
   [Anonymous], RES CIT GROSV RES RE
   [Anonymous], WP75093 IIASA
   [Anonymous], ENR HUM SAF SEC
   Balica SF, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V41, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.11.002
   Burby RaymondJ., 2000, Natural Hazards Review, V1, P99, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)]
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Cheshire PC, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P1231, DOI 10.1080/00420980600775600
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Frankenberger T., 2013, Community Resilience: Conceptual Framework and Measurement Feed the Future Learning Agenda
   Godwin JW, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P9415, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1300290110
   Gustin JosephF., 2004, Disaster Recovery Planning: A Guide for Facility Managers, V3rd
   Hall J.W., 2011, Flood Risk Science and Management Eds
   Hall JW, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P126, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(126)
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Houston D., 2011, Pluvial (rain-related) flooding in urban areas: the invisible hazard
   Jones M.W., 2003, PRINCIPLES ROMAN ARC
   Keeble L., 1952, Principle and practice of town and country planning
   Kreimmer A., 2003, Building safer cities: the future of disaster risk, disaster risk management series
   Lennon M, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P745, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.944113
   León J, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lu P.-W., 2014, SPATIAL PLANNING URB
   Lynch K., 1981, Theory of good city form
   Niehoff D, 2002, J HYDROL, V267, P80, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00142-7
   Ning L, 2006, IRRIG DRAIN, V55, P247, DOI 10.1002/ird.255
   Pescaroli G, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160707003
   Shaw K, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P308
   Tarbatt J., 2012, PLOT DESIGNING DIVER
   Taylor N., 2004, Urban Planning Theory
   Tierney K., 2007, SCOPUS
   UNISDR, 2009, TERM DIS RISK RED UN
   Walker BH, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   White I, 2008, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V161, P151, DOI 10.1680/udap.2008.161.4.151
   Windle G., 2010, What is resilience? A review and concept analysis, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0959259810000420
   Zevenbergen C., 2011, Urban flood management
   Zielins ER, 2016, ORGANOGENESIS, V12, P16, DOI 10.1080/15476278.2016.1163463
NR 52
TC 42
Z9 45
U1 8
U2 69
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JUN
PY 2018
VL 28
BP 176
EP 190
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.009
PG 15
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA GD1TK
UT WOS:000430284000018
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sun, J
   Zhai, NN
   Mu, HR
   Miao, JC
   Li, WX
   Li, MF
AF Sun, Jing
   Zhai, Ningning
   Mu, Hairong
   Miao, Jichao
   Li, Weixiao
   Li, Mengfei
TI Assessment of urban resilience and subsystem coupling coordination in
   the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Subsystem resilience; Subsystem coupling coordination;
   CCD model; Beijing -Tianjin -Hebei urban agglomeration
ID ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT; CITIES; PERSPECTIVE; EVOLUTION
AB Building resilient cities is a novel concept for dealing with risk crises and achieving sustainable urban development in modern times. This paper utilized data from the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration (BTHUA) spanning from 2009 to 2019, along with the CRITIC-Entropy weight method, coupling coordination degree (CCD) model and spatial correlation analysis to measure urban resilience and investigate subsystem coupling coordination relationships while considering spatial clustering characteristics. The results indicate that: (1) Spatially, there is a significant gap between the UR index of cities in Hebei Province and that of Beijing-Tianjin, with a "Beijing-Tianjin dual-core driven" trend. Regarding temporal evolution, the growth trend of the UR index is consistent with that of the subsystem resilience index. (2) In general, the CCD of the urban resilience subsystem is slowly trending upwards, with the overall CCD level of BTHUA ranging from primary coordination to moderate coordination. (3) The degree of spatial correlation of subsystem CCD in BTHUA is weak, and more cities exhibit heterogeneous agglomeration. These findings provide valuable inspiration and reference for resilient city construction and coordinated regional development to a certain extent.
C1 [Sun, Jing; Zhai, Ningning; Li, Weixiao; Li, Mengfei] Qingdao Univ, Sch Business, 93 Songling Rd, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, Peoples R China.
   [Mu, Hairong] Harper Adams Univ, Dept Food Land & Agribusiness Management, Newport, Shrops, England.
   [Miao, Jichao] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Quantitat & Tech Econ, Beijing 100732, Peoples R China.
C3 Qingdao University; Harper Adams University; Chinese Academy of Social
   Sciences
RP Zhai, NN (corresponding author), Qingdao Univ, Sch Business, 93 Songling Rd, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, Peoples R China.
EM 1581078515@qq.com
RI Mu, Hairong/GON-4899-2022
OI Zhai, Ningning/0000-0002-2332-9074; Mu, Hairong/0000-0002-0814-6229
FU Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province [23CJJJ12]; Social
   Science Planning Project of Oingdao City [QDSKL2301071]
FX This study was supported by Social Science Planning Project of Shandong
   Province [NO. 23CJJJ12] and Social Science Planning Project of Oingdao
   City [NO. QDSKL2301071] .
CR Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Ariken M, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107014
   Baoxing Q, 2018, LANDSC ARCHIT FRONT, V6, P42, DOI 10.15302/J-LAF-20180404
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Chen YT, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.885976
   [丛晓男 Cong Xiaonan], 2019, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V39, P18
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Fan YP, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.027
   Fei JH, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105793
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Giacomoni MH, 2013, J WATER RES PL, V139, P554, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000302
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Guo XM, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108782
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Iturriza M, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102688
   Lin YZ, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109194
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Liu L, 2002, J APPL PHYS, V92, P5560, DOI 10.1063/1.1512682
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu Y, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V375, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134191
   Luo D, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107858
   Ma YC, 2023, SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P2291, DOI 10.1002/sd.2506
   Maclean K, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P144, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.763774
   McPhearson T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V70, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   Nel D, 2018, INT PLAN STUD, V23, P250, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2018.1439370
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V244, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.027
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   Nyström M, 2019, NATURE, V575, P98, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Rong Z., 2021, Theory Reform, V55, P16, DOI [10.13553/j.cnki.llygg.2021.06.005, DOI 10.13553/J.CNKI.LLYGG.2021.06.005]
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Sun J, 2022, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/agriculture12101550
   Wang XL, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V331, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117124
   Wang Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.128
   Wang ZB, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V243, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.088
   [翁钢民 Weng Gangmin], 2021, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V41, P196
   [吴玉鸣 Wu Yuming], 2011, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V31, P1474
   Yang C, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102271
   [杨君 Yang Jun], 2021, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V41, P185
   Yang M, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191911988
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   Zhao LL, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P19774, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08463-3
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhu ZY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104274
NR 49
TC 35
Z9 35
U1 87
U2 214
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 100
AR 105058
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105058
EA NOV 2023
PG 13
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA HQ5U8
UT WOS:001160994100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Esteban, TAO
AF Esteban, Theresa Audrey O.
TI Collective engagement as a navigational framework for urban resilience
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Collective engagement; Urban resilience; Flood disasters; Governance;
   Collective engagement urban resilience; framework; Adaptive capacity;
   Drivers of resilience
ID BUILDING RESILIENCE; PARTICIPATION; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY;
   VULNERABILITY; EARTHQUAKE; CAPACITY; INSIGHTS; SCIENCE; DESIGN
AB Collective engagement is an essential factor in building a resilient city. According to studies, while resilience strategies can lessen cities' vulnerability to disaster, their effectiveness depends on the cities' ability to execute them. Collective engagement helps to ensure the effective implementation of these resilience strategies. In this research, I examined collective engagement as a basis for strengthening, a city's resilience. Anchoring on the collective engagement urban resilience framework, I explore the links between collective engagement and urban resilience. Using an explanatory case study approach, I looked at the vertical, horizontal, and transverse links between collective engagement and urban resilience of two Dutch cities, Rotterdam and Dordrecht, and two Philippine cities, Marikina and Malabon. This research examines adaptive cycles in cities, including triggers, policies, and stakeholder collaboration. It contributes to the debate on cross-sector collaboration among stakeholders, which is essential for resolving issues and achieving common goals.
C1 [Esteban, Theresa Audrey O.] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture Management Built Environm, Bldg 8,Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
   [Esteban, Theresa Audrey O.] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Grad Sch Social Sci & Humanities, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
C3 Delft University of Technology; Erasmus University Rotterdam; Erasmus
   University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC
RP Esteban, TAO (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture Management Built Environm, Bldg 8,Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
EM t.a.esteban@tudelft.nl
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   [Anonymous], 2022, ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT-Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework and Amendments to the Common Reporting Standard
   Ansell C, 2008, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V18, P543, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Baana P.J., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P113, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226]
   Bahadur AV, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.004
   Baud I., 2009, 4 INT C INT FOR URB
   Bhattacharya-Mis N, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P111, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00920-4
   Brown R., 2016, MOVING WATER SENSITI
   Bryson JM, 2006, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V66, P44, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Carpini MXD, 2004, ANNU REV POLIT SCI, V7, P315, DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Collenteur RA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P373, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1496-6
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Commission on Audit, 2014, CPA report no. 2013-002
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Djalante Riyanti., 2011, Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, V03, P339, DOI [DOI 10.3850/S1793924011000952, 10.3850/S1793924011000952]
   EISENHARDT KM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE REV, V14, P532, DOI 10.2307/258557
   Esteban M., 2015, Handbook of coastal disaster mitigation for engineers and planners, P205
   Esteban T. A. O., 2022, Collective engagement: From disaster-prone to disaster-resilient city
   Esteban T. A. O., 2017, Urban governance in the realm of complexity, P219
   Esteban TAO, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103604
   Esteban TAO, 2020, AMPS, V17, DOI 10.14324/111.444.amps.2020v17i1.001
   European Commission, 2020, Zuid-Holland
   Gastil J., 2000, By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections
   Gotham KF, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16, DOI 10.5751/ES-04292-160312
   Gunderson L, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Hooli LJ, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P695, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0782-5
   Huck A, 2021, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V29, P12, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12295
   Hutton NS, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12469
   Jahangiri K, 2011, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V20, P82, DOI 10.1108/09653561111111108
   Kaarbo J, 1999, POLIT PSYCHOL, V20, P369, DOI 10.1111/0162-895X.00149
   Kaufmann Maria, 2016, Analysing and Evaluating Flood Risk Governance in the Netherlands: Drowning in Safety?
   Klijn EH, 2016, GOVERNANCE NETWORKS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, P1
   Koppenol D. D., 2014, The case of the port expansion by Maasvlakte II (1969-2008), P1
   Kuipers Bart, 2018, Het Rotterdam Effect: De impact van Mainport Rotterdam op de Nederlandse economie
   Ling TY, 2022, CURR RES ENVIRON SUS, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100184
   Marcus L., 2011, 18 INT C URB FORM IS, P1
   McSweeney K, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P5203, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1014123108
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Meierkord Christiane, 2022, World risk report 2020
   Momeni M., 2011, P REAL CORP 2011 TAG
   Moon BE, 2006, STUD COMP INT DEV, V41, P3, DOI 10.1007/BF02686309
   Mosley JE, 2021, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V31, P328, DOI 10.1093/jopart/muaa044
   Oduwaye Leke, 2006, Journal of Human Ecology, V20, P43
   Ostrom E, 1998, AM POLIT SCI REV, V92, P1, DOI 10.2307/2585925
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Port of Rotterdam, 2018, The Rotterdam effect: Economic significance of the port is twice as high as previously calculated
   Rijksoverheid, 2020, Membership of private nature and environmental organizations, 1989-2018
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Salkind N., 2010, Encyclopedia of research design
   Schwarz AM, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1128, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.011
   Seeliger L, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P2108, DOI 10.3390/su5052108
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Simo G, 2007, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V67, P125, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00821.x
   Simons H., 2009, Case study research in practice
   SLOVIC P, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P280, DOI 10.1126/science.3563507
   Sotarauta M, 2001, EUR PLAN STUD, V9, P693, DOI 10.1080/09654310120073766
   Steiner F, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.023
   Stouten Paul., 2010, CHANGING CONTEXTS UR
   Takeuchi K, 2014, SUSTAIN SCI, V9, P513, DOI 10.1007/s11625-014-0257-5
   Terpstra T, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P1658, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x
   The North Sea Region Programme 2007-2013, 2009, MARE: Managing Adaptive Responses to changing flood risk in the North Sea Region
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2021, 100 resilient cities
   Thomas G., 2015, ANATOMY CASE STUDY
   UNISDR, 2012, Making cities resilient report 2012 (2nd)
   van Meerkerk I, 2014, POLICY SCI, V47, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11077-013-9181-2
   Wagner M, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V50, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.009
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wolfram M, 2016, CITIES, V51, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011
   Yin R.K., 2009, SAGE HDB APPL SOCIAL, V2nd, P254
   Ysa T, 2014, PUBLIC ADMIN, V92, P636, DOI 10.1111/padm.12076
NR 74
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN
PY 2025
VL 161
AR 105900
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2025.105900
EA JUN 2025
PG 25
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 0VH9P
UT WOS:001456880100001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, KL
   Jiang, W
   Miao, Z
AF Wang, Ke-Liang
   Jiang, Wei
   Miao, Zhuang
TI Impact of high-speed railway on urban resilience in China: Does urban
   innovation matter?
SO SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; HSR; Time-varying DID model; Urban innovation
ID INFRASTRUCTURE; URBANIZATION; INTEGRATION; MOBILITY; SYSTEM
AB Based on calculating the urban resilience index from five aspects of economy, society, institutions, infrastructure, and ecology by adopting the entropy method, this study applies the time-varying DID model to systematically examine HSR's impact on China's urban resilience, on basis of which its heterogeneities and the mediating effect of urban innovation are also quantified. The findings reveal that: (1) HSR can significantly promote China's urban resilience, as supported by various robustness tests. (2) HSR can significantly improve economic and institution resilience of cities, but does not play a significant role on social resilience and infrastructure resil-ience, and has a negative effect on ecological resilience. (3) The driving effects of HSR on the resilience of core cities, large cities, and non-resource-based cities are more significant. (4) Urban innovation is an important channel through which HSR impacts urban resilience. The conclusions of this study can offer useful insights for China's future HSR planning and resilient cities construction.
C1 [Wang, Ke-Liang; Jiang, Wei] Ocean Univ China, Sch Econ, Qingdao 266011, Shandong, Peoples R China.
   [Miao, Zhuang] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, China Western Econ Res Ctr, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
C3 Ocean University of China; Southwestern University of Finance &
   Economics - China
RP Wang, KL (corresponding author), Ocean Univ China, Sch Econ, Qingdao 266011, Shandong, Peoples R China.; Miao, Z (corresponding author), Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, China Western Econ Res Ctr, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
EM klwang@163.com; miaozhuang@nuaa.edu.cn
OI Jiang, Wei/0000-0002-1566-6986; Ke-Liang, Wang/0000-0003-3220-0296
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [71973131, 71973132]; Major
   Project of National Social Science Foundation of China [19VHQ002]
FX The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the
   National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71973131 and
   71973132) , Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China
   (No. 19VHQ002) .
CR Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   An YJ, 2022, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V16, P483, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2021.1897909
   [Anonymous], 2020, China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2019
   Baker AC, 2022, J FINANC ECON, V144, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004
   BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Borusyak K, 2024, REV ECON STUD, V91, P3253, DOI 10.1093/restud/rdae007
   Callaway B, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V225, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cavallaro F, 2023, TRANSPORTATION, V50, P1685, DOI 10.1007/s11116-022-10291-y
   Chacon-Hurtado D, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102695
   Chang Z, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V155, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.020
   Cheng X, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V104, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.003
   Clark J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P121, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp034
   Connelly A, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102842
   De Chaisemartin C, 2020, AM ECON REV, V110, P2964, DOI 10.1257/aer.20181169
   Dippel C, 2020, STATA J, V20, P613, DOI 10.1177/1536867X20953572
   Dubbeling Marielle., 2009, Urban Agriculture Magazine, P3
   Fang HS, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101866
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Fingleton B, 2019, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V75, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2018.12.004
   Fior M., 2022, Transportation Research Procedia, V60, P306, DOI [10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.040, DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2021.12.040]
   Gao YY, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101211
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Goodman-Bacon A, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V225, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
   Goodspeed R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P79, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu013
   Guirao B, 2020, REG STUD, V54, P539, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2018.1530751
   Hainmueller J, 2012, POLIT ANAL, V20, P25, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpr025
   Hemmati M, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001382
   Heuermann DF, 2019, J ECON GEOGR, V19, P335, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lby019
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Ke X, 2017, CHINA ECON REV, V44, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.02.008
   Kong QX, 2022, RES INT BUS FINANC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101726
   KRUGMAN P, 1991, J POLIT ECON, V99, P483, DOI 10.1086/261763
   Laakkonen S, 2020, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100035
   Lhomme S., 2013, Resilience and Urban Risk Management, P109
   Liu SL, 2022, DEV ECON, V60, P30, DOI 10.1111/deve.12298
   Liu TY, 2021, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101034
   Liu X, 2022, CITIES, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103582
   Liu YH, 2022, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V69, P333, DOI 10.1007/s00168-022-01135-9
   Liu YQ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P642, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.028
   Liu Z, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/2145951
   Lobo J, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P819, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-0970-3
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Madlener R, 2011, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V1, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.006
   Miao Z, 2024, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V71, P2184, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2022.3165146
   Miao Z, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106777
   Miao Z, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121368
   Miwa N, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V159, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2022.01.019
   Qiu D, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031285
   Rizzi P, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P285, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0854-1
   Schintler LA, 2022, J URBAN MANAG, V11, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004
   Shaw SL, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V40, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.010
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Sun LY, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V225, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
   Sun YP, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122055
   Táncosová J, 2019, ENTREP SUSTAIN ISS, V6, P2127, DOI 10.9770/jesi.2019.6.4(40)
   Tang HY, 2024, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V36, P195, DOI [10.1109/TENCON55691.2022.9977727, 10.1080/09537325.2022.2026322]
   United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs, 2018, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision key facts, DOI DOI 10.18356/B9-995FE-EN
   van der Waldt G, 2018, LOCAL ECON, V33, P694, DOI 10.1177/0269094218809316
   Wang F, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V127, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.018
   Wang J, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, P445
   Wang J, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15065543
   Wang JT, 2020, CHINA ECON REV, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101539
   Wang KL, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122017
   Wang KL, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106756
   Wang KL, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V739, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140280
   Wang KL, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19138053
   Wang YP, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132011550
   Williams RG, 2017, J CLIMATE, V30, P9343, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0468.1
   Wu Q, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102075
   Wu WL, 2022, J APPL ECON, V25, P962, DOI 10.1080/15140326.2022.2096954
   Xu J, 2019, CITIES, V85, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.003
   Xu Q, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P30130, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-06107-9
   Xu Y, 2022, J INNOV KNOWL, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100195
   Yang Q, 2023, J ENVIRON SCI, V131, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.020
   Yang XH, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101305
   Yi YC, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P86692, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-21722-9
   Yu L, 2021, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V67, P671, DOI 10.1007/s00168-021-01061-2
   Zeng ZX, 2022, APPL ECON, V54, P2643, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2021.1992344
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zheng SQ, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, pE1248, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1209247110
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu PY, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102974
NR 86
TC 31
Z9 31
U1 34
U2 165
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0038-0121
EI 1873-6041
J9 SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI
JI Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 87
AR 101607
DI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101607
EA MAY 2023
PN B
PG 13
WC Economics; Management; Operations Research & Management Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science
GA J3LR3
UT WOS:001008664100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jun, J
   Song, MY
AF Jun, Jinhyun
   Song, Minkyung
TI Study on the Redevelopment of the Hangang River Waterfront from an Urban
   Resilience Perspective
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; riverfront; waterfront; Hangang River; resilient by
   design challenge
ID HAN RIVER
AB Cities worldwide are developing strategies to cope with heat waves, extreme colds, floods, wildfires, hurricanes, earthquakes, droughts, pandemics, and other disasters caused by climate change. To this end, a resilience theory is being expanded and applied as a methodology to secure social and spatial systems that respond to climate change while providing ecological habitats and spaces for more diverse human activities. This study evaluated resilient redevelopment strategies for the Hangang River in Seoul by drawing on practices grounded in resilience theory. This study analyzed the nine proposals from the Resilience by Design Challenge, which aimed to gather response strategies for climate change in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2017 to identify practical physical design and social system strategies. Each team's strategy for implementing urban resilience focused on six categories: governance systems, financial planning, public engagement, accessibility, ecology, and diversity. The guidelines to consider during the redevelopment of the Hangang River in Seoul were formulated by applying these criteria to the review of the river. This process has also yielded the following implications and characteristics for resilient design. First, ensuring the resilience of a city necessitates prioritizing the resolution of regional imbalances. Second, the social and ecological resilience of cities is intricately intertwined. Moreover, comprehending the dynamics between the two can guide effective, resilient design. Third, resilient design's spatial and temporal scales are extensive and varied, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationships among categories and subcategories at different hierarchies. Finally, the value of urban waterfront space, traditionally associated with positive cultural and economic contributions to cities, must be reevaluated more profoundly and meaningfully in light of climate change.
C1 [Jun, Jinhyun] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Milyang 50463, South Korea.
   [Song, Minkyung] Studio MRDO, 150 Myrtle Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
C3 Pusan National University
RP Jun, J (corresponding author), Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture, Milyang 50463, South Korea.
EM jhjun@pusan.ac.kr; candypoppy@ks.ac.kr
FU Pusan National University
FX This work was supported by a 2-Year Research Grant from Pusan National
   University.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahn H., 2020, J. Environ. Impact Assess, V29, P441
   [Anonymous], 2019, K-Water Flood Damage by Administrative Area
   Asabor EN, 2022, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V112, P518, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306558
   Bae J., 2018, Landscape Architecture Korea
   Cai WJ, 2022, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V7, pE1073, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00224-9
   Chen Wen-Li, 2020, [The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지], V20, P644, DOI 10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.01.644
   Cho S.-H., 2011, J. Korean Inst. Landsc. Archit, V39, P1, DOI [10.9715/KILA.2011.39.1.001, DOI 10.9715/KILA.2011.39.1.001]
   Choi H, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051225
   CHOI HYEYOUNG, 2018, [Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 한국조경학회지], V46, P44, DOI 10.9715/KILA.2018.46.5.044
   Choi Sun-Ju, 2011, [Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 한국조경학회지], V39, P74
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong SJ, 2014, TERR ATMOS OCEAN SCI, V25, P689, DOI 10.3319/TAO.2014.05.08.01(Hy)
   Huang Y, 2022, J ENVIRON ENG LANDSC, V30, P206, DOI 10.3846/jeelm.2022.16352
   Jin S., 2005, Archit. Inst. Korea, V25, P175
   Jo Cheong-Hun, 2021, [Journal of Urban Studies and Real Estate, 도시부동산연구], V12, P59, DOI 10.21447/jup.2021.12.3.59
   Jun J, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15129207
   Kim Hyung-A., 2004, Korea's Development under Park Chung Hee: Rapid Industrialization, 1961- 1979
   Kim J, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010105
   Kim JungIn., 2008, Constructing a "Miracle," Architecture, National identity and Development of the Han River: A critical Exploration of Architecture and Urbanism: Seoul, 1961-1988
   Kim S, 2023, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2023.100552
   김현지, 2014, [Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 한국조경학회지], V42, P52
   Kim Yunseung, 2023, [The Korea Local Administration Review, 지방행정연구], V37, P67, DOI 10.22783/krila.2023.37.2.067
   Ko Hajung, 2020, [Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 한국조경학회지], V48, P1, DOI 10.9715/KILA.2020.48.3.001
   Lambrou N, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11101795
   Lee C.-R., 2005, Korean Soc. Road Eng, V7, P36
   Lee Kumjin, 2018, [Journal of The Korean Society of Disaster Information, 한국재난정보학회 논문집], V14, P352
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mok JH, 2007, INT J URBAN SCI, V11, P185, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2007.9693618
   Nyaupane GP, 2008, J TRAVEL RES, V46, P433, DOI 10.1177/0047287507308325
   Park S.W., 2011, J. Disaster Manag, V9, P43
   Seo Jung ho, 2022, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, V55, P421, DOI 10.3741/JKWRA.2022.55.6.421
   Seoul Metropolitan Goverment Seoul Solution, The History of Seoul
   Shin Heejae, 2019, [Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 한국방재학회논문집], V19, P293, DOI 10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.5.293
   Siegel Z., 2019, Resilient by Design Teams Resilient by Design, Bay Area Challenge
   김남성, 2015, [Journal of The Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 한국방재학회논문집], V15, P45
   WOO YOON SANG, 2022, [Asia Review, 아시아리뷰], V12, P7
   심주영, 2016, [Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 한국조경학회지], V44, P60
NR 41
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 9
U2 56
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 19
AR 14249
DI 10.3390/su151914249
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA U2BP1
UT WOS:001082912900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dong, WL
   Zhou, YH
   Guo, DL
   Chen, ZH
   Wang, JW
AF Dong, Wenli
   Zhou, Yunhan
   Guo, Dongliang
   Chen, Zhehui
   Wang, Jiwu
TI Evaluation of Urban Infrastructure Resilience Based on Risk-Resilience
   Coupling: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE infrastructure resilience; evaluation system; risk-resilience coupling;
   resilience transmission; resilience enhancement
AB The frequent occurrence of disasters has brought significant challenges to increasingly complex urban systems. Resilient city planning and construction has emerged as a new paradigm for dealing with the growing risks. Infrastructure systems like transportation, lifelines, flood control, and drainage are essential to the operation of a city during disasters. It is necessary to measure how risks affect these systems' resilience at different spatial scales. This paper develops an infrastructure risk and resilience evaluation index system in city and urban areas based on resilience characteristics. Then, a comprehensive infrastructure resilience evaluation is established based on the risk-resilience coupling mechanism. The overall characteristics of comprehensive infrastructure resilience are then identified. The resilience transmission level and the causes of resilience effects are analyzed based on the principle of resilience scale. Additionally, infrastructure resilience enhancement strategies under different risk scenarios are proposed. In the empirical study of Zhengzhou City, comprehensive infrastructure resilience shows significant clustering in the city area. It is high in the central city and low in the periphery. Specifically, it is relatively high in the southern and northwestern parts of the airport economy zone (AEZ) and low in the center. The leading driving factors in urban areas are risk factors like flood and drought, hazardous materials, infectious diseases, and epidemics, while resilience factors include transportation networks, sponge city construction, municipal pipe networks, and fire protection. This study proposes a "risk-resilience" coupling framework to evaluate and analyze multi-hazard risks and the multi-system resilience of urban infrastructure across multi-level spatial scales. It provides an empirical resilience evaluation framework and enhancement strategies, complementing existing individual dimensional risk or resilience studies. The findings could offer visualized spatial results to support the decision-making in Zhengzhou's resilient city planning outline and infrastructure special planning and provide references for resilience assessment and planning in similar cities.
C1 [Dong, Wenli; Zhou, Yunhan; Chen, Zhehui; Wang, Jiwu] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Dongliang] Zhengzhou Urban Planning Design & Survey Res Inst, Zhengzhou 450052, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang University
RP Zhou, YH (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China.
EM wenlidong@zju.edu.cn; yunhanzhou@zju.edu.cn; guo21000210@163.com;
   beiming@zju.edu.cn; wangjiwu@zju.edu.cn
FU National Social Science Fund of China; Natural Science Foundation of
   Zhejiang Province [Y24E080048];  [21BSH138]
FX This research was funded by the National Social Science Fund of China
   grant number 21BSH138 and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang
   Province grant number Y24E080048. The APC was funded by the Natural
   Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province grant number Y24E080048.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], 2021, Guide for Safety Resilient City Evaluation
   Arvin M, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103601
   Bi W, 2024, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2024.104263
   Bi W, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103793
   Bixler RP, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102613
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Chen L., 2017, Mod. Urban Res, V9, P18, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2017.09.003, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-6000.2017.09.003]
   Coletta VR, 2024, J HYDROL, V636, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131248
   Cox LA, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01030.x
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   De Fino M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104847
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Ge YY, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V367, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122047
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Hananel R, 2022, CITIES, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103526
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Kyprianou I, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103763
   [李燕凌 Li Yanling], 2024, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V33, P2329
   Lin CX, 2024, HABITAT INT, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103187
   Najafi MR, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102516
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   She S., 2020, China Real Estate, V27, P31, DOI [10.13562/j.china.real.estate.2020.27.006, DOI 10.13562/J.CHINA.REAL.ESTATE.2020.27.006]
   Tian RM, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104950
   Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia LS, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V707, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136078
   [王劲峰 Wang Jinfeng], 2017, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V72, P116
   Wen GF, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112901
   Wu H.T., 2016, Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev, V1, P19
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Xiong F., 2023, Yangtze River, V54, P60, DOI [10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2023.08.009, DOI 10.16232/J.CNKI.1001-4179.2023.08.009]
   Yan W.T., 2023, Urban Plan. Int, V1, P1
   [颜文涛 Yan Wentao], 2022, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P19
   Yang B., 2018, P 2018 CHINA URBAN P, VVolume 12, P139
   [尹懋森 Yin Maosen], 2024, [热带地理, Tropical Geography], V44, P2001
   Yin Z.G., 2024, Water Resour. Hydropower Eng, V55, P74, DOI [10.13928/j.cnki.wrahe.2024.01.007, DOI 10.13928/J.CNKI.WRAHE.2024.01.007]
   Yu Fucai, 2023, Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), P306, DOI 10.12202/j.0476-0301.2022309
   Zhang M.D., 2020, J. Ind. Technol. Econ, V39, P3
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   Zhang YQ, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105221
   Zhu MC, 2024, PHYSICA A, V656, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2024.130211
NR 42
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 7
U2 7
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD MAR 3
PY 2025
VL 14
IS 3
AR 530
DI 10.3390/land14030530
PG 25
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 0PS8P
UT WOS:001453086100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, W
   Liu, GY
   Ghisellini, P
   Yang, ZF
AF Zhang, Wen
   Liu, Gengyuan
   Ghisellini, Patrizia
   Yang, Zhifeng
TI Ecological risk and resilient regulation shifting from city to urban
   agglomeration: A review
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Review
DE Ecological risk transmission; Ecological network; Urban resilience;
   Urban ecosystem
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SPATIAL-PATTERN; CLIMATE-CHANGE; NETWORK;
   SIMULATION; COMMUNICATION; PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE; RESERVOIR; SOUTHERN
AB The study of urban resilience from a risk perspective is crucial for reducing urban ecological risks and achieving sustainable development in cities. However, the large scale of urban areas (urban agglomeration) poses challenges to maintaining resilience. Under the influence of the inter-city relationship, urban ecological risk transmission process and the relationship with resilience have the characteristics of nonlinear network transmission. Current relative researches ignored the transmission effect on the ecological risk complexity and relationship between ecological risk and resilience. To fill this gap, it is necessary to explore innovative methods and develop a theoretical framework for studying ecological risk and resilience regulation in urban agglomerations. This study proposes a new ecological risk and resilient regulation framework for urban agglomeration. This framework should encompass ecological risk transmission, resilience regulation and optimization, and collaborative management. The results indicate several important trends: 1) Future research should integrate urban inter connectivity into ecological risk assessment and urban network structure resilience assessment. 2) Ecological risks in urban agglomerations exhibit cumulative and infectious characteristics. 3) Factors such as water resource sharing, air pollution diffusion, ecological protection and restoration, and geographic information sharing contribute to the complexity of ecological risk and resilience research in urban agglomerations compared to individual cities. 4) The proposed new framework enables comprehensive representation of multi-source risk superposition and multi-risk levels, aiming to enhance the resilience of urban agglomerations.
C1 [Zhang, Wen; Yang, Zhifeng] Guangdong Univ Technol, Inst Environm & Ecol Engn, Key Lab City Cluster Environm Safety & Green Dev, Minist Educ, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Wen] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Gengyuan; Yang, Zhifeng] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Ghisellini, Patrizia] Univ Naples Parthenope, Ctr Direzionale, Dept Sci & Technol, Isola C4, I-80143 Naples, Italy.
C3 Guangdong University of Technology; Southern Marine Science &
   Engineering Guangdong Laboratory; Southern Marine Science & Engineering
   Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou); Beijing Normal University; Parthenope
   University Naples
RP Yang, ZF (corresponding author), Guangdong Univ Technol, Inst Environm & Ecol Engn, Key Lab City Cluster Environm Safety & Green Dev, Minist Educ, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.; Liu, GY; Yang, ZF (corresponding author), Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
EM liugengyuan@bnu.edu.cn; zfyang@bnu.edu.cn
RI Yang, Zhifeng/AFL-3211-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52239005, 52300242,
   52070021]; Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams
   [2019ZT08L213]
FX This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (52239005, 52300242, 52070021) , and the Guangdong Introducing
   Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams (2019ZT08L213) .
CR Abolfazl M., 1394, Environ. Based Terr. Plan. (Amayesh), V8, P99
   Agirbas A, 2020, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V35, P171, DOI 10.1007/s10901-019-09671-1
   Al-Bahrani M, 2022, INT J ENERG RES, V46, P7519, DOI 10.1002/er.7657
   Andion C, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P1259, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01496-9
   Banzhaf HS, 2016, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V50, P2830, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b03829
   Barnett J, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P977, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00022-5
   Belem M., 2006, INT C REGIONAL URBAN
   Bellini E., 2022, Urban Resil. Methodol. Tools Eval, V11, P49
   Benekos I, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V13, P358, DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00422-5
   Buono D, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V82, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.12.020
   Cazorla A, 2013, CUAD DESARRO RURAL, V10, P131
   김미리, 2014, [Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 한국환경복원기술학회지], V17, P61, DOI 10.13087/kosert.2014.17.6.61
   Chang NB, 2017, ECOL INFORM, V39, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.03.002
   Chen BW, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031227
   Chen CK, 2023, J SAF SCI RESIL, V4, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.09.008
   Chen D.Z, 2013, J. Zhejiang Univ. Tech. (Social Sci.), V12, P268
   Clark-Ginsberg A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101714
   Cui XZ, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106667
   Davoudi S., 2009, Planning for Climate Change Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners
   de Almeida SJ, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1490, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.021
   Dong SD, 2021, AGR WATER MANAGE, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106587
   Dong Y., 2019, P 2019 INT C RESOURC
   Du YY, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V828, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154493
   Dureja A., 2020, Mumbai Working Papers 2020-010
   Esposito Dario, 2021, Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. Proceedings of the 11th INPUT Conference. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (LNCE 146), P571, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_61
   Fan FF, 2022, APPL GEOGR, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102619
   Fan Y., 2021, Geo J. Library, V129, P225, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-83856-0_14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-83856-0_14]
   Fang CL, 2020, CITIES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102735
   Fleischhauer M., 2008, NATO ADV RES WORKSHO
   Frey K, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P424, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1470968
   Gallotti R, 2021, COMPLEXITY, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/1782354
   Gao H, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105257
   Gao Y., 2018, PhD Thesis
   Gilioli G, 2017, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V65, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.008
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   [郭卫东 Guo Weidong], 2022, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V41, P1371
   [韩雪 Han Xue], 2018, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V38, P175
   He LL, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V313, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127585
   He Yong-xiu, 2010, Journal of North China Electric Power University, V37, P6
   Hollnagel E., 2006, Resilience engineering. Concepts and precepts, P347, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1847979019827151, DOI 10.1201/9781315605685]
   Huang JJ, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106637
   Islam MA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101667
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jaiswal D, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115771
   Jia Zhen-yi, 2017, Shengtaixue Zazhi, V36, P782, DOI 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201703.011
   Johari Z., 2016, J. Ilam Univ. Med. Sci. Med. Sci, V26, P79, DOI [10.29252/sjimu.26.5.79, DOI 10.29252/SJIMU.26.5.79]
   Kang P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P1442, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.427
   Kelly RA, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V47, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005
   Kiriscioglu T, 2013, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V33, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.11.001
   Kontogianni A, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1479, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.019
   Kramer A.M., 2022, The Elgar Companion to Urban Infrastructure. Governance, DOI [10.4337/9781800375611, DOI 10.4337/9781800375611]
   Kuenzer C, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105362
   Kurth M, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102419
   Lei L., 2021, Large data based city traffic flow pre-warning detection method, involves collecting vehicle stream image data in vehicle bayonet camera collecting area, and sending pre-warning result to visual platform, Patent No. [CN112417960-A, 112417960]
   Li C., 2020, Water-Related Urban. Local., P283, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-3507-9_15, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-3507-9_15]
   Li HQ, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13040414
   Li XP, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10070739
   [李艳 Li Yan], 2019, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V38, P1694
   Lin JH, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107475
   Liu AJ, 2017, ADV SOC SCI EDUC HUM, V83, P451
   Liu F., 2016, Territory Nat. Resourc. Study., V5, P16, DOI [10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2016.05.005, DOI 10.16202/J.CNKI.TNRS.2016.05.005]
   Liu HY, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132111849
   Liu JC, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P59861, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-26781-0
   [刘佳燕 Liu Jiayan], 2017, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V24, P83
   Lu Yonglong, 2015, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, V1, DOI 10.1890/EHS14-0013.1
   Luo XY, 2021, ENVIRON PLANN A, V53, P887, DOI 10.1177/0308518X21997818
   Ma QJ, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.10.004
   Ma XF, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052899
   Ma Z.H., 2019, Bull. Soil Water Conserv, V39, P1000
   McLeod E, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111384
   Mitra A, 2021, IEEE T CONTROL NETW, V8, P713, DOI 10.1109/TCNS.2021.3050032
   Nathwani J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
   Ocaña-Riola R, 2008, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V62, P147, DOI 10.1136/jech.2006.053280
   Ouyang Xiao, 2020, Acta Ecologica Sinica, V40, P5478
   Pan JH, 2019, CITIES, V94, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.022
   Park MS, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.004
   Peng LQ, 2009, COMPUT MATH APPL, V57, P1511, DOI 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.01.016
   Qian YG, 2019, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V111, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2019.05.001
   Räsänen A, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102185
   Rong Z., 2005, J. Henan Agricult. Univ., V39, P230, DOI [10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00136.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1744-7909.2005.00136.X]
   Rosenbaum E, 2022, EMERG MED AUSTRALAS, V34, P654, DOI 10.1111/1742-6723.14020
   Rousselle O., 2020, Master Thesis.
   Saiymova M., 2023, Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy, V13, P309, DOI [10.32479/ijeep.13998, DOI 10.32479/IJEEP.13998]
   Santos JR, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1091, DOI 10.1177/2399808321999318
   Satterthwaite D., 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE URBAN
   Schmitt P., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P197, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_12, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_12]
   Sharma C, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2110.14626
   Shi ZH, 2018, STRUCTURAL RESILIENCE IN SEWER RECONSTRUCTION: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, P17, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811552-7.00002-X
   Suter Glenn W. III, 2008, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, V4, P285, DOI 10.1897/IEAM_2007-062
   System E.E.I., 2017, Sahyadri Conserv. Ser., V68, P12, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.28727.42400, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.28727.42400]
   Tanko M, 2017, TRANSP RES PROC, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.483
   Teurlincx S, 2019, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V40, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.07.004
   Tian SZ, 2023, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1057/s41599-023-01752-5
   Tokai A, 2014, J DISASTER RES, V9, P603, DOI 10.20965/jdr.2014.p0603
   Uusitalo L, 2018, ECOL INFORM, V45, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.03.003
   [王广成 WANG GuangCheng], 2007, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V27, P4758
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   Wang X, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11769-021-1229-1
   Wang XH, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P7050, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.042
   [汪洋 Wang Yang], 2018, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V28, P62
   Wang Z, 2016, J HYDROL, V543, P612, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.034
   Wei SM, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10120796
   [魏冶 Wei Ye], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P488
   Wu KK, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14084416
   Wu Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106088
   Wu ZN, 2020, J HYDROL, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124596
   Xiao Y, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102958
   Xie K, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P1765, DOI 10.1007/s11269-023-03453-9
   Yan NY, 2020, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V6, P1, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2020.1839358
   Yang X.P., 2021, Geogr. Geo-Inform. Sci, V37, P79, DOI 10.1672-0504.2021.06.012
   Yang XY, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061861
   Ye C., 2020, J. Phys. Conf. Ser, V1621, DOI [10.1088/1742-6596/1621/1/012107,012107, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1621/1/012107,012107]
   Yeh SC, 2006, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V21, P937, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.005
   Yin DZ, 2022, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V218, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108161
   Yu L., 2023, Urb. Dev. Stud, V17, P54, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2010.01.009, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-3862.2010.01.009]
   Zhang H, 2020, COMPUT COMMUN, V160, P799, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.03.041
   Zhang Q., 2019, Characteristics of Drought in Southern China under Climatic Warming, the Risk, and Countermeasures for Prevention and Control, V3, P1, DOI [10.1007/s00704-018-2541-2, DOI 10.1007/S00704-018-2541-2]
   Zhang QZ, 2021, ECOL MODEL, V450, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109560
   [张鑫 Zhang Xin], 2016, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P36
   [张翼鸥 Zhang Yiou], 2019, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V38, P370
   Zhu SY, 2020, J PETROL SCI ENG, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107516
NR 121
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 57
U2 142
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 105
AR 107386
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107386
EA DEC 2023
PG 13
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA EO7W2
UT WOS:001139942700001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Samarakkody, A
   Amaratunga, D
   Haigh, R
AF Samarakkody, Aravindi
   Amaratunga, Dilanthi
   Haigh, Richard
TI Characterising Smartness to Make Smart Cities Resilient
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE smartness; smart city; urban (city) resilience
ID URBAN; PERFORMANCE
AB In broader terms, a Smart City improves the quality of life of its citizens through the effective use of innovative (digital) solutions. While innovative Smart City solutions keep growing, attention has been paid to resilience-making within Smart Cities, recognising that disasters are unavoidable. In light of the characteristics of a Smart City (smartness requirements) being inchoate and vague, different Smart Cities develop their own smartness criteria. Regardless of the Smart City type, smartness criteria need to adequately embed resilience. Integrating the resilience concept provides a strategic direction for Smart Cities and there is a significant positive relationship between the two concepts, Smart Cities, and urban resilience. Although Smart Cities are increasingly growing in popularity all around the world, there is a lack of research to guide a Smart City to define its smartness reflecting on disaster resilience. This paper intends to address this research gap by setting out a set of smartness criteria (with particular reference to urban (city) resilience) which should compulsorily feature in any type of Smart City that desires to be resilient. The study undertakes a systematic literature review to provide a new dimension, depth, and value to existing research discoveries. The findings are presented by structuring ten urban (city) resilience dimensions built upon six Smart City dimensions: smart economy, smart governance, smart people, smart mobility, smart living, and smart environment. Our findings make a niche contribution to knowledge by guiding Smart Cities that intend to build, enhance, and/or sustain resilience, to develop smartness criteria/smart characteristics reflecting on urban resilience. The research outcomes will be of large importance to Smart City policymakers, administrators, project managers, etc. to efficiently manage extreme events timely with optimal resource allocation and will be of specific interest to all the stakeholders (for instance, the innovators) in a Smart City ecosystem who may use the research outcomes as a decision-making tool.
C1 [Samarakkody, Aravindi; Amaratunga, Dilanthi; Haigh, Richard] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Biol & Geog Sci, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England.
C3 University of Huddersfield
RP Samarakkody, A (corresponding author), Univ Huddersfield, Dept Biol & Geog Sci, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England.
EM aravindi.samarakkody@hud.ac.uk
RI Haigh, Richard/H-7455-2016
OI Amaratunga, Dilanthi/0000-0002-1682-5301; Samarakkody,
   Aravindi/0000-0002-7594-4036
CR A Reporting Service for Environment and Development, 2015, NEG RAMS CONV WETL
   Abdel-Basset M, 2020, MECH SYST SIGNAL PR, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106941
   Abdulkareem M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.009
   Acuti D., 2018, CLIMATE ACTION, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_21-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_21-1]
   Al Mahrooqi Shaima, 2020, ICEGOV 2020: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, P791, DOI 10.1145/3428502.3428622
   Allan BM, 2018, ECOSPHERE, V9, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2163
   Ambrosetti F., 2012, SMART CITIES ITALY O
   Angelidou M, 2017, J URBAN TECHNOL, V24, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2017.1348880
   [Anonymous], 2015, City Resilience Framework Rockefeller Foundation
   [Anonymous], SUST DEV GOALS 11 SU
   [Anonymous], 2014, P 2014 ACM INT WORKS, DOI DOI 10.1145/2633661.2633670
   [Anonymous], 2019, Sustainable cities and communities - Indicators for smart cities
   Anthopoulos L., 2015, Proceedings of the 14th IFIP Electronic Government (EGOV) and 7th Electronic Participation (ePart) Conference 2015, 30 August - 2 September, 2015, P140, DOI DOI 10.3233/978-1-61499-570-8-140
   Arafah Y, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V70, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012065
   Arkema KK, 2017, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1399, P5, DOI 10.1111/nyas.13322
   Australian Government, 2017, SMART CIT PLAN NAT C
   Barbehön M, 2016, URBAN RES PRACT, V9, P37, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2015.1037342
   Baron M., 2012, Journal of Economics & Management, V10
   Batty M, 2012, EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP, V214, P481, DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
   Bosch P., 2016, DELIVERABLE 14 SMART
   Boukerche A., 2019, P 2019 IEEEACM 23 IN, P1
   Brink E, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V36, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003
   Cavallo M., 2020, REV INT GOUV OUVERT, V9, P93
   Chen YM, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ELECTRONIC GOVERNANCE (ICEGOV2019), P270, DOI 10.1145/3326365.3326401
   Choong KK, 2014, INT J PRODUCT PERFOR, V63, P879, DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0015
   Chourabi H., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P2289, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
   de Falco S, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P205, DOI 10.1177/0969776418783813
   de Santana E.d.S., 2018, INT J ADV ENG RES SC, V5, P309, DOI [10.22161/ijaers.5.12.42, DOI 10.22161/IJAERS.5.12.42]
   DesRoches R., 2018, PROMISE SMART RESILI, V48
   Donthu N, 2021, J BUS RES, V133, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Ejaz W, 2017, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V55, P84, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600218CM
   Elburz Z., 2021, SPATIAL EC, V2, P3
   Europeansmartcities, 2015, EUR 40
   Gabella J.I., 2016, AM J RURAL DEV, V4, P49
   Giffinger Rudolf., 2007, City-ranking of European medium-sized cities
   Gil-Garcia J. Ramon, 2015, Information Polity, V20, P61, DOI 10.3233/IP-150354
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Horton Richard., 2021, The COVID-19 catastrophe: whats gone wrong and how to stop it happening again, V2nd
   Huma Z., 2021, WATER ENV SUSTAIN, V1, P37
   Huovila A, 2019, CITIES, V89, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029
   Ingram J.C., 2012, SAPIENS, V5
   Jung YN, 2017, L N INST COMP SCI SO, V179, P12, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-49622-1_3
   Khatibi H, 2021, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V11, P493, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-03-2020-0049
   Khatibi H, 2022, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V12, P5, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-07-2020-0122
   Khazai B, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.012
   Komninos N, 2008, REG CITIES, V37, P1
   Konecny M., 2017, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF
   Kumail T, 2020, ANATOLIA, V31, P436, DOI 10.1080/13032917.2020.1742169
   Kunzmann KR, 2020, DISP, V56, P20, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2020.1794120
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Li K, 2017, DG.O 2017: THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH: INNOVATIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNMENT, P568, DOI 10.1145/3085228.3085249
   Lombardi P, 2012, INNOVATION-ABINGDON, V25, P137, DOI 10.1080/13511610.2012.660325
   Manville C., 2014, Mapping Smart Cities in the EU, DOI DOI 10.2861/3408
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Merli MZ, 2014, PROGR IS, P139, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_7
   Molavi M, 2018, TEMA, V11, P195, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/5485
   Mora L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V142, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.035
   Morley P., 2015, P C 5 INT C BUILDING
   Murti R., 2016, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
   Naden C., 2020, TEARING CARBON FOOTP
   Nam TaewooTheresa Pardo., 2011, Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions, P282, DOI [10.1145/2037556.2037602, DOI 10.1145/2037556.2037602]
   Naydenov K., 2018, P 5 SGEM INT MULTIDI
   Neffati OS, 2021, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101125
   Newton AC, 2016, CONSERV LETT, V9, P369, DOI 10.1111/conl.12227
   Nikhil N., 2020, 2020 Third International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), P140, DOI 10.1109/ICSSIT48917.2020.9214241
   Nitoslawski SA, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101770
   Obringer R, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103278
   Ostadtaghizadeh Abbas, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed
   Papa R, 2015, TEMA, V8, P19, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/2883
   Parizi SM, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P725, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04855-x
   Parthasarathy K. S. S., 2022, ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, V28, P422, DOI 10.1080/09715010.2020.1753250
   Pursiainen C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.08.006
   Putz FE, 2010, BIOTROPICA, V42, P10, DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00567.x
   Qayyum S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103022
   Quatrini Simone, 2021, Ecosyst Serv, V48, P101240, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101240
   Rachmawati R, 2020, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V451, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/451/1/012029
   Lopez LJR, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010181
   Renschler CS., 2010, A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework
   Sakurai M, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100012
   Schuurman Dimitri, 2012, J. theor. appl. electron. commer. res., V7, P49
   Shapiro JM, 2006, REV ECON STAT, V88, P324, DOI 10.1162/rest.88.2.324
   Shen LY, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V200, P667, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.281
   Stratigea A, 2015, J URBAN TECHNOL, V22, P43, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2015.1018725
   Takemoto S., 2019, INFORM COMMUNICATION
   Teoh R, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P2941, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b05608
   The Business Research Company, 2022, GLOB SMART CIT IND
   The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Convention on Biological Diversity, CONV BIOL DIV
   Tzioutziou A, 2021, INFRASTRUCTURES-BASE, V6, DOI 10.3390/infrastructures6020024
   UN/HABITAT, 2001, CIT GLOB WORLD GLOB
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, MAK CIT RES 2030 MCR
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   Volkova II, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P1975, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01596-w
   Winters JV, 2011, J REGIONAL SCI, V51, P253, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 95
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 19
U2 130
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 19
AR 12716
DI 10.3390/su141912716
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 5H0GY
UT WOS:000867367300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pickett, STA
   McGrath, B
   Cadenasso, ML
   Felson, AJ
AF Pickett, Steward T. A.
   McGrath, Brian
   Cadenasso, M. L.
   Felson, Alexander J.
TI Ecological resilience and resilient cities
SO BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; adaptive cycle; built environment; cities; ecological urban
   design; resilience; resilient cities; sustainability; urban systems
ID URBAN ECOSYSTEMS; SYSTEMS; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSFORMATION; BIODIVERSITY;
   FRAMEWORK; CONSEQUENCES; FOUNDATIONS; ADAPTATION
AB The urban realm is changing rapidly and becoming increasingly interconnected across continents, and across contrasting types of land covers, while at the same time facing new environmental threats and experiencing new demographic and social pressures. The urban component of the global ecosystem can be made more sustainable by incorporating the ecological understanding of resilience into the discourse. Sustainability is seen as a social, normative goal, which can be promoted using the mechanisms of ecological resilience. Ecological resilience differs from engineering resilience. Ecological resilience emphasizes the capacity of a site to adjust to external shocks and changes in controlling interactions, while engineering resilience emphasizes its ability to return to a state that existed before perturbation. Ecological resilience is particularly appropriate to urban systems, given the extent and open-ended nature of the changes and challenges they face. Adaptive processes are explored as contributions to the achievement of a successful adaptive cycle in urban socio-ecological systems. Key tools for incorporating the ecological thinking about resilience into the social discourse include landscape or patch ecology, the novel idea of the metacity, an assessment of ecological and design models, and the use of designs as experiments.
C1 [Pickett, Steward T. A.] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
   [McGrath, Brian] Parsons New Sch Design, Sch Constructed Environm, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [Cadenasso, M. L.] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Felson, Alexander J.] Yale Univ, Sch Architecture, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA.
C3 Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; University of California System;
   University of California Davis; Yale University
RP Pickett, STA (corresponding author), Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
EM picketts@caryinstitute.org; mcgrath@newschool.edu;
   mlcadenasso@ucdavis.edu; alexander.felson@yale.edu
RI felson, alex/L-5808-2013
OI Cadenasso, Mary/0000-0002-6521-067X; Pickett,
   Steward/0000-0002-1899-976X
FU US National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research programme
   [DEB-1027188]; Urban Sustainability Research Coordination Network; 
   [DEB1140077]; Direct For Biological Sciences [0844778] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation; Direct For Biological Sciences; Division Of
   Environmental Biology [1027188] Funding Source: National Science
   Foundation; Division Of Environmental Biology [0844778] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX The authors acknowledge support by the US National Science Foundation's
   Long-Term Ecological Research programme [DEB-1027188] and the Urban
   Sustainability Research Coordination Network [funded by DEB1140077]. Any
   opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this
   material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
   views of the National Science Foundation.
CR Adams W.M., 2008, Transition to sustainability: Towards a humane and diverse world
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   [Anonymous], ECOLOGY SOC
   [Anonymous], 2003, COLLAPSE COMPLEX SOC
   [Anonymous], FRONTIERS ECOLOGY EN
   [Anonymous], LINKAGES SUSTAINABIL
   [Anonymous], 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   [Anonymous], 2002, RESILIENCE SUSTAINAB
   [Anonymous], LANDSCAPE U IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design
   [Anonymous], RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   [Anonymous], 2013, RETHINKING URBAN LAN
   [Anonymous], CITIES OUR FUTURE
   [Anonymous], BUILDING RES INFORM
   [Anonymous], AM CONSERVATION IMPU
   [Anonymous], 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   [Anonymous], 1990, Urban Ecology. Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environment
   Arendt RandallG., 1996, Conservation Design for Subdivisions: A Practical Guide to Creating Open Space Networks
   BEATLEY T., 1997, The Ecology of Place, P1
   BERKES F, 1994, INVESTING IN NATURAL CAPITAL, P128
   Biggs R, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/ES-03411-150209
   Bloomberg MR, 2010, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1196, P1, DOI [10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05415.x, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05415_1.x]
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brunn SD, 2004, PROF GEOGR, V56, P76
   Burch WilliamR., 1988, ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT, P145
   Cadenasso M., 2008, Cities and the Environment, V1, P4
   Cadenasso ML, 2008, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1134, P213, DOI 10.1196/annals.1439.012
   Cadenasso M.L., 2006, NATURES SCI SOC, V14, P4, DOI [10.1051/nss:2006002, DOI 10.1051/NSS:2006002]
   Cadenasso MaryL., 2013, Resilience in ecology and urban design linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, P29, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5341-92, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-92]
   Cadenasso ML, 2006, ECOL COMPLEX, V3, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.07.002
   Cardinale BJ, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1915
   Castells Manuel., 2000, RISE NETWORK SOC VOL
   Chapin FS, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008
   Collins JP, 2000, AM SCI, V88, P416
   Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Cumming GS, 2010, DIVERS DISTRIB, V16, P414, DOI 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00651.x
   Czerniak J., 2001, CASE: Downsview Park, Toronto
   Dow K., 2000, Urban Ecosystems, V4, P255, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1015767231137
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Felson A., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, V3, P365, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9
   Felson AJ, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P549, DOI 10.2307/3868611
   Felson AJ, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P362, DOI 10.1890/130061
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forman R.T., 2008, Urban regions: ecology and planning beyond the city, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511754982, 10.1017/CBO9780511754982]
   Foster JB, 1999, AM J SOCIOL, V105, P366, DOI 10.1086/210315
   Gandy Matthew., 2003, Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City
   Graham S., 2001, SPLINTERING URBANISM
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Groffman PM, 2004, ECOSYSTEMS, V7, P393, DOI 10.1007/s10021-003-0039-x
   Groffman PM, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P315, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0315:DBTRUR]2.0.CO;2
   Grove JM, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P578, DOI 10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z
   Grove J.M., 2009, Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship, P281, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-73033-213
   Gunderson L.H., 2002, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI, P507
   Gunderson LH, 2002, SCOPE SER, V60, P249
   Gunderson LH, 2002, SCOPE SER, V60, P3
   Hart J.F., 1991, Our changing cities
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C. S., 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hough M., 1995, CITIES NATURAL PROCE
   Jenks M, 2010, FUTURE CITY, V2, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_1
   Johnson E.A., 2007, PLANT DISTURBANCE EC
   Kauffman J, 2009, SUSTAIN SCI, V4, P233, DOI 10.1007/s11625-009-0088-y
   Kolasa J., 2005, Environmental education and advocacy, P50
   Kowarik I, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P1974, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022
   Laband DN, 2012, ACSESS PUBL, P1, DOI 10.2136/2012.urban-rural
   Larson B., 2011, Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature
   Lister Nina-Marie., 2007, LARGE PARKS
   Lombardi P, 2005, SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENTS, P43
   Lyle J.T., 1994, REGENERATIVE DESIGN
   Lyle J.T., 1999, DESIGN HUMAN ECOSYST
   Machlis GE, 1997, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V10, P347, DOI 10.1080/08941929709381034
   McDonnell MJ, 2009, ECOLOGY OF CITIES AND TOWNS: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH, P71, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511609763.006
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   McGrath B., 2011, CHALLENGES, V2, P55, DOI [10.3390/challe2040055, DOI 10.3390/CHALLE2040055]
   [McGrath B. Columbia University Urban Design Program Columbia University Urban Design Program], 2007, Designing patch dynamics
   McGrath B., 2013, Urban design ecologies
   McHarg I., 1992, DESIGN NATURE
   Mebratu D., 1998, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V18, P493, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
   Melosi M.V., 2000, The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present
   Meyer EK, 2000, DUMBARTON OAKS COLLO, P187
   Montgomery MR, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P761, DOI 10.1126/science.1153012
   Mostafavi Moshen., 2010, Ecological Urbanism
   Munier N, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P1020, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.006
   Musacchio L.R., 2008, LANDSCAPE J, V27, P1, DOI DOI 10.3368/LJ.27.1.1
   Musacchio LR, 2009, ECOLOGY OF CITIES AND TOWNS: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH, P484, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511609763.029
   Naveh Z, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P357, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0357:TTHEIE]2.3.CO;2
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Nicholls R.J., 1995, GEOJOURNAL, V37, P369, DOI [10.1007/BF00814018, DOI 10.1007/BF00814018]
   Ostrom E, 2005, UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY, P1
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Peterson G, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P6, DOI 10.1007/s100219900002
   Pickett STA, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022
   Pickett S. T. A., 1995, P261
   Pickett S.T. A., 1997, URBAN ECOSYST, V1, P183, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1018579628818
   Pickett S.T. A., 2013, Vegetation Ecology, P107, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118452592.CH4
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett STA, 2002, ECOSYSTEMS, V5, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0051-y
   Pickett STA, 2008, BIOSCIENCE, V58, P139, DOI 10.1641/B580208
   Pickett Steward T.A., 1992, P65
   Pickett Steward T. A., 2009, Urban Ecosystems, V12, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11252-008-0079-2
   Pickett Stewart., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   Pincetl S, 2012, CITIES, V29, pS32, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.009
   Platt R.H., 2006, HUMANE METROPOLIS PE
   Redman CL, 2003, CONSERV ECOL, V7
   Rees WE, 2000, ECOL ECON, V32, P371
   Scheiner S.M., 2011, The Theory of Ecology
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7687, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1117622109
   Shane DavidGrahame., 2005, RECOMBINANT URBANISM
   Shannon Kelly., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design [electronic resource]: Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, P163, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_8
   Spirn AnneWhiston., 1984, GRANITE GARDEN URBAN
   Steiner F.R., 2002, HUMAN ECOLOGY FOLLOW
   Sze J., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P289
   Szlavecz K, 2011, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V214, P75, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16707-2_6
   Troy A, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.010
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   UNFPA U., 2007, State of World Population 2007
   Vicino TJ, 2007, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V31, P344, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00728.x
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Warner SB, 2011, ROUT URB READ SER, P55
   Warner SamBass., 2012, AM URBAN FORM REPRES
   Wu Jianguo., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-910
   Yohe G, 2002, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V12, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00026-7
   Zhao SQ, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P341, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0341:ECORUE]2.0.CO;2
NR 128
TC 130
Z9 160
U1 56
U2 564
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0961-3218
EI 1466-4321
J9 BUILD RES INF
JI Build. Res. Informat.
PD MAR 4
PY 2014
VL 42
IS 2
SI SI
BP 143
EP 157
DI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology
GA 290RP
UT WOS:000329776300003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Croese, S
   Green, C
   Morgan, G
AF Croese, Sylvia
   Green, Cayley
   Morgan, Gareth
TI Localizing the Sustainable Development Goals Through the Lens of Urban
   Resilience: Lessons and Learnings from 100 Resilient Cities and Cape
   Town
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; 100RC; city networks; global policies; SDGs; Cape Town
ID TRANSNATIONAL MUNICIPAL NETWORKS; GOVERNANCE; AGENDA
AB Urban resilience is increasingly seen as essential to managing the risks and challenges arising in a globally changing, connected, and urbanized world. Hence, cities are central to achieving a range of global development policy commitments adopted over the past few years, ranging from the Paris Climate Agreement to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, knowledge of the ways in which cities are going about implementing resilience or of how such efforts can practically contribute to the implementation of global agendas is still limited. This paper discusses the experience of cities that were members of the 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) network, an entity pioneered by The Rockefeller Foundation. It reviews the resilience strategies developed by 100RC members to show that 100RC cities are increasingly aligning their resilience work to global development policies such as the SDGs. It then draws on the case of the city of Cape Town in South Africa to illustrate the process of developing a resilience strategy through 100RC tools and methodologies including the City Resilience Framework (CRF) and City Resilience Index (CRI) and its alignment to the SDGs and reflects on lessons and learnings of Cape Town's experience for the global city network-policy nexus post-2015.
C1 [Croese, Sylvia] Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Green, Cayley] Western Cape Prov Govt, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Morgan, Gareth] Resilience Dept, ZA-8000 Cape Town, South Africa.
C3 University of Cape Town
RP Croese, S (corresponding author), Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, ZA-7700 Cape Town, South Africa.
EM sylvia.croese@uct.ac.za; cayleygreen@outlook.com;
   GarethRichard.Morgan@capetown.gov.za
OI Croese, Sylvia/0000-0003-3197-1363
FU Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); Swedish
   Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA); PEAK Urban
   programme - UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund
   [ES/P011055/1]; GCRF [ES/P011055/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX Sylvia Croese acknowledges funding received from the Swedish
   International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and the Swedish
   Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research (MISTRA) and support
   from the PEAK Urban programme, funded by the UK Research and Innovation
   Global Challenges Research Fund, grant reference ES/P011055/1. The views
   expressed here do not necessarily reflect the positions of the funders.
CR Acuto M, 2017, GLOB POLICY, V8, P14, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12382
   Acuto M, 2016, INT AFF, V92, P1147, DOI 10.1111/1468-2346.12700
   Acuto M, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P873, DOI 10.1126/science.aag1385
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE POLIC
   [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], ROCK FDN LAUNCH CHAL
   [Anonymous], MELAKA RESILIENCE ST
   [Anonymous], RES STRAT
   [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2019, ROCK FDN LAUNCH NEW
   [Anonymous], 2016, CIT RES IND UND MEAS
   [Anonymous], NYC WORLD CITIES UNI
   [Anonymous], 2017, 5 YEAR INTEGRATED DE
   [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], INTR CRI CRI T UNPUB
   [Anonymous], PUN RES STRAT
   [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION
   [Anonymous], RES CIT RES LIV LEAR
   Arfvidsson H, 2017, AFR GEOGR REV, V36, P100, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2015.1130636
   Bansard JS, 2017, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V17, P229, DOI 10.1007/s10784-016-9318-9
   Béné C, 2014, J INT DEV, V26, P598, DOI 10.1002/jid.2992
   Bertoldi P, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V30, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.03.009
   Betsill MicheleM., 2003, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG
   Borie M, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.014
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Davidson K, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P3540, DOI 10.1177/0042098018816010
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments (GTLRG), 2016, ROADM LOC SDGS IMPL
   Hakelberg L, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V14, P107, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00216
   Haupt W, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P123, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1583235
   Keeler LW, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10092966
   Lee T, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V13, P108, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00156
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Revi A., 2016, URBANISATION, V1, px, DOI DOI 10.1177/2455747116682899
   Simon D, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P49, DOI 10.1177/0956247815619865
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tomlinson R, 2018, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V42, P1127, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12658
   United Cities and Local Governments, 2019, LOC REG GOV REP 2018
   Valencia SC, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P4, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1573172
   Ziervogel G., 2019, UNPACKING CAPE TOWN
   Zinkernagel R, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093201
NR 48
TC 74
Z9 79
U1 11
U2 137
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JAN 2
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 2
AR 550
DI 10.3390/su12020550
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KQ3KE
UT WOS:000516824600108
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shi, CC
   Guo, NL
   Zhu, XP
   Wu, F
AF Shi, Chenchen
   Guo, Naliang
   Zhu, Xiaoping
   Wu, Feng
TI Assessing Urban Resilience from the Perspective of Scaling Law: Evidence
   from Chinese Cities
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE urban scaling laws; scaling exponent; scale-adjusted metropolitan
   indicator; allometric growth; resilient cities; resilience index;
   scaling patterns
ID AGGLOMERATION; FRAMEWORK; GROWTH
AB Urban resilience, as an emerging research focus in urban studies, is the capability of an urban system to adapt to the uncertainties and disturbances faced by modern cities. Numerical characterization of an urban system's resilience can be performed with urban resilience indicators. Moreover, as cities evolve with intensive socio-economic interactions, the performances of urban indicators are heavily dependent on the scale of these interactions; these relationships are conceptualized as urban scaling laws. Therefore, this study explores the scaling patterns of urban resilience, analyzing the scaling relationship between different resilience indicators and urban population size, as well as the spatial-temporal evolutions of the scaling patterns. The empirical case is based on 267 prefectural-level cities in China. The results show resilience indicators demonstrate scaling patterns on both spatial and temporal scales. Moreover, the scale-adjusted metropolitan indicator (SAMI) differs from the commonly used per capita indicator. Therefore, the scale needs to be considered when assessing urban resilience performance. Findings in this study indicate that moderate scale enhances resilience, enriching urban resilience theorization and urban scaling laws application. The empirical results in the case study also provide a reference for future urban resilience planning and management.
C1 [Shi, Chenchen] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Adm, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Chenchen; Guo, Naliang; Wu, Feng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Chenchen] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Beijing Key Lab Megareg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Naliang] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Naliang; Wu, Feng] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Zhu, Xiaoping] Hebei Normal Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Qinhuangdao 066104, Hebei, Peoples R China.
C3 Capital University of Economics & Business; Chinese Academy of Sciences;
   Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS;
   Capital University of Economics & Business; Chinese Academy of Sciences;
   Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS;
   Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
   CAS; Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology
RP Shi, CC (corresponding author), Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Adm, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.; Shi, CC; Wu, F (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.; Shi, CC (corresponding author), Capital Univ Econ & Business, Beijing Key Lab Megareg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.; Wu, F (corresponding author), Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
EM ccshi@cueb.edu.cn; wufeng@igsnrr.ac.cn
RI Shi, Chenchen/JMC-4424-2023; zhu, xiaoping/A-3979-2013; Wu,
   Feng/ABB-9233-2022
OI Wu, Feng/0000-0003-4688-0157; Shi, Chenchen/0000-0002-8608-668X
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72104149]; Academy of
   Metropolis Economic and Social Development at Capital University of
   Economics and Business [ZSXM2021003]; Capital University of Economics
   and Business: The Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing Universities
   [XRZ2021048, QNTD202009]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China, grant number 72104149; Academy of Metropolis Economic and Social
   Development at Capital University of Economics and Business, grant
   number ZSXM2021003; Capital University of Economics and Business: The
   Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing Universities, grant number
   XRZ2021048 and QNTD202009.
CR Aldunce P, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V30, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.010
   Alves LGA, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0134862
   Alves LGA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069580
   Arcaute E, 2015, J R SOC INTERFACE, V12, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2014.0745
   Bettencourt L, 2010, NATURE, V467, P912, DOI 10.1038/467912a
   Bettencourt LMA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
   Bettencourt LMA, 2020, J R SOC INTERFACE, V17, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2019.0846
   Bettencourt LMA, 2013, SCIENCE, V340, P1438, DOI 10.1126/science.1235823
   Bettencourt LMA, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013541
   Boyd E, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1234, DOI 10.1177/0042098014527483
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Crowe PR, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.007
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Depersin J, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P2317, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718690115
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Ding L, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080746
   Duit A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   Fang CL, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V162, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.014
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Gabaix X, 1999, AM ECON REV, V89, P129, DOI 10.1257/aer.89.2.129
   Hallegatte S., 2014, Economic resilience: definition and measurement
   Herrera H., 2020, ENVIRON SYST DECIS, V40, P342, DOI [10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Jha AK, 2013, Building Urban Resilience Principles, Tools, and, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jiao LM, 2020, HABITAT INT, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102172
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Lei WQ, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P1889, DOI 10.1177/00420980211017817
   Li RQ, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01882-w
   Lobo J, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058407
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Muller NZ, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181407
   NORDBECK S, 1971, GEOGR ANAL, VB 53, P54, DOI 10.2307/490887
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Parsons M, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P20
   Petit E.P., 2022, Smart Cities Policies and Financing, P377, DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-819130-9.00001-2
   Puga D, 2010, J REGIONAL SCI, V50, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00657.x
   Ribeiro FL, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0233003
   Ribeiro HV, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0192931
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, City Resilience Framework100 Resilient Cities
   Rybski D, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1605, DOI 10.1177/2399808319886125
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi CC, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11060921
   Shi CC, 2022, CLIM SERV, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100284
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Strano E, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0159465
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   West GB, 1997, SCIENCE, V276, P122, DOI 10.1126/science.276.5309.122
   Xiao YX, 2022, CITIES, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103600
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   Zhou CC, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106443
NR 62
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 13
U2 100
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 10
AR 1803
DI 10.3390/land11101803
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 5P4WD
UT WOS:000873151800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fu, GT
   Zhang, C
   Hall, JW
   Butler, D
AF Fu, Guangtao
   Zhang, Chi
   Hall, Jim W.
   Butler, David
TI Are sponge cities the solution to China's growing urban flooding
   problems?
SO WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE community resilience; flood resilience; nature-based solution; sponge
   city; stormwater management
ID WATER MANAGEMENT; RESILIENCE
AB Nature-based solutions have been promoted as a sustainable solution for urban stormwater management and they are currently adopted at an unprecedented speed and scale to build sponge cities in China, with a primary aim to solving urban flood problems. However, there are limits to how much rainfall sponge cities can absorb, hence, they are unlikely to be a panacea for flooding problems in cities. We argue that bottom-up community-based measures are essential part of the intervention development framework that is required to transform sponge cities into flood resilient cities. This community-based approach can effectively build on the distinctive and unique feature of Chinese cities, that is, the prevalence of gated communities, which provides a solid foundation for implementing community-based measures for flood management. A range of such community-based measures including resilience mapping, property-based resistant and resilient measures, flood insurance, and social resilience building are discussed. Flood resilience building does not just mean investments in gray-green-blue infrastructure, it requires social transformation toward flood resilient communities. This article provides a roadmap for the next stage development of sponge cities which plays a key role in coping with extreme storm events and adapting to climate change in cities.
   This article is categorized under:
   Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water
   Engineering Water > Planning Water
   Science of Water > Water Extremes
C1 [Fu, Guangtao; Butler, David] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter, Devon, England.
   [Zhang, Chi] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Dalian, Peoples R China.
   [Hall, Jim W.] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England.
C3 University of Exeter; Dalian University of Technology; University of
   Oxford
RP Fu, GT (corresponding author), Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter, Devon, England.
EM g.fu@exeter.ac.uk
RI Fu, Guangtao/ABE-3874-2021; Hall, Jim/ABF-1407-2020; Butler,
   David/I-2991-2012
OI Butler, David/0000-0001-5515-3416; Fu, Guangtao/0000-0003-1045-9125;
   Hall, Jim W/0000-0002-2024-9191
FU Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N510129/1]; Royal
   Society [IF160108]; EPSRC [EP/N510129/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Grant/Award Number:
   EP/N510129/1; Royal Society, Grant/Award Number: IF160108
CR [Anonymous], 2015, A Community -Based Flood Insurance Option, DOI [10.17226/21758, DOI 10.17226/21758]
   Butler D., 2010, Urban Drainage, VThird
   Butler D, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, P63, DOI 10.1002/gch2.1010
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P99, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00251-y
   Disse M., 2020, Water Security, V9, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100059
   Erisman JW, 2015, NATURE, V519, P151, DOI 10.1038/519151a
   Fekete A, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1370
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Ghesquiere Francis, 2020, Learning from Experience Insights from China's Progress in Disaster Risk Management
   Hamama B., 2020, Hamama and Liu City Territ Archit (2020), V7, P13, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40410-020-00122-X
   Hartmann T, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1465
   Imperiale AJ, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P891, DOI 10.1002/sd.2182
   Jiang YQ, 2019, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V78, DOI 10.1007/s12665-019-8059-9
   Kapetas L, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0204
   Kelly D., 2020, CODE PRACTICE PROPER
   Li H, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9090594
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   McPhillips LE, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P133, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1754625
   Meng M, 2022, CITIES, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103702
   Michel-Kerjan E, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P408, DOI 10.1126/science.1202616
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   O'Donnell E, 2020, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V2, P28, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2019.199
   Oral HV, 2020, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V2, P112, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2020.932
   Pescaroli G, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160707003
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Wang YT, 2019, WATER RES, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
   Webber JL, 2020, URBAN WATER J, V17, P598, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2019.1700286
   Wishart M., 2021, GRAY GREEN BLUE CONT
   Wu XL, 2020, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000582
   Yin DK, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124963
NR 31
TC 33
Z9 35
U1 32
U2 143
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2049-1948
J9 WIRES WATER
JI Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Water
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 10
IS 1
AR e1613
DI 10.1002/wat2.1613
EA OCT 2022
PG 9
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA 8D5YE
UT WOS:000863814500001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Romero-Lankao, P
   Gnatz, DM
   Wilhelmi, O
   Hayden, M
AF Romero-Lankao, Patricia
   Gnatz, Daniel M.
   Wilhelmi, Olga
   Hayden, Mary
TI Urban Sustainability and Resilience: From Theory to Practice
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban; sustainability; resilience; capacity; transformation
ID GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VULNERABILITY; CITIES;
   CAPACITY; GOVERNANCE; ADAPTATION; NETWORKS; TRANSFORMATION; INDICATORS
AB Urbanization and urban areas are profoundly altering the relationship between society and the environment, and affecting cities' sustainability and resilience in complex ways at alarming rates. Over the last decades, sustainability and resilience have become key concepts aimed at understanding existing urban dynamics and responding to the challenges of creating livable urban futures. Sustainability and resilience have also moved and are now core analytic and normative concepts for many scholars, transnational networks and urban communities of practice. Yet, even with this elevated scholarly attention, strategies for bridging between research and practice remain elusive, and efforts to understand and affect change towards more sustainable and resilient urban centers have often fallen short. This paper seeks to synthesize, from this issue's papers and other strands of literature, the knowledge, theory and practice of urban sustainability and resilience. Specifically, we focus on what capacities urban actors draw on to create sustainability and resilience and how different definitions of these concepts intersect, complement, or contradict each other. We then examine the implications of those intersections and differences in the efforts by urban actors to enhance the capacity to change unsustainable trajectories and transform themselves, their communities, and their cities toward sustainable and resilient relationships with the environment.
C1 [Romero-Lankao, Patricia; Wilhelmi, Olga; Hayden, Mary] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
   [Gnatz, Daniel M.] MnS Inst Sustainable Urban Transformat, POB 21292, Boulder, CO 80308 USA.
C3 National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - USA
RP Romero-Lankao, P (corresponding author), Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
EM prlankao@ucar.edu; gnatz@isut.org; olgaw@ucar.edu; mhayden@ucar.edu
RI Romero-Lankao, Patricia/Q-3341-2017
OI Romero-Lankao, Patricia/0000-0001-9533-2363
CR Adger WN, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596667.002
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Adger WN, 1999, J DEV STUD, V35, P96, DOI 10.1080/00220389908422593
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00083-2
   [Anonymous], 2001, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI
   [Anonymous], 2006, FAIRNESS FUTURITY ES
   [Anonymous], 1994, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, The Environment, and a Sustainable Future
   [Anonymous], 2014, At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203714775
   [Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMM FUT
   Arup RPA, RES SUST CIT SIEM
   Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX
   Baumol W. J., 1988, Baumol & Oates, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139173513, 10.1017/cbo9781139173513]
   Baumol W.J., 1993, Economics, environmental policy, and the quality of life
   Bendor R., 2015, INTERACTIONS, V22, P54, DOI [10.1145/2801039, DOI 10.1145/2801039]
   Berkes F., 2000, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO
   Betsill MM, 2004, INT STUD QUART, V48, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00310.x
   Biermann F, 2010, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V10, P277, DOI 10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3
   Brandt P, 2013, ECOL ECON, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
   Buhaug H, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.016
   Bulkeley H, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P914, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.010
   Burch S, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P304, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685658
   Burch S, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN C, V31, P822, DOI 10.1068/c1206
   Campbell S, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Campbell S.D, 2013, MICH J SUSTAIN
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Clark W.C., 2005, SCI GLOBAL SUSTAINAB
   Common M., 1992, Ecological Economics, V6, P7, DOI 10.1016/0921-8009(92)90036-R
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Davidson DJ, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P1135, DOI 10.1080/08941921003652940
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Eakin H, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.001
   Engle NL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.001
   Feola G, 2015, AMBIO, V44, P376, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0582-z
   Fischer-Kowalski M., 2011, Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Fujita K., 2013, CITIES CRISIS NEW CR
   Galea S, 2005, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V26, P341, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144708
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Garschagen M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P37, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0812-6
   Geels FW, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Giordani P, 2010, STAT METHOD APPL-GER, V19, P587, DOI 10.1007/s10260-010-0146-8
   GLADWIN TN, 1995, ACAD MANAGE REV, V20, P874, DOI 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024
   Gnatz D.M., 2015, CLIMATE CHANGE RISKS
   Grundmann R, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P562, DOI 10.1038/ngeo2780
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Harlan SL, 2007, RES SOC PROBL PUBLIC, V15, P173, DOI 10.1016/S0196-1152(07)15005-5
   Hart S.L., 2005, CAPITALISM CROSSROAD
   Hoel M, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V84, P265, DOI [10.1007/s10584-007-9255-2, 10.1007/S10584-007-9255-2]
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Homsy GC, 2015, URBAN AFF REV, V51, P46, DOI 10.1177/1078087414530545
   Hughes S, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05929-180448
   Ikeme J, 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V13, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00047-5
   Jepson W, 2014, GEOFORUM, V51, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.002
   Klenk NL, 2015, FOREST POLICY ECON, V61, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.008
   Kollmair M., SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHO
   Logan J.R., 1987, The Gentrification Debates
   Maggs D., 2016, ENV PHILOS
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Minx J, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035039
   Moser CON, 1998, WORLD DEV, V26, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10015-8
   NAESS A, 1973, INQUIRY, V16, P95, DOI 10.1080/00201747308601682
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   O'Brien K, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P667, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425767
   OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), OECD ENV IND DEV MEA
   Ostrom E, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P15176, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701886104
   Padilla E, 2002, ECOL ECON, V41, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00026-5
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Piketty T., 2014, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, DOI [DOI 10.4159/9780674369542, 10.4159/9780674369542]
   Rashed T, 2003, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V17, P547, DOI 10.1080/1365881031000114071
   Revi A, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P207, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089157
   Robinson J, 2015, BUILD RES INF, V43, P133, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.979082
   Romero-Lankao P., 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUSTAI, V16
   Romero-Lankao P., 2016, CLIM CHANG
   Romero-Lankao P, 2015, CITIES GLOBAL GOVERN, P181
   Romero-Lankao P, 2014, HABITAT INT, V42, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.008
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN C, V31, P785, DOI 10.1068/c12173
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Romero-Lankao P, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.002
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Saha D, 2008, J PLAN EDUC RES, V28, P21, DOI 10.1177/0739456X08321803
   Selman P., 1998, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V41, P533, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09640569811443, 10.1080/09640569811443]
   Seto K.C., 2013, BIODIVERSITY ECOSYST, P1
   Shove E, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN A, V42, P1273, DOI 10.1068/a42282
   Simon D, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P49, DOI 10.1177/0956247815619865
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Stirling A., 2014, SUSTAINABILITY TRANS
   Svara JH, 2013, CITYSCAPE, V15, P9
   Tah J.H.M., 2000, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V18, P491, DOI [10.1080/01446190050024905, DOI 10.1080/01446190050024905]
   Tompkins EL, 2005, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V8, P562, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.012
   Tuckett D, 2015, CRIT REV, V27, P1, DOI 10.1080/08913811.2015.1037078
   Turner BL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
   United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), SUST DEV COALS
   United Nations Environment Programme, GLOB ENV OUTL 5 ENV
   Vincent K, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.009
   Vos RO, 2007, J CHEM TECHNOL BIOT, V82, P334, DOI 10.1002/jctb.1675
   Wackernagel M, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P9266, DOI 10.1073/pnas.142033699
   Wilhelmi OV, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, P14
   Wirth L, 1938, AM J SOCIOL, V44, P1, DOI 10.1086/217913
   Zeemering ES, 2009, URBAN AFF REV, V45, P247, DOI 10.1177/1078087409337297
NR 103
TC 92
Z9 107
U1 13
U2 176
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD DEC
PY 2016
VL 8
IS 12
AR 1224
DI 10.3390/su8121224
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA EE1CA
UT WOS:000389317100015
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yabe, T
   Rao, PSC
   Ukkusuri, SV
AF Yabe, Takahiro
   Rao, P. Suresh C.
   Ukkusuri, Satish V.
TI Resilience of Interdependent Urban Socio-Physical Systems using
   Large-Scale Mobility Data: Modeling Recovery Dynamics
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Cities; Disasters; Socio-physical interdependencies;
   Mobility data
ID INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSFORMATION; SIMULATION
AB Cities are complex systems comprised of socioeconomic systems relying on critical services delivered by multiple physical infrastructure networks. Due to interdependencies between social and physical systems, disruptions caused by natural hazards may cascade across systems, amplifying the impact of disasters. Despite the increasing threat posed by climate change and rapid urban growth, how to design interdependencies between social and physical systems to achieve resilient cities have been largely unexplored. Here, we study the socio-physical interdependencies in urban systems and their effects on disaster recovery and resilience, using large-scale mobility data collected from Puerto Rico during Hurricane Maria. We find that as cities grow in scale and expand their centralized infrastructure systems, the recovery efficiency of critical services improves, however, curtails the selfreliance of socio-economic systems during crises. Results show that maintaining self-reliance among social systems could be key in developing resilient urban socio-physical systems for cities facing rapid urban growth.
C1 [Yabe, Takahiro; Rao, P. Suresh C.; Ukkusuri, Satish V.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, 550 Stadium Mall Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Rao, P. Suresh C.] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, 915 W State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
C3 Purdue University System; Purdue University; Purdue University System;
   Purdue University
RP Ukkusuri, SV (corresponding author), Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, 550 Stadium Mall Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
EM tyabe@purdue.edu; sukkusur@purdue.edu
RI Ukkusuri, Satish/JXM-5723-2024
OI Yabe, Takahiro/0000-0001-8967-1967
FU NSF [1638311]; Lee A. Rieth Endowment in Lyles School of Civil
   Engineering; Directorate For Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, &
   Manufact Inn [1638311] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX The work of T.Y. and S. V. U. is partly funded by NSF Grant No. 1638311
   CRISP Type 2/Collaborative Research: Critical Transitions in the
   Resilience and Recovery of Interdependent Social and Physical Networks.
   P. S. C. R. was supported in part by the Lee A. Rieth Endowment in Lyles
   School of Civil Engineering.
CR Aksha SK, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17061985
   Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
   [Anonymous], 2016, PLOS CURRENTS
   Bagrow JP, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037676
   Bettencourt LMA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
   Blondel VD, 2015, EPJ DATA SCI, V4, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-015-0046-0
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chester M, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00016-y
   Cui P, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101880
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   de Koning K, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101981
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2020, 3 YEARS HURR MARD FE
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, FEM HOUS ASS PROGR D
   Fortunato S, 2016, PHYS REP, V659, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002
   González MC, 2008, NATURE, V453, P779, DOI 10.1038/nature06958
   Grafton RQ, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P907, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0376-1
   Hallegatte S., 2012, Policy Research Working Paper - World Bank
   Hewawasam V, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102091
   Internews, 2018, HUM PHOT PUERT RIC
   Ji TT, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102726
   Klammler H., 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P140, DOI 10.1007/s10669-017-9649-2
   Klingel P, 2012, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V12, P504, DOI 10.2166/ws.2012.023
   Klinkhamer C., 2017, FUNCTIONALLY FRACTAL
   Krueger EH, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P1167, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001306
   Krueger E, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V56, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.009
   Krueger EH, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2d
   Landfalling Hurricane Probability Project, 2020, CAR CENTR AM LANDF P
   Liu YL, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101914
   Logan TM, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1538, DOI 10.1111/risa.13492
   Lu X, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P11576, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1203882109
   McCaughey JW, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P38, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0002-z
   Modica M, 2015, NETW SPAT ECON, V15, P211, DOI 10.1007/s11067-014-9261-7
   Moglia M, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.009
   Mohebbi S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102327
   National Academies of SciencesEngineering and Medicine, 2019, BUILD MEAS COMM RES
   Ouyang M, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
   Padilla J., 2017, TRACKING STATUS PR
   Padowski JC, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4913, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1461-0
   Rendon C, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102774
   Rinaldi SA, 2001, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V21, P11, DOI 10.1109/37.969131
   Rose S, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3247, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1111769109
   Rosvall M, 2009, EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP, V178, P13, DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2010-01179-1
   Sadri AM, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V90, P1377, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0
   Safegraph Inc, 2021, SAF TECHN DOC
   Sajjad M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850
   Schubert E, 2017, ACM T DATABASE SYST, V42, DOI 10.1145/3068335
   United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2012, DIS RISK RES
   United States Department of Energy Infrastructure Security and Energy Restoration, 2017, HURR NAT MAR IRM HAR
   Verschuur J, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102179
   Waters J, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.011
   World Bank, 2009, SYST CIT HARN URB GR
   Yabe T, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1042, DOI 10.1177/2399808320980744
   Yabe T, 2020, EPJ DATA SCI, V9, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00255-6
   Yabe T, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102260
   Yabe Takahiro, 2020, J R Soc Interface, V17, P20190532, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2019.0532
   Yang YF, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101485
   Yin WH, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V42, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.02.015
   Yu DJ, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1509, DOI 10.1111/risa.13494
NR 62
TC 32
Z9 33
U1 11
U2 61
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 75
AR 103237
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103237
EA AUG 2021
PG 10
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA XE8QW
UT WOS:000723648000001
OA Bronze, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, C
   Li, XH
   Li, SH
AF Wang, Chuan
   Li, Xinhua
   Li, Siheng
TI How Does the Concept of Resilient City Work in Practice? Planning and
   Achievements
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient city; theory and practice; planning practice; future built
   environment; scoring evaluation matrix; assessment framework; urban
   resilience; RC100
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBAN RESILIENCE; ADDIS-ABABA; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY;
   ADAPTATION; ROTTERDAM; PATHWAYS; RIGHTS
AB In the past decade, resilient cities (RCs) have gained extensive attention in academic and political debates as a vision of urban futures. In particular, with the support of the Rockefeller Foundation's Resilient City 100 Program (RC100), a number of cities worldwide have pushed this concept forward from theory to practice through their RC plans/strategies. However, there is widespread doubt regarding how much this holistic idea of the future built environment contributes to urban practice. After developing a scoring evaluation matrix based on the synthesis of existing RC assessment frameworks, this review scrutinizes the plans, reports, city leaders' speeches, official websites and academic reviews of five representative resilient cities and investigates their motivations, planning and achievements. The results demonstrate a huge theoretical and practical gap in RC: while RC plans attempt to expand as comprehensively as possible from cities' initially narrow motivations, their achievements in implementation are limited. Although RC provides more holistic solutions to the cities, the limited resources mean that cities have to prioritize their urgent issues in their everyday practice. This paper calls for designating more feasible and specific features in RC visions and maintaining regular alignments from planning to actions in future RC practice.
C1 [Wang, Chuan; Li, Xinhua; Li, Siheng] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China.
C3 Southeast University - China
RP Wang, C (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, 2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China.
EM chuanwang@seu.edu.cn; xinhua_li@seu.edu.cn; sihengli@seu.edu.cn
RI Wang, Chuan/JWO-9837-2024
OI Wang, Chuan/0000-0002-1439-4798
FU Jiangsu Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Program; Future
   Exploration Program of the School of Architecture, Southeast University;
   Student Research Training Program, Southeast University
FX This research was funded by the Jiangsu Innovation and Entrepreneurship
   Talent Program, the Future Exploration Program of the School of
   Architecture, Southeast University and the Student Research Training
   Program, Southeast University.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alem G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063081
   Allen N, 2018, J PLAN EDUC RES, V38, P222, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17695195
   [Anonymous], GREENER CITY FUND
   [Anonymous], RC100 MILESTONE ADDI
   [Anonymous], RC100 ADDIS ABABA RE
   [Anonymous], LONDON WINS MEMBERSH
   Arup, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Assefa M, 2018, URBAN REG PLAN, V3, P44, DOI [10.11648/j.urp.20180302.12, DOI 10.11648/J.URP.20180302.12]
   Baron N, 2016, P TRANSF RES URB DEV
   Baron N, 2018, INT J BUILD PATHOL, V36, P337, DOI 10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0014
   Birhanu D, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V154, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.571
   Boano C., 2017, Environmental Justice and Urban Resilience in the Global South, P137
   Brown T, 2016, ANTIPODE, V48, P115, DOI 10.1111/anti.12164
   Campelo A., 2021, A research agenda for place branding, P101, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781839102851.00015
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Connolly JJT, 2019, CITIES, V91, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.011
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davenport S, URBAN GREENING BIODI
   Davidson M., 2010, City, V14, P390, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604813.2010.492603
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dey I., 2007, SAGE HDB GROUNDED TH
   DuPuis EM, 2019, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V9, P352, DOI 10.1007/s13412-019-0538-5
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fitzgerald A, 2018, LOCAL GOV STUD, V44, P788, DOI 10.1080/03003930.2018.1473767
   Galderisi A., 2020, City Territ Archit, V7, P16, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40410-020-00123-W
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   2018, [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315661407
   Hagos KG, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102769
   Herslund L, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.008
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huck A, 2021, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V29, P12, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12295
   Huck A, 2020, GEOFORUM, V117, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.10.001
   Ilgen S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050983
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jha AK, 2013, Building Urban Resilience Principles, Tools, and, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Khader M., 2021, URBAN PLANNING TRANS, P1
   Khan S, 2018, CITIES, V72, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.022
   Koert M.v., 2020, PUBLIC TRANSPORTER R
   Lavers T, 2018, AFR AFFAIRS, V117, P462, DOI 10.1093/afraf/ady010
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Mahadevia D, 2018, Affordable housing as flood resilient for low-income households: Case of Ahmedabad and Surat
   Martin Carlos, 2018, Institutionalizing Urban Resilience: A Midterm Monitoring and Evaluation Report of 100 Resilient Cities
   Mavalankar D, LESSONS MASSIVE FLOO
   McPhearson T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V70, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mohamed A, 2020, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100050
   Naef P, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208469
   Oke C, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-020-00010-w
   Ostadtaghizadeh Abbas, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Patel R., 2016, Defining the Resilient City
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Raj V., 2018, THESIS CEPT U AHMEDA
   Reichertz J., 2007, The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory
   Roberts D, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN, V32, P547, DOI 10.1177/0956247820946555
   Roberts D, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P397, DOI 10.1177/0956247810379948
   Rodrigues S, SPEECH RESILIENCE 1
   Rosenzweig C, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.003
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Szpakowska-Loranc E, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102936
   Therrien MC, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102931
   United Nations 11, SUSTAINABLE CITIES C
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), 2017, DISASTER RESILIENCE
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Wakefield S, 2020, POLIT GEOGR, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102148
   Wang C, 2022, PLAN THEOR, V21, P155, DOI 10.1177/14730952211038936
   Wang L, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102181
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   World Bank Group GFDRR, 2015, ADD AB ENH URB RES C
   World Resources Institute India, 2018, IMPL URB COMM RES AS
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 81
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 4
U2 58
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 10
IS 12
AR 1319
DI 10.3390/land10121319
PG 22
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA YB6JS
UT WOS:000739116800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Trundle, A
AF Trundle, Alexei
TI Resilient cities in a Sea of Islands: Informality and climate change in
   the South Pacific
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Informal settlements; Pacific SIDS; Climate change
   adaptation; Ecosystem services
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; STRATEGIES; ADAPTATION; MIGRATION; DISASTER
AB This paper demonstrates pathways for building on the resources, networks, and latent capacities of urban informality to enhance the climate resilience of urban systems, using post-disaster case study research from two Pacific Small Island Developing States to illustrate conceptual and practical opportunities for urban planning to engage constructively with endogenous resilience. Semi-structured qualitative interviews with informal settlement households (n = 57) and institutional representatives (n = 26) were used to identify informal modes of resilience, with secondary analysis of institutional projects and spatially-differentiated socio-economic data being integrated with these primary datasets. Findings demonstrate important distinctions in sub-city scales of resilience relating to values and equity within socio-ecological resilience research that have not been extensively studied to date. These case study observations have implications for understandings of 'core' systems functions, which are critical for planning communities when conceptualising resilience at a metropolitan level. Sub-city analysis also highlights aspects of urban resilience not previously identified in practice elsewhere, with informal maintenance of ecosystem services, use of kinship and familial networks, and translocation of traditional knowledge providing opportunities for enhancing urban climate change adaptation and climate resilient development initiatives.
C1 [Trundle, Alexei] Univ Melbourne, Australian German Climate & Energy Coll, Carlton, Vic, Australia.
   [Trundle, Alexei] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne; University of Melbourne
RP Trundle, A (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Design, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Level 3,Bldg 133,Masson Rd, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
EM alexei.trundle@unimelb.edu.au
RI Trundle, Alexei/D-5762-2018
OI Trundle, Alexei/0000-0002-7076-4626
FU University of Melbourne's Faculty of Architecture, Building, and
   Planning; Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute; Australian-German
   Climate Energy College
FX The author wishes to acknowledge the community members and
   organisational representatives in Port Vila and Honiara that contributed
   their time and expertise to take part in this research. The fieldwork
   conducted for this research was supported by the University of
   Melbourne's Faculty of Architecture, Building, and Planning, the
   Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, and the Australian-German
   Climate & Energy College.
CR Allen CR, 2014, ECOSYSTEMS, V17, P578, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9744-2
   [Anonymous], 2015, 21 C PART
   [Anonymous], 3 INT C SMALL ISL DE
   [Anonymous], MODELS MIGRATION MEL
   [Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
   [Anonymous], 2004, PROF INT DISPL SOL I
   [Anonymous], 2016, Dynamics and resilience of informal areas
   [Anonymous], 2012, World urbanization prospects
   [Anonymous], STAT PAC TOWNS CIT P
   [Anonymous], IMPLICATIONS LAND IS
   [Anonymous], HYOG FRAM ACT 2005 2
   [Anonymous], NAT HAZ RISK ATL
   [Anonymous], SLUM AL 2015 2016 TR
   [Anonymous], BIG CONFUSION LAND Q
   [Anonymous], WAN SMOLB THEATR ANN
   [Anonymous], EMERGENCE PACIFIC UR
   [Anonymous], AGENDA
   [Anonymous], 2012, STREETS TOOLS URB TR
   [Anonymous], PATHW CIRC CROSSR C
   [Anonymous], 2017, OPEN CITY QUITO PAPE
   [Anonymous], 2018, Demographic Research, V12
   [Anonymous], BUILDING RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], 2019, Asian Development Outlook: 2019: Strengthening Disaster Resilience
   [Anonymous], WORLD RISK REPORT 20
   [Anonymous], 2016, The New Urban Agenda
   [Anonymous], NEW OCEANIA REDISCOV
   [Anonymous], POSTD NEEDS ASS TROP
   [Anonymous], PLANNING URBAN INFOR
   Barnett J, 2018, POPUL ENVIRON, V39, P339, DOI 10.1007/s11111-018-0295-5
   Birkmann J, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P171, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0108-y
   Butcher-Gollach C, 2015, INT DEV PLANN REV, V37, P225, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2015.17
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Connell J, 2016, GLOB SOC, V30, P583, DOI 10.1080/13600826.2016.1158701
   Da Silva J., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Haberkorn Gerald., 2008, New Zealand Population Review, V33/34, P95
   Helmke G, 2012, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK ON INFORMAL GOVERNANCE, P85
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   KEARNEY M, 1986, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V15, P331, DOI 10.1146/annurev.an.15.100186.001555
   Keen M., 2017, Urban Development in Honiara: Harnessing Opportunities, Embracing Change
   Keen M, 2019, URBAN POLICY RES, V37, P324, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2019.1626710
   Lawson VA, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P173, DOI 10.1191/030913200672491184
   MASSEY DS, 1990, POPUL INDEX, V56, P3, DOI 10.2307/3644186
   Mayo Larry W., 1987, City and Society, V1, P99
   McEvoy D., 2017, GREATER PORT VILA SO
   McEvoy D, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1594666
   McGreavy B, 2016, ENVIRON COMMUN, V10, P104, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2015.1014390
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mortensen R., 2000, J. South Pacif. Law, V4
   MUNRO D, 1995, J SOC HIST, V28, P609, DOI 10.1353/jsh/28.3.609
   Nunbogu AM, 2018, CITIES, V74, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.022
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Posso A, 2014, ASHGATE ECON GEO SER, P67
   Scheffran J, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V33, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.002
   Seeliger L, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P184, DOI 10.1177/0956247813516240
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Silvey R, 1999, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V89, P121, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00134
   Solecki W, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.03.001
   Solomon Islands Government (SIG), 2014, RAP ASS MACR SECT IM
   Speedy K, 2015, J PAC HIST, V50, P344, DOI 10.1080/00223344.2015.1073868
   Stead D, 2014, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V21, P15, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2013.824928
   Storper M, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P1114, DOI 10.1177/0042098016634002
   Tanner T, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P23, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2431
   Trundle A., 2017, Local Action on Climate Change, P35
   Trundle A, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P53, DOI 10.1177/0956247818816654
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 76
TC 24
Z9 24
U1 8
U2 50
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD FEB
PY 2020
VL 97
AR 102496
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102496
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA KG6TM
UT WOS:000510082600052
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, W
   Song, ZY
AF Liu, Wei
   Song, Zhaoyang
TI Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure
   networks
SO RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
LA English
DT Review
DE Resilience; Critical infrastructure networks; Resilience-enhanced
   strategies; Methodologies; Coupled systems
ID WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS; VULNERABILITY
   ANALYSIS; IMPROVING RESILIENCE; CASCADING FAILURES; EXTREME WEATHER;
   ENERGY-SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RISK; RESTORATION
AB With the rise of the resilience concept, scholars and practitioners have paid increasing attention to resilient city, which has become a new means of coping with hazards. As the cornerstone of modem cities, urban critical infrastructure networks (CINs) are prerequisites for resilient cities due to the huge economic losses and social impacts caused by their incapacities. In recent years, researches on the resilience of CINs have considerably increased, resulting in various resilience definitions, approaches, and enhanced strategies. This work reviews literature on six CINs, namely, water, drainage, gas, transportation, electric, and communication networks. The resilience definitions, hazard categories, methodologies, and enhanced measures for each CIN are analyzed in detail. Research challenges and future directions are also presented.
C1 [Liu, Wei] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Disaster Reduct Civil Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Wei; Song, Zhaoyang] Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
C3 Tongji University; Tongji University
RP Liu, W (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Dept Struct Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
EM liuw@tongji.edu.cn; songzy@tongji.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51720105005]
FX The support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
   No. 51720105005) is greatly appreciated.
CR Al-Deek H, 2006, J INTELL TRANSPORT S, V10, P117, DOI 10.1080/15472450600793586
   Alipour A, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001399
   [Anonymous], COMM RES PLANN GUID
   [Anonymous], EARTHQUAKE ENG ENG V
   [Anonymous], WATER SUPPLY DRAINAG
   [Anonymous], J STRUCT ENG
   [Anonymous], MODERN URBAN TRAFFIC
   [Anonymous], SUST CITIES SOC
   [Anonymous], MCEER04SP01 RES PROG
   [Anonymous], J MECH DES
   [Anonymous], ELSEVIER SCI
   [Anonymous], FIN REP AUG 14 2003
   [Anonymous], P 13 INT C URB DRAIN
   [Anonymous], CRIT ASS LIF SYST PE
   [Anonymous], EARTHQUAKE ENG ENG V
   [Anonymous], 2004, RES PROG ACCOMPL
   Aven T, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P515, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01528.x
   Aydin NY, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.022
   Aydin NY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
   Baños R, 2011, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V25, P2351, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-9812-3
   Batouli M, 2018, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V33, P393, DOI 10.1111/mice.12348
   Berche B, 2009, EUR PHYS J B, V71, P125, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3
   Berdica K., 2002, TRANSPORT POLICY, V9, P117, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
   Bhamra R, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5375, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
   Bi WW, 2016, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000649
   Bigger JE, 2009, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V5, P199, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2009.024871
   Birgani YT, 2016, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V169, P3, DOI 10.1680/wama.14.00043
   Bostick TP, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V175, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.025
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Buldyrev SV, 2010, NATURE, V464, P1025, DOI 10.1038/nature08932
   Çagnan Z, 2006, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V22, P589, DOI 10.1193/1.2222400
   Calvert SC, 2018, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V14, P130, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2017.1363315
   Cavdaroglu B, 2013, ANN OPER RES, V203, P279, DOI 10.1007/s10479-011-0959-3
   Chan R, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000200
   Chang L, 2011, INT J ELEC POWER, V33, P1410, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.06.021
   Chang SE, 2004, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V20, P739, DOI 10.1193/1.1775796
   Chen A, 1999, J ADV TRANSPORT, V33, P183, DOI 10.1002/atr.5670330207
   Cheng R, 2018, CONDENS MATTER, V4, DOI 10.3390/condmat4010003
   Chenyang Lian, 2006, Systems Engineering, V9, P241, DOI 10.1002/sys.20051
   Chertoff M., 2009, NATL INFRASTRUCTURE
   Christodoulou S., 2017, Urban Water Distribution Networks: Assessing Systems Vulnerabilities, Failures, and Risks
   Cimellaro GP, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000204
   Cimellaro GP, 2014, ENG STRUCT, V69, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.003
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001592
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
   Cimorelli L, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P3997, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-2032-3
   Cong H, 2018, J MOD POWER SYST CLE, V6, P1066, DOI 10.1007/s40565-018-0377-5
   Cox A, 2011, TRANSPORT POLICY, V18, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.004
   Creaco E, 2016, URBAN WATER J, V13, P167, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.949799
   Crucitti P, 2004, PHYS REV E, V69, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.045104
   Cuppens A, 2012, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V65, P1506, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.040
   Diao KG, 2016, WATER RES, V106, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.011
   Do M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10114188
   Dong X, 2017, WATER RES, V124, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.038
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   Dueñas-Osorio L, 2009, STRUCT SAF, V31, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.007
   Esposito S, 2013, B EARTHQ ENG, V11, P2447, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9478-8
   Farahmandfar Z, 2018, J PIPELINE SYST ENG, V9, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000293
   Faturechi R, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000212
   Fiksel J, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P5330, DOI 10.1021/es0344819
   Fotouhi H, 2017, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V163, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.026
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Gao HX, 2017, P IEEE, V105, P1214, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2666548
   Garshnek V, 1998, SPACE POLICY, V14, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0265-9646(98)00023-X
   Golara A, 2017, J PIPELINE SYST ENG, V8, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000250
   Gomez K, 2014, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V52, P66, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.2014.6979954
   Greco R, 2012, J HYDROINFORM, V14, P761, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2012.037
   Guikema SD, 2009, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V94, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.003
   Han ZY, 2011, J HAZARD MATER, V189, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.067
   Hartmann AK, 2014, EUR PHYS J B, V87, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2014-50078-4
   He C, 2018, IEEE T POWER SYST, V33, P5787, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2820383
   Herrera M, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P1685, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1245-6
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong S, 2016, J PHYS A-MATH THEOR, V49, DOI 10.1088/1751-8113/49/19/195101
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Hu P, 2015, PHYSICA A, V429, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2015.02.002
   Ip WH, 2011, IEEE SYST J, V5, P189, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2010.2096670
   Jayaram N, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005316
   Jenelius E, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V49, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.02.003
   Joyce J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.026
   Juan-García P, 2017, WATER RES, V115, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.047
   Kaviani A, 2017, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V13, P794, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2017.1335807
   Khomami MS, 2018, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V165, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2018.08.016
   Kyriakidis M, 2018, ENERGY TECHNOL-GER, V6, P1700, DOI 10.1002/ente.201700841
   Lanzano G, 2013, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V117, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.019
   Lee EE, 2007, IEEE T SYST MAN CY C, V37, P1303, DOI 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905859
   Lee EH, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000775, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000775]
   Li J, 1996, MOL CARCINOGEN, V16, P213
   Li J, 2005, Lifeline earthquake engineering-basic methods and applications
   Li J., 2009, Stochastic dynamics of structures
   Li J, 2008, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V37, P1295, DOI 10.1002/eqe.815
   Li SD, 2012, NONLINEAR DYNAM, V69, P837, DOI 10.1007/s11071-011-0308-8
   Little RG, 2002, J URBAN TECHNOL, V9, P109, DOI 10.1080/106307302317379855
   Liu W, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V291, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.012
   Luo DS, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P61633, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2872941
   Ma SS, 2018, IEEE T SMART GRID, V9, P1442, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2016.2591885
   MacKenzie CA, 2016, RISK ANAL, V36, P847, DOI 10.1111/risa.12479
   MacKenzie CA, 2013, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V19, P25, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000103
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Mendonça D, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.017
   Meng F, 2018, WATER RES, V143, P376, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.048
   Mojtahedi M, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1119, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2624-2
   Motter AE, 2002, PHYS REV E, V66, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.065102
   Mugume SN, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P727, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2016.1253754
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Murray-Tuite PM, 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1-5, P1398, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2006.323240
   Nateghi R, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P13478, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2792680
   Ning X, 2013, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V7, P658, DOI 10.1007/s11783-013-0546-8
   Nogal M, 2017, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V3, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000908
   Nogal M, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V156, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.07.020
   Ouyang M, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.011
   Ouyang M, 2014, STRUCT SAF, V48, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001
   Ouyang M, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Pandit A, 2016, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V12, P120, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2016.075865
   Panteli M, 2017, IEEE T POWER SYST, V32, P4732, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2664141
   Panteli M, 2015, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V127, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.012
   Panteli M, 2015, IEEE POWER ENERGY M, V13, P58, DOI 10.1109/MPE.2015.2397334
   Panzieri S, 2008, INT J MODEL IDENTIF, V3, P69, DOI 10.1504/IJMIC.2008.018186
   Pastor-Satorras R, 2001, PHYS REV LETT, V87, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.258701
   Patil GR, 2016, ADV COMPLEX SYST, V19, DOI 10.1142/S021952591650003X
   Piratla KR, 2016, PIPELINES 2016 - OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND, NOT OUT OF RISK, P1856
   Prasad TD, 2004, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V130, P73, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(73)
   Rahimi K, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.006
   Rak J, 2015, COMPUT COMMUN NETW S, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22333-9
   Reca J, 2008, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V134, P234, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(234)
   Reed D, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001395
   Reed DA, 2009, IEEE SYST J, V3, P174, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017396
   Reggiani A, 2013, TRANSPORT POLICY, V28, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.09.007
   Reggiani A, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.012
   Righi AW, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007
   Rinaldi SA, 2001, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V21, P11, DOI 10.1109/37.969131
   Sakakibara H, 2004, J TRANSP ENG, V130, P560, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:5(560)
   Schoen M., 2015, Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology, V6, P75, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SWAQE.2015.05.001
   Scholz RW, 2012, J RISK RES, V15, P313, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2011.634522
   Sharma N, 2018, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V3, P49, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2017.1345257
   Shin S, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10020164
   Singh M, 2009, ENG FAIL ANAL, V16, P2098, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.02.003
   Soldi D, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V119, P1259, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.990
   Spiegelhalter D, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P1393, DOI 10.1126/science.1191181
   Sterbenz JPG, 2010, COMPUT NETW, V54, P1245, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.03.005
   Tang J., PLoS One
   Tavakol-Davani H, 2016, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V2, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000805
   Taylor MAP, 2013, TRANSPORTMETRICA B, V1, P174, DOI 10.1080/21680566.2013.859107
   Todini E., 2000, Urban Water, V2, P115, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758, 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00049-2, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00049-2, 10.1016/s1462-0758(00)00049-2]
   Wadhawan Y, 2016, CPS-SPC'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ACM WORKSHOP ON CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS SECURITY & PRIVACY, P71, DOI 10.1145/2994487.2994488
   Wang SL, 2012, PHYSICA A, V391, P3323, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2011.12.043
   Wright R, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V119, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.917
   Wright R, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V119, P1249, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.987
   Wu JJ, 2007, PHYSICA A, V378, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2006.12.003
   Xi DC, 1999, Design and construction of urban gas pipeline network
   Yazdani A, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P1574, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.016
   Ye Q, 2015, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, V7, P91, DOI 10.1080/19439962.2014.907384
   Yin WS, 1997, J APPL POLYM SCI, V65, P1
   Zhang P, 2013, EPL-EUROPHYS LETT, V103, DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/103/68005
   Zhang WL, 2017, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V13, P1404, DOI 10.1080/15732479.2016.1271813
   Zhang WL, 2016, STRUCT SAF, V62, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.06.003
   Zhang X, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V46, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.006
   Zhao X, 2015, ANIM BIOL, V65, P1, DOI 10.1163/15707563-00002455
   Zhuang BY, 2013, J HYDRAUL ENG, V139, P527, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000676
NR 161
TC 186
Z9 201
U1 161
U2 881
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0951-8320
EI 1879-0836
J9 RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE
JI Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
PD JAN
PY 2020
VL 193
AR 106617
DI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
PG 16
WC Engineering, Industrial; Operations Research & Management Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science
GA JU4IN
UT WOS:000501641400025
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liang, Y
   Cheng, YS
   Ren, F
   Du, QY
AF Liang, Yan
   Cheng, Yingsong
   Ren, Fu
   Du, Qingyun
TI Urban resilience assessment framework and spatiotemporal dynamics in
   Hubei, China
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Driving force-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR);
   BP neural network; Obstacle diagnosis model; Sustainable development
ID SUSTAINABILITY
AB Building resilient cities has become an emerging risk management strategy, thus it is necessary to make a scientific evaluation on urban resilience. In this study, both the Driving Force-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework and the BP neural network are innovatively adopted to construct a comprehensive urban resilience evaluation system. Prefecture-level cities in Hubei Province are examined for empirical analysis. The results show that: (1) The urban resilience in Hubei Province exhibits an intermittent growth pattern, progressing in a west-to-east direction. This growth is characterized by three years of advancement followed by a one-year period of stagnation. (2) There is a spatial negative correlation. Owing to uneven development within Hubei Province, it can be seen that Wuhan, the provincial capital, holds a dominant position. (3) Resource and environmental pressure has become the main obstacle to the construction of resilient cities in Wuhan. The primary limiting factors for other cities are the degree of socioeconomic growth and the capacity of the government to handle affairs. This study, based on the process-oriented nature of resilience, constructs an indicator system for urban resilience evaluation under the DPSIR framework, fully reflecting the characteristics of urban resilience. It not only enriches the theory and methodology of urban resilience evaluation but also offers valuable references for governments to formulate effective strategies for sustainable urban development.
C1 [Liang, Yan; Ren, Fu; Du, Qingyun] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China.
   [Cheng, Yingsong] Wuhan Univ, Sch Elect Informat, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University; Wuhan University
RP Du, QY (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, 129 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China.
EM qydu@whu.edu.cn
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2022YFC3005704]
FX This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China
   (2022YFC3005704)
CR Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Amirzadeh M., 2022, Urban Resilience: A Vague or an Evolutionary Concept?, V81
   Borongan G, 2022, MAR POLLUT BULL, V181, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113920
   Cao FF, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110643
   Chacon-Hurtado D, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102695
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen X. L., 2023, Urban Resilience Assessment from the Multidimensional Perspective Using Dynamic Bayesian Network: A case Study of Fujian Province, China 238
   Chen YG, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0249589
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Delgado LE, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V758, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143999
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Federigi I, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109395
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   HOLYOAK KJ, 1987, SCIENCE, V236, P992, DOI 10.1126/science.236.4804.992
   Hou XR, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107263
   Hu L. Z., 2020, Negative Spatial Autocorrelation and Its Impacts on Georeferenced Data Analyses: With Case Studies of Cancer Incidences
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Jiao L. D., 2023, An Assessment Model for Urban Resilience Based on the pressure-state-response Framework and BP-GA Neural Network 49
   Kutty AA, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V378, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203
   Levrel H, 2009, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V18, P1719, DOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9507-0
   Liao K. H., 2012, A Theory on Urban Resilience to Floods-A Basis for Alternative Planning Practices, V17, P4
   Liu ZZ, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.12.003
   Lu H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Maisseu A., 1995, Energy, Entropy and Sustainable Development
   Malmir M, 2021, GEOSCI FRONT, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101169
   Mangi SC, 2007, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V50, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.10.003
   Manservisi F, 2023, REG SUSTAIN, V4, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.regsus.2023.08.002
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moss ED, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105394
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   Northam M. R., 1979, URBAN GEOGRAPHY
   Ntona MM, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118543
   OECD. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2003, core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews
   Qasim S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.009
   Qin XM, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118926
   Qu SJ, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104856
   Rezvani SMHS, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103612
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Ruan WQ, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V75, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.06.021
   Shamsipour A, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105252
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tang D. C., 2023, The Influence of Industrial Structure Transformation on Urban Resilience Based on 110 prefecture-level Cities in the Yangtze River 96
   Tang X. L., 2023, A multi-scenario Urban Resilience Simulation Study Based on the System Dynamics Model 132
   Tschimmel K., 2012, Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation, P1, DOI DOI 10.13140/2.1.2570.3361
   UNHSP, 2022, World cities report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   Wang X, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103828
   Xia C. H., 2022, The Spatiotemporal Evolution Pattern of Urban Resilience in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration Based on TOPSIS-PSO-ELM 87
   Yang YC, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V161, P1251, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.207
   Zhang MS, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229735
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 59
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 30
U2 30
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD DEC 28
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 1
AR 31391
DI 10.1038/s41598-024-82895-6
PG 16
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA Q6Q5D
UT WOS:001385899200032
PM 39732853
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Johnson, C
   Blackburn, S
AF Johnson, Cassidy
   Blackburn, Sophie
TI Advocacy for urban resilience: UNISDR's Making Cities Resilient Campaign
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE planning; local government; urban; disaster; resilience; risk reduction
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE
AB This paper reviews what local governments in more than 50 cities are doing with regard to disaster risk reduction. It draws on the reports of their participation in the global Making Cities Resilient Campaign and its 10 "essential" components, and on interviews with city mayors or managers. These show how resilience to disasters is being conceived and addressed by local governments, especially with regard to changes in their institutional framework and engagement with communities and other stakeholders, also in mobilizing finance, undertaking multi-hazard risk assessments, upgrading informal settlements, adjusting urban planning and implementing building codes. The paper summarizes what city mayors or managers view as key milestones for building resilience, and further discusses their evaluation of the usefulness of the campaign to them. It also discusses how a local government-focused perspective on disaster risk reduction informs our understanding of resilience. This includes how development can contribute much to disaster risk reduction as well as a more tangible and operational understanding of resilience (resistance + coping capacity + recovery + adaptive capacity) that local governments can understand and act on.
C1 [Johnson, Cassidy] UCL, Bartlett Dev Planning Unit, London WC1H 9EZ, England.
   [Blackburn, Sophie] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England.
C3 University of London; University College London; University of London;
   King's College London
RP Johnson, C (corresponding author), UCL, Bartlett Dev Planning Unit, 34 Tavistock Sq, London WC1H 9EZ, England.
EM cassidy.johnson@ucl.ac.uk; sophie.blackburn@kcl.ac.uk
OI Johnson, Cassidy/0000-0002-6080-6458; Blackburn,
   Sophie/0000-0003-1959-5465
CR [Anonymous], 2013, The Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR) 2013
   [Anonymous], 2010, WORLD DIS REP 2010 F
   [Anonymous], 2012, How To Make Cities More Resilient: A Handbook For Local Government Leaders
   [Anonymous], 2002, RESILIENCE SUSTAINAB
   [Anonymous], 2012, Making cities resilient report 2012
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Da Silva J, 2010, URBAN RESILIENCE FRA
   Davis Ian, 2004, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
   GoF, 2017, Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 'Risk and Poverty in a Changing Climate: Invest Today for a Safer Tomorrow'
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Lewis Dan, 2013, UN HAB SESS UNISDR G
   Oliver-Smith A., 2011, DEFYING DISPLACEMENT
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   Schipper L, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x
   Smit B, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P877
   Thomalla F., 2004, 9 EVA POTSD I CLIM I
   Turner BL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
   UNISDR, 2011, REV RISK RED DEV 201
   UNISDR, 2011, TAK STOCK PROGR FUT
   UNISDR, 2013, TOOLK LOC GOV 10 ESS
NR 21
TC 73
Z9 84
U1 5
U2 142
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD APR
PY 2014
VL 26
IS 1
BP 29
EP 52
DI 10.1177/0956247813518684
PG 24
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA AG8FC
UT WOS:000335653200003
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xu, Q
   Zhong, MR
   Dong, Y
AF Xu, Qiong
   Zhong, Meirui
   Dong, Yu
TI Digital economy and risk response: How the digital economy affects urban
   resilience
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Digital economy; Urban economic resilience; Impact mechanisms
ID PLATFORMS; CITIES; ENERGY; MEDIA
AB Digital economy is fundamentally changing the production, life, and governance of cities and reshaping benign interactions between urban systems. Consequently, it has profound implications for exploring resilient city building in the Chinese context. Using panel data of 274 cities in China from 2011 to 2020, this research explores the impact mechanisms and spatial effects of the digital economy on urban economic resilience. The results suggest that digital economy facilitates the building of urban economic resilience. The digital economy is effective in enhancing the economic resilience of smart cities and cities in eastern and central China. The economic resilience of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta is prominently affected by the digital economy, while the impact of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei is not obvious. The digital economy mainly enhances urban economic resilience by activating innovation dynamics, catalyzing industrial structure diversification, and accelerating human resource accumulation. Finally, the digital economy has a significant positive spillover effect on urban economic resilience. This research provides valuable guidance for cities to grasp the growth opportunities of the digital economy, scientifically coordinate the synergistic building of urban systems and improve the economic resilience of cities.
C1 [Xu, Qiong] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China.
   [Zhong, Meirui; Dong, Yu] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
   [Zhong, Meirui] Cent South Univ, Inst Met Resources Strategy, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing Agricultural University; Central South University; Central South
   University
RP Zhong, MR; Dong, Y (corresponding author), Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
EM zmr726@163.com; 15656939334@163.com
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72373165]; Late Subsidized
   Projects of the National Social Science Fund of China [23FJYB011]; Key
   Scientific Research Project of the Hunan Provincial Department of
   Education [23A0006]
FX We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China (72373165) , the Late Subsidized
   Projects of the National Social Science Fund of China (23FJYB011) , the
   Key Scientific Research Project of the Hunan Provincial Department of
   Education (23A0006) . Besides, we also have an appreciation to the
   Editor and anonymous referees for the very useful comments and
   suggestions.
CR Alam ASAF, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101626
   Anttiroiko AV, 2014, AI SOC, V29, P323, DOI 10.1007/s00146-013-0464-0
   Chandna V, 2022, BUS HORIZONS, V65, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.09.005
   Chen Y, 2017, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V54, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.008
   Chen YM, 2020, CHINA ECON REV, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101482
   Chen Y, 2023, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V29, P353, DOI 10.3846/tede.2023.17869
   Chen Y, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20010036
   Cheng T, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103997
   Cheng Y, 2023, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106762
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Contreras D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.048
   Corodescu-Rosca E, 2023, CITIES, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104090
   D'Amico G, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105819
   de Falco S, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P205, DOI 10.1177/0969776418783813
   Del Giudice M, 2021, INT J LOGIST MANAG, V32, P337, DOI 10.1108/IJLM-03-2020-0119
   Derder A., 2023, American Journal of Education and Practice., V7, P1
   Domini G, 2021, RES POLICY, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104137
   Enciso-Santocildes M, 2021, INT J INNOV STUD, V5, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.ijis.2021.11.001
   Fieseler C, 2019, J BUS ETHICS, V156, P987, DOI 10.1007/s10551-017-3607-2
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Freedman S, 2012, REV ECON STAT, V94, P499, DOI 10.1162/REST_a_00162
   Gafter L, 2022, CITIES, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103636
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gongora-Svartzman G, 2022, RISK ANAL, V42, P1686, DOI 10.1111/risa.13820
   Grabner SM, 2023, REG STUD, V57, P2521, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2022.2042470
   Gu JF, 2022, J INNOV KNOWL, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100228
   Guan HP, 2022, TELEMAT INFORM REP, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.teler.2022.100010
   Guo BN, 2023, ECON MODEL, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106194
   Hao XL, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V325, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116504
   Henman P, 2020, ASIA PAC J PUBLIC AM, V42, P209, DOI 10.1080/23276665.2020.1816188
   Hernandez-Matamoros A, 2020, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106610
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Hu XH, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P3466, DOI 10.1177/0042098018817223
   Huang J, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091470
   Jasiunas J, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476
   Kamchatova EY, 2021, STUD SYST DECIS CONT, V314, P159, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-56433-9_18
   Kapucu N., 2022, Urban Governance., V1, P10
   Kimhi S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101746
   Kong Y., 2020, International Journal of Science and Business., V4, P160, DOI DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.4282943
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li X, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P21384, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-23722-1
   Li ZZ, 2024, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V71, P5523, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2024.3362065
   Liang L, 2023, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122328
   Lin BQ, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V28, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.016
   Liu SF, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191710559
   Liu Y, 2024, SUSTAIN DEV, V32, P307, DOI 10.1002/sd.2656
   Liu Y, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19042414
   Lupu D, 2023, REG STUD, V57, P2406, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2023.2217218
   Lythreatis S, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
   Ma D, 2022, J BUS RES, V145, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.041
   Mahajan S, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103942
   Mallick SK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103196
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   Meekes J, 2019, J URBAN ECON, V109, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2018.11.005
   Myovella G, 2020, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101856
   Nunn N, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P1630, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.6.1630
   Pan WR, 2022, J BUS RES, V139, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061
   Patil A, 2023, J BUS RES, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.018
   Pham H., 2020, Management Science Letters., V10, P2897
   Roodman D, 2009, STATA J, V9, P86, DOI 10.1177/1536867X0900900106
   Schintler LA, 2022, J URBAN MANAG, V11, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004
   Sgambati S, 2022, CITIES, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103811
   Si S, 2023, TECHNOVATION, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102484
   Sitinjak E, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.029
   Song Y, 2022, RESOUR POLICY, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102751
   Styrin E, 2022, GOV INFORM Q, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101627
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Tang C, 2022, TECHNOL SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101963
   Tian Y, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21087
   Usman A, 2021, TELEMAT INFORM, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101537
   Vicari R, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P1485, DOI 10.5194/nhess-19-1485-2019
   Wan GH, 2022, ECON MODEL, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105854
   Wang H, 2021, J URBAN MANAG, V10, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.006
   Wang XY, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192316094
   Wu BZ, 2022, FINANC RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2022.103047
   Wu TL, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0277787
   Xu Q, 2023, CORP SOC RESP ENV MA, V30, P1816, DOI 10.1002/csr.2457
   Xu Q, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V319, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115710
   Xu Q, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V325, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116464
   Xu Q, 2024, J POLICY RES TOUR LE, V16, P445, DOI 10.1080/19407963.2022.2069115
   Xu Q, 2022, ENERG ECON, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105879
   Xu Q, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154321
   Yang HY, 2021, COMPUT NETW, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108102
   Yeo JW, 2022, RISK ANAL, V42, P1670, DOI 10.1111/risa.13652
   Zenka J, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10121335
   Zhang JN, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106821
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhang YJ, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121481
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zou J, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121647
NR 92
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 205
U2 250
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 155
AR 105397
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105397
EA SEP 2024
PG 16
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA F6I4G
UT WOS:001310833200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hammond, MJ
   Chen, AS
   Djordjevic, S
   Butler, D
   Mark, O
AF Hammond, M. J.
   Chen, A. S.
   Djordjevic, S.
   Butler, D.
   Mark, O.
TI Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review
SO URBAN WATER JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article; Proceedings Paper
CT ToRC Workshop at the International Conference on Urban Drainage
   Modelling
CY 2012
CL Belgrade, SERBIA
DE impact assessment; urban water management; urban flooding; resilience
ID POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; INPUT-OUTPUT MODEL; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   POTENTIAL IMPACTS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; DAMAGE; RESILIENCE; WATER;
   VULNERABILITY; LIFE
AB Flooding can cause major disruptions in cities, and lead to significant impacts on people, the economy and on the environment. These impacts may be exacerbated by climate and socio-economic changes. Resilience thinking has become an important way for city planners and decision makers to manage flood risks.
   Despite different definitions of resilience, a consistent theme is that flood resilient cities are impacted less by extreme flood events. Therefore, flood risk professionals and planners need to understand flood impacts to build flood resilient cities. This paper presents a state-of-the-art literature review on flood impact assessment in urban areas, detailing their application, and their limitations. It describes both techniques for dealing with individual categories of impacts, as well as methodologies for integrating them. The paper will also identify future avenues for progress in improving the techniques.
C1 [Hammond, M. J.; Chen, A. S.; Djordjevic, S.; Butler, D.] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter, Devon, England.
   [Mark, O.] DHI Grp, Horsholm, Denmark.
C3 University of Exeter; Danish Hydraulic Institute (DHI)
RP Hammond, MJ (corresponding author), Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter, Devon, England.
EM m.j.hammond@exeter.ac.uk
RI Chen, Albert/E-2735-2010; Butler, David/I-2991-2012; Djordjevic,
   Slobodan/P-8853-2015
OI Chen, Albert S./0000-0003-3708-3332; Butler, David/0000-0001-5515-3416;
   Djordjevic, Slobodan/0000-0003-1682-1383
FU European Commission [244047]
FX Research on the CORFU (Collaborative research on flood resilience in
   urban areas) project was funded by the European Commission through
   Framework Programme 7, Grant Number 244047.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern M, 2005, EPIDEMIOL REV, V27, P36, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxi004
   Anand S, 1997, J HEALTH ECON, V16, P685, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00005-2
   [Anonymous], 1945, HUMAN ADJUSTMENT FLO
   [Anonymous], 11 INT C URB DRAIN 3
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2006, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V54, P1, DOI 10.2166/wst.2006.572
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P273, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.298
   ARNELL NW, 1989, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V115, P94, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1989)115:1(94)
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Booysen HJ, 1999, WATER SA, V25, P41
   Brewin CR, 2000, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V68, P748, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.748
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bureau of Transport Economics, 2001, 103 BTE
   Cagno E, 2011, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V96, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2010.07.011
   Chang H, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P938, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.497110
   Chatterton J. B., 2007, COSTS SUMMER 2007 FL
   Chen Y, 2013, J PROP RES, V30, P298, DOI 10.1080/09599916.2013.765499
   Conrad SH, 2006, BELL LABS TECH J, V11, P57, DOI 10.1002/bltj.20178
   Crowther K. G., 2005, Systems Engineering, V8, P323, DOI 10.1002/sys.20037
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Daniel VE, 2009, ECOL ECON, V69, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.018
   Dassanayake D. R., 2012, P 2 EUR C FLOODRISK
   Dawson RJ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P167, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4
   DE Bruijn K., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P199, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232]
   DEFRA and EA,, 2004, APPR HUM REL INT IMP
   Department of Natural Resources and Environment, 2000, RAP APPR METH RAD FL
   Djordjevic S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.008
   Dutta D, 2003, J HYDROL, V277, P24, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00084-2
   Eleutério J, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P983, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-983-2013
   ELLSON RW, 1984, J REGIONAL SCI, V24, P559, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1984.tb01048.x
   Emanuelsson MAE, 2014, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V7, P31, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12028
   Fewtrell L., 2008, Flooding and Health-an Evaluation of the Health Impacts of Urban Pluvial Flooding in the UK
   Freni G, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V61, P2979, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.177
   Gain AK, 2013, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V6, P219, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12003
   Galea S, 2005, EPIDEMIOL REV, V27, P78, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxi003
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Gersonius B, 2008, 11 TH INT C URBAN DR
   Gissing A, 2004, AUST GEOGR, V35, P209, DOI 10.1080/0004918042000249511
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Green C., 2011, D61 CONHAZ FLOOD HAZ
   Gupta K., 2007, Urb. Wat. J, V4, P183, DOI DOI 10.1080/15730620701464141
   Haimes YY, 2005, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V11, P67, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(67)
   Hajat S, 2005, EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS AND PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSES, P185, DOI 10.1007/3-540-28862-7_18
   Hallegatte S, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P779, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01046.x
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Harris AM, 2008, AM J TROP MED HYG, V79, P708, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.708
   HASHIMOTO T, 1982, WATER RESOUR RES, V18, P14, DOI 10.1029/WR018i001p00014
   Henonin J, 2013, J HYDROINFORM, V15, P717, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2013.132
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hutton G, 2007, J WATER HEALTH, V5, P481, DOI 10.2166/wh.2007.009
   James L.D., 1971, EC WATER RESOURCES P, DOI DOI 10.4296/CWRJ1503201
   Jonkman SN, 2008, NAT HAZARDS, V46, P353, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9227-5
   Jonkman SN, 2008, ECOL ECON, V66, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.022
   Jonkman SN, 2005, DISASTERS, V29, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00275.x
   Kay D, 2008, ENVIRON FLUID MECH, V8, P451, DOI 10.1007/s10652-008-9096-1
   Kazama S, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0141-5
   Khan D. M., 2012, P 2 EUR C FLOODRISK
   Kolen B, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1312, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01932.x
   Kowalewski J., 2009, 125 HWWI
   Kreibich H, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1679, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009
   Kubal C, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1881, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1881-2009
   Lau CL, 2010, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V104, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.07.002
   Lekuthai A, 2001, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V15, P343, DOI 10.1023/A:1014489329348
   Leontief WW, 1936, REV ECON STATISTICS, V18, P105, DOI 10.2307/1927837
   Lorgelly PK, 2008, EPIDEMIOL INFECT, V136, P34, DOI 10.1017/S0950268807008163
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Merz B, 2004, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V4, P153, DOI 10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004
   Merz B, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1697, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
   Messner F., 2007, EVALUATING FLOOD DAM
   Meyer V, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P1351, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
   Meyer V., 2005, 212005 UFZ
   MURL, 2000, POT HOCHW AM RHEIN N
   Murray CJL, 1997, J HEALTH ECON, V16, P703, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00004-0
   NaDiNe, 2012, HELMH ZENTR POTSD DE
   Natural Resources and Mines, 2002, GUID ASS TANG FLOOD
   Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board, 2012, GROSS DOM PROD Q4 20
   Oliveri E., 2000, Urban Water, V2, P223, DOI 10.1016/s1462-0758(00)00062-5
   Parker D.J., 2000, FLOODS
   Peng H, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-207
   Penning-Rowsell E., 2005, The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: a Handbook of Assessment Techniques
   PENNINGROWSELL EC, 1987, APPL GEOGR, V7, P263, DOI 10.1016/0143-6228(87)90020-8
   Peterson TC, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JD009453
   Prashar S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1609, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0320-4
   Prüss A, 2002, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V110, P537, DOI 10.1289/ehp.02110537
   Pryce G, 2011, HOUSING STUD, V26, P259, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2011.542086
   Ranger N, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9979-2
   Reacher M, 2004, Commun Dis Public Health, V7, P39
   Rinaldi SA, 2001, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V21, P11, DOI 10.1109/37.969131
   Rogers CDF, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V165, P73, DOI 10.1680/muen.11.00030
   Rose A, 2005, J REGIONAL SCI, V45, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
   Rose A., 2002, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V4, P1
   Rose Adam., 2004, Disaster Prevention and Management, V13, P307, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410556528
   Santos BF, 2010, TRANSPORT PLAN TECHN, V33, P297, DOI 10.1080/03081061003732375
   Saul A., 2011, FLOOD RISK SCI MANAG
   Scawthorn C., 2006, Natural Hazards Review, V7, P60, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(60)
   Schwartz BS, 2006, AM J TROP MED HYG, V74, P1067, DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.74.1067
   Seifert I., 2009, Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice, P1669
   Sidley P, 2000, BRIT MED J, V320, P669, DOI 10.1136/bmj.320.7236.669
   SMITH DI, 1994, WATER SA, V20, P231
   Smith Keith., 1998, FLOODS PHYS PROCESSE
   Suarez P, 2005, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V10, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2005.04.007
   ten Veldhuis JAE, 2011, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V4, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01112.x
   ten Veldhuis JAE, 2010, WATER RES, V44, P2910, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.009
   UNISDR, 2011, MAK CIT RES MY CIT I
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, 2012, WORLD URB PROS 2011
   Van der Veen A, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V36, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-4542-y
   Van der Veen A., 2003, SEARCH COMMON METHOD, P4
   Vetere Arellano A. L., 2003, SEARCH COMMON METHOD, P195
   Viscusi WK, 2003, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V27, P5, DOI 10.1023/A:1025598106257
   Ward PJ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P899, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9599-1
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00010.x
   Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
   Zhou Q, 2012, J HYDROL, V414, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.031
   Zhou QM, 2013, ELECTRON J QUAL THEO, P1
NR 116
TC 467
Z9 502
U1 92
U2 723
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1573-062X
EI 1744-9006
J9 URBAN WATER J
JI Urban Water J.
PD JAN 2
PY 2015
VL 12
IS 1
SI SI
BP 14
EP 29
DI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
PG 16
WC Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (CPCI-S)
SC Water Resources
GA AW9HW
UT WOS:000346568900004
OA Green Accepted
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, Q
   Qiao, YR
   Zhang, H
   Zhou, S
AF Zhou, Qian
   Qiao, Yurong
   Zhang, Hui
   Zhou, Shuai
TI How does college scale affect urban resilience? Spatiotemporal evidence
   from China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE College; Urban resilience; Urban scale effect; Technological innovation
   effect; Spatial instrumental variable method
ID HIGHER-EDUCATION; SMART CITIES; UNIVERSITY; EXPANSION; GROWTH;
   POPULATION; TOWN
AB Based on the data of 281 cities in China from 2011 to 2018, this paper explores the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of urban resilience and the college scale, and investigates the causal relationship between the college scale and urban resilience by a spatial two-stage least squares regression (2SLS) model and the relocation data of colleges in 1952 as an instrumental variable. The conclusions are as follows: (1) The cold-hot spots of college scale and urban resilience have remained relatively stable. (2) The college scale can promote urban resilience and urban social resilience. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the college scale has a significant effect on cities with weak urban resilience or a low level innovation. (3) The mechanism analysis shows that the urban scale effect and technological innovation effect are the mechanisms between college scale and urban resilience. The conclusions provide new evidences for accelerating the construction of resilient cities from the perspective of college development.
C1 [Zhou, Qian; Zhang, Hui] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China.
   [Qiao, Yurong] Naikai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
   [Qiao, Yurong] Naikai Univ, Econ Behav & Policy Simulat Lab, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Shuai] Liaoning Univ, Sch Int Econ & Int Relat, Shenyang 110136, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhongnan University of Economics & Law; Nankai University; Nankai
   University; Liaoning University
RP Zhou, S (corresponding author), Liaoning Univ, Sch Int Econ & Int Relat, Shenyang 110136, Peoples R China.
EM zhoushuaitc@163.com
OI Zhou, Qian/0000-0002-2319-1095
FU Major projects of China Social Science Foundation [18VSJ036, 21ZDA115];
   National Social Science Foundation of China [18CGJ002]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [NSFC71804056, NSFC71834005]; Nankai
   University Liberal Arts Development Fund [ZB21BZ0207]; Ministry of
   Education Philoso-phy and Social Science Laboratory Special Funds
   Project [2022103]; Social science project of Liaoning Provincial
   Department of Education [LQN202033]; Project of Liaoning Provincial
   Federation Social Science Circles [2022lslwtkt-031]; Liaoning Province
   Xingliao Talents Program Project [XLYC2002042]
FX This paper is supported by the Major projects of China Social Science
   Foundation (18VSJ036, 21ZDA115) , National Social Science Foundation of
   China (18CGJ002) , National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (NSFC71804056, NSFC71834005) , Nankai University Liberal Arts
   Development Fund (ZB21BZ0207) , Ministry of Education Philosophy and
   Social Science Laboratory Special Funds Project (2022103) , Social
   science project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education
   (LQN202033) ; Project of Liaoning Provincial Federation Social Science
   Circles (2022lslwtkt-031) ; Liaoning Province Xingliao Talents Program
   Project (XLYC2002042) .
CR Addie JPD, 2017, REG STUD, V51, P1089, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1224334
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allahar H, 2019, TECHNOL INNOV MANAG, V9, P15, DOI 10.22215/timreview/1280
   Allam Z., 2019, ECONOMIES, V7, P62, DOI [10.3390/economies7020062, DOI 10.3390/economies7020062]
   Allam Z, 2019, CITIES, V89, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032
   Arafah Y, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V70, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012065
   Audretsch DB, 2013, ECON DEV Q, V27, P56, DOI 10.1177/0891242412472536
   Benneworth P, 2010, EUR PLAN STUD, V18, P1611, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2010.504345
   Bereitschaft B, 2020, URBAN SCI, V4, DOI 10.3390/urbansci4040056
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Cao ZP, 2018, EDUC SCI-THEOR PRACT, V18, P1612, DOI 10.12738/estp.2018.5.060
   Cariolet JM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V615, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.334
   Caughman L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218796
   Cavada M, 2016, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V169, P243, DOI 10.1680/jensu.15.00032
   Champion T, 2014, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V20, P421, DOI 10.1002/psp.1806
   Chea P, 2019, INT J EDUC DEV, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.102075
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chen SL, 2017, EURASIA J MATH SCI T, V13, P7921, DOI 10.12973/ejmste/80764
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Cheng L, 2020, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V23, P2602, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2019.1711029
   Choi S, 2015, SOC SCI RES, V50, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.11.014
   Choy LHT, 2017, CITIES, V60, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.04.008
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   de Falco S, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P205, DOI 10.1177/0969776418783813
   De Falco S, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P759, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2019.1568396
   Doran J, 2018, ENVIRON PLANN A, V50, P111, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17736067
   Du ZW, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1662-6
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Evans R, 2014, EUR PLAN STUD, V22, P1259, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.778958
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gu JF, 2012, HIGH EDUC, V63, P513, DOI 10.1007/s10734-011-9455-6
   He D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102923
   Heaton S, 2019, IND CORP CHANGE, V28, P921, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtz038
   Holl A, 2018, J REGIONAL SCI, V58, P837, DOI 10.1111/jors.12392
   Holley KA, 2018, INNOV HIGH EDUC, V43, P77, DOI 10.1007/s10755-017-9410-2
   Hu MC, 2009, J MANAGE ORGAN, V15, P138, DOI 10.5172/jmo.837.15.2.138
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Iannelli C, 2011, OXFORD REV EDUC, V37, P717, DOI 10.1080/03054985.2011.636227
   Khusnutdinova SR, 2017, MOD J LANG TEACH MET, V7, P19
   Knight J, 2017, CHINA ECON REV, V43, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2017.01.008
   Komendantova N, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P114, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2015-0013
   Kummitha RKR, 2017, CITIES, V67, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Lazzeroni M, 2015, IND HIGHER EDUC, V29, P11, DOI 10.5367/ihe.2015.0241
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Lepawsky J, 2010, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V54, P324, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2010.00315.x
   Liu C, 2019, EDUC URBAN SOC, V51, P120, DOI 10.1177/0013124517727582
   Luo WJ, 2020, INT J E-PLAN RES, V9, P63, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.2020010104
   Luo Y, 2018, HIGH EDUC RES DEV, V37, P1015, DOI 10.1080/07294360.2018.1474856
   Madakam S, 2016, ADV INTELL SYST, V452, P269, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1023-1_27
   Diaz-Sarachaga JM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P971, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.061
   Maraña P, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119954
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miao YJ, 2015, ADV SOC SCI EDUC HUM, V29, P173
   Modica M, 2015, NETW SPAT ECON, V15, P211, DOI 10.1007/s11067-014-9261-7
   Mollick AV, 2012, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V48, P135, DOI 10.1007/s00168-010-0386-4
   [聂晶鑫 Nie Jingxin], 2018, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V38, P1979
   Nielsen TAS, 2015, RES TRANSP ECON, V51, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.07.003
   Niu F. L., 2015, P INT C SOCIAL SCI H, P533
   Nunn N, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P1630, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.6.1630
   Östh J, 2018, NETW SPAT ECON, V18, P313, DOI 10.1007/s11067-017-9375-9
   Rong Z, 2020, J COMP ECON, V48, P709, DOI 10.1016/j.jce.2019.12.005
   Shi T, 2022, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V28, P979, DOI 10.3846/tede.2022.16721
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Sliwa M, 2017, HABITAT INT, V66, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.003
   Standish RJ, 2014, BIOL CONSERV, V177, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.06.008
   Thisse JF, 2018, DEV ECON, V56, P117, DOI 10.1111/deve.12167
   Thomas E, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P770, DOI 10.1111/grow.12442
   Thomson G, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1502, DOI 10.1177/0042098018779769
   Wang XY, 2011, HIGH EDUC, V62, P213, DOI 10.1007/s10734-010-9383-x
   Whisler RL, 2008, GROWTH CHANGE, V39, P58, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2007.00405.x
   Winters JV, 2011, ECON DEV Q, V25, P353, DOI 10.1177/0891242411418221
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   Xu WP, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18010088
   Yian C, 2019, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V32, P3342, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1663546
   Youn H, 2016, J R SOC INTERFACE, V13, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2015.0937
   Zborovsky GE, 2018, EKON REG, V14, P914, DOI 10.17059/2018-3-16
   Zeng G., 2021, SAGE OPEN, V11
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhou YX, 2018, ECON CHANG RESTRUCT, V51, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10644-016-9194-x
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 86
TC 32
Z9 33
U1 15
U2 144
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 85
AR 104084
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
EA AUG 2022
PG 12
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA 3Q5VF
UT WOS:000838297800004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Suárez, M
   Benayas, J
   Justel, A
   Sisto, R
   Montes, C
   Sanz-Casado, E
AF Suarez, Marta
   Benayas, Javier
   Justel, Ana
   Sisto, Raffaele
   Montes, Carlos
   Sanz-Casado, Elias
TI A holistic index-based framework to assess urban resilience: Application
   to the Madrid Region, Spain
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Composite indicator; Resilient city; Social-ecological justice;
   Sustainable development goals; Urban sustainability
ID SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSFORMATION; COMMUNITY; SYSTEMS; AREAS
AB Resilience is considered to be a component of sustainability and is addressed in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals adopted by all United Nations Member States. Resilience in this context is mainly oriented to climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. However, a holistic approach, considering urban systems as a whole and resilience to all kind of disturbances, is needed for a better understanding of the complexity of urban resilience. To advance in this direction we have proposed an Urban Resilience Index and applied it to 81 cities in the Madrid Region, Spain. The index comprises 42 indicators that measure six resilience characteristics: diversity, self-sufficiency and autonomy, polycentric governance, social cohesion, learning and innovation, and social-ecological justice, in five urban dimensions: socio-cultural, economic, ecological, physical and technological, and governance system. Our results showed that the ecological dimension in the Madrid Region is largely determined by the geomorphological characteristics and the associated ecosystems, but municipalities compensate it with resilience strategies focused on social and physical aspects. The most resilient municipalities are also in general the most sustainable, but not always. We propose to use the Urban Resilience Index in combination with the Sustainable Development Goals Index to develop resilient strategies towards sustainability.
C1 [Suarez, Marta; Benayas, Javier; Montes, Carlos] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, C-Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, Spain.
   [Suarez, Marta] Univ Basque Country UPV, UNESCO Chair Sustainable Dev & Environm Educ, EHU, Barrio Sarriena S-N, Leioa 48940, Spain.
   [Justel, Ana] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Math, C-Francisco Tomas & Valiente,7, Madrid 28049, Spain.
   [Sisto, Raffaele] Smart &City Solut, C-Hermosilla 48 5 D, Madrid 28001, Spain.
   [Sanz-Casado, Elias] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Res Inst Higher Educ & Sci INAECU, C-Madrid 126, Getafe 28903, Spain.
   [Sanz-Casado, Elias] Univ Carlos III Madrid, C-Madrid 126, Getafe 28903, Spain.
C3 Autonomous University of Madrid; University of Basque Country;
   Autonomous University of Madrid; Autonomous University of Madrid;
   Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
RP Benayas, J (corresponding author), Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, C-Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, Spain.
EM marta.suarez@inv.uam.es; javier.benayas@uam.es; ana.justel@uam.es;
   raffaele.sisto@smartandcity.com; carlos.montes@uam.es; elias@bib.uc3m.es
RI Justel, Ana/A-3955-2010; Benayas, Javier/E-5663-2017; Sanz-Casado,
   Elias/E-6587-2010; Montes, Carlos/M-1449-2014
FU European Social Fund; SmartCity Solutions; Pedro Martin
FX This research has been financed by the Program H2019/HUM-5744
   CM-INCLUSIVA-CM, in the 2019 call for grants for R&D projects in social
   sciences and humanities of the Community of Madrid co-financed by the
   European Social Fund. We thank Smart&City Solutions and Pedro Martin for
   their support with indicators development and calculations.
CR Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   [Anonymous], 2018, City Resilience Profiling Tool
   Arnaiz-Schmitz C, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.215
   Arnaiz-Schmitz C, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P1199, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0797-z
   Arup, 2016, Measuring City Resilience, V4
   Assarkhaniki Z, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101840
   Assembly U. G., 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   Bahadur A., 2015, Resilience in the SDGs: developing an indicator for Target 1.5 that is fit for purpose
   Baró F, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
   Bautista-Puig N., 2022, Cities, V126, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2022.103715]
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Carpenter SR, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P3248, DOI 10.3390/su4123248
   Cavalli L., 2018, UNITALIA SOSTENIBILE
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Hernández RC, 2022, CIUDADES, V25, P181, DOI 10.24197/ciudades.25.2022.181-200
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   dataset INE (Spanish Statistical Office), 2021, Resident population by date, sex and age
   De Luca C, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12535-260438
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Fang XN, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   González-García A, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V803, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150048
   González-García A, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104493
   Grafakos S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8050461
   Grosvenor, 2014, A Grosvenor research report
   Hametner M, 2022, ECOL ECON, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107490
   INE (Spanish Statistical Office), 2021, Madrid: Population by municipality and sex
   ISO, 2019, 371232019 ISO
   Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, 2019, INT AGROPHYS, V33, P455, DOI 10.31545/intagr/113349
   Lafortezza R, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V172, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.063
   Lafortune G., 2019, The 2019 SDG Index and Dashboards Report for European Cities
   Lozano R, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1838, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008
   McPhearson T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V70, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Mebratu D., 1998, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V18, P493, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nguyen HL, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197896
   OECD, 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-EN, 10.1787/9789264043466-EN]
   Olias de Lima Gete C., 2016, Tipificacion socioeconomica y laboral del territorio de la Comunidad de Madrid. Analisis de los municipios por conglomerados
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Puertas R, 2023, SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P797, DOI 10.1002/sd.2420
   Qin WM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P331, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2967-3
   Quintanilla Cabanero A., 2023, Monitoring the SDGs in Andalusia region, DOI [10.2760/1223,JRC134397, DOI 10.2760/1223,JRC134397]
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   REDS, 2020, Los ODS en 100 Ciudades Espaolas (2 edicion)
   Rodriguez M. N., 2008, Psicologica, V29, P205
   Rumaling MI, 2022, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V8, P27, DOI [10.22034/GJESM.2022.01.03, 10.22034/gjesm.2022.01.03]
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Sanchez de Madariaga I., 2018, OBJETIVOS DESARROLLO
   Sharifi A, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107102
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Siragusa A., 2021, EUR, 30855. EN, DOI [10.2760/0720, DOI 10.2760/0720]
   Sisto R., 2021, Los municipios de la Comunidad de Madrid y la Agenda 2030. Diagnostico sobre su grado de aplicacion
   Suárez M, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104923
   Suárez M, 2020, ROUT INT HANDB, P197
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   United Nations, 2021, Global indicator framework for the sustainable development goals and targets of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 66
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 22
U2 34
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 166
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112293
EA JUL 2024
PG 12
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA XS3R0
UT WOS:001263631600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cardoso, MA
   Brito, RS
   Pereira, C
   Gonzalez, A
   Stevens, J
   Telhado, MJ
AF Cardoso, Maria Adriana
   Brito, Rita Salgado
   Pereira, Cristina
   Gonzalez, Andoni
   Stevens, John
   Telhado, Maria Joao
TI RAF Resilience Assessment Framework-A Tool to Support Cities' Action
   Planning
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience assessment; urban resilience; climate change; urban services;
   cities
ID DISASTER RESILIENCE; CLIMATE
AB Urban areas are dynamic, facing evolving hazards, having interacting strategic services and assets. Their management involves multiple stakeholders bringing additional complexity. Potential impacts of climate dynamics may aggravate current conditions and the appearance of new hazards. These challenges require an integrated and forward-looking approach to resilient and sustainable urban development, being essential to identify the real needs for its achievement. Several frameworks for assessing resilience have been developed in different fields. However, considering the focus on climate change and urban services, specific needs were identified, particularly in assessing strategic urban sectors and their interactions with others and with the wider urban system. A resilience assessment framework was developed directing and facilitating an objective-driven resilience diagnosis of urban cities and services. This supports the decision on selection of resilience measures and the development of strategies to enhance resilience, outlining a path to co-build resilience action plans, and to track resilience progress in the city or service over time. This paper presents the framework and the main results of its application to three cities having diverse contexts. It was demonstrated that the framework highlights where cities and urban services stand, regarding resilience to climate change, and identifies the most critical aspects to improve, including expected future impacts.
C1 [Cardoso, Maria Adriana; Brito, Rita Salgado; Pereira, Cristina] LNEC, Natl Civil Engn Lab, Urban Water Unit, Av Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal.
   [Gonzalez, Andoni] Barcelona City Council, Ajuntament Barcelona, Barcelona Torrent Olla 218-220,4a Planta, Barcelona 08012, Spain.
   [Stevens, John] Bristol City Council, 100 Temple St,POB 3176, Bristol, Avon, England.
   [Telhado, Maria Joao] Lisbon City Council, CML, Praca Jose Queiros 1-3,Piso Fracao 5, P-1800237 Lisbon, Portugal.
C3 National Civil Engineering Laboratory
RP Cardoso, MA (corresponding author), LNEC, Natl Civil Engn Lab, Urban Water Unit, Av Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal.
EM macardoso@lnec.pt; rsbrito@lnec.pt; clpereira@lnec.pt;
   agonzalezgom@bcn.cat; john.stevens@bristol.gov.uk;
   joao.telhado@cm-lisboa.pt
RI Cardoso, Maria/AAA-3113-2021
OI Cardoso, Maria Adriana/0000-0002-0422-2781
FU EUROPEAN UNION'S HORIZON 2020 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION PROGRAM [700174]
FX This research was funded by EUROPEAN UNION'S HORIZON 2020 RESEARCH AND
   INNOVATION PROGRAM, under the Grant Agreement number 700174.
CR Abdrabo M., 2014, P 5 GLOB FOR URB RES
   Ainuddin S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0201-x
   [Anonymous], 2015, ISO 9001:2015
   ARUP, 2015, CIT RES FRAM 100 RES
   Batica J., 2015, Methodology for flood resilience assessment in urban environments and mitigation strategy development
   Brito R.S., 2019, P ECCA 2019 EUR CLIM
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Cox RS, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P220, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550297
   EPA, 2017, EPA600R16365F
   ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives), 2010, CHANG CLIM CHANG COM
   Joerin J, 2011, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V6, P47, DOI 10.1108/S2040-7262(2011)0000006009
   Kwasinski A., 2016, CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
   Pagani G., 2018, REPORT RESILIENCE DI
   Panda A, 2018, P 8 INT C BUILD RES
   Patel R, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P9, DOI 10.3141/2561-02
   Peacock W., 2010, Advancing Resilience of Coastal Localities: Developing, Implementing, and Sustaining the Use of Coastal Resilience Indicators: A Final Report
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Schipper E.L.F., 2015, COMP OVERVIEW RESILI
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Summers JK, 2017, GEOHEALTH, V1, P151, DOI 10.1002/2016GH000047
   The Rockefeller Foundation Arup Group, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   UKWIR, 2017, 17RG064 UKWIR
   UN-GA, 2016, P UN GEN ASS 71 SESS
   UNDRR, 2017, UN INT STRAT DIS RED
   United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), 2017, CIT RES PROF TOOL CR
   Vallejo L., 2017, Environment Working Paper 121, DOI [10.1787/02f74d61-en, DOI 10.1787/02F74D61-EN]
   Walloth C., 2014, Understanding Complex Urban Systems: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Modeling
   World Bank, 2015, CIT STRENGTH RES CIT
   Yoon DK, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P436, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1016142
NR 29
TC 22
Z9 22
U1 10
U2 91
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR 2
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 6
AR 2349
DI 10.3390/su12062349
PG 64
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA LA1YW
UT WOS:000523751400196
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dastjerdi, MS
   Lak, A
   Ghaffari, A
   Sharifi, A
AF Dastjerdi, Masoud Shafiei
   Lak, Azadeh
   Ghaffari, Ali
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
TI A conceptual framework for resilient place assessment based on spatial
   resilience approach: An integrative review
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient place assessment (RPA); Spatial resilience; Urban resilience
   attribute (URA); Urban Design; Place making
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; CITIES;
   ADAPTATION; ECOLOGY; DESIGN; FORM
AB Creating ?resilient places? has increasingly become a major priority for urban planners, designers, and policy makers. ?Spatial resilience? as a subset of urban resilience can be used to guide the development of a conceptual framework for resilient place assessment. In this regard, a resilient place should feature a combination of physical and non-physical characteristics that can contribute to improved response and adaptation to a broad range of natural and manmade hazards. In this context, resilience is claimed to be the ability to manage, mitigate and adapt to varied risks and changes that threaten the quality of the functionality, livability, and vitality of a place. To further elaborate on the concept of resilient place, in this study, 127 articles were reviewed using qualitative methods, and general urban resilience definitions related to semantic resilience dimensions were extracted. These are, namely, intrinsic, resilience behavior, and reinforcing attributes. Eventually, 22 studies were selected for content analysis using a qualitative review. The conceptual framework of place assessment was developed concerning the constituent attributes of ?place? and ?spatial resilience.? In the proposed framework, the constructive dimensions of Resilient Place Assessment (RPA) include four dimensions, three of which are semantic resilience dimensions. These dimensions include the intrinsic resilience attributes (i.e., robustness, coherence, efficiency, foresight capacity, flexibility, resourcefulness, knowledge and learning, and self-organization), behavioral resilience attributes (i.e., recovery; adaption; innovation; transformation), reinforcing resilience attributes (i.e., diversity, redundancy, modularity, and connectivity), and place-making components (i.e., form and structure, environment and behavior, and image and meaning). Insights provided in this conceptual framework can be used by urban planners, designers, and policy makers in their efforts towards creating more resilient places.
C1 [Dastjerdi, Masoud Shafiei; Lak, Azadeh; Ghaffari, Ali] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, Dept Planning & Urban Design, Tehran, Iran.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan.
C3 Shahid Beheshti University; Hiroshima University; Hiroshima University
RP Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398530, Japan.
EM ma_shafiei@sbu.ac.ir; a_lak@sbu.ac.ir; a_ghaffari@sbu.ac.ir;
   sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
RI dastjerdi, masoud/AAO-2629-2021; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013; Ghaffari,
   Ali/AAV-3651-2020; Lak, Azadeh/ABB-1490-2021
CR Adger W.N., 2003, BUILDING RESILIENCE
   Adger WN, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P112, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1666, 10.1038/nclimate1666]
   Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Aelbrecht PS, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P124, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1106920
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allan P, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P242, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772881
   Allen CR, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P625, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12634
   Anderies JM, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P130, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
   [Anonymous], 1960, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   [Anonymous], 1992, J PLAN LIT
   Arefi M, 2011, ROUTL COMPANIONS, P674
   ARUP, 2015, CIT RES FRAM 100 RES
   Bankoff G., 2004, Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people, P25, DOI [10.4324/9781849771924, DOI 10.4324/9781849771924]
   Barnes A., 2017, Urban Forum, V28, P219, DOI [10.1007/s12132-017-9303-6, DOI 10.1007/S12132-017-9303-6]
   Batty M, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P571, DOI 10.1068/b4004ed
   Bene C., 2013, IDS Working Paper - Institute for Development Studies
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brunetta G, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8
   Brunetta G., 2019, SUSTAINABLE CITIES C, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_28-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_28-1]
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082286
   Canter David., 1977, The Psychology of Place
   Carmin J., 2012, PROGR CHALLENGES URB, P33
   Carmona M., 2010, Public Space Urban Space: The Dimension of Urban Design
   Chand AVM, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.021
   Chandler D., 2014, RESILIENCE GOVERNANC
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L., 2012, BASQUE CENT CLIM CHA, P1
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Cloete CE., 2012, Risk Analysis VIII, V167, P341
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Coaffee J, 2013, POLITICS-OXFORD, V33, P240, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12011
   Contreras D, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.010
   Coppola A, 2017, VOLUNTAS, V28, P1352, DOI 10.1007/s11266-017-9840-6
   Cruz S.S., 2012, Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_4, 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_4]
   Cumming GS, 2017, ECOSYSTEMS, V20, P649, DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-0089-5
   Cumming GS, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P899, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
   Cumming GS, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P975, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
   Cumming GS, 2011, SPATIAL RESILIENCE IN SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0307-0
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Czerniak J., 2007, LARGE PARKS AMAZONCO
   Davidson K, 2019, CITIES, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.012
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Eraydin A., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-81
   Erixon H, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P349, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2013.813960
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Faludi A., 2000, PLANN PRACT RES, V15, P299, DOI DOI 10.1080/713691907
   Feliciotti A, 2015, 29 ANN AESOP 2015 C, P3051
   Feliciotti A, 2018, URBAN RESILIENCE DES
   Feliciotti A, 2017, URBAN MORPHOL, V21, P61
   Feliciotti A, 2016, OPEN HOUSE INT, V41, P23
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gehl J., 1987, Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space
   Gehl J., 2010, CITIES PEOPLES
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goldstein BE, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1285, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505653
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gustafson P, 2001, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V21, P5, DOI 10.1006/jevp.2000.0185
   Hassler U, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P119, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.873593
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jacobs J., 1961, CITY READ, P189, DOI [10.4324/9780429261732-25, DOI 10.4324/9780429261732-25]
   Jerneck A, 2008, CLIM POLICY, V8, P170, DOI 10.3763/cpol.2007.0434
   Kärrholm M, 2014, CITIES, V36, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.012
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Kropf K, 2009, URBAN MORPHOL, V13, P105
   Kropf Karl., 2017, The Handbook Of Urban Morphology, V1, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118747711
   Lak A, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P2194, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2020.1714561
   Li YF, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V42, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.032
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Lu YW, 2021, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V27, P921, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2020.1788918
   Lynch K., 1981, AM I PLANNERS
   Lynch K, 1960, THE IMAGE OF CITY, DOI [10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201, DOI 10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201]
   Lyon C, 2014, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V27, P1009, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2014.918228
   Marcus L., 2011, 18 INT SEM URB FORM
   Marshall NA, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V107, P511, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9962-y
   McAllister RRJ, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Mcaslan D.S, 2018, EXAMINATION BEHAV AT, V345
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehaffy M, 2010, URBAN DES INT, V15, P22, DOI 10.1057/udi.2009.26
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Mehta V, 2019, URBAN DES INT, V24, P16, DOI 10.1057/s41289-018-0069-9
   Moher D., 2009, BMJ, V62, pE1, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.B2700
   Montgomery J., 1998, J. Urban Des, V3, P93, DOI DOI 10.1080/13574809808724418
   Morphet J., 2011, Effective Practice in Spatial Planning
   Moudon A.V, 1986, BUILT CHANGE NEIGHBO, DOI [10.2307/1424985, DOI 10.2307/1424985]
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Nyström M, 2000, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V15, P413, DOI 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01948-0
   Nystrom M., 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P406
   Olazabal M, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_11
   Owens P.M., 2005, Beyond density: measuring neighborhood form in New England's upper Connecticut river valley
   Panerai P., 1980, ECOL ECON, DOI [10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016, DOI 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2012.10.016]
   Pearson L., 2014, RESILIENT SUSTAINABL
   Pearson Leonie J., 2014, Resilient Sustainable Cities: A future, P242, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602]
   Peres E, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V198, P690, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.120
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Punter J., 1997, DESIGN DIMENSION PLA, DOI [10.4324/9781351203319-7, DOI 10.4324/9781351203319-7]
   Ray B, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.016
   Relph ET., 1976, PLACE PLACELESSNESS
   Remali A.M., 2018, SUBURBAN URBANITIES, P104, DOI [10.2307/ctt1g69z0m.13, DOI 10.2307/CTT1G69Z0M.13]
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Salingaros N.A., 2005, J URBAN DES, V4
   Samuelsson K, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V187, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.015
   SCHULZ Norberg., 1980, Genius Loci, Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture
   Shamsuddin S, 2008, HABITAT INT, V32, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.004
   Sharifi A, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5010018
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_9
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sharifi A, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE & UTILITY EXHIBITION ON GREEN ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (ICUE)
   Smaldone D, 2005, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V25, P397, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.12.003
   Smith JW, 2012, RURAL SOCIOL, V77, P380, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00082.x
   Stedman RC, 2003, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V16, P671, DOI 10.1080/08941920309189
   Stokols Daniel., 1981, COGNITION SOC BEHAV, P441, DOI DOI 10.1080/09638288.2017.1309583
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Yang PPJ, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P153, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_9
   Yu L., 2019, Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019
NR 133
TC 25
Z9 27
U1 17
U2 125
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 36
AR 100794
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100794
EA FEB 2021
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA RC3YK
UT WOS:000632739900004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Banai, R
AF Banai, Reza
TI Pandemic and the planning of resilient cities and regions
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Cities; Regions; Pandemic; Coronavirus; Climate change; Public health;
   Public realm; Urban system; Resilience; Sustainability; Urban form;
   Comprehensive plan
AB The emergence of the coronavirus pandemic motivated this paper, which revisits the nexus of public health and the city, itself a main source of a pandemic which similarly threatens the lives and properties of the world population gradually one glacier at a time: climate change. We argue that pandemics expose both the vulnerability and resilience of the urban system expansively, from rooftop to the region, but also serve as change agents for the planning of resilient cities and regions globally. The discussion of the urban system and the pandemic is comparative, with the recent coronavirus and climate change, a persistent, long-lasting pandemic. The historical and critical review and synthesis of the durable concepts of the urban system at the kernel of the theories and practices of urbanism is highlighted by place matters, cyberspace, density, access, and the city-region. We note the implications for reconfiguring the resilient urban system of the future effectively with pandemic as change agent and the comprehensive plan and its regulatory zoning ordinance as implementation tool.
C1 [Banai, Reza] Univ Memphis, Sch Urban Affairs & Publ Policy, City & Reg Planning, 217 McCord Hall, Memphis, TN 38152 USA.
C3 University of Memphis
RP Banai, R (corresponding author), Univ Memphis, Sch Urban Affairs & Publ Policy, City & Reg Planning, 217 McCord Hall, Memphis, TN 38152 USA.
EM rbanai@memphis.edu
RI Banai, Reza/AAF-4350-2020
CR [Anonymous], 1929, NEIGHBORHOOD UNIT SC
   [Anonymous], 2011, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SEPS.2011.07.001
   [Anonymous], 1984, CITIES WEALTH NATION
   [Anonymous], 1998, EARLY URBAN PLANNING
   [Anonymous], 2009, SUSTAINABLE DEV READ
   [Anonymous], 2009, Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization
   [Anonymous], 2003, BUILDING SUBURBIA GR
   BANAI R, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN C, V11, P447, DOI 10.1068/c110447
   Banai R., 2013, J URBANISM INT RES P, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/17549175.2012.668427
   Banai R., 2009, J URBANISM INT RES P, V2, P279
   Banai R, 2017, J TRANSP LAND USE, V10, P357, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2016.889
   Banai R, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P807, DOI 10.1177/0042098012458548
   Beatley T., 2014, SUSTINABLE URBAN DEV, P422
   Birch E.L., 2009, The urban and regional planning reader
   Brown L, 2011, MORRISSEY: FANDOM, REPRESENTATIONS AND IDENTITIES, P9
   Calthorpe P., 1993, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community and the American dream
   Calthorpe P., 2001, REGIONAL CITY PLANNI
   Calthorpe Peter., 2011, Urbanism in the Age of Climate Change
   Cervero R, 1997, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V2, P199, DOI 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Cervero R., 1998, TRANSIT METROPOLIS G
   DAVIDOFF P, 1965, J AM I PLANNERS, V31, P331, DOI 10.1080/01944366508978187
   Ewing R, 2011, ROUTL COMPANIONS, P467
   Frumkin H., 2004, Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities
   Hall P., 1996, Cities of tomorrow
   Howard E., 1902, TO MORROW PEACEFUL P
   Kasarda J. D., 2006, International Airport Review, V10
   Kasarda J. D., 2011, ATLANTIS-SPAIN, V22, P12
   Katz Peter., 1994, The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community
   Kelly E., 2010, Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan, V2nd
   Korten DC, 1996, ENVIRON URBAN, V8, P35, DOI 10.1177/095624789600800110
   Lang J.T., 1994, URBAN DESIGN AM EXPE
   Le Corbusier, 1967, VILLE RADIEUSE
   Lynch K., 1984, GOOD CITY FORM
   Lynch K., 1960, IMAGE CITY
   McHarg I., 1992, DESIGN NATURE
   Oldenburg R., 1991, The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community
   Pacala S, 2004, SCIENCE, V305, P968, DOI 10.1126/science.1100103
   Perlman J. E., 2007, FIGHTING POVERTY ENV
   Roseland M., 2007, STATE WORLD 2007 OUR
   Shuman M.H., 1998, Going local: Creating self-reliant communities in a global age
   Wackernagel M., 1996, OUR ECOLOGICAL FOOTP, DOI 10.5070/g31710273
   Webber MelvinM., 1964, EXPLORATIONS URBAN S
   Young L., 2020, NEW YORK BUSINESS J
NR 43
TC 65
Z9 70
U1 11
U2 132
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 106
AR 102929
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
PG 6
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA NY8MJ
UT WOS:000576636800013
PM 32952256
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pirlone, F
   Spadaro, I
   Candia, S
AF Pirlone, Francesca
   Spadaro, Ilenia
   Candia, Selena
TI More Resilient Cities to Face Higher Risks. The Case of Genoa
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; territorial security; urban planning; risk mitigation;
   stakeholder participation
ID DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBAN RESILIENCE; ADAPTIVE
   COMANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE;
   INNOVATION; LESSONS
AB This paper analyzes some natural and man-made disasters that happened in recent years, which demonstrate how the resilience of a city does not depend only on the actions carried out by public authorities, but it requires the joint work of all actors that live or work in a city. Resilience represents the ability of an urban system to adapt to an external event and quickly return to normality. In recent years, urban resilience has mainly addressed natural risks, neglecting man-made disaster. Therefore, this study considers the risk issue in relation to the resilience concept within urban planning and policies to achieve sustainability and urban security. Urban resilience has become an important objective for cities, particularly to face climate change. The paper proposes a review of the existing Civil Protection Urban Emergency Plan, as a sector plan to support urban planning at the local level, aimed at building resilience in cities. In particular, the proposed Emergency Plan reduces risk and increases resilience by identifying specific scenarios and actions that every city actor-public authorities, research, enterprises, and citizens-can implement. This proposal contributes to the implementation of the quadruple helix principle, according to which the involvement of these four actors is necessary to achieve a common goal, such as increasing urban resilience. The proposed methodology is then applied to the man-made disasters that have involved the city (such as the flood of 2011 and the collapse of the Morandi Bridge in 2018). Genoa represents a good example to be studied according to the "learning-by-doing" approach to understand how the city has responded, adapting resiliently, to natural and man-made events thanks to the collaboration of all the actors above mentioned. The new scenarios, included in the Urban Emergency Plan, can play a fundamental role, both in the emergency and prevention phase, and can help other cities around the world in planning more resilient cities to face higher risks.
C1 [Pirlone, Francesca; Spadaro, Ilenia; Candia, Selena] Univ Genoa, Dept Civil Chem & Environm Engn, I-16145 Genoa, Italy.
C3 University of Genoa
RP Pirlone, F (corresponding author), Univ Genoa, Dept Civil Chem & Environm Engn, I-16145 Genoa, Italy.
EM francesca.pirlone@unige.it; ilenia.spadaro@unige.it;
   selena.candia@edu.unige.it
RI Pirlone, Francesca/GOV-4485-2022; Spadaro, Ilenia/MBV-9571-2025
OI SPADARO, ILENIA/0000-0002-8454-2629; PIRLONE,
   FRANCESCA/0000-0001-5429-4284
CR Acuto M, 2013, GLOBAL GOV, V19, P481, DOI 10.1163/19426720-01903008
   Adaptation: Resilience strategy, 2019, PATH MUN GEN URB AG
   Ahern J., 2010, WATER CENTRIC SUSTAI, P539
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], 2010, CIT CLIM CHANG
   [Anonymous], 1998, 483484 PAS
   [Anonymous], 2013, EU STRAT AD CLIM CHA
   [Anonymous], 2019, MUNICIPALITY GENOA
   Ardebili AA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072602
   Barbarossa L., 2018, RAPPORTO TERRITORIO, V16, P41
   Betsill MM, 2006, GLOBAL GOV, V12, P141, DOI 10.1163/19426720-01202004
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Bruntland G.H., 1987, REPORT 1987 WORLD CO
   Campbell S, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Candia S., 2019, P 24 INT C LIV WALK
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Cascio J., 2009, Foreign Policy, V172, P92
   Chandler David., 2016, The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience
   Chapman S, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.014
   Cheli E., 2005, CULTURA PACE GESTION
   Chen J, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P152, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1465-1
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Corfee-Morlot J., 2009, OECD Environment Working Papers
   Crowe PR, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.007
   Darchen S., 2018, GLOBAL PLANNING INNO, P137
   DAVIDOFF P, 1965, J AM I PLANNERS, V31, P331, DOI 10.1080/01944366508978187
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Enzo F., 2015, P DIFF CONN UN THEOR
   Etzkowitz H, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Fabbricatti K., 2015, QUADERNI OSSERVATORI, P43
   Fera G., 1991, CITTA ANTISISMICA
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Forester J., 2001, The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes
   Fraser EDG, 2006, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V78, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009
   FRIEDMANN J, 1993, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V59, P482, DOI 10.1080/01944369308975902
   Frykberg Robert G, 2006, J Foot Ankle Surg, V45, pS1
   Galderisi A., 2004, CITTA TERREMOTI METO
   Gouldson A, 2016, CITIES, V54, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.010
   Gouldson A, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.009
   Healey P., 2006, FRAGMENTED SOC
   Hjalager AM, 2011, J QUAL ASSUR HOSP TO, V12, P289, DOI 10.1080/1528008X.2011.541837
   Hynes W., 2013, P FUT SEC BERL GERM, P1
   IRPI-CNR Hydrogeological Research Institute CNR, 2019, HIST CAT GEOH EV DAM
   Kammouh O, 2018, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V17, P261, DOI 10.1007/s11803-018-0440-2
   Kato S, 2008, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V51, P543, DOI 10.1080/09640560802117028
   Kazmierczak A, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.008
   Koks EE, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
   Kron W., 2005, WATER INT
   Lantada N, 2010, B EARTHQ ENG, V8, P201, DOI 10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   LELE SM, 1991, WORLD DEV, V19, P607, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
   Lew AA, 2016, TOURISM GEOGR, V18, P18, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2015.1122664
   Lombardy Region POR FESR 2014-2020, 2014, LOMBARDY REGION FESR
   Lovelock J., 1991, HEALING GAIA PRACTIC
   Lu XZ, 2019, APPL SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/app9173497
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Marshall A., 2002, The unity of nature: Wholeness and disintegration in ecology and science
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   Menoni S., 1997, ELEMENTI VALUTAZIONE
   Miller KD, 2003, LONG RANGE PLANN, V36, P93, DOI 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00205-4
   Nino Sulkowska M.S., 2017, NEW INTEGRATED APPRO, P324
   Paton D., 2013, GNS SCI REPORT 2013
   Paton D., 2007, GNS SCI REPORT 2007
   Peizer R., 2014, RESILIENCE HOLISTIC
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Pilone E, 2016, SAFETY SCI, V85, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.029
   Pirlone F., 2009, IMPORTANZA TEMPORALI
   Pirlone F., 2021, AFFORDABLE CLEAN ENE
   Pirlone F., 2018, SMART CITY URBAN PLA, P159
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Reckien D, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0989-8
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Rosenzweig Cynthia., 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE CITIE
   Sainz M., 2016, DELIVERABLE 2 4 HOLI
   Salizzoni E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072900
   Saunders WSA, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.013
   Solecki W, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.03.001
   Suggested elements for the post-2015 framework for disaster risk reduction, 2014, 3 UN WORLD C DIS RIS
   Tiboni M., 2002, COLLANA URBANISTICA
   TIRA M, 1997, PIANIFICARE CITTA SI
   UCCRN, 2018, URB CLIM CHANG RES N
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   United Nations, 2005, HYOG FRAM ACT 2005 2
   Wagenaar H., 2002, Administrative Theory Praxis, V24, P231, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10841806.2002.11029342, 10.1080/10841806.2002.11029342]
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Walloth C., 2014, Understanding Complex Urban Systems: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Modeling
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wang XD, 2010, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V91, P1981, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.006
   World Bank report, 2010, WORLD BANK REP CIT C
   Yoon DK, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P436, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1016142
   Zeng HC, 2007, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V22, P1240, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.07.002
   Zhou QQ, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-05773-4
   Zimmerman R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.004
NR 97
TC 25
Z9 26
U1 1
U2 44
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 12
AR 4825
DI 10.3390/su12124825
PG 21
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ML1UI
UT WOS:000549259400001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Niu, DW
   Wang, LC
   Li, W
   Ma, YC
AF Niu, Dingwei
   Wang, Lucang
   Li, Wei
   Ma, Yongchi
TI An International Comparative Study on the Resilience of Urban
   Communities after COVID-19 Pandemic: A One-Year Case Study between
   Lanzhou, China and Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE community resilience; COVID-19; comparative study; Sarajevo
AB After the prevailing of the COVID-19 pandemic, urban communities around the world took initiatives to bring their cities back to life. In this research, 45 indicators and 55 elements were selected to make comparisons between urban communities in Lanzhou, China and Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina from five dimensions of social resilience, economic resilience, institutional resilience, infrastructural resilience, and community capital resilience. At the same time, the ArcGIS platform tool was used for spatial interpolation analysis. In this paper, the inverse distance weighting (IDW) method was used to carry out the spatial analysis of the perceived resilience of the two cities. Due to the heterogeneity of the neighborhood physical environment, operation and management mode, individual attribute characteristics, and internal relations, the resilience of the two urban communities showed disparity in different dimensions. Overall, the communities with good urban property management services, high-income owners, and the convenient transportation have stronger resilience in the face of pandemic. On the contrary, scattered communities, which are scattered in the inner cities, lack effective management, and based on unstable employment, people become the most affected by the epidemic with the lowest resilience power. The importance of social capital, represented by community understanding, identity, and mutual help and cooperation between neighbors, is highlighted in the resilience assessment of the two cities, respectively, in the East and West, indicating that to build more resilient cities, in addition to improving government management and increasing investment in urban infrastructure, building the residents' sense of belonging, identity, and enduring community culture is even more important in the construction of resilient cities.
C1 [Niu, Dingwei; Wang, Lucang; Li, Wei] Northwest Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.
   [Ma, Yongchi] Gansu Guancheng Planning Design Res Co Ltd, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.
C3 Northwest Normal University - China
RP Wang, LC (corresponding author), Northwest Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.
EM wanglc007@nwnu.edu.cn
RI Ma, Yongchi/GRR-5230-2022
CR [Anonymous], 2014, GLOB RISKS REP
   [Anonymous], 2006, ASSESSING RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], 2013, HLTH 2020 EUR POL FR
   Arora AS, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P6553, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00883-y
   Barkham R., 2014, Resilient cities: a Grosvenor research report
   Bherwani H, 2020, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V13, P683, DOI 10.1007/s11869-020-00845-3
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cao HB, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14030763
   clix, VIJESTIBIHU KANTONU
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Fischer A, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V54, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.020
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Gautam S, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P4953, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00818-7
   Gautam S, 2020, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V104, P724, DOI 10.1007/s00128-020-02877-y
   Holladay PJ, 2013, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V21, P1188, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2013.776059
   Li ZG, 2020, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.532420
   Maldonado JH, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-05962-190116
   Peng C, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V29, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.12.003
   Qiao H, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010038
   Rai SS, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P12006, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-01154-6
   Ruiz-Ballesteros E, 2011, TOURISM MANAGE, V32, P655, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.05.021
   Sajko M, 2021, J MANAGE, V47, P957, DOI 10.1177/0149206320902528
   Sharma A, 2020, J HEALTH MANAG, V22, P248, DOI 10.1177/0972063420935653
   Solangi YA, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117655
   South J, 2020, PERSPECT PUBLIC HEAL, V140, P305, DOI 10.1177/1757913920949582
   voice.baidu, ACT NEWPNEUMONIA NEW
   Wang Qun Wang Qun, 2016, Tourism Tribune, V31, P116
   Worldometer Coronavirus, 2019, WORLD COR
   Yang M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710585
   Yue ST, 2021, J COMMUN HEALTH, V46, P286, DOI 10.1007/s10900-020-00877-x
   Ziglio E., 2017, STRENGTHENING RESILI
NR 33
TC 5
Z9 6
U1 5
U2 43
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD NOV
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 21
AR 14458
DI 10.3390/ijerph192114458
PG 24
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA 6F3GB
UT WOS:000883952700001
PM 36361337
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yu, SY
   Yuan, MN
   Wang, Q
   Corcoran, J
   Xu, ZH
   Peng, J
AF Yu, Shuying
   Yuan, Maoning
   Wang, Qi
   Corcoran, Jonathan
   Xu, Zihan
   Peng, Jian
TI Dealing with urban floods within a resilience framework regarding
   disaster stages
SO HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban flood resilience; Resistance; Adaptation; Recovery; Shenzhen City
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; RISK
AB Cities encounter various risks, and flood disasters are one of the most frequent, leading to significant economic loss. The uncertainty of external shocks makes it necessary to bring disaster processes into the assessment of urban flood resilience. However, current resilience assessment lacked the consideration of disaster stages to support urban planning. Thus, focusing on urban flood resilience, we proposed a "resistance-adaptation-recovery" assessing framework in view of the three stages of flood disasters (before, during and after), with a case study in Shenzhen City, China. The results showed that the flood resilience of Shenzhen City did not perform well because of the low resistance while the adaptation and recovery had good conditions. Nevertheless, more than half of the sub-districts belonged to the high and medium-high resilience grades. Four kinds of urban resilience zones had been identified, which showed spatial distribution of overall dispersion and local concentration. The impacts of indicator weights and specialized suggestions for each resilience zone were given correspondingly. This study proposed an urban flood resilience assessment framework, which is helpful to identify the way to promote a resilient city for urban planning.
C1 [Yu, Shuying; Xu, Zihan; Peng, Jian] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Yuan, Maoning; Wang, Qi] Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Key Lab Environm & Urban Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China.
   [Corcoran, Jonathan] Univ Queensland, Queensland Ctr Populat Res, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
   [Peng, Jian] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; University of Queensland; Peking
   University
RP Peng, J (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM jianpeng@urban.pku.edu.cn
RI xu, zihan/KHZ-4930-2024; Peng, Jian/AAO-6397-2020; Corcoran,
   Jonathan/A-4631-2010
OI Corcoran, Jonathan/0000-0003-3565-6061
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42130505]
FX Acknowledgments This study was financially supported by National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42130505) . And we are sincerely
   grateful to the two reviewers for their insightful advice.
CR Aerts JCJH, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Angeler DG, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P617, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12649
   Berland A, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V162, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017
   Boyd E, 2015, AMBIO, V44, pS149, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0604-x
   Bulti DT, 2019, SN APPL SCI, V1, DOI 10.1007/s42452-019-1731-6
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Campbell KA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101257
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Choudhury MUI, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12107-260105
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Darabi H, 2019, J HYDROL, V569, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002
   Driessen PPJ, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08921-210453
   Edmonds DA, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18531-4
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Ensor JE, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P134, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2016.1223595
   Fang YP, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004
   Feng BY, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P613, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04480-0
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Gupta K, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0211
   Hewawasam V, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102091
   Jones L, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P288, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00642-x
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Kuang D, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111025
   Leandro J, 2020, WATER RES, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115502
   Luo FH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
   Lyu HM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101682
   Marana P, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101531
   McClymont K, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Nelson DR, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V45, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.001
   Papilloud T, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103045
   Peng J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007
   Sajjad M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850
   Schelfaut K, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
   Shao ZF, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111338
   Smith A, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09282-y
   Sun HH, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2178-3
   Sun LQ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19158-1
   Sung K, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P2661, DOI 10.1002/2017WR021440
   Vojinovic Z, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V789, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147725
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walters P, 2015, HABITAT INT, V50, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.004
   Wang YT, 2019, WATER RES, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
   White C, 2021, ECOSYST SERV, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101330
   Xu ZH, 2022, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V37, P3201, DOI 10.1007/s10980-022-01542-5
   Yu SY, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V230, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104605
NR 49
TC 20
Z9 21
U1 46
U2 171
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0197-3975
EI 1873-5428
J9 HABITAT INT
JI Habitat Int.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 136
AR 102783
DI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102783
EA MAY 2023
PG 9
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning;
   Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA K7DY4
UT WOS:001018021200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU McPhearson, T
   Andersson, E
   Elmqvist, T
   Frantzeskaki, N
AF McPhearson, Timon
   Andersson, Erik
   Elmqvist, Thomas
   Frantzeskaki, Niki
TI Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services
SO ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Urban ecosystem services; Urban planning; Governance;
   Sustainability
ID CITIES; BIODIVERSITY; OPPORTUNITIES; COMPLEXITY; DYNAMICS; METAPHOR;
   CYCLES
AB Cities and urban areas are critical components of global sustainability as loci of sustainability progress and drivers of global transformation, especially in terms of energy efficiency, climate change adaptation, and social innovation. However, urban ecosystems have not been incorporated adequately into urban governance and planning for resilience despite mounting evidence that urban resident health and wellbeing is closely tied to the quality, quantity, and diversity of urban ecosystem services. We suggest that urban ecosystem services provide key links for bridging planning, management and governance practices seeking transitions to more sustainable cities, and serve an important role in building resilience in urban systems. Emerging city goals for resilience should explicitly incorporate the value of urban ES in city planning and governance. We argue that cities need to prioritize safeguarding of a resilient supply of ecosystem services to ensure livable, sustainable cities, especially given the dynamic nature of urban systems continually responding to global environmental change. Building urban resilience of and through ecosystem services, both in research and in practice, will require dealing with the dynamic nature of urban social-ecological systems and incorporating multiple ways of knowing into governance approaches to resilience including from scientists, practitioners, designers and planners. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [McPhearson, Timon] New Sch Social Res, Tishman Environm & Design Ctr, New York, NY 10011 USA.
   [Andersson, Erik; Elmqvist, Thomas] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Frantzeskaki, Niki] Erasmus Univ, Dutch Res Inst Transit DRIFT, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
C3 The New School; Stockholm University; Erasmus University Rotterdam;
   Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC
RP McPhearson, T (corresponding author), New Sch Social Res, Tishman Environm & Design Ctr, New York, NY 10011 USA.
EM mcphearp@newschool.edu
RI Elmqvist, Thomas/AAY-6344-2021; Andersson, Erik/AAE-9771-2019;
   Frantzeskaki, Niki/AAN-1044-2021; McPhearson, Timon/JOZ-3799-2023
OI Frantzeskaki, Niki/0000-0002-6983-448X; Andersson,
   Erik/0000-0003-2716-5502; Elmqvist, Thomas/0000-0002-4617-6197;
   McPhearson, Timon/0000-0002-9499-0791
FU New School Tishman Environment and Design Center; ERA-Net BiodivERsA,
   URBES Project; national funders NOW
FX This research was funded by The New School Tishman Environment and
   Design Center and by ERA-Net BiodivERsA as part of the URBES Project
   with national funders NOW for Dr. Niki Frantzeskaki and FORMAS and SEPA
   for Dr. Erik Andersson and Dr. Thomas Elmqvist.
CR Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Andersson E, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P1267, DOI 10.1890/06-1116.1
   Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
   Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001
   Andersson E, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P445, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
   [Anonymous], 2013, Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities
   [Anonymous], URBAN STUD
   [Anonymous], 2011, CHOICE REV ONLINE, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.49-0882
   [Anonymous], 2011, TEEB MAN CIT EC SERV
   [Anonymous], 2010, EC ECOSYSTEMS BIODIV
   Bettencourt LMA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Cardinale BJ, 2012, NATURE, V486, P59, DOI 10.1038/nature11148
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chapin FS, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P500, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5325.500
   CHAPIN FS, 2011, ECOSPHERE, V2
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cumming GS, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1139, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9725-4
   de Groot RS, 2010, ECOL COMPLEX, V7, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Elmqvist T, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P488, DOI 10.2307/3868116
   Elmqvist T., 2014, RESILIENT SUSTAINABL, P19, DOI [10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.4324/9780203593066]
   Erixon H, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P349, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2013.813960
   Ernstson H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
   Folke C, 2011, AMBIO, V40, P719, DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y
   Frantzeskaki N, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P542, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0
   Gomez-Baggethun Erik, 2013, P175
   Grove JM, 2006, ECOSYSTEMS, V9, P578, DOI 10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z
   Hansen R, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Kaye JP, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.12.006
   McPhearson T., 2013, CITIES BIODIVERSITY, P355, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
   McPhearson T, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V5, pE11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.005
   McPhearson T, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P502, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8
   Olsson P., 2009, UNDERSTANDING TRANSI
   Pataki DE, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P27, DOI 10.1890/090220
   Peters DPC, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P15130, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0403822101
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Rosenzweig C., 2010, Climate Change Adaptation in New York City: Building a Risk Management Response, New York City Panel on Climate Change 2010 Report
   Rosenzweig C, 2010, NATURE, V467, P909, DOI 10.1038/467909a
   Sander H, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1646, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.011
   Scarlett L, 2015, ECOL ECON, V115, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.09.013
   Schewenius M, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P434, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7687, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1117622109
   Slavin M., 2011, TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE S
   Solecki W, 2013, CITIES BIODIVERSITY, P85, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-7088-125, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-125]
   Solecki W, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.03.001
   Tidball K, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.004
   Troy A, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V87, P233, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.005
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wilkinson Cathy, 2013, P539
   Yachi S, 1999, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V96, P1463, DOI 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
NR 59
TC 296
Z9 329
U1 36
U2 411
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0416
J9 ECOSYST SERV
JI Ecosyst. Serv.
PD APR
PY 2015
VL 12
SI SI
BP 152
EP 156
DI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
PG 5
WC Ecology; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA CU6TA
UT WOS:000363665300016
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fitzgibbons, J
   Mitchell, CL
AF Fitzgibbons, Joanne
   Mitchell, Carrie L.
TI Just urban futures? Exploring equity in "100 Resilient Cities"
SO WORLD DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Planning; Justice; Social equity; Inclusive cities;
   Urban experimentation
ID BUILDING RESILIENCE; CLIMATE RESILIENCE; SOCIAL-CHANGE; PARTICIPATION;
   JUSTICE; POLITICS; PERSPECTIVE; CAPACITY; RIGHTS
AB The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) view resilience, sustainability, and social equity as being inherently linked. However, several critical scholars have cautioned that theories of resilience fail to address issues of equity, justice, and power, which potentially puts these goals at odds with one another. To date, we have limited empirical evidence testing these theoretical claims. In 2013, the USA-based Rockefeller Foundation pioneered 100 Resilient Cities (100RC), a network of cities dedicated to building resilience in urban areas. Critical engagement with the outputs and "lessons learned" from this program, particularly around how participating cities operationalize concepts of equity and justice, is important and timely given the scale and influence of this global urban experiment.
   Using directed and summative content analysis of 31 100RC "City Resilience Strategies" from Global North and South countries, we examine the extent to which participating cities focus on social equity in their narratives, and whether justice is operationalized in the strategies' embedded actions. Actions featuring a focus on inequality and justice are piece-meal across the Strategies, suggesting that the decision to prioritize or ignore equity may not be a direct result of the 100RC program offerings. Furthermore, we identify a number of threats to social equity and justice that appear in the program itself, and its resultant City Resilience Strategies. We conclude by making recommendations that could enable future large-scale urban experiments to promote equity and justice more universally across member cities. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Fitzgibbons, Joanne; Mitchell, Carrie L.] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
C3 University of Waterloo
RP Fitzgibbons, J (corresponding author), Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
EM jmfitzgibbons@uwaterloo.ca; carrie.mitchell@uwaterloo.ca
OI Fitzgibbons, Joanne/0000-0002-8926-7945
FU Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
   Insight Development Grants [430-2017-00135]; Canada Graduate
   Scholarships program; Province of Ontario's Ontario Graduate Scholarship
FX This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research
   Council of Canada (SSHRC) Insight Development Grants (#430-2017-00135)
   and Canada Graduate Scholarships program, and the Province of Ontario's
   Ontario Graduate Scholarship.
CR Aldunce P, 2016, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V15, P58, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2015.1134427
   Anderson LC, 2005, PALAEONTOL ELECTRON, V8
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], JUSTICE AND THE POLI
   [Anonymous], APPLYING RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], ARUP 2014
   [Anonymous], RES DALL DALL PATH S
   [Anonymous], OUR RES GLASG
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], AN UPDATE FROM 100 R
   [Anonymous], FIVE U S MEMBERS OF
   [Anonymous], FAIRNESS AND FUTURIT
   [Anonymous], 2015, [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2015, CITY RESILIENCE INDE
   [Anonymous], JUSTICE INTERRUPTUS
   [Anonymous], PARTICIPATION THE NE
   Archer D, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.007
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Bahadur AV, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.004
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bonanno GA, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P20, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brown K., 2012, Climate change and the crisis of capitalism: A chance to reclaim self, society and nature, P37, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203146118
   Brownill S, 2007, TOWN PLAN REV, V78, P401, DOI 10.3828/tpr.78.4.2
   Bulkeley H, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P914, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.010
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Creswell J. W., 2014, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   FRASER N, 1995, NEW LEFT REV, P68
   Friend R, 2015, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V6, P643, DOI 10.1002/wcc.364
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gillard R, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P251, DOI 10.1002/wcc.384
   Gillard R, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P13, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00334
   Guyadeen D, 2016, PLAN PRACT RES, V31, P215, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2015.1081335
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hollnagel E, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P221, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.862607
   Honneth A, 2004, ACTA SOCIOL, V47, P351, DOI 10.1177/0001699304048668
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Lawless JL, 2001, SOC PROBL, V48, P362, DOI 10.1525/sp.2001.48.3.362
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Masten AS, 2001, AM PSYCHOL, V56, P227, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Moore ML, 2017, WIRES WATER, V4, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1180
   Olsson P, 2004, ENVIRON MANAGE, V34, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P593, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
   Pugh J, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P1266, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.706571
   Rahimi M, 2014, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V28, P809, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2014.03.096
   Ravensbergen F, 2010, COMMUNITY DEV J, V45, P389, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsp014
   Schlosberg D, 2004, ENVIRON POLIT, V13, P517, DOI 10.1080/0964401042000229025
   SCHLOSBERG D, 1995, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V43, P291, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01713.x
   Schlosberg David., 2007, DEFINING ENV JUSTICE, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199286294.001.0001]
   Schlosberg David, 2001, EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   VERBA S, 1993, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V23, P453, DOI 10.1017/S0007123400006694
   Verba Sidney., 1995, Voice_and_equality:_Civic voluntarism_in_American_politics
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Young IM, 2001, J POLIT PHILOS, V9, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-9760.00115
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 67
TC 113
Z9 128
U1 6
U2 89
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0305-750X
EI 1873-5991
J9 WORLD DEV
JI World Dev.
PD OCT
PY 2019
VL 122
BP 648
EP 659
DI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
PG 12
WC Development Studies; Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Business & Economics
GA IS6ER
UT WOS:000482245600046
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Feng, XH
   Tang, Y
   Bi, MY
   Xiao, ZP
   Zhong, YX
AF Feng, Xinghua
   Tang, Yan
   Bi, Manyu
   Xiao, Zeping
   Zhong, Yexi
TI Analysis of Urban Resilience in Water Network Cities Based on
   Scale-Density-Morphology-Function (SDMF) Framework: A Case Study of
   Nanchang City, China
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE scale-density-morphology-function (SDMF); coupling coordination model;
   adaptive cycle theory; urban resilience; Nanchang City
ID SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; ROTTERDAM; SYSTEMS; MODEL
AB In the face of increasing disturbance factors, resilience has become an important criterion for measuring the sustainable development of cities. Quantitatively describing the development process of urban resilience and identifying key areas and important dimensions of urban resilience are of scientific significance for understanding the evolutionary law of urban resilience, guiding regional risk prevention, and building an environment for urban resilience development. For this study, taking Nanchang City as a case study and dividing the natural water network groups, the resilience index system was constructed from scale, density, morphology, and function by drawing on the theory of landscape ecology on the basis of considering the internal relationship between urban development attributes and disturbance factors. On this basis, the study focuses on the evolution process and development differences of resilience in various dimensions from the water network groups and quantitatively describes the coordinated development status and adaptive phase characteristics of urban resilience. This study not only enriches the research scale and perspective of urban resilience but also provides specific spatial guidance for formulating resilient urban planning and promoting sustainable urban development.
C1 [Feng, Xinghua; Tang, Yan; Bi, Manyu; Xiao, Zeping; Zhong, Yexi] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
C3 Jiangxi Normal University
RP Zhong, YX (corresponding author), Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
EM fengxinghua@jxnu.edu.cn; 202140100088@jxnu.edu.cn; bimanyu@jxnu.edu.cn;
   201940100051@jxnu.edu.cn; zhongyexi@jxnu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42001189]; Opening Fund of
   Key Laboratory of Poyang LakeWetland andWatershed Research (Jiangxi
   Normal University), Ministry of Education [PK2020006]; Jiangxi
   Provincial Department of Education Science and Technology Research
   Project [GJJ200315]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. 42001189), the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Poyang
   LakeWetland andWatershed Research (Jiangxi Normal University), Ministry
   of Education (Grant No. PK2020006), Jiangxi Provincial Department of
   Education Science and Technology Research Project (Grant No. GJJ200315).
CR Acuti D, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102608
   Admiraal H, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
   Aguilera F, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.004
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Allen CR, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P625, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12634
   Almeida MD, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062227
   Assumma V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V756, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143806
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Chelleri L, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.016
   Childers DL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Etinay N, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.074
   Fabbricatti K., 2020, City, Territory and Architecture, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40410-020-00126-7
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Feng XH, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10121305
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Galderisi A., 2014, Z Magazine (Boston, V11, P36
   He YF, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119720
   Heinzlef C, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1049, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1049-2020
   Hennig EI, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V49, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.001
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jönsson K, 2021, DEV POLICY REV, V39, P181, DOI 10.1111/dpr.12497
   Kalantari Z, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P1629, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01518-w
   Lee H, 2021, LANDSC ECOL ENG, V17, P427, DOI 10.1007/s11355-021-00458-7
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   [李辉丹 Li Huidan], 2020, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V27, P277
   Li YF, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V98, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
   Liu YB, 2014, AQUAT ECOSYST HEALTH, V17, P161, DOI 10.1080/14634988.2014.907223
   Liu ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Mallick SK, 2021, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V2, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.06.002
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moglia M, 2021, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100052
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Moore ML, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Ng ST, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.026
   Pamukcu-Albers P, 2021, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V36, P665, DOI 10.1007/s10980-021-01212-y
   Parizi SM, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P725, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04855-x
   Peng J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007
   Rescia AJ, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V98, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.007
   Santos J, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P43, DOI 10.1111/risa.13186
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Therrien MC, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102931
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang P, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P2575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04933-0
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   Wang SH, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.002
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Xu Zhongmin, 2003, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V14, P280
   Yang F., 2019, URBAN DEV STUD, V26, P23
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
   Zhang J, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P447, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04590-3
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V44, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.05.001
NR 70
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 12
U2 103
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 6
AR 898
DI 10.3390/land11060898
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 2K5PD
UT WOS:000816386700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sharifi, A
AF Sharifi, Ayyoob
TI Resilient urban forms: A review of literature on streets and street
   networks
SO BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban form; Urban resilience; Urban streets; Centrality and
   connectivity; Street design; Street orientation
ID OUTDOOR THERMAL COMFORT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CANYON DESIGN; ROAD NETWORKS;
   ASPECT RATIO; CITIES; CENTRALITY; SYSTEMS; IMPACT; CITY
AB Cities need to build on their resilience to deal with the combined effects of urbanization, changing geopolitical contexts, and climate change. The physical form of cities has significant implications for their capacity to deal with adverse events and changing conditions. This paper focuses on streets as major constituent elements of urban form. It offers a review of the theoretical discussions and empirical evidence on how design and configuration of urban streets and street networks can contribute to/detract from urban resilience. For the purpose of this study, measures related to urban streets are divided into two broad categories: network topology and design and orientation. Network topology is used to represent urban street network as a combination of nodes and links. Relationships between urban resilience and different centrality and connectivity measures related to network topology are discussed. The design and orientation category explores the possible effects of street width, street edges, street canyon geometry, and street layout and orientation on resilience of cities. It is discussed that all topology and design measures have implications for urban resilience. Appropriate physical form of urban streets can contribute to urban resilience by, among other things, ameliorating urban microclimate, reducing energy consumption and its associated Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, enhancing social capital, improving community health and well-being, and facilitating rapid and effective emergency response in the aftermath of disasters. Overall, results provide insights about physical properties that are required to design resilient streets and street networks.
C1 [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398530, Japan.
C3 Hiroshima University
RP Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398530, Japan.
EM sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
RI Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI Sharifi, Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613
CR Akbarzadeh M, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9814-y
   Alexander Christopher., 2017, A City is Not a Tree: 50th Anniversary Edition
   Ali-Toudert F, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.013
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   Allan P, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P242, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772881
   Andreou E, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V55, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.040
   [Anonymous], DOES URBAN DENSITY F
   [Anonymous], ARCH GEOMATICS 2016
   [Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180601805
   [Anonymous], DIS RES NAT IMP
   [Anonymous], J URBAN PLANE DEV
   [Anonymous], COMM RES PLANN GUID
   Argyroudis S, 2015, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V30, P524, DOI 10.1111/mice.12136
   Aydin NY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
   Balslev YJ, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V93, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.005
   Barthélemy M, 2009, NETW SPAT ECON, V9, P401, DOI 10.1007/s11067-008-9068-5
   Batty M, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P571, DOI 10.1068/b4004ed
   Boeing G, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P590, DOI 10.1177/2399808318784595
   Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
   Bond T, 2014, GEOGR RES-AUST, V52, P6, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12040
   Bosselmann Peter., 1998, REPRESENTATION PLACE
   Bourbia F, 2010, RENEW ENERG, V35, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.017
   Bourdic L, 2012, BUILD RES INF, V40, P518, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2012.690951
   Brand D, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P159, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1133231
   Brody S, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P789, DOI 10.1177/0042098012448551
   Buhl J, 2006, EUR PHYS J B, V49, P513, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00085-1
   Caprì S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V45, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.005
   Carpenter A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.003
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chatzidimitriou A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V33, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.019
   Clark TA, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V53, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.006
   Crucitti P, 2006, CHAOS, V16, DOI 10.1063/1.2150162
   Crucitti P, 2006, PHYS REV E, V73, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.036125
   Csete M, 2016, J ENVIRON ENG LANDSC, V24, P258, DOI 10.3846/16486897.2016.1185431
   Cullen G., 1971, CONCISE TOWNSCAPE
   Davis J.M., 2013, Evolving cities: Exploring the relations between urban form resilience and the governance of urban form
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   De Montis A, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.004
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Ewing R, 2015, J PLAN LIT, V30, P413, DOI 10.1177/0885412215595439
   Ewing R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P265, DOI 10.1080/01944361003766766
   Fang CL, 2015, APPL ENERG, V158, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.095
   Feliciotti A, 2016, OPEN HOUSE INT, V41, P23
   Fraser AM, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V4, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2016.07.005
   FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOC NETWORKS, V1, P215, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   FREEMAN LC, 1977, SOCIOMETRY, V40, P35, DOI 10.2307/3033543
   Guerra E, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P394, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14545170
   Hachem C, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.117
   Hachem C, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V49, P335, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02.021
   Hillier B., 1976, Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des, V3, P147, DOI [DOI 10.1068/B030147, 10.1068/b030147]
   Huang KT, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V154, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.054
   Jane J., 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   Jaroszweski D, 2014, PROG PHYS GEOG, V38, P448, DOI 10.1177/0309133314538741
   Jayawardena HMIDP, 2017, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V12, P964, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2017.100
   Jiang B, 2004, GEOINFORMATICA, V8, P157, DOI 10.1023/B:GEIN.0000017746.44824.70
   Kermanshah A, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2678-1
   Ketterer C, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V122, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.003
   Ko YK, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN B, V41, P573, DOI 10.1068/b12038p
   Krüger E, 2010, APPL ENERG, V87, P2068, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.034
   Larco N, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1071649
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   León J, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
   Lin JY, 2013, TRANSPORT REV, V33, P658, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2013.848955
   Long Y, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P406, DOI 10.1177/2399808317715640
   Lynch K., 1960, IMAGE CITY
   Marshall S., 2004, STREETS AND PATTERNS
   Massengale J., 2014, STREET DESIGN SECRET
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Mehaffy M, 2010, URBAN DES INT, V15, P22, DOI 10.1057/udi.2009.26
   Milakis D, 2015, J TRANSP LAND USE, V8, P59, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.557
   Mohajeri N, 2015, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V35, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.025
   NASAR JL, 1990, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V56, P41, DOI 10.1080/01944369008975742
   Nouri AS, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9030108
   Novak DC, 2014, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V57, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.015
   Oke T. R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI 10.1017/9781139016476
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Porta S, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P1471, DOI 10.1177/0042098011422570
   Porta S, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P450, DOI 10.1068/b34098
   Radhakrishnan M, 2018, CITIES, V78, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.022
   Rantzoudi EC, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P1081, DOI 10.1007/s11252-017-0655-4
   Remali AdelM., 2015, Suburban Urbanities, V1st, P104
   Revelli R, 2018, URBAN ECOSYST, V21, P489, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0741-2
   Algeciras JAR, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V101, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.02.026
   Salat S., 2012, Urban Complexity, Efficiency and Resilience, Urban Morphology Lab
   Salat S, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P107, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2016.1277227
   Salat S, 2012, TEMA, V5, P55, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/918
   Salat S, 2010, CESB 10: CENTRAL EUROPE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE BUILDING - FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, P509
   Scoppa MD, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN B, V42, P354, DOI 10.1068/b130051p
   Seelig S, 2011, CITIES, V28, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.001
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_9
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sharifi A, 2013, HABITAT INT, V38, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.05.007
   Sharmin T, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V94, P734, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.10.007
   Silva M, 2017, J PLAN LIT, V32, P346, DOI 10.1177/0885412217706900
   Stead D., 2001, An International Review and Evaluation
   Taleghani M, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V83, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.014
   Pham TTH, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V157, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.001
   Tsai YH, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P141, DOI 10.1080/0042098042000309748
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   van Esch MME, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V47, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.11.042
   Vartholomaios A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.006
   Villagra P, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V48, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.010
   Wang J, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140581
   Wang SH, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.002
   Wasserman S., 1994, SOCIAL NETWORK ANAL
   Zhang X, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V46, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.006
   Zhang YF, 2017, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V61, P1421, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1320-6
NR 109
TC 181
Z9 198
U1 35
U2 363
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0360-1323
EI 1873-684X
J9 BUILD ENVIRON
JI Build. Environ.
PD JAN
PY 2019
VL 147
BP 171
EP 187
DI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
PG 17
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA HE4LN
UT WOS:000453338500014
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, H
   Huang, ZY
   Liang, YQ
   Zhang, QX
   Hu, SX
   Cui, LY
   An, XY
AF Wang, Hao
   Huang, Zhiying
   Liang, Yanqing
   Zhang, Qingxi
   Hu, Shaoxiong
   Cui, Liye
   An, Xiangyun
TI Dynamic evolution of urban infrastructure resilience and its spatial
   spillover effects: An empirical study from China
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID SEISMIC RESILIENCE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; SPACE
AB Urban infrastructure resilience is an important perspective for measuring the development quality of resilient cities and an important way to measure the level of infrastructure development. This paper uses the kernel density estimation, exploratory spatial data analysis, and spatial econometric models to analyze the characteristics of dynamic evolution and the spillover effects of the infrastructure resilience levels in 283 prefecture-level and above cities in China from 2010 to 2019. Our results are as follows. (1) The overall level of urban infrastructure resilience increased. The eastern region had a higher level than the national average. In contrast, the central, western and north-eastern regions had a slightly lower level than the national average. (2) The areas with high and higher resilience levels were mostly cities with more developed economic and social conditions in Eastern China. The areas below moderate resilience levels show a certain degree of clustering and mainly include some cities in Central, Western, and Northeast China. (3) The national level of urban infrastructure resilience shows significant spatial clustering characteristics, and the spatial pattern from coastal to inland regions presents a hotspot-subhotspot-subcoldspot-coldspot distribution. (4) There is a differential spatial spillover effect of national urban infrastructure resilience, which is gradually strengthened under the role of the economy, financial development, population agglomeration and government funding and weakened under the role of urbanization, market consumption and infrastructure investment. By exploring the dynamic evolution of infrastructure resilience in cities at the prefecture level and above and its spatial spillover effects, we provide a scientific basis for avoiding the siphoning effect among cities, improving the level of infrastructure resilience, and guiding the construction and development of resilient cities.
C1 [Wang, Hao; Liang, Yanqing; Zhang, Qingxi; An, Xiangyun] Hebei Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Zhiying] Hebei Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Spatial Planning, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
   [Liang, Yanqing] Hebei Key Lab Environm Change & Ecol Construct, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
   [Liang, Yanqing] Hebei Technol Innovat Ctr Remote Sensing Identific, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
   [Liang, Yanqing] Hebei Normal Univ, Hebei Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ Ge, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
   [Hu, Shaoxiong] Zhangjiakou Univ, Sch Tourism & Environm, Zhangjiakou, Peoples R China.
   [Cui, Liye] Natl Terr Spatial Planning Res Ctr Hebei Prov, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
C3 Hebei Normal University; Hebei GEO University; Hebei Normal University;
   Zhangjiakou University
RP Liang, YQ (corresponding author), Hebei Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.; Huang, ZY (corresponding author), Hebei Univ Geosci, Sch Land Sci & Spatial Planning, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.; Liang, YQ (corresponding author), Hebei Key Lab Environm Change & Ecol Construct, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.; Liang, YQ (corresponding author), Hebei Technol Innovat Ctr Remote Sensing Identific, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.; Liang, YQ (corresponding author), Hebei Normal Univ, Hebei Key Res Inst Humanities & Social Sci Univ Ge, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China.
EM hzy366@sohu.com; liangyanqing@126.com
RI Zhang, Qingxi/JTU-3304-2023
OI Liang, Yanqing/0000-0003-4993-9273
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41471090]; Key Projects of
   Science and Technology Research of Hebei Provincial Education Department
   [ZD2019115]
FX We greatly appreciated Prof. Jingfeng Ge and Prof. Zhongjiang Feng for
   their valuable comments at various stages of this study. We thank AJE
   (www.aje.cn) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of
   this manuscript.
CR An HM, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14184580
   Anselin L, 1996, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V26, P77, DOI 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
   Anselin L., 1999, GEOGRAPHIC INFORM SY, V47, P415
   [白帅 Bai Shuai], 2022, [水土保持通报, Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation], V42, P308
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bruneau M, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P41, DOI 10.1193/1.2431396
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   [陈超 Chen Chao], 2017, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V37, P125
   Chen HL, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14137569
   Chen M, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12062819
   [陈明星 CHEN Mingxing], 2009, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V64, P387
   Chen Shao-qing, 2020, Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, V43, P10, DOI 10.7612/j.issn.2096-5281.2020.03.002
   [陈晓红 Chen Xiaohong], 2020, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V40, P2000
   Chen Y.E., 2016, ECON GEOGR, V36, P23
   Chen Y, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V216, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109000
   Cutter S L., 2008, Geography, V1, P2301
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davidson-Hunt I.J., 2004, THESIS U MANITOBA WI
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Fang Y.L., 2022, PROG GEOGR, V41, P214, DOI [10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.02.003, DOI 10.18306/DLKXJZ.2022.02.003]
   [高志刚 Gao Zhigang], 2021, [科技导报（北京）, Science & Technology Review], V39, P118
   Gay LF, 2013, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V9, P330, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2013.058172
   Guo GQ., 1990, CONSTRUCTION DEV URB, V1st ed, P3
   Guo L., 2013, URBAN PROBLEMS, V1, P16
   Haimes YY, 2008, SYSTEMS ENG, V11, P287, DOI 10.1002/sys.20101
   Han DR, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229499
   Heshmati A, 2020, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000513
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huang J, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091470
   Li JL., 2020, CITY, V9, P16
   Li Y, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0181917
   Liu QQ, 2017, HABITAT INT, V64, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.010
   Lu C, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P124070, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3110368
   Luo X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127467
   [马志飞 Ma Zhifei], 2018, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V38, P869
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Peng AY., 2004, NANJING J SOCIAL SCI, VS2, P329
   Qiao Z, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12050794
   Ren JY, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V340, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130744
   Shafieezadeh A, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V132, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021
   Shen TY., 2010, SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS, V1st ed, P89
   Sun Y, 2018, FUNCT FOOD SCI TECHN, P1, DOI 10.1155/2018/8280328
   Tao ZM, 2019, MATH PROBL ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/8206902
   Wang GH, 2021, GUIZHOU SOCIAL SCI, V1, P126
   [王倩 Wang Qian], 2020, [地理与地理信息科学, Geography and Geo-information Science], V36, P113
   Wu J., 2022, Earth Syst. Dyn, P1, DOI DOI 10.5194/ESD-2021-104
   Xie P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103746
   Xie WH., 1996, URBAN EC, V1st ed, P309
   Yang J, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V795, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148791
   Yu HS, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103800
   Yu HS, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11020165
   Yu WB, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.893876
   Yu YJ., 2021, SCI TECHNOLOGY MANAG, V41, P9
   Zhang Guiming, 2013, Acta Ecologica Sinica, V33, P7590
   Zhang M.D., 2020, J. Ind. Technol. Econ, V39, P3
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   Zhang P., 2018, Urban Probl, V9, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180904, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.180904]
   Zhang X, 2022, TRANSPORT POLICY, V129, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.009
   Zhang Y.-H., 2021, MOD MANAG, V41, P77, DOI [10.19634/j.cnki.11-1403/c.2021.05.018, DOI 10.19634/J.CNKI.11-1403/C.2021.05.018]
   [周倩 Zhou Qian], 2020, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V27, P286
   Zhu J.H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
NR 62
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 18
U2 76
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD MAR 16
PY 2023
VL 18
IS 3
AR e0282194
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0282194
PG 20
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA F8XZ1
UT WOS:000985134400003
PM 36928451
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fu, KY
   Liu, YZ
   Lu, XY
   Chen, B
   Chen, YH
AF Fu, Kai-yang
   Liu, Yu-zhe
   Lu, Xin-yu
   Chen, Bin
   Chen, You-hua
TI Health impacts of climate resilient city development: Evidence from
   China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate resilient city; Health of vulnerable groups; Physical health;
   Mental health; Urban climate governance
ID AIR-POLLUTION; WASTE-WATER; URBAN; ADAPTATION
AB This study examines the health impacts of Climate Resilient City (CRC) policies using a difference-in-differences methodology. Our findings demonstrate that CRC policies significantly improve public health, particularly benefiting vulnerable populations and residents in regions with extreme temperatures. Mechanism analysis reveals that these policies enhance urban climate resilience through improved water management, air pollution reduction, energy conservation, and strengthened social capital. Moreover, our results show that CRC policies help reduce health disparities linked to differences in medical resources and climate conditions. This study provides crucial insights for policymakers in designing effective climate and public health strategies, emphasizing the importance of climate-resilient urban development.
C1 [Fu, Kai-yang; Liu, Yu-zhe; Lu, Xin-yu; Chen, You-hua] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Bin] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, You-hua] South China Agr Univ, Agr & Rural Policy & Reform Innovat Lab, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, You-hua] South China Agr Univ, Guangdong Ctr Rural Policy Studies, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, You-hua] South China Agr Univ, Res Ctr Agr Ind Dev, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China.
C3 South China Agricultural University; Beijing Normal University; South
   China Agricultural University; South China Agricultural University;
   South China Agricultural University
RP Chen, YH (corresponding author), South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China.
EM yhchen214@scau.edu.cn
RI Lu, Xin-Yu/AAK-8839-2021; Chen, Bin/ABD-5074-2021; Liu,
   Yuzhe/ADY-8455-2022; Chen, You-hua/M-4136-2013
OI Chen, You-hua/0000-0001-5697-9295; Fu, Kaiyang/0009-0007-2205-3081
FU National Natural Science Major Program of China [72091511]; National
   Natural Science Foundation of China [72273045]; Outstanding Youth Fund
   of the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [2024B1515020042]; Major
   Project of National Social Science Fund of China [23 ZD121]
FX This study was supported by several significant funding sources: the
   National Natural Science Major Program of China (Grant No. 72091511)
   titled "Research on Certain Risk Prevention, Control, and Management of
   Resilient Cities", the National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (Grant No. 72273045) titled "Research on the Impact Mechanisms of
   Climate Change on the Resilience of Grains Production and its
   Enhancement Paths: A Research Based on the Main Producing Regions in
   Northern China", the Outstanding Youth Fund of the Guangdong Natural
   Science Foundation (Grant No. 2024B1515020042) under the project
   "Climate Change and Grains Production Resilience", and the Major Project
   of National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 23 & ZD121) titled
   "Research on the Path and Policies to Ensure Stable and Safe Supply of
   Grain and Important Agricultural Products in China".
CR Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Bai J., 2022, China Industrial Economics, V6, P61, DOI 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.06.016
   BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Böckerman P, 2009, HEALTH ECON, V18, P161, DOI 10.1002/hec.1361
   Bulkeley H, 2005, ENVIRON POLIT, V14, P42, DOI 10.1080/0964401042000310178
   Chen S, 2024, AEA PAP P, V114, P423, DOI DOI 10.1257/pandp.20241062
   Chen S, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105241
   Chen Y, 2020, AM ECON REV, V110, P3393, DOI 10.1257/aer.20191414
   Cherqui F, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V514, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.027
   Cohen AJ, 2017, LANCET, V389, P1907, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6, 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30505-6]
   Corvalan C, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17238849
   Croce S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103313
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Dosa D, 2023, HEALTH SERV RES, V58, P36, DOI 10.1111/1475-6773.14043
   Enssle F, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.008
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Fuller R, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE535, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0
   Gao SD, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-43717-3
   Garcia X, 2015, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V101, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.015
   Guo YM, 2018, PLOS MED, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002629
   Hagedoorn LC, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P723, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562869
   Hammond MJ, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P14, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
   He C, 2024, NAT SUSTAIN, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41893-024-01294-x
   He C, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE648, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00139-5
   He QL, 2023, EBIOMEDICINE, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104854
   Hendryx MS, 2002, HEALTH SERV RES, V37, P87
   Hu Y, 2023, SSM-POPUL HLTH, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101547
   Hua JY, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103755
   Jabbar M, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P4405, DOI 10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7
   Jiang T., 2022, China Ind. Econ, V5, P100, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2022.05.005, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2022.05.005]
   Kelly FJ, 2015, ENVIRON GEOCHEM HLTH, V37, P631, DOI 10.1007/s10653-015-9720-1
   Kiecolt-Glaser JK, 2001, PSYCHOL BULL, V127, P472, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.472
   Lambert GW, 2002, LANCET, V360, P1840, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11737-5
   Lei J, 2022, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V130, DOI 10.1289/EHP9284
   Levy H, 2008, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V29, P399, DOI 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144042
   Li MW, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab26ca
   Li Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024
   Li TT, 2023, INNOVATION-AMSTERDAM, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100427
   Li Y, 2024, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1285568
   Lima F, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142114435
   Liu WG, 2022, STUD COMPUT INTELL, V1015, P16, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_2
   Long J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P992, DOI 10.1177/0042098018770846
   Luo N, 2020, EC RES J, V12, P80
   Miller W, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V101, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.050
   Morley JE, 2020, J NUTR HEALTH AGING, V24, P917, DOI [10.1007/s12603-020-1473-6, 10.1007/s12603-020-1497-y]
   Naik KS, 2012, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V66, P644, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.144
   Nawaz S, 2021, ENERG ECON, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105338
   Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, 2020, ENVIRON INT, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661
   Niu KY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V670, P961, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.159
   Prtner H.-O., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, P3056, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781009325844, 10.1017/9781009325844]
   Ramírez-Coronel AA, 2024, REV ENVIRON HEALTH, V39, P423, DOI 10.1515/reveh-2022-0216
   Romanello M, 2023, LANCET, V402, P2346, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01859-7
   Roux AVD, 2001, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V91, P1783, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1783
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shtjefni D, 2024, CITIES, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104883
   Silverstein M, 2020, BMC GERIATR, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12877-020-1435-1
   Singh PK, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102277
   Smit B, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Steptoe A, 2015, LANCET, V385, P640, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0
   Sun CJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102390
   Tomasetti C, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P20482, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1905722116
   Wang C, 2024, ENVIRON INT, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108579
   Wang D, 2024, CITIES, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105316
   Wang YP, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V114, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.046
   Wen X. X., 2017, China Rural Survey, V2017, P130
   World H. O. R. O., 2004, Reducing Hospital Deds: What are the Lessons to be Learned?
   Zhao M., 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, P1971, DOI [10.3390/rs11171971, DOI 10.3390/rs11171971, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11171971]
   Zhao YH, 2014, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V43, P61, DOI 10.1093/ije/dys203
   Zhou YC, 2023, JAMA PSYCHIAT, V80, P488, DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0301
   Zielinska-Dabkowska KM, 2023, SCIENCE, V380, P1130, DOI 10.1126/science.adg5277
NR 71
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 55
U2 55
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD DEC 1
PY 2024
VL 116
AR 105914
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105914
EA OCT 2024
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA K2Q7D
UT WOS:001342380000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, ZL
   Wang, XB
   Wang, WZ
   Deveci, M
   Wu, ZY
   Pedrycz, W
AF Wang, Zelin
   Wang, Xiangbin
   Wang, Weizhong
   Deveci, Muhammet
   Wu, Zengyuan
   Pedrycz, Witold
TI Consensus reaching-based decision model for assessing resilient urban
   public health safety ecosystem with social network analysis
SO JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION INTEGRATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Emergency capacity assessment; Urban public health development; Social
   network analysis; Consensus-reaching process
ID RISK-ASSESSMENT
AB In 2021, United Nations released the "Creating Resilient Cities 2030 Project", which aims to strengthen urban resilience in developing and implementing disaster reduction strategies. Resilient cities are a new type of urban development model that emphasizes the ability of cities to resist natural disasters and social pressures, reduce losses, and allocate resources reasonably to quickly recover from disasters. With the frequent occurrence of public health and safety accidents, the concept of public health safety ecosystem has become increasingly prominent in the field of urban resilience. To effectively manage public health incidents and enhance emergency response capabilities, evaluating the urban public health safety ecosystem is essential. A consensus-based decision-making model that accounts for the social networks among experts to accurately assess urban public health emergency capacity is introduced. To ensure the objectivity of indicator weights, we build up a novel model to calculate the weight of indicators utilizing social network analysis and consensus-reaching process analysis of indicator evaluation value. An illustrative case study on public health emergency capacity in Luoding is presented. This research expands the framework for assessing resilience in urban systems and provides a methodology for improving urban public health and resilience, introducing a novel approach for evaluating the urban public health safety ecosystem through social network analysis.
C1 [Wang, Zelin; Wang, Xiangbin; Wu, Zengyuan] China Jiliang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Weizhong] Anhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China.
   [Deveci, Muhammet] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34942 Istanbul, Turkiye.
   [Deveci, Muhammet] Imperial Coll London, Royal Sch Mines, Dept Bioengn, London SW7 2AZ, England.
   [Deveci, Muhammet] Western Caspian Univ, Dept Informat Technol, Baku 1001, Azerbaijan.
   [Pedrycz, Witold] Univ Alberta, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 9211 116,St NW, Edmonton, AB T6 G 1H9, Canada.
C3 China Jiliang University; Anhui Normal University; Imperial College
   London; Ministry of Education of Azerbaijan Republic; Western Caspian
   University; University of Alberta
RP Wang, WZ (corresponding author), Anhui Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China.
EM zelinwang61@hotmail.com; wangweizhongky@163.com;
   muhammetdeveci@gmail.com; wuzengyuan@cjlu.edu.cn; wpedrycz@ualberta.ca
RI Deveci, Muhammet/V-8347-2017; Wu, Zeng-Yuan/ABD-4758-2021
FU Zhejiang Province Social Science Planning Project [23NDJC185YB,
   BRZK24C]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of
   Zhejiang [2022YW68]
FX This work was supported in part by the Zhejiang Province Social Science
   Planning Project under Grant 23NDJC185YB, China Jiliang University-the
   Belt and Road Regional Standardization Research Center Funding Project
   under the Grant BRZK24C, the Fundamental Research Funds for the
   Provincial Universities of Zhejiang under Grant 2022YW68.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Akram M, 2023, EXPERT SYST APPL, V213, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119237
   Akram M, 2023, GRANULAR COMPUT, V8, P917, DOI 10.1007/s41066-022-00359-6
   Aminbakhsh S, 2013, J SAFETY RES, V46, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.05.003
   An M, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103493
   Bryson N, 1996, COMPUT OPER RES, V23, P27, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(96)00002-H
   Cariolet JM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V615, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.334
   Chen CK, 2023, J SAF SCI RESIL, V4, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.09.008
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   Demir G., 2024, Comput. Decis. Mak. Int. J, V1, P211, DOI [10.59543/comdem.v1i.10713, DOI 10.59543/COMDEM.V1I.10713]
   Dong YC, 2017, INFORM SCIENCES, V397, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2017.02.052
   Dong YC, 2010, EUR J OPER RES, V203, P455, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.08.013
   Du YW, 2019, EXPERT SYST APPL, V126, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.006
   Freebairn L, 2018, BMC MED INFORM DECIS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12911-018-0707-6
   Froehlich DE, 2020, REV RES EDUC, V44, P244, DOI 10.3102/0091732X20903311
   Gai TT, 2023, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V32, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10726-022-09798-7
   Gao Y, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P2177, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1847339
   Gou XJ, 2024, FUZZY OPTIM DECIS MA, V23, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10700-023-09409-3
   Herrera F, 2000, FUZZY SET SYST, V114, P43, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00093-1
   Herrera F, 1996, FUZZY SET SYST, V78, P73, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00107-7
   Herrera F, 2000, IEEE T FUZZY SYST, V8, P746, DOI 10.1109/91.890332
   Kara K., 2024, J. Soft Comput. Decis. Anal., V2, P236, DOI [10.31181/jscda21202444, DOI 10.31181/JSCDA21202444]
   Kurtay K.G., 2024, Computer and Decision Making: An International Journal, V1, P134, DOI [10.59543/comdem.v1i.10413, DOI 10.59543/COMDEM.V1I.10413]
   Liao HC, 2024, IEEE T COMPUT SOC SY, V11, P3678, DOI 10.1109/TCSS.2023.3327173
   Liu BS, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V275, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.075
   Liu J, 2022, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102796
   Liu SC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
   Liu X, 2019, INFORM SCIENCES, V505, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.050
   Liu ZZ, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.12.003
   Lu YL, 2021, INFORM SCIENCES, V547, P910, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.022
   Machado C Jr, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102671
   MILLER GA, 1956, PSYCHOL REV, V63, P81, DOI 10.1037/h0043158
   Naz S, 2024, INT J MACH LEARN CYB, V15, P303, DOI 10.1007/s13042-023-01911-9
   Paraskevas A, 2019, TOURISM MANAGE, V70, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.007
   Ray M, 2024, J MULTI-CRITERIA DEC, V31, DOI 10.1002/mcda.1820
   Rezvani SMHS, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103612
   Rodríguez RM, 2013, INFORM SCIENCES, V241, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.006
   Serrano-Guerrero J., 2020, A T1OWA Fuzzy Linguistic Aggregation Methodology For Searching Feature-Based Opinions, V189
   Suleimany M, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103248
   Sun JP, 2023, INFORM FUSION, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101952
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Wang HQ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191610200
   Wang J, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16183478
   Wang WD, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104798
   Wang ZL, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106973
   Wu J, 2017, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V122, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.031
   Wu J, 2016, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V96, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.004
   Wu J, 2014, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V59, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.01.017
   Wu JS, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.03.006
   Xiao K, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P31217, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17247-2
   Xu Y, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103292
   Yuksel S., 2025, Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, V3, P18
   Yushuo C, 2024, J. Oper. Intell., V2, P153, DOI [10.31181/jopi21202418, DOI 10.31181/JOPI21202418]
   Zhang Z, 2020, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106240
   Zhu YC, 2023, COMPUT IND ENG, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108943
NR 55
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 22
U2 22
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2467-964X
EI 2452-414X
J9 J IND INF INTEGR
JI J. Ind. Inf. Integr.
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 42
AR 100716
DI 10.1016/j.jii.2024.100716
EA NOV 2024
PG 13
WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Engineering,
   Industrial
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Computer Science; Engineering
GA L5L7K
UT WOS:001351138600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Elfversson, E
   Höglund, K
AF Elfversson, Emma
   Hoglund, Kristine
TI Urban growth, resilience, and violence
SO CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
ID SOCIAL DISORDER; LAND CONFLICT; MIGRATION; MEDELLIN; SECURITY; AFRICAN
AB Cities undergoing rapid growth are at risk of outbreaks of violence as competition over scarce resources and space intensifies. In this context, it is critical to identify conditions that make cities and their inhabitants resilient to violence. We review research findings about the general relationship between urban growth and the violence-proneness of cities, as well as insights about the factors that underpin violence-resilience in three different areas: 1) urban governance and planning, 2) security institutions, and 3) the everyday practices of urban dwellers. We argue that in order to understand cities' resilience to violence, we need to account for both the mechanisms linking urban growth to violence, and the possible conflict resolution and mitigation mechanisms present in cities.
C1 [Elfversson, Emma] Uppsala Univ, Dept Govt, Box 514, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden.
   [Hoglund, Kristine] Uppsala Univ, Dept Peace & Conflict Res, Box 514, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden.
C3 Uppsala University; Uppsala University
RP Elfversson, E (corresponding author), Uppsala Univ, Dept Govt, Box 514, SE-75120 Uppsala, Sweden.
EM emma.elfversson@statsvet.uu.se
OI Elfversson, Emma/0000-0001-5673-9056
FU Swedish Research Council [2018-03924]; Formas (Sweden) [2019-00269];
   Vinnova [2019-00269, 2018-03924] Funding Source: Vinnova; Swedish
   Research Council [2019-00269, 2018-03924] Funding Source: Swedish
   Research Council; Formas [2019-00269] Funding Source: Formas
FX <B>Acknowledgements</B> This work was supported by the Swedish Research
   Council [grant number 2018-03924] and Formas (Sweden) [grant number
   2019-00269] .
CR Agegnehu SK, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10101071
   Amponsah O, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105979
   Anwar NH, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1320, DOI 10.1177/0042098019834160
   Asibey MO, 2021, CITIES, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103297
   Auyero Javier., 2000, POOR PEOPLES POLITIC
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Beall J, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P3065, DOI 10.1177/0042098013487775
   Berenschot W, 2020, J PEACE RES, V57, P171, DOI 10.1177/0022343319889678
   Blair G, 2021, SCIENCE, V374, P1098, DOI 10.1126/science.abd3446
   Buhaug H, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.016
   Büscher K, 2020, CITIES AT WAR, P160
   Coaffee J, 2022, Urban Violence, Resilience and Security, P72
   Cottyn I, 2018, J EAST AFR STUD, V12, P329, DOI 10.1080/17531055.2018.1457280
   de Coning C, 2016, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V4, P166, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2016.1153773
   Dorward N, 2022, POLIT GEOGR, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102762
   Doyle C, 2019, URBAN RES PRACT, V12, P211, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2018.1434822
   Elfversson E, 2023, PEACEBUILDING, V11, P321, DOI 10.1080/21647259.2023.2225914
   Elfversson E, 2023, POLIT GEOGR, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102810
   Elfversson E, 2021, CITIES, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103356
   Elfversson E, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P1749, DOI 10.1177/0042098017698416
   Felbab-Brown V, 2022, Urban Violence, Resilience and Security, P138
   Flom H, 2024, J URBAN AFF, V46, P1644, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2021.2018935
   Fox S, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P1959, DOI 10.1177/00420980211032654
   Fox S, 2016, POLIT GEOGR, V53, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.02.004
   Gaviria S, 2020, CITIES, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102498
   Gizelis TI, 2021, POLIT GEOGR, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102357
   Glass M. R., 2022, Urban Violence, Resilience and Security, P1
   Gunning J, 2022, POLIT GEOGR, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102485
   Diman AH, 2024, STUD CONFL TERROR, V47, P1772, DOI 10.1080/1057610X.2022.2074394
   Harboe L, 2023, PEACEBUILDING, V11, P403, DOI 10.1080/21647259.2023.2211835
   Huijsmans T, 2021, POLIT GEOGR, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102353
   Jenss A, 2020, POLIT GEOGR, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102113
   Jones P, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P1835, DOI 10.1177/0042098018789059
   Juncos AE, 2020, J INTERV STATEBUILD, V14, P289, DOI 10.1080/17502977.2020.1745445
   Kaldor M., 2020, Cities at war: global insecurity and urban resistance
   Lisa P, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105711
   Lombard M, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P2683, DOI 10.1177/0042098016659616
   Mahadevia D, 2019, ROU STUD CIT DEVELOP, P177
   Mantilla J, 2023, PEACEBUILDING, V11, P358, DOI 10.1080/21647259.2023.2231296
   Mccandless E, 2015, Interpeace
   Meth P, 2021, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V45, P985, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.13044
   Mohamed A, 2020, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100050
   Moncada E, 2022, Urban Violence, Resilience and Security, P177
   Moncada Eduardo., 2016, CITIES BUSINESS POLI
   Moser CON, 2006, WORLD DEV, V34, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.07.012
   Muthama DM, 2020, URBAN FORUM, V31, P237, DOI 10.1007/s12132-019-09382-4
   Naef P, 2022, POLIT GEOGR, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102603
   Nagle J, 2023, PEACEBUILDING, V11, P381, DOI 10.1080/21647259.2023.2219119
   Nhamo L, 2021, CITIES, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103266
   Oldenburg S, 2023, Rebellious Riots: Entangled Geographies of Contention in Africa, P180
   Ostby G, 2016, CONFLICT MANAG PEACE, V33, P491, DOI 10.1177/0738894215581315
   Oura KR, 2020, Afr J Land Policy Geospat Sci, V3, P80, DOI [10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v3i2.18874, DOI 10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/AJLP-GS.V3I2.18874]
   Paller JW, 2021, AREA DEV POLICY, V6, P319, DOI 10.1080/23792949.2020.1799716
   Pavoni A, 2020, PROG HUM GEOG, V44, P49, DOI 10.1177/0309132518810432
   Pellerin CL, 2023, URBAN FORUM, V34, P293, DOI 10.1007/s12132-022-09469-5
   Petrova K, 2021, J PEACE RES, V58, P33, DOI 10.1177/0022343320973741
   Plänitz E, 2020, PEACE ECON PEACE SCI, V26, DOI 10.1515/peps-2019-0046
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Pope N, 2023, URBAN STUD, V60, P343, DOI 10.1177/00420980221093181
   Raleigh C, 2015, INT STUD REV, V17, P90, DOI 10.1111/misr.12206
   Richmond MA, 2022, CONTEMP SOC SCI, V17, P248, DOI 10.1080/21582041.2021.1906937
   Rieken J, 2020, CITIES AT WAR, P184
   Salahub JE, 2019, ROU STUD CIT DEVELOP, P221
   Sampaio A, 2019, Third World Themat TWQ J, V4, P179, DOI [10.1080/23802014.2019.1669487, DOI 10.1080/23802014.2019.1669487]
   Sampaio Antnio., 2021, J ILLICIT EC DEV, V2, P171, DOI DOI 10.31389/JIED.64
   Sanín FG, 2004, ENVIRON URBAN, V16, P17, DOI 10.1177/095624780401600209
   Sassen Saskia., 2012, J INT AFF, P85
   Simone A., 2018, NEW URBAN WORLDS INH
   Smaira D, 2023, PEACEBUILDING, V11, P338, DOI 10.1080/21647259.2023.2212465
   Stuvoy K, 2021, CONFL SECUR DEV, V21, P153, DOI 10.1080/14678802.2021.1920230
   Thomson, 2019, 3 WORLD THEMATICS, V4, P94
   Thomson H, 2023, J PEACE RES, V60, P521, DOI 10.1177/00223433221082991
   Trudeau J, 2022, WORLD DEV, V160, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105961
   Urdal H, 2012, INT INTERACT, V38, P512, DOI 10.1080/03050629.2012.697427
   Van Santen E, 2019, TWQ J, V4, P201
   Varshney A., 2002, ETHNIC CONFLICT CIVI
   Wojciechowska M, 2022, POLIT GEOGR, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102693
NR 77
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 16
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 1877-3435
EI 1877-3443
J9 CURR OPIN ENV SUST
JI Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 64
AR 101356
DI 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101356
EA SEP 2023
PG 7
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA S4DG4
UT WOS:001070683900001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jiang, HZS
   Xu, LY
   Li, JN
   Liu, JY
   Shen, Y
AF Jiang, Hezhishi
   Xu, Liyan
   Li, Jianing
   Liu, Jinyuan
   Shen, Yao
TI Enhancing Urban Resilience Through Spatial Interaction-Based City
   Management Zoning
SO ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS
LA English
DT Article
DE city management; community detection; resilience; spatial interaction;
   Steiner Traveling Salesman problem; zoning
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; CITIES; REGIONALIZATION; REGIONS; FORMULATIONS; MODEL;
   GRAPH
AB Good city management is essential in mitigating the impact of various crisis events and thus enhances urban resilience. The current zoning system that underlies China's city management system, however, hardly meets the resilient requirements in failing to appropriately and flexibly allocate patrol personnel under normal and various crisis scenarios. We propose an optimization method that gives rise to a resilient city management zoning system by introducing spatial interaction. We realize this through community detection in a spatially embedded patrol passage cost network. Illustrated by a case in Jiangbei District, Ningbo, China, we show that the optimized zoning system has significant advantages in terms of event coverage, response efficiency, and workload balance in the normal scenario as compared to the status quo with up to 3.6 percent, 5.9 percent, and 34.0 percent performance improvement, respectively. Moreover, the method also achieves similar performance improvement in three typical shock scenarios in city management: epidemic, typhoon, and crowd gathering. We conclude the article with discussions on the findings' significance in urban resilience building and their methodological and theoretical implications in applied urban sciences.
C1 [Jiang, Hezhishi] Peking Univ, Acad Adv Interdisciplinary Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Liyan; Li, Jianing; Liu, Jinyuan] Peking Univ, Coll Architecture & Landscape, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Shen, Yao] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; Tongji University
RP Xu, LY (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Coll Architecture & Landscape, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM xuliyan@pku.edu.cn
RI Liu, Jinyuan/JVY-7424-2024; Xu, Liyan/GPW-7716-2022
OI Xu, Liyan/0000-0002-6933-3394
FU National Social Science Foundation of China
FX We acknowledge the Urban Management and Law Enforcement Bureau of Ningbo
   for providing data for this study and advice on shock scenarios and
   case-disposal priorities. We thank Mrs. Hongbin Yu, Yuqiao Deng, and Fu
   Li, who are research associates at our lab, for their help with data
   acquisition and analysis. We thank Professor Hongmou Zhang at Peking
   University for his advice on trajectory data processing. We thank Ms.
   Kunjing Xu for her help in processing the pictures.
CR Apornak A, 2021, INT J HEALTHCARE MAN, V14, P264, DOI 10.1080/20479700.2020.1861173
   Assunçao RM, 2006, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V20, P797, DOI 10.1080/13658810600665111
   Aydin O, 2021, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V35, P2287, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2021.1905819
   Aynaud T., 2020, COMMUNITY DETECTION
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Barabási AL, 2005, NATURE, V435, P207, DOI 10.1038/nature03459
   Barthelemy M., 2022, SPATIAL NETWORKS
   Barthélemy M, 2011, PHYS REP, V499, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002
   Barthélemy M, 2008, PHYS REV LETT, V100, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.138702
   Batty M, 2013, NEW SCIENCE OF CITIES, P1
   Blondel VD, 2008, J STAT MECH-THEORY E, DOI 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
   Bouajaja S, 2017, OPER RES-GER, V17, P339, DOI 10.1007/s12351-016-0247-8
   BROWN LA, 1971, J REGIONAL SCI, V11, P57, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1971.tb00240.x
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Cerina F, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037507
   Ceselli A, 2014, DISCRETE APPL MATH, V165, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.dam.2013.02.014
   [柴彦威 Chai Yanwei], 2015, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V34, P466
   Chen ZF, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101771
   City Management and Law Enforcement Bureau of Ningbo, 2020, NOTICE PRINTING DIST
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   De Montis A, 2013, EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP, V215, P75, DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2013-01716-4
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dewil R, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V247, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.067
   Dewinter M, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9030157
   Duque JC, 2012, J REGIONAL SCI, V52, P397, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00743.x
   Duque JC, 2007, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V30, P195, DOI 10.1177/0160017607301605
   Expert P, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P7663, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1018962108
   Farmer CJQ, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN A, V43, P2723, DOI 10.1068/a44136
   Feng X, 2022, T GIS, V26, P717, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12874
   Fortunato S, 2010, PHYS REP, V486, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002
   Georgeson L, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P584, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2944, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2944]
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   González MC, 2008, NATURE, V453, P779, DOI 10.1038/nature06958
   Guo D, 2008, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V22, P801, DOI 10.1080/13658810701674970
   Guo DS, 2009, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR, V15, P1041, DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2009.143
   Gurobi Optimization LLC., 2023, Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual
   He X, 2022, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V7, P391, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1871541
   HESS SW, 1965, OPER RES, V13, P998, DOI 10.1287/opre.13.6.998
   Hirt S.A., 2015, Zoned in the USA
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS., 2002, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI, P63
   Hu XW, 2021, REG SUSTAIN, V2, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.regsus.2021.10.001
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kang CG, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V60, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.08.002
   Kempinska K, 2018, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V32, P1348, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2017.1418878
   Kuo FY, 2021, APPL GEOGR, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102375
   Letchford AN, 2013, EUR J OPER RES, V228, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.01.044
   Li CJ, 2022, CITIES, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103597
   Li RQ, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01882-w
   Li YZ, 2019, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V33, P2385, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1643025
   [刘瑜 Liu Yu], 2020, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V75, P1523
   [刘瑜 Liu Yu], 2016, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V71, P564
   Lobo J., 2020, SSRN Electron. J, V38, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3526940
   Lu YW, 2021, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V27, P921, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2020.1788918
   Mazzoli M, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-11841-2
   Miranda L, 2022, T GIS, V26, P1775, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12903
   Miyazawa FK, 2021, EUR J OPER RES, V293, P826, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.059
   National Bureau of Statistics, 2019, MAJOR FIGURES 2020 P
   Newman ME, 2004, Physical review E, V69, DOI [10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133, DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVE.69.066133, DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVE.69.026113]
   Ojala M, 2009, IEEE DATA MINING, P908, DOI 10.1109/ICDM.2009.108
   OPENSHAW S, 1995, ENVIRON PLANN A, V27, P425, DOI 10.1068/a270425
   Park, 2020, 14 TH EUROPEAN C ANT, P1
   Peng X, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101790
   [彭晓 Peng Xiao], 2020, [北京大学学报. 自然科学版, Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis], V56, P721
   Portugal D., 2010, P 2010 ACM S APPL CO, P1271, DOI DOI 10.1145/1774088.1774360
   Ratti C, 2010, PLOS ONE, V5, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014248
   Roth C, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015923
   Sameer DAB, 2011, INT J URBAN SCI, V15, P1, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2011.580148
   Si YT, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19052809
   Singleton A, 2021, GEOGR ANAL, V53, P61, DOI 10.1111/gean.12194
   Vazifeh MM, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V121, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.002
   Wang Y, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000782
   Warntz W., 1966, Papers of the Regional Science Association, V17, P47, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1435-5597.1966.TB01341.X, 10.1007/BF01982509]
   WEAVER JB, 1963, YALE LAW J, V73, P288, DOI 10.2307/794769
   Wei R, 2021, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V35, P135, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2020.1759806
   Wiandt B, 2018, FED CONF COMPUT SCI, P261, DOI 10.15439/2018F213
   [邬伦 Wu Lun], 2017, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V24, P99
   [邬伦 Wu Lun], 2017, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V24, P108
   Xu MQ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-16619-5
   Xu YY, 2023, NAT COMPUT SCI, V3, P611, DOI 10.1038/s43588-023-00484-5
   Yan Y., 2006, URBAN PROBLEMS, V25, P76, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1002-2031.2006.02.017, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-2031.2006.02.017]
   Yu KJ, 1996, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00331-3
   Zhang Y, 2010, 2010 THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION (PACIIA2010), VOL VI, P82
   Zhou QF, 2021, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/6637251
   Zhu R., 2014, Journal of Xiamen University (Arts Social Sciences), V000, P102
   ZOLTNERS AA, 1983, MANAGE SCI, V29, P1237, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.29.11.1237
NR 87
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 8
U2 21
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 2469-4452
EI 2469-4460
J9 ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR
JI Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.
PD JUL 2
PY 2024
VL 114
IS 6
BP 1310
EP 1329
DI 10.1080/24694452.2024.2322477
EA MAR 2024
PG 20
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA YK6J9
UT WOS:001201764100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kolte, R
   Goswami, S
   Kumar, A
   Pipralia, S
AF Kolte, Rushikesh
   Goswami, Shipra
   Kumar, Ashwani
   Pipralia, Satish
TI Challenges in practical implementation of the concept of urban
   resilience in cities
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient cities; Scoping review; SDG11; Urban resilience framework
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; DISASTER RESILIENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   SUSTAINABILITY; CITY; TRANSFORMATION; SIMILARITIES; ROTTERDAM;
   FRAMEWORK; METAPHOR
AB Urban areas are exposed to high disaster risks and other shocks and stresses. The call for risk reduction has prevailed in global policies, but risk creation has outpaced the efforts of risk reduction. To further the sustainable agenda, socio-economic assets, and the environment must be protected from rising risks. This signifies the need for achieving resilience in cities and thus protecting the development gains. The concept of Urban Resilience has gained pace in academic studies but appears to be in its nascent stage of practical implementation. The pertaining literature on Urban Resilience is divided on understanding the basic tenets of this concept. The literature observes that Urban Resilience cannot be adequately accommodated in practice without a proper definition. These ambiguities, therefore, have raised challenges regarding the practical implementation of Urban Resilience in cities. This study attempts a scoping review of the relevant literature to identify these multiple challenges and the underlying ambiguities and anomalies for its practical challenges. This study also proposes a list of future directions according to the identified inconsistencies that would form the crucial step toward the practical implementation of Urban Resilience in cities by inculcating the many ambiguities related to the concept.
C1 [Kolte, Rushikesh; Goswami, Shipra; Kumar, Ashwani; Pipralia, Satish] Malaviya Natl Inst Technol, Dept Architecture & Planning, Jaipur, India.
C3 National Institute of Technology (NIT System); Malaviya National
   Institute of Technology Jaipur
RP Kumar, A (corresponding author), Malaviya Natl Inst Technol, Dept Architecture & Planning, Jaipur, India.
EM 2022rar9003@mnit.ac.in; 2021rar9006@mnit.ac.in; akumar.arch@mnit.ac.in;
   spipralia.arch@mnit.ac.in
RI Pipralia, Satish/LDG-6783-2024; Kumar, Ashwani/R-3565-2016
OI Kumar, Ashwani/0000-0002-1387-4503
CR Adewunmi Y, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106479
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   ADRC, 2022, Natural Disaster Data Book 2021 (An Analytical Overview), P20
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
   [Anonymous], 2022, GAR 2022 OUR WORLD R, DOI DOI 10.18356/9789210015059
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2015, Global Risks 2015, V10th, P69
   Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
   Armstrong R, 2011, J PUBLIC HEALTH-UK, V33, P147, DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Baravikova A, 2021, EUR PLAN STUD, V29, P241, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1729346
   Bautista-Puig N., 2022, Cities, V126, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2022.103715]
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bengtsson J, 2003, AMBIO, V32, P389, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2003)032[0389:RRADL]2.0.CO;2
   Bhamra R, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5375, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
   Bocchini P, 2014, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177
   Bodin P., 2004, The ESS Bulletin, V2, P11
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brien SE, 2010, IMPLEMENT SCI, V5, DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-5-2
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bueno S, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102588
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Buzási A, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P616, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01817-w
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cañizares JC, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13158538
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Cheek W, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V13, P317, DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00410-9
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Coaffee J, 2008, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V161, P173, DOI 10.1680/udap.2008.161.4.173
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Connelly Elizabeth B., 2017, Environment Systems & Decisions, V37, P46, DOI 10.1007/s10669-017-9634-9
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Davies J, 2015, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V28, P328, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2014.970734
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Desjardins E, 2015, Q REV BIOL, V90, P147, DOI 10.1086/681439
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Fiksel J., 2014, Solutions, V5, P38
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Folke Carl, 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC, P352, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511541957.020, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020]
   Fu Xin, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P367, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9693-6
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Hamilton WAH, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P109, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.109
   Heinzlef C, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102974
   Henstra D, 2012, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V14, P175, DOI 10.1080/13876988.2012.665215
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C S., 2002, Resilience and adaptive cycles
   Holling C. S., 1995, BIODIVERSITY FUNCTIO
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Intergov Panel Clim Chg, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jia CZ, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2022.109023
   Khazai B, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.012
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Knodt M, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113433
   Kong L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-20891-x
   Koop SHA, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P385, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9760-4
   Kumar SK, 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100226
   Lamond JE, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P63, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Levine S., 2014, Assessing Resilience: Why Quantification Misses the Point, P31
   Lew AA, 2016, TOURISM GEOGR, V18, P18, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2015.1122664
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liao TY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P469, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3310-3
   Liu YJ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P63674, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-20138-9
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Moomaw RL, 1996, J URBAN ECON, V40, P13, DOI 10.1006/juec.1996.0021
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Neumayer E, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.011
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   O'Brien K, 2010, AIDS BEHAV, V14, P448, DOI 10.1007/s10461-009-9528-z
   O'Flaherty J, 2015, INTERNET HIGH EDUC, V25, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
   Otto FEL, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V149, P399, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2258-3
   Ouyang M, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.011
   Parker DJ, 2020, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V19, P1, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2019.1694857
   Pascariu GC, 2023, APPL SPAT ANAL POLIC, V16, P1097, DOI 10.1007/s12061-022-09449-z
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   PIMM SL, 1984, NATURE, V307, P321, DOI 10.1038/307321a0
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Rockfeller Foundation & ARUP, 2015, City Resilience Framework, P5
   Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Roostaie S, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V154, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.042
   Saja AMA, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.004
   Serbanica C, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104177
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sharifi A., 2014, 2014 INT C UT EXH GR, P1
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P167, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_9
   Sharma M, 2023, NAT HAZARDS REV, V24, DOI 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1523
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Terblanche T, 2022, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V14, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1264
   Thorén H, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P112, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1406842
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Tricco AC, 2016, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V16, DOI 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
   Ulanowicz RE, 2009, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.005
   UNDP, 2021, An Analytical Review: A Decade of Urban Resilience: Lessons and Recommendations, P80
   UNISDR, 2013, Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers. A Global Snapshot of How Local Governments Reduce Disaster Risk, P24
   UNISDR, 2008, Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction, P12
   UNISDR, 2005, WORLD C DIS RED, V25
   UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), 2009, UNISDR TERM DIS RISK, P35
   United Nations, 2021, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2021, P68
   United Nations, 2015, THE PARIS AGREEMENT, P27
   United-Nations, 2019, World Urbanization Prospects: the 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420, P126
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   van Eck NJ, 2017, SCIENTOMETRICS, V111, P1053, DOI 10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
   Wagner Iwona, 2013, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
   Weichselgartner J., 2014, A/Z ITU J. Fac. Archit., V11, P20
   Wu Jianguo., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-910
   Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
NR 143
TC 9
Z9 10
U1 24
U2 50
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD DEC
PY 2023
VL 99
AR 104142
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104142
EA NOV 2023
PG 16
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA FZ4F9
UT WOS:001149657400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shi, CC
   Guo, NL
   Gao, X
   Wu, F
AF Shi, Chenchen
   Guo, Naliang
   Gao, Xing
   Wu, Feng
TI How carbon emission reduction is going to affect urban resilience
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Carbon emission reduction; Resilience assessment;
   Resilient city; Spatial autocorrelation; China
ID VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK; CITIES
AB In tackling climate change and promoting sustainable development, carbon emission reduction through means of cleaner production, circular economy and eco-innovation, etc., may lead to increased resilience of an urban system. This study aims to explore the impact of carbon emission reduction on urban resilience and its spatial -temporal characteristics with a sample of 267 prefectural-level cities from 2006 to 2019 in China. Firstly, this research conceptualizes urban resilience as economic prosperity, social wellbeing, cleaner environment and analyzes the impact mechanism of carbon emission reduction on these three dimensions. Then in the empirical analysis, the urban resilience assessment index is built to quantitatively evaluate urban resilience in Chinese cities and its spatial-temporal characteristics. Subsequently, the impact of carbon emission on urban resilience is investigated through geostatistical analysis. The results show that the urban resilience level in China shows significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity. High resilience cities are clustered in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Yangtze River Delta region and Pearl River Delta region, while lower resilience cities are in the northeast, northwest and southwest regions. Moreover, urban resilience in Chinese cities is mainly contributed by the economic subsystem. Over the study period, carbon emission reduction is positively related to urban resilience with high resilience and high carbon emission reduction agglomerated over space. Furthermore, the agglom-eration effect increased from 2006 to 2019. These indicate that in the past fifteen years, urban resilience in Chinese cities is highly dependent on regional economic development which is still reliant on emission-intensive industries. The research provides important references for China's carbon emission reduction and resilience -building policies. Spatial heterogeneities need to be acknowledged to focus on key areas of emission reduction and resilience improvement in policymaking and implementation.
C1 [Shi, Chenchen] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Adm, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Chenchen; Guo, Naliang; Wu, Feng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, 11,Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Chenchen] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Beijing Key Lab Megareg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Naliang; Gao, Xing] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Guo, Naliang; Gao, Xing; Wu, Feng] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Feng] 11A Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
C3 Capital University of Economics & Business; Chinese Academy of Sciences;
   Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS;
   Capital University of Economics & Business; Chinese Academy of Sciences;
   Institute of Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS;
   Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,
   CAS
RP Wu, F (corresponding author), 11A Datun Rd, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM wufeng@igsnrr.ac.cn
RI Wu, Feng/ABB-9233-2022; Shi, Chenchen/JMC-4424-2023
OI Wu, Feng/0000-0003-4688-0157; Shi, Chenchen/0000-0002-8608-668X
FU National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [72104149]; Academy of
   Metropolis Economic and Social Development at Capital University of
   Economicsand Business [ZSXM2021003]; Capital University of Economics and
   Business: The Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing Universities
   [XRZ2021048, QNTD202009]
FX Funding This research was supported by the National Natural Science
   Foun-dation of China [grant number 72104149] ; Academy of Metropolis
   Economic and Social Development at Capital University of Economicsand
   Business [grant number ZSXM2021003] ; and Capital University of
   Economics and Business: The Fundamental Research Funds for Beijing
   Universities [grant numbers XRZ2021048, QNTD202009] .
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Aldunce P, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V30, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.010
   Ang JB, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2658, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.002
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Anselin L., 2002, Visualizing Multivariate Spatial Correlation with Dynamically Linked Windows
   Bazbauers AR, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P689, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1974331
   Bozza A, 2017, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V32, P527, DOI 10.1111/mice.12275
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Cortekar J, 2016, CLIM SERV, V4, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2016.11.002
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Draper N R., 1998, Applied Regression Analysis, Vvol 326
   Fang CL, 2016, J GEOGR SCI, V26, P153, DOI 10.1007/s11442-016-1260-9
   Giffinger R, 2010, URBAN RES PRACT, V3, P299, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2010.524420
   Gleeson B, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P2653, DOI 10.1177/0042098008098198
   Han BL, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V318, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.015
   Herrera H., 2020, ENVIRON SYST DECIS, V40, P342, DOI [10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Hu AG, 2016, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V7, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2016.12.005
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Huck A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Links JM, 2018, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V12, P127, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.39
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Lynch C., 2018, CityStrength Diagnostic: Methodological Guidebook
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mehryar S, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101047
   Miles L, 2008, SCIENCE, V320, P1454, DOI 10.1126/science.1155358
   Moglia M, 2021, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100052
   MORAN PAP, 1948, J ROY STAT SOC B, V10, P243
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   OECD, 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-EN, 10.1787/9789264043466-EN]
   Parsons M, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P20
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Qi R, 2023, CHINA INFORM, V37, P100, DOI 10.1177/0920203X221093188
   Rockefeller Foundation Arup, 2014, CIT RES IND
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Sharifi E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120035
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   SUN X, 2021, PAP APPL GEOGR, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/23754931.2021.1977171
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Truchy A, 2015, ADV ECOL RES, V53, P55, DOI 10.1016/bs.aecr.2015.09.004
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wang ZX, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P1228, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2021.1872779
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Wu J., 2016, STAT RES, V33, P54, DOI [10.19343/j.cnki.11-1302/c.2016.01.008, DOI 10.19343/J.CNKI.11-1302/C.2016.01.008]
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 58
TC 47
Z9 47
U1 63
U2 339
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD OCT 20
PY 2022
VL 372
AR 133737
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
EA AUG 2022
PG 12
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA 4Y2YC
UT WOS:000861394800003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Boyd, RL
AF Boyd, Robert L.
TI Urban locations and Black Metropolis resilience in the Great Depression
SO GEOFORUM
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban centers; Ethnic economies; Black communities; Resilience; Great
   Depression
ID UNITED-STATES; NEW-YORK; MIGRATION; SEGREGATION; BUSINESSES; CHICAGO;
   CITIES; NORTH; CITY
AB Motivated by theoretical arguments about ethnicity and economics and by historical research on urban black communities in the United States, this paper investigates the resilience of the early twentieth-century Black Metropolis. The study tests hypotheses about changes. during the Great Depression (1930-1940) in the advantages of various cities as locations of black communities' ethnic economies, analyzing Census data on blacks' representation in occupations reflecting the Black Metropolis's professional, entrepreneurial, and cultural media pursuits. There is mixed support for the hypothesis that the nationally dominant urban centers of New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia had the most resilient Black Metropolises, a finding that casts doubt on claims that black communities in such key places enjoyed exceptionally favorable locational advantages. Yet, the results support the hypothesis that northern cities were, overall, more resilient locations than southern cities, particularly for black professionals and entrepreneurs, affirming the argument that the urban North's Black Metropolises were vital economic opportunity centers for these black communities' upper- and middle-classes.
C1 [Boyd, Robert L.] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Sociol, 207 Bowen Hall,456 Hardy Rd, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA.
C3 Mississippi State University
RP Boyd, RL (corresponding author), Mississippi State Univ, Dept Sociol, 207 Bowen Hall,456 Hardy Rd, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA.
EM boyd@soc.msstate.edu
RI Boyd, Robert/ABF-2610-2020
OI Boyd, Robert/0000-0001-8729-7430
CR ALDRICH H, 1985, SOC FORCES, V63, P996, DOI 10.2307/2578603
   ALDRICH H, 1989, SOC FORCES, V67, P920, DOI 10.2307/2579708
   [Anonymous], 2019, Social stratification, class, race, and gender in sociological perspective, DOI 10.4324/9780429306419-102/american-apartheid-segregation-making-underclass-douglas-massey-nancy-denton
   [Anonymous], 2012, DECLINING SIGNIFICAN, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226032993.001.0001
   Bates T., 1997, Race, Self-Employment, and Upward Mobility: An Illusive American Dream
   Blalock H.M., 1967, THEORY MINORITY GROU
   BONACICH E, 1976, AM SOCIOL REV, V41, P34, DOI 10.2307/2094371
   Boustan LP, 2009, J ECON HIST, V69, P755, DOI 10.1017/S0022050709001119
   Boyd R. L., 2009, SE GEOGRAPH, V49, P261
   Boyd RL, 2000, SOC SCI QUART, V81, P972
   Boyd RL, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P129, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12048
   Boyd RL, 2011, URBAN GEOGR, V32, P1066, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.32.7.1066
   Boyd RL, 2009, URBAN STUD, V46, P2061, DOI 10.1177/0042098009339434
   Butler JohnS., 1991, Entrepreneurship and Self-Help Among Black Americans: A Reconsideration of Race and Economics, DOI [10.1353/book4736, DOI 10.1353/BOOK4736]
   Collins WJ, 2014, AM ECON J-APPL ECON, V6, P220, DOI 10.1257/app.6.1.220
   CONZEN MP, 1977, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V67, P88, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1977.tb01122.x
   Darden JoeT. Richard W. Thomas., 2013, DETROIT RACE RIOTS R
   Davis GeorgeArliss., 1975, BLACKS US GEOGRAPHIC
   Drake St. Clair., 1962, BLACK METROPOLIS
   Eichenlaub SC, 2010, AM SOCIOL REV, V75, P101, DOI 10.1177/0003122409357047
   Fischer C.S., 1984, URBAN EXPERIENCE
   FISCHER CS, 1995, AM J SOCIOL, V101, P543, DOI 10.1086/230753
   Frazier E. F., 1966, NEGRO FAMILY CHICAGO
   Frazier E.Franklin., 1957, The Negro in the United States
   Gregory JN, 2005, SOUTHERN DIASPORA: HOW THE GREAT MIGRATIONS OF BLACK AND WHITE SOUTHERNERS TRANSFORMED AMERICA, P1
   Grigoryeva A, 2015, AM SOCIOL REV, V80, P814, DOI 10.1177/0003122415589170
   HAWLEY AH, 1972, DEMOGRAPHY, V9, P521, DOI 10.2307/2060663
   Higgs Robert., 1977, COMPETITION COERCION
   Ingham JN, 2003, BUS HIST REV, V77, P639, DOI 10.2307/30041232
   Kaplan D H., 2009, International Journal of Business and Globalization, V3, P256, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJBG.2009.023498
   Kaplan DH, 1998, URBAN GEOGR, V19, P489, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.19.6.489
   Landry Bart., 1987, NEW BLACK MIDDLE CLA
   Lieberson S., 1980, A Piece of the Pie: Blacks and White Immigrants Since 1880
   LIGHT I, 1977, AM SOCIOL REV, V42, P464, DOI 10.2307/2094751
   Light Ivan., 1972, Ethnic Enterprise in America: Business and Welfare Among Chinese, Japanese, and Blacks
   Light Ivan., 2000, Ethnic Economies
   Light IvanHubert., 1983, CITIES WORLD PERSPEC
   Logan JR, 2015, AM J SOCIOL, V120, P1055, DOI 10.1086/680680
   Meier August., 1976, From Plantation to Ghetto
   Ostransky Leroy., 1978, Jazz City: The Impact of Our Cities on the Development of Jazz
   Pearce David W., 1986, The MIT Dictionary of Modern Economics
   Price-Spratlen T, 1999, DEMOGRAPHY, V36, P553, DOI 10.1007/BF03208385
   Sowell Thomas., 1981, ETHNIC AM
   Sussman RobertWald., 2014, MYTH RACE TROUBLING
   Tolnay SE, 2003, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V29, P209, DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100009
   Tolnay SE, 2001, SOC SCI QUART, V82, P235, DOI 10.1111/0038-4941.00020
   U. S. Bureau of the Census, 1943, 16 CENS US 1940 1, VIII
   U. S. Bureau of the Census, 1943, 16 CENS US 1940 1, VII
   U. S. Bureau of the-Census, 1943, 16 CENS US 1940 2, VIII
   *US BUR CENS, 1933, CENS POP 1930, V2
   *US BUR CENS, 1933, CENS POP 1930, V4
   Waldinger R., 1990, ETHNIC ENTREPRENEURS
   Waldinger R., 1990, ETHNIC ENTREPRENEURS, P13
   Wang Q., 2014, J NANOMATER, V2014, P35
   Weems RobertE., 1998, DESEGREGATING DOLLAR
   WILSON KL, 1980, AM J SOCIOL, V86, P295, DOI 10.1086/227240
NR 56
TC 2
Z9 5
U1 0
U2 18
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0016-7185
EI 1872-9398
J9 GEOFORUM
JI Geoforum
PD AUG
PY 2017
VL 84
BP 1
EP 10
DI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.007
PG 10
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA FE5YK
UT WOS:000408287000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xie, ZQ
   Fu, XF
   Jiang, FS
   Deng, ZT
   Yin, SQ
   Xie, XY
   Zhao, L
   Wang, QS
   Ji, CH
   Zheng, DY
   Lian, JY
   Yuan, XD
AF Xie, Zhiqiang
   Fu, Xingfeng
   Jiang, Fengshan
   Deng, Zhanting
   Yin, Siqiao
   Xie, Xinyu
   Zhao, Lei
   Wang, Qisheng
   Ji, Chunhou
   Zheng, Daoyang
   Lian, Junyu
   Yuan, Xiangdong
TI Resilience Levels of Natural-Social Security in Urbanization: A Case
   Study of Kunming, China
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient city; Urban safety; Ecological safety; Flooding; Urban
   transportation; Resilience evaluation index system
ID FLOOD RESILIENCE; URBAN; FRAMEWORK; SCALE
AB In the context of the current global climate change, rapid urbanization, and sustained population growth, frequent natural and social disasters pose an increasingly serious threat to human life and property. The imperative to elevate the level of urban safety resilience has become a focal point in global urban disaster prevention and mitigation efforts. This study aims to examine the disaster resilience level in the central urban area of Kunming, Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, southwest China. Our focus lies on three representative dimensions: urban ecology, transportation, and flooding, which denote the natural, social, and combined natural-social safety resilience capacities of the study area. We identified indicator factors influencing urban safety resilience, categorizing them into resistance, adaptability, and resilience components. A disaster resilience evaluation system was constructed and quantitatively expressed in a geographic information system. By comparing the levels of urban ecological, transportation, and flood safety resilience in Kunming's central urban area, we unveil safety risks and associated problems related to urbanization in the process, along with their interconnections. Our findings indicate that urban flood resilience is generally higher in mature urban areas and new districts than in urban-rural and suburban areas. Additionally, improvements in urban ecological and transportation resilience contribute to enhanced urban flood resilience. Social factors significantly impact the level of urban safety resilience. This study offers valuable insights for constructing safe and resilient cities in mountainous regions, supporting decision-making in urban disaster planning research.
C1 [Xie, Zhiqiang; Fu, Xingfeng; Jiang, Fengshan; Deng, Zhanting; Yin, Siqiao; Xie, Xinyu; Wang, Qisheng; Zheng, Daoyang; Lian, Junyu] Yunnan Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Zhiqiang] Minist Water Resources, Res Ctr Mt Torrent & Geol Disaster Prevent, Wuhan 430010, Peoples R China.
   [Yin, Siqiao; Ji, Chunhou] Yunnan Univ, Inst Int River & Ecosecur, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Lei; Yuan, Xiangdong] Kunming Surveying & Mapping Management Ctr, Kunming 650000, Peoples R China.
C3 Yunnan University; Ministry of Water Resources; Yunnan University
RP Zhao, L (corresponding author), Kunming Surveying & Mapping Management Ctr, Kunming 650000, Peoples R China.
EM xzq_2019@ynu.edu.cn; fxf20000424@outlook.com;
   florachaing@mail.ynu.edu.cn; 2764427706@qq.com; 563474304@qq.com;
   415368548@qq.com; kmzhaolei@126.com; 2816847690@qq.com;
   jichunhou@mail.ynu.edu.cn; 2359232156@qq.com; 490485435@qq.com;
   3169008932@qq.com
RI Zheng, Daoyang/JHU-5339-2023; Zhang, Xitian/AAX-5010-2021; Fu,
   Xingfeng/LNP-5549-2024
OI Ji, Chouhou/0000-0002-1236-5993
FU CRSRI Open Research Program [CKWV20221029/KY]; National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [72361035]; Yunnan Province Industry Education
   Integration Postgraduate Joint Training Base Project [2022]; Science and
   Technology Plan Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Housing and
   Urban-Rural Development [K00000135]; Yunnan University Graduate
   Ideological and Political Demonstration Course Project [KCSZ202301]
FX This research was supported by several grants: CRSRI Open Research
   Program (Grant No. CKWV20221029/KY), National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (Grant No. 72361035), Yunnan Province Industry Education
   Integration Postgraduate Joint Training Base Project (2022), Science and
   Technology Plan Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Housing and
   Urban-Rural Development (Grant No. K00000135), and Yunnan University
   Graduate Ideological and Political Demonstration Course Project (Grant
   No. KCSZ202301). Finally, the authors express their gratitude to Kunming
   Surveying and Mapping Management Center and Guangzhou South Surveying &
   Mapping Instrument Co., Ltd. (SOUTH) for providing data and technical
   support in the process of writing this paper.
CR [Anonymous], Acta Ecologica Sinica, DOI [10.5846/stxb202101030007, DOI 10.5846/STXB202101030007]
   Bai GG, 2021, J HYDROL ENG, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002113
   [白帅 Bai Shuai], 2022, [水土保持通报, Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation], V42, P308
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Bing Q.L., 2017, Planners, V33, P12
   Cao Q, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13234887
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   [方东平 Fang Dongping], 2017, [土木工程学报, China Civil Engineering Journal], V50, P1
   Franchin P., 2013, P 11 INT C STRUCT SA
   Gao X., 2021, Constr. Small Towns, V39, P35, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1009-1483.2021.11.006, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-1483.2021.11.006]
   Goldsharke D. R., 2015, Urban Plann. Int, V30, P22
   Guo X., 2016, Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev, V1, P41
   Holling CS, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Hou X., 2018, Enterpr. Sci. Technol. Dev, V10, P51, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1674-0688.2018.10.021, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-0688.2018.10.021]
   [黄晶 Huang Jing], 2020, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V29, P2519
   Huang Z., 2017, Smart City, V1, P133
   Jing W., 2022, Traffic Transp., V38, P11
   Kunming Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Kunming statistical yearbook 2021
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   [李苏 Li Su], 2022, [干旱区地理, Arid Land Geography], V45, P1281
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Lv B., 2020, Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf, V20, P114
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   Nikinmaa L, 2020, CURR FOR REP, V6, P61, DOI 10.1007/s40725-020-00110-x
   Oladokun VO, 2017, INT J BUILD PATHOL, V35, P470, DOI 10.1108/IJBPA-12-2016-0029
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Peng J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007
   Qin Hui-yan, 2022, Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, V38, P281, DOI 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0465
   [仇保兴 Qiu Baoxing], 2018, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V25, P1
   Shen J., 2021, CHINA RESOUR COMPREH, V39, P55
   Tansar H, 2023, J HYDROL, V620, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129381
   汪辉, 2016, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V36, P4958
   Wang KW, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104783
   Wang L., 2018, Sci. Technol. Innovation, V16, P119, DOI [10.15913/j.cnki.kjycx.2018.16.119, DOI 10.15913/J.CNKI.KJYCX.2018.16.119]
   [王少剑 Wang Shaojian], 2021, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V76, P973
   Wu YW, 2022, J HYDROL, V613, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128349
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   [许洪国 Xu Hongguo], 2004, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science], V14, P34
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   Xu ZZ, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-39999-w
   [杨帆 Yang Fan], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P119
   [杨选梅 Yang Xuanmei], 2021, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P112
   Zang X., 2019, Urban Archit, V16, P34, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1673-0232.2019.15.009, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1673-0232.2019.15.009]
   [张欣 Zhang Xin], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P5243
   Zhang YY, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106862
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   [郑艳 Zheng Yan], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P31
   Zhou Hai-ju, 2022, Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, V38, P545, DOI 10.19741/j.issn.1673-4831.2021.0570
   Zhu SY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102355
NR 53
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 38
U2 60
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP 1
PY 2024
VL 150
IS 3
AR 05024029
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4539
PG 16
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA YU2F2
UT WOS:001270926900021
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fan, XY
   Liu, B
   Yang, XY
   Wang, K
   Wu, D
   Zhou, ZL
AF Fan, Xinyue
   Liu, Bin
   Yang, Xiaoyi
   Wang, Kai
   Wu, Dan
   Zhou, Zhongli
TI Correlation analysis between resilience and carbon emissions of
   resource-based cities based on scenario simulation against the dual
   carbon background
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
DE Resource-based cities; Carbon peaking; Urban resilience; Scenario
   analysis
ID ENERGY EFFICIENCY
AB Studying the correlation between resilience and carbon emissions in resource-based cities (RBCs) holds considerable significance for advancing regional sustainable development. Herein, by taking 18 RBCs in southwestern China as the research object, a carbon emission impact index system and an urban resilience index system were constructed. The resilience was quantified from the three dimensions of "resources - ecology - society", and divided into high, medium, and low categories. Besides, the LSTM model was utilized to simulate carbon peak scenarios in different types of cities and analyze the specific path to achieve low-carbon development. As indicated by the research results, between 2005 and 2020, the resilience and carbon emissions of Southwest China's RBCs presented fluctuations and showed an upward trend. Scenario simulation suggested that highly resilient cities were poised for sustainable development and necessitated a coordinated government structure; moderately resilient cities should prioritize clean energy development; and cities with low resilience should pursue steady growth, market expansion, and enhanced communication. Overall, this study provides support for the low-carbon development of RBCs.
C1 [Fan, Xinyue; Zhou, Zhongli] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Management Sci, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Bin; Yang, Xiaoyi; Wang, Kai; Wu, Dan; Zhou, Zhongli] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Math & Phys, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Fan, Xinyue; Liu, Bin; Yang, Xiaoyi; Wang, Kai; Zhou, Zhongli] Chengdu Univ Technol, Geomath Key Lab Sichuan Prov, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
C3 Chengdu University of Technology; Chengdu University of Technology;
   Chengdu University of Technology
RP Liu, B; Wu, D (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Math & Phys, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.; Liu, B (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ Technol, Geomath Key Lab Sichuan Prov, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
EM liubincim@163.com; wuud1029@163.com
RI fan, xinyue/ISA-0230-2023
FU Sichuan Science and Technology Program; Opening Fund of Sichuan Mineral
   Resources Research Center [SCKCZY2022-YB017, ZHJJ2022-YB002]; 
   [2023NSFSC0807]
FX This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program
   (2023NSFSC0807), Opening Fund of Sichuan Mineral Resources Research
   Center (SCKCZY2022-YB017) and the General Program of Sichuan Center for
   Disaster Economy Research (ZHJJ2022-YB002).
CR Ba R, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.08.004
   Bilgili M., 2022, TIME SERIES PREDICTI, DOI [10.1007/s00521-022-07275-5, DOI 10.1007/S00521-022-07275-5]
   Fan XY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109979
   Hua XZ, 2023, CLEAN RESPONS CONSUM, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100117
   Huang L., 2022, Sustain. Dev., V12, P1347
   Huang X, 2021, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V12683, P617, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-73200-4_47
   Jonek-Kowalska I, 2022, RESOUR POLICY, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102701
   Li QY, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101940
   Li X, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2021EF002339
   Li YJ, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V59, P1195, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.042
   Lin Y, 2020, ACTA MATER, V193, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.027
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu SW, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119083
   Raza MY, 2022, ENERGY, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123461
   Ren F, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V317, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128408
   Ren JWF, 2023, RESTOR ECOL, V31, DOI 10.1111/rec.13907
   Ripple WJ, 2023, BIOSCIENCE, V73, P841, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biad080
   Sarkar MSK, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SUSTAI, V18, P318
   Tan JT, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P471, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0878-6
   Tan SK, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V301, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113778
   Wang C, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V198, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.154
   Wang HT, 2022, CONNECT SCI, V34, P2466, DOI 10.1080/09540091.2022.2128047
   Wei J, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V757, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143912
   Yan Zhenhua, 2023, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2488/1/012006
   Yang Y, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12280-260220
   Yao F, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103113
   Yu WB, 2022, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V19, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3117882
   Yuan Y, 2022, ECOL ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106486
   Zhang HT, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V838, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156341
   Zhang HJ, 2022, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V269, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116142
   Zhang J, 2019, J HYDROL, V568, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.059
   Zhang W, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V102, P645, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03607-2
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu DM, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122968
   Zhu J, 2022, RESOUR POLICY, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102618
   Zhu Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103892
NR 36
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 23
U2 23
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD NOV 25
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 1
AR 29122
DI 10.1038/s41598-024-80416-z
PG 13
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA N2Y6S
UT WOS:001363058400002
PM 39582083
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ji, J
   Chen, JF
AF Ji, Juan
   Chen, Junfei
TI Urban flood resilience assessment using RAGA-PP and KL-TOPSIS model
   based on PSR framework: A case study of Jiangsu province, China
SO WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE assessment; KL-TOPSIS; projection pursuit; PSR framework; urban flood
   resilience
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
AB The research on urban flood resilience will contribute to build a more resilient city and provide valuable reference for municipal decision-makers. There are many frameworks and approaches for empirical studies on what constitutes urban flood resilience and how to evaluate it. In this study, a typical region suffering from flood disaster in China-Jiangsu Province was selected as the study area, including 13 prefecture-level cities. The pressure-state-response (PSR) framework, the projection pursuit based on real-coded accelerated genetic algorithm (RAGA-PP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution based on the Kullback-Leibler distance (KL-TOPSIS) were combined to develop a hybrid multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience. Then the grey relational analysis obtained the important factors. The results illustrate that (1) the development of each subsystem in the city is uncoordinated, that is, the pressure-subsystem has little influence on urban flood resilience, while the state-subsystem and the response-subsystem have great influence. (2) The urban flood resilience in Jiangsu Province presents obvious polarization trend, that is, Southern Jiangsu is more resilient than Northern Jiangsu. The underlying factors are closely related to the level of economic development. Furthermore, the proposed method provides a practical evaluation approach for other fields.
C1 [Ji, Juan; Chen, Junfei] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Junfei] Hohai Univ, Yangtze Inst Conservat & Dev, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Junfei] Yangtze Inst Conservat & High Qual Dev, Jiangsu Res Base, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China.
C3 Hohai University; Hohai University
RP Ji, J (corresponding author), Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China.
EM jijuan26@126.com
OI Ji, Juan/0000-0003-0596-8785
FU Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province;
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National
   Natural Science Foundation of China; National Key R&D Program of China; 
   [KYCX21_0443];  [B210207036];  [42071278];  [2019YFC0409000]
FX ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study has been funded by the Postgraduate Research
   & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No.
   KYCX21_0443), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
   Universities (Grant No. B210207036), National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (Grant No. 42071278), the National Key R&D Program of China
   (Grant No. 2019YFC0409000).
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Ali SA, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106620
   Asadzadeh A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.002
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Chen JL, 2021, J HYDROL, V601, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126601
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Douglass M, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V1, P271, DOI 10.1177/2514848618797333
   Gallego-Lopez C., 2016, Designing for infrastructure resilience
   Golz S, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P30, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.939090
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu Y.H., 2002, MATH PRACTICE THEORY, V4, P572, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0984.2002.04.009
   Jia HF, 2017, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V11, DOI 10.1007/s11783-017-0984-9
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Li ZM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101140
   Liang P, 2017, ADV ATMOS SCI, V34, P321, DOI 10.1007/s00376-016-6120-0
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lin CT, 2015, IEEE T SYST MAN CY-S, V45, P1389, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.2015.2406855
   Liu S., 2006, Grey Information: Theory and Practical Applications
   Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China, 2006, CHINA FLOOD DROUGHT
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   OECD, 1993, 1 OECD GROUP STAT EN
   Peyroux E, 2015, EUR J DEV RES, V27, P560, DOI 10.1057/ejdr.2015.52
   Qasim S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.009
   Rockefeller ARUP, 2015, CIT RES IND
   Sefton C, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100390
   Shen YW, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124159
   Sweya LN, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106165
   Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia LS, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V707, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136078
   Verrucci E., 2012, MULTIDISCIPLINARY IN
   Wagner Iwona, 2013, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002
   Wan B., 2017, MOD CITY RES, V09, P41, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-6000.2017.09.006
   Wang MM, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112472
   Wang WC, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P461, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1538-9
   Wang YT, 2019, WATER RES, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   WMO, 2019, The global climate in 20152019
   [赵方凯 Zhao Fangkai], 2018, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V38, P4109
   Zhu SY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102355
NR 39
TC 27
Z9 28
U1 29
U2 167
PU IWA PUBLISHING
PI LONDON
PA REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON,
   ENGLAND
SN 0273-1223
EI 1996-9732
J9 WATER SCI TECHNOL
JI Water Sci. Technol.
PD DEC 15
PY 2022
VL 86
IS 12
BP 3264
EP 3280
DI 10.2166/wst.2022.404
EA DEC 2022
PG 17
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA 7L1KW
UT WOS:000894933400001
PM 36579883
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Han, XH
   Wang, L
   Xu, DD
   Wei, H
   Zhang, XH
   Zhang, XD
AF Han, Xuehua
   Wang, Liang
   Xu, Dandan
   Wei, He
   Zhang, Xinghua
   Zhang, Xiaodong
TI Research Progress and Framework Construction of Urban Resilience
   Computational Simulation
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE urban resilience; computational simulation; urban planning; computing
   framework
ID MODEL; DISASTERS; CITIES; SYSTEM; INDEX
AB Simulating the dynamic process of urban resilience and analyzing the mechanism of resilience-influencing factors are of great significance to improve the intelligent decision-making ability of resilient urban planning. The purpose of this article is to implement a comprehensive literature review on the quantitative computation and simulation studies of urban resilience, investigating the characteristics of current research, including the most commonly applied methods, the most frequently space-time scales, the most popular research topics, and the most commonly involved risk types. Then, the study provides recommendations for future research: (1) research on multiple risk disturbance scenarios, (2) the computation of urban resilience from the public perspective, and (3) a computation-simulation framework with the goal of revealing the mechanism. Finally, this study constructs a resilience-computation simulation framework for resilient urban planning, which lays a foundation for the further development of urban-resilience dynamic-simulation computing and planning-scenario applications in the future.
C1 [Han, Xuehua; Wang, Liang; Xu, Dandan; Wei, He; Zhang, Xiaodong] Beijing Municipal Inst City Planning & Design, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Dandan; Zhang, Xinghua] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Phys Sci & Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Jiaotong University
RP Zhang, XD (corresponding author), Beijing Municipal Inst City Planning & Design, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China.
EM zhangxiaodong@bmicpd.com.cn
RI Xu, Dandan/H-7261-2019; Zhang, Xinghua/K-2471-2012; wei,
   he/KCY-2550-2024
OI wang, liang/0000-0003-3987-6678; HAN, XUEHUA/0000-0002-0819-4917
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2021YFA1000300, 2021YFA1000304];
   Beijing Science and Technology Plan [Z211100004121014]
FX This research is supported by theNational Key R&D Programof China (Nos.
   2021YFA1000300 and 2021YFA1000304) and the Beijing Science and
   Technology Plan (No. Z211100004121014).
CR Ba R, 2021, J SAF SCI RESIL, V2, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.05.002
   Bansal N, 2017, SPR TRANS CIV ENV EN, P109, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-2141-1_8
   Bozza A, 2017, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V32, P527, DOI 10.1111/mice.12275
   Burger A, 2019, FUTURE INTERNET, V11, DOI 10.3390/fi11050103
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   [陈长坤 Chen Changkun], 2018, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V28, P1
   [陈晓红 Chen Xiaohong], 2020, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V40, P2000
   Chen ZH, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101520
   [陈志端 Chen Zhiduan], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P1
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Datola G, 2019, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V11622, P108, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_9
   De Iuliis M, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107320
   De Iuliis M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.017
   DesRoches R., 2018, BRIDGE, V48, P2
   Dong SJ, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101443
   Dresback KM, 2019, J MAR SCI ENG, V7, DOI 10.3390/jmse7070225
   Dunn S, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000267
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Ferdowsi A, 2017, 2017 RESILIENCE WEEK (RWS), P184, DOI 10.1109/RWEEK.2017.8088670
   Forrest SA, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102843
   Gao JX, 2016, NATURE, V530, P307, DOI 10.1038/nature16948
   Gao SD, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04576-1
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grinberger AY, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V59, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.06.005
   Heinzlef C, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102762
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
   Honghu S, 2019, SCI GEOGR SIN, V39, P788
   [侯彩霞 Hou Caixia], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P117
   [黄晶 Huang Jing], 2020, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V29, P2519
   Huang WJ, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V71, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.04.003
   Kammouh O, 2018, ENG STRUCT, V173, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.093
   Kasmalkar IG, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aba2423
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Kryvasheyeu Y, 2016, SCI ADV, V2, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500779
   Laun A.W, 2022, THESIS G WASHINGTON
   Li GJ, 2021, CITIES, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103206
   Li QC, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P27189, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058568
   Li R, 2019, THESIS E CHINA NORMA
   Li T., 2017, Urban Planning International, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Li Zhengzhao, 2022, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V62, P266, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.22.037
   Links JM, 2018, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V12, P127, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.39
   [刘彦平 Liu Yanping], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P93
   Liu Z, 2019, THESIS NE NORMAL U C
   Lu L, 2020, URBAN PROBLEMS, V8, P42
   [吕悦风 Lyu Yuefeng], 2021, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V36, P2281
   Marasco S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102506
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Melendez A, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P1121, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05118-5
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Nateghi R, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P13478, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2792680
   Nejat A, 2020, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V35, P150, DOI 10.1111/mice.12487
   Oke AE, 2020, CONSTR ECON BUILD, V20, P45, DOI 10.5130/AJCEB.v20i2.6647
   Palmieri F, 2016, COMPUT ELECTR ENG, V56, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.02.012
   Peng L., 2021, P 2020 CHINA URBAN P, P214
   Podesta C, 2021, J R SOC INTERFACE, V18, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2021.0158
   [仇保兴 Qiu Baoxing], 2018, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V25, P1
   Rogov M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124431
   Roy D, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101458
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Salgado-Gálvez MA, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P1995, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2056-4
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Shao WW, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12050537
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Shi YJ, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16040618
   Sun L, 2019, RISK ANAL, V39, P1597, DOI 10.1111/risa.13277
   Taberna A., 2020, Social-Environmental Systems Modeling, DOI DOI 10.18174/SESMO.2020A17938
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Wang B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102884
   Wang HW, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102619
   Wang P, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P2575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04933-0
   [魏冶 Wei Ye], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P488
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   [颜文涛 Yan Wentao], 2021, [国际城市规划, Urban Planning International], V36, P1
   [杨秀平 Yang Xiuping], 2021, [地理与地理信息科学, Geography and Geo-information Science], V37, P78
   Yao F, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102448
   [臧鑫宇 Zang Xinyu], 2019, [科技导报（北京）, Science & Technology Review], V37, P94
   Zayas J., 2015, Urban Resilience Master Planning: A Guidebook for Practitioners and Policymakers
   [翟国方 Zhai Guofang], 2021, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V45, P44
   Zhang C, 2020, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V35, P1331, DOI 10.1111/mice.12576
   [张行 Zhang Hang], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P1450
   Zhang P., 2018, Urban Probl, V9, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180904, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.180904]
   [张姗琪 Zhang Shanqi], 2020, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V39, P1580
   [张晓东 Zhang Xiaodong], 2021, [指挥与控制学报, Journal of Command and Control], V7, P28
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
NR 91
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 16
U2 121
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 19
AR 11929
DI 10.3390/su141911929
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 5G6NA
UT WOS:000867112300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Addabbo, N
   Clemente, MF
   Quesada-Ganuza, L
   Khalek, RA
   Labattaglia, F
   Nocerino, G
   Prall, M
   Ruggiero, A
   Stoffels, S
   Tersigni, E
   Verde, S
   Visconti, C
   Leone, MF
AF Addabbo, Nicola
   Clemente, Maria Fabrizia
   Quesada-Ganuza, Laura
   Khalek, Riwa Abdel
   Labattaglia, Federica
   Nocerino, Giovanni
   Prall, Mia
   Ruggiero, Angela
   Stoffels, Sara
   Tersigni, Enza
   Verde, Sara
   Visconti, Cristina
   Leone, Mattia Federico
TI A Framework for Climate Resilient Urban Design: The Case of Porte de
   Montreuil, Paris
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban climate resilience; climate resilient urban design; multi-scale
   design; climate change adaptation; climate change mitigation;
   co-benefits
ID MEAN RADIANT TEMPERATURE; BUILDING ENVELOPE; MULTISCALE; MORPHOLOGY;
   CITIES
AB With the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme climate events in cities, it is essential to develop multi-scale and multi-hazard design tools to ensure urban climate resilience. A designed approach to urban development across spatial scales offers the opportunity to integrate diverse fields to create a strong multidisciplinary knowledge base and avoid fragmented planning approaches. This paper proposes a process-based methodological framework for climate resilient urban design-integrating analysis of climate impact with concerns of local communities. A combined focus on climate impact and co-benefits enables a design process with the ability to promote adaptation and mitigation while also addressing diverse urban challenges and responding to local needs and priorities. The proposed methodological framework is applied in the context of the climate resilient urban redevelopment of the Porte de Montreuil district in Paris, France. The results show that the Porte de Montreuil area is at risk from heat waves as a result of the urban characteristics of the area. However, it is possible to suggest specific design measures that integrate local planning priorities with climate resilient design measures to decrease the risk and improve climate resilience in the area.
C1 [Addabbo, Nicola; Nocerino, Giovanni; Leone, Mattia Federico] Univ Naples Federico II, Ctr Studi PLINIVS, I-80134 Naples, Italy.
   [Clemente, Maria Fabrizia; Labattaglia, Federica; Tersigni, Enza; Verde, Sara; Visconti, Cristina; Leone, Mattia Federico] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Architecture, I-80134 Naples, Italy.
   [Quesada-Ganuza, Laura] Univ Basque Country UPV, Sch Engn Bilbao, Mech Engn Dept, EHU, Leioa 48940, Spain.
   [Khalek, Riwa Abdel; Stoffels, Sara] Univ Int Catalunya U, Dept Architecture, Barcelona 08195, Spain.
   [Prall, Mia] Aalborg Univ, Dept Planning, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
   [Ruggiero, Angela] Univ Gustave Eiffel, Dept Genie Urbain, F-77447 Marne La Vallee, France.
C3 University of Naples Federico II; University of Naples Federico II;
   University of Basque Country; Aalborg University; Universite
   Gustave-Eiffel
RP Addabbo, N (corresponding author), Univ Naples Federico II, Ctr Studi PLINIVS, I-80134 Naples, Italy.
EM nicola.addabbo@unina.it; mariafabrizia.clemente@unina.it;
   laura.quesada@ehu.eus; riwa.abdelkhalek@gmail.com;
   federicalabdesign@gmail.com; giovanni.nocerino@unina.it;
   mcp@plan.aau.dk; angela.ruggiero@u-pem.fr; sara.stoffels@vlaanderen.be;
   enza.tersigni@unina.it; sara.verde@unina.it; cristina.visconti@unina.it;
   mattia.leone@unina.it
RI Leone, Mattia/L-4807-2018; Quesada-Ganuza, Laura/ABA-2494-2021
OI Addabbo, Nicola/0009-0000-7882-3830; Ruggiero,
   Angela/0009-0002-4286-2832; Tersigni, Enza/0000-0002-2981-1603;
   NOCERINO, GIOVANNI/0000-0002-6778-6971; Prall, Mia
   Cassidy/0000-0003-3332-6464; Visconti, Cristina/0000-0003-3773-254X;
   VERDE, SARA/0000-0002-2339-5936; Quesada-Ganuza,
   Laura/0000-0001-8225-575X; LEONE, MATTIA FEDERICO/0000-0003-2434-509X
FU The work in this paper presents the results from the research and
   educational activities carried out by the working group from the
   University of Naples Federico II (UNINA) and Urban Climate Change
   Research Network European Hub, as part of the international; University
   of Naples Federico II (UNINA); Urban Climate Change Research Network
   European Hub
FX The work in this paper presents the results from the research and
   educational activities carried out by the working group from the
   University of Naples Federico II (UNINA) and Urban Climate Change
   Research Network European Hub, as part of the international mobility
   programs organized within the projects UCCRN_edu
   (<URI>www.uccrn.education</URI>, accessed on 1 June 2023), coordinated
   by UNINA (Italy), and CRUD-Climate Resilient Urban Design
   (<URI>https://www.laburba.com/recherches/crud/</URI>, accessed on 1 June
   2023)-coordinated by University Gustave Eiffel (UGE, France). The
   authors would like to thank Bruno Barroca and Margot Pellegrino from
   UGE, organizers and curators of the workshops in Paris.
CR [Anonymous], about us
   [Anonymous], TVK Porte de Montreuil - Projet urbain
   Ascione F, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P10809, DOI 10.3390/su70810809
   Badach J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159688
   Brears R.C., 2018, Blue and Green Cities: The Role of Blue-Green Infrastructure in Managing Urban Water Resources, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-41393-32, 10.1057/978-1-137-59258-3, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59258-3]
   City of Paris, 2018, Green Parks and Environment, Urban Ecology Agency Paris Climate Action Plan
   CLARITY Project Consortium, 2019, Clarity D3.2 Science Support Report V1
   Di Napoli C, 2021, GEOSCI DATA J, V8, P2, DOI 10.1002/gdj3.102
   European Commission, 2013, Non-Paper Guidelines for Project Managers: Making Vulnerable Investments Climate Resilient
   Hewitt C, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P831, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1745
   IPCC, 2021, AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
   Javanroodi K., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V588, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032036
   Jeffrey R., 2011, Resilient Cities: Cities and Adaptation to Climate Change-Proceedings of the Global Forum 2010
   Kandya A, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V164, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.014
   Kennedy S, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P5259, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.038
   Koutra S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.011
   Krüger E, 2014, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V58, P1727, DOI 10.1007/s00484-013-0777-1
   Langergraber G, 2020, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V2, P173, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2020.933
   Leone M., 2020, Progetto Resiliente e Adattamento Climatico. Metodologie, P94
   Leone MF, 2018, TECHNE, V15, P299, DOI 10.13128/Techne-22076
   Lindberg F, 2016, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V60, P1439, DOI 10.1007/s00484-016-1135-x
   Lindberg F, 2011, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V105, P311, DOI 10.1007/s00704-010-0382-8
   Losasso M, 2015, TECHNE, V10, P4
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Paiho S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102143
   Pellegrino M, 2017, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.007
   Pozoukidou G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020928
   Raven J., 2018, Climate Change and Cities eds, P139, DOI [10.1017/9781316563878.012, DOI 10.1017/9781316563878.012]
   Reinventing Cities, Designing a Green and Just Urban Future
   Romero-Lankao P, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P754, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0
   Rosenzweig C., 2018, CLIMATE CHANGE CITIE, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781316563878
   Santos LGR, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100776
   Tang YT, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12451
   Thorsson S, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V10, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.01.004
   URBAN DESIGN CLIMATE WORKSHOP #1, Report
   Urrutia-Azcona K, 2019, DYNA-BILBAO, V94, P676, DOI 10.6036/9273
   Ville de Paris, Projet 20e - Porte de Montreuil
   Yu BL, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P4359, DOI 10.1080/01431160802555846
   Zuccaro G, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101783
   Zuccaro G, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.693319
   Zuccaro G, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.112
NR 41
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 47
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 18
AR 13857
DI 10.3390/su151813857
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA S7AT5
UT WOS:001072664600001
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, L
   Li, JY
   Lv, LG
AF Wang, Liang
   Li, Jingye
   Lv, Ligang
TI Urban Resilience and Its Links to City Size: Evidence from the Yangtze
   River Economic Belt in China
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; city size; spatial heterogeneity; obstacle factors;
   Yangtze River Economic Belt
ID COUPLING COORDINATION; URBANIZATION; SECURITY
AB Understanding the relationship between city size and resilience is crucial for informed decisions on preparedness and interventions in building resilient cities. This study addresses this issue by dividing urban resilience into four components: stability, redundancy, resourcefulness, and connectivity. Using the above evaluation framework, we assessed the spatial-temporal variations in the relationship between city size and resilience in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2005 to 2020. The findings shows that, overall, resilience increased in the cities, with larger populations and spatial scales showing greater resilience, but both megacities and small cities experienced a decline in resilience. In terms of the four components of resilience, most of the region's cities have roughly equal connectivity and stability, but redundancy and resourcefulness vary by city size and location. Specifically, downstream and larger cities demonstrated better crisis resolution and innovation. The dominant coupling coordination states showed antagonism between population and resilience. Upstream areas experienced a mismatch between "low resilience" and "large population", while a moderate coordination existed between spatial scale and resilience. Further, it was found that factors hindering urban resilience varied according to city size. Cities with a population of <3 million faced low connectivity and limited transformation capacity. Those with a population of 3-5 million had moderate connectivity limitations, while cities with a population >5 million faced energy and aging population challenges. This study contributes to urban resilience discourse by providing a conceptual understanding and empirical analysis of the impact of city size on resilience.
C1 [Wang, Liang] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Jingye] Hohai Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Dept Land Resource Management, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Jingye] Chinese Acad Sci, Nanjing Inst Geog & Limnol, Key Lab Watershed Geog Sci, Nanjing 210008, Peoples R China.
   [Lv, Ligang] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Adm, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Hohai University; Chinese Academy of
   Sciences; Nanjing Institute of Geography & Limnology, CAS; Nanjing
   University of Finance & Economics
RP Lv, LG (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Adm, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China.
EM wangliang@casisd.cn; jingye.li@hhu.edu.cn; liganglv@nufe.edu.cn
RI Wang, Liang/LDF-5708-2024; li, jingye/HJY-6670-2023; Lv,
   Ligang/GYJ-1373-2022
OI Lv, Ligang/0000-0003-3840-6455; Wang, Liang/0000-0001-7906-2615; Li,
   Jingye/0000-0001-6561-2962
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China
FX No Statement Available
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Al Nasiri N, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V11, P10, DOI 10.1177/0975425320906307
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Beck U., 1992, Risk society: Towards a new modernity, V17
   Bettencourt LMA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
   Birkmann J, 2016, NATURE, V537, P605, DOI 10.1038/537605a
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Capello R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P951, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   City Resilience Index, 2014, City Resilience Framework, VVolume 4, P928
   Cottineau C, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0183919
   Deng XZ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P3, DOI 10.1007/s11442-021-1930-0
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Earl C, 2020, CITY SOC, DOI [10.1111/ciso.12306, 10.1111/CISO.12306]
   Fan YP, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106659
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Feng XH, 2020, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V30, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s11769-020-1163-7
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Giddens A., 1994, CONS QUENCES MODERNI
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102580
   Hua JY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102507
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jiang JK, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V850, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158076
   Kim S, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V111, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.001
   Kuang WH, 2019, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V62, P1591, DOI 10.1007/s11430-018-9342-3
   Lee VJ, 2020, LANCET INFECT DIS, V20, P17, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30674-7
   Lei WQ, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P1889, DOI 10.1177/00420980211017817
   Li Q, 2021, REG SUSTAIN, V2, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.regsus.2021.04.001
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Lloyd, 2015, Lloyds City Risk Index 20152025. City Risk Executive Summary
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Michel-Kerjan E, 2015, NATURE, V524, P389, DOI 10.1038/524389a
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Stier A.J., 2020, arXiv, V2003, P10376
   UN-Habitat, 2017, New Urban Agenda: Habitat III: Quito 1720 October 2016
   van Putten I, 2017, AUST GEOGR, V48, P121, DOI 10.1080/00049182.2016.1168727
   Wang L, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P363, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1603-4
   Xiao Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104148
   Yang XY, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P13171, DOI 10.1007/s10668-022-02610-1
   Zhang X, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P1831, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-1831-2022
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zhou BB, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105228
NR 56
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 16
U2 40
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD DEC
PY 2023
VL 12
IS 12
AR 2131
DI 10.3390/land12122131
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DL3H9
UT WOS:001132154600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Feng, XH
   Xiu, CL
   Li, JX
   Zhong, YX
AF Feng, Xinghua
   Xiu, Chunliang
   Li, Jianxin
   Zhong, Yexi
TI Measuring the Evolution of Urban Resilience Based on the
   Exposure-Connectedness-Potential (ECP) Approach: A Case Study of
   Shenyang City, China
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive cycle; exposure-connectedness-potential (ECP); spatial-temporal
   characteristics; urban resilience; Shenyang city
ID SYSTEM RESILIENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES;
   ROTTERDAM; CITIES; FLOODS
AB Resilience is a new path to express and enhance urban sustainability. Cities suffer from natural shocks and human-made disturbances due to rapid urbanization and global climate change. The construction of an urban resilient developmental environment is restricted by these factors. Strengthening the comprehensive evaluation of resilience is conducive to identifying high-risk areas in cities, guiding regional risk prevention, and providing a scientific basis for differentiated strategies for urban resilience governance. For this study, taking Shenyang city as a case study, the resilience index system was constructed as an ECP ("exposure", "connectedness", and "potential") framework, and the adaptive cycle model was introduced into the resilience assessment framework. This model not only comprehensively considers the relationship between exposure and potential but also helps to focus on the temporal and spatial dynamics of urban resilience. The results show that the exposed indicators have experienced three spatial evolution stages, including single-center circle expansion, multicenter clustering, and multicenter expansion. The potential index increased radially from the downtown area to the outer suburbs, and the low-value area presented a multicenter pattern. The spatial agglomeration of connectivity indicators gradually weakened. The results reflect the fact that the resilience level of the downtown area has been improved and the resilience of the outer expansion area has declined due to urban construction. The multicenter cluster pattern is conducive to the balance of resilience levels. In terms of the adaptive cycle phases of urban resilience, the first ring has gone through three phases: exploitation (r), conservation (K), and release (omega). The second and third rings have gradually shifted from the exploitation (r) phase to the conservation (K) phase. The fourth ring has entered the exploitation (r) phase from the reorganization (alpha) phase. The fifth ring and its surrounding areas are in the reorganization (alpha) phase. The results provide specific spatial guidance for implementing resilient urban planning and realizing sustainable urban development.
C1 [Feng, Xinghua; Zhong, Yexi] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
   [Xiu, Chunliang] Northeastern Univ, Jangho Architecture Coll, Shenyang 110169, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Jianxin] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Jiangxi Inst Econ Dev, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
C3 Jiangxi Normal University; Northeastern University - China; Jiangxi
   Normal University
RP Li, JX (corresponding author), Jiangxi Normal Univ, Jiangxi Inst Econ Dev, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China.
EM 005383@jxnu.edu.cn; xiuchunliang@mail.neu.edu.cn; lijianxin@jxnu.edu.cn;
   zhongyexi@jxnu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42001189, 41471141];
   Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed
   Research (Jiangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education [PK2020006];
   Science and Technology Research of Jiangxi Provincial Department of
   Education [GJJ200315]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. 42001189, 41471141), the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory
   of Poyang Lake Wetland and Watershed Research (Jiangxi Normal
   University), Ministry of Education (Grant No. PK2020006) and Science and
   Technology Research of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (Grant
   No. GJJ200315).
CR Acuti D, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102608
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allen CR, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P625, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12634
   Assumma V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V756, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143806
   Ayub B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102925
   Bai LM, 2019, HABITAT INT, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102042
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Caprotti F, 2017, URBAN RES PRACT, V10, P367, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2016.1275618
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Cariolet JM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V615, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.334
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   Childers DL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Cobbinah PB, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104948
   Cutter SL, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P25, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.768076
   Dessavre DG, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V149, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.009
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Etinay N, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.074
   Feng XH, 2020, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V30, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s11769-020-1163-7
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forrest SA, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102843
   Galderisi A., 2014, Z Magazine (Boston, V11, P36
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Heinzlef C, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1049, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1049-2020
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Ilgen S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050983
   Ilmola L, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_11
   Jönsson K, 2021, DEV POLICY REV, V39, P181, DOI 10.1111/dpr.12497
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li T., 2017, Urban Planning International, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Li Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P1505, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.227
   Liu LJ, 2020, MATH BIOSCI ENG, V17, P7302, DOI 10.3934/mbe.2020374
   Liu ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Luo FH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moglia M, 2021, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100052
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Pamukcu-Albers P, 2021, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V36, P665, DOI 10.1007/s10980-021-01212-y
   Parker J, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080252
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Sharifi A., 2021, COVID-19: Systemic risk and resilience, P285
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Shiau TA, 2013, ECOL INDIC, V34, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.001
   Simonovic S. P., 2013, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V3, P378, DOI 10.9734/BJECC/2013/2504
   Singh R, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P29, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.819431
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang P, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P2575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04933-0
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Weichselgartner J., 2014, A/Z ITU J. Fac. Archit., V11, P20
   Yang ZP, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10060573
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
   Zuccaro G, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.112
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V44, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.05.001
NR 74
TC 13
Z9 16
U1 11
U2 109
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 10
IS 12
AR 1305
DI 10.3390/land10121305
PG 22
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA YA2RD
UT WOS:000738185900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, B
   Han, S
   Ao, YB
   Liao, FW
AF Wang, Bo
   Han, Shan
   Ao, Yibin
   Liao, Fangwei
TI Evaluation and Factor Analysis for Urban Resilience: A Case Study of
   Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE sustainable urban development; urban resilience; influencing factors;
   Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration
AB Resilient cities provide a new operating mechanism for sustainable urban development and can effectively reduce urban disaster losses. Urban resilience has become an important research topic, but few scholars focus on the urban resilience of urban agglomerations in western China. Therefore, this paper takes the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration of China as the study area and aims to evaluate the resilience level of cities in typical regions of western China. This study uses multiple interdisciplinary methods, such as the entropy weight method, Theil index, and geographically and temporally weighted regression, to evaluate the resilience levels of 16 cities in the region and discuss the influencing factors of regional urban resilience. The results show that the urban resilience of cities in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration has evolved from a low to high level. Additionally, there are significant spatial differences in urban resilience in the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration, and the resilience levels of cities in the east and west of the region are relatively high, while the resilience levels of cities in the south and north are relatively low. Further research found that factors such as administrative level, marketization level, industrial structure, population density, urbanization level, and emergency facility level all have a significant positive impact on the improvement of urban resilience, but this impact has spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Based on the above research results, the strategies have been proposed from the perspective of sustainable urban development to provide a new theoretical support and decision-making reference for improving the resilience level of urban agglomerations in western China.
C1 [Wang, Bo; Han, Shan] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
   [Ao, Yibin] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Liao, Fangwei] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China.
C3 Southwest University of Science & Technology - China; Chengdu University
   of Technology; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Science &
   Technology of China, CAS
RP Han, S (corresponding author), Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, Peoples R China.; Ao, YB (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
EM boy@swust.edu.cn; hanshan2020@mails.swust.edu.cn;
   aoyibin10@mail.cdut.edu.cn; lfw377801@163.com
RI Han, Shan/KJL-9072-2024
OI Han, Shan/0009-0003-0024-1584; Wang, Bo/0000-0002-5519-6309; Ao,
   Yibin/0000-0001-7288-638X
FU Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2022JDR0229]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [72171028]; Sichuan Mineral Resources
   Research Center [SCKCZY2022-YB001]
FX This research was funded by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program
   (2022JDR0229), National Natural Science Foundation of China (72171028),
   and Sichuan Mineral Resources Research Center (SCKCZY2022-YB001).
CR [Anonymous], PR NEWSWIRE
   [Anonymous], XINHUA
   Aoki N, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.025
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082286
   Bruzzone M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147824
   Bueno S, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102588
   Cardoso MA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062349
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   China Government Net, 14 5 YEAR PLAN NATL
   China Government Net Ministry of Emergency Management of the People's Republic of China, MIN EM MAN REL BAS S
   China Government Net The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council issued the, OUTL CONSTR PLAN CHE
   Das S, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P950, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01241-7
   [董丽晶 Dong Lijing], 2020, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V40, P1142
   Fan JH, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18115827
   Ghouchani M, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P3966, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00752-8
   Grantham Theodore E., 2019, Water Security, V8, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2019.100049
   Guo P, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010229
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Javadpoor M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102609
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Khan M, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000749
   Kumar R, 2021, J MATER RES TECHNOL, V10, P1471, DOI 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.114
   Lam NSN, 2014, J COASTAL RES, P473, DOI 10.2112/SI70-080.1
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   Ma XF, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052899
   Mallick SK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103196
   Mallick SK, 2021, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V2, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.06.002
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Moradi A, 2021, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V18, P2441, DOI 10.1007/s13762-021-03377-0
   Motesharrei S, 2016, NATL SCI REV, V3, P470, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nww081
   Mujjuni F, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111684
   Opach T, 2020, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V74, P181, DOI 10.1080/00291951.2020.1753236
   Panda A, 2018, P 8 INT C BUILD RES
   Parsons M, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.005
   Ruan JE, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102578
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Sarker MNI, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101769
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Shen LY, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006
   Simmons DE, 2018, J COMPLEX NETW, V6, P859, DOI 10.1093/comnet/cnx061
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Tasyürek M, 2021, J FAC ENG ARCHIT GAZ, V36, P715, DOI 10.17341/gazimmfd.757131
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   United Nations, CONV DECL RET SYST N
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, WORLD URB OUTL REP W
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Zanotti L, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11642-250304
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 61
TC 16
Z9 18
U1 39
U2 260
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD JUL
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 7
AR 962
DI 10.3390/buildings12070962
PG 20
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA 3G9AS
UT WOS:000831639200001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Han, H
   Bai, XM
   Costanza, R
   Dong, L
AF Han, Hao
   Bai, Xuemei
   Costanza, Robert
   Dong, Liang
TI The effects of COVID-19 on the resilience of urban life in China
SO NPJ URBAN SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
ID CLIMATE RESILIENCE; SYSTEMS-APPROACH; VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT; CITIES;
   EXPERIENCES; ADAPTATION; GOVERNMENT; IMPACTS; POLICY
AB Understanding the impacts of COVID-19 on citizens from different cities is crucial for urban resilience-building and reducing inequal resilience distribution. However, little research focuses on urban life at the individual level, particularly in second- and third-tier cities. An online survey was therefore conducted to collect data on how COVID-19 affected the cities and urban residents in mainland China. The results indicate that COVID-19 limited citizens' access to healthcare facilities and socioeconomic activities apart from the immediate health crisis. Most citizens suffered reduced income, unemployment, and social anxiety. However, COVID-19 also raised social awareness and actions for disaster adaptation. The Chinese pandemic management has strengthened governmental leadership and credibility among most citizens in the early stage. Importantly, the results suggested that citizens in first-tier cities appeared more resilient to pandemics than those in second-tier cities. A networked resilience framework was therefore discussed for resilience-building policy implications.
C1 [Han, Hao; Dong, Liang] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
   [Bai, Xuemei] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, B141,B48,B48A,Linnaeus Way, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
   [Costanza, Robert] UCL, Inst Global Prosper, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NE, England.
   [Dong, Liang] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
C3 City University of Hong Kong; Australian National University; University
   of London; University College London; City University of Hong Kong
RP Dong, L (corresponding author), City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.; Bai, XM (corresponding author), Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, B141,B48,B48A,Linnaeus Way, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.; Dong, L (corresponding author), City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
EM xuemei.bai@anu.edu.au; liadong@cityu.edu.hk
RI Dong, Liang/IAR-4638-2023; Costanza, Robert/AAJ-3546-2021; Bai,
   Xuemei/A-5443-2012; Costanza, Robert/A-4912-2008
OI Dong, Liang/0000-0001-9747-5851; Bai, Xuemei/0000-0001-6556-8041; Hao,
   Han/0000-0002-8199-2616; Costanza, Robert/0000-0001-6348-8734
FU Fenner School of Environment and Society at the Australian National
   University; National Science Foundation, China (NSFC); Dutch Research
   Council (NWO); NSFC [72061137071]; NWO [482.19.608]; Youth Project of
   the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41701636]
FX This research was funded by the Fenner School of Environment and Society
   at the Australian National University. The fourth author also thanks the
   support from the National Science Foundation, China (NSFC), and the
   Dutch Research Council (NWO). [NSFC grant number 72061137071; NWO grant
   number 482.19.608], and the Youth Project of the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [grant number 41701636].
CR Abramowitz Sharon Alane, 2015, PLoS Negl Trop Dis, V9, pe0003706, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003706
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Alon T., 2020, NBER Working Paper Series
   Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Bai Xuemei, 2024, Science, V383, peado5304, DOI 10.1126/science.ado5304
   Bai XM, 2020, NATURE, V584, P517, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-02459-2
   Bai XM, 2017, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V42, P215, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061128
   Bai XM, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V23, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.010
   Balica SF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P2571, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.183
   Bruce C, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0262301
   Bureau D. S., 2019, Dongguan Statistical Yearbook 2019
   Bureau S. S., 2019, Shenzhen Statistical Yearbook 2019
   Bureau Z. S., 2019, Zhanjiang Statistical Yearbook 2019
   Cajigal E., Sustainable Development Research and Practice in Mexico and Selected Latin American Countries, P185, DOI [10.1007/978-3, DOI 10.1007/978-3]
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   China T. S. C. I. O. o. t. P. s. R. o, 2020, FIGHT COVID 19 CHIN
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Cutter SL, 2020, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V19, P10, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2018.1511405
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   Deng CY, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128663
   Development M. O. H. A. U.-R., 2019, Statistic Yearbook of Chinese Urban Development
   DeWit A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101808
   Eckersley P, 2018, PUBLIC MONEY MANAGE, V38, P335, DOI 10.1080/09540962.2018.1477642
   Fan B, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V211, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.168
   Forrest SA, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102843
   Gautam S, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P4953, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00818-7
   Georgeson L, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P584, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2944, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2944]
   Göransson G, 2021, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V11, P376, DOI 10.1007/s13412-021-00696-z
   Guardaro M, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102886
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Haldane V, 2021, NAT MED, V27, P964, DOI 10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y
   Han ZQ, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P437, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2699-9
   He CY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V12, P805, DOI 10.1007/s13753-021-00385-z
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hossain MZ, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P407, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9888-2
   Index, 2014, C. R. City Resilience Framework, V928
   Javadpoor M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102609
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Karanth A, 2014, DEV PRACT, V24, P514, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2014.911246
   Killgore WDS, 2020, PSYCHIAT RES, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113216
   Liu HX, 2016, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V39, P258, DOI 10.1080/01900692.2015.1004090
   Lupe SE, 2020, CURR OPIN GASTROEN, V36, P295, DOI 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000646
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Mandel Antoine, 2020, Econ Disaster Clim Chang, V4, P431, DOI 10.1007/s41885-020-00066-z
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McCartney G, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103130
   McKibbin W, 2021, ASIAN ECON PAP, V20, P1, DOI 10.1162/asep_a_00796
   Meerow S, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P2649, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17723630
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Midoes C, 2022, SOC INDIC RES, V161, P125, DOI 10.1007/s11205-021-02811-7
   Okware SI, 2015, AFR HEALTH SCI, V15, P312, DOI 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.45
   Ostadtaghizadeh A., 2015, PLOS Curr., V7, DOI [10.1371/currents.dis.2a9f81-8b72aa6fa44b5a7a4f19d8b36, DOI 10.1371/CURRENTS.DIS.2A9F81-8B72AA6FA44B5A7A4F19D8B36]
   Pietromonaco PR, 2021, AM PSYCHOL, V76, P438, DOI 10.1037/amp0000714
   Prime H, 2020, AM PSYCHOL, V75, P631, DOI 10.1037/amp0000660
   Qian Y, 2020, RES SOC STRAT MOBIL, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100522
   Rey T, 2017, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V26, P259, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2016-0137
   Rezende OM, 2019, J HYDROL, V576, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.063
   Rose Adam., 2004, Disaster Prevention and Management, V13, P307, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410556528
   Rosenzweig B, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.020
   Sampathkumar P, 2003, MAYO CLIN PROC, V78, P882, DOI 10.4065/78.7.882
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Schulze Peter., 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, DOI [10.17226/4919, DOI 10.17226/4919]
   Seitzinger SP, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P787, DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0353-7
   Shammi M, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04063
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sher L, 2020, QJM-INT J MED, V113, P707, DOI 10.1093/qjmed/hcaa202
   Song QY, 2021, CHIN J URBAN ENV STU, V09, DOI 10.1142/S234574812150010X
   Sung CH, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12051401
   Tahir M, 2013, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V18, P4
   Thoi PT, 2020, CITY SOC, V32, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12284
   Tiernan A, 2019, POLICY DES PRACT, V2, P53, DOI 10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Torabi E, 2018, CITIES, V72, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.008
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2022, UNDESA/POP/2022/TR/NO.3
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Wamsler C, 2014, ROUTL CRIT INTRO URB, P1
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Wilson MT, 2020, BUILD RES INF, V48, P84, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2019.1642731
   Wooldridge J.M., 2016, Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, Vsixth
   Zhang J, 2020, CITY SOC, V32, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12264
   Zhang SS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V170, P1404, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.205
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhong NS, 2004, PHILOS T R SOC B, V359, P1115, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2004.1491
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2021, ENVIRON DEV, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100552
NR 93
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 11
U2 19
PU SPRINGERNATURE
PI LONDON
PA CAMPUS, 4 CRINAN ST, LONDON, N1 9XW, ENGLAND
EI 2661-8001
J9 NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN
JI npj Urban Sustain.
PD JUL 4
PY 2024
VL 4
IS 1
AR 32
DI 10.1038/s42949-024-00167-8
PG 13
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA XN2M5
UT WOS:001262299400002
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xu, WP
   Kong, YL
   Proverbs, D
   Zhang, YW
   Zhang, Y
   Xu, JT
AF Xu, Wenping
   Kong, Yuli
   Proverbs, David
   Zhang, Yuwan
   Zhang, Yuan
   Xu, Jitao
TI A Water Resilience Evaluation Model for Urban Cities
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE DEMATEL method; ANP method; water resilience; evaluation model
ID SPONGE CITY; MANAGEMENT; SATISFACTION; STORMWATER; SIMULATION; SOUTHERN;
   DESIGN
AB Cities around the world are having to become more resilient to the effects of climate change and ongoing development pressures and consequently are seeking to improve urban water resource management. In order to analyze the key factors affecting a city's water resilience, this research establishes an urban water resilience evaluation model. The DEMATEL method is used to calculate the intensity of the interaction among the water resilience indicators and to establish their causal relationships. Then, an ANP structured diagram is established and the weighting of the water resilience evaluation index for the city of Wuhan is obtained using the Super Decisions software. The key water resilience factors for Wuhan are shown to have significant mutual influences, with the main factors found to be the utilization of rainwater resources, the utilization of reclaimed water, and the total annual runoff control of the city. This method provides a sound basis for the evaluation of urban water resilience with scope to extend this to other cities. The results provide useful guidance for policy makers and other key stakeholders in supporting more sustainable urban development.
C1 [Xu, Wenping; Kong, Yuli; Zhang, Yuwan; Zhang, Yuan; Xu, Jitao] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Evergrande Sch Management, Wuhan 430065, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Wenping] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Ctr Serv Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430065, Peoples R China.
   [Proverbs, David] Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Sci & Engn, Wolverhampton WV1 1NA, England.
C3 Wuhan University of Science & Technology; Wuhan University of Science &
   Technology; University of Wolverhampton
RP Proverbs, D (corresponding author), Univ Wolverhampton, Fac Sci & Engn, Wolverhampton WV1 1NA, England.
EM xuwenping@wust.edu.cn; kyl1395433242@163.com; proverbs@wlv.ac.uk;
   zywzzjya@163.com; zhangyuanzy123@163.com; xjt19107125312@163.com
RI Proverbs, David/AAL-1178-2020
OI Kong, Yuli/0000-0002-0644-5647; xu, wenping/0000-0003-4474-1583;
   Proverbs, David/0000-0002-3297-2205
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [71503194]; Foundation of
   Education Department of Hubei Province [B2020312]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China [grant no.71503194], the Foundation of Education Department of
   Hubei Province [grant no. B2020312].
CR Adedeji T, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081699
   Aini MS, 2001, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V15, P31, DOI 10.1023/A:1012256903509
   Al-Ghuraiz Y, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1243, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.028
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Andrés-Doménech I, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P1320, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.011
   [Anonymous], 2012, World Water Development Report 4
   Babaei S, 2018, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V105, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2018.02.002
   Braga IFB, 2021, TECHNOL SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101687
   Chai NJ, 2022, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V36, P3439, DOI 10.1007/s00477-022-02203-4
   Chan FKS, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
   Chang IS, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121410
   Cheng T, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101058
   Chou B., 2015, WATER WASTEWATER ENG, V51, P1, DOI [10.13789/j.cnki.wwe1964.2015.0069, DOI 10.13789/J.CNKI.WWE1964.2015.0069]
   Coombes P.J., 2000, Urban Water, V1, P335, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00027-3, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00027-3]
   Dar MUD, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V318, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128474
   Darnthamrongkul W, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113716
   Ekmekcioglu Omer, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI [10.1016/j.scs.2022.103759, DOI 10.1016/J.SCS.2022.103759]
   Guoru H., 2018, CHINA FLOOD CONTROL, V28, P8
   Herslund L, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101573
   Hongqun C., 2016, SCI TECHNOL MANAG RE, V36, P42
   Hou JW, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V232, P574, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.111
   [黄敬军 Huang Jingjun], 2018, [地质论评, Geological Review], V64, P1472
   Huang L., 2016, GREEN TECHNOL, V22, P117
   Jia HF, 2017, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V11, DOI 10.1007/s11783-017-0984-9
   Kiriscioglu T, 2013, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V33, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.11.001
   Li CL, 2022, J HYDROL, V610, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127838
   Li Q, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V270, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110878
   Li Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024
   Ma YC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139078
   Maureen, 2012, URBANDE FLOMEN TRESE, V5, P130
   MOHURD, 2017, GUID APPL ADV TECHN
   Muñoz E, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081733
   Palazzo E, 2019, J URBAN DES, V24, P137, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2018.1511972
   Pietrucha-Urbanik K, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13143617
   Pyke C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006
   Qiao XJ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V196, P943, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.049
   Shanfeng H.E., 2019, J HENAN POLYTECH U, V20, P48
   She L, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102706
   Song C., 2022, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022.100010
   Sun ML, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108436
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   Tingsanchali T, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V32, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1233
   Veettil AV, 2022, J HYDROL, V607, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127463
   Voyde E, 2010, J HYDROL, V394, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.013
   Wang H, 2018, SCI CHINA TECHNOL SC, V61, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11431-017-9170-5
   Wang L., 2021, GREEN GASES, V23, P237
   Wang YT, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V796, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148991
   Wu J., 2018, S ARCHIT, V3, P34
   Xu CQ, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V304, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114241
   Xu WP, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104699
   Xue BX, 2012, ENRGY PROCED, V16, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.002
   Yang LH, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P1535, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02522-7
   Zawilski Marek, 2014, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V14, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2014.07.003
   Zhang TT, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131038
   Zhu L., 2018, WATER CONSERV PLAN, V6, P17
   Zölch T, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V157, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
NR 56
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 12
U2 117
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 12
AR 1942
DI 10.3390/w14121942
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA 2N6BZ
UT WOS:000818463100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jiao, H
   Feng, SN
AF Jiao, Hong
   Feng, Shining
TI Towards Resilient Cities: Optimizing Shelter Site Selection and Disaster
   Prevention Life Circle Construction Using GIS and Supply-Demand
   Considerations
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient cities; sustainable development; disaster prevention life
   circle; emergency shelter; Gaussian two-step floating catchment area
   method; weighted Voronoi diagrams
AB City health examinations are integral to China's urban planning, construction, and management. They effectively identify potential risks and vulnerabilities in urban development, ensuring safety resilience-a critical component. This resilience enhances the city's ability to withstand internal and external shocks, promoting the safety of urban residents and fostering sustainable city development. Drawing on the Japanese disaster prevention strategy, the disaster prevention life circle emerges as a rescue and protection system during urban disasters, fortifying urban safety resilience. However, smaller and mid-sized cities, constrained by limited resources, significantly need to catch up in disaster prevention planning. Consequently, bolstering safety resilience in these cities becomes a pressing concern. This study focuses on Lindian County in Heilongjiang Province as the urban area under consideration for resilient city objectives. Leveraging the ArcGIS network analysis tool, we optimize the placement of emergency shelters, aligning with urban disaster assessments and the equilibrium of disaster prevention facility supply and demand. Accessibility analysis of emergency shelters was conducted using the Gaussian two-step floating catchment area method. Ultimately, we integrate the range of demand points assigned to each shelter, along with the effective land area reflecting the supply of shelters, as weights into a weighted Voronoi diagram. This diagram is combined with a reference to the entire region to delineate the disaster prevention life circle. Findings reveal that, under the premise of minimizing government construction costs while maximizing coverage and evacuation utilization rates, the optimal resident emergency congregate shelters in the study area are 8, with 98 emergency evacuation and embarkation shelters. Striking a balance between disaster prevention facility supply and demand and regional accessibility, the urban area of Lindian County is segmented into 3 resident disaster prevention life circles and 24 emergency disaster prevention life circles. The objective of this study is to optimize shelter siting and establish disaster prevention life circles in diverse urban areas. This endeavor aims to bolster urban resilience and foster sustainable urban development.
C1 [Jiao, Hong; Feng, Shining] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Landscape Architecture, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China.
C3 Northeast Forestry University - China
RP Jiao, H (corresponding author), Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Landscape Architecture, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China.
EM jh881@nefu.edu.cn; 1751734804@nefu.edu.cn
CR Bai ZQ, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051363
   [柏中强 Bai Zhongqiang], 2013, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V32, P1692
   By, 2024, China will Carry out Comprehensive Urban Medical Checkups in Cities of Prefectural Level and above_Departmental News_Chinese Government
   Capano G, 2017, POLICY SCI, V50, P399, DOI 10.1007/s11077-016-9273-x
   [陈宣先 Chen Xuanxian], 2020, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V29, P162
   China Earthquake Administration, 2008, Emergency Shelter for Earthquake Disasters: Site and its Facilities GB 21734-2008
   cma.gov, Rainstorm Popularization I Rainstorm and Its Definition-China Meteorological Administration Government Portal
   De Nicola A, 2023, J IND INF INTEGR, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.jii.2023.100489
   Department of Natural Resources, 2021, Spatial Planning Guidance to Community Life Unit, P37
   Di Nardo M., 2020, Int. Rev. Civ. Eng, V11, P98, DOI DOI 10.15866/IRECE.V11I3.19025
   Dimitrova M, 2024, GLOBALIZATION HEALTH, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12992-023-01006-8
   [郭建兴 Guo Jianxing], 2020, [地震地质, Seismology and Geology], V42, P968
   Guo W.T., 2022, Shanghai Urban Planning Review, P8
   He L., 2021, BUILD SCI, P43, DOI DOI 10.12049/J.URP.202103006
   Kim NY, 2024, NAT HAZARDS REV, V25, DOI 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1906
   Lee YH, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12198046
   Li G., 2006, Build. Sci, P55, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1002-8528.2006.03.014, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-8528.2006.03.014]
   [李彦熙 Li Yanxi], 2022, [国际城市规划, Urban Planning International], V37, P113
   Lu Wei, 2022, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V62, P1102, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2022.22.032
   [马运佳 Ma Yunjia], 2014, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V24, P137
   Que Z., 2013, Beijing Surv. Mapp, P18, DOI DOI 10.19580/J.CNKI.1007-3000.2013.02.005
   [石龙宇 Shi Longyu], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P6016
   Simone F, 2023, IEEE ACCESS, V11, P11430, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3241552
   Tang SQ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15097283
   The State Council of the Peoples Republic of China, 2022, Opinions on Promoting Urbanization with County Cities as Important Carriers
   Tian Z., 2019, Ph.D. Thesis
   [仝德 Tong De], 2021, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V40, P1113
   Wang D., 2018, Masters Thesis
   Wang M., 2023, Acta Ecol. Sin, V43, P1
   Wu WB, 2023, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113578
   Xue F., 2012, Geomat. Spat. Inf. Technol, V35, P12
   [杨慧 Yang Hui], 2021, [复旦学报. 自然科学版, Journal of Fudan University. Natural Sciences], V60, P618
   Zeng S., 2017, J. South China Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.), V49, P87
   [张宣峰 Zhang Xuanfeng], 2020, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V27, P59
   Zhang Y., 2011, Planners, V27, P19
   Zhao XT, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142416907
   zhengce, Opinions on Promoting Green Development of Urban and Rural Construction Issued by the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council_Related Documents of the Central Government_Chinese Government Website
   [周爱华 Zhou Aihua], 2021, [安全与环境学报, Journal of Safety and Environment], V21, P1662
NR 38
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 44
U2 61
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 6
AR 2345
DI 10.3390/su16062345
PG 22
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MG2R0
UT WOS:001192412500001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lu, H
   Lu, X
   Jiao, LD
   Zhang, Y
AF Lu, Hao
   Lu, Xin
   Jiao, Liudan
   Zhang, Yu
TI Evaluating urban agglomeration resilience to disaster in the Yangtze
   Delta city group in China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Urban agglomeration; Resilience evaluation; Particle
   swarm optimization algorithm; The Back Propagation Neural Network; China
AB With the rapid acceleration of global urbanization, progressively more natural disasters and public safety problems are encountered in cities. Previous studies have shown that highly resilient cities can promptly and effectively respond to disasters. Therefore, in this study, a mixed-methods approach to urban agglomeration resilience estimation is proposed. First, the particle swarm optimization algorithm is used to optimize the back propagation neural network in order to evaluate the resilience of subsystems, including economy, society, environment, and science and technology resilience subsystems. Then, the entropy weight method is integrated to obtain the urban agglomeration resilience. Finally, the kernel density estimation and Moran's I are utilized for comprehensive analysis of the dynamic evolution and spatial correlation of the urban agglomeration resilience. The Yangtze River Delta cities are adopted as a case study, and the results indicated that the resilience in the most developed urban agglomeration in China showed the pyramidal spatial distribution. From the perspective of evolution, the resilience level is constantly improving, and the differences among cities are gradually decreasing from 2015 to 2019. The results indicate that the model is valuable for evaluating urban resilience, and thus it can help policymakers formulate proposals to effectively improve the resilience of urban agglomerations.
C1 [Lu, Hao; Lu, Xin; Jiao, Liudan; Zhang, Yu] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing Jiaotong University
RP Lu, H (corresponding author), Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
EM luhao@cqjtu.edu.cn; 622190122021@mails.cqjtu.edu.cn; 3967324441@qq.com;
   zhangyu_0112@foxmail.com
RI Jiao, Liudan/HIK-0853-2022; Ye, Longwu/B-5665-2012
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [71901043]; Chongqing
   Municipal Education Commission Project [18SKGH055, KJQN201900739];
   Frontier Project of Chongqing [stc2019jcyj-msxmX0629]; Science and
   Technology Bureau Foundation
FX This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (No. 71901043), the Chongqing Municipal Education Commission
   Project (No. 18SKGH055, KJQN201900739) and the Science and Technology
   Bureau Foundation and Frontier Project of Chongqing (Grant
   No.cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0629).
CR Atreya A., 2018, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, P1
   Berkouwer S. B., 2021, NBER WORKING PAPERS
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Croese S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020550
   Cui Z, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108079
   Dong XJ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041321
   Du WD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102858
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   [范峻恺 Fan Junkai], 2020, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V35, P2875
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   He BJ, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101647
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huang JB, 2020, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101373
   Kousky C, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101296
   Kunreuther H., 2016, Insurance, Economic Incentives and Other Policy Tools for Strengthening Critical Infrastructure Resilience: 20 Proposals for Action
   Kunreuther H, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P2263, DOI 10.1111/risa.13616
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P1505, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.227
   Li YJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124147
   Lin JH, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107475
   Liu ZP, 2019, CHINA COMMUN, V16, P144, DOI 10.23919/j.cc.2019.07.012
   Lu F. Y., 2021, World Reg. Stud, V30, P589, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1004-9479.2021.03.2019717, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2021.03.2019717]
   Luo D, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107858
   Matsuo M, 2020, INT J TRAIN DEV, V24, P144, DOI 10.1111/ijtd.12177
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mol JM., 2021, Behavioural Public Policy, P1
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Ripberger JT, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P2300, DOI 10.1111/risa.13131
   Serrano W, 2021, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102909
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Song XP, 2018, NATURE, V560, P639, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tan SK, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105449
   Tang DZ, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10050495
   Tepanosyan G, 2019, APPL GEOCHEM, V104, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.03.022
   Tian P, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107351
   Tian Y, 2018, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V68, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.10.014
   Tonn G, 2021, TRANSPORT POLICY, V100, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.10.011
   Vallance S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.010
   Wang Y, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119284
   Wang Y, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P900, DOI 10.1007/s11769-021-1224-6
   Wang Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.128
   Wilson M.T., 2019, Risk Hazards Crisis Publ. Pol., V10, P403, DOI [10.1002/rhc3.12166, DOI 10.1002/RHC3.12166]
   Wing OEJ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15264-2
   Wu MY, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117795
   Wu Q, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102075
   Xu XY, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126147
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang Y, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120973
   Yang ZD, 2021, ECOL INFORM, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101321
   Yu X, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110061
   Zewdie B., 2017, UNDERSTANDING RESILI, V14, P118
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   Zhang W, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/6616988
   Zhao Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125097
   Zhu B, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V778, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146089
NR 60
TC 76
Z9 77
U1 52
U2 342
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 76
AR 103464
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
EA OCT 2021
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA XE5UZ
UT WOS:000723453700003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yuan, Y
   Zheng, Y
   Huang, XK
   Zhai, JQ
AF Yuan, Yuan
   Zheng, Yan
   Huang, Xiankai
   Zhai, Jianqing
TI Climate resilience of urban water systems: A case study of sponge cities
   in China
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban climate adaptation; Urban water system; Climate resilience;
   Resilient city; Sponge city
ID BUILDING RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; CITY
AB Resilience is an important aim of climate adaptation in urban development planning. Since 2015, sponge city (SC) pilot construction in China has highlighted the importance of urban water systems, but has paid insufficient attention to extreme and long-term climate change risks. This paper aims to provide a new method for evaluating the urban water system climate resilience (UWSCR), classify China cities in combination with climate hazards, conduct case studies on SC pilots, and propose ways to improve the UWSCR in SCs. Firstly, Taking heavy rain and drought as hazards, an evaluation index system of UWSCR is established, including engineering resilience (ENR), ecological resilience (ECR) and evolutionary resilience (EVR). A combination model based on the analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method is used to measure the UWSCR of 27 SC pilot cities and 253 non-pilot cities at or above the prefecture level in China. Secondly, coordinating hazard index and UWSCR index, cities are divided into four types. The results show that the ENR and EVR of SC pilots exhibited an increasing trend from 2010 to 2020 and were greater than those of non-pilots. Among the four types, Resilient Cities and Low Risk Cities with high climate resilience (CR) were mainly distributed in the eastern and central regions of China. High Risk Cities and Vulnerable Cities with low CR were mostly distributed in the central and western regions. Among the cities of high CR, SC pilots accounted for 63.0% of the pilot samples, while non-pilots only accounted for 26.5% of the non-pilot samples. Finally, this paper analyzes the typical cases of SC pilots, and puts forward some suggestions, such as considering the UWSCR systematically and holistically, improving the ECR of UWSCR, making medium-term to long-term adaptation planning and providing differentiated policy support. The originality of this work is to identify four types of cities from the perspective of UWSCR and provide reference for improving the CR of SCs.
C1 [Yuan, Yuan] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
   [Zheng, Yan] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Res Inst Ecocivilizat, Beijing 100710, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Xiankai] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
   [Zhai, Jianqing] Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Yuan, Yuan; Huang, Xiankai] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Inst Culture & Tourism Dev, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Technology & Business University; Chinese Academy of Social
   Sciences; Beijing Technology & Business University; China Meteorological
   Administration; National Climate Centre, China Meteorological
   Administration; Beijing Technology & Business University
RP Yuan, Y (corresponding author), Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.; Huang, XK (corresponding author), Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.; Yuan, Y; Huang, XK (corresponding author), Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Inst Culture & Tourism Dev, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China.
EM yy20235523@163.com; huangxk@btbu.edu.cn
RI Zhai, Jianqing/MBG-1866-2025
FU National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1509003];
   National Social Science Fund of China [18BJY060]
FX * This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development
   Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFC1509003) and the National Social
   Science Fund of China (Grant No. 18BJY060) .
CR Abolfathi S., 2018, Coastal Eng. Proc., V1, P109, DOI 10.9753/icce.v36.papers.109
   Al-Jawari SM, 2022, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V8, P2220, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-10-013
   An M, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P16355, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-23271-7
   [Anonymous], 1989, Calculation of monthly and annual 30-year standard normals: prepared by a meeting of experts
   [Anonymous], 2007, Climate Change 2007: A Synthesis Report, P22
   Aquilina MC, 2022, EUR PLAN STUD, V30, P1355, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2021.1958758
   ARUP, 2019, City Water Resilience Approach
   Balaei B, 2019, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V28, P706, DOI 10.1108/DPM-08-2018-0278
   BD (Beijing Daily, 2019, The South-To-North Water Diversion Project's Central Route Transfers 20 Billion Cubic Meters of Water to Beijing in Four Years, Equaling the Amount of Water of the Miyun Reservoir
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Butler D, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, P63, DOI 10.1002/gch2.1010
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chan FKS, 2024, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.107015
   Chan FKS, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
   Chen B, 2020, STAT METHODS MED RES, V29, P1972, DOI 10.1177/0962280219880571
   Chen J., 2017, Evolution of Urban Dual Water Circulation System and a Safe and Efficient Water Use Mechanism
   Cheng T, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101058
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001433
   CNR (China National Radio), 2019, The Water Transfer in the South-To-North Water Diversion Project's Central Route Has Exceeded 25.5 Billion M3 in Five Years, and 73% of the Water Used in the Main Urban Area of Beijing comes from South China Water
   CYN (China Youth Network), 2020, Beijing's Groundwater Depth Rises to 22.54m, a Rise for Five Years in a Row
   Dibs H., 2023, Emerg Sci J, V7, P1215, DOI [10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-013, DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-013]
   Dodman D., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, V1, P907
   Dong S., 2018, COASTS MARINE STRUCT, P1217
   Donnelly J, 2024, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107536
   Donnelly J, 2024, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V912, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168814
   Du J., 2018, J. Nat. Resour., V33, P14
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   GMN(Guangming Net), 2023, By storing water by rainfall, Chongqing can supply 1.637 billion m3 of water
   GMPG(Guyuan Municipal People's Government), 2019, Major Projects Provide Strong Support and Solid Guarantee for High-Quality Development
   Golladay SW, 2021, FRESHW SCI, V40, DOI 10.1086/712514
   GOSC(General Office of the State Council), 2015, Guiding Opinions of General Office of the State Council on Promoting the Sponge City Construction
   Han J, 2023, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V21, P1297, DOI 10.1007/s10311-022-01559-x
   HASHIMOTO T, 1982, WATER RESOUR RES, V18, P14, DOI 10.1029/WR018i001p00014
   He CY, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3
   IPCC, 2022, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Climate Change 2022-Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Jimoh M, 2022, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102491
   Johannessen Å, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-08870-220101
   Khalaf N, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P1779, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-07-016
   Lashford C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010213
   Li JK, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P62051, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-26357-y
   Li Y, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120525
   [李阳力 Li Yangli], 2022, [中国软科学, China Soft Science], P96
   [李智飞 Li Zhifei], 2014, [干旱区地理, Arid Land Geography], V37, P939
   Liang ZF, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18042082
   Liu N., 2022, P 9 INT C COAST OC E, V1072
   Lomba-Fernández C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11174727
   Lu CP, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107605
   Ma YC, 2023, CLIM POLICY, V23, P268, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2022.2131503
   Ma YC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139078
   Mahdian M, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-32343-8
   Meyer C., 2018, UN World Water Development Report 2018: Nature-Based Solutions for Water
   MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development), 2014, Technical Guide for the Development of Sponge Cities: Construction of Low-Impact-Development Storm Water System (Trial)
   MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development), 2019, Evaluation Standards for the Development of Sponge Cities
   Morison PJ, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.08.019
   Muller M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P99, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076726
   Noori R, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-42411-2
   OSullivan J., 2020, COASTAL ENG P, V36, DOI [10.9753/icce.v36v.structures.13, DOI 10.9753/ICCE.V36V.STRUCTURES.13]
   Pyke C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006
   Qiao XJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101963
   Qiu B., 2015, Meaning, Approaches and Prospect of Sponge Cities (LID), V3, P1
   RF & Arup (The Rockefeller Foundation & Arup), 2015, City resilience framework
   Sabah N, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P3108, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-010
   Satterthwaite D, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.002
   Shang SW, 2023, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1238203
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Shin S, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10020164
   [苏贤保 Su Xianbao], 2018, [干旱区资源与环境, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment], V32, P112
   [孙才志 Sun Caizhi], 2020, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V40, P2094
   Tahmasseby S, 2022, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V8, P2154, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2022-08-10-09
   Torabi E, 2018, CITIES, V72, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.008
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang MJ, 2022, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V13, P3532, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2022.164
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
   Warner J, 2011, INT REV ADM SCI, V77, P779, DOI 10.1177/0020852311419387
   Wu YN, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120734
   [武占云 Wu Zhanyun], 2021, [气候变化研究进展, Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis], V17, P559
   Xia J, 2017, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V60, P652, DOI 10.1007/s11430-016-0111-8
   Xu LL, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aafe27
   Xu WP, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14121942
   Yang L., 2015, Econ. Probl, V12, P115, DOI DOI 10.16011/J.CNKI.JJWT.2015.03.023
   [姚鸣奇 Yao Mingqi], 2023, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V30, P25
   Yigitcanlar T., 2022, Emerg Sci J, V6, P1199, DOI DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-06-01
   Yin DK, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124963
   [俞孔坚 Yu Kongjian], 2015, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P75
   [袁媛 Yuan Yuan], 2022, [干旱区资源与环境, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment], V36, P116
   Zeng C, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12745
   Zhai G., 2018, City Plann. Rev., V2, P42
   Zhai J., 2017, Annual Report on Actions to Address Climate Change (2017), P19
   Zhang M, 2014, Opportunities and Challenges of EU Cities in Adapting to the Climate
   Zhang YT, 2020, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000550
   Zhang Y, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110230
   Zhang ZY, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102980
   Zheng Y., 2018, China Popul. Res. Environ., V3, P31
   Zhu YM, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1088064
NR 95
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 38
U2 60
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD APR 20
PY 2024
VL 451
AR 141781
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141781
EA APR 2024
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA QV3L2
UT WOS:001223603900001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xiang, Y
   Chen, YH
   Su, YY
   Chen, ZY
   Meng, JN
AF Xiang, Yong
   Chen, Yonghua
   Su, Yangyang
   Chen, Zeyou
   Meng, Junna
TI Research on the Evaluation and Spatial-Temporal Evolution of Safe and
   Resilient Cities Based on Catastrophe Theory-A Case Study of Ten Regions
   in Western China
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban-safety resilience; spatial-temporal-evolution analysis; western
   China; catastrophe theory
ID COMPLEXITY
AB In today's highly complex world, urban security has become a focus of attention for people in various positions due to its enormous uncertainty. As an essential path towards urban safety, resilient development can effectively provide emergency management capability for cities when they are exposed to unknown risks. In this study, an evaluation-index system for urban-safety resilience was constructed from the perspective of sustainable urban development. The urban-safety-resilience evaluation model was established with the help of catastrophe theory to study and analyze urban-safety resilience. The corresponding spatial-temporal-evolution analysis used the geographic information system (GIS) and Moran index to evaluate the urban-security resilience of 10 regions in western China. Finally, it was concluded that (1) the urban-safety resilience of most regions in western China showed an increasing trend over time in 2017, 2019, and 2021; (2) the urban-safety resilience of Chongqing, Sichuan, and Shaanxi provinces is at a relatively high level compared to the western region overall; and (3) regions such as Ningxia and Gansu are disaster-prone, and urban infrastructure conditions are relatively backward. Therefore, urban planning and governance should be flexibly transformed to explore and apply appropriate urban-safety-resilience models, with sustainable development as the cornerstone.
C1 [Xiang, Yong; Chen, Yonghua; Su, Yangyang; Chen, Zeyou] Xihua Univ, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China.
   [Meng, Junna] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
C3 Xihua University; Tianjin University
RP Su, YY (corresponding author), Xihua Univ, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China.
EM 0120010008@mail.xhu.edu.cn; chenyonghua@stu.xhu.edu.cn;
   suyangyang@stu.xhu.edu.cn; 0119940033@mail.xhu.edu.cn;
   mengjunna@tju.edu.cn
RI Su, yangyang/AAS-2508-2021; Chen, Yonghua/H-4134-2013
FU General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
   [72174140]
FX This research was funded by the General Program of National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (NSFC): A Study on Polycentric Governance
   Mechanism of Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems of Smart
   Cities (grant no. 72174140).
CR Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Atrachali M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101231
   Bai MH, 2023, FIRE-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/fire6020062
   Bivand RS, 2018, TEST-SPAIN, V27, P716, DOI 10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Cai S.H., 2022, ECOECONOMY, V38, P168
   Campbell KA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101257
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   [陈长坤 Chen Changkun], 2018, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V28, P1
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Ci T.J., 2015, STAT DECIS, V3, P36, DOI [10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2015.03.010, DOI 10.13546/J.CNKI.TJYJC.2015.03.010]
   Deng C.X., 2021, RES DISASTER MITIGAT, DOI [10.27204/d.cnki.glzhu.2021.000110, DOI 10.27204/D.CNKI.GLZHU.2021.000110]
   [杜金莹 Du Jinying], 2020, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V29, P88
   Fan W., 2022, PEOPLES FORUM ACAD F, VZ1, P14, DOI [10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2022.1112.002, DOI 10.16619/J.CNKI.RMLTXSQY.2022.1112.002]
   [房玉东 Fang Yudong], 2023, [中国工程科学, Strategic Study of CAE], V25, P1
   [冯俊华 Feng Junhua], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P4617
   GB, 409472021 GBT
   Ge L.L., 2011, SAFETY, V32, P1
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   [郭羽羽 Guo Yuyu], 2021, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V36, P168
   Hu Y.T., 2022, LEADERSH SCI, V12, P137, DOI [10.19572/j.cnki.ldkx.2022.12.028, DOI 10.19572/J.CNKI.LDKX.2022.12.028]
   [黄浪 Huang Lang], 2016, [中国安全生产科学技术, Journal of Safety Science and Technology], V12, P15
   Jain AK, 2010, PATTERN RECOGN LETT, V31, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011
   Jin L., 2001, THEOR PERSPECT, P18, DOI [10.19632/j.cnki.11-3953/a.2001.01.006, DOI 10.19632/J.CNKI.11-3953/A.2001.01.006]
   Kan T.Y., 2020, THESIS U SCI TECHNOL
   Krimsky S., 1992, SOCIAL THEORIES RISK, P27
   Lee HC, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101284
   [李博 LI Bo], 2010, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V29, P361
   Li J, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108620
   Li X., 2021, URBAN PLAN, V45, P78
   Likas A, 2003, PATTERN RECOGN, V36, P451, DOI 10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00060-2
   Liu H., 2023, DISASTER SCI, V38, P25
   Liu JG, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1513, DOI 10.1126/science.1144004
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu W, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
   Lü GN, 2019, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V33, P346, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1533136
   Lu H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   Ma X.L., 2022, SMART CITIES, V8, P44, DOI [10.19301/j.cnki.zncs.2022.07.015, DOI 10.19301/J.CNKI.ZNCS.2022.07.015]
   Ma XF, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052899
   Manyena B, 2019, WORLD DEV, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.011
   Marana P, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101531
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   MORAN PAP, 1950, BIOMETRIKA, V37, P17, DOI 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   Na W., 2007, URBAN ISSUES, V7, P43
   [庞莎 Pang Sha], 2011, [干旱区资源与环境, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment], V25, P63
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Su F., 2009, GEOGR RES DEV, V28, P71
   Sun Y.Q., 2021, SHANGHAI EC RES, V8, P60, DOI [10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2021.08.006, DOI 10.19626/J.CNKI.CN31-1163/F.2021.08.006]
   Tao X.D., 2023, URBAN PLAN, P1
   Tian J., 2022, W J HABITAT HUMANIT, V37, P66
   Wang JM, 2020, CATENA, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104773
   Wang Q., 2023, CONTEMP ECON, V40, P3
   Wang Q., 2012, Electronic Design Engineering, V20, P21, DOI [DOI 10.14022/j.cnki.dzsjgc.2012.07.034, 10.14022/j.cnki.dzsjgc.2012.07.034]
   Wang SK., 2013, Journal of Quantitative Economics, V30, P57, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-1660.2013.03.011
   Wu Bohong, 2018, Science & Technology Review, V36, P94, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.16.011
   [许兆丰 Xu Zhaofeng], 2019, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V29, P1
   Yang J., 2019, Chin J Popul Sci, V4, P30
   [张红梅 ZHANG Hongmei], 2007, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V16, P133
   Zhang S.S., 2023, STAT DECISION, V39, P110
   Zhang WW, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V24, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.06.022
   Zhao G.J., 2006, STAT DECIS MAK, P12, DOI [10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2006.05.005, DOI 10.13546/J.CNKI.TJYJC.2006.05.005]
   Zhu JX, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10062009
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
   Zobel CW, 2020, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2018.12.005
NR 69
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 38
U2 96
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 12
AR 9698
DI 10.3390/su15129698
PG 50
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA K7BB8
UT WOS:001017946500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, J
   Deng, YZ
   Kumari, S
   Song, ZH
AF Wang, Jian
   Deng, Yuzhou
   Kumari, Sonia
   Song, Zhihui
TI Research on the Spatial Spillover Effect of Transportation
   Infrastructure on Urban Resilience in Three Major Urban Agglomerations
   in China
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE transportation infrastructure; sustainable transportation; urban
   resilience; spatial spillover effect; urban agglomeration
AB The development of transportation infrastructure can ensure the strong recovery and reconstruction function of a city, and it is an important way to build a resilient city. Studying the impact of the transportation infrastructure level on urban resilience is related to the future development of a city. Based on panel data for China's three major urban agglomerations from 2008 to 2019, this paper uses the spatial econometric model to explore the spatial spillover effect of transportation infrastructure on urban resilience. The results show that, due to its spillover effect, intra-regional transportation infrastructure promotes the urban resilience of cities around Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and the Pearl River Delta, while it only promotes the urban resilience of local cities in the Yangtze River Delta. Inter-regional transportation infrastructure not only inhibits the local urban resilience of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei but also reduces the urban resilience of surrounding cities. However, the impact on the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta is not obvious. To promote the overall resilience level in three major urban agglomerations in China, this paper argues that it is urgently required to improve the quality of urban road traffic facilities and optimize the structure of intercity transportation to promote the development of transportation infrastructure and urban resilience. The implementation of several policies is recommended to efficiently improve the transportation infrastructure and urban resilience in these three major urban agglomerations in China.
C1 [Wang, Jian; Deng, Yuzhou; Song, Zhihui] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Jian] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Automot & Traff Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China.
   [Kumari, Sonia] Sukkur IBA Univ, Dept Business Adm, Sukkur 65200, Pakistan.
C3 Jiangsu University; Jiangsu University; Sukkur IBA University
RP Kumari, S (corresponding author), Sukkur IBA Univ, Dept Business Adm, Sukkur 65200, Pakistan.
EM wangj@ujs.edu.cn; 2211919023@ujs.edu.cn; sonia.kumari@iba-suk.edu.pk;
   2212119004@ujs.edu.cn
RI Kumari, Sonia/JRY-2122-2023; , Jian/HRN-4590-2023
OI , Jian/0000-0001-6216-317X; Kumari, Sonia/0000-0002-8272-1332
CR [Anonymous], 2010, China Ind. Econ
   Anselin Luc., 2004, ADV SPATIAL ECONOMET
   ASCHAUER DA, 1989, J MONETARY ECON, V23, P177, DOI 10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
   Baltagi B.H., 2006, Panel data econometrics theoretical contributions and empirical applications
   Bernard Andrew., 2015, Production Networks, Geography, and Firm Performance
   Boarnet MG, 1998, J REGIONAL SCI, V38, P381, DOI 10.1111/0022-4146.00099
   Cao J.B., 2019, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, P35
   Chen S.Q., 2020, MOD URBAN RES, V1, P37, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2020.01.006
   Chen Shao-qing, 2020, Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, V43, P10, DOI 10.7612/j.issn.2096-5281.2020.03.002
   Chen Z.N., 2016, AREAL RES DEV, V35, P54
   Démurger S, 2001, J COMP ECON, V29, P95, DOI 10.1006/jcec.2000.1693
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Elhorst J.P., 2010, Spatial Panel Data Models
   Faber B, 2014, REV ECON STUD, V81, P1046, DOI 10.1093/restud/rdu010
   Ji Y.B., 2016, ACAD EXCH, V7, P127
   Jiang S.L., 2021, CHONGQING SOC SCI, V6, P33
   LeSage J, 2009, STAT TEXTB MONOGR, P1
   Li XR., 2021, Guizhou Soc. Sci, V1, P116, DOI [10.13713/j.cnki.cssci.2021.01.015, DOI 10.13713/J.CNKI.CSSCI.2021.01.015]
   Li Y., 2016, URBAN DEV STUDIES, V23, P113, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-3862.2016.06.016
   Lim H, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142315889
   Lin YT, 2017, J URBAN ECON, V98, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2016.11.002
   Liu HS, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031502
   Luo Ziyuan, 2021, Science & Technology Review, V39, P124, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.15.013
   Ma D.B., 2021, RESOUR DEV MARK, V37, P820
   Macioszek E, 2022, ENERGIES, V15, DOI 10.3390/en15030791
   Macioszek E, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14010203
   Monfort P, 2000, J URBAN ECON, V48, P286, DOI 10.1006/juec.1999.2167
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2018, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V37, P1193
   Shao S., 2013, Management World, P32
   Sun Y., 2019, Review of Economy and Management, V35, P122, DOI 10.13962/j.cnki.37-1486/f.2019.06.012
   [王俊松 Wang Junsong], 2017, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V37, P11
   [王少剑 Wang Shaojian], 2021, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V76, P973
   Wang SK., 2013, Journal of Quantitative Economics, V30, P57, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-1660.2013.03.011
   Wang X.W., 2018, JIANGXI SOC SCI, V38, P30
   Wang Y., 2020, PEOPLE, V9, P19
   Wei B, 2020, Macroeconomic Management, V12, P77
   Wu Y.C., 2021, J PUBLIC ADM, V14, P25
   Xiang C.L., 2014, J XINJIANG NORM U PH, V35, P45
   Xie C.Y., 2020, Manag. World, V36, P52
   Yang C., 2015, ECOL INDIC, V12, P62
   Yang L., 2015, Econ. Probl, V12, P115, DOI DOI 10.16011/J.CNKI.JJWT.2015.03.023
   Zhang M.D., 2020, J. Ind. Technol. Econ, V39, P3
   [张明斗 Zhang Mingdou], 2019, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V26, P82
   Zhang P., 2018, URBAN PROBL, V9, P27, DOI 10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180904
   Zhang XL, 2013, SOC SCI CHINA, V34, P24, DOI 10.1080/02529203.2013.787222
   Zhang Z., 2021, CONT E CONMANAG, V43, P89
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
NR 47
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 23
U2 95
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 6
AR 5543
DI 10.3390/su15065543
PG 21
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA C0HZ9
UT WOS:000958847800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Alizadeh, H
   Sharifi, A
   Damanbagh, S
AF Alizadeh, Hadi
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
   Damanbagh, Safiyeh
TI Assessing urban resilience to pandemics with a hybrid framework of
   planning, absorption, recovery, and adaptation abilities: A case study
   of Ahvaz, Iran
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Absorption; Recovery; Adaptation; COVID-19; Urban
   planning
ID CRITERIA; CITIES; TOOLS
AB This research advances urban resilience assessment beyond conventional social, economic, environmental, and institutional dimensions by introducing a hybrid framework integrating systemic resilience characteristics across planning, absorption, recovery, and adaptation abilities. Our study focused on Ahvaz, Iran, during the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing a questionnaire survey involving 705 residents between May and November 2022. The results show that urban resilience in Ahvaz is low in all four capacities, especially in absorption, which indicates the city 's limited ability to isolate disruptive events and prevent cascading impacts. We found that there is no significant difference in urban resilience across different districts of the city. However, a positive relationship exists between socio-economic status and urban resilience, underscoring its role in bolstering a city 's ability to deal with adverse events. Ensuring fair distribution and accessibility of assets and resources within the city is crucial to minimize adverse effects on lowincome groups. The findings highlight the necessity of reinforcing absorption capacities and addressing socio-economic inequalities to enhance urban resilience. The insights from this study can help shape policies and planning efforts aimed at building more resilient cities capable of withstanding pandemics and other stressors, including climate change.
C1 [Alizadeh, Hadi; Damanbagh, Safiyeh] Shahid Chamran Univ Ahvaz, Fac Humanities, Dept Geog & Urban Planning, Ahvaz, Iran.
   [Alizadeh, Hadi] Iran Minist Rd & Urban Planning, Off Housing Planning & Econ, Deputy Housing & Construct, Tehran, Iran.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kaga Miyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon.
C3 Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz; Hiroshima University; Lebanese
   American University
RP Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kaga Miyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.; Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, 1-5-1 Kaga Miyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.
EM std.hadi@gmail.com; sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp;
   Safiyeh_damanbagh@yahoo.com
RI Alizadeh, Hadi/AAG-4671-2021; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI Sharifi, Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613; Alizadeh, Hadi/0000-0001-6618-0209
CR Afrin S, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.668263
   Ahvaz, 2019, Statistical Yearbook of Ahvaz Municipality Areas
   Al-Humaiqani MM, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103797
   Alidadi M, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V850, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158056
   Alizadeh H, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V117, P2139, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-05959-2
   Alizadeh H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102514
   Alizadeh H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093691
   Amini P., 2021, Iran. J. Med. Microbiol., V15, P612
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   [Anonymous], 2012, How to make cities more resilient: A handbook for local government leaders
   [Anonymous], 2016, Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes
   Arvin M, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103504
   Benfer EA., 2020, Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, V19, P122, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3636975
   Bento F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031447
   Boudaghi A., 2021, J Strategic Research on Social Problems, V10, P45
   Boza-Kiss B, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.645914
   Broomandi P, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P36392, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18195-7
   Caputo S., 2015, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, V8, P222, DOI [10.1080/17549175.2014.990913, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2014.990913, DOI 10.1080/1754]
   Carramiñana D, 2024, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102924
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Davis I, 2006, OPEN HOUSE INT, V31, P11
   DeWit A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101808
   Endo T, 2015, J NUCL SCI TECHNOL, V52, P993, DOI 10.1080/00223131.2015.1034216
   Faber MH, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V198, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.151
   Feng ML, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V805, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150248
   Fiksel J, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P5330, DOI 10.1021/es0344819
   Fink A., 2003, MANAGE ANALYZE INTER, V2nd
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Goudarzi G, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14095429
   Guo XS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102239
   Han SY, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10101099
   Hejazi SJ, 2023, CITIES, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104075
   Hernández JRE, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
   Huang CN, 2021, MATH PROBL ENG, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/9474753
   Hunter M., 2021, Urban Gov, V1, P115, DOI [10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.004, DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2021.11.004]
   Hynes William, 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, P174, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x
   Jamali A, 2023, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V51, P893, DOI 10.1007/s12524-023-01670-8
   Jewett RL, 2021, INT J HEALTH SERV, V51, P325, DOI 10.1177/0020731421997092
   Koczkodaj WW, 1998, J STAT PLAN INFER, V69, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0378-3758(97)00131-6
   Lapuh L, 2018, REG STUD REG SCI, V5, P149, DOI 10.1080/21681376.2018.1459202
   Ling TY, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P13016, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-01197-9
   Linkov I, 2022, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01117-4
   McCreesh N, 2012, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V23, P138, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Moglia M, 2021, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100052
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Moraci F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187743
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Noy C, 2008, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V11, P327, DOI 10.1080/13645570701401305
   Nyamwanza AM, 2012, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V4, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v4i1.55
   OLKEN F, 1995, STAT COMPUT, V5, P25, DOI 10.1007/BF00140664
   Papa R, 2015, TEMA, V8, P19, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/2883
   Rahimi Z, 2021, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-10152-2
   Ramezani R, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000756
   Ross A., 2017, Basic and Advanced Statistical Tests, P9, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-6351-086-8_2, 10.1007/978-94-6351-086-82, DOI 10.1007/978-94-6351-086-82]
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Salganik MJ, 2004, SOCIOL METHODOL, V34, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x
   Sanchis R, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041464
   Sawyer SF, 2009, J MAN MANIP THER, V17, pE27, DOI 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.27E
   Sharifi A., 2021, COVID-19: Systemic risk and resilience, P285
   Sharifi A, 2024, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, DOI 10.1038/s42949-024-00151-2
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104207
   Sharifi A, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105297
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.006
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sitas N., 2021, Urban Ecology in the Global South, P325, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6_13]
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Steele W., 2012, Resilient Cities, V2
   Suleimany M, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103248
   Tariq H, 2021, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V11, P722, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-03-2020-0053
   Temel S, 2018, RES SCI TECHNOL EDUC, V36, P55, DOI 10.1080/02635143.2017.1338251
   von der Gracht HA, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1525, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Zarei Javad, 2021, Inform Med Unlocked, V23, P100520, DOI 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100520
   Zhang JM, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265
NR 87
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 12
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JUN 15
PY 2024
VL 108
AR 104573
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104573
EA MAY 2024
PG 13
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA YA5G4
UT WOS:001265770800001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bai, MH
   Liu, Q
AF Bai, Minghao
   Liu, Qiong
TI Evaluating Urban Fire Risk Based on Entropy-Cloud Model Method
   Considering Urban Safety Resilience
SO FIRE-SWITZERLAND
LA English
DT Article
DE safety resilience; fire risk; urban safety; risk evaluation
ID INDICATORS; CITIES
AB Creating a safe and resilient urban environment is a crucial part of sustainable urban development. Therefore, it is imperative that a city's safety resilience is evaluated from various perspectives. To evaluate and improve the resilience of urban fire safety more scientifically, this study proposes a theoretical framework for evaluating urban safety resilience based on the triangle model and an index system including fire hazard, regional characteristics, and fire resilience is established. The entropy weight method and cloud model are used for quantitative evaluation, and the weights and risk level ratings are analyzed and discussed. The results demonstrate that the method considering urban safety resilience plays a significant role in promoting the development of urban fire safety and can provide a reference for policymakers in improving fire services.
C1 [Bai, Minghao; Liu, Qiong] Cent South Univ, Sch Resource & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
C3 Central South University
RP Liu, Q (corresponding author), Cent South Univ, Sch Resource & Safety Engn, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China.
EM liuqiong@csu.edu.cn
OI Liu, Qiong/0000-0002-6859-914X
CR Anelli D, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133496
   [Anonymous], EM PLAN FIR ACC HUN
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burby RaymondJ., 2000, Natural Hazards Review, V1, P99, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)]
   Changsha Municipal People's Government, US
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Fan W., 2022, PEOPLES FORUM ACAD F, VZ1, P14, DOI [10.16619/j.cnki.rmltxsqy.2022.1112.002, DOI 10.16619/J.CNKI.RMLTXSQY.2022.1112.002]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu J, 2019, FIRE SAFETY J, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102890
   Huang H, 2023, J SAF SCI RESIL, V4, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2022.10.003
   HuNan Fire and Rescue Department, US
   Jennings CR, 2013, FIRE SAFETY J, V62, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.07.002
   Li DY, 2009, INT J INTELL SYST, V24, P357, DOI 10.1002/int.20340
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu ZG, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103138
   Marana P, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.011
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Ministry of Public Security Fire Service Bureau, 2013, CHIN FIR YB
   National Fire and Rescue Administration, US
   Nuthammachot N, 2021, GEOCARTO INT, V36, P212, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2019.1611946
   Shaham Y, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P1337, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.010
   SHANNON CE, 1948, BELL SYST TECH J, V27, P379, DOI 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Tan F, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103743
   Turner SL, 2017, INJURY PREV, V23, P131, DOI 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042174
   Wang J, 2016, INFORM SCIENCES, V373, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.030
   Wu DM, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V113, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.022
   Xiao H., 2020, P 2020 INT C URBAN C, VVolume 608, P012008, DOI [10.1088/1755-1315/608/1/012008, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/608/1/012008]
   Xu H, 2017, J BUILD ENG, V12, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.06.018
   Yang M, 2020, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104174
   Zhang C, 2022, IEEE T AUTOM SCI ENG, V19, P163, DOI 10.1109/TASE.2020.3014907
   Zhang XX, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7010007
   Zhang YC, 2021, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100986
   Zhao JR, 2022, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104709
NR 34
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 34
U2 122
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2571-6255
J9 FIRE-BASEL
JI Fire-Switzerland
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 6
IS 2
AR 62
DI 10.3390/fire6020062
PG 14
WC Ecology; Forestry
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry
GA 9H7YA
UT WOS:000939042400001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Derickson, KD
AF Derickson, Kate Driscoll
TI Urban geography III: Anthropocene urbanism
SO PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Anthropocene; resilient cities; smart cities
ID SMART CITY; RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; RESOURCEFULNESS;
   PREPAREDNESS; GENEALOGIES; COMPLEXITY; LIFE
AB Geologists are considering in earnest whether to mark the emergence of a new geological epoch - characterized by human impacts on the geology of the planet - as the dawn of the Anthropocene. In this third of three urban geography progress reports, I identify interrelated elements of what I call Anthropocene thinking' - non-linearity, reworked temporalities, and ontologies of systemicity - that invite the perceived need for anticipatory governance' and pervade contemporary urban theory and governance. This is exemplified, I argue, by two current trends in urban governance: the promotion of smart and resilient cities.
C1 [Derickson, Kate Driscoll] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
C3 University of Minnesota System; University of Minnesota Twin Cities
RP Derickson, KD (corresponding author), Univ Minnesota, Dept Geog, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
EM kdericks@umn.edu
CR Adey P, 2012, SECUR DIALOGUE, V43, P99, DOI 10.1177/0967010612438432
   Anderson B, 2015, POLITICS-OXFORD, V35, P60, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12079
   Anderson B, 2010, PROG HUM GEOG, V34, P777, DOI 10.1177/0309132510362600
   [Anonymous], 2015, PROGR HUMAN GEOGRAPH
   [Anonymous], 2015, SMART CIT REG PERSP
   [Anonymous], FAC INST TWITT PROV
   [Anonymous], GREAT STONE BOOK NAT
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], COMPACT CINEMATICS
   [Anonymous], BIG DATA SOC
   [Anonymous], SPECULATIVE WONDER W
   [Anonymous], 2012, 2012 45 HAWAII INT C
   [Anonymous], ANTHROPOCENE
   [Anonymous], 2007, POSTPOLITICAL CITY U
   Braun B, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P239, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.1000893
   Braun BP, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN D, V32, P49, DOI 10.1068/d4313
   Brenner Neilcd., 2014, Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization
   Crampton J, 2015, GEOGR HELV, V71, P137
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Crowther TW, 2016, NATURE, V540, P104, DOI 10.1038/nature20150
   Davidson M., 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P543, DOI DOI 10.1177/0309132514535284
   Davis Mike., 2006, PLANET SLUMS
   Derickson KD, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P304, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.1001002
   DeVerteuil G., 2016, CITY, V20, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714, https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714]
   Elsaesser T, 2013, CRIT INQUIRY, V39, P217, DOI 10.1086/668523
   Evans B, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P83, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.770703
   Farrier David., 2016, The Atlantic
   Gibbs D, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P2151, DOI 10.1177/0042098013491165
   Graham SDN, 2005, PROG HUM GEOG, V29, P562, DOI 10.1191/0309132505ph568oa
   Guston DH, 2014, SOC STUD SCI, V44, P218, DOI 10.1177/0306312713508669
   Hollands R. G., 2008, City, V12, P303, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126, DOI 10.4324/9781315178387-13, 10.1080/13604810802479126, DOI 10.1080/13604810802479126]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Introna LD, 2016, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V41, P17, DOI 10.1177/0162243915587360
   Kitchin R., 2015, Data-Driven, Networked Urbanism
   Kitchin R, 2017, INFORM COMMUN SOC, V20, P14, DOI 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
   Kitchin R, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Lansing JS, 2003, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V32, P183, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093440
   Leszczynski A, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN A, V48, P1691, DOI 10.1177/0308518X16651445
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Manson SM, 2001, GEOFORUM, V32, P405, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(00)00035-X
   McGuirk PM, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P145, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2015.1084670
   McLean H, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P669, DOI 10.1111/anti.12078
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   Mouffe Chantal., 2009, DEMOCRATIC PARADOX
   Nelson SH, 2014, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V2, P1, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2014.872456
   Paddison R, 2009, ESPACE POLITIQUE REV, V8, P2, DOI DOI 10.4000/ESPACEP0LITIQUE
   Peck J, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P380, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
   Quay R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P496, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2010.508428
   Ranciere Jacques., 2009, Jacques Ranciere: History, Politics, Aesthetics, P273
   Robbins P, 2013, CULT GEOGR, V20, P3, DOI 10.1177/1474474012469887
   Serrao-Neumann S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P440, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.795788
   Shelton T, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P13, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu026
   Soderstrom O., 2014, City, V18, P307, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716
   Swyngedouw E, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P55, DOI 10.1177/0042098016671475
   Szerszynski B, 2012, OXFORD LITERARY REV, V34, P165, DOI 10.3366/olr.2012.0040
   Thatcher J, 2013, GEOJOURNAL, V78, P967, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9491-0
   Thite M, 2011, HUM RESOUR DEV INT, V14, P623, DOI 10.1080/13678868.2011.618349
   Townsend A. M., 2013, Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia
   Tschakert P, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Vanolo A, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P883, DOI 10.1177/0042098013494427
   Wakefield S, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN D, V32, P4, DOI 10.1068/d3201int
   Walker J, 2011, SECUR DIALOGUE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0967010611399616
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Zanella A, 2014, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V1, P22, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328
NR 65
TC 45
Z9 47
U1 3
U2 58
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0309-1325
EI 1477-0288
J9 PROG HUM GEOG
JI Prog. Hum. Geogr.
PD JUN
PY 2018
VL 42
IS 3
BP 425
EP 435
DI 10.1177/0309132516686012
PG 11
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA GG3VY
UT WOS:000432623000006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ambily, P
   Chithra, NR
   Firoz, CM
   Viswanath, S
AF Ambily, P.
   Chithra, N. R.
   Firoz, C. Mohammed
   Viswanath, Saranya
TI Ecological Flood Resilience Index (EFRI) to Assess the Urban Pluvial
   Flood Resilience of Blue-Green infrastructure: A case from a
   southwestern coastal city of India
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban pluvial flood; Ecological flood resilience index; PCA;
   Crowd-sourced data validation; Blue-green infrastructure
ID ENVIRONMENTAL-QUALITY; IMPACT
AB Urban pluvial flood resilience planning must account for the ecological capacity to absorb, adapt, and transform with floods. Research on flood resilience indices highlights resilience as a normative condition, characterized by the return to equilibrium or the recovery time. However, the socio-ecological approach, including adaptive, absorptive, and transformative capacities is often overlooked, and the determinants of these capacities are underexplored. The present study addresses this gap by proposing an impact-based composite index to measure the flood resilience of urban Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI). An eight-step procedure was used for the composite index construction. Statistical correlation and regression analysis established indicator appropriateness, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used for weighing and aggregation. The Ecological Flood Resilience Index (EFRI) was developed and applied to the city of Kochi, India to assess the ability of existing urban BGI to temporarily store, infiltrate, and delay runoff, indicating the capacity of the system to withstand urban flooding. The index was validated using crowd- based data followed by sensitivity analysis. The EFRI Map outlines that the highly urbanized low resilient central areas, marked by poor vegetation and disrupted natural drainage contribute to flooding in various parts of the city. A comprehensive analysis of the 37 % regions of the city that falls within 'very low' to 'extremely low' resilience is essential to understand the critical factors in flood resilient spatial planning. The proposed composite index is significant for its novelty and theoretical clarity in resilience evaluations, promoting a shift from risk-based to resilience approaches in urban flood management.
C1 [Ambily, P.; Chithra, N. R.; Viswanath, Saranya] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Civil Engn Water Resources, NIT Campus, Kozhikode 673601, India.
   [Firoz, C. Mohammed] Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Architecture & Planning, NIT Campus, Kozhikode 673601, India.
C3 National Institute of Technology (NIT System); National Institute of
   Technology Calicut; National Institute of Technology (NIT System);
   National Institute of Technology Calicut
RP Ambily, P (corresponding author), Natl Inst Technol Calicut, Dept Civil Engn Water Resources, NIT Campus, Kozhikode 673601, India.
EM ambilymenon@rit.ac.in
RI FIROZ C, MOHAMMED/LDF-8024-2024; NR, Chithra/JZD-4597-2024
OI P, AMBILY/0000-0002-4790-0968; NR, Chithra/0000-0003-2555-0263
CR Abdulkareem M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.009
   Arthur N, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127459
   Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Asadzadeh A, 2022, CITIES, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103642
   Assarkhaniki Z, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101840
   Auerswald K, 2021, SOIL TILL RES, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2021.105034
   Bae J, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127315
   Rosa DWB, 2023, URBAN WATER J, V20, P1348, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2022.2066549
   Battemarco BP, 2023, URBAN WATER J, V20, P1695, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2022.2134804
   Battemarco BP, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V333, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129993
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Bibi TS, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101291
   Cai H, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
   Chen KF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040830
   Cumming GS, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P975, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
   Cyriac S, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105992
   Dastjerdi MS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100794
   Debele SE, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108799
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Ghasemzadeh B, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147852
   Ghofrani Z., 2019, International Journal of Water, V13, P151, DOI 10.1504/IJW.2019.099514
   Gonzales LP, 2017, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V37, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.024
   Grabs T, 2009, J HYDROL, V373, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.031
   Gunnell K, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V670, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.212
   Helmrich AM, 2021, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105124
   Hysa A, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107432
   Kaykhosravi S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11112341
   Kazak JK, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124388
   Kim HW, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V28, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.010
   Klimanova O, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10121292
   Klimanova Oxana A., 2020, Geography, Environment, Sustainability, V13, P251
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Krishnan VS, 2021, REG STAT, V11, P102, DOI 10.15196/RS110205
   Krishnan VS, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.03.001
   Leandro J, 2020, WATER RES, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115502
   Lee HK, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P469, DOI 10.1007/s10668-018-0210-3
   Ling TY, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020875
   Liu CS, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118482
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   Mitchell A., 2013, OECD Working Paper, 2013, 13/2013
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Monteiro R, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14095170
   Mooi M., 2019, CONCISE GUIDE MARKET
   Munna GM, 2021, ENVIRON SUSTAIN IND, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.indic.2021.100129
   OECD, 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-EN, 10.1787/9789264043466-EN]
   Pacetti T, 2022, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101081
   Piedelobo L, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11242967
   Qi WC, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108565
   Rezende OM, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071485
   Sánchez FG, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106455
   Senes G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116124
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Sonu ST, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101089
   Sorensen R, 2007, J HYDROL, V347, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.001
   Sowmya K, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1271, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1372-4
   Tsatsou A, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V394, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136325
   Uteuov A, 2019, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V156, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.211
   Xue JF, 2022, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2022.1002231
   Yang B, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10090897
   Zapata-Caldas E, 2022, ECOSYST SERV, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101445
   Zellner M, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V59, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.04.008
   Zhu H., 2021, A Group-Decision-Making Framework for Evaluating Urban Flood Resilience: A Case Study in Yangtze River
   Zhuang YC, 2023, J HYDROL, V627, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130474
NR 63
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 38
U2 40
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD OCT 15
PY 2024
VL 113
AR 104867
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104867
EA SEP 2024
PG 15
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA I1G9U
UT WOS:001327823500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Man, S
   Wu, XL
   Yang, YC
   Meng, QM
AF Man, Shan
   Wu, Xiangli
   Yang, Yongchun
   Meng, Qingmin
TI An Assessment Approach to Urban Economic Resilience of the Rust Belt in
   China
SO COMPLEXITY
LA English
DT Article
ID REGIONAL RESILIENCE; CITIES; ROTTERDAM; FRAMEWORK; SHOCKS
AB Urban economic resilience provides a novel perspective on the sustainable development of urban and regional economy. Selecting 37 prefecture-level cities in the Northeast China that also known as the rust belt in China as a regional study sample that has experienced significant economic decline and out-migration in the last 20 years compared to many other regions in China, this study aims to construct an index system using the data collected in 2005, 2010, and 2016. This study evaluates urban economic resilience including five socioeconomic aspects: diversity, capabilities related to revenue and expenditure, innovation environment, trend of development, and openness. We analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of urban economic resilience, explore the key factors contributing to urban resilience and then provide decision-making suggestions to enhance it. We find the following: (1) urban economic resilience in the Northeast China has gradually increased over time, but spatial heterogeneity of resilience was prominent. Specifically, coastal cities were more economically resilient than inland cities. (2) Urban economic resilience in the Northeast China is significantly contributed by the diversity of an economic system and the trend of development, which contribute to resilience with weights of 0.214 and 0.216, respectively. The dominant factors contributing to urban economic resilience are different among diverse urban economic types and size. (3) To enhance urban economic resilience, comprehensive economic cities need to focus on increasing the diversity of economic structures. Resource-based and old industrial cities should focus on raising the innovation environment. Coastal cities should focus on increasing the diversity of their economic structures and creating positive trends of economic and social development. Agricultural cities should focus on creating positive trends of economic and social development.
C1 [Man, Shan; Yang, Yongchun] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
   [Man, Shan; Wu, Xiangli] Harbin Normal Univ, Coll Geog Sci, Harbin 150025, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Yongchun] Lanzhou Univ, Key Lab Western Chinas Environm Syst, Minist Educ Peoples Republ China, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
   [Meng, Qingmin] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Geosci, Starkville, MS 39762 USA.
C3 Lanzhou University; Harbin Normal University; Lanzhou University;
   Mississippi State University
RP Wu, XL (corresponding author), Harbin Normal Univ, Coll Geog Sci, Harbin 150025, Peoples R China.
EM jndxwxl@163.com
OI , Xiangli/0000-0003-4949-9896; Meng, Qingmin/0000-0002-6287-5553
FU Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China [16BJY039]
FX This research was supported by the Philosophy and Social Science
   Foundation of China, no. 16BJY039.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Capello R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P951, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
   Chen L., 2017, Mod. Urban Res, V9, P18, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2017.09.003, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-6000.2017.09.003]
   Chen Y.M., 2017, Chinese Public Administration, V1, P137, DOI DOI 10.3782/J.ISSN.1006-0863.2017.01.23
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Fingleton B, 2012, J REGIONAL SCI, V52, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x
   [关皓明 Guan Haoming], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P771
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holm JR, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P95, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2013.787159
   Hu XH, 2018, CITIES, V72, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.002
   Landry F, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V202, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103856
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   [李连刚 Li Liangang], 2019, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V39, P116
   Li T., 2017, Urban Planning International, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Liu J., 2014, E GOVT, V3, P82, DOI [10.16582/j.cnki.dzzw.2014.03.011, DOI 10.16582/J.CNKI.DZZW.2014.03.011]
   Liu K., 2014, CITY PLANNING REV, V38, P59, DOI [10.11819/cpr20141110a, DOI 10.11819/CPR20141110A]
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Oxborrow L, 2012, INT J RETAIL DISTRIB, V40, P882, DOI 10.1108/09590551211267629
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Qi X., 2019, ZHEJIANG SOCIAL SCI, V40-46, P156, DOI [10.14167/j.zjss.2019.05.005, DOI 10.14167/J.ZJSS.2019.05.005]
   Quan M., 2019, Hous. Sci, V39, P1, DOI [10.13626/j.cnki.hs.2019.02.001, DOI 10.13626/J.CNKI.HS.2019.02.001]
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Slocum S, 2014, ANATOLIA, V25, P403, DOI 10.1080/13032917.2014.888673
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   [孙久文 Sun Jiuwen], 2017, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V37, P1
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Wink R, 2014, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V72, P83, DOI 10.1007/s13147-014-0283-x
   Wood NJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9376-1
   Woolf S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003
   Xie Q., 2017, TECHNOL DECIS, V4, P60, DOI [10.3773/j.issn.1006-4885.2017.04.060, DOI 10.3773/J.ISSN.1006-4885.2017.04.060]
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   [徐媛媛 Xu Yuanyuan], 2017, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V36, P986
   Zang X., 2019, RESILIENCE URBAN DIS, V37, P94, DOI [10.4337/9781788970105.00011, DOI 10.4337/9781788970105.00011]
   Zhang T, 2018, J WUXI VOCATIONAL I, V18, P1, DOI [10.13659/j.cnki.wxsy.20180508.002, DOI 10.13659/J.CNKI.WXSY.20180508.002]
   Zhao D.Y., 2016, MANAGE REV, V28, P207
   Zhao L., 2014, Economic Geography, V34, P69, DOI DOI 10.15957/J.CNKI.JJDL.2014.12.011
   Zhou L, 2016, J BEIJING ADM I, P13, DOI [10.16365/j.cnki.11-4054/d.2016.02.003, DOI 10.16365/J.CNKI.11-4054/D.2016.02.003]
NR 47
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 11
U2 179
PU WILEY-HINDAWI
PI LONDON
PA ADAM HOUSE, 3RD FL, 1 FITZROY SQ, LONDON, WIT 5HE, ENGLAND
SN 1076-2787
EI 1099-0526
J9 COMPLEXITY
JI Complexity
PD SEP 10
PY 2021
VL 2021
AR 1935557
DI 10.1155/2021/1935557
PG 16
WC Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Mathematics; Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA UT9RX
UT WOS:000698446100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Li, R
   Lu, Y
AF Li, Rui
   Lu, Yi
TI Toward a resilient and smart city: Analysis on enablers for smart city
   resilience using an integrated DEMATEL-ISM-ANP method
SO TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart city; Urban resilience; Enablers; Influencing interrelationships;
   DEMATEL-ISM-ANP
ID SUSTAINABLE CITIES; DECISION-MAKING; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; NETWORK;
   GOVERNANCE; TECHNOLOGIES; INTERNET; THINGS; PLACE
AB An integrated strategy that incorporates both smartness and resilience is critical to achieving long-term urban sustainability. A smart city brings both challenges and opportunities for resilience, making the improvement of smart city resilience a key goal in many countries today. This study extracts 21 key enablers that can drive smart city resilience through a literature review and expert opinions, and examines their interrelationships, hierarchies, and priorities by integrating decision making trial and evaluation laboratory, interpretive structural modeling, and analytic network process methods (DEMATEL-ISM-ANP) into a relational model. The results show that financial resource allocation should be prioritized in short-term strategies to support open innovation platform building, ecological protection and disaster risk reduction actions to improve the infrastructural, social, economic and environmental resilience of smart cities. Data reliability, and smart and networked infrastructure are the main transmission enablers, facilitated through technology and governance. Data security, environmental protection, and sustainable resource management are key direct enablers for long-term strategy, facilitated from the bottom up in the structural hierarchy. This research can guide public authorities, practitioners, and academics seeking to advance smart city resilience, and contributes to the building of smart and resilient cities.
C1 [Lu, Yi] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, South Sect 1 24, Yihuan Rd, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
   [Lu, Yi] Sichuan Univ, Inst Disaster Management & Reconstruct, Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
   [Lu, Yi] Sichuan Univ, Inst Emergency Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
C3 Sichuan University; Sichuan University; Hong Kong Polytechnic
   University; Sichuan University
RP Lu, Y (corresponding author), 122 Huanghe Middle Rd Sect 1, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
EM lirui1023@stu.scu.edu.cn; luyiscu@scu.edu.cn
FU Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China
   [22 ZD142]
FX This work was supported by the Major Program of National Fund of
   Philosophy and Social Science of China [grant number No. 22 & ZD142] .
CR Abreu DP, 2017, ANN TELECOMMUN, V72, P19, DOI 10.1007/s12243-016-0530-y
   Abu-Rayash A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102704
   Adali EA, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104021
   Adapa S, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P3351, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.250
   Ahvenniemi H, 2017, CITIES, V60, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
   Aina YA, 2017, CITIES, V71, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.007
   Albino V, 2015, J URBAN TECHNOL, V22, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
   Alizadeh H, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104612
   Alshamaila Y, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103521
   Angelidou M, 2018, J SCI TECHNOL POLICY, V9, P146, DOI 10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0016
   Anjum A, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.014
   [Anonymous], 2020, Human cost of disasters: An onverview of the last 20 years 2000-2019, DOI DOI 10.18356/79B92774-EN
   Anthopoulos L, 2017, CITIES, V63, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005
   Anthopoulos L, 2016, INT J ELECTRON GOV R, V12, P77, DOI 10.4018/IJEGR.2016040105
   Arafah Y, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V158, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012045
   Banica A, 2020, GEOGRAFIE-PRAGUE, V125, P397, DOI 10.37040/geografie2020125040397
   Barns S, 2016, URBAN GEOGR, V37, P554, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1139876
   Batabyal AA, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V147, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.013
   Baykasoglu A, 2015, INFORM SCIENCES, V301, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2014.12.048
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Büyüközkan G, 2016, INT J PROD ECON, V182, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.015
   Büyüközkan G, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P5835, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.022
   Cañavera-Herrera JS, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102970
   Chen FH, 2011, INT J HOSP MANAG, V30, P908, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.02.001
   Chen SH, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V131, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.019
   Cooke P., 2017, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, V3, P9, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40852-017-0060-5
   Cooke P., 2024, J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex., V10, P177, DOI [10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100177, DOI 10.1016/J.JOITMC.2023.100177]
   Cooke Philip, 2020, J OPEN INNOV TECHNOL, V6, P24, DOI DOI 10.3390/JOITMC6020024
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P25, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.768076
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   de Falco S, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P205, DOI 10.1177/0969776418783813
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Degbelo A, 2016, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V5, DOI 10.3390/ijgi5020016
   Eder-Neuhauser P, 2016, IEEE ACCESS, V4, P839, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2531279
   Ehwi RJ, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P2968, DOI 10.1177/00420980211064983
   Franchin P., 2015, nisee.berkeley.edu, V30, P583, DOI [10.1111/MICE.12092, DOI 10.1111/MICE.12092]
   Fromhold-Eisebith M, 2019, WORLD DEV, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104614
   Gabus A., 1972, WORLD PROBLEMS INVIT
   Gao WC, 2020, IEEE T NETW SCI ENG, V7, P776, DOI 10.1109/TNSE.2018.2846736
   Giffinger Rudolf., 2007, City-ranking of European medium-sized cities
   Golcuk I, 2016, EXPERT SYST APPL, V46, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.10.041
   Gómez-Expósito A, 2018, P IEEE, V106, P626, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2018.2793461
   Gupta A, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119929
   Hamzah H., 2012, Smart City assessment framework
   Hartley K, 2021, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V46, P1286, DOI 10.1177/0162243921992864
   Huang CN, 2014, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V55, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.10.010
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Huovila A, 2019, CITIES, V89, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029
   Israilidis J, 2021, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.015
   Jha AV, 2021, WIREL NETW, V27, P2595, DOI 10.1007/s11276-021-02579-1
   Kamolova S.G., 2024, Manag. Sci., V13, P34, DOI [10.26794/2304-022X-2023-13-4-34-46, DOI 10.26794/2304-022X-2023-13-4-34-46]
   Kang MG, 2020, INT J URBAN SCI, V24, P297, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2020.1803107
   Khan HH, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P1507, DOI 10.1002/sd.2090
   Khan Z, 2017, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V77, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2017.06.031
   Khatibi H, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1556, DOI 10.1177/23998083221092422
   Kim C., 2021, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, V7, P42
   Kitchin R, 2019, J URBAN TECHNOL, V26, P47, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2017.1408002
   Kong L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-20891-x
   Kotevska O, 2017, IEEE ACCESS, V5, P20524, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2757841
   Kumar M, 2022, OPER MANAGE RES, V15, P1198, DOI 10.1007/s12063-022-00272-w
   Kumar S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023
   Lara A., 2016, J OPEN INNOVATION, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S40852-016-0034-Z, 10.1186/s40852-016-0034-z]
   Lazaroiu GC, 2012, ENERGY, V47, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2012.09.028
   Lee JH, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033
   Leszczynski A, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN A, V48, P1691, DOI 10.1177/0308518X16651445
   Li R, 2025, SYSTEMS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/systems13010060
   Li X, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V215, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.046
   Liang Y, 2022, COMPUT IND ENG, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107818
   Liu W, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
   Liu XX, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V383, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135447
   Lu Y, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103313
   Lytras MD, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061998
   Mahdiraji HA, 2022, BRIT FOOD J, V124, P1984, DOI 10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0876
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   Meijer A, 2016, INT REV ADM SCI, V82, P392, DOI 10.1177/0020852314564308
   Mercado JMR, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101683
   Mora L, 2023, TECHNOVATION, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717
   Mora L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V142, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.035
   Mosannenzadeh F, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V105, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.007
   Nam T., 2011, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2011), September 26-28, Tallinn, Estonia, P185, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2072069.2072100, 10.1145/2072069.2072100]
   Nguyen P.-H., 2023, J. Open Innov., Technol., Market, Complex., V9, DOI 10.1016/j.joitmc
   Nitoslawski SA, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101770
   Obringer R, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103278
   Offenhuber D, 2018, CITIES, V72, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.017
   Palomo-Navarro A, 2018, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V42, P872, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.10.002
   Paskaleva K, 2018, TECHNOVATION, V78, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.07.003
   Pereira GV, 2017, INFORM TECHNOL DEV, V23, P526, DOI 10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
   Pira M, 2021, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1057/s41599-021-00879-7
   Poncela J, 2014, WIRELESS PERS COMMUN, V76, P149, DOI 10.1007/s11277-014-1683-5
   Rad TG, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P608, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.024
   Romao J, 2018, CITIES, V78, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.007
   Saaty T.L., 2006, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, DOI [10.1007/0-387-33,987-63, DOI 10.1007/0-387-33,987-63]
   Samarakkody A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141912716
   Sen MK, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125526
   Shah SA, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P91885, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928233
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148018
   Sharifi A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P1269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sun SG, 2020, J MECH SCI TECHNOL, V34, P3181, DOI 10.1007/s12206-020-0709-z
   Sipahi B., 2024, Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, V8, P41, DOI [10.25019/dvm98x09, DOI 10.25019/DVM98X09]
   Sonn JW, 2020, EURASIAN GEOGR ECON, V61, P482, DOI 10.1080/15387216.2020.1768423
   Sterbenz JPG, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 9TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON RESILIENT NETWORKS DESIGN AND MODELING (RNDM)
   Syrmakesis AD, 2022, INT J INF SECUR, V21, P1189, DOI 10.1007/s10207-022-00594-7
   Szromek A. R., 2022, J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex., V8, P112, DOI [10.3390/joitmc8030112, DOI 10.3390/JOITMC8030112]
   Thomas D, 2022, INT J LEAN SIX SIG, V13, P502, DOI 10.1108/IJLSS-09-2020-0140
   Tobin G.A., 1999, Environmental Hazards, V1, P13, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(99)00002-9, 10.3763/ehaz.1999.0103]
   Trencher G, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V142, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033
   UNDRR, 2012, How to Make Cities More Resilient: A Handbook for Local Government Leaders
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2020, World Social Report: Inequality in a Rapidly Changing World
   Vieira M., 2023, J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex., V9, P068
   Walravens Nils, 2012, J. theor. appl. electron. commer. res., V7, P121
   WARFIELD JN, 1974, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC4, P405, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1974.4309336
   Xu WP, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13152022
   Yadav G, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101462
   Yang JL, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P1417, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048
   Yao F, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102448
   Yarime M, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P881, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0498-1
   Yigitcanlar T, 2018, CITIES, V81, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
   Yu RC, 2006, APPL MATH COMPUT, V180, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2005.11.163
   Yu YG, 2022, INFORM TECHNOL PEOPL, V35, P1029, DOI 10.1108/ITP-10-2020-0680
   Yun JJ, 2024, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123263
   Yun JJ, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124495
   Yun Y., 2019, J. Open Innov.: Technol. Mark. Complex., V5, P92, DOI [10.3390/joitmc5040092, DOI 10.3390/JOITMC5040092]
   Zhang YH, 2018, SOFT COMPUT, V22, P7763, DOI 10.1007/s00500-018-3435-z
   Zhao F, 2021, CITIES, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103406
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu SY, 2020, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V10, DOI 10.1002/widm.1388
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 131
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 18
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0040-1625
EI 1873-5509
J9 TECHNOL FORECAST SOC
JI Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
PD JUN
PY 2025
VL 215
AR 124081
DI 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124081
EA MAR 2025
PG 16
WC Business; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Public Administration
GA Z7H8B
UT WOS:001440578700001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Gupta, K
AF Gupta, Kapil
TI Challenges in developing urban flood resilience in India
SO PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL
   AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE urbanization; flooding; resilience; India
ID CITY; COCHIN
AB This note presents a short commentary on the recurring urban flooding in India and the challenges the country faces in implementing sustainable drainage practices and developing urban flood resilience. The major incidences of heavy rainfall and the consequent urban flooding and their causes are briefly described. The recent flood disaster management and mitigation measures carried out by the Central, State and Local Government are highlighted. The flood resilience initiatives and challenges are then discussed. The effects of climate change on increased rainfall in shorter durations are now being felt in many Indian cities. The planners are now taking cognizance of this and future flood resilience measures are being planned to incorporate an integrated approach to stormwater management by recommending best management practices in the stormwater manuals. However, a lot still needs to be done to make the cities in India flood resilient.
   This article is part of the theme issue 'Urban flood resilience'.
C1 [Gupta, Kapil] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Bombay
RP Gupta, K (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
EM kgupta@iitb.ac.in
OI Gupta, Kapil/0000-0002-9034-6907
CR [Anonymous], 2018, 2018 FLOODS KILL 350, P239
   [Anonymous], 2011, Technical Report
   [Anonymous], 2011, Report on Indian Urban Infrastructure and Services
   CPHEEO, 2013, Manual on sewerage and sewage treatment systems
   CPHEEO (Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation), 2019, MAN STORMW DRAIN SYS
   Dhar S, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 MEDITERRANEAN MICROWAVE SYMPOSIUM (MMS2014), P287, DOI 10.1109/MMS.2014.7088783
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Government of India, 2015, AMRUT AT MISS REJ UR
   Gupta H, 2017, 14 IWA IAHR INT C UR
   Gupta K, 2013, IAHS-AISH P, V357, P385
   Gupta K, 2014, 13 INT C URB DRAIN S
   Gupta K., 2007, Urb. Wat. J, V4, P183, DOI DOI 10.1080/15730620701464141
   India Meteorological Department, 2019, ALL IND WEATH SUMM F
   JANSEN M, 1985, ENDEAVOUR, V9, P161, DOI 10.1016/0160-9327(85)90072-9
   Kotharkar R, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.12.006
   Mathew S, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.005
   Murali RM, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V148, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.010
   National Disaster Management Authority, 2010, NAT DIS MAN GUID MAN
   National Disaster Management Authority, 2016, NAT DIS MAN PLAN
   Oppenheimer M., 2019, IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate
   Patel DP, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P93, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2956-6
   Portner H. -O., 2019, CLIMATE CHANGE LAND
   Rangari Vinay Ashok, 2019, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A (Civil, Architectural, Environmental and Agricultural Engineering), V100, P49, DOI 10.1007/s40030-018-0345-0
   Rao V.G., 2012, Ecol. Environ. Group, V80, P89
   Sahoo SN, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI [10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000271, 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000271]
   Shukla D, 1995, LOTHAL SANITARY DRAI
   Sowmya K, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1271, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1372-4
   Suriya S, 2012, J HYDROL, V412, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.008
   Town and Country Planning Organization (TCPO), 2017, OP INS HUM ASS BANGL
   Waghwala RK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101155
   World Bank, 2011, 53282IN WORLD BANK
NR 31
TC 44
Z9 44
U1 14
U2 90
PU ROYAL SOC
PI LONDON
PA 6-9 CARLTON HOUSE TERRACE, LONDON SW1Y 5AG, ENGLAND
SN 1364-503X
EI 1471-2962
J9 PHILOS T R SOC A
JI Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
PD APR 3
PY 2020
VL 378
IS 2168
SI SI
AR 20190211
DI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0211
PG 9
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA KO6JB
UT WOS:000515653700016
PM 32063174
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Romolini, M
   Bixler, RP
   Grove, JM
AF Romolini, Michele
   Bixler, R. Patrick
   Grove, J. Morgan
TI A Social-Ecological Framework for Urban Stewardship Network Research to
   Promote Sustainable and Resilient Cities
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban natural resources management; environmental governance; governance
   networks; social-ecological systems; urban ecology; urban resilience
ID NEW-YORK-CITY; ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
   GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; BALTIMORE; SEATTLE; SCALE
AB To realize more sustainable and resilient urban social-ecological systems, there is great need for active engagement from diverse public agencies, non-profit organizations, businesses, natural resource managers, scientists, and other actors. Cities present unique challenges and opportunities for sustainability and resilience, as issues and organizations are frequently intertwined in networks of relations. Understanding and leveraging the range of knowledge types, motivations, skills, and goals of diverse participants and their networks is fundamental to sustainable and resilient cities. As efforts to examine and understand urban stewardship networks continue to emerge, it is increasingly clear that there are no structured or systematic frameworks to guide the integration of social and ecological phenomena. Such a framework could facilitate planning new urban stewardship network research, and provide a basis for comparisons among cities and their urban stewardship networks. In this paper, we develop and present a social-ecological framework for examining and understanding urban stewardship networks. To illustrate this framework and provide examples of its prospective and evaluative utility, we use examples from the U.S. Forest Service's Stewardship Mapping (STEW-MAP) network in the United States from Baltimore, MD, USA, New York City, NY, USA, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA, and Seattle, WA, USA.
C1 [Romolini, Michele] Loyola Marymount Univ, Ctr Urban Resilience, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA.
   [Bixler, R. Patrick] Univ Texas Austin, RGK Ctr Philanthropy & Community Serv, LBJ Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
   [Grove, J. Morgan] US Forest Serv, Northern Res Stn, USDA, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA.
C3 Loyola Marymount University; University of Texas System; University of
   Texas Austin; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA); United
   States Forest Service
RP Romolini, M (corresponding author), Loyola Marymount Univ, Ctr Urban Resilience, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA.
EM michele.romolini@lmu.edu; rpbixler@utexas.edu; morgangrove@fs.fed.us
OI Romolini, Michele/0000-0003-4669-9796; Grove, J.
   Morgan/0000-0002-7803-074X; Bixler, R. Patrick/0000-0003-0515-0967
FU National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) - National
   Science Foundation [DBI-1052875]; USDA Forest Service's Northern
   Research Station; International Institute for Tropical Forestry; SESYNC;
   [NSF-DEB-1027188];  [NSF-RCN-1140070]; Direct For Biological Sciences;
   Division Of Environmental Biology [1140077] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation; Direct For Biological Sciences; Division Of
   Environmental Biology [1140070, 1027188] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation; Direct For Biological Sciences; Div Of Biological
   Infrastructure [1052875] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX This work was supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis
   Center (SESYNC) under funding received from the National Science
   Foundation DBI-1052875. Research used to illustrate the framework in
   this paper was funded by NSF-DEB-1027188 and NSF-RCN-1140070 and the
   USDA Forest Service's Northern Research Station and International
   Institute for Tropical Forestry. Grove would like to acknowledge the
   support of SESYNC, where he is a Social Science Scholar in Residence.
   The authors also thank colleagues from our STEW-MAP network, including
   Erika Svendsen, Lindsay Campbell, Michelle Johnson, Tischa
   Munoz-Erickson, Lynne Westphal, Cherie Fisher, Kathy Wolf, Dale Blahna,
   Dexter Locke, and Nancy Sonti.
CR Allen T.F. H., 2015, Toward a unified ecology, V2nd, DOI 10.7312/alle06918
   [Anonymous], 2014, ECOL SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-06457-190302
   Bixler RP, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P145, DOI 10.1002/fee.1250
   Bodin Ö, 2014, CONSERV BIOL, V28, P1371, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12306
   Bodin Ö, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Bodino Prell C., 2011, SOCIAL NETWORKS NATU
   Connolly JJ, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001
   Connolly JJT, 2014, ECOSYST SERV, V10, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.005
   Crona B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Ernstson H, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Fisher DR, 2012, ENVIRON POLIT, V21, P26, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.643367
   Grove J. M., 2016, ECOSYST HLT IN PRESS
   Guerrero AM, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P35, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01964.x
   Kania J., 2011, Stanford Social Innovation Review, V1, P36
   Laven DN, 2010, EVALUATION REV, V34, P271, DOI 10.1177/0193841X10370668
   Lemos MC, 2006, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V31, P297, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
   Locke D.H., 2014, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V4, P250, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S13412-014-0176-X, 10.1007/s13412, DOI 10.1007/S13412, 10.1007/s13412-014-0176-x]
   Mandarano LA, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P245, DOI 10.1080/08941920801922182
   Newell P, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P365, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659
   Pickett Steward T. A., 2016, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, V2, pe01229, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1229
   Prell C, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P501, DOI 10.1080/08941920802199202
   Romolini M, 2016, ENVIRON MANAGE, V58, P254, DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0704-4
   Romolini M, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V120, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.008
   Sandström A, 2008, POLICY STUD J, V36, P497, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00281.x
   Schneider M, 2003, AM J POLIT SCI, V47, P143, DOI 10.2307/3186098
   Sternlieb F, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V130, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.053
   Wolf KL, 2013, URBAN ECOSYST, V16, P13, DOI 10.1007/s11252-011-0175-6
NR 28
TC 23
Z9 28
U1 4
U2 99
PU MDPI AG
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2016
VL 8
IS 9
AR 956
DI 10.3390/su8090956
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DZ0LC
UT WOS:000385529400125
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Schewenius, M
   McPhearson, T
   Elmqvist, T
AF Schewenius, Maria
   McPhearson, Timon
   Elmqvist, Thomas
TI Opportunities for Increasing Resilience and Sustainability of Urban
   Social-Ecological Systems: Insights from the URBES and the Cities and
   Biodiversity Outlook Projects
SO AMBIO
LA English
DT Article
DE Urbanization; Ecosystem services; Governance; URBES; CBO
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COMMUNITY GARDENS; GOVERNANCE; CITY; URBANIZATION;
   MANAGEMENT; GROWTH
AB Urban futures that are more resilient and sustainable require an integrated social-ecological system approach to urban policymaking, planning, management, and governance. In this article, we introduce the Urban Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (URBES) and the Cities and Biodiversity Outlook (CBO) Projects as new social-ecological contributions to research and practice on emerging urban resilience and ecosystem services. We provide an overview of the projects and present global urbanization trends and their effects on ecosystems and biodiversity, as a context for new knowledge generated in the URBES case-study cities, including Berlin, New York, Rotterdam, Barcelona, and Stockholm. The cities represent contrasting urbanization trends and examples of emerging science-policy linkages for improving urban landscapes for human health and well-being. In addition, we highlight 10 key messages of the global CBO assessment as a knowledge platform for urban leaders to incorporate state-of-the-art science on URBES into decision-making for sustainable and resilient urban development.
C1 [Schewenius, Maria; Elmqvist, Thomas] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
   [McPhearson, Timon] New Sch, Tishman Environm & Design Ctr, New York, NY 10003 USA.
C3 Stockholm University; The New School
RP Schewenius, M (corresponding author), Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
EM maria.schewenius@su.se; mcphearp@newschool.edu; thomas.elmqvist@su.se
RI Elmqvist, Thomas/AAY-6344-2021; McPhearson, Timon/JOZ-3799-2023
OI Elmqvist, Thomas/0000-0002-4617-6197; McPhearson,
   Timon/0000-0002-9499-0791; Schewenius, Maria/0000-0002-7122-6790
FU BiodivERsA; Formas
FX We thank BiodivERsA and Formas for research funding to the URBES and CBO
   projects. We also thank the global team of contributors to the CBO
   publications.
CR Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2013, BARCELONA GREEN INFR
   Anderson Pippin M.L., 2013, P453
   Andersson E, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P445, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
   [Anonymous], 2011, The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, DOI DOI 10.2779/39229
   [Anonymous], 1987, OUR COMM FUT
   [Anonymous], Ecosystems and Human Well-Being-Synthesis
   [Anonymous], 2012, CIT BIOD OUTL ACT PO
   [Anonymous], 2011, NY TIMES
   [Anonymous], 2011, synthesis report of the PLUREL project
   Baró F, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P466, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x
   Barthel S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001
   Bendt P, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.003
   Biermann F, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.010
   Borgström ST, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Butler CD, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Carpenter SR, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P1305, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Colding Johan, 2013, P313
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Crossman ND, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V4, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001
   Eigenbrod F, 2011, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V278, P3201, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.2754
   Elmqvist T., 2010, EC ECOSYSTEMS BIODIV
   Elmqvist Thomas, 2013, P719
   Erixon H, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P349, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2013.813960
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Ernstson H, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Folke C, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0109-x
   Fragkias M., 2013, Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: Challenges and opportunities, P409, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-121, 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-121, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_21]
   Frantzeskaki N, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P542, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0
   Gomez-Baggethun Erik, 2013, P175
   Guneralp Burak, 2013, P437
   Haase D, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P413, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
   Haase D, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V35, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.012
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   ICLEI, 2013, ICLEI LOC GOV SUST
   ICSU, 2013, FUT EARTH
   Ignatieva M, 2011, LANDSC ECOL ENG, V7, P17, DOI 10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y
   Kabisch N, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V122, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016
   Kabisch N, 2011, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V17, P236, DOI 10.1002/psp.600
   Kohsaka Ryo, 2013, P93
   Kremen C, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P540, DOI 10.2307/3868610
   Kremer P, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V120, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.003
   Langemeyer J., 2014, ASSESSING MULTIPLE V, DOI [10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x, DOI 10.1007/S13280-014-0507-X]
   Lauf S, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V27-28, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.005
   Marcotullio P.J., 2013, CHANGING ENV HUMAN S, P496
   Marull J, 2005, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V71, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.03.007
   Marull J, 2010, LAND USE POLICY, V27, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.004
   McPhearson P.T., 2011, SUSTAINABILITY AMERI, P181, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-028-6_9
   McPhearson T, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V5, pE11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.005
   McPhearson Timon, 2013, P279
   McPhearson T, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P502, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8
   Meyer H, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P71, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.638498
   Muñiz I, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V113, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.004
   NYC Green Infrastructure Plan, 2010, NYC GREEN INFR PLAN
   Pauchard Anibal, 2013, P589
   Paul V., 2005, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V48, P7, DOI 10.1080/0964056042000308139
   Pe'er G, 2013, CONSERV BIOL, V27, P1, DOI 10.1111/cobi.12000
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Rosol M, 2010, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V34, P548, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x
   Schmidt S, 2011, URBAN GEOGR, V32, P105, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.32.1.105
   Seitzinger SP, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P787, DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0353-7
   Senatsverwaltung fur Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt, 2012, BEV BERL BEZ 2011 20
   Seto Karen, 2013, Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-11/FIGURES/2, 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-11, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_1, 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1]
   Seto KC, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023777
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P16083, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1211658109
   Siedentop S, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P2765, DOI 10.1068/a4580
   Solecki W, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.03.001
   Sweden Statistics, 2011, FOLKMANGD RIKET OCH
   TEEB, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations
   The Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010, AICH BIOD TARG
   UN-DESA, 2011, POP DISTR URB INT MI
   Wang HJ, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.006
   Ward PJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P518, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2012.683155
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Westerink J, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P473, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.722927
   Wilkinson Cathy, 2013, P539
NR 76
TC 76
Z9 91
U1 14
U2 210
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0044-7447
EI 1654-7209
J9 AMBIO
JI Ambio
PD MAY
PY 2014
VL 43
IS 4
SI SI
BP 434
EP 444
DI 10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
PG 11
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA AF0YY
UT WOS:000334442400003
PM 24740615
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, ZT
   Fang, CL
   Liao, X
   Fan, R
   Sun, B
   Mu, XF
AF Liu, Zhitao
   Fang, Chuanglin
   Liao, Xia
   Fan, Rong
   Sun, Biao
   Mu, Xufang
TI Adaptation and adaptability: Deciphering urban resilience from the
   evolutionary perspective
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban evolutionary resilience; Trade-off and synergy; Marginal utility
   function; Spatial exploration algorithms
ID ECONOMIC RESILIENCE; REGIONAL RESILIENCE; SUPPORT; SYSTEMS; IMPACT
AB Given that cities are complex and evolving adaptive systems facing various crises, evolutionary resilience plays a crucial role in fostering urban sustainable development. However, the concept of evolution has been largely overlooked in cognitive assessments of urban resilience, leaving the relationships among the internal elements of urban evolutionary resilience insufficiently understood. To address this research gap, we introduce the evolutionary perspective to redefine urban resilience, and accordingly we develop a conceptual framework and evaluation model that consider two dimensions: adaptation and adaptability. Subsequently, an empirical assessment is conducted using data from 281 Chinese prefecture-level cities spanning the period from 2000 to 2019. Furthermore, we employ the marginal utility function and spatial exploration algorithm to investigate the adaptation-adaptability relationship within urban evolutionary resilience. Our findings reveal that while the overall evolutionary resilience of Chinese cities has increased by 31.91% over the past two decades, the disparities between cities have significantly widened. Additionally, the trade-off or synergetic relationship between urban adaptation and adaptability varies with the stage of urban development. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of urban agglomerations overlaps significantly with the synergy zones of urban adaptation-adaptability relationships. By providing new insights into the comprehensive and systematic evaluation of urban evolutionary resilience, this study holds the potential to inform policy and practice aimed at fostering the development of resilient cities.
C1 [Liu, Zhitao; Fang, Chuanglin; Liao, Xia; Fan, Rong; Sun, Biao] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Resources, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Zhitao; Fang, Chuanglin; Liao, Xia; Fan, Rong; Sun, Biao] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
   [Mu, Xufang] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Geog Sci & Geomat Engn, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China.
   [Fang, Chuanglin] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Academy of Sciences; Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of
   Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS; Suzhou University of Science &
   Technology; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geographic
   Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS
RP Fang, CL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM liuzht7@foxmail.com; fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn
RI Fang, Chuanglin/ABF-2458-2020; Liu, Zhitao/GON-6401-2022; Liao,
   Xia/GLU-9067-2022
OI Liu, Zhitao/0000-0003-0823-076X
FU Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [42121001]; Major Program of National
   Natural Science Foundation of China [41590840]
FX This work was supported by Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of
   the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42121001) and
   Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.
   41590840) .
CR Akcomak I..S., 2007, How Do Social Capital and Government Support Affect Innovation and Growth?: Evidence from the EU Regional Support Programmes
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   [Anonymous], 2020, WORLD CITIES REPORT, DOI DOI 10.18356/D437CD7E-EN
   Asadzadeh A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104637
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2014, CITIES, V36, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.007
   Béné C, 2014, J INT DEV, V26, P598, DOI 10.1002/jid.2992
   Bettencourt L, 2010, NATURE, V467, P912, DOI 10.1038/467912a
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Brakman S, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P225, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv005
   Butchart SHM, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1164, DOI 10.1126/science.1187512
   Climent-Gil E, 2018, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V73, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.005
   Coenen L, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P850, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.979321
   Cooke P., 2019, The role of art and culture for regional and urban resilience
   Cross JA., 2001, ENV HAZARDS, V3, P63, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(01)00020-1
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Doh S, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P1557, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.001
   Dong XY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104549
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fan F, 2020, GROWTH CHANGE, V51, P440, DOI 10.1111/grow.12346
   Fan J., 1996, Local Polynomial Modeling and Its Applications
   Feng Q, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120469
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Fingleton B, 2012, J REGIONAL SCI, V52, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x
   Fistola R, 2020, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106464
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Glaeser EL, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P3, DOI 10.1177/00420980211052230
   Grabher G, 1997, REG STUD, V31, P533, DOI 10.1080/00343409750132315
   Grabher G., 1993, EMBEDDED FIRM SOCIOE, P255
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Henning M, 2013, REG STUD, V47, P1348, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2012.750422
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hölscher K, 2019, CITIES, V94, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.037
   Hu XH, 2017, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V10, P527, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsx012
   IVES AR, 1995, ECOL MONOGR, V65, P217, DOI 10.2307/2937138
   Karl TR, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1719, DOI 10.1126/science.1090228
   Kogler DF, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P1374, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.755832
   Lafortune G., 2019, SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2018
   Langemeyer J, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055
   Li RQ, 2017, NAT COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01882-w
   Liu JG, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09830-220429
   Liu JG, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05873-180226
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   MacKinnon D, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P227, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr009
   Magnusson L., 2009, The evolution of path dependence
   Marin G, 2017, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V64, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.03.002
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Martini B, 2020, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V54, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2020.03.006
   MASSEY D, 1993, GEOGRAPHY, V78, P142
   McPhearson T, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P502, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0509-8
   McPhillips LE, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P441, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000686
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   Mu XF, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11050675
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Neffke F, 2011, ECON GEOGR, V87, P237, DOI 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Neubert MG, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P653, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0653:ATRFMT]2.0.CO;2
   Newbold T, 2015, NATURE, V520, P45, DOI 10.1038/nature14324
   Ning Y, 2020, GLOB HEALTH RES POL, V5, DOI 10.1186/s41256-020-00161-4
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V244, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.027
   OECD, 2008, Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, DOI [DOI 10.1787/9789264043466-EN, 10.1787/9789264043466-EN]
   Östh J, 2018, NETW SPAT ECON, V18, P313, DOI 10.1007/s11067-017-9375-9
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Petryna Adriana., 2013, LIFE EXPOSED BIOL CI
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Pradhan P, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P1169, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000632
   Rana IA, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106820
   Reynolds JF, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P847, DOI 10.1126/science.1131634
   Roemer KF, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102752
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Shaw K, 2012, LOCAL GOV STUD, V38, P281, DOI 10.1080/03003930.2011.642869
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Song YZ, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102585
   Sun HH, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2178-3
   Tomlinson PR, 2014, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V7, P489, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu016
   Tozer L, 2023, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V113, P599, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2130867
   UNISDR, 2015, Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, P316
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   Walker BH, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11647-250211
   Wang CA, 2024, J ASIA PAC ECON, V29, P837, DOI 10.1080/13547860.2022.2058257
   Wang ZR, 2023, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106912
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yusuf S, 2009, TECHNOL SOC, V31, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.007
   Zhang HJ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110193
   Zhang X, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V830, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154742
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 95
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 27
U2 102
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 103
AR 107266
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107266
EA AUG 2023
PG 11
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA T3IX6
UT WOS:001076965600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Beatley, T
   Newman, P
AF Beatley, Timothy
   Newman, Peter
TI Biophilic Cities Are Sustainable, Resilient Cities
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE biophilic cities; sustainable cities; resilient cities
ID NATURAL-ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; NEARBY NATURE; HEALTH
AB There is a growing recognition of the need for daily contact with nature, to live happy, productive, meaningful lives. Recent attention to biophilic design among architects and designers acknowledges this power of nature. However, in an increasingly urban planet, more attention needs to be aimed at the urban scales, at planning for and moving towards what the authors call. biophilic cities.. Biophilic cities are cities that provide close and daily contact with nature, nearby nature, but also seek to foster an awareness of and caring for this nature. Biophilic cities, it is argued here, are also sustainable and resilient cities. Achieving the conditions of a biophilic city will go far in helping to foster social and landscape resilience, in the face of climate change, natural disasters and economic uncertainty and various other shocks that cities will face in the future. The paper identifies key pathways by which biophilic urbanism enhances resilience, and while some are well-established relationships, others are more tentative and suggest future research and testing.
C1 [Beatley, Timothy] Univ Virginia, Dept Urban & Environm Planning, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
   [Newman, Peter] Curtin Univ, Curtin Univ Sustainabil Policy CUSP Inst, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia.
C3 University of Virginia; Curtin University
RP Newman, P (corresponding author), Curtin Univ, Curtin Univ Sustainabil Policy CUSP Inst, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia.
EM tb6d@cms.mail.virginia.edu; p.newman@curtin.edu.au
OI Newman, Peter/0000-0002-8668-2764
CR [Anonymous], J ILLUM ENG SOC
   [Anonymous], DISASTER RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], REP ENV BEN COSTS GR
   [Anonymous], ECOLOGY PLACE
   [Anonymous], 2010, GENERATION M2 MEDIA
   [Anonymous], GREEN URBANISM
   [Anonymous], ARE GREEN ELEMENTS P
   [Anonymous], 2007, EC GREEN AG MENT HLT
   [Anonymous], PLANNING COASTAL RES
   [Anonymous], ENHANCING URBAN ENV
   [Anonymous], J SOC ISSUES
   [Anonymous], PARKS PLAYGR US EC
   [Anonymous], WILD PASSP GUID TEAC
   [Anonymous], RESILIENT CITIES RES
   [Anonymous], RECLAIMING OUR FOOD
   [Anonymous], OUTDOOR RECREATION H
   Aspinall P, 2015, BRIT J SPORT MED, V49, P272, DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091877
   Atchley RA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051474
   Beatley Timothy., 2010, BIOPHILIC CITIES INT
   Costanza R, 2008, AMBIO, V37, P241, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[241:TVOCWF]2.0.CO;2
   Costanza R, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P465, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[465:ANVFNO]2.0.CO;2
   Curtin S, 2009, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V12, P451, DOI 10.1080/13683500903042857
   de Vries S, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN A, V35, P1717, DOI 10.1068/a35111
   Florida Richard., 2003, RISE CREATIVE CLASS
   Girling C., 2005, Skinny streets and green neighbourhoods: design for environment and community
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Kroenke CH, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P1105, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.2846
   Kuo FE, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P343, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973025
   Kuo FE, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P543, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973124
   Leather P, 1998, ENVIRON BEHAV, V30, P739, DOI 10.1177/001391659803000601
   Louv Richard., 2005, LAST CHILD WOODS WHY
   Manzo LC, 2006, J PLAN LIT, V20, P335, DOI 10.1177/0885412205286160
   Manzo LC, 2003, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V23, P47, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9
   Mitchell R, 2008, LANCET, V372, P1655, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X
   Nielsen TS, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P839, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001
   Nisbet EK, 2011, PSYCHOL SCI, V22, P1101, DOI 10.1177/0956797611418527
   Peter Newman., 1999, Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence
   Schnall S, 2008, J EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V44, P1246, DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.011
   Seeland K, 2009, FOREST POLICY ECON, V11, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.005
   Steel C., 2009, HUNGRY CITY FOOD SHA, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.12.006
   ULRICH RS, 1984, SCIENCE, V224, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.6143402
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Weinstein N, 2009, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V35, P1315, DOI 10.1177/0146167209341649
   Wells NM, 2003, ENVIRON BEHAV, V35, P311, DOI 10.1177/0013916503035003001
   Wilson E.O., 1984, Biophilia. Cambridge, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674045231
   Wilson E.O., 1993, Biophilia: The Human Bond with Other Species
   Wilson E.O., 2007, CREATION APPEAL SAVE
   Wolch J., 1996, CAPITALISM NATURE SO, V7, P21, DOI [10.1080/10455759609358677, DOI 10.1080/10455759609358677]
   Wolf K. L., 2008, Arborist News, V17, P22
NR 49
TC 162
Z9 184
U1 23
U2 343
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD AUG
PY 2013
VL 5
IS 8
BP 3328
EP 3345
DI 10.3390/su5083328
PG 18
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 213IR
UT WOS:000324050300006
OA Green Submitted, Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Saikia, P
   Beane, G
   Garriga, RG
   Avello, P
   Ellis, L
   Fisher, S
   Leten, J
   Ruiz-Apilánez, I
   Shouler, M
   Ward, R
   Jiménez, A
AF Saikia, Panchali
   Beane, George
   Garriga, Ricard Gine
   Avello, Pilar
   Ellis, Louise
   Fisher, Sophie
   Leten, James
   Ruiz-Apilanez, Inigo
   Shouler, Martin
   Ward, Robin
   Jimenez, Alejandro
TI City Water Resilience Framework: A governance based planning tool to
   enhance urban water resilience
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban Water Resilience; Water governance; Cities; Resilience indicators;
   Planning Tool; Cape Town; Miami
ID CAPACITY
AB The resilience model is an increasingly well-established paradigm of urban planning that guides responses to water related shocks and stresses, such as floods, droughts. However, due to limited studies and guidance on how to apply the concept of water resilience in practice, there is a growing demand for innovative tools that can help urban planners make better decisions and investments for a resilient urban water system. This paper presents a governance-based water resilience planning tool called the City Water Resilience Framework (CWRF), which is designed to meet this need. CWRF enables cities to collectively assess and plan for strengthening urban water resilience. It has been co-created through research and a robust peer-review process with eight partner cities and consultation with global experts. Based on this research, different factors of resilience were identified, which informed the development of CWRF, that includes a set of resilience goals, sub-goals and indicators, categorised across four dimensions: infrastructure and ecosystems, health and wellbeing, planning and finance, and leadership and strategy. Evidence is presented from the application of CWRF in Cape Town and Greater Miami and the Beaches (GM&B), which informed the cities' key water planning and strategies by integrating water resilience factors and activities.
C1 [Saikia, Panchali; Garriga, Ricard Gine; Avello, Pilar; Leten, James; Ward, Robin; Jimenez, Alejandro] Stockholm Int Water Inst SIWI, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Beane, George; Fisher, Sophie; Ruiz-Apilanez, Inigo] Arup, London, England.
   [Ellis, Louise; Shouler, Martin] Resilience Shift, London, England.
RP Jiménez, A (corresponding author), Stockholm Int Water Inst SIWI, Stockholm, Sweden.
EM alejandro.jimenez@siwi.org
RI Ellis, Louise/KPB-3352-2024; Garriga, Ricard/A-7914-2012
OI Saikia, Panchali/0000-0002-6268-9291; Jimenez Fdez de Palencia,
   Alejandro/0000-0002-7818-7739
FU Rockefeller Foundation; Swedish International Development Cooperation
   (Sida); Resilience Shift; Arup
FX The paper draws from the information and data collected under the City
   Water Resilience Approach (CWRA) programme. Assessment workshops in Cape
   Town were undertaken in partnership with Katrin Bruebach and Martine
   Sobey from 100 Resilient Cities. Funding for the Stockholm International
   Water Institute (SIWI) authors contributing to the paper was provided by
   the Rockefeller Foundation and the Swedish International Development
   Cooperation (Sida). Funding for the Arup authors contributing to this
   paper was provided by The Resilience Shift, The Rockefeller Foundation
   and Arup. We would also like to acknowledge Gareth Morgan (Cape Town),
   Hardeep Anand, Debbie Griner, Nicole Hefty (Greater Miami and the
   Beaches). The City Water Resilience Approach Steering Group: Fred Boltz
   (Resolute Development Solutions), Casey Brown & Sarah Freeman
   (University of Massachusetts, Amherst), Katrin Bruebach & Andrew Salkin
   (100 Resilient Cities), Mark Fletcher & Jo da Silva (Arup), Nancy Kete &
   Juliet Mian (The Resilience Shift), Diego Rodriguez & Maria Angelica
   Sotomayor (World Bank). The additional six partner cities: Amman, Hull,
   Mexico City, Manchester, Thessaloniki and Rotterdam.
CR Alegre H., 2016, Performance Indicators for Water Supply Services
   [Anonymous], 2009, UNISDR TERM DIS RISK
   [Anonymous], 2020, [No title captured]
   Armitage D., 2007, International Journal of the Commons, V2, P7
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Bruce Alexa, 2020, Water Security, V9, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100060
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Chaffin BC, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06824-190356
   Ching L, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.023
   City of Cape Town, 2020, OUR SHARED FUTURE CA
   City of Cape Town, 2019, RES STRAT 2019 2022
   CWRA, 2019, CIT WAT RES APPR LIT
   CWRA, WAT RES PROF CAP TOW
   CWRA, 2020, CIT WAT RES ASS METH
   Djalante R, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0797-5
   Djalante R, 2011, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V2, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13753-011-0015-6
   Falkenmark M, 2019, J HYDROL X, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.hydroa.2018.100009
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fraser A., 2017, Supporting governance for climate resilience: working with political institutions
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Index C.R., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Jiménez A, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12030827
   Johannessen Å, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-08870-220101
   Kerner DA, 2014, RESOURCES-BASEL, V3, P672, DOI 10.3390/resources3040672
   Laitinen J, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12010187
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Leigh NG, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030918
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   OECD, 2014, MAN WAT FUT CIT POL
   Olsson P, 2004, ENVIRON MANAGE, V34, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
   Sellberg MM, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P906, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012
   Tai HS, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P2045, DOI 10.3390/su7022045
   Tanner T., 2009, Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities
   UN News, 2019, BETTER TRAINING A NE
   UN (United Nations), 2018, WORLDS CIT 2018 D A, DOI 10.18356/c93f4dc6-en
   WHO/UNICEF JMP, 2019, Progress on Household Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene, 2000-2017. Special Focus on Inequalities
   Zhong M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041521
NR 39
TC 48
Z9 50
U1 53
U2 300
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD FEB
PY 2022
VL 77
AR 103497
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103497
EA JAN 2022
PG 9
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA 1N5LO
UT WOS:000800697400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yu, YH
   Yang, CL
   Hu, QS
   Kong, SN
AF Yu, Yihua
   Yang, Caili
   Hu, Qingsha
   Kong, Shuning
TI Towering sustainability: Unraveling the complex effects of skyscrapers
   on urban resilience
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Skyscraper; Instrumental variable; China
ID ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; TALL BUILDINGS; TURNOVER RATES; REGRESSION;
   CITY; LOCALIZATION; INNOVATION; GEOGRAPHY; SKYLINE; CITIES
AB This study examines the impact of skyscrapers on urban resilience in China using a panel dataset of 295 cities from 2002 to 2018. Urban resilience is evaluated across economic, social, ecological, and infrastructure dimensions, focusing on the impact of skyscrapers' quantity and height. The study finds that skyscrapers have a positive effect on urban resilience. Specifically, one standard deviation increase in the skyscraper index (1.010) corresponds to a 0.229 increase in urban resilience, approximately 23% of its own standard deviation. The qualitative result remains robust across different model specifications and instrumental variable estimation methods. Mechanism tests reveal that skyscrapers drive economic and societal shifts, such as increased urban density and diverse populations, which enhance urban resilience. Conversely, they present challenges to ecological resilience. The paper also finds that the skyscraper effect is complex, characterized by the nonlinear, heterogeneous, and persistent effects of skyscrapers. This study highlights the importance of balancing economic growth with social and ecological sustainability in urban development. The findings also suggest that future research should continue to explore the complex relationships between urban spatial patterns, economic resilience, and ecological sustainability to support the development of sustainable and resilient cities.
C1 [Yu, Yihua; Yang, Caili; Kong, Shuning] Renmin Univ China, Sch Appl Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Hu, Qingsha] Hainan Univ, HNU ASU Joint Int Tourism Coll, Haikou 570228, Peoples R China.
C3 Renmin University of China; Hainan University
RP Kong, SN (corresponding author), Renmin Univ China, Sch Appl Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM yihua.yu@ruc.edu.cn; yangcaili@ruc.edu.cn; hn57320221111_yx@163.com;
   kongshuning@ruc.edu.cn
CR Abel Chris., 2003, SKY HIGH VERTICAL AR
   Ahlfeldt GM, 2022, J URBAN ECON, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2021.103419
   Al-Kodmany K., 2012, International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, V1, P131, DOI [10.21022/IJHRB.2012.1.2.131, DOI 10.21022/IJHRB.2012.1.2.131]
   Al-Kodmany K, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.782007
   Al-Kodmany K, 2018, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/buildings8010007
   Al-Kodmany K, 2011, J URBAN TECHNOL, V18, P115, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2011.615573
   Ali MM, 2012, BUILDINGS, V2, P384, DOI 10.3390/buildings2040384
   2017, [No title captured]
   AMBROSE Gavin., 2008, The Visual Dictionary of Architecture
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Angel S., 2011, Making Room for a Planet of Cities
   [Anonymous], 2010, State of the World's Cities 2010/2011-Cities for All: Bridging the Urban Divide
   Arifwidodo S, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V79, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.461
   Arzaghi M, 2008, REV ECON STUD, V75, P1011, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00499.x
   Auerbach J, 2020, INT J FORECASTING, V36, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.09.004
   Barr J., 2016, CTBUH C, P423
   Barr J, 2021, J REAL ESTATE FINANC, V63, P210, DOI 10.1007/s11146-020-09764-7
   Barr J, 2020, EAST ECON J, V46, P344, DOI 10.1057/s41302-019-00163-2
   Barr J, 2013, J REGIONAL SCI, V53, P369, DOI 10.1111/jors.12017
   Barr J, 2012, J REAL ESTATE FINANC, V45, P723, DOI 10.1007/s11146-010-9274-z
   Barr JasonM., 2016, Building the Skyline: The Birth and Growth of Manhattan's Skyscrapers
   Beedle L., 2007, The Skyscraper and the City: Design, Technology, and Innovation
   Begec H., 2015, 9 INT SIN S ED
   Belsley D.A., 2005, Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity
   Bian Y., 2019, J Financial Res, V468, P132, DOI DOI 10.1111/PIRS.12641
   Binder G., 2001, Tall Buildings of Asia and Australia
   Blundell R, 1998, J ECONOMETRICS, V87, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
   Borck R, 2016, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V58, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.01.004
   Boschetti F, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P345, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0429-1
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Breschi S, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P613
   Briguglio L, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P229, DOI 10.1080/13600810903089893
   Brueckner J. K., 1987, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, V2, P821, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(87)80006-8, 10.1016/S1574-0080(87)80006-8]
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Cappelli R, 2021, J EVOL ECON, V31, P147, DOI 10.1007/s00191-020-00693-5
   Chapple K, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P85, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp031
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Chen Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106771
   Cheng L, 2020, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V23, P2602, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2019.1711029
   China Briefing, 2021, China's City-Tier Classification: How Does it Work?
   COPELAND BR, 1994, Q J ECON, V109, P755, DOI 10.2307/2118421
   Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat CTBUH, 2021, China is the capital of supertall skyscrapers. Why is it banning them?
   Crescenzi R, 2016, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V9, P13, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv031
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davoudi S, 2021, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_2
   Davoudi S, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P3, DOI 10.1111/cico.12281
   de Falco S, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P205, DOI 10.1177/0969776418783813
   Della Torre E, 2018, HUM RESOUR MANAG J, V28, P112, DOI 10.1111/1748-8583.12167
   Duranton G, 2001, AM ECON REV, V91, P1454, DOI 10.1257/aer.91.5.1454
   Ellis G., 2005, Simulating Tall Buildings Using Energy plus
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   Fujita M., 2001, The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade
   Fünfgeld H, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P324
   Giannakis E, 2020, REG STUD, V54, P1200, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720
   Glaeser EL, 2010, J URBAN ECON, V67, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2009.11.006
   Greene WH, 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL
   Hajzler C, 2014, J INT ECON, V92, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.10.004
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Hancock JI, 2013, J MANAGE, V39, P573, DOI 10.1177/0149206311424943
   Harris CD, 1954, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V44, P315
   Hartal S, 2023, REG STUD, V57, P2359, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2023.2196301
   Harun Z, 2020, ALEX ENG J, V59, P4475, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.053
   HAUSMAN JA, 1978, ECONOMETRICA, V46, P1251, DOI 10.2307/1913827
   Helsley RW, 2008, J URBAN ECON, V64, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2007.08.004
   Helsley RW, 2002, J URBAN ECON, V51, P25, DOI 10.1006/juec.2001.2235
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Iturriza M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113054
   Jadevicius A, 2016, ENTREPR BUS ECON REV, V4, P37, DOI 10.15678/EBER.2016.040204
   JAFFE AB, 1993, Q J ECON, V108, P577, DOI 10.2307/2118401
   Jamali A, 2023, URBAN SCI, V7, DOI 10.3390/urbansci7010007
   Karimimoshaver M, 2018, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V73, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.08.007
   Kim D, 2018, FUTURES, V102, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.001
   Kmenta J., 1996, Elements of econometrics
   Koenker R, 2004, J MULTIVARIATE ANAL, V91, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.jmva.2004.05.006
   LARSEN WA, 1972, TECHNOMETRICS, V14, P781, DOI 10.2307/1267305
   Leiper N, 2010, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V13, P333, DOI 10.1080/13683501003748047
   Leung L, 2008, STRUCT DES TALL SPEC, V17, P929, DOI 10.1002/tal.480
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Li JW, 2022, ECON MODEL, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105828
   Li Q., 2020, J. Urban Aff., V448, P1117
   Li Q, 2022, MANAGE SCI, V68, P5667, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4199
   Li S., 2021, China Econom. Stud., V11, P107
   Lu JX, 2023, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2023.103881
   Marcos J., 2008, ORG RESILIENCE KEY A
   Marshall A., 1890, PRINCIPLES EC
   McNeill D, 2005, PROG HUM GEOG, V29, P41, DOI 10.1191/0309132505ph527oa
   McNeill D., 2002, International Planning Studies, V7, P325, DOI DOI 10.1080/1356347022000027747
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Mustra V, 2023, PAP REG SCI, V102, P465, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12731
   National Research Council, 2012, Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative
   Oke A., 2020, Improving resilience of cities through smart city drivers, P2
   Olazabal M, 2016, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V18, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.006
   Ostadtaghizadeh Abbas, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed
   Park TY, 2013, J APPL PSYCHOL, V98, P268, DOI 10.1037/a0030723
   PARKS RW, 1967, J AM STAT ASSOC, V62, P500, DOI 10.2307/2283977
   Pesaran MH, 2021, EMPIR ECON, V60, P13, DOI 10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
   Pesaran MH, 1999, J AM STAT ASSOC, V94, P621, DOI 10.2307/2670182
   Pudelko F, 2018, REV REG RES, V38, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10037-018-0124-4
   Puga D, 2010, J REGIONAL SCI, V50, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00657.x
   Redding S, 2004, J INT ECON, V62, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001
   Rosenthal S.S., 2005, EC POLICY REV, P29
   Rosenthal SS, 2008, J URBAN ECON, V64, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.006
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Shaw JD, 2011, ORGAN PSYCHOL REV, V1, P187, DOI 10.1177/2041386610382152
   Shaw JD, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P594, DOI 10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843940
   Tian YH, 2012, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V138, P101, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000076
   TOBEY JA, 1990, KYKLOS, V43, P191, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6435.1990.tb00207.x
   Torjman S., 2007, Shared space: The communities agenda
   Wood A., 2014, P CTBUH 2014 SHANGH, P26
   Wood Anthony., 2015, 100 of the world's tallest buildings
   Wood Antony., 2008, Best Tall Buildings 2008: CTBUH International Award Winning Projects, V1
   Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND EDITION, P3
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Yang M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710585
   Youn H, 2016, J R SOC INTERFACE, V13, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2015.0937
   Yuen B, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P583, DOI 10.1080/00420980500533133
   Zenka J, 2017, GEOSCAPE, V11, P25, DOI 10.1515/geosc-2017-0003
   Zhang JM, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
NR 122
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 15
U2 19
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 108
AR 107614
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107614
EA AUG 2024
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA C2Z4P
UT WOS:001288085500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ziervogel, G
   Pelling, M
   Cartwright, A
   Chu, E
   Deshpande, T
   Harris, L
   Hyams, K
   Kaunda, J
   Klaus, B
   Michael, K
   Pasquini, L
   Pharoah, R
   Rodina, L
   Scott, D
   Zweig, P
AF Ziervogel, Gina
   Pelling, Mark
   Cartwright, Anton
   Chu, Eric
   Deshpande, Tanvi
   Harris, Leila
   Hyams, Keith
   Kaunda, Jean
   Klaus, Benjamin
   Michael, Kavya
   Pasquini, Lorena
   Pharoah, Robyn
   Rodina, Lucy
   Scott, Dianne
   Zweig, Patricia
TI Inserting rights and justice into urban resilience: a focus on everyday
   risk
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE African cities; rights and entitlements; risk; social justice; urban
   resilience
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADAPTATION; VULNERABILITY; CITIES; SCALE; CITY; TOWN
AB Resilience building has become a growing policy agenda, particularly for urban risk management. While much of the resilience agenda has been shaped by policies and discourses from the global North, its applicability for cities of the global South, particularly African cities, has not been sufficiently assessed. Focusing on rights of urban citizens as the object to be made resilient, rather than physical and ecological infrastructures, may help to address many of the root causes that characterize the unacceptable risks that urban residents face on a daily basis. Linked to this idea, we discuss four entry points for grounding a rights and justice orientation for urban resilience. First, notions of resilience must move away from narrow, financially oriented risk analyses. Second, opportunities must be created for negotiated resilience, to allow for attention to processes that support these goals, as well as for the integration of diverse interests. Third, achieving resilience in ways that do justice to the local realities of diverse urban contexts necessitates taking into account endogenous, locally situated processes, knowledges and norms. And finally, urban resilience needs to be placed within the context of global systems, providing an opportunity for African contributions to help reimagine the role that cities might play in these global financial, political and science processes.
C1 [Ziervogel, Gina; Pasquini, Lorena] Univ Cape Town, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, African Climate & Dev Initiat, Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Pelling, Mark] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England.
   [Cartwright, Anton] Univ Cape Town, African Ctr Cities, Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Chu, Eric] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Geog Planning & Int Dev Studies, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [Deshpande, Tanvi] Indian Inst Human Settlements, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
   [Harris, Leila; Rodina, Lucy] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Harris, Leila] Stellenbosch Univ, Inst Adv Studies, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   [Hyams, Keith] Univ Warwick, Dept Polit & Int Relat, Coventry, W Midlands, England.
   [Kaunda, Jean] Mzuzu Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Mzuzu, Malawi.
   [Klaus, Benjamin] ALAT, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.
   [Michael, Kavya] IIHS, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
   [Pharoah, Robyn; Zweig, Patricia] Stellenbosch Univ, Res Alliance Disaster & Risk Reduct RADAR, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
   [Scott, Dianne] Univ Cape Town, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, Cape Town, South Africa.
C3 University of Cape Town; University of London; King's College London;
   University of Cape Town; University of Amsterdam; Indian Institute for
   Human Settlements (IIHS); University of British Columbia; Stellenbosch
   University; University of Warwick; Indian Institute for Human
   Settlements (IIHS); Stellenbosch University; University of Cape Town
RP Pelling, M (corresponding author), Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England.
EM gina@csag.uct.ac.za; mark.pelling@kcl.ac.uk; anton@econologic.co.za;
   E.K.Chu@uva.nl; tdeshpande@iihs.ac.in; lharris@ires.ubc.ca;
   K.D.Hyams@warwick.ac.uk; kaundajean@hotmail.com;
   benjamin.klaus@cimonline.de; kmichael@iihs.ac.in;
   lorena.pasquini@gmail.com; robynpharoah@sun.ac.za;
   lucy.rodina@gmail.com; diannescott.dbn@gmail.com;
   patriciazweig@sun.ac.za
RI Ziervogel, Gina/AAG-2945-2019; Michael, Kavya/AAC-4846-2020; Deshpande,
   Tanvi/GRF-5418-2022; Zweig, Patricia/JXO-3405-2024; Chu,
   Eric/O-6464-2015; Harris, Leila/C-7156-2013
OI Deshpande, Tanvi V/0000-0003-4188-8483; Pharoah,
   Robyn/0000-0002-7291-371X; Ziervogel, Gina/0000-0003-4219-6809; Zweig,
   Patricia/0000-0002-1561-1029; Cartwright, Anton/0000-0002-2033-9162;
   Chu, Eric/0000-0002-5648-6615; Harris, Leila/0000-0002-1700-1902;
   Rodina, Lucy/0000-0001-5470-9005; Hyams, Keith/0000-0003-3755-646X;
   Pelling, Mark/0000-0002-6472-9875; Michael, Kavya/0000-0002-2310-8263
FU research programme - UK Department for International Development (DFID);
   Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), called Urban Africa: Risk
   Knowledge (Urban ARK project) [ES/L008777/1]; African Climate and
   Development Initiative Research Chair Fund, University of Cape Town;
   ESRC [ES/L008777/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The work presented has been financed by a research programme funded by
   the UK Department for International Development (DFID) and the Economic
   and Social Research Council (ESRC), called Urban Africa: Risk Knowledge
   (Urban ARK project number ES/L008777/1), and the African Climate and
   Development Initiative Research Chair Fund, University of Cape Town.
CR Adelekan I, 2015, INT DEV PLANN REV, V37, P33, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2015.4
   AfDB/OECD/UNDP, 2016, AFR EC OUTL SUST CIT
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2011, What Every Environmentalist Needs to Know About Capitalism
   Archer D, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P345, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.918868
   Bahadur A., 2015, Resilience in the SDGs: developing an indicator for Target 1.5 that is fit for purpose
   Barnett C, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P87, DOI 10.1177/0956247815621473
   Béné C, 2014, J INT DEV, V26, P598, DOI 10.1002/jid.2992
   Biermann M, 2015, RESILIENCE
   Boke C, 2015, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V3, P207, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1072313
   Brenner N, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P349, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Bulkeley H, 2015, URBAN POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: EXPERIMENTATION AND THE GOVERNING OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL TRANSITIONS, P1
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Casal P, 2007, ETHICS, V117, P296, DOI 10.1086/510692
   Chu E, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P372, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2015.1019822
   Cohen G.A., 1995, SELF OWNERSHIP FREED
   COHEN GA, 1989, ETHICS, V99, P906, DOI 10.1086/293126
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   de Sherbinin A, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P39, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076725
   Didier S, 2013, ANTIPODE, V45, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00987.x
   Epstein G.A., 2005, FINANCIALIZATION WOR
   Ernstson H, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P1563, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.892573
   Ezeh A, 2016, LANCET
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fainstein SS, 2014, INT J URBAN SCI, V18, P1
   Feinberg J., 1970, J VALUE INQUIRY, V4, P243, DOI [10.1007/BF00137935, DOI 10.1007/BF00137935]
   [Field C.B. IPCC. IPCC.], 2012, MANAGING RISKS EXTRE, P555
   Filion P, 2013, SAPIENS, V6
   Fraser N., 2003, Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange, P7, DOI 10.4135/9781446218112.n2
   Hallegatte S., 2017, Unbreakable: Building the Resilience of the Poor in the Face of Natural Disasters, Climate Ch
   HARVEY D, 1989, GEOGR ANN B, V71, P3, DOI 10.2307/490503
   Heynen N., 2007, Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203946848
   Hyams K, 2015, OXFORD STUDIES POLIT
   Kasperson R.E., 2001, GLOBAL ENV RISK
   Laurent E., 2014, Inequality as Pollution, Pollution as Inequality: the Social-Ecological Nexus
   Lawhon M, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P497, DOI 10.1111/anti.12051
   Lilford R J, 2016, LANCET
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Mamdani Mahmood, 1996, CITIZEN SUBJECT CONT
   Manda M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P15, DOI 10.1177/0956247817692200
   Meerow S, 2016, URBAN GEOGRAPHY
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Morsink J, 2009, INHERENT HUMAN RIGHTS: PHILOSOPHICAL ROOTS OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION, P1
   Myers G.A., 2011, AFRICAN CITIES
   Narveson Jan., 2001, THE LIBERTARIAN IDEA
   Neumayer E, 2007, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V97, P551, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00563.x
   Nussbaum M., 2000, Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Approach, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511841286
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Parfit D, 1995, LINDL LECT
   Parnell Sue., 2014, ROUTLEDGE HDB CITIES, V1
   Parnell S, 2016, WORLD DEV, V78, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.028
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pettit J., 2013, Power Analysis - A Practical Guide'
   Pieterse E.A., 2008, CITY FUTURES C CRISI
   Pieterse E, 2011, SOC DYNAMICS, V37, P5, DOI 10.1080/02533952.2011.569994
   Rawls J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
   Ribot J, 2014, J PEASANT STUD, V41, P667, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2014.894911
   Rijke J, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P2652, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.031
   RITTEL HWJ, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF01405730
   Roberts J.Timmons., 2007, CLIMATE INJUSTICE
   Satterthwaite D., 2007, HUMAN SETTLEMENTS DI
   Satterthwaite D, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P767, DOI 10.1002/wcc.136
   Schlosberg David., 2007, DEFINING ENV JUSTICE, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199286294.001.0001]
   Sen A, 1984, RESOURCES VALUES DEV
   Sen Amartya., 1990, Development as Freedom
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Shue Henry., 1980, BASIC RIGHTS SUBSIST
   Sjöstedt M, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-08034-200423
   Sultana F, 2012, RIGHT WATER POLITICS, P20
   Taylor B A, 2014, CLIMATE DEV KNOWLEDG
   Turok I, 2013, LOCAL ECON, V28, P142, DOI 10.1177/0269094212469920
   UNISDR, 2015, Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction, P316
   United Nations, 2015, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   VATN A, 1994, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V26, P129, DOI 10.1006/jeem.1994.1008
   Wainwright J, 2013, ANTIPODE, V45, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01018.x
   Walsh-Dilley M, 2015, RESILIENCE, V3, P173, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1072310
   Walsh-Dilley M, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-07981-210111
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Wilson GA, 2015, ENVIRON VALUE, V24, P227, DOI 10.3197/096327114X13947900182157
   World Bank, 2016, AFR CLIM BUS PLAN BL
   Yamagata Y, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9
   Young I. M., 1990, JUSTICE AND THE POLITICS OF DIFFERENCE
   Ziervogel G, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090955
NR 86
TC 224
Z9 233
U1 23
U2 227
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD APR
PY 2017
VL 29
IS 1
BP 123
EP 138
DI 10.1177/0956247816686905
PG 16
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA ET2FX
UT WOS:000400086300008
OA Green Published, hybrid
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shamsuddin, S
AF Shamsuddin, Shomon
TI Resilience resistance: The challenges and implications of urban
   resilience implementation
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Policy implementation; Resilient cities; Resistance; Urban resilience
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; CITIES; METAPHOR; POVERTY;
   MODELS; CITY
AB Growing concern about major threats, including climate change, environmental disasters, and other hazards, is matched with the increased interest and appeal of the concept of urban resilience. Much scholarly attention has focused on how to define urban resilience, in addition to raising questions about its applicability and usefulness. But those debates typically overlook questions of implementation. Implementation is important not only for how cities respond to threats but also because it can influence how urban resilience is perceived, discussed, and understood. The policy literature suggests that implementation is rarely straightforward and has ideological and normative perspectives embedded within it. Building on this literature, this paper argues that urban resilience implementation raises its own conceptual questions for both theory and practice. Further, implementing urban resilience entails its own unique challenges, such as extensive coordination, maintaining adaptability, divergent time horizons, and diverse outcomes. The paper also introduces the idea of resilience resistance as a new challenge for urban resilience. Resistance refers to the condition in which governance systems inherently develop barriers to change, flexibility, and adaptability through implementation. Several aspects of resistance are highlighted, including fatigue, complacency, and overconfidence. However, the implementation process can also have unintended positive effects on a city's capacity to prepare for and respond to shocks.
C1 [Shamsuddin, Shomon] Tufts Univ, Dept Urban & Environm Policy & Planning, 97 Talbot Ave, Medford, MA 02155 USA.
C3 Tufts University
RP Shamsuddin, S (corresponding author), Tufts Univ, Dept Urban & Environm Policy & Planning, 97 Talbot Ave, Medford, MA 02155 USA.
EM shomon.shamsuddin@tufts.edu
RI Shamsuddin, Shomon/KEH-9744-2024
OI /0000-0002-9512-3171
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 1978, INTERORGANIZATIONAL
   [Anonymous], 2015, Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 -2030
   [Anonymous], 1978, STUDY MACRO MICROIMP
   BARDACH Eugene., 1977, IMPLEMENTATION GAME
   Barrett S.M., 1981, POLICY ACTION ESSAYS, P3
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Béné C, 2014, J INT DEV, V26, P598, DOI 10.1002/jid.2992
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chandler David., 2016, The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Chmutina K, 2016, CITIES, V58, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   ELMORE RF, 1978, PUBLIC POLICY, V26, P185
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gartner, GARTN HYP CYCL
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goggin Malcolm L., 1990, Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation
   Grindle M.S., 2017, Politics and policy implementation in the Third World, DOI [doi:10.1515/9781400886081, DOI 10.2307/2619175]
   Hill M.J., 2002, Implementing public policy: governance in theory and practice
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Lipsky M., 1980, STREEL LEVEL BUREAUC
   Majone G., 1978, POLICY STUDIES ANN R, V2
   Matland R.E., 1995, Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, V5, P145
   Mazmanian D., 1983, IMPLEMENTATION PUBLI
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Normandin JM, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_2
   Pain A., 2012, A conceptual analysis of livelihoods and resilience: addressing the 'insecurity agency'
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Pressman JeffreyLeonard Aaron B. Wildavsky., 1984, IMPLEMENTATION GREAT, V3
   Pu B., 2016, Current Urban Studies, P36, DOI DOI 10.4236/cus.2016.41004
   Ripley R.B., 1982, Bureaucracy and Policy: Implementation
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES FRAM 100 RES
   Sabatier P.A., 1986, J PUBLIC POLICY, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0143814X00003846
   Shamsuddin S, 2021, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V31, P127, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2020.1719181
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Spillane JP, 2002, REV EDUC RES, V72, P387, DOI 10.3102/00346543072003387
   Therrien M.-C., 2017, IMPLEMENTING URBAN R
   Torabi E, 2018, CITIES, V72, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.008
   Vale L., 2014, PLACES J, DOI [10.22269/141215, DOI 10.22269/141215]
   Vale LJ, 2014, CITYSCAPE, V16, P21
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   VANMETER DS, 1975, ADMIN SOC, V6, P445, DOI 10.1177/009539977500600404
   Werners S., 2019, 4 EUROPEAN CLIMATE C
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 59
TC 90
Z9 96
U1 43
U2 264
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD AUG
PY 2020
VL 103
AR 102763
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
PG 8
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA LZ3TZ
UT WOS:000541152300020
PM 32501356
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Leichenko, R
AF Leichenko, Robin
TI Climate change and urban resilience
SO CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABLE CITIES; LATIN-AMERICA; VULNERABILITY;
   ADAPTATION; SYSTEMS; MITIGATION; COMPLEXITY; FRAMEWORK; DISASTERS
AB The notion of resilience is gaining increasing prominence across a diverse set of literatures on cities and climate change. Although there is some disagreement among these different literatures about how to define and measure resilience, there is broad consensus that: (1) cities must become resilient to a wider range of shocks and stresses in order to be prepared for climate change; and (2) efforts to foster climate change resilience must be bundled with efforts to promote urban development and sustainability. Emerging issues for future study highlight some of the challenges associated with practical application of resilience approaches. These include responding to equity concerns associated with uneven patterns of resilience both within and across cities, assessing the costs of implementing resilience strategies, and identifying options for harnessing the innovation potential in cities as a means to foster resilience and sustainability.
C1 Rutgers State Univ, Dept Geog, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA.
C3 Rutgers University System; Rutgers University New Brunswick
RP Leichenko, R (corresponding author), Rutgers State Univ, Dept Geog, 54 Joyce Kilmer Ave, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA.
EM robin.leichenko@rutgers.edu
RI Leichenko, Robin/C-6047-2013
FU Rutgers University Initiative on Climate and Social Policy
FX This research was supported by the Rutgers University Initiative on
   Climate and Social Policy. The author thanks Addle Thomas for research
   assistance, and the reviewers and editor for their helpful comments and
   suggestions.
CR Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Allenby B, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1034, DOI 10.1126/science.1111534
   Andersson E, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   [Anonymous], SHAP CLIM RES DEV FR
   Ayers J, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P225, DOI 10.1177/0956247809103021
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Boyd E., 2008, Development (London), V51, P390, DOI 10.1057/dev.2008.32
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chatterjee M, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9221-6
   Coaffee J, 2008, SPACE POLITY, V12, P101, DOI 10.1080/13562570801969556
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Colten CE, 2008, ENVIRONMENT, V50, P36, DOI 10.3200/ENVT.50.5.36-47
   Crichton D, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P2731, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.2081
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   de Sherbinin A, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P39, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076725
   Duxbury J, 2007, ECOL ECON, V63, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.016
   Eakin HC, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P355, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9514-x
   Emstson H, 2010, AMBIO J HUMAN ENV 20, DOI [10 1007/s13280-010-0081-9, DOI 10.1007/S13280-010-0081-9]
   Essletzbichler J, 2007, APPLIED EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS AND ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, P203
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gaillard JC, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P218, DOI 10.1002/jid.1675
   Hardoy J, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P203, DOI 10.1177/0956247809103019
   Hulme M, 2009, WHY WE DISAGREE ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE: UNDERSTANDING CONTROVERSY, INACTION AND OPPORTUNITY, P1
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Leichenko R., 2008, ENV CHANGE GLOBALIZA
   Liu JG, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1513, DOI 10.1126/science.1144004
   Martin R, 2007, J ECON GEOGR, V7, P573, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Maru Y.T., 2010, SOCIOECONOMICS ENV D
   McDaniels T, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Muller M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P99, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076726
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   O'Brien K, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P542, DOI 10.1177/0309132510377573
   O'Brien K, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Ostrom E, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Pais JF, 2008, SOC FORCES, V86, P1415, DOI 10.1353/sof.0.0047
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Resilience Alliance, 2007, URB RES RES PROSP
   Revi A, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P207, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089157
   Rose A, 2007, ENV HAZARDS, V7, P383
   Sanchez-Rodriguez R, 2009, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V1, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.005
   Sapountzaki K, 2007, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V18, P274, DOI 10.1108/14777830710731743
   Satterthwaite D., 2007, ADAPTING CLIMATE CHA
   Seto KC, 2010, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V35, P167, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-100809-125336
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Sperling F., 2008, ENV DEP PAPERS
   Swalheim S., 2008, BUILDING RESILIENCE
   Tanner T, 2009, IDS WORKING PAPERS, P315
   Turner BL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
   Vogel C, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wilbanks TJ, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P719, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.500200
   Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
NR 56
TC 500
Z9 575
U1 29
U2 417
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1877-3435
J9 CURR OPIN ENV SUST
JI Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.
PD JUN
PY 2011
VL 3
IS 3
BP 164
EP 168
DI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
PG 5
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 771QV
UT WOS:000291176700008
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bozza, A
   Asprone, D
   Parisi, F
   Manfredi, G
AF Bozza, Anna
   Asprone, Domenico
   Parisi, Fulvio
   Manfredi, Gaetano
TI Alternative Resilience Indices for City Ecosystems Subjected to Natural
   Hazards
SO COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
ID SEISMIC RESILIENCE; DECISION-MAKING; INFRASTRUCTURE; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK;
   NETWORKS; COMPLEXITY; LANDSLIDE; DISASTERS; SARNO
AB Prompt and efficient responses against natural hazards are needed to build cities capable of withstanding disasters, namely resilient cities. This study aims at presenting and testing synthetic resilience indices over a real urban center threatened by multiple hazards, for which a global overview of city performance is requested. An integrated framework is proposed for quantitative resilience assessment by way of time-independent synthetic indices. The approach proposed is in accordance to the complex network theory and uses a global indicator of the system connectivity to assess the city functioning also in case of network disruption. Resilience is evaluated as a proxy for systemic urban damage by modeling a city ecosystem as a hybrid social-physical network. Seismic and landslide scenario analyses are performed for the city of Sarno, Italy. A probability-based approach is used to compute urban vulnerability. Subsequently, to highlight changes in results according to the type of disaster, a recovery strategy is simulated to assess efficiency and damage states in each recovery stage, and urban resilience.
C1 [Bozza, Anna; Asprone, Domenico; Parisi, Fulvio; Manfredi, Gaetano] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Struct Engn & Architecture, Naples, Italy.
C3 University of Naples Federico II
RP Bozza, A (corresponding author), Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Struct Engn & Architecture, Naples, Italy.
EM anna.bozza@unina.it
RI Asprone, Domenico/G-8166-2012; Parisi, Fulvio/C-7457-2011
OI Parisi, Fulvio/0000-0002-1374-0732
CR Ahmad N., 2011, Internal Report
   [Anonymous], 2001, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI
   [Anonymous], 2005, INTERDEPENDENT RESPO
   [Anonymous], LECT NOTES STAT
   [Anonymous], 2011, GUIDELINES LANDSLIDE
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Bar-Yam Y, 2003, Dynamics of Complex Systems
   Basile A, 2003, GEODERMA, V117, P331, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00132-0
   Berche B, 2009, EUR PHYS J B, V71, P125, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3
   Bettencourt L, 2010, NATURE, V467, P912, DOI 10.1038/467912a
   Bozza A., 2016, THESIS
   Bozza A., 2015, COMPDYN 2015 5 ECCOM
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bruneau M, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P41, DOI 10.1193/1.2431396
   Buldyrev SV, 2010, NATURE, V464, P1025, DOI 10.1038/nature08932
   Cascini L, 2011, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V126, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.038
   Castillo E, 1997, J AM STAT ASSOC, V92, P1609
   Catapano F, 2001, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V104, P438, DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00512.x
   Cavalieri F, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P590, DOI 10.1111/mice.12064
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chen G., 2015, FUNDAMENTALS COMPLEX, P195
   D'Agostino G., 2014, LAST FRONTIER COMPLE
   Dorbritz R, 2011, ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, P1070
   Dueñas-Osorio L, 2011, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V26, P111, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00661.x
   Faturechi R, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P572, DOI 10.1111/mice.12027
   Franchin P, 2015, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V30, P583, DOI 10.1111/mice.12092
   Freckleton D, 2012, TRANSPORT RES REC, P109, DOI 10.3141/2284-13
   Fu GH, 2014, EUR PHYS J B, V87, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2014-40876-y
   Gómez C, 2014, STRUCT SAF, V50, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.011
   González AD, 2016, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V31, P334, DOI 10.1111/mice.12171
   Heaslip K., 2010, TRANSPORTATION RES B
   Highland L., 2004, LANDSLIDE TYPES PROC
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   HOLLING CS, 1994, FUTURES, V26, P598, DOI 10.1016/0016-3287(94)90031-0
   ISTAT, 2011, 15 CENS GEN POP AB
   Latora V, 2001, PHYS REV LETT, V87, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701
   Leu G., 2012, RESILIENCE GROUND TR
   Li H, 2013, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V28, P780, DOI 10.1111/mice.12053
   Miller-Hooks E, 2012, COMPUT OPER RES, V39, P1633, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.017
   Min LL., 2008, NORME TECNICHE COSTR
   Nejat A, 2012, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V27, P748, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00787.x
   Omer M, 2009, IEEE SYST J, V3, P295, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2022570
   Opricovic S, 2002, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V17, P211, DOI 10.1111/1467-8667.00269
   Ouyang M., 2017, MATH FRAMEWORK OPTIM
   Ouyang M, 2012, CHAOS, V22, DOI 10.1063/1.4737204
   Parisi F., 2015, 12 INT C APPL STAT P
   Parisi F, 2013, ENG FAIL ANAL, V34, P735, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.005
   PIMM SL, 1984, NATURE, V307, P321, DOI 10.1038/307321a0
   PIMM SL, 1994, BIODIVERSITY ECOSYST, P347
   Pregnolato M., 2015, 12 INT C APPL STAT P
   Reilly AC, 2015, DECIS ANAL, V12, P155, DOI 10.1287/deca.2015.0318
   Renschler C.S., 2010, P 9 US NAT 10 CAN C, P25
   Revellino P, 2004, ENVIRON GEOL, V45, P295, DOI 10.1007/s00254-003-0885-z
   Sharkey TC, 2015, EUR J OPER RES, V244, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.12.051
   Ukkusuri SV, 2009, J TRANSP SECUR, V2, P29, DOI 10.1007/s12198-009-0025-4
   Yuen KV, 2011, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V26, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00648.x
   Zhang P, 2005, NETW SPAT ECON, V5, P147, DOI 10.1007/s11067-005-2627-0
NR 59
TC 36
Z9 38
U1 15
U2 147
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1093-9687
EI 1467-8667
J9 COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF
JI Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng.
PD JUL
PY 2017
VL 32
IS 7
BP 527
EP 545
DI 10.1111/mice.12275
PG 19
WC Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications; Construction &
   Building Technology; Engineering, Civil; Transportation Science &
   Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Computer Science; Construction & Building Technology; Engineering;
   Transportation
GA EY5KH
UT WOS:000404015600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chirisa, I
   Bandauko, E
   Mazhindu, E
   Kwangwama, NA
   Chikowore, G
AF Chirisa, Innocent
   Bandauko, Elmond
   Mazhindu, Elias
   Kwangwama, Ndarova Audrey
   Chikowore, Godfrey
TI Building resilient infrastructure in the face of climate change in
   African cities: Scope, potentiality and challenges
SO DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA
LA English
DT Article
DE African cities; resilient infrastructure; resilience; governance;
   participatory democracy
AB This article seeks to explain the capacity and limitations of African cities in building resilient infrastructure in the face of climate change. In this article, resilience means the ability of a social or ecological system to absorb disturbances while retaining the same basic structure and ways of functioning, the capacity for self-organisation, and the capacity to adapt to stress and change. To expose the capacity and limitations of African cities in building resilient urban infrastructure, the article presents comparative case studies on contemporary experiences in Harare, Nairobi, Abuja, Cairo and Johannesburg relative to the Latin American and Asian cities where resilient infrastructure practices are in vogue. We conclude that most African cities exhibit critical bottlenecks towards emulating the Asian prototypes. Corruption is among the key explanations for the shortcomings of African cities in the delivery of resilient infrastructure and services. Corruption and non-participatory approaches prevailing in most cities have only courted resistance by citizens in the reimbursement of loans obtained from both international and local financial houses.
C1 [Chirisa, Innocent; Bandauko, Elmond; Mazhindu, Elias; Kwangwama, Ndarova Audrey] Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Rural & Urban Planning, Harare, Zimbabwe.
   [Mazhindu, Elias] UNISA, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Chikowore, Godfrey] Univ Zimbabwe, Ctr Appl Social Sci, Harare, Zimbabwe.
C3 University of Zimbabwe; University of Zimbabwe
RP Chirisa, I (corresponding author), Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Rural & Urban Planning, Harare, Zimbabwe.
EM chirisa.innocent@gmail.com
RI Chikowore, Godfrey/AAR-7402-2021
OI Bandauko, PhD, Dr. Elmond/0000-0002-1917-9640
CR African Development Group, 2011, INFR GROWTH ZIMB ACT
   Alarslan E, 2009, THESIS U DORTMUND
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   [Anonymous], 2009, Guidance on Water and Adaptation to Climate Change
   [Anonymous], TALE 2 CITIES DEV CI
   Asoka G.W., 2013, Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology, V1, P41
   Bahadur AdityaV., 2010, The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters
   Bland G., 2010, Zimbabwe in Transition: What about the Local Level? Available at
   CIBD (Construction Industry Development Board), 2007, STAT MUN INFR S AFR
   City of Sendai, 2013, REB RES FORT INFR WI
   Dodman D, 2009, BUILDING URBAN RESIL
   Doherty M, 2003, FUNDING PUBLIC TRANS
   Dube T, 2011, THESIS U S AFRICA PR
   EC, 2009, CISC VIS NETW IND GL
   Energy and Resources Institute, 2009, EXPL SUST PROV URB B
   Energy and Resources Institute, 2011, MAINSTR URB RES PLAN
   Farlam P, 2005, 2 SAIIA NEP ROYAL NE
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Galderisi A, 2012, TEMA, V5, P69, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/936
   Goncalves Sonia., 2009, Power to the People: The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil
   Jinadu A., 2004, Journal of the Nigerian Institute of Town Planners, VXVII, P15
   Kessides C., 2005, The urban transition in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for economic growth and poverty reduction
   KPMG, 2013, INSIGHT GLOBAL INFRA
   Lassa JA, 2011, JAPANS RESILIENCE TS
   Lawson Marian L, 2013, FOREIGN ASSISTANCE P
   Lemanski C, 2007, CITIES, V24, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.011
   Madbouly M, 2007, TACKLING SHELTER CHA
   Mapira J., 2011, Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, V13, P258
   Mlatsheni C, 2002, INT MIGRATION PAPERS
   Nabutola W, 2006, 23 FIG C MUN
   O'Connor A, 1983, THE AFRICAN CITY
   Onyenechere E. C., 2010, Journal of Human Ecology, V32, P137
   Opiyo R, 2009, 5 URB RES S NAIR
   Phalatse L, 2011, RES CIT C BONN GERM
   Rakodi C., 1997, URBAN CHALLENGE AFRI
   Robinson J, 2002, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V26, P531, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00397
   Schafer K, 2013, 1 AR REG C DIS RISK
   Shah F, 2009, 5 URB RES S 2009
   Smith JJ, 2014, FINANCING TRANSIT SY
   Smith M, 2011, WATER SECURITY WATER, P201
   SPAID (Support Programme for Accelerated Infrastructure Development), 2007, KEY CHALL PUBL PRIV
   Srivastava S, 2002, NAT SEM CREEKS EST M
   STATS-SA (Statistics South Africa), 2007, COMM SURV 2007 BAS R
   Thapa GB, 2005, INTEGRATED WATERSHED
   The Housing Development Agency, 2012, GAUT INF SETTL STAT
   UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2007, CIT NAIR ENV OUTL
   UNISDR, 2008, Linking disaster risk reduction and poverty reduction: Good practices and lessons learned
   Usman BA, 2010, ENV ISSUES, V3, P101
   World Bank, 2009, DO NAT DIS AFF HUM C
NR 49
TC 24
Z9 25
U1 1
U2 59
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0376-835X
EI 1470-3637
J9 DEV SO AFR
JI Dev. South. Afr.
PD JAN 2
PY 2016
VL 33
IS 1
SI SI
BP 113
EP 127
DI 10.1080/0376835X.2015.1113122
PG 15
WC Development Studies; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Public Administration
GA DC5RU
UT WOS:000369278900009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lu, PW
   Stead, D
AF Lu, Peiwen
   Stead, Dominic
TI Understanding the notion of resilience in spatial planning: A case study
   of Rotterdam, The Netherlands
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Water management; Spatial planning; Resilience; Rotterdam; The
   Netherlands
ID SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PERSPECTIVE; STABILITY;
   POLICY
AB The notions of urban resilience and the resilient city have gained considerable attention and interest over recent years, not only in relation to environmental management but also in terms of urban planning. The notion of urban resilience is not just confined to academic discourses - it is increasingly prevalent in urban policy documents. This paper examines awareness and understanding of urban resilience in the planning policy arena in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, where planning has a long history of managing water. Specific attention in the paper is paid to the issue of climate change and how planning processes in the city consider or deal with the risks that it presents. The ways in which the city assesses and prepares for these risks or threats form the two main areas of analysis. The paper concludes that evidence of resilient thinking can be found at all levels of decision-making, ranging from the transnational to local levels. However, the notion of resilience is still quite fuzzy and its significance can vary substantially between policy officials and between policy documents, sometimes even within the same administration. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Lu, Peiwen] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture, Dept Urbanism, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
   [Stead, Dominic] Delft Univ Technol, OTB Res Inst, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Delft University of Technology; Delft University of Technology
RP Lu, PW (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture, Dept Urbanism, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
EM Peiwen.Lu@tudelft.nl
RI Stead, Dominic/O-8029-2014
OI Stead, Dominic/0000-0002-8198-785X
CR [Anonymous], CLIM 21 CENT 4 SCEN
   [Anonymous], ROTT CLIM PROOF 2010
   [Anonymous], ROOM RIVER
   [Anonymous], MAN MADE LOWLANDS HI
   [Anonymous], PORT VIS 2020 SPAC Q
   [Anonymous], NAT SPAT STRAT NOT R
   [Anonymous], GERMAN ANN SPATIAL R
   [Anonymous], PROV WAT ZUID HOLL 2
   [Anonymous], STADSV ROTT 2030
   [Anonymous], CITIES
   [Anonymous], NAT PROGR CLIM AD SP
   [Anonymous], WAT 2 ROTT
   [Anonymous], ROTT CLIM PROOF 2009
   [Anonymous], 2008, Working together with water: A living land builds for its future
   [Anonymous], SAF OUR FUT WAT VIS
   [Anonymous], RUIMT PLAN REG ROTT
   [Anonymous], FINL 24 AESOP ANN C
   [Anonymous], GERMAN ANN SPATIAL R
   [Anonymous], PLANNING CLIMATE CHA
   [Anonymous], RISK RESILIENCE SPAT
   [Anonymous], NAT KNOWL INN AG WAT
   [Anonymous], STRUCT RANDST 2040
   [Anonymous], NATURAL HAZARDS
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   [Anonymous], ANN C ASS COLL SCH P
   [Anonymous], CITIES IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], POLITICS CLIMATE CHA
   [Anonymous], ADAPTIVE ENV ASSESSM
   Beatley Timothy., 2009, Planning for Coastal Resilience: Best Practices for Calamitous Times
   Campbell H, 2006, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V7, P201, DOI 10.1080/14649350600681875
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Davoudi S., 2009, Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning, P7
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   FIERING MB, 1982, WATER RESOUR RES, V18, P33, DOI 10.1029/WR018i001p00033
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gerrits L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P336, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.669992
   Gleeson B, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P2653, DOI 10.1177/0042098008098198
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gupta J, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   HOLLING CS, 1987, EUR J OPER RES, V30, P139, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(87)90091-9
   Howard J., 2009, PLANNING CLIMATE CHA, P19
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Linnenluecke M, 2010, BUS SOC, V49, P477, DOI 10.1177/0007650310368814
   LUDWIG D, 1978, J ANIM ECOL, V47, P315, DOI 10.2307/3939
   McCarthy J, 1998, CITIES, V15, P337, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00029-8
   Meijerink S, 2005, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V12, P1060, DOI 10.1080/13501760500270745
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN
   Ministry of Transport, 2009, NAT WAT PLAN 2009 20
   Needham B., 1997, MAKING STRATEGIC SPA, P173
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Pimm S.L., 1991, BALANCE NATURE ECOLO
   Stead D., 2013, Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, P211, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_13, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_13, 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-813, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-813]
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Tasan-Kok T., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P39
   van den Berg MM, 2010, SOCIAL AND BEHAVIOURAL ASPECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: LINKING VULNERABILITY, ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION, P130
   van den Brink M, 2011, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V2, P272, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2011.044
   VAYDA AP, 1975, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V4, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.001453
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   WALKER BH, 1981, J ECOL, V69, P473, DOI 10.2307/2259679
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Walters C. J., 1986, ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   ZIMMERER KS, 1994, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V84, P108, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01731.x
NR 69
TC 168
Z9 198
U1 18
U2 246
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2013
VL 35
SI SI
BP 200
EP 212
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
PG 13
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 250IY
UT WOS:000326847700022
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Han, H
   Bai, XM
   Dong, L
AF Han, Hao
   Bai, Xuemei
   Dong, Liang
TI Global policy stocktake of urban climate resilience: A literature review
SO RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
LA English
DT Review
DE Resilience; Urban resilience; Climate; Disasters; Disaster resilience
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; DISASTER
   RESILIENCE; FLOOD RISK; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; STRATEGIES; IMPACTS;
   CITIES
AB Cities are positioning themselves at the center of the Anthropocene, hosting most of the world's population and global socioeconomic activities. The increasing prospect of escalating climate hazards is threatening cities and citizens worldwide, indicating the unprecedented importance of urban climate resilience building. However, the disconnect between resilience scholarship and practical policymaking hinders effective, evidence-based policy- making. By analyzing case-based, peer-reviewed articles worldwide, this study reveals the status of current resilience-building policies and the gaps therein. The results suggest that less than a third of the literature discusses policy implementations, with a notable absence of macro-level policies and crisis management toolkits. The authors underscore the potential integrated pathways to transcending the traditional place- and community- based resilience building practices, emphasizing the importance of integrating scholarly insights into practical policy frameworks for a more resilient urban future.
C1 [Han, Hao; Dong, Liang] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
   [Bai, Xuemei] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, B141,B48,B48A Linnaeus Way, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia.
   [Dong, Liang] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
C3 City University of Hong Kong; Australian National University; City
   University of Hong Kong
RP Dong, L (corresponding author), City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.; Dong, L (corresponding author), City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China.
EM haohan7-c@my.cityu.edu.hk; liadong@cityu.edu.hk
RI Dong, Liang/IAR-4638-2023; Bai, Xuemei/A-5443-2012
OI Bai, Xuemei/0000-0001-6556-8041; Hao, Han/0000-0002-8199-2616; Dong,
   Liang/0000-0001-9747-5851
FU National Science Foundation, China (NSFC); Dutch Research Council (NWO)
   [72061137071]; NWO [482.19.608]; Youth Project of National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [41701636]
FX The corresponding author thanks to the support from National Science
   Foundation, China (NSFC) , and the Dutch Research Council (NWO) . [NSFC
   grant number 72061137071; NWO grant number 482.19.608] , and the Youth
   Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number
   41701636] .
CR Abdrabo MA, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.09.005
   Acuto M, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P2, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0013-9
   Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahmed F, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V79, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.051
   Al-Ghazawi Z, 2021, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102423
   Almansi F, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN, V32, P407, DOI 10.1177/0956247820935717
   Alves A, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P2505, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-1943-3
   Ansell C, 2008, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V18, P543, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Antrobus D, 2011, URBAN RES PRACT, V4, P207, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2011.579777
   Bai X., 2024, Build Networked Resilience Across Cities, V383
   Bai XM, 2020, NATURE, V584, P517, DOI 10.1038/d41586-020-02459-2
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Balogun AL, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101888
   Baniassadi A, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V132, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.037
   Barah M, 2021, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102196
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Barzaman S, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P119, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05174-x
   Bazán J, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.003
   Beheshtian A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P1299, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.039
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Bettencourt LMA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
   Biermann F, 2022, NAT SUSTAIN, V5, P795, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5
   Birchall SJ, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101062
   Birchall SJ, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103001
   Birkmann J, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P193, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5
   Busayo ET, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105454
   Buzási A, 2022, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100088
   Canales N, 2023, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V13, P413, DOI 10.1038/s41558-023-01656-x
   Charoenkit S, 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V22, P695, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9694-4
   Chirisa I, 2016, DEV SO AFR, V33, P113, DOI 10.1080/0376835X.2015.1113122
   Chokhachian A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101952
   Chou JS, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P661, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1206-4
   Chow WTL, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P510, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1335186
   Cinner JE, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P117, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cole HD, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102459
   Cortès M, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3014-0
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   De Masi RF, 2021, APPL ENERG, V303, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117584
   Deng CY, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128663
   Doberstein B, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109753
   Dvorak AC, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P951, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.102
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2018, URBAN PLANET KNOWLED
   Fitton JM, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105787
   Freeman AC, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P659, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2885-4
   Georgeson L, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P584, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2944, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2944]
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gonzales P, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V30, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.012
   Grönwall J, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-7181-9
   Gulsrud NM, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V161, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005
   Haidera M, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P473, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.565465
   Han H, 2024, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, DOI 10.1038/s42949-024-00167-8
   Haque AN, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102534
   Hong TZ, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100871
   Hoyle HE, 2023, LANDSCAPE RES, V48, P460, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2020.1829573
   Jenkins K, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V595, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.242
   Jensen PD, 2021, FOOD SECUR, V13, P551, DOI 10.1007/s12571-021-01142-2
   Jing R, 2022, ENERGY, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124626
   Kastner P, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108639
   Khirfan L., 2020, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, V13, P187, DOI [10.1080/17549175.2019.1650801, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2019.1650801]
   Laetitia M, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110181
   Lamb WF, 2019, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V9, P279, DOI 10.1038/s41558-019-0440-x
   Levenda AM, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P634, DOI 10.1177/2399654418797127
   Liu OY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102772
   Luo FH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Magnan AK, 2020, CURR CLIM CHANGE REP, V6, P166, DOI 10.1007/s40641-020-00166-8
   Mahadevia D, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V11, P29, DOI 10.1177/0975425320906249
   Mahajan S, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103942
   Marvuglia A, 2020, ECOL MODEL, V438, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109351
   Mashi SA, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P1727, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04052-2
   McDonald RI, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P6312, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1011615108
   Mechler R, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1141-0
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meng M, 2022, CITIES, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103702
   Mera AP, 2020, TRANSPORTATION, V47, P1809, DOI 10.1007/s11116-019-09984-8
   Moher D, 2016, REV ESP NUTR HUM DIE, V20, P148, DOI 10.14306/renhyd.20.2.223
   Molinaroli E, 2019, ENVIRON MANAGE, V64, P391, DOI 10.1007/s00267-019-01198-z
   Ndebele-Murisa MR, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0227915
   Nelson A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2673, P11, DOI 10.1177/0361198118822272
   Nop S, 2019, ECOL SOC, V24, DOI 10.5751/ES-10860-240223
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   O'Malley C, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V19, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.009
   Parker DJ, 2009, METEOROL APPL, V16, P103, DOI 10.1002/met.119
   Pauleit S, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.006
   Portner HO, 2022, IPCC, 2022: Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability
   Potter E, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1536, DOI 10.1177/0042098018821304
   Qiao H, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010038
   Reckien D, 2023, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V13, P907, DOI 10.1038/s41558-023-01774-6
   Robinson SA, 2022, DEV PRACT, V32, P234, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2021.1907534
   Rockstroem J, 2023, NATURE, V619, P102, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06083-8
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Roth D, 2019, CLIM POLICY, V19, pS78, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2018.1530967
   Muñoz DS, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128793
   Schibuola L, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112368
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7687, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1117622109
   Shokry G, 2022, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V32, P211, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2021.1944269
   Soltani A, 2017, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V6, P529, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2017.08.001
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Su WX, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V225, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109600
   Tablada A, 2016, SOL ENERGY, V139, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.041
   Testa AC, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P29, DOI 10.3141/2532-04
   Tiernan A, 2019, POLICY DES PRACT, V2, P53, DOI 10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240
   Torabi E, 2018, CITIES, V72, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.008
   Torres-Bagur M, 2019, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V11, P552, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2018-0070
   Twigg J., 2009, Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community
   UN D ESA., 2015, World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision
   Valencia A, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105991
   van den Berg HJ, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V94, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.015
   Velibeyoglu K, 2018, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V18, P1339, DOI 10.2166/ws.2017.199
   Vieira LC, 2021, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V45, P344, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2020.1812788
   Wang P, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P2575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04933-0
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Williams DS, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P157, DOI 10.1177/0956247818819694
   Wolf J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.09.004
   Xu LL, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aafe27
   Yang YF, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101485
   Yumagulova L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.022
   Zahmatkesh Z, 2017, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V189, DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-6282-y
   Zanon BD, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V151, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.048
   Zhang B, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P5057, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020463
   Zhang YN, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102396
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2021, ENVIRON DEV, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100552
NR 129
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 53
U2 55
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0921-3449
EI 1879-0658
J9 RESOUR CONSERV RECY
JI Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 212
AR 107923
DI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107923
EA SEP 2024
PG 14
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA H3D8D
UT WOS:001322282600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Colombino, A
   Vanolo, A
AF Colombino, Annalisa
   Vanolo, Alberto
TI Turin and Lingotto: resilience, forgetting and the reinvention of place
SO EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; forgetting; multifunctional spaces; cultural containers;
   post-Fordism; cultural economy
ID URBAN; GEOGRAPHIES; ADAPTATION; CRISIS
AB Lingotto used to be an important industrial site and a highly symbolic space at the heart of the city of Turin, Italy. The aim of this article is to analyse the multiple trajectories, spatialities and layers of memories, meanings and practices that overlapped within and across Lingotto in the last decades, following the changing economic conditions and connected discursive paradigms associated with the evolution of the local economy since the Fordist crisis of the 1970s. The analysis shows that Lingotto may be interpreted as a mirror of Turin's resilience strategies used to cope with the economic crises that have hit the city. Furthermore, it shows how Lingotto is a highly resilient urban fragment and building. Contrary to mainstream debates about the need to conserve and stage local urban heritages, this paper offers an account of Lingotto's resilience, which highlights how forgetting the past may be a strategy for tackling the present and being resilient. The analysis of the evolution of Lingotto thus contributes to understanding urban processes that entwine with the quest for resilience in the contemporary post-industrial city, stressing the ambiguous role of the often-implicit politics of forgetting and amnesia in a framework of urban resilience.
C1 [Colombino, Annalisa] Graz Univ, Dept Geog & Reg Sci, Graz, Austria.
   [Vanolo, Alberto] Univ Turin, Dipartimento Culture Polit & Soc, Turin, Italy.
C3 University of Graz; University of Turin
RP Vanolo, A (corresponding author), Univ Turin, Dipartimento Culture Polit & Soc, Turin, Italy.
EM alberto.vanolo@unito.it
RI Colombino, Annalisa/G-3311-2016
OI Colombino, Annalisa/0000-0001-6854-9903; Vanolo,
   Alberto/0000-0002-8550-2338
CR Amin Ash., 1994, POSTFORDISM READER, P1
   [Anonymous], 2015, CITY CULT SOC, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.05.001
   Banks A., 2003, CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY P, P88
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Bigazzi Duccio, 1994, LINGOTTO 1915 1939 A, P281
   Bosio R, 1983, IL SOLE 24 ORE
   Brockmeier J, 2002, CULT PSYCHOL, V8, P15, DOI 10.1177/1354067X0281002
   Buffa C, 1994, LINGOTTO 1915 1939 A, P151
   Butz D, 2009, GEOGR COMPASS, V3, P1660, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00279.x
   Cabras I, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P254, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1074163
   Camerana O, 1985, ENIGMA CAVALIER AGNE
   Castells M., 1994, TECHNOPOLES WORLD
   Conti M. Dapra, 1984, VISITE AL LINGOTTO
   Cooke P, RESILIENCE IN PRESS
   Cooke P, 2012, NEW HORIZ REG SCI, P43
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Crang M., 2007, DOING ETHNOGRAPHIES
   Ellis C. E., 2003, ETHNOGRAPHIC
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Gabert G., 1964, TURIN VILLE IND
   Giaccaria P., 2010, DI CAPITALE IMPORTAN, P57
   Greco F., 2016, SOLE24ORE ONLIN 0812
   Greco F., 2015, SOLE24ORE ONLIN 1104
   Griseri P., 2016, REPUBBLICA ONLI 0814
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hannigan J., 1998, Fantasy city
   HARVEY D, 1990, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V80, P418, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00305.x
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Hoelscher S, 2004, SOC CULT GEOGR, V5, P347, DOI 10.1080/1464936042000252769
   KNOX PL, 1991, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V81, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01686.x
   Lazzeretti L., 2013, RE FRAMING REGIONAL, P256
   Le Corbusier, 1931, NEW ARCHITECTURE
   Le Corbusier, 1934, QUADRANTE, V14, P37
   Legg S, 2007, ENVIRON PLANN A, V39, P456, DOI 10.1068/a38170
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Massey D., 1993, Mapping the Futures, P59
   McGlade J, 2006, COMPLEXITY AND CO-EVOLUTION: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, P147
   McGuigan Jim., 2009, COOL CAPITALISM
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Minucci E., 2012, STAMPA
   Moss P., 2001, Placing autobiography in geography, P188
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Olmo C., 1994, LINGOTTO 1915 1939 A, P9
   Olmo C., 2004, METAFORE CANTIERE LI
   Pasquinelli C., 2015, City, Culture and Society, V6, P75, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.04.001
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Pinson G, 2002, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V26, P477, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00394
   Pizzolato Nicola., 2013, CHALLENGING GLOBAL C
   POZZETTO M, 1975, FIAT LINGOTTO ARCHIT
   Provost C., 2016, The Guardian
   Purcell M., 2009, INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR, P23
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   SOJA EW, 1980, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V70, P207, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x
   Stefanoni F., 1994, IL MONDO, P60
   Stehr SD, 2006, URBAN AFF REV, V41, P492, DOI 10.1177/1078087405284887
   Tidball K.G., 2007, SOCIAL LEARNING SUST, P149, DOI DOI 10.3920/978-90-8686-594-9
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Vannini P, 2015, CULT GEOGR, V22, P317, DOI 10.1177/1474474014555657
   Vanolo A, 2015, CITIES, V46, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.04.004
   Vanolo Alberto., 2015, City, Culture and Society, V6, P69, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.01.003
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Whitford J, 2005, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V29, P771, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00621.x
   Zardini M., 1984, CASABELLA, V502, P16
NR 63
TC 11
Z9 12
U1 1
U2 16
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0965-4313
EI 1469-5944
J9 EUR PLAN STUD
JI Eur. Plan. Stud.
PY 2017
VL 25
IS 1
BP 10
EP 28
DI 10.1080/09654313.2016.1254598
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA EL2HG
UT WOS:000394440100002
OA Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sharifi, A
AF Sharifi, Ayyoob
TI Resilient urban forms: A macro-scale analysis
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban form; Resilience; Macro-scale; Scale hierarchy; Development type;
   Degree of clustering
ID COMPACT CITY; DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; EMERGY ANALYSIS;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; HEAT-ISLAND; ENERGY; CITIES; DESIGN; SUSTAINABILITY
AB Cities need to build on their resilience to cope with a broad range of natural and manmade hazards that threaten their competitiveness, livability, and functionality. Recognizing this need, the resilience concept is increasingly used as an organizing principle to guide research design and facilitate a more informed decision-making process. However, despite the abundance of studies on urban resilience, research on the link between urban form and resilience is limited and fragmented. This study sheds more light on this issue by reviewing and synthesizing theoretical and empirical evidence on how physical structure of cities can facilitate or hinder urban resilience. Acknowledging that each city is located within a nested hierarchy of scales that is characterized by cross-scale dynamics, only the macro-level aspects and elements of urban form are analyzed in this paper. These are namely 'scale hierarchy', 'city size', 'development type', 'degree of clustering', and 'landscape/habitat connectivity'. Key criteria and indicators for analyzing resilience of each element/aspect are specified and used to discuss how macro-scale urban form is related to various resilience properties such as robustness, redundancy, resourcefulness, modularity, flexibility, adaptability, and efficiency. Findings indicate that urban form has major implications for social, ecological, and economic functionality of cities and can play a key role in enhancing their resilience and sustainability.
C1 [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398530, Japan.
C3 Hiroshima University
RP Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398530, Japan.
EM sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp
RI Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI Sharifi, Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613; Varela, Juan
   Carlos/0000-0003-1480-0837
CR Abdulkareem M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.009
   Adachi S. A, 2014, J APPL METEOROL CLIM
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahmad S, 2016, TRANSPORT POLICY, V50, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.04.014
   Ajibade I, 2014, GEOFORUM, V55, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.05.005
   Alawadi K, 2017, J PLAN EDUC RES
   Andersson E, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   [Anonymous], 2012, DIRENAT IMP
   Antoniucci V, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V59, P580, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.004
   Baiocchi G, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V34, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.001
   Barau AS, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V42, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.007
   Batty M., 1994, FRACTAL CITIES GEOME
   Batty M, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V166, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.002
   Berardi U, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080822
   Bertaud A., 2001, Metropolis: A measure of the spatial organization of 7 large cities, P1, DOI [10.1017/S0954579418001700, DOI 10.1017/S0954579418001700]
   Brand D, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P159, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1133231
   Brody S, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P789, DOI 10.1177/0042098012448551
   Brody SD, 2011, J PLAN EDUC RES, V31, P438, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11419515
   Burton E, 2000, URBAN STUD, V37, P1969, DOI 10.1080/00420980050162184
   Cabaleiro R, 2013, AM REV PUBLIC ADM, V43, P729, DOI 10.1177/0275074012451523
   Capello R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P951, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
   Carpenter A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.003
   CATS, 2018, RUR URB TRANS
   Cavan G, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V42, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.025
   Chen Y.-J, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN B
   Cheng V, 2006, NON TRADITIONAL REF
   Clark TA, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V53, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.006
   Comer D, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V60, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.02.015
   Creutzig F, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1054, DOI 10.1038/nclimate3169
   De Montis A, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.004
   De Risi R, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P1003, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0749-0
   De Rosa S, 2016, CITIES, V51, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.025
   Dempsey N, 2010, FUTURE CITY, V2, P21, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_2
   Dieleman H, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.027
   Ding XH, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.140
   Dovey K, 2012, INT DEV PLANN REV, V34, P349, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2012.23
   DPZ, 2018, THE URB TRANS
   Duy PN, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P197, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-12-2016-0169
   Elmer F, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1641, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1641-2012
   Evans DH, 2013, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V110, P12595, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1306539110
   Ewing R, 2008, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V19, P1, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2008.9521624
   Ewing R, 2018, CITIES, V72, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.010
   Fang CL, 2015, APPL ENERG, V158, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.095
   Farmani R, 2014, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V28, P83, DOI 10.1007/s11269-013-0472-3
   Feliciotti A, 2016, OPEN HOUSE INT, V41, P23
   Fletcher R., 2011, COMP ARCHAEOLOGY COM, P285, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139022712.013
   Fragkias M, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0064727
   Gauk M, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V128, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.07.003
   Gleeson B, 2012, GEOGR RES-AUST, V50, P242, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2011.00728.x
   Gobattoni F, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.011
   Hachem C, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.117
   Hale JD, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0033300
   Harrison P., 2014, Urban Resilience Thinking for Municipalities, DOI DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.991329
   Ho HC, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V112, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.001
   Holden E, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P2145, DOI 10.1080/00420980500332064
   Hubbart JA, 2014, ENERGIES, V7, P1770, DOI 10.3390/en7031770
   Hui SCM, 2001, RENEW ENERG, V24, P627, DOI 10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00049-0
   Huq S, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P3, DOI 10.1177/0956247807078058
   Irajifar L, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P259, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2014-0074
   Jayawardena HMIDP, 2017, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V12, P964, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2017.100
   Kim S, 2015, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V22, P189, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2014.1003202
   Larco N, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1071649
   Larson W, 2015, J URBAN ECON, V90, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2015.08.001
   Lee JM, 2017, ECOL MODEL, V363, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.08.014
   Lee K, 2016, RELATIONSHIP URBAN S
   Lee S, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V68, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.024
   Lehmann S., 2016, Future Cities and Environment, V2, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40984-016-0021-3, DOI 10.1186/S40984-016-0021-3, DOI 10.1186/S40984-016-0021-3,20162:1]
   Lemonsu A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.10.007
   León J, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P826, DOI 10.1177/0265813515597229
   León J, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
   Lieske SN, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN B, V39, P155, DOI 10.1068/b37099
   Ling C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.006
   Lohrey S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V45, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.004
   Louf R, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep05561
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Marcus L, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06939-190455
   Mehrotra S, 2018, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V9, P158, DOI 10.1177/0975425318783548
   Mörtberg U, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V100, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.031
   Neuman M, 2005, J PLAN EDUC RES, V25, P11, DOI 10.1177/0739456X04270466
   Newman P., 2000, Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, P109
   Nielsen TAS, 2015, RES TRANSP ECON, V51, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.07.003
   Okeil A, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P1437, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.013
   Olazabal M, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_11
   Oliveira EA, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep04235
   Pearsall H, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V79, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.010
   Petit-Bohr A, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V621, P434
   Pharr J, 2013, Int J Sci, V10, P539
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Qubbaj MR, 2015, B MATH BIOL, V77, P390, DOI 10.1007/s11538-014-9949-3
   Radywyl N, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.020
   Ray I, 2015, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V25, P549, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2014.971043
   Rickwood P, 2008, URBAN POLICY RES, V26, P57, DOI 10.1080/08111140701629886
   Rosiers FD, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P964, DOI 10.1177/0265813516656862
   Sadowy K, 2016, SUSTAINABLE CITY FLE
   Salat S, 2012, OBUDA U E B, V3, P263
   Salat S, 2012, ENERGY EFFICIENCY A
   Salat S., 2012, Urban Complexity, Efficiency and Resilience, Urban Morphology Lab
   Salat S, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P107, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2016.1277227
   Salat S, 2012, TEMA, V5, P55, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/918
   Salat S, 2010, CESB 10: CENTRAL EUROPE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE BUILDING - FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, P509
   Schlee MB, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P2054, DOI 10.3390/su4092054
   Schneider A, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P659, DOI 10.1177/0042098007087340
   Schwarz N, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000263
   Sharifi A, 2016, URBAN RESILIENCE
   Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sharifi A, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V20, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.09.002
   Silva M, 2017, J PLAN LIT
   Silva MC, 2017, APPL ENERG, V202, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.113
   Stead D., 2001, EJTIR, V1, P113, DOI [https://doi.org/10.18757/EJTIR.2001.1.2.3497, DOI 10.18757/EJTIR.2001.1.2.3497]
   Stone B, 2010, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V118, P1425, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0901879
   Syphard AD, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071708
   Thomas I, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V84, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.002
   Tsai YH, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P141, DOI 10.1080/0042098042000309748
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   van Putten I, 2016, AUST GEOGR, P1
   Vega-Azamar RE, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V118, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.06.001
   Veneri P, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P1017, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.673566
   Villagra P, 2016, REV GEOGR NORTE GD, P63, DOI 10.4067/S0718-34022016000200006
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   WB, 2015, INV URB RES PROT PRO
   Wilson B, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3302, DOI 10.3390/su5083302
   Yang L, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034018
   Zetterberg A, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V95, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.002
NR 126
TC 167
Z9 182
U1 44
U2 459
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD FEB
PY 2019
VL 85
BP 1
EP 14
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA HK9WV
UT WOS:000458344500001
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, R
   Yu, Y
   Wu, BX
   Luo, XR
AF Zhou, Rui
   Yu, Yang
   Wu, Bingxia
   Luo, Xunrui
TI Quantitative evaluation of urban resilience in underdeveloped regions: A
   study of cities along the Sichuan-Tibet Railway in China
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient city; underdeveloped region; TOPSIS; coupled coordination
   model; built-up environment
ID SPATIOTEMPORAL EVOLUTION; DISASTER RESILIENCE; ECONOMIC-CRISIS;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; MODELS; TOPSIS; FRAMEWORK; CITY
AB Introduction: Urban resilience construction can aid in the management of urban crises and enhance the quality of the human living environment. Compared to metropolises in developed regions, cities in underdeveloped regions with unsatisfactory natural environments, insufficient economic and social development, and inadequate infrastructure construction are highly vulnerable to challenges posed by natural disasters, epidemics, and climate change. Comprehensive quantitative evaluations are needed to identify avenues for enhancing urban resilience. Methods: This study employs the TOPSIS entropy weight method and coupled coordination model to evaluate the economic, social, environmental, and infrastructure resilience of six cities and states along the Sichuan-Tibet Railway in China from 2015 to 2020. Furthermore, correlation and gray correlation analysis are used to identify the primary factors influencing the urban resilience of underdeveloped regions. Results: Firstly, during 2015-2020, the overall urban resilience of each city and state maintained an increasing trend, with different trends in the evolution of the four resilience indices and differences among cities, and the highest overall resilience is in Lhasa. Secondly, the coupling coordination between the overall resilience and each resilience aspect maintained an increasing trend and differed significantly from each other. Finally, the social and economic resilience of each city and state maintained an increasing trend and differed significantly from each other. Discussion: Economic, social, environmental, and infrastructure factors each have their own characteristics in influencing urban resilience. Based on the results, we present a three-dimensional evaluation model for analyzing the evolutionary trajectories and resilience patterns of cities. This work intends to present new concepts for assessing and optimizing urban resilience in underdeveloped regions using quantitative methodologies, as well as providing references for urban resilience construction in these places.
C1 [Zhou, Rui; Yu, Yang; Wu, Bingxia; Luo, Xunrui] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
C3 Southwest Jiaotong University
RP Yu, Y (corresponding author), Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
EM yuyang@swjtu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52178059]; Sichuan Science
   and Technology Program [2021JDR0068]
FX Funding This study was supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 52178059), and the Sichuan Science and
   Technology Program (No. 2021JDR0068).
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Alderson DL, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P562, DOI 10.1111/risa.12333
   Alizadeh H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093691
   Arifin B, 2022, VALUE HEALTH REG ISS, V30, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.12.002
   Bao ZC, 2022, ECOL INFORM, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101889
   Bixler RP, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102613
   Bozza A, 2017, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V32, P527, DOI 10.1111/mice.12275
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Capozzo M, 2019, J EARTHQ TSUNAMI, V13, DOI 10.1142/S1793431119500088
   Cheng T, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103997
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Dobson S, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.028
   Doherty M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.001
   Faturechi R, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000212
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Graham L, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.001
   Heeks R, 2019, INFORM SYST J, V29, P70, DOI 10.1111/isj.12177
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jin Q, 2023, ATMOS ENVIRON, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119479
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Jordan E, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000087
   Khatibi H, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1556, DOI 10.1177/23998083221092422
   Kondo T, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102219
   Labaka L, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V103, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.005
   LAI YJ, 1994, EUR J OPER RES, V76, P486, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90282-8
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li XJ, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.908744
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lin YZ, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109194
   Liu D, 2022, J HYDROL, V612, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128134
   Liu GS, 2007, WASTE MANAGE, V27, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.010
   Liu W, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
   Lu H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Maclean K, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P144, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.763774
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Murgatroyd A, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.571647
   Olson DL, 2004, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V40, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.003
   Parsons M, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P20
   Perrings C, 2006, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V11, P417, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X06003020
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Sabatino M, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P1924, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.081
   Saja AMA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shen Lulu, 2022, Procedia Computer Science, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.199
   Snep RPH, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.599060
   Song JL, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103698
   Song JL, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190701
   Talubo J.P., 2022, Environmental Challenges, V7, P100511, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2022.100511, 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100511]
   Tang JQ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102840
   Tomao A, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105740
   Ulfarsson GF, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V49, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.10.012
   Wang L, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104048
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   Wang XL, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101806
   Wang YY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109859
   Wu SY, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.993722
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Xu WT, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V116, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.023
   Yang LC, 2022, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104528
   Ye CS, 2022, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V3, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.004
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhou SY, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103180
   Zimmerman R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.004
NR 73
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 21
U2 99
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD FEB 7
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1133595
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1133595
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 9C5KU
UT WOS:000935456800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tang, XL
   Chen, N
AF Tang, Xiaolin
   Chen, Ning
TI A multi-scenario urban resilience simulation study based on the system
   dynamics model
SO PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; System dynamics; Shared socio-economic pathways;
   Yangtze river economic belt
AB Scientific quantification of urban resilience can provide a basis for decision-making on the construction of resilient cities to ensure safe and high-quality urban development. This study used text mining and big data statistical analysis to construct an urban resilience evaluation index system from four dimensions: social, economic, infrastructure, and ecological, and constructed an urban resilience evaluation model based on the system dynamics approach to elucidate the interactions among the indicators. Taking 11 cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt as study cases, four future development scenarios were set under Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs), and the variations in the urban resilience index of each city to 2030 were simulated. The research results show that: (1) The resilience of the 11 cities currently shows an upward trend, but the stratification phenomenon is obvious, and the overall situation is high in the east and low in the west, high in the north and low in the south; (2) The variations of resilience index vary among cities under different scenarios, and in a comprehensive comparison, SSP1 is the optimal development path; (3) The resilience gap among the 11 cities will remain in the future, but the gap in the east-west direction may gradually decrease, while the gap in the north-south direction remains significant.
C1 [Tang, Xiaolin; Chen, Ning] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Informat & Safety Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China.
   [Tang, Xiaolin; Chen, Ning] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Inst Environm Management & Policy, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhongnan University of Economics & Law; Zhongnan University of Economics
   & Law
RP Chen, N (corresponding author), Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Informat & Safety Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China.
EM safetychn@zuel.edu.cn
OI Chen, Ning/0000-0001-6607-1758
CR Bai YP, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120606
   Bauer N, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V42, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.006
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Chen GZ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14386-x
   [陈晓红 Chen Xiaohong], 2020, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V40, P2000
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Ding YT, 2022, ENERGY, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123518
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   [李福香 Li Fuxiang], 2022, [地球信息科学学报, Journal of Geo-Information Science], V24, P684
   Li GJ, 2021, CITIES, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103206
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li L. G., 2019, Hum. Geogr, V2, P1, DOI [10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.001, DOI 10.13959/J.ISSN.1003-2398.2019.02.001]
   Li Y.J., 2021, Ecol. Econ, V37, P44
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Lu H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Meinshausen M, 2020, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V13, P3571, DOI 10.5194/gmd-13-3571-2020
   [彭智敏 Peng Zhimin], 2022, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V31, P1694
   [王军 Wang Jun], 2020, [地球科学进展, Advance in Earth Sciences], V35, P816
   Wen LX, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136789
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   [徐慧敏 Xu Huimin], 2023, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V32, P14
   Xu XC, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110102
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang XP, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P65094, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-14932-0
   Yang ZS, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102226
   Ye CS, 2022, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V3, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.004
   [张帆 Zhang Fan], 2021, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V41, P9691
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
NR 35
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 16
U2 65
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1474-7065
EI 1873-5193
J9 PHYS CHEM EARTH
JI Phys. Chem. Earth
PD DEC
PY 2023
VL 132
AR 103467
DI 10.1016/j.pce.2023.103467
EA AUG 2023
PG 10
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA S1HZ3
UT WOS:001068761000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lu, YW
   Zhai, GF
   Zhai, W
AF Lu, Yuwen
   Zhai, Guofang
   Zhai, Wei
TI Quantifying urban spatial resilience using multi-criteria decision
   analysis (MCDA) and back propagation neural network (BPNN)
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban spatial resilience; Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Back
   propagation neural network (BPNN); Resilience assessment; Spatial
   analysis
ID CRITERIA; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; ACCESSIBILITY; ROBUSTNESS; WEIGHTS;
   ECOLOGY; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; IMPACT
AB In the face of rapid urbanization and increasing environmental risks, building resilient cities has become a global priority. This study introduces a novel methodology for quantifying urban spatial resilience by integrating multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and back propagation neural network (BPNN). The urban spatial resilience assessment system encompasses five critical criteria layers (urban spatial scale, structure, form, function, and network resilience) and 29 indicator layers. An empirical study of Yinchuan City, China, demonstrates the effectiveness of the MCDA-BPNN model in quantifying urban spatial resilience. The models identified significant disparities in resilience between central and peripheral urban zones, with central areas showing higher resilience scores compared to peripheral areas. This spatial pattern was most pronounced in structure, functional and network resilience. These results contribute to the field of urban environmental science by advancing the fundamental understanding of urban spatial resilience mechanisms and their spatial distribution. The study has significant implications for urban planners, policymakers, and risk management authorities, enabling data-driven decision-making and the development of targeted, resilience-oriented urban policies and strategies. The MCDA-BPNN approach offers a promising tool for comprehensive urban resilience assessment in diverse urban contexts.
C1 [Lu, Yuwen; Zhai, Guofang] Nanjing Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhai, Wei] Univ Texas San Antonio, Sch Architecture & Planning, San Antonio, TX USA.
C3 Nanjing University; University of Texas System; University of Texas at
   San Antonio (UTSA)
RP Zhai, GF (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
EM luyw@nju.edu.com; guofang_zhai@nju.edu.com; wei.zhai@utsa.edu
RI 鲁, 钰雯/JDW-1571-2023; Zhai, Guofang/JJD-3299-2023
OI Zhai, Wei/0000-0003-4064-0427; Lu, Yuwen/0000-0002-7449-829X
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2023YFC3805204]; Natural Science
   Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20220782]; China Postdoctoral Science
   Foundation [2023T160302]
FX This paper was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant
   No. 2023YFC3805204) , the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
   (Grants No. BK20220782) , and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
   (Grants No. 2023T160302) .
CR Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allan P, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P242, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772881
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   [Anonymous], 2013, Anal. Theory Appl, DOI [10.4208/ata.2013.v29.n2.8, DOI 10.4208/ATA.2013.V29.N2.8]
   [Anonymous], 2015, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Arianoutsou M, 2011, ENVIRON MANAGE, V47, P384, DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9614-7
   Armstrong A., 2019, 100 Resilient Cities
   Assumma V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V756, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143806
   Aydin NY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
   Bai L., 2019, Master's Thesis, DOI [10.27011/d.cnki.gdbsu.2019.000089, DOI 10.27011/D.CNKI.GDBSU.2019.000089]
   Bathrellos GD, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V575, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.025
   Baudry G, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V264, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.036
   Berche B, 2009, EUR PHYS J B, V71, P125, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Bristow DN, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000338
   Capello R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P951, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Choo EU, 1999, COMPUT IND ENG, V37, P527, DOI 10.1016/S0360-8352(00)00019-X
   Cinelli M, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V46, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011
   Collins A, 2017, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V25, P148, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2016.1189922
   Cooper CHV, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P643, DOI 10.1007/s11116-019-10072-0
   Cumming GS, 2011, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V26, P899, DOI 10.1007/s10980-011-9623-1
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P25, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.768076
   Dempsey N, 2010, FUTURE CITY, V2, P21, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8647-2_2
   Derrible S, 2010, PHYSICA A, V389, P3678, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.008
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   DIAKOULAKI D, 1995, COMPUT OPER RES, V22, P763, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Dieleman H, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.027
   [段亚明 Duan Yaming], 2018, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V33, P788
   European Commission, 2020, Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on 'nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities', DOI [10.3030/730468, DOI 10.3030/730468]
   Feliciotti A, 2016, OPEN HOUSE INT, V41, P23
   Gevrey M, 2003, ECOL MODEL, V160, P249, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00257-0
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goldberg D. E., 1987, Genetic Algorithms and their Applications: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, P41
   Goodfellow I, 2016, ADAPT COMPUT MACH LE, P1
   Guo J., 2015, ECON GEOGR, V35, P68, DOI [10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.08.010, DOI 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.08.010]
   Hachem C, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.117
   Harrison P., 2014, Solutions, V5, P26
   Haykin S., 2008, NEURAL NETWORKS LEAR
   Haykin SS, 1999, NEURAL NETWORKS COMP, DOI 10.1142/S0129065794000372
   Heaton J., 2008, Introduction to Neural Networks with Java, V2, P1
   Heinimann HR, 2017, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_5
   Hirota M, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P232, DOI 10.1126/science.1210657
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu G., 2016, Scientific Development, P46
   Hulse David, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P295, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044041.94705.52
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Kwasinski Alexis, 2011, 2011 IEEE 33 INT TEL
   Ling C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V99, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.006
   Liu JY, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P195, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
   Locatelli B., 2016, Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services, P481
   Long Y, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P406, DOI 10.1177/2399808317715640
   Lu YW, 2021, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V27, P921, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2020.1788918
   Mageau MT., 1995, ECOSYST HEALTH, V1, P201
   Malalgoda C., 2013, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V4, P72, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299017, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299017]
   Malczewski J., 2015, Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science
   [毛帅永 Mao Shuaiyong], 2019, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V38, P1675
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti D., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN REA, DOI DOI 10.17226/5782
   Morinière L, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P435, DOI 10.1177/0042098011402233
   Müller A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P2107, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011
   Novak DC, 2014, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V57, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.015
   Olden JD, 2004, ECOL MODEL, V178, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.013
   Opach T, 2020, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V74, P181, DOI 10.1080/00291951.2020.1753236
   Ouyang M, 2014, STRUCT SAF, V48, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.01.001
   Pauleit S, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Porta S, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P450, DOI 10.1068/b34098
   Radke J., 2000, Geogr. Inf. Sci, V6, P105, DOI DOI 10.1080/10824000009480538
   Rojas R., 1996, Neural Networks: A Systematic Introduction, P149, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-61068-47
   RUMELHART DE, 1986, NATURE, V323, P533, DOI 10.1038/323533a0
   Sakakibara H, 2004, J TRANSP ENG, V130, P560, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:5(560)
   Schröder A, 2005, OIKOS, V110, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13962.x
   Serre D, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS69, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12253
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Song X., 2009, Geographic Information System Internship Tutorial, P204
   Sterbenz JPG, 2013, TELECOMMUN SYST, V52, P705, DOI 10.1007/s11235-011-9573-6
   Sun GB, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P2586, DOI 10.1177/0042098017733943
   Waley P, 2005, GEOGR J, V171, P190
   Wang FH, 2012, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V102, P1104, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.657146
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Willmott CJ, 2005, CLIMATE RES, V30, P79, DOI 10.3354/cr030079
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   [许泽宁 Xu Zening], 2016, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V71, P928
   Yariyan P, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101705
   Yegnanarayana B., 2009, Artificial Neural Networks
   Zhai GF, 2015, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V21, P1206, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2014.955385
   Zhang GQ, 1998, INT J FORECASTING, V14, P35, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00044-7
   Zhang X, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V46, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.006
NR 101
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 39
U2 57
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 111
AR 104694
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104694
EA JUL 2024
PG 25
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA A6H5U
UT WOS:001283526200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shukla, N
   Das, A
   Mazumder, T
AF Shukla, Nitesh
   Das, Arup
   Mazumder, Taraknath
TI Assessment of urban form resilience: a review of literature in the
   context of the Global South
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE Flood hazard; Global South; Urban form; Urban morphology; Urban
   resilience
ID MORPHOLOGY; CITY; ECOLOGY; NETWORK; PATTERN; DESIGN
AB Building resilient and sustainable cities in the face of rising climate change is increasingly getting attention of the research community as well as decision-makers. Despite the sizable quantum of research encompassing various facets of urban resilience, the physical form of cities has received limited attention from researchers. One of the challenges encountered involves the generalization of these studies across diverse settings and heterogeneous contexts. This study investigates different tools and frameworks proposed for the assessment of urban form resilience. Furthermore, it explores the applicability of these frameworks within the specific context of the Global South. The literature analysis is based on attribute selection, study context, methodology, and resilience perspective. The findings reveal a degree of fragmentation in the selection of attributes, approaches, and perspectives within the literature concerning the assessment of urban form resilience. Divergent arguments exist concerning the impact of urban form attributes on urban resilience, notably regarding factors like density and city size. Furthermore, the research underscores the complexities associated with integrating these assessment frameworks into the unique urban morphology of cities in the Global South, characterized by the prevalence of informal development. The findings of this study offer valuable insights for researchers and planners in comprehending the relationship between resilience and urban morphology, enabling the application of these concepts for the assessment of urban form resilience, particularly in the context of the Global South.
C1 [Shukla, Nitesh; Das, Arup; Mazumder, Taraknath] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Architecture & Reg Planning, Kharagpur 721302, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Kharagpur
RP Shukla, N (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Architecture & Reg Planning, Kharagpur 721302, India.
EM niteshshukla2010@gmail.com; arup.das@arp.iitkgp.ac.in;
   taraknm@arp.iitkgp.ac.in
RI Das, Arup/AAS-5643-2021
OI Das, Arup/0000-0002-9265-8242; Shukla, Nitesh/0000-0002-9568-1616
CR Abdulkareem M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.009
   Allan P, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P242, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772881
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   Barau AS, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V42, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.007
   Bartosiewicz B, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102855
   Bera S, 2022, REMOTE SENS APPL, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100686
   Birkmann J., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002
   Brody SD, 2011, J PLAN EDUC RES, V31, P438, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11419515
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bruwier M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.325
   Caparros-Midwood D., 2014, OPTIMIZATION URBAN S, P145, DOI [10.1061/9780784413609.015, DOI 10.1061/9780784413609.015]
   Capello R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P951, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Cetin M, 2020, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V13, P991, DOI 10.1007/s11869-020-00858-y
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   CONZEN MRG, 1960, T I BRIT GEOGR, P1
   Cox S, 2022, GEOGR J, V188, P294, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12437
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dilley M, 2005, DISAST RISK MANAGE, P1
   Dovey K, 2012, INT DEV PLANN REV, V34, P349, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2012.23
   DTE-CSE, 2019, STAT IND ENV 2019 FI
   Elmer F, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1641, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1641-2012
   Etkin D., 2014, DISASTER THEORY INTE, DOI [10.1016/C2013-0-13535-0, DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-13535-0]
   Feliciotti A., 2018, THESIS GLASGOW, DOI [10.48730/yrsa-7747, DOI 10.48730/YRSA-7747]
   Feliciotti A, 2016, OPEN HOUSE INT, V41, P23
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Fischer K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061800
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   Galantini Z. D., 2016, 41 IAHS WORLD C ALG
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Guidotti R, 2016, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V1, P153, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Habibian A., 2017, EXPLORING 6 DIMENSIO, DOI [10.1061/9780784480878.040, DOI 10.1061/9780784480878.040]
   Hanson J., 2001, 3 INT SPAC SYNT S
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V643, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.197
   Irajifar L, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P259, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2014-0074
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kamelifar M.J., 2013, J. Civ. Eng. Urbanism (JCEU), V3, P380
   León J, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Lynch K., 1981, Theory of good city form
   Ma XF, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052899
   March H., 2022, URBAN RESILIENCE CLI, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-07301-4_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-07301-4_1]
   Marcus L, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06939-190455
   Marin J, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102541
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   McHarg IL., 1970, DESIGN NATURE
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN
   Mohanty MP, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101660
   Oliveira V, 2016, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0
   Perera ATD, 2021, APPL ENERG, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116430
   Pickett S., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, V3, P269, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9, 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9]
   Ran J, 2017, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000376
   Roy A, 2009, PLAN THEOR, V8, P76, DOI 10.1177/1473095208099299
   Salat S., 2012, Energy Efficiency - A Bridge to Low Carbon Economy, P25, DOI [10.5772/38599, DOI 10.5772/38599]
   Salat S, 2012, TEMA, V5, P55, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/918
   Sharifi A, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5010018
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   Sharma SE, 2021, NEW POLIT ECON, V26, P1078, DOI 10.1080/13563467.2021.1899152
   Singh M., 2019, URBAN FLOODING CASE
   Singh N., 2022, RESILIENT SMART CITI, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-95037-8_4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-95037-8_4]
   Singh P, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.017
   Stepanov A, 2009, EUR J OPER RES, V198, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.08.025
   Sullivan F. O., 2022, WORLDS FASTEST GROWI
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Timmeren C. F., 2014, URBAN FORM FITNESS S, DOI [10.13140/2.1.4017.3444, DOI 10.13140/2.1.4017.3444]
   Timmerman Peter., 1981, Vulnerability, Resilience and the Collapse of Society
   UN-Habitat, 2018, State of the World Cities: 2008/2009-Harmonious Cities
   UN-SDG, 2018, Sustainable Cities and Communities
   United Nations, 2015, MILLENNIUM DEV GOALS
   United Nations Population Division, 2018, World Urbanization Prospects database
   VAYDA AP, 1975, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V4, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev.an.04.100175.001453
   White I, 2008, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V161, P151, DOI 10.1680/udap.2008.161.4.151
   ZIMMERER KS, 1994, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V84, P108, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01731.x
NR 81
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 24
U2 71
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 27
IS 2
BP 2863
EP 2899
DI 10.1007/s10668-023-04058-3
EA OCT 2023
PG 37
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA W9W2C
UT WOS:001093262500006
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, Z
   Zhang, JQ
   Zhang, YC
   Chen, YA
   Yan, JH
AF Zhang, Zhen
   Zhang, Jiquan
   Zhang, Yichen
   Chen, Yanan
   Yan, Jiahao
TI Urban Flood Resilience Evaluation Based on GIS and Multi-Source Data: A
   Case Study of Changchun City
SO REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE urban flood resilience; analytic hierarchy process; remote sensing and
   GIS; TOPSIS; k-means; resilience evaluation
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; RISK-ASSESSMENT
AB With extreme rainfall events and rapid urbanization, urban flood disaster events are increasing dramatically. As a key flood control city in China, Changchun City suffers casualties and economic losses every year due to floods. The improvement of flood resilience has become an important means for cities to resist flood risks. Therefore, this paper constructs an assessment model of urban flood resilience from four aspects: infrastructure, environment, society and economy. Then, it quantifies infrastructure and environmental vulnerability based on GIS, and uses TOPSIS to quantify social and economic recoverability. Finally, based on k-means clustering of infrastructure and environmental vulnerability and social and economic recoverability, the flood resilience of Changchun City was evaluated. The results show that different factors have different effects on flood resilience, and cities with low infrastructure and environmental vulnerability and high socioeconomic recoverability are more resilient in the face of floods. In addition, cities in the same cluster have the same flood resilience characteristics. The proposed framework can be extended to other regions of China or different countries by simply modifying the indicator system according to different regions, providing experience for regional flood mitigation and improving flood resilience.
C1 [Zhang, Zhen; Zhang, Yichen; Chen, Yanan; Yan, Jiahao] Changchun Inst Technol, Sch Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Jiquan] Northeast Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China.
C3 Changchun Institute Technology; Northeast Normal University - China
RP Zhang, YC (corresponding author), Changchun Inst Technol, Sch Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun 130021, Peoples R China.
EM zhangyc@ccit.edu.cn
FU Key Scientific and Technology Research and Development Program of Jilin
   Province [20180201035SF]
FX This research was funded by the Key Scientific and Technology Research
   and Development Program of Jilin Province (20200403074SF); the Key
   Scientific and Technology Research and Development Program of Jilin
   Province (20180201033SF); the Key Scientific and Technology Research and
   Development Program of Jilin Province (20180201035SF).
CR Abhas K., 2008, CITIES FLOODING GUID, P20433
   Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   Alfieri L, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004
   [Anonymous], 1981, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93
   Arup, 2015, CIT RES IND
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chen P, 2014, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V11, P9964, DOI 10.3390/ijerph111009964
   Choi E, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102817
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Duan CY, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14133101
   Tran D, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12030879
   Hamidi AR, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V101, P385, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03878-0
   Haque MM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102861
   Hoque MA, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19061302
   [黄曦涛 Huang Xitao], 2019, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V28, P167
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li ZM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101140
   Liu G., 2018, Resour. Dev. Mark, V34, P593
   Lyu HM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P1012, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.138
   Marasco S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102506
   McClymont K, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
   Ministry of Emergency Management of the Peoples Republic China, 2020, BAS SIT NAT DIS 2020
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Morrison A, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, P291, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12315
   Muller M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P99, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076726
   Omran EE, 2017, J COAST CONSERV, V21, P849, DOI 10.1007/s11852-017-0546-0
   Orencio PM, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V3, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.11.006
   Qasim S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.009
   Roy S., 2021, Environmental Challenges, V4, DOI [10.1016/j.envc.2021.100194, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2021.100194]
   Saaty TL, 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429504419-2
   Saha Amit Kumar, 2020, Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, V5, DOI 10.1007/s41204-020-00073-1
   Sar N, 2015, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V1, DOI 10.1007/s40808-015-0039-9
   Saroj Kavita, 2016, INT J COMPUT SCI ENG, P279
   Shah AA, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P147, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3293-0
   Shen YW, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124159
   Siebeneck L, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P955, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1886-4
   Sun RL, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101768
   Suna RR, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103344
   Tayyab M, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13101864
   Wallemacq P., 2018, Economic Losses, Poverty Disasters: 1998-2017
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   Yang WC, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V213, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.085
   Yang YY, 2021, J HYDROL, V600, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126470
   Yusmah MY, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V101, P551, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03885-1
   Zhang HM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102248
NR 47
TC 17
Z9 20
U1 72
U2 240
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2072-4292
J9 REMOTE SENS-BASEL
JI Remote Sens.
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 7
AR 1872
DI 10.3390/rs15071872
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Remote Sensing;
   Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Remote Sensing; Imaging
   Science & Photographic Technology
GA D5KU7
UT WOS:000969129200001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xu, C
   Huo, XX
   Hong, YXX
   Yu, C
   de Jong, M
   Cheng, BD
AF Xu, Chang
   Huo, Xinxin
   Hong, Yaoxiaoxue
   Yu, Chang
   de Jong, Martin
   Cheng, Baodong
TI How urban greening policy affects urban ecological resilience:
   Quasi-natural experimental evidence from three megacity clusters in
   China
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban greening; Forest city; Urban ecological resilience;
   Differences-in-differences model; Policy experimentation
ID WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; AIR; HEALTH; IMPLEMENTATION; SERVICES; POLITICS;
   MODEL; DPSIR
AB This study examines how urban greening policies affect urban ecological resilience through a quasi-natural experimental analysis of various cities in China. Leveraging the country's large-scale promotion of forest city development, we assess the effectiveness of these policies using differences-in-differences modeling across multiple time periods. The results affirm the positive impact of urban greening on resilience, as designated forest cities demonstrated enhanced resilience levels compared to control cities. Notable disparities were also found among the three major Chinese urban agglomerations - the Yangtze River Delta, Pearl River Delta, and BeijingTianjin-Hebei regions - in terms of policy effects. While short-term resilience increased under central government oversight, long-term gains relied more on intercity cooperation within agglomerations. It highlights the limitations inherent within China's "experiment under hierarchy" paradigm but also benefits from regional integration. This study contributes novel insights regarding the dynamic relationship between governance structures and urban ecosystem resilience under authoritarian contexts. Innovatively, we explore how intercity cooperation among urban agglomerations affects the long-term effectiveness of urban ecological governance, thereby contributing to a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in fostering resilient urban ecosystems under such governance models.
C1 [Xu, Chang; Huo, Xinxin] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, 962 Caoshan Rd, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, Peoples R China.
   [Hong, Yaoxiaoxue] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Yu, Chang; Cheng, Baodong] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 35 Tsinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [de Jong, Martin] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Law, Burg Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
C3 Anhui University of Finance & Economics; University of International
   Business & Economics; Beijing Forestry University; Erasmus University
   Rotterdam; Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC
RP Yu, C (corresponding author), Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Econ & Management, 35 Tsinghua East Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
EM xuchang@aufe.edu.cn; huoxinxin@aufe.edu.cn; yxxhong@uibe.edu.cn;
   changyu@bjfu.edu.cn; w.m.dejong@rsm.nland; baodong@bjfu.edu.cn
RI Xu, Chang/LDG-7745-2024
OI Xu, Chang/0000-0002-8721-5041; de Jong, Martin/0000-0001-6554-2458; Yu,
   Chang/0000-0002-9795-3443
FU General Projects for Humanities and Social Sciences Research - Ministry
   of Education [22YJC790147]; Anhui Province Philosophy and Social Science
   Planning Youth Project [AHSKQ2022D052]; National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [52270174, 72073012]
FX This research was supported by the General Projects for Humanities and
   Social Sciences Research funded by the Ministry of Education
   (22YJC790147), Anhui Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning
   Youth Project (AHSKQ2022D052) and National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (52270174; 72073012). We are indebted to the anonymous reviewers
   and editors.
CR Almenar JB, 2023, ECOSYST SERV, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101506
   Bautista-Puig N., 2022, Cities, V126, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2022.103715]
   Beck T, 2010, J FINANC, V65, P1637, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
   Bonilla-Duarte S, 2022, FORESTS, V13, DOI 10.3390/f13040587
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Carnohan SA, 2023, CURR RES ENVIRON SUS, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100201
   Deschênes O, 2017, AM ECON REV, V107, P2958, DOI 10.1257/aer.20131002
   Du YM, 2019, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V95, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.007
   Du YW, 2022, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106206
   Elliott M, 2002, MAR POLLUT BULL, V44, pIII, DOI 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00146-7
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Freeman R, 2019, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V94, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.01.005
   Guan JC, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P683, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-2058-7
   He PJ, 2019, ENERG ECON, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104569
   He WJ, 2022, FOREST POLICY ECON, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102669
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Homsy GC, 2019, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V42, P572, DOI 10.1080/01900692.2018.1491597
   Homsy GC, 2015, URBAN AFF REV, V51, P46, DOI 10.1177/1078087414530545
   Hsieh CC, 2023, FOREST POLICY ECON, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102878
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Kostka G, 2013, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V15, P3, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2013.763629
   Lan J, 2017, FOREST POLICY ECON, V83, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.07.009
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu ZL, 2022, URBAN AFF REV, V58, P767, DOI 10.1177/1078087421995241
   Long X., 2022, J. Govern. Econ., V6
   Lu XS, 2015, TRANSPORT POLICY, V44, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.014
   Meerow S, 2021, URBAN AFF REV, V57, P70, DOI 10.1177/1078087420905655
   Nathwani J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
   Power MC, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V350, DOI 10.1136/bmj.h1111
   Pun VC, 2017, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V125, P342, DOI 10.1289/EHP494
   Sanesi Giovanni, 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V5, P121, DOI [10.1016/j.ufug.2006.06.001, 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.12.001]
   Shamsipour A, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105252
   Sharp EB, 2011, URBAN AFF REV, V47, P433, DOI 10.1177/1078087410392348
   Shi L, 2021, URBAN AFF REV, V57, P1442, DOI 10.1177/1078087419910827
   Shindell D, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P291, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0108-y
   Shono A, 2014, SOC SCI MED, V110, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.025
   Tambe S, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V145, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.007
   Uy Pham Duc, 2008, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V7, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.09.002
   Wang DW, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104177
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   [王一旭 Wang Yixu], 2020, [环境科学学报, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae], V40, P2278
   Wei YG, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.155
   Westman LK, 2019, POLIT GEOGR, V70, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.002
   Xu C, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121607
   Yu JH, 2016, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V57, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.12.003
   Zhang Q, 2019, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102254
   Zhang X, 2017, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V85, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.04.001
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zheng LY, 2022, CHINA AGR ECON REV, V14, P509, DOI 10.1108/CAER-12-2020-0292
   Zivin JG, 2018, SCIENCE, V359, P39, DOI 10.1126/science.aap7711
NR 51
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 89
U2 115
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD MAY 1
PY 2024
VL 452
AR 142233
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142233
EA APR 2024
PG 11
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA C8C1Z
UT WOS:001291586100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Deng, HJ
   Liu, K
AF Deng, Haojian
   Liu, Kai
TI Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Resilience and Spatial Spillover
   Effects in Guangdong Province, China
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Guangdong; optimal-parameters
   geographical detector (OPGD); spatial spillovers; urban resilience
AB In the context of global environmental changes, the frequency of various disasters and extreme events is increasing, and enhancing urban resilience has become an important guide for current urban development. Previous studies have mainly focused on changes in urban resilience, with less consideration for the impact of spatial spillover effects on urban resilience. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze the temporal and spatial evolution of urban resilience and its spatial spillover effects in Guangdong from 2012 to 2020 based on the urban resilience assessment model, the Getis-Ord Gi* model, and the improved Capello model. The results are as follows: Affected by COVID-19, the urban resilience of Guangdong Province declined from 2019 to 2020, and 42.86% of the cities demonstrated negative growth in their urban resilience. Urban resilience exhibited significant spatially non-equilibrium characteristics among different cities. The urban resilience of the cities in eastern, northern, and western Guangdong, which are the "collapse zone" of urban resilience, was lower than 0.229 from 2012 to 2020. The intensity of urban resilience spillover in Guangdong presented a typical three-level circle structure of "core-subcore-periphery", which decreased from the core circle to the surrounding circle. COVID-19 caused a 27.21% decrease in the total urban resilience spillover in Guangdong from 2019 to 2020. Finally, we identified critical driving factors of urban resilience using the optimal-parameters geographical detector model. This study can provide a scientific reference for the Chinese government to build resilient cities and improve sustainable urban development.
C1 [Deng, Haojian; Liu, Kai] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Kai] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Urbanizat & Geosimulat, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Kai] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Prov Engn Res Ctr Publ Secur & Disaster, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Kai] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai 519000, Peoples R China.
C3 Sun Yat Sen University; Sun Yat Sen University
RP Liu, K (corresponding author), Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.; Liu, K (corresponding author), Guangdong Prov Key Lab Urbanizat & Geosimulat, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.; Liu, K (corresponding author), Sun Yat Sen Univ, Guangdong Prov Engn Res Ctr Publ Secur & Disaster, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.; Liu, K (corresponding author), Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab, Zhuhai 519000, Peoples R China.
EM denghj9@mail2.sysu.edu.cn; liuk6@mail.sysu.edu.cn
RI ; Liu, Kai/K-7307-2015
OI Haojian, Deng/0000-0003-3724-8571; Liu, Kai/0000-0002-1829-7557
FU We thank the PIE-Engine cloud platform for providing us with the data
   processing platform. Our Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group of
   Dalhousie University provided us with the data.
FX We thank the PIE-Engine cloud platform for providing us with the data
   processing platform. Our Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group of
   Dalhousie University provided us with the data.
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Alliance R, 2007, Urban Resilience Research Prospectus
   Capello R, 2009, EUR PLAN STUD, V17, P639, DOI 10.1080/09654310902778045
   Chen ZQ, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P889, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-889-2021
   CPGPRC (Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China), Notification by the Standard of State Council on Adjusting the Urban Scale
   Deng HJ, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000735
   Gafter L, 2022, CITIES, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103636
   Getis A, 2010, ADV SPAT SCI, P127, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-01976-0_10
   GPDNR (Guangdong Provincial Department of Natural Resources), Guidelines for Land Spatial Planning Coordination in Metropolitan Area of Guangdong Province
   Haitao Zhang, 2011, 2011 2nd IEEE International Conference on Emergency Management and Management Sciences (ICEMMS), P37, DOI 10.1109/ICEMMS.2011.6015613
   Hill Edward., 2008, EXPLORING REGIONAL E
   Huang HB, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102115
   Huang J, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091470
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   [刘彦平 Liu Yanping], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P93
   Mallick SK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103196
   NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2021, China Urban Statistics Yearbook, DOI [10.42921/y.cnki.yzgca.2022.000001, DOI 10.42921/Y.CNKI.YZGCA.2022.000001]
   NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), 2021, China Statistics Yearbook, DOI [10.40049/y.cnki.yinfn.2021.000001, DOI 10.40049/Y.CNKI.YINFN.2021.000001]
   NHCPRC (National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China), Notification on the Prevention and Control of the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Epidemic
   ORD JK, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P286, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Song PB, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041199
   Song YZ, 2020, GISCI REMOTE SENS, V57, P593, DOI 10.1080/15481603.2020.1760434
   Wang JF, 2010, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V24, P107, DOI 10.1080/13658810802443457
   Wang XL, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101806
   Wang YZ, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132799
   Wang Z, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V183, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.128
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Xu HZ, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105735
   Xue YT, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14127330
   Yang M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710585
   Yi PT, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103528
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhu J.H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
   Zhu ZY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104274
NR 38
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 17
U2 65
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 12
IS 9
AR 1800
DI 10.3390/land12091800
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA S5SH9
UT WOS:001071757900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chelleri, L
   Baravikova, A
AF Chelleri, Lorenzo
   Baravikova, Aliaksandra
TI Understandings of urban resilience meanings and principles across Europe
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Resilience theory; Adaptation; Transformation;
   Sustainability; Resilient cities; Europe
AB In the last decade many papers have explored the challenges of defining and framing urban resilience. Academic literature has recently emphasised how urban resilience differs from urban sustainability, while urban policy agendas use these terms almost interchangeably. This paper explores European academics' and city practitioners' perspectives around urban resilience meanings and principles. It aims to enhance the understanding of the concept's evolution and to discuss the gap between theory and implementation. To do so, we conducted a survey among around 100 junior and senior European scholars from different fields and interviewed 24 city practitioners.
   Both academics' and practitioners' perspectives have aligned with the latest conceptualisations of urban resilience. The respondents endorsed transformative and "bouncing forward" approaches, emphasizing that nowadays challenges stand within reconciling and combining transformation and resistance to change resilience perspectives. The more engineering, robustness and safety driven ones seem to be left behind. However, inconsistencies emerged when addressing implementation and resilience characteristics: interviews' responses showed how practices are still driven through robustness and safety-driven measures. The paper critically discusses these emerging conceptual misalignment and gaps to overcome in future research and practice.
C1 [Chelleri, Lorenzo] Univ Int Catalunya UIC, Sch Architecture, Immaculada 22, Barcelona 08011, Spain.
   [Baravikova, Aliaksandra] Gran Sasso Sci Inst, Dept Social Sci, Viale F Crispi 7, I-67100 Laquila, Italy.
C3 Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC); Gran Sasso Science
   Institute (GSSI)
RP Baravikova, A (corresponding author), Gran Sasso Sci Inst, Dept Social Sci, Viale F Crispi 7, I-67100 Laquila, Italy.
EM lchelleri@uic.es; aliaksandra.baravikova@gssi.it
CR Achour Nebil., 2015, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V6, P347, DOI [DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2013-0016, 10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2013-0016]
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Berkes J., 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change
   Bonds A, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1285, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1462968
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Checker M, 2011, CITY SOC, V23, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x
   Chelleri L, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.016
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L., 2016, URBAN RESILIENCE FAL
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Cote M., 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, P1
   Cutter SL, 2013, CHALL SUSTAIN, V1, P72, DOI 10.12924/cis2013.01020072
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Derissen S, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003
   Dodman D, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P97, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2017.1345740
   Doorn N, 2019, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V4, P112, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2018.1428162
   Eakin HC, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.013
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist T, 2017, NATURE, V546, P352, DOI 10.1038/546352d
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gillard R, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P13, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00334
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Grafakos S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V154, P87, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02394-w
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Hinkel J, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
   Holling CS., 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P51
   Jha AK, 2013, Building Urban Resilience Principles, Tools, and, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Khasalamwa S, 2009, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V63, P73, DOI 10.1080/00291950802712152
   Landauer M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V131, P505, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1395-1
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Liao KH, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.014
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Mannakkara Sandeeka, 2013, Structural Survey, V31, P314, DOI 10.1108/SS-12-2012-0044
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   Matin N, 2018, WORLD DEV, V109, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McEvoy D., 2006, T TELF LTD P I CIV E
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mulligan M, 2016, INT PLAN STUD, V21, P348, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2016.1155974
   Neocleous M, 2013, RADICAL PHILOS, P2
   Neuman M, 2005, J PLAN EDUC RES, V25, P11, DOI 10.1177/0739456X04270466
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Olazabal M, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_11
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Pearson LJ, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, pE2030, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1207552109
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pelling M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Rodina L, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V26-27, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.001
   Rodriguez-Nikl T, 2015, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V32, P157, DOI 10.1080/10286608.2015.1025386
   Romero P, 2016, SCI TRANSL MED, V8, DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf0685
   Saldana J., 2012, CODING MANUAL QUALIT
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P291, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501421
   Schipper E.L. F., 2015, A comparative overview of resilience measurement frameworks
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Siders AR, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.573
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Smith A, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Tanner T., 2017, Challenges for resilience policy and practice
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Thorsen TS, 2013, CAMBR COMPANION LIT, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0884-3
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Walker B, 2012, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Walsh-Dilley M, 2015, RESILIENCE, V3, P173, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1072310
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Wenger C, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09491-220318
   Wolfram M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8020144
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Ziervogel G, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090955
NR 94
TC 38
Z9 41
U1 7
U2 72
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 108
AR 102985
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
PG 12
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA PC8DR
UT WOS:000597225500010
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ge, YY
   Jia, WJ
   Zhao, H
   Xiang, PC
AF Ge, Yuanyuan
   Jia, Wenjuan
   Zhao, Hui
   Xiang, Pengcheng
TI A framework for urban resilience measurement and enhancement strategies:
   A case study in Qingdao, China
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Comprehensive measurement; Obstruct factor;
   Enhancement strategies; Qingdao
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; SMART CITIES; ROTTERDAM
AB Comprehensive measurement and analysis of urban resilience is essential to ensure sustainable urban development. This paper creates a multilevel urban resilience evaluation index system based on four dimensions of economy, society, ecology, and infrastructure and the three attributes (resistance, recovery, and adaptability), then applies the framework to Qingdao, China. The results suggest that: (1) The overall level of urban resilience in Qingdao showed an upward trend, rising from a relatively high level in 2012 to a high level in 2021. Economic and social resilience maintained a high consistency, developing rapidly, while the development of ecological and infrastructure resilience fluctuated, and infrastructure resilience was slow and lagging. (2) Qingdao's overall resilience is higher than other cities in the same region, but infrastructure resilience is relatively low. Moreover, the coupling coordination degree (CCD) of the resilience of the four subsystems in Qingdao has evolved from near imbalance to good coordination. (3) Infrastructure resilience is the primary obstacle factor in the dimension layer, followed by ecological resilience. Based on the results, corresponding improvement strategies are proposed. A comprehensive multidimensional measurement of the urban resilience of Qingdao can identify the main shortcomings and provide a reference for decision-making and resource allocation in resilient cities.
C1 [Ge, Yuanyuan; Xiang, Pengcheng] Chongqing Univ, Sch Management Sci & Real Estate, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.
   [Jia, Wenjuan; Zhao, Hui] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Management Engn, Qingdao 266525, Peoples R China.
   [Xiang, Pengcheng] Chongqing Univ, Constructi Econ & Management Res Ctr, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing University; Qingdao University of Technology; Chongqing
   University
RP Xiang, PC (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Sch Management Sci & Real Estate, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.
EM pcxiang@cqu.edu.cn
CR Abdel-Basset M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119586
   Alliance R., 2007, Urban Resilience Research Prospectus
   Alshehri SA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P395, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1719-5
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Beatley T, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3328, DOI 10.3390/su5083328
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chen M, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12062819
   Chen Y, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102939
   Cheng X, 2023, J ENERGY STORAGE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2023.108623
   Clark-Ginsberg A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101714
   Coumou D, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P491, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1452
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   DIAKOULAKI D, 1995, COMPUT OPER RES, V22, P763, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Dong XJ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041321
   Fang CL, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108107
   Fei JH, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105793
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gao YY, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121006
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grimm NB, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1255
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hou J, 2024, J ENERGY STORAGE, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2024.110878
   Huang LF, 2022, IND MARKET MANAG, V102, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.02.009
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jiang JK, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V850, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158076
   Jiang NN, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107298
   Jiaxing Z, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0256502
   Kolte R, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104142
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li J, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107518
   Li LY, 2017, ENVIRON POLLUT, V224, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.037
   Li Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024
   Li SJ, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105974
   Li WW, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120453
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lu H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Ma Caihua S.J., 2024, Trans. Oceanol. Limnol., V46, P167
   Ma SB, 2023, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V30, P5280, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-05-2022-0471
   Man JC, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15097299
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti D., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN REA, DOI DOI 10.17226/5782
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Pan HL, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16031247
   Patorniti NP, 2017, HABITAT INT, V66, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.008
   Peng PY, 2024, LAND USE POLICY, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107210
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   QBS, 2014, Qingdao Statistical Yearbook
   QBS, 2017, Qingdao Statistical Yearbook
   QBS, 2022, Qingdao Statistical Yearbook
   Qiao H, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010038
   Rezvani SM, 2023, APPL SCI-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/app13042223
   Saikia P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103497
   SBS, 2022, Shandong Statistical Yearbook
   Shamsipour A, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105252
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Silva BN, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P697, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
   Song Q, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15021538
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Sun J, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105058
   Suna RR, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103344
   Tang CC, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V426, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139076
   Tang DC, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104621
   UNDRR, 2010, Making cities resilient: my city is getting ready
   Viitanen J, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P803, DOI 10.1068/a46242
   Wan L, 2024, MAR ENVIRON RES, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106515
   Wang HH, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16062306
   Wang HH, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107333
   Wang J, 2024, APPL GEOGR, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103302
   Wang SY, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12101586
   Wang X, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103828
   Xinhua, 2021, Qingdao, Shandong Province to fight the largest scale enteromorpha invasion
   Xu WP, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18010088
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang SS, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-46166-0
   Zhang DN, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103351
   Zhang JM, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265
   Zhang JY, 2023, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/buildings13071695
   Zhang M, 2013, CITIES, V31, P591, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.021
   Zhao H, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-12830-0
   Zhao H, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0263842
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zheng Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104138
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
NR 103
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 83
U2 128
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 367
AR 122047
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122047
EA AUG 2024
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA C3V4A
UT WOS:001288668700001
PM 39096735
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, Y
   Li, KY
   Zhou, Q
AF Chen, Yu
   LI, Keyang
   Zhou, Qian
TI SPATIAL DIFFERENTIATION OF URBAN ECONOMIC RESILIENCE AND ITS INFLUENCING
   FACTORS: EVIDENCE FROM BAIDU MIGRATION BIG DATA
SO TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY
LA English
DT Article
DE economic resilience; population mobility; spatial difference;
   Multi-scale Geographical Weighted Regression (MGWR)
ID ADAPTATION; DISASTERS; REGIONS
AB Under the development pattern of the "double cycle", optimizing urban economic re-silience is tremendously meaningful to improving a city's affordability and the adaptability of the economy and to promoting the Chinese economy to develop with high quality. Based on Baidu migration big data perspective, exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) and multi-scale geographical weighted regression (MGWR) model were used to analyze the spatial characteristics and driving factors of economic resilience in 287 Chinese cities in 2019. The results show that (1) the number of low-level economically resilient cities is the largest and distributed continu-ously, while the number of high-level economically resilient cities is the lowest and distributed in clusters and blocks; (2) compared with the Pearl River Delta and Yangtze River Delta, the population accumulation characteristic of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region is relatively slow; (3) Both net inflow of population after spring festival and daily flow scale are significantly correlated with urban economic resilience, and the former will affect urban economic resilience; and (4) the spatial heterogeneity of each factor driving is significant, and they have different impact scales. The impact intensity is as follows: net population inflow > innovation ability > public financial expenditure > financial efficiency > urban size.
C1 [Chen, Yu; LI, Keyang] Zhengzhou Univ Light Ind, Sch Econ & Management, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Qian] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhengzhou University of Light Industry; Zhongnan University of Economics
   & Law
RP Zhou, Q (corresponding author), Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
EM Z0005072@zuel.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [71974125]; National Social
   Science Foundation of China [20CJY064]; Support Plan for Scientific and
   Technological Innovation Talents in Henan Institutions of Higher
   Learning (humanities and social sciences) [2018-cx-012]; Training Plan
   for Key Young Teachers in Henan Institutions of Higher Learning
   [2018GGJS094]; Philosophy and Social Science Innovation Team Building
   Program of Henan Universities [2019-YXXZ-20]; Good Scholar in Philosophy
   and Social Sciences in Henan Institutions of Higher Learning; 
   [2021-CXTD-12]
FX This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (71974125), National Social Science Foundation of
   China (20CJY064); Support Plan for Scientific and Technological
   Innovation Talents in Henan Institutions of Higher Learning (humanities
   and social sciences) (2018-cx-012); Training Plan for Key Young Teachers
   in Henan Institutions of Higher Learning (2018GGJS094); Good Scholar in
   Philosophy and Social Sciences in Henan Institutions of Higher Learning
   (2019-YXXZ-20); and Philosophy and Social Science Innovation Team
   Building Program of Henan Universities (2021-CXTD-12) .
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Ayadi R, 2016, J FINANC STABIL, V23, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.jfs.2015.12.007
   Bailey D, 2010, POLICY STUD-UK, V31, P457, DOI 10.1080/01442871003723408
   [鲍勤 Bao Qin], 2019, [科技促进发展, Science & Technology for Development], V15, P1212
   Beckmann J, 2017, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V142, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.031
   Berliant M, 2009, INT J ECON THEORY, V5, P155, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-7363.2009.00104.x
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Bristow G, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Combes PP, 2008, J URBAN ECON, V63, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2007.04.004
   Crespo J, 2014, J ECON GEOGR, V14, P199, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbt006
   Dawley S, 2010, LOCAL ECON, V25, P650, DOI 10.1080/02690942.2010.533424
   Di Caro P, 2017, PAP REG SCI, V96, P93, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12168
   Diodato D., 2012, PAPERS EVOLUTIONARY, P1
   Du Y, 2015, CHINA'S ECONOMY: A COLLECTION OF SURVEYS, P25
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Giannakis E, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P1394, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1319464
   Glaeser E., 2018, HUMAN-CAPITAL EXTERNALITIES IN CHINA
   Glaeser E, 2011, SCI AM, V305, P50, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0911-50
   Goodchild M.F., 2001, MODELLING SCALE GEOG, P3
   Gu S, 1996, Chin J Popul Sci, V8, P59
   Hauser C, 2007, REG STUD, V41, P75, DOI 10.1080/00343400600928368
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu MM, 2018, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V27, P1085, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/76242
   Hudson R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P11, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp026
   Jiang DY, 2022, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.787190
   Kirdar MG, 2008, PAP REG SCI, V87, P545, DOI 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00178.x
   Klimanov VV, 2018, EKONOMICHESKAYA POLI, V13, P164, DOI 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-6-164-187
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Martin Philippe, 2013, CEPR Discussion Paper
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Masik G, 2016, GEOGR POL, V89, P457, DOI 10.7163/GPol.0068
   McMaster RobertB., 2004, SCALE GEOGRAPHIC INQ, P1
   Niu X., 2021, URBAN PLAN FORUM, V1, P82
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Rose A, 2005, J REGIONAL SCI, V45, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
   Shaw K., 2013, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V28, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0952076711432578, 10.1177/0952076711432578]
   Shi T, 2022, TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO, V28, P979, DOI 10.3846/tede.2022.16721
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   [Смирнов Сергей Владиславович Smirnov Sergey], 2015, [Экономический журнал Высшей школы экономики, Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki], V19, P534
   Storper M, 2009, J ECON GEOGR, V9, P147, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbn052
   [童昀 Tong Yun], 2020, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V75, P2505
   Walker B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Website of central Government of the People's Republic of China, 2020, PROP CTR COMM COMM P
   Yan XD, 2022, ALEX ENG J, V61, P7571, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.016
   You HL, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/3646145
   Yu HC, 2020, GEOGR ANAL, V52, P87, DOI 10.1111/gean.12189
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
NR 53
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 20
U2 126
PU VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
PI VILNIUS
PA SAULETEKIO AL 11, VILNIUS, LT-10223, LITHUANIA
SN 2029-4913
EI 2029-4921
J9 TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO
JI Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ.
PY 2023
VL 29
IS 2
BP 353
EP 381
DI 10.3846/tede.2023.17869
PG 29
WC Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics
GA A6IK0
UT WOS:000956135600002
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Keck, M
   Etzold, B
AF Keck, Markus
   Etzold, Benjamin
TI RESILIENCE REFUSED WASTED POTENTIALS FOR IMPROVING FOOD SECURITY IN
   DHAKA
SO ERDKUNDE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban food security; food systems; social resilience; urban governance;
   Bangladesh
ID URBAN-POOR; SOCIAL RESILIENCE; CITY; SYSTEMS; SPACE
AB In 2007 and 2008, Bangladesh was subject to a food crisis - the outcome of multiple causes - which had a severe impact on the urban poor of the country's capital. Dhaka's food supplies were repeatedly disconnected due to floods and cyclones, yet there was always enough food in the megacity thanks to wholesale traders' diverse and flexible supply networks. Despite the interim government's eviction drives aimed at slum dwellers and street vendors, the food hawkers still managed to distribute prepared food throughout the city. And despite rapidly rising food prices, most of the urban poor found ways to endure the crisis. In this article, we look at the people who made Dhaka's food system resilient enough to avoid catastrophe. We discuss three relevant actor groups - food traders in wholesale markets, street food vendors, and poor consumers - and investigate the roles they play in keeping the city fed, and how they act in the light of crises. Neither these actors nor their contributions to urban food security are acknowledged by the state, nor are they substantially supported. Significant potentials for a resilient urban food system thus remain unpromoted and even blocked. Resilience is being refused.
C1 [Keck, Markus; Etzold, Benjamin] Univ Bonn, Dept Geog, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
C3 University of Bonn
RP Keck, M (corresponding author), Univ Bonn, Dept Geog, Meckenheimer Allee 176, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
EM markus.keck@geographie.uni-bonn.de; etzold@geographie.uni-bonn.de
RI Etzold, Benjamin/AAN-6223-2020
OI Etzold, Benjamin/0000-0002-1109-7640; Keck, Markus/0000-0002-6152-097X
FU German Research Foundation (DFG) [BO 680/35-1/-2]
FX We would like to acknowledge the financial support of the German
   Research Foundation (DFG), who funded our project "The mega-urban
   foodsystem of Dhaka/Bangladesh" (Grant No. BO 680/35-1/-2) within the
   research program "Megacities - Megachallenge: Informal Dynamics of
   Global Change". Special thanks go to Hans-Georg Bohle (University of
   Bonn) and to Wolfgang-Peter Zingel (University of Heidelberg) who led
   the research project, to Shafique uz-Zaman (Dhaka University) for
   continuous support, to our local research assistants, in particular
   Taufique Hassan, Sania Rahman, Md. Ajfal Hosain and Shahidul Haque, for
   their great work in facilitating our research in the field, and to two
   anonymous reviewers for precise critique and constructive comments.
CR ALTVATER E., 2005, AALBORG U DEP RES SE
   [Anonymous], 2011, World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision
   [Anonymous], 2007, REP HOUS INC EXP SUR
   [Anonymous], 2010, FOOD SECURITY GLOBAL
   [Anonymous], Food Price Increases in South Asia: National Responses and Regional Dimensions
   [Anonymous], 2011, STAT FOOD INS WORLD
   Arabindoo P., 2012, Urban informalities: Reflections on the formal and informal, P67
   Assheuer T, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P21, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.03
   Banks N, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P487, DOI 10.1177/0956247811417794
   Bayat Asef., 1997, Street Politics: Poor People's Movements in Iran
   BBS (BANGLADESH BUREAU OF STATISTICS), 2004, REP LAB FORC SURV 20
   Begum S, 2005, ENVIRON URBAN, V17, P11, DOI 10.1177/095624780501700202
   Berkes F., 2009, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change
   Bhowmik Sharit., 2010, Street Vendors in the Global Urban Economy
   Bn C., 2012, IDS WORKING PAPERS, V2012, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X, 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Bohle H.G., 2009, IHDP Update 2.2009, P8
   Bohle H.-G., 2002, ERDE, V133, P401
   Bohle HG, 2005, GEOGR Z, V93, P65
   Braun B, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P771, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9752-5
   Brenner N, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P349, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Brown A., 2006, CONTESTED SPACE STRE
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Chatterjee P., 2004, POLITICS GOVERNED RE
   Cohen MJ, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P467, DOI 10.1177/0956247810380375
   De Haan LJ, 2012, ERDKUNDE, V66, P345, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2012.04.05
   DoF (DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES,MINISTRY OF FISHERIES AND LIVESTOCK), 2009, FISHERY STAT YB BANG
   Eakin H., 2010, Food security and global environmental change, P245
   Ericksen P., 2010, Food Security and Global Environmental Change, P67, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781849776615
   ETZOLD B, 2012, THESIS BONN
   Etzold B, 2012, ERDKUNDE, V66, P185, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2012.03.01
   Etzold B, 2009, ERDE, V140, P3
   Flick U., 2008, Triangulation
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Ghafur S, 2000, HABITAT INT, V24, P261, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00042-9
   Glavovic B., 2003, Contesting development: pathways to better practice. Proceedings of 3rd Biennial Conference of the Aotearoa New Zealand International Development Network, P289
   GREINER C., 2012, POPUL ENVIRON, DOI [10.1007/s11111-11012-10178-11110, DOI 10.1007/S11111-11012-10178-11110]
   Gruebner O, 2011, CONTRIB STAT, P243, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7908-2733-0_16
   Hackenbroch K., 2008, TRIALOG, V98, P17
   Hackenbroch K, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P37, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.04
   Heynen Nik., 2006, NATURE CITIES URBAN, P129
   HIES, 2023, Provincial Expenditure Reviews
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   IGS (INSTITUTE OF GOVERNANCE STUDIES  BRAC UNIVERSITY), 2008, STAT GOV BANGL 2007
   Ingram John., 2010, Food Security and Global Environmental Change
   IPCC, 2012, Managing the Risk of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation: Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Jessop Bob., 1997, TRANSFORMING CITIES, P28
   Keck M., 2012, Urban Informalities: Reflections on the Formal and Informal, P111
   Keck M., 2012, THESIS BONN
   Keck M, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P5, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02
   Keck M, 2012, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V56, P43
   Kulke E, 2009, ERDE, V140, P25
   Kumar S., 2002, METHODS COMMUNITY PA
   Li P. P., 2007, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, V24, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10490-006-9031-2
   Lohnert B., 2005, S AFR GEOGR J, V87, P95, DOI [DOI 10.1080/03736245.2005.9713832, 10.1080/03736245.2005.9713832]
   MacLeod G, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P602, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00256
   MacLeod G, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P2443, DOI 10.1177/0042098011415717
   Maligalig D., 2009, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, V155
   Maxwell D., 1995, 8 FCND INT FOOD POL
   *MOA, 2007, HDB AGR STAT
   MoA (MinistryofAgriculture), 2009, DAIL RET PRIC DAT BA
   Obrist B, 2010, PROG DEV STUD, V10, P283, DOI 10.1177/146499340901000402
   Pryer JaneA., 2003, Poverty and Vulnerability in Dhaka Slums: The Urban Livelihoods Study
   Ravallion M, 2007, POPUL DEV REV, V33, P667, DOI 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00193.x
   Ruel MT, 2010, J NUTR, V140, p170S, DOI 10.3945/jn.109.110791
   Salway S, 2003, WORLD DEV, V31, P881, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00016-0
   Sen A., 1981, POVERTY FAMINES ESSA
   Shafique S, 2007, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V36, P449, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyl306
   Siddiqui K, 2010, SOCIAL FORMATION IN DHAKA, 1985-2005: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SOCIETY IN A THIRD WORLD MEGACITY
   Smith DW, 1998, T I BRIT GEOGR, V23, P207, DOI 10.1111/j.0020-2754.1998.00207.x
   Smith N., 1996, The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city
   SUJATHA T., 1997, FOOD NUTR B, V18
   Tinker I., 1997, STREET FOODS URBAN F
   Uzzi B, 1997, ADMIN SCI QUART, V42, P35, DOI 10.2307/2393808
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   WATTS MJ, 1993, PROG HUM GEOG, V17, P43, DOI 10.1177/030913259301700103
   Weber R, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P519, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00253
   Webster PJ, 2010, B AM METEOROL SOC, V91, P1493, DOI 10.1175/2010BAMS2911.1
   World Bank, 2007, Paper 17
   ZINGEL W.-P., 2008, GEOGRAPHISCHE RUNDSC, V60, P28
   Zingel WP, 2011, CONTRIB STAT, P301, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7908-2733-0_19
NR 80
TC 24
Z9 26
U1 0
U2 33
PU UNIV BONN, GEOGRAPHISCHES INST
PI BONN
PA MECKENHEIMER ALLEE 166, BONN, GERMANY
SN 0014-0015
J9 ERDKUNDE
JI Erdkunde
PD JAN-MAR
PY 2013
VL 67
IS 1
BP 75
EP 91
DI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.07
PG 17
WC Geography; Geography, Physical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography; Physical Geography
GA 223LW
UT WOS:000324807800007
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, YQ
   Li, XC
   Liu, QL
AF Zhang, Yueqian
   Li, Xinchun
   Liu, Quanlong
TI Advancing urban resilience: A multi-hazard risk perspective on frontier
   evolution, research hotspots, and practical exploration
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Multi-hazard risks; Urban resilience; Systematic review; Bibliometric
   analysis; Future directions
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; NATURAL DISASTERS;
   SMART CITIES; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; CITY; ADAPTATION
AB The heightened complexity, severity, and diversity of multi-hazard risks render numerous cities increasingly vulnerable. Existing research predominantly focuses on urban resilience from an individual hazard perspective; however, disasters often result from the interaction, concurrence, and coupling of multiple hazards. A singular perspective is insufficient to capture the complexity of urban responses to multifaceted risks accurately. Therefore, this study explores urban resilience from a multi-hazard risk perspective, analyzing the academic impact of urban resilience research and the practical impact of urban resilience policies. Academically, this study employs bibliometric tools to review, trace, and identify the frontier evolution and key research themes in urban resilience. The analysis of 141 selected publications encompasses 889 keywords, 37 subjects, 95 publication sources, 245 institutions, and 53 countries. Through co-occurrence analysis, clustering analysis, and burst detection, three primary research clusters are identified. Practically, this study conducts a qualitative analysis of 33 internationally renowned urban resilience projects, focusing on five key themes. Based on academic and practical findings, the study identifies key research gaps and proposes valuable future research directions. The outcomes provide theoretical support and decision-making references for addressing key issues in urban sustainable development, holding significant implications for building high-quality, safe, and resilient cities.
C1 [Zhang, Yueqian; Li, Xinchun; Liu, Quanlong] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Xinchun; Liu, Quanlong] China Univ Min & Technol, Safety Management Res Ctr, Key Construct Bases Philosophy & Social Sci Jiangs, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Mining & Technology; China University of Mining &
   Technology
RP Li, XC (corresponding author), Univ RD 1, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM xcl_cumt@163.com
FU National Social Science Foundation of China [24BGL288]
FX This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of
   China (Grant no. 24BGL288) .
CR Abdillah A, 2023, COGENT SOC SCI, V9, DOI 10.1080/23311886.2023.2235170
   Abdrabo MA, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.09.005
   Abdrabo MA, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101212
   Aguilar-Barajas I, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.021
   Al-Awadhi T, 2019, DEV PRACT, V29, P594, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2019.1593320
   Almeida MD, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062227
   Alotaibi BS, 2024, J ASIAN ARCHIT BUILD, DOI 10.1080/13467581.2024.2358203
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Anelli D, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133496
   Aslam A, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101120
   Ba R, 2021, J SAF SCI RESIL, V2, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.05.002
   Beatley T, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3328, DOI 10.3390/su5083328
   Berrang-Ford L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012
   Birchall SJ, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101348
   Bixler RP, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.1015630
   Bixler RP, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102613
   Bowen KJ, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V26-27, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.002
   Bozza A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010103
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Bueno S, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102588
   Busch H, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.03.004
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Camero A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.014
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chaffin BC, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06824-190356
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V110, P2397, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05030-y
   Chandrasekhar D, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1249, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1492907
   Chang M, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103128
   Chang YS, 2023, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V16, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12877
   Chen B, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V181, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106268
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   Chen GH, 2024, ENG FAIL ANAL, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107867
   Chen YL, 2024, J HYDROL, V642, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131783
   Cheng YH, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12071301
   Coffee JE, 2010, J GREAT LAKES RES, V36, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2009.11.011
   Crellin C, 2023, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V176, DOI 10.1007/s10584-023-03601-5
   Cui XG, 2020, J GEOGR SCI, V30, P333, DOI 10.1007/s11442-020-1731-x
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Dakos V, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5767
   Daudey L, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P226, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2017.1339278
   de Koning K, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101981
   de Ruiter MC, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001425
   Dehghani A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141911798
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dianat H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102561
   Donthu N, 2021, J BUS RES, V133, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Doorga JRS, 2024, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103788
   Drakes O, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5140
   Duy PN, 2018, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000419
   Eakin H, 2024, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V121, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2313191121
   Fan PY, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14067
   Feofilovs M, 2020, ENVIRON CLIM TECHNOL, V24, P249, DOI 10.2478/rtuect-2020-0101
   Finn D, 2023, J PLAN EDUC RES, V43, P136, DOI 10.1177/0739456X19864145
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Gaborit P, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100453
   Geelen LHWT, 2017, J COAST CONSERV, V21, P657, DOI 10.1007/s11852-016-0452-x
   Gerritsen H, 2005, PHILOS T R SOC A, V363, P1271, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2005.1568
   Glaeser EL, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P3, DOI 10.1177/00420980211052230
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Goyal K, 2021, INT J CONSUM STUD, V45, P80, DOI 10.1111/ijcs.12605
   Grigorescu I, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106351
   Haasnoot M, 2024, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102907
   Haasnoot M, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
   He ZC, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P1362, DOI 10.1111/risa.13628
   Heinzlef C, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102974
   Hemmati M, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001382
   Hernández JRE, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
   Herschler SB, 2018, J CHIN POLIT SCI, V23, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11366-018-9556-5
   Hewidy H, 2025, SUSTAIN DEV, V33, P794, DOI 10.1002/sd.3145
   Hirsch JE, 2005, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V102, P16569, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   Hofmann SZ, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100189
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu LT, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105167
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Huang YC, 2018, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V54, P2367, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2017.1364235
   Hunt A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6
   Islam A, 2021, J HYDROL, V599, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126457
   Jamali A, 2023, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V51, P893, DOI 10.1007/s12524-023-01670-8
   Jamaludin I.S., 2018, Plan. Malaysia, V16, P15
   Jiang Y, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P521, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2977-1
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Johnson JM, 2018, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V54, P872, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12645
   Ke SS, 2024, J EARTHQ TSUNAMI, V18, DOI 10.1142/S1793431124500088
   Kim J, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104650
   Kleinberg J, 2003, DATA MIN KNOWL DISC, V7, P373, DOI 10.1023/A:1024940629314
   Klopp JM, 2017, CITIES, V63, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019
   Kluger LC, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102095
   Komendantova N, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P114, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2015-0013
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Krueger EH, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac78f4
   Kundu S, 2024, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103618
   Kwadijk JCJ, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P729, DOI 10.1002/wcc.64
   Lamaury Y, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13030337
   Lavery S, 2005, PHILOS T ROY SOC A, V363, P1455, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2005.1579
   Lee RY, 2024, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V912, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169120
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li C, 2023, TRANSPORTMETRICA B, V11, DOI 10.1080/21680566.2023.2179461
   Li W, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104631
   Lian JS, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105027
   Ling F, 2014, BIOSCI TRENDS, V8, P350, DOI 10.5582/bst.2014.01119
   Liu BY, 2021, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V12, P2544, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2021.1969451
   Liu JN, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13202939
   Liu WY, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101857
   Liu W, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
   Liu WY, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105109
   Liu XQ, 2018, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V61, P302, DOI 10.1007/s11430-016-9077-5
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lowe M, 2024, LOCAL ENVIRON, V29, P886, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2024.2318571
   Mabrouk M, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16125076
   Mach KJ, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V136, P427, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1645-x
   Mackay BR, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16188076
   Maharjan A, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P879, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1867044
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P2649, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17723630
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mendizabal M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V94, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.003
   Miao Q, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V63, P421, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.005
   Middelanis R, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac39c0
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Moral-Muñoz JA, 2020, PROF INFORM, V29, DOI 10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
   Naef P, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P2012, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2038069
   Nagel M, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100502
   Nagenborg M, 2019, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V4, P103, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2019.1607658
   Ndebele-Murisa MR, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0227915
   Newman Peter., 2017, RESILIENT CITIES OVE, VSecond, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-686-8
   Nikolopoulos D, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020330
   Ning L, 2022, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/feart.2022.827438
   Noby M, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102217
   Nop S, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P297, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-02055-y
   Nop S, 2019, ECOL SOC, V24, DOI 10.5751/ES-10860-240223
   Ostrom E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
   Owolabi TA, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103727
   Pagano A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.005
   Park H, 2019, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V109, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2019.09.016
   Patel R, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN, V32, P589, DOI 10.1177/0956247820909275
   Patel RB, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.003
   Peiris MTOV, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16209117
   Perera ATD, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113038
   Prashar N, 2024, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V26, P8235, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-03094-3
   Qian JL, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104213
   Ramezani R, 2021, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000756
   Ran PL, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104963
   Remo JWF, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P1055, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0206-5
   Ribeiro DF, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104200
   Rivero-Villar A, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P208, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1906203
   Rogov M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124431
   Rozell DJ, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103369
   Rözer V, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bc
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Ryan EJ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V127, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.012
   Salomon F, 2018, EARTH-SCI REV, V177, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.10.003
   Sánchez-Corcuera R, 2019, INT J DISTRIB SENS N, V15, DOI 10.1177/1550147719853984
   Seong K, 2024, J PLAN LIT, V39, P62, DOI 10.1177/08854122231199462
   Serbanica C, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104177
   Shah SA, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P91885, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928233
   Shan SQ, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103998
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2023, PROG PLANN, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2023.100740
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Silva BN, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P697, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
   Smith AP, 2023, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V176, DOI 10.1007/s10584-023-03648-4
   Smith B, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V45, P223, DOI 10.1023/A:1005661622966
   Solecki W, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V163, P1815, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02947-4
   Caro MS, 2022, CHILD GEOGR, V20, P206, DOI 10.1080/14733285.2021.1925633
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stead D, 2014, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V21, P15, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2013.824928
   Su J, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101923
   Sun H, 2024, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/rs16020350
   Sutton J, 2023, PROG HUM GEOG, V47, P500, DOI 10.1177/03091325231174183
   Takefuji Y, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109845
   Takeuchi K, 2014, SUSTAIN SCI, V9, P513, DOI 10.1007/s11625-014-0257-5
   Thierry P, 2008, NAT HAZARDS, V45, P429, DOI 10.1007/s11069-007-9177-3
   Thorn JPR, 2023, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V23, DOI 10.1007/s10113-022-01973-5
   Nguyen TT, 2022, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V4, P58, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2022.008
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Tubi A, 2024, CLIM RISK MANAG, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100614
   Tumini I, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1363, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2630-4
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Ugolini D, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V22, P6957, DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-3925-1
   Van Koningsveld M, 2008, J COASTAL RES, V24, P367, DOI 10.2112/07A-0010.1
   Vinke K, 2020, MIGR STUD, V8, P626, DOI 10.1093/migration/mnaa029
   Wang CW, 2024, ENERGY, V313, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2024.133843
   Wang HH, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107333
   Wang L, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104048
   Wang L, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102181
   Wang T, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15020989
   [王威 Wang Wei], 2019, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V29, P161
   Wang WJ, 2024, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V12, DOI 10.3389/feart.2024.1247360
   Wang Y, 2018, J MT SCI-ENGL, V15, P2730, DOI 10.1007/s11629-017-4798-9
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Wiegel H, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.610
   Wu CL, 2018, HABITAT INT, V75, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.009
   Xiao Y, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12111997
   Xiong YN, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14105889
   Xu K, 2023, J HYDROL, V617, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129166
   Xu WP, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13152022
   Xue F, 2024, WATER-SUI, V16, DOI 10.3390/w16081162
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang L, 2023, PROG PLANN, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2022.100657
   Yang P, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P131723, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3009876
   Yang QR, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101957
   Yang TT, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13030397
   Yang WC, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V119, P1531, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06159-8
   Yao FG, 2024, PLOS ONE, V19, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0285113
   You C, 2020, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113252
   Yuan XM, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104807
   Yumagulova L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.022
   Zang YW, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105025
   Zhang H, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14092010
   Zhang JM, 2024, CITIES, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105294
   Zhang T, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V479, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144008
   Zhang W, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102174
   Zhang XW, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101402
   Zhang YQ, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105221
   Zhang ZY, 2024, RES INT BUS FINANC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102154
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhou R, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1133595
   Zhou SQ, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V452, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142087
NR 221
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 11
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD MAR
PY 2025
VL 60
AR 102342
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102342
EA FEB 2025
PG 31
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA Y4R5B
UT WOS:001432014500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xu, T
   Xie, ZQ
   Jiang, FS
   Yang, SQ
   Deng, ZT
   Zhao, L
   Wen, GZ
   Du, QY
AF Xu, Tong
   Xie, Zhiqiang
   Jiang, Fengshan
   Yang, Shouquan
   Deng, Zhanting
   Zhao, Lei
   Wen, Guangzheng
   Du, Qingyun
TI Urban flooding resilience evaluation with coupled rainfall and flooding
   models: a small area in Kunming City, China as an example
SO WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE entropy weight method; flooding simulation; InfoWorks ICM; rainfall and
   flood model; urban flood resilience
ID INDEX; FRAMEWORK
AB Climate change and increasing urbanization have contributed greatly to urban flooding, making it a global problem. The resilient city approach provides new ideas for urban flood prevention research, and currently, enhancing urban flood resilience is an effective means for alleviating urban flooding pressure. This study proposes a method to quantify the resilience value of urban flooding based on the '4R' theory of resilience, by coupling the urban rainfall and flooding model to simulate urban flooding, and the simulation results are used for calculating index weights and assessing the spatial distribution of urban flood resilience in the study area. The results indicate that (1) the high level of flood resilience in the study area is positively correlated with the points prone to waterlogging; the more an area is prone to waterlogging, the lower the flood resilience value. (2) The flood resilience index in most areas shows a significant local spatial clustering effect, with the number of areas with nonsignificant local spatial clustering accounting for 46% of the total. The urban flood resilience assessment system constructed in this study provides a reference for assessing the urban flood resilience of other cities, thus facilitating the decision-making process of urban planning and disaster mitigation.
C1 [Xu, Tong; Xie, Zhiqiang; Jiang, Fengshan; Deng, Zhanting] Yunnan Univ, Coll Earth Sci, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Shouquan] Yunnan Univ, Int Rivers & Ecol Secur Res Inst, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Lei] Kunming Surveying & Mapping Inst, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
   [Wen, Guangzheng] Yunnan Remote Sensing Ctr, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
   [Du, Qingyun] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China.
C3 Yunnan University; Yunnan University; Wuhan University
RP Xie, ZQ (corresponding author), Yunnan Univ, Coll Earth Sci, Kunming 650504, Peoples R China.
EM xzq_2019@ynu.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Xitian/AAX-5010-2021
OI xu, tong/0000-0001-5324-9107
FU Postgraduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Yunnan University
   [2021Y041]; Yangtze River Conservancy Commission Yangtze River Academy
   of Sciences 2022 Open Research Fund [CKWV20221029/KY]; 2021 Ministry of
   Natural Resources Digital Cartography, and Land Information Key
   Laboratory Open Research Fund [ZRZYBWD202108]
FX This study was supported by the Postgraduate Research and Innovation
   Foundation of Yunnan University (2021Y041), Yangtze River Conservancy
   Commission Yangtze River Academy of Sciences 2022 Open Research Fund
   (CKWV20221029/KY), 2021 Ministry of Natural Resources Digital
   Cartography, and Land Information Key Laboratory Open Research Fund
   (ZRZYBWD202108).
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   [陈长坤 Chen Changkun], 2018, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V28, P1
   Chen J., 2021, J HYDROL, V601
   Chen KF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040830
   Chen Y., 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, V18, p12538. School
   Fox-Lent Cate, 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P209, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9555-4
   Gao M., 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19
   Hammond M, 2018, URBAN WATER J, V15, P427, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2018.1508598
   Hemmati M, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001382
   Hettiarachchi S, 2022, CITIES, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103789
   Huang G. R., 2017, HYDROPOWER ENERGY SC, V35, P66
   Jing H., 2020, YANGTZE RIVER BASIN, V29, P2519
   Jülich S, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V8, P91, DOI 10.1007/s13753-017-0114-0
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Lee E., 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, P6
   Lin T, 2018, HABITAT INT, V71, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.013
   Liu C., 2018, HYDROPOWER ENERGY SC, V36, P70
   Liu D, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118406
   Liu G., 2018, Resour. Dev. Mark, V34, P593
   Lwin KK, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101745
   Ma SQ, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100974
   [缪惠全 Miao Huiquan], 2021, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V30, P10
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Narimani R, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13142786
   Pohl R, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1431
   Qi M, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14132000
   Rentschler J, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-30727-4
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Rezende OM, 2019, J HYDROL, V576, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.063
   Rözer V, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bc
   Sharma A, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P8545, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023749
   Sharma SE, 2023, REV INT POLIT ECON, V30, P1413, DOI 10.1080/09692290.2022.2100449
   Su B., 2015, J TSINGHUA U NATURAL, V55
   Wu YW, 2022, J HYDROL, V613, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128349
   Wu ZN, 2020, J HYDROL, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124596
   Xu T., 2015, URBAN ISSUES, P2
   Xu T, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P661, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05072-2
   Xu W., 2021, WATER-SUI, V13
   Yang YY, 2021, J HYDROL, V600, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126470
   Zhang H., 2022, Remote Sens, V14
   Zhang Q., 2021, SOCIAL RESILIENCE UR
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zhou JY, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9080471
NR 47
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 85
U2 289
PU IWA PUBLISHING
PI LONDON
PA REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON,
   ENGLAND
SN 0273-1223
EI 1996-9732
J9 WATER SCI TECHNOL
JI Water Sci. Technol.
PD JUN 1
PY 2023
VL 87
IS 11
BP 2820
EP 2839
DI 10.2166/wst.2023.149
EA MAY 2023
PG 20
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA J6LI0
UT WOS:000989053500001
PM 37318926
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Luo, XX
   Liu, QL
   Song, XF
AF Luo, Xixi
   Liu, Quanlong
   Song, Xuefeng
TI China's strategies for promoting differentiated urban resilience
   measurement from the social ecosystem perspective
SO SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE China; cloud model; entropy weight method; social-ecological system
   (SES); urban resilience
ID FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; COMMUNITY
AB Building resilient cities has become a hot topic in urban planning and risk management. Adopting the perspective of the social-ecological system (SES), this paper incorporated economy-ecology-society-infrastructure into an integrated research framework and established a system for assessing the urban resilience development level. The entropy weight method was combined with a cloud model to systematically calculate and classify the resilience of 31 provinces (cities) in China. The evaluation results show that (1) the overall level of urban resilience in China was relatively low; the regional analysis showed that (2) the urban resilience of the eastern region was higher than the national average and that of the central and western regions, and from the perspective of the four subsystems, (3) the comprehensive development of each subsystem was the key to improving urban resilience. Finally, five improvement strategies were proposed to provide ideas for enhancing urban SES ability.
C1 [Luo, Xixi; Liu, Quanlong; Song, Xuefeng] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Mining & Technology
RP Liu, QL (corresponding author), China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM lxx17602934024@163.com
FU Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020ZDPYMS29]
FX Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant/Award
   Number: 2020ZDPYMS29
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2019, CHIN ENV STAT YB CHI
   [Anonymous], 2014, World urbanization prospects, the 2014 revision: Highlights
   Arundel R, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P33, DOI 10.1177/0265813515608640
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Chen Y.L., 2018, SOFT SCI, V32, P104
   [迟国泰 Chi Guotai], 2012, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice], V32, P1464
   Chuang WC, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V213, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.083
   Cumming GS, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P975, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Fang D.P., 2017, CHINA CIVIL ENG J, V7, P1
   Feng J, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18052572
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gong Y.B., 2012, CHIN J POPUL RESOUR, V1, P144
   Holling CS, 2001, PANARCHY, P25
   Jabareen Y, 2017, CITIES, V68, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.003
   Leslie HM, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P5979, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1414640112
   LI D, 1995, J. Comput. Res. Dev., V32, P15
   Li DY, 1998, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V10, P431, DOI 10.1016/S0950-7051(98)00038-0
   Li G., 2018, J SHANDONG U SCI TEC, V98, P87
   Liang J., 2020, Watershed Ecology and the Environment, V2, P6, DOI [10.1016/j.wsee.2020.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.WSEE.2020.06.001]
   Nakano S., 2021, IMPORTANCE SMART NEI, V115
   Nathwani J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
   National Bureau of Statistics, 2019, CHIN STAT YB CHIN ST
   O'Brien, 2016, INT J ENVIRON STUD, V73, P1, DOI [10.1080/00207233.2016.1185333, DOI 10.1080/00207233.2016.1185333]
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   Peng Y., 2018, GEOGR RES-AUST, V6, P1193
   Petersen L, 2020, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2020.100340
   Rockefeller, 2015, CIT RES IND
   Rybski D, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P425, DOI 10.1177/0265813516638340
   Simpson D.M., 2006, Indicator issues and proposed framework for a disaster preparedness index (DPi)
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   [孙阳 Sun Yang], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P151
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Walker B, 2010, Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: Workbook for Practitioners
   Wei YG, 2016, HABITAT INT, V53, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.025
   Woolf S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003
   Xiao M, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V40, P633, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.147
   Xu Z.F., 2019, CHINESE J SAFETY SCI, V3, P1
   Yan W.Z., 2009, SHANDONG WATER RESOU, V000, P66
   Yao D.Q., 2013, CHINA EC WKLY, V48, P49
   Yu K.J., 2015, J URBAN PLANNING, V1, P75
   Yuan JH, 2019, ENERGY, V176, P623, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.038
   Zhang M., 2018, Ecological Economy, V34, P154
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhao DF, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123190
   Zhao JR, 2022, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104709
NR 52
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 14
U2 120
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1092-7026
EI 1099-1743
J9 SYST RES BEHAV SCI
JI Syst. Res. Behav. Sci.
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 40
IS 1
BP 235
EP 249
DI 10.1002/sres.2832
EA FEB 2022
PG 15
WC Management; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA 7U9KK
UT WOS:000756671000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, XQ
   Long, SS
AF Wang, Xiangqian
   Long, Shuangshuang
TI Analysis of Sustainable Development Level for Resource-Exhausted Cities
   in China from Perspective of Resilience
SO POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE resource-exhausted city; resilience; sustainable development; entropy
   weight-TOPSIS-grey relational degree; coupling coordination; obstacle
   model
AB How to improve the sustainability of resource-exhausted cities has become a difficult problem for China to implement the sustainable development strategy, and the construction of resilient cities has become the best way to solve this problem. This paper constructed an evaluation indicator system of the sustainable development for resource-exhausted cities from the perspective of resilient cities. The entropy weight-TOPSIS-grey relational degree model was used to quantitatively analyze the sustainable development capacity of 23 resource-exhausted cities in China from 2010 to 2020. And the coupling coordination degree model was further used to analyze the relationship between urban resilience and the dimensions of economy, environment, society and resource respectively. The weak links affecting their sustainable development was explored through obstacle degree model. The research results are helpful to fully understand the current situation and obstacle factors of the sustainable development of resource-exhausted cities in China, and promote the sustainable development of cities through the construction of resilient cities.
C1 [Wang, Xiangqian; Long, Shuangshuang] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China.
C3 Anhui University of Science & Technology
RP Long, SS (corresponding author), Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Huainan 232001, Peoples R China.
EM 3165490646@qq.com
RI Long, Shuangshuang/HII-4174-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874003]; Academic
   Funding Projects for Top Talents in Disciplines and Majors of Anhui
   [gxbjZD2021051]
FX This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (51874003) , and the Academic Funding Projects for Top Talents in
   Disciplines and Majors of Anhui (No. gxbjZD2021051) .
CR Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   AN H., 2017, CHINA MINING MAGAZIN, V26, P128
   Croese S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020550
   Martínez-Bravo MD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V224, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.110
   Derissen S, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003
   Hou XR, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107657
   KIRAN K.S., 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V14
   Li HJ, 2013, ENERG POLICY, V55, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.007
   LI J, 2005, RES FINANCIAL EC ISS, V6, P52
   Li XF, 2021, MICROPROCESS MICROSY, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103805
   [李艳 Li Yan], 2019, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V38, P1694
   Liu D, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P667, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.406
   LU Z.M., 2007, MACROECONOMICS, V11, P32
   Luo Ziyuan, 2021, Science & Technology Review, V39, P124, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.15.013
   NORIA B.P., 2022, CITIES, V126
   QIN B.T., 2019, J ENV EC, V4, P142
   Sun X, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS329, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.002
   Sun YJ, 2021, CHINA ECON REV, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101623
   TANG Z.Q., 2008, J ARID LAND RESOURCE, V11, P96
   Turner BL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
   WAN J., 2012, EC PROBLEMS, V1, P46
   Wang YQ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031049
   Xu L, 2015, SUSTAIN SCI, V10, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11625-014-0274-4
   Xu XY, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126147
   Yan Y, 2017, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V189, DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-5814-9
   [朱艳娜 Zhu Yanna], 2021, [安全与环境学报, Journal of Safety and Environment], V21, P2865
NR 26
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 9
U2 48
PU HARD
PI OLSZTYN 5
PA POST-OFFICE BOX, 10-718 OLSZTYN 5, POLAND
SN 1230-1485
EI 2083-5906
J9 POL J ENVIRON STUD
JI Pol. J. Environ. Stud.
PY 2023
VL 32
IS 2
BP 1967
EP 1974
DI 10.15244/pjoes/157654
PG 8
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA H9VN3
UT WOS:000999356600041
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lowe, M
   Bell, S
   Briggs, J
   McMillan, E
   Morley, M
   Grenfell, M
   Sweeting, D
   Whitten, A
   Jordan, N
AF Lowe, Melanie
   Bell, Sarah
   Briggs, Jessie
   McMillan, Elissa
   Morley, Merrick
   Grenfell, Maree
   Sweeting, David
   Whitten, Alison
   Jordan, Nikki
TI A research-based, practice-relevant urban resilience framework for local
   government
SO LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban resilience; evolutionary resilience; local government; resilience
   framework; Melbourne
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CHALLENGES
AB Urban resilience has rapidly developed as a concept to assist urban actors to prepare for, and respond to, shocks and stresses experienced in cities. Urban resilience has been variously defined, and abstract and nebulous resilience concepts can be difficult to apply in practice. Through a research-practice partnership we sought to clarify the concept of urban resilience and make it applicable to the multi-sectoral work of local government in Australia. By conducting a literature review and researcher-practitioner workshops, we developed an urban resilience framework to assist local government planning. We defined urban resilience from an evolutionary perspective: The capacity of individuals, communities, institutions, businesses and systems within a city to adapt, survive, and thrive no matter what kind of chronic stresses and acute shocks we experience, and to positively transform as a result. Evolutionary urban resilience has four characteristics: recovery, persistence, adaptive capacity and transformative capacity. We mapped these characteristics to 10 core qualities of resilient urban systems: prepared, robust, spare capacity, diverse, reflective, integrated, inclusive, flexible, future-focused, and innovative. Resilience-building focuses on designing, delivering and evaluating urban systems and programmes, to ensure that cities can respond and transform in the face of growing ecological, economic and social uncertainty. We discuss the various ways in which the framework has been applied by the City of Melbourne. The framework may be relevant to other jurisdictions in Australia and internationally, as it provides the basis for implementing resilience across government policy, projects and operations, and in partnership with communities and other stakeholders.
C1 [Lowe, Melanie] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Lowe, Melanie; Bell, Sarah; Briggs, Jessie; Morley, Merrick] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Ctr Cities, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [McMillan, Elissa; Grenfell, Maree; Sweeting, David; Whitten, Alison; Jordan, Nikki] City Melbourne, City Resilience & Sustainable Futures, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Lowe, Melanie] RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT); University of Melbourne;
   Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)
RP Lowe, M (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Ctr Urban Res, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
EM melanie.lowe@rmit.edu.au
OI Bell, Sarah/0000-0001-5289-4358
FU City of Melbourne
FX No Statement Available
CR Adil A, 2020, ROUT INT HANDB, P35
   Allen A, 2020, ROUT INT HANDB, P476
   [Anonymous], 2011, Strategic national framework on community resilience
   [Anonymous], 2018, Climate Change Mitigation Strategy to 2050: Melbourne Together for 1.5 C
   [Anonymous], 2016, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 April 2015
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2019, HIST POPULATION
   Berke PR, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P901, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1453354
   Biermann M, 2016, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V4, P59, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1094170
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Borquez R, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P163, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0400-6
   City of Melbourne, 2021, COOL ROUTES
   City of Melbourne, 2023, CITY MELBOURNE
   City of Melbourne, 2021, City of Melbourne city of possibility: Council plan 2021-2025
   City of Melbourne, 2022, United Nations sustainable development goals: City of Melbourne voluntary local review 2022
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   Davidson K, 2019, CITIES, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.012
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dovey K, 2016, URBAN DESIGN THINKING: A CONCEPTUAL TOOLKIT, P1
   Fastenrath S, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P138, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1744551
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Ferguson P., 2021, PALGRAVE HDB CLIMATE, P1
   Fünfgeld H, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P324
   Gleeson B., 2013, 1 U MELB MELB SUST S
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Laurien F, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100443
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lowe M., 2023, CITY RESILIENCE ACUT
   Lowe M., 2023, URBAN RESILIENCE LOC
   Lowe M., 2021, Urban resilience for local government: Concepts, definitions and qualities
   Lowe M, 2018, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V19, P180, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2017.1407820
   Lowe M, 2015, URBAN POLICY RES, V33, P131, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Melbourne Centre for Cities, 2021, URBAN RESILIENCE INN
   Münzel T, 2021, EUR HEART J, V42, P2422, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab235
   Naughtin C., 2022, Our future world: Global megatrends impacting the way we live over coming decades
   OECD, 2021, RESILIENT CITIES
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Reid Julian., 2012, DEV DIALOGUE, V58, P67
   Resilient Cities Network, 2021, WHAT IS URBAN RESILI
   Resilient Cities Network, 2021, OUR STORY
   Resilient Melbourne, 2016, RESILIENT MELBOURNE
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2021, 100 RESILIENT CITIES
   Rockefeller Foundation and Arup, 2015, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Shaw K, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P308
   Suárez M, 2020, ROUT INT HANDB, P197
   The Nature Conservancy and Resilient Melbourne, 2019, Living Melbourne: Our Metropolitan Urban Forest
   Torabi E, 2017, URBAN POLICY RES, V35, P312, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1294538
   UN, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2
   UN-Habitat, 2021, RESILIENCE
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wamsler C, 2014, ROUTL CRIT INTRO URB, P1
   Watts N, 2021, LANCET, V397, P129, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X
   White I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P934, DOI 10.1068/c12117
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
NR 63
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 29
U2 52
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1354-9839
EI 1469-6711
J9 LOCAL ENVIRON
JI Local Environ.
PD JUL 2
PY 2024
VL 29
IS 7
BP 886
EP 901
DI 10.1080/13549839.2024.2318571
EA MAR 2024
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies;
   Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA UO0J1
UT WOS:001174560900001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shi, T
   Qiao, YR
   Zhou, Q
   Zhang, JG
AF Shi, Tao
   Qiao, Yurong
   Zhou, Qian
   Zhang, Jiguang
TI THE REGIONAL DIFFERENCES AND RANDOM CONVERGENCE OF URBAN RESILIENCE IN
   CHINA
SO TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience index; regional differences; random convergence; China
ID SMART CITIES; SIGMA-CONVERGENCE; BETA-CONVERGENCE; INEQUALITY; CITY;
   SUSTAINABILITY; ROADMAP; DAGUM
AB This paper focuses on calculating resilience index of 282 cities in China from 2012 to 2019, to analysis the regional differences and random convergence. We use the entropy method to calculate the urban resilience index, adopt the Dagum Gini coefficient method to analyze the regional differences and the sources, explore the variation coefficients method and beta convergence model to diagnose the convergence mechanism. The conclusions are: (1) The urban resilience in China is at a medium and low level with a stable growth tendency, with a significant regional unbalance of ???higher in east, and lower in other regions???. As the sub-resilience, there is a big gap in the regional difference of the resilience structure with good performance in social resilience and economic resilience, poor in ecological resilience and infrastructure resilience. (2) The Gini coefficient of urban resilience continuously decreases with the regional unbalance narrowing accordingly. The Gini coefficients in different regions have a phased convergence tendency, and the hypervariable density contribution and intra-regional differences contribution are the main sources of differences in urban resilience. (3) The urban resilience in China and eastern region has ?? convergence, while China and all regions have significant absolute ?? and conditional ?? convergence. Therefore, this paper proposes to continuously accelerate the urban resilient construction, make up for the shortcomings, and narrow the regional development gap, to promote the healthy and orderly development of cities.
C1 [Shi, Tao] Henan Acad Social Sci, Econ Inst, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Tao] Chinese Acad Governance, Party Sch Cent Comm CPC, Sch Econ Teaching & Res, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Qiao, Yurong] Nankai Univ, Coll Econ & Social Dev, Ctr Urban & Reg Econ Res China, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Qian] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Jiguang] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
C3 Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party; Nankai University;
   Zhongnan University of Economics & Law; Shanghai University of Finance &
   Economics
RP Zhou, Q (corresponding author), Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Econ Sch, Wuhan, Peoples R China.
EM Z0005072@zuel.edu.cn
OI SHI, TAO/0000-0002-6556-4144
FU National Social Science Foundation of China [20CJY064]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [NSFC71804056]; Annual Innovation Project
   [22A06]
FX This paper is supported by the National Social Science Foundation of
   China (20CJY064), National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (NSFC71804056) and the Annual Innovation Project (22A06).
CR Ahad MA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301
   Angelidou M, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V33, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.016
   [Anonymous], 2020, Bloomberg
   [Anonymous], 2008, World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography
   Araral E, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102873
   Batty M, 2012, EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP, V214, P481, DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
   Bibri SE, 2020, J FUTURES STUD, V25, P77, DOI 10.6531/JFS.202012_25(2).0009
   Bibri SE, 2018, EUR J FUTURES RES, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40309-018-0142-z
   Bifulco F, 2016, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V29, P132, DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0132
   Chang V, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120559
   Chmutina K, 2016, CITIES, V58, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   Christensen L, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04499-170105
   Dapena AD, 2016, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V56, P473, DOI 10.1007/s00168-016-0750-0
   Domma F, 2018, PHYSICA A, V511, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.027
   Feldmeyer D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145734
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Hill Edward., 2008, EXPLORING REGIONAL E
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Johnson PA, 2020, GOV INFORM Q, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2019.101414
   Kakamu K, 2016, COMPUT ECON, V48, P593, DOI 10.1007/s10614-015-9538-z
   Kong JN, 2019, J ECONOMETRICS, V209, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.12.022
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Lu HP, 2019, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V97, P727, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2019.03.014
   Lv CC, 2021, ENERG ECON, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105476
   Majeed U, 2021, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V181, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103007
   Malakar K, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P841, DOI 10.1007/s10668-017-9913-0
   Matos PV, 2012, ECON MODEL, V29, P2198, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.07.004
   Miao Z, 2021, APPL ENERG, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116296
   Motesharrei S, 2016, NATL SCI REV, V3, P470, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nww081
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Shi T, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118739
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, REVISED RESILIENCE M
   UN-Habitat, 1996, URB WORLD GLOB REP H
   Vu KM, 2013, ECON LETT, V118, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.008
   Xiao XY, 2021, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101381
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
NR 38
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 15
U2 169
PU VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
PI VILNIUS
PA SAULETEKIO AL 11, VILNIUS, LT-10223, LITHUANIA
SN 2029-4913
EI 2029-4921
J9 TECHNOL ECON DEV ECO
JI Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ.
PY 2022
VL 28
IS 4
BP 979
EP 1002
DI 10.3846/tede.2022.16721
EA MAY 2022
PG 24
WC Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics
GA 2A7PK
UT WOS:000805330400001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Simone, C
   Iandolo, F
   Fulco, I
   Loia, F
AF Simone, Cristina
   Iandolo, Francesca
   Fulco, Irene
   Loia, Francesca
TI Rome was not built in a day. Resilience and the eternal city: Insights
   for urban management
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Rome; Urban resilience; Urban management; Aspect-based sentiment
   analysis (ABSA); Collective perception
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; BIG DATA; SYSTEMS; CITIES;
   SUSTAINABILITY; OPPORTUNITIES; GOVERNANCE; TERRITORY; COMMUNITY
AB Resilience has been intensely investigated as the viable quality of individuals, groups, organizations, and systems to respond productively to notable change without engaging in an extended period of regressive behaviour. Recently, there has been growing attention to the relationship between resilience and cities. To contribute to this stimulating debate, this paper first provides the theoretical framework and links the concept of resilience to urban studies. Subsequently, it enlightens, through a systems perspective and the aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA) methodology, the possibility to enrich the information variety endowment of urban policymakers, generated by new information units, to foster resilience capabilities in the urban context. Specifically, a largescale text analysis study was conducted on the city of Rome to understand the sentiments expressed within the text generated online by citizens and visitors. The positive or negative sentiments linked to the hidden problems of the urban context were organized within collective perception-based maps for each of the analysed points of interest (POIs). Since cities represent complex decision-making contexts, this study aimed to outline a methodology and a tool that would help foster resilient thinking in urban policies by enriching the diversity of the information variety endowment of urban decision-makers.
C1 [Simone, Cristina; Iandolo, Francesca] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Rome, Italy.
   [Fulco, Irene] Univ Tuscia, Dept Econ & Management, Viterbo, Italy.
   [Loia, Francesca] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Econ Management & Inst, Naples, Italy.
C3 Sapienza University Rome; Tuscia University; University of Naples
   Federico II
RP Iandolo, F (corresponding author), Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Rome, Italy.
EM cristina.simone@uniroma1.it; francesca.iandolo@uniroma1.it;
   irenefulco@unitus.it; francesca.loia@unina.it
RI Iandolo, Francesca/AFK-0311-2022
OI Iandolo, Francesca/0000-0002-2366-4892; loia,
   francesca/0000-0003-1755-968X
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   American Psychological Association, 2014, ROAD RES
   [Anonymous], 1995, SENSEMAKING ORG
   [Anonymous], 1956, An introduction to cybernetics
   [Anonymous], 2009, RESILIENCE GREAT CON
   [Anonymous], 2011, CONTRIBUTIONS THEORE
   [Anonymous], 2010, These rules are adapted from Taleb, P50
   [Anonymous], 1957, INTRO CYBERNETICS
   [Anonymous], 2004, THESIS U LAUSANNE SW
   Ashby WR., 1958, Facets of Systems Science, V1, P83, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-928, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_28]
   Baccianella S, 2010, LREC 2010 - SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION
   Barile S., 2009, Management Sistemico Vitale
   Barile S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030790
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Berthoz A., 2013, Vicariance (La): Le cerveau createur de mondes
   Bird Steven, 2009, Natural Language Processing with Python
   Bo Pang, 2008, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, V2, P1, DOI 10.1561/1500000001
   Bodin R., 2004, ESS B, V2, P33
   Brown K., 2012, Climate change and the crisis of capitalism: A chance to reclaim self, society and nature, P37, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203146118
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Buhalis D., 2014, INFORM COMMUNICATION, P553
   Butler L., 2007, PSYCHOL TERRORISM, V400, P417
   Capra Fritjof., 1997, The web of life: a new scientific understanding of living systems
   Cardin MA, 2013, RES ENG DES, V24, P277, DOI 10.1007/s00163-012-0145-x
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Ciasullo Maria Vincenza, 2018, TQM Journal, V30, P554, DOI 10.1108/TQM-11-2017-0156
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Coutu DL, 2002, HARVARD BUS REV, V80, P46
   Crutzen P.J., 2006, The Anthropocene. Earth System Science in the Anthropocene, P13, DOI [10.1007/3-540-26590-2 3, DOI 10.1007/3-540-26590-23]
   Denecke K, 2008, I C DATA ENGIN WORKS, P427
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Durodie B., 2003, MONITOR, V2, P15
   Esuli Andrea., 2007, Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, P424
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fiksel J, 2015, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V56, P79
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08748-210341
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gandomi A, 2015, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V35, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
   Gillard R, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P13, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00334
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gordon J., 1978, STRUCTURES
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hamel G, 2003, HARVARD BUS REV, V81, P52
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Horne J.F., 1998, Employment Relations Today, V24, P29, DOI DOI 10.1002/ERT.3910240405
   Hu M, 2004, P 10 ACM SIGKDD INT, P168
   Hu MQ, 2004, PROCEEDING OF THE NINETEENTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE SIXTEENTH CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P755
   Iandolo F, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V84, P21, DOI [10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.019, 10.1016/j.land]
   Index C.R., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Ioppolo G, 2012, LAND USE POLICY, V29, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.005
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Kaplan R.S., 1996, BALANCED SCORECARD
   KAPLAN RS, 1992, HARVARD BUS REV, V70, P71
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   KOBASA SC, 1982, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V42, P168, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.168
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Le Coze J.C., 2006, 2 RES ENG S EC MIN P, P173
   Li X, 2008, J TRAVEL RES, V46, P235, DOI 10.1177/0047287507303976
   Liu B, 2015, SENTIMENT ANALYSIS: MINING OPINIONS, SENTIMENTS, AND EMOTIONS, P1
   Liu B, 2011, DATA CENTRIC SYST AP, P459, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19460-3_11
   Lynch K., 1960, IMAGE CITY, V11
   Manca A. R., 2017, JRC Science for Policy Report
   McManus S., 2007, Resilience management: a framework for assessing and improving the resilience of organisations
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meril E, 2019, DISASTERS, V44, P125
   Minguzzi A, 2009, ADV TOURISM DESTINAT, V113, P113
   Mubarok MS, 2017, AIP CONF PROC, V1867, DOI 10.1063/1.4994463
   Myeong S, 2010, ADMIN SOC, V42, P441, DOI 10.1177/0095399710362724
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Nyström M, 2019, NATURE, V575, P98, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3
   Ohana B., 2009, 9 IT T C, P13, DOI DOI 10.21427/D77S56
   Olsson P, 2004, ENVIRON MANAGE, V34, P75, DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
   Oteng-Ababio M, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V12, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.02.005
   Pavlopoulos Ioannis, 2014, Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis
   Pedrycz W, 2014, INFORM GRANULARITY B, V8
   Pereira GV, 2017, INFORM TECHNOL DEV, V23, P526, DOI 10.1080/02681102.2017.1353946
   Pooley JA, 2010, AUST COMMUNITY PSYCH, V22, P30
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P329
   PORTER ME, 1985, HARVARD BUS REV, V63, P149
   Rangaswamy A, 2005, J INTERACT MARK, V19, P5, DOI 10.1002/dir.20037
   Riolli L, 2002, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V32, P1604, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02765.x
   Rist L, 2014, ECOSPHERE, V5, DOI 10.1890/ES13-00330.1
   RITTEL HWJ, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF01405730
   Rode C, 2000, EYE BEHOLDER VISUAL
   Rutter M, 2008, DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND WELLNESS: GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES, P3
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Simon H. A., 1976, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Processes in Administrative Organization
   Simone C, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V72, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.070
   Sonn CC, 1998, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V26, P457, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199809)26:5<457::AID-JCOP5>3.3.CO;2-7
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Taleb N. N., 2007, The black swan
   Tang FL, 2019, INFORM SCIENCES, V488, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.064
   Troisi O, 2018, BEHAV INFORM TECHNOL, V37, P1111, DOI 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1502355
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van der Leeuw SE, 2005, MICRO MESO MACRO: ADDRESSING COMPLEX SYSTEMS COUPLINGS, P227, DOI 10.1142/9789812701404_0013
   Vogus T. J, 2003, ORG RESILIENCE POSIT, P94
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker B, 2012, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Walker B.H., 2006, EXPLORING RESILIENCE
   Walker J, 2011, SECUR DIALOGUE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0967010611399616
   Weick KE, 2006, ORGAN SCI, V17, P514, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1060.0196
   WEICK KE, 1993, ADMIN SCI QUART, V38, P628, DOI 10.2307/2393339
   Wiley N., 1988, SOCIOL THEOR, V6, P254
   Woods D. D, 2006, ESSENTIAL CHARACTERI, P21
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Zimmerman M.A., 1994, SOCIAL POLICY REPORT, V8, P1, DOI [10.1002/j.2379-3988.1994.tb00032.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2379-3988.1994.TB00032.X]
NR 111
TC 17
Z9 18
U1 1
U2 28
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 110
AR 103070
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103070
PG 16
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA QH8SZ
UT WOS:000618544100008
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Moglia, M
   Frantzeskaki, N
   Newton, P
   Pineda-Pinto, M
   Witheridge, J
   Cook, S
   Glackin, S
AF Moglia, Magnus
   Frantzeskaki, Niki
   Newton, Peter
   Pineda-Pinto, Melissa
   Witheridge, Jennifer
   Cook, Stephen
   Glackin, Stephen
TI Accelerating a green recovery of cities: Lessons from a scoping review
   and a proposal for mission-oriented recovery towards post-pandemic urban
   resilience
SO DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Review
DE Transitions; Missions; Pathways; Infrastructure; Housing; Urban
   regeneration; Mobility; Circular economy; Smart cities; Urban; Cities;
   Resilience
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; FLOOD RISK; COVID-19; FUTURE; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   SUSTAINABILITY; SCENARIOS; HEALTH; CITY; TRANSFORMATION
AB In the post-pandemic era, we must value our cities as cultural and economic centres, that are socially and environmentally diverse. This requires a transformation in the way we plan and govern our cities, but what can be learnt from the current crisis about how cities should be managed? In this article, we report on a scoping review to help identify seven lessons learnt for cities from the COVID-19 pandemic. We build on these lessons through a synthesis, outlining three urban missions that will chart a green urban recovery. The missions are to accelerate the urban mobility transition; to attain regenerative urban development; and create resilient urban infrastructure. We expand on what these missions entail, by defining six pathways that supports transition of urban mobility, energy, food, housing, health and nature. These pathways, when implemented in an integrated manner, provides a roadmap for green recovery in cities, that also builds resilience.
C1 [Moglia, Magnus; Frantzeskaki, Niki; Newton, Peter; Pineda-Pinto, Melissa; Witheridge, Jennifer; Cook, Stephen; Glackin, Stephen] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Urban Transit, Howthorn, Vic, Australia.
   [Cook, Stephen] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
C3 Swinburne University of Technology; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial
   Research Organisation (CSIRO); CSIRO Land & Water
RP Moglia, M (corresponding author), Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Urban Transit, Howthorn, Vic, Australia.
EM mmoglia@swin.edu.au
RI Pineda, Melissa/HGE-4576-2022; Frantzeskaki, Niki/AAN-1044-2021; Cook,
   Stephen/ABB-8673-2020; Cook, Stephen/G-7216-2011; Moglia,
   Magnus/C-8575-2011
OI Glackin, Stephen/0000-0002-6791-2229; Cook, Stephen/0000-0002-9623-7031;
   PINEDA PINTO, MELISSA/0000-0001-9644-0569; Moglia,
   Magnus/0000-0002-8290-610X; Frantzeskaki, Niki/0000-0002-6983-448X
CR Acuto M, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P977, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00620-3
   Aldaco R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V742, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140524
   Alexandri G, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P3202, DOI 10.1177/0042098020946453
   Ali Shah S.A., 2020, J CLEAN PROD
   Alizadeh T., 2009, J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain, V2, P195
   [Anonymous], 2014, Fifth assessment report
   Anttiroiko A.V., 2021, INT J E PLANN RES, V10
   Arksey HOML., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
   Aziz HMA, 2018, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V86, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.008
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Barbarossa L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12177172
   Basto L, 2010, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V129, P311, DOI 10.2495/SC100271
   Batten D.F., 2000, DISCOVERING ARTIFICI
   Beck MJ, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102846
   Beck MJ, 2020, TRANSPORT POLICY, V99, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.004
   Beery TH, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P717, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0920-z
   Belcher BM, 2020, METHODSX, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100788
   Belzunegui-Eraso A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093662
   Bereitschaft B, 2020, URBAN SCI, V4, DOI 10.3390/urbansci4040056
   Bergantino A.S, 2021, RES TRANSPORT EC, V86
   Blay-Palmer A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031325
   Bolano-Ortiz T.R., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P1
   Boogaard F., 2017, MATEC WEB C
   Botello B., 2018, PLANNING WALKING CYC
   Bouton S., 2017, VOICES SEP
   Brand C, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102224
   Budd L, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100151
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Butler D, 2016, NATURE, V530, P399, DOI 10.1038/530398a
   Campisi T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218829
   Cartení A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084553
   Caulfield B, 2021, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V9, P616, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.02.016
   Cerreta M., 2020, LECT NOTES COMPUTER, P952
   Chang M, 2021, URBAN DES INT, V26, P291, DOI 10.1057/s41289-020-00143-5
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chen K, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE210, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30107-8
   Cheshmehzangi A, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05202
   Chung CKL, 2020, ASIAN GEOGR, V37, P99, DOI 10.1080/10225706.2020.1767423
   Clark C, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103899
   Coats ER, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P4158, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b00363
   Colman R., 2015, CLIM CHANG AUSTR
   Colquhoun HL, 2014, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V67, P1291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
   Cook S., 2019, FUTURE SYDNEY SCENAR
   CSIRO, 2016, CLIM CHANG AUSTR CLI
   D'Adamo I, 2020, ENERG POLICY, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111910
   Danckert S., 2020, SYDNEY MORNING HERAL
   Das A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102577
   Tàbara JD, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V31, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.01.012
   De R, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102171
   Deutsch L, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V120, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.009
   Dong X, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104918
   Dujardin S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041501
   Durizzo K, 2021, WORLD DEV, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105175
   Egerer M., 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, P22
   Ellena M, 2020, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12940-020-00667-x
   Elliott RJR, 2020, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V76, P1187, DOI 10.1007/s10640-020-00478-1
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Everard M, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V111, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.017
   Fallas K., 2021, FESTIVAL ARCHITETTUR, V52-53, P127
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Fetais GH, 2020, OPEN HOUSE INT, V45, P269, DOI 10.1108/OHI-05-2020-0042
   Fezi BA, 2020, J GREEN BUILD, V15, P185
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz042
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Free C, 2021, ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN, V34, P58, DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2020-4634
   Fuentes R., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P1
   Garrard GE, 2018, CONSERV LETT, V11, DOI 10.1111/conl.12411
   Gasparrini A, 2017, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V1, pE360, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30156-0
   Gassner A, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abae2b
   Geels FW, 2013, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V6, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2012.11.004
   Ghosh A, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102928
   Glaser BG, 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
   Glazebrook G, 2009, URBAN POLICY RES, V27, P5, DOI 10.1080/08111140802369820
   Goffman E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-SCI P, V16, P48, DOI 10.1080/15487733.2020.1765678
   Gouveia Nelson, 2020, Ambient. soc., V23, pe0120, DOI 10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200120vu2020l3id
   Graziano T, 2021, INT J E-PLAN RES, V10, P80, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa7
   Gren Å, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P580, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1087-y
   Gude VG, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102558
   Hannon E., 2016, INTEGRATED PERSPECTI
   Harrington Philip., 2019, Decarbonising the built environment: charting the transition, P193
   Hettiarachchi S, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P2041, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018
   Hinkel R.U., 2020, Interiority, V3, P121, DOI DOI 10.7454/IN.V3I2.98
   Hodson M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9020299
   HOEGH-GULDBERG O., 2018, IPCC
   Holiencinová M, 2020, MOBILE NETW APPL, V25, P868, DOI 10.1007/s11036-020-01516-4
   Howden-Chapman P, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V700, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134408
   Hurley J., 2020, Benchmarking Urban Vegetation Cover: Melbourne, Perth Sydney
   Ibn-Mohammed T, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
   Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, 2017, AUT VEH DO WE KNOW W
   Irvine S., 2019, URBAN TRANSFORM, V1
   Ives CD, 2016, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V25, P117, DOI 10.1111/geb.12404
   Jack T, 2022, SOC CULT GEOGR, V23, P814, DOI 10.1080/14649365.2020.1820561
   Jackson W. J, 2016, AUSTR STATE ENV 2016
   Jefferies T., 2020, CITIES HLTH, P1
   Jiricka-Purrer A., 2020, OUTDOOR RECREATION T, V31
   Ju MJ, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141521
   Kaklauskas A, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14082072
   Kang MG, 2020, INT J URBAN SCI, V24, P297, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2020.1803107
   Keeler BL, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P29, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
   Kihato CW, 2020, CITY SOC, V32, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12265
   Kimani J, 2021, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V52, P37, DOI 10.19088/1968-2021.104
   Kleinschroth F, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P318, DOI 10.1002/fee.2230
   Klemes JJ, 2021, INT J ENERG RES, V45, P3457, DOI 10.1002/er.6007
   Nakada LYK, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V730, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139087
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
   Kunzmann KR, 2020, DISP, V56, P20, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2020.1794120
   Kurtz CF, 2003, IBM SYST J, V42, P462, DOI 10.1147/sj.423.0462
   Lakhani A., 2020, CONVERSATION
   Lenzen M, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235654
   Li B, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102685
   Liu Z, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18922-7
   Locke EA, 2007, J MANAGE, V33, P867, DOI 10.1177/0149206307307636
   Longden T., LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, P171
   Lubowiecki-Vikuk A, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V25, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.007
   Maithani S, 2020, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V48, P1297, DOI 10.1007/s12524-020-01157-w
   Maloutas T, 2020, SOC INCL, V8, P5, DOI 10.17645/si.v8i3.2778
   Markus M, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V111, P879, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0172-z
   Maturana B, 2021, ARCHNET-IJAR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1108/ARCH-02-2021-0024
   Mazzucato M, 2018, IND CORP CHANGE, V27, P803, DOI 10.1093/icc/dty034
   McGreevy M, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105053
   McPhearson T., 2020, J EXTREME EVENTS, DOI 10.1142/S234573762150007X
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Megahed NA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
   Mendes L, 2020, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V111, P318, DOI 10.1111/tesg.12450
   Miao J, 2021, CHINESE SOCIOL REV, V53, P1, DOI 10.1080/21620555.2020.1820860
   Miao Q., 2021, RESPONDING COVID 19, V137
   Miles Sam., 2021, LIFE AFTERLIFE GAY N, P393
   Mills N., 2019, Melbourne Has the Most Co-working Spaces in Australia, So Whats All the Fuss about? ABC
   Moglia M, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.009
   Moloney S, 2021, CITIES, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103017
   Moraci F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187743
   Mounce R, 2019, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V120, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.003
   Muley D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187367
   Nathan M, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1537, DOI 10.1177/2399808320971910
   Nevens F, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   Newton P., 2018, RETROFITTING CITIES
   Newton P., 2012, UNINTENDED CITY
   Newton P., 2014, Resilient sustainable cities, P7
   Newton P., 2018, AUSTR CITIES GOVERNA
   Newton P, 2020, URBAN POLICY RES, V38, P338, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2020.1815186
   Newton P, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101718
   Newton P, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P9417, DOI 10.3390/su7079417
   Newton PW, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114745
   Newton PW, 2012, J URBAN TECHNOL, V19, P81, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2012.626703
   Nhamo L, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V192, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110376
   Nian GY, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197954
   Nikiforiadis A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12198215
   Norman B, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-020-00013-7
   O'Hara S, 2021, ECOL ECON, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106859
   OECD, OECD ENV POL PAP
   OECD, 2020, TACKL COR COVID 19
   Oke C., 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1
   Oni T, 2020, NAT MED, V26, P304, DOI 10.1038/s41591-020-0788-5
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Peralta O., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
   Perez P, 2006, COMPLEX SCIENCE FOR A COMPLEX WORLD: EXPLORING HUMAN ECOSYSTEMS WITH AGENTS, P1
   Pineda-Pinto M, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P167, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7
   Pinto MR, 2020, VITRUVIO, V5, P87, DOI 10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2020.14521
   Pisano C, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155883
   Poch M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V744, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140980
   Porebska A., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11
   Prieto-Sandoval V, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V179, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.224
   Radcliffe JC, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00001-0
   Rahman MM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219101
   Raisiene AG, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135332
   Raymond CM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
   Rodgers C., 2020, Environ. Law Rev, V22, P165, DOI DOI 10.1177/1461452920934667
   Rojas-Rueda D, 2021, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V8, P138, DOI 10.1007/s40572-021-00307-7
   Romanach L, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V121, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.023
   Rooij R, 2020, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V173, P119, DOI 10.1680/jurdp.20.00052
   Ropkins K, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V754, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142374
   Rowan NJ, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V748, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141362
   Saladi ~e O., 2020, TRANSPORT RES INTERD, V8
   Sander L., 2020, CONVERSATION
   Sarkar P, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V753, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141757
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharma A.K., 2018, APPROACHES WATER SEN
   Shorfuzzaman M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102582
   Silva G., 2016, RAI Revista de Administracao e Inovacao, V13, P128, DOI [10.1016/j.rai.2016.03, DOI 10.1016/J.RAI.2016.03]
   Skegg D, 2021, LANCET, V397, P777, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00424-4
   Slater SJ, 2020, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V17, DOI 10.5888/pcd17.200204
   Song M., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12
   Song S., ADV 21 CENTURY HUMAN, P63
   Staddon Chad, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P330, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9
   Steffen W, 2015, ANTHROPOCENE REV, V2, P81, DOI 10.1177/2053019614564785
   Stegeman I., 2020, INT J ENV RES PUBL H, V17, P1
   Sugiyama T, 2020, PERSPECT PUBLIC HEAL, V140, P198, DOI 10.1177/1757913919897931
   Sui Y, 2020, APPL ENERG, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115966
   Sukhwani V, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17165710
   Sun Q.C., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V763
   The Resilience Shift, 2020, SEC OUR FUT RES INFR
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Tirachini A, 2020, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V22, P1, DOI [10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1, 10.5038/2375-091.22.1.1]
   Tokazhanov G., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P1
   Transport for N.S.W, 2016, FUT TRANSP TECHN ROA
   Ugolini F, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888
   Van Bavel JJ, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, P460, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
   Venter ZS, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396
   Verstraete W, 2016, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V215, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.094
   von Schneidemesser E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V688, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.309
   Walker BH, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11647-250211
   Wallerstein I, 2000, INT SOCIOL, V15, P249, DOI 10.1177/0268580900015002007
   Wang Y., 2019, ASCE INT C COMP CIV
   Webb R, 2018, AMBIO, V47, P57, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
   Weible CM, 2020, POLICY SCI, V53, P225, DOI 10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4
   Wen L, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3010018
   Wu T, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P18, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0809-2
   Zevenbergen C., 2018, WATER SWITZERLAND, V10
   Zhang Y, 2020, MED J AUSTRALIA, DOI 10.5694/mja2.50869
   Zuo F, 2021, J TRANSP HEALTH, V21, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101032
NR 239
TC 45
Z9 46
U1 3
U2 82
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
EI 2666-1659
J9 DEV BUILT ENVIRON
JI Dev. Built Environ.
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 7
AR 100052
DI 10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100052
EA JUN 2021
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA TP4DX
UT WOS:000677546400006
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wu, P
   Duan, QX
   Zhou, LG
   Wu, Q
   Deveci, M
AF Wu, Peng
   Duan, Qingxia
   Zhou, Ligang
   Wu, Qun
   Deveci, Muhammet
TI Spatial-temporal evaluation of urban resilience in the Yangtze River
   Delta from the perspective of the coupling coordination degree
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Coupling coordination degree; Spatial-temporal
   evaluation; Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations; Econometric panel
   model
AB Scientific evaluation of urban resilience will help to improve the ability of self-prevention and self-recovery when facing internal and external pressure. However, existing studies are on basis of the overall perspective of the urban resilience evaluation index system to measure urban resilience, often ignoring the coupling and coordination degree among indicators. Therefore, an empirical analysis is developed, which is used to measure the urban resilience of eight cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2010 to 2019 from the perspective of coupling coordination degree based on the urban resilience evaluation index system. The empirical results show that (1) In time, the eight cities' resilience fluctuated dynamically and varied to different degrees. It presents the spatial distribution characteristics of "high in the center and low in the periphery" in space. (2) In time, the coupling coordination degree in the eight cities fluctuated slightly. The spatial distribution pattern of "high in the center and low in the periphery" was formed in terms of space. (3) There is a long-term stable relationship between urban resilience and the coupling coordination degree among all indicators. In a certain sense, the higher the coupling coordination degree is, the higher the urban resilience is. These results can improve urban resilience to some extent and make cities more resilient in the future collaborative development process, and provide a way to evaluate urban resilience at different spatial-temporal scales.
C1 [Wu, Peng; Duan, Qingxia] Anhui Univ, Sch Business, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Peng; Zhou, Ligang; Wu, Qun] Appl Math Ctr Anhui Univ, Anhui Univ, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China.
   [Duan, Qingxia] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Ligang; Wu, Qun] Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Qun] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
   [Deveci, Muhammet] UCL, Bartlett Sch Sustainable Construct, London WC1E 7HB, England.
   [Deveci, Muhammet] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Naval Acad, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34940 Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkiye.
C3 Anhui University; Anhui University; East China University of Science &
   Technology; Anhui University; Southeast University - China; University
   of London; University College London; Deniz Harp Okulu Komutanligi
RP Zhou, LG; Wu, Q (corresponding author), Appl Math Ctr Anhui Univ, Anhui Univ, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China.; Zhou, LG; Wu, Q (corresponding author), Anhui Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China.; Wu, Q (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM littlepengwu@126.com; duan_qingxia@163.com; shuiqiaozlg@126.com;
   qunw_ahu@126.com; muhammetdeveci@gmail.com
RI wu, peng/MGA-4068-2025; Wu, Qun/U-4767-2019; Deveci,
   Muhammet/V-8347-2017
OI Bechlem, Rayen/0009-0006-6438-2062
FU Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Program [AHSKQ2020D10]
FX The authors of this study received financial support from the Anhui
   Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Program (AHSKQ2020D10).
CR Admiraal H, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Aydin NY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Ciobanu N, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P1065, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00590-8
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Ghouchani M, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P3966, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00752-8
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Haque MM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102861
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Huang LY, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130681
   Ireni-Saban L, 2013, ADMIN SOC, V45, P651, DOI 10.1177/0095399712438375
   Jacinto R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V744, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140973
   Li Zhengzhao, 2022, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V62, P266, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.22.037
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Liu CJ., 2021, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V11, P79
   Liu ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Liu ZZ, 2022, PHYSICA A, V586, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126465
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Oliva S., 2018, City, Culture and Society, V15, P53, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2018.05.005
   Opricovic S, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V156, P445, DOI 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2021, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V30, P1795
   [彭荣熙 Peng Rongxi], 2021, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V40, P1732
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Shamout S, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V25, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.015
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Sun HH, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11769-021-1201-0
   Sun HH, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V765, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144567
   [孙阳 Sun Yang], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P151
   Tepes A, 2020, WATER RES, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115780
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Tu QY., 2022, ANN REPORT WORLD CIT
   Tzeng GH, 2011, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, P1
   Utami ID, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102074
   Wang H, 2022, APPL ENERG, V315, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118824
   Wilbanks T.J., 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P957, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11027-007-9108-3
   World Bank, 2021, DISASTER RISK MANAGE
   Wu Bohong, 2018, Science & Technology Review, V36, P94, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.16.011
   Wu P, 2022, COMPUT IND ENG, V171, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108404
   Wu P, 2022, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V31, P293, DOI 10.1007/s10726-021-09768-5
   Zhang J, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P447, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04590-3
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   [张明斗 Zhang Mingdou], 2019, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V26, P82
   Zhang YY, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106862
   [朱江丽 Zhu JiangLi], 2015, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V25, P75
NR 51
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 41
U2 171
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 27
IS 1
BP 409
EP 431
DI 10.1007/s10668-023-03087-2
EA MAR 2023
PG 23
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA W0R4F
UT WOS:000949738200004
PM 37363022
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xie, LL
   Zhao, YG
   Wen, WP
   Zhai, CH
AF Xie, Lili
   Zhao, Yonggang
   Wen, Weiping
   Zhai, Changhai
TI From earthquake resistance structure to earthquake resilience city -
   urban seismic resilience assessment
SO EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION
LA English
DT Review
DE urban seismic capacity; urban seismic resilience assessment; analytic
   hierarchy process; functionality loss
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; NATURAL HAZARDS; DISASTER; RECOVERY; FRAMEWORK;
   RANKING; SYSTEM; AREAS; CHINA
AB Earthquakes pose significant perils to the built environment in urban areas. To avert the calamitous aftermath of earthquakes, it is imperative to construct seismic resilient cities. Due to the intricacy of the concept of urban seismic resilience (USR), its assessment is a large-scale system engineering issue. The assessment of USR should be based on the notion of urban seismic capacity (USC) assessment, which includes casualties, economic loss, and recovery time as criteria. Functionality loss is also included in the assessment of USR in addition to these criteria. The assessment indicator system comprising five dimensions (building and lifeline infrastructure, environment, society, economy, and institution) and 20 indicators has been devised to quantify USR. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is utilized to compute the weights of the criteria, dimensions, and indicators in the urban seismic resilience assessment (USRA) indicator system. When the necessary data for a city are obtainable, the seismic resilience of that city can be assessed using this framework. To illustrate the proposed methodology, a moderate-sized city in China was selected as a case study. The assessment results indicate a high level of USR, suggesting that the city possesses strong capabilities to withstand and recover from potential future earthquakes.
C1 [Xie, Lili; Zhao, Yonggang; Wen, Weiping; Zhai, Changhai] Harbin Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Lili; Zhao, Yonggang; Wen, Weiping; Zhai, Changhai] Harbin Inst Technol, Minist Ind & Informat Technol, Key Lab Smart Prevent & Mitigat Civil Engn Disaste, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Lili] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China.
C3 Harbin Institute of Technology; Harbin Institute of Technology; China
   Earthquake Administration; Institute of Engineering Mechanics, CEA
RP Zhai, CH (corresponding author), Harbin Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China.; Zhai, CH (corresponding author), Harbin Inst Technol, Minist Ind & Informat Technol, Key Lab Smart Prevent & Mitigat Civil Engn Disaste, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China.
EM zch-hit@hit.edu.cn
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2023YFC3805100]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [52222811, 52494963]
FX This investigation is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China
   (No. 2023YFC3805100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (Nos. 52222811 and 52494963). These supports are greatly appreciated.
CR Ainuddin S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0201-x
   Aitsi-Selmi A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P164, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0050-9
   Alshehri SA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P395, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1719-5
   Aragonés-Beltrán P, 2014, ENERGY, V66, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.016
   Atrachali M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101231
   Balaei B, 2018, NAT HAZARDS REV, V19, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000292
   Basher R, 2006, PHILOS T R SOC A, V364, P2167, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2006.1819
   Becker D., 2015, Guidelines for Development of Indicators, Indicator Systems and Provide Challenges
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Cai H, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
   Casciati F, 2022, J INFRASTRUCT INTELL, V1
   Ceferino L, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18072-w
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001514
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V6, P127, DOI 10.1080/15732470802663847
   Comes T, 2019, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V4, P124, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2017.1405653
   Cremen G, 2020, EARTH-SCI REV, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103184
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Didier M, 2018, J STRUCT ENG, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002007
   Filiatrault A, 2014, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V13, P17, DOI 10.1007/s11803-014-0238-9
   Franchin P, 2015, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V30, P583, DOI 10.1111/mice.12092
   French EL, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001
   Gatto A, 2020, ECOL ECON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106527
   Girsang AS, 2015, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V26, P313, DOI 10.1007/s00521-014-1630-0
   Gu Y, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.11.003
   Han Z, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12030914
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Ishizaka A, 2011, J OPER RES SOC, V62, P700, DOI 10.1057/jors.2010.23
   Kammouh O, 2018, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V17, P261, DOI 10.1007/s11803-018-0440-2
   Kammouh O, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V198, P985, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.144
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Li XL, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P393, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0109-2
   Liu F, 2009, FUZZY SET SYST, V160, P2686, DOI 10.1016/j.fss.2009.01.010
   Liu Y, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P587, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3142-6
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Lu XZ, 2020, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V36, P806, DOI 10.1177/8755293019891724
   Mazurek J, 2021, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/math9050554
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Pan SJ, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103170
   Saaty T.L., 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI [10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
   SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Saaty TL, 1998, APPL MATH LETT, V11, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0893-9659(98)00068-8
   Salimi M, 2020, ENERGY, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117509
   Sameer DAB, 2011, INT J URBAN SCI, V15, P1, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2011.580148
   Shang QX, 2020, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V19, P811, DOI 10.1007/s11803-020-0597-3
   Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
   Shiwaku K, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P333, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2204-5
   Song JL, 2020, SOC INDIC RES, V148, P189, DOI 10.1007/s11205-019-02188-8
   Tan YS, 2019, IEEE T POWER SYST, V34, P2611, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2898966
   Tao ZR, 2010, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V16, P524, DOI 10.1080/10807031003788634
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wang JH, 2020, IEEE POWER ENERGY M, V18, P17, DOI 10.1109/MPE.2020.2985436
   Xie L., 2006, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, V3, P1
   Xiong C, 2020, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V35, P322, DOI 10.1111/mice.12496
   Xu C, 2013, Q J ENG GEOL HYDROGE, V46, P221, DOI 10.1144/qjegh2012-006
   Yergin Daniel., 2011, The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World
   Yoon DK, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P436, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1016142
   Zhang WL, 2017, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V13, P1404, DOI 10.1080/15732479.2016.1271813
   Zhao YG, 2023, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V30, P3509, DOI 10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0806
   Zhou K, 2020, J GEOGR SCI, V30, P1363, DOI 10.1007/s11442-020-1786-8
NR 62
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 29
U2 29
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1671-3664
EI 1993-503X
J9 EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB
JI Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib.
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 24
IS 1
BP 1
EP 13
DI 10.1007/s11803-025-2294-8
PG 13
WC Engineering, Civil; Engineering, Geological
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA S8T7Z
UT WOS:001400886500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, M
   Jiang, Y
   Wang, ED
   Wang, Y
   Zhang, J
AF Chen, Min
   Jiang, Yu
   Wang, Endong
   Wang, Yi
   Zhang, Jun
TI Measuring Urban Infrastructure Resilience via Pressure-State-Response
   Framework in Four Chinese Municipalities
SO APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE urban infrastructure; resilience; pressure-state-response; Chinese
   Municipalities; temporal differences
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; SYSTEMS; VULNERABILITY; SECURITY; NEED
AB Urban infrastructure (UI), subject to ever-increasing stresses from artificial activities of human beings and natural disasters due to climate change, assumes a key role in modern cities for maintaining their functional operations. Therefore, understanding UI resilience turns essential. Based on the Pressure-State-Response (PSR) model, this paper built a comprehensive evaluation index system for urban infrastructure resilience evaluation. Four municipalities, including Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Chongqing in China, were selected for the case study, given their specific significance in terms of geographical location and urban infrastructure scale. Temporal differences of UI resilience in those four cities during 2002-2018 were explored. The results showed that: (1) The various stages of PSR relative importance for the urban infrastructure resilience development in the four cities were different. The infrastructure status, primarily resource environmental benefit, had the most significant effect on urban infrastructure resilience, accounting for 38.73%. (2) While Shanghai ranked first, the levels of urban infrastructure resilience in four cities were generally poor in 2002-2018 with continuously low resilience. (3) Significant differences were found in the resilience levels associated with the three stages of pressure, state and response failing to form a positive development cycle, with the poorest pressure resilience. This paper puts forward some recommendations for providing scientific support for urban resilient infrastructure development in four municipalities in China.
C1 [Chen, Min; Jiang, Yu; Wang, Yi; Zhang, Jun] Nantong Univ, Sch Transportat & Civil Engn, Nantong 226000, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Endong] SUNY Syracuse, Sustainable Construct Engn Program, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
C3 Nantong University; State University of New York (SUNY) System
RP Jiang, Y; Wang, Y (corresponding author), Nantong Univ, Sch Transportat & Civil Engn, Nantong 226000, Peoples R China.
EM chen.min@ntu.edu.cn; 1933310002@stmail.ntu.edu.cn; ewang01@esf.edu;
   wang12yi@ntu.edu.cn; 13951411616@139.com
RI MIN, CHEN/JCN-7106-2023
OI Wang, Endong/0000-0002-7715-0045; Chen, Min/0000-0002-6197-2159; Wang,
   Yi/0000-0002-9149-9024
FU Ministry of Housing Urban-Rural Development of China [2019K014];
   Practice and Innovation Fund for University Students of Jiangsu Province
   [201910304039Z]
FX This work was supported by the Ministry of Housing Urban-Rural
   Development of China (2019K014) and the Practice and Innovation Fund for
   University Students of Jiangsu Province (201910304039Z).
CR Aldarajee AHM, 2020, ENERGY, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117916
   Birgani YT, 2014, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V8, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2014.04.004
   Brenkert AL, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V72, P57, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5930-3
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Chang SE, 2004, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V20, P739, DOI 10.1193/1.1775796
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Davidson-Hunt I.J., 2004, THESIS U MANITOBA WI
   Deng J., 2021, P 25 INT S ADV CONST, P1477
   Dong QJ, 2010, KYBERNETES, V39, P864, DOI 10.1108/03684921011046627
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Franchin P, 2015, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V30, P583, DOI 10.1111/mice.12092
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Fu J.C, 2014, MOD URBAN RES, V8, P56
   Goldbeck N, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V188, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.007
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gu CL, 2017, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V60, P1067, DOI 10.1007/s11430-016-9022-2
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Haimes YY, 2009, RISK ANAL, V29, P498, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01216.x
   HASHIMOTO T, 1982, WATER RESOUR RES, V18, P14, DOI 10.1029/WR018i001p00014
   Hazbavi Z, 2020, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V31, P3, DOI 10.1002/ldr.3420
   Hollnagel E., 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
   Huang J., 2018, URBAN RESILIENCE ASS
   Huck A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008
   Jackson S., 2010, DOMPREP J
   Kamyar S.V, 2019, INT J URBAN MANAG EN, V2, P30
   Kaur M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120897
   Koski C, 2015, AM REV PUBLIC ADM, V45, P327, DOI 10.1177/0275074013494754
   [Linster M. OECD. OECD.], 2003, OECD ENV INDICATORS
   Lirn T.-C., 2004, MARITIME EC LOGISTIC, V6, P70, DOI DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.MEL.9100093
   Maurya SP, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105691
   McDaniels T, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Min C., 2012, URBAN PROBLEMS, P15
   Omer M, 2009, IEEE SYST J, V3, P295, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2022570
   Pandit A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS19, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.010
   Pei L, 2010, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V2, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.094
   Peterson G, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P6, DOI 10.1007/s100219900002
   Radvanovsky R., 2018, Critical infrastructure: homeland security and emergency preparedness
   Sahoo MM, 2017, EUR J ENVIRON CIV EN, V21, P730, DOI 10.1080/19648189.2016.1150895
   Shuo S., 2020, CHINA REAL ESTATE, V27, P31
   Sun WJ, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P168, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663
   Sun Y, 2018, MATH PROBL ENG, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/8280328
   Tao ZM, 2019, MATH PROBL ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/8206902
   Twumasi-Boakye R, 2019, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V15, P455, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2018.1504832
   Vugrin ED, 2011, PROCESS SAF PROG, V30, P280, DOI 10.1002/prs.10437
   Wang DL, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105701
   Wang JH, 2015, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V51, P614, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12315
   Wang JH, 2020, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106381
   Wei SM, 2020, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V26, P782, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2018.1536521
   Wu H.T., 2016, Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev, V1, P19
   Xiao W, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105843
   [徐伟 Xu Wei], 2004, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V13, P9
   Yang W, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106965
   Yao S., 2012, HUM GEOGR, V27, P48
   Yodo N, 2016, J MECH DESIGN, V138, DOI 10.1115/1.4034223
   [虞继进 Yu Jijin], 2013, [国土资源遥感, Remote Sensing for Land & Resources], V25, P143
   Zhang KM, 2008, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V88, P1249, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.019
   Zhang Y, 2020, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2020.102894
NR 59
TC 30
Z9 31
U1 34
U2 259
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2076-3417
J9 APPL SCI-BASEL
JI Appl. Sci.-Basel
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 6
AR 2819
DI 10.3390/app12062819
PG 19
WC Chemistry, Multidisciplinary; Engineering, Multidisciplinary; Materials
   Science, Multidisciplinary; Physics, Applied
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Chemistry; Engineering; Materials Science; Physics
GA 0D5DV
UT WOS:000776016700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jiang, NN
   Jiang, W
   Wang, YF
   Zhang, JN
AF Jiang, Nana
   Jiang, Wei
   Wang, Yanfei
   Zhang, Jinning
TI Impact of financial reform on urban resilience: Evidence from the
   financial reform pilot zones in China
SO SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE Financial reform; Urban resilience; Technological innovation; Industrial
   agglomeration; DID method
ID INNOVATION
AB Financial reform serves as a crucial measure for implementing structural reforms in the supply side of finance, with the aim of improving the financial system and financial services. Undoubtedly, it can enhance the competitiveness and sustainable development capabilities of cities. However, little is known about whether and how the financial reform pilots (FRPs) implemented in China since 2012 have affected urban resilience. Therefore, this paper treats FRPs as a quasi-natural experiment and uses the DID model to investigate the impact of financial reforms on urban resilience. Subsequently, heterogeneity effects, transmission mechanisms, spatial spillover effects and superimposed policy effects are also further discussed. Empirical results demonstrate that: (1) FRPs can enhance urban resilience and this fact has been confirmed by various robustness tests. (2) Regarding sub-resilience, FRPs can substantially improve economic, social, and infrastructure resilience without any obvious effect on ecological resilience. (3) Technological innovation and industrial agglomeration are vital channels through which FRPs affect urban resilience; and the resilience-enhancing effects of FRPs are more prominent in core cities, cities with advanced development of internet finance, and higher levels of marketization. (4) FRPs exhibit positive spatial spillover effects and enhance the resilience of surrounding cities. Meanwhile, FRPs and broadband China pilots (BCPs) have a positive cumulative effect on improving urban resilience. Overall, this paper illuminates the importance of financial reform in fostering urban resilience, and provides valuable recommendations for financial reform and the development of resilient cities.
C1 [Jiang, Nana; Wang, Yanfei] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China.
   [Jiang, Wei] Ocean Univ China, Sch Econ, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Jinning] Shandong Univ, Sch Business, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China.
C3 Shandong University; Ocean University of China; Shandong University
RP Jiang, NN (corresponding author), Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan 250100, Peoples R China.; Jiang, W (corresponding author), Ocean Univ China, Sch Econ, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China.
EM jiangnanasd1995@163.com; 17863811281@163.com
RI zhang, jinning/ABK-0531-2022
OI Jiang, Wei/0000-0002-1566-6986
CR Abrardi L, 2023, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102480
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Ang JB, 2014, J BANK FINANC, V47, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.07.007
   Ang JB, 2010, J MACROECON, V32, P457, DOI 10.1016/j.jmacro.2009.06.002
   Beck T, 2010, J FINANC, V65, P1637, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01589.x
   Boikos S, 2023, J INT MONEY FINANC, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2023.102820
   Brown JR, 2009, J FINANC, V64, P151, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01431.x
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Cui ZZ, 2023, J RURAL STUD, V99, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.03.007
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Deng X, 2021, Economist, P71
   Ding J, 2022, ENERG ECON, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106156
   Du MF, 2023, ENERG ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106769
   Du YA, 2023, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102709
   Fang HS, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101866
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Feng Y, 2023, ECON ANAL POLICY, V77, P581, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.020
   Gatto A, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10860
   Glaeser EL, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P3, DOI 10.1177/00420980211052230
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Guo Q, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122003
   Hong L, 2023, FINANC RES LETT, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103730
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Huang X, 2023, Urban Probl, P49
   Huang YP, 2017, ASIAN ECON POLICY R, V12, P188, DOI 10.1111/aepr.12173
   Jiang KQ, 2022, J INT FINANC MARK I, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101535
   Jiang NN, 2023, SUSTAIN DEV, V31, P698, DOI 10.1002/sd.2413
   Jiao LD, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101543
   Klapper L, 2020, FINANC MANAGE, V49, P589, DOI 10.1111/fima.12283
   Laing J, 2023, Financ Econ Res, V38, P39
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li AY, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102828
   Li GZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110667
   Li KF, 2021, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101613
   Li Q, 2023, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102081
   Liu B., 2022, Economic Perspectives, V9, P71
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu WY, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105109
   Liu XP, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106264
   Liu YH, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101591
   Lu FZ, 2023, INT REV ECON FINANC, V88, P1272, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.036
   Luo Q, 2022, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102440
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Blanco JMM, 2017, INT J MANPOWER, V38, P661, DOI 10.1108/IJM-11-2015-0196
   Naeem K, 2019, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V62, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2019.01.003
   Nielsen TAS, 2015, RES TRANSP ECON, V51, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.07.003
   Niu G, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101853
   Niu RY, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V89, P855, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.104
   Osei-Kyei R, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102316
   Qin CY, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V407, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137174
   Sakyi-Nyarko C, 2022, J DEV STUD, V58, P692, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2021.2013467
   Schintler LA, 2022, J URBAN MANAG, V11, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi YF, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15129250
   Tang C, 2022, TECHNOL SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101963
   Tang DC, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104621
   Tang Y., 2022, China Industrial Economics, V10, P62, DOI DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2022.10.004
   Tian Y, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21087
   Trenca I, 2015, PROC ECON FINANC, V32, P1391, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01516-6
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Veil SR, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P721, DOI 10.1111/risa.12130
   Wang FH, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104436
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   Wang J, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118133
   Wang KL, 2023, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101607
   Wang X, 2022, J MARKETING, V86, P155, DOI 10.1177/00222429211047822
   Xi QM, 2021, CHINA ECON REV, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101558
   Xie W, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P1306, DOI 10.1111/risa.12948
   Xu Y, 2022, J INNOV KNOWL, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100195
   Ye CS, 2022, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V3, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.004
   Yu ZH, 2023, FINANC RES LETT, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103920
   Zha DL, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113782
   Zhang HX, 2019, EMERG MARK FINANC TR, V55, P2298, DOI 10.1080/1540496X.2018.1526668
   Zhang H, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V330, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117196
   Zhang MM, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V321, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115873
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   Zhang XF, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101364
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhong WQ, 2021, FINANC RES LETT, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101731
   Zhou BL, 2023, ASIAN J TECHNOL INNO, V31, P137, DOI 10.1080/19761597.2021.2022985
   Zhou L, 2020, Collect Essays Finance Econ, P43
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
NR 86
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 35
U2 53
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0038-0121
EI 1873-6041
J9 SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI
JI Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 94
AR 101962
DI 10.1016/j.seps.2024.101962
EA JUN 2024
PG 17
WC Economics; Management; Operations Research & Management Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Operations Research & Management Science
GA UT7Z1
UT WOS:001250387400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Meerow, S
   Stults, M
AF Meerow, Sara
   Stults, Melissa
TI Comparing Conceptualizations of Urban Climate Resilience in Theory and
   Practice
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; resilience; urban resilience; resilient city; climate
   resilience; adaptation
ID ADAPTATION; MITIGATION; POLICY; CITY; MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGY; SYSTEMS;
   CITIES; PLANS
AB In the face of climate change, scholars and policymakers are increasingly concerned with fostering "urban resilience". This paper seeks to contribute towards a better understanding of synergies and differences in how academics and local decision-makers think about resilience in the context of climate change. We compare definitions and characteristics of urban climate resilience in the academic literature with a survey of 134 local government representatives from across the U.S. Our analysis shows discrepancies in how academics and practitioners define and characterize urban climate resilience, most notably in their focus on either "bouncing back" or "bouncing forward" after a disturbance. Practitioners have diverse understandings of the concept, but tend to favor potentially problematic "bouncing back" or engineering-based definitions of resilience. While local government respondents confirm the importance of all 16 resilience characteristics we identified in the academic literature, coding practitioners' free response definitions reveals that they rarely mention qualities commonly associated with resilience in the scholarly literature such as diversity, flexibility, and redundancy. These inconsistencies need to be resolved to ensure both the usability of climate resilience research and the effectiveness of resilience policy.
C1 [Meerow, Sara; Stults, Melissa] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
   [Stults, Melissa] Unviers Michigan, Urban & Reg Planning, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
   [Stults, Melissa] Climate Resilience Fund, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan
RP Meerow, S (corresponding author), Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
EM sameerow@umich.edu; missy.stults@gmail.com
RI Meerow, Sara/J-8037-2019
OI Meerow, Sara/0000-0002-6935-1832
FU Kresge Foundation
FX This research was supported with funding from the Kresge Foundation.
CR Adger W. N., 2003, Progress in Development Studies, V3, P179, DOI 10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
   Adger WN, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P757, DOI 10.1002/wcc.133
   Adger WN, 2005, CR GEOSCI, V337, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2004.11.004
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   [Anonymous], 2010, STRENGTHENING CLIMAT
   Bahadur AV, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.004
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419
   Berke P, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P1, DOI 10.3390/su3010001
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Brown K., 2012, Climate change and the crisis of capitalism: A chance to reclaim self, society and nature, P37, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203146118
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dilling L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   dos Santos FT, 2011, EUR PLAN STUD, V19, P1517, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.533515
   Eraydin A., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, V106, P39, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8
   Eraydin Ayda., 2013, Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, P17
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Fu XY, 2013, CITIES, V32, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.001
   Garmestani AS, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05180-180109
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Henstra D, 2012, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V14, P175, DOI 10.1080/13876988.2012.665215
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, ENG ECOLOGICAL CONST, V1st, DOI 10.17226/4919
   Hunt A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6
   Huq Saleemul., 2005, Adaptation to climate change: A paper for the International Climate Change Taskforce
   Jabareen Y., 2015, THE RISK CITY
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kawakami A., 2007, FUNDAMENTAL ISSUEE, P226
   Klein R.J., 2003, BUILDING SAFER CITIE, P101
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lemos M.C., 2013, Climate Science for Serving Society: Research, Modeling and Prediction Priorities, P437, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_16, 10.1007/978-94-007-6692-1_16]
   Lhomme S., 2013, Resilience and Urban Risk Management, P109
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   McDaniels T, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
   McEvoy D, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P280, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787710
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   Meerow Sara., 2016, Urban Geography
   Muller M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P99, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076726
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Nordgren J., 2016, ENV SCI POLICY
   Olsson P, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06799-190401
   Pearson AL, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V91, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.046
   Quay R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P496, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2010.508428
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Schrock G, 2015, J PLAN EDUC RES, V35, P282, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15580022
   Shaw K., 2012, PUBLIC POLICY ADM
   STAR SL, 1989, SOC STUD SCI, V19, P387, DOI 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Stone B, 2012, CITY AND THE COMING CLIMATE: CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE PLACES WE LIVE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139061353
   Stumpp EM, 2013, CITIES, V32, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.003
   Tanner T., 2009, Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities
   Termeer C., 2013, CLIM CHANG GOV, P9
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Turner MD, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P616, DOI 10.1177/0309132513502770
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vogel C, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Walker B, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Zhu JM, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V122, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.052
NR 79
TC 102
Z9 121
U1 17
U2 174
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUL
PY 2016
VL 8
IS 7
AR 701
DI 10.3390/su8070701
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DS4OM
UT WOS:000380760400108
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fernández, IC
   Manuel-Navarrete, D
   Torres-Salinas, R
AF Fernandez, Ignacio C.
   Manuel-Navarrete, David
   Torres-Salinas, Robinson
TI Breaking Resilient Patterns of Inequality in Santiago de Chile:
   Challenges to Navigate towards a More Sustainable City
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE inequalities; uneven development; segregation; resilience;
   transformability; sustainable development
ID RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION; GATED COMMUNITIES; LATIN-AMERICA; SCHOOL
   CHOICE; CITIES; TRANSFORMATION; SYSTEMS; POLICY; NEOLIBERALISM;
   ADAPTABILITY
AB Resilience can have desirable and undesirable consequences. Thus, resilience should not be viewed as a normative desirable goal, but as a descriptor of complex systems dynamics. From this perspective, we apply resilience thinking concepts to assess the dynamics of inequality, spatial segregation, and sustainability in Chile's capital city of Santiago. Chile's economy boosted since democracy was restored in 1990, but continuity of neoliberal reforms and transformations of Pinochet's dictatorship (1973-1990) seem to have locked Chilean cities in resilient, albeit unsustainable, patterns of uneven development. Socio-economic data from Santiago shows highly resilient patterns of urban inequality and segregation from 1992 to 2009 despite democratic efforts, political agendas and discourses packed with calls for reducing poverty and inequality. We present a conceptual model based on the notion of stability landscapes to explore potential trade-offs between resilience and sustainable development. We mapped Santiago's spatio-temporal inequality trends and explored if these patterns support an inequality-resilience stability landscape. Analysis of temporal and spatial distribution of development assets across four human development dimensions (i.e., income, education, health, democracy) revealed potential socio-political and spatial feedbacks supporting the resilience of inequality and segregation in Santiago. We argue that urban sustainability may require breaking this resilience, a process where bottom-up stressors such as social movements could play a key role.
C1 [Fernandez, Ignacio C.; Manuel-Navarrete, David] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
   [Torres-Salinas, Robinson] Univ Concepcion, Fac Environm Sci, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion 4070386, Chile.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Universidad de
   Concepcion
RP Fernández, IC (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
EM ignacio.fernandez@asu.edu; davidmn@asu.edu; torres.robinson@gmail.com
RI Manuel-Navarrete, David/LDF-0124-2024; Torres-Salinas,
   Robinson/GVS-9540-2022
OI Fernandez, Ignacio/0000-0002-3631-9932; Torres-Salinas,
   Robinson/0000-0001-8673-4141
FU United States National Science Foundation [1444755]; Chilean National
   Commission for Scientific and Technological Research Grant
   [FONDAP/15130015]
FX This material is based upon work supported by the United States National
   Science Foundation under Grant Number 1444755, and Chilean National
   Commission for Scientific and Technological Research Grant
   FONDAP/15130015. We would also like to thanks Cristian Massad, from
   Ecomabi Foundation, for his help processing data from CASEN survey.
CR Agostini Claudio A., 2010, Estudios Publicos, P219
   Alkire S, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P181, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7
   Alves F, 2015, INT J EDUC DEV, V41, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.12.004
   [Anonymous], 2006, ECOL SOC
   [Anonymous], Statistics from A to Z
   [Anonymous], 2015, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   [Anonymous], 2006, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
   [Anonymous], EURE
   [Anonymous], INDICE CALIDAD VIDA
   [Anonymous], THESIS
   Azócar G, 2007, LAND USE POLICY, V24, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.04.003
   Bebbington A.J., 2008, Institutional pathways to equity: Addressing inequality traps
   Borsdorf A, 2008, LAND USE POLICY, V25, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.04.001
   Borsdorf A, 2007, CITIES, V24, P365, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.002
   Borsdorf A, 2016, HABITAT INT, V54, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.033
   Brain Isabel., 2007, Temas de la Agenda Publica, V2, P1
   CEPAL, STAT IND
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Contreras D., 2012, Falling Inequality in Latin America
   Corvaln Alejandro, 2015, CONDICIONANTES PARTI
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Davidson DJ, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P1135, DOI 10.1080/08941921003652940
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Derissen S, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003
   Dockemdorff E, 2000, ENVIRON URBAN, V12, P171, DOI 10.1177/095624780001200112
   Elacqua G, 2012, INT J EDUC DEV, V32, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.003
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Escobedo FJ, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V90, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.021
   Ferreiro S., 2012, SEN C NAC CHIL VALP
   Ffrench-Davis R., 2002, EC REFORMS CHILE DIC, P2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Goic A, 2015, REV MED CHILE, V143, P774, DOI 10.4067/S0034-98872015000600011
   Grant Ursula., 2010, SPATIAL INEQUALITY U
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Harvey D, 2008, SPACES NEOLIBERALIZA
   Hölzl C, 2014, PLAN PRACT RES, V29, P21, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.872895
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holst J., 2004, J PUBLIC HLTH, V12, P271, DOI 10.1007/s10389-004-0026-5
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Johnston R, 2011, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V102, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00577.x
   Kay JJ, 1999, FUTURES, V31, P721, DOI 10.1016/S0016-3287(99)00029-4
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Livert Aquino F, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P5876, DOI 10.3390/su6095876
   Manuel-Navarrete D, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P558, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.012
   Manuel-Navarrete D, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07720-200326
   Manuel-Navarrete D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.009
   Manzi J.S., 2008, Quality of Education in Chile
   Marans RW, 2015, HABITAT INT, V45, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.019
   Mayol A.Azocar., 2011, POLIS, Revista Latinoamericana, V10, P163
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   MINVU; PNUD, 2014, POL NAC DES URB
   Murray WE, 2011, PROG DEV STUD, V11, P307, DOI 10.1177/146499341001100403
   Olavarria-Gambi M., 2012, TEKHNE, V10, P39
   Orellana Ossandón Arturo Maximiliano, 2013, Revista INVI, V28, P17
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Peña MA, 2008, INT J REMOTE SENS, V29, P4385, DOI 10.1080/01431160801908137
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Posner PW, 2012, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V36, P49, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01059.x
   Pressacco Carlos Fabián, 2012, Pap.polit., V17, P85
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Rodriguez A., 2004, SANTIAGO GLOBALIZACI, P115
   Rodríguez A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P359, DOI 10.1177/0956247814542723
   Romero H, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V23, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.012
   Ruiz-Tagle J, 2014, EURE, V40, P25, DOI 10.4067/S0250-71612014000100002
   Sabatini F, 2009, URBAN SEGREGATION AND GOVERNANCE IN THE AMERICAS, P121
   Sánchez RH, 2004, REV MED CHILE, V132, P453
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   SCARPACI JL, 1988, URBAN GEOGR, V9, P19, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.9.1.19
   Scheffer M, 2001, NATURE, V413, P591, DOI 10.1038/35098000
   Sharma P., 2014, Nepal human development report 2014
   Smith Neil., 1982, Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space
   Solimano A., 2009, UNU WIDER WORKING PA
   Solimano A., 2011, Prosperity without equality: the Chilean Experience after the Pinochet Regime
   Solimano A., 2015, RED ESTUDIOS PROFUND
   Solt F, 2008, AM J POLIT SCI, V52, P48, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
   Stromquist NP, 2013, INT STUD SOCIOL EDUC, V23, P152, DOI 10.1080/09620214.2013.790662
   Torche F, 2005, SOCIOL EDUC, V78, P316, DOI 10.1177/003804070507800403
   UN-HABITAT, 2014, CONSTR MOR EQ CIT PU
   UNDP, 1990, Human Development Report 1990
   *UNDP, 2002, HUM DEV REP 2002 DEP
   Unger JP, 2008, PLOS MED, V5, P542, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050079
   Urzua S., 2012, Estudios Publicos, V125, P1
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Valencia M. A., 2008, REV DISENO URBANO PA, V5, P1
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wu J., 2007, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P211
NR 89
TC 27
Z9 27
U1 3
U2 61
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD AUG
PY 2016
VL 8
IS 8
AR 820
DI 10.3390/su8080820
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA DU8HC
UT WOS:000382452900119
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Meng, ZR
   He, MX
   Li, XM
   Li, HY
   Tan, YD
   Li, Z
   Wei, Y
AF Meng, Zirui
   He, Mengxuan
   Li, Xuemei
   Li, Hongyuan
   Tan, Yidan
   Li, Zhen
   Wei, Yuan
TI Spatio-temporal analysis and driving forces of urban ecosystem
   resilience based on land use: A case study in the Great Bay Area
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Resistance-adaption-elasticity; Ecosystem resilience; Driving factors
ID HEALTH; SERVICES; CITY
AB Ecosystem resilience plays a vital role for security and resilience in the urban system which experiences the combined effects of anthropogenic activities and natural disasters. Nonetheless, there is currently no unified indicator for assessing urban resilience. Therefore, this study aims to examine the changes of ecosystem resilience in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area (GBA) based on land use, using the framework of resistance, adaption, and elasticity. The study's results revealed that between 2000 and 2020, the increase in ecosystem resilience in peripheral GBA cities outpaced the decrease in central cities, leading to a yearly rise in overall ecosystem resilience. Nighttime light (NL), population density (PD), urbanization rate (UR), and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were the primary driving factors influencing resistance and elasticity resilience in the GBA, thereby shaping overall ecosystem resilience. Findings from the multi-scale geographical weighted regression (MGWR) analysis demonstrated that ecosystem resilience decreased as NL, PD, and UR increased, while it exhibited an increase in areas with higher NDVI. This study contributes to the improvement of urban resilience in cities by providing targeted strategies, expediting the development of resilient cities, and offering theoretical insights for land management, urban planning, and policy formulation.
C1 [Meng, Zirui; Li, Xuemei; Tan, Yidan; Wei, Yuan] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China.
   [He, Mengxuan] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300382, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Hongyuan] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Zhen] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Environm, Key Lab Microbial Technol Ind Pollut Control Zheji, Hangzhou 310014, Peoples R China.
C3 Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences; Tianjin Normal
   University; Nankai University; Zhejiang University of Technology
RP Wei, Y (corresponding author), Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China.
EM craes_wy_team@163.com
RI Meng, Zirui/IAP-3368-2023
OI Meng, Zirui/0000-0002-2648-8417
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171853, 41977294];
   National Key Research and Devel- opment Program [2020YFC1807704];
   Special fund project for environ- mental protection of Guangdong
   province [2022-18, 2023- 12]; Youth Foundation of Tianjin Natural
   Science Foundation [22JCQNJC01430]
FX This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (32171853 and 41977294) , National Key Research and Devel- opment
   Program (2020YFC1807704) , Special fund project for environ- mental
   protection of Guangdong province (NO. 2022-18 and NO. 2023- 12) , and
   Youth Foundation of Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (22JCQNJC01430) .
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Antonelli A, 2018, NAT GEOSCI, V11, P718, DOI 10.1038/s41561-018-0236-z
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Christina G., 2019, Behav. Public Policy, V5, P378
   Contestabile M, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P464, DOI 10.1038/s41893-021-00703-9
   Crenna E, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V227, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.054
   Fan Yulong, 2020, Acta Ecologica Sinica, V40, P6729
   Fotheringham AS, 2017, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V107, P1247, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1352480
   Gong CF, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V117, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.009
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Jiang L, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V397, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136485
   Kelson SJ, 2020, MOL ECOL, V29, P870, DOI 10.1111/mec.15367
   Lambin EF, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P3465, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1100480108
   Li QR, 2022, SUSTAIN SCI, V17, P1873, DOI 10.1007/s11625-022-01116-z
   Li ZQ, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1500, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2019.1704680
   Liao X, 2022, APPL GEOGR, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102806
   Liao ZJ, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-33342-5
   Luo JJ, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V96, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.05.012
   Mansour S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102627
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meng ZR, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V899, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165677
   Peng J, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V72, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.024
   Peng J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007
   Razzaghmanesh M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.013
   Sajid Z, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111574
   Speranza CI, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P521, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0391-5
   Tan MH, 2008, HABITAT INT, V32, P471, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.003
   Tschakert P, 2007, AGR SYST, V94, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.07.010
   [王劲峰 Wang Jinfeng], 2017, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V72, P116
   [王效科 Wang Xiaoke], 2020, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V40, P5093
   Wei RF, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V882, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163555
   Woolway RI, 2021, NATURE, V589, P402, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-03119-1
   [谢高地 Xie Gaodi], 2015, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V30, P1243
   Xue Fei, 2023, Acta Ecologica Sinica, V43, P6810
   Yang BY, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P24737, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17482-7
   Yang JL, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V233, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111395
   Yu GM, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V44, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.010
   Zhang D, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106841
   Zhang T, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118129
   Zhao X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128880
   Zhao Z, 2021, NAT GEOSCI, V14, P479, DOI 10.1038/s41561-021-00763-8
   Zhu CM, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106654
   Zhu JY, 2020, BMC PLANT BIOL, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12870-020-02359-7
   Zhu SY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109959
   Zou WY, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P242, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-22159-w
NR 48
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 54
U2 105
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 159
AR 111769
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111769
EA FEB 2024
PG 11
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NL0U4
UT WOS:001200500500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rogers, CDF
AF Rogers, Chris D. F.
TI Engineering future liveable, resilient, sustainable cities using
   foresight
SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CIVIL ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE infrastructure planning; sustainability; town & city planning
ID URBAN REGENERATION; DECISION-MAKING; INFRASTRUCTURE; UK
AB This paper shows how civil engineers can build better cities through a deeper understanding of the future benefits, resilience and value of their proposed urban infrastructure solutions. Three practical, foresight-based assessment methods are introduced and, for the first time, combined into a coherent design process founded on systems thinking. Based on data derived from a portfolio of research programmes, the University of Birmingham's 2014 Future Urban Living report and the findings from the UK government's Foresight Future of Cities project, they represent a synthesis of 15 years of research into sustainable, resilient and liveable cities. The three scenario-based methods provide a robust way for civil engineers to determine the likely performance and value of any future urban infrastructure scheme.
C1 [Rogers, Chris D. F.] Univ Birmingham, Geotech Engn, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
   [Rogers, Chris D. F.] Univ Birmingham, UKCRIC Natl Buried Infrastruct Facil, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
C3 University of Birmingham; University of Birmingham
RP Rogers, CDF (corresponding author), Univ Birmingham, Geotech Engn, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.; Rogers, CDF (corresponding author), Univ Birmingham, UKCRIC Natl Buried Infrastruct Facil, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
RI Rogers, Christopher/AAE-2395-2020
OI Rogers, Christopher/0000-0002-1693-1999
FU EPSRC [GR/S20482, EP/C513177, EP/E021603, EP/F007426, EP/I016133,
   EP/J017698, EP/K012699, EP/K012398, EP/N010523, EP/P002021]; EPSRC
   [EP/K021699/1, EP/I016163/1, EP/P002021/1, EP/J017698/1, EP/F007426/1,
   EP/E021603/1, EP/N010523/1, EP/K012398/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the EPSRC
   under grant numbers GR/S20482, EP/C513177 and EP/E021603 (Birmingham
   Eastside Regeneration - Sustainable Urban Redevelopment), EP/F007426
   (Urban Futures), EP/I016133 (Resilience of Critical Local Transport and
   Utility Infrastructures), EP/J017698 (Liveable Cities), EP/K012699
   (Assessing the Underworld), EP/K012398 (iBUILD), EP/N010523
   (Self-Repairing Cities) and EP/P002021 (Urban Living Birmingham), and
   the inspiration, knowledge and wisdom passed on by all those with whom
   he has worked in these research grants. He also gratefully acknowledges
   the members of the ICE Futures Group, with whom many interesting debates
   have been had.
CR Ainger C M., 2014, Sustainable infrastructure: principles into practice, DOI [10.1680/sipp.57548, DOI 10.1680/SIPP.57548]
   [Anonymous], 2004, Future risks and their drivers
   [Anonymous], 2009, CENTURY AHEAD 4 GLOB
   [Anonymous], 2015, ASPIRATIONAL CITY FU
   Bouch CJ, 2017, P INT S NEXT GEN INF
   Bruntland GroHarlem ., 1987, Our Common Future
   Cavada M, 2014, SCIFORUM ELECT C SER
   Cavada M, 2016, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V169, P243, DOI 10.1680/jensu.15.00032
   Clift R., 2015, URBAN METABOLISM REV
   Dawson R, 2014, INFRASTRUCT ASSET MA, V1, P66, DOI 10.1680/iasma.14.00027
   Dunn N., 2014, A visual history of the future
   EPSRC, 2017, LIV ENV CHANG
   EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council), 2017, EPSRC REV SUE ARCC P
   Evans E., 2004, Foresight. Future Flooding. Scientific Summary: Volume 2- Managing future risks, V2
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT ASP SCEN
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT URB FORM INF
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT EC SERV
   GOfS, 2017, FUT OF CIT
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT OV EV
   GOfS, 2017, FOR PROJ
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT FOR CIT
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT URB MET
   GOfS, 2017, FUT CIT UK SCEN
   GOfS (Government Office for Science), 2017, FUT CIT SCI CIT
   Hall J., 2016, FUTURE NATL INFRASTR
   Hall JW, 2014, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000196
   Hall JW, 2013, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V166, P249, DOI 10.1680/ensu.12.00028
   Hayes R, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V165, P193, DOI 10.1680/muen.12.00004
   Hojjati A, 2018, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V171, P68, DOI 10.1680/jensu.16.00050
   Hunt DV, 2008, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V161, P77, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.77
   Hunt DVL, 2014, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V39, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.001
   Hunt D.V.L., 2008, GEOTECHNICAL SPECIAL, V178, P859
   Hunt DVL, 2013, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V166, P258, DOI 10.1680/ensu.12.00040
   Hunt DVL, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P740, DOI 10.3390/su4040740
   Hunt DVL, 2015, ASP CIT FUT 3 MOD CI
   Hunt DVL, 2012, DESIGNING RESILIENT
   iBUILD, 2017, VAL INFR C
   Leach JM, 2011, SUSTAINABLE URBAN EN
   Leach JM, 2013, P INT S NEXT GEN INF, P397
   Leach JM., 2016, Int. J. Complex. Appl. Sci. Technol, V1, P86, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJCAST.2016.081296
   Leach JM, 2014, P I CIVIL ENG MANAGE, V168, P30
   Leach JM, 2017, CITIES, V71, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.016
   Leach JM, 2017, DATA BRIEF, V15, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2017.10.004
   Leonard Annie., 2010, STORY STUFF OUR OBSE
   Lombardi D. R., 2012, DESIGNING RESILIENT
   Lombardi DR, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN B, V38, P1105, DOI 10.1068/b36161
   Lombardi DR, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P273, DOI 10.1177/0042098009360690
   Mair R., 2015, How Will City Infrastructure and Sensors Be Made Smart? Cambridge Centre for Smart Infrastructure and Construction
   McGregor A, 2003, P US GREEN BUILD C P, P1
   Pearce OJD, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V165, P129, DOI 10.1680/ensu.9.00064
   Purnell P, 2015, WHAT WILL CITIES FUT
   Raskin P, 1998, 8 POLESTAR STOCKH EN, V8
   Raskin P, 2002, 10 POLESTAR STOCKH E, V10
   Raskin Paul D., 2010, Sustainability, V2, P2626, DOI 10.3390/su2082626
   Raskin PD, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P133, DOI 10.1007/s10021-004-0074-2
   Ravetz J., 2015, Future of the Urban Environment Ecosystem Services in the UK. Future of Cities Foresight programme
   RCUK (Research Councils UK), 2017, URB LIV PARTN
   Rogers C., 2017, RETROFITTING CITIES, P139
   Rogers C. D. F., 2014, The Changing American Family and Public Policy
   Rogers CDF, 2017, P I CIVIL ENG WASTE, V166, P49
   Rogers CDF, 2008, IMPLEMENTING SUSTAIN
   Rogers CDF, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V165, P5, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2012.165.1.5
   Rogers CDF, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V165, P73, DOI 10.1680/muen.11.00030
   University of Birmingham, 2017, POL COMM FUT URB LIV
NR 64
TC 41
Z9 42
U1 3
U2 51
PU ICE PUBLISHING
PI WESTMINISTER
PA INST CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1 GREAT GEORGE ST, WESTMINISTER SW 1P 3AA, ENGLAND
SN 0965-089X
J9 P I CIVIL ENG-CIV EN
JI Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Civil Eng.
PD NOV
PY 2018
VL 171
IS 6
SI SI
BP 3
EP 9
DI 10.1680/jcien.17.00031
PG 7
WC Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA GW6HF
UT WOS:000447053300002
OA hybrid, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tedeschi, G
AF Tedeschi, Giovanni
TI Integrating Urban Energy Resilience in Strategic Urban Planning:
   Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans and Urban Plans in Three
   Case Studies in Italy
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE urban planning tools; resilient city; sustainability; SECAPs
ID CITIES; ADAPTATION; POLICIES; IMPACTS
AB Contemporary cities are facing many challenges, from social and economic issues to the new risks related to the impacts of climate change. Focusing on energy consumptions, and the related GHG emissions, cities are considered not only the main global contributors but also the areas most exposed to risks, because of their density of population and economic activities. Implementing urban planning strategies with the purpose of increasing energy efficiency and resilience overall, is, for all these reasons, considered a top priority. This paper investigates the innovative content related to the energy-efficient and energy-resilient urban planning solutions that have started to be implemented in the cities of the Emilia-Romagna region. Two kinds of planning instruments are therefore analysed: the voluntary Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs) and the mandatory General Urban Plans (GUPs), recently approved in several cities of Emilia-Romagna. A comparative analysis of three cities in the Emilia-Romagna region, Bologna, Modena, and Ravenna is proposed, looking at the strategies of their new local city plans and SECAPs with a focus on energy management and planning. The aim is to assess whether the new structure of local city plans and the influence of SECAPs could be useful in implementing such urban-energy resiliency solutions.
C1 [Tedeschi, Giovanni] Univ Parma, Dept Engn & Architecture, Parco Area Sci 181-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy.
C3 University of Parma
RP Tedeschi, G (corresponding author), Univ Parma, Dept Engn & Architecture, Parco Area Sci 181-A, I-43124 Parma, Italy.
EM giovanni.tedeschi@unipr.it
RI Tedeschi, Giovanni/LTF-0464-2024
OI Tedeschi, Giovanni/0000-0002-8854-9721
CR Abis E, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P139, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1031091
   Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2021, Climate Emergency Action Plan for 2030
   Alagna F., 2021, Archivio Studi Urbani e Regionali, V131, P23
   [Anonymous], ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability, Canada
   [Anonymous], C40 Cities Annual Report 2021
   [Anonymous], 1992, United Nations-UN Agenda 21
   [Anonymous], 1992, UNITED NATIONSUNCONF
   [Anonymous], 2007, Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius
   [Anonymous], 2008, Environmental Outlook to 2030, DOI [10.1787/9789264040519-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264040519-EN]
   [Anonymous], 2015, UN FRAMEWORK CONVENT
   Betsill MM, 2006, GLOBAL GOV, V12, P141, DOI 10.1163/19426720-01202004
   BOLLEN J., 2009, Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Literature Review and New Results
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Chen DL, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12050945
   Clerici M.A., 2017, Commercio, Consumo e Citta: Quaderno di Lavoro
   Comune di Bologna, I Numeri di Bologna Metropolitana
   Comune di Mantova, 2020, Piano d'Azione per l'Energia Sostenibile ed il Clima (PAESC)
   Comune di Milano, 2022, Piano Aria e Clima
   Comune di Ravenna, Statistica Popolazione Residente
   De Pascali P., 2021, Arch. Studi Urbani Reg, V131, P5, DOI [10.3280/ASUR2021-131-S1001, DOI 10.3280/ASUR2021-131-S1001]
   De Pascali P., 2021, ARCH STUDI URBANI RE, V131, P2021, DOI [10.3280/ASUR2021-131-S1004, DOI 10.3280/ASUR2021-131-S1004]
   Dodman D., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, V1, P907
   European Commission, 2018, Joint Research Centre. EntreComp into Action: Get Inspired
   European Commission Joint Research CentreJRC, 2018, How to Develop a Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plan (SECAP), DOI [10.2760/223399, DOI 10.2760/223399]
   European Environment Agency, 2012, Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe: challenges and opportunities for cities together with supportive national and European policies, DOI [10.2800/41895, DOI 10.2800/41895]
   European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2006, ESPON. ESPON 1.4.1The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Towns (SMESTO)
   European Union, European Green Leaf Award
   Eurotowns, The Network of Medium-Sized Cities in Europe
   Filpa A., 2014, Il Clima Cambia la Citta. Strategie di Adattamento e Mitigazione Nella Pianificazione Urbanistica
   Grafakos S., 2018, Climate Change and Cities eds, P101
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Heidrich O, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V168, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
   Henstra D, 2012, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V14, P175, DOI 10.1080/13876988.2012.665215
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hurlimann A, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105188
   International Energy Agency IEA, Net Zero Cities, DOI [10.1787/7a222c8b-en, DOI 10.1787/7A222C8B-EN]
   Juhola S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006
   Kumar A., 2020, Techniques for disaster risk management and mitigation, P33, DOI [10.1002/9781119359203.CH3, 10.1002/9781119359203.ch3, DOI 10.1002/9781119359203.CH3]
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Musco F., 2014, Il clima cambia le citta. Strategie di Adattamento e Mitigazione Nella Pianificazione Urbanistica
   Nematchoua MK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103053
   Palermo V, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102258
   Pinto F, 2014, TEMA, P829
   Provinca di Modena, Modenastatistiche
   Regione Emilia-Romagna La Regione, 2018, Il Clima: La Strategia di Mitigazione e Adattamento per i Cambiamenti Climatici
   Rosenzweig C, 2010, NATURE, V467, P909, DOI 10.1038/467909a
   Servillo L., 2014, TOWN, small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sharifi A, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V75, P2904, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.586
   Shen LY, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.03.006
   Societa Italiana degli Urbanisti (SIU), 2021, Urbanistica
   Tedeschi G., 2023, Ph.D. Thesis
   Teebken J., 2022, SSRN Electron. J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4295483, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4295483]
   UN HabitatUnited Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2017, Trends in Urban Resilience 2017
   United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997, UNFCC Kyoto Protoco
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
NR 58
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 4
U2 6
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 4
AR 450
DI 10.3390/land13040450
PG 17
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OX9Z9
UT WOS:001210707300001
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mageto, J
   Twinomurinzi, H
   Luke, R
   Mhlongo, S
   Bwalya, K
   Bvuma, S
AF Mageto, Joash
   Twinomurinzi, Hossana
   Luke, Rose
   Mhlongo, Siyabonga
   Bwalya, Kelvin
   Bvuma, Stella
TI Building resilience into smart mobility for urban cities: an emerging
   economy perspective
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart mobility; emerging economies; smart cities; resilience; transport
   disruption; dynamic capabilities
ID SUPPLY CHAIN; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES; SYSTEM;
   IMPLEMENTATION; VULNERABILITY; MODEL
AB Population growth in urban cities has created transport problems such as traffic congestion, pollution, accidents, and infrastructure failures. These problems often lead to disruption of mobility, especially in emerging economies. The goal of any city is to have a resilient transport system that is free from frequent and severe disruptions. Resilience can be incorporated into smart mobility systems to create a robust, integrated and intelligent transport system. Therefore, this study sought to determine resilience factors required for a resilient smart mobility system in emerging economies. The study used interpretive structural modelling (ISM) to establish the causal interrelationships among the factors drawing from data from experts in smart cities, city transport and academia. It was found that the most critical factor to drive resilience is foresight - the ability to anticipate disruptions. Three other resilience factor categories identified were dynamism, certainty and optimisation, which all point to the importance of building dynamic capabilities. The key implication for practice highlights the role that human and artificial intelligence can play in anticipating natural, social and infrastructure disruptions. ISM offered a mechanism to determine the critical causal resilience factors to be prioritised amongst the competing demands on the limited resources of emerging economies. Apart from foresight, which was found to be a driving factor, the other resilience factors are equally strong linkage factors (influence each other), thus further revealing the complexities that decision-makers in urban cities of emerging economies constantly face. A research agenda for resilience in smart mobility in emerging economies was developed.
C1 [Mageto, Joash; Luke, Rose] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Transport & Supply Chain Management, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Twinomurinzi, Hossana; Bwalya, Kelvin] Univ Johannesburg, Ctr Appl Data Sci, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Mhlongo, Siyabonga; Bvuma, Stella] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Appl Informat Syst, Johannesburg, South Africa.
C3 University of Johannesburg; University of Johannesburg; University of
   Johannesburg
RP Mageto, J (corresponding author), Cnr Kingsway & Univ Rd,Auckland Pk, ZA-2092 Johannesburg, South Africa.
EM joashm@uj.ac.za
RI bwalya, Kelvin/KEH-9164-2024; Twinomurinzi, Hossana/A-5328-2015
OI Bwalya, Kelvin Joseph/0000-0003-0509-5515; Twinomurinzi,
   Hossana/0000-0002-9811-3358; , Stella Bvuma/0000-0001-8351-5269
FU URC, University of Johannesburg [URC247205]
FX This work was supported by URC, University of Johannesburg [grant number
   URC247205].
CR Alexopoulos K, 2022, INT J PROD RES, V60, P7178, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2021.2018519
   Amovic M, 2021, APPL SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/app11104557
   [Anonymous], 2020, BusinessTech
   [Anonymous], 2016, BUSINESSTECH
   [Anonymous], 2017, European Journal of Economics and Business Studies
   Attri R., 2013, RES J MANAGEMENT SCI, V2, P3, DOI DOI 10.1108/01443579410062086
   Auvinen H, 2012, FORESIGHT, V14, P191, DOI 10.1108/14636681211239746
   Azevedo S, 2013, BALT J MANAG, V8, P208, DOI 10.1108/17465261311310027
   Balakrishna C, 2012, INT CONF NEXT GEN, P223, DOI 10.1109/NGMAST.2012.51
   Bhamra R, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5375, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
   Borekci DY, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P6839, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.903346
   Cebecauer M, 2021, IEEE OPEN J INTEL TR, V2, P24, DOI 10.1109/OJITS.2021.3057221
   Chowdhury MMH, 2017, INT J PROD ECON, V188, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020
   Chwilkowska-Kubala A, 2021, J AIR TRANSP MANAG, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2021.102024
   Cledou G, 2018, GOV INFORM Q, V35, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.008
   Diabat A, 2012, INT J PROD RES, V50, P3039, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.588619
   Dixon Simon, 2018, GAUGING GLOBAL READI
   Dolgui A, 2022, INT J PROD RES, V60, P442, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2021.2002969
   Dolgui A, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P102, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2021.1840148
   Dolgui A, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P414, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1387680
   Dubey R., 2015, International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, V2, P231, DOI [10.1080/23302674.2015.1025890, DOI 10.1080/23302674.2015.1025890]
   Duperrin J.C., 1973, Rapport economique du CEA, R, P45
   Enjalbert S, 2020, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V53, P10090, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2732
   FastCo Works, 2020, WHATS DRIVING DISRUP
   Fiksel J., 2015, Resilient by Design
   Fiksel J, 2015, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V56, P79
   Ghobakhloo M, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P2384, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1630775
   Gholami H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010363
   GODET M, 1986, FUTURES, V18, P134, DOI 10.1016/0016-3287(86)90094-7
   Gunasekaran A, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P6809, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2015.1093667
   Hiroshima for Global Peace, 2014, LEARNING HIROSHIMAS
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Jain V, 2017, INT J PROD RES, V55, P6779, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2017.1349947
   Janssen M, 2018, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V20, P647, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689
   Kähkönen AK, 2023, INT J PROD RES, V61, P2696, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2021.2009588
   Labuschagne F.J.J., 2016, Cost of crashes in South Africa
   Lambourdiere E, 2020, WORLDW HOSP TOUR THE, V12, P24, DOI 10.1108/WHATT-10-2019-0069
   Legal Information Institute Cornell Law School, 2006, 6 US CODE 901 DEFINI
   Linde L, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120614
   Louisot Jean-Paul., 2015, RISK GOVERNANCE CONT, V5, P84, DOI DOI 10.22495/RGCV5I2C1ART2
   Mageto J, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13137101
   Marodin GA, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P3947, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.980454
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Namdar J, 2022, INT J PROD RES, V60, P661, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2021.2013561
   NARASSIMA MS, 2022, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/13675567.2022.2056584
   Owoseni A, 2018, TELEMAT INFORM, V35, P2067, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2018.07.009
   Paiva S, 2021, SENSORS-BASEL, V21, DOI 10.3390/s21062143
   Raj T, 2008, INT J PROD RES, V46, P6883, DOI 10.1080/00207540701429926
   Rathore R, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P1814, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1725683
   Rodrigue J. P., 2020, The geography of transport systems, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780429346323, 10.4324/9780429346323]
   Rodríguez-Núñez E, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V35, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.008
   Sage A.P., 1977, Methodology for Large-Scale Systems
   Sazvar Z, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107406
   Semanjski I, 2018, ELMAR PROC, P63, DOI 10.23919/ELMAR.2018.8534693
   Sima AC., 2021, Holistic approach for decision making towards designing smart cities, V18, P199, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-85566-6_10
   Singh RK, 2018, INT J PROD RES, V56, P6809, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2018.1424373
   Staber U, 2002, J MANAGE INQUIRY, V11, P408, DOI 10.1177/1056492602238848
   Stead D, 2017, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P283, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43851-1_14
   Sushil, 2020, ANN OPER RES, V290, P677, DOI 10.1007/s10479-018-2946-4
   Sushil, 2018, ANN OPER RES, V270, P473, DOI 10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3
   Sushil, 2012, GLOBAL J FLEXIBLE SY, V13, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3, 10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3, 10.1007/s40171-012-0008-3]
   Zan TTT, 2015, 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY/SOCIALCOM/SUSTAINCOM (SMARTCITY), P170, DOI 10.1109/SmartCity.2015.66
   WALSHAM G, 1995, EUR J INFORM SYST, V4, P74, DOI 10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Wang CL, 2007, INT J MANAG REV, V9, P31, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00201.x
   Warfield J.N., 1976, Societal systems: Planning, policy, and complexity
   WARFIELD JN, 1974, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC4, P81, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1974.5408524
   WARFIELD JN, 1973, IEEE T SYST MAN CYB, VSMC3, P441, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309270
   Yap M, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P1703, DOI 10.1007/s11116-020-10109-9
   Yousefi S, 2022, INT J PROD ECON, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108429
   Zhang Hao, 2023, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, P320, DOI 10.1080/13675567.2021.1948978
NR 70
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 12
U2 81
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0020-7543
EI 1366-588X
J9 INT J PROD RES
JI Int. J. Prod. Res.
PD AUG 2
PY 2024
VL 62
IS 15
SI SI
BP 5556
EP 5573
DI 10.1080/00207543.2022.2139866
EA NOV 2022
PG 18
WC Engineering, Industrial; Engineering, Manufacturing; Operations Research
   & Management Science
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science
GA XH4R3
UT WOS:000878092200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, J
   Wang, XY
   Gao, GJ
AF Liu, Jie
   Wang, Xinyu
   Gao, Gongjing
TI Spatiotemporal Evolution and Determinants of Urban Flood Resilience: A
   Case Study of Yellow River Basin
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban flood resilience; Yellow River Basin; PSR model; spatial
   correlation; spatial Durbin model
ID ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; DISASTER RESILIENCE; URBANIZATION; RISK
AB Global climate change has intensified flood disasters at the local scale. In response, this study constructs a flood resilience indicator system at the urban scale based on the "pressure-state-response" (PSR) model. Indicator weights were determined using the analytic hierarchy process-entropy weight method (AHP-EWM), the flood resilience of 35 cities within the Yellow River Basin from 2010 to 2021, and their spatiotemporal evolution patterns, spatial correlations, and determinants were analyzed. The results indicate that flood resilience shows an upward trend over time, with stronger resilience observed in upstream and downstream cities and weaker resilience in midstream cities. The spatial correlation of flood resilience was significantly positive in 2010, 2015, and 2021, while it exhibited non-significant, fluctuating declines in other years. Most cities in Henan and Shandong provinces are characterized as high-high agglomeration type, whereas most cities in Shanxi and Shaanxi provinces are classified as low-low type. Drainage efficiency, municipal investment, resilient planning, and urbanization have significant positive impacts on flood resilience, while the urban registered unemployment rate shows a positive spatial spillover effect. This study analyzed the flood resilience of cities in the Yellow River Basin from a comprehensive and logically coherent perspective and concluded with targeted recommendations aimed at enhancing flood resilience in the region.
C1 [Liu, Jie; Wang, Xinyu; Gao, Gongjing] Univ Jinan, Sch Polit Sci & Law, Jinan 250022, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jie] Shandong Univ, Ctr Emergency Management, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Jinan; Shandong University
RP Liu, J (corresponding author), Univ Jinan, Sch Polit Sci & Law, Jinan 250022, Peoples R China.; Liu, J (corresponding author), Shandong Univ, Ctr Emergency Management, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China.
EM sss_liujie@ujn.edu.cn; wangxinyu@stu.ujn.edu.cn; sl_gaogj@ujn.edu.cn
FU Shandong Province Social Science Youth Project; Shandong Province
   Science Youth Project [ZR2024QG145]; Shandong Province Education Science
   "14th Five-Year Plan" Youth Key Project [2023QZ003]; Shandong Province
   Higher Education Institutions Philosophy and Social Sciences Research
   Project [2024ZSMS075]; University of Jinan Disciplinary [2023,
   XKJC-202306];  [24DJYJ01]
FX This research was funded by Shandong Province Social Science Youth
   Project (Grant Number 24DJYJ01); Shandong Province Science Youth Project
   (Grant Number ZR2024QG145); Shandong Province Education Science "14th
   Five-Year Plan" Youth Key Project (Grant Number 2023QZ003); Shandong
   Province Higher Education Institutions Philosophy and Social Sciences
   Research Project (Grant Number 2024ZSMS075); and University of Jinan
   Disciplinary Cross-Convergence Construction Project 2023 (Grant Number
   XKJC-202306) And the APC was funded by G.G.
CR Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   [Anonymous], Human cost of disasters: An overview of the last 20 years 2000-2019
   [Anonymous], MINISTRY WATER RESOU
   Bai T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103584
   Bucherie A, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102897
   Cao FF, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110643
   Chen MX, 2014, J GEOGR SCI, V24, P33, DOI 10.1007/s11442-014-1071-9
   Chen Y, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19042484
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Elhorst JP, 2014, SPRINGERBR REG SCI, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8_3
   Fan H., 2024, Agric. Technol, V44, P78, DOI [10.19754/j.nyyjs.20240415016, DOI 10.19754/J.NYYJS.20240415016]
   Farrugia Simon, 2013, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V9, P136, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2013.782342
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gori A, 2019, J HYDROL, V568, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.053
   Haque MM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102861
   [黄国如 Huang Guoru], 2020, [水资源保护, Water Resources Protection], V36, P1
   Ihlanfeldt K., 1995, CITYSCAPE J POLICY D, V1, P125
   Ji J, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104519
   Ji J, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V425, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138955
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Ke XL, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127159
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Kubara M, 2024, SPAT ECON ANAL, V19, P73, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2023.2176539
   Lee CC, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V443, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141082
   Li HC, 2022, CATENA, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106081
   Li XN, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081654
   Li ZM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101140
   Lin WB, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V739, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139899
   Ling TY, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.020
   Liu D, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113764
   Liu J., 2023, Public Adm. Policy Rev, V12, P111
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Ma ZC, 2024, EARTH SPACE SCI, V11, DOI 10.1029/2023EA003418
   Mannucci S, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14074096
   Mavhura E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102152
   McClymont K, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moher D., 2010, Int J Surg, V8, p336 341, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, DOI 10.1016/J.IJSU.2010.02.007]
   Olyaei MA, 2018, J ENVIRON ENG, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001422
   Pumo D, 2017, J HYDROL, V554, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.002
   Qian YP, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030933
   Rapport DJ, 2006, ECOL INDIC, V6, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.05.003
   Rezende OM, 2019, J HYDROL, V576, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.063
   Ruan JE, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102578
   Sajjad M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Schulze J, 2024, WATER-SUI, V16, DOI 10.3390/w16040582
   Shan XM, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V110, P1039, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04978-1
   Siebeneck L, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P955, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1886-4
   [宋晓猛 Song Xiaomeng], 2024, [水科学进展, Advances in Water Science], V35, P357
   Sun HH, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P39, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2178-3
   Sun N, 2023, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V14, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2023.2240943
   Suna RR, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103344
   Suresh N, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104620
   Tzavella K, 2020, Ph.D. Thesis
   UNDRR, 2021, Global Disaster Assessment Report|PreventionWeb
   Wang LH, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11763
   [王有恒 Wang Youheng], 2021, [中国沙漠, Journal of Desert Research], V41, P235
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Whittaker S, 2020, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V16, P53, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2020.105411
   Wu PF, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101289
   Xiao S, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V866, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161321
   Zevenbergen C, 2018, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V16, P299, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2018.1433185
   Zhang HM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102248
   [张建云 Zhang Jianyun], 2016, [水科学进展, Advances in Water Science], V27, P485
   Zhang JL, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P3014, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01593-9
   Zhang PY, 2019, GEOJOURNAL, V84, P303, DOI 10.1007/s10708-018-9860-9
   Zhang QC, 2022, COMPLEXITY, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/7539984
   Zhang W., 2020, Environ. Econ, V8, P60
   Zhang W, 2018, NATURE, V563, P384, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0676-z
   Zhang Y, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104050
   Zhang Z, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15071872
   Zhang ZW, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142013102
   Zhao HG, 2018, J GEOGR SCI, V28, P175, DOI 10.1007/s11442-018-1466-0
   Zhao SQ, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P81896, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-22694-6
   Zhao X, 2021, J DEV EFFECT, V13, P309, DOI 10.1080/19439342.2021.1964577
   Zhu SY, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104243
   Zhu SY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109959
   Zhu YX, 2020, MATH PROBL ENG, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/3564835
NR 81
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 9
U2 9
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 17
IS 4
AR 1433
DI 10.3390/su17041433
PG 22
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA Y4K8F
UT WOS:001431840700001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, L
   Pei, JJ
   Wang, HQ
   Luo, Y
AF Liu, Lu
   Pei, Jingjing
   Wang, Huiquan
   Luo, Yun
TI The Evaluation and Obstacle Analysis of Urban Safety Resilience Based on
   Multi-Factor Perspective in Beijing
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE safe and resilient city; multi-factor; Beijing; TOPSIS; obstacle model
ID FRAMEWORK
AB Urban resilience assessment is crucial to guarantee the safe and stable operation of our cities. Looking at the whole process of emergencies from the occurrence, development, causing disaster losses to taking emergency response measures, we combine the danger of urban accident and disaster, the capacity of disaster-bearing carriers, and the emergency management capacity as the influencing factors. Taking Beijing as an example, considering the completeness of the relevant indicators and the difficulty of obtaining data, TOPSIS is used to construct a multi-factor comprehensive assessment model of urban safety resilience; At the same time, the important factors constraining the improvement of safety resilience are further analyzed by using the obstacle degree model. The results show that: among the 16 districts in Beijing, Chaoyang and Haidian districts have the highest level of safety resilience; the level of the degree of disaster tolerance among the multi-factors has the greatest impact on the level of urban safety resilience in Beijing; and the multifactorial comprehensive assessment model of urban resilience is able to reflect the urban resilience distribution, discover the weaknesses that exist in the development of urban safety and provide decision-making aids for the relevant city managers to carry out urban resilience construction.
C1 [Liu, Lu; Pei, Jingjing; Luo, Yun] China Univ Geosci, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Huiquan] China Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences; China University of Political Science &
   Law
RP Pei, JJ (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
EM liulwhq@cugb.edu.cn; peijj@cugb.edu.cn; whqlustrive@cupl.edu.cn;
   luoyun@cugb.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004258]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China: "Research on the theory and method of urban accident disaster
   risk assessment and resilience prevention and control" (52004258).
CR Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Amaratunga D., 2019, Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction (GAR 2019), P14
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Bloomberg M.R., 2013, STRONGER MORE RESILI
   Chen A., 2009, Modern Emergency Management Theory and Methods, P2
   Chen C.F., 2020, China Bus. J, V805, P48
   Chen XS, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P65455, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-26861-1
   Chen XL, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109469
   [程方明 Cheng Fangming], 2023, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V33, P158
   [范维澄 FAN Weicheng], 2009, [科技导报, Science & Technology Review], V27, P3
   Fan Wenchen, 2020, labor protection, P20
   Fu B., 2020, Saf. Environ. Eng, V27, P142
   [盖美庆 Gai Meiqing], 2020, [火力与指挥控制, Fire Control & Command Control], V45, P43
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Hartmann T, 2019, CITIES, V91, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.009
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   [黄浪 Huang Lang], 2016, [中国安全生产科学技术, Journal of Safety Science and Technology], V12, P15
   [姜福川 Jiang Fuchuan], 2021, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V31, P24
   Li D., 2023, Disaster Sci, P99
   Li Ruiqi, 2020, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V60, P1, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.21.039
   Li T.Y., 2014, P 2014 2 INT C SOC S, VVolume 6, P74
   Li XH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142113710
   Lv H., 2021, China Economic Times27 September, pT01
   Ministry of Construction of China, 2006, The notice on further improving disaster prevention, resistance and relief work in the construction system
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Patriarca R, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107467
   Pei JJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11164321
   Peterson GD, 2000, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V44, P291, DOI 10.1023/A:1005502718799
   Qiao H, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010038
   Rotarangi SJ, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06262-190128
   Sanghi Apurva., 2010, Natural Hazards, Unnatural Disasters: The Economics of Effective Prevention
   Shahab S, 2021, EUR PLAN STUD, V29, P1132, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1817867
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shan S., 2022, J. Grassl, V10, P1
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stringer LC, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Tariq H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102358
   The Central People's Government of the People's Republic of China, Suggestions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Formulating the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and the Vision for 2035
   United Nations Department of Ecinomic and Social Affairs, Exposure and Vulnerability to Natural Disasters for World's Cities
   Wang CH, 2009, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V135, P528, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(528)
   [王钧 Wang Jun], 2020, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V39, P2189
   Wang K, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192316201
   Wang WD, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104798
   Wang Y., 2020, Leadersh. Sci, V16, P37
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang HY, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P50388, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-14236-3
   Ye T., 2021, ISSUES AGR EC, V3, P100
   Zhang K, 2023, FRONT ENERGY RES, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2022.1102997
   Zhang Y., 2014, Disaster Sci, V29, P109
   Zhang Z., 2023, Disaster Sci, V38, P213
   [赵冬月 Zhao Dongyue], 2022, [中国安全生产科学技术, Journal of Safety Science and Technology], V18, P54
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
NR 54
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 36
U2 81
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 12
IS 10
AR 1918
DI 10.3390/land12101918
PG 29
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA W2DN8
UT WOS:001089789900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yang, HN
   Su, HZ
   Yang, LJ
AF Yang, Hainan
   Su, Huizhen
   Yang, Liangjie
TI Evolution of Urban Resilience from a Multiscale Perspective: Evidence
   from Five Provinces in Northwest China
SO COMPLEXITY
LA English
DT Article
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADAPTABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; RISK
AB As a new idea of urban risk management, building resilient cities with the ability to resist, eliminate, and adapt to uncertain risks is of great importance to mitigate risk impacts and promote sustainable urban development. Based on the adaptive cycle model and the characteristics of an urban system, this study analyzes the resilience levels of cities, urban agglomerations, and provinces and their adaptive stages. The results show that (1) the comprehensive resilience of cities in the five provinces of northwest China is on the rise and that the differences between cities are gradually narrowing. The development stages of the urban adaptive cycle can be divided into six stages: the rapid exploitation stage, exploitation-conservation stage, stable conservation stage, conservation-release stage, development reorganization stage, and reorganization-exploitation stage. (2) The spatial distribution of the comprehensive resilience of urban agglomerations is "high in the southeast and low in the northwest," and the development stage of the adaptive cycle is consistent with its central city or central region. (3) The level of resilience varies greatly among provinces, and the development stage of the adaptive cycle is equivalent to the average level of all cities in the province and is closely related to their respective development forces and urban problems. These findings can provide reference for policymakers to formulate scientific resilience building strategies to achieve regional sustainable development.
C1 [Yang, Hainan] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730030, Peoples R China.
   [Su, Huizhen; Yang, Liangjie] Northwest Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Liangjie] Key Lab Resource Environm & Sustainable Dev Oasis, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, Peoples R China.
C3 Lanzhou University; Northwest Normal University - China
RP Yang, LJ (corresponding author), Northwest Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China.; Yang, LJ (corresponding author), Key Lab Resource Environm & Sustainable Dev Oasis, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, Peoples R China.
EM 932393066@qq.com; suhuizhen8365@163.com; yangljmnx@163.com
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501176, 41961030]
FX AcknowledgmentsThis research was funded by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41501176 and 41961030).
CR [Anonymous], 2018, Medium
   Aoki N, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.025
   Borsekova K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.012
   Bouzarovski S, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P2689, DOI 10.1177/0042098010385158
   Brand D, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P159, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1133231
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Chiang YC, 2018, CITIES, V74, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.001
   Cui P, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101880
   Eken C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195326
   [方创琳 Fang Chuanglin], 2020, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V40, P1
   [方创琳 Fang Chuanglin], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P651
   [方东平 Fang Dongping], 2017, [土木工程学报, China Civil Engineering Journal], V50, P1
   Fath BD, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07467-200224
   Feng XH, 2020, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V30, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s11769-020-1163-7
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gleeson B., 2004, Urban Policy and Research, V22, P345, DOI DOI 10.1080/0811114042000296290
   González DP, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V94, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.004
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hughes TP, 2003, SCIENCE, V301, P929, DOI 10.1126/science.1085046
   Hung HC, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
   Lei L. T., 2018, RES SPACE TIME DIFFE
   Li L. G., 2019, Hum. Geogr, V2, P1, DOI [10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.001, DOI 10.13959/J.ISSN.1003-2398.2019.02.001]
   Li QK, 2017, BMC MED GENOMICS, V10, DOI 10.1186/s12920-017-0263-4
   Li Ruiqi, 2020, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V60, P1, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2019.21.039
   [李彤玥 Li Tongyue], 2014, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P23
   Li X. Y., 2020, STUDY URBAN SPATIAL
   Li Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P1505, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.227
   Liu XJ, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P1302, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1004535
   [刘严萍 Liu Yanping], 2019, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V34, P8
   Lu L, 2020, URBAN PROBLEMS, V8, P42
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Luo FH, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
   [马海涛 Ma Haitao], 2020, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V40, P11
   Marsal-Llacuna ML, 2016, CITIES, V55, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.006
   McClintock N, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V148, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.008
   Moore ML, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-10166-230238
   Muller B, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V154, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.020
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2018, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V37, P1193
   Qin Y. F., 2022, SCI GEOGR SIN
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   Resilience Alliance, 2007, URB RES RES PROSP
   Roy M, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.022
   Samuelsson K, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V171, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   [孙阳 Sun Yang], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P151
   Nguyen TMP, 2018, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V42, P934, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12662
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wang B, 2013, RES INDICATORS CONST
   [魏石梅 Wei Shimei], 2021, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V76, P1394
   Wildavsky A., 1988, Searching for safety
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Woolf S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003
   Wu Bohong, 2018, Science & Technology Review, V36, P94, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.16.011
   Wu Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106088
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   [徐美 Xu Mei], 2012, [冰川冻土, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology], V34, P1265
   [杨新军 Yang Xinjun], 2015, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V70, P1313
   Yang Y., 2019, RES COMPREHENSIVE EV
   [叶珊珊 Ye Shanshan], 2022, [干旱区地理, Arid Land Geography], V45, P277
   Zhang YN, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102396
   [郑彬 Zheng Bin], 2017, [中国公共卫生, China Journal of Public Health], V33, P699
   Zheng Y., 2017, CITY, V6, P22
   Zheng YF, 2018, CANCER LETT, V431, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.026
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu J. H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
NR 66
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 4
U2 36
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1076-2787
EI 1099-0526
J9 COMPLEXITY
JI Complexity
PD MAY 8
PY 2023
VL 2023
AR 2352094
DI 10.1155/2023/2352094
PG 23
WC Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Mathematics; Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA H0VX4
UT WOS:000993235900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wu, CW
   Cenci, J
   Wang, W
   Zhang, JZ
AF Wu, Chengwei
   Cenci, Jeremy
   Wang, Wei
   Zhang, Jiazhen
TI Resilient City: Characterization, Challenges and Outlooks
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient city; literature review; climate change; sustainable
   development; vulnerability; resilience assessment; CiteSpace;
   bibliometric analysis; progress and prospects; visualization
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; SCIENTOMETRIC ANALYSIS; VISUAL ANALYSIS;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; STRATEGIES; LANDSCAPE; THINKING; ISSUES
AB The increasingly severe environmental pollution and the Earth's ecological crisis make the concept of resilient cities (RCs) a hot topic in urban research. We ran a bibliometric analysis to analyze the research progress, areas, hotspots, and strategies pertaining to RCs. The core collection came from the Web of Science (WoS) database as the data source to explore 4462 literature works on RCs. The results revealed that development time series analysis is divided into three stages. Changes in the number of publications are linked to natural disasters, the ecological environment, and science policy. The top five issuing journals accounted for 24.15% of the total sample. Country cooperation mainly is concentrated in countries with good economic development trends, such as the United States, China, and the United Kingdom. There were 63 core authors. The most published research institution was the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The RC research hotspots included the definition of resilience and evolution, the study of resilience as an analytical framework for urban issues, and resilience assessment indicators. This paper shows that RCs should strengthen multi-country cooperation and interdisciplinary integration and should focus on comprehensive research on basic theories, evaluation systems, and action mechanisms to reference future research on RCs further.
C1 [Wu, Chengwei] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Art & Design, 159 Longpan Rd, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China.
   [Cenci, Jeremy; Zhang, Jiazhen] Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, Rue Havre 88, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
   [Wang, Wei] Nanjing Forestry Univ, Coll Furnishings & Ind Design, 159 Longpan Rd, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing Forestry University; University of Mons; Nanjing Forestry
   University
RP Zhang, JZ (corresponding author), Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, Rue Havre 88, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
EM chevy_wu@163.com; jeremy.cenci@umons.ac.be; vivian1219@foxmail.com;
   jiazhen.zhang@umons.ac.be
RI ZHANG, Jiazhen/AAC-2039-2021; Wu, Cheng-Wei/G-5210-2012
OI ZHANG, Jiazhen/0000-0001-7455-0548; jeremy, cenci/0000-0001-9247-4016
FU University of Mons
FX This work was supported by the University of Mons, grant project CoMod,
   Compacite urbaine sous l'angle de la modelisation mathematique (theorie
   des graphes et des jeux) of the Faculty of Architecture and Urban
   Planning and the Faculty of Sciences.
CR AlHinai YS, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101851
   Allam Z, 2019, ECONOMIES, V7, DOI 10.3390/economies7020062
   [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
   Barber B.R., 2017, Cool cities: Urban sovereignty and the fix for global warming
   Beichler SA, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06583-190304
   Boin A., 2010, Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events, P1
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082286
   Bush J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102483
   Chen C., 2014, Coll. Comput. Inf, V1, P1
   Chen CM, 2017, J DATA INFO SCI, V2, P1, DOI 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
   Chen CM, 2012, EXPERT OPIN BIOL TH, V12, P593, DOI 10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
   Chen XY, 2020, TRANSPORT POLICY, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.10.004
   Cianconi P, 2020, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   D'Onofrio R, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031252
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Silva AMD, 2022, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V148, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000818
   Dentoni D, 2021, BUS SOC, V60, P1216, DOI 10.1177/0007650320935015
   DeWit A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101808
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Fang Y., 2018, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V26, P108, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310, 10.1080/09669582.2017.1329310]
   Feldmeyer D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145734
   Feldmeyer D, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106861
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Goldmann E, 2014, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V35, P169, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182435
   Gotham KevinFox., 2014, Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199752225.001.0001
   Grainger S, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V85, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.004
   Guo P, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010229
   Heimerl F, 2016, IEEE T VIS COMPUT GR, V22, P190, DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467621
   Ho CSH, 2020, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V49, P155
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Hutter G, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P294, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787706
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kagawa F., 2012, J. Educ. Sustain. Dev, V6, P207, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0973408212475200, 10.1177/0973408212475200]
   Kakderi C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116486
   Lak Azadeh, 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, P71, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.34.71
   Lazaroiu C, 2018, INT CONF RENEW ENERG, P1292, DOI 10.1109/ICRERA.2018.8566775
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Li P., 2021, Landsc. Res, V13, P107
   Li XW, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P22129, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08603-9
   Liang J., 2020, Watershed Ecology and the Environment, V2, P6, DOI [10.1016/j.wsee.2020.06.001, DOI 10.1016/J.WSEE.2020.06.001]
   Lindell MK, 2013, CURR SOCIOL, V61, P797, DOI 10.1177/0011392113484456
   Liu ZW, 2019, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/buildings9100210
   Malone DM, 2001, GLOB GOV, V7, P11, DOI 10.1163/19426720-00701003
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meng B, 2018, FRONT ENG MANAG, V5, P307, DOI 10.15302/J-FEM-2018030
   Meng LC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062384
   Moraci F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187743
   Moran E.F., 2018, HUMAN ADAPTABILITY I
   Murphy JF, 2020, PROCESS SAF PROG, V39, DOI 10.1002/prs.12160
   Nardini G, 2022, J PUBLIC POLICY MARK, V41, P254, DOI 10.1177/07439156221087997
   Ng ST, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V196, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.034
   Orliange PA, 2020, REV BRAS POLIT INT, V63, DOI 10.1590/0034-7329202000202
   Pelling M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0
   Peters DJ, 2020, J RURAL HEALTH, V36, P446, DOI 10.1111/jrh.12477
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Qiu D, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031285
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Shi YL, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11133716
   Shultz JM, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, P494, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.243
   Sih A, 2011, EVOL APPL, V4, P367, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00166.x
   Stojanovic T, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08633-210315
   Tiernan A, 2019, POLICY DES PRACT, V2, P53, DOI 10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240
   Tierney K., 2019, DISASTERS SOCIOLOGIC
   Troisi O, 2022, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106986
   Ugalde Monzalvo M., 2022, HUMANITARIAN LOGISTI, P205
   Ungar M, 2013, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V54, P348, DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12025
   Wang HC, 2023, URBAN AFF REV, V59, P949, DOI 10.1177/10780874221080145
   Wang L, 2019, FRONT ENG MANAG, V6, P313, DOI 10.1007/s42524-019-0049-9
   Wang MM, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12030287
   Wheeler StephenM., 2004, SUSTAINABLE URBAN DE
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wu YN, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010066
   Yan D, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11010117
   Yang H, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11184908
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Yang Q, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11120628
   Yu DY, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05190-x
   Zhang D, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121537
   Zhang J, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11030331
   Zhang JZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P27124, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17866-9
   Zhang JZ, 2021, HERITAGE-BASEL, V4, P1375, DOI 10.3390/heritage4030075
   Zhang JZ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135348
   Zhu L, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11120630
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 89
TC 31
Z9 31
U1 10
U2 108
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 5
AR 516
DI 10.3390/buildings12050516
PG 23
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA 1Q1ZG
UT WOS:000802494000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Datola, G
   Bottero, M
   De Angelis, E
   Romagnoli, F
AF Datola, Giulia
   Bottero, Marta
   De Angelis, Elena
   Romagnoli, Francesco
TI Operationalising resilience: A methodological framework for assessing
   urban resilience through System Dynamics Model
SO ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; System Dynamics Model; Scenario simulation; Complex
   systems; Decision-Making support tool
ID LAND-USE CHANGE; ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; WASTE GENERATION; SCENARIO; CITIES;
   PARTICIPATION; SIMULATION; CARE
AB The global ambition of making cities resilient is leading to growing attention towards evaluation frameworks that can assess and communicate the performance of cities in terms of resilience. This perspective requires appropriate approaches and tools which consider complexity, multidimensionality and dynamic behaviour of urban resilience over time. In this context, the System Dynamics Model (SDM) is a suitable tool to analyse and evaluate urban resilience as part of its main characteristics. This paper firstly provides a literature review on the application of SDM in the field of urban resilience assessment in order to underline both the strengths and the weaknesses that characterise the implementations currently available in the literature. Secondly, the article proposes a methodological framework to build a comprehensive multidimensional SDM to assess urban resilience. The final part of the paper provides a specific literature review that collects in a single framework the existing applications of SDM that analyse and model urban resilience issues related to economic, social, environmental and infrastructure dimensions of urban systems. This review is helpful to understand how different urban elements can be characterised and described through mathematical equations. Thus, it provides a basis for a multidimensional SDM to assess urban resilience and identify the mutual interdependences among the considered urban variables.
C1 [Datola, Giulia; Bottero, Marta; De Angelis, Elena] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, I-10125 Turin, Italy.
   [Romagnoli, Francesco] Riga Tech Univ, Inst Energy Syst & Environm, Riga, Latvia.
C3 Polytechnic University of Turin; Riga Technical University
RP Datola, G (corresponding author), Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, I-10125 Turin, Italy.
EM giulia.datola@polito.it; marta.bottero@polito.it;
   elena.deangelis@polito.it; Francesco.Romagnoli@rtu.lv
RI Datola, Giulia/AAQ-9019-2020
OI Datola, Giulia/0000-0002-5522-3573; Romagnoli,
   Francesco/0000-0003-1814-7310
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M., 2008, Urban Ecology, P623
   Assumma V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V756, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143806
   Assumma V, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010003
   Bajracharya A., 2013, WIT T BUILT ENV, V130, P365, DOI [10.2495/UT130281 bll, DOI 10.2495/UT130281BLL]
   Bala BK, 2017, SPRING TEXT BUS ECON, P15, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-2045-2_2
   Batty M., 2009, International encyclopedia of human geography., DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.01092-0, 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.01092-0]
   Batty M., 2005, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals
   Batty M, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P251, DOI 10.1177/0265813516630803
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Bottero M, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102464
   Brown M, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V94, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.038
   Brown MT, 2004, ECOL MODEL, V178, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.03.002
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082286
   Brzezina N, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8100971
   Burby RaymondJ., 2000, Natural Hazards Review, V1, P99, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)]
   Bures V., 2015, INT REV MODELL SIMUL, V8, P245, DOI [10.15866/iremos.v8i2.5401, DOI 10.15866/IREMOS.V8I2.5401]
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Caprioli C., 2019, AGENT BASED MODEL EV
   Caprioli C, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105147
   Castle C., 2006, CASA WORKING PAPERS, V110, P110
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Da Silva J., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Dasgupta D, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P1473, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9815-6
   Dell'Anna F, 2021, ENERG POLICY, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112031
   DellOvo M., 2020, SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, P29, DOI [10.1007/978- 3-030-50173-0_2 (Reds) (bll., DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-50173-02]
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Douglas I., 2010, ROUTLEDGE HDB URBAN
   Douglas Ian., 1981, Progress in Physical Geography, V5, P315, DOI [10.1177/030913338100500301, DOI 10.1177/030913338100500301]
   Dyson B, 2005, WASTE MANAGE, V25, P669, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.10.005
   Fallah-Fini S, 2010, SYST DYNAM REV, V26, P216, DOI 10.1002/sdr.449
   Feng YY, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V252, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.09.008
   Feofilovs M, 2020, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V11, P615, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2020-0013
   Feofilovs M, 2019, ENRGY PROCED, V158, P3944, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.848
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Forrester J. W., 1961, IND DYNAMICS
   Forrester J.W., 1979, URBAN DYNAMICS
   Gaston K.J., 2010, URBAN ECOL
   Givens JE, 2018, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00104
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gotangco CK, 2016, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V9, P196, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12222
   Gravelsins A, 2018, ENRGY PROCED, V147, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.060
   Gu CL, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-66125-3
   Guan DJ, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P1333, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.007
   Haase D., 2009, Living Reviews in Landscape Research, V3, P1
   Haghshenas H, 2015, CITIES, V45, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.003
   He YX, 2017, ENERGY, V133, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.107
   Heinzlef C, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102762
   Herrera H., 2020, ENVIRON SYST DECIS, V40, P342, DOI [10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09760-5]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hollnagel E., 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
   HUTCHINSON BG, 1976, SOCIO ECON PLAN SCI, V10, P47, DOI 10.1016/0038-0121(76)90020-3
   Joakim EP, 2016, INT J EMERG MANAG, V12, P366, DOI 10.1504/IJEM.2016.079846
   Johnston R.B., 2016, ARSENIC RES GLOBAL S, P12, DOI DOI 10.1201/B20466-7
   Jose H, 2019, SYST DYNAM REV, V35, P287, DOI 10.1002/sdr.1643
   Király G, 2019, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V36, P199, DOI 10.1002/sres.2580
   Klein B., 2017, Informatik-Spektrum, V40, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S00287-016-1005-2, 10.1007/s00287-016-1005-2]
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kopainsky B, 2017, ECOL MODEL, V362, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.08.010
   Kuznecova T, 2014, 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (9TH ICEE) - SELECTED PAPERS, DOI 10.3846/enviro.2014.125
   Lauf S, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V27-28, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.09.005
   Lazarevic EV, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V158, P1130, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.005
   Lei X, 2012, Int. J. Adv. Inf. Sci. Serv. Sci, V4, P239, DOI [10.4156/aiss.vol4.issue1.31, DOI 10.4156/AISS.VOL4.ISSUE1.31]
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Links JM, 2018, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V12, P127, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2017.39
   Liu D., 2019, Development of a Tailings Simulation Model Using System Dynamics. MSc thesis, DOI 10.1016/j. ecolmodel.2019.108924
   Liu DY, 2017, ECOL MODEL, V350, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.02.005
   Lowry IraS., 1964, MODEL METROPOLIS
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Machado C., 2018, DESTECH T ENG TECHNO, DOI [10.12783/dtetr/icpr2017/17689 (icpr), DOI 10.12783/DTETR/ICPR2017/17689(ICPR)]
   Marandure T, 2020, ECOL MODEL, V438, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109294
   Meadows D.H., 2008, Thinking in Systems: International Bestseller
   Meadows DH, 2007, SYST DYNAM REV, V23, P191, DOI 10.1002/sdr.371
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Monaco R., 2017, NEW MATH MODEL ENV M, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319- 66839-0_13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66839-0_13]
   Montag T, 1974, URBAN ECOSYSTEM HOLI
   Moon TH, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9040524
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   ODUM EP, 1968, AM ZOOL, V8, P11
   Odum Howard T., 1983, SYSTEMS ECOLOGY
   Olmen J. van, 2012, Health, Culture and Society, V2, P1
   Pagano A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.005
   Park M, 2013, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V57, P2082, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.05.058
   Paz DB, 2020, ECOL MODEL, V437, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109312
   Pedram S., 2020, A Literature Review of System Dynamics Modelling for Asset Management
   Bach MP, 2020, KYBERNETES, V49, P460, DOI 10.1108/K-04-2018-0210
   Pelorosso R, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101867
   Pickett STA, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022
   Pickett STA, 2001, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V32, P127, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
   Priya T., 2009, DYNAMICS SOCIAL EXCL
   Qureshi MA, 2009, INT J SOC ECON, V36, P93, DOI 10.1108/03068290910921217
   Rodriguez-Gonzalez PT, 2020, ECOL MODEL, V426, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109018
   Royston G, 1999, SYST DYNAM REV, V15, P293, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199923)15:3<293::AID-SDR169>3.3.CO;2-T
   Schwarz N, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN B, V37, P265, DOI 10.1068/b35087
   Schwind N, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P239, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_12
   Sharifi A., 2017, APN Science Bulletin, V7, DOI [DOI 10.30852/SB.2017.182, 10.30852/sb.2017.182]
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shen QP, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.02.004
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Simonovic S. P., 2013, British Journal of Environment and Climate Change, V3, P378, DOI 10.9734/BJECC/2013/2504
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Stave KA, 2002, SYST DYNAM REV, V18, P139, DOI 10.1002/sdr.237
   Sukholthaman P, 2016, WASTE MANAGE, V52, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.026
   Tan YT, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.154
   Uehara T, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061765
   UNISDR, 2005, Encycl. Earth Sci. Ser., DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, 10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4180, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wardekker A., 2018, Solutions, V9
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   WOLSTENHOLME EF, 1993, J OPER RES SOC, V44, P925
   World Economic Forum, 2019, Global Climate Observing System Report GCOS, P1
   Wu YZ, 2012, HABITAT INT, V36, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.10.011
   Wu YZ, 2011, CITIES, V28, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.11.002
   Xu Z, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V47, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.07.012
   Yao H, 2011, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V20, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.007
   Zucchetto J., 1975, ECOL MODEL, V1, P241, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(75)90010-1, 10.1016/0304-3800(75)90010-1]
NR 123
TC 68
Z9 70
U1 33
U2 210
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0304-3800
EI 1872-7026
J9 ECOL MODEL
JI Ecol. Model.
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 465
AR 109851
DI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
EA JAN 2022
PG 14
WC Ecology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 0V1BB
UT WOS:000788079400009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hangebruch, N
   Othengrafen, F
AF Hangebruch, Nina
   Othengrafen, Frank
TI Resilient Inner Cities: Conditions and Examples for the Transformation
   of Former Department Stores in Germany
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; urban transformation; mixed use; re-use; department stores;
   inner city development; conversion; retail; urban planning
AB Digitalisation is leading to fundamental changes in the German retail sector and the city centres as places of trade. Traditional forms of business such as department stores have significantly reduced their branch networks. Their conversion poses major questions not only for the property owners but also for the municipalities concerned. As key properties, the buildings are of particular relevance for the reorientation of the inner-city use structure. In view of the reduced importance of retail in inner cities, it is discussed how the transformation of these properties can increase the resilience of city centres. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature analysis on urban and retail resilience and derived ten dimensions for resilient city centres. We applied the ten dimensions and related criteria in the analysis of five selected case studies in Germany and assessed that new, innovative and flexible re-uses could be realised in the former department stores, increasing the multifunctionality and robustness of the city centres. The conversion of the buildings is not only sustainable from the perspective of climate and resource efficiency, but also contributes to the preservation of the local building culture and the identification of the citizens with the inner city.
C1 [Hangebruch, Nina] Res Inst Reg & Urban Dev, ILS, D-44135 Dortmund, Germany.
   [Hangebruch, Nina; Othengrafen, Frank] TU Dortmund Univ, Sch Spatial Planning, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany.
C3 Dortmund University of Technology
RP Othengrafen, F (corresponding author), TU Dortmund Univ, Sch Spatial Planning, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany.
EM nina.hangebruch@tu-dortmund.de; frank.othengrafen@tu-dortmund.de
OI Othengrafen, Frank/0000-0001-6348-4485; Hangebruch,
   Nina/0000-0003-2901-0264
FU Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; TU Dortmund University
FX We acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and
   TU Dortmund University within the funding programme Open Access Costs.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Anders S., 2020, INFORM RAUMENTWICKL, V47, P80
   Anders S., 2017, PLANERIN, P16
   ARL (Akademie fur Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft), 2021, ONL RAUM NEUE URB AL, V127
   ARL (Akademie fur Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft), 2020, NEUE IMPULSE NUTZUNG, V116
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229433
   BBSR (Bundesinstitut fur Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung), 2017, NUTZ BEW NUTZ INN ST, V23
   BBSR (Bundesinstitut fur Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung), 2017, EXWOST INFORM
   BBSR (Bundesinstitut fur Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung), 2011, BBSR BERICHTE KOMPAK
   BBSR (Bundesinstitut fur Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung), 2022, STRAT INN LEB NUTZ W
   BBSR (Bundesinstitut fur Bau-,Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR) Bundesamt fur Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR, 2021, NEUE LEIPZ CHART TRA
   BBSR (Bundesinstitut fur Bau-Stadt- und Raumforschung) Bundesamt fur Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR), 2018, STRESST STADT WIE RE
   Beckmann R.M., 2016, FORUM WOHN STADTENTW, V1, P7
   Berger T., 2019, BERICHT KOMMUNALEN P, V202, P64
   Birkmann J, 2013, Glossar Klimawandel und Raumentwicklung. 2. Uberarbeitete Fassung
   BMI (Bundesministerium des Innern fur Bau und Heimat), 2021, INN BEIR INN BEIM BM
   BMWi (Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Energie), 2017, PERSP LEB STADT ABSC
   Book S, 2020, SPIEGEL WIRTSCHAFT 0
   Cachinho H, 2014, CITIES, V36, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.005
   Guimaraes PPC, 2018, MORAV GEOGR REP, V26, P160, DOI 10.2478/mgr-2018-0013
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DeVerteuil G., 2016, CITY, V20, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714, https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714]
   Dobson J., 2015, J URBAN REGENERATION, V8, P347
   Dolega L., 2015, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne - Polish Section of the Regional Studies Association, V2, P8, DOI [DOI 10.7366/1509499526001, 10.7366/1509499526001]
   DST (Deutscher Stadtetag), 2021, POSITIONSPAPIER DTSC
   During R, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14073857
   EESC (European Economic and Social Committee, 2019, FUT RET CIT CENTR CH
   Fernandes JR, 2014, CITIES, V36, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.006
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Friedrich J., 2020, BAUWELT, P30
   Handelsverband Deutschland (HDE e.V, 2021, ONL MON 2021
   Hangebruch N., STADTBAUWELT 2020 BA, P30
   Hangebruch N., 2020, DIGITALISIERUNG ONLI, DOI [10.17877/DE290R-21686, DOI 10.17877/DE290R-21686]
   Hangebruch N, 2020, FORUM STADT, V2, P141
   Hangebruch N, 2020, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V173, P171, DOI 10.1680/jurdp.20.00041
   Hatzfeld U., 2021, WISO DIREKT, V14, P1
   HERTZBERGER Herman -., 2001, Lessons for Students in Architecture
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Kärrholm M, 2014, CITIES, V36, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.012
   Korzer T., 2020, KLEINUND MITTELST DT, P207
   Louw E., 2006, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, V21, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10901-005-9029-Y
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   McEachern MG, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147563
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   MWIDE (Ministerium fur Wirtschaft Innovation Digitalisierung und Energie des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen), 2021, ZUK HAND ZUK STADT H
   Neufeld E., 2021, IMMOB ZTG, V51, P2
   OECD, 2020, COVID-19 and the Retail Sector: Impact and Policy Responses, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19)
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Rao FJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11153999
   Rao FJ, 2016, CITIES, V58, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.002
   Reynolds Jonathan., 2003, Retail Strategy, The View from the Bridge
   Ruess P., 2021, ZUK INN INN ENTW ZUK
   Schnur O., 2013, INFORM RAUMENTWICKLU, P337
   Selman P., 2009, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, V5, P45
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Sommella R, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147620
   Sparks L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13105631
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van Broekhoven S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061875
   Vesper M., 2004, PREIS F R VORBILDLIC, V6
   Weidner S., 2022, INNENST DTE EINZELHA, P13
   White I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P934, DOI 10.1068/c12117
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
NR 64
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 2
U2 19
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUL
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 14
AR 8303
DI 10.3390/su14148303
PG 25
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 3J9QN
UT WOS:000833723300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Trundle, A
   Organo, V
AF Trundle, Alexei
   Organo, Vanessa
TI Urban adaptation pathways at the edge of the anthropocene: lessons from
   the Blue Pacific Continent
SO URBAN GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban planning; climate adaptation; informal settlements; Pacific
   Islands; sustainable development
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOLOMON-ISLANDS; CYCLONE PAM; PORT VILA; RESILIENCE;
   LAND; CITIES; URBANIZATION; COLONIALISM; CHALLENGES
AB Pacific Island cities exhibit high levels of informality. In these spaces, traditional cultural practices and production converge with the periphery of global financial markets and systems of trade and production. These hybrid, nonconforming urban systems fall between regional policy agendas, requiring practitioners to embed urban considerations within broader regional platforms such as climate change. This paper demonstrates how these "covert" processes are used to advance urban justice at a settlement scale, both within and in resistance to city-level resilience frameworks and governance. In addition to a wider review of secondary data and Pacific urban literature the authors - non-Indigenous Pacific urban experts - draw upon empirical evidence from climate resilient development initiatives across the region. This includes case studies from the two Vanuatu municipalities of Luganville and Port Vila, and Honiara, the capital of Solomon Islands. Approaches for negotiating divergences between these functional systems of traditional and state justice within the urban domain are proposed, particularly in relation to disaster response and climate resilient development. Adaptation pathways are also presented, that draw upon decolonized visions of Pacific cities. These build upon observations of endogenous resilience in Pacific informal settlements; imaginaries centered upon quasi-customary urban governance, social structures, and ecosystem services.
C1 [Trundle, Alexei] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne Ctr Cities, GO2,Baldwin Spencer Bldg 113,Masson Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne
RP Trundle, A (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne Ctr Cities, GO2,Baldwin Spencer Bldg 113,Masson Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
EM alexei.trundle@unimelb.edu.au
RI Trundle, Alexei/D-5762-2018
OI Trundle, Alexei/0000-0002-7076-4626
CR Abrams M, 2020, MECH ENG, V142, P42, DOI 10.1115/1.2020-APR2
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   [Anonymous], 1957, CUSTOMARY LAND TENUR
   Atteridge A.N. Canales., 2017, Climate finance in the Pacific: An overview of flows to the region's Small Island Developing States
   Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Association (CSIRO), 2014, CLIMATE VARIABILITY
   Bahadur AV, 2013, CLIM DEV, V5, P55, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.762334
   Bamfortha T, 2017, URBAN PLANNING FOR DISASTER RECOVERY, P47, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-804276-2.00004-9
   Barber R., 2015, [No title captured]
   Barnett J, 2017, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V58, P3, DOI 10.1111/apv.12153
   Bertram I., 1985, Pacific Viewpoint, V26, P497, DOI DOI 10.1111/APV.263002
   Blaschke P.M., 2017, PORT VILA VANUATU EC
   BRAY M, 1993, COMP EDUC, V29, P333, DOI 10.1080/0305006930290309
   Brenner N, 2013, PUBLIC CULTURE, V25, P85, DOI 10.1215/08992363-1890477
   Brogden L., 2021, Enhancing Disaster Preparedness, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819078-4.00001-0
   Bryant-Tokalau J, 2018, PALG S DISASTER ANTH, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-78399-4_2
   Burlo C. de, 1989, Geojournal, V19, P317, DOI 10.1007/BF00454578
   Burrows K, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13040443
   Butcher-Gollach C., 2017, PLANNING URBAN INFOR, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_3]
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Cocklin C, 2000, ENVIRON CONSERV, V27, P392, DOI 10.1017/S0376892900000448
   CONNELL J, 1994, CONTEMP PACIFIC, V6, P267
   Connell J., 1981, GEOJOURNAL, V5, P583, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00213569, DOI 10.1007/BF00213569]
   Connell John., 2006, Globalisation and Governance in the Pacific Islands, P59
   Cowen D, 2020, URBAN GEOGR, V41, P469, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2019.1677990
   Durokifa AA, 2018, AFR J SCI TECHNOL IN, V10, P355, DOI 10.1080/20421338.2018.1463654
   Foukona JD, 2017, STATE SOC GOV MELANE, P85
   Fraenkel J, 2011, CONTEMP PACIFIC, V23, P456
   French M., 2021, CLIMATE RESILIENT UR, P129, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_7, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3]
   French Matthew, 2021, Cities & Health, V5, DOI [/10.1080/23748834.2020.1812331, DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1812331, 10.1080/23748834.2020.1812331]
   Friend R, 2015, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V6, P643, DOI 10.1002/wcc.364
   Fry G, 2019, PACIFIC SERIES, P1, DOI 10.22459/FI.2019
   Gero A., 2020, URBANISATION RISK PA, P34
   Haberkorn Gerald., 2008, New Zealand Population Review, V33/34, P95
   Hallwright J, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101104
   Handmer J, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P60
   Hassall G., 2017, New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, P9, DOI DOI 10.1163/9789004387935
   Hassall G., 2012, CANTERBURY LAW REV, V18, P13, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.2720256, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2720256]
   Hassall G, 2008, COMMONW J LOCAL GOV, P6
   Hawksley C, 2009, GLOB CHANG PEACE SEC, V21, P115, DOI 10.1080/14781150802659473
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Jerneck A, 2008, CLIM POLICY, V8, P170, DOI 10.3763/cpol.2007.0434
   Jones P, 2005, AUST PLAN, V42, P39, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2005.9982403
   Kabutaulaka TT, 2008, POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS, P103
   Kant R, 2018, PAC JOURNAL REV, V24, P64, DOI 10.24135/pjr.v24i2.444
   Keen M., 2019, PUF FRESH AIR PACIFI
   Keen M, 2019, URBAN POLICY RES, V37, P324, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2019.1626710
   Keen MR, 2018, MAR POLICY, V88, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.002
   Kiddle GL, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.723166
   Kiddle GL, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101878
   Komugabe-Dixson AF, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100973
   Kumar L, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P992, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2702, 10.1038/nclimate2702]
   Larmour Peter., 1998, GOVERNANCE REFORM S
   Leder K, 2021, BMJ OPEN, V11, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042850
   Lindstrom M., 1981, PACIFIC STUDIES, V4, P101
   Marris E, 2017, NATURE, V550, P22, DOI 10.1038/550022a
   Mawyer A, 2021, PAC AFF, V94, P123, DOI 10.5509/2021941123
   McCarthy S, 2011, INT POLIT SCI REV, V32, P563, DOI 10.1177/0192512111418775
   McDonnell S, 2020, ANTHROPOL FORUM, V30, P55, DOI 10.1080/00664677.2019.1647828
   McDonnell S, 2017, STATE SOC GOV MELANE, P283
   McEvoy D, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1594666
   Mecartney S, 2017, STATE SOC GOV MELANE, P57
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Monson R., 2010, JUSTICE POOR, V4
   Moore C., 2022, HONIARA VILLAGE CITY, DOI [10.22459/H.2022, DOI 10.22459/H.2022]
   Morgan W, 2022, E ASIA-NETHERLANDS, V39, P45, DOI 10.1007/s12140-021-09377-8
   Nalau J, 2017, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P151, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50094-2_9
   Nurse LA, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1613
   Odendaal N, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P391, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2020.1807166
   Office of the Auditor-General (OAG), 2020, SPEC INV AUD REP ACC
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Pacific Climate Change Science Program (PCCSP) & Papua New Guinea National Weather Service, 2011, CURR FUT CLIM PAP NE
   Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS), 2018, ACT PLAN IMPL BOE DE
   Parnell S, 2010, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V34, P146, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00954.x
   Parsons M., 1981, NEW INT, V101
   Parthasarathy D, 2015, PAC AFF, V88, P551, DOI 10.5509/2015883551
   Poustie MS, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V105, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.008
   Rakowski, 1967, UGLY SCHOLAR NEOCOLO
   Ranganathan S, 2019, LEIDEN J INT LAW, V32, P205, DOI 10.1017/S092215651900013X
   Rawlings GE, 1999, OCEANIA, V70, P72, DOI 10.1002/j.1834-4461.1999.tb02990.x
   Regenvanu R., 2010, DEFENCE MELANESIAN C, P29
   Reuben R, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2189-0
   Rodil A.S., 2014, HONIARA CLIMATE CHAN
   Satterthwaite D, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.002
   Savage A, 2020, FOOD SECUR, V12, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s12571-020-01053-8
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Smarzewski R, 2020, INT J APPROX REASON, V124, P123, DOI [10.1787/4dd50c09-en, 10.1016/j.ijar.2020.06.001]
   Storey D., 2003, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, V44, P259
   Storper M, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P1114, DOI 10.1177/0042098016634002
   Taylor H., 2020, NATL URBAN POLICY PA
   Thaman KH, 2003, CONTEMP PACIFIC, V15, P1, DOI 10.1353/cp.2003.0032
   Thaman R., 1995, Habitat International, V19, P209, DOI [10.1016/0197-3975(94)00067-C, DOI 10.1016/0197-3975(94)00067-C]
   The Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2020, PORT VIL MUN COUNC F
   Trundle A., 2021, DEV B, P70
   Trundle A., 2020, ENDOGENOUS CLIMATE R
   Trundle A, 2020, CITIES, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102496
   Trundle A, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P53, DOI 10.1177/0956247818816654
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   United Nations Economic and Social Council for Asia Pacific (UNESCAP), 2019, 5 PAC URB FOR CALL A, P3
   United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2016, SLUM AL 2015 2016 TR
   United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), 2015, POT DAM ZON PORT VIL
   United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OHCA), 2018, VAN SUBN ADM BOUND
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wakefield S, 2021, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V11, P443, DOI 10.1177/20438206211017455
   Woodward K, 2014, POLITICAL MEMOIR OF THE ANGLO-FRENCH CONDOMINIUM OF THE NEW HEBRIDES, P1
   World Bank, 2015, POSTD NEEDS ASS TROP, P172
   Zari MP, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100968
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 108
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 16
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0272-3638
EI 1938-2847
J9 URBAN GEOGR
JI Urban Geogr.
PD MAR 16
PY 2023
VL 44
IS 3
SI SI
BP 492
EP 516
DI 10.1080/02723638.2022.2143692
EA NOV 2022
PG 25
WC Geography; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography; Urban Studies
GA D4OJ0
UT WOS:000882934200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rodriguez, CNAS
   Ashley, R
   Gersonius, B
   Rijke, J
   Pathirana, A
   Zevenbergen, C
AF Rodriguez, Carlos N. A. Salinas
   Ashley, Richard
   Gersonius, Berry
   Rijke, Jeroen
   Pathirana, Assela
   Zevenbergen, Chris
TI Incorporation and application of resilience in the context of
   water-sensitive urban design: linking European and Australian
   perspectives
SO WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER
LA English
DT Article
AB The water sensitive city is a term within urban water management in which the concept of resilience to extreme climatic events and climate change plays a key role and represents the interaction between different branches of water science, engineering, and other domains such as urban planning and design. In this context, resilience is the ability of a system to cope with or recover from inter alia floods and droughts and also to retain original identity in some form in the face of long-term change. It is generally accepted that sustainable systems with respect to water management are mainly dominated by their resilience, which is intrinsic to water sensitive cities, and includes social, economic, and environmental as well as technical systems, such as built infrastructure and environments, and their interactions. Therefore, each system cannot be considered in isolation but needs to be seen as a part of wider aspects of water and urban services and utilities in resilient cities. New urban development can be better provided with flood and drought resilience because of the opportunity for the implementation of the available technical, social, and economic knowledge. This is different in the case of existing urban areas where maximization of the value and use of water requires more and in-depth analysis. The growing movement for water-sensitive urban design (WSUD), a concept developed in Australia, provides inspiration for maximizing the value and use of water in urban areas, with an increasing consideration of flood and drought resilience. Synergistic integration between the extant knowledge on WSUD together with resilience approaches can lead to the establishment of a new model for water sensitive cities which are also flood resilient. Similarly, dealing with urban flooding in a wise manner can simultaneously optimize the use of all kinds of available resources-also enhancing resilience for droughts. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
C1 [Rodriguez, Carlos N. A. Salinas; Ashley, Richard; Gersonius, Berry; Rijke, Jeroen; Pathirana, Assela; Zevenbergen, Chris] UNESCO IHE, Flood Resilience Grp, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Ashley, Richard] Univ Sheffield, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Pennine Water Grp, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England.
   [Zevenbergen, Chris] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Delft, Netherlands.
C3 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education; University of Sheffield; Delft
   University of Technology
RP Rodriguez, CNAS (corresponding author), UNESCO IHE, Flood Resilience Grp, Delft, Netherlands.
EM c.salinas@unesco-ihe.org
RI Gersonius, Berry/C-7724-2009; Pathirana, Assela/B-5189-2011
FU EPSRC [EP/I029346/1] Funding Source: UKRI
CR Adamowicz R, 2012, WSUD 2012 WATER SENS
   ADB, 2013, MARE AS GREEN AS CIT
   [Anonymous], 2006, INT WORKING GROUP WA
   [Anonymous], 2011, ICLEI Global report
   [Anonymous], 2013, WORLD RISKS EXECUTIV
   [Anonymous], 7 INT C WAT SENS URB
   [Anonymous], 8 INT C PLANN TECHN
   Ashley RM, 2012, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V5, P14, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01108.x
   Ashley R, 2013, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V166, P65, DOI 10.1680/muen.12.00046
   Bacchin T, 2013, 8 INT C PLANN TECHN
   Brouwer R, 2010, HDB ENV AGENCY ENGLA
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Bruijn K. M. de, 2004, Water Policy, V6, P53
   Council of Australian Government (CoAG), 2004, INT AGR NAT WAT IN
   Coutts AM, 2013, PROG PHYS GEOG, V37, P2, DOI 10.1177/0309133312461032
   DE Bruijn K., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P199, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232]
   Fratini CF, 2012, URBAN WATER J, V9, P317, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2012.668913
   Gaffin SR, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P704, DOI 10.1038/nclimate1685
   Gersonius B, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P6824, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.060
   Gersonius B, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2139, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2139-2012
   Gersonius B., 2012, The resilience approach to climate adaption applied for flood risk
   Gersonius B, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V116, P411, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5
   Green C, 2010, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V1, P33, DOI 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.01.006
   Griggs D, 2013, NATURE, V495, P305, DOI 10.1038/495305a
   Haasnoot M, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V115, P795, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0444-2
   Hall JW, 2013, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V166, P249, DOI 10.1680/ensu.12.00028
   Healthy Waterways, 2009, WAT BY DES CONC DES
   Howe C, 2012, CITIES FUTURE SERIES, P1
   Howley P, 2009, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V52, P847, DOI 10.1080/09640560903083798
   ICPDR, 2012, FLOOD HAZARD MAPS SA
   Kwadijk JCJ, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P729, DOI 10.1002/wcc.64
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Mens MJP, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003
   Morgan C., 2013, Water Sensitive Urban Design in the UK - Ideas for built environment practitioners
   Newman R, 2011, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V164, P95, DOI 10.1680/ensu.1000032
   NWE IIB, FUT CIT AD COMP GUID
   NWI, 2007, WAT MAN OP TERMS
   OECD, 2012, ENV/JM/MONO(2012), V67, P1, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264185203-EN
   Rijke J, 2012, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V10, P369, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2012.739173
   SAEIJS HLF, 1991, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V20, P245, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(91)90118-6
   Tawfik S., 2020, FACILITATING WATER S
   USEPA, 2012, TOT WAT MAN
NR 42
TC 36
Z9 42
U1 4
U2 45
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 2049-1948
J9 WIRES WATER
JI Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.-Water
PD MAR-APR
PY 2014
VL 1
IS 2
BP 173
EP 186
DI 10.1002/wat2.1017
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA VF8JU
UT WOS:000443717100004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ilgen, S
   Sengers, F
   Wardekker, A
AF Ilgen, Silvana
   Sengers, Frans
   Wardekker, Arjan
TI City-To-City Learning for Urban Resilience: The Case of Water Squares in
   Rotterdam and Mexico City
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE city-to-city learning; policy transfer; resilient cities; water squares
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; CITIES;
   SUSTAINABILITY; NETWORKS; POLICY; COOPERATION; STRATEGIES
AB Cities worldwide are building resilience' in the face of water-related challenges. International networks have emerged through which urban communities draw on each other's experiences and expertise in order to become resilient cities. Learning is a key principle in resilience-building, but thus far little empirical research is available on city-to-city learning and learning for urban resilience. This paper presents an analysis of how policy relevant knowledge on the notion of Water Squares' is exchanged between Rotterdam and Mexico City. We mobilize a framework composed of four distinct phases: exploration and marketing (phase 1), building pipelines (phase 2), translation and adoption (phase 3), and internalization and reflection (phase 4). Critical in first phase was introspective analysis of one's own systems, strengths and weaknesses, rather than an outward-looking search for knowledge or mentees. During the second phase, the cities reframed their own narratives to match those of their counterparts as a way to create a mutual understanding of each other's struggles and histories. This facilitated policy and knowledge exchange as equal partners on a basis of trust. In the third phase, strong local leaders were recruited into the process, which was key to anchor knowledge in the community and to reduce the risks of losing institutional memory in centralized, hierarchical institutions. For the fourth phase it should be stressed that by internalizing such lessons, cities might strengthen not only their own resilience, but also enhance future exchanges with other cities.
C1 [Ilgen, Silvana; Sengers, Frans; Wardekker, Arjan] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, POB 80115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Sengers, Frans] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, 40 Aldwych, London WC2B 4BG, England.
   [Wardekker, Arjan] Univ Bergen, Ctr Study Sci & Humanities, POB 7805, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
C3 Utrecht University; University of London; King's College London;
   University of Bergen
RP Wardekker, A (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, POB 80115, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands.; Wardekker, A (corresponding author), Univ Bergen, Ctr Study Sci & Humanities, POB 7805, N-5020 Bergen, Norway.
EM silvana.ilgen@gmail.com; F.Sengers@uu.nl; J.A.Wardekker@uu.nl
RI Wardekker, Arjan/U-8500-2019
OI Sengers, Frans/0000-0002-6875-1607; Wardekker, Arjan/0000-0001-7974-4835
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   [Anonymous], 2015, Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316014240
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2016, HAB
   [Anonymous], 2014, World urbanization prospects, the 2014 revision: Highlights
   Argyris C., 1978, ORG LEARNING THEORY
   Bahadur AV, 2015, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V7, P196, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2015.1060595
   Bandura A., 1977, Social Learning Theory, V1
   Bathelt H, 2004, PROG HUM GEOG, V28, P31, DOI 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Berbés-Blázquez M, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1897-0
   Betsill MM, 2006, GLOBAL GOV, V12, P141, DOI 10.1163/19426720-01202004
   Betsill MM, 2004, INT STUD QUART, V48, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00310.x
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Boer F., 2016, HAC CIUD MEX SENS AG
   Bontenbal M, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.009
   Boschma RA, 2005, REG STUD, V39, P61, DOI 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Boschma R, 2010, HANDBOOK OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, P120
   Bremer S, 2019, CLIM SERV, V13, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.01.003
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P839, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.028
   Bulkeley H, 2005, POLIT GEOGR, V24, P875, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
   Campbell T, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.012
   Capela Lourenco T., 2014, ADAPTING UNCERTAIN C
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   CDMX, 2016, CDMX RES STRAT AD IN
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Cundill G, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P3205, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.012
   Da Silva J., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   de Graaf R, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P1282, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.011
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   De Urbanisten, WAT SQUAR BENTH
   Deppisch S., 2017, URBAN REGIONS NOW TO, P165
   Dolowitz DP, 2000, GOVERNANCE, V13, P5, DOI 10.1111/0952-1895.00121
   Douglass M, 2002, ENVIRON URBAN, V14, P53, DOI 10.1177/095624780201400105
   Driessen PPJ, 2012, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V22, P143, DOI 10.1002/eet.1580
   Eraydin Ayda., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Ferguson BC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.008
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke Carl, 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC, P352, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511541957.020, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020]
   Gemeente Rotterdam, 2016, ROTT RES STRAT READ
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gordon IR, 2005, J ECON GEOGR, V5, P523, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbh072
   Gupta J, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
   Hegger D, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07929-200401
   Hoogma R., 2005, Experimenting for sustainable transport: the approach of strategic niche management
   Howells J, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kaijser A, 2002, TECHNOL CULT, V43, P521, DOI 10.1353/tech.2002.0120
   Keiner M, 2007, EUR PLAN STUD, V15, P1369, DOI 10.1080/09654310701550843
   Kimmelman H., 2017, NY TIMES
   KNIGHT RV, 1995, URBAN STUD, V32, P225, DOI 10.1080/00420989550013068
   Kolb D. A., 1984, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
   Koop SHA, 2015, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V29, P5649, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1139-z
   Lankao PR, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P157, DOI 10.1177/0956247809362636
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Loorbach D., 2007, Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development
   Markard J, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P955, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   McCann E, 2011, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V101, P107, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mills A.J., 2010, Encyclopedia of case study research
   Moodley S, 2019, HABITAT INT, V85, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.02.004
   Olazabal M, 2017, Urban Regions Now Tomorrow: Between Vulnerability, Resilience and Transformation, P73, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-16759-2_4
   Owen-Smith J, 2004, ORGAN SCI, V15, P5, DOI 10.1287/orsc.1030.0054
   PEARSALL M, 1965, NURS RES, V14, P37, DOI 10.1097/00006199-196501410-00011
   Reed SO, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P393, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501136
   Resilience Alliance, 2010, Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners revised version 2.0
   Rijke J, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V25, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012
   Runhaar H, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P777, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0292-7
   Salinas E.M., 2016, WATER SENSITIVE MEXI
   Schewenius M, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P434, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
   Schot J, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P537, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Sengers F, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Sengers F, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V17, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.003
   Seymoar N.K., 2009, CITY CITY LEARNING
   Spradley J., 1980, Participant observation
   Stone D., 1999, Politics, V19, P51, DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00086
   Trogrlic RS, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050553
   Trompenaars F., 1993, Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in global business
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UNESCO IHE, 2016, CITY TO CITY LEARN D
   van Ewijk E, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P756, DOI 10.1177/0042098014528057
   van Herk S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Wardekker A., 2019, URBAN RESILIENCE MET
   Wardekker A., 2018, Solutions, V9
   Wardekker A., CITIES
   Wardekker JA, 2016, SPRINGERPLUS, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2408-x
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wilk B., 2016, THESIS
   Yin R. K., 2014, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
   Zegwaard A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V94, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.01.011
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00010.x
NR 97
TC 37
Z9 37
U1 10
U2 63
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAY
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 5
AR 983
DI 10.3390/w11050983
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA IE9FN
UT WOS:000472680400113
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, ZX
   Bai, Y
AF Zhang, Zhixia
   Bai, Yu
TI Spatiotemporal Evolutionary Features and Disorder Factor Diagnosis of
   Urban Resilience
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Disorder factor diagnosis; Spatial association pattern; Spatiotemporal
   evolution; Urban resilience
AB A resilient city is a key goal of the country's high-quality development and could effectively reduce city disaster losses. However, due to the significant spatial differences in China's urban development, research on resilience has mainly focused on developed regions in Eastern China. Therefore, this paper takes Chongqing, a typical city in Western China, as the study area and evaluates the level of urban resilience from four dimensions: (1) economic; (2) social; (3) ecological; and (3) technological. The entropy weight method and exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) are applied to identify its spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and regional heterogeneity, and the obstacle degree model is applied to diagnose its main obstacle factors to improve the city's resilience in a reverse direction. The results show that in the time dimension, Chongqing's urban resilience level shows yearly growth and economic resilience is the main factor in the improvement of the urban resilience level. In the spatial dimension, the western part of the city is higher than the eastern part, which shows the nonequilibrium phenomenon of high-value agglomeration and low-value dispersion, which has a significant spatial spillover effect. For the obstacle factors, the degree of obstruction at the guideline level is in the order of social > economic > technological > ecological, and the public library collection and the balance of RMB deposits are the main factors that restrict the resilience of cities. Performing the resilience evaluation for typical cities could identify the weak links in resilience in different dimensions and provide a theoretical basis for the governmental decision-making and resource allocation for cities that are under sudden risk disasters. (c) 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers. .
C1 [Zhang, Zhixia; Bai, Yu] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Management, Xian 710311, Peoples R China.
C3 Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
RP Bai, Y (corresponding author), Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Coll Management, Xian 710311, Peoples R China.
EM zzx1024@126.com; 2109211814@xauat.edu.cn
FU Social Science Foundation Project of Shaanxi Province Study on ways to
   improve the resilience governance capacity of urban communities in
   Shaanxi Province under normal epidemic prevention and control [2022R012]
FX This research was funded by the Social Science Foundation Project of
   Shaanxi Province Study on ways to improve the resilience governance
   capacity of urban communities in Shaanxi Province under normal epidemic
   prevention and control (2022R012).
CR [Anonymous], 2022, China City Statistical Yearbook
   [Anonymous], 2020, 5 PLEN SESS 19 CPC C
   [Anonymous], 2022, Chongqing statistical yearbook
   [Anonymous], 2022, China County Statistical Yearbook 20122021 (County and City Volume)
   [Anonymous], 2021, Chongqing Statistical Yearbook
   [陈长坤 Chen Changkun], 2018, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V28, P1
   Chen M, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12030340
   Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Zone Regional Plan, 2011, National Development and Reform Commission
   Chongqing Emergency Management Bureau Net, 2023, ABOUT US
   Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Statistics, 2012, Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Statistics
   Ding XW, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9050329
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   He Z, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11110523
   Huang J, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091470
   Huang LJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102074
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Hunter M., 2021, Urban Gov, V1, P115, DOI [10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.004, DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2021.11.004]
   Jiang S. L., 2022, Stat. Decision., V38, P63, DOI [10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.24.012, DOI 10.13546/J.CNKI.TJYJC.2022.24.012]
   Jin J. Y., 2007, Urban Dev. Res, V06, P95
   Li T.Y., 2017, Urban Plan. Int, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Lin JY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104891
   Lin JY, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P3590, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2020.1870166
   Liu L, 2010, EXPERT SYST APPL, V37, P2517, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.08.004
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   McGill R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.04.004
   Mehaffy MichaelW., 2011, Built Environ, V37, P479
   Mengjie L., 2022, China Saf. Sci. J, V32, P144
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   National Catalog Service for Geographic Information, 2022, ABOUT US
   National Geomatics Center of China, 2022, ABOUT US
   Qasim S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.009
   Qiu D, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031285
   Rezvani S. M. H. S., 2023, P 16 WORLD C ENG ASS
   Rezvani SMHS, 2023, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/buildings13092163
   Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
   Sarker MNI, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101769
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Su L. Y., 2015, Popul. Res, V39, P74
   Third Conference on Human Settlements, 2016, UN C HOUS SUST URB D
   Wang B, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12070962
   Wang X., 2022, Statistics and Decision Matring, V38, P70, DOI [10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2022.05.013, DOI 10.13546/J.CNKI.TJYJC.2022.05.013]
   Wang YA, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102553
   Xiao H.Y., 2023, Research on Government Emergency Management of Urban Public Health Emergencies in China
   Yang H., 2023, Disaster Sci, V38, P30
   Yang HY, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P50388, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-14236-3
   Yang Q., 2022, J. Wuhan Univ. Technol, V44, P701
   Ye CS, 2022, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V3, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2022.09.004
   Yuan Y, 2022, ECOL ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106486
   Zhang KZ, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16234765
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   Zhang Y.S., 2022, AM J NUCL MED MOLEC, V2, P54
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 53
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 31
U2 31
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD DEC 1
PY 2024
VL 150
IS 4
AR 05024031
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4891
PG 15
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA J3Z4O
UT WOS:001336478000032
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, WJ
   Wei, HB
   Hassan, H
   He, XY
AF Wang, Wenjing
   Wei, Hongbin
   Hassan, Hasmadi
   He, Xiangyu
TI Research progress and prospects of urban resilience in the perspective
   of climate change
SO FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
LA English
DT Review
DE urban resilience; climate change; urban system; nature-based solutions;
   sustainable development
ID INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES; ADAPTATION; CITIES; GREEN; VULNERABILITY;
   FRAMEWORK
AB The natural hazards caused by climate change have a significant impact on the production and life of urban residents, enhancing urban resilience is an important way to cope with climate disasters and ensure the safety of urban systems. Based on the "urban resilience" research relevant literature, the paper applies bibliometric analysis software to reveal the research hotspots and evolution trends of urban resilience in the perspective of climate change. The results indicate that the main research contents can be summarized into four aspects: ⅰ) influencing factors of urban resilience; ii) evaluation index and method of urban resilience; iii) the impact of climate change on urban resilience; ⅳ) Enhancing urban resilience in response to climate change. Finally, potential directions for future research on urban resilience were proposed, multi-dimensional research on urban resilience should be carried out from aspects of theoretical development, urban planning based on resilience mechanisms should be carried out from the perspective of planning practice, and innovation and reform should be carried out in policy implementation and urban management. Accurately understanding the conceptual connotation and construction mechanism of urban resilience is a crucial premise for climate mitigation and adaptation. Relevant research conclusions can provide useful reference for theoretical research and spatial planning of resilient cities.
C1 [Wang, Wenjing; Hassan, Hasmadi] Univ Malaysia Pahang AL Sultan Abdullah, Ctr Human Sci, Kuantan, Malaysia.
   [Wang, Wenjing] Hebei Normal Univ Nationalities, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Chengde, Peoples R China.
   [Wei, Hongbin] Minist Nat Resources, Land Consolidat & Rehabil Ctr, Land Sci & Technol Innovat Ctr, Key Lab Land Consolidat & Rehabil, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [He, Xiangyu] Mil Commiss, Engn Qual Supervis Ctr, Logist Support Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA); Hebei Normal
   University for Nationalities; Ministry of Natural Resources of the
   People's Republic of China
RP Hassan, H (corresponding author), Univ Malaysia Pahang AL Sultan Abdullah, Ctr Human Sci, Kuantan, Malaysia.; Wei, HB (corresponding author), Minist Nat Resources, Land Consolidat & Rehabil Ctr, Land Sci & Technol Innovat Ctr, Key Lab Land Consolidat & Rehabil, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM hongbin1202@163.com; hasmadi@ump.edu.my
RI Wei, Hongbin/MFZ-5802-2025; WANG, WENJING/IWU-5455-2023
FU Key Laboratory of Degraded and Unused Land Consolidation Engineering,
   the Ministry of Natural Resources [SXDJ2024-02]; Opening foundation of
   Anhui province engineering laboratory of water and soil resources
   comprehensive utilization and ecological protection in high groundwater
   mining area [2022-WSREPMA-02]; Third Batch of Huizhi Leader Creative
   Space Project in Chengde Hi-Tech Zone [HZLC2024023]
FX This work was supported by Key Laboratory of Degraded and Unused Land
   Consolidation Engineering, the Ministry of Natural Resources
   (SXDJ2024-02); the opening foundation of Anhui province engineering
   laboratory of water and soil resources comprehensive utilization and
   ecological protection in high groundwater mining area (2022-WSREPMA-02);
   The Third Batch of Huizhi Leader Creative Space Project in Chengde
   Hi-Tech Zone (HZLC2024023).
CR Abel N, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.002
   Adger W. N., 2003, Progress in Development Studies, V3, P179, DOI 10.1191/1464993403ps060oa
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Barbarossa L., 2018, J. urban Plan. Landsc. Environ. Des, V3, P15
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Bosselmann P. C., 2019, Landsc. Archit, V9, P45
   [蔡建明 Cai Jianming], 2012, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V31, P1245
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Casal-Campos A, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P8307, DOI 10.1021/es506144f
   Chen B. L., 2019, Landsc. Archit, V9, P57
   Dai W., 2019, Landsc. Archit, V9, P83
   [戴伟 Dai Wei], 2017, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V41, P26
   Dawley S, 2010, LOCAL ECON, V25, P650, DOI 10.1080/02690942.2010.533424
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Denton F, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1101
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Han Y, 2022, TRANSPORTATION, V49, P163, DOI 10.1007/s11116-021-10172-w
   Han Y, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V76, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.04.001
   He XY, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1133433
   Highfield WE, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P287, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14531828
   Hunt A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Joerin J, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P226, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2012.689248
   Kennedy CA, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P343, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2160
   Klein R.J., 2003, BUILDING SAFER CITIE, P101
   Lan F, 2020, CITIES, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102454
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li H., 2019, Planners, V15, P53
   [李鹤 LI He], 2011, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V30, P920
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674
   Maliszewski PJ, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V32, P668, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.08.001
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   Maru YT, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moser S. C., 2013, Successful adaptation to climate change: linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world, V17
   Papa R, 2015, TEMA, V8, P19, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/2883
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2018, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V37, P1193
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   Shaker RR, 2019, URBAN SCI, V3, DOI 10.3390/urbansci3020044
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
   Staddon Chad, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P330, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Tu X. L., 2019, Planners, V13, P49
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Wang H, 2017, J MATER SCI-MATER M, V28, DOI 10.1007/s10856-017-5860-4
   Wang M., 2017, Landsc. Archit, V11, P73
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   Zhang R., 2019, CHIN LANDSC, V2, P64
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   [周侃 Zhou Kan], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P2078
   Zhou Y., 2017, Planners, V33, P90
NR 57
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 87
U2 182
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-6463
J9 FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ
JI Front. Earth Sci.
PD FEB 26
PY 2024
VL 12
AR 1247360
DI 10.3389/feart.2024.1247360
PG 7
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology
GA KI1W5
UT WOS:001179249500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wei, Y
   Kidokoro, T
   Seta, F
   Shu, B
AF Wei, Yang
   Kidokoro, Tetsuo
   Seta, Fumihiko
   Shu, Bo
TI Spatial-Temporal Assessment of Urban Resilience to Disasters: A Case
   Study in Chengdu, China
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; disasters; resilience assessment; urban planning;
   Chengdu city
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; BUILDING RESILIENCE; NATURAL HAZARDS; RECOVERY;
   SUSTAINABILITY; RECONSTRUCTION; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; POLICY
AB Urban areas with an imbalanced vulnerability to disasters have garnered attention. Building an urban resilience index helps to develop a progressively favored instrument for tracking progress toward disaster-resilient cities. However, there remains a lack of empirical studies on measuring urban resilience, with limited focus on the spatial-temporal characteristics of urban resilience to disasters, particularly relevant in developing nations like China. Thus, a refined urban resilience index to disasters based on the subcomponents of infrastructure, environment, socio-economy, and institution is suggested in this study. This index-based assessment framework is applied and validated to measure the spatial-temporal resilience using a real-world case study in Chengdu, China. The main findings of this study indicate that: (1) the overall urban resilience of Chengdu has been growing toward better conditions, with infrastructural resilience accounting for the majority of this growth. (2) The distribution of urban resilience exhibits a regional disparity and a spatially polarized pattern. (3) The agglomeration characteristics of urban resilience are significant. (4) There is a clear regional mismatch in the distribution of urban resilience to disaster risk. The validated model offers a comprehensive and replicable approach for urban resilience assessment and planning, especially for disaster-frequent regions.
C1 [Wei, Yang; Shu, Bo] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Design, Chengdu 611756, Peoples R China.
   [Kidokoro, Tetsuo] Toyo Univ, Ctr Sustainable Dev Studies, Tokyo 1128606, Japan.
   [Seta, Fumihiko] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Engn, Dept Urban Engn, Tokyo 1138656, Japan.
C3 Southwest Jiaotong University; Toyo University; University of Tokyo
RP Shu, B (corresponding author), Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Design, Chengdu 611756, Peoples R China.
EM y-wei@swjtu.edu.cn; kidokoro@urban.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp;
   seta@urban.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp; shubo@swjtu.edu.cn
RI WEI, Yang/KIX-2926-2024
OI Fumihiko, SETA/0000-0001-6034-1577; Wei, Yang/0009-0003-1750-5312
FU Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province
FX No Statement Available
CR Abenayake CC, 2018, ENVIRON DEV, V27, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.08.002
   Abramson DB, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1372, DOI 10.1177/0042098019843020
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Allan P, 2013, J URBAN DES, V18, P242, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2013.772881
   Anelli D, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133496
   Baba K., 2020, Resilient Policies Asian Cities Adapt. Clim. Chang. Nat. Disasters, V2020, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-8600-8_1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8600-8_1]
   Baldwin C, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106808
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Bixler RP, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102726
   Boyd E, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1234, DOI 10.1177/0042098014527483
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Buck KD, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V119, P1011, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05493-7
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Cai H, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P844, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cardoni A, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102059
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Casadio Tarabusi E, 2013, SOC INDIC RES, V112, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0070-4
   Chorynski A, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103928
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Da Silva J., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   DeWit A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101808
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Elkhidir E, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104243
   Fan RL, 2023, APPL MATH COMPUT, V437, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127535
   Fang YP, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004
   Gencer E.A., 2013, Mediterranean Studies, V7, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-29470-9_2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-29470-9_2]
   Gencer Ebru A., 2017, How To Make Cities More Resilient. A Handbook for Local Government Leaders
   Gerges F, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P1271, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05094-w
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Guo Y, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1007/s13753-012-0006-2
   Huang X, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103891
   Huang XJ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V87, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.043
   Hung HC, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
   Javadpoor M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102609
   Ji TT, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102726
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kawakubo S., 2020, Resilient Policies Asian Cities Adapt. Clim. Chang. Nat. Disasters, V2020, P47, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-8600-8_2, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8600-8_2]
   Kwok AH, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.013
   Lam NSN, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000193
   Langemeyer J, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lu H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103167
   Lu Y, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103313
   Mai X, 2021, HABITAT INT, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102326
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Mehryar S, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101047
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Peng C, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V29, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.12.003
   Qin WM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P331, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2967-3
   Rapaport C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.020
   Roostaie S, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V154, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.042
   SAATY TL, 1977, J MATH PSYCHOL, V15, P234, DOI 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Scott M, 2013, GEOGR COMPASS, V7, P597, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12066
   Serdar MZ, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103452
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
   Shi P, 2016, NATURAL DISASTERS CH, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-50270-9_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-50270-9]
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Song HX, 2021, FOOD RES INT, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109805
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   The State Council of the People"s Republic of China, 2022, China's urbanization rate hits 64.72% in 2021
   Tumini I, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1363, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2630-4
   UNDRR, 2020, 2020 Global Natural Disaster Assessment Report
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2022, UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3
   Wang YT, 2019, WATER RES, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   Xu J, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P525, DOI 10.1177/0042098019859232
   Yang SN, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1225-1
   Yang W., 2020, Rethink. Sustain. Pac. Rim Territ, P237, DOI [10.17608/k6.auckland.13578266.v2, DOI 10.17608/K6.AUCKLAND.13578266.V2]
   Yang YY, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11464-250205
   Yu LG, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V434, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140027
   Yu SY, 2023, HABITAT INT, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102783
   Zhang HM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102248
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   Zhu SY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102355
   Zhu YX, 2020, MATH PROBL ENG, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/3564835
NR 100
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 70
U2 104
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 4
AR 506
DI 10.3390/land13040506
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA QJ0P8
UT WOS:001220393600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Novosadova, L
   van der Knaap, W
AF Novosadova, Linda
   van der Knaap, Wim
TI The Role of Biophilic Agents in Building a Green Resilient City; the
   Case of Birmingham, UK
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE biophilic city; agents; building green resilience; governance; urban
   planning
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABLE CITIES; SMART GOVERNANCE; URBANIZATION
AB The present research offers an exploration into the biophilic approach and the role of its agents in urban planning in questions of building a green, resilient urban environment. Biophilia, the innate need of humans to connect with nature, coined by Edgar O. Wilson in 1984, is a concept that has been used in urban governance through institutions, agents' behaviours, activities and systems to make the environment nature-inclusive. Therefore, it leads to green, resilient environments and to making cities more sustainable. Due to an increasing population, space within and around cities keeps on being urbanised, replacing natural land cover with concrete surfaces. These changes to land use influence and stress the environment, its components, and consequently impact the overall resilience of the space. To understand the interactions and address the adverse impacts these changes might have, it is necessary to identify and define the environment's components: the institutions, systems, and agents. This paper exemplifies the biophilic approach through a case study in the city of Birmingham, United Kingdom and its biophilic agents. Using the categorisation of agents, the data obtained through in-situ interviews with local professionals provided details on the agent fabric and their dynamics with the other two environments' components within the climate resilience framework. The qualitative analysis demonstrates the ways biophilic agents act upon and interact within the environment in the realm of urban planning and influence building a climate-resilient city. Their activities range from small-scale community projects for improving their neighbourhood to public administration programs focusing on regenerating and regreening the city. From individuals advocating for and educating on biophilic approach, to private organisations challenging the business-as-usual regulations, it appeared that in Birmingham the biophilic approach has found its representatives in every agent category. Overall, the activities they perform in the environment define their role in building resilience. Nonetheless, the role of biophilic agents appears to be one of the major challengers to the urban design's status quo and the business-as-usual of urban governance. Researching the environment, focused on agents and their behaviour and activities based on nature as inspiration in addressing climate change on a city level, is an opposite approach to searching and addressing the negative impacts of human activity on the environment. This focus can provide visibility of the local human activities that enhance resilience, while these are becoming a valuable input to city governance and planning, with the potential of scaling it up to other cities and on to regional, national, and global levels.
C1 [Novosadova, Linda; van der Knaap, Wim] Wageningen Univ & Res, Land Use Planning Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3,POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research
RP Novosadova, L; van der Knaap, W (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ & Res, Land Use Planning Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3,POB 47, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM linda.novosadova@wur.nl; wim.vanderknaap@wur.nl
OI van der Knaap, Wim/0000-0002-3888-9138; Novosadova,
   Linda/0000-0001-6719-3263
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Albrechts L, 2004, ENVIRON PLANN B, V31, P743, DOI 10.1068/b3065
   Anonymous, 2017, SUSTAINABLE DEV KNOW
   [Anonymous], BBC
   [Anonymous], 2017, Smart Cities Movement in BRICS
   [Anonymous], GUARDIAN
   Bai XM, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V23, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.010
   Beatley T., VISION PRACTICE BIOP
   Beatley T, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3328, DOI 10.3390/su5083328
   Beatley Timothy., 2011, Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bibri SE, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V31, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
   Biophilic Cities, PARTNER CITIES
   Biophilic Cities, SPOTLIGHT BIRMINGHAM
   Birmingham City Council, 2017, BIRM DEV PLAN 2031, P150
   Bulkeley H, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P2237, DOI 10.1080/00420980600936491
   Chapman S, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P1921, DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0561-4
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Corfee-Morlot J., 2009, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG, V14, P124
   Costello A, 2009, LANCET, V373, P1693, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60929-6]
   EEA, HIST PROJ POP 10 MOS
   Entec UK Limited, 2003, POTENTIAL IMPACTS CL, P164
   [Field C.B. IPCC. IPCC.], 2012, MANAGING RISKS EXTRE, P555
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gabbatiss J., SPACE 1 MILLION NEW
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Grimmond S, 2007, GEOGR J, V173, P83, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.232_3.x
   Healey P, 2009, J PLAN EDUC RES, V28, P277, DOI 10.1177/0739456X08325175
   Howard Ebenezer., 1965, Garden Cities of Tomorrow
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kinney PL, 2008, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V11, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.08.001
   Kotecha R., 2008, BIRMINGHAMS LOCAL CL
   Le Corbusier, 1933, LA VILLE RADIEUSE
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, 2018, LOC PLANN AUTH GREEN
   Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, 2019, National strategy for Artifcial Intelligence, P74
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2019, MONITORING ED EQUITY, DOI [https://doi.org/10.17226/25389, DOI 10.17226/25389]
   ONS, 2018, ESTIMATES POPULATION
   Reckien D, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V191, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220
   Reeve AC, 2015, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V4, P215, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-11-2014-0057
   Rivolin UJ, 2008, PLAN PRACT RES, V23, P167, DOI 10.1080/02697450802327081
   Roy F., 2015, LAND TENURE J, V1, P71
   Sanchez-Rodriguez R, 2009, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V1, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.005
   Scott M, 2016, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V17, P267, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2016.1158907
   Steele W, 2012, PLAN PRACT RES, V27, P155, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2012.662670
   Tomor Z, 2019, J URBAN TECHNOL, V26, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-Habitat, UNHABITAT WORLD C DI
   UNDRR, MAK CIT RES
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Webster CWR, 2018, INFORM POLITY, V23, P95, DOI 10.3233/IP-170065
NR 51
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 9
U2 72
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 9
AR 5033
DI 10.3390/su13095033
PG 20
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA SC7TN
UT WOS:000650868500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Webber, S
   Leitner, H
   Sheppard, E
AF Webber, Sophie
   Leitner, Helga
   Sheppard, Eric
TI Wheeling Out Urban Resilience: Philanthrocapitalism, Marketization, and
   Local Practice
SO ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS
LA English
DT Article
DE complex; Indonesia; neoliberalism; philanthrocapitalism; policy
   mobility; urban resilience
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLICY; ADAPTATION; CITIES; CITY; CONSULTANTS;
   ASSEMBLAGE; NETWORKS; THINKING
AB In this article, we examine how urban resilience has emerged as a global urban policy project, offering solutions for cities about how they can adapt to and recover from shocks and stresses, particularly those associated with climate change. We conceptualize this as a multicentric global urban resilience complex, catalyzed until recently by the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities initiative in concert with the World Bank. The complex is comprised of three components: (1) a global network of foundations, multilateral agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and private-sector goods and services providers, wielding differential power and influence; (2) measurement and assessment devices that both mobilize and define resilience; and (3) initiatives to marketize urban resilience as producing a dividend also for private-sector firms and investors. Northern institutions define what should be done, downscaling this as a sequence of practices, participatory agenda setting, strategizing, and implementation to be followed by cities. Examining how the complex has come to ground in Semarang and Jakarta, Indonesia, we identify ways in which it is reproduced but also criticized and contested. If the complex in many ways is driven by philanthrocapitalist and neoliberal norms and aspirations, its programs also are subject to critique and contestations at the local scale.
C1 [Webber, Sophie] Univ Sydney, Sch Geosci, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Leitner, Helga; Sheppard, Eric] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Geog, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA.
C3 University of Sydney; University of California System; University of
   California Los Angeles
RP Webber, S (corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Sch Geosci, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
EM sophie.webber@sydney.edu.au; hleitner@geog.ucla.edu;
   esheppard@geog.ucla.edu
OI Webber, Sophie/0000-0002-7597-4622
FU Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. National
   Science Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic
   Sciences [BCS-1636437]; American Association of Geographers; UCLA
   International Institute
FX The research that informs this article was funded by the Social Sciences
   and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the U.S. National Science
   Foundation Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
   (Grant No. BCS-1636437), the American Association of Geographers, and
   the UCLA International Institute.
CR [Anonymous], 2015, Investing in urban resilience: protecting and promoting development in a changing world
   [Anonymous], 1987, Our Common Future
   [Anonymous], 2015, CIT RES FRAM
   Arrow KJ, 2003, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V26, P647, DOI 10.1023/B:EARE.0000007353.78828.98
   Berkowitz, 2019, UPDATE 100 RESILIENT
   Berndt C, 2018, GEOFORUM, V90, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.019
   Betsill M, 2007, LOCAL ENVIRON, V12, P447, DOI 10.1080/13549830701659683
   Betteridge B, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V2, P944, DOI 10.1177/2514848619853985
   Bond Craig., 2017, Resilience Dividend Valuation Model
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Callon M, 1998, LAWS OF THE MARKETS, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03468.x
   Chadwick V., 2019, 100 RESILIENT CITIES
   Chang ICC, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P1719, DOI 10.1177/0308518X16685092
   Chang ICC, 2013, J URBAN TECHNOL, V20, P57, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2012.735104
   Clements FE, 1936, J ECOL, V24, P252, DOI 10.2307/2256278
   Colven E, 2017, WATER ALTERN, V10, P250
   Davoudi, 2018, RESILIENCE MACHINE, P12
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Derickson KD, 2018, PROG HUM GEOG, V42, P425, DOI 10.1177/0309132516686012
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Foundation, 2019, RES CIT RES LIV LEAR
   Furlong K, 2017, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V41, P888, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12582
   Giridharadas Anand., 2018, Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World
   Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, 2017, CIT RES PROGR
   Goh K, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2222, DOI 10.1177/0042098018807306
   Grove KJ, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P611, DOI 10.1111/anti.12066
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Havice E, 2015, GEOFORUM, V58, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.008
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kooy M, 2008, GEOFORUM, V39, P1843, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.07.012
   Larner W, 2010, GEOFORUM, V41, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.11.005
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Leitner H, 2017, ROUTL LIT COMPAN, P194
   Leitner H, 2018, ENVIRON PLANN A, V50, P437, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17709279
   Li Tania., 2007, The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics
   Long J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P992, DOI 10.1177/0042098018770846
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Martin C., 2018, I URB RES MIDT MON E
   McCann E, 2013, URBAN GEOGR, V34, P5, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2013.778627
   McCann EugeneKevin Ward., 2011, MOBILE URBANISM CITI
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mitchell K, 2016, ANTIPODE, V48, P724, DOI 10.1111/anti.12203
   MOLOTCH H, 1976, AM J SOCIOL, V82, P309, DOI 10.1086/226311
   Nelson SH, 2014, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V2, P1, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2014.872456
   Peck J., 2017, Offshore: Exploring the Worlds of Global Outsourcing
   Peck J.Theodore., 2015, FAST POLICY EXPT STA
   Peck J, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P21, DOI 10.1068/a44179
   Prince R, 2014, T I BRIT GEOGR, V39, P90, DOI 10.1111/tran.12012
   Rainey HJ, 2015, ORYX, V49, P232, DOI 10.1017/S0030605313001476
   Rapoport E, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P1779, DOI 10.1177/0308518X16686069
   Resilience Network Initiative, 2017, PET KOT LAUNCH USH D
   Resilient Cities, 2016, RES SEM MOV TOG RES
   Resilient Cities, 2018, JAK AG SETT WORKSH
   Resilient Cities, 2016, RES CIT ACT EARL INS
   Rice JL, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P929, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.502434
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2017, CAT URB RES MARK
   Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP, CIT RES IND UND MEAS
   Rodin Judith., 2014, RESILIENCE DIVIDEND
   Rosenman E, 2019, PROG HUM GEOG, V43, P141, DOI 10.1177/0309132517739142
   Roy Ananya., 2010, POVERTY CAPITAL MICR
   Ruibal M., 2017, RESILIENCE VALUE REA
   Rutland T, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN D, V26, P627, DOI 10.1068/d6907
   Sayer Andrew., 2000, REALISM SOCIAL SCI
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stiglitz J., 2009, Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
   Thompson C, 2018, THIRD WORLD Q, V39, P51, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2017.1357112
   Thurlow I., 2002, BUILDING RESILIENCY
   UN Habitat, MED COLL URB RES
   United Nations-Habitat III, 2016, NEW URB AG
   Ushahidi, 2017, PETAKOTA SEMARANG
   Webber S, 2016, GEOGR COMPASS, V10, P401, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12278
   Webber S, 2015, GEOGR RES-AUST, V53, P26, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12102
   Whitehead M, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P1348, DOI 10.1177/0042098013480965
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   World Bank, 2018, CIT RES PROGR
   World Bank, 2018, CITYSTRENGTH DIAGN P
   Yin R. K., 2014, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
NR 81
TC 50
Z9 53
U1 3
U2 29
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 2469-4452
EI 2469-4460
J9 ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR
JI Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.
PD JUN 8
PY 2020
VL 111
IS 2
BP 343
EP 363
DI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
EA JUN 2020
PG 21
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA QC5EA
UT WOS:000555163600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Davidson, K
   Gleeson, B
AF Davidson, Kathryn
   Gleeson, Brendan
TI New Socio-ecological Imperatives for Cities: Possibilities and Dilemmas
   for Australian Metropolitan Governance
SO URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; urban resilience; metropolitan governance
ID CLIMATE
AB This review examines two new socio-ecological imperatives that have the potential to reshape planning practice and policy: urban climate governance and governance for resilience. The roots of the new imperatives lie in international city collaborative networks funded by philanthropy organisations that operate at city scale. City networks operating at the metropolitan scale raise issues for Australian cities with distributed governance. This practice review considers the early manifestation of both imperatives in what might be termed policy experiments' in Australia's two largest cities: the new climate governance framework emerging through the City of Sydney's collaboration with the C40 network and the resilience regime being shaped by the City of Melbourne's partnership with Rockefeller Foundation's Resilient 100 program. Whilst our early analysis has accentuated the positive to some degree, pointing to different, if preliminary, forms of success in both Sydney and Melbourne, the limits and frustrations that present in both contexts cannot be discounted. Urban planners in many world cities and regions will need to consider and possibly absorb these new agendas of urban climate governance and governing for resilience driven by international city collaborative networks.
C1 [Davidson, Kathryn] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Gleeson, Brendan] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sustainable Soc Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
C3 University of Melbourne; University of Melbourne
RP Davidson, K (corresponding author), Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
EM kathryn.davidson@unisa.edu.au
RI ; Davidson, Kathryn/F-3769-2013
OI Gleeson, Brendan/0000-0001-7264-7397; Davidson,
   Kathryn/0000-0003-3521-3535
CR Acuto M, 2013, REV INT STUD, V39, P835, DOI 10.1017/S0260210512000502
   [Anonymous], 2015, Climate Changemakers: Action Playbook: Require Climate Education
   [Anonymous], 2010, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG, DOI [10.1182/blood-2010-12-326355, DOI 10.1182/BLOOD-2010-12-326355]
   [Anonymous], URB DEV SER KNOWL PA
   Armstrong B., 2015, DELIVERING SUSTAINAB
   Aust H.P., 2015, The European Journal of International Law, V26, P255, DOI DOI 10.1093/EJIL/CHV011
   Barber BenjaminR., 2013, MAYORS RULED WORLD D
   Beck U., 1999, World Risk Society
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Bouteligier S., 2013, Cities, Networks, and Global Environmental Governance: Spaces of Innovation, Places of Leadership (Wageningen UR Library)
   Brenner N, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P731, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12115
   Bulkeley H, 2014, TRANSNATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE GOVERNANCE, P1
   Bulkeley H, 2013, T I BRIT GEOGR, V38, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Burton Paul., 2016, CONVERSATION
   C40, 2015, CAM 3 0
   City of Sydney, 2009, ITEM 3 3 REPORT SEOU
   City of Sydney, 2007, ITEM 3 1 C40 LARGE C
   City of Sydney, 2013, C40 LARGE CITIES CLI
   City of Sydney, 2011, REPORT PARTICIPATION
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dodson J., 2016, CONVERSATION
   Duit A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Gleeson B., 2010, METROPOLITAN GOVERNA, V12
   Gleeson B, 2012, AUSTRALIA'S UNINTENDED CITIES: THE IMPACT OF HOUSING ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT, P117
   Gleeson Brendan., 2014, The Urban Condition
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Heine J, 2008, STUD DIPL INT RELAT, P271
   Hodson M.Marvin., 2010, World cities and climate change: Producing urban ecological security
   Kearney A.T., 2012, 2012 GLOBAL CITIES I
   Legacy C., 2014, PUBLIC CITY ESSAYS H, P74
   Legacy C., 2015, MELBOURNE WHAT NEXT, P116
   McGuirk P, 2015, GEOGR RES-AUST, V53, P39, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12098
   McGuirk P, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P2717, DOI 10.1177/0042098014533732
   Mulligan M., 2016, RESILIENT MELBOURNE
   Parkin A., 1982, GOVERNING THE CITIES
   Pinkse J., 2008, INT BUSINESS GLOBAL
   Rabe BG, 2008, REV POLICY RES, V25, P105, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00314.x
   Ruming KJ, 2014, AUST PLAN, V51, P108, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2014.894105
   Sassen S, 2014, CITIES WORLD EC
   Selin H, 2009, AM COMP ENVIRON POLI, P111
   Sorensen E., 2005, Administrative Theory and Praxis, V27, P197, DOI DOI 10.1080/10841806.2005.11029489
   Spiller M., 2015, MELBOURNE WHAT NEXT, P49
   State of Victoria, 2017, PLAN MELBOURNE REFRE
   Stone J, 2009, URBAN POLICY RES, V27, P419, DOI 10.1080/08111140903342411
   Stretton Hugh., 1975, IDEAS AUSTR CITIES
   Taylor P., 2005, Key Concepts in Geography, P146
   The Fifth Estate, 2016, C40 POOR GOV COLL HA
   UN Habitat, 2013, TIM THINK URB UN HUM
   UN Habitat, 2011, CIT CLIM CHANG UN HS
   Victorian Labor Party, 2014, KEEP IT LIV LAB PLAN
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Whitzman C., 2015, MELBOURNE WHAT NEXT, P4
   Wilkinson C., 2010, Critical Planning, P25
   [No title captured]
NR 55
TC 22
Z9 22
U1 1
U2 26
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0811-1146
EI 1476-7244
J9 URBAN POLICY RES
JI Urban Policy Res.
PY 2018
VL 36
IS 2
BP 230
EP 241
DI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1354848
PG 12
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA GP3DY
UT WOS:000440722800008
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wen, HJ
   Huang, JH
   Qian, L
   Li, ZH
   Zhang, YL
   Zhang, JL
AF Wen, Haijia
   Huang, Junhao
   Qian, Long
   Li, Zhuohang
   Zhang, Yalan
   Zhang, Jialan
TI The spatial-temporal evolution patterns of landslide-oriented resilience
   in mountainous city: A case study of Chongqing, China
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Landslides; Urban resilience; CCD; Spatial-temporal evolution
ID DISASTER RESILIENCE; SUSCEPTIBILITY
AB Cities, as complex systems with multi-interconnected subsystems, face significant challenges from both rapid urbanization and climate change. Ensuring high resilience in urban areas is essential for managing these dynamic risks effectively. This study introduces an innovative, data-driven approach to quantitatively analyze the spatialtemporal evolution patterns of urban resilience, validated through a case study of Chongqing, a representative mountainous city in China. Based on historical landslide data from Chongqing (2010-2020), which includes 4464 events, along with indicator data from the Chongqing Statistical Yearbook, we developed a comprehensive assessment framework. This framework incorporates 33 variables, covering indicators of physical-environmental resilience (PER) and socio-economic resilience (SER). The model integrates the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Coupling Coordination Degree (CCD) model. Key findings include: (1) Social development in mountainous cities like Chongqing follows a point-to-area pattern. Although there is an overall increase in SER, the CCD in more developed areas (Chongqing urban circle) was generally higher than in less developed areas (northeastern and southeastern Chongqing) (2) The PER model demonstrated exceptional performance (AUC values consistently above 0.95). Spatiotemporal evolution models reveal that Chongqing maintains a high overall PER. Notably, from 2019 to 2020, the proportion of administrative units classified as highly resilient peaked at 24.5%, marking a historical high. (3) Multi-year average rainfall primarily impacts PER (ranked first), while Gross Domestic Product (GDP) significantly affect SER. The development of multidimensional recovery indicators provides a robust framework for assessing resilience against landslides in mountainous cities. The CCD model illustrates the importance of regional dynamic coordinated development in resilience trajectories. This study provides a detailed blueprint for the scientific development of resilient mountainous cities, emphasizing the need for a spatial-temporal perspective on resilience and the benefits of coordinated regional development.
C1 [Wen, Haijia; Huang, Junhao; Qian, Long; Li, Zhuohang; Zhang, Yalan; Zhang, Jialan] Chongqing Univ, Natl Joint Engn Res Ctr Prevent & Control Environm, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area,Minis, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing University
RP Zhang, JL (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Natl Joint Engn Res Ctr Prevent & Control Environm, Sch Civil Engn, Key Lab New Technol Construct Cities Mt Area,Minis, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
EM jhw@cqu.edu.cn; hjh@stu.cqu.edu.cn; 202216131400@stu.cqu.edu.cn;
   202116131373@stu.cqu.edu.cn; yalan_z@126.com; lanaij@cqu.edu.cn
RI Huang, Junhao/LZI-7116-2025; Zhang, Jialan/JCN-9303-2023; Wen,
   Haijia/J-8112-2019
OI Zhang, Jialan/0000-0003-0740-7180; Wen, Haijia/0000-0002-2045-729X;
   Huang, Junhao/0009-0004-6635-399X
FU National Key Research and Development Program of China [2023YFC3007204]
FX We would like to extend our appreciation to the Chongqing
   Meteo-rological Administration for their contribution of crucial
   meteorological data. We are also grateful to the Chongqing Institute of
   Geology and Mineral Resources for providing valuable research data on
   historical landslides. The funding for this research was provided by the
   National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No.
   2023YFC3007204) .
CR Akshaya M., 2021, SAF EXTREME ENVIRON, V3, P181, DOI [10.1007/s42797-021-00042-0, DOI 10.1007/S42797-021-00042-0, 10.1007/s42797-021]
   Anchima SJ, 2025, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V27, P6423, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-04149-1
   Bahrami S, 2020, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V79, P1619, DOI 10.1007/s10064-019-01639-3
   Bai X, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112913
   Benmakhlouf M, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P3218, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-018
   Chan SL, 2014, SOC INDIC RES, V115, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0225-3
   Chowdhuri I, 2020, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V79, DOI 10.1007/s12665-020-09227-5
   Dandapat K, 2017, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V3, P1627, DOI 10.1007/s40808-017-0388-7
   Deepak S, 2020, GEOENVIRONMENTAL DIS, V7, DOI 10.1186/s40677-020-00172-w
   Desalegn H, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05865
   Dou J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V662, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.221
   Feloni E, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12563
   Feng YJ, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134824
   Guayjarernpanishk P., 2023, Emerging Science Journal, V7, P1116, DOI [10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-06, DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-06]
   Hong HY, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6981-2
   Hong-in P, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V359, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120970
   Hu XD, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10114016
   Huang BFF, 2016, BMC BIOINFORMATICS, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1228-x
   Huang Junhao, 2025, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, V17, P1612, DOI 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.03.008
   Hussain M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063126
   Kavzoglu T, 2022, ARAB J SCI ENG, V47, P7367, DOI 10.1007/s13369-022-06560-8
   Leng A, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V448, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141461
   Li BL, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121765
   Li HW, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V108, P1001, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04717-6
   Liao MY, 2022, CATENA, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106428
   Liu PD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104231
   Liu R, 2023, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V14, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2023.2190858
   Liu Y, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V375, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134191
   Madzík P, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0268777
   Miroshnyk NV, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105941
   Nabrawi E, 2023, RISKS, V11, DOI 10.3390/risks11090160
   Nikhil S, 2021, J GEOVIS SPAT ANAL, V5, DOI 10.1007/s41651-021-00082-x
   O'Brien RM, 2007, QUAL QUANT, V41, P673, DOI 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Ostadtaghizadeh A, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V83, P1843, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2377-y
   Pant S, 2022, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/math10081206
   Probst P, 2019, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V9, DOI 10.1002/widm.1301
   Rosly MH, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P75, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-SP2023-09-06
   Senan CPC, 2023, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V37, P527, DOI 10.1007/s00477-022-02267-2
   Shano Leulalem, 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V14, DOI 10.1007/s12517-021-06995-7
   Shi PJ, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P426, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00296-5
   Shi T, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118739
   Siebeneck L, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P955, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1886-4
   Suhua Zhou, 2021, Arabian Journal of Geosciences, V14, DOI 10.1007/s12517-021-06630-5
   Sun DL, 2020, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V362, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107201
   Wang YR, 2022, J HYDROL, V614, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128461
   Wen HJ, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118177
   Xing HW, 2024, GONDWANA RES, V129, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2023.12.014
   Xu HS, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V874, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162399
   Yang C, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102271
   Zhang H, 2022, FRONT MAR SCI, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmars.2022.1014959
   Zhang KX, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6731-5
   Zhang XW, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.074
   Zhang YL, 2021, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V80, P7385, DOI 10.1007/s10064-021-02415-y
   Zhao M, 2022, CHINA WTO REV, V8, P331, DOI 10.14330/cwr.2022.8.2.05
   Zhou C, 2018, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V112, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.019
   Zhou XZ, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P13419, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2022.2076928
NR 56
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 30
U2 30
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 370
AR 122963
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122963
EA OCT 2024
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA K2Q1D
UT WOS:001342364400001
PM 39437692
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, J
   Deng, YZ
   Qalati, SA
   Qureshi, NA
AF Wang, Jian
   Deng, Yuzhou
   Qalati, Sikandar Ali
   Qureshi, Naveed Akhtar
TI Urban Resilience and Transportation Infrastructure Level in the Yangtze
   River Delta
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; transport infrastructure; coupling coordination;
   spatial autocorrelation; Yangtze River Delta
ID COORDINATED DEVELOPMENT; HAZE POLLUTION; CHINESE CITIES; URBANIZATION
AB The development of urban resilience is inseparable from the construction of urban infrastructure. As an important lifeline of the city, transportation infrastructure is an important part of improving urban resilience. Studying the coordinated development degree of urban resilience and transportation infrastructure level is related to the future development of the city. On the basis of measuring the urban resilience and transportation infrastructure level in the Yangtze River Delta, this study uses the coupling coordination model and spatial autocorrelation model to explore the spatiotemporal evolution trend of the coupling coordination between urban resilience and transportation infrastructure level. The results show that first, the average development levels of urban resilience and transportation infrastructure are at the middle and lower levels, showing a spatial pattern of "high in the southeast and low in the northwest." Second, the degree of coupling coordination fluctuates and rises and is in the transition stage from mild imbalance to primary coordination. Finally, the degree of coupling coordination is spatially positively autocorrelated, and the degree of agglomeration shows a stable development trend, but the difference of coordinated agglomeration between cities is expanding. To enhance the security and sustainable competitiveness of the Yangtze River Delta, this study argues that it is urgent to establish the concept of resilient urban development and promote the integration of urban agglomeration transportation infrastructure to promote the coordinated development of urban safety systems and infrastructure. Suggestions were recommended to efficiently improve the urban resilience and transportation infrastructure level in the Yangtze River Delta.
C1 [Wang, Jian; Deng, Yuzhou; Qalati, Sikandar Ali] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Jian] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Automot & Traff Engn, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China.
   [Qureshi, Naveed Akhtar] Sukkur IBA Univ, Dept Business Adm, Sukkur, Pakistan.
C3 Jiangsu University; Jiangsu University; Sukkur IBA University
RP Qalati, SA (corresponding author), Jiangsu Univ, Sch Finance & Econ, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China.
EM sidqalati@gmail.com
RI Qalati, Sikandar Ali/AAQ-3265-2020; , Jian/HRN-4590-2023
OI Qalati, Sikandar Ali/0000-0001-7235-6098; , Jian/0000-0001-6216-317X
CR Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Feng XH, 2020, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V30, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s11769-020-1163-7
   Gan T, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102642
   Huang GB, 2020, ENERG ECON, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104973
   Jiajing L., 2018, J S CHINA NORMAL U N, V50, P90, DOI [10.6054/j.jscnun.2018006, DOI 10.6054/J.JSCNUN.2018006]
   Lai ZZ, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0228426
   Liu JP, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107394
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Rehak D, 2019, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V25, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.03.003
   Sun Y, 2018, TRANSPORT POLICY, V66, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.006
   Wang S., 2021, Journal of Geography, V76, P973
   Wang SK., 2013, Journal of Quantitative Economics, V30, P57, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1007-1660.2013.03.011
   Wang XR, 2015, HABITAT INT, V47, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.02.001
   Wei B, 2020, Macroeconomic Management, V12, P77
   XU Y., 2019, Financ. Trade Econ, V40, P110
   Yao L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11041171
   [游细斌 You Xibin], 2017, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V37, P96
   Zhang M, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106547
   [张明斗 Zhang Mingdou], 2019, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V26, P82
   Zhang QY, 2022, CITIES, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103476
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   [周倩 Zhou Qian], 2020, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V27, P286
NR 23
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 23
U2 164
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD APR 28
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 893964
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.893964
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 1E2SH
UT WOS:000794344700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Abastante, F
   Lami, IM
   La Riccia, L
   Gaballo, M
AF Abastante, Francesca
   Lami, Isabella M.
   La Riccia, Luigi
   Gaballo, Marika
TI Supporting Resilient Urban Planning through Walkability Assessment
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE walkability; walkability measure; urban resilience; quantitative;
   qualitative and mixed models and methods; urban planning; public space
ID DESIGN QUALITIES; MULTICRITERIA; RELIABILITY; CITIES; CHOICE; LEVEL;
   TOOL
AB The urban planning and evaluation literature suggests that making a walkable city means creating a resilient and healthy city. In recent years, alternative mobility has been the subject of numerous studies, showing that the concept of urban walkability can be used as an additional support in planning resilient cities. Though researchers agree that walkability assessment has a positive impact on public space planning, it is still difficult to include the topic in planning strategies because of its novelty in the scientific debate. This paper will first review the literature on walkability assessment and then propose a multi-methodological assessment framework that fills the gaps in existing assessment methods. The multi-methodological assessment framework contributes to overcoming the idea that objective and subjective aspects are "not part of the same planning project." Thanks to its combination of hard and soft methods, the assessment framework illustrated in this paper can consider physical and perceptual aspects simultaneously and represent them visually using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). It can thus provide easily readable results that can be applied in establishing guidelines for planning resilient cities.
C1 [Abastante, Francesca; Lami, Isabella M.; La Riccia, Luigi; Gaballo, Marika] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning DIS, Viale Mattioli 39, I-20125 Turin, Italy.
C3 Polytechnic University of Turin
RP Gaballo, M (corresponding author), Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning DIS, Viale Mattioli 39, I-20125 Turin, Italy.
EM francesca.abastante@polito.it; isabella.lami@polito.it;
   luigi.lariccia@polito.it; s251715@studenti.polito.it
RI La Riccia, Luigi/D-6869-2019
OI La Riccia, Luigi/0000-0002-4800-2641; LAMI, Isabella
   Maria/0000-0002-6468-3184
CR Abastante F., 2020, International Symposium: New Metropolitan Perspectives, P254
   Abastante F., 2016, SEM IT SOC PROP EV I, P535
   Abastante F, 2017, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/buildings7040103
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M.Marina., 2016, CITIES THINK PLANETS
   Amaturo E., 2013, QUAD SOCIOL, V62, P25
   Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.3.CO;2-Z
   Andrienko G, 2007, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V21, P839, DOI 10.1080/13658810701349011
   [Anonymous], 2017, FORUM QUALITATIVE SO
   [Anonymous], 2006, CASE STUDY RES PRINC
   [Anonymous], 2011, SUSTAINABLE URBAN MO
   Balaga P., 2010, U.S. Patent, Patent No. [US7792331B2, 7792331]
   Barua A., 2013, Journal of Asian Scientific Research, V3, P35
   Batty M., 2008, ENCY COMPLEXITY SYST
   Blecic I, 2015, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V29, P1350, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2015.1026824
   Boeing G., 2019, MATH URBAN MORPHOLOG, P271
   Bosco D.L., 2019, LABOREST, V18, P49
   Bradshaw C., 1993, P 14 INT PED C
   Brunetta G., 2017, FUTURO AFFIDABILE CI, P135
   Brunetta G, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_3
   Cambra P., 2012, Pedestrian Accessibility and Attractiveness Indicators for Walkability Assessment
   Cavalli L., 2019, EQUILIBRI, V23, P69
   Cerasoli M, 2015, URBANISTICA INF, V7, P16
   Cerin Ester, 2011, Health Place, V17, P937, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.04.005
   Chiantera G., 2018, P C NAZ ASITA TRIEST, P1
   Congiu T., 2015, URBANISTICA INF, V7, P2
   D'Alessandro D, 2016, EPIDEMIOL PREV, V40, P237, DOI 10.19191/EP16.3-4.P237.090
   De Carlo G., 1968, PIANIFICAZIONE E DIS
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Domokos S., 2014, WALKABILITY U AVENUE
   Dorrzapf L., 2019, Urban Development Issues, V62, P5, DOI DOI 10.2478/UDI-2019-0008
   Ewing R, 2009, J URBAN DES, V14, P65, DOI 10.1080/13574800802451155
   Favaro S., 2017, THESIS POLITECNICO T
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Ford A.M., 2013, Walkability of campus communities surrounding Wright State University
   Forsyth A, 2015, URBAN DES INT, V20, P274, DOI 10.1057/udi.2015.22
   Galanis A., 2011, WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, V7, P385
   Gao Y., 2020, URBAN SCI, V4, P23
   Gehl J., 2010, CITIES PEOPLE
   Hamers D, 2012, URBAN RES PRACT, V5, P129, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2012.656458
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Keat L.K., 2016, PLAN MALAYS, V14, P101
   Krambeck H.V, 2016, THESIS MIT CAMBRIDGE
   La Riccia L., 2019, SPATIAL PLANNING BIG, P113
   La Rocca RA, 2010, TEMA, V3, P85
   Lami IM, 2014, EURO J DECIS PROCESS, V2, P281, DOI 10.1007/s40070-014-0033-x
   Lee S, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P368, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
   Likert R., 1932, ARCH PSYCHOL, V140, P44
   Lo R. H., 2009, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, V2, P145, DOI DOI 10.1080/17549170903092867
   Lovelace R, 2019, INTEGRATING GEOGRAPH
   MacEachren AM, 2004, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V24, P13, DOI 10.1109/MCG.2004.1255801
   Masoumzadeh S., 2019, URBAN RES PRACT, P1
   Moayedi F., 2013, J TEKNOL, P65
   Nijkamp Peter., 2012, Impact assessment and evaluation in transportation planning
   Pensa S., 2015, CIVIL ENG
   Pensa S., 2013, PLANNING SUPPORT SYS, P451, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0
   Politecnico di Torino Project Team, 2017, MASTERPLAN PROCESSO
   Porebska A, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102878
   Robertson N, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V7, pS85, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.137
   Rogers SH, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3473, DOI 10.3390/su5083473
   Ross S.M, 2014, INTRO STAT
   Scheiner J, 2007, TRANSPORTATION, V34, P487, DOI 10.1007/s11116-007-9112-1
   Sennett Richard., 2018, BUILDING DWELLING ET
   Shatu F, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V70, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.06.004
   Simangunsong D, 2018, MATEC WEB CONF, V147, DOI 10.1051/matecconf/201814707003
   Solnit Rebecca., 2000, Wanderlust: A History of Walking
   Soman D., 2015, The last mile: Creating social and economic value from behavioral insights
   Stake R., 1995, CASE STUDY RES
   Taleai M, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V31, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.011
   Urry J., 2016, MOBILITIES NEW PERSP
   Ussery EN, 2019, J TRANSP HEALTH, V12, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2018.11.007
   Vennix JAM., 1996, Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics
   Wackernagel M., 1996, OUR ECOLOGICAL FOOTP, DOI 10.5070/g31710273
   Westfall L, 2009, CERTIFIED QUALITY EN
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Won J, 2018, J PLAN EDUC RES, V38, P463, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17702443
   Yin L, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P288, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.001
   Yin R., 2011, Applications of Case Study Research
   Zhou H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605
   Zoppi C, 2012, PIANIFICAZIONE EVALU
NR 80
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 3
U2 76
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 19
AR 8131
DI 10.3390/su12198131
PG 20
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ON2ZH
UT WOS:000586575200001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Moglia, M
   Cork, SJ
   Boschetti, F
   Cook, S
   Bohensky, E
   Muster, T
   Page, D
AF Moglia, Magnus
   Cork, Steven J.
   Boschetti, Fabio
   Cook, Stephen
   Bohensky, Erin
   Muster, Tim
   Page, Declan
TI Urban transformation stories for the 21st century: Insights from
   strategic conversations
SO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban transformation; Resilience; Adaptive cycles; Urban planning
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESILIENT CITIES; CULTURAL THEORY; SUSTAINABILITY;
   ECOLOGY; CITY; PERSPECTIVE; ENVIRONMENT; TRANSITION; COMPLEXITY
AB It is commonly argued that cities face unprecedented pressures and therefore must transform. To guide transformations, it is important to develop guiding visions. This paper reports on a futures thinking exercise in the context of cities. It employs a methodology based on a series of community workshops with a diverse mix of experts using a "strategic conversation". The conversation was framed around the question: 'How might your city build and maintain resilience in a range of plausible futures?' Results of the process help to identify risks and opportunities, as well as urban transformation archetypes. Furthermore, these narratives are interpreted as city reorganization patterns similar to those theorized in resilience thinking through the notion of adaptive cycles. Finally, the possibility of developing a more functional transformation narrative for cities is outlined, which would enable the development of a collective vision for a desired urban future and how to avoid the adverse consequences of drivers of change in cities.
C1 [Moglia, Magnus; Cook, Stephen; Bohensky, Erin; Muster, Tim; Page, Declan] CSIRO Land & Water, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Cork, Steven J.] EcoInsights, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Cork, Steven J.] ANU Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Boschetti, Fabio] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Perth, WA, Australia.
C3 Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO);
   Australian National University; Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial
   Research Organisation (CSIRO)
RP Moglia, M (corresponding author), CSIRO Land & Water, Ian Wark Bldg B203, Clayton, Vic 3169, Australia.
EM magnus.moglia@csiro.au
RI Cook, Stephen/B-4156-2010; Muster, Tim/D-2987-2013; Moglia,
   Magnus/C-8575-2011; Bohensky, Erin/C-3636-2011; Page,
   Declan/F-2566-2011; Boschetti, Fabio/A-1607-2015; Cook,
   Stephen/G-7216-2011
OI Muster, Tim/0000-0002-9847-5201; Moglia, Magnus/0000-0002-8290-610X;
   Bohensky, Erin/0000-0002-4159-5325; Page, Declan/0000-0002-4902-3911;
   Boschetti, Fabio/0000-0001-8999-6913; Cook, Stephen/0000-0002-9623-7031
FU Northern Australia Development Office; CSIRO Land and Water
FX We would like to thank the participants of the workshops in Brisbane,
   Melbourne, Darwin and Perth who thus contributed to developing the
   storylines of the future of Australian cities. We would also like to
   thank City of Melbourne and the 100 Resilient Cities network for helping
   to organise the workshop in Melbourne. Particular thanks to Toby Kent,
   Chief Resilience Officer at the City of Melbourne. We would like to
   thank the Northern Australia Development Office who funded the workshop
   in Darwin. We thank Liam Egerton at the Global Foresight Network for
   useful inputs. Furthermore, we thank CSIRO staff members who have helped
   in the process, including Brenda Lin, Simon Toze, Ian Walker, Zoe
   Leviston, Nicky Grigg, George Quezada and Murray Hall. This research was
   funded by CSIRO Land and Water with some additional funding provided by
   the Northern Australia Development Office for the Darwin workshop.
CR Ajibade I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.029
   Alcamo J., 2006, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
   Allen CR, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090844
   Alliance Resilience, 2017, AD CYCL
   [Anonymous], EC HUM WELL BEING
   [Anonymous], 2017, MAKING RESILIENCE AD
   [Anonymous], 2008, PREDICTABLY IRRATION
   Bai XM, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P465, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.009
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Batten D.F., 2000, DISCOVERING ARTIFICI
   Batty M., 2005, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals
   Bennett EM, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P441, DOI 10.1002/fee.1309
   Bettencourt LMA, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P7301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
   Blackmore JM, 2008, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V134, P224, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(224)
   Boschetti F, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P611, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0436-2
   Boschetti F, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P345, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0429-1
   Boyd E, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.012
   Chen X., 2008, 2008 INT C WIR COMM
   Cilona T., 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUTER
   Colloff MJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V68, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.007
   Cork S., 2015, ROUTLEDGE HDB ECOSYS
   Costello A, 2009, LANCET, V373, P1693, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60929-6]
   CRUTCHFIELD JP, 1994, PHYSICA D, V75, P11, DOI 10.1016/0167-2789(94)90273-9
   Curry A, 2009, J FUTURES STUD, V13, P35
   de Haan FJ, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V85, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.005
   Diab Y., 2011, IET C PUBLICATIONS, P38
   Dieleman H, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.027
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P186, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620081114
   Ferguson BK, 2012, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V23, P140, DOI 10.1108/14777831211204895
   Folke C, 1997, AMBIO, V26, P167
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fuggle Sophie., 2013, Anthropologica, V55, P29
   Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Glaeser Edward., 2012, TRIUMPH CITY, V1
   Glaser BG, 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
   Godet M, 2012, FUTURIST, V46, P46
   Gomez-Baggethun Erik, 2013, P175
   Grunwald A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V197, P1854, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.212
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hailing C. S., 1996, ENG ECOLOGICAL CONST
   Halpern D., 2005, SOCIAL CAPITAL BRIST
   Hohwy J., 2013, The predictive mind
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   HUMMON DM, 1985, J CULT GEOGR, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/08873638509478545
   Kotilainen J, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P53, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.820086
   Kurtz CF, 2003, IBM SYST J, V42, P462, DOI 10.1147/sj.423.0462
   Larson KL, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P14761, DOI 10.3390/su71114761
   Locke EA, 2007, J MANAGE, V33, P867, DOI 10.1177/0149206307307636
   McDaniels Timothy L., 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P252, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9544-7
   McPhearson T, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.004
   McPhearson T, 2016, NATURE, V538, P165, DOI 10.1038/538165a
   Meadows D., 1999, LEVERAGE POINTS PLAC
   Meadows D. H., 2008, THINKING SYSTEMS
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miller R, 2010, FORESIGHT, V12, DOI 10.1108/fs.2010.27312caa.001
   Milojevic I, 2015, FUTURES, V73, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.007
   Moglia M., 2018, GLOBAL ENV CHANGE
   Namazi-Rad Mohammad-Reza., 2016, Bulletin de methodologie sociologique: BMS, V129, P5
   Newman P, 2006, ENVIRON URBAN, V18, P275, DOI 10.1177/0956247806069599
   O'Connor D, 2017, GLOB SOC POLICY, V17, P3, DOI 10.1177/1468018116658776
   O'Riordan T, 1999, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V9, P81, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00030-2
   Office for Science and Technology, 2002, FOR FUT 2020
   Ostrom E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
   Ostrom E, 2010, ENVIRON CONSERV, V37, P451, DOI 10.1017/S0376892910000834
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Perez P, 2006, COMPLEX SCIENCE FOR A COMPLEX WORLD: EXPLORING HUMAN ECOSYSTEMS WITH AGENTS, P1
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Price JC, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V37, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.10.001
   Raco M, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P1065, DOI 10.1177/0042098011415716
   Ramos JoseM., 2004, Foresight Practice in Australia: A Meta-Scan of Practitioners and Organisations
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Rohrbeck R, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P1593, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.004
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Rosen R, 1985, ANTICIPATORY SYSTEMS
   Rothwell A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V114, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.096
   Roxburgh Charles., 2003, The McKinsey Quarterly, V2, P27
   Ruth M, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P317, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685659
   Satterthwaite D, 2000, BRIT MED J, V321, P1143, DOI 10.1136/bmj.321.7269.1143
   Satterthwaite D., 2008, CLIMATE CHANGE URBAN
   Satterthwaite D., 2009, ROLE CITIES CLIMATE
   Satterthwaite D, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P539, DOI 10.1177/0956247808096127
   Scearce Diana., 2004, Global Business Network
   Scerri A, 2016, ENVIRON VALUE, V25, P527, DOI 10.3197/096327116X14703858759053
   Serre D., 2012, P 4 INT DIS RISK C I, P635
   Seto KC, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P923
   Snowden DJ, 2007, HARVARD BUS REV, V85, P68
   Sovacool BK, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P4856, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.001
   STAR SL, 1989, SOC STUD SCI, V19, P387, DOI 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Steg L, 2000, ENVIRON BEHAV, V32, P250, DOI 10.1177/00139160021972513
   Stewart CC, 2008, FUTURES, V40, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2007.11.013
   Taleb Nicholas Nassim, 2007, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11138-008-0051-7
   UNEP, 2011, CIT INV EN RES EFF G
   United Nations, 2015, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, DOI DOI 10.4054/DEMRES.2005.12.9
   Van der Heijden K., 1996, SCENARIOS ART STRATE
   Vazquez-Brust D, 2014, FUTURES, V64, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.005
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Watts N, 2015, LANCET, V386, P1861, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60854-6
   Webb R, 2018, AMBIO, V47, P57, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
   Williams J, 2013, ENVIRON CHEM, V10, P269, DOI 10.1071/EN13061
   Wilson GA, 2013, AREA, V45, P207, DOI 10.1111/area.12012
   Zhao PJ, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3202, DOI 10.3390/su5073202
NR 103
TC 30
Z9 32
U1 2
U2 32
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-3780
EI 1872-9495
J9 GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG
JI Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens.
PD MAY
PY 2018
VL 50
BP 222
EP 237
DI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.009
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography
GA GK5OG
UT WOS:000436223800019
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rao, FJ
   Han, SS
   Pan, R
AF Rao, Fujie
   Han, Sun Sheng
   Pan, Ran
TI Planning for resilient central-city shopping districts in the post-Covid
   era: an explanatory case study of the Hoddle Grid in Melbourne
SO CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF REGIONS ECONOMY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptive resilience; retail planning; online retailing; urbanity; mix;
   pedestrian
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; RETAIL RESILIENCE; HIGH STREET; POLICY; CENTERS;
   ONLINE; SUSTAINABILITY; CROSS
AB This research explores how central-city shopping districts could be transformed to support a post-Covid lifestyle, where people re-embrace community, local streets and walking while relying more on online shopping. By reviewing metropolitan/city development plans since the 1980s and mapping changes of retail provisions, urban environment and pedestrian movements in Melbourne's Hoddle Grid in the twenty-first century, this paper shows that planning policies focusing on people-centred experiences in the central-city shopping district helped to improve retail resilience. This paper thus adds insights to understanding the relentless retail landscape changes and has implications for central-city retail planning in the post-Covid era.
C1 [Rao, Fujie] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Design, Dept Architecture, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China.
   [Han, Sun Sheng] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture, Grattan St, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
   [Pan, Ran] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Bldg 8,Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Shanghai Jiao Tong University; University of Melbourne; Delft University
   of Technology
RP Rao, FJ (corresponding author), Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Design, Dept Architecture, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China.
EM raofujie@gmail.com; sshan@unimelb.edu.au; ran.pan@outlook.com
RI Rao, Fujie/AAH-5242-2019
OI Han, Sun Sheng/0000-0002-6542-1354; Rao, Fujie/0000-0002-6828-6944; Pan,
   Ran/0000-0003-3441-751X
FU Humanities & Social Sciences Research Grant for Young Scholars
   [21YJCZH121]; Ministry of Education of China
FX The corresponding author gratefully acknowledges the financial support
   of Humanities & Social Sciences Research Grant for Young Scholars (No.
   21YJCZH121) by the Ministry of Education of China.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   [Anonymous], 1998, INT REV RETAIL DISTR
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229433
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2014, CITIES, V36, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.007
   Beck N, 2015, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V27, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.08.001
   Berry B.J.L., 1963, COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE
   Blomkamp E., 2019, GREAT POLICY SUCCESS, P180
   Bond C., 2021, The Herald Sun
   Briedis H., 2020, SMART VEHICLE ARCH S
   Brown S., 1990, EUR J MARKETING, V24, P39
   Cachinho H, 2014, CITIES, V36, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.005
   City of Melbourne, 2016, FUTURE MELBOURNE 202
   City of Melbourne, 2021, PROPERTY BOUNDARIES
   City of Melbourne, 2022, PEDESTRIAN COUNTING
   City of Melbourne, 2004, PLACES FOR PEOPLE
   City of Melbourne, 2021, CENSUS LAND USE EMPL
   City of Melbourne, 1985, CITY MELBOURNE STRAT
   City of Melbourne, 2015, PLACES FOR PEOPLE
   City of Melbourne, 1994, PLACES FOR PEOPLE
   City of Sydney Data Hub, 2022, PEDESTRIANS CITY
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Day N., 1978, AGE
   Dobson J., 2015, J URBAN REGENERATION, V8, P347
   Dovey K, 2016, URBAN DESIGN THINKING: A CONCEPTUAL TOOLKIT, P1
   Dovey K., 2018, URBAN CHOREOGRAPHY C
   Dovey K, 2017, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V18, P249, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2017.1281996
   Elmqvist T., 2014, RESILIENT SUSTAINABL, P19, DOI [10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.4324/9780203593066]
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Erkip F, 2022, J URBAN AFF, V44, P967, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2020.1773838
   Fernandes JR, 2014, CITIES, V36, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.006
   Fernie J., 2003, Principles of retailing
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gaisie E, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102292
   Garreau J., 1991, Edge City: Life On The New Frontier
   Gibbs RobertJ., 2012, Principles of Urban Retail Planning and Development
   Guy C., 2007, Planning for retail development
   Hallsworth AG, 2018, CITIES, V79, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.002
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   ICSC, 2015, ENV 2020 FUT SHOPP C
   Jones C, 2018, INT REV RETAIL DISTR, V28, P47, DOI 10.1080/09593969.2017.1393441
   Kärrholm M, 2014, CITIES, V36, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.012
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   McNair M.P., 1958, COMPETITIVE DISTRIBU, P17
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works, 1981, METR STRAT IMPL REP
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Ozuduru BH, 2014, CITIES, V36, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.003
   Peterson G, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P6, DOI 10.1007/s100219900002
   Rao FJ, 2021, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V22, P747, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2021.1965647
   Rao FJ, 2020, GEOGR COMPASS, V14, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12539
   Rao FJ, 2020, URBAN DES INT, V25, P310, DOI 10.1057/s41289-020-00114-w
   Rao FJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11153999
   Rao FJ, 2016, CITIES, V58, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.002
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Singleton AD, 2016, GEOFORUM, V69, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.013
   State of Victoria, 1995, LIV SUB
   State of Victoria, 2017, PLAN MELBOURNE 2017
   State of Victoria, 2002, MELBOURNE 2030
   Talen E, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1140, DOI 10.1177/2399808320950042
   Teller C, 2016, J MARKET MANAG-UK, V32, P1537, DOI 10.1080/0267257X.2016.1240705
   Times Square, 2022, PEDESTRIAN COUNTS
   Towell N., 2021, CURR CONTENTS
   Wahlquist C., 2017, The Guardian
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Weltevreden JWJ, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P279, DOI 10.1068/b34011t
   Wrigley N, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN A, V43, P2337, DOI 10.1068/a44270
   Zukin S, 2016, GLOBAL CITIES, LOCAL STREETS: EVERYDAY DIVERSITY FROM NEW YORK TO SHANGHAI, P1, DOI 10.4324/9781315776194
NR 70
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 36
PU OXFORD UNIV PRESS
PI OXFORD
PA GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND
SN 1752-1378
EI 1752-1386
J9 CAMB J REG ECON SOC
JI Camb. J. Regions Econ. Soc.
PD DEC 12
PY 2022
VL 15
IS 3
SI SI
BP 575
EP 596
DI 10.1093/cjres/rsac003
EA APR 2022
PG 22
WC Development Studies; Economics; Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Business & Economics; Geography
GA 7K8AC
UT WOS:000789881200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ge, WJ
   Zhang, GX
AF Ge, Wenjing
   Zhang, Guixiang
TI Resilient Public Transport Construction in Mega Cities from the
   Perspective of Ecological Environment Governance
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
AB With the rapid development of the social economy, environmental and resource constraints of economic growth are becoming more and more serious. Therefore, for cities, we should take the road of green development and sustainable development. On the one hand, we should fully implement the basic policies issued by the central government. On the other hand, we should fully integrate the actual situation of the city to make it better implemented, which will help to improve the ability of ecological environment governance and consolidate the ecological advantages of the city. With the development of the urban economy and the continuous increase of population, the development pressure faced by cities is also increasing. Innovating urban construction mode has increasingly become the focus of the development of the new era. The main reason is that the continuous growth of the urban population, environmental pollution, traffic congestion, and ecological damage has caused great trouble to urban residents. The traditional public service governance model has been unable to meet the current public service needs of urban residents. Based on this background, major cities around the world have begun to study urban resilience in order to prevent and resist the interference and impact brought by the outside world and maintain the sound development of the urban system. Based on the demand for ecological environment governance, this study analyzes the current situation and causes of urban ecological environment governance in China and the problems existing in urban resilient transportation construction in China, and puts forward corresponding countermeasures for ecological environment governance and the current situation of urban resilient public transportation construction. This study has great theoretical and practical significance to promote the sustainable development of the Chinese ecological environment and the resilience construction of urban transportation.
C1 [Ge, Wenjing; Zhang, Guixiang] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Adm, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
C3 Capital University of Economics & Business
RP Ge, WJ (corresponding author), Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Adm, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
EM wenjing@cueb.edu.cn; zhanggx9154@163.com
OI Ge, Wenjing/0000-0002-9128-6950
FU National Social Science Foundation of China: Study on interregional
   interest compensation and Regional Coordinated Development Mechanism
   [21BJL005]; Capital High-End Think Tank Research project: Study on the
   realization path [ZD202102]; Capital University of Economics and
   Business of Beijing Municipal Universities Basic Scientific Research
   Funds major cultivation special project: Promote green development by
   MSW classification [GDZK20190107002]
FX The research was supported by National Social Science Foundation of
   China: Study on interregional interest compensation and Regional
   Coordinated Development Mechanism (21BJL005), Capital High-End Think
   Tank Research project: Study on the realization path and mechanism of
   "lucid water and lush mountains are gold and silver mountains" in
   ecological conservation area (GDZK20190107002), and Capital University
   of Economics and Business of Beijing Municipal Universities Basic
   Scientific Research Funds major cultivation special project: Promote
   green development by MSW classification (ZD202102).
CR Amikova E.A., 2020, IOP C SERIES EARTH E, V579, DOI [10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012082, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/579/1/012082]
   An J., 2021, ADV EC BUSINESS MANA, P165
   An J., 2021, P 6 INT C EC MANAGEM, V5, P45
   Ao YB, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102708
   Cardoso M., 2021, URBE REV BRASILEIRA, V13, P99
   Cheriyan D, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120077
   Grofelnik I., 2021, BUSINESS LOGISTICS M, V21, P119
   Hahladakis JN, 2020, WASTE MANAGE RES, V38, P460, DOI 10.1177/0734242X19897816
   Kliment D, 2020, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V960, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/960/3/032060
   Krajewska R., 2022, P SCI TECHNICAL C TR, V6, P44
   Kurichev N.K., 2020, RUDN J EC, V30, P19
   Nobrega B., 2022, PERSPECTIVES INTEGRA, V4, P112
   Bocarejo JP, 2022, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100560
   Smirnov S.A., 2020, TRANSPORTATION SYSTE, V6, P161, DOI [10.17816/transsyst202061161-173, DOI 10.17816/TRANSSYST202061161-173]
   Soares I., 2022, J URBAN DES, V9, P133
   Varavin D., 2021, THESIS MINISTRY ED S, V6, P28
   Wiik Marianne Kjendseth, 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V588, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/588/2/022017
   Yaar Z., 2020, J SUSTAINABLE CONSTR, V5, P55
   Zalewski A, 2020, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V960, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/960/4/042005
   Zhirui D., 2021, TOB REGUL SCI, V4, P55
NR 20
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 3
U2 43
PU HINDAWI LTD
PI LONDON
PA ADAM HOUSE, 3RD FLR, 1 FITZROY SQ, LONDON, W1T 5HF, ENGLAND
SN 1687-9805
EI 1687-9813
J9 J ENVIRON PUBLIC HEA
JI J. Environ. Public Health
PD AUG 8
PY 2022
VL 2022
AR 9143618
DI 10.1155/2022/9143618
PG 10
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA 3X8VS
UT WOS:000843312700009
PM 35978589
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, H
   Liu, Z
   Zhou, Y
AF Wang, Heng
   Liu, Zhen
   Zhou, Yang
TI Assessing urban resilience in China from the perspective of
   socioeconomic and ecological sustainability
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Resilience assessment; Entropy method; ESDA; China
ID REGIONAL ECONOMIC RESILIENCE; DISASTER; VULNERABILITY; DISPARITIES;
   ADAPTATION; REDUCTION; FRAMEWORK; RISK
AB Global uncertainties brought about by external shocks have surged in recent years, posing huge challenges to achieve the global 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Urban resilience determines how cities responds, adapts and recovers from external shocks. At present, the theoretical analysis and systematic evaluation of urban resilience in China are still insufficient. Here, we constructed an urban resilience index (URI) system from the perspective of socioeconomic and ecological sustainability to evaluate the urban resilience of prefecture-level cities in China from 2000 to 2020. Then, entropy method and exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) were used to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of urban resilience in China. Finally, the influencing factors that hinder the improvement of urban resilience in China were identified through the obstacle diagnosis model. Results showed that over the past 20 years, China's urban resilience has been greatly improved, as shown in the average URI increased from 0.048 in 2000 to 0.092 in 2010, and further raised to 0.148 in 2020. But the growth rate of China's urban resilience improvement over the past decade (2010-2020) has been slower than in the previous decade (2000-2010). Over the past two decades, China's urban resilience varied across the geographical regions, urban agglomerations and population scales, showing that URI was higher in eastern regions, urban agglomerations and cities with larger population scales than in the mid-west, non-urban agglomerations, and cities with smaller population scales. China's urban resilience has positive spatial auto-correlation, indicating that cities with higher or lower URI tend to have a trend of spatial agglomeration. The dominant factors that hinder the improvement of urban resilience in China have changed over time, manifested as the role of infrastructure gradually weakening, and the role of economic level, industrial structure, and education level gradually strengthening. In view of the heterogeneity of urban resilience in China and the complexity of its influencing factors, differentiated rather than one-size-fits-all countermeasures to improve urban resilience may be more effective. Our findings would provide a beneficial reference for China and other developing countries to optimize urban planning to cope with external shocks and build sustainable and resilient cities.
C1 [Wang, Heng; Liu, Zhen; Zhou, Yang] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Yang] Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China.
C3 Renmin University of China; Renmin University of China
RP Zhou, Y (corresponding author), Renmin Univ China, Sch Agr Econ & Rural Dev, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China.
EM zhouyang2021@ruc.edu.cn
RI Zhou, Yang/HJA-9545-2022
OI Zhou, Yang/0000-0002-2202-2388
FU National Natural Science Founda- tion of China [41871183]; Research
   Funds of Renmin University of China [22XNA022]
FX This study was supported by the National Natural Science Founda- tion of
   China (Grants 41871183) and the Research Funds of Renmin University of
   China (No. 22XNA022) .
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   [Anonymous], 2009, Asian J. Environ. Disaster Manag. (AJEDM), V1, P101, DOI [10.3850/S179392402009000088, DOI 10.3850/S179392402009000088]
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2014, CITY RESILIENCE INDE
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Antonioli D, 2022, NETW SPAT ECON, V22, P541, DOI 10.1007/s11067-021-09521-0
   Armitage D, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04940-170415
   Bellamy CC, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023
   Bonanno GA, 2007, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V75, P671, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.671
   Borsekova K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.012
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106771
   Cheng L, 2022, NETW SPAT ECON, V22, P567, DOI 10.1007/s11067-021-09518-9
   Cheng Y, 2019, ASIA PAC POLICY STU, V6, P73, DOI 10.1002/app5.267
   Cimellaro GP, 2014, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V43, P1763, DOI 10.1002/eqe.2422
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Cutter SL, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P25, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.768076
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Duy PN, 2018, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000419
   Etinay N, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.074
   Fabbricatti K., 2020, City, Territory and Architecture, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40410-020-00126-7
   Fan SG, 2011, REV DEV FINANC, V1, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.rdf.2010.10.001
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Heinzlef C, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.003
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Katina PF, 2014, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V7, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.01.005
   Keck M, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P5, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   KRUGMAN P, 1991, J POLIT ECON, V99, P483, DOI 10.1086/261763
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Li Z, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V206, P920, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.241
   Liang LW, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117649
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Maisseu A., 1995, International Journal of Global Energy Issues, V8, P201
   Diaz-Sarachaga JM, 2019, CITIES, V93, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.018
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Matisziw TC, 2022, NETW SPAT ECON, V22, P587, DOI 10.1007/s11067-020-09513-6
   Matthews EC, 2014, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V49, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.05.003
   McEvoy D, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P280, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787710
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   MORAN PAP, 1950, BIOMETRIKA, V37, P17, DOI 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   Morecroft MD, 2012, J APPL ECOL, V49, P547, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02136.x, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02147.x]
   Morris M, 2012, RESOUR POLICY, V37, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.008
   Munoz-Erickson T.A., 2014, Ecology and Society, V19
   National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), 2021, CHIN STAT YB 2020
   NDRC, 2022, IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
   Nikkhah A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V665, P538, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.170
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   Östh J, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V49, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.07.007
   Pollnac RB, 2015, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V55, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.08.006
   Rose A, 2005, J REGIONAL SCI, V45, P75, DOI 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00365.x
   Santos J, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P43, DOI 10.1111/risa.13186
   Sensier M, 2016, SPAT ECON ANAL, V11, P128, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2016.1129435
   Shaw K., 2013, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V28, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0952076711432578, 10.1177/0952076711432578]
   Sheng PF, 2017, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V28, P673, DOI 10.1177/0958305X17723893
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Shi YJ, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16040618
   Shi YJ, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15112453
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   State Council of China (SCC), 2021, 14 5 YEAR PLAN NAT E
   State Council of China (SCC), 2014, CIRC STAT COUNC ADJ
   Sun Y., 2012, SOCIAL SCI NANJING, V6, P1, DOI [10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2012.06.014, DOI 10.15937/J.CNKI.ISSN1001-8263.2012.06.014]
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme), 2022, WORLD CIT REP 2022
   Vejmelková E, 2012, COMPOS PART B-ENG, V43, P3534, DOI 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.11.053
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wang D, 2020, RESOUR POLICY, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101794
   Wang Y, 2020, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2019.100003
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Xu WP, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13152022
   Xu ZC, 2021, APPL ECON LETT, V28, P1066, DOI 10.1080/13504851.2020.1796913
   Yuan FX, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105079
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhang ZT, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105443
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 92
TC 39
Z9 39
U1 117
U2 288
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 102
AR 107163
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
EA JUN 2023
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA K0WJ4
UT WOS:001013733600001
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Velasco, M
   Russo, B
   Monjo, R
   Paradinas, C
   Djordjevic, S
   Evans, B
   Martínez-Gomariz, E
   Guerrero-Hidalga, M
   Cardoso, MA
   Brito, RS
   Pacheco, D
AF Velasco, Marc
   Russo, Beniamino
   Monjo, Robert
   Paradinas, Cesar
   Djordjevic, Slobodan
   Evans, Barry
   Martinez-Gomariz, Eduardo
   Guerrero-Hidalga, Maria
   Adriana Cardoso, Maria
   Salgado Brito, Rita
   Pacheco, David
TI Increased Urban Resilience to Climate Change-Key Outputs from the
   RESCCUE Project
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; climate change; urban services; water cycle;
   adaptation; disaster risk management
ID PRECIPITATION; IMPACT; DAMAGE
AB RESCCUE is an H2020 research project that aims to help cities around the world to become more resilient to physical, social, and economic challenges, using the water sector as the central point of the approach. Since 2016, RESCCUE has been developing methodologies and tools to support cities increase their resilience. The three RESCCUE cities, Barcelona, Bristol, and Lisbon, have become a testing platform for the cutting-edge technologies developed in RESCCUE but these are also ready to be deployed to different types of cities, with different climate change pressures. This paper presents some of the main outputs generated by RESCCUE. From climate change scenarios to dissemination tools, and from sectorial models to Resilience Action Plans (RAPs), the outputs that have been produced are very diverse, but special focus is put on the urban water cycle and urban floods. All the project results have a common goal: to increase the resilience of cities from around the world, by offering the methodologies and tools so anyone can take advantage of using them and replicate the RESCCUE results.
C1 [Velasco, Marc; Russo, Beniamino] Aquatec, SUEZ Adv Solut, Urban Drainage & Resilience Direct, Barcelona 08038, Spain.
   [Russo, Beniamino] Univ Zaragoza, Escuela Univ Politecn Almunia, Grp Ingn Hidraul & Ambiental GIHA, Grp Hydraul & Environm Engn, La Almunia De Dona Godin 50100, Spain.
   [Monjo, Robert; Paradinas, Cesar] FIC Climate Res Fdn, Madrid 28013, Spain.
   [Djordjevic, Slobodan; Evans, Barry] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England.
   [Martinez-Gomariz, Eduardo; Guerrero-Hidalga, Maria; Pacheco, David] Cetaqua Water Technol Ctr, Barcelona 08940, Spain.
   [Adriana Cardoso, Maria; Salgado Brito, Rita] LNEC Natl Lab Civil Engn, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal.
C3 University of Zaragoza; University of Exeter; National Civil Engineering
   Laboratory
RP Velasco, M (corresponding author), Aquatec, SUEZ Adv Solut, Urban Drainage & Resilience Direct, Barcelona 08038, Spain.
EM marc.velasco@suez.com; brusso@aquatec.es; rma@ficlima.org;
   cesar@ficlima.org; S.Djordjevic@exeter.ac.uk; B.Evans@exeter.ac.uk;
   eduardo.martinez@cetaqua.com; maria.guerrero@cetaqua.com;
   macardoso@lnec.pt; rsbrito@lnec.pt;
   david.pacheco.ext@externalpartner.com
RI Cardoso, Maria/AAA-3113-2021; Martinez-Gomariz, Eduardo/I-1269-2019;
   Djordjevic, Slobodan/P-8853-2015; Russo, Beniamino/Z-6372-2019; Monjo,
   Robert/J-4033-2014
OI Guerrero Hidalga, Maria/0000-0003-4550-5013; Paradinas Blazquez,
   Cesar/0000-0003-1417-6894; Martinez-Gomariz,
   Eduardo/0000-0002-0189-0725; Djordjevic, Slobodan/0000-0003-1682-1383;
   Cardoso, Maria Adriana/0000-0002-0422-2781; Russo,
   Beniamino/0000-0001-9437-0085; Velasco, Marc/0000-0003-4441-542X; Monjo,
   Robert/0000-0003-3100-2394
FU Horizon2020 Programme [700174]
FX This research was funded by Horizon2020 Programme, Grant Agreement No.
   700174.
CR Almeida MD, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062227
   [Anonymous], 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   [Anonymous], 2014, City resilience index: understanding and measuring city resilience
   Cardoso M.A, 2020, RESILIENCE ACTION PL
   Cardoso MA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219017
   Cardoso MA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062349
   Chen AS, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P857, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2223-2
   Evans B., 2019, IMPACT ASSESSMENTS M
   Evans B., 2020, IMPACT ASSESSMENTS M
   Evans B, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062330
   Forero-Ortiz E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135291
   Forero-Ortiz E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12051779
   Gonzalez A., 2020, RESILIENCE ACTION PL
   Guerrero-Hidalga M., 2020, RESILIENT CITIES FAC, P47
   Guerrero-Hidalga M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124807
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2019, ING AGUA, V23, P229, DOI 10.4995/Ia.2019.12137
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072666
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12558
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12475
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P1259, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2242-z
   Monjo R, 2020, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V12, P741, DOI 10.5194/essd-12-741-2020
   Monjo R, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P757, DOI 10.1002/joc.4380
   Monjo R, 2014, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V117, P317, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-1008-8
   Redolat D, 2020, INT J CLIMATOL, V40, P5671, DOI 10.1002/joc.6543
   Ribalaygua J., 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, V114, P253, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-0836-x
   Rockefeller Foundation, 100 RES CIT
   Rumbolt R, 2019, MULTIHAZARDS ASSESSM
   Russo B, 2020, ING AGUA, V24, P101, DOI 10.4995/Ia.2020.12179
   Russo B., 2018, MULTIHAZARDS ASSESSM
   Russo B, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12145638
   Sánchez-Muñoz D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041527
   Stevens J., 2020, RESILIENCE ACTION PL
   Stevens J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12083233
   Telhado M.J., 2020, RESILIENCE ACTION PL
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   Velasco M, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10101356
NR 36
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 1
U2 22
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 23
AR 9881
DI 10.3390/su12239881
PG 25
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PD8LY
UT WOS:000597930700001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, Z
   Xu, XB
   Zhang, J
AF Wang, Zheng
   Xu, Xiaobo
   Zhang, Jie
TI Spatial spillover and threshold effect of green development efficiency
   on urban human settlement resilience in Yangtze River Delta urban
   agglomeration
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID ECO-EFFICIENCY; CITIES
AB Green development is the necessary path and fundamental way for urban development. Exploring the influence mechanism and spatial effect of green development on the urban human settlement resilience is conducive to promoting high-quality and sustainable urban development. We used the entropy method, super-efficient SBM model, spatial econometric model and threshold model to analyze the spatial spillover effect of green development efficiency on urban human settlement resilience and its nonlinear impact in the Yangtze River Delta(YRD) urban agglomeration. The results indicated that During the study period, the level of green development efficiency and urban settlement resilience was on the rise, and the spatial differences between different regions was significant. The green development efficiency of each city in the YRD urban agglomeration has a significant contribution to urban human settlement resilience in the region, but has a negative spatial effect on the level of urban human settlement resilience in the neighboring region. At different population density levels, the effect of green development efficiency on urban human settlement resilience shows a significant "V" non-linear characteristic. Furthermore, the influence of green development efficiency on urban human settlement resilience increases in a stepwise manner under different industrial structure distribution. The results of this study can help provide a reference basis for the creation of high-level, high-quality green and livable resilient cities in the YRD urban agglomeration under the concept of green development, and provide relevant experience for the construction of livable cities in other regions of China.
C1 [Wang, Zheng; Xu, Xiaobo; Zhang, Jie] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Hefei, Peoples R China.
C3 Anhui Jianzhu University
RP Xu, XB (corresponding author), Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Hefei, Peoples R China.
EM xuxiaobo2002@163.com
FU Anhui Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning [AHSKY2021D168]
FX This study received funding from the project titled "Research on the
   Construction of Resilient Cities in Anhui Province under the
   Decision-Making Model of the Mass Line," which is supported by Anhui
   Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning (Project No:
   AHSKY2021D168). The project was spearheaded by Xiaobo Xu, who provided
   oversight and editorial guidance for the article.ZhengWang,a keymemberof
   the projectteam,undertookthe writingof the articleand manageddata
   collection. JieZhangcontributedto the paper'sreviewandformatting
CR Ahmed NO, 2019, EUR J SUSTAIN DEV, V8, P165, DOI 10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p165
   [Anonymous], 2015, Advanced Materials Research
   Bilgili F, 2024, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V26, P24183, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-03641-y
   Bulfone F, 2023, COMPET CHANG, V27, P22, DOI 10.1177/10245294221076225
   [常新锋 Chang Xinfeng], 2020, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V40, P185
   Chen C, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104687
   Dang YX, 2020, HABITAT INT, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102120
   Ding L, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080746
   Dong C, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110442
   Elhorst JP, 2014, SPRINGERBR REG SCI, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8_3
   Friends A., 1979, Towards a comprehensive framework for environment statistics: stress-response approach, P428
   Ge T, 2023, ECON MODEL, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106149
   Geng YQ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110510
   Geng YQ, 2023, ENERGY STRATEG REV, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2023.101111
   Geng YQ, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125486
   Han BL, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V318, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.015
   Hao Y, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V763, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144183
   He QS, 2023, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V149, DOI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4394
   Howard E, 2003, ORGAN ENVIRON, V16, P98, DOI 10.1177/1086026602250259
   Hu XY, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15075955
   Huang JH, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V67, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.003
   Huo K, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.871482
   Lee CC, 2023, ENERG ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106772
   Li N, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-37384-7
   Li X.M., 2022, HUM GEOGR, V37, P54, DOI [10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.007, DOI 10.13959/J.ISSN.1003-2398.2022.01.007]
   Li XS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P20318, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17175-1
   Li XF, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106478
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Long RY, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102415
   Ma CZ, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V186, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/186/3/012058
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meo MS, 2022, BORSA ISTANB REV, V22, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.bir.2021.03.002
   Molin ValdesH., 2013, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V4, P43, DOI DOI 10.1108/17595901311298991
   Muhammad S, 2022, ENERGY, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123576
   ONISHI T, 1994, REG STUD, V28, P39, DOI 10.1080/00343409412331348056
   Peng YT, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V326, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116682
   Rapport D. J., 1979, Statistics Canada 11-510
   Rasoulinezhad E, 2022, ENERG EFFIC, V15, DOI 10.1007/s12053-022-10021-4
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Su YY, 2023, REG STUD, V57, P722, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2022.2106360
   Tweneboah-Koduah D, 2023, COGENT SOC SCI, V9, DOI 10.1080/23311886.2023.2223399
   Ulpiani G, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V751, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141727
   Wang B, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103758
   Wang HT, 2023, INT J BIOMETEOROL, DOI 10.1007/s00484-023-02528-x
   Wang K. P., 2010, Econ. Geogr, V30, P1992, DOI [10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2010.12.005, DOI 10.15957/J.CNKI.JJDL.2010.12.005]
   Wang XL, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121471
   Xiao Y, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108995
   Yan L., 2020, Industrial Construction, V50, P32, DOI [10.13204/j.gyjzG20070703, DOI 10.13204/J.GYJZG20070703]
   Yan ZM, 2023, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122507
   Yang T, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104069
   You XT, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V113, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05368-x
   Zeng SZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110419
   Zhang B, 2008, ECOL ECON, V68, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.009
   Zhang Hongfeng, 2023, Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, V30, P12041, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-22886-0
   Zhang J, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1174875
   Zhang SB, 2023, ENERG ECON, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106816
   Zhang WJ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151612328
   Zhao PJ, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V25, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.009
   Zhong ZQ, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106900
   Zhou XG, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V318, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115537
   Zhu QS, 2023, AIMS MATH, V8, P12239, DOI 10.3934/math.2023617
   Zhu XQ, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/124020
   Zhu ZY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104274
   Zou C, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109152
NR 64
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 12
U2 39
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD OCT 19
PY 2023
VL 18
IS 10
AR e0292230
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0292230
PG 26
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA X6AU1
UT WOS:001099265800012
PM 37856466
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chelleri, L
   Schuetze, T
   Salvati, L
AF Chelleri, L.
   Schuetze, T.
   Salvati, L.
TI Integrating resilience with urban sustainability in neglected
   neighborhoods: Challenges and opportunities of transitioning to
   decentralized water management in Mexico City
SO HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Urban sustainability; Climate change adaptation;
   Neglected neighborhoods; Decentralized water management; Mexico City
   Green Plan
ID PERIURBAN AREAS; RAINWATER; ADAPTATION; SYSTEMS; VULNERABILITY;
   ENVIRONMENT; QUALITY
AB The impacts of climate change and decreasing local resources are increasingly threatening the resilience and sustainable management of urban areas and infrastructures worldwide. To cope with such threads and vulnerabilities, urban sustainability and resilience oriented plans have been developed. Accordingly, policy makers need to learn how to properly integrate urban sustainability with urban resilience principles and practices in the re-shaping of urban agendas. In order to highlight the future potential of integrating transformative resilience principles into the general sustainability approach, this paper provides a critical review of a recent and successful urban regeneration and development plan, the "Mexico City Green Plan". This paper also discusses a feasibility study for urban redevelopment and transition towards resilience in Mexico City, in order to illustrate the necessity and potential of urban resilience for the improvement of the life prospects of disadvantaged inhabitant groups. The Valle del Chalco neighborhood in Mexico City is presented as an example, whereby resilient and sustainable urban transformation was achieved through an integrated and sustainable decentralized water management and infrastructure plan. In practice, the terms 'Sustainability' and 'Resilience' can be exploited to justify conventional, non-sustainable urban development practices. The results discussed in this paper demonstrate the necessity of the integration of transformative resilience principles within sustainable urban redevelopment and regeneration. The main findings are i) Policy makers underestimate the potential of urban resilience in shaping more sustainable urban futures, since they only understand resilience as the flipside of specific vulnerabilities, ii) The building of urban resilience within sustainable urban transitions and redevelopment can effectively foster people empowerment, particularly in combination with the decentralization of resources management systems, and iii) The main challenge for the implementation and execution of transitions processes towards urban resilience and sustainability is the elimination of political barriers. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Chelleri, L.] GSSI Cities, Gran Sasso Sci Inst, I-67100 Laquila, Italy.
   [Schuetze, T.] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Architecture, Suwon 440746, South Korea.
   [Salvati, L.] Council Res Agr, Unit Climatol & Meteorol Appl Agr CRA CMA, I-00186 Rome, Italy.
C3 Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI); Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU)
RP Chelleri, L (corresponding author), GSSI Cities, Gran Sasso Sci Inst, Viale F Crispi 7, I-67100 Laquila, Italy.
EM Lorenzo.chelleri@gmail.com
RI Schuetze, Thorsten/ABA-5119-2021; Salvati, Luca/AAS-6179-2021
OI Chelleri, Lorenzo/0000-0003-0229-5028; Schuetze,
   Thorsten/0000-0001-7849-2330
CR Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Amin MT, 2013, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V10, P27, DOI 10.1007/s13762-012-0096-9
   [Anonymous], 2012, WORLD URB PROSP 2011
   Baker JL, 2012, URB DEV SER, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8845-7
   BOERS TM, 1982, AGR WATER MANAGE, V5, P145, DOI 10.1016/0378-3774(82)90003-8
   Carmin J, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11430951
   Cerón-Palma I, 2013, HABITAT INT, V38, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.09.008
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Domènech L, 2012, WATER ENVIRON J, V26, P465, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00305.x
   Martinez SE, 2011, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V25, P239, DOI 10.1007/s11269-010-9697-6
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Garrido S, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V63, P2395, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.199
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Kyessi AG, 2005, HABITAT INT, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00059-6
   Lankao PR, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.016
   Lizarralde G, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V15, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.004
   Lopez A., 2011, TECHNOLOGY SUSTAINAB
   Lye DJ, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P5429, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.011
   Massoud MA, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001
   Meera V, 2006, J WATER SUPPLY RES T, V55, P257, DOI 10.2166/aqua.2006.0010
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Morales Novelo J. A., 2011, WATER RESOURCES MEXI, P395
   Morales-Pinzón T, 2012, WATER ENVIRON J, V26, P550, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2012.00316.x
   Nanninga TA, 2012, WATER-SUI, V4, P739, DOI 10.3390/w4030739
   Spring UO, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.11.002
   Otterpohl R, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V35, P121, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00190-X
   Parkinson J, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P75, DOI 10.1177/095624780301500119
   Pearson L., 2014, RESILIENT SUSTAINABL
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Romero-Lankao P, 2014, HABITAT INT, V42, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.008
   Sample DJ, 2006, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V132, P362, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:5(362)
   Schewenius M, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P434, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
   Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, 2012, PROGR ACC CLIM CIUD, P197
   Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, 2012, CINC AN AV PLAN VERD, P218
   Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, 2007, PLAN VERD CIUD MEX
   Secretaria del Medio Ambiente, 2008, PROGR ACC CLIM CIUD, P171
   Sen Z, 2013, ARAB J GEOSCI, V6, P287, DOI 10.1007/s12517-011-0354-z
   Spring, 2012, WATER RESOURCES MEXI, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-05432-7_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-05432-7_1]
   Suriyachan C, 2012, HABITAT INT, V36, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.06.001
   Tortajada C, 2006, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V22, P353, DOI 10.1080/07900620600671367
   Tsur Y., 1997, DECENTRALIZATION COO
   Turner BL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wilder M, 2006, WORLD DEV, V34, P1977, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.026
   Wilderer P.A., 2001, Decentralised Sabitation and Reuse: Concepts, Systems and Implementation, P39
   Zhang DQ, 2009, URBAN WATER J, V6, P375, DOI 10.1080/15730620902934827
NR 51
TC 122
Z9 131
U1 13
U2 184
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0197-3975
EI 1873-5428
J9 HABITAT INT
JI Habitat Int.
PD AUG
PY 2015
VL 48
BP 122
EP 130
DI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.016
PG 9
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning;
   Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA CK3JU
UT WOS:000356113200014
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dong, WL
   Chen, XW
AF Dong, Wenli
   Chen, Xiaowei
TI Evaluation of Community Regeneration Planning and Resilience Based on
   Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Method
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Community planning resilience; Resilience planning; Community renewal;
   Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method; Group decision-making
AB In today's increasingly complex stock era, resilient community planning for uncertainty risks is important for building resilient cities and communities and for realizing the refinement, process, and systematization of planning. Therefore, this paper proposes the concept of community planning resilience based on resilience theory and explores a framework system for evaluating the planning resilience of renewal and transformation community by taking renewal and transformation future community planning of Zhejiang as the research object. At the same time, the technical path of realizing public participation in community planning is explored through the method, mechanism, and technical platform of fuzzy group decision-making. Finally, the feasibility of the aforementioned framework and approach is experimentally explored and verified based on a typical case of renewal and renovation of future community planning. In order to make community regeneration planning more planning resilient, this paper develops a community planning group decision-making study from the perspective of community planning resilience, which provides a new research perspective for the field of community resilience and provides a reference for community planning evaluation and the construction of resilient communities.
   In China's advancing urbanization, major cities are grappling with diverse risks, necessitating urban planning and governance with heightened resilience to face unforeseen black swan events and foreseeable gray rhinoceros challenges. This urgency is particularly pronounced in community renewal, prompting a vital shift from rigid to resilient planning methodologies. To address this shift, this paper advocates for resilient community construction to be a focal point in both policy and practical implementation of community regeneration. A novel approach utilizing the fuzzy decision-making method is proposed to establish a comprehensive resilient community renewal decision-making technology support system. This system employs a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, integrating an empowerment approach to simplify the complexities of a multicriteria index system. By mitigating the risks inherent in resilience planning, our approach enhances the scientific foundation and feasibility of decision-making in community renewal. A case study on the Future Community in Zhejiang Province validates the effectiveness of our approach, providing practical insights for constructing resilient community renewal models and system technology platforms. This research contributes to the ongoing exploration of strategies and technologies capable of addressing diverse challenges in urban development, providing references in enhancing urban resilience.
C1 [Dong, Wenli; Chen, Xiaowei] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Reg & Urban Planning, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang University
RP Chen, XW (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ, Dept Reg & Urban Planning, 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
EM wenlidong@zju.edu.cn; cxw6115@126.com
RI Chen, Xiaowei/ADY-5365-2022
OI Dong, Wenli/0000-0003-4603-6212
FU National Social Science Foundation Project of China [21BSH138]; Natural
   Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY24E080007]
FX This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation
   Project of China (21BSH138) and the Natural Science Foundation of
   Zhejiang Province (LY24E080007).
CR [陈秋琼 Chen Qiuqiong], 2022, [探测与控制学报, Journal of Detection & Control], V44, P104
   DIAKOULAKI D, 1995, COMPUT OPER RES, V22, P763, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Du M., 2021, A preliminary study on the path and strategy of integrating resilience planning into territorial spatial planning systemBased on international multi-scale resilience planning practice experience, P248
   Fan Z., 1998, J. Manage. Sci, V3, P52
   Guo S., 2017, Ph.D. thesis
   Guo Y., 2016, Stat. Decis. Making, V24, P63
   [韩利 Han Li], 2004, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science], V14, P86
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Lu Y., 2022, Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev, V6, P1, DOI [10.11982/j.supr.20220601, DOI 10.11982/J.SUPR.20220601]
   MacKee J., 2009, Conserving cultural built heritage in south and Southeast Asia: A conceptual framework for the conservation of non-secular built heritage based on the philosophical and cultural experiences of the region
   McAllister T.P., 2015, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
   Miao Z., 2015, Settlements, V2015, P6, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1674-9073.2015.04.021, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-9073.2015.04.021]
   [仇保兴 Qiu Baoxing], 2018, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V25, P1
   Rapaport C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.020
   Shao Y. W., 2017, CITY DISASTER REDUCT, V4, P71, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/10225706.2017.1328606, DOI 10.1080/10225706.2017.1328606]
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shen J., 2017, Landscape Archit, V3, P98
   Shen Y., 2019, Construction of resilience planning support system based on fuzzy multi-criteria analysis, P407
   Tianyilin, 2008, 2008 International Workshop on Modelling, Simulation and Optimization, P25, DOI 10.1109/WMSO.2008.21
   Tu H., 2016, J. Archit, V55, P72
   Wang H., 2022, Hebei Ind. Sci. Technol, V39, P449
   Wang WM, 2013, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V54, P1092, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.035
   [颜文涛 Yan Wentao], 2022, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P19
   Yu L., 2021, Mod. Intell, V41, P121
   Zeng C., 2011, P INT C COMP SCI SER
   Zeng Xiao-Tao, 2022, Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, V47, P5193, DOI 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20220511.202
   Zhang B. J., 2014, Hierarchical analysis and its application cases
   Zhang F. J., 2022, Comprehensive evaluation of basic methods and applications
   Zhang R., 2008, Highway Motor Transp, V2008, P49
   Zhang Y., 2012, Stat. Decis. Making, V2012, P75
   Zhong X., 2021, Int. Urban Plann, V36, P32
   Zhuang W., 2015, J. Archit, V56, P14
   Zou Z., 2015, Cent. China Archit, V33, P79
NR 34
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 44
U2 68
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP 1
PY 2024
VL 150
IS 3
AR 04024024
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-5023
PG 18
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA YU2F2
UT WOS:001270926900019
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Woodruff, SC
   Meerow, S
   Stults, M
   Wilkins, C
AF Woodruff, Sierra C.
   Meerow, Sara
   Stults, Missy
   Wilkins, Chandler
TI Adaptation to Resilience Planning: Alternative Pathways to Prepare for
   Climate Change
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; adaptation; resilience; plan evaluation
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; EVOLUTION; JUSTICE; CITIES
AB Increasingly, local governments are creating resilience plans. What do these plans contain and how do they compare to other efforts to plan for climate change? We use plan evaluation to analyze 10 resilience plans from U.S. cities in the 100 Resilient Cites program and compare them to 44 climate change adaptation plans. Resilience plans lack critical elements to prepare cities for climate change but offer a platform to address economic, social, and environmental policies that may amplify climate change impacts. Resilience planning represents an alternative, potentially complementary, path to preparing for climate change, but there is room for improvement.
C1 [Woodruff, Sierra C.; Wilkins, Chandler] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, 3137 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
   [Meerow, Sara] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [Stults, Missy] City Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station;
   Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Woodruff, SC (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, 3137 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
EM swoodruff@tamu.edu
RI Meerow, Sara/J-8037-2019
CR Abt Associates, 2016, CLIM AD STAT PRACT U
   [Anonymous], 2014, TOWN GUILF COMM COAS
   [Anonymous], 2015, RES NEW ORL STRAT AC
   [Anonymous], 2017, RES BOST EQ CONN CIT
   [Anonymous], 2016, RES SAN FRANC STRONG
   [Anonymous], 2013, GRAND RAP CLIM CHANG
   [Anonymous], 2017, RES ATL ACT BUILD EQ
   [Anonymous], 2017, ONEPGH RES PITTSB
   [Anonymous], 2016, RES OAKL IT TAK TOWN
   [Anonymous], 2012, CIT FLAGST RES PREP
   [Anonymous], 2015, NORF RES CIT
   [Anonymous], 2016, CIT BOULD RES STRAT
   [Anonymous], 2010, LEE COUNT CLIM CHANG
   Appler D, 2016, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V82, P92, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1123640
   Berke P, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P287, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1093954
   Berke P, 2009, J PLAN LIT, V23, P227, DOI 10.1177/0885412208327014
   Berke PR, 2008, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V74, P393, DOI 10.1080/01944360802381751
   Berke PR, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P60, DOI 10.1177/0739456X13517004
   Berke PR, 2000, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V66, P21, DOI 10.1080/01944360008976081
   Boulder County, 2012, BOULD COUNT CLIM CHA
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Burby RJ, 1999, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V65, P247, DOI 10.1080/01944369908976055
   Campbell SD, 2016, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V82, P388, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080
   City of New York, 2013, STRONG MOR RES NEW Y
   City of New York, 2015, One New York: the plan for a strong and just city
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dempwolf CS, 2012, J PLAN LIT, V27, P3, DOI 10.1177/0885412211411092
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gencer EA, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P41, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_4
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goldstein B.E., 2018, TRANSFORMATIVE LEARN
   Gupta N., 2016, CASE STUDIES COMMUNI, DOI [10.6028/NIST.GCR.16-002, DOI 10.6028/NIST.GCR.16-002]
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   KAISER EJ, 1995, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V61, P365, DOI 10.1080/01944369508975648
   Krippendorff K., 2018, Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology
   Kythreotis AP, 2017, REG STUD, V51, P1530, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1200719
   Linder Rene., 2017, RES ENG ASS S LIEG B
   Lyles W, 2018, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V61, P1994, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1379958
   Lyles W, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P433, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14549752
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moser SusanneC., 2017, Rising to the Challenge, Together
   QSR International Pty Ltd, 2018, NVivo (Version 12)
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2018, WHAT IS URB RES
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Stevens MR, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P77, DOI 10.1177/0739456X13513614
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Woodru SC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P796, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3012
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 55
TC 89
Z9 97
U1 53
U2 272
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0739-456X
EI 1552-6577
J9 J PLAN EDUC RES
JI J. Plan. Educ. Res.
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 42
IS 1
BP 64
EP 75
DI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
PG 12
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA YT6ZN
UT WOS:000751505500006
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU De Luca, C
   Langemeyer, J
   Vano, S
   Baró, F
   Andersson, E
AF De Luca, Claudia
   Langemeyer, Johannes
   Vano, Simeon
   Baro, Francesc
   Andersson, Erik
TI Adaptive resilience of and through urban ecosystem services: a
   transdisciplinary approach to sustainability in Barcelona
SO ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE ecosystem services; green and blue infrastructure; participatory
   process; resilience principles; scenario narratives; urban greening
   policies
AB Ecosystem services (ES) from urban green and blue infrastructure (GBI) provide cities and their citizens with benefits necessary to cope with present and future sustainability challenges. Long-term comprehensive urban greening strategies, policies, and plans are thus central to the development of sustainable, liveable, and resilient cities. However, urban greening strategies are increasingly tailored to provide short-term benefits, overlooking the dynamic character of cities, which face both changes in the capacity of GBI to provide benefits (e.g., in the face of climate change) as well dynamic needs and preferences for benefits over time as a result of changing demographic compositions. Starting with a literature review on GBI-relevant policies for the city of Barcelona, we: (1) investigated the presence of resilience thinking in the city's GBI-relevant policies through the application of the urban ecosystem services resilience assessment matrix; (2) investigated resilience thinking in the city's policies through the co-development of scenario narratives of possible futures and their implications for ES; and (3) applied the narratives through a participatory approach to enhance stakeholder thinking on adaptive policies based on possible shifts in ES provision and needs. Application of the matrix identified two main gaps to current GBI-relevant policies related to two main aspects of resilience: recognition and assessment of possible future disturbances and changes, and low understanding of social and structural diversity. Through the co-development of four future scenario narratives (aging and shrinking population, enhanced tourism, gender inequalities, and global warming), stakeholders identified the most susceptible ES in the city of Barcelona. Workshop participants indicated mental well-being, regulation of microclimate, social cohesion, air purification, physical recreation, runoff control, and soil permeability as ES with the widest capacity-demand mismatch. The results elicited discussion around GBI and ES resilience, addressing the need for intersectoral policy integration (including housing, education, and mobility) and for fostering a wider understanding of the role of institutions in providing for a resilient urban future. Through the use of scenario narratives, and highlighting the potential of co-creation, the proposed approach enhances critical thought around ES resilience among key players in the city. The study thereby supports the development of a comprehensive resilience strategy for Barcelona and indicates pathways for how other cities can change their current urban trajectory towards sustained ES flows.
C1 [De Luca, Claudia] Univ Bologna, Dept Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
   [Langemeyer, Johannes; Baro, Francesc] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol ICTA, Barcelona, Spain.
   [Langemeyer, Johannes] Humboldt Univ, Inst Geog, Berlin, Germany.
   [Vano, Simeon] Constantine Philosopher Univ Nitra, Dept Ecol & Environm Sci, Nitra, Slovakia.
   [Vano, Simeon] Czech Acad Sci, Global Change Res Inst, Brno, Czech Republic.
   [Baro, Francesc] Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, Dept Geog, Brussels, Belgium.
   [Baro, Francesc] Vrije Univ Brussel VUB, Dept Sociol, Brussels, Belgium.
   [Andersson, Erik] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Andersson, Erik] North West Univ, Unit Environm Sci & Management, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
C3 University of Bologna; Autonomous University of Barcelona; Humboldt
   University of Berlin; Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra;
   Czech Academy of Sciences; Global Change Research Centre of the Czech
   Academy of Sciences; Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Vrije Universiteit
   Brussel; Stockholm University; North West University - South Africa
RP De Luca, C (corresponding author), Univ Bologna, Dept Architecture, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
RI Vano, Simeon/ABB-4601-2021; Andersson, Erik/AAE-9771-2019; de Luca,
   Claudia/AFL-6981-2022; Langemeyer, Johannes/AAH-7736-2020; Baro,
   Francesc/C-1564-2019
OI Andersson, Erik/0000-0003-2716-5502; Vano, Simeon/0000-0001-8676-9459;
   Langemeyer, Johannes/0000-0002-0558-8486; Baro,
   Francesc/0000-0002-0145-6320
FU Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and
   Spatial Planning; Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; German
   Aeronautics and Space Research Centre; National Science Centre (Poland)
   [2016/22/Z/NZ8/00003]; Research Council of Norway; Spanish Ministry of
   Economy and Competitiveness; EU's Horizon 2020 framework program for
   research and innovation (project NATURVATION) [730243]; European
   Research Council (ERC Consolidator Grant) [818002-URBAG]; European
   Research Council (project GREENLULUs) [678034]; Marco Polo scholarship;
   "Maria de Maeztu" Programme for Units of Excellence of the Spanish
   Ministry of Science and Innovation at ICTA-UAB [CEX2019-000940-M];
   European Research Council (ERC) [678034] Funding Source: European
   Research Council (ERC)
FX We would like to thank Ares Gabas Masip, Maria Gomez Llabres and their
   team at the Barcelona's Urban Resilience Department, Myroslava Savisko
   for supporting the policy analysis, as well as Filka Sekulova, Luis
   Campos, Katriona McGlade and Andoni Gonzales Gomez for supporting the
   workshop moderation. This research was funded through the 2015-2016
   BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals, by the national funders:
   the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and
   Spatial Planning, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, the
   German Aeronautics and Space Research Centre, the National Science
   Centre (Poland) (grant no. 2016/22/Z/NZ8/00003), the Research Council of
   Norway, and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. It also
   received funding through the EU's Horizon 2020 framework program for
   research and innovation (project NATURVATION, grant agreement ID:
   730243). JL acknowledges additional funding from the European Research
   Council (ERC Consolidator Grant: 818002-URBAG). FB's contributions were
   also supported by the European Research Council (project GREENLULUs;
   grant agreement ID: 678034). CdL acknowledges additional funding from
   the Marco Polo scholarship supporting her visiting semester at ICTA-UAB.
   This research also contributes to the "Maria de Maeztu" Programme for
   Units of Excellence of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
   (CEX2019-000940-M) at ICTA-UAB.
CR Ahern J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
   Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2018, BARC BUILD RES CIT
   Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2014, BARC GREEN INFR BIOD
   Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2017, TREES LIF MAST PLAN
   Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2018, CLIM ACT PLAN 2018 2
   Maia ATA, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V112, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.021
   Andersson E, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P566, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz058
   Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
   [Anonymous], 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI [10.5751/ES-10166-230238, DOI 10.5751/ES-10166-230238]
   Barnaud C, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-09848-230115
   Baro F, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V102, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.016
   Baró F, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V57, P405, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006
   Bendt P, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.003
   Biernacka M., 2019, Cities Environ, V12, P5
   Biernacka M, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V36, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.007
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Borgström S, 2015, AMBIO, V44, pS357, DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0655-7
   Bratman GN, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aax0903
   Camps-Calvet M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cortinovis C, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V70, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.017
   DeLuca C., 2021, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES G, P127, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-54345-710, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-54345-7_10]
   Dennis EM, 2020, INT J COMMONS, V14, P313, DOI 10.5334/ijc.974
   Eagles PFJ, 2014, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V22, P528, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2013.785554
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist T, 2017, NATURE, V546, P352, DOI 10.1038/546352d
   Ernstson H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
   Fumagalli N, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12083166
   Gascon M, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P4354, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120404354
   Geneletti D, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.003
   Ghent Carleigh., 2018, Consilience, P58, DOI [DOI 10.7916/CONSILIENCE.V0I19.3892, 10.7916/consilience.v0i19.3892]
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Grêt-Regamey A, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V26, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012
   Güneralp B, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P8945, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1606035114
   Haase D, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P413, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0
   Laarman JG, 1996, TOURISM MANAGE, V17, P247, DOI 10.1016/0261-5177(96)00016-7
   Langemeyer J, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.021
   Langemeyer J, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V707, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135487
   Langemeyer J, 2018, ECOSYST SERV, V30, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.012
   Larondelle N, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.008
   Li ZZ, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11050584
   Maruthaveeran S, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.11.006
   McPhearson T, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P198, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw002
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S., 2004, RENEW SUST ENERG REV
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Nakicenovic N., 2017, FUTURE SCENARIOS GLO, P23, DOI [10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14, DOI 10.14282/2198-0403-GD-14]
   Nelson G. C., 2005, DRIVERS CHANGE ECOSY, P173
   Nykvist B, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P2359, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1149-x
   Palomo I, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Pereira L, 2019, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V7, DOI 10.1525/elementa.374
   Priess JA, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06168-190112
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   Riechers M, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.11.007
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121224
   Rozas-Vásquez D, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V71, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.015
   Sang AO, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V18, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008
   Schewenius M, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P434, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0505-z
   Schröter M, 2014, CONSERV LETT, V7, P514, DOI 10.1111/conl.12091
   Scolozzi R, 2019, Landscape Online, V73, P1, DOI [10.3097/LO.201973, DOI 10.3097/LO.201973]
   Sellberg MM, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P906, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012
   Simon D, 2018, Urban Planet, P149, DOI [10.1017/9781316647554.009, DOI 10.1017/9781316647554.009]
   Taff BD, 2019, ENVIRONMENTS, V6, DOI 10.3390/environments6040043
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019, Report No. ST/ESA/SER.A/420)
   van den Berg M, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.008
   Villamagna AM, 2013, ECOL COMPLEX, V15, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004
   Walker WE, 2001, EUR J OPER RES, V128, P282, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00071-0
   Webster C, 2007, TOWN PLAN REV, V78, P81, DOI 10.3828/tpr.78.1.6
   Wiese F, 2016, RESOURCES-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/resources5040030
NR 71
TC 19
Z9 20
U1 10
U2 46
PU RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
PI WOLFVILLE
PA ACADIA UNIV, BIOLOGY DEPT, WOLFVILLE, NS B0P 1X0, CANADA
SN 1708-3087
J9 ECOL SOC
JI Ecol. Soc.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 26
IS 4
AR 38
DI 10.5751/ES-12535-260438
PG 25
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA VM1AM
UT WOS:000946368400001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Velasco, M
   Russo, B
   Martínez, M
   Malgrat, P
   Monjo, R
   Djordjevic, S
   Fontanals, I
   Vela, S
   Cardoso, MA
   Buskute, A
AF Velasco, Marc
   Russo, Beniamino
   Martinez, Montserrat
   Malgrat, Pere
   Monjo, Robert
   Djordjevic, Slobodan
   Fontanals, Ignasi
   Vela, Salvador
   Cardoso, Maria Adriana
   Buskute, Aira
TI Resilience to Cope with Climate Change in Urban Areas-A Multisectorial
   Approach Focusing on Water-The RESCCUE Project
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; climate change; urban services; water cycle;
   adaptation; disaster risk management
AB The RESCCUE Project is an H2020 research project that aims to help cities around the world to become more resilient to physical, social, and economic challenges, using the water sector as the central point of the approach. RESCCUE will generate models and tools to bring this objective to practice, while delivering a framework enabling city resilience assessment, planning and management. This will be achieved by integrating software tools, methods, and new knowledge related to the detailed urban services performance into novel and promising loosely coupled models (integrated models), multi-risk assessment method, and a comprehensive resilience platform. These tools will allow urban resilience assessment from a multisectorial approach, for current and future climate change scenarios, including multiple hazards and cascading effects. The RESCCUE approach will be implemented in three EU cities (Barcelona, Bristol, and Lisbon) and, with the support of UN-Habitat, disseminate their results among other cities belonging to major international networks. The aim of this paper is to present the main goals of this project, as well as the approach followed and the main expected results after the four years of implementation, so other cities around the world can use the RESCCUE approach to increase their resilience.
C1 [Velasco, Marc; Russo, Beniamino; Martinez, Montserrat; Malgrat, Pere] Aquatec, SUEZ Adv Solut Urban Drainage & Resilience Direct, Barcelona 08038, Spain.
   [Russo, Beniamino] Univ Zaragoza, Escuela Univ Politecn La Almunia, La Almunia Dona Godina 50100, Spain.
   [Monjo, Robert] FIC Climate Res Fdn, Madrid 28013, Spain.
   [Djordjevic, Slobodan] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England.
   [Fontanals, Ignasi] Opticits Resilience, Barcelona 08022, Spain.
   [Vela, Salvador; Buskute, Aira] Cetaqua, Water Technol Ctr, Barcelona 08940, Spain.
   [Cardoso, Maria Adriana] LNEC Natl Lab Civil Engn, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal.
C3 University of Zaragoza; University of Exeter; National Civil Engineering
   Laboratory
RP Velasco, M (corresponding author), Aquatec, SUEZ Adv Solut Urban Drainage & Resilience Direct, Barcelona 08038, Spain.
EM marc.velasco@suez.com; brusso@aquatec.es; mmartinezp@aquatec.es;
   pmalgratb@aquatec.es; rma@ficlima.org; s.djordjevic@exeter.ac.uk;
   ifontanals@opticits.com; svela@cetaqua.com; macardoso@lnec.pt;
   abuskute@externalpartner.com
RI Cardoso, Maria/AAA-3113-2021; Russo, Beniamino/Z-6372-2019; Djordjevic,
   Slobodan/P-8853-2015; Monjo, Robert/J-4033-2014
OI Russo, Beniamino/0000-0001-9437-0085; Djordjevic,
   Slobodan/0000-0003-1682-1383; Cardoso, Maria
   Adriana/0000-0002-0422-2781; Monjo, Robert/0000-0003-3100-2394
FU European Commission; EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation
   [700174]
FX The RESCCUE Project (RESilience to cope with Climate Change in Urban
   arEas-a multisectorial approach focusing on water) has received funding
   from European Commission by means of Horizon 2020, the EU Framework
   Program for Research and Innovation, under Grant Agreement No. 700174.
CR [Anonymous], 2014, City resilience index: understanding and measuring city resilience
   [Anonymous], BC3 WORKING PAPER SE
   [Anonymous], 2015, BARCELONA OBSERVATOR
   Evans B, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P816, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.105
   Fontanals L., 2014, ESTUDIOS EMPRESARIAL, V144, P6
   Global Cities Institute & GDF Suez, 2015, 3 GCI
   Monjo R, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P757, DOI 10.1002/joc.4380
   Redolat D., 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V133, P1
   Ribalaygua J., 2013, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, V114, P253, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-0836-x
   UN, 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   Walloth C., 2014, Understanding Complex Urban Systems: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Modeling
   Watts D, 2008, 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES (ICSET), VOLS 1 AND 2, P1200, DOI 10.1109/ICSET.2008.4747189
NR 12
TC 25
Z9 25
U1 2
U2 32
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD OCT
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 10
AR 1356
DI 10.3390/w10101356
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA HB6UP
UT WOS:000451208400071
OA Green Published, Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Serre, D
   Barroca, B
   Balsells, M
   Becue, V
AF Serre, D.
   Barroca, B.
   Balsells, M.
   Becue, V.
TI Contributing to urban resilience to floods with neighbourhood design:
   the case of Am Sandtorkai/Dalmannkai in Hamburg
SO JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE DS3 model; neighbourhood scale; urban design; urban flood risk; urban
   resilience
ID MANAGEMENT; MODEL
AB On-going changes in cities caused by rapid urbanisation and climate change have increased both the flood probability and the severity of flooding. Consequently, there is a need for all cities to adapt to climate and socio-economic changes by developing new strategies for flood risk management. The following risk paradigm shifts from traditional to more integrated approaches, since one of the main emerging tasks for city managers is the development of resilient cities. The concept of resilience is becoming more and more important, despite the many challenges that interfere with its implementation. The goal of this research is to create knowledge on how to operationalise flood resilience at the neighbourhood level through neighbourhood design. A research approach was used and a qualitative analysis tool, the DS3 model, was developed in order to study a particular neighbourhood of HafenCity, in Hamburg. Results show that design measures involving transportation infrastructure, land use (open public spaces) and buildings have been the main contributions to the flood resilience of the neighbourhood.
C1 [Serre, D.] Univ Avignon, ESPACE, UMR 7300, 74 Rue Louis Pasteur Case 19, F-84029 Avignon 1, France.
   [Barroca, B.] Univ Paris Est, LEESU, Dept Genie Urbain, Marne La Vallee 2, France.
   [Balsells, M.; Becue, V.] Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, Mons, Belgium.
C3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute
   for Humanities & Social Sciences (INSHS); Avignon Universite; Universite
   Gustave-Eiffel; Universite Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC);
   Institut Polytechnique de Paris; Ecole des Ponts ParisTech; University
   of Mons
RP Serre, D (corresponding author), Univ Avignon, ESPACE, UMR 7300, 74 Rue Louis Pasteur Case 19, F-84029 Avignon 1, France.
EM damien.serre@univ-avignon.fr
RI Barroca, Bruno/ABF-5436-2020
OI serre, damien/0000-0002-2902-2989; BARROCA, Bruno/0000-0001-6653-0803
CR [Anonymous], 2016, EEA, 2008
   [Anonymous], 2012, DEV DURABLE TERRITOR, DOI DOI 10.4000/DEVEL0PPEMENTDURABLE.9208
   [Anonymous], 3 CARRI ORNL
   [Anonymous], 2005, RESILIENT CITY MODER
   [Anonymous], 2005, Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters
   Ashley RM, 2012, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V5, P14, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01108.x
   Balsells M, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P2448, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.527
   Balsells M., 2014, WATER MANAGE J, V168, P57
   Balsells M., 2012, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS, P143
   Barroca B., 2013, BARRIERS RESILIENCE, V6, P1
   Cambien A., 2008, URBAN MODELLING EMER
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   De Rosnay J., 1975, Le macroscope: vers une vision globale
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Heilemann K., 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
   Kluge K, 2012, FLOODS IN HAMBURG
   LHOMME S., 2012, THESIS U PARIS DIDER, P365
   Lhomme S., 2013, CYBERGEO EUR J GEOGR
   Mees HLP, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P671, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0527-2
   Merlin P., 2010, DICT URBANISME AMENA
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Provitolo D, 2015, RESILIENCE IMPERATIVE: UNCERTAINTY, RISKS AND DISASTERS, P29
   Redeker C., 2008, ZOLLHAFEN MAINZ FLOO
   Saint-Pierre C., 2010, 6 INT C URB REG SUST
   Schelfaut K, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
   Serre D., 2012, 7 INT C WAT SENS URB
   Serre D., 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS, P189
   Serre D, 2008, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V14, P201, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(201)
   Toubin M, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
   van Herk S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Zevenbergen C, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS17, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12173
   Zwingelstein G., 1996, La maintenance basee sur la fiabilite
NR 32
TC 43
Z9 47
U1 6
U2 78
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1753-318X
J9 J FLOOD RISK MANAG
JI J. Flood Risk Manag.
PD JAN
PY 2018
VL 11
SU 1
BP S69
EP S83
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12253
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA FU2OS
UT WOS:000423690200007
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Guo, Y
AF Guo, Yan
TI Urban Resilience in Post-Disaster Reconstruction: Towards a Resilient
   Development in Sichuan, China
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Dujiangyan; Great Sichuan Earthquake; post-disaster reconstruction;
   design for urban resilience
AB This article discusses the post-disaster urban resilience design framework in the case of post-disaster urban reconstruction in Sichuan after the Great Sichuan Earthquake (also known as the Wenchuan Earthquake) in May 2008 in China. The focus is on three main aspects of post-disaster urban reconstruction: sociospatial coherence, temporal continuity, and multistakeholder integration and communication. Critical interpretation of the government-guided reconstruction reveals that reconstruction was limited to the generic production and implementation of top-down planning. From the perspective of urban resilience, and through an alternative design scenario developed in this research, this article highlights an urban resilience design framework based on postdisaster development in the Sichuan city of Dujiangyan. By identifying the deficiencies of the governmental reconstruction where in many aspects resilience has not been considered, and by proposing the alternative where resilience has been considered to develop a better living, this research seeks to integrate urban resilience as a key aspect in the Sichuan reconstruction and as essential for developing the postdisaster city towards a more coherent, sustainable, and integral urban future.
C1 Univ IUAV Venice, Ist Univ Architettura Venezia, Sch Doctorate Studies, I-30125 Venice, Italy.
C3 IUAV University Venice
RP Guo, Y (corresponding author), Univ IUAV Venice, Ist Univ Architettura Venezia, Sch Doctorate Studies, I-30125 Venice, Italy.
EM charles.yan.gore@gmail.com
CR 512 Help (NGO), 2008, SEARCH REL AFT WENCH
   Alliance Resilience, 2009, ASS MAN RES SOC EC S
   Bull-Kamanga L, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P193, DOI 10.1177/095624780301500109
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chengdu Planning and Management Bureau, 2008, NEW HOM ACH SHOW CHE
   Coaffee J, 2008, NEW SECUR CHALL, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230583337
   DOVERS SR, 1992, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V2, P262, DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90044-8
   Ge Y, 2010, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V1, P17, DOI 10.3974/j.issn.2095-0055.2010.02.003
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goldstein BE, 2010, COLLABORATIVE RESILIENCE: MOVING THROUGH CRISIS TO OPPORTUNITY, P1
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Guo Y., 2010, INTEGRALISM POST DIS
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Lin M., 2010, ADM MANAGEMENT CHINA
   Pelling M, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Potangaroa R., 2008, IDENTIFYING RESILIEN
   State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2008, POST WENCH EARTHQ RE
   Timmerman P., 1981, ENV MONOGRAPH, P1
   UNCRD (United Nations Centre for Regional Development), 2009, REP GREAT SICH EARTH
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
NR 21
TC 41
Z9 46
U1 8
U2 58
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 2095-0055
EI 2192-6395
J9 INT J DISAST RISK SC
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci.
PD MAR
PY 2012
VL 3
IS 1
SI SI
BP 45
EP 55
DI 10.1007/s13753-012-0006-2
PG 11
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA V38US
UT WOS:000209368900006
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU La Vigna, F
AF La Vigna, Francesco
TI Review: Urban groundwater issues and resource management, and their
   roles in the resilience of cities
SO HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban groundwater; sustainability; urban subsoil dynamics; groundwater
   city clustering
ID MONITORING NETWORK; WATER MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CITY; AQUIFERS;
   SURFACE; AREA; IMPLEMENTATION; URBANIZATION; HYDROGEOLOGY
AB The relationships between cities and underlying groundwater are reviewed, with the aim to highlight the importance of urban groundwater resources in terms of city resilience value. Examples of more than 70 cities worldwide are cited along with details of their groundwater-related issues, specific experiences, and settings. The groundwater-related issues are summarized, and a first groundwater-city classification is proposed in order to facilitate a more effective city-to-city comparison with respect to, for example, the best practices and solutions that have been put in practice by similar cities in terms of local groundwater resources management. The interdependences between some groundwater services and the cascading effects on city life in cases of shock (e.g., drought, heavy rain, pollution, energy demand) and chronic stress (e.g., climate change) are analyzed, and the ideal groundwater-resilient-city characteristics are proposed. The paper concludes that groundwater is a crucial resource for planning sustainability in every city and for implementing city resilience strategies from the climate change perspective.
C1 [La Vigna, Francesco] Geol Survey Italy ISPRA, Rome, Italy.
C3 Italian Institute for Environmental Protection & Research (ISPRA)
RP La Vigna, F (corresponding author), Geol Survey Italy ISPRA, Rome, Italy.
EM francesco.lavigna@isprambiente.it
RI La Vigna, Francesco/G-6463-2011
OI La Vigna, Francesco/0000-0003-2727-2017
CR Abidin H. Z., 2010, Groundwater response to changing climate, P113
   Adelana S. M. A., 2008, ResearchGate, P231, DOI [10.1201/9780203889497.pt3, DOI 10.1201/9780203889497.PT3]
   Afonso M., 2007, URBAN HYDROGEOLOGICA, P389
   Afonso MJ, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102797
   Al-Rashed MF, 2001, HYDROL PROCESS, V15, P777, DOI 10.1002/hyp.179
   Alfarrah N, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10020143
   Allen A, 2003, GEOTHERMICS, V32, P569, DOI 10.1016/S0375-6505(03)00063-4
   Angelakis A., 2014, Evolution of water supply through the millennia
   [Anonymous], 2015, City Resilience Framework Rockefeller Foundation
   [Anonymous], 2006, IHP SERIES GROUNDWAT
   [Anonymous], 1995, ENVIRON URBAN, V7, P227, DOI DOI 10.1177/095624789500700216
   [Anonymous], 2003, EARTH SCI CITY READE, DOI DOI 10.1029/SP056P0257
   [Anonymous], 2007, URBAN GROUNDWATER MA
   [Anonymous], 2001, PIDS DISCUSSION PAPE
   Anton D. J., 1993, Thirsty cities: urban environments and water supply in Latin America.
   Antrop M, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V67, P9, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
   Arai T., 1990, GEOGRAPHICAL REV JAP, V63, P88, DOI [10.4157/grj1984b.63.88, DOI 10.4157/GRJ1984B.63.88]
   Armson D, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.001
   Arnhardt R., 2020, GEOLOGICAL GROUND MO
   Ashley R, 2013, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V166, P65, DOI 10.1680/muen.12.00046
   Attard G, 2016, HYDROGEOL J, V24, P1213, DOI 10.1007/s10040-016-1385-z
   Attard G, 2016, HYDROGEOL J, V24, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10040-015-1317-3
   Bell G, 1959, B N059 GEOLOGICAL SU
   Berland A, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V162, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017
   Bonfa I, 2017, ACQUE SOTTER, V6, P29, DOI 10.7343/as-2017-280
   Bonsor H, 2017, GROUNDWATER GEOTHERM
   Bonte M, 2013, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V4, P77, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2013.061
   Bottrell S, 2008, APPL GEOCHEM, V23, P2382, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.03.012
   Boukhemacha MA, 2015, HYDROGEOL J, V23, P437, DOI 10.1007/s10040-014-1220-3
   Braun C L., 2020, Status of Groundwater-Level Altitudes and Long-Term Groundwater-Level Changes in the Chicot, Evangeline, and Jasper Aquifers, Houston-Galveston Region, Texas
   Bricker SH, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P618, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.018
   BRISCOE J, 1993, ENVIRONMENT, V35, P7
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Burri NM, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V684, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.236
   Caldwell RR., 1993, GEOCHEMISTRY ALLUVIA, DOI [10.15760/etd.6457, DOI 10.15760/ETD.6457]
   Caputo S., 2015, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, V8, P222, DOI [10.1080/17549175.2014.990913, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2014.990913, DOI 10.1080/1754]
   Chen M, 2016, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/rs8060468
   Cheng GD, 2013, HYDROGEOL J, V21, P5, DOI 10.1007/s10040-012-0927-2
   Chilton J, 1997, 27 CONG INT ASS HYDR
   Chilton J, 1997, GROUNDWATER URBAN EN, V2
   Chu Yiu-Wai., 2017, Hong Kong Cantopop: A Concise History
   Clausi A, 2019, ACQUE SOTTERRANEE IT
   Coaffee Jon., 2016, Urban Resilience: Planning for Risk, Crisis and Uncertainty, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-28884-4
   Colombo L, 2017, ACQUE SOTTER, V6, P15, DOI 10.7343/as-2017-301
   Corniello A, 2019, ACQUE SOTTER, V8, P7, DOI 10.7343/as-2019-375
   Custodio E, 1997, GROUNDWATER IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT - VOL I, P11
   Da Lio C, 2013, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V135, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.10.021
   Day T., 2018, CLIMATE OPPORTUNITY
   De Vries J.J., 2007, Geology of the Netherlands, P295
   Dillon P., 2002, Proceedings of the international groundwater conference on sustainable development and management of groundwater resources in semi-arid region with special reference to hard rocks, Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India, 20-22 February, 2002, P71
   Dillon P., 1997, Groundwater pollution by sanitation on tropical islands
   Dillon P., 2010, DEV AQUIFER STORAGE
   Dochartaigh BO, 2019, EARTH ENV SCI T R SO, V108, P155, DOI 10.1017/S1755691018000385
   DOWNING RA, 1994, GROUNDWATER PROBLEMS IN URBAN AREAS, P213
   Eastoe CJ, 2004, WATER SCI APPL, V9, P217
   Eberts S.M., 2013, Factors Affecting Public-Supply Well Vulnerability to Contamination: Understanding Observed Water Quality and Anticipating Future Water Quality
   EEA, 2010, FRESHW DRIV PRESS LI
   El Baghdadi M, 2019, INT J AGRON, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/7469741
   Engel K., 2011, Big Cities. Big Water. Big Challenges. Water in an Urbanizing World
   EPA, 2021, EC BIOF
   Epting J, 2012, HYDROLOGY EARTH SYST, V9
   Fan Ji-hui, 2005, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences, V10, P665, DOI 10.1007/BF02830378
   Farr GJ, 2017, Q J ENG GEOL HYDROGE, V50, P187, DOI 10.1144/qjegh2016-058
   Ferguson G, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JB002715
   Ferrara V, 2008, ITAL J ENG GEOL ENV, P77, DOI 10.4408/IJEGE.2008-01.S-06
   Filbà M, 2016, ENG GEOL, V200, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.11.010
   Fletcher TD, 2007, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V55, P265, DOI 10.2166/wst.2007.117
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Ford Jonathan Richard, 2010, BRIT GEOLOGICAL SURV
   Foster S, 1990, HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS
   Foster S, 2019, SOURCE-NOTE HIST ART, P58
   Foster S, 1999, GROUNDWATER URBAN EN
   Foster S., 2010, Urban Groundwater Use Policy: Balancing Benefits and Risks in Developing Nations 2010
   Foster S, 2011, WATER FRONT 2011
   Foster SSD, 2004, HYDROGEOL J, V12, P115, DOI 10.1007/s10040-003-0296-y
   FOSTER SSD, 1994, GROUNDWATER PROBLEMS IN URBAN AREAS, P43
   Foster S, 2020, WATER POLICY, V22, P121, DOI 10.2166/wp.2020.177
   Gaitanaru D, 2013, EGUGAEGU2013 11297
   Gaitanarua D, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V209, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.140
   Gambolati G., 2013, Venice Shall Rise Again: Engineered Uplift of Venice Through Seawater Injection, V1st
   Garcia-Fresca B., 2007, Urban Groundwater, Meeting the Challenge
   Geake A, 1986, HYDROGEOL REPORT, V86
   Gerges N. Z., 2006, 200610 DEP WAT LAND
   Göbel P, 2004, J HYDROL, V299, P267, DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00370-1
   Gogu CR, 2015, INT MULTI SCI GEOCO, P834
   Gorla M, 2016, ACQUE SOTTERRANEE IT
   Grönwall J, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-7181-9
   Guo K, 2011, GROUNDWATER EMERGENC
   Heathcote JA, 2003, Q J ENG GEOL HYDROGE, V36, P159, DOI 10.1144/1470-9236/2002-29
   Herath G, 2007, ENG-J INST ENG SRI L, V40, P123, DOI 10.4038/engineer.v40i4.7163
   HOLLIS GE, 1988, HYDROL PROCESS, V2, P227, DOI 10.1002/hyp.3360020304
   Howard K.W., 2007, URBAN GROUNDWATER M, V8
   Howard KWF, 2015, IAHSTRATEGIC OVERVIE
   Howard KWF, 1997, GROUNDWATER URBAN EN
   Howe C., 2015, Pathways to One Water - A Guide for institutional innovation
   IGES Freshwater Resources Management Project, 2007, SUST GROUNDW MAN AS
   Jakeman AJ., 2016, Integrated Groundwater Management, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-23576-91, 10.1007/978]
   JOHNSON ST, 1994, GROUNDWATER PROBLEMS IN URBAN AREAS, P285
   Jones CE, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-SOL EA, V121, P3867, DOI 10.1002/2015JB012636
   Jones MA, 2012, GEOL SOC SPEC PUBL, V364, P99, DOI 10.1144/SP364.8
   Jurado A, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V424, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.074
   Keller GR, 2009, REPORT ACTIVITIES 20, P207
   Khan A., 2020, Asian Rev. Environ. Earth Sci, V7, P9, DOI [10.20448/journal.506.2020.71.9.17, DOI 10.20448/JOURNAL.506.2020.71.9.17]
   King C., 2003, 101 UNU IAS
   Kononov VI., 1979, INT GEOL REV, V21, P385, DOI [10.1080/00206818209467070, DOI 10.1080/00206818209467070]
   Kortatsi B.K., 2008, W AFR J APP ECOL, V13, P16, DOI 10.4314/wajae.v13i1.40586
   La Vigna F, 2019, REND LINCEI-SCI FIS, V30, P297, DOI 10.1007/s12210-019-00790-z
   La Vigna F, 2016, J MAPS, V12, P88, DOI 10.1080/17445647.2016.1158669
   La Vigna F, 2015, AQUA2015 HYDROGEOLOG
   La Vigna F, 2017, 44 ANN C INT ASS HYD
   La Vigna F, 2022, ENVIRON FORENSICS, V23, P114, DOI 10.1080/15275922.2021.1887969
   La Vigna F, 2015, ACQUE SOTTER, V4, P59, DOI 10.7343/AS-132-15-0159
   La Vigna F, 2015, ACQUE SOTTER, V4, P9, DOI 10.7343/AS-128-15-0155
   Lee JY, 2005, HYDROL PROCESS, V19, P2525, DOI 10.1002/hyp.5689
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Lerner D., 1988, AQUA LONDON, V1, P33
   Lerner DN, 2002, HYDROGEOL J, V10, P143, DOI 10.1007/s10040-001-0177-1
   Lerner DN., 1997, GROUNDWATER URBAN EN
   Liu JT, 2018, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V77, DOI 10.1007/s12665-018-7833-4
   Lubis RF, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V118, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/118/1/012022
   Lubis RF, 2013, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V70, P2033, DOI 10.1007/s12665-013-2712-5
   Lyons S, 2015, JAKARTA FLOODS EARLY
   Mahlknecht J, 2015, WATER CITIES LATIN A, P126
   Maliva R, 2021, WSP METHODS WATER RE, V6
   Manca F, 2014, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V72, P1083, DOI 10.1007/s12665-013-3024-5
   Mancini CP, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12072030
   Marinos PG, 1997, GROUNDWATER IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT - VOL I, P49
   Mastrorillo L, 2016, ACQUE SOTTER, V5, P35, DOI 10.7343/as-2016-192
   Mazza R, 2015, ACQUE SOTTER, V4, P19, DOI 10.7343/AS-129-15-0156
   McArthur JM, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P5161, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b04996
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Menberg K, 2013, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V442, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.043
   Michel C, 2017, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V98, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2016.07.005
   Minnig M, 2018, J HYDROL, V563, P1135, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.058
   Montenegro S.M.G.L., 2006, P 1 INT JOINT SALT W
   Morris BL, 1997, GROUNDWATER IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT - VOL I, P55
   Mudd GM, 2004, P INT C WAT SENS URB
   Naumann S., 2019, International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2018, P83
   NIWA National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, 2004, FRESHW FEAT GROUNDW
   Obu J, 2019, EARTH-SCI REV, V193, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.023
   Oiro S, 2020, HYDROGEOL J, V28, P2635, DOI 10.1007/s10040-020-02236-5
   Olivier DW, 2019, HYDROGEOL J, V27, P823, DOI 10.1007/s10040-018-1893-0
   Osipov V, 2015, ENGINEERING GEOLOGY FOR SOCIETY AND TERRITORY, VOL 5: URBAN GEOLOGY, SUSTAINABLE PLANNING AND LANDSCAPE EXPLOITATION, P11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-09048-1_2
   Ozgul N, 2011, Geology of istanbul city area (executive summary)
   Patton AM, 2020, Q J ENG GEOL HYDROGE, V53, P49, DOI 10.1144/qjegh2019-020
   Pavlova N, 2020, GEOSCIENCES, V10, DOI 10.3390/geosciences10050192
   Peloggia AUG, 2018, REV I GEOLOGICO, V39
   Prakken LB., 2009, 80 US DEP INT US GEO
   Prinos ST, 2002, DESIGN REAL TIME GRO
   Rachwal T, 2014, FUTURE VISIONS WATER
   Ravier E, 2018, PAST GLACIAL ENVIRONMENTS, 2ND EDITION, P431, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-100524-8.00013-0
   Saito T, 2016, WATER RES, V94, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.043
   San Sebastian JSSS, 2020, INT COMP ACQUE SOTTE
   Scalenghe R, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.011
   Schirmer M, 2013, ADV WATER RESOUR, V51, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.06.015
   Schneider R, 1963, GROUND WATER PROVINC
   Seither A, 2016, BERGEN TU1206 COST S
   Senthilkumar M, 2017, REPORT ONAQUIFER MAP
   Shanahan Peter, 2009, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-84891-4_3
   Sharp JM, 1997, GROUNDWATER IN THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT - VOL I, P67
   Shestopalov VM, 2000, IAHS-AISH P, P54
   Shiklomanov NI, 2017, POLAR GEOGR, V40, P273, DOI 10.1080/1088937X.2017.1329237
   Shrestha S, 2016, GROUNDWATER ENV ASIA, DOI [10.1016/C2014-0-02217-4, DOI 10.1016/C2014-0-02217-4]
   Siedentop S, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P2765, DOI 10.1068/a4580
   Singh M, 2013, HYDROGEOL J, V21, P687, DOI 10.1007/s10040-013-0958-3
   Sommer W., 2013, COMBINING SHALLOW GE
   Stevenazzi S, 2017, ACQUE SOTTER, V6, P51, DOI 10.7343/as-2017-295
   Sultan M, 2019, J HYDROL, V576, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.017
   Tanaka T., 2008, P IWRA 13 WORLD WATE
   Taniguchi M, 1999, WATER RESOUR RES, V35, P1507, DOI 10.1029/1999WR900009
   Tanner T., 2009, Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities
   Thierry P, 2009, ENG GEOL, V105, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.12.010
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   United Nations, 2019, The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420)
   United States Geological Survey, 2018, AQUIFER STORAGE RECO
   Vairavamoorthy K, 2008, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V33, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.008
   van der Gun Jac., 2012, Groundwater and Global Change: Trends, Opportunities and Challenges
   Varis O, 2006, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V22, P377, DOI 10.1080/07900620600684550
   Vázquez-Suñe E, 2010, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V14, P2085, DOI 10.5194/hess-14-2085-2010
   Vázquez-Suñé E, 2000, IAHS-AISH P, P363
   Venvik G, 2020, HYDROL RES, V51, P322, DOI 10.2166/nh.2019.030
   Wiek A, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P1, DOI [10.1007/s11625-011-0154-0, 10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6]
   Williams L.J., 2016, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, P1, DOI DOI 10.3133/PP1807
   WILSON WL, 1992, GROUND WATER, V30, P918, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1992.tb01575.x
   Wyman R., 1993, B ASS ENG GEOLOGISTS, V30, P33
   Yalcin T, 2009, HYDROGEOL J, V17, P1247, DOI 10.1007/s10040-009-0474-7
   Yelderman JC, 2019, WACO GROUND WATER WA, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.2.16532.04483, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.16532.04483]
   Yu W.B., 2014, The Cryosphere Discussions, V8, P4327, DOI [10.5194/tcd-8-4327-2014, DOI 10.5194/TCD-8-4327-2014]
   Zhang H, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11091775
   Zhou YX, 2013, GEOSCI FRONT, V4, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2012.03.008
   Zhu K, 2010, ENVIRON RES LETT, V5, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044002
NR 192
TC 23
Z9 25
U1 5
U2 42
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1431-2174
EI 1435-0157
J9 HYDROGEOL J
JI Hydrogeol. J.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 30
IS 6
BP 1657
EP 1683
DI 10.1007/s10040-022-02517-1
EA AUG 2022
PG 27
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Water Resources
GA 4M5NB
UT WOS:000836542300001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, XL
   Li, H
AF Zhang, Xiaoling
   Li, Huan
TI Urban resilience and urban sustainability: What we know and what do not
   know?
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Urban sustainability; CiteSpace
ID RESOURCE SUSTAINABILITY; CITIES; INFRASTRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT; DISASTER;
   SYSTEM; MODEL; EARTHQUAKE; LANDSCAPE; RECOVERY
AB The past literatures have studied both 'urban resilience (UR)' and 'urban sustainability (US)' in terms of the dual character - vulnerability and pertinacity - of cities. However, there is a large overlap between the meaning of resilience and sustainability, which threatens to weaken both concepts. In this study, we discuss the difference between urban resilience (UR) and urban sustainability (US) from three aspects of research trends, research scale and research clusters. CiteSpace 4.0.R5 is used for co-citation analysis, visualizing co-citation networks and research clusters. UR and US studies contrast in not only their different theoretical bases, but also even more in their empirical work. A conceptual framework is proposed to define the difference between UR and US, and four kinds of urban development are examined based on the framework. We indicate that rational urban development can be achieved only when it is both resilient and sustainable, and conclude that urban planners, policymakers and researchers should pay equal attention to both UR and US before decision-making.
C1 [Zhang, Xiaoling] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Xiaoling] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Xiaoling] Tongji Univ Sustainable Dev & New Type Urbanizat, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Huan] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Land Management, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Huan] Minist Land & Resources, Key Lab Coastal Zone Exploitat & Protect, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing Normal University; City University of Hong Kong; Tongji
   University; Zhejiang University; Ministry of Natural Resources of the
   People's Republic of China
RP Li, H (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ, Dept Land Management, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
EM lihuan2039@163.com
RI Zhang, Xiaoling/AAT-4795-2020
OI Zhang, Xiaoling/0000-0002-6369-9424
FU State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,
   Beijing Normal University; National Natural Science Foundation of China
   [71673232]; Tongji University Sustainable Development and New-Type
   Urbanization Think Tank; CityU Internal Funds for PRC Grants (MFPRC)
   [9680195]; Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special
   Administrative region, China [CityU 11271716, CityU 21209715]; China
   Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100434];  [DXB-ZKQN-2016-009]
FX The research reported in this paper is supported by the State Key
   Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing
   Normal University; National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (71673232), Tongji University Sustainable Development and New-Type
   Urbanization Think Tank and CityU Internal Funds for PRC Grants (MFPRC)
   (9680195). The work described in this paper was partially supported by a
   grant from the Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special
   Administrative region, China (Project No: CityU 11271716 and CityU
   21209715). In addition, the authors are indebted to the Junior
   Fellowships for CAST Advanced Innovation Think-Tank Program (Project No:
   DXB-ZKQN-2016-009) and Special Grade of the Financial Support from the
   China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017T100434).
CR Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Bagaeen SG, 2006, CITIES, V23, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2006.05.002
   Balsells M, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P2448, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.527
   Banai R, 2005, ENVIRON MANAGE, V36, P282, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-1047-0
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2014, CITIES, V36, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.007
   Barthel S, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1321, DOI 10.1177/0042098012472744
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Brand D, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P159, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1133231
   Braun-Lewensohn O, 2014, COMMUNITY MENT HLT J, V50, P229, DOI 10.1007/s10597-013-9623-5
   Buffel T, 2016, CITIES, V55, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016
   CAIN S A, 1968, Biological Conservation, V1, P33, DOI 10.1016/0006-3207(68)90012-8
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chan EHW, 2008, SUSTAIN DEV, V16, P353, DOI 10.1002/sd.350
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   CHELIMSKY E, 1993, SCIENCE, V262, P525, DOI 10.1126/science.8211177
   Chelleri L, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.016
   Chen CM, 2014, J ASSOC INF SCI TECH, V65, P334, DOI 10.1002/asi.22968
   Chen CM, 2012, EXPERT OPIN BIOL TH, V12, P593, DOI 10.1517/14712598.2012.674507
   Chen CM, 2010, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V61, P1386, DOI 10.1002/asi.21309
   Chen CM, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P5303, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0307513100
   Chester M, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015041
   Coaffee J, 2010, INT AFF, V86, P939, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00921.x
   Cox A, 2011, TRANSPORT POLICY, V18, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.004
   Davoudi S, 2009, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V52, P137, DOI 10.1080/09640560802666495
   Eames M, 2011, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V78, P769, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.002
   Foley JA, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P570, DOI 10.1126/science.1111772
   Fung M, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN B, V32, P639, DOI 10.1068/b31113
   Githens-Mazer J, 2012, PARLIAMENT AFF, V65, P896, DOI 10.1093/pa/gsr030
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kareiva P, 2007, SCIENCE, V316, P1866, DOI 10.1126/science.1140170
   Kendra JM, 2003, DISASTERS, V27, P37, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00218
   Khan S., 2015, P 10 GLOB ENG SCI TE
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Liu JG, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1513, DOI 10.1126/science.1144004
   Madani F, 2016, WORLD PAT INF, V46, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.wpi.2016.05.008
   Marsden T, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.004
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Molnar C, 2011, ENVIRONMENT, V53, P18, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2011.539944
   Moussiopoulos N, 2010, CITIES, V27, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.06.001
   Muller M, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P585, DOI 10.1126/science.aac7606
   Mustafee N, 2013, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V19, P586, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.078
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Pandolfini E, 2016, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V8, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.082
   Passarini KC, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V65, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.037
   Pauwelussen A, 2016, MARIT STUD, V15, DOI 10.1186/s40152-016-0041-5
   Rao FJ, 2016, CITIES, V58, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.002
   Rees W, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
   Saadatian O, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V6, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2012.08.002
   Sahely HR, 2005, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V32, P72, DOI 10.1139/L04-072
   Server OB, 1996, HABITAT INT, V20, P23, DOI 10.1016/0197-3975(95)00032-1
   Shi PJ, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.025
   Sinha KC, 2003, J TRANSP ENG, V129, P331, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(331)
   Smith C, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4558, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.011
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Specht K, 2014, AGR HUM VALUES, V31, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10460-013-9448-4
   Stone R, 2008, SCIENCE, V321, P476, DOI 10.1126/science.321.5888.476
   Sui D, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN B, V37, P568
   Takewaki I, 2011, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V1, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2010.08.002
   Testa AC, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P29, DOI 10.3141/2532-04
   Tidball K, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.004
   Timon M., 2014, RISE RESILIENCE LINK
   Toubin M, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
   Vallance S, 2015, URBAN POLICY RES, V33, P433, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2014.980401
   Wagenaar H, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1265, DOI 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Wang R, 2011, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V35, P112, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01378.x
   Wei YG, 2016, HABITAT INT, V53, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.025
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Woolhouse MEJ, 2015, SCI TRANSL MED, V7, DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab0191
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
   Zhang Y, 2006, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V8, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2005.08.005
   Zinatizadeh S, 2017, CITIES, V66, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.002
NR 72
TC 213
Z9 235
U1 58
U2 954
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD FEB
PY 2018
VL 72
BP 141
EP 148
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
PN A
PG 8
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA FR9QZ
UT WOS:000419409500015
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Maru, M
   Worku, H
   Birkmann, J
AF Maru, Mulugeta
   Worku, Hailu
   Birkmann, Joern
TI Factors affecting the spatial resilience of Ethiopia's secondary cities
   to urban uncertainties: A study of household perceptions of Kombolcha
   city
SO HELIYON
LA English
DT Article
DE Household perceptions; Spatial resilience; Urban problems; Hazard
   recurrence; Secondary cities
AB The resilience measurement focuses on urban shocks and stresses, which are excluded from current spatial resilience assessments. As a result, existing literature suggests that research in secondary cities of the global south is needed to understand better spatial resilience in the face of multivariate, intersecting, and uncertain challenges. This study aims to determine the factors affecting the spatial resilience of Ethiopia's secondary cities to urban uncertainties using household perceptions of Kombolcha city. The study collected empirical data through questionnaires and key informant interviews, and then analyzed those using SPSS and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Accordingly, seventeen environmental and physical urban problems affecting the spatial resilience of the country's secondary cities were identified. Deforestation, surface flooding, landslides, poor solid waste management, and inadequate drainage facilities were perceived as top priority urban problems in Kombolcha city with the respective values of 19.73%, 13.02%, 12.70%, 7.59%, and 6.82% of the four hundred sampled households. However, water scarcity and wind-related shocks, scoring 1.48% and 1.89%, respectively, were the least recurring urban problems. The city's spatial resilience is further limited by unsustainable material and resource consumption, a lack of infrastructure, poor transportation system conditions, poor implementation of response measures: lack of appropriate planning, and non-long-lasting biophysical measures. The household perception also showed that the urban uncertainties are severe in the city, with a 49.48% response rate. The findings also revealed a relationship and commonalities amongst the problems exacerbated by land-use zoning changes and the thriving informal settlements. The study implied that improving secondary cities' coping, adaptation, and governance systems are critical for mitigating the perceived urban problems and making cities spatially resilient. Thus, the study's spatial planning implications are that local governments in secondary cities commit to localizing international initiatives, strictly establishing and enforcing local resource utilization strategies, and improving living conditions in their cities.
C1 [Maru, Mulugeta; Worku, Hailu] Addis Ababa Univ AAU, Ethiopian Inst Architecture Bldg Construct & City, POB 518, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   [Birkmann, Joern] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Spatial & Reg Planning, IREUS, Pfaffenwaldring 7, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
C3 University of Stuttgart
RP Maru, M (corresponding author), Addis Ababa Univ AAU, Ethiopian Inst Architecture Bldg Construct & City, POB 518, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
EM mulugeta.maru@eiabc.edu.et
RI Mekuria, Dr Mulugeta Maru/IRZ-0275-2023
OI Maru, Dr. Mulugeta/0000-0002-1692-1045
CR Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Aftabuzzaman M., 2007, 30 AUSTRALASIAN TRAN, P1
   Agbola BS, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V3, P207, DOI 10.1007/s13753-012-0021-3
   Allen CR, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P625, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12634
   Allen CR, 2011, WILDLIFE BIOL, V17, P337, DOI 10.2981/10-084
   [Anonymous], 2007, ENHANCING URBAN SAFE
   [Anonymous], 2010, Disaster Risk Reduction, Governance and Mainstreaming
   [Anonymous], 2013, The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency (CSA), Agricultural Sample Survey. Volume vii, report on crop and livestock product utilization (private peasant holdings
   [Anonymous], 2019, Resilient cities, thriving cities: The evolution of urban resilience
   Asadzadeh A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.002
   Asian Development Bank, 2013, PACIFIC STUDIES SERI
   Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, 2010, URB GOV COMM RES GUI
   Bahadur AdityaV., 2010, The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters
   Bansal N., 2013, INT C CHALL DISASTER, V15
   Bene C., 2012, 405 IDS, V2012, DOI [10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Benini A., 2016, Severity Measures in Humanitarian Needs Assessments: Purpose, Measurement, Integration
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Brunetta G., 2020, SUSTAINABLE CITIES C, P628
   Brunetta G., 2019, NEW METROPOLITAN PER, V2, P101
   Brunetta G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031113
   Carmin JoAnn., 2012, Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Carrilho M., 2015, USE ANALYTICAL HIERA
   Choularton R., 2015, TECHNICAL SERIES, V5
   Christiaensen L, 2017, ANNU REV RESOUR ECON, V9, P405, DOI 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053453
   Cohen L., 2002, Literacy, Vsixth, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203224342, DOI 10.4324/9781315110592-2]
   Cote M.E., 2017, URBAN RESILIENCE PLA
   Crown, 2011, DEF DIS RES DFID APP
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Damtew A.A., 2019, ADV SCI TECHNOLOGY, V308, P325, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-43690-222
   Dickson E., 2012, URBAN DEV SERIES
   Feng C.C., 2004, INT J CONST MANAG, V4, P103
   Ferronato N, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16061060
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Ganin AA, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1701079
   Gharai F, 2018, BAGH E NAZAR, V14, P19
   Githira D., 2020, Analysis of Multiple Deprivations in Secondary Cities
   Guwahat S., 2013, Bull. Gauhati Univ. Math. Assoc. Int. J. Appl. Math. Stat. Sci, V12, P28
   Highland Lynn M., 2008, US Geological Survey Circular, V1325
   Hohmann R.P., 2014, CIVIS SHARING KNOWLE, P1
   Horst A., 2006, J Drylands, V1, P108
   IPE Global, 2017, CLIMATE COMPATIBLE U
   Jones L., 2019, HOW TO GUIDE SUBJECT
   Jones L, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.552
   Jones L, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-09840-230109
   Jones L, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P229, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0995-2
   Keeney RL, 2001, RISK ANAL, V21, P989, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.216168
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mitchell T., 2012, ODI background note, P1
   Obrist B, 2010, PROG DEV STUD, V10, P283, DOI 10.1177/146499340901000402
   OECD, 2013, OECD GUIDN MEAS SUBJ
   Pallant J., 2016, SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL
   Paton D., 2001, Disaster Prevent Manag, V10, P270, DOI [10.1108/EUM0000000005930, DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005930, https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005930]
   Perry G., 2020, WHY SECONDARY CITIES
   Popa M.C., 2019, AIR WATER COMPONENTS
   Rahman M.M., 2020, Am. J. Trade Pol., V7, P65, DOI DOI 10.18034/AJTP
   Razafindrabe G.A., 2009, ASIAN J ENV DISASTER, V1, P101, DOI DOI 10.3850/S179392402009000088
   Reinwald F, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V323, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012082
   RIMA, 2016, AN RES BETT TARG ACT
   Rogov M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124431
   Saaty T.L., 1988, What Is the Analytic Hierarchy Process
   Sanchez A.X., 2018, PALGRAVE COMMUN, V4, P347
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Shores A, 2019, APPL NETW SCI, V4, DOI 10.1007/s41109-019-0229-x
   Sofroniou N., 1999, The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models
   Song L., 2013, SECONDARY CITIES SE
   Tasan-Kok T., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, V106
   UN-Habitat, 1996, The management of secondary cities in Southeast Asia
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2016, WORLDS CIT 2016
   Viverita V., 2014, SE ASIAN J MANAG
   Walker BH, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Water and Land Resource Center/WLRC/ Ethiopia, 2018, NAT CIT LOC MAP ETH
   Woldeyes F., 2015, Unlocking the Power of Ethiopias Cities
NR 77
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 3
U2 21
PU CELL PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA 50 HAMPSHIRE ST, FLOOR 5, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
EI 2405-8440
J9 HELIYON
JI Heliyon
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 7
IS 12
AR e08472
DI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08472
EA DEC 2021
PG 16
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA YD9WQ
UT WOS:000740784200019
PM 34917791
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cao, Q
   Huang, YD
   Ran, BS
   Zeng, G
   Van Rompaey, A
   Shi, M
AF Cao, Qi
   Huang, Yudie
   Ran, Baisong
   Zeng, Gang
   Van Rompaey, Anton
   Shi, Manjiang
TI Coordination Conflicts between Urban Resilience and Urban Land Evolution
   in Chinese Hilly City of Mianyang
SO REMOTE SENSING
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; land conversion; morphology resilience; density
   resilience; coupling coordinated development
ID HEAT-ISLAND; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY;
   VULNERABILITY; TEMPERATURE; PATTERN; IMPACT; FORM
AB Urban resilience, the combinational characteristic of nature and society, that reflects the dynamic accumulation process that is multi-level and multi-dimensional. Particularly, the rational spatial distribution structure of land mixture and compactness is an effective way to improve urban resilience because the evolution of morphology and density of the urban land blocks in the process of land spatial conversion reflect the performance characteristics of complexity, diversity, stability, compactness, and connectivity. Therefore, we evaluated the relationship between urban resilience and land use and land cover (LULC) change, to find the keys to resilient urban development for urban land and space planning. In this study, taking the Chinese hilly city of Mianyang as an example, the results show: (1) the complexity of homogeneous patch shape and heterogeneous patch combination leads to the decrease of urban morphology resilience. (2) the development trend of LULC spatial layout and structure ratio were more rational with the increased of land mixing degree. (3) the speed and intensity of urban expansion were basically coordinated with the development of urban resilience. The research provides the new ideas, approaches, and toolkits for solving the intractable problems of urban spatial planning based on coordinating conflicts between urban resilience and urban land evolution.
C1 [Cao, Qi; Huang, Yudie; Ran, Baisong; Shi, Manjiang] Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
   [Zeng, Gang] Natl Remote Sensing Ctr, Mianyang S&T City Div, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
   [Van Rompaey, Anton] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Geog & Tourism Res Grp, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium.
C3 Southwest University of Science & Technology - China; KU Leuven
RP Shi, M (corresponding author), Southwest Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
EM zenggang@swust.edu.cn; anton.vanrompaey@kuleuven.be
RI Van Rompaey, Anton/AAM-1970-2020
OI Van Rompaey, Anton/0000-0001-5435-6887
FU Foreign Expert Project Foundation of Ministry of Science and Technology
   of China [G2021036009L]; Landscape and Recreation Research Center
   Foundation of Sichuan [JGYQ2021035]; National Natural Science Foundation
   of China [51908475]
FX FundingThis research was funded by (1) the Foreign Expert Project
   Foundation of Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No.
   G2021036009L). (2) the Landscape and Recreation Research Center
   Foundation of Sichuan (Grant No. JGYQ2021035). (3) the National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41701172).
   http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/ (accessed on 18 August 2018). The funders had no
   role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish,
   or preparation of the manuscript. (4) the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant No. 51908475). http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/
   (accessed on 20 August 2020). The funders had no role in study.
CR Ahern J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Botequilha Leitao A., 2011, LANDSCAPE METRICS PL
   Cao Q, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0246746
   [曹琦 Cao Qi], 2019, [国土资源遥感, Remote Sensing for Land & Resources], V31, P190
   Cao X, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V96, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.008
   [陈爱莲 Chen Ailian], 2012, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V32, P4553
   [陈利顶 CHEN LiDing], 2006, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V26, P1444
   [陈利顶 Chen Liding], 2003, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V23, P2406
   Chen Y., 2020, DISASTER SCI, V2, P136
   Davoudi S., 2009, Planning for Climate Change Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners
   DiBari JN, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V79, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.004
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Estoque RC, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V577, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.195
   Ewing R, 2008, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V19, P1, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2008.9521624
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   [高静 Gao Jing], 2019, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V38, P1770
   Guan C.Y., 2022, ACTA ECOL SIN, V42, P216
   Hardoy J, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P203, DOI 10.1177/0956247809103019
   Harrison P., 2016, URBAN RESILIENCE THI
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jing WL, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P2523, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-1944-2
   Lam NSN, 2014, J COASTAL RES, P473, DOI 10.2112/SI70-080.1
   Lee S, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V68, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.024
   Li X, 2001, J ARID ENVIRON, V48, P521, DOI 10.1006/jare.2000.0715
   [李霞 Li Xia], 2016, [地球信息科学学报, Journal of Geo-Information Science], V18, P117
   Liu ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Lohrey S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V45, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.004
   Ma SF, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V62, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.11.004
   [马勇刚 MA Yonggang], 2006, [干旱区研究, Arid Zone Research], V23, P172
   Maimaitiaili A, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7010006
   McMichael A., 2003, CLIMATE CHANGE HUMAN
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Monteiro MV, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V16, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.008
   Nozdrovická J, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080273
   O'Brien K, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Oertli B, 2019, ECOSPHERE, V10, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.2810
   OKE TR, 1991, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V56, P339, DOI 10.1007/BF00119211
   Pelling M., 2012, ANGEW CHEM INT EDIT, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781849773379, 10.4324/9781849773379]
   Poelmans L, 2010, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V34, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.06.001
   [祁兰兰 Qi Lanlan], 2021, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V28, P199
   Rui Y., 2010, P 13 AGILE INT C GEO
   Salat S, 2012, ENERGY EFFICIENCY A
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tang JM, 2006, GISCI REMOTE SENS, V43, P218, DOI 10.2747/1548-1603.43.3.218
   Tanner Thomas., 2009, IDS Work. Pap, DOI 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2009.003152.x
   Wang Yao-bin, 2017, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V28, P2621, DOI 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201708.022
   Wu J., 2007, KEY TOPICS LANDSCAPE
   Wu J., 2008, Encyclopedia of Ecology, DOI 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00864-8
   Xu G., 2016, J GEOMAT, V41, P56
   Xu JC, 2008, ENVIRON INT, V34, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2007.08.004
   Xu SL, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V151, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0270-1
   [袁振 Yuan Zhen], 2017, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V37, P1600
NR 57
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 11
U2 136
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2072-4292
J9 REMOTE SENS-BASEL
JI Remote Sens.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 23
AR 4887
DI 10.3390/rs13234887
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Remote Sensing;
   Imaging Science & Photographic Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Remote Sensing; Imaging
   Science & Photographic Technology
GA XU9PC
UT WOS:000734586500001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yang, CT
   Xie, LL
   Li, AQ
   Zeng, DM
   Jia, JB
   Chen, X
   Chen, M
AF Yang, Cantian
   Xie, Linlin
   Li, Aiqun
   Zeng, Demin
   Jia, Junbo
   Chen, Xi
   Chen, Min
TI Resilience-based retrofitting of existing urban RC-frame buildings using
   seismic isolation
SO EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION
LA English
DT Article
DE existing urban RC frame building; retrofitting using seismic isolation;
   seismic resilience; yield ratio
ID ENERGY-DISSIPATION; ISOLATION SYSTEM; VISCOUS DAMPERS
AB The improvement of the seismic resilience of existing reinforced-concrete (RC) frame buildings, which is essential for the seismic resilience of a city, has become a critical issue. Although seismic isolation is an effective method for improving the resilient performance of such buildings, target-oriented quantitative improvements of the resilient performance of these buildings have been reported rarely. To address this gap, the seismic resilience of two existing RC frame buildings located in a high seismic intensity region of China were assessed based on the Chinese Standard for Seismic Resilience Assessment of Buildings. The critical engineering demand parameters (EDPs) affecting the seismic resilience of such buildings were identified. Subsequently, the seismic resilience of buildings retrofitted with different isolation schemes (i.e., yield ratios) were evaluated and compared, with emphasis on the relationships among yield ratios, EDPs, and levels of seismic resilience. Accordingly, to achieve the highest level of seismic resilience with respect to the Chinese standard, a yield ratio of 3% was recommended and successfully applied to the target-oriented design for the seismic-resilience improvement of an existing RC frame building. The research outcome can provide an important reference for the resilience-based retrofitting of existing RC frame buildings using seismic isolation in urban cities.
C1 [Yang, Cantian; Li, Aiqun] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Linlin; Li, Aiqun] Southeast Univ, Res & Dev Joint Ctr Energy Dissipat Technol, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Linlin; Li, Aiqun] Southeast Univ, Forceset Corp, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China.
   [Xie, Linlin; Li, Aiqun; Zeng, Demin; Jia, Junbo; Chen, Min] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Xi] Beijing Inst Architectural Design, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China.
C3 Southeast University - China; Southeast University - China; Southeast
   University - China; Beijing University of Civil Engineering &
   Architecture
RP Xie, LL (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Res & Dev Joint Ctr Energy Dissipat Technol, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China.; Xie, LL (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Forceset Corp, Nanjing 210096, Peoples R China.
EM xielinlin@bucea.edu.cn
RI yang, can/GXV-5624-2022; Xie, linlin/GZG-9107-2022
OI Xie, Linlin/0000-0003-3796-5271
FU Beijing Natural Science Foundation [8192008]; Scientific Research
   Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [YBPY2021];
   Science and Technology Project of Beijing Municipal Education Commission
   [KM201910016014]; Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative
   Research Team in University [IRT_17R06]
FX The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the
   Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant 8192008), the Scientific
   Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University
   (YBPY2021), the Science and Technology Project of Beijing Municipal
   Education Commission (KM201910016014), and the Program for Changjiang
   Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_17R06).
CR Almufti I., 2013, REDITM RATING SYSTEM
   [Anonymous], 2020, STAND SEISM RES ASS
   Avsar Ö, 2013, J BRIDGE ENG, V18, P250, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000340
   Bhagat S, 2017, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V16, P365, DOI 10.1007/s11803-017-0387-8
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cimellaro GP, 2017, J EARTHQ ENG, V21, P203, DOI 10.1080/13632469.2016.1172373
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Computers and Structures Inc, 2003, ETABS
   Dong Y, 2016, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V45, P739, DOI 10.1002/eqe.2682
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2012, SEISM PERF ASS BUILD, V1
   Hu K, 2017, ENG STRUCT, V152, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.006
   Li AQ, 2017, APPL SCI-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/app7111191
   Li XJ, 2012, CHINESE J ORG CHEM, V32, P127, DOI 10.6023/cjoc1104181
   Liu LD, 2019, RES INFLUENCE YIELD
   Lu XZ, 2015, FINITE ELEM ANAL DES, V98, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.finel.2015.01.006
   MANDER JB, 1988, J STRUCT ENG-ASCE, V114, P1804, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
   Matsagar VA, 2008, PRACT PERIOD STRUCT, V13, P175, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2008)13:4(175)
   Mayes RL, 2012, BULL N Z SOC EARTHQ, V45, P117, DOI 10.5459/bnzsee.45.3.117-122
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, 2016, COD SEISM DES BUILD
   Mollaioli F, 2013, B EARTHQ ENG, V11, P1841, DOI 10.1007/s10518-013-9431-x
   Moretti S, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P969, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01024-7
   Park JG, 1999, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V28, P941, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<941::AID-EQE848>3.0.CO;2-5
   Pourzeynali S, 2008, J SOUND VIB, V311, P1141, DOI 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.10.008
   Providakis CP, 2008, ENG STRUCT, V30, P1187, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.020
   Renschler CS, 2010, A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework
   Shang QX, 2019, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V18, P903, DOI 10.1007/s11803-019-0542-5
   Taniguchi M., 2016, Front Built Environ, V2, DOI [10.3389/fbuil.2016.00026, DOI 10.3389/FBUIL.2016.00026]
   Tian Y, 2016, EARTHQ STRUCT, V11, P925, DOI 10.12989/eas.2016.11.6.925
   Xie LL, 2015, J EARTHQ ENG, V19, P1320, DOI 10.1080/13632469.2015.1040897
   Xiong C, 2020, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V35, P322, DOI 10.1111/mice.12496
   Yang CT, 2022, J EARTHQ ENG, V26, P427, DOI 10.1080/13632469.2019.1689869
   Yang CT, 2019, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105727
   Zhou FL, 2018, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V17, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11803-018-0422-4
   Zhou Y, 2020, SMART STRUCT SYST, V25, P543, DOI 10.12989/sss.2020.25.5.543
   Zhou Y, 2019, J ENG MECH, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001611
   Zhou Y, 2017, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V100, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.002
   Zisserman A, 2020, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
NR 37
TC 33
Z9 39
U1 12
U2 102
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1671-3664
EI 1993-503X
J9 EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB
JI Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib.
PD OCT
PY 2020
VL 19
IS 4
BP 839
EP 853
DI 10.1007/s11803-020-0599-1
PG 15
WC Engineering, Civil; Engineering, Geological
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA OF2SU
UT WOS:000581065100003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Monaco, L
   Herce, C
AF Monaco, Lina
   Herce, Carlos
TI Impact of Maker Movement on the Urban Resilience Development: Assessment
   Methodology and Analysis of EU Research and Innovation Projects
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; environmental indicators; maker movement; FabLab;
   smart cities; EU-funded projects
ID SMART CITY; SUSTAINABILITY; CITIES; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; WASTE
AB Cities are the engine of human development, and increasing urban sustainability is crucial to ensure human prosperity. The development of smart cities generally increases the sustainability of the cities. However, technical and environmental aspects are generally developed in smart cities neglecting socio-economic dimensions. The urban resilience concept includes the complex interactions of environmental, economic, and societal pillars. In this context, the emerging maker movement proposes an economic paradigm shift, with the interaction of humans and technology at the center of urban evolution. This paper proposes a multi-criteria methodology to define and assess the main characteristics of the resilient approach of the projects involving maker practices applied to urban development. The proposed methodology is based on the application of computer-assisted qualitative text analysis and a subsequent classification according to 12 indicators (community and urban efficiency, co-creation and professional, making sense and problem-solving, network and site-specific, implementation and optimization, sustainability-oriented and market-oriented) that define different dimensions of a bottom-up project's resilient approach in three main key principles: inclusiveness, complexity, and durability. The method has been tested in 94 EU-funded projects. This analysis reveals the evolution and orientation of EU-funded projects from economic, technical, and social perspectives. Specifically, the patterns of remediation of non-participatory practices, the weak presence of open innovation initiatives, and the development of activities focusing on co-creation as a participatory tool. The applied methodology could be subsequently implemented at different scales and integrated with LCA in order to evaluate the sustainability of bottom-up projects toward urban development.
C1 [Monaco, Lina] Univ Zaragoza, Sch Engn & Architecture, C Maria Luna 3, Zaragoza 50018, Spain.
   [Herce, Carlos] Italian Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainable, ENEA, DUEE SPS ESE, CR Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, I-00123 Rome, Italy.
C3 University of Zaragoza; Italian National Agency New Technical Energy &
   Sustainable Economics Development
RP Monaco, L (corresponding author), Univ Zaragoza, Sch Engn & Architecture, C Maria Luna 3, Zaragoza 50018, Spain.; Herce, C (corresponding author), Italian Natl Agcy New Technol Energy & Sustainable, ENEA, DUEE SPS ESE, CR Casaccia, Via Anguillarese 301, I-00123 Rome, Italy.
EM 752761@unizar.es; carlos.herce@enea.it
RI Herce, Carlos/ABA-7248-2020
OI Herce, Carlos/0000-0002-6631-3961
FU The authors thanks Jorge R. Gmez for his crucial support on the
   independence variable analysis. The authors are also grateful to
   Raimundo Bamb and Ignacio Zabalza for their valuable comments that
   helped improve the quality of this paper. Th
FX The authors thanks Jorge R. Gomez for his crucial support on the
   independence variable analysis. The authors are also grateful to
   Raimundo Bambo and Ignacio Zabalza for their valuable comments that
   helped improve the quality of this paper. The authors wish to thank
   Francesca Pagliaro, Marco Morini, and Giovanni Murano for the invitation
   to publish in this Sustainable Special Issue.
CR Abbassi W, 2022, R&D MANAGE, V52, P343, DOI 10.1111/radm.12503
   Agirre E., 2009, N AM CHAPTER ASS COM
   Agustí-Juan I, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P2780, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.190
   Ahvenniemi H, 2017, CITIES, V60, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
   Anderson Chris., 2012, MAKERS NEW IND REVOL
   [Anonymous], 2013, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2470654.2481360, 10.1080/09505439609526460</]
   [Anonymous], 2007, P 16 INT WORLD WID W, DOI DOI 10.1145/1242572.1242675
   [Anonymous], 2021, IEA Empowering Cities for a Net Zero Future
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Arup City Resilience Index, 2014, Understanding and Measuring City Resilience
   Asuero AG, 2006, CRIT REV ANAL CHEM, V36, P41, DOI 10.1080/10408340500526766
   Behrendt T, 2012, CIRP ANN-MANUF TECHN, V61, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.103
   Browder RE, 2019, J BUS VENTURING, V34, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.01.005
   Calvillo CF, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V55, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.133
   Capdevila I, 2015, J STRATEGY MANAG, V8, P266, DOI 10.1108/JSMA-03-2015-0030
   Caragliu A, 2011, J URBAN TECHNOL, V18, P65, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
   Cardullo P, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P813, DOI 10.1177/0263774X18806508
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chen YL, 2022, UNDERGR SPACE, V7, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2021.12.006
   Choi YH, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063058
   Cjková A, 2022, NISPACEE J PUBLIC AD, V15, P17, DOI 10.2478/nispa-2022-0002
   Corsini L, 2021, R&D MANAGE, V51, P195, DOI 10.1111/radm.12446
   Corsini L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11133562
   Coskun A, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106495
   De Jong M., 2018, Review of Research Findings Generated under JPI Urban Europe's Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda 2013-2018
   Dicken P., 2007, Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy
   Diez T., 2016, Fab City Whitepaper. Locally Productive
   Ebrahimi M, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112341
   Esmaeilian B, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V81, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.047
   European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, 2023, EU Missions, 100 Climate-Neutral and Smart Cities: Cities on a Journey to Climate Neutrality, DOI [10.2777/734384, DOI 10.2777/734384]
   Faludi J, 2015, RAPID PROTOTYPING J, V21, P14, DOI 10.1108/RPJ-07-2013-0067
   Fasoli A, 2017, DES J, V20, pS3121, DOI 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352819
   Ford S, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V137, P1573, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150
   Gershenfeld N., 2017, DESIGNING REALITY SU
   Gershenfeld N.A., 2007, Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop--from personal computers to personal fabrication
   Goldstein B, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035024
   Guo Q, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V184, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122003
   Haarstad H, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V129, P918, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.001
   Halverson ER, 2014, HARVARD EDUC REV, V84, P495, DOI 10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
   Hildebrandt L., 2022, P C PROD SYST LOG CP, P192
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Huang L, 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V30, P1175, DOI 10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2
   Kieslinger B, 2021, FRONT SOCIOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2021.629587
   Kim D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11164416
   Kitchin R, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Kohtala C, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V99, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.093
   Koop SHA, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P385, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9760-4
   Kuo YH, 2023, EUR J OPER RES, V306, P1001, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.06.057
   Lotteau M, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V93, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.06.029
   Manzini Ezio., 2015, Design
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Menichinelli M., 2019, European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes, V2, P35, DOI [https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/9640, DOI 10.6092/ISSN.2612-0496/9640]
   Milara IS, 2017, DES J, V20, pS1080, DOI 10.1080/14606925.2017.1353052
   Millard J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072212
   Monaco L., 2021, P CUM C P 2021 ROM I, P2920
   Monaco L., 2018, P FAB14 TOUL FRANC 2
   Mori K, 2012, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V32, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.001
   Nascimento S., 2014, From Citizen Science to Do It Yourself Science: An Annotated Account of an On-Going Movement, DOI [10.2788/12246, DOI 10.2788/12246]
   Obradovic T, 2021, TECHNOVATION, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102221
   Pessoa S, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110794
   Petit-Boix A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.030
   Pincetl S, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.006
   Pisano Umberto -., 2012, Resilience and Sustainable Development: Theory of resilience, systems thinking and adaptive governance
   Principale S, 2023, J PUBLIC AFF, V23, DOI 10.1002/pa.2863
   Qin ZT, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103723
   Qu R, 2018, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V54, P1002, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.07.002
   Rifkin J., 2015, The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism
   Rosa P, 2020, INT J PROD RES, V58, P1662, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896
   Saari H, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132413559
   Sararu CS, 2016, JURID TRIB, V6, P160
   Sharifi A, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107102
   Soomro SA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031196
   Spatari S, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P2174, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.015
   Srebalová M, 2022, LAWS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/laws11050067
   Staffans A, 2020, INT J E-PLAN RES, V9, P1, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.2020040101
   Strauss A., 1995, Handbook of Qualitative Research
   Taylor N, 2016, 34TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, CHI 2016, P1415, DOI 10.1145/2858036.2858073
   Tsui T, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010023
   Voigt C, 2016, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9934, P189, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_17
   Yigitcanlar T, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V45, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033
   Yu BB, 2023, INT REV ECON FINANC, V88, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.033
NR 83
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 11
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 17
AR 12856
DI 10.3390/su151712856
PG 39
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA R0CJ6
UT WOS:001061101300001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Goyal, MK
   Poonia, V
   Jain, V
AF Goyal, Manish Kumar
   Poonia, Vikas
   Jain, Vijay
TI Three decadal urban drought variability risk assessment for Indian smart
   cities
SO JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Extreme Events; Urban Drought; Risk; Indian Smart Cities
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SOIL-MOISTURE; RAINFALL; TEMPERATURE; MANAGEMENT;
   RESOLUTION; RAJASTHAN; PATTERNS; GLACIERS; BASIN
AB In 2015 the beginning of the Indian Smart Cities' mission was one of the significant steps taken by the Indian government to make the urban environment resilient to climate change impact and extreme weather events like drought, floods, heatwaves, etc. This study computes the urban drought risk for Indian smart cities before the beginning of the Indian smart cities mission. This study considers three decadal variability (1982-2013) in meteorological, hydrological, vegetation, and soil moisture parameters for inducing water scarcity and drought conditions in urban regions. Hazards associated with urban drought-inducing parameters variability, vulnerability, and exposure of Indian smart cities were used to compute the Urban drought risk. The research investigations revealed the maximum urban drought risk for Bangalore, Chennai, and Surat cities. Northwest, West Central, and South Peninsular urban regions have higher risk among all the urban regions of India. Indian smart cities mission can be used to make Indian cities resilient to urban drought risk and increase their sustainability. The present research aligned with several national and international agreements by providing an urban drought risk rank for Indian cities, making them less vulnerable to extreme weather events and improving their resilience to climate change.
C1 [Goyal, Manish Kumar; Poonia, Vikas; Jain, Vijay] Indian Inst Technol Indore, Dept Civil Engn, Indore, India.
   [Poonia, Vikas] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ Indianapolis, Dept Earth Sci, Indianapolis, IN USA.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Indore; Indiana University System; Indiana University
   Indianapolis
RP Jain, V (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Indore, Dept Civil Engn, Indore, India.
EM tomarvijay5514@gmail.com
RI POONIA, Dr. VIKAS/AAH-4893-2021
OI POONIA, VIKAS/0000-0001-5819-3747; JAIN, VIJAY/0000-0001-6430-1863
FU Prime Minister Research Fellowship
FX The author would acknowledge all the national and international
   organizations for providing precipitation, temperature, soil moisture,
   and runoff datasets like the National Institute of Urban Affairs, New
   Delhi (NIUA), NITI Aayog, Indian Meteorological Department (IMD),
   Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications-2
   (MERRA-2) and Global Inventory Modelling and Mapping Studies
   (GIMMS)-NDVI, NASA significantly. The authors like to acknowledge the
   Prime Minister Research Fellowship to fund research studies regarding
   Climate Change Impact on Water Resources.
CR Aayog N.I.T.I., 2022, SDG index
   Adarsh S, 2020, J HYDROL, V586, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124913
   Bhuyan-Erhardt U, 2019, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V265, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.016
   Cse, 2022, Average annual rainfall
   Das J, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V867, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161566
   Das S, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P2483, DOI 10.1007/s11269-022-03297-9
   Das S, 2022, HYDROLOG SCI J, V67, P1683, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2022.2079416
   Das S, 2022, J HYDROL, V610, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127900
   Das S, 2022, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V36, P1597, DOI 10.1007/s00477-021-02073-2
   Das S, 2021, J HYDROL ENG, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002039
   Das S, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P5644, DOI 10.1002/joc.7145
   Dash SK, 2013, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V108, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.06.004
   Dilling L, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAG, V23, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2018.11.001
   Everard M, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V44, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.004
   Everard M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V612, P1249, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.308
   Flörke M, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P51, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8
   Government of India, 2011, Population finder census 2011
   Goyal MK, 2018, J ENVIRON ENG, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001394
   Goyal M, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P805, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1840-1
   Goyal MK, 2012, HYDROL RES, V43, P215, DOI 10.2166/nh.2012.040
   Güneralp B, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V31, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.002
   Guglielmi Giorgia, 2022, Nature, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-01667-2
   Hauser M, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P2819, DOI 10.1002/2016GL068036
   He CY, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3
   Humphrey V, 2021, NATURE, V592, P65, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03325-5
   IITM, 2022, Homogeneous Rainfall Zones of India
   Indiana Department of Natural Resources, 2022, SPI at Different Time Scales
   IPCC, 2022, IPCC AR6 WGII FINALD
   Jain G., 2016, Urban Risks and Resilience in India, DOI [10.24943/updsdg2016_5, DOI 10.24943/UPDSDG2016_5]
   Jain G, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1038/s42949-022-00050-4
   KOGAN FN, 1990, INT J REMOTE SENS, V11, P1405, DOI 10.1080/01431169008955102
   Kumar M, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112403
   Kumar N, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120532
   Li JZ, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P669, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1184-7
   McKee T.B., 1993, P 8 C APPL CLIM, V17, P179
   Ministry of housing and urban affairs, 2022, About the mission | smartcities
   Mishra AK, 2005, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V3, P31, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2005.9635243
   Mishra AK, 2005, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V19, P326, DOI 10.1007/s00477-005-0238-4
   Mishra AK, 2011, J HYDROL, V403, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.049
   Mishra V, 2010, J HYDROMETEOROL, V11, P46, DOI 10.1175/2009JHM1156.1
   MoHUA, 2021, Ease of Living: INDEX 2020
   NDMA, 2019, DIS RISKS RES IND AN
   Nidis, 2022, Soil moisture
   Observatory C.E.D., 2020, Standard precipitation index
   Pai DS, 2014, MAUSAM, V65, P1
   Poonia V, 2022, J HYDROL, V605, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127402
   Poonia V, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127737
   Poonia V, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, P4637, DOI 10.1002/joc.7091
   Poonia V, 2021, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V35, P1175, DOI 10.1007/s00477-020-01942-6
   Pritchard HD, 2019, NATURE, V569, P649, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1240-1
   Pritchard HD, 2017, NATURE, V545, P169, DOI 10.1038/nature22062
   Salimi H, 2021, APPL WATER SCI, V11, DOI 10.1007/s13201-020-01345-6
   Sannan M., 2020, How can I get a shapefiles of Indian Homogeneous Rainfall Regions?
   Saxena R, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V135, P1323, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2416-6
   Sharma A, 2020, ATMOS RES, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104670
   Sharma A, 2018, J HYDROL, V564, P1048, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.079
   Sharma LK, 2021, J ARID ENVIRON, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2021.104609
   Shukla S, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2007GL032487
   Singh VP, 2014, HANDB ENVIRON ENG, V15, P525, DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-595-8_11
   Singha M, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102394
   Smart Cities Mission, 2020, City Rankings 2020
   Tellman B, 2022, NATURE, V608, P41, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-02031-0
   UNCCD, 2022, Vulnerability and risk assessment
   UNCCD, 2022, DROUGHT NUMB 2022
   UNDP, 2019, popul. Aging., P263, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-4050-1_17, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-4050-1_17]
   United Nations, 2022, About UN-water
   Wang YX, 2022, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V36, P2433, DOI 10.1007/s11269-022-03151-y
   Yang WZ, 2021, INT J REMOTE SENS, V42, P6025, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2021.1934597
   Yisehak B, 2021, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V7, P1005, DOI 10.1007/s40808-020-00923-6
   Zhang X, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V693, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.342
NR 70
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 10
U2 30
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0022-1694
EI 1879-2707
J9 J HYDROL
JI J. Hydrol.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 625
AR 130056
DI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130056
EA AUG 2023
PN A
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Geology; Water Resources
GA X3WJ6
UT WOS:001097788500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Meerow, S
   Newell, JP
   Stults, M
AF Meerow, Sara
   Newell, Joshua P.
   Stults, Melissa
TI Defining urban resilience: A review
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban resilience; Adaptation; Adaptive capacity; Climate change;
   Resilient cities; Socio-ecological systems
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE;
   ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; PLANNING PRACTICE; CITIES; CITY; VULNERABILITY;
   LESSONS; SYSTEMS
AB Fostering resilience in the face of environmental, socioeconomic, and political uncertainty and risk has captured the attention of academics and decision makers across disciplines, sectors, and scales. Resilience has become an important goal for cities, particularly in the face of climate change. Urban areas house the majority of the world's population, and, in addition to functioning as nodes of resource consumption and as sites for innovation, have become laboratories for resilience, both in theory and in practice. This paper reviews the scholarly literature on urban resilience and concludes that the term has not been well defined. Existing definitions are inconsistent and underdeveloped with respect to incorporation of crucial concepts found in both resilience theory and urban theory. Based on this literature review, and aided by bibliometric analysis, the paper identifies six conceptual tensions fundamental to urban resilience: (1) definition of 'urban'; (2) understanding of system equilibrium; (3) positive vs. neutral (or negative) conceptualizations of resilience; (4) mechanisms for system change; (5) adaptation versus general adaptability; and (6) timescale of action. To advance this burgeoning field, more conceptual clarity is needed. This paper, therefore, proposes a new definition of urban resilience. This definition takes explicit positions on these tensions, but remains inclusive and flexible enough to enable uptake by, and collaboration among, varying disciplines. The paper concludes with a discussion of how the definition might serve as a boundary object, with the acknowledgement that applying resilience in different contexts requires answering: Resilience for whom and to what? When? Where? And why? (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Meerow, Sara; Newell, Joshua P.; Stults, Melissa] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
C3 University of Michigan System; University of Michigan
RP Meerow, S (corresponding author), Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
EM sameerow@umich.edu; jpnewell@umich.edu; stultsm@umich.edu
RI Meerow, Sara/J-8037-2019; Newell, Joshua/J-6665-2016
OI Meerow, Sara/0000-0002-6935-1832; Newell, Joshua/0000-0002-1440-8715
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   [Anonymous], 2009, P INT AAAI C WEBLOG, DOI DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V3I1.13937
   [Anonymous], 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   [Anonymous], 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], 2010, The World Urbanization Prospects, The 2009 Revision
   [Anonymous], TRACING ROOTS URBAN
   [Anonymous], 2004, ECOLOGY SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG 2014 MIT
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], DESIGN WITH NATURE
   Armitage D, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Asprone D., 2013, SAFETY RELIABILITY R, P4069
   Bahadur AV, 2010, CLIMATE ENV
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2014, CITIES, V36, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.007
   Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419
   Beichler SA, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06583-190304
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brown K, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Burby RaymondJ., 2000, Natural Hazards Review, V1, P99, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)]
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Carmin JoAnn., 2012, Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Carpenter SR, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Cascio J., 2009, Foreign Policy, V172, P92
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Clements FE, 1936, J ECOL, V24, P252, DOI 10.2307/2256278
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dicken P., 2007, Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy
   Elmqvist T., 2014, RESILIENT SUSTAINABL, P19, DOI [10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.4324/9780203593066]
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fiksel J., 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, V2, P14
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gaillard JC, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P218, DOI 10.1002/jid.1675
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Graham S., 2001, SPLINTERING URBANISM
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Guy S., 2001, Urban infrastructure in transition: Networks, buildings, plans
   Hamilton WAH, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P109, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.109
   Harvey David., 1996, JUSTICE NATURE GEOGR
   Henstra D, 2012, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V14, P175, DOI 10.1080/13876988.2012.665215
   Hodson M, 2010, RES POLICY, V39, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, ENG ECOLOGICAL CONST, V1st, DOI 10.17226/4919
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jane J., 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   Jerneck A, 2008, CLIM POLICY, V8, P170, DOI 10.3763/cpol.2007.0434
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kennedy C, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1107
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   LAMOND Jessica., 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, V162, P63, DOI DOI 10.1680/UDAP.2009.162
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lhomme S., 2013, Resilience and Urban Risk Management, P109
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McEvoy D, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P280, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787710
   McLellan B., 2012, CHALLENGES, V3, P153, DOI [10.3390/challe3020153, DOI 10.3390/CHALLE3020153]
   Meerow S, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P236, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12252
   Meerow SA, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P20, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.667414
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Molyneaux L, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V47, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.057
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Noyons E, 2001, SCIENTOMETRICS, V50, P83, DOI 10.1023/A:1005694202977
   O'Hare P, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P275, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787721
   Orencio PM, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V3, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.11.006
   Pearson Leonie J., 2014, Resilient Sustainable Cities: A future, P242, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602]
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Perrings C, 2006, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V11, P417, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X06003020
   Persson O., 2009, Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, P9
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Resilience Alliance, 2007, URB RES RES PROSP
   Rodin Judith., 2014, RESILIENCE DIVIDEND
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Salat S, 2011, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V21, P1193, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2130
   Scheffer M, 2001, NATURE, V413, P591, DOI 10.1038/35098000
   Schmitt Peter., 2013, Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, V106, P197
   Seitzinger SP, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P787, DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0353-7
   Serre D, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2675, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2675-2013
   Shaw K., 2013, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V28, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0952076711432578, 10.1177/0952076711432578]
   SMALL H, 1973, J AM SOC INFORM SCI, V24, P265, DOI 10.1002/asi.4630240406
   Smith A, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Solecki W, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.03.001
   STAR SL, 1989, SOC STUD SCI, V19, P387, DOI 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Tanner T., 2009, Urban Governance for Adaptation: Assessing Climate Change Resilience in Ten Asian Cities
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Turner BS, 2006, THEOR CULT SOC, V23, P183, DOI 10.1177/0263276406062698
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wagner Iwona, 2013, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Wu Jianguo., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-910
   Yu C, 2014, J IND ECOL, V18, P280, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12073
   Zimmerman R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.004
   Zurlini G, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1161, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9763-y
NR 127
TC 1491
Z9 1711
U1 363
U2 2906
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD MAR
PY 2016
VL 147
BP 38
EP 49
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
PG 12
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA DD7JM
UT WOS:000370100300004
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Leigh, NG
   Lee, H
AF Leigh, Nancey Green
   Lee, Heonyeong
TI Sustainable and Resilient Urban Water Systems: The Role of
   Decentralization and Planning
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE sustainable urban water management; decentralized water infrastructure;
   water security and resiliency; socio-institutional impediments
ID SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; CRISIS; FLINT;
   VULNERABILITY; SIMILARITIES; FRAMEWORK; FAILURE; CITIES
AB Urban water systems face multiple challenges related to future uncertainty and pressures to provide more sustainable and resilient modes of service delivery. Transitioning away from fully centralized water systems is seen as a primary solution to addressing these urban challenges and pressures. We first review the literature on advantages, potential risks, and impediments to change associated with decentralized water system. Our review suggests that adopting decentralized solutions may advance conditions of sustainability and resilience in urban water management. We then explore the potential to incorporate decentralized water systems into broader urban land use patterns that include underserved residential neighborhoods, mixed-use developments, and industrial districts.
C1 [Leigh, Nancey Green; Lee, Heonyeong] Georgia Inst Technol, Dept City & Reg Planning, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
C3 University System of Georgia; Georgia Institute of Technology
RP Leigh, NG (corresponding author), Georgia Inst Technol, Dept City & Reg Planning, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA.
EM ngleigh@gatech.edu; leehy@gatech.edu
RI Leigh, Nancey/AAU-1688-2020
OI Lee, Heonyeong/0000-0003-0286-098X
FU NSF [1441208]
FX This research is funded by NSF Grant #1441208 (RIPS Type2: Participatory
   Modeling of Complex Urban Infrastructure Systems (Modeling Urban
   Systems)).
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Allen L., 2010, Overview of greywater reuse: The potential of greywater systems to aid sustainable water management
   [Anonymous], REV REC IMPL WAT WAS
   Armitage DR, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P95, DOI 10.1890/070089
   ARTHUR WB, 1989, ECON J, V99, P116, DOI 10.2307/2234208
   ASCE, 2009, 2009 REP CARD AM INF
   AWWA, 2011, Buried no longer: Confronting america's water infrastructure challenge
   Balazs CL, 2014, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V104, P603, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301664
   Banister D, 1997, ENVIRON PLANN B, V24, P437, DOI 10.1068/b240437
   Bell S., 2012, Emergence: Complexity Organisation, V14, P45
   Bellinger DC, 2016, NEW ENGL J MED, V374, P1101, DOI 10.1056/NEJMp1601013
   Bieker S, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V61, P2905, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.189
   Biggs C., 2009, Distributed Water Systems: A Networked and Localised Approach for Sustainable Water Services, P31
   Bocchini P, 2014, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P839, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.028
   Brown R, 2011, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V25, P4037, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-9886-y
   Brown RR, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V41, P221, DOI 10.1007/s00267-007-9046-6
   Brundtland G., 1987, REPORT WORLD COMMISS
   Burn S, 2012, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V66, P113, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.071
   Campbell S, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Carpenter SR, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P75, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-021810-094524
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Connor Tracy, 2016, NBC News
   Copeland C., 2017, Energy - Water Nexus: The Water Sector's Energy Use
   Daigger G.T., 2007, J ENV ENG MANAGEMENT, V17, P1
   Daigger GT, 2009, WATER ENVIRON RES, V81, P809, DOI 10.2175/106143009X425898
   Diao KG, 2016, WATER RES, V106, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.011
   Farrelly M, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gleick PH, 1998, ECOL APPL, V8, P571, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0571:WICPTS]2.0.CO;2
   Gleick PH, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1524, DOI 10.1126/science.1089967
   Glennon R.J, 2010, UNQUENCHABLE AM WATE
   Grant SB, 2012, SCIENCE, V337, P681, DOI 10.1126/science.1216852
   Hanna-Attisha M, 2016, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V106, P283, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303003
   Jeffrey P, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V35, P45, DOI 10.2166/wst.1997.0329
   Jenks M., 2003, The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form
   Keath NA, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P1271, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.136
   Krozer Y, 2010, J CLEAN PROD, V18, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.11.013
   Lew AA, 2016, TOURISM GEOGR, V18, P18, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2015.1122664
   Listowski A, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V72, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.011
   Little RG, 2002, J URBAN TECHNOL, V9, P109, DOI 10.1080/106307302317379855
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Marlow DR, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7150, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.046
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Missimer TM, 2014, WATER POLICY, V16, P669, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.131
   Mitchell VG, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V37, P589, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0252-1
   Myers CA, 2008, POPUL ENVIRON, V29, P271, DOI 10.1007/s11111-008-0072-y
   Ni L, 2012, APPL THERM ENG, V39, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.01.031
   Niemczynowicz J., 1999, Urban Water, V1, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00009-6
   Novotny V., 2010, WATER CENTRIC SUSTAI
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT OF WATER RESOURCES AND GLOBAL CHANGE, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Raman S., 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V36, P63, DOI [10.2148/benv.36.1.63, DOI 10.2148/BENV.36.1.63]
   Rosner D, 2016, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V106, P200, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2015.303011
   Rozos E, 2012, URBAN WATER J, V9, P1, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2011.630096
   Sahely HR, 2005, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V32, P72, DOI 10.1139/L04-072
   Sapkota M, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P153, DOI 10.3390/w7010153
   Schramm E., 2012, Resilient Cities 2, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4223-9_19, 10.1007/978-94-007-4223-9_19]
   Shuster W.D., 2005, Urban Water Journal, V2, P263, DOI [10.1080/15730620500386529, DOI 10.1080/15730620500386529]
   Stenekes N, 2006, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V31, P107, DOI 10.1177/0162243905283636
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   VanDerslice J, 2011, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V101, pS109, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300189
   Weber B, 2007, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V55, P349, DOI 10.2166/wst.2007.021
   Werbeloff L, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V64, P2362, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.774
   Westcott L., 2016, Newsweek
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wong THF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P673, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.436
   Xue XB, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8040154
   Younos T, 2011, FRONT EARTH SCI-PRC, V5, P421, DOI 10.1007/s11707-011-0209-7
   Zadeh SM, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P2887, DOI 10.3390/su5072887
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
NR 77
TC 126
Z9 139
U1 8
U2 108
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD FEB 1
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 3
AR 918
DI 10.3390/su11030918
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HL7NY
UT WOS:000458929500363
OA Green Submitted, Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hernández, JRE
   Moghadam, ST
   Sharifi, A
   Lombardi, P
AF Hernandez, Jhon Ricardo Escorcia
   Moghadam, Sara Torabi
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
   Lombardi, Patrizia
TI Cities in the times of COVID-19: Trends, impacts, and challenges for
   urban sustainability and resilience
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban sustainability; Sustainable cities; COVID-19; Post-pandemic;
   Resilient urban planning; Literature review
ID SMART CITIES; CITY; HEALTH
AB Since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, understanding its impacts on cities has received much attention in science and policy circles. This paper systematically reviews the literature on the interface of the pandemic and urban sustainability. The objective is to portray the impacts brought by the COVID-19 outbreak in urban environments within the sustainability framework and to detect trends and challenges for future research. The paper follows a methodology that integrates both bibliometric and systematic review approaches. The first approach relies on bibliometric analysis to provide an overview of the landscape of main trends on this nexus. The second approach presents a content analysis that deepens the work by outlining the impacts of the pandemic and the challenges that emerged on five different key topics for urban sustainability. The role of resilient urban planning is discussed as an integrative concept to face diverse challenges in the construction of sustainable cities in a post-pandemic scenario. Likewise, the study deliberates on future research topics related to resilient urban planning, social equity, healthy urban environments, sustainable mobility, and circular economy. This review serves as a guide for researchers and urban planners to understand emerging challenges and future research trends in urban sustainability.
C1 [Hernandez, Jhon Ricardo Escorcia; Moghadam, Sara Torabi; Lombardi, Patrizia] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Viale Pier Andrea Mattioli 39, I-10123 Turin, Italy.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Hiroshima Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.
C3 Polytechnic University of Turin; Hiroshima University
RP Hernández, JRE (corresponding author), Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Viale Pier Andrea Mattioli 39, I-10123 Turin, Italy.
EM Jhon.escorcia@polito.it; Sara.torabi@polito.it;
   sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp; Patrizia.lombardi@polito.it
RI TORABI MOGHADAM, SARA/AAM-1702-2020; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI TORABI MOGHADAM, SARA/0000-0002-1037-6146; Sharifi,
   Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613; Escorcia, Jhon/0000-0002-1402-5896
FU Politecnico di Torino and Compagnia di San Paolo
FX This research was funded through a Borsa di Studio for Doctorate
   students granted by the Politecnico di Torino and Compagnia di San
   Paolo.
CR Abass Zainab Ibrahim, 2021, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V779, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/779/1/012011
   AbouKorin SAA, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324
   Abu-Rayash A, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101693
   Afrin S, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.668263
   Ahmad K, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0241327
   Ahmadpoor N, 2021, TOWN PLAN REV, V92, P49, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2020.37
   Allam Z, 2022, ENERGIES, V15, DOI 10.3390/en15166042
   Allam Z, 2022, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01145-0
   Allam Z, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE181, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6
   Allam Z, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105201
   Amerio A, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17165973
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Navas-Martín MA, 2022, J BUILD ENG, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105012
   [Anonymous], 2018, HIGH LEVEL POLITICAL, P1
   Arellana J, 2020, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/8867316
   Auerbach AM, 2021, WORLD DEV, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105304
   Axhausen KW, 2020, DISP, V56, P82, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2020.1906060
   Baker J., 2020, World Bank Group, V1, P1
   Barbarossa L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12177172
   Barbier EB, 2020, WORLD DEV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105082
   Barcelo D, 2020, J ENVIRON CHEM ENG, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104006
   Barouki R, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106272
   Behera Bikash Chandra, 2021, Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag, V15, P100432, DOI 10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100432
   Benfer EA, 2021, J URBAN HEALTH, V98, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11524-020-00502-1
   Benita F, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104158
   Berdejo-Espinola V, 2021, PEOPLE NAT, V3, P597, DOI 10.1002/pan3.10218
   Bergantino AS, 2021, RES TRANSP ECON, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101028
   Bhattacharjee S, 2022, EQUAL DIVERS INCL, V41, P64, DOI 10.1108/EDI-07-2020-0196
   Bherwani H, 2021, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V18, P1019, DOI 10.1007/s13762-020-03122-z
   Bong CL, 2020, ANESTH ANALG, V131, P86, DOI 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004846
   Braut B, 2022, CITIES, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103554
   C40, 2022, C40 cities: Case studies
   Campisi T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218829
   Cartenì A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V741, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140489
   Casado-Aranda LA, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103126
   Chan APC, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V151, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.029
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Cheshmehzangi A, 2021, J HUM BEHAV SOC ENVI, V31, P184, DOI 10.1080/10911359.2020.1817225
   Choi TM, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101961
   Cobo MJ, 2011, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V62, P1382, DOI 10.1002/asi.21525
   Coccia M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138474
   Corburn J, 2020, J URBAN HEALTH, V97, P348, DOI 10.1007/s11524-020-00438-6
   Coskun A, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106495
   Costa DG, 2020, IET SMART CITIES, V2, P64, DOI 10.1049/iet-smc.2020.0044
   Cuerdo-Vilches T, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13115949
   D'Alessandro Daniela, 2020, Acta Biomed, V91, P61, DOI 10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10115
   De Vos J, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100121
   De-la-Torre GE, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145774
   Munguía-López AD, 2022, CHEM ENG PROCESS, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.cep.2022.108942
   Del Giudice V, 2020, SOC SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/socsci9070114
   DeWit A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101808
   Duca JV, 2021, J EUR REAL ESTATE RE, V14, P421, DOI 10.1108/JERER-11-2020-0055
   East J, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V776, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145894
   Echegaray F, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V27, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.025
   Elander I, 2022, PROG PLANN, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2021.100634
   Elavarasan RM, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102789
   Encinas F, 2021, ACE-ARCHIT CITY ENVI, V16, DOI 10.5821/ace.16.46.9645
   Felix CB, 2022, J HAZARD MATER, V423, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127215
   Ferrari AA, 2023, CLEAN LOGIST SUPPL C, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100101
   Francis Dania V, 2022, Rev Black Polit Econ, V49, P41, DOI 10.1177/00346446211017797
   Frank LD, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P193, DOI 10.1177/0160017604273853
   Fu F, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11111189
   Giovannini E., 2020, Time for transformative resilience: the COVID-19 emergency. No. JRC120489, DOI [10.2760/062495, DOI 10.2760/062495]
   Gormley M, 2020, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V8, pE643, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30112-1
   Gubic I, 2022, HABITAT INT, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102651
   Guzman LA, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V24, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.008
   Haase A, 2020, FRONT SOCIOL, V5, DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2020.583638
   Hakovirta M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093727
   Hambleton IR, 2020, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V8, pE1114, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30291-6
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Hananel R, 2022, CITIES, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103526
   Hantoko D, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V286, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112140
   Hernández JRE, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15032830
   Heshmati A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127475
   Honey-Roses Jordi, 2021, CITIES HLTH, V5, P263, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074, 10.31219/osf.io/rf7xa, DOI 10.31219/OSF.IO/RF7XA]
   Hubbard P, 2021, TOWN PLAN REV, V92, P3, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2020.46
   Ibn-Mohammed T, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169
   Isabella D, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127739
   Istrate AL, 2022, PROG PLANN, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2021.100544
   Torres MJ, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18136993
   Jakovljevic I, 2021, AIR QUAL ATMOS HLTH, V14, P467, DOI 10.1007/s11869-020-00950-3
   Jiang P, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123673
   Kakderi C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116486
   Kaklauskas A, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14082072
   Kang MG, 2020, INT J URBAN SCI, V24, P297, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2020.1803107
   Keenan Jesse M., 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, P216, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09773-0
   Kelly C, 2020, LANDSC ARCHIT FRONT, V8, P180, DOI 10.15302/J-LAF-1-050026
   Kim J, 2023, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V31, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.002
   Kim YJ, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17114066
   Krellenberg K, 2021, POLITICS GOV, V9, P200, DOI 10.17645/pag.v9i1.3607
   Lazarescu L.-M., 2020, Asociatia LUMEN, P294, DOI [10.18662/lumproc/ibmage2020/22, DOI 10.18662/LUMPROC/IBMAGE2020/22]
   Leal W, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121338
   Lenzen M, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0235654
   Low S, 2020, CITY SOC, V32, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12260
   Lucchesi ST, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052945
   Mahmoudnia A, 2022, J HAZARD MATER ADV, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100109
   Manout O, 2021, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2021.654279
   Marchesi M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102925
   Mardones-Fernández de Valderrama N, 2020, CIUDAD TERRIT-ESTU, V52, P653, DOI 10.37230/CyTET.2020.205.13.1
   Marí-Dell'Olmo M, 2017, INT J HEALTH SERV, V47, P207, DOI 10.1177/0020731416684292
   Marín-Cots P, 2020, CIUDAD TERRIT-ESTU, V52, P685, DOI 10.37230/CyTET.2020.205.13.3
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Megahed NA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
   Mihai FC, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17155439
   Mitchell D, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10060563
   Moldavska A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V166, P744, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Nazir R, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18073488
   Nichols G, 2021, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V27, pS57, DOI 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001287
   Nicola M, 2020, INT J SURG, V78, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
   Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106850
   Noszczyk T, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105925
   Nundy S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127705
   O'Hara S, 2021, ECOL ECON, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106859
   Onoda H, 2020, IET SMART CITIES, V2, P89, DOI 10.1049/iet-smc.2020.0051
   Orro A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12177206
   Ouigmane A, 2021, J HEALTH POLLUT, V11, DOI 10.5696/2156-9614-11.30.210606
   Patel A, 2021, Cit Health, V5, pS145, DOI DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1790252
   Pelling M, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P617, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1956411
   Peters T, 2021, ARCHNET-IJAR, V15, P10, DOI 10.1108/ARCH-08-2020-0159
   Pierantoni I, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10165576
   Pinheiro MD, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12145863
   Pirouz B, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062427
   Pongutta S, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07161
   Poortinga W, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104092
   Menéndez EP, 2020, DISP, V56, P64, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2020.1906059
   Prata JC, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P7760, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.0c02178
   Prieto J, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13063402
   Przybylowski A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010364
   Rai PK, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V858, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159880
   Ralli M, 2021, ANN GLOB HEALTH, V87, DOI 10.5334/aogh.3186
   Ranjbari M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V297, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126660
   Ranjbari M, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P16646, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01372-6
   Ribeiro P, 2018, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V61, P195, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1300576
   Rume T, 2020, HELIYON, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04965
   Rupani PF, 2020, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V17, P4655, DOI 10.1007/s13762-020-02910-x
   Rweyendela AG, 2022, AFR J SCI TECHNOL IN, V14, P1560, DOI 10.1080/20421338.2021.1972786
   Saadat S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138870
   Sahasranaman A, 2021, J R SOC INTERFACE, V18, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2020.0599
   Sarmento T.S., 2021, Social Housing and Working-FromHome: an Ergonomic Analysis of Brazilian Dwelling during the Covid-19 Pandemic, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-74608-7_42]
   Seifert R, 2023, CITIES, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104343
   Shamshiripour A, 2020, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216
   Sharifi A, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104207
   Sharifi A, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105297
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103190
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharma HB, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V800, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149605
   Shermin N, 2021, J URBAN MANAG, V10, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2021.06.003
   Shill J, 2021, MED J AUSTRALIA, V214, pS5, DOI 10.5694/mja2.51020
   Dastgerdi AS, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010174
   Shokouhyar S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102714
   Shorfuzzaman M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102582
   Shulla K, 2021, DISCOV SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1007/s43621-021-00026-x
   Sikorska D, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127838
   Sohn W, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104553
   Sonn JW, 2020, EURASIAN GEOGR ECON, V61, P482, DOI 10.1080/15387216.2020.1768423
   Sonnier E, 2022, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2022.100084
   Sukhwani V, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17165710
   Takefuji Y, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109845
   TAMPE T., 2021, Cities & Health, V5, pS76, DOI [10.1080/23748834.2020.1791443, DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1791443]
   Tandel V, 2022, J REGIONAL SCI, V62, P645, DOI 10.1111/jors.12552
   Teixeira JF, 2022, TRANSPORT POLICY, V129, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.09.026
   Tirachini A, 2020, J PUBLIC TRANSPORT, V22, P1, DOI [10.5038/2375-0901.22.1.1, 10.5038/2375-091.22.1.1]
   Tirkolaee EB, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V756, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143607
   Tokazhanov G, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208732
   Tonne C, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110482
   Torabi Moghadam S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V165, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.142
   Truong N, 2021, GLOB PUBLIC HEALTH, V16, P1, DOI 10.1080/17441692.2020.1850830
   UN-Habitat, 2022, WORLD CITIES REPORT 2022 - Chapter 6: Urban Planning for the Future of Cities
   UNESCO, 2020, UNESCO CIT ONL M PLA, P1
   Urban RC, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V755, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142471
   Valenzuela-Levi N, 2021, TRANSPORT POLICY, V109, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.006
   van Eck, 2023, VOSviewer Manual Version 1.6.16
   van Zanten JA, 2021, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V28, P210, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2020.1768452
   Venter ZS, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396
   Wang Q, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102629
   Wang W, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104387
   Wang Zhipeng, 2021, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/821/1/012023
   Watson MF, 2020, FAM PROCESS, V59, P832, DOI 10.1111/famp.12572
   Wilkinson A., 2020, Cities Health, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1813538
   Xiu N, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P729, DOI 10.1007/s11252-017-0648-3
   Yang SS, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102897
   Zarrabi M, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102021
   Zhu YS, 2023, HABITAT INT, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102812
   Zoran MA, 2023, ENVIRON RES, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115907
NR 185
TC 24
Z9 24
U1 12
U2 36
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD DEC 20
PY 2023
VL 432
AR 139735
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
EA NOV 2023
PG 23
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA CK5M1
UT WOS:001125159200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Poku-Boansi, M
   Cobbinah, PB
AF Poku-Boansi, Michael
   Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful
TI Are we planning for resilient cities in Ghana? An analysis of policy and
   planners' perspectives
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Urban planning; Urbanisation; Ghana; Adaptive capacity
ID SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; KUMASI; URBANIZATION
AB This paper sets forth a set of four principles that define and operationalise the concept of urban resilience. Using these four principles, 105 registered planners with the Ghana Institute of Planners were interviewed and five most recent and relevant national planning documents (four legislation, and one policy) were evaluated to determine how well planning practice advances resilience planning. Findings indicate limited appreciation of the concept amongst planners, despite the national planning documents stating an intention to integrate urban resilience. In addition, these national planning documents do not provide balanced support for all four urban resilience principles, as they advance some principles significantly more than others. More importantly, there is a disconnect between these national planning documents on the one hand, and planning practice on the other, as planning actions are not consistent with the legislation and policies. This paper recommends education of planners on urban resilience issues, credentialing of the concept in the local context, and reconsideration of international agencies' role in resilience planning in Ghanaian cities.
C1 [Poku-Boansi, Michael; Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Planning, Fac Built Environm, Kumasi, Ghana.
   [Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful] Charles Sturt Univ, Inst Land Water & Soc, POB 789, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia.
C3 Kwame Nkrumah University Science & Technology; Charles Sturt University
RP Poku-Boansi, M (corresponding author), Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Planning, Fac Built Environm, Kumasi, Ghana.
EM mpoku-boansi.cap@knust.edu.gh; pcobbinah@csu.edu.au
RI Poku-Boansi, Michael/AGZ-8640-2022; Cobbinah, Patrick/ABH-9950-2020
OI Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful/0000-0003-2522-9293; Poku-Boansi,
   Michael/0000-0003-4929-0961
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberton M, 2012, STUD TERRIT CULT DIV, V1, P1
   [Anonymous], 2003, IHDP UPDATE NEWSLETT
   [Anonymous], GRAPHIC ONLINE 0727
   [Anonymous], RESILIENT CITY MODER
   [Anonymous], RESILIENCE MOVING BU
   [Anonymous], NEW PLANNER
   [Anonymous], UN SECR GEN HIGH LEV
   [Anonymous], RESILIENT CITY PREPA
   [Anonymous], GLOB SNAPSH LOC GOV
   [Anonymous], 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_7
   [Anonymous], 2014, The state of African cities 2014: Reimagining sustainable urban transitions
   [Anonymous], WORLD DIS RED CAMP
   [Anonymous], URBAN FORUM
   [Anonymous], QUALITATIVE INTERVIE
   [Anonymous], NAT URB POL FRAM 201
   [Anonymous], 2012, Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Urban Resilience: A Workshop Report
   Berke PR, 2000, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V66, P21, DOI 10.1080/01944360008976081
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Burgess RobertG., 1994, ANAL QUALITATIVE DAT
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chelleri L., 2012, Multidisciplinary perspectives on urban resilience: a workshop report
   Cobbinah P. B., 2015, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, P1
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.050
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P1229, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9750-y
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, CITIES, V60, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.011
   Cobbinah PB, 2016, CLIM DEV, V8, P169, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2015.1034228
   Cohen B, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dodman D, 2009, BUILDING URBAN RESIL
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Fuseini I, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.020
   Gentle P, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V21, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.007
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Korah PI, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P1113, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9731-1
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   LEVIN SA, 1993, ECOL APPL, V3, P545
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Miles M.B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTER DESIGN
   New Zealand Government, 2015, NAT CIV DEF EM MAN P, P96
   Obeng-Atuah D, 2017, J TRANSP HEALTH, V5, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jth.2016.06.007
   Obeng-Odoom F, 2009, CITIES, V26, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2008.11.001
   Okpala D., 2009, Regional Overview of the Status of Urban Planning and Planning Practice in Anglophone (Sub-Saharan) African Countries
   UN-HABITAT, 2011, GLOB REP HUM SETTL 2
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Walker B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
NR 49
TC 36
Z9 37
U1 3
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD FEB
PY 2018
VL 72
BP 252
EP 260
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
PN B
PG 9
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA FR9SZ
UT WOS:000419414700006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, L
   Luo, Y
   Pei, JJ
   Wang, HQ
   Li, JX
   Li, Y
AF Liu, Lu
   Luo, Yun
   Pei, Jingjing
   Wang, Huiquan
   Li, Jixia
   Li, Ying
TI Temporal and Spatial Differentiation in Urban Resilience and Its
   Influencing Factors in Henan Province
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; temporal and spatial differentiation; spatial
   analysis; Henan Province
ID FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS
AB Building resilient cities is playing an increasingly important role in enhancing urban safety and promoting sustainable urban development. However, few scholars pay attention to urban resilience in inland provinces. Choosing Henan Province, as it is a typical representative of China's major inland economic provinces, has practical guiding significance. This study aims to provide a systematic indicator system and evaluation tool to measure the cuity's resilience level. Therefore, based on a multidimensional perspective, this paper dissects the urban resilience spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of 18 Henan Province cities with the entropy method, Thiel index, and ESDA (Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis) and explores influencing factors with a spatial econometric model. The main results are as follows: (1) the overall resilience in Henan Province continuously grows, and the resilience level of the Zhengzhou metropolitan area is the highest. In the urban resilience subsystem, economic and social resilience notably drive urban resilience improvement in Henan Province. (2) The spatial difference of urban resilience has been significantly reduced, but the inner metropolitan area presents the characteristics of "core-periphery". Urban resilience presents a positive spatial correlation, and local spatial agglomeration is relatively stable. (3) Under the state of spatial interaction, urbanization rate, administrative, innovation, market, and industrial structure factors all have significant direct effects and spatial spillover effects on overall resilience, but openness exerts downward pressure on local resilience. (4) On this basis, strategies have been proposed to continuously promote the development of new urbanization, improve the regional coordinated development mechanism, increase market activity, optimize the environment for scientific and educational innovation, and promote the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure. The approach taken in this research may also be useful for developing urban resilience assessment tools in other central plains cities as well as in other cities in the interior of the world with similar conditions.
C1 [Liu, Lu; Luo, Yun; Pei, Jingjing; Li, Ying] China Univ Geosci, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Huiquan] China Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Jixia] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Govt Management, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences; China University of Political Science &
   Law; Beijing Normal University
RP Pei, JJ (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci, Sch Engn & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China.
EM liulwhq@cugb.edu.cn; luoyun@cugb.edu.cn; Peijj@cugb.edu.cn;
   whqlustrive@cupl.edu.cn; 202131260023@mail.bnu.edu.cn;
   lucineliying@cugb.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China: "Risk Assessment of Urban
   Accidents and Disasters and Research on the Theory and Method of
   Resilience Air Defense [52004258]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China: "Risk Assessment of Urban Accidents and Disasters and Research on
   the Theory and Method of Resilience Air Defense" (52004258).
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Alexeeff GV, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P648, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9020648
   Alliance R, 2007, URB RES RES PROSP
   [Anonymous], 2008, World Development Report 2008
   [Anonymous], CHINA JIANGSU NET UN
   [Anonymous], ROCKEFELLER FDN 100
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transformation Investments and Business Impacts Version 0.2, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11069-014-1328-8
   [Anonymous], CHINA INSURANCE NEWS
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   ANSELIN L, 1988, PAP REG SCI ASSOC, V65, P11
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Brecht H., 2013, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6506
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Brunetta G, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031113
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chang CH, 2018, CEREB CORTEX, V28, P1, DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhw342
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Chi S., 2017, CITY DISASTER REDUCT, V4, P1
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Du ZW, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1662-6
   Fan JH, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18115827
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gunderson Lance H., 1995, BARRIERS BRIDGES REN
   Habitat U.N., 1996, URB WORLD GLOB REP H
   Hang S., 2015, J ECON, V8, P144
   Hartmann T, 2019, CITIES, V91, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.009
   Heeks R, 2019, INFORM SYST J, V29, P70, DOI 10.1111/isj.12177
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jha A.K., 2013, BUILDING URBAN RESIL, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Joerin J, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P226, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2012.689248
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Li T., 2017, Int. Urban Plan, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Limin B., 2019, WORLD REG STUD, V28, P77
   Liu Y.P., 2021, URBAN DEV RES, V6, P93
   [马学成 Ma Xuecheng], 2018, [地球科学进展, Advance in Earth Sciences], V33, P435
   Manika S, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5040070
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Motesharrei S, 2016, NATL SCI REV, V3, P470, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nww081
   Nan, 2017, CITY PLANNING REV, V41, P9
   Nyström M, 2019, NATURE, V575, P98, DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3
   Parsons M, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P20
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121224
   Shahab S, 2021, EUR PLAN STUD, V29, P1132, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1817867
   Shao Y., 2015, Urban Plan. Int, V30, P48
   Sharifi A, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5010018
   Song JL, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190701
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Sun Y.N., 2021, Nanjing Social. Sci, V7, P31
   [孙阳 Sun Yang], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P151
   The Development and Reform Commission of the Peoples Republic of China, NOT NAT DEV REF COMM
   Theil H., 1967, STUDIES MATH MANAGER, V7
   TOMPKINS E.J., 2007, Industrial Management, V49, P14
   Wu Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106088
   Ya L., 2016, URBAN DEV RES, V23, P113
   Yan Z., 2013, URBAN DEV RES, V20, P10
   Ye T., 2021, ISSUES AGR EC, V3, P100
   Zhang M.D., 2018, Urban Probl, V10, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.181004, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.181004]
   Zhang P., 2018, Urban Probl, V9, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180904, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.180904]
   Zhaofeng X., 2019, CHINA SAF SCI J, V29, P1
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   [周立青 ZHOU Liqing], 2015, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V30, P491
   Zhu J.H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
NR 67
TC 30
Z9 30
U1 9
U2 152
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 22
AR 12460
DI 10.3390/su132212460
PG 26
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 1X1IB
UT WOS:000807214700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, HF
   Shi, XY
   Yuan, PW
   Dong, XQ
AF Liu, Huifang
   Shi, Xiaoyi
   Yuan, Pengwei
   Dong, Xiaoqing
TI Study on the Evolution of Multiple Network Resilience of Urban
   Agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Yellow River Basin urban agglomeration; resilience; social network
ID VULNERABILITY; COMPLEXITY; SYSTEMS; CARBON; CHINA
AB To promote the healthy development of urban agglomerations in the Yellow River Basin, we construct a multi-city network-resilience evolution model based on social network theory, combined with QAP regression analysis and analyze the evolution of multiple-city network resilience in the Yellow River Basin in 2014 and 2021 by screening and drawing on indicators in social networks. The results show that (i) only the financial linkage network and the information exchange network are resilient networks, and the magnitude of the evolution of resilience level in the Yellow River basin is finance > information > innovation > transportation. (ii) Except for the increase in the hierarchy of transportation networks, other networks show the trend of flattening. (iii) The matching of the information exchange network shows a shift between heterogeneity and homogeneity, and the transmission and aggregation of the network fluctuate. Based on the study's findings, a path to improve the resilience level of the Yellow River Basin urban agglomeration by consolidating the status of core cities, optimizing the structure of multiple city networks, and optimizing the flow of factors is proposed.
C1 [Liu, Huifang; Shi, Xiaoyi; Yuan, Pengwei; Dong, Xiaoqing] Univ Jinan, Sch Business, Jinan 250022, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Jinan
RP Yuan, PW (corresponding author), Univ Jinan, Sch Business, Jinan 250022, Peoples R China.
EM sm_yuanpw@ujn.edu.cn
RI Dong, Xiaoqing/G-1386-2014
OI Liu, Huifang/0000-0001-5357-4938
FU National Social Science Foundation of China (NSSC) Project "Study on
   Vulnerability Evaluation and Prevention and Control Mechanism of Public
   Transportation System in Mega-cities" [17CGL073]
FX This research was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of
   China (NSSC) Project "Study on Vulnerability Evaluation and Prevention
   and Control Mechanism of Public Transportation System in Mega-cities",
   grant number 17CGL073.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alizadeh M, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10060975
   Balbo A, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127518
   Balland PA, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P167, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv007
   Barthélemy M, 2011, PHYS REP, V499, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002
   Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Cai PL, 2016, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V62, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2015.11.002
   Caparros-Midwood D, 2019, CITIES, V89, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.018
   Cariolet JM, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V615, P588, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.334
   Castells M, 1999, URBAN GEOGR, V20, P294, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.294
   Chen Y, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19042484
   Chen Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106771
   Cheng CCJ, 2023, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V28, P559, DOI 10.1108/SCM-09-2021-0443
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Clark J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P121, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp034
   Crespo J, 2014, J ECON GEOGR, V14, P199, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbt006
   Crucitti P, 2006, PHYS REV E, V73, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.036125
   de Zubielqui GC, 2016, ENTREP RES J, V6, P75, DOI 10.1515/erj-2015-0016
   Forbes BC, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05791-180436
   Gandica Y, 2020, EPJ DATA SCI, V9, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-020-00223-0
   Georgalakis J, 2020, SOC SCI MED, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112851
   Hughes TP, 2018, NATURE, V556, P492, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0041-2
   Khan SU, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V783, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146959
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Liu JG, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1513, DOI 10.1126/science.1144004
   Liu XQ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19042347
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   McCluney KE, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P48, DOI 10.1890/120367
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Newman MEJ, 2003, PHYS REV E, V67, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126
   Oliver TH, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009
   Palekiene O, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V213, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.423
   Pan X, 2022, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108483
   Peng C, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V29, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.12.003
   Piñeiro-Chousa J, 2018, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V57, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.02.005
   Roine T, 2019, MED IMAGE ANAL, V52, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.media.2018.10.009
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Schlüter M, 2012, NAT RESOUR MODEL, V25, P219, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x
   Suire R, 2014, ENTREP REGION DEV, V26, P142, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2013.877985
   Sun HP, 2018, ENERGY, V153, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.077
   Sun YF, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V337, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130452
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   Varis O, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V53, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.05.012
   Wang TR, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19116794
   Wang YY, 2022, J PARALLEL DISTR COM, V167, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.jpdc.2022.04.019
   Wang Z, 2022, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V52, P7164, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3035034
   Wong IA, 2021, INT J CONTEMP HOSP M, V33, P2314, DOI 10.1108/IJCHM-09-2020-0953
   Zhang DG, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-66665-8
   Zhang M, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182312342
   Zhang Q, 2022, CHAOS SOLITON FRACT, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112264
   Zhang Y, 2006, J ENVIRON SCI, V18, P1031, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60034-X
   Zhao L, 2020, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V21, P3848, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2019.2935152
NR 53
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 25
U2 122
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 18
AR 11174
DI 10.3390/su141811174
PG 24
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 4R7IH
UT WOS:000856932300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhao, RD
   Fang, CL
   Liu, HM
   Liu, XX
AF Zhao, Ruidong
   Fang, Chuanglin
   Liu, Haimeng
   Liu, Xiaoxiao
TI Evaluating urban ecosystem resilience using the DPSIR framework and the
   ENA model: A case study of 35 cities in China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban ecosystem resilience; Eco-network resilience; DPSIR framework;
   ENA; Sectoral relationship
ID ECOLOGICAL NETWORK ANALYSIS; SECURITY ASSESSMENT; MANAGEMENT;
   RESTORATION; SYSTEMS
AB Rapid urbanization and large-scale industrialization in China have produced problems that affect resources, the environment, and local ecology, which are obstacles to urban ecosystem resilience. Ecosystem resilience is critical for recovery from adverse natural events and the security of urban ecosystems. In this paper, we constructed the evaluation indexes of urban ecological resilience systems (UERs) using DPSIR framework to quantify urban ecological resilience index (UERI) for 35 major cities in China, and we evaluated the sustainability of UER networks using ecological network analysis. The results show that: (1) UERI generally increases annually, but it gradually decreases geographically from developed coastal areas to developing inland areas; (2) factors that affect the DPSIR components Drivers, State and Responses significantly increase UERI, and factors that affect Pressures and Impact decrease UERI; all paths of DPSIR passed the causal hypotheses test; (3) the ideal value for resilience of an urban ecosystem network was 0.550; we found that resilience in 2005 was 0.659, and in 2010 was 0.512 but in 2015 was 0.462 (<0.550). As ecosystem vulnerability and adverse ecological risks continue to increase, it is critical for cities to transform themselves to increase ecological security and become more resilient.
C1 [Zhao, Ruidong; Fang, Chuanglin] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Urumqi 800046, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Ruidong; Fang, Chuanglin; Liu, Haimeng] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Xiaoxiao] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Urban Econ & Publ Affairs, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China.
C3 Xinjiang University; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of
   Geographic Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS; Capital
   University of Economics & Business
RP Zhao, RD; Fang, CL (corresponding author), Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
EM zhaord@stu.xju.edu.cn; fangcl@igsnrr.ac.cn; liuhm@igsnrr.ac.cn;
   liuxiaoxiao_1994@163.com
RI Liu, Xiaoxiao/HNI-6180-2023; Fang, Chuanglin/ABF-2458-2020; Liu,
   Haimeng/R-7364-2018
OI Liu, Haimeng/0000-0003-0390-9140
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41590840, 41590842]
FX We would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and
   suggestions. This study is supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (grant no. 41590840, no. 41590842).
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Arrow K., 1996, SCINCE, V1, P104, DOI [10.1017/s1355770x00000413, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X00000413]
   Arroyo-Rodriguez V, 2020, ECOL LETT, V23, P1404, DOI 10.1111/ele.13535
   Bonacini E, 2017, COMMUN NONLINEAR SCI, V48, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.01.013
   Brenner N, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P731, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12115
   Briggs D., 1997, TECHNICAL GUIDELINES
   Brrings D., 1996, LINK METH ENV HLTH A LINK METH ENV HLTH A
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Dai J, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P4796, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.027
   de Jonge VN, 2012, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V68, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.017
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Duan N, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120134
   Elliott M, 2002, MAR POLLUT BULL, V44, pIII, DOI 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00146-7
   Fang DL, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P6722, DOI 10.1021/es505388n
   Fang YP, 2016, IEEE T RELIAB, V65, P502, DOI 10.1109/TR.2016.2521761
   Fath BD, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V208, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.029
   Gabrielsen P., 2003, ENV INDICATORS TYPOL, P1
   Gbanie SP, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10010129
   Goerner SJ, 2009, ECOL ECON, V69, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.018
   Gregory AJ, 2013, EUR J OPER RES, V227, P558, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.020
   Guan JC, 2009, SCIENTOMETRICS, V81, P683, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-2058-7
   Han BL, 2015, ECOL MODEL, V318, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.12.015
   HANNON B, 1973, J THEOR BIOL, V41, P535, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(73)90060-X
   Haring Sansavini G., 2017, RESILIENCE RISK NATO
   He PJ, 2019, ENERG ECON, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104569
   Hines DE, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V101, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.011
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kennedy CA, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P343, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2160
   Kharrazi A, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0171184
   Kharrazi A, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090935
   Lee EE, 2007, IEEE T SYST MAN CY C, V37, P1303, DOI 10.1109/TSMCC.2007.905859
   Li Y, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V195, P1505, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.227
   Liang JS, 2018, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V28, P127, DOI 10.1007/s11769-018-0935-9
   Liu LR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V200, P922, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.298
   Lowe CD, 2014, MAR POLICY, V43, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.006
   Lu WW, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.054
   Lu XS, 2015, TRANSPORT POLICY, V44, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.06.014
   Ludovisi A, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V72, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.014
   Ma Q, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V175, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.010
   Nathwani J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
   Nations U, 2015, **NON-TRADITIONAL**, DOI 10.1201/b20466-7
   Naveh Z., 1994, Restoration Ecology, V2, P180, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1526-100X.1994.TB00065.X, 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1994.tb00065.x]
   Pei L, 2010, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V2, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.094
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   ULANOWICZ RE, 1980, J THEOR BIOL, V85, P223, DOI 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90019-3
   Ulanowicz RE, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P1886, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.015
   Ulanowicz RE, 2009, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.005
   Wei YG, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V212, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.155
   Yang ZF, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.004
   Zhang G, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V670, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.132
NR 52
TC 123
Z9 131
U1 96
U2 548
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 72
AR 102997
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
EA MAY 2021
PG 11
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA TY5CW
UT WOS:000683803300001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sui, LL
   Peng, F
   Wu, SY
AF Sui, Lili
   Peng, Fei
   Wu, Siyu
TI Spatio-temporal evolution of the resilience of Chinese border cities
SO FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE border cities; spatio-temporal pattern; urban resilience; regional
   differences; Chinese prefecture-level cities; China border region
ID VULNERABILITY; MODEL
AB In China, border cities are developing in the direction of trade, investment, tourism, and regional diversification and becoming crucial for the national opening-up strategy and inter-regional exchange. In this study, we construct a comprehensive system for measuring and evaluating the resilience of border cities in China that also reveals the spatial and temporal characteristics of resilience. Three representative sample zones (Northeast, Northwest, and Southwest) are selected within the three major regions of China to analyze the regional differences in border city resilience and propose targeted coping strategies. The findings of this study are as follows. First, the spatial distribution of resilience in Chinese border cities varies significantly, with the overall resilience decreasing in the following order: Northeast China > Southwest China > Northwest China > North China > Tibetan China. Higher resilience of border cities is predominantly related to better economic foundations and advantages in border trade. Second, the resilience of China's border cities has increased significantly over the past decade, with highly resilient border cities concentrated in the northeastern part of China, the northern part of Xinjiang, and Guangxi Province. Moreover, high resilience generally spreads to surrounding low-resilience cities over time. Third, the spatial distribution and development trends of resilience levels differ among the three sample zones. Therefore, it is crucial to improve urban resilience according to the regional characteristics of each border city and its specific developmental stage.
C1 [Sui, Lili] Liaoning Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Dalian, Peoples R China.
   [Sui, Lili] Liaodong Univ, Ctr Korean Peninsula Studies, Dandong, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Fei; Wu, Siyu] Liaoning Normal Univ, Ctr Studies Marine Econ & Sustainable Dev, Dalian, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Fei; Wu, Siyu] Liaoning Normal Univ, Inst Marine Sustainable Dev, Dalian, Peoples R China.
C3 Liaoning Normal University; Liaodong University; Liaoning Normal
   University; Liaoning Normal University
RP Peng, F (corresponding author), Liaoning Normal Univ, Ctr Studies Marine Econ & Sustainable Dev, Dalian, Peoples R China.; Peng, F (corresponding author), Liaoning Normal Univ, Inst Marine Sustainable Dev, Dalian, Peoples R China.
EM pfly324@163.com
RI sui, lili/IWL-7861-2023
FU General Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China;
   Project of Education Department of Liaoning Province; Achievements of
   Innovation Team of colleges and universities of Liaoning Province; 
   [42271253];  [LJKR0549]
FX Funding This work was supported by the General Project of the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant No. 42271253], Project of
   Education Department of Liaoning Province (LJKR0549), and Achievements
   of Innovation Team of colleges and universities of Liaoning Province.
CR Anischenko AG, 2012, BALT REG, P19, DOI 10.5922/2079-8555-2012-1-3
   Buursink Jan., 2001, GEOJOURNAL, V54, P7
   Carlisle D., 2017, Virtual currencies and financial crime: Challenges and opportunities, DOI [10.4324/9781315722559-1, DOI 10.4324/9781315722559-1]
   Cavalieri C., 2020, J URBAN, V14, P1, DOI [10.1080/17549175.2020.1801490, DOI 10.1080/17549175.2020.1801490]
   Chiu R., 2005, URBAN POLICY RES, V23, P305, DOI [10.1080/08111470500197847, DOI 10.1080/08111470500197847]
   Chow CKW, 2019, INT J TOUR RES, V21, P693, DOI 10.1002/jtr.2297
   Collins TW, 2009, APPL GEOGR, V29, P448, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2008.10.005
   Dovganiuk A., 2021, CURR PROBL ARCHIT UR, P205, DOI [10.32347/2077-3455.2021.61.205-216, DOI 10.32347/2077-3455.2021.61.205-216]
   Fontana I, 2022, INT POLITICS, V59, P465, DOI 10.1057/s41311-020-00268-y
   Hamza M, 1998, CITIES, V15, P291, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00020-1
   He T, 2012, J YUNNAN POLICE OFFI, V6, P30
   Huang RJ, 2020, COMPUT ECON, V55, P1233, DOI 10.1007/s10614-019-09886-y
   Huang WC, 2022, TRANSPORT-VILNIUS, V37, P98, DOI 10.3846/transport.2021.16003
   Kim I, 2021, ECOSYST SERV, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101337
   Kim M, 2013, ASIAN POLIT POLICY, V5, P523, DOI 10.1111/aspp.12063
   LADMAN JR, 1979, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V13, P23, DOI 10.1007/BF01284075
   Lee K.-S., 1998, GeoJournal, V44, P249
   Léonard S, 2015, INTELL NATL SECUR, V30, P306, DOI 10.1080/02684527.2014.988447
   Li J., 2022, ASIAN J SOC SCI STUD, V7, P52, DOI [10.20849/ajsss.v7i9.1297, DOI 10.20849/AJSSS.V7I9.1297]
   Li YX, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192013042
   Loser C.M., 2009, GLOBAL J EMERGING MA, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1177/097491010800100104
   Maher K.H., 2021, Unequal neighbors: Place stigma and the making of local borders, DOI 10.1093/oso/9780197557198.003.0009
   Merabishvili G, 2023, GEOPOLITICS, V28, P2074, DOI 10.1080/14650045.2022.2104158
   Naimi K., 2017, ANAL COMMUNITY BASED
   Ng ST, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.026
   Rachmawati I., 2021, J NATIONALISM MEM LA, V15, P210, DOI [10.2478/jnmlp-2021-0002, DOI 10.2478/JNMLP-2021-0002]
   Rippa Alessandro., 2018, Journal of Business Anthropology, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.33423/IJBA.V7I1.1106
   Rumford C., 2006, inComparative European Politics, V4, P127
   Samuels P., 2016, ADVICE EXPLORATORY F, DOI [DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.5013.9766, 10.13140/RG.2.1.5013.9766]
   Song T, 2024, TERRIT POLIT GOV, V12, P1158, DOI 10.1080/21622671.2022.2096685
   Song T, 2017, J GEOGR SCI, V27, P1463, DOI 10.1007/s11442-017-1447-8
   Song T, 2017, J GEOGR SCI, V27, P497, DOI 10.1007/s11442-016-1389-1
   Song ZY, 2020, J GEOGR SCI, V30, P775, DOI 10.1007/s11442-020-1755-2
   Su XB, 2022, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V46, P522, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.13079
   Tan Y, 2021, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V62, P355, DOI 10.1111/apv.12323
   Wiratri A., 2020, J KAJIAN WILAYAH, V11, P35, DOI [10.14203/jkw.v11i1.837, DOI 10.14203/JKW.V11I1.837]
   Xie L, 2016, CITIES, V58, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.009
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Yildirim Ozcan K., 2020, ANAL SOME FEATURES C, P207
   You Z, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.021
   Young JEE, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P407, DOI 10.1177/2399654418790765
   Zhao Lin WD., 2018, ECON GEOGR, V11, P39, DOI [10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2018.11.005, DOI 10.15957/J.CNKI.JJDL.2018.11.005]
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
NR 43
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 14
U2 70
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-2565
J9 FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH
JI Front. Public Health
PD DEC 20
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 1101799
DI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1101799
PG 13
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA 7L7QF
UT WOS:000906154700001
PM 36605233
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Afriyanie, D
   Julian, MM
   Riqqi, A
   Akbar, R
   Suroso, DSA
   Kustiwan, I
AF Afriyanie, Dian
   Julian, Miga M.
   Riqqi, Akhmad
   Akbar, Roos
   Suroso, Djoko S. A.
   Kustiwan, Iwan
TI Re-framing urban green spaces planning for flood protection through
   socio-ecological resilience in Bandung City, Indonesia
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban green spaces; Spatial planning; Socio-ecological resilience; Flood
   protection; Ecosystem services
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INFRASTRUCTURE; ECOLOGY; CHALLENGES;
   FRAMEWORK; RESPONSES; CITIES; ISSUES
AB An increasing number of studies use the advantages of the ecosystem services (ES) framework compared to the standard approach for identifying priority locations for urban green spaces. Few of these studies discuss the disparities between supply and demand of ES, which are dependent on spatial relationships and even fewer reveal the impact of land use zoning on disparities in ES. We advance the ES framework by examining the equitable distribution and resilient supply of flood protection of urban green spaces in Bandung City. To illustrate supply, we used land cover-based methods to produce flood protection benefits whereas we used the IPCC Risk Framework to generate flood risk for indicating demand. This study found that the distribution of urban green spaces is not equitably distributed and green space locations do not offer resilient supply of flood protection. Moreover, Bandung's existing zoning regulations will exacerbate these problems in the future. This paper provides insights into the considerations for determining spatial priorities in planning urban green spaces especially for flood protection and co-leverage of flood adaptation and mitigation measures. Furthermore, the paper demonstrates how to re-frame urban green spaces planning through socio-ecological resilience to inform the decision-making process in delivering inclusive urban ES.
C1 [Afriyanie, Dian] Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Sch Architecture Planning & Policy Dev, Doctoral Program Reg & City Planning, Bandung, Indonesia.
   [Julian, Miga M.; Riqqi, Akhmad] Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Fac Earth Sci & Technol, Bandung, Indonesia.
   [Julian, Miga M.] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena FSU Jena, Geog Informat Sci, Jena, Germany.
   [Akbar, Roos; Suroso, Djoko S. A.; Kustiwan, Iwan] Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Sch Architecture Planning & Policy Dev, Dept Reg & City Planning, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung, Indonesia.
C3 Institute Technology of Bandung; Institute Technology of Bandung;
   Institute Technology of Bandung
RP Afriyanie, D (corresponding author), Inst Teknol Bandung ITB, Sch Architecture Planning & Policy Dev, Dept Reg & City Planning, Jalan Ganesha 10, Bandung, Indonesia.
EM dian.afriyanie@gmail.com
RI Akbar, Roos/HLQ-0444-2023; Julian, Miga/AAB-8861-2021
OI Riqqi, Akhmad/0000-0002-0713-7208
FU Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation; IPCC
FX The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their
   constructive comments and suggestions on prior manuscript of this paper,
   as well as to Jesika Taradini and Dini Aprilia Norvyani for their
   assistance; and to Bandung Municipality Agency in providing data on
   land-use zoning regulation 2015-2035. This paper was produced with the
   financial support of the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and the
   IPCC. The contents of this paper are solely the liability of the authors
   and under no circumstances may be considered as a reflection of the
   position of the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and/or the IPCC.
CR Afriyanie D., 2018, IOP C SERIES
   Alberti Marina., 2008, ADV URBAN ECOLOGY IN, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75510-6, 10.1007/978-0-387-75510-6]
   Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
   Bergsten A, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06931-190406
   Binder CR, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05551-180426
   Borgström ST, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Budiyono Y, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P757, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-757-2016
   Budiyono Y, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P389, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1327-9
   Burkhard B., 2009, Landscape Online
   Burkhard B, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V21, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
   Byrne J., 2010, GREEN OPEN SPACE PLA
   Cadenasso MaryL., 2013, Resilience in ecology and urban design linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, P29, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-5341-92, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-92]
   Childers DL, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P3774, DOI 10.3390/su7043774
   Childers DL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   Conine A, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V68, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00159-2
   Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Davoudi S., 2008, Conceptions of Space and Place in Strategic Spatial Planning
   Davoudi S., 2009, CONCEPTIONS SPACE PL, P207
   de Groot RS, 2010, ECOL COMPLEX, V7, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Dusik J., 2010, Indonesia-Denmark Environmental Support Programme, Phase 2, Component 1
   Ernstson H., 2008, Rhizomia: actors, networks and resilience in urban landscape
   Ernstson H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Friedmann J., 1987, Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action
   Goldstein BE, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Healey Pasty., 2006, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, V2nd
   Heynen NikolasC., 2006, In the Nature of Cities, P1, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203027523
   Hills J., 2010, ANATOMY EC INEQUALIT, P1
   James P, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001
   Jose Martinez-Harms Maria, 2012, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V8, P17, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
   Julian M.M., 2013, JMAS, V1, P1
   Julian MM, 2019, INT J TECHNOL, V10, P866, DOI 10.14716/ijtech.v10i5.2376
   Kabisch N, 2015, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V50, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.007
   Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, 2013, DESKR PET EK PUL KEP
   Kralisch S, 2007, MODSIM 2007: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, P812
   Krause P., 2001, Das hydrologische Modellsystem J2000Beschreibung und Anwendung in groen Flugebieten Issue PreJuSER37462
   Kremer P, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08445-210229
   Kremer P, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.012
   Li F, 2005, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V72, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.002
   Lyytimäki J, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003
   Madureira H, 2014, URBAN DES INT, V19, P38, DOI 10.1057/udi.2013.11
   Marfai MA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1365-3
   McPhearson T, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P198, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw002
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meinhardt M., 2017, THESIS
   Nengsih S.R., 2015, GEOMATIKA, V21, P31
   Niemelä J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.014
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   Olsson H., 2012, THESIS
   Oppenheimer M, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1039
   Pekerjaan Umum C.-K., 2006, IDENTIFIKASI KAWASAN
   Pickett Steward T. A., 2016, Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, V2, pe01229, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1229
   Riqqi A., 2019, SEMIN NAS GEOMATIKA, V3, P237, DOI [10.24895/SNG.2018.3-0.962, DOI 10.24895/SNG.2018.3-0.962]
   Riqqi A., 2019, SEM NAS GEOM, V3, P247, DOI [10.24895/SNG.2018.3-0.963., DOI 10.24895/SNG.2018.3-0.963]
   Rukmana D, 2015, INT PLAN STUD, V20, P350, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2015.1008723
   Susilowardhani A, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V135, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.317
   Swyngedouw E., 2010, The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory, P299
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Victor D, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V41, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.005
   Ward P. J., 2014, JAKARTA CLIMATE ADAP
   Wilkinson C, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05368-180137
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
NR 62
TC 56
Z9 59
U1 19
U2 132
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 101
AR 102710
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102710
PG 20
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA LN2VE
UT WOS:000532800700012
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lomba-Fernández, C
   Hernantes, J
   Labaka, L
AF Lomba-Fernandez, Cinta
   Hernantes, Josune
   Labaka, Leire
TI Guide for Climate-Resilient Cities: An Urban Critical Infrastructures
   Approach
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; critical infrastructures; interdependency analysis;
   climate change; assessment methodology; guide; co-creation process
ID FRAMEWORK; SUSTAINABILITY; ADAPTATION; SYSTEMS; CHALLENGES; PRINCIPLES;
   EVENTS; EUROPE
AB Climate change (CC) is one of the most challenging issues ever faced, as it affects every system worldwide at any scale. Urban areas are not an exception. Extreme weather-related events have seriously affected urban areas in recent years, and they have a significant impact on the welfare of people. According to UN projections, by 2050 more than 68% of the world's population could be concentrated in urban areas. Additionally, daily life in urban areas is highly dependent on certain critical services and products provided by critical infrastructures (CIs). Therefore, it is especially relevant to understand how CC affects urban CIs in order to develop mechanisms to improve their capacity to handle crises derived from CC. In this context, resilience-based strategies provide a holistic approach, considering both predictable and unpredictable threats. This paper proposes a guide for assessing and enhancing the resilience level of cities against CC, considering urban CIs as key agents in improving the city's capacity to face and recover from CC-related crises. The guide was developed through a co-creation process in which two cities in the Basque Country (Spain) worked together with CI providers and other relevant stakeholders in the resilience-building process. The resulting guide is to be used by city stakeholders at a strategic level, providing them with: (1) a qualitative assessment of the city's current resilience level in the CC context; (2) better knowledge about urban CI sectors, their interdependency relationships and the chain of impacts due to cascading effects in the short, medium and in the long term and; (3) a set of policies that enhance city resilience.
C1 [Lomba-Fernandez, Cinta; Hernantes, Josune; Labaka, Leire] Univ Navarra, Escuela Ingenieros, TECNUN, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
C3 University of Navarra
RP Lomba-Fernández, C (corresponding author), Univ Navarra, Escuela Ingenieros, TECNUN, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
EM clomba@tecnun.es
RI Lomba-Fernández, Cinta/AAB-8489-2021; Labaka, Leire/H-9744-2014;
   Hernantes, Josune/C-9247-2017
OI Labaka, Leire/0000-0002-1721-0624; Lomba-Fernandez,
   Cinta/0000-0002-6338-5580; Hernantes, Josune/0000-0002-9307-9787
FU Sociedad Publica IHOBE S.A. under the contract Retos de innovacion
   ambiental de la Administracion Vasca [460906]
FX This research was funded by Sociedad Publica IHOBE S.A. under the
   contract Retos de innovacion ambiental de la Administracion Vasca, grant
   number 460906.
CR Aguiar FC, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V86, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.04.010
   [Anonymous], 2015, City Resilience Framework Rockefeller Foundation
   [Anonymous], 2018, WORD URBANIZATION PR, P1
   [Anonymous], 2011, RESILIENCE ENG PRACT
   [Anonymous], 2018, A Clean Planet for all. A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy - Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, P25
   Bram S., 2016, ORG RESILIENCE CONCE
   Brown C, 2017, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V18, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2017.05.002
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Chang SE, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9039-4
   Ching L, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.023
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Comes Tina, 2014, ISCRAM, V11, P195
   Curt C, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P2441, DOI 10.1111/risa.13166
   de Coninck H., 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, P132
   Espinoza S, 2016, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V136, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2016.03.019
   EU Commission (EU Comm.), 2013, EU STRAT AD CLIM CHA
   Eusgeld I, 2011, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V96, P679, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.010
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Fu GH, 2018, IEEE SYST J, V12, P3169, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2017.2700791
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Heidrich O, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V168, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
   Heino O, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030838
   HENNINK Monique., 2013, FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSI
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Hild, 2017, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC, DOI [10.2800/534806., DOI 10.2800/534806]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   IPCC, CLIM CHANG 2014 IMP, P1
   Kanno T, 2019, COGN TECHNOL WORK, V21, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10111-018-0510-2
   Labaka L, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V103, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.005
   Laugé A, 2015, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V8, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2014.12.004
   Lauge-Eizaguirre A., 2014, THESIS
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Lizarralde G, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V15, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.004
   Loggins RA, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000249
   Madni AM, 2009, IEEE SYST J, V3, P181, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397
   Malalgoda C, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P736, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00997-6
   Marana P, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.011
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mikellidou CV, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.022
   Nan C, 2017, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V157, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.013
   Ouyang M, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.011
   Panteli M, 2017, IEEE SYST J, V11, P1733, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2389272
   Pescaroli G, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.004
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Rinaldi S. M., 2004, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
   Sansavini G., 2017, NATO SCI PEACE SEC C
   Shakou LM, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.019
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   Shen SW, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, P589, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2442-6
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Torabi E, 2017, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P241, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50094-2_14
   Toubin M, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Van Oldenbourg G.J., 2018, TRENDS WEATHER EXTRE
   Voorberg WH, 2015, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V17, P1333, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Zimmerman Rae, 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), P165, DOI 10.1109/THS.2009.5168029
NR 59
TC 23
Z9 24
U1 8
U2 36
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP 1
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 17
AR 4727
DI 10.3390/su11174727
PG 19
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA IZ1WC
UT WOS:000486877700215
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liang, J
   Ge, M
AF Liang, Jing
   Ge, Ming
TI Algorithm for planning shelters in oil and gas energy resource-based
   cities based on artificial intelligence resilient city model
SO FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE artistic intelligence; resilient city model; oil and gas energy
   resource-based cities; shelter planning; artificial bee colony
AB Cities based on oil and gas energy resources are crucial to energy production and economic development, but they also face various disasters and security risks. To ensure the safety and well-being of urban residents during disaster events, the planning of urban shelters is crucial. In this paper, comprehensively considering multiple factors such as disaster risk, population distribution, and convenient transportation, the artificial bee colony algorithm is used to optimize the site selection and capacity planning of shelters. By comprehensively evaluating the disaster resistance capacity of urban refuges, the response speed of residents and other related indicators, the planning algorithm of refuges is continuously optimized to better meet the needs of oil and gas energy resource-based cities. The results of the study showed that the average overall disaster resilience of AI-based urban shelters reached 0.64. When the distance to the shelter was 4 km, the average response speed of residents reached 10.22 min, and other indicators also improved. The research shows that the oil and gas energy urban refuge planning algorithm based on the artificial intelligence elastic city model provides an innovative approach for urban planners and disaster managers. Further research and practice will help promote the application of this algorithm in real cities, improving the resilience and disaster resistance of cities and the safety and security level of residents.
C1 [Liang, Jing] Northeast Petr Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Daqing, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
   [Ge, Ming] Daqing Inst Planning & Architecture, Daqing, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
C3 Northeast Petroleum University
RP Ge, M (corresponding author), Daqing Inst Planning & Architecture, Daqing, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
EM woshiliangjing@163.com
RI Liang, Jingjing/AAO-6865-2020
FU The study was supported by "the Heilongjiang Province basic research
   project foundation in university (Grant No. 2020QNW-01)".; Heilongjiang
   Province basic research project foundation in university;  [2020QNW-01]
FX The study was supported by "the Heilongjiang Province basic research
   project foundation in university (Grant No. 2020QNW-01)".
CR Ahmed I, 2022, IEEE T IND INFORM, V18, P5031, DOI 10.1109/TII.2022.3146552
   Cao ZY, 2023, FRONT BIOENG BIOTECH, V11, DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1178737
   Deng JY, 2019, IET SCI MEAS TECHNOL, V13, P1111, DOI 10.1049/iet-smt.2018.5123
   Guo Q., 2022, NAT ENV PROT, V3, P27, DOI [10.38007/NEP.2022.030304, DOI 10.38007/NEP.2022.030304]
   Junian J, 2018, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V4, P1678, DOI 10.28991/cej-03091104
   Kann BH, 2021, CANCER CELL, V39, P916, DOI 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.04.002
   Kimms A, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V269, P1122, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.050
   Li JQ, 2020, CLUSTER COMPUT, V23, P2483, DOI 10.1007/s10586-019-03022-z
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Rahnema N, 2020, MULTIMED TOOLS APPL, V79, P32169, DOI 10.1007/s11042-020-09639-2
   Shan PF, 2019, ENERGIES, V12, DOI 10.3390/en12122382
   Sircar A., 2021, Petroleum Res, V6, P379, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.PTLRS.2021.05.009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.05.009]
   Su HR, 2023, GEOJOURNAL, V88, P951, DOI 10.1007/s10708-022-10669-6
   Sun ZM, 2021, COMPUT INTELL-US, V37, P1166, DOI 10.1111/coin.12351
   Taeihagh A, 2021, POLICY SOC, V40, P137, DOI 10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377
   Wang T., 2022, Nat. Environ. Prot, V3, P54, DOI [10.38007/NEP.2022.030307, DOI 10.38007/NEP.2022.030307]
   Xu W, 2018, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V32, P236, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2017.1395882
   Yin LJ, 2017, SUSTAIN COMPUT-INFOR, V13, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.suscom.2016.11.002
   Yu J, 2018, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V32, P1884, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1463442
   Yu J, 2022, APPL THERM ENG, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119175
   Zhang B, 2023, SCI CHINA INFORM SCI, V66, DOI 10.1007/s11432-021-3449-x
   Zhao YH, 2022, MEASUREMENT, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111405
NR 24
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 6
U2 18
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 2296-598X
J9 FRONT ENERGY RES
JI Front. Energy Res.
PD AUG 23
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1237180
DI 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1237180
PG 9
WC Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Energy & Fuels
GA Q7HQ6
UT WOS:001059201100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mugume, SN
   Diao, K
   Astaraie-Imani, M
   Fu, G
   Farmani, R
   Butler, D
AF Mugume, Seith N.
   Diao, Kegong
   Astaraie-Imani, Maryam
   Fu, Guangtao
   Farmani, Raziyeh
   Butler, David
TI Enhancing resilience in urban water systems for future cities
SO WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY
LA English
DT Article
DE flexibility; pipe failure; redundancy; resilience; urban water systems
ID MANAGEMENT
AB In future cities, urban water systems (UWSs) should be designed not only for safe provision of services but should also be resilient to emerging or unexpected threats that lead to catastrophic system failure impacts and consequences. Resilience can potentially be built into UWSs by implementing a range of strategies, for example by embedding redundancy and flexibility in system design, or by rehabilitation to increase their ability to maintain acceptable customer service levels during unexpected system failures. In this work, a new resilience analysis is carried out to investigate the performance of a water distribution system (WDS) and an urban drainage system (UDS) during pipe failure scenarios. Using simplified synthetic networks, the effect of implementing adaptation (resilient design) strategies on minimising the loss of system functionality and cost of UWSs is investigated. Study results for the WDS case study show that the design strategy in which flexibility is enhanced ensures that all customers are served during single pipe failure scenarios. The results of the UDS case study indicate that the design strategy incorporating upstream distributed storage tanks minimises flood volume and mean duration of nodal flooding by 50.1% and 46.7%, respectively, even when system functionality is significantly degraded. When costs associated with failure are considered, resilient design strategies could prove to be more cost-effective over the design life of UWSs.
C1 [Mugume, Seith N.; Diao, Kegong; Astaraie-Imani, Maryam; Fu, Guangtao; Farmani, Raziyeh; Butler, David] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, N Pk Rd, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England.
C3 University of Exeter
RP Mugume, SN (corresponding author), Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, N Pk Rd, Exeter EX4 4QF, Devon, England.
EM snm205@exeter.ac.uk
RI Imani, Maryam/T-1187-2019; Mugume, Seith/ADW-0407-2022; Fu,
   Guangtao/ABE-3874-2021; Farmani, Raziyeh/D-3457-2012; Butler,
   David/I-2991-2012
OI Farmani, Raziyeh/0000-0001-8148-0488; Butler, David/0000-0001-5515-3416;
   Imani, Maryam/0000-0003-3059-7648; Mugume, Seith/0000-0002-8289-0099
FU UK Commonwealth PhD scholarship; UK Engineering and Physical Sciences
   Research Council (ESPRC) [EP/K006924/1]; EPSRC [EP/K006924/1] Funding
   Source: UKRI
FX This work is financially supported through a UK Commonwealth PhD
   scholarship awarded to the first author. The work has also been
   supported through the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
   Council (ESPRC) funded Safe & SuRe research fellowship (EP/K006924/1)
   awarded to D. B.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], 2011, Keeping the Country Running: Natural Hazards and Infrastructure
   [Anonymous], 2009, Critical Infrastructure Resilience Final Report and Recommendations
   Blackmore JM, 2008, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V134, P224, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(224)
   Butler D, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V89, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.198
   Butler D., 2011, Urban Drainage, Vthird
   DeBusk KM, 2013, PhD Dissertation
   Djordjevic S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.008
   Farmani R, 2005, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V131, P161, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:3(161)
   Hassler U, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P119, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.873593
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Johansson J., 2010, THESIS LUND U
   Jones RN, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P296, DOI 10.1002/wcc.97
   Jung D, 2014, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000421
   Kleiner Y., 2001, URBAN WATER, V3, P131, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00033-4
   Lansey K., 2012, P WDSA 2012 14 WATER, P1
   Masson-Delmotte V.P., 2018, CLIM CHANG 2014 IMP, P32, DOI [10.1017/9781009157926.005, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324]
   Mehaffy M., 2013, RESILIENT ARCHITECTU, P1
   Ofwat, 2012, RES OUTC FOC REG PRI
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Rossman L. A., 2000, EPANET USERS MANUAL
   Rossman L. A., 2010, . Rep. No. EPA/600/R-05/040
   Sitzenfrei R, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7251, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.038
   Sliuzas R., 2013, Flood Risk Assessment, Strategies and Actions for Improving Flood Risk Management in Kampala
   Spiller M, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V149, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.031
   Stovin VR, 2007, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V160, P207, DOI 10.1680/wama.2007.160.4.207
   Todini E., 2000, Urban Water, V2, P115, DOI [10.1016/S1462-0758, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758, 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00049-2, DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00049-2, 10.1016/s1462-0758(00)00049-2]
   Urich C, 2014, WATER RES, V66, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.020
   Vugrin ED, 2010, SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS: SIMULATION, MODELING, AND INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING, P77, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-11405-2_3
   WATT KEF, 1986, SYST RES, V3, P191, DOI 10.1002/sres.3850030403
   Wildavsky Aaron, 1988, SEARCH FOR SAFETY
NR 31
TC 42
Z9 45
U1 7
U2 85
PU IWA PUBLISHING
PI LONDON
PA REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON,
   ENGLAND
SN 1606-9749
EI 1607-0798
J9 WATER SCI TECH-W SUP
JI Water Sci. Technol.-Water Supply
PD DEC
PY 2015
VL 15
IS 6
BP 1343
EP 1352
DI 10.2166/ws.2015.098
PG 10
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA DJ6EJ
UT WOS:000374302500022
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kiener, J
   Kornatowski, G
   Mizuuchi, T
AF Kiener, Johannes
   Kornatowski, Geerhardt
   Mizuuchi, Toshio
TI Innovations in Gearing the Housing Market to Welfare Recipients in
   Osaka's Inner City: A Resilient Strategy?
SO HOUSING THEORY & SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Rental housing; resilience; single elderly households; public
   assistance; inner city; Osaka
ID HONG-KONG; SOCIETY
AB For this paper we apply the framework of resilience as an adaptive process to examine alternative practices that assist socially vulnerable populations into the urban fabrik. The recent direction of Osaka's inner city rental housing market for public assistance recipients is used as case study. We look on systemic aspects such as changing tenant revenues and welfare policies, and analyze the innovative housing reuse practices of local landlords and real estate agents. Our results show that the resilience-producing systemic properties are co-produced by public assitance policies, the particular condition of Osaka's inner city and individual stakeholders' actions. While these stakeholders have benefited immensely from the housing market's resilient response, it is structured by uneven dependencies, which ultimately affects the housing opportunities and care services for current and future tenants.
C1 [Kiener, Johannes] Osaka City Univ, Urban Culture Res Ctr, Sugimoto 3-3-138, Osaka 5588585, Japan.
   [Kornatowski, Geerhardt; Mizuuchi, Toshio] Osaka City Univ, Urban Res Plaza, Osaka, Japan.
C3 Osaka Metropolitan University; Osaka Metropolitan University
RP Kiener, J (corresponding author), Osaka City Univ, Urban Culture Res Ctr, Sugimoto 3-3-138, Osaka 5588585, Japan.
EM johanneskiener01@gmail.com
RI Kiener, Johannes/KHX-2172-2024
FU Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan
   [25257014]; Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25257014] Funding
   Source: KAKEN
FX This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
   Science and Technology Japan [25257014].
CR Andres L, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN A, V47, P676, DOI 10.1068/a46299
   [Anonymous], 2015, HOUS POL OSK 2015
   [Anonymous], 2017, TKEISH
   [Anonymous], CANADIAN CITIES TRAN
   Antoniucci V, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V59, P580, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.004
   Aoki H, 2003, URBAN STUD, V40, P361, DOI 10.1080/00420980220080311
   BKDN (Buraku Kaih Drenmei Nishinari shibu), 1998, HENSH 5 NEN NO KIS N
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   DeVerteuil Geoffrey., 2015, RESILIENCE POSTWELFA
   EAK (Esu Ai Kykai), 2010, NISH KU HOK NIOK KYO
   Evans B, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P83, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.770703
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gibb K, 2016, INT J HOUS POLICY, V16, P435, DOI 10.1080/14616718.2016.1198085
   Gill T., 2001, SOCIAL SCI JAPAN, V21, P17
   Haraguchi T., 2016, SHIPBUILDING SHIP RE, P591
   Haraguchi T., 2002, NISHINARI SABETSU JI, P137
   Haraguchi T., 2003, JAPANESE J HUMAN GEO, V55, P23
   Haraguchi Takeshi, 2010, HMURESU SUTADZU HAIJ
   Hatuka T, 2017, HOUS THEORY SOC, V34, P277, DOI 10.1080/14036096.2016.1223166
   Hayashi M, 2015, ANTIPODE, V47, P418, DOI 10.1111/anti.12106
   Hirakawa T., 2011, KAMAGASAKI NO SUSUME, P113
   Hirayama Y., 2009, J TAKU SEISAKU DOKO
   Inada N., 2011, SAKA FU KANISHUKUSHO, P42
   Iwayama H., 2014, TABUNKA CHIIKI NIOKE
   Kiener J., 2017, FACES HOMELESSNESS A, P9
   Kiener J., 2018, GURBARI ZESHON NAKA
   Kiener J., 2015, JAPANESE J HUMAN GEO, V67, P25, DOI [10.4200/jjhg.67.5_395, DOI 10.4200/JJHG.67.5_395]
   Kofner S, 2014, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V29, P255, DOI 10.1007/s10901-013-9383-0
   Konno H., 2013, SEIKATSUHOGO SHIRARE
   KREINS (Kinki Real Estate Information Network System), 2014, 54 KRIENS
   Lau KY, 2017, HOUSING STUD, V32, P271, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2016.1194376
   Maruyama H, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_1
   MHLW (Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare), 2017, HMUR NO JIT NI KANS
   Mizuuchi T., 2017, TOSHI HYRYOKU SEFUTI, P1
   Mizuuchi T., 2011, CITY PLANNING REV, V60, P35
   Mizuuchi T., 2001, RAKUZ NOJUKU NI IKIR, P146
   Mizuuchi T., 2002, KUMACRONKAN SHAKAI C, V7, P17
   Mizuuchi T., 2007, HMURESU KENKYUMACRON, P68
   Mizuuchi T., 2011, SAKA FU KANISHUKUSHO, P10
   Mizuuchi Toshio, 2008, MODAN TOSHI KEIFU CH
   Motooka T., 2015, GEOGRAPHICAL REV JAP, V88, P25
   Murayama A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P79, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_5
   OSFK (saka shi Fukushi kyoku), 2013, SEIK GYS NIK YOK AR
   OSFK (saka shi Fukushi kyoku), 2015, SEIK TEK
   OSFK (saka shi Fukushi kyoku), 2015, HINK BIJ TAIS NAD
   OSFK (saka shi Fukushi kyoku), 2017, SEIK TEK NAD
   OSKK (saka shi Kenk kyoku), 2015, SHIB
   Raco M, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P1065, DOI 10.1177/0042098011415716
   Raymond E, 2016, HOUSING STUD, V31, P324, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2015.1080821
   Shirahase T., 2015, BURAKU KAIH KENKY, V202, P80
   Shji Y., 2015, NIKKEI BIJINESU ONRA
   STK (Smu sh Tkei kyoku), 2016, J TAKU TOCHI TKEI CH
   Stollmann J, 2016, BUILD RES INF, V44, P737, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1217386
   Suzuki W., 2010, HMURESU SHAKAI, V2, P22
   Takayama M., 1982, JAPANESE J HUMAN GEO, V34, P53, DOI [10.4200/jjhg1948.34.53, DOI 10.4200/JJHG1948.34.53]
   Terauchi M., 1992, SAKA NAGAYA KINDAI N
   TKK (Toshi Keikaku kyoku), 2016, CHIK JA
   TSK (Toshi Seibi kyoku), 2008, NISH KU HOK CHIK J T
   Yoshimura T., 2011, KAMAGASAKI NO SUSUME, P185
NR 59
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 11
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1403-6096
EI 1651-2278
J9 HOUS THEORY SOC
JI Hous. Theory Soc.
PY 2018
VL 35
IS 4
SI SI
BP 410
EP 431
DI 10.1080/14036096.2018.1481141
PG 22
WC Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA GW5NK
UT WOS:000446982100003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Huck, A
   Monstadt, J
   Driessen, PPJ
   Rudolph-Cleff, A
AF Huck, Andreas
   Monstadt, Jochen
   Driessen, Peter P. J.
   Rudolph-Cleff, Annette
TI Towards Resilient Rotterdam? Key conditions for a networked approach to
   managing urban infrastructure risks
SO JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE critical infrastructures; governance challenges; institutions; network
   management; Rotterdam; urban resilience
AB Critical infrastructures are increasingly recognized to be playing important roles in urban resilience theory and practice. However, little is known about which governance challenges result from making them an integral part of urban resilience policies and what role city administrations play or could play in the resulting governance arrangements. We address these shortcomings in the scholarly literature by analysing the case of the Dutch city of Rotterdam, which has positioned itself as a front runner with regard to urban resilience. We find that the city administration is limited in its authority and depends on decisions made by other public and private actors, particularly those relating to the integrated management of interconnected infrastructure networks such as those for water and energy provision. We therefore argue that institutionalizing resilience will strongly depend on city administrations' institutional capacity to manage networks more effectively. For this, we derive key conditions for institutional adjustments in current governance arrangements. Necessary adjustments include redefining roles and responsibilities for cross-territorial risk management, cross-sectoral and cross-departmental budgeting of resilience measures, and integrating local actions and measures with those at regional and national levels of government. Our conclusions call for national and supranational legal reforms to establish uniform procedural rules for urban risk management and contingency planning to provide guidance for municipalities on how to enhance the resilience of their cities and infrastructures.
C1 [Huck, Andreas] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Res Training Grp KRITIS, Dolivostr 15, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
   [Huck, Andreas; Monstadt, Jochen] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Driessen, Peter P. J.] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Fac Geosci, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Rudolph-Cleff, Annette] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Fachgebiet Entwerfen & Stadtentwicklung, Darmstadt, Germany.
C3 Technical University of Darmstadt; Utrecht University; Utrecht
   University; Technical University of Darmstadt
RP Huck, A (corresponding author), Tech Univ Darmstadt, Res Training Grp KRITIS, Dolivostr 15, D-64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
EM huck@kritis.tu-darmstadt.de
RI Monstadt, Jochen/AAE-5440-2022; Driessen, Peter/M-6751-2013
OI Huck, Andreas/0000-0001-6251-8700; Monstadt, Jochen/0000-0001-9146-1571;
   Driessen, Peter/0000-0002-0724-6666
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   [Anonymous], 2017, EU RESILIENCE PROSPE
   [Anonymous], 2014, DELTA ROTTERDAM CONN
   [Anonymous], 2016, ROTTERDAM RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], 100RC
   [Anonymous], 2012, RISK INTERDEPENDENCI
   [Anonymous], 2008, OJ L, V345, P75
   Bach C, 2014, SAPIENS, V6, P1
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Boin A., 2007, J CCM, V15, P50, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00504.X
   Bollinger LA, 2014, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V14, P919, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0428-4
   Chandler David., 2017, The Routledge Handbook of International Resilience
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen SQ, 2016, APPL ENERG, V184, P905, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.042
   Coaffee J., 2016, URBAN RESILIENCE PLA
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2017, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V5, P161, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2016.1241475
   Collier SJ, 2015, THEOR CULT SOC, V32, P19, DOI 10.1177/0263276413510050
   Crowe PR, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.007
   de Bruijne M., 2007, J CONTINGENCIES CRIS, V15, P18, DOI [10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00501.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00501.X]
   Dewulf A, 2015, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V6, P1, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2014.000
   Dieperink C, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4467, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1491-7
   Dunn G, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V73, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.013
   Dunn-Cavelty M, 2009, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V2, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.08.006
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Fekete A, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Francesch-Huidobro M, 2017, PROG PLANN, V114, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2015.11.001
   Glaser J., 2013, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, V14, P1, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-14.2.1886
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goldstein BruceEvan., 2012, Collaborative Resilience: Moving Through Crisis to Opportunity
   Graham Stephen., 2009, DISRUPTED CITIES INF
   Guy S., 2012, Shaping urban infrastructures: Intermediaries and the governance of socio-technical networks
   Hegger DLT, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   Hegger DLT, 2014, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V28, P4127, DOI 10.1007/s11269-014-0732-x
   Hohn U, 2006, EUR PLAN STUD, V14, P291, DOI 10.1080/09654310500420750
   Hommels A., 2018, The Sociotechnical Constitution of Resilience: A New Perspective on Governing Risk and Disaster, P265, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_12, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8509-3_12]
   Huck A, 2021, J CONTINGENCIES CRIS, V29, P12
   Huck A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008
   Jordan A., 2006, COORDINATION EUROPEA
   Klijn EH, 2016, GOVERNANCE NETWORKS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR, P1
   Kroger W, 2011, VULNERABLE SYSTEMS, P1
   Laporte T.R., 2007, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V15, P60, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00505.X
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Linkov I., 2017, Resilience and risk: Methods and application in environment, cyber and social domains
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Medd W., 2005, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V13, P44, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2005.00455.X
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   North D. C., 1990, I I CHANGE EC PERFOR, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511606892.012, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808678]
   Padt F., 2014, Scale-sensitive governance of the environment
   Peck J, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P380, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
   Perrow C., 1994, J CONTINGENCIES CRIS, V2, P212
   Port of Rotterdam Authority, FACTS FIGURES WEALTH
   Prins R, 2012, INNOV PUBLIC SECT, V17, P19, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-998-1-19
   Rinaldi SA, 2001, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V21, P11, DOI 10.1109/37.969131
   Sapountzaki K, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1445, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9843-3
   Scharpf F.W., 1978, Interogranisational policy making, P345
   Seager TP, 2017, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P81, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_3
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Vedeld T, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, pS173, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1875-7
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
NR 65
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 7
U2 36
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0966-0879
EI 1468-5973
J9 J CONTING CRISIS MAN
JI J. Cont. Crisis Manag.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 29
IS 1
BP 12
EP 22
DI 10.1111/1468-5973.12295
PG 11
WC Management
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics
GA QH4KE
UT WOS:000618244000002
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chirisa, I
   Chinozvina, QL
   Mandaza-Tsoriyo, WW
AF Chirisa, Innocent
   Chinozvina, Queen Linda
   Mandaza-Tsoriyo, Wendy Wadzanai
TI URBAN AND BUILDING DESIGN FOR RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY: CHALLENGES
   AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR ZIMBABWE
SO JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL AND PLANNING RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
ID ADAPTATION; TRANSITION; SECURITY; HARARE
AB Urban regeneration and revitalization, green buildings and roofs, compact cities, and mixed-use developments are among the adaptation techniques being used to design resilient and sustainable cities globally. However, Zimbabwe's economic circumstances have impeded the implementation of such strategies, leaving the country with colonial buildings and structures that are not resilient or sustainable. These strategies require considerable financial investment, and given the current situation in Zimbabwe, sustainability is not a priority when compared with other urban challenges such as poverty and unemployment. This study employed a qualitative methodology, which allowed for the development of a geographical explanation and a description of the building designs in Zimbabwean cities. Harare, Mutare, Bulawayo, Chipinge, Victoria Falls, and selected growth points were used as case studies to explore the design approaches employed in Zimbabwean cities and how such designs are influencing sustainability and resilience in urban centers. The study findings revealed that urban and building designs in Zimbabwean cities predate when the country started experiencing the effects of climate change, as is true of other cities in Africa. Moreover, Zimbabwe has not been able to respond adequately to the effects of climate change due to economic conditions, so appropriate designs and plans are not being implemented, and the adaptation and adoption of techniques such as urban generation and the construction of green buildings are not possible due to a lack of revenue and political will on the part of the government, local authorities, and developers. The study concludes with a number of policy suggestions to effectively implement sustainable and resilient urban and building design in Zimbabwe.
C1 [Chirisa, Innocent; Chinozvina, Queen Linda] Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Rural & Urban Planning, POB MP 167, Harare, Zimbabwe.
   [Chirisa, Innocent] Univ Zimbabwe, Fac Social Studies, Harare, Zimbabwe.
   [Chirisa, Innocent] Univ Free State, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
   [Mandaza-Tsoriyo, Wendy Wadzanai] Great Zimbabwe Univ, Dept Rural & Urban Dev, Masvingo, Zimbabwe.
   [Mandaza-Tsoriyo, Wendy Wadzanai] Univ Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.
C3 University of Zimbabwe; University of Zimbabwe; University of the Free
   State; University of Venda
RP Chirisa, I (corresponding author), Univ Zimbabwe, Dept Rural & Urban Planning, POB MP 167, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Chirisa, I (corresponding author), Univ Zimbabwe, Fac Social Studies, Harare, Zimbabwe.; Chirisa, I (corresponding author), Univ Free State, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
EM chirisa.innocent@gmail.com
CR Adelekan I, 2015, INT DEV PLANN REV, V37, P33, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2015.4
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   African Development Bank Group, 2019, ZAMB AFR DEV BANK PA
   Alberti M, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00083-2
   Allouche J, 2011, FOOD POLICY, V36, pS3, DOI 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.013
   Angotti T., 2018, Metropolis 2000: Planning, poverty and politics
   [Anonymous], 2017, BULAWAYO24 NEWS 0226
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2012, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   [Anonymous], 2017, RESILIENT CITIES OVE
   [Anonymous], 2012, CIT RES PROF PROGR
   Arefi M, 2018, LEARNING INFORMAL SE
   Bhatta GD, 2010, FARMING RURAL SYSTEM, P68
   Bianchini F.P., 1993, CULTURAL POLICY URBA
   Brockman RAC, 2011, INCENTIVIZING ASIAS
   Carter JG, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.015
   Chirisa I., 2014, Consilience: The journal of sustainable development, V11, P1
   Chokunonga E, 2013, INT J CANCER, V133, P721, DOI 10.1002/ijc.28063
   City of Sydney, 2016, GREEN ENV SUSTAINABI
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DOAN Abigail., 2012, BIOMIMETIC ARCHITECTURE: Green Building in Zimbabwe Modeled After Termite Mounds
   Frantzeskaki N., 2016, Urban resilience a concept for co-creating cities of the future
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Kamete AY, 2010, J S AFR STUD, V36, P889, DOI 10.1080/03057070.2010.527643
   Kessides Christine., 2006, The Urban Transition in Sub-Saharan Africa
   Kibert C.J., 2016, Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery
   Laros M., 2013, ECOSYSTEM BASED APPR
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li YH, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V178, P580, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.273
   Lindau LuisAntonio., 2010, Built Environment, V36, P274, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.36.3.274
   Lo K, 2014, CARBON MANAG, V5, P269, DOI 10.1080/17583004.2014.981384
   Marshall R, 2009, URBAN DESIGN, P38
   Ministry of Local Government Public Works and National Housing, 2004, 70 MIN LOC GOV PUBL
   Ministry of Local Government Public Works and National Housing, 1999, LAYOUT DES MAN 1999
   Morrissey JE, 2018, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P53, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4792-3_4
   Muchadenyika D, 2016, 3 THESPACE
   Mukuhlani T., 2014, Journal of Sustainable Development, V7, P144
   MUTISI L, 2015, J PUBLIC ADM, V50, P108
   Muzondidya J., 2013, HARD ROAD REFORM POL, P39
   Ndah AB, 2012, OPERATIONALIZING SUS
   Ndugwa R, 2017, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P713, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1610-3_26
   Nhuta S., 2015, International Journal of Contemporary Applied Sciences, V2, P57
   Pauchard Anibal, 2013, P589
   Pharoah R, 2016, STRENGTHENING URBAN
   Preston BL, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P407, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9270-x
   Ranger T, 2007, AFR STUD SEM ST ANT
   Reed D., 2015, GUARDIAN
   Roberts Peter., 2017, Em Urban Regeneration, P9
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121224
   Sarzynski A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.08.002
   Sharma D, 2014, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V6, P133, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2014.937720
   Tashobya A, 2016, THE NEW TIMES
   TERI, 2011, MAINSTR URB RES PLAN
   The World Bank and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), 2015, COMPR HENS DIS RISK
   Tshuma DT, 2013, INT J NOVATIVE RES D, V2, P1845
   Uda M, 2016, THESIS
   UN-Habitat, 2014, The state of African cities 2014
   Wang WM, 2005, BUILD ENVIRON, V40, P1512, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017
   Wekwete K. H., 1988, Journal of Social Development in Africa, V3, P5
   Wu N., 2008, 08011 USAEE, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.1289827, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1289827]
   Zinyama L, 1986, GeoJournal, V13, P365
NR 61
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 14
PU LOCKE SCIENCE PUBL CO INC
PI CHICAGO
PA 117 WEST HARRISON BLDG SUITE 640-L221, CHICAGO, IL 60605 USA
SN 0738-0895
J9 J ARCHIT PLAN RES
JI J. Archit. Plan. Res.
PD SUM
PY 2019
VL 36
IS 2
BP 149
EP 164
PG 16
WC Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA OE2MW
UT WOS:000580372200005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Seong, K
   Jiao, JF
AF Seong, Kijin
   Jiao, Junfeng
TI Is a Smart City Framework the Key to Disaster Resilience? A Systematic
   Review
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE
LA English
DT Review
DE disaster resilience; smart city; systematic literature review (SLR);
   cluster analysis
ID BIG DATA; RECOVERY; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; EAST; TOOL
AB Despite a growing body of research on the smart city framework for disaster resilience, a comprehensive systematic literature review from urban planning perspectives has never been attempted. In this review of smart and resilient cities, we distill vital learning and shared concepts, identify research trends and limitations, and suggest avenues for future research. The results reveal that reviewed articles primarily focused on methodological approaches addressing how to adapt technologies for disaster resilience, yet rarely discussed the sociological approaches to environment, economy, and governance. This study will provide a reference to trace existing research and suggest equitable smart resilience.
C1 [Seong, Kijin; Jiao, Junfeng] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Architecture, Urban Informat Lab, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
C3 University of Texas System; University of Texas Austin
RP Seong, K (corresponding author), Univ Texas Austin, Sch Architecture, Urban Informat Lab, Austin, TX 78712 USA.
EM kijin.seong@austin.utexas.edu
RI Seong, Kijin/KRQ-5606-2024
OI Jiao, Junfeng/0000-0002-7272-8805; Seong, Kijin/0000-0003-3942-6984
FU NSF [2043060, 2133302, 1952193, 2125858, 2236305]; USDOT Consortium of
   Cooperative Mobilityfor Competitive Megaregions; Good Systems Grand
   Challenge at the University of Texas at Austin; MITRE Corporation
FX & nbsp;The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support
   for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
   project is supported by the NSF Grants (2043060, 2133302, 1952193,
   2125858, 2236305), USDOT Consortium of Cooperative Mobilityfor
   Competitive Megaregions, Good Systems Grand Challenge at the University
   of Texas at Austin, and the MITRE Corporation
CR Akbarian H, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114939
   Andrew Booth, 2021, SYSTEMATIC APPROACHE, P1
   [Anonymous], 2012, How To Make Cities More Resilient: A Handbook For Local Government Leaders
   Arafah Y, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V70, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012065
   Balis B, 2017, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V108, P2220, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.192
   Biniyaz A, 2022, GEOSCIENCES, V12, DOI 10.3390/geosciences12020064
   Boyd C., 2015, The 3 Generations of Smart Cities Inside the Development of the Technology Driven City
   Chandra Anita, 2011, Rand Health Q, V1, P6
   Chang KH, 2022, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2022.113743
   Chaudhuri N, 2020, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113234
   Cheng JW, 2015, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V39, P515, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.006
   Cui FM, 2020, COMPUT COMMUN, V150, P818, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.051
   Damalas A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.011
   Duarte ME, 2021, ACM T COMPUT-HUM INT, V28, DOI 10.1145/3453862
   Ejaz W, 2020, COMPUT COMMUN, V155, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.03.019
   Fan C, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101514
   Feldmeyer D, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V774, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145734
   Francini M, 2021, J PLAN LIT, V36, P283, DOI 10.1177/0885412221994246
   Goyal HR, 2021, MATER TODAY-PROC, V46, P10418, DOI 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.959
   Hao HY, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101760
   Hasfi N, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102271
   Hossain MS, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100132
   Independent Evaluation Group, 2019, BUILDING URBAN RESIL
   Janitra M. R., 2020, 5 PLAN INT C INFR AL, P592
   Kangi A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.004
   Khan A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101642
   Khan S, 2021, EXPERT SYST APPL, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.204.115125
   Kim SW, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V779, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146389
   Kitchin R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P131, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu027
   Kitchin R, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Komninos N, 2019, J URBAN TECHNOL, V26, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368
   KUNISHINA EV, 2014, LIFE SCI J, V11, P517
   Kunzmann K. R., 2014, Crios, V4, P9, DOI DOI 10.7373/77140
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Lung-Amam W, 2021, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V31, P93, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2019.1672082
   Malandrino F, 2019, AD HOC NETW, V89, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.04.001
   Masroor R, 2021, COMPUT COMMUN, V177, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.07.006
   Munawar HS, 2020, BIG DATA COGN COMPUT, V4, DOI 10.3390/bdcc4020004
   Murayama Y, 2021, INFORM SYST FRONT, V23, P1077, DOI 10.1007/s10796-021-10204-x
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Olshansky RB, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P173, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000077
   Papadopoulos T, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P1108, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.059
   Paul JD, 2021, CLIM RISK MANAG, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100296
   Peacock WG, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P356, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.980440
   Pereira FL, 2021, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V186, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.127
   Poonia V, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V312, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127737
   Pourebrahim N, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101176
   Ragini JR, 2018, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V42, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.004
   Lopez LJR, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010181
   Reetu Gupta, 2016, 2016 S COL DAT AN NE
   Rodríguez-Espíndola O, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562
   Romero L, 2019, FRONT PHARMACOL, V10, DOI 10.3389/fphar.2019.00564
   Sarker MNI, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101769
   Schempp T, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101143
   Seong K, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13168754
   Seong K, 2022, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V32, P190, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2021.1938172
   Sermet Y, 2022, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105010
   Sharma A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102332
   Siderska J., 2018, Engineering Management in Production and Services, V10, P22, DOI [DOI 10.1515/EMJ-2018-0002, 10.1515/emj-2018-0002]
   Singh PP, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102432
   Solmaz G, 2017, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V84, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2017.02.007
   Song Y, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P239, DOI 10.1177/0160017604273854
   Spicer Z, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P535, DOI 10.1177/0042098019863666
   Steven French, 2008, QUANTITATIVE MODELS, P1
   Sukhwani V, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100052
   Supadchaya Puangpontip, 2019, P 2019 3 INT C BIG D
   Tan L, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V313, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127882
   Tonmoy FN, 2020, FRONT WATER, V2, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2020.00003
   van Eck NJ, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   Vargas-Quesada B., 2017, Front Res Metrics Analytics, V2, DOI [10.3389/frma.2017.00007, DOI 10.3389/FRMA.2017.00007]
   Velásquez I, 2018, INFORM SOFTWARE TECH, V94, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.09.012
   Villegas CA, 2022, CITIES, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103500
   Wang B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102884
   Wang CM, 2020, COMPUT COMMUN, V151, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.11.028
   Wang YQ, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102867
   Xiao Y, 2019, J PLAN EDUC RES, V39, P93, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17723971
   Yabe T, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2111997119
   Yan YW, 2020, APPL GEOGR, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102306
   Yang L, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P1854, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.011
   Yao F, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102448
   Zhang T, 2020, COMPUT COMMUN, V150, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.12.006
   Zhang Y, 2022, KNOWL-BASED SYST, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107984
   Zhu SY, 2020, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V10, DOI 10.1002/widm.1388
   Zubairi JA, 2018, ICT EXPRESS, V4, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.icte.2017.05.005
NR 84
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 17
U2 50
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0885-4122
EI 1552-6593
J9 J PLAN LIT
JI J. Plan. Lit.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 39
IS 1
BP 62
EP 78
DI 10.1177/08854122231199462
EA SEP 2023
PG 17
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA HV7A9
UT WOS:001059370500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Balsells, M
   Barroca, B
   Amdal, JR
   Diab, Y
   Becue, V
   Serre, D
AF Balsells, M.
   Barroca, B.
   Amdal, J. R.
   Diab, Y.
   Becue, V.
   Serre, D.
TI Analysing urban resilience through alternative stormwater management
   options: application of the conceptual Spatial Decision Support System
   model at the neighbourhood scale
SO WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE DS3 model; neighbourhood scale; stormwater management system; urban
   resilience
AB Recent changes in cities and their environments, caused by rapid urbanisation and climate change, have increased both flood probability and the severity of flooding. Consequently, there is a need for all cities to adapt to climate and socio-economic changes by developing new strategies for flood risk management. Following a risk paradigm shift from traditional to more integrated approaches, and considering the uncertainties of future urban development, one of the main emerging tasks for city managers becomes the development of resilient cities. However, the meaning of the resilience concept and its operability is still not clear. The goal of this research is to study how urban engineering and design disciplines can improve resilience to floods in urban neighbourhoods. This paper presents the conceptual Spatial Decision Support System (DS3) model which we consider a relevant tool to analyse and then implement resilience into neighbourhood design. Using this model, we analyse and discuss alternative stormwater management options at the neighbourhood scale in two specific areas: Rotterdam and New Orleans. The results obtained demonstrate that the DS3 model confirmed in its framework analysis that stormwater management systems can positively contribute to the improved flood resilience of a neighbourhood.
C1 [Balsells, M.; Becue, V.] Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urbanisme, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
   [Barroca, B.; Diab, Y.] Univ Paris Est, LEESU, Dept Genie Urbain, F-77455 Marne La Vallee 2, France.
   [Amdal, J. R.] Univ New Orleans, Transportat Inst, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA.
   [Balsells, M.; Diab, Y.] Univ Paris Est, Ecole Ingn Ville Paris, F-75019 Paris, France.
   [Serre, D.] RECUE Solut, F-92220 Bagneux, France.
   [Serre, D.] Univ Paris Diderot Sorbonne Paris, Interdisciplinary Energy Res Inst, Paris 7, France.
C3 University of Mons; Universite Gustave-Eiffel; Universite
   Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC); Institut Polytechnique de Paris;
   Ecole des Ponts ParisTech; University of Louisiana System; University of
   New Orleans; Universite Gustave-Eiffel
RP Balsells, M (corresponding author), Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urbanisme, Pl Parc 23, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
EM mireia.balsells@umons.ac.be
RI Barroca, Bruno/ABF-5436-2020
OI serre, damien/0000-0002-2902-2989; BARROCA, Bruno/0000-0001-6653-0803
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], THESIS DELFT U TECHN
   Barroca B., 2012, CONCEPT RESILIENCE E
   Campanella Richard., 2006, GEOGRAPHIES NEW ORLE
   Chammah E., 2007, ROTTERDAM WATER CITY
   Colten C. E., 2008, 3 CARRI, P1
   De Brujin KM, 2005, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
   De Graaf R., 2013, EFFECTIVENESS FLOOD
   De Graaf R.E, 2009, Ph.D. Thesis
   Galland J. P., 2010, FLUX, V81, P6
   Heilemann K., 2013, IDENTIFICATION ANAL, P3
   Khaimi D, 2012, LAND USE POLICY, V30, P615
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Meyer Han., 2009, Dutch Dialogues: New Orleans, Netherlands; Common Challenges in Urbanized Deltas
   Sajaloli B., 2011, REV GEOGRAPHIQUE EST, V51
   Schelfaut K, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
   Serre D., 2011, THESIS PARIS EST U, P173
   Serre D., 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS, P189
   Toubin M., 2012, RESILIENCE URBAINE N
NR 19
TC 24
Z9 27
U1 4
U2 80
PU IWA PUBLISHING
PI LONDON
PA ALLIANCE HOUSE, 12 CAXTON ST, LONDON SW1H0QS, ENGLAND
SN 0273-1223
EI 1996-9732
J9 WATER SCI TECHNOL
JI Water Sci. Technol.
PY 2013
VL 68
IS 11
BP 2448
EP 2457
DI 10.2166/wst.2013.527
PG 10
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA 276HN
UT WOS:000328740600018
PM 24334895
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Li, HY
   Hu, CX
   Zhu, MY
   Hong, JR
   Wang, ZJ
   Fu, F
   Zhao, JQ
AF Li, Haiyang
   Hu, Chenxu
   Zhu, Mengying
   Hong, Jiarong
   Wang, Zhaojun
   Fu, Fen
   Zhao, Jiaqi
TI Study on the coupled and coordinated development of urban resilience and
   urbanization level in the Yellow River Basin
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Urban resilience; Urbanization level; Coupling coordination degree;
   Geodetector; Yellow River Basin
ID VULNERABILITY; CITY
AB Urban resilience and urbanization share an interdependent and mutually beneficial relationship, fostering a robust interaction that drives cities toward sustainable development. Elevated urbanization not only reinforces urban resilience but also effectively addresses uncertainties that arise during urbanization, creating an optimal environment for development. With the current national emphasis on resilient urban development and considering the challenges presented by the ecologically sensitive Yellow River Basin, there is an urgent research and practical imperative to align urban resilience and urbanization. Built upon the essence, foundational theories, and mutual mechanisms of urban resilience and urbanization, this study zeroes in on 60 prefecture-level cities within the Yellow River Basin. It assesses and analyzes the interplay and driving factors between urban resilience and urbanization from 2005 to 2020. Key findings include: (1) Over the study period, the coupling and coordination between urban resilience and urbanization in the Yellow River Basin exhibited a consistent upward trajectory. This reflects a substantial affirmative relationship, underscoring their distinct interdependence. Spatially, distribution patterns indicated higher levels downstream, tapering upwards, with provincial capitals and sub-provincial cities serving as central benchmarks. (2) Throughout the study duration, the coordinated evolution of urban resilience and urbanization in the Yellow River Basin displayed spatial clustering and an upward trend. Notably, the HH agglomeration predominantly emerged downstream in Shandong, Henan. Meanwhile, the LL agglomeration showcased the highest city concentration, primarily within the middle and upper basin regions, revealing a pronounced basin-wide polarization. (3) The predominant factors influencing spatial divergence in the degree of coordination between urban resilience and urbanization in the Yellow River Basin were regional innovation levels and external openness. Additionally, the influence of transportation infrastructure and regional innovation levels played an increasingly significant role in spatial differentiation during the study period.
C1 [Li, Haiyang; Zhu, Mengying; Hong, Jiarong; Wang, Zhaojun] China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Hu, Chenxu] Henan Water Conservancy Survey Ltd, Zhengzhou 450008, Peoples R China.
   [Fu, Fen] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Jiaqi] Zhejiang Business Human Resource Exchange Serv Ctr, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences; Tsinghua University
RP Li, HY (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
EM lihaiyang1106@163.com; hucx_001@163.com; zhumengying_echo@163.com;
   2414325583@qq.com; ZhaojunWang51@cug.edu.cn; 499339304@qq.com;
   953408427@qq.com
RI Li, Haiyang/HGE-7991-2022; Wang, Zhaojun/ABG-5173-2021; Zhu,
   Mengying/MIN-1586-2025
CR Alberti A., 2020, GOVERNANCE FOR URBAN SERVICES: ACCESS, PARTICIPATION, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, P127
   Arshad A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101468
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Chen SQ, 2020, Modern Urban Research, V1, P37
   Chen XM, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15053931
   Darkwah R. M., 2016, An analysis of urban resilience in selected communities in Kumasi and its Environs
   Dohwe P. T., 2019, Community resilience under the impact of urbanisation and climate change: Cases and experiences from Zimbabwe, V53
   Dong GL, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110578
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Fang Y.L., 2022, PROG GEOGR, V41, P214, DOI [10.18306/dlkxjz.2022.02.003, DOI 10.18306/DLKXJZ.2022.02.003]
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Gao YP, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244024
   Giovinazzi S, 2011, BULL N Z SOC EARTHQ, V44, P402, DOI 10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.402-417
   [关兴良 Guan Xingliang], 2016, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V35, P227
   Huang LJ, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10040400
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Hynes William, 2020, Environment Systems & Decisions, V40, P174, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x
   Inglehart R., 2018, Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology, V7, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780190879228.003.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190879228.003.0001]
   Ji SW, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P6804, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01728-y
   Joerin J, 2012, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V11, P226, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2012.689248
   Li HY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110672
   Li LY, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103703
   Li T., 2015, Econ. Geogr, V35, P65, DOI DOI 10.15957/J.CNKI.JJDL.2015.05.010
   Li XM, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112981
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Li Y, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V28, P1724, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.012
   Li Z., 2022, 2022 2 INT C MANAGEM, P495, DOI [10.2991/978-94-6463-056-5_73, DOI 10.2991/978-94-6463-056-5_73]
   Liang HG, 2017, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/5693896
   Lin YZ, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109194
   Liu H., 2020, MATEC WEB C, V331
   Liu L, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110214
   [刘彦平 Liu Yanping], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P93
   [吕添贵 Lyu Tiangui], 2016, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V36, P239
   Ma HT, 2020, J GEOGR SCI, V30, P1761, DOI 10.1007/s11442-020-1811-y
   [缪惠全 Miao Huiquan], 2021, [自然灾害学报, Journal of Natural Disasters], V30, P10
   Moraci F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030755
   Ouyang X, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105587
   Peng KJ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15032702
   Pinto APGM, 2016, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V204, P467, DOI 10.2495/SC160401
   Pirlone F, 2020, TEMA, P305, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6856
   Seeliger L, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P2108, DOI 10.3390/su5052108
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Sun HH, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P387, DOI 10.1007/s11769-021-1201-0
   Sun YQ, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11081262
   Xie ZY, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15032387
   Xiong YN, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14105889
   Yang LJ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192013667
   Yang M, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191911988
   [杨莹 Yang Ying], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P266
   Zeng P, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V365, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132730
   Zhang BF, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14092268
   [张明斗 Zhang Mingdou], 2019, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V26, P82
   Zhang RT, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191710729
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
   Zhu J.H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
NR 57
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 13
U2 49
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD 2024 MAR 26
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s10668-024-04746-8
EA MAR 2024
PG 31
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA LY9G5
UT WOS:001190485000005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Meerow, S
   Pajouhesh, P
   Miller, TR
AF Meerow, Sara
   Pajouhesh, Pani
   Miller, Thaddeus R.
TI Social equity in urban resilience planning
SO LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; social equity; justice; urban sustainability; planning
ID JUSTICE; ADAPTATION; COMMUNITIES; POLITICS; THINKING; RIGHTS; RISK
AB A growing number of cities are incorporating resilience into their plans and policies to respond to shocks, stresses, and uncertainties. While some scholars advocate for the potential of resilience research and practice, others argue that it promotes an inherently conservative and neoliberal agenda, prevents systemic transformations, and pays insufficient attention to power, politics, and justice. Notably, critics of the urban resilience agenda argue that policies fail to adequately address social equity issues. This study seeks to inform these debates by providing a cross-sectional analysis of how issues of equity are incorporated into urban resilience planning. We develop a tripartite framework of equity that includes distributional, recognitional, and procedural dimensions and use it to analyse the goals, priorities, and strategies of formal resilience plans created by member cities of the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities programme. Our analysis reveals considerable variation in the extent to which cities focus on equity, implying that resilience may be more nuanced than some critics suggest. There are, however, clear areas for improvement. Dominant conceptions of equity are generally tied to a distributional orientation, with less focus on the recognitional and procedural dimensions. We hope our conceptual framework and lessons learned from this study can inform more just resilience planning and provide a foundation for future research on the equity implications of resilience.
C1 [Meerow, Sara] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, POB 875302, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Pajouhesh, Pani] Univ Toronto, Dept Geog & Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   [Miller, Thaddeus R.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Future Innovat Soc, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; University of
   Toronto; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Meerow, S (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, POB 875302, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
EM sara.meerow@asu.edu
RI Meerow, Sara/J-8037-2019
OI Meerow, Sara/0000-0002-6935-1832; Miller, Thaddeus/0000-0002-1692-5839
FU National Science Foundation [SES-1444755]
FX This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
   Foundation under award number SES-1444755 (Urban Resilience to Extremes
   Sustainability Research Network).
CR 100 Resilient Cities, 2018, FREQ ASK QUEST FAQ 1
   Agyeman J, 2003, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V590, P35, DOI 10.1177/0002716203256565
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bolin B., 2018, HDB DISASTER RES, P181, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_10, 10.1007/978-3-319-63254-410]
   Bonds A, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1285, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1462968
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Broto VC, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P635, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2016.1248379
   Bulkeley H, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Evans B, 2015, RESILIENCE, V3, P154, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1022991
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Keenan JM, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32
   Kythreotis AP, 2017, REG STUD, V51, P1530, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1200719
   Laurian L, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P53, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976338
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Long J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P992, DOI 10.1177/0042098018770846
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Masterson J.H., 2014, Planning for community resilience: A handbook for reducing vulnerability to disasters, V3rd ed.
   Matin N, 2018, WORLD DEV, V109, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020
   Meerow S, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P2649, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17723630
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moglia M, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.009
   NOZICK R, 2000, WHAT IS JUSTICE CLAS, P301
   Nussbaum MC, 2003, FEM ECON, V9, P33, DOI 10.1080/1354570022000077926
   Rawls J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
   Schlosberg D, 2004, ENVIRON POLIT, V13, P517, DOI 10.1080/0964401042000229025
   Schlosberg David., 2007, DEFINING ENV JUSTICE, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199286294.001.0001]
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   The Rockefeller Foundation and ARUP, 2014, CIT RES IND CIT RES
   UN Habitat, 2018, RESILIENCE
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   Young I.M., 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference, DOI DOI 10.2307/1964259
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 48
TC 228
Z9 260
U1 35
U2 202
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1354-9839
EI 1469-6711
J9 LOCAL ENVIRON
JI Local Environ.
PD SEP 2
PY 2019
VL 24
IS 9
BP 793
EP 808
DI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
EA JUL 2019
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies;
   Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA IS9TM
UT WOS:000479594200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lang, QL
   Wan, ZY
   Zhang, JQ
   Zhang, YC
   Zhu, D
   Liu, GX
AF Lang, Qiuling
   Wan, Ziyang
   Zhang, Jiquan
   Zhang, Yichen
   Zhu, Dan
   Liu, Gexu
TI Resilience Assessment and Enhancement Strategies for Urban
   Transportation Infrastructure to Cope with Extreme Rainfalls
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban transportation resilience; extreme rainfall; transportation
   infrastructure; MCDM; climate adaptation strategy
ID ACCESSIBILITY; SYSTEM; IMPACT
AB As climate change intensifies, urban transportation infrastructure faces unprecedented challenges from extreme weather events, such as floods. This study investigates the resilience and vulnerability of such infrastructure under extreme rainfall conditions in Changchun City. Utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis (MCDM) and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques, we comprehensively assess the physical, functional, and service vulnerabilities of the transportation network. Our analysis reveals that only 3.57% of the area is classified as highly resilient, demonstrating effective flood management capabilities. In contrast, a significant 61.73% of the area exhibits very low resilience, highlighting substantial vulnerabilities that could impact urban operations. Based on our findings, we propose specific strategies to enhance resilience, including optimizing drainage systems, upgrading infrastructure standards, implementing green infrastructure initiatives, and integrating disaster risk factors into urban planning. These strategies and insights provide valuable references for global cities facing similar climatic challenges.
C1 [Lang, Qiuling; Wan, Ziyang; Zhang, Yichen; Zhu, Dan; Liu, Gexu] Changchun Inst Technol, Coll Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China.
   [Lang, Qiuling; Zhang, Jiquan] Northeast Normal Univ, Inst Nat Disaster Res, Sch Environm, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China.
C3 Changchun Institute Technology; Northeast Normal University - China
RP Lang, QL (corresponding author), Changchun Inst Technol, Coll Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China.; Lang, QL (corresponding author), Northeast Normal Univ, Inst Nat Disaster Res, Sch Environm, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China.
EM langqiuling@tom.com; wanziyang@stu.ccit.edu.cn; zhangjq022@nenu.edu.cn;
   zhangyc@ccit.edu.cn; baoli0426@163.com; liugexu@stu.ccit.edu.cn
FU Key Science and Technology Development Program Research and Development
   Projects of Jilin Province
FX No Statement Available
CR Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Alves GJ, 2022, INT SOIL WATER CONSE, V10, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.02.002
   Asadabadi A, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V105, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.010
   Barzaman S, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P119, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05174-x
   Bi W, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103793
   Boakye J, 2022, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108184
   Borghetti F., 2023, Transp. Res. Procedia, V69, P77
   Burayu DG, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101640
   Chen X, 2022, CITIES, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103646
   Chen Y, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15139984
   Crimmins M, 2021, APPL GEOGR, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102477
   de Magalhaes RF, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101296
   de Moura RAV, 2024, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101182
   Diakakis M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101542
   Dong X, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104918
   Esmalian A, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103214
   Fang XY, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.103819
   Fernández DS, 2010, ENG GEOL, V111, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006
   Fofana M., 2022, Environ Challenges, V6, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENVC.2022.100449
   Foltin P., 2023, Transp. Res. Procedia, V74, P1508, DOI [10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.313, DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2023.11.313]
   Gabriels K, 2021, J HYDROL, V602, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126872
   Gao C, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101562
   Gao W, 2024, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.104000
   Gouda KC, 2018, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V21, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2018.05.001
   Guo J, 2024, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103931
   Huang LL, 2024, WORLD DEV, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106446
   Hussain M, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101589
   Iradukunda P, 2024, HELIYON, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27126
   Kapucu N., 2023, Urban Governance, V3, P5, DOI [10.1016/j.ugj.2023.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2023.01.001]
   Khayal D, 2015, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V52, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2015.09.002
   Krigel K, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101433
   Kudas D, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16062224
   Li C, 2022, ENERGY REP, V8, P387, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.207
   Li JM, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101490
   Mohebbi S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102327
   Morshed Syed Ahnaf., 2021, Transportation Engineering, V4, P100058, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.TRENG.2021.100058, 10.1016/j.treng.2021, DOI 10.1016/J.TRENG.2021]
   Morsy MM, 2018, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V107, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.007
   Mukhametzyanov I.Z., 2021, Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng, V4, P76, DOI [10.31181/dmame210402076i, DOI 10.31181/DMAME210402076I]
   Müller CC, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16083415
   Ng ST, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.026
   Pascoal R, 2022, PHYSICA A, V593, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2022.126979
   Pulugurtha SS, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103071
   Rahimi-Golkhandan A, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101166
   Rathnayaka B, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104093
   Rochas C, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V88, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.081
   Roldán-Valcarce A, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103894
   Sharma S, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-03411-w
   Singh T, 2024, CASE STUD THERM ENG, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103922
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Sullivan JL, 2024, EUR J OPER RES, V317, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.04.015
   Thakur DA, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V901, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166423
   Travis WR, 2014, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V5-6, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2014.08.001
   Wu JR, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102968
   Yu SY, 2023, HABITAT INT, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102783
   Zhang XW, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101402
   Zhang Z, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15071872
   Zheng ZJ, 2024, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100728
   Zhou YQ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151914518
NR 58
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 43
U2 60
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 11
AR 4780
DI 10.3390/su16114780
PG 25
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA UG0A6
UT WOS:001246776500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mackay, BR
   Shaker, RR
AF Mackay, Brian R.
   Shaker, Richard R.
TI A Megacities Review: Comparing Indicator-Based Evaluations of
   Sustainable Development and Urban Resilience
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE cities; index; megacities; population growth; rural to urban migration;
   sustainable development; sustainability indicators; systematic
   literature review; urban assessment; urban resilience
ID RAIL TRANSIT; BIG DATA; CITY; INDEX; DISASTERS; PATTERNS; WORLDS; AIR
AB Urbanization is defining global change, and megacities are fast becoming a hallmark of the Anthropocene. Humanity's pursuit toward sustainability is reliant on the successful management of these massive urban centers and their progression into sustainable and resilient settlements. Indicators and indices are applied assessment and surveillance tools used to measure, monitor, and gauge the sustainable development and urban resilience of megacities. Unknown is how indicator-based evaluations of sustainable development and urban resilience of the world's largest 43 cities compare. In response, this review paper used the PRISMA reporting protocol, governed by 33 established and 10 emerging megacities, to compare and contrast evaluations of sustainable development and urban resilience. Results reveal that applied assessments of sustainable development of megacities appeared earlier in time and were more abundant than those of urban resilience. Geographically, China dominated other nations in affiliations to scientific research for both sustainable development and urban resilience of megacities. Among the 100 most recurrent terms, three distinct key term clusters formed for sustainable development; seven budding key term clusters formed for urban resilience suggesting breadth in contrast to sustainable development depth. The most cited assessments of sustainable development emphasize topics of energy, methodological approaches, and statistical modeling. The most cited assessments of urban resilience emphasize topics of flooding, transit networks, and disaster risk resilience. Megacities research is dominated by few countries, suggesting a need for inclusion and international partnerships. Lastly, as the world's people become increasingly urbanized, sustainable development and urban resilience of megacities will serve as a key barometer for humanity's progress toward sustainability.
C1 [Mackay, Brian R.] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Grad Programs Environm Appl Sci & Management, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
   [Shaker, Richard R.] SUNY, Dept Sustainable Resources Management, Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
C3 Toronto Metropolitan University; State University of New York (SUNY)
   System; SUNY Maritime College; State University of New York (SUNY)
   College of Environmental Science & Forestry
RP Mackay, BR (corresponding author), Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Grad Programs Environm Appl Sci & Management, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.
EM brian.mackay@torontomu.ca; rrshaker@esf.edu
RI Mackay, Brian/HCH-3393-2022
OI Shaker, Richard/0000-0002-3093-8628
FU Toronto Metropolitan University and SUNY College of Environmental
   Science and Forestry; Toronto Metropolitan University; SUNY College of
   Environmental Science and Forestry
FX This research was funded by Toronto Metropolitan University and SUNY
   College of Environmental Science and Forestry.
CR Adjetey-Bahun K, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V153, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.015
   Ajibade I, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1714, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.009
   [Anonymous], 2018, The worlds cities in 2018 data booklet.
   [Anonymous], 2021, FEEDBACK ONLINE VALI
   [Anonymous], 2015, GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE D
   [Anonymous], 2008, State of the World Cities 2008-2009
   Baklanov A, 2016, ATMOS ENVIRON, V126, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.059
   Batty M, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN A, V43, P765, DOI 10.1068/a43403
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Böhringer C, 2007, ECOL ECON, V63, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.008
   Brundtland G., 1987, Med.: Confl. Surviv
   Castells-Quintana D, 2020, J DEV STUD, V56, P1663, DOI 10.1080/00220388.2019.1702160
   Chrysoulakis N, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V112, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.005
   Corporation for Digital Scholarship, 2024, Zotero Version 6.0.26
   D'Lima M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.017
   Dlng CR, 2022, CHIN J URBAN ENV STU, V10, DOI 10.1142/S2345748122500051
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   ESRI, 2024, ArcGIS Pro version 3.3.1
   Folberth GA, 2015, ENVIRON POLLUT, V203, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.004
   GADM-TENA, 2021, Global Administrative Areas, Angola: Global Administrative Areas
   Coelho LMG, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V128, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.026
   Guo S, 2015, APPL ENERG, V158, P390, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.082
   Haddad EA, 2015, HABITAT INT, V45, P106, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.023
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huang HW, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V51, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.044
   Janousková S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051540
   Jia Xy, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.457
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Jones T., 1996, Local Environ, V1, P87, DOI [10.1080/13549839608725482, DOI 10.1080/13549839608725482]
   Kennedy CA, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P5985, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1504315112
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Lee H., 2023, CORE WRITING TEAM, DOI DOI 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
   Li WW, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120453
   Lu QC, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V117, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.015
   Mayer AL, 2008, ENVIRON INT, V34, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2007.09.004
   McEwan S, 2024, Rise of New Megacities Will Drive Global Urban Growth
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meixler MS, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V24, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.009
   Microsoft Corporation, 2024, Excel | Microsoft 365
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Molina MJ, 2004, J AIR WASTE MANAGE, V54, P644, DOI 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470936
   Page MJ, 2021, SYST REV-LONDON, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
   Parrish DD, 2009, SCIENCE, V326, P674, DOI 10.1126/science.1176064
   Priem J, 2022, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2205.01833, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2205.01833, 10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833]
   Reza B, 2011, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V25, P2053, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.041
   Roberts PD, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V132, P409, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.034
   Roy M, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.022
   Rustiadi E, 2021, CITIES, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103000
   Shaker RR, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12030997
   Shaker RR, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P972, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.389
   Shaker RR, 2016, HABITAT INT, V55, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.03.005
   Shaker RR, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108227
   Shaker RR, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.01.050
   Shaker RR, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V63, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.009
   Shatkin G, 2019, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V43, P208, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12758
   Singh RK, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V15, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007
   Singh V, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141461
   Sueyoshi T, 2015, ENERG ECON, V49, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.024
   Tan S, 2017, APPL ENERG, V185, P1919, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.041
   Torrico JC, 2010, AN ACAD BRAS CIENC, V82, P1095, DOI 10.1590/S0001-37652010000400027
   Ul Moazzam MF, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105095
   UN, 2019, DEP EC SOCIAL AFFAIR
   UN, 1992, Agenda 21, P351
   UN Habitat, 2022, World Cities Report
   UN-Habitat, 2019, Annual Report 2018Urban Resilience Programme
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019, Highlights
   van Eck N.J., 2023, VOSviewer ManualVersion 1.6.20, P55
   van Eck N.J., 2023, VOSviewerVisualizing Scientific Landscapes Version 1.6.20
   Voogt JA, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P370, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00079-8
   Wang YW, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V888, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164142
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Wilson J, 2007, ECOL INDIC, V7, P299, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.02.009
   World Bank Group, 2024, Urban PopulationWorld Bank Staff Estimates Based on the United Nations Population Divisions World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision
   Yin K, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V36, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.003
   Zhang DM, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V106, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhao PJ, 2019, CITIES, V92, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.022
   Zhao SX, 2017, WORLD DEV, V98, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.038
NR 79
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 47
U2 54
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 18
AR 8076
DI 10.3390/su16188076
PG 27
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA H4N7K
UT WOS:001323230500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Abdul, L
   Yu, TF
   Mangi, MY
AF Abdul, Latif
   Yu, Taofang
   Mangi, Muhammad Yousuf
TI Climate change and urban vulnerabilities: analysing flood and drought
   resilience of Islamabad
SO LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Islamabad; climate change; resilient urbanism; flood; drought
AB Climate change has significantly altered the precipitation rates in Pakistan. Its capital Islamabad, once a dynamic, futuristic, and resilient city, faces floods during monsoon and chronic water scarcity during summer. Using empirical data and mixed research methods, this paper has analysed the flood and drought resilience of the city and its inhabitants. The study has established the notion that the city and its residents have partial coping capacity to heavier rainfalls which, if left unattended, may lead to serious economic and physical losses in the future. Moreover, the residents also suffer from acute water scarcity during summer, confirming the fact that the city no longer ensures sufficient water supply to all of its residents. Based on the research findings and suggestions received from various stakeholders such as the residents, key-informants, and city management; this paper has highlighted the strengths in city resilience and also identified the gaps, which warrant immediate attention.
C1 [Abdul, Latif; Yu, Taofang] Tsinghua Univ, Urban Planning Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Mangi, Muhammad Yousuf] Mehran Univ Engn & Technol, City & Reg Planning Dept, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.
C3 Tsinghua University; Mehran University Engineering & Technology
RP Abdul, L (corresponding author), Tsinghua Univ, Urban Planning Dept, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM marilatif@yahoo.com
CR ADB, 2014, A Synopsis, P28
   Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Albers M, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P1598, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.722961
   [Anonymous], 2014, City Resilience Index: Understanding and Measuring City Resilience
   Arup, 2015, City Resilience Framework, P24
   Atkinson R., 2001, SOC RES UPDATE, V33, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1442-2018.2010.00541.X
   Berz G, 2000, P I CIVIL ENG-WATER, V142, P3, DOI 10.1680/wame.2000.142.1.3
   BIERNACKI P, 1981, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V10, P141, DOI 10.1177/004912418101000205
   Botka Dusan., 1995, Ekistics, V373-75, P209
   Butt A, 2015, EGYPT J REMOTE SENS, V18, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrs.2015.07.003
   Corbetta P., 2003, SOCIAL RES THEORY ME
   Dieleman H, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.027
   EM-CRED, 2017, Disaster Country Profiles
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Folke C, 2011, AMBIO, V40, P719, DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y
   Fylan F., 2005, A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology, P65
   Government of Pakistan, 2021, Updated Nationally Determined Contributions 2021
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hassan Z, 2016, SPRINGERPLUS, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2414-z
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jamshed I., 2018, Changes in Vulnerability and Response Capacities of Rural Communities After Extreme Events: Case of Major Floods of 2010 and 2014 in Pakistan
   Khan MA, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75, DOI 10.1007/s12665-015-5127-7
   Kreft S, 2016, Global Climate Risk Index, DOI 20.500.12592/1cp03c
   KREJCIE RV, 1970, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V30, P607, DOI 10.1177/001316447003000308
   Kvale Steinar., 2009, INTERVIEWS LEARNING
   Maria Sajida Iqbal., 2006, Planning of Islamabad and Rawalpindi: What Went Wrong?
   McKee T.B., 1993, P 8 C APPL CLIM, V17, P179
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mekonnen MM, 2016, SCI ADV, V2, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500323
   Molden David., 2000, International Water Management Institute (IWMI)
   Mortsch L. D., 2007, International Conference on Climate Change and Water, P351
   Mumtaz M, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127296
   NDMA, 2012, National Disaster Management Plan
   OECD, 2014, India Policy Brief
   Pazhuhan M, 2023, CLIM DEV, V15, P793, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2022.2161298
   Saeed Aamir., 2015, Rapid Groundwater Depletion Threatens Pakistan Food Security
   Saldaa J., 2014, The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, P581, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199811755.013.001, 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.001, 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199811755.001.0001]
   Sandelowski M, 2000, RES NURS HEALTH, V23, P246, DOI 10.1002/1098-240X(200006)23:3<246::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H
   Satterthwaite D, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.002
   Shah Attaullah, 2021, GeoJournal
   Shaheen N., 2015, Journal of Social Science
   Sheikh MM, 2009, Climate Profile and Past Climate Changes in Pakistan
   Than Ker, 2012, Livescience
   Thom H.C.S., 1958, Mon. Weather Rev., V86, P117, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1958)086andlt;0117:ANOTGDandgt;2.0.CO;2
   UN, 2018, Urban and Rural Population Proportion of Pakistan 1955-2050
   Wagenaar H., 2011, Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis, P241
   Walliman N., 2015, Social research methods: The essentials
   Wilhite D. A., 1995, Developing a Precipitation-Based Index to Assess Climatic Conditions Across Nebraska
   Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
NR 49
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 3
U2 3
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1354-9839
EI 1469-6711
J9 LOCAL ENVIRON
JI Local Environ.
PD 2025 FEB 28
PY 2025
DI 10.1080/13549839.2025.2472370
EA FEB 2025
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies;
   Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA Y7W0Q
UT WOS:001434166200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Asibey, MO
   Akakpo, E
   Kpeebi, Y
AF Asibey, Michael Osei
   Akakpo, Ebenezer
   Kpeebi, Yetimoni
TI Revisiting the garden city concept and urban green infrastructure
   discourse in sustainable city planning in sub-Saharan Africa
SO LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Review
DE Garden city; urban parks; sustainable city planning; sub-Saharan Africa;
   sustainability
ID SPACE; CITIES; GHANA; TOWN
AB Urban green infrastructure is critical for creating garden cities, promoting public health, environmental quality, and building resilience to climate change. While these spaces are increasingly recognised as valuable ecological and environmental assets, the state of urban green infrastructure in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) cities is concerning. Rapid urbanisation, weak enforcement of development controls, and informal settlements have reduced the availability of green infrastructure, which has implications on the sustainability of African cities. This paper provides a review of the state and challenges associated with urban green infrastructure in SSA, focusing on the loss of green spaces, urban planning challenges, and the need for policy and citizen action. Drawing on extensive literature (secondary data), the paper highlights the importance of integrating greeneries into the urban fabric of SSA cities to promote resilience to climate change and enhance environmental sustainability. It argues that concrete steps are needed at all levels of society - from policymakers to citizens - to ensure that SSA cities can regain their status as garden cities and promote a healthier, and more resilient ecological landscape.
C1 [Asibey, Michael Osei; Akakpo, Ebenezer] KNUST, Coll Art & Built Environm, Fac Built Environm, Dept Planning, Kumasi, Ghana.
   [Kpeebi, Yetimoni] Missouri State Univ, Dept Geog Geol & Planning, Springfield, MO USA.
C3 Kwame Nkrumah University Science & Technology; Missouri State University
RP Asibey, MO (corresponding author), KNUST, Coll Art & Built Environm, Fac Built Environm, Dept Planning, Kumasi, Ghana.
EM asibeymichael@yahoo.com
RI Kpeebi, Yetimoni/HNC-1064-2023; Asibey, Michael Osei/P-2396-2016
OI Asibey, Michael Osei/0000-0002-5534-2695
CR Aceves-Avila C. D., 2020, SUSTAINABLE CITIES C, P167, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95717-364, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-95717-364]
   Adjei CollinsMensah., 2014, AM J ENV PROTECTION, V3, P1, DOI [10.11648/j.ajep.20140301.11, https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajep.20140301.11, DOI 10.11648/J.AJEP.20140301.11]
   Adjei Mensah C, 2016, J URBAN REG ANAL, V8, P159
   Ahern J., 2007, CITIES FUTURE INTEGR, P267, DOI 10.2166/9781780405308
   Allen M., 2018, E-Planning and Collaboration: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, P256, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-5646-6.CH012
   Amoako C, 2019, AFR GEOGR REV, V38, P310, DOI 10.1080/19376812.2018.1436076
   [Anonymous], 2012, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering
   [Anonymous], 2009, Planning sustainable cities: global report on human settlements 2009, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315541389
   [Anonymous], 2015, The Guardian
   Arku G, 2016, LOCAL ENVIRON, V21, P1500, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2016.1140132
   Arku Godwin., 2009, Urban Forum, V20, P253, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-009-9047-z, DOI 10.1007/S12132-009-9047-Z, 10.1007/s12132-009-9047-z]
   Asibey MO, 2024, HABITAT INT, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103161
   Azadi H, 2011, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V54, P785, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2010.530513
   Azagew Sileshi, 2020, Environmental Systems Research, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40068-020-00187-0
   Batchelor P., 1969, J SOC ARCHIT HIST, V28, P184, DOI DOI 10.2307/988557
   Benedict M. A., 2002, Renewable Resources Journal, V20, P12
   BHATIA G, 1990, INDIAN ECON SOC HIST, V27, P248, DOI 10.1177/001946469002700208
   Bigon L, 2013, PLAN PERSPECT, V28, P477, DOI 10.1080/02665433.2013.800716
   Bodo T., 2019, Geogr. Res., V2, P32, DOI [10.22259/2642-9136.0203005, DOI 10.22259/2642-9136.0203005]
   Brinkhoff T., 2020, GHANA REGIONS MAJOR
   Bryant, 2018, JVENES CIENCIA, V1, P2785
   Camara G, 2022, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V88, P281, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2021.1987803
   Chen YY, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11060776
   Cilliers SS, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P294, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.01.011
   Cobbinah PB, 2017, GEOJOURNAL, V82, P1229, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9750-y
   Cobbinah PatrickBrandful., 2016, Urban Forum, V27, P149, DOI [10.1007/s12132-016-9274-z, DOI 10.1007/S12132-016-9274-Z]
   Combrinck Z, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9070235
   Cooney T., 1987, The History Teacher, V20, DOI [DOI 10.2307/493138, 10.2307/493138]
   Darkwah R. M., 2014, Int. J. Environ. Ecol. Geol. Min. Eng, V8, P676
   Dipeolu AA, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103378
   Dipeolu AA, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126931
   Duku E, 2023, GEO-GEOGR ENVIRON, V10, DOI 10.1002/geo2.119
   Eigenbrod F, 2011, P ROY SOC B-BIOL SCI, V278, P3201, DOI 10.1098/rspb.2010.2754
   Enete I. C., 2012, Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, V5, P484
   Eyita-Okon E, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.917764
   Gagakuma D., 2022, SSRN ELECT J, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4168414, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4168414]
   Sánchez FG, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V79, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.010
   Gataric Dragica., 2019, Zbornik radova-Geografski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, P33, DOI [10.5937/zrgfub1901033G, DOI 10.5937/ZRGFUB1901033G]
   Girma Y, 2019, REMOTE SENS APPL, V13, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.10.019
   Guma P., 2020, RETHINKING SMART URB, DOI [10.33540/497, DOI 10.33540/497]
   Haruna AI, 2018, COGENT SOC SCI, V4, P1, DOI 10.1080/23311886.2018.1478492
   Jabbar M, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P4405, DOI 10.1007/s10708-021-10474-7
   Kitonga D. M., 2017, STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
   Lewis J, 2015, PLAN PERSPECT, V30, P153, DOI 10.1080/02665433.2014.971127
   Maganga M., 2022, Ecological control and the garden city: Utopia for whom?
   Makworo M, 2011, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V54, P1107, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2010.549631
   Martin R, 2012, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V36, P179, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01091.x
   McConnachie M. Matthew, 2008, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V7, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.12.003
   Mensah Adjei., 2017, Urban Forum, V28, P125, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12132-016-9295-7
   Mensah C. A., 2014, INT J ECOSYST, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.5923/j.ije.20140401.01
   Morris A. E. J., 1994, History of Urban Form Before the Industrial Revolution, DOI [10.4324/9781315841199, DOI 10.4324/9781315841199]
   Mpofu T.P.Z., 2013, Research Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Management, V2, P105
   Nor ANM, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132112024
   Nabila N., 2021, Southeast University Journal of Architecture, V1, P1
   Narh SN, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126819
   National Parks Board, 2021, MISSION HIST WHO WE
   Oduro-Ofori E., 2014, PROMOTING GREEN INFR, V4, P110
   Oduwaye L., 2013, P REAL CORP 2013 ROM, V4, P1193
   Okpala D., 2009, Regional Overview of the Status of Urban Planning and Planning Practice in Anglophone (Sub-Saharan) African Countries
   Okyere EAB, 2024, CITIES, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105177
   Onyekwelu JC., 2011, J BIODIVERS ECOL SCI, V1, P77
   Pauleit S., 2021, URBAN GREEN INFRASTR, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-67650-65, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-67650-65]
   Pauleit S, 2011, URBAN ECOLOGY: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND APPLICATIONS, P272
   Quagraine VictorK., 2011, Future of the tree: Towards growth and development of Kumasi, P212
   Rahaman S, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P6481, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00882-z
   Randolph GF, 2023, URBAN STUD, V60, P3, DOI 10.1177/00420980211067926
   Saporiti N., 2006, PUBLIC POLICY   0604
   Seth A.-O., 2023, J. Afr. Stud. Dev, V15, P46, DOI [10.5897/JASD2023.0682, DOI 10.5897/JASD2023.0682]
   Silva C. N., 2019, ROUTLEDGE HDB URBAN, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351271844, DOI 10.4324/9781351271844]
   Smith D., 2020, STATE MIDDLE E, V1, P120, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315065977-35, DOI 10.4324/9781315065977-35]
   Strohbach MW, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.013
   Tibesigwa B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102853
   Turok I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P749, DOI 10.1068/a4697
   UN, 2022, DEP EC SOCIAL AFFAIR, VJuly 2022, P11
   UNEP, 2021, GREEN GROWTH SUSTAIN
   Ward S., 2005, The garden city: Past, present and future: Routledge, DOI [10.4324/9780203973615, DOI 10.4324/9780203973615]
   Willemse L, 2018, GEOJOURNAL, V83, P915, DOI 10.1007/s10708-017-9809-4
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Zakka SD, 2017, INT J BUILT ENV SUST, V4, P180, DOI 10.11113/ijbes.v4.n3.211
NR 79
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 9
U2 13
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1354-9839
EI 1469-6711
J9 LOCAL ENVIRON
JI Local Environ.
PD DEC 1
PY 2024
VL 29
IS 12
BP 1538
EP 1552
DI 10.1080/13549839.2024.2386966
EA SEP 2024
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Studies;
   Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology;
   Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA N5B8F
UT WOS:001303783100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU García-Blanco, G
   Navarro, D
   Feliu, E
AF Garcia-Blanco, Gemma
   Navarro, Daniel
   Feliu, Efren
TI Adopting Resilience Thinking through Nature-Based Solutions within Urban
   Planning: A Case Study in the City of Valencia
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; climate change; risk; adaptative planning; nature-based
   solutions
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; COMFORT; STRESS
AB The paper exposes the experience of Valencia in applying climate-resilient thinking to the current revision of the city's General Urban Development Plan. A semi-quantitative, indicator-based risk assessment of heat stress was carried out on the 23 functional areas of the city sectorized by the Plan, including modeling and spatial analysis exercises. A data model of 18 indicators was built to characterize vulnerability. A thermal stress map was developed using the URbCLim model and a heat index was then calculated using Copernicus hourly data (air temperature, humidity, and wind speed) for the period of January 2008-December 2017 at a spatial resolution of 100 m x 100 m. General recommendations at the city level as well as guidelines for development planning in the functional areas at risk are provided, with specifications for the deployment of nature-based solutions as adaptation measures. From a planning perspective, the study positively informs the General Urban Development Plan, the City Green and Biodiversity Plan, and contributes to City Urban Strategy 2030 and City Missions 2030 for climate adaptation and neutrality. Applying the same approach to other climate change-related hazards (i.e., water scarcity, pluvial flooding, sea level rise) will allow better informed decisions towards resilient urban planning.
C1 [Garcia-Blanco, Gemma; Navarro, Daniel; Feliu, Efren] Fdn TECNALIA Res & Innovat, Derio 48160, Spain.
RP Feliu, E (corresponding author), Fdn TECNALIA Res & Innovat, Derio 48160, Spain.
EM gemma.garcia@tecnalia.com; daniel.navarro@tecnalia.com;
   efren.feliu@tecnalia.com
OI Garcia Blanco, Gemma/0000-0002-7835-4373; Navarro,
   Daniel/0000-0002-0705-586X
FU GrowGreen Project, under the European Union [730283]; H2020 Societal
   Challenges Programme [730283] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges
   Programme
FX This research was funded by the GrowGreen Project, under the European
   Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement
   number 730283).
CR Al Sayah MJ, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101229
   [Anonymous], BOEA201511723
   [Anonymous], 2021, JEFATURA ESTADO LEY, P62009
   Ayuntamiento de Valencia, 2018, PLAN ESP DIR CAL URB
   Ayuntamiento de Valencia, 2020, URB ESTR VAL 2030
   Barker A., 2021, Nature-Based Solutions for More Sustainable CitiesA Framework Approach for Planning and Evaluation, P97, DOI [10.1108/978-1-80043-636-720211008, DOI 10.1108/978-1-80043-636-720211008]
   Barros VR, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1133
   Blazejczyk K, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P515, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0453-2
   Coccolo S, 2016, URBAN CLIM, V18, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.08.004
   Comission of the European Parliament,, 2021, COMM COMM EUR PARL C
   De Ridder K, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V12, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.01.001
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Desa U. N., 2019, World population prospects 2019: Highlights
   Europakommisjonen, 2022, 2022 STATE UNION ADD
   European Commission, EUR CLIM LAW
   European Commission, 2021, Evaluating the Impact of Nature-Based Solutions: A Handbook for Practitioners, DOI [10.2777/244577, DOI 10.2777/244577]
   European Environment Agency, HEAT COLD EXTR HEAT
   Faivre N, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032
   Feliu E., 2015, GUIA ELABORACION PLA
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Fritz M, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P159, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_10
   Gherri B, 2021, HERITAGE-BASEL, V4, P4286, DOI 10.3390/heritage4040236
   Iungman T, 2023, LANCET, V401, P577, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02585-5
   Keramitsoglou I, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V34, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.006
   Lafortezza R, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V172, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.063
   Ley de Cambio Climatico y Transicion, LEY CAMBIO CLIMATICO
   Liu Y, 2014, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V11, P2583, DOI 10.5194/bg-11-2583-2014
   Mayor B, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13137413
   Missions Valencia, MISSIONS VALENCIA 20
   Nardo M., 2005, OECD Statistics Working Papers 2005/03 Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide, DOI DOI 10.1787/533411815016
   Nazarian N, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2022EF002682
   Reid CE, 2012, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V120, P715, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1103766
   Rothfusz L.P., 1990, 9023 NAT OC ATM ADM
   Sanusi R, 2020, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P545, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-37425-9_28
   Sturiale L, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7100119
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Tapia C, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V78, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.040
   Tyrväinen L, 2014, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V38, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005
   UNDRR, 2012, MAK CIT MOR RES HDB, P102
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   Valone TF., 2021, J GEOSCI ENV PROT, V9, P84, DOI DOI 10.4236/GEP.2021.93007
   World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2016, Urban green spaces and health
NR 42
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 7
U2 32
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD MAY 18
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 5
AR 1317
DI 10.3390/buildings13051317
PG 20
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA H8GF7
UT WOS:000998274500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tang, QY
   Wang, T
   Liu, BS
AF Tang, Qingyun
   Wang, Tao
   Liu, Bingsheng
TI Factors influencing urban socioeconomic resilience after the withdrawal
   of nonpharmaceutical interventions: Evidence from intra-city travel
   intensity in China
SO JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Intracity travel intensity; Urban socioeconomic resilience; COVID-19;
   Public health events; Nonpharmaceutical interventions
ID COVID-19; MOBILITY; ASSOCIATIONS; FRAMEWORK; RECOVERY; BEHAVIOR; ENHANCE
AB The ramifications for the withdrawal of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), which are widely implemented worldwide to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in different cities, remain inadequately understood. Therefore, we quantified socioeconomic resilience following the withdrawal of the zero-COVID policy by examining the reduction and recovery of daily intracity travel intensity in 259 Chinese cities. We then established ordinary least squares (OLS) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models of resilience associated with urban social, economic, and environmental characteristics. The results revealed that most cities recovered from the shock within a month, and significant spatial variations in urban socioeconomic resilience. Well-developed cities in terms of GDP per capita and the share of service sectors, and those with inadequate healthcare resources and high population aging, were less resilient. In addition, higher population densities and colder climates exacerbated urban socioeconomic downturns, whereas higher road densities accelerated urban socioeconomic recovery. Furthermore, the impact of GDP per capita and the service sector share on resilience was most pronounced in major urban agglomerations and southeastern regions, while the impact of population aging and temperature was greatest in northeastern regions, and population density and healthcare resources were most influential in western and central regions. These findings suggest that the well-timed withdrawal of NPIs is secure as the pandemic evolves, but has to be mindfully managed in different cities based on their specific characteristics.
C1 [Tang, Qingyun; Wang, Tao] Chongqing Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Bingsheng] Hebei Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Tianjin 300401, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing University; Hebei University of Technology
RP Wang, T (corresponding author), 174 Shazheng St, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China.
EM wangtaothu@163.com
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72474038, 72074034];
   Chongqing Graduate Student Research Innovation Project [CYB240001]; Key
   Projects of Philos-ophy and Social Sciences Research, Ministry of
   Education of China [21JZD029]; Key Projects of Social Sciences and
   Planning Research of Chongqing [2024CXZD23]; Chongqing Talents Program
   [CQYC202105082]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
   of China [2024CDJSKPT02, 2022CDJSKPT31-01]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (No. 72474038, No. 72074034) , Chongqing Graduate Student Research
   Innovation Project (No. CYB240001) , Key Projects of Philos-ophy and
   Social Sciences Research, Ministry of Education of China (No. 21JZD029)
   , Key Projects of Social Sciences and Planning Research of Chongqing
   (No. 2024CXZD23) , Chongqing Talents Program (No. CQYC202105082) , and
   the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
   (No. 2024CDJSKPT02, No. 2022CDJSKPT31-01) .
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Amuedo-Dorantes C, 2021, J POPUL ECON, V34, P1445, DOI 10.1007/s00148-021-00845-2
   Arsiso BK, 2023, J AFR EARTH SCI, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2023.105047
   BBC, 2021, Covid: How is Europe lifting lockdown restrictions?
   Bloise F, 2021, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V56, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.01.001
   Bonaccorsi G, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P15530, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007658117
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Bozza A, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P136, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2016.1244538
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Brunsdon C, 1996, GEOGR ANAL, V28, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Castaldo M, 2021, EPJ DATA SCI, V10, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00262-1
   Chang S, 2021, NATURE, V589, P82, DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2923-3
   Charlton M., 2009, Geographically Weighted Regression White Paper, P1
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chen KQ, 2024, MAR POLICY, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106178
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Cheng T, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104389
   Cheng YR, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104028
   Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2023, Epidemic situation of novel coronavirus infection in China
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   CNN&#x0027s Beijing Bureau, 2023, China says 80% of population have had Covid-19, as millions travel for Lunar New Year
   Copeland S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101799
   Ding HX, 2021, TRANSPORT POLICY, V110, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.014
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   Erkus EC, 2021, EUR J OPER RES, V291, P560, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.014
   Fang D, 2023, J ECON GEOGR, V23, P1345, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbad022
   Fang D, 2022, RES TRANSP ECON, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2022.101185
   Fu HY, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104385
   Gautam R, 2024, J EARTH SYST SCI, V133, DOI 10.1007/s12040-024-02346-8
   Ge Y, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-30897-1
   Gong HW, 2020, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V111, P497, DOI 10.1111/tesg.12447
   GRUBBS FE, 1969, TECHNOMETRICS, V11, P1, DOI 10.2307/1266761
   Her PH, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-10941-2
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Ji YP, 2020, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V8, pE480, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30068-1
   Jiang HX, 2023, J URBAN TECHNOL, V30, P71, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2023.2255122
   Kumar S, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101141
   Lak A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103034
   Lau JTF, 2024, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1286596
   Levin R, 2021, NAT COMPUT SCI, V1, P588, DOI 10.1038/s43588-021-00125-9
   Li SD, 2024, J TRANSP GEOGR, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103886
   Li SJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102752
   Li Y, 2021, LANCET INFECT DIS, V21, P193, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4
   Liu JT, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V726, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138513
   Liu JX, 2024, CITIES, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104827
   Liu J, 2022, CHINA CDC WEEKLY, V4, P74, DOI 10.46234/ccdcw2022.015
   Liu K, 2020, J INFECTION, V80, pE14, DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.005
   Liu XY, 2023, CITIES, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104104
   Liu YX, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104314
   Liu YX, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103206
   Liu YH, 2021, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V3, pE349, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00059-5
   Long JA, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101710
   Lu QB, 2020, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V25, P17, DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.40.2000250
   Luo W, 2023, HEALTH PLACE, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103000
   Man W, 2021, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-11032-z
   Mancini A., 2012, INT J LATEST TRENDS, V2, P190
   Martin R., 2020, Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience, DOI 10.4337/9781785360862.00007
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nicola M, 2020, INT J SURG, V78, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018
   O'Sullivan D, 2003, GEOGR ANAL, V35, P272, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2003.tb01114.x
   Pan Y, 2023, LANCET, V401, P664, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00129-0
   Popovic M, 2023, MICROB RISK ANAL, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.mran.2023.100249
   Pudelko F, 2018, REV REG RES, V38, P141, DOI 10.1007/s10037-018-0124-4
   Pullano G, 2020, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V2, pE638, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30243-0
   Qiu Y, 2020, J POPUL ECON, V33, P1127, DOI [10.1007/s00148-020-00778-2, 10.1101/2020.03.13.20035238]
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Saikia P, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103497
   Saja AMA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096
   Schläpfer M, 2021, NATURE, V593, P522, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03480-9
   Smith TP, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2019284118
   Tu WJ, 2023, LANCET REG HEALTH-W, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100689
   Tuysuz S, 2022, ASIA-PAC J REG SCI, V6, P1133, DOI 10.1007/s41685-022-00255-6
   Wang J, 2024, APPL GEOGR, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103302
   Wang JE, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1038/s42949-022-00061-1
   Wang MS, 2017, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000400
   Wang XL, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-98259-3
   Wang YL, 2022, INT J INTELL SYST, V37, P9339, DOI 10.1002/int.22995
   Wu WH, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V436, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140678
   Xinhua, 2022, Xinhua
   Xu C, 2023, NAT MED, DOI 10.1038/s41591-022-02177-4
   Xu G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103485
   Yan JL, 2024, CITIES, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105259
   Yang LJ, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V13, P125, DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00393-7
   Yang M, 2021, J HOSP TOUR MANAG, V47, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.03.014
   Yang TH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103643
   Yang XD, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105270
   Yao T, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P6099, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01694-5
   Zhang JM, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265
   Zhang JJ, 2021, SCI ADV, V7, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.abe2584
   Zhang XW, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101402
   Zhao S.X.B., 2023, Comparative Studies on Pandemic Control Policies and the Resilience of Society, P53
   Zheng LW, 2023, EMERG MICROBES INFEC, V12, DOI 10.1080/22221751.2023.2191738
   Zhou XB, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104357
NR 101
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0966-6923
EI 1873-1236
J9 J TRANSP GEOGR
JI J. Transp. Geogr.
PD APR
PY 2025
VL 124
AR 104172
DI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104172
EA APR 2025
PG 15
WC Economics; Geography; Transportation
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Geography; Transportation
GA 0DL4Q
UT WOS:001444746500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Aziz, KMA
   Daoud, AO
   Singh, AK
   Alhusban, M
AF Aziz, Khaled Mahmoud Abdel
   Daoud, Ahmed Osama
   Singh, Atul Kumar
   Alhusban, Mohammad
TI Integrating digital mapping technologies in urban development: Advancing
   sustainable and resilient infrastructure for SDG 9 achievement - a
   systematic review
SO ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL
LA English
DT Review
DE Sustainable development goals; Digital transformation/data; Resilient
   infrastructure; Sustainable industrialisation and smart cities;
   Fostering innovation; Urban climate resilience
ID SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; INNOVATION; COUNTRIES;
   INDUSTRY; GREEN
AB The UN Agenda 2030 recognised the critical role of urban areas as cultural, economic, and social life centres that can simultaneously address different sustainability goals and provide quick and more practical responses to associated problems. Goal 9 aimed to build resilient infrastructure, enhance sustainable and inclusive industrialisation and increase innovation, as stated by the UN. This review demonstrates our novel effort toward increasing understanding of the existing literature concerning integrating digital mapping technologies in urban development: advancing sustainable and resilient infrastructure for SDG 9 achievement. The review employed a systematic approach to literature search and selection. Results showed that SDGs' Resilient Infrastructure constituted 13.2 %, Sustainable Industrialisation/Smart Cities (30.2 %), Fostering Innovation (13.2 %), ICT (3.8 %), Digital Data (5.7 %), Urban/Climate Resilience (5.7 %), and other aspects of SDG 9 accounted for 28.3 %. SDGs were not addressed by the studies relating to SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 9 (Infrastructure, Industry, and Innovation), SDG 12 (Responsible production and consumption), SDG 14 (life beneath water), and SDG 17 (Goals for partnership). A comparative dearth of research was also reported from low and middle-income nations. The study further indicated a lack of reliable data on SDG 9; finding what existed was challenging. These comprise economic shifts to viable urban design patterns, including smart cities, consumption and production, effective governance, and renewed international means and partnerships of SDG implementation. Another set of challenges comprised a dearth of economic and social inclusion, extensive regional variations and rural-urban gaps, and gender inequality among women and men. Lastly, this study proposed a conceptual framework for implementing SDG 9. The study inferred that digital transformation (DT) improves SDG 9 attainment. However, it might be mediated by the e-governance/brilliant city performance and stakeholder commitment level.
C1 [Aziz, Khaled Mahmoud Abdel] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn Al Kharj, Dept Civil Engn, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
   [Aziz, Khaled Mahmoud Abdel] Benha Univ, Fac Engn Shoubra, Geomat Engn Dept, Cairo, Egypt.
   [Daoud, Ahmed Osama] British Univ Egypt BUE, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Cairo 11837, Egypt.
   [Singh, Atul Kumar] Dayananda Sagar Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Bengaluru 560111, Karnataka, India.
   [Alhusban, Mohammad] Middle East Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Amman 3626, Jordan.
C3 Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB);
   Benha University; Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB); British University in
   Egypt; Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering
RP Aziz, KMA (corresponding author), Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Engn Al Kharj, Dept Civil Engn, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.
EM KHALED.MAHMOUD@feng.bu.edu.eg
RI Daoud, Ahmed/AAL-5111-2020; Abdel Aziz, Khaled/LCD-2388-2024; Alhusban,
   Mohammad/AAC-8300-2022; Singh, Atul Kumar/GYU-6499-2022
OI Daoud, Ahmed Osama/0000-0001-7032-4690
FU Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (PSAU)
   [PSAU-2023-SDG-2023/SDG/09]
FX This project is sponsored by Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
   (PSAU) as part of funding for its SDG Roadmap Research Funding Programme
   project number PSAU-2023-SDG-2023/SDG/09.
CR Abdulhamid N.A., 2020, Disruptive Technologies, Innovation and Development in Africa, P187
   Abubakar IR, 2020, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V22, P5129, DOI 10.1007/s10668-019-00417-1
   Alvarez-Risco A., 2020, Building Sustainable Cities: Social, Economic and Environmental Factors, P313
   Anand N., 2021, J. Sci. Policy Gov., V18, P1
   Andrade L, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V236, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.104
   Angel S., 2010, PLANET CITIES URBAN
   Argyroudis SA, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100387
   Azevedo SG, 2012, IEEE T ENG MANAGE, V59, P753, DOI 10.1109/TEM.2012.2189108
   Baffoe G, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P1341, DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-00929-8
   Bajpai N., 2021, ICT India Working Paper
   Bibri SE, 2021, EUR J FUTURES RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4
   Bibri SE, 2019, J BIG DATA-GER, V6, DOI 10.1186/s40537-019-0182-7
   Blasi S, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103793
   Brodny J, 2023, OECON COPERNIC, V14, P47, DOI 10.24136/oc.2023.002
   Chamberlain M, 2023, SPORTS ENG, V26, DOI 10.1007/s12283-022-00394-1
   Clement J, 2023, ECOL ECON, V213, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107941
   Cuthbert A. R., 2007, URBAN DES INT, V12, P177, DOI [DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.UDI.9000200, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200, 10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200]
   Eisenmenger N, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P1101, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00813-x
   ElMassah S, 2020, ECOL ECON, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490
   Fukui H, 2021, BIG EARTH DATA, V5, P476, DOI 10.1080/20964471.2021.1948677
   Gautam M., 2021, Carbon Footprint Case Studies, P123, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-9577-6_5
   Gold S, 2013, INT BUS REV, V22, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.12.006
   Güneralp B, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P8945, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1606035114
   Trinh HH, 2023, APPL ECON, V55, P4108, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2022.2125493
   Henze J., 2016, 12th European International Farming Systems Association (IFSA) Symposium, Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways, 12-15 July 2016, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, UK, P1
   Immler NL, 2022, INT J HUM RIGHTS, V26, P262, DOI 10.1080/13642987.2021.1913411
   Kakar A, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P2753, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10661-y
   Kinelski G, 2022, ENERGIES, V15, DOI 10.3390/en15092980
   Kosciejew M, 2020, IFLA J-INT FED LIBR, V46, P328, DOI 10.1177/0340035219898708
   Kundu D., 2020, Developing National Urban Policies: Ways Forward to Green and Smart Cities, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-3738-7_2
   Kutty AA, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P1347, DOI 10.1002/sd.2088
   Leal W, 2022, ENVIRON SCI EUR, V34, DOI 10.1186/s12302-022-00629-9
   Leavesley A, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1416, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01714-2
   Lekan A, 2022, INT J CONSTR MANAG, V22, P2647, DOI 10.1080/15623599.2020.1819522
   Liang X, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V31, P2009, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-31155-7
   Mabkhot MM, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052560
   Macatulad E, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104310
   Mawere J., 2024, CONTRIBUTIONS AFRICA
   Mejia-Dugand S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12176778
   Mishra R.K., 2022, Smart Cities Sustain. Dev., P1, DOI [10.1007/978-981-16-7410-51, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-7410-51]
   Moallemi EA, 2020, ONE EARTH, V3, P300, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.006
   Mokgohloa K, 2022, S AFR J IND ENG, V33, P10, DOI 10.7166/33-4-2592
   Mondejar ME, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V794, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539
   Nhamo G, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV GOAL SER, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-33216-7_1
   Nyaaba AA, 2021, TECHNOL SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101624
   Papadopoulou C.-A., 2021, Smart Cities and the UN SDGs, P45
   Pigola A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132413669
   de Oliveira JAP, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V362, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132355
   Raihan A., 2023, INNOVATION GREEN DEV, V2, P100085, DOI [10.1016/j.igd.2023.100085, DOI 10.1016/J.IGD.2023.100085]
   Satterthwaite D, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P545, DOI 10.1177/0956247809344361
   Schmidt S, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114696
   Song YZ, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13081528
   Sun LQ, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-19158-1
   Tate C, 2024, CITIES, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104706
   Tcholtchev N, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P156, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010009
   Tiwari G, 2021, IATSS RES, V45, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.02.001
   van der Hoogen A, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16031320
   Velazquez L., 2021, SDG9-Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, P61
   Verdejo A, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103559
   Wali S. U., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V884, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/884/1/012030
   Wiktor-Mach D, 2020, INT J CULT POLICY, V26, P312, DOI 10.1080/10286632.2018.1534841
   Young C., 2015, INV GROWTH UND VAL G
NR 62
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 11
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1110-0168
EI 2090-2670
J9 ALEX ENG J
JI Alex. Eng. J.
PD MAR
PY 2025
VL 116
BP 512
EP 524
DI 10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.078
EA JAN 2025
PG 13
WC Engineering, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA T8Y5H
UT WOS:001407794600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Vieira, LC
   Serrao-Neumann, S
   Howes, M
   Mackey, B
AF Vieira, Leticia Canal
   Serrao-Neumann, Silvia
   Howes, Michael
   Mackey, Brendan
TI Unpacking components of sustainable and resilient urban food systems
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Review
DE Sustainable development; Climate change; Urban food strategies; Urban
   and regional planning; Urban resilience
ID FOODSCAPE; CITIES; AGRICULTURE; STRATEGIES.; SECURITY; WORLD
AB Urban food systems are connected with several pressing issues, including urban population growth, resource scarcity, and climate change. To cope within these issues, urban food systems need to become more sustainable in their practices, as well as resilient in the face of extreme weather events. While scholars have started to investigate this topic, no comprehensive analysis has yet addressed what entails sustainable and resilient urban food systems. Through a systematic review of the literature, this paper aims to improve our understanding of the key components of sustainable and resilient urban food systems. This study reviewed 53 publications and identified components related to the health, social, economy, environment, and governance domains. Only 5 of the works included in the review discussed sustainability and resilience to the impacts of climate change in urban food systems simultaneously, so there is an opportunity for original research and analysis. The most frequently identified components of urban food systems relate to: access to healthy food; connectivity between urban and rural areas; having a strong local food economy and food production; reducing food waste; and, having active participation of all actors in decision making. There is some level of consensus on linking sustainability and resilience, but diversity in food sources and the development of social capabilities need to be emphasised for climate change adaptation. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Vieira, Leticia Canal; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia] Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, Nathan Campus,170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
   [Serrao-Neumann, Silvia] Univ Waikato, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Private Bag 3150, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
   [Howes, Michael] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Cities Res Inst, Gold Coast Campus,Parklands Dr, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.
   [Mackey, Brendan] Griffith Univ, Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Gold Coast Campus,Parklands Dr, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.
C3 Griffith University; University of Waikato; Griffith University;
   Griffith University - Gold Coast Campus; Griffith University; Griffith
   University - Gold Coast Campus
RP Vieira, LC (corresponding author), Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, Nathan Campus,170 Kessels Rd, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.
EM leticia.canalvieira@griffithuni.edu.au; s.neumann@waikato.co.nz;
   m.howes@griffith.edu.au; b.mackey@griffith.edu.au
RI Howes, Michael/S-2804-2019; Serrao-Neumann, Silvia/K-2470-2012; Vieira,
   Letícia/Y-8700-2019; Mackey, Brendan/ABE-3805-2020
OI Mackey, Brendan/0000-0003-1996-4064; Canal Vieira,
   Leticia/0000-0001-5810-8565; Howes, Michael/0000-0003-1102-1483;
   Serrao-Neumann, Silvia/0000-0001-9601-4914
CR Anderson M.D., 2015, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, V5, P543, DOI [10.1007/s13412-015-0311-3, DOI 10.1007/S13412-015-0311-3]
   [Anonymous], 2010, IMAGINING SUSTAINABL
   [Anonymous], WHAT IS COLLECTIVE T
   [Anonymous], GEOGR J
   [Anonymous], IMAGINING SUSTAINABL
   [Anonymous], PLANN FOOD ACC COMM
   [Anonymous], NVIVO QUAL DAT AN SO
   [Anonymous], SAN FRANCISCO EXECUT
   [Anonymous], 2015, CREATING SPACE SUSTA
   [Anonymous], FOOD WORKS VIS IMPR
   [Anonymous], 2015, CITIES AGR DEV RESIL
   [Anonymous], CCIT LINK CIT URB AG
   [Anonymous], CULT FOOD CONN HLTH
   [Anonymous], IMAGINING SUSTAINABL
   [Anonymous], 2013, GOOD FOOD PLAN BRIST
   [Anonymous], 51 ISOCARP C 2015
   [Anonymous], LOCAL SUSTAINABILITY
   [Anonymous], REGIONAL FOOD SYSTEM
   [Anonymous], 1999, HUNGER PROOF CITIES
   [Anonymous], RESILIENCE OXF RES E
   [Anonymous], MAKING CASE MEASURIN
   [Anonymous], POLICY SUSTAINABLE D
   Bedore M, 2010, GEOGR COMPASS, V4, P1418, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00383.x
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Billen G, 2012, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V9, P607, DOI 10.5194/bg-9-607-2012
   Blay-Palmer Alison., 2010, IMAGINING SUSTAINABL
   BOTTIGLIERI M., 2016, Toward the Turin Food Policy. Good practices and visions
   Calori A, 2017, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V41, P1026, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2017.1340918
   Carey J, 2013, INT PLAN STUD, V18, P111, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2013.750938
   Carey R., 2016, Melbournes Food Future: Planning a Resilient City Foodbowl
   Chiffoleau Y, 2016, AGRICULTURE-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/agriculture6040057
   Cretella A, 2016, RES RURAL SOCIOL DEV, V23, P303, DOI 10.1108/S1057-192220160000023013
   Cretella A, 2016, CITIES, V51, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.12.001
   Desmarais AA, 2014, J PEASANT STUD, V41, P1153, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2013.876623
   Donovan J., 2011, Food-Sensitive Planning and Urban Design: A Conceptual Framework for Achieving a Sustainable and Healthy Food System
   Dowding-Smith E., 2013, Resilient Urban Food Systems Forum, P1
   Dubbeling M., 2016, City region food systems and food waste management: linking urban and rural areas for sustainable and resilient development
   Edwards F, 2010, LOCAL ENVIRON, V15, P153, DOI 10.1080/13549830903527662
   Ericksen PJ, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002
   Food Futures, 2007, FOOD STRAT MANCH
   Forssell S, 2015, AGR HUM VALUES, V32, P63, DOI 10.1007/s10460-014-9516-4
   Forster T., 2015, Strengthening urban rural linkages through city region food systems
   Galaitsi S., 2018, SEI Working Paper
   Garnett T, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V73, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.045
   Giddings B, 2002, SUSTAIN DEV, V10, P187, DOI 10.1002/sd.199
   Goldstein B, 2016, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V36, DOI 10.1007/s13593-015-0348-4
   Grewal SS, 2012, CITIES, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.003
   Hall G., 2014, Agriculture Food Security, V3, P6, DOI 10.1186/2048-7010-3-6
   Hanson LL, 2014, RES URBAN SOCIOL, V14, P191, DOI 10.1108/S1047-004220140000014009
   IPES-Food, 2015, NEW SCI SUST FOOD SY
   James S. W., 2015, Public Health Nutrition, V18, P2498, DOI 10.1017/S1368980015000610
   Jennings S., 2015, FOOD URBANISED WORLD
   Karg H, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121175
   Keck M, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P75, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.07
   Kirschenmann FL, 2008, J HUNGER ENVIRON NUT, V3, P106, DOI 10.1080/19320240802243134
   Lamine C, 2015, SOCIOL RURALIS, V55, P41, DOI 10.1111/soru.12061
   Larsen K., 2008, SUSTAINABLE SECURE F
   Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
   Longo P, 2016, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V8, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.005
   Lyons K., 2014, Dialogues in Human Geography, V4, P212, DOI DOI 10.1177/2043820614537163
   MacMahon A, 2015, J ENV STUDIES SCI, V53, P378, DOI 10.1007/s13412-015- 0278-0
   Mansfield B, 2013, INT PLAN STUD, V18, P37, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2013.750942
   Marsden T, 2014, EARTHSCAN FOOD AGRIC, P1
   Matacena R., 2016, International Review of Social Research, V6, P49, DOI DOI 10.1515/IRSR-2016-0007
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moragues-Faus A, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN A, V47, P1558, DOI 10.1177/0308518X15595754
   Morgan K, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1379, DOI 10.1177/0042098014534902
   Morgan K, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P209, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq007
   Ozor N, 2016, CLIM DEV, V8, P83, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.998605
   Pickering C, 2014, HIGH EDUC RES DEV, V33, P534, DOI 10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
   Prosperi Paolo., 2015, Measuring progress towards sustainable food cities: Sustainability and food security indicators
   Skordili S, 2013, INT PLAN STUD, V18, P129, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2013.770635
   Sonnino R., 2014, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, V21, P173
   Sonnino R, 2014, EARTHSCAN FOOD AGRIC, P186
   Sonnino R, 2009, INT PLAN STUD, V14, P425, DOI 10.1080/13563471003642795
   Tagtow A.M., 2011, CULTIVATING RESILIEN
   Toth A, 2016, URBAN ECOSYST, V19, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11252-015-0489-x
   Tranfield D, 2003, BRIT J MANAGE, V14, P207, DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   UN (United Nations), 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A/RES/70/1, DOI DOI 10.54648/ECTA2007029
   Wiskerke JSC, 2009, INT PLAN STUD, V14, P369, DOI 10.1080/13563471003642803
NR 80
TC 44
Z9 53
U1 7
U2 133
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD NOV 1
PY 2018
VL 200
BP 318
EP 330
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.283
PG 13
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA GU9ZI
UT WOS:000445715400028
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Iturriza, M
   Labaka, L
   Hernantes, J
   Abdelgawad, A
AF Iturriza, Marta
   Labaka, Leire
   Hernantes, Josune
   Abdelgawad, Ahmed
TI Shifting to climate change aware cities to facilitate the city
   resilience implementation
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; City resilience; Awareness-development process;
   Simulation tool; Pilot test
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSFORMATION; FLOODS
AB Climate change (CC) is one of the most urgent threats to modern societies, having direct and indirect consequences on the rapid growth of urban areas. Cities are attempting to both reduce their impact on the environment and build resilience to be able to face the irreversible effects of CC through plans and strategies. However, barriers, such as the fact that cities are complex systems and the uncertainty posed by CC have led to less engaged and committed city stakeholders, which have hampered the operationalisation of city resilience. In this context, developing city stakeholders awareness has been demonstrated to be an effective way to put an end to passive behaviour and help transform cities so they are more climate-resilient. Thus, we posit that developing city stakeholder awareness leads to more effective implementation of CC resilience-building plans. To that end, this paper presents a framework that defines the awareness-development process and combines it with an educational simulation tool that facilitates understanding of the theory presented in the framework. Finally, the paper presents a pilot test in the city of Kristiansand, Norway, to show the contribution of the simulation tool in improving city stakeholder awareness.
C1 [Iturriza, Marta; Labaka, Leire; Hernantes, Josune] Univ Navarra, TECNUN Escuela Ingn, Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 13, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
   [Abdelgawad, Ahmed] Univ Agder, Dept ICT, Kristiansand, Norway.
C3 University of Navarra; University of Agder
RP Iturriza, M (corresponding author), Univ Navarra, TECNUN Escuela Ingn, Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 13, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
EM miturriza@tecnun.es; llabaka@tecnun.es; jhernantes@tecnun.es;
   ahmedg@uia.no
RI Abdelgawad, Ahmed/I-4017-2019; Hernantes, Josune/C-9247-2017; Labaka,
   Leire/H-9744-2014
OI Hernantes, Josune/0000-0002-9307-9787; Labaka,
   Leire/0000-0002-1721-0624; ITURRIZA, MARTA/0000-0002-1645-7385;
   Aboughonim, Ahmed/0000-0002-1174-9151
FU Basque Government through the Predoctoral Researcher Training
   Scholarship Programme
FX The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by Basque
   Government through the Predoctoral Researcher Training Scholarship
   Programme for the 2018-2019 academic year.
CR [Anonymous], 2009, INTERDISCIPLINARY AS
   [Anonymous], EMERGENCE COMPLEXITY
   [Anonymous], 2015, A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   [Anonymous], 8 INT C BUILD RES C
   [Anonymous], DEL 1 3 SMART MAT RE
   [Anonymous], 135 SCI IND DYNAMICS
   [Anonymous], 2013, INT J DISASTER RESIL, DOI DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2012-0027
   [Anonymous], 2009, TERM DIS RISK RED
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Bakaki Z, 2017, ENVIRON POLIT, V26, P1, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2016.1244964
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bulkeley H, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P136, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   Burnside-Lawry J, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P4, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2013-0028
   Chappin EJL, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V156, P556, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.069
   Colloff MJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V68, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.007
   DALKEY N, 1969, FUTURES, V1, P408, DOI 10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
   Diamond IR, 2014, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V67, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Gimenez R, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.001
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Handayani W, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073
   Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Societ y (IHS), 2018, Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 o C, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
   Heinzlef C, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.003
   Henly-Shepard S, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V45, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.004
   Keenan JM, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V88, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.015
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Lieske DJ, 2014, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V140, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.04.017
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Ludin SM, 2017, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V26, P13, DOI 10.1108/DPM-08-2016-0177
   Luís S, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.015
   McDonald KS, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P60, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000990
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moglia M, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.009
   Morgan D. L., 1996, Focus groups as qualitative research, V16
   Orderud Geir Inge, 2011, International Journal of Environmental Studies, V68, P667, DOI 10.1080/00207233.2011.587648
   Poponi S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061584
   Rhodes E, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.001
   ROGERS RW, 1975, J PSYCHOL, V91, P93, DOI 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
   Saxena A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.001
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Sheppard SRJ, 2011, FUTURES, V43, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009
   Siriporananon S., 2018, KASETSART J SOCIAL S, V39, P269, DOI [10.1016/j.kjss.2018.01.005, DOI 10.1016/J.KJSS.2018.01.005]
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Toubin M, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Xie B, 2019, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101331
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
NR 47
TC 17
Z9 19
U1 6
U2 43
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 101
AR 102688
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102688
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA LN2VE
UT WOS:000532800700014
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, MY
   Xu, XZ
   Xiao, PQ
   Cao, YQ
AF Liu, Mingyang
   Xu, Xiangzhou
   Xiao, Peiqing
   Cao, Yongqiang
TI Advocating integration of human responses in the flood resilience
   framework for inland cities of northern China
SO WATER POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood risk; Inland cities of northern China; Policy recommendation;
   Practical strategy; Urban flood resilience
ID URBAN; MANAGEMENT
AB Frequent urban flooding poses a predominant challenge to resilience managers and the public in inland cities. Nevertheless, various facets of the formation, development, and response to inland flooding in developing countries are still less understood. Using the statistics data of typical flood events in China, the paper examines the causes of devastation in inland areas of the north combined with a comprehensive risk assessment methodology and explores a nuanced understanding of resilience. The conclusions reveal that the inland cities of northern China are facing an imminent threat from escalating flood hazards. 11% of the flood-influenced population and 17% of the disaster-caused economic losses are concentrated in the region. Increased extreme precipitation, heightened exposure and vulnerability, and a sluggish human response to crises are the main factors contributing to these complex disasters. The study also proposes a transformative flood resilience framework for inland flooding from three dimensions, emphasizing the integration of human responses. The three aspects of the framework are summarized based on the driving factors mentioned earlier and a simplified multidimensional perspective of resilient cities, reflecting the adaptive and evolutionary features of resilience. Hence, incorporating resilience strategies is a relatively practical approach for urban flood risk management in inland regions.
C1 [Liu, Mingyang; Xu, Xiangzhou] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Infrastruct Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Mingyang; Xiao, Peiqing] Yellow River Inst Hydraul Res, Key Lab Proc & Control Soil Loss Loess Plateau, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China.
   [Cao, Yongqiang] Tianjin Normal Univ, Acad Ecocivilizat Dev Jing Jin Ji Megalopolis, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China.
C3 Dalian University of Technology; Tianjin Normal University
RP Xu, XZ (corresponding author), Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Infrastruct Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.
EM xzxu@dlut.edu.cn
OI Liu, Mingyang/0000-0002-7277-0915
FU Open Research Fund Program of Key Laboratory of Process and Control of
   Soil Loss on the Loess Plateau [201903]; National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [52379060]
FX This study was supported by the Open Research Fund Program of Key
   Laboratory of Process and Control of Soil Loss on the Loess Plateau
   (201903), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (52379060).
CR Adekola J, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.006
   [Anonymous], 2016, ECOL SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   AON, 2022, INSURED EC LOSS
   BJnews, 2023, RECONSTRUCTION SITE
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P99, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00251-y
   Chen AB, 2022, J HYDROL, V609, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127724
   Chen JL, 2021, J HYDROL, V601, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126601
   Chen Y, 2021, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V48, DOI 10.1029/2021GL092549
   Chen Y, 2021, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104415
   [程晓陶 Cheng Xiaotao], 2022, [水利学报, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering], V53, P757
   China meteorological administration, 2012, POPULARIZATION RAINS
   Chinanews, 2021, BLUE BOOK CLIMATE CH
   City of New York, 2021, HURRICANE IDA
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dianat H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102561
   Disse M., 2020, Water Security, V9, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100059
   Fisher L, 2015, NATURE, V518, P35, DOI 10.1038/518035a
   Fletcher TD, 2013, ADV WATER RESOUR, V51, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001
   Ge Y, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P3119, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04458-y
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Guo XA, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104168
   Guo XN, 2021, SCIENCE, V374, P831, DOI 10.1126/science.abm7149
   He K, 2022, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V22, P2921, DOI 10.5194/nhess-22-2921-2022
   He SA, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111345
   Hossain MK, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104829
   IFRC, 2023, BANGLADESH FLOODS 20
   Jiang Y, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016
   Kati V, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.031
   Kim G, 2020, CITIES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102730
   Kleerekoper L, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V64, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.004
   Kreibich H, 2022, NATURE, V608, P80, DOI 10.1038/s41586-022-04917-5
   Laudan J, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P2163, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-2163-2017
   Lechowska E, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V94, P1341, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3480-z
   Li GJ, 2021, CITIES, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103206
   Li L, 2021, ATMOS RES, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105759
   Li QJ, 2024, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105540
   Liao P, 2021, FRONT ARCHIT RES, V10, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.foar.2021.04.002
   Liu, 2019, CHINA FLOOD DROUGHT, V29, P25, DOI [10.16867/j.issn.1673-9264.2019174, DOI 10.16867/J.ISSN.1673-9264.2019174]
   Liu M., 2024, WATER RESOURCES PROT
   [刘敏 Liu Min], 2005, [给水排水, Water & wastewater engineering], V31, P6
   Lu YJ, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050881
   Ma Y, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12822
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Working Group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Mayor of London, 2020, LONDON CITY RESILIEN
   Messager ML, 2021, APPL GEOGR, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102492
   Mongold E, 2021, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V20, P363, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2020.1829531
   Moore S, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P732, DOI [10.1080/07900627.2017.1348937, 10.1080/07900627.2017.1313157]
   MWR, 2020, CHINA WATER DROUGHT
   National Scientific Meteorological Data Center, 2021, 5 QUESTIONS RARE EXT
   Netzel LM, 2021, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V14, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12688
   Office of the Governor for Policy Planning, 2021, FUTURE TOKYO TOKYOS
   Ostadtaghizadeh A., 2015, PLOS CURR, V7, DOI [10.1371/currents.dis, DOI 10.1371/CURRENTS.DIS]
   Rodina L, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1334
   Rosenzweig B, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.020
   Rushforth RR, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P2698, DOI 10.1002/2015WR018006
   Sayers P., 2021, WATER SECUR, V12, DOI [10.1016/j.wasec.2021.100085, DOI 10.1016/J.WASEC.2021.100085]
   Shepherd TG, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V151, P555, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9
   Simpson NP, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.005
   Suter M., 2011, Resilience and Risk Management in Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy: Exploring the Relationship and Comparing its Use
   The State Council the People's Republic of China, 2020, CPC CENTRAL COMMITTE
   Thieken AH, 2022, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V22, P165, DOI 10.5194/nhess-22-165-2022
   Thieken AH, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P1519, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-1519-2016
   UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme, 2012, UN WORLD WATER DEV R
   UNISDR (The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction), 2009, 2009 UNISDR TERMINOL
   United Nations, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, P1
   Wang LH, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11763
   Whitford V, 2001, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V57, P91, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X
   Willner SN, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P594, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0173-2
   Xinhua News Agency, 2021, CHINA RELEASES PROBE
   Xinhua News Agency, 2023, BEIJING TIANJIN HEBE
   Zhao DJ, 2022, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V13, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2022.07.002
   Zhu SY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102355
NR 72
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 8
U2 17
PU IWA PUBLISHING
PI LONDON
PA REPUBLIC-EXPORT BLDG, UNITS 1 04 & 1 05, 1 CLOVE CRESCENT, LONDON,
   ENGLAND
SN 1366-7017
EI 1996-9759
J9 WATER POLICY
JI Water Policy
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 26
IS 7
BP 652
EP 670
DI 10.2166/wp.2024.253
EA JUN 2024
PG 19
WC Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Water Resources
GA A2P8L
UT WOS:001244377300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Qiu, D
   Lv, BL
   Chan, CML
   Huang, YS
   Si, K
AF Qiu, Dong
   Lv, Binglin
   Chan, Calvin M. L.
   Huang, Yuesen
   Si, Kai
TI How Does a Smart City Bridge Diversify Urban Development Trends? A
   systematic Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Study
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE smart city; resilient city; low-carbon city; sponge city; inclusive
   city; bibliometric
ID CHI MINH CITY; INCLUSIVE CITIES; PERFORMANCE; RESILIENCE; INNOVATION;
   TOLERANCE; SCIENCE; GREENER; MODEL
AB In recent years, the smart city concept has developed rapidly and has gradually become the most popular urban concept. However, the advent of the new century has been accompanied by the emergence of many other emerging city concepts. For these emerging urban concepts, such as a resilient city, low-carbon city, sponge city, and inclusive city, it needs to be clarified how these concepts relate to a smart city. In this paper, the scientometrics software Pajek was used to analyze the publication activities of the city concept and two-mode keywords co-occurrence network with cities. Meanwhile, the study also explores these concepts' global development and correlation. Further, it also analyzes the core problems that each city concept addresses through a literature review. It was observed that although the research content of these four city concepts is different from that of smart cities, they are conceptually and technologically connected with them. The development of smart cities can accelerate the smart development of other city concepts. At the same time, it can acquire and absorb more advanced models from other city concepts to enrich itself. The results suggest that the development of city concepts should be more comprehensive to help cities become more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable, which has important implications for urban policy and practice.
C1 [Qiu, Dong; Lv, Binglin; Si, Kai] Fujian Univ Technol, Sch Management, Fuzhou 350118, Peoples R China.
   [Chan, Calvin M. L.] Singapore Univ Social Sci, Sch Business, Singapore 599494, Singapore.
   [Huang, Yuesen] Fujian Prov Erjian Construction Grp Co Ltd, Fuzhou 350118, Peoples R China.
C3 Fujian University of Technology; Singapore University of Social Sciences
   (SUSS)
RP Chan, CML (corresponding author), Singapore Univ Social Sci, Sch Business, Singapore 599494, Singapore.
EM calvinchanml@suss.edu.sg
RI Chan, Calvin/AEP-8155-2022
OI Chan, Calvin M.L./0000-0003-0282-3716
FU Fujian Institute of Engineering Development Strategies 2021 Key
   Consulting Projects [2021-DFZ-20-2]; Innovative Methods Project of the
   Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
   [2020IM010200]
FX The Fujian Institute of Engineering Development Strategies 2021 Key
   Consulting Projects (project No. 2021-DFZ-20-2). The Innovative Methods
   Project of the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's
   Republic of China (project No. 2020IM010200).
CR Aahlaad M, 2021, J INDIAN SOC REMOTE, V49, P2639, DOI 10.1007/s12524-021-01416-4
   Abella A, 2017, CITIES, V64, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.011
   Albino V, 2015, J URBAN TECHNOL, V22, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
   Angelidou M, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121915
   [Anonymous], UN HABITAT GOAL 11 M
   [Anonymous], 2005, National Water Development Report: Uganda, Second UN World Water Development Report
   [Anonymous], RESILIENT CITIES OEC
   Bar-Ilan J, 2007, J INFORMETR, V1, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2006.08.001
   Bellini E, 2021, SENSORS-BASEL, V21, DOI 10.3390/s21020435
   Best D, 2019, ADDICT RES THEORY, V27, P55, DOI 10.1080/16066359.2018.1520223
   Britain G., 2003, ENERGY WHITE PAPER O
   Budge T., 2006, CHANGING NATURE AUST, V11, P12
   Bungau CC, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142013121
   Campbell S, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Cheng HT, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061751
   Danjie W., 2016, China Soft Sci, V1, P79
   Amaral RDDM, 2021, REV GEST AMBIENT SUS, V10, DOI 10.5585/geas.v10i1.18131
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   De Vita GE, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V223, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.333
   Deng SH, 2019, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V10, P298, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2018.197
   Edge S, 2020, CITIES, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102478
   Epstein S, 2017, J URBAN HIST, V43, P683, DOI 10.1177/0096144215612470
   Falagas ME, 2008, FASEB J, V22, P338, DOI 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
   Florida Richard., 2014, The Rise of the Creative Class - Revisited
   Fu Y, 2017, CITIES, V60, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.003
   Gassner A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V311, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127591
   Glaeser EL, 2013, J ECON SOCIOL, V14, P75, DOI 10.17323/1726-3247-2013-4-75-94
   Glebova E., 2022, SMART CITIES TOURISM
   Hassaan O, 2016, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V49, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.10.004
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kamalski J, 2012, CITIES, V29, pS3, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.012
   Kinzig AP, 1998, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V8, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00013-2
   Kitchin R, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Leite C., 2012, Cidades sustentaveis, cidades inteligentes: desenvolvimento sustentavel num planeta urbano
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   LIU Q., 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, P68, DOI [10.16785/j.issn1943-989x.2016.6.016, DOI 10.16785/J.ISSN1943-989X.2016.6.016]
   Mahizhnan A, 1999, CITIES, V16, P13, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00050-X
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meng W., 2008, 2008 INT S INTELLIGE, P573, DOI [10.16353/j.cnki.1000-7490.2008.04.009, DOI 10.16353/J.CNKI.1000-7490.2008.04.009]
   Mora H, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124732
   Narulita S, 2016, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V33, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.079
   Nations U., 2018, World Urbanization Prospects, Demographic Research
   Nguyen HD, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13020262
   Oliva S., 2018, City, Culture and Society, V15, P53, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2018.05.005
   Pauleit S, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00109-2
   Duy PN, 2019, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V15, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.11.001
   Prada M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V718, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137446
   Prendeville S, 2018, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V26, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2017.03.002
   Rebernik N, 2021, DISABIL SOC, V36, P952, DOI 10.1080/09687599.2020.1779035
   Rezende J.H., 2020, REV SOC BRAS ARBORIZ, V15, P75, DOI [10.5380/revsbau.v15i2.72430, DOI 10.5380/REVSBAU.V15I2.72430]
   Roseland M, 1997, CITIES, V14, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00003-6
   Ruhlandt RWS, 2018, CITIES, V81, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.014
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Sachs JD, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P805, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
   Schmutzler J, 2018, IND CORP CHANGE, V27, P243, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtx034
   Schraven D, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V292, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125924
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148018
   Stolfi DH, 2018, APPL SOFT COMPUT, V71, P952, DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.07.032
   Storch H, 2011, CITIES, V28, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.07.002
   Thellufsen JZ, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109922
   Torabi Moghadam S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.002
   Wang GZ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118793
   Wang MH, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V666, P1245, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.139
   Wang SJ, 2019, ENRGY PROCED, V158, P3271, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.985
   XueShuDianDi, COOC IS SOFTW BIBL K
   Zheng CJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120689
   Zhou H., 2020, MOD URBAN STUD, P112, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2020.12.014, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1009-6000.2020.12.014]
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 69
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 8
U2 50
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 5
AR 4455
DI 10.3390/su15054455
PG 18
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 9U8UL
UT WOS:000947980100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, XW
   Song, J
   Peng, J
   Wu, JS
AF Zhang, Xiwen
   Song, Jing
   Peng, Jian
   Wu, Jiansheng
TI Landslides-oriented urban disaster resilience assessment-A case study in
   ShenZhen, China
SO SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban disaster resilience; Rainfall-induced landslides; Physical
   resilience; Social resilience; Support vector machines (SVM);
   Delphi-analytic hierarchy process (Delphi-AHP)
ID SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VULNERABILITY; URBANIZATION;
   COMMUNITIES; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; ADAPTATION; RECOVERY; RAINFALL
AB With the increasing expansion of cities associated with rapid urbanization, the ecological environment is being severely damaged, exposing cities to frequent extreme weather events. Urban ecological ecosystems are under great threat. Research on urban disaster resilience is conducive to a better understanding of disaster prevention and mitigation capacity, and provides valuable references for resilient city construction. In this study, a typical city under rapid urbanization in China - Shenzhen - was chosen as the research area, including the city's 57 sub-districts. Urban disaster resilience to rainfall-induced landslides was conceptually framed into the dimensions of physical resilience and social resilience. Support vector machine (SVM) was applied to evaluate the physical resilience and a Delphi-analytic hierarchy process (Delphi-AHP) model was used to assess social resilience on a sub-district scale in 2016. The results show that the physical resilience and social resilience of Shenzhen demonstrate obvious spatial concentration trends. Areas with low physical resilience were located in sub-districts of Dapeng New District with intense rainfall and complex topography, as well as those in Guangming New District with lateritic red earth derived from arenaceous shale. Areas with low social resilience were mainly located in eastern Shenzhen, including sub-districts in Longgang District and Dapeng New District, with undeveloped economy, inadequate infrastructures and many vulnerable people. All sub-districts in the three districts of Pingshan New District, Dapeng New District and Guangming New District need attention because of their low comprehensive resilience. Comparison of the physical resilience and social resilience indicated that the performance of physical resilience was significantly better than that of social resilience; only 26% of the sub-districts of Shenzhen had a higher level of social resilience than of physical resilience. Therefore, the government should strengthen urban management of social services and physical infrastructure provision to improve social resilience to cope with urban disasters. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Zhang, Xiwen; Wu, Jiansheng] Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Key Lab Urban Habitat Environm Sci & Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Xiwen; Peng, Jian; Wu, Jiansheng] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Key Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Song, Jing] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Song, Jing] Univ Hong Kong, Shenzhen Inst Res & Innovat, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; University of Hong Kong; The
   University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Institute of Research & Innovation;
   University of Hong Kong
RP Wu, JS (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Key Lab Urban Habitat Environm Sci & Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China.
EM wujs@pkusz.edu.cn
RI Wu, Jiansheng/GLS-1168-2022; Peng, Jian/AAO-6397-2020
OI peng, jian/0000-0003-0332-0248
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671180]
FX This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (No. 41671180) and we express our sincere gratitude to all the
   participants of this study.
CR Abramson DM, 2015, J BEHAV HEALTH SER R, V42, P42, DOI 10.1007/s11414-014-9410-2
   Acharya G, 2011, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V129, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.012
   Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Alberini A, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.001
   Alshehri SA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P395, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1719-5
   Alshehri SA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P2221, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1423-x
   [Anonymous], MAIN DAT B 6 NAT POP
   Aven T, 2011, RISK ANAL, V31, P515, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01528.x
   Bene C., 2015, IDS Working paper, V2015, P1
   Berkes F., 2000, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO
   Berkes F, 2006, HUM ECOL, V34, P479, DOI 10.1007/s10745-006-9008-2
   Bhamra R, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5375, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   [蔡建明 Cai Jianming], 2012, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V31, P1245
   Cao Lulai, 2014, J ENG GEOLOGICAL HYD, V41, P143
   Cox RS, 2011, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V48, P395, DOI 10.1007/s10464-011-9427-0
   Cuomo S, 2015, J MT SCI-ENGL, V12, P783, DOI 10.1007/s11629-014-3242-7
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Demirci A, 2012, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V66, P903, DOI 10.1007/s12665-011-1300-9
   Deng WP, 2013, DISASTER ADV, V6, P51
   Dolan AH, 2006, J COASTAL RES, P1316
   Einstein H. H., 1988, Landslides  Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Landslides, Volume 2., P1075
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Gaillard Jean-Christophe., 2007, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V16, P522
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Guo X. D, 2016, SHANGHAI URBAN PLANN, V41-44, P71
   Han LF, 2016, J GEOGR SCI, V26, P694, DOI 10.1007/s11442-016-1293-0
   Han Longfei, 2013, Hupo Kexue, V25, P335
   Izadkhah YO, 2005, INT J EMERG MANAG, V2, P138, DOI 10.1504/IJEM.2005.007355
   Jaiswal P, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P887, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0404-1
   Jia GY, 2008, SCI CHINA SER E, V51, P164, DOI 10.1007/s11431-008-6013-2
   Jiang G., 2013, Geoinformatics (GEOINFORMATICS), 2013 21st International Conference on, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2013.6626026
   Kalnay E, 2003, NATURE, V423, P528, DOI 10.1038/nature01675
   Keck M, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P5, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.02
   Keim ME, 2008, AM J PREV MED, V35, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.022
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leykin D, 2013, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V52, P313, DOI 10.1007/s10464-013-9596-0
   [李秀珍 Li Xiuzhen], 2010, [水土保持通报, Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation], V30, P128
   [李秀珍 Li Xiuzhen], 2010, [工程勘察, Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying], V38, P47
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Liang P, 2017, ADV ATMOS SCI, V34, P321, DOI 10.1007/s00376-016-6120-0
   Liao, 2015, ECOL SOC, V30, P36
   Maguire B, 2007, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V22, P16
   Mann ME, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V144, P131, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2048-3
   McCarthy DDP, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16, DOI 10.5751/ES-04255-160318
   Miao SG, 2011, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V50, P806, DOI 10.1175/2010JAMC2513.1
   Parsons M, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.005
   Pelling M, 2015, FRAMEWORK, P1
   Raudys S, 2000, NEURAL NETWORKS, V13, P17, DOI 10.1016/S0893-6080(99)00097-0
   Rozos D, 2013, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V70, P3255, DOI 10.1007/s12665-013-2390-3
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISASTER RISK, V31
   Shenzhen Real Estate Assessment Center, 2006, SHENZH SLOP CENS REP
   Shenzhen Statistics Bureau, 2014, SHENZH HLTH STAT YB
   Shenzhen Statistics Bureau, 2017, SHENZH STAT YB 2016
   Shephard JM, 2005, EARTH INTERACT, V9
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   The University at Buffalo Regional Institute, 2011, RES CAP IND
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Wang HB, 2005, PROG PHYS GEOG, V29, P548, DOI 10.1191/0309133305pp462ra
   Windle G, 2011, REV CLIN GERONTOL, V21, P152, DOI 10.1017/S0959259810000420
   WISCHMEIER WALTER H., 1958, TRANS AMER GEOPHYS UNION, V39, P285
   Xie QM, 2004, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V41, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.12.089
   [谢全敏 Xie Quanmin], 2017, [水利水电技术, Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering], V48, P120
   Xu J., 2015, Urban Plates Internet, V30, P1
   Yu XB, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P959, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2613-5
   [原立峰 YUAN Lifeng], 2007, [中国地质灾害与防治学报, The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control], V18, P29
NR 69
TC 69
Z9 79
U1 22
U2 282
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0048-9697
EI 1879-1026
J9 SCI TOTAL ENVIRON
JI Sci. Total Environ.
PD APR 15
PY 2019
VL 661
BP 95
EP 106
DI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.074
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA HL0TY
UT WOS:000458408200011
PM 30665136
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Brown, A
   Dayal, A
   del Rio, CR
AF Brown, Anna
   Dayal, Ashvin
   del Rio, Cristina Rumbaitis
TI From practice to theory: emerging lessons from Asia for building urban
   climate change resilience
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; climate change; equity; integrated planning; resilience;
   risk; secondary cities; urban governance; urban poverty; vulnerability
AB This paper aims to capture and analyze emerging experiences, lessons and tensions evident from several years of work underway through the Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network, a network of secondary cities in South and Southeast Asia that have engaged in a process to analyze vulnerabilities and plan and implement measures to address them. With the support of the Rockefeller Foundation and numerous partners, these cities have identified more than 59 specific resilience-building measures, of which 23 are being implemented. Through this work we see 10 critical urban climate change resilience action areas that cities must consider in order to strengthen their ability to anticipate, prepare for and respond to the types of sudden and slow onset impacts. These are: climate sensitive land use and urban planning; institutional coordination mechanisms and capacity support; drainage, flood and solid waste management; water demand and conservation systems; emergency management and early warning systems; responsive health systems; resilient housing and transport systems; strengthening of ecosystem services; diversification and protection of climate-affected livelihoods; and education and capacity building of citizens. We present case studies of how these measures are implemented in specific cities and highlight the tensions and challenges that have emerged. Primary tensions arise around the powerful political economy forces that influence decisions in cities; ensuring that the risks and benefits of resilience-building measures are distributed equitably; aligning incentives of various stakeholders in cities; and developing the mandates, coordination and capacities needed to manage a multi-scale and multi-sector issue as complex as urban climate change resilience. This empirical base of practice provides important learning to help guide further the refinement of both theory and practice in the nascent field of urban climate change resilience.
C1 [Brown, Anna; Dayal, Ashvin] Rockefeller Fdn, Bangkok 10110, Thailand.
   [del Rio, Cristina Rumbaitis] Rockefeller Fdn, New York, NY 10018 USA.
RP Brown, A (corresponding author), Rockefeller Fdn, 21st Floor UBC II Bldg,591 Sukhumvit 33, Bangkok 10110, Thailand.
EM abrown@rockfound.org; adayal@rockfound.org;
   CRumbaitisdelRio@rockfound.rg
CR [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
   [Anonymous], 2010, URB DEV SER KNOWL PA
   [Anonymous], 2012, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   Bandar Lampung ACCCRN City Working Group, 2011, BAND LAMP CIT RES ST
   Carmin JoAnn., 2012, Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN IN PRESS
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gorakhpur Environmental Action Group, 2011, RES GOR
   Gorakhpur Environmental Action Group, 2012, URB COMM BAS WARD LE
   Government of India, 2011, PROV CENS RES
   ISET-Vietnam, 2011, SUMM CLIM CHANG RES
   McDonald RI, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P6312, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1011615108
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   Mercy Corps, 2011, SEM BUILD RES GROUND
   Moench M., 2011, Catalyzing Urban Climate Resilience
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Rumbaitis del Rio Cristina, 2011, INTEGRATING ECOLOGY, P327
   Surat Municipal Corporation the Southern Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry Taru Leading Edge and the Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network, 2011, SUR CIT RES STRAT
   Taru Leading Edge, 2011, CONJ WAT MAN IND
NR 19
TC 142
Z9 164
U1 18
U2 267
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD OCT
PY 2012
VL 24
IS 2
BP 531
EP 556
DI 10.1177/0956247812456490
PG 26
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA 020RR
UT WOS:000309831700009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rayan, M
   Gruehn, D
   Khayyam, U
AF Rayan, Muhammad
   Gruehn, Dietwald
   Khayyam, Umer
TI Green infrastructure indicators to plan resilient urban settlements in
   Pakistan: Local stakeholder's perspective
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban green infrastructure (UGI); Urban resilience; Urban eco-system;
   Sustainable UGI indicators; Relative Index (RI) analysis
ID ECOSYSTEM; HEALTH
AB Over the recent years, urban green infrastructure (UGI) modelling has emerged as an adaptation strategy to enhance cities' resilience against ever-rising environmental hazards. The UGI improves urban eco-system functions to protect human health and wellbeing, both locally and globally. Pakistan lacks inclusive and resilient land-use planning policies as well as frameworks to protect its inhabitants, and ecosystems from the rising climatic hazards. So, this research aims to determine and assemble sustainable UGI planning indicators based on local stakeholder's perspectives. It is to develop a comprehensive and integrative indicator-based framework model to build climate-resilient urban regions in Pakistan's northwest parts. The in-depth online expert's survey is administered through 172 questionnaires themed around UGI, urban resilience and climate change adaptation. The data is analysed by using Relative Importance Index (RII) and Interquartile Range Technique (IQR). The finding shows potential twenty-two (primary and secondary) sustainable UGI indicators, classified into three main categories; Extremely Important (E-Imp); Important (Imp) and Moderately important (M-Imp) levels. Subsequently, a set of vital green elements that achieved (RII value >= 0.76) were identified that upgraded and strengthened each UGI indicator's quality. Additionally, it helps to reinforce an intricate connection among climate resilience strategies, green spaces, ecosystem functions, and human health/wellbeing in the study region. The UGI model facilitates policy planning and decision-making process for resilient land use planning and urban sustainability.
C1 [Rayan, Muhammad; Gruehn, Dietwald] TU Dortmund Univ, Chair Landscape Ecol & Landscape Planning LLP, Sch Spatial Planning, Dortmund, Germany.
   [Khayyam, Umer] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, Sch Social Sci & Humanities S3H, Dept Dev Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan.
C3 Dortmund University of Technology; National University of Sciences &
   Technology - Pakistan
RP Rayan, M (corresponding author), TU Dortmund Univ, Chair Landscape Ecol & Landscape Planning LLP, Sch Spatial Planning, Dortmund, Germany.
EM muhammad.rayan@tu-dortmund.de; dietwald.gruehn@tu-dortmund.de;
   dr.umer@s3h.nust.edu.pk
OI Gruehn, Dietwald/0000-0002-7570-4104; Rayan,
   Muhammad/0000-0001-6984-797X
CR Adetunji Israel O, 2006, SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUC
   Ahsan Ahmad, 2018, THE DAILY TIMES
   Akadiri O.P., 2011, Ph.D. Thesis
   [Anonymous], 2014, P INT C TOWN PLANNIN
   [Anonymous], 2007, CITIES FUTURE INTEGR
   [Anonymous], 2006, URBAN ENV ED REV, DOI DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-693-6_1
   Ashfaque R, 2015, FINAL REPORT POLICY
   Atta-ur-Rahman, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P887, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0528-3
   Babbie E.R., 1973, SURV RES METHODS-GER
   Baruch Y, 1999, HUM RELAT, V52, P421, DOI 10.1177/001872679905200401
   Beattie A., 2004, NT RES, V9, P348, DOI [10.1177/136140960400900505, DOI 10.1177/136140960400900505]
   Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Braimah N, 2009, J CONSTR ENG M, V135, P1279, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000096
   Bucci H.P, 2003, VALUE LIKERT SCALES
   Chinyio EA, 1998, J MANAGE ENG, V14, P87, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1998)14:1(87)
   Cochran W., 1977, Sampling techniques
   CORTINA JM, 1993, J APPL PSYCHOL, V78, P98, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Davies C, 2005, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Desa U., 2014, World urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision
   Desa U.N., 2019, STESASERA421
   Eckstein D., 2021, Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events, 2000-2019
   Eckstein J., 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV
   Foster J., 2011, Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, P1
   Gill SE, 2007, Built Environ, V33, P115, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115
   Guramani Nadir, 2018, Dawn
   Hair J. F., 1998, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
   Harnik P., 2006, The humane metropolis: People and nature in the 21st centruy city, P47
   Iqbal N., 2009, SUPREME COURT ORDERS
   Khayyam U, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P19638, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-08303-4
   Lafortezza R, 2013, IFOREST, V6, P102, DOI 10.3832/ifor0723-006
   Likert A., 1932, ARCH PSYCHOL, V22, P55
   Lu F, 2003, ECOL MODEL, V170, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00300-4
   Luo DH, 2018, STAT METHODS MED RES, V27, P1785, DOI 10.1177/0962280216669183
   Matthews T, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010
   Mell I, 2017, INT PLAN STUD, V22, P333, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2017.1291334
   Monette D., 2013, Applied social research: A tool for human services, V9th
   Monteiro R, 2020, J COASTAL RES, P889, DOI 10.2112/SI95-173.1
   Munn P., 1990, USING QUESTIONNAIRES
   Naeem S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041049
   PBS, 2018, URB DEM
   PETERSON RA, 1994, J CONSUM RES, V21, P381, DOI 10.1086/209405
   Rayan M., 2021, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, P197
   Singh K., 2007, QUANTITATIVE SOCIAL
   The Environment Partnership (TEP), 2005, ADV DEL GREEN INFR T
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   USEPA, 2010, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Wakil K., 2016, PROJECT REPORT SCENA
   Wan X, 2014, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
   Weber T.C, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
NR 50
TC 26
Z9 26
U1 4
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD JUL
PY 2021
VL 38
AR 100899
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100899
EA JUN 2021
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA TS0HZ
UT WOS:000679338800001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mou, Y
   Luo, YY
   Su, ZR
   Wang, J
   Liu, T
AF Mou, Yu
   Luo, Yuyan
   Su, Zerui
   Wang, Jun
   Liu, Tao
TI Evaluating the dynamic sustainability and resilience of a hybrid urban
   system: case of Chengdu, China
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban sustainability; System dynamics; Resilience; Water resources;
   Disturbance
ID URBANIZATION; CITY; SIMULATION; MODEL; ADAPTABILITY; HEALTH
AB Cities are faced with booming populations, limited resources, and intensified pollution. To remain its sustainability and resilience against the varying environment, a city has to tackle the challenges from both the nature and human ourselves. This paper aims at evaluating the sustainability and resilience of cities in terms of their capabilities for maintaining, in face of potential threats in the future. Five subsystems, i.e. economy, environment, population, resource, science & technology are incorporated in the conceptual framework of linked urban sustainability and resilience. Through scenario simulations, we measure the performance of system elements and evaluate the resilience process with water resources trial when disturbance occurs. With Chengdu, China as the case, we have found that: (1) Limited water resources could not meet the basic demand well, and the quality could not be significantly improved till 2035 under the current path, and the modifications could be done with ongoing strategies. (2) Impacts of disturbances could be largely expanded in resource-dependent period, for which improving resource use efficiency and conducting industry structural adjustment could make cities more resilient. (3) The greater the presence of resilience system elements, the more developed the sustainability system.
   (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Mou, Yu; Luo, Yuyan; Liu, Tao] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Management Sci, Erxianqiao Rd 1, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Luo, Yuyan] Chengdu Univ Technol, Postdoctorate R&D Base Management Science & Engn, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
   [Su, Zerui] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Jun] Sichuan Normal Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610101, Peoples R China.
C3 Chengdu University of Technology; Chengdu University of Technology;
   Sichuan University; Sichuan Normal University
RP Luo, YY (corresponding author), Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Management Sci, Erxianqiao Rd 1, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China.
EM my191001@163.com; luoyuyan13@mail.cdut.edu.cn; suzerui@stu.scu.edu.cn;
   wangjun.sicnu@qq.com; liutao@stu.cdut.edu
RI Luo, Yuyan/AAR-7810-2020; , 刘小涛/AGV-9953-2022; Su, Zerui/AGH-0258-2022
OI Su, Zerui/0000-0003-2653-1785; Liu, Tao/0000-0002-6404-960X; Yu,
   Mou/0009-0005-1919-0865
FU Philosophy and Social Science Planning Program of Chengdu [2018A09];
   National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501019, 71971151];
   Humanities and Social Sciences Program of the Ministry of Education
   [20YJC630095]; Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China [2018M631069];
   Funding Program for Middle-aged Core Teachers at Chengdu University of
   Technology [2019KY37-04203]; Philosophy and Social Science Research
   Foundation of Chengdu University of Technology [YJ2019-NS004]; Special
   Funding for Post-doctoral Research Projects on Sichuan in 2017 Named
   "dynamic evolution of multi-system coupling in resource-oriented cities
   of western China from a technology innovation-driven perspective";
   Program of Graduate Education Reform Program at Chengdu University of
   Technology [10800-00009824]
FX This work was supported by the Philosophy and Social Science Planning
   Program of Chengdu (Grant No. 2018A09), the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant Nos.71501019, 71971151), the Humanities and
   Social Sciences Program of the Ministry of Education (Grant No.
   20YJC630095), Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (Grant No.
   2018M631069), the Funding Program for Middle-aged Core Teachers at
   Chengdu University of Technology (Grant No. 2019KY37-04203), Philosophy
   and Social Science Research Foundation of Chengdu University of
   Technology (Grant No. YJ2019-NS004) and the Special Funding for
   Post-doctoral Research Projects on Sichuan in 2017 Named "dynamic
   evolution of multi-system coupling in resource-oriented cities of
   western China from a technology innovation-driven perspective" and the
   Program of Graduate Education Reform Program at Chengdu University of
   Technology (Grant No. 10800-00009824).
CR Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   BARLAS Y, 1989, EUR J OPER RES, V42, P59, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(89)90059-3
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Divakar L, 2011, J HYDROL, V401, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.003
   Doan V.Q, 2019, ROLES PRESENT FUTURE, DOI [10.1016/j.scs.2019.101479, DOI 10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101479]
   Fang W, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V100, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.044
   Feng CY, 2019, EKOLOJI, V28, P1325
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   GaWC, 2018, GLOB CHENGD AN CHENG
   Genga B, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V29, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.12.013
   Gong P, 2012, LANCET, V379, P843, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61878-3
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jia SQ, 2017, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V101, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2017.05.003
   Jiang Y, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061616
   Kelly RA, 2013, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V47, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005
   Labaka L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
   Li GD, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V174, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.004
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Li TH, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P882, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.052
   Liu HB, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V214, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.046
   Lu XC, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P683, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.140
   Luo YY, 2019, DISCRETE CONT DYN-S, V12, P1073, DOI 10.3934/dcdss.2019074
   [马涵玉 Ma Hanyu], 2017, [南水北调与水利科技, South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology], V15, P101
   Marana P, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101531
   Mavrommati G, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7235, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.041
   Pan HZ, 2020, APPL SPAT ANAL POLIC, V13, P137, DOI 10.1007/s12061-019-09296-5
   Pan HZ, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V102, P426, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.059
   Patterson J, 2017, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V24, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001
   Peng WF, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V17, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.03.004
   People' s Government of Chengdu, 2016, SCHEM WAT POLL PREV
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Shen LY, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.333
   SMR project, 2018, SMART MAT RES MOR RE
   Song XP, 2018, NATURE, V560, P639, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9
   STRN, 2010, MISS STAT RES AG SUS
   Tan YT, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.154
   Tan YT, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V193, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.058
   Tilman D, 2014, NATURE, V515, P518, DOI 10.1038/nature13959
   Timon M., 2014, RISE RESILIENCE LINK
   Tobin G.A., 1999, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V1, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-28679900002-9
   Waas T, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P5512, DOI 10.3390/su6095512
   Waas T, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P1637, DOI 10.3390/su3101637
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Wang JL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V662, P824, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.260
   Wang M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010280
   Wang SJ, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V45, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006
   Wang S, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V472, P1070, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.115
   Wang XX, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-17103-w
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Wu JS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V182, P872, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.060
   Xing L, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P474, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.065
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhao JJ, 2018, PHYSICA A, V508, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.077
   Zhao W, 2011, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V55, P933, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.04.011
NR 54
TC 44
Z9 46
U1 21
U2 204
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD APR 1
PY 2021
VL 291
AR 125719
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
EA JAN 2021
PG 14
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA QQ7AK
UT WOS:000624673800005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Oliva, S
   Lazzeretti, L
AF Oliva, Stefania
   Lazzeretti, Luciana
TI Adaptation, adaptability and resilience: the recovery of Kobe after the
   Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995
SO EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; earthquake; Kobe; recovery; creative city
ID ECONOMIC RESILIENCE; COMPLEXITY; POLICY
AB In the past few years, the concept of resilience has captured the attention of academics, politicians and public opinion and has been identified as the source of recovery policies of local, regional and national economies. As a result, searching for the so-called resilient factor has led governments to manage territories and resources, combining sustainability and adaptation in an increasingly risky world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate resilience in response to natural disasters through the analysis of the recovery process of the city of Kobe destroyed by the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in 1995. Japanese regions have always coexisted with significant external pressures often leading to environmental disasters and consequent relevant economic and social damage. Kobe has been an emblematic case because of its rapidity in urban reconstruction and speeding of economic recovery. Kobe and the Great Hanshin Earthquake of 1995 represent a successful case of resilient city able to adapt to changing circumstances and to foster local development proposing a renewed image of a creative city.
C1 [Oliva, Stefania; Lazzeretti, Luciana] Univ Florence, Dept Econ & Management, Florence, Italy.
C3 University of Florence
RP Lazzeretti, L (corresponding author), Univ Florence, Dept Econ & Management, Florence, Italy.
EM luciana.lazzeretti@unifi.it
OI Oliva, Stefania/0000-0003-2933-4795; Lazzeretti,
   Luciana/0000-0002-9759-2289
CR Aldrich D.P., 2012, Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery, P1, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226012896.001.0001
   Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
   [Anonymous], 2015, CITY CULT SOC, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.05.001
   [Anonymous], REFRAMING REGIONAL D
   Bakhshi Hasan., 2008, Creating Innovation: Do the Creative Industries Support Innovation in the Wider Economy?
   Benson C., 2004, UNDERSTANDING EC FIN
   Bhamraa R., 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P537
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Bristow G, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P241, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv002
   Chang S.E., 2000, J TRANSP GEOGR, V8, P53
   Chang SE, 2010, DISASTERS, V34, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.x
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   City of Kobe, 2015, KOB CIT STAT
   City of Kobe, 2010, COMPR STRAT REC GREA
   Cooke P, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P48, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2016.1259398
   Cooke P, 2012, NEW HORIZ REG SCI, P43
   Cooke Philip., 2015, CITY CULTURE SOC, V6, P51, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.02.003, 10.1016/j.ccs.2015.02.003]
   Dawley S., 2010, SERC DISCUSSION PAPE
   duPont W, 2015, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V63, P777, DOI 10.1086/681129
   Edgington DW, 2010, RECONSTRUCTING KOBE: THE GEOGRAPHY OF CRISIS AND OPPORTUNITY, P1
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gong H., CREATING RESILIENT E
   Grabher G., 1993, EMBEDDED FIRM SOCIOE, P255
   Guha-Sapir Debarati., 2015, EM-DAT: The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Horwich G, 2000, ECON DEV CULT CHANGE, V48, P521, DOI 10.1086/452609
   Hu, 2015, PAPERS EVOLUTIONARY, V1533
   Kingston J, 2012, NISSAN I ROUTL JPN S, P1
   Lazzeretti L., 2015, City Cult. Soc, V6, P83, DOI [10.1016/j.ccs.2015.02.004, DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.02.004]
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Markusen A, 1999, REG STUD, V33, P869, DOI 10.1080/00343409950075506
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Nakashima M., 2003, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, V4, P3
   Noy I., 2016, WORKING PAPERS EC FI
   Pasquinelli C., 2015, City, Culture and Society, V6, P75, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.04.001
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Porter J., 2013, REGIONAL STUDIES ANN
   Pratt AC, 2009, ROUTL STUD GLOB COMP, V46, P1
   Pratt Andy C., 2015, City, Culture and Society, V6, P61, DOI [10.1016/j.ccs.2014.11.001, DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2014.11.001]
   Sasaki M, 2010, CITIES, V27, pS3, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.03.002
   Simmie J., 2014, EVOLUTIONARY GROWTH
   Simmie J, 2014, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V72, P103, DOI 10.1007/s13147-014-0274-y
   Simmie J, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P729, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.667922
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Statistics Bureau of Japan, 2001, EST ENT CENS JAP
   Stocker K., 2013, POW DES JOURN 11 UNE
   Swanstrom Todd., 2008, REGIONAL RESILIENCE
   UNCRD, 1995, UNCRD Research Report Series, V12
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Vanolo Alberto., 2015, City, Culture and Society, V6, P69, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.01.003
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Whiston S.C., 1993, J CAREER DEV, V19, P175, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01353276, 10.1007/BF01353276]
   Zhao DP, 1996, SCIENCE, V274, P1891, DOI 10.1126/science.274.5294.1891
   Zolli A., 2012, Resilience: Why things bounce back
NR 58
TC 32
Z9 32
U1 1
U2 64
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0965-4313
EI 1469-5944
J9 EUR PLAN STUD
JI Eur. Plan. Stud.
PY 2017
VL 25
IS 1
BP 67
EP 87
DI 10.1080/09654313.2016.1260093
PG 21
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA EL2HG
UT WOS:000394440100005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ramalho, J
AF Ramalho, Jordana
TI Worlding aspirations and resilient futures: Framings of risk and
   contemporary city-making in Metro Cebu, the Philippines
SO ASIA PACIFIC VIEWPOINT
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster risk reduction and management; Philippines; resilience; urban
   slums; worlding; urban development
ID GOVERNMENTALITY; BIOPOLITICS
AB In the Philippines, calls for creating 'global', 'sustainable' and 'resilient' cities are placing urban poor communities in increasingly precarious positions. These communities have long been the targets of urban development and 'modernisation' efforts; more recently the erasure of informal settlements from Philippine cities is being bolstered at the behest of climate change adaptation and disaster risk management (DRM) agendas. In Metro Cebu, flood management has been at the heart of DRM and broader urban development discussions, and is serving as justification for the demolition and displacement of informal settler communities in areas classed as 'danger zones'. Using Kusno's (2010) interpretation of the 'exemplary centre' as a point of departure, this paper interrogates the relationship between DRM, worlding aspirations (Roy and Ong, 2011) and market-oriented urbanisation in Cebu, and considers the socio-spatial implications of these intersecting processes for urban poor communities. Through analysing the contradictions inherent in framings of certain bodies and spaces as being 'of risk' or 'at risk' over others, I argue that the epistemologies of modernity, disaster risk and resilience endorsed and propagated by the state are facilitating processes of displacement and dispossession that serve elite commercial interests under the auspices of disaster resilience and pro-poor development.
C1 [Ramalho, Jordana] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Geog & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England.
C3 University of London; London School Economics & Political Science
RP Ramalho, J (corresponding author), London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Geog & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England.
EM j.r.ramalho@lse.ac.uk
RI Ramalho, Jordana/AAP-4315-2021
OI Ramalho, Jordana/0000-0003-4614-968X
FU ESRC Postgraduate Award [ES/J500070/1]; FORGE
FX This paper draws on research conducted for my PhD, funded by an ESRC
   Postgraduate Award (ES/J500070/1) offered by the Department of
   Geography, London School of Economics and Political Science, for a
   thesis provisionally entitled: "Risk, Resilience and Responsibilisation:
   Gendered Participation and Empowerment in Informal Settlements of Metro
   Cebu, the Philippines'. Many thanks to Sylvia Chant, Gareth Jones,
   Austin Zeiderman, Lisa Tilley, Juanita Elias, and Lena Rethel for their
   helpful comments on earlier drafts. I am especially grateful to FORGE,
   Regina Yoma, and the many people in the Philippines whose time and
   support made this study possible.
CR [Anonymous], 2007, DEMOCRATIZATION
   [Anonymous], 2018, THESIS
   [Anonymous], 2008, SOCIAL THEORIES RISK
   [Anonymous], FREEMAN
   [Anonymous], SUNSTAR CEBU 0718
   [Anonymous], METROPOLITICS
   [Anonymous], RES ACTION POLICY AD
   [Anonymous], ROADM STUD SUST URB
   [Anonymous], GOOD BAD UGLY DISAST
   [Anonymous], CEBU DAILY NEWS 1122
   [Anonymous], RESILIENCE GOVT DFID
   [Anonymous], CEBU DAILY INQU 0530
   Bankoff Greg., 2003, Cultures of Disaster: Society and Natural Hazard in the Philippines
   Cardona OmarD., 2013, Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People
   Elliott L., 2012, Climate Change, Migration and Human Security in Southeast Asia
   Escobar A, 1996, FUTURES, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/0016-3287(96)00011-0
   Escobar A., 1995, ENCOUNTERING DEV MAK
   Geertz Clifford., 1980, NEGARA
   Ghertner A., 2015, RULE AESTHETICS WORL
   Ghertner DA, 2011, STUD URBAN SOC CH, P279
   Ghertner D.Asher., 2008, Economic and Political Weekly, V43, P57
   Gillespie T, 2016, T I BRIT GEOGR, V41, P66, DOI 10.1111/tran.12105
   Gotham KevinFox., 2014, Crisis Cities: Disaster and Redevelopment in New York and New Orleans, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199752225.001.0001
   Grove K, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P198, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12118
   Harvey D., 2012, Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution
   Tran HA, 2019, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V60, P37, DOI 10.1111/apv.12216
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kusno A, 2011, SINGAPORE J TROP GEO, V32, P314, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2011.00440.x
   Kusno Abidin., 2010, The Appearances of Memory: Mnemonic Practices of Architecture and Urban Form in Indonesia
   O'Malley Pat., 2004, Risk, Uncertainty and Government
   Ortega A A.C., 2012, Philippine Population Review, V11, P41
   Paprocki K, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P955, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1406330
   Rosenberg Daniel., 2005, HIST FUTURE
   Roy A, 2011, STUD URBAN SOC CH, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781444346800
   Shatkin G, 2000, URBAN STUD, V37, P2357, DOI 10.1080/00420980020002841
   Tilley L, 2019, ASIA PAC VIEWP, V60, P80, DOI 10.1111/apv.12209
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Wisner B., 2004, AT RISK, V2nd
   Yilmaz S, 2013, J INT DEV, V25, P227, DOI 10.1002/jid.1687
   Zeiderman A, 2013, AM ETHNOL, V40, P71, DOI 10.1111/amet.12006
   Zeiderman A, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P1570, DOI 10.1068/a44283
   Zeiderman Austin., 2016, ENDANGERED CITY POLI
   2011, STUD URBAN SOC CH, P1
NR 43
TC 18
Z9 19
U1 0
U2 15
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1360-7456
EI 1467-8373
J9 ASIA PAC VIEWP
JI Asia Pac. Viewp.
PD APR
PY 2019
VL 60
IS 1
SI SI
BP 24
EP 36
DI 10.1111/apv.12208
PG 13
WC Area Studies; Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Area Studies; Geography
GA HR1HD
UT WOS:000462880500004
OA Green Published, Green Accepted, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Li, ZH
   Yan, WT
   Wang, L
AF Li, Zihao
   Yan, Wentao
   Wang, Lan
TI Measuring mobility resilience with network-based simulations of flow
   dynamics under extreme events
SO TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient cities; Resilience measurement; Urban mobility pattern;
   Data-driven; Spatial planning
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; EARTHQUAKE; CITIES; FORM
AB Extreme events disrupt routine mobility patterns and affect citizens' daily lives. Current disaster resilience measurements often rely on static proxies or topological analyses, failing to capture the dynamic interactions between functional organization and transportation systems, as well as critical regime shifts within the resilience process. Using big data sourced from mobile-devices, this study delineates the evolving nature of various response flows during disasters with different intensities, depicts curves illustrating shifts in maintained traffic flow proportion, maps mobility resilience heterogeneity, and examines the spatial ramifications of flow redistribution. Our findings revealed that even minor incidents prompt city-wide flow reorganization. Clusters of low resilience with gradients are caused by mobility structures rather than distance from the disaster. Arterial roads uphold connectivity for long-distance journeys, whereas branch roads facilitate shorter trips but remain vulnerable to traffic surges. Based on these findings, strategies for preparedness and emergency planning under road failure conditions are evidence-based.
C1 [Li, Zihao; Yan, Wentao; Wang, Lan] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Dept Urban Planning, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
   [Yan, Wentao] Tongji Univ, Engn Res Ctr Major Engn Software Technol Sensing &, Minist Educ Peoples Republ China, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
   [Yan, Wentao] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, 292 Ziyun Rd, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China.
C3 Tongji University; Tongji University; Anhui Jianzhu University
RP Yan, WT (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Room 709,C Bldg,1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
EM zihaolee@tongji.edu.cn; yanwt@tongji.edu.cn; wanglan@tongji.edu.cn
RI Li, Zihao/AHC-0775-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52178048]; National Key
   Research and Development Program of China [2020YFB2103901]; Science
   Foundation for the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai
   Municipality, China [22DZ1207800]; Program of Anhui Province University
   Outstanding Scientific Research and Innovation Team [2022AH010021]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (52178048) , the National Key Research and Development Program of
   China (2020YFB2103901) , the Science Foundation for the Science and
   Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (22DZ1207800) ,
   the Program of Anhui Province University Outstanding Scientific Research
   and Innovation Team (2022AH010021) .
CR Abenayake C, 2022, APPL GEOGR, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102772
   Allen CR, 2014, ECOSYSTEMS, V17, P578, DOI 10.1007/s10021-013-9744-2
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Aydin NY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
   Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Casali Y, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220338
   Chalkiadakis C, 2022, CASE STUD TRANSP POL, V10, P2377, DOI 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.10.013
   Chen Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104003
   Chen YD, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000836
   Coles D, 2017, J HYDROL, V546, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.013
   Contreras D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.048
   Cutter SL, 2016, GEOGR J, V182, P110, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12174
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Dawson RJ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P167, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4
   Deng HF, 2021, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V8, DOI 10.1057/s41599-021-00824-8
   Dong SJ, 2022, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V3, DOI 10.1038/s43247-022-00366-0
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   Fan C, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1038/s42949-022-00051-3
   Ganin AA, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1701079
   Gao W, 2024, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.104000
   Golla APS, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102439
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Hamedmoghadam H, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-21483-y
   Haraguchi M, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1507, DOI 10.1177/23998083221075634
   Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
   Ilbeigi M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V33, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.10.002
   Jones L, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P288, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00642-x
   Kasmalkar IG, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aba2423
   Lee CC, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103496
   Lee CC, 2022, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1057/s41599-022-01353-8
   Li CQ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102395
   Li J, 2015, J GEOGR SCI, V25, P311, DOI 10.1007/s11442-015-1170-2
   Li MY, 2021, CITIES, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103314
   Li WY, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2203042119
   Li ZH, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104996
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liu XY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102106
   Liu YX, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104314
   Martín B, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102851
   Martín Y, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000354
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Oliver N, 2015, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V3, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00189
   Pietrapertosa F, 2019, CITIES, V91, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.009
   Rajput AA, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104693
   Sadri AM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000244
   Sadri AM, 2014, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V48, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.008
   Salat S, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P107, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2016.1277227
   Salat S, 2010, CESB 10: CENTRAL EUROPE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE BUILDING - FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, P509
   Schläpfer M, 2021, NATURE, V593, P522, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03480-9
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
   Shi XY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104814
   Tang JQ, 2023, NATL SCI REV, V10, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nwad097
   Villagra P, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V48, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.010
   Wang JQ, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0141736
   Wang Q, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0147299
   Wang RX, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104435
   Wang RX, 2022, CITIES, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103939
   Xu XD, 2021, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102448
   Xu XD, 2018, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V114, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2018.05.014
   Yabe T, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-37913-y
   Yabe T, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2111997119
   Yabe T, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1042, DOI 10.1177/2399808320980744
   Yabe T, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0211375
   Yabe TC, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101777
   Yin ZE, 2011, J GEOGR SCI, V21, P274, DOI 10.1007/s11442-011-0844-7
   Yuan FX, 2022, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101870
   Zhang YC, 2024, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2023.104021
NR 71
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 38
U2 47
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1361-9209
EI 1879-2340
J9 TRANSPORT RES D-TR E
JI Transport. Res. Part D-Transport. Environ.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 135
AR 104362
DI 10.1016/j.trd.2024.104362
EA SEP 2024
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies; Transportation; Transportation Science &
   Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Transportation
GA G2G8F
UT WOS:001314882600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Evans, JP
AF Evans, J. P.
TI Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city
SO TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS
LA English
DT Article
DE experimental governance; adaptive epistemologies; urban ecology;
   resilience; Long Term Ecological Research Programme (USA)
ID SCIENCE-POLICY; LONG-TERM; SUSTAINABILITY; CITIES; GEOGRAPHIES;
   ECOSYSTEMS; CLIMATE; REGIONS; WORK
AB In the face of global urbanisation and climate change, scientists are increasingly using cities to experiment with more resilient forms of urban infrastructure. Experimentation represents the practical dimension of adaptation; it is what happens in practice when policymakers, researchers, businesses and communities are charged with finding new paths. This paper traces one particular lineage of experimentation to resilience ecology, which rejects the possibility of external control over a system, casting planning and administrative functions, and even scientists themselves, as part of a Social-Ecological System. Using insights from political ecology, laboratory studies and urban studies, the paper explores how ecologists involved with the Long Term Ecological Research Programme in the USA are embedding adaptive experiments into urban governance. Discussion focuses on the role of place in adaptive science, considering the political implications of ecologising urban governance and rendering it experimental.
C1 Univ Manchester, Sch Environm & Dev, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England.
C3 University of Manchester
RP Evans, JP (corresponding author), Univ Manchester, Sch Environm & Dev, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England.
EM jp.evans@manchester.ac.uk
RI Evans, James/ABC-9633-2021
OI Evans, James/0000-0002-2953-1118
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Alberti Marina., 2008, ADV URBAN ECOLOGY IN, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75510-6, 10.1007/978-0-387-75510-6]
   Amin Ash., 2002, CITIES REIMAGINING U
   Barnett G., 2007, Urban Resilience Research Prospectus. A Resilience Alliance Initiative for Transitioning Urban Systems towards Sustainable Futures
   Berkes F., 2001, Linking Social-Ecological Systems
   Berkes F., 2009, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change
   Breuste Jurgen., 1998, Urban Ecology
   Brunner PH, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P11, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1293
   BULKELEY H, CITIES LOW IN PRESS
   Bulkeley H, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN A, V38, P1029, DOI 10.1068/a37300
   BURTON I, 2008, ADAPTATION CLIMATE C, P11
   Caldeira Teresa., 2005, GLOBAL ASSEMBLAGES T, P393, DOI [10.1002/9780470696569.ch21/summary, DOI 10.1002/9780470696569.CH21/SUMMARY]
   Carpenter SR, 2001, ECOLOGY: ACHIEVEMENT AND CHALLENGE, P357
   Chilvers J, 2009, GEOFORUM, V40, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.03.007
   Colding J, 2006, AMBIO, V35, P237, DOI 10.1579/05-A-098R.1
   Cook WM, 2004, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V2, P467
   Davis Mike., 1990, CITY QUARTZ EXCAVATI
   DAVISON G, 1983, PURSUIT URBAN HIST, P151
   Dear P, 1995, BRIT J HIST SCI, V28, P451, DOI 10.1017/S0007087400033495
   Dierig S, 2003, OSIRIS, V18, P1
   Dobson Andrew., 1998, JUSTICE ENV CONCEPTI, DOI 10.1093/0198294956.001.0001
   DUVIGNEAUD P, 1974, Memoires de la Societe Royale de Botanique de Belgique, V6, P5
   Ehrlich P.R., 1997, A World of Wounds: Ecologists and the Human Dilemma
   EVANS J, CITIES LOW IN PRESS
   Evans J, 2009, LOCAL ENVIRON, V14, P683, DOI 10.1080/13549830903090661
   Evans JP, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN A, V38, P517, DOI 10.1068/a37393
   Folke C, 1997, AMBIO, V26, P167
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Forsyth T., 2003, CRITICAL POLITICAL E
   Gibbs D., 2007, The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban political economy in the United States and Europe, P95
   Gieryn TF, 2006, SOC STUD SCI, V36, P5, DOI 10.1177/0306312705054526
   Gieryn TF, 2008, ISIS, V99, P796, DOI 10.1086/595773
   Graham S., 2001, SPLINTERING URBANISM
   GRIMM N, 1997, CENTRAL ARIZONA PHOE
   Grimm N.B., 2004, CENTRAL ARIZONA PHOE
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Grimm Nancy B., 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P199, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044036.59953.a1
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson LanceH., 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC, P33, DOI DOI 10.1017/CB09780511541957.005
   GUNDERSON LH, 1995, BIOSCIENCE, pS66
   Haughton G., 1994, SUSTAINABLE CITIES
   Hodson M, 2008, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V33, P1619, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.12.053
   Hodson M, 2007, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V31, P303, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00733.x
   Hodson M, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00832.x
   Hodson M, 2009, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V21, P515, DOI 10.1080/09537320902819213
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Holmgren David., 2009, Future Scenarios: How Communities can adapt to Peak Oil and Climate Change
   Holston James., 1999, CITIES CITIZENSHIP, P155
   Hulme M, 2008, T I BRIT GEOGR, V33, P424, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00311.x
   *ICLEI, 2009, RES COMM CIT IN
   *ICLEI, 2010, RES RES POINT
   *IHDP, 2005, 15 IHDP
   Joss S, 2010, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V129, P239, DOI 10.2495/SC100211
   KALLIS G, 2008, COMMENT EXISTENTIAL
   KEMP R, 2005, ENV INNOVATION SYSTE, P35
   Klein N, 2009, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
   Klein U, 2008, ISIS, V99, P769, DOI 10.1086/595771
   Kohler RobertE., 2002, Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology
   Krueger R, 2009, GEOGR REV, V99, pIII, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2009.tb00414.x
   Lakatos Imre., 1977, Philosophical Papers, V1
   Levin SA, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P431, DOI 10.1007/s100219900037
   LIVINGSTONE D, 2002, HETTNER LECT, V5
   Livingstone DN., 2003, Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge
   Lovering J, 1999, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V23, P379, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00202
   MARCOTULLIO P, 2003, 105 UNUIAS
   McDonnell M.J., 1993, HUMANS COMPONENTS EC
   MCDONNELL MJ, 1990, ECOLOGY, V71, P1232, DOI 10.2307/1938259
   McIntyre NE., 2000, URBAN ECOSYST, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-54
   Meadowcroft J, 2009, POLICY SCI, V42, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Melosi M.V., 2000, The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present
   Monstadt J, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1924, DOI 10.1068/a4145
   Musacchio Laura R., 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P175, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044034.55695.bd
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Nilsson D, 2006, ENVIRON URBAN, V18, P369, DOI 10.1177/0956247806069618
   *NSF, 2002, LONG TERM EC RES 20
   O'Riordan T, 2004, T I BRIT GEOGR, V29, P234, DOI 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00127.x
   PADOCH CR, 1993, HUMANS AS COMPONENTS OF ECOSYSTEMS, P303
   Perry B, 2007, REG STUD, V41, P1039, DOI 10.1080/00343400701565846
   PICKETT S, 2004, BALTIMORE ECOSYSTEM
   PICKETT S, 1997, BALTIMORE ECOSYSTEM
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett Steward T. A., 2009, Urban Ecosystems, V12, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11252-008-0079-2
   Pielke R, 2007, NATURE, V445, P597, DOI 10.1038/445597a
   Pincetl S, 2010, LOCAL ENVIRON, V15, P43, DOI 10.1080/13549830903406065
   Pincetl S, 2010, ENVIRON MANAGE, V45, P227, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9412-7
   Powell RC, 2007, PROG HUM GEOG, V31, P309, DOI 10.1177/0309132507077081
   Prakash Gyan., 1999, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India
   Raudsepp-Hearne C, 2010, BIOSCIENCE, V60, P576, DOI 10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.4
   Redman CL, 2004, ECOSYSTEMS, V7, P161, DOI 10.1007/s10021-003-0215-z
   *ROCK FDN, 2009, AS CIT CLIM CHANG RE
   Secord JA, 2004, ISIS, V95, P654, DOI 10.1086/430657
   SHAPIN S, 1989, LEVATHAN AIR PUMP HO
   SUKOPP H, 2005, BIODIVERSITAT BESIED, P93
   Swyngedouw Eric., 2004, Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power
   Swyngedouw E, 2010, URBAN LAND PERSPECT, P185, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3106-8_11
   TOL R, 2005, ENV SCI POLICY, V8
   Turnpenny J, 2007, T I BRIT GEOGR, V32, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2007.00226.x
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Vitousek PM, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P494, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5325.494
   WALISSER B, 2005, RESILIENT CITY
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Weiland U, 2009, GAIA, V18, P49, DOI 10.14512/gaia.18.1.13
   While A, 2010, T I BRIT GEOGR, V35, P76, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00362.x
   Zimmerer KS, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P356, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00199
NR 106
TC 255
Z9 304
U1 6
U2 265
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0020-2754
EI 1475-5661
J9 T I BRIT GEOGR
JI Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr.
PD APR
PY 2011
VL 36
IS 2
BP 223
EP 237
DI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
PG 15
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA 741KO
UT WOS:000288862800006
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kontokosta, CE
   Malik, A
AF Kontokosta, Constantine E.
   Malik, Awais
TI The Resilience to Emergencies and Disasters Index: Applying big data to
   benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Emergency management; Disaster recovery; Community
   resilience; Big data; Anomaly detection
ID NEW-YORK-CITY; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; ECONOMIC
   VULNERABILITY; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; INDICATORS;
   ENHANCE; METRICS
AB Resilience planning and emergency management require policymakers and agency leaders to make difficult decisions regarding which at-risk populations should be given priority in the allocation of limited resources. Our work focuses on benchmarking neighborhood resilience by developing a unified, multi-factor index of local and regional resilience capacity: the Resilience to Emergencies and Disasters Index (REDI). The strength of the REDI methodology is the integration of measures of physical, natural, and social systems - operationalized through the collection and analysis of large-scale, heterogeneous, and high resolution urban data - to classify and rank the relative resilience capacity embedded in localized urban systems. Feature selection methodologies are discussed to justify the selection of included indicator variables. Hurricane Sandy is used to validate the REDI scores by measuring the recovery periods for neighborhoods directly impacted by the storm. Using over 12,000,000 records for New York City's 311 service request system, we develop a proxy for neighborhood activity, both pre- and post-event. Hurricane Sandy had a significant and immediate impact on neighborhoods classified as least resilient based on the calculated REDI scores, while the most resilient neighborhoods were shown to better withstand disruption to normal activity patterns and more quickly recover to pre-event functional capacity.
C1 [Kontokosta, Constantine E.] NYU, Dept Civil & Urban Engn, 1 MetroTech Ctr,19th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
   NYU, Ctr Urban Sci & Progress, 1 MetroTech Ctr,19th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
C3 New York University; New York University
RP Kontokosta, CE (corresponding author), NYU, Dept Civil & Urban Engn, 1 MetroTech Ctr,19th Floor, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA.
EM ckontokosta@nyu.edu; awais.malik@nyu.edu
OI Varela, Juan Carlos/0000-0003-1480-0837; Malik,
   Awais/0000-0002-1220-9579; Kontokosta, Constantine/0000-0003-4831-9996
FU New York State Office of Storm Recovery through the New York State
   Resiliency Institute for Storms and Emergencies (RISE)
FX The authors thank Schuyler Poukish and William Vidal for their research
   assistance, and Bud Griffis, Magued Iskander, and Ilan Juran for their
   comments and feedback. This work was supported, in part, by a grant from
   the New York State Office of Storm Recovery through the New York State
   Resiliency Institute for Storms and Emergencies (RISE). Any opinions,
   findings, and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the
   authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of any supporting
   institution.
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
   Aldunce P, 2014, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V23, P252, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2013-0130
   Angeon V, 2015, WORLD DEV, V72, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.02.011
   [Anonymous], J INFRASTRUCT SYST
   [Anonymous], 2007, 8 U CAL BUILD RES RE
   [Anonymous], 2010, J HOMELAND SECURITY
   Ayyub Bilal M., 2014, Sustainable Development of Critical Infrastructure. 2014 International Conference on Sustainable Development of Critical Infrastructure. Proceedings, P91
   Ayyub BM, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P340, DOI 10.1111/risa.12093
   Bakkensen LA, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P982, DOI 10.1111/risa.12677
   Barker K, 2013, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V117, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.012
   Barry JJ, 2002, TRANSPORT RES REC, P183
   Bates S, 2014, ECON MODEL, V42, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.027
   Bergstrand K, 2015, SOC INDIC RES, V122, P391, DOI 10.1007/s11205-014-0698-3
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Bloomberg M.R., 2013, STRONGER MORE RESILI
   Bocchini P, 2014, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V20, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000177
   Bonstrom H. L., 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Structures Congress. Structures Congress 2012, P2268, DOI 10.1061/9780784412367.199
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Briguglio L, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P229, DOI 10.1080/13600810903089893
   Brownjohn James, 2013, Proceedings of the Structures Congress 2013, P1812
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burnside-Lawry J, 2015, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V24, P80, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2014-0129
   Cai H, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8020046
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chang S.E., 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P186, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(186)
   Cimellaro GP, 2014, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V43, P1763, DOI 10.1002/eqe.2422
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Croope SV, 2011, TRANSPORT RES REC, P3, DOI 10.3141/2234-01
   Cutter S.L., 2016, Journal of Extreme Events, V3, P1671005, DOI [DOI 10.1142/S2345737616710056, 10.1142/S2345737616710056]
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Dale A., 2010, Sustainability, V2, P215
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Flanagan BE, 2011, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V8, DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1792
   Foster KA, 2012, URBAN AND REGIONAL POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS: BUILDING RESILIENT REGIONS, VOL 4, P24
   Fox-Lent Cate, 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P209, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9555-4
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Ganin AA, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep19540
   Gibbs Linda., 2013, HURRICANE SANDY ACTI
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gonzales P, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V30, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.012
   Granot H., 1995, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, V4, P5
   Grayson J.M., 2014, Structures Congress 2014, P1392
   Guillaumont P, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P193, DOI 10.1080/13600810903089901
   Hémond Y, 2012, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V21, P404, DOI 10.1108/09653561211256125
   Henry D, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V99, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002
   Highfield WE, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P287, DOI 10.1177/0739456X14531828
   Highfield WE, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P229, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000114
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Islam MS, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V3, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.10.001
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jie Gong, 2014, Construction in a Global Network. 2014 Construction Research Congress. Proceedings, P1259
   Jordan E, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000087
   Kats P., 2017, ARXIV170706122
   Kojima K, 2014, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V12, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2014.01.004
   Kontokosta C. E., 2016, J URBAN TECHNOL, P1
   Kontokosta C.E., 2017, Bloomberg Data for Good Exchange 2017
   Kontokosta C. E., 2016, 16 INT C COMP CIV BU
   Kontokosta CE, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.01.011
   Kontokosta C, 2015, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V30, P569, DOI 10.1007/s10901-014-9430-5
   Kontokosta CE, 2014, J URBAN AFF, V36, P716, DOI 10.1111/juaf.12068
   Kontokosta CE, 2013, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1295, P34, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12163
   Koraz Y., 2017, SUSTAINABLE CITIES S
   Lam NSN, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000193
   Lam NSN, 2015, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V42, P315, DOI 10.1080/15230406.2015.1040999
   Linkov I., 2016, International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) Resource Guide on Resilience
   Linkov I., 2017, Resilience and risk: Methods and application in environment, cyber and social domains
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Linkov I, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P10108, DOI 10.1021/es403443n
   Lopez-Cuevas A., 2017, Risk Analysis
   Madrigano J, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V123, P672, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1408178
   Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674
   Maity R, 2013, J HYDROL ENG, V18, P859, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000639
   Manyena SB, 2015, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V24, P38, DOI 10.1108/DPM-04-2014-0075
   Martani C, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V47, P584, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.037
   Martin R, 2011, J ECON GEOGR
   Matthews EC, 2014, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V49, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.05.003
   McArdle A.L., 2014, Idaho Law Review, V50, P19
   McPhearson T, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P198, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw002
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miles SB, 2011, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V38, P36, DOI 10.1559/1523040638136
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   O'Brien D. T., 2016, SOCIAL SCI RES
   Orencio PM, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V3, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.11.006
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Peacock W., 2010, Advancing Resilience of Coastal Localities: Developing, Implementing, and Sustaining the Use of Coastal Resilience Indicators: A Final Report
   Ranjan R, 2009, NAT RESOUR MODEL, V22, P437, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-7445.2009.00044.x
   Razafindrabe B.H., 2009, Asian journal of environment and disaster management, V1
   Reddy A, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P128, DOI 10.3141/2110-16
   Renschler CS, 2010, A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework
   Robert B, 2015, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V24, P70, DOI 10.1108/DPM-10-2013-0195
   Rose Adam., 2004, Disaster Prevention and Management, V13, P307, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410556528
   Sevtsuk A, 2010, J URBAN TECHNOL, V17, P41, DOI 10.1080/10630731003597322
   Shafieezadeh A, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V132, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2014.07.021
   Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Simpson D.E., 2008, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V17, P645, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560810918658
   Stewart MC, 2016, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V54, P639, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.009
   Sullivan D., 2012, HURRICANE POSTTROPIC
   Tate E, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P325, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2
   Timashev S., 2011, P INT C VULN RISK AN
   Van Zandt S, 2012, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V22, P29, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2011.624528
   Wagner M, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V50, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.009
   Wallace D, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Wang Lingjing, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12
   Weichselgartner J., 2001, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V10, P85, DOI [10.1108/09653560110388609, DOI 10.1108/09653560110388609]
   Winderl T., 2014, TECH REP
   Zhang Y, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P277, DOI 10.1080/13600810903094471
   Zimmerman R, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000394
NR 114
TC 142
Z9 153
U1 17
U2 276
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD JAN
PY 2018
VL 36
BP 272
EP 285
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA FN3LG
UT WOS:000415900000025
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, SC
   Peng, FL
   Qiao, YK
   Zhang, JB
AF Liu, Si-Cong
   Peng, Fang-Le
   Qiao, Yong-Kang
   Zhang, Jun-Bo
TI Evaluating disaster prevention benefits of underground space from the
   perspective of urban resilience
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban underground space (UUS); Urban resilience; Monetary valuation;
   Disaster prevention; Disaster mitigation
ID VALUATION; SUSTAINABILITY; PATTERNS; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; DESIGN
AB Urban underground space (UUS) is such a crucial constituent part of a city that contributes to urban sustainability via various external benefits. Disaster prevention benefits, as one of these benefits, were simply taken as responses to catastrophes such as earthquakes or wars in the process of cost-benefit analysis. The rough analysis can improve people's overall understanding of UUS, but can hardly cover and reveal the benefits that underground facilities may produce in response to certain types of disasters. Urban resilience, a concept that has been widely discussed in recent years, requires cities to be prepared for whatever impacts caused by natural disasters or human actions. With the help of this concept, the disaster prevention services and benefits of UUS will be rerecognized by analyzing the relationships between underground facilities and urban resilience. This paper intends to establish the linkages between UUS and urban resilience, reveal the various disaster prevention services that underground facilities can provide, and set up a monetary valuation framework to the benefits of these services. The results show that UUS has a close connection with infrastructure resilience, an important domain of urban resilience, and can generate huge benefits when confronted with disasters. It is anticipated that this study will deepen people's understanding of the disaster prevention value of UUS and promote the integrated planning of UUS in the construction of resilient cities.
C1 [Liu, Si-Cong; Peng, Fang-Le; Qiao, Yong-Kang] Tongji Univ, Res Ctr Underground Space, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Si-Cong; Peng, Fang-Le; Qiao, Yong-Kang] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Jun-Bo] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Qingdao 266033, Peoples R China.
C3 Tongji University; Tongji University; Qingdao University of Technology
RP Peng, FL (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Res Ctr Underground Space, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.; Peng, FL (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
EM pengfangle@tongji.edu.cn
RI Qiao, Yong-Kang/ABE-6708-2021
OI Peng, Fang-Le/0009-0001-9550-2075; Qiao, Yong-Kang/0000-0003-3166-1656
FU National Key Technology RD Program [2012BAJ01B04]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [42071251]
FX This work was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program
   [Grant numbers 2012BAJ01B04] and the National Natural Science Foundation
   of China (NSFC) [grant numbers 42071251]. The authors gratefully
   appreciate the efforts of editorial office and constructive comments of
   the three anonymous reviewers.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Admiraal H, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
   Alberico I, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101893
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   [Anonymous], 2015, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V30, P9
   [Anonymous], 2010, CHIN J UNDERGR SPACE
   [Anonymous], 2017, REF STAND PAID US CH
   Bae C, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101412
   Bobylev N, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.022
   Borsekova K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.012
   Broere W, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012
   Casado MR, 2017, WASTE MANAGE, V61, P608, DOI [10.1015/j.wasman.2016.10.036, 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.036]
   Chen J, 2012, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V30, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.023
   Chen WX, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V701, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134690
   China Earthquake Administration, 2011, ASS METH EARTHQ CAUS
   China Urban Construction Statistical Yearbook 2017, 2019, CHIN URB CONSTR STAT
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Dai S.Z., 2018, BEIJING PLANNING REV, P14
   [丁留谦 Ding Liuqian], 2016, [中国给水排水, China Water & Wastewater], V32, P35
   DUNN CE, 1992, AREA, V24, P259
   Edogawa river office, 2014, METR AR OUT UND DISC
   Eom YS, 2006, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V52, P501, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.11.001
   Geekiyanage D, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101847
   Ramírez-Camacho JG, 2017, SAFETY SCI, V97, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.01.021
   Govindarajulu D, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101549
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hunt DVL, 2014, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V39, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.001
   ITA Working Group, 1990, TUNN UNDERGR SPACE T, V5, P39, DOI [10.1016/0886-7798(90)90061-N, DOI 10.1016/0886-7798(90)90061-N]
   ITF, WHAT IS VALU SAV TRA
   Jackson S, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V135, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.018
   Jha AK, 2013, Building Urban Resilience Principles, Tools, and, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jia J., 2012, CHIN J UNDERGR SPACE, V8, P1339
   Jia M.J., 2017, IND CONTROL COMPUTER, V30, P116
   Johnson D, 2019, ECOL ECON, V158, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.024
   Kazemi F, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V209, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.046
   Kilanitis I, 2019, J TRAFFIC TRANSP ENG, V6, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jtte.2018.07.002
   Labbé M, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.004
   Lavee D, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.005
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Lin JJ, 2008, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V23, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2006.12.003
   Luo Y, 2020, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103511
   Ma CX, 2018, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V82, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.09.034
   Maddison D., 1997, J TRANSPORT EC POL, V31, P337, DOI [10.1016/S0966-6923(97)84105-1, DOI 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)84105-1]
   McClymont K, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173
   Mileti D., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN REA, DOI DOI 10.17226/5782
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People's Republic of China, 2015, GUID OP GEN OFF STAT
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   National Research Council of U.S, 2002, TERRORISM
   Normandin J.M., RESILIENT CITIES
   Notaro S, 2012, J FOREST ECON, V18, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.06.002
   Pappalardo V, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101830
   Peng FL, 2021, FRONT STRUCT CIV ENG, V15, P20, DOI 10.1007/s11709-021-0716-x
   Penning-Rowsell E., 1977, GEOGR J, V145, P472
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Qiao YK, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101757
   Qiao YK, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.037
   Qiao YK, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.001
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, ARUP CIT RES FRAM
   Rose A, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.003
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Schultz N., 2012, P WATER ENV FEDERATI, P98, DOI [10.2175/, DOI 10.2175/]
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Shahid S, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P459, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0757-6
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shanghai Bureau of Statistics, 2019, SHANGH STAT YB
   Shanghai Urban Planning and Land Resource Administration Bureau, 2018, Shanghai Master Plan 2017-2035
   Shi Wei-Hong, 2015, CHINESE OVERSEAS AR, V12, P103
   Sterling R, 1997, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V12, P479, DOI 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00007-8
   Sterling R., 2013, CITY RESILIENCY UNDE, DOI [10.3850/978-981-07-3757-3key6, DOI 10.3850/978-981-07-3757-3KEY6]
   Tan WKB, 1999, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V14, P509
   Tan Z, 2018, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V71, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2017.09.002
   Tang S., 2017, CONSTRUCTION, V37, P449
   The State Council of the People's Republic of China, 1995, DESTR EARTHQ EM REG
   Tian Q., 2015, Chin. J. Undergr. Space Eng, V11, P373
   Tumini I, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V85, P1363, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2630-4
   Un-Habitat, 2017, TRENDS URB RES
   UNDDR, 2019, MAK CIT RES
   Urban Outfitters, 2019, SHANGH COMPR TRANSP
   Wallis S., 2010, SANTIAGO METRO WITHS
   Wang B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102884
   Wang TY, 2018, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V76, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.03.006
   Wang W.H., 2011, MILITARY OPERATIONS, V25, P67
   Wang Y, 2012, CHIN J UNDERGR SP S1, V8, P1560
   Wei Z., 2019, URBAN RAIL TRANSIT R, V22, P1
   Wu JH, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V40, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.05.004
   [吴奇兵 Wu Qibing], 2011, [交通运输系统工程与信息, Journal of Transporation Systems Engineering & Information Technology], V11, P168
   Wudong D., 2013, ECOLOGICAL EC, V8, P75
   Yang BC, 2017, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V60, P4644, DOI 10.6038/cjg20171209
   [杨超 Yang Chao], 2017, [地下空间与工程学报, Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering], V13, P821
   [袁红 Yuan Hong], 2020, [工业建筑, Industrial Construction], V50, P29
   Yue F, 2020, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103579
   Zhang Y.Z., 2007, TECHNOLOGY
   Zhao JW, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011
   [周光全 Zhou Guangquan], 2007, [中国地震, Earthquake Research in China], V23, P115
   Zhu LC, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V127, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.004
   Zischg AP, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P2759, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-2759-2018
NR 99
TC 51
Z9 53
U1 32
U2 180
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 58
AR 102206
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
EA MAR 2021
PG 15
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA SB0TB
UT WOS:000649714700001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Veról, AP
   Lourenço, IB
   Fraga, JPR
   Battemarco, BP
   Merlo, ML
   de Magalhaes, PC
   Miguez, MG
AF Verol, Aline Pires
   Lourenco, Ianic Bigate
   Rebechi Fraga, Joao Paulo
   Battemarco, Bruna Peres
   Merlo, Mylenna Linares
   de Magalhaes, Paulo Canedo
   Miguez, Marcelo Gomes
TI River Restoration Integrated with Sustainable Urban Water Management for
   Resilient Cities
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE river restoration; sustainable urban drainage; integrated urban
   planning; flood resilience
ID FLOOD-CONTROL; URBANIZATION; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; SUPPORT; BASIN
AB Urban floods can threaten citizens' quality of life, produce socioeconomic losses, and act as an urban degradation driver. Restoring urban rivers, however, is not simple and its results are usually limited. It would be desirable to enhance urban fluvial systems, control flood risks, and increase city resilience while improving the city itself. This work suggests that river restoration, when applied to an urban watershed, should be supported by sustainable urban drainage measures to compensate for the negative effects induced by city growth in the water cycle, in a systemic approach to the entire watershed. A methodological framework is proposed to verify this hypothesis intending to assess urban flooding projects in a wide sense. This framework uses a hydrodynamic mathematical model and a set of multicriteria indices. A case study in Dona Eugenia Watershed, in Brazil, was developed. Two different design concepts were considered: the usual drainage design and the river restoration combined with sustainable urban drainage. Both solutions were designed to completely solve the problems, leading to virtually zero flooding in the present situation; however, environmental and urban gains were greater when using the proposed combination. Besides, when testing resilience behavior, it was also shown to be more consistent over time.
C1 [Verol, Aline Pires] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Fac Arquitetura Urbanismo, Programa Engn Civil COPPE, Programa Posgrad Arquitetura PROARQ, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Lourenco, Ianic Bigate; Battemarco, Bruna Peres] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Civil COPPE, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Rebechi Fraga, Joao Paulo] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Escola Politecn, Programa Engn Urbana PEU, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Merlo, Mylenna Linares] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Fac Arquitetura Urbanismo, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [de Magalhaes, Paulo Canedo] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Civil COPPE, Programa Engn Ambiental PEA, Escola Politecn, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [de Magalhaes, Paulo Canedo; Miguez, Marcelo Gomes] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Escola Quim, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [Miguez, Marcelo Gomes] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Civil COPPE, Programa Engn Urbana PEU, Escola Politecn,Programa Engn Ambiental PEA, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de
   Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do
   Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade
   Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
RP Veról, AP (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Fac Arquitetura Urbanismo, Programa Engn Civil COPPE, Programa Posgrad Arquitetura PROARQ, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
EM alineverol@fau.ufrj.br; ianicbigate@gmail.com; jpfraga@poli.ufrj.br;
   brunabattemarco@poli.ufrj.br; m.linaresmerlo@gmail.com;
   canedo@hidro.ufrj.br; marcelomiguez@poli.ufrj.br
RI Fraga, João/AAT-2783-2021; Bigate Lourenco, Ianic/IWM-7174-2023; VEROL,
   ALINE PIRES/R-2750-2017; Miguez, Marcelo Gomes/A-3252-2013
OI Magalhaes, Paulo Canedo/0000-0002-3030-4414; Bigate Lourenco,
   Ianic/0000-0002-3524-8191; VEROL, ALINE PIRES/0000-0001-7793-1143;
   Linares Merlo, Mylenna/0000-0002-5213-5383; Rebechi Fraga, Joao
   Paulo/0000-0002-0172-0726; Miguez, Marcelo Gomes/0000-0003-4206-4013;
   Battemarco, Bruna/0000-0003-1388-4688
FU Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil
   (CAPES) [001, 1526717, 88887.495814/2020-00]; Conselho Nacional de
   Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [148705/2010-3,
   303240/2017-2]; Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do
   Estado do Rio de Janeiro [E-26/211.085/2015, E-26/200.270/2017];
   International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IRSES]
FX This work was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de
   Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001; 1526717;
   88887.495814/2020-00]; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e
   Tecnologico (CNPq) [148705/2010-3; 303240/2017-2]; Fundacao Carlos
   Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
   [E-26/211.085/2015; E-26/200.270/2017]; and by the International
   Research Staff Exchange Scheme [FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IRSES].
CR Ahmed E.H.A.-R., 2019, Biodiversity and Conservation, P1
   Ali M, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V102, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.006
   Andoh R.Y.G., 2004, GLOBAL SOLUTIONS URB
   [Anonymous], 2016, ADB RED DIS RISK MAN
   [Anonymous], 2009, FUNDACAO COPPETEC PL
   [Anonymous], 1996, FUNDACAO COPPETEC PL
   Arnaud F, 2019, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V330, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.01.004
   Chou RJ, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111159
   Cunge J.A., 1980, PRACTICAL ASPECTS CO
   de Bell S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020695
   DELTANANGO MG, 2007, RESTAURACION RIOS GU
   Dixon SJ, 2016, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V41, P997, DOI 10.1002/esp.3919
   Everard M, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST, V15, P293, DOI 10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7
   Gusmaroli G., 2011, P ACQ CITT 4 CONV NA
   Haque CE, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11122654
   IBGE-Instituo Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2010, Censo Demografico
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Kozak D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062163
   Lähde E, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071854
   Liao KH, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.014
   Mascarenhas FCB, 2002, WATER INT, V27, P208, DOI 10.1080/02508060208686994
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Middle I, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P638, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.001
   Miguez M. G., 2007, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, V2, P153, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V2-N2-153-166
   Miguez M.G., 2012, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, P21, DOI DOI 10.5772/33896
   Miguez M.G., 2018, URBAN AGGLOMERATION
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   Miguez MG, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V231, P1281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.187
   Miguez MG, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060445
   Miguez MG, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P11068, DOI 10.3390/su70811068
   Nardini A., 2006, RIQ FLUV RIQ FLUV IN
   Pan BZ, 2016, INT J SEDIMENT RES, V31, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2016.03.001
   PARK K, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI DOI 10.3390/su11030674
   Perini K., 2016, Urban sustainability and river restoration: green and blue infrastructure, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119245025
   Pertiwi I. G. A. I. M., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V351, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/351/1/012005
   Riley AnnL., 1998, RESTORING STREAMS CI
   Shadie C.E., 2018, Managing Flood Risk, P11
   Thiagarajan M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103665
   Veról AP, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118058
   Wheater H, 2009, LAND USE POLICY, V26, pS251, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.019
   Wohl E, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P5974, DOI 10.1002/2014WR016874
   Xu FR, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V154, P787, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.407
   Zanobetti D., 1970, Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, V96, P181, DOI DOI 10.1061/AWHCAR.0000013
   Zhou QQ, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P976, DOI 10.3390/w6040976
   Zonensein J., 2008, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on urban drainage, P31
   Zope PE, 2016, CATENA, V145, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2016.06.009
NR 46
TC 17
Z9 18
U1 5
U2 59
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 11
AR 4677
DI 10.3390/su12114677
PG 36
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MC6JX
UT WOS:000543391800340
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yu, Y
   Zhou, R
   Qian, LY
   Yang, X
   Dong, LY
   Zhang, GY
AF Yu, Yang
   Zhou, Rui
   Qian, Liyuan
   Yang, Xian
   Dong, Liuyang
   Zhang, Guangyuan
TI Supply-demand balance and spatial distribution optimization of primary
   care facilities in highland cities from a resilience perspective: A
   study of Lhasa, China
SO FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE resilient city; public health; spatial analysis; urban planning;
   highland area
ID PRIMARY-HEALTH-CARE; ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE;
   ACCESSIBILITY; LOCATION; LESSONS; SYSTEMS; EQUITY; RESIDENTS; FRAMEWORK
AB IntroductionThe development of urban resilience, which is fundamentally a balance between the supply capacity of primary care resources and the demand from urban residents, includes an appropriate architecture of primary care facilities. Resilient city construction in highland areas is hampered by the physical environment and transportation constraints and frequently encounters issues like poor accessibility and unequal distribution of primary care facilities. MethodsTo optimize the supply and demand of primary care resources in highland cities and effectively improve the resilience of urban public health, this paper assesses the distribution of primary care facilities within the built-up area of Lhasa (China) through a spatial network analysis method based on GIS, combined with population distribution data, and employs a location-allocation model to optimize the distribution. ResultsFirstly, the overall supply of primary care exceeds the overall demand, but the facilities' service area can only accommodate 59% of the residences. Secondly, there is a clear spatial variation in the accessibility of primary care facilities, and the time cost of healthcare is too high in some residences. Thirdly, the supply-demand relationship of primary care facilities is unbalanced, with both over-saturated and over-deficient areas. DiscussionAfter distribution optimization, the coverage and accessibility of primary care facilities have increased significantly, and the spatial imbalance of supply and demand has been alleviated. This paper proposes a research method to evaluate and optimize the spatial distribution of primary care facilities from multiple perspectives based on the resilience theory. The results of the study and visualization analysis methods can be used as an invaluable reference for planning the distribution of urban healthcare facilities and urban resilience construction in highland areas and other underdeveloped areas.
C1 [Yu, Yang; Zhou, Rui; Qian, Liyuan; Yang, Xian; Dong, Liuyang] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Guangyuan] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Transportat & Logist, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
C3 Southwest Jiaotong University; Southwest Jiaotong University
RP Zhang, GY (corresponding author), Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Transportat & Logist, Chengdu, Peoples R China.
EM gyzhang@swjtu.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Guangyuan/ACW-3451-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52178059]; Sichuan Science
   and Technology Program [2021JDR0068]
FX Funding This study was supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 52178059) and the Sichuan Science and
   Technology Program (No. 2021JDR0068).
CR Achour N., 2010, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V1, P264, DOI [DOI 10.1108/17595901011080869, https://doi.org/10.1108/17595901011080869]
   Aghapour AH, 2019, J BUILD ENG, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100853
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Akman M, 2022, PRIM HEALTH CARE RES, V23, DOI 10.1017/S1463423622000275
   [Anonymous], 2018, Technical Series on Primary Health Care: Integrating Health Services
   Apparicio P, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P187, DOI 10.1080/00420980500409334
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Bhaskar S, 2020, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2020.556720
   Boyd E., 2011, Adapting Institutions: Governance, Complexity, and Social-Ecological Resilience, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139017237
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cheng T, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103997
   Church R.L. Murray., 2009, BUSINESS SITE SELECT
   Cimellaro GP, 2019, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V18, P663, DOI 10.1007/s11803-019-0528-3
   Coston JM, 1998, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V18, P479, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-162X(199812)18:5<479::AID-PAD37>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Curtis S, 2017, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V16, P23, DOI 10.1186/s12940-017-0324-3
   Daskin MS., 2015, Location Science, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13111-52, 10.1007/978-3-319-13111-52, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-13111-5_2]
   Del Conte DE, 2022, TRANSP RES INTERDISC, V13, DOI 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100550
   Demitiry M, 2022, J TRANSP GEOGR, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103356
   DREZNER Z, 1991, NAV RES LOG, V38, P763, DOI 10.1002/1520-6750(199110)38:5<763::AID-NAV3220380510>3.0.CO;2-A
   Ellis LA, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P241, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.044
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Ferguson WJ, 2016, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V15, DOI 10.1186/s12942-016-0037-9
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fu SH, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10111225
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   GREGG SR, 1988, ENVIRON PLANN A, V20, P83, DOI 10.1068/a200083
   Grimaz S, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102594
   Gu W, 2010, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V9, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-9-17
   Guo M, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17228506
   HANSEN WG, 1959, J AM I PLANNERS, V25, P73, DOI 10.1080/01944365908978307
   Hassan EM, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106953
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hone T, 2018, LANCET, V392, P1461, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31829-4
   Hu P, 2019, URBAN POLICY RES, V37, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2018.1523055
   Iflaifel M, 2020, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05208-3
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jha AK, 2013, Building Urban Resilience Principles, Tools, and, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jiang S, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V53, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.12.001
   Jin MH, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16071150
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kharrazi A, 2020, CURR RES ENVIRON SUS, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.crsust.2020.06.001
   Kieny MP, 2014, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V92, P850, DOI 10.2471/BLT.14.149278
   Kinder K, 2021, PRIM HEALTH CARE RES, V22, DOI 10.1017/S1463423621000311
   Kruk ME, 2017, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V357, DOI 10.1136/bmj.j2323
   Kruk ME, 2015, LANCET, V385, P1910, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60755-3
   Landry Michel D, 2008, Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, V3, P393
   Leslie Myles, 2021, Healthc Policy, V17, P54, DOI 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26657
   Li LZ, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.764069
   LIANG GS, 1991, INT J PROD RES, V29, P2313, DOI 10.1080/00207549108948085
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liu D, 2022, J HYDROL, V612, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128134
   Liu ZZ, 2022, J SAF SCI RESIL, V3, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.12.003
   Luo W, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN B, V30, P865, DOI 10.1068/b29120
   Maclean K, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P144, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.763774
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Marmo R, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103265
   Moturi AK, 2022, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002975
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Murgatroyd A, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.571647
   Orsetti E, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19031355
   Paschoalotto MAC, 2023, SOC SCI MED, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115716
   Pearce J, 2006, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V60, P389, DOI 10.1136/jech.2005.043281
   Perrings C, 2006, ENVIRON DEV ECON, V11, P417, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X06003020
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Sabatino M, 2016, J BUS RES, V69, P1924, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.081
   Shen Y, 2022, APPL GEOGR, V139, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102644
   Silva LL, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.740284
   [宋正娜 Song Zhengnuo], 2010, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V30, P213
   Starfield B, 2005, MILBANK Q, V83, P457, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x
   Taleai M, 2014, CITIES, V40, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.04.006
   Talen E, 1998, ENVIRON PLANN A, V30, P595, DOI 10.1068/a300595
   Teixeira JC, 2008, EUR J OPER RES, V185, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.027
   Umakanthan S, 2022, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.844333
   Valdes HM., 2013, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V4, P5, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299035, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299035]
   Vale LJ., 2005, RESILIENT CITY MODER, DOI [10.1093/oso/9780195175844.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195175844.001.0001]
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang CH, 2009, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V135, P528, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(528)
   Wang FH, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P195, DOI 10.1068/b37096
   Wang J, 2014, JAMA INTERN MED, V174, P1914, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5214
   Wang L, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104048
   Wang W, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18020516
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   WHITE JA, 1974, GEOGR ANAL, V6, P281
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wong CY, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103923
   Wu CW, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12050516
   Wu D, 2017, FAM PRACT, V34, P194, DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmw133
   Xia YT, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104130
   Yang LC, 2023, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103571
   Yang LC, 2023, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104931
   Yang LC, 2022, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104528
   Yang LC, 2019, RES TRANSP ECON, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2019.06.001
   Yang LC, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V62, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.001
   Yeoh K, 2023, CLIN ONCOL-UK, V35, pE289, DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.004
   Zhang DH, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10111249
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhong S, 2014, EMERG MED J, V31, P930, DOI 10.1136/emermed-2012-202282
   Zhou ZL, 2021, SOC SCI MED, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113372
NR 100
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 18
U2 100
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-2565
J9 FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH
JI Front. Public Health
PD MAR 8
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1131895
DI 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1131895
PG 16
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA 9Z3FT
UT WOS:000951030300001
PM 36969676
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hu, LT
   Meng, J
   Xiong, CY
   Fang, W
   Yang, JX
   Liu, MM
   Bi, J
   Ma, ZW
AF Hu, Litiao
   Meng, Jing
   Xiong, Chaoying
   Fang, Wen
   Yang, Jianxun
   Liu, Miaomiao
   Bi, Jun
   Ma, Zongwei
TI City-level resilience to extreme weather shocks revealed by satellite
   nighttime lights in China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Extreme heat; Heavy rainfall; Nighttime lights;
   Empirical model
ID URBAN HEAT-ISLAND; CLIMATE-CHANGE; URBANIZATION; INTENSITY; IMPACT;
   REGION
AB Given the unprecedented climate change, extreme weathers have become more intense and frequent, causing severe socio-economic impacts. Urban resilience is vital for mitigating extreme events, but little is known about its city-level response to such shocks in China. Here, we aim to investigate the persistent effects of extreme heat and heavy rainfall on Chinese cities, ultimately revealing urban resilience. We use monthly nighttime lights from 2013-2019 as a proxy for urban functioning. Our results suggest that cities are less resilient to extreme heat than to heavy rainfall, yet the adverse effects of heavy rainfall can persist for up to seven months. Importantly, we reveal for the first time that areas near the Hu Line are vulnerable to heavy rainfall (e.g., Beijing, Tianjin and Chongqing), and cities in the Yangtze River basin are most affected by extreme heat (up to 24.8 % loss of nighttime light intensity). There is an urgent need to address severe weather impacts in regions dominated by secondary sector, while developed economies are vulnerable to climate hazards, despite having high defense. Our findings identify urban climate risk hotspots and underlying impact mechanisms, providing valuable insights into climate mitigation policies and urban development strategies.
C1 [Hu, Litiao; Xiong, Chaoying; Fang, Wen; Yang, Jianxun; Liu, Miaomiao; Bi, Jun; Ma, Zongwei] Nanjing Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Meng, Jing] UCL, Bartlett Sch Sustainable Construct, London, England.
   [Bi, Jun; Ma, Zongwei] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Collaborat Innovat Ctr Atmospher Environm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing University; University of London; University College London;
   Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology
RP Ma, ZW (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
EM zma@nju.edu.cn
RI Liu, Miaomiao/MEK-9155-2025; Yang, Jianxun/IZE-3606-2023; Ma,
   Zongwei/ABG-4851-2020
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52170189, 71921003,
   72234003]; Jiangsu R & D Special Fund for Carbon Peaking and Carbon
   Neutrality [BK20220014]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grants 52170189, 71921003, and 72234003) , Jiangsu R & D Special
   Fund for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality (Grant BK20220014) . We
   thank Qi Wang and Xurui Wang at Nanjing University for their valuable
   insights in the analysis of the results. The authors declare that they
   have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
CR Alexander LV, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JD006290
   Auffhammer M, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, P1886, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1613193114
   Auffhammer M, 2013, REV ENV ECON POLICY, V7, P181, DOI 10.1093/reep/ret016
   Barreca A, 2022, NAT ENERGY, V7, P1052, DOI 10.1038/s41560-022-01134-2
   Barton-Henry K, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac998d
   Beyer RCM, 2021, WORLD DEV, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105287
   Cadini F, 2017, APPL ENERG, V185, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.086
   Caglar AE, 2022, SUSTAIN DEV, V30, P1313, DOI 10.1002/sd.2318
   Callahan CW, 2023, SCIENCE, V380, P1064, DOI 10.1126/science.adf2983
   Callahan CW, 2022, SCI ADV, V8, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.add3726
   Ceola S, 2014, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V41, P7184, DOI 10.1002/2014GL061859
   Chen TY, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15184581
   Cui YZ, 2021, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V18, P1906, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3010936
   Dasgupta S, 2021, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V5, pE455, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00170-4
   Dave R, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac2d67
   Elliott RJR, 2015, J URBAN ECON, V88, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2015.05.001
   Farah S, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V183, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.045
   Felbermayr G, 2022, WORLD DEV, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105745
   Feofilovs M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102328
   General Administration of Quality Supervision Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic of China Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, 2012, GB/T 28592-2012 Grade of precipitation
   Georgeson L, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P584, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2944, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2944]
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Han LF, 2022, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V49, DOI 10.1029/2021GL097546
   Harrington LJ, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abbd61
   Hersbach H., 2023, ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present
   Huang SZ, 2023, EARTHS FUTURE, V11, DOI 10.1029/2022EF003117
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2023, Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis, P1513, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.013
   Ji CY, 2016, NAT ENERGY, V1, DOI 10.1038/NENERGY.2016.52
   Ji XL, 2019, ISPRS INT GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8090419
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kalkuhl M, 2020, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102360
   Kotz M, 2022, NATURE, V601, P223, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04283-8
   Kotz M, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P319, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00985-5
   Lai WY, 2022, NAT HUM BEHAV, V6, P837, DOI 10.1038/s41562-022-01315-9
   Leszczensky L, 2022, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V51, P837, DOI 10.1177/0049124119882473
   Li LY, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V194, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103703
   Li YT, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P472, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1804667115
   Liu YH, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101591
   Liu YH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103649
   Longden T, 2022, NAT ENERGY, V7, P43, DOI 10.1038/s41560-021-00942-2
   Ma T, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V124, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.018
   Mallapaty S, 2022, NATURE, V609, P888, DOI 10.1038/d41586-022-02954-8
   Mård J, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aar5779
   Mueller V, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P182, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2103, 10.1038/nclimate2103]
   Oh S, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P20521, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3055146
   Palagi E, 2022, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V119, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2203595119
   Parsons LA, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-27328-y
   Qiang Y, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102115
   Quesnel KJ, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1700784
   Román MO, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0218883
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Sachindra DA, 2016, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V142, P172, DOI 10.1002/qj.2642
   Sarkar S, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P579, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04477-9
   Shan YL, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaq0390
   Suna RR, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103344
   Vicedo-Cabrera AM, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P492, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x
   Vogel E, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab154b
   Wang B, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102884
   Wang J, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P1084, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01196-2
   Wang SH, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.002
   Wang YJ, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101595
   Wang Z., 2018, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, VXLII-3, P1853, DOI [DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-3-1853-2018, 10.5194/isprsarchives-XLII-3-1853-2018, DOI 10.5194/ISPRSARCHIVES-XLII-3-1853-2018]
   Xu MM, 2022, ENERG ECON, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105901
   Xu WL, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.921659
   Yalew SG, 2020, NAT ENERGY, V5, P794, DOI 10.1038/s41560-020-0664-z
   Yu B, 2023, INNOVATION-AMSTERDAM, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100419
   Zhang Lixian., 2021, A Prolonged Artificial Nighttime-light Dataset of China (1984-2020), DOI [DOI 10.11888/SOCIOECO.TPDC.271202, 10.11888/Socioeco.tpdc.271202]
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   Zhang P, 2018, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V88, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.11.001
   Zhang P, 2019, ENERG POLICY, V128, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.014
   Zhang W, 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V47, DOI 10.1029/2020GL089185
   Zhao CL, 2020, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V25, P221, DOI 10.1007/s11027-019-09874-5
   Zhao M, 2022, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V14, P517, DOI 10.5194/essd-14-517-2022
   Zhao N, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V688, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.374
   Zhao XZ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10101526
   Zhong S, 2017, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V17, P5439, DOI 10.5194/acp-17-5439-2017
   Zhong X., 2022, Digital Journal of Global Change Data Repository, V6
   Zhong X., 2022, J. Glob. Chang. Data Discov, V3, P420
NR 78
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 42
U2 91
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 101
AR 105167
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105167
EA JAN 2024
PG 12
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA GS6Q8
UT WOS:001154705400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tang, B
   Tan, ZC
AF Tang, Bo
   Tan, Zechuang
TI The research on spatial-temporal evolution and influence factors of
   urban resilience: A case study in the Guangzhou metropolitan area
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; spatial-temporal evolution; global entropy weight
   method; obstacle degree; Guangzhou metropolitan area
ID FRAMEWORK; VULNERABILITY; ENHANCE; CITIES
AB Resilience city, a new concept of city sustainable development, becomes one of the important subjects of high-quality development research. Compared to the traditional urban disaster mitigation approach, resilient cities focus more on the organizational capacity and coordination within the urban systems. Taking Guangzhou metropolitan area as an instance, which is featured a highly developed economy and society and frequently happened hazards and disturbances, the paper constructs an evaluation index system from four city subsystems, including economy, society, ecology, and engineering. Meanwhile, by applying the methods of global entropy weight, variation coefficient, geographic information system, and obstacle degree model, the paper explores the time changes, space evolution, and obstacle degree factors of city resilience in the Guangzhou metropolitan area from 2010 to 2020. The research results show that: (1) There is a significant change in the time difference of city comprehensive resilience of the Guangzhou metropolitan area. The resilience of each city's resilience subsystem has grown steadily, of which the development level of economic resilience, social resilience, and engineering resilience has been steadily improved, and ecology resilience level shows a slight decline among a steadily increasing. (2) The overall city resilience of the Guangzhou metropolitan area shows a radial pattern taking Guangzhou as the core, of which the city economy, society, and engineering resilience grades mainly show a medium and low resilience level, the ecology resilience mainly shows a medium and high resilience level, and the general performance of resilience space distribution level is high in the southeast and low in the northwest. (3) Social resilience and ecological resilience are the main driving subsystems in the early and late stages of city resilience development in Guangzhou metropolitan area during the research period, and engineering resilience is the main constraint subsystem. (4) Water and soil loss control area and population density are the main obstacle factors in the early and late stages of city resilience in the Guangzhou metropolitan area. The density of the city drainage pipeline and the total import and export volume are the basic resilience barrier factors. The paper analyzes the spatial-temporal pattern and influencing factors of city resilience in the metropolitan area from a multi-dimensional perspective, provides a new thinking and analysis framework for the management and sustainability of city resilience in the metropolitan area, and provides a reference for the coordinated development of the metropolitan area.
C1 [Tang, Bo; Tan, Zechuang] Guangzhou Xinhua Univ, Sch Resources & Planning, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Tan, Zechuang] Fujian Agr & Forestry Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Fuzhou, Peoples R China.
C3 Fujian Agriculture & Forestry University
RP Tang, B (corresponding author), Guangzhou Xinhua Univ, Sch Resources & Planning, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
EM tballen196@163.com
RI 唐, 波/GYV-5280-2022; tan, zechuang/HLX-7126-2023
FU project of the 14th five-year plan for the development of Philosophy and
   Social Sciences in Guangzhou in 2021 [2021GZYB22]; Project of Special
   Innovation Classes for Regular Universities in Guangdong Province
   [2020WTSCX136]; College students' innovative entrepreneurial training
   program [202213902008]; Guangzhou Xinhua University's Educational Reform
   Project [2022J002]
FX This research was funded by project of the 14th five-year plan for the
   development of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Guangzhou in 2021
   (Grant No. 2021GZYB22); Project of Special Innovation Classes for
   Regular Universities in Guangdong Province (Grant No. 2020WTSCX136);
   College students' innovative entrepreneurial training program (Grant No.
   202213902008); Guangzhou Xinhua University's Educational Reform Project
   (Grant No. 2022J002).
CR Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Colclough G., 2021, Int. J. Urban Plan. Smart Cities, V2, P70, DOI [10.4018/IJUPSC.2021070105, DOI 10.4018/IJUPSC.2021070105, 10.4018/ijupsc.2021070105]
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dulebenets MA, 2018, INT J PROD ECON, V196, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.027
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   [方创琳 Fang Chuanglin], 2015, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V70, P234
   Fei Xuan, 2014, Journal of Natural Disasters, V23, P19, DOI 10.13577/j.jnd.2014.0603
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   [何继新 He Jixin], 2022, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V37, P148
   Herrera M, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P1685, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1245-6
   Izydorczyk G, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111050
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jiang X., 2021, J. Manag. World, V37, P1
   Li T., 2017, Urban Planning International, V32, P15, DOI [10.22217/upi.2015.284, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2015.284]
   Liang XD, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P15838, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-11632-z
   [刘彦平 Liu Yanping], 2021, [城市发展研究, Urban Studies], V28, P93
   Lorenz DF, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P7, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9654-y
   Ma X.D., 2014, HUM GEOGR, V29, P89, DOI [10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2014.01.016, DOI 10.13959/J.ISSN.1003-2398.2014.01.016]
   McClymont K, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103729
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Morrow BH, 1999, DISASTERS, V23, P1, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00102
   Müller B, 2011, GER ANNU SPAT RES PO, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12785-4_1
   Ni X.L., 2021, INT CITY PLAN, V36, P76, DOI [10.19830/j.upi.2019.07, DOI 10.19830/J.UPI.2019.07]
   Osman T, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103372
   Pfefferbaum B, 2017, CLIN SOC WORK J, V45, P102, DOI 10.1007/s10615-015-0556-z
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Song L., 2020, J SOC SCI, V3, P21, DOI [10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2020.03.004, DOI 10.13644/J.CNKI.CN31-1112.2020.03.004]
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   [孙阳 Sun Yang], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P151
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   Wang MZ, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V60, P1189, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9902-9
   Woolf S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003
   Wu Bohong, 2018, Science & Technology Review, V36, P94, DOI 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2018.16.011
   [吴康 Wu Kang], 2017, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V37, P59
   Xu J., 2015, INT CITY PLAN, V30, P1
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   [许兆丰 Xu Zhaofeng], 2019, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V29, P1
   [杨秀平 Yang Xiuping], 2021, [地理与地理信息科学, Geography and Geo-information Science], V37, P78
   [杨莹 Yang Ying], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P266
   [臧鑫宇 Zang Xinyu], 2019, [科技导报（北京）, Science & Technology Review], V37, P94
   Zhai G.F., 2022, URBAN PLAN, V46, P29, DOI [10.11819/cpr20220304s, DOI 10.11819/CPR20220304S]
   Zhang XY, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V306, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127259
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zhou C., 2017, TROP GEOGR, V7, P802, DOI [10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003011, DOI 10.13284/J.CNKI.RDDL.003011]
   Zhu J.H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
NR 47
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 28
U2 150
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD NOV 10
PY 2022
VL 10
AR 1052930
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1052930
PG 24
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 6O4LU
UT WOS:000890214900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Labaka, L
   Maraña, P
   Giménez, R
   Hernantes, J
AF Labaka, Leire
   Marana, Patricia
   Gimenez, Raquel
   Hernantes, Josune
TI Defining the roadmap towards city resilience
SO TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE City resilience; Co-creation process; Maturity model; Resilience
   policies; Delphi method
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; MATURITY MODEL; DELPHI METHOD; CITIES; MANAGEMENT;
   ROTTERDAM
AB A growing majority of the world's population lives in cities, and the concentration of people and critical services in cities increases their exposure to acute shocks and long-term stresses. Therefore, building resilient cities that are able to resist and absorb threats and are capable of adapting to and recovering from shocks and stresses is vital for the wellbeing of society. Although the literature offers several studies on how city resilience can be improved, operationalizing resilience is still a challenge. This article describes the different phases of the co-creation process followed in the development of a maturity model that can guide cities in assessing and future improving their resilience level. This co-creation process was conducted using different methodologies involving an interdisciplinary group of international experts who contributed their knowledge and experience to the development process of the maturity model. The outcome of this process is the final version of a maturity model that operationalizes the steps that should be taken to build city resilience.
C1 [Labaka, Leire; Marana, Patricia; Gimenez, Raquel; Hernantes, Josune] Univ Navarra, TECNUN, Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 13, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
C3 University of Navarra
RP Labaka, L (corresponding author), Univ Navarra, TECNUN, Paseo Manuel Lardizabal 13, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
EM llabaka@tecnun.es; pmarana@tecnun.es; rgimenez@tecnun.es;
   jhernantes@tecnun.es
RI Labaka, Leire/H-9744-2014; Hernantes, Josune/C-9247-2017
OI Labaka, Leire/0000-0002-1721-0624; Marana, Patricia/0000-0002-4536-8074;
   Hernantes, Josune/0000-0002-9307-9787
FU European Union [653569]; H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [653569]
   Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
FX The Smart Mature Resilience research project has received funding from
   the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under
   grant agreement no. 653569.
CR [Anonymous], 2015, A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   [Anonymous], 1975, The delphi method
   [Anonymous], 2011, RES RISK MAN CRIT IN
   [Anonymous], WHAT IS URB RES
   Antunes P, 2014, ENERG POLICY, V73, P803, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.011
   Becker J, 2009, BUS INFORM SYST ENG+, V1, P213, DOI 10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5
   Caralli R., 2012, Maturity models 101: APrimer for Applying Maturity Models to Smart Grid Security, Resilience, and Interoperability Mark Knight
   Cavallo A, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.001
   Chmutina K, 2016, CITIES, V58, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.017
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   DALKEY N, 1969, FUTURES, V1, P408, DOI 10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
   Delbecq A.L., 1975, Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi process
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Frantzeskaki N, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
   Gimenez R, 2017, BUILDING CITY RESILI
   Gonzalez J, 2017, STALKING RESILIENCE
   Harrison CG, 2016, SIMUL MODEL PRACT TH, V65, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.simpat.2016.02.008
   Hernantes J, 2019, CITIES, V84, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.07.010
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Kreimer A, 2019, BUILDING SAFER CITIE
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   NELMS KR, 1985, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V28, P43, DOI 10.1016/0040-1625(85)90072-1
   Okoli C, 2004, INFORM MANAGE-AMSTER, V42, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
   Oteng-Ababio M, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V12, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.02.005
   Oxley MC, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.03.004
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Peng C, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V29, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.12.003
   RICHARDSON GP, 1995, SYST DYNAM REV, V11, P113, DOI 10.1002/sdr.4260110203
   Skulmoski GJ, 2007, J INF TECHNOL EDUC-R, V6, P1
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, CRIT INFR DEP WORKSH
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, HOL RES WORKSH REP
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2017, PEER REV M 2
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, Revised resilience maturity mode report
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, DELPH AN REP
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, CLIM CHANG WORKSH RE
   Smart Mature Resilience, 2016, SOC DYN WORKSH REP
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   United Nations, 2014, REP WORLD URB PROSP
   Valdes HM., 2013, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V4, P5, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299035, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299035]
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Wendler R, 2012, INFORM SOFTWARE TECH, V54, P1317, DOI 10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007
NR 44
TC 33
Z9 34
U1 9
U2 89
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0040-1625
EI 1873-5509
J9 TECHNOL FORECAST SOC
JI Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
PD SEP
PY 2019
VL 146
BP 281
EP 296
DI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.019
PG 16
WC Business; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Public Administration
GA JR9FS
UT WOS:000499922800024
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, QW
   Zhao, GY
   Zhao, RZ
AF Wang, Qianwen
   Zhao, Guangyu
   Zhao, Runze
TI Resilient urban expansion: Identifying critical conflict patches by
   integrating flood risk and land use predictions: A case study of Min
   Delta Urban Agglomerations in China
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood risk; Land use; Scenario simulation; Decision-making; Resilient
   growth
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COVER CHANGE; URBANIZATION; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT;
   CATCHMENT; IMPACT; RIVER
AB The increasing occurrence of floods due to global climate change is a challenge to the growth of urban resilience. However, few studies have investigated strategies to avoid flood risks during long-term and comprehensive land use and development. To address this issue, this study proposes a method that integrates flood risk and land use predictions to identify critical conflict patches that impact urban resilience. Further strategies for differential development based on the attributes of these critical conflict patches were formulated. Taking the Min Delta Urban Agglomeration (MDUA) in China as a case study, critical conflict patches for expanded urban resilience were identified based on a multi-source data set, a random forest (RF) algorithm, and a patch generating land use simulation model (PLUS) combined with cellular automata (CA). These patches were categorized into three levels of risk prediction-low, medium, and high risk-based on flood risk attributes. These risk forecast levels were further divided into seven categories. The best land use approach was determined by assessing the quantity, spatial distribution, and risk based priority ranking of these conflict patches. The results demonstrated that most conflicting patches were located in bare land within built-up areas, urban-rural intersection zones, and remote suburban areas with high traffic accessibility. The identified conflicting patches were applied to three different land use patterns: intra-city renewal, urban edge expansion, and the creation of derived cities. The total number of conflicting patches for land use decisions in the MDUA was 122 (170.82 km2) in 2025 and 685 (1205.81 km2) in 2035. Approximately 108 km2 of urban land was added for resilience expansion following optimization. In all development scenarios, the optimized land use pattern facilitated resilient growth of urban development while maintaining the stability of the flood disaster environment. Based on our methodology and case study, we proposed a decision-making framework to assist cities or potential urban regions to avoid water-related problems and related issues. This approach could also contribute to decisions involving different geographical areas for resilient land use.
C1 [Wang, Qianwen] Tianjin Normal Univ, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Guangyu] Tianjin Univ, Res Inst Architectural Design, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Guangyu] Urban Planning Co Ltd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
   [Zhao, Runze] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Zhengzhou 450045, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Qianwen] 393 Binshui West Rd, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China.
C3 Tianjin Normal University; Tianjin University; North China University of
   Water Resources & Electric Power
RP Wang, QW (corresponding author), 393 Binshui West Rd, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China.
EM qwwang@tjnu.edu.cn
RI WANG, QIANWEN/KVY-5475-2024; Runze, Zhao/ABB-1781-2020; Zhao,
   Guangyu/GLR-4035-2022
FU Tianjin Philosophy and Social Science Foundation [TJGLQN23-011]
FX This work was supported by the Tianjin Philosophy and Social Science
   Foundation [grant number TJGLQN23-011] .
CR Arabameri A, 2020, J HYDROL, V587, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125007
   Avand M, 2021, J HYDROL, V595, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125663
   Bai XM, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P132, DOI 10.1021/es202329f
   Ceres RL, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V15, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12771
   COHEN J, 1968, PSYCHOL BULL, V70, P213, DOI 10.1037/h0026256
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   Cutler A, 2012, ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, P157, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5
   Delphin S, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11081339
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Di Marino M, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V82, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.007
   Bui DT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V668, P1038, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.422
   Duan L, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14215432
   Huang J, 2022, HYDROL PROCESS, V36, DOI 10.1002/hyp.14771
   Hussein K, 2020, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V11, P112, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2019.1707718
   Nguyen HD, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P12810, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2022.2071477
   Julca A, 2012, J ECON ISSUES, V46, P499, DOI 10.2753/JEI0021-3624460225
   Khare D, 2015, APPL GEOMAT, V7, P23, DOI 10.1007/s12518-014-0148-6
   Koks EE, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V47, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013
   Li C, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108328
   Li YC, 2023, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V34, P2862, DOI 10.1002/ldr.4653
   Li ZZ, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11050584
   Liang X, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569
   Lin BQ, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V58, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.031
   Ma Y, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12822
   Mashiyi S, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103787
   Mosavi A, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111536
   Mustafa A, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V225, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.090
   Nguyen HD, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13020262
   Nie YL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V659, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.242
   Okazawa Y, 2011, HYDROLOG SCI J, V56, P789, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2011.583249
   Olden JD, 2008, Q REV BIOL, V83, P171, DOI 10.1086/587826
   Parrott A, 2009, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V2, P272, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01044.x
   Schoppa L, 2020, J HYDROL, V590, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125531
   Stamellou E, 2021, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/hydrology8040159
   Stoker P, 2022, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V58, P321, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.13022
   Sun X, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106097
   Tyralis H, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050910
   Votsis A, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.04.005
   Wang J, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V243, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.007
   Woltjer J, 2007, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V73, P211, DOI 10.1080/01944360708976154
   Xie GD, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V26, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.010
   Yang XD, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109577
   Zhang H, 2007, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V14, P485, DOI 10.1080/13504500709469747
   Zheng JX, 2023, J HYDROL, V617, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128911
   Zhu ZJ, 2022, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V34, P3443, DOI 10.1007/s00521-021-05757-6
NR 45
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 20
U2 63
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 100
AR 104192
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104192
EA DEC 2023
PG 15
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA EN2V8
UT WOS:001139548200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shan, SQ
   Zhao, F
AF Shan, Siqing
   Zhao, Feng
TI Social media-based urban disaster recovery and resilience analysis of
   the Henan deluge
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Henan deluge; Infrastructure resilience; Psychological resilience;
   Short-term disaster recovery; Social media mining
ID INFRASTRUCTURE RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SENTIMENT
AB Measuring disaster resilience from the perspective of long-term recovery ability is important for the planning and construction of urban sustainability, whereas short-term resilient recovery can better reflect a city's ability to recover quickly after a disaster occurs. This study proposes an analytical framework for urban disaster recovery and resilience based on social media data that can analyze short-term disaster recovery and assess disaster resilience from the perspectives of infrastructure and people's psychological states. We consider the downpour in Henan, China, in July 2021. The results show that (1) social media data can effectively reflect short-term disaster recovery, (2) disaster resilience can be assessed using social media data combined with rainfall and damage data, and (3) the framework can quantitatively reflect the differences in disaster recovery and resilience across regions. The findings can facilitate better decision-making in disaster emergency management for precise and effective post-disaster reconstruction and psychological intervention, and provide references for cities to improve disaster resilience.
C1 [Shan, Siqing; Zhao, Feng] BeiHang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Beihang University
RP Zhao, F (corresponding author), BeiHang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM zhao_feng@buaa.edu.cn
OI Zhao, Feng/0000-0002-1010-4511
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72071010, 71771010]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (No. 72071010; No. 71771010).
CR Adiguzel F, 2022, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V194, DOI 10.1007/s10661-022-10172-y
   Ainuddin S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P909, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0201-x
   Aksha SK, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17061985
   Al Rifat SA, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9080469
   Barabadi A, 2018, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V169, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.018
   Basu M, 2022, SOC NETW ANAL MIN, V12, DOI 10.1007/s13278-021-00841-0
   Sert EB, 2021, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V144, P103, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03524-0
   Cetin IZ, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P5688, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-22566-z
   Cetin M, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V119, P2299, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05601-7
   Cetin M, 2015, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V22, P420, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066
   Cetin M, 2016, J SUSTAIN FOREST, V35, P527, DOI 10.1080/10549811.2016.1228072
   Chen CK, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104756
   Chen YD, 2021, J MANAGE ENG, V37, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000955
   Chen Z, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102482
   Chong WK, 2018, ENGINEERING-PRC, V4, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.eng.2018.03.010
   Cimellaro GP, 2021, J EARTHQ ENG, V25, P703, DOI 10.1080/13632469.2018.1531090
   Cui P, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101880
   Degerli Burcu, 2022, Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, V10, P2446, DOI 10.24925/turjaf.v10i12.2446-2452.5535
   Degerli Burcu Cevik, 2022, Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, V10, P2453, DOI 10.24925/turjaf.v10i12.2453-2466.5555
   DeRoon-Cassini TA, 2010, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V55, P1, DOI 10.1037/a0018601
   Dhakal S, 2021, NAT HAZARDS REV, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000512
   Dou MX, 2021, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104893
   Eyre R, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15405-7
   Fang JG, 2018, INT J SOLIDS STRUCT, V135, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.08.013
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Gallagher RJ., 2017, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, V5, P529, DOI [DOI 10.1162/TACL_A_00078, DOI 10.1162/TACLA00078, 10.1162/tacla00078]
   Guan XY, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V74, P837, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1217-1
   Jamali M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101788
   Kong JJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195143
   Lam NSN, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000193
   Leykin D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.021
   Li LY, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101776
   [李梦杰 Li Mengjie], 2020, [水土保持通报, Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation], V40, P200
   Li XL, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V7, P393, DOI 10.1007/s13753-016-0109-2
   Lopreite M, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-81333-1
   Lu YX, 2021, THESIS DALIAN U TECH
   McMillen H, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080775
   Ngamassi L, 2016, J ORGAN END USER COM, V28, P122, DOI 10.4018/JOEUC.2016070108
   Nguyen L, 2022, IEEE T BIG DATA, V8, P229, DOI 10.1109/TBDATA.2019.2941887
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Olshansky RB, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P293, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.967710
   Olshansky RB, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P173, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000077
   Page-Tan C, 2021, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V18, P93, DOI 10.1515/jhsem-2018-0054
   Prayag G, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102438
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   Rachunok B, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102236
   Rodriguez-Llanes JM, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V12, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-12-115
   Rossi C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.002
   Ruan JE, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102578
   Samuels R, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P545, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05193-8
   Shan SQ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102418
   Shan SQ, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V115, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.029
   Shan SQ, 2018, ENTERP INF SYST-UK, V12, P888, DOI 10.1080/17517575.2017.1293300
   Shoyama K, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V767, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144371
   Slemp CC, 2020, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V135, P565, DOI 10.1177/0033354920938012
   Starbird K, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P1071
   Tan L, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V313, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127882
   Thelwall M, 2018, ONLINE INFORM REV, V42, P45, DOI 10.1108/OIR-05-2017-0139
   Thelwall M, 2010, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V61, P2544, DOI 10.1002/asi.21416
   Thompson RW, 2011, TRAUMA VIOLENCE ABUS, V12, P220, DOI 10.1177/1524838011416375
   Vilares D, 2015, J INF SCI, V41, P799, DOI 10.1177/0165551515598926
   Wahid JA, 2022, EXPERT SYST APPL, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116562
   Wang BR, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V93, P1145, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3344-6
   Wang KJ, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10030116
   Xu H, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18073677
   Yang YY, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11464-250205
   Zhang J, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P447, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04590-3
   Zhu J, 2017, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V33, pS147, DOI 10.1193/121116EQS231M
   Zou L, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P1422, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897
NR 69
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 22
U2 134
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD AUG
PY 2023
VL 118
IS 1
BP 377
EP 405
DI 10.1007/s11069-023-06010-0
EA MAY 2023
PG 29
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA N1KW7
UT WOS:000993331000001
PM 37360801
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Prashar, N
   Lakra, HS
   Kaur, H
   Shaw, R
AF Prashar, Naveen
   Lakra, Harshit Sosan
   Kaur, Harsimran
   shaw, Rajib
TI Urban flood resilience: mapping knowledge, trends and structure through
   bibliometric analysis
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE Flood resilience; Science mapping; Urban flooding; Resilience
   assessment; Bibliometric analysis
ID DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; ENHANCING RESILIENCE;
   RISK-MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CITIES; WATER; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   VULNERABILITY; DRAINAGE
AB The discourse on urban flood resilience and the notions associated with the word has grown enormously and has been discovered to be in staggering form. This paper intends to provide a bibliometric analysis of nearly 30 years of urban flood resilience by mapping the knowledge domain, identifying evolving themes & trends over time, and extracting publications addressing urban flood resilience from the Scopus database. Trends, evolution, and mapping purpose of subject and field information analysis are undertaken using VOSviewer and SciMAT tools. The VOSviewer programme highlights the emphasis areas, whereas SciMAT traces the field's intellectual evolution across time and the essential themes that drove the transition. The study period is divided into four segments: 1996-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2022 based on the significant international policy milestones. The findings of the analysis highlight that the urban flood resilience field initially concentrated on a few themes and subsequently expanded to encompass the multi-dimensional characteristics of urban area resilience. In recent years, spatial planning approaches, nature-based and sustainable solutions, community-based and citizen science approaches, application of artificial intelligence, urban-rural relationship in resilience aspect, health services, and critical infrastructure networks have been the field's primary themes and concerns for achieving and assessing urban flood resilience. Despite a lack of emphasis on resilience assessment methods and approaches favouring conceptual framework and factors, it is observed that these themes are emerging in the developing scenario to solve the resilience concepts. The research may serve as a springboard for people's and policymakers' concerns about climate change and its effects, infrastructure development to improve the health and social well-being of societies, and a desire to learn more about resolving urban flooding problems in order to enhance flood management concepts pertaining to urban flood resilience and its history. Hence, a comprehensive list of themes and thematic areas concerning urban flood resilience with varying weights according to contexts is recommended, leading to the development of the urban flood resilient assessment tool and modifying the existing tools to reflect better the holistic understanding of sustainable and resilient cities/areas.
C1 [Prashar, Naveen; Lakra, Harshit Sosan] Indian Inst Technol, Architecture & Planning Dept, Roorkee, India.
   [Kaur, Harsimran] Indian Inst Technol BHU, Architecture Planning & Design Dept, Varanasi, India.
   [shaw, Rajib] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Media & Governance, Fujisawa 2520882, Japan.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Roorkee; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT
   System); Indian Institute of Technology BHU Varanasi (IIT BHU Varanasi);
   Keio University
RP Lakra, HS (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Architecture & Planning Dept, Roorkee, India.
EM naveen_p@ar.iitr.ac.in; hsl31fap@iitr.ac.in; Harsimran.apd@iitbhu.ac.in;
   shaw@sfc.keio.ac.jp
RI PRASHAR, NAVEEN/KCQ-8535-2024
OI PRASHAR, NAVEEN/0000-0002-0206-9912
FU Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR); Ministry of Human
   Resource Development (MHRD), India
FX The authors acknowledge the support of Indian Institute of Technology
   Roorkee (IITR) and the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD),
   India.
CR Ali S, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P389, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05058-0
   [Anonymous], 2017, An Emergency Management Framework for Canada: Ministers Responsible for Emergency Management - Third Edition
   [Anonymous], 2002, Guidelines for reducing flood losses
   Aroca-Jiménez E, 2018, J HYDROL, V565, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.029
   Auliagisni W, 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100229
   Balsells M, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P2448, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.527
   Barreiro J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218931
   Barroca B, 2006, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V6, P553, DOI 10.5194/nhess-6-553-2006
   Barroca B., 2019, Flood resilience assessment of New Orleans neighborhood over time, P1
   Batica J, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V154, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.411
   Beceiro P, 2022, ECOL ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106489
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Bodoque JM, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.005
   Bottazzi P, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072135
   Bulti DT, 2019, SN APPL SCI, V1, DOI 10.1007/s42452-019-1731-6
   Butler D, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, P63, DOI 10.1002/gch2.1010
   Cashman AC, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P77, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.283
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen KF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040830
   Chen TL, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101564
   Chuang MT, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101494
   Cobo MJ, 2012, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V63, P1609, DOI 10.1002/asi.22688
   Cobo MJ, 2011, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V62, P1382, DOI 10.1002/asi.21525
   Cobo MJ, 2011, J INFORMETR, V5, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
   CRED, 2019, About us
   de Goyet CD, 2006, DISEASE CONTROL PRIORITIES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2ND EDITION, P1147
   Djordjevic S, 1999, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V39, P95, DOI 10.2166/wst.1999.0451
   Doorga JRS, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102683
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Fahad S, 2022, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V35, P5486, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2029713
   Fahad S, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P5561, DOI 10.1007/s10668-022-02280-z
   Fahad S, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P33167, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17450-1
   Fan GD, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V805, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150404
   Fenner R, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11051082
   Ferreira C.S. S., 2021, Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation, V107, P59, DOI [DOI 10.1007/698_2021_758, 10.1007/978-3-030-77505-6, 10.1007/698_2021_758]
   Fu GT, 2008, EXPERT SYST APPL, V34, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.021
   Fu ZM, 2011, WATER SCI ENG, V4, P284, DOI 10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2011.03.005
   Gersonius B, 2013, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V116, P411, DOI 10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gupta K., 2007, INDIA URBAN WATER J, V4, P183, DOI [10.1080/15730620701464141, DOI 10.1080/15730620701464141]
   Hammond MJ, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P14, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
   Han MS, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V362, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132402
   Heinzlef C, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1049, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1049-2020
   Hossain MS, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V338, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130584
   Houghton A, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14121519
   Irfanullah H., 2020, Nature-based solutions (NbS) for development planning in bangladesh Dr Haseeb Md Irfanullah, P1
   Jiang Y, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016
   Kaaviya R, 2021, ECOL PROCESS, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13717-021-00341-1
   Kissi A.E., 2015, J. Geogr. Inf. Syst., V07, P607, DOI [10.4236/jgis.2015.76049, DOI 10.4236/JGIS.2015.76049]
   Kodag S, 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V14, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100219
   Kumar N, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116346
   Kwak Y, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V300, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113742
   Lamaury Y, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13030337
   Leroy J, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160708002
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Lhomme S, 2010, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V129, P661, DOI 10.2495/SC100561
   Li XF, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127034
   Liu XZ, 2013, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V64, P1852, DOI 10.1002/asi.22883
   Mashi SA, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P1727, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04052-2
   McClymont K, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
   Mees HLP, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06639-190258
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   Mireia B., 2014, Making urban flood resilience more operational: Current practice, P1
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Mohanty MP, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V792, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148323
   Moreira LL, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P1513, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-1513-2021
   Mugume SN, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P727, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2016.1253754
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V15, P1343, DOI 10.2166/ws.2015.098
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Newman G, 2020, LANDSCAPE RES, V45, P63, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2019.1569219
   Oriangi G., 2019, Am J Clim Change, V8, P520, DOI [10.4236/ajcc.2019.84028, DOI 10.4236/AJCC.2019.84028]
   Rafiq F., 2016, Int J Sci Eng Res, V7, P721
   Rathnayaka B, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103123
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Rezende OM, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11071485
   Rumbach A, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000357
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Sajjad M, 2021, APPL GEOGR, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102367
   Schelfaut K, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
   Serre D, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS69, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12253
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Sharifi A, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107102
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Simon C., 2015, Mozambique, P1
   Su F, 2022, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V35, P4922, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2021.2019597
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Thattai DV, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V80, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/80/1/012054
   Tong PH, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102276
   Twigger-Ross C., 2020, Evidence review of the concept of flood resilience
   Tyler J, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P1223, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03606-3
   van Eck N. J., 2020, UNIVERISTEIT LEIDEN, P1
   van Eck NJ, 2010, SCIENTOMETRICS, V84, P523, DOI 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   Venkataramanan V, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V246, P868, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.028
   Ventimiglia U, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092395
   Waghwala RK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101155
   Wang MM, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112472
   Xu WP, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102784
   Yin YZ, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14050683
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V118, P221, DOI 10.2495/FRIAR080221
   Zhang HM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102248
NR 101
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 34
U2 70
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 26
IS 4
BP 8235
EP 8265
DI 10.1007/s10668-023-03094-3
EA MAR 2023
PG 31
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MR1H5
UT WOS:001196243600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yu, JZ
   Hu, WZ
   Deng, T
AF Yu, Junzhou
   Hu, Wenzheng
   Deng, Ting
TI Towards more resilient economy-analyzing the impact of new-type
   urbanization on urban economic resilience: mechanisms and spatial
   spillover boundaries
SO ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING
LA English
DT Article
DE New-type urbanization pilot policy; Urban economic resilience; Economic
   agglomeration; Urban technology innovation; New industry sector; Digital
   inclusive finance; Spatial spillover boundary
ID CHINA; GROWTH; CONSTRUCTION; PERSPECTIVE; INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY;
   REDUCTION; REGIONS
AB This study delves into the new-type urbanization pilot policy (NTUP) and its impact on urban economic resilience (UER), showcasing how NTUP diverges from traditional urbanization by fostering a human-centric, sustainable, and inclusive development model. This study applies a multi-period DID model to analyze panel data from 281 Chinese cities spanning 2006 to 2022, examining NTUP's direct effects on UER, its underlying mechanisms, and spatial spillover boundaries. Key findings demonstrate that: (1) NTUP significantly boosts UER. (2) The key channels through which NTUP enhances UER include urban technology innovation, economic agglomeration, the development of new industry sectors, and digital inclusive finance. (3) NTUP exerts a positive spatial spillover effect on the resilience of neighboring cities within a 250 km radius, but this effect diminishes to zero beyond that distance.
C1 [Yu, Junzhou; Hu, Wenzheng; Deng, Ting] Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
C3 Sichuan University
RP Yu, JZ (corresponding author), Sichuan Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
EM yujunzhou0705@163.com; huwenzheng0@163.com; dengting417@163.com
OI Yu, Junzhou/0009-0006-6141-7776
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Audretsch D. B., 2001, Ind. Corp. Chang, V10, P267, DOI DOI 10.1093/ICC/10.1.267
   BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Berdegué JA, 2015, WORLD DEV, V73, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.013
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Boschma R, 2011, ECON GEOGR, V87, P363, DOI 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01116.x
   Bristow G, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6
   Bristow G, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P923, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2013.854879
   Brock WA, 2005, HANDB ECON, V22, P1749
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Chai J, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113389
   Chen H, 2022, ASIA PAC BUS REV, V28, P467, DOI 10.1080/13602381.2021.1874665
   Chen MX, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V80, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.031
   Chen MX, 2018, CITIES, V78, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.012
   Chen MX, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V55, P334, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.025
   Chen WX, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104429
   Cheng KM, 2024, ECON CHANG RESTRUCT, V57, DOI 10.1007/s10644-024-09665-2
   Cheng ZH, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118150
   Chu YW, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102736
   Chu Z, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103304
   Cooke P, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P1889, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.723426
   Corodescu-Rosca E, 2023, CITIES, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104090
   Cui HY, 2023, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V42, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2023.09.011
   Doran J, 2018, ENVIRON PLANN A, V50, P111, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17736067
   Du MF, 2023, ENERG ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106769
   Du YA, 2023, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102709
   Duranton G, 2005, J URBAN ECON, V57, P343, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2004.12.002
   Fan Y, 2023, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V70, P81, DOI 10.1007/s00168-021-01103-9
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Feng YD, 2023, ENERG ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106752
   Feng YD, 2022, ENERG POLICY, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112866
   Fratesi U, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P241, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0828-3
   Gereffi G, 2020, J INT BUS POLICY, V3, P287, DOI 10.1057/s42214-020-00062-w
   Gong HW, 2020, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V111, P497, DOI 10.1111/tesg.12447
   Goodman-Bacon A, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V225, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
   Guan XL, 2018, HABITAT INT, V71, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.009
   He D, 2023, ECON CHANG RESTRUCT, V56, P4043, DOI 10.1007/s10644-023-09506-8
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hou SY, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21086
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Huang J, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1109857
   Huggins R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P313, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu035
   Jiang NN, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107298
   LeSage JamesP., 2014, Handbook of Regional Science, P1535
   Levine R, 1997, J ECON LIT, V35, P688
   Lewis W. A., 1954, Manchester School, V22, P139, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9957.1954.TB00021.X
   Li RM, 2023, CITIES, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104498
   Li SS, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106709
   Li Y, 2022, COMPLEXITY, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/8240806
   Liao B, 2024, ECON ANAL POLICY, V82, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2024.02.029
   Lin BQ, 2021, ENERG ECON, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105292
   Liu H, 2023, J INNOV KNOWL, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100444
   Liu JL, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106445
   Liu LN, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107186
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu NA, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15010456
   Liu Y, 2021, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101889
   Lobo J, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P819, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-0970-3
   LUCAS RE, 1988, J MONETARY ECON, V22, P3, DOI 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
   Ma LB, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.007
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Ouyang ZT, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-31558-z
   Pang SL, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V89, P561, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.014
   Peduzzi P, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P1149, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-1149-2009
   Rajan RG, 1998, AM ECON REV, V88, P559
   Reggiani A., 2002, Networks and Spatial Economics, V2, P211, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1015377515690, 10.1023/A:1015377515690]
   ROMER PM, 1990, J POLIT ECON, V98, pS71, DOI 10.1086/261725
   Rypestol JO, 2022, IND INNOV, V29, P879, DOI 10.1080/13662716.2022.2082271
   Shang J, 2023, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V20, P6395, DOI 10.1007/s13762-022-04381-8
   Shao J, 2023, ENERGY, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125499
   Shao S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107286
   Shaw K., 2013, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V28, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0952076711432578, 10.1177/0952076711432578]
   Shen Y, 2016, CHINA ECON J, V9, P304, DOI 10.1080/17538963.2016.1211384
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Sun Y, 2023, CITIES, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104458
   Tan JT, 2020, GROWTH CHANGE, V51, P362, DOI 10.1111/grow.12352
   Tang DC, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104621
   Tober T, 2022, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V29, P259, DOI 10.1080/13501763.2020.1824010
   TOBLER WR, 1970, ECON GEOGR, V46, P234, DOI 10.2307/143141
   Tsiotas D, 2025, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V27, P8433, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-04240-7
   Wang KL, 2023, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101607
   Wang L, 2023, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103372
   Wang SS, 2024, J KNOWL ECON, DOI 10.1007/s13132-024-02140-3
   Wang XW, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020809
   Wang XR, 2024, APPL ENERG, V357, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122457
   Wang XL, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101806
   Wang ZH, 2019, ENERG ECON, V80, P917, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.017
   Xie R, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106353
   Yang Y, 2024, PAC-BASIN FINANC J, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102353
   Yu JZ, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V448, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141687
   Zhang J, 2024, APPL ECON, V56, P9174, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2023.2299219
   Zhao C, 2022, ENVIRON INT, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107304
   Zhao Y, 2024, J KNOWL ECON, DOI 10.1007/s13132-024-02129-y
   Zhao Z, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V137, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.031
   Zhou Q, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104983
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhou Q, 2021, HABITAT INT, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102348
NR 99
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 51
U2 63
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1573-9414
EI 1574-0277
J9 ECON CHANG RESTRUCT
JI Econ. Chang. Restruct.
PD OCT
PY 2024
VL 57
IS 5
AR 158
DI 10.1007/s10644-024-09742-6
PG 41
WC Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics
GA E6K0W
UT WOS:001304062800002
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ibrahim, AS
   Kuuire, V
   Kepe, T
AF Ibrahim, Abdul-Salam
   Kuuire, Vincent
   Kepe, Thembela
TI On mapping urban community resilience: Land use vulnerability, coping
   and adaptive strategies in Ghana
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Community resilience; Vulnerability; Participatory GIS; Urban floods;
   Climate change; Urban resilience planning
ID LIMITATIONS
AB Cities across the globe are prioritizing resilience in the wake of increasing climate change-related disasters. About 44% of these disasters are floods and their manifestation in cities is more pronounced, threatening urban social, ecological, and economic systems. This study draws on community resilience and participatory GIS, to examine land use vulnerability to flooding and local coping and adaptive strategies to achieve resilience. Using Ghana as a case study, the results show that participatory mapping offers community resilience benefits by providing context to community resilience challenges and potentials, enabling a deeper understanding of socio-environmental coupling that contributes to flood vulnerability and builds on community adaptive strategies through harnessing local community knowledge. We identified that topography, poor drainage and road network, rainfall variability, residents' land use practices, and land use planning conundrum drive disparities in land use vulnerability to flooding. Participants underscored the necessity of critical urban infrastructure in facilitating community adaptability to floods. The findings indicate that socio-spatial inequities threaten urban community resilience, especially in increasingly cosmopolitan urban contexts, by putting the marginalized urban population in a more vulnerable position. We recommend the prioritization of recognitional equity in community resilience planning efforts to allow for the targeting of resilient interventions that reflect and respect social differentiation in the urban environment so that outcomes will not exacerbate or generate new urban socio-spatial inequalities.
C1 [Ibrahim, Abdul-Salam] Univ Toronto, Dept Geog & Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   [Kuuire, Vincent] Univ Toronto Mississauga, Dept Geog Geomat & Environm, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
   [Kuuire, Vincent] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Social & Behav Hlth Sci Div, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   [Kepe, Thembela] Univ Toronto, Dept Geog, Toronto, ON, Canada.
   [Kepe, Thembela] Rhodes Univ, Geog Dept, Makhanda, South Africa.
C3 University of Toronto; University of Toronto; University Toronto
   Mississauga; University of Toronto; University of Toronto; Rhodes
   University
RP Ibrahim, AS (corresponding author), Univ Toronto, Dept Geog & Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada.
EM as.ibrahim@mail.utoronto.ca; vincent.kuuire@utoronto.ca;
   thembela.kepe@utoronto.ca
RI Ibrahim, Abdul-Salam/GYV-3948-2022; Kuuire, Vincent/ABQ-9809-2022
OI Ibrahim, Abdul-Salam/0000-0001-9983-9524; Kuuire, Vincent
   Z./0000-0003-2782-3915
CR Abdul-Hamid A., 2023, Journal of Planning and Land Management, V3, P1
   Adger WN, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1588, DOI 10.1177/0042098020904594
   Akanbang B.A.A., 2021, SN Social Sciences, V1, P259
   Almoradie A, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12664
   [Anonymous], 2013, Ghana national climate change policy
   [Anonymous], 2021, Climate Risk Country Profile: Bangladesh
   Awah LS, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104236
   Babanawo D, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103646
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Braslow J., 2016, A Guide for Participatory Mapping of Ecosystem Services in Multiuse Agricultural Landscapes: How to Conduct a Rapid Spatial Assessment of Ecosystem Services, P86
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082331
   Bullen J, 2024, APPL GEOGR, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103176
   Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, The Human Cost of Disasters: An Overview of the Last 20 Years (20002019)
   Chrysogonus A., 2022, GHANA J DEV STUDIES, V19, P187, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v19i2.8, DOI 10.4314/GJDS.V19I2.8]
   Comfort L.K., 2023, Hazardous Seas: A Sociotechnical Framework for Early Tsunami Detection and Warning, V1
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Di Ruocco A., 2015, Urban Vulnerability and Climate Change in Africa: a Multidisciplinary Approach, P1
   Diaz-Sarachaga JM, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V100, P437, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03805-y
   Echendu A. J., 2023, Nat. Hazards Res, V3, P240, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.NHRES.2023.04.002, 10.1016/j.nhres.2023.04.002]
   Ermagun A, 2024, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V5, DOI 10.1038/s43247-023-01165-x
   Feinberg A, 2023, J URBAN AFF, V45, P142, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2020.1851139
   Forrest SA, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102843
   Gnecco I, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16051936
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   GSS, 2021, Population and Housing Census, V3A
   Hamlat A, 2024, ARID LAND RES MANAG, V38, P1, DOI 10.1080/15324982.2023.2235315
   Heesen J, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V5, P74, DOI 10.1007/s13753-014-0014-5
   Ibrahim AS, 2023, SOCIETY, V60, P994, DOI 10.1007/s12115-023-00913-1
   Ibrahim AS, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P641, DOI 10.1007/s10708-020-10276-3
   Imperiale AJ, 2021, SUSTAIN DEV, V29, P891, DOI 10.1002/sd.2182
   Kirby N, 2024, COMMUNITY DEV J, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsae031
   Kocornik-Mina A, 2020, AM ECON J-APPL ECON, V12, P35, DOI 10.1257/app.20170066
   Kosoe E.A., 2021, Sustainable urban futures in Africa, P228
   Li SH, 2022, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V172, DOI 10.1007/s10584-022-03344-9
   Li YQ, 2024, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/rs16020219
   Lu S, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15101865
   Mabrouk M, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103684
   Marino EK, 2020, ANN ANTHROPL PRACT, V44, P33, DOI 10.1111/napa.12132
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Mccloy MWD, 2024, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2024.1302002
   McKay RC, 2023, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V14, DOI 10.1002/wcc.820
   Meerow S., 2021, Geographic Perspectives on Urban Sustainability, P43, DOI [10.4324/9781003130185, DOI 10.4324/9781003130185]
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Membele GM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102766
   Mitchell D, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10060563
   Doost DM, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151813818
   Mulligan M, 2016, INT PLAN STUD, V21, P348, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2016.1155974
   Nyashilu IM, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15000
   Nyiwul L, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123393
   Osumanu IK, 2020, SPAT INF RES, V28, P523, DOI 10.1007/s41324-020-00313-1
   Palmer PI, 2023, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V4, P254, DOI 10.1038/s43017-023-00397-x
   Peng L, 2024, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107319
   Petersson L, 2020, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00304
   Pitidis V, 2024, CITIES, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105015
   Rendon C, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102774
   Rentschler J, 2023, NATURE, V622, P87, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06468-9
   Republic of Ghana, 2015, 2015 Climate Change Report
   Ro B, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103474
   Sabatier Lauriane., 2021, Urban Risks, V1, P1
   Saja AMA, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P862, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.004
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharma M, 2023, NAT HAZARDS REV, V24, DOI 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1523
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Spaliviero M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101419
   Sullivan-Wiley KA, 2019, APPL GEOGR, V105, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.02.008
   Sun L, 2018, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V27, P623, DOI 10.1108/DPM-05-2018-0135
   Swanson K, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P287, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i4.4399
   Tariq H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102358
   Tasantab JC, 2019, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V11, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v11i1.638
   Taylor FE, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103771
   Uddin M.S., 2019, Resilient Struct. Infrastruct., P379, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-7446-3, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-7446-3]
   Unangst M, 2023, J HIST GEOGR, V79, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.jhg.2022.12.003
   UNDESA, 2018, World Population Prospects 2017
   UNHABITAT, 2022, World cities report 2022: Envisaging the future of cities
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2022, Summary of Park Evaluation Results: 2019, 2021, and 2022
   Wardekker A, 2023, Urban Resilience: Methodologies, Tools and Evaluation: Theory and Practice, P17
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
   Woldai T, 2020, GEO-SPAT INF SCI, V23, P107, DOI 10.1080/10095020.2020.1730711
   World Bank, 2022, World Bank Group Country Classifications by Income Level for 2022
   Zhang XW, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101402
   Zhu SY, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104243
NR 84
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 45
U2 55
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 370
AR 122426
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122426
EA SEP 2024
PG 17
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA F7S9K
UT WOS:001311783400001
PM 39244927
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Schaefer, M
   Thinh, NX
   Greiving, S
AF Schaefer, Mathias
   Nguyen Xuan Thinh
   Greiving, Stefan
TI How Can Climate Resilience Be Measured and Visualized? Assessing a Vague
   Concept Using GIS-Based Fuzzy Logic
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate resilience; sustainable development; urban planning; remote
   sensing; fuzzy logic; compromise programming
ID SURFACE TEMPERATURE RETRIEVAL; URBAN RESILIENCE; ADAPTATION;
   SUSTAINABILITY; LANDSCAPE; IMPACTS; INDEX
AB As negative impacts of climate change tend to increase in the future, densely-populated cities especially need to take action on being robust against natural hazards. Consequently, there is a growing interest from scientists in measuring the climate resilience of cities and regions. However, current measurements are usually assessed on administrative levels, not covering potential hotspots of hazardous or sensitive areas. The main aim of this paper focusses on the measurement of climate resilience in the City of Dortmund, Germany, using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Based on a literature review, we identified five essential components of climate resilience and initially designed a theoretical framework of 18 indicators. Since climate resilience is still a vague concept in scientific discourses, we implemented local expert knowledge and fuzzy logic modelling into our analysis. The benefit of this study not only lies in the fine-scale application, but also in the relevance for multiple disciplines by integrating social and ecological factors. We conclude that climate resilience varies within the city pattern, with the urban core tending to be less resilient than its surrounding districts. As almost the entire geodata set used is freely available, the presented indicators and methods are to a certain degree applicable to comparable cities.
C1 [Schaefer, Mathias; Nguyen Xuan Thinh] TU Dortmund Univ, Dept Spatial Informat Management & Modelling RIM, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
   [Greiving, Stefan] TU Dortmund Univ, Inst Spatial Planning IRPUD, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
C3 Dortmund University of Technology; Dortmund University of Technology
RP Schaefer, M (corresponding author), TU Dortmund Univ, Dept Spatial Informat Management & Modelling RIM, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
EM mathias.schaefer@tu-dortmund.de; nguyen.thinh@tu-dortmund.de;
   stefan.greiving@tu-dortmund.de
OI Schaefer, Mathias/0000-0002-5330-7714
FU German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01LR1721A]
FX This research was funded by the German Ministry for Education and
   Research (BMBF), grant number 01LR1721A.
CR Abramson DM, 2015, J BEHAV HEALTH SER R, V42, P42, DOI 10.1007/s11414-014-9410-2
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   Allgaier J, 2019, FRONT COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036
   [Anonymous], 2014, COMP LUBECK ROSTOCK
   [Anonymous], 2019, JB BEVOLK, V206, P1
   [Anonymous], 2019, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU11082331
   [Anonymous], STRESSTEST STADT WIE
   [Anonymous], NOISE IN EUROPE 2014
   [Anonymous], 2015, RES LOCATE
   [Anonymous], 2019, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU11205713
   Avdan U, 2016, J SENSORS, V2016, DOI 10.1155/2016/1480307
   Bach C., 2014, PRACT EXP CIV PROT, V11, P1
   Birkmann J, 2012, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V70, P293, DOI 10.1007/s13147-012-0172-0
   Bradford K, 2015, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V49, P11303, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b03127
   Brugge D, 2015, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V8, P95, DOI 10.1089/env.2015.0007
   Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), 2015, STRAT FORSCH INN
   Caniglia BS, 2014, INT J INNOV SUSTAIN, V8, P409, DOI 10.1504/IJISD.2014.066654
   Caniglia Beth Schaefer., 2017, Resilience, Environmental Justice and the City, P57
   Choko OP, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113100
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Comber A, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V86, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Davoudi S, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P3, DOI 10.1111/cico.12281
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Denton F, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1101
   Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), 2006, R D OUTP FLOOD RISKS
   European Commission Directorate-General for Environment, 2013, GUID INT CLIM CHANG
   European Environment Agency (EEA), 2024, Economic Losses From Weatherand Climate-Related Extremes in Europe
   Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI), NAT STRAT PROT CRIT
   Fekkak M., 2016, RESILIENTE STADT ZUK
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Flacke J, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13070711
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08748-210341
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Foudi S, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V42, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.002
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Friesecke F., 2020, Zeitschrift fur Geodasie, Geoinformation und Landmanagement, V145, P144
   Goncalves C., 2013, Framework and Indicators to Measure Urban Resilience
   Greiving S, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1085, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1085-2012
   Greiving S., 2011, URBAN FLOOD RISK MAN, P257
   Greiving S., 2017, J EXTREM EVENTS, V04, P1850003, DOI [10.1142/S2345737618500033, DOI 10.1142/S2345737618500033]
   Haddad BM, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.10.002
   Hagedorn G, 2019, SCIENCE, V364, P139, DOI 10.1126/science.aax3807
   Halkia M., 2016, Measuring the accessibility of urban green areas: a comparison of the green ESM with other datasets in four European cities
   Hassler U, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P119, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.873593
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holloway S.R., 1997, People and Place: Dasymetric Mapping Using Arc/Info
   Honiden T., 2018, OECD REGIONAL DEV WO
   Honold J, 2012, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V32, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002
   Imbery F., 2018, 2018 WARMSTER SOMMER
   Imbery F., VORLAUFIGER RUCKBLIC
   Jelinski DE, 1996, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V11, P129, DOI 10.1007/BF02447512
   Kayacan E, 2016, FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS FOR REAL TIME CONTROL APPLICATIONS: CONCEPTS, MODELING AND ALGORITHMS FOR FAST LEARNING, P1
   Kiran KC, 2020, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.010
   Krüger T, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.003
   Laux P, 2017, WATER RESOUR DEV MAN, P143, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-2624-9_9
   Leibniz-Zentrum fur Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), MUNCH PROGR HER ZALF
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   LIU ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Matzarakis A, 2008, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V30, P161, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6877-5_10
   Mayer Brian., 2017, Resilience, Environmental Justice and the City Abingdon, P37, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315652054
   McGarigal K., FRAGSTATS SPATIAL PA
   McGarigal K., FRAGSTATS HELP
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTER DESIGN
   Mileu N., 2018, FREE OPEN SOURCE SOF, V18, P9
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Palka G, 2018, J GEOVIS SPAT ANAL, V2, DOI 10.1007/s41651-018-0023-9
   Pellow DN, 2000, AM BEHAV SCI, V43, P581, DOI 10.1177/00027640021955441
   Pestel Institut, REG KRIS IND BEST EB
   Piegat A., 2001, Fuzzy Modeling and Control
   Platt S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.006
   Reckien D, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P331, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0989-8
   Renschler CS, 2010, A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework
   Richter H, 2016, ASMC PROC, P472, DOI 10.1109/ASMC.2016.7491098
   Rockefeller Foundation, 100 RES CIT
   Saaty T.L., 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI [10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
   Sandoval V, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P416, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00958-7
   Schaefer M, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01773
   Schwarze B., 2015, Eine Methode zum Messen von Naherreichbarkeit in Kommunen
   Shrestha R, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13070691
   Sobrino JA, 2004, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V90, P434, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.003
   Sokan-Adeaga AA, 2018, London Journal of Research in Science: Natural and Formal, V18, P7
   Stein J., 2015, QUALITATSKRITERIEN B
   Strohmeier K.P., DEMOGRAPHIC DECLINE
   Taubenböck H, 2011, TSUNAMI THREAT - RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, P107
   Telesca L, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL026630
   The Nature Conservancy, TNC COAST RES TOOL
   Thinh N. X., 2005, MODELLIERUNG SIMULAT, P57
   United Nations Economic and Social Affairs, 2018, EC SOC AFF WORLD URB
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wang F, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P4268, DOI 10.3390/rs70404268
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Werner E.E., 1971, The children of Kauai: A longitudinal study from the prenatal period to age ten
   Wieland R, 2006, ECOL INFORM, V1, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2005.10.005
   Wilbanks TJ, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, pS147, DOI 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.10.013
   Willows R., 2003, UKCIP TECHNICAL REPO
   Winderl T., 2010, Disaster Resilience Measurements: Stocktaking of Ongoing Efforts in Developing Systems for Measuring Resilience
   World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 1987, OUR COMM FUT SUST DE
   Wu Jianguo., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-910
   Xu L, 2015, SUSTAIN SCI, V10, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11625-014-0274-4
   Zadeh LA, 1997, FUZZY SET SYST, V90, P111, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00077-8
   ZADEH LA, 1965, INFORM CONTROL, V8, P338, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Zeleny M., 1976, Multiple-Criteria Decision Making
   Zhang ZY, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P14309, DOI 10.3390/su71014309
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 111
TC 18
Z9 18
U1 8
U2 40
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JAN 2
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 2
AR 635
DI 10.3390/su12020635
PG 30
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KQ3KE
UT WOS:000516824600193
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU James, MC
   White, DW
   Waxman, H
   Rivera, H
   Harmon, WC 
AF James, Marlon C.
   Wandix White, Diana
   Waxman, Hersh
   Rivera, Hector
   Harmon, Willie C., Jr.
TI Remixing Resilience: A Critical Examination of Urban Middle School
   Learning Environments among Resilient African American Learners
SO URBAN EDUCATION
LA English
DT Article
DE African American learners; resilience; urban middle schools; culturally
   affirming
ID STUDENTS; ACHIEVEMENT; TEACHER
AB This study examines a sample of African American students attending urban middle schools in a Southern city, and considers their perceptions of learning environments within mathematics classrooms. This study concluded that variables like Academic Self-Concept, Mathematics Anxiety, Satisfaction, Involvement, and Academic Aspiration varied significantly among higher and lower performing students. These variables are informed by the classic resilience literature on learning environment that tends to be less culturally affirming. In an effort to move resilience theory away from racial ideologies, we reconceptualize resilience as a cultural trait common among African American learners that should not be conceptualized dichotomously nor hierarchically
C1 [James, Marlon C.] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Teaching Learning & Culture, Multicultural Educ, College Stn, TX USA.
   [Waxman, Hersh; Rivera, Hector] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX USA.
   [Harmon, Willie C., Jr.] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Teaching Learning & Culture, Curriculum & Instruct Foci Urban & Multicultural, College Stn, TX USA.
   [Wandix White, Diana] Texas A&M Univ, San Antonio, TX USA.
C3 Texas A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas
   A&M University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas A&M
   University System; Texas A&M University College Station; Texas A&M
   University System
RP James, MC (corresponding author), Texas A&M Univ, Coll Educ & Human Dev, Dept Teaching Learning & Culture, 402B Harrington Tower, College Stn, TX 77843 USA.
EM mjames1@tamu.edu
OI Wandix-White, Diana/0000-0002-3989-0528; Harmon, Jr., Willie
   C./0000-0002-4850-1977; James, Marlon/0000-0002-2569-0234
CR Allen Q, 2017, ANTHROPOL EDUC QUART, V48, P269, DOI 10.1111/aeq.12199
   Allen T., 2006, No child left behind and other federal programs for urban school districts, P201, DOI [10.1016/S1479-3660(06)09011-1, DOI 10.1016/S1479-3660(06)09011-1]
   American Psychological Association Task Force on Resilience and Strength in Black Children and Adolescents, 2008, RESILIENCE AFRICAN
   Anderson JamesD., 1988, ED BLACKS S 1860 193
   Andrews DJC, 2012, TEACH COLL REC, V114
   [Anonymous], CAREER DEV Q
   [Anonymous], URBAN EDUC, V00, P1
   Bonner F. A., 2014, J HIGH ENERGY PHY
   Brennan M., 2008, Child Care in Practice, V14, P55, DOI DOI 10.1080/13575270701733732
   Bronfenbrenner U., 1994, International Encyclopaedia Education, V3, P37, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9507.1994.TB00025.X
   Brown DL, 2011, J BLACK PSYCHOL, V37, P259, DOI 10.1177/0095798410390689
   Brown J. H., 2001, IN PRESS
   Chesmore A.A., 2016, The Urban Review, V48, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11256-015-0342-9
   Chipangura A., 2017, LEARNING ENV RES, V20, P121, DOI [10.1007/s10984-016-9224-7, DOI 10.1007/S10984-016-9224-7]
   Collins P.H., 2004, The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, P103, DOI DOI 10.1525/SP.1986.33.6.03A00020
   Cross W.E., 1991, Shades of Black: Diversity in African American identity
   Curry T. J., 2018, SCIENC
   Darling-Hammond L., 2010, FLAT WORLD E
   Darvin J, 2018, J MULTICULT EDUC, V12, P2, DOI 10.1108/JME-03-2017-0020
   Deieso D, 2019, LEARNING ENVIRON RES, V22, P133, DOI 10.1007/s10984-018-9261-5
   Durlak JA, 2011, CHILD DEV, V82, P405, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
   Feagin J. R., 2008, RACIAL ETHNIC RELAT
   Fisher D., 1983, Educational and Policy Analysis, V5, P261, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1164125, 10.3102/01623737005003261, DOI 10.3102/01623737005003261]
   Fraser B.J., 1982, AM J EVAL, V3, P72, DOI DOI 10.1177/109821408200300221
   Fraser B.J ., 1990, Windows intoscience classrooms: Problems associated with higher-level cognitivelearning, P199
   Fraser B. J., 2014, HDB RES SCI ED VOL 2, P119
   Fraser B. J., 1995, IMPROVING SCI E, P141
   Fraser B.J., 1998, Learning Environments Research, V1, P7, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009932514731
   Fraser B.J., 1982, Journal of Educational Measurement, V3, P221, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3984.1982.TB00130.X
   Fraser B.J., 1987, INT J EDUC RES, V11, P145, DOI [10.1016/0883-0355, DOI 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90035-8]
   French D., 2018, LANCET HI, V70, P21
   GARMEZY N, 1991, AM BEHAV SCI, V34, P416, DOI 10.1177/0002764291034004003
   Garmezy N., 1991, LIF DEV PSYCHOL, P174
   Haertel G.D., 1981, British Educational Research Journal, V7, P27, DOI [10.1080/0141192810070103, DOI 10.1080/0141192810070103]
   Hansen M., 2018, LOOKING EVIDENCE NE
   Henderson N., 1996, RESILIENCY SCH MAKI
   Hill R., 1972, STRENGTHS AFRICAN A
   Howard S, 1999, OXFORD REV EDUC, V25, P307, DOI 10.1080/030549899104008
   HUBERTY CJ, 1989, MEAS EVAL COUNS DEV, V22, P158, DOI 10.1080/07481756.1989.12022925
   James M., 2014, Journal of African American Males in Education, V5, P267
   James M. C., 2009, NATL J URBAN ED PRAC, V3, P230
   James M. C., 2018, J HIST RES MUSIC ED, P123
   Jones J., 2018, 50 YEARS KERNER COMM
   Joseph NM, 2017, REV RES EDUC, V41, P203, DOI 10.3102/0091732X16689045
   Kliebard H.M., 2002, Changing course : American curriculum reform in the 20th century
   Knight S. L., 1989, ANN M SW ED RES AS
   Knight S.L., 1990, J SOCIAL STUDENTS RE, V14, P1
   Ladson-Billing G., 2006, EDUC RESEARCHER, V35, P3, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X035007003, 10.3102/0013189x035007003]
   Ladson-Billings G., 2011, CONN LAW REV, V43, P1439
   Lee BL, 2019, INT J EDUC MANAG, V33, P678, DOI 10.1108/IJEM-05-2017-0103
   LEE VE, 1991, EDUC URBAN SOC, V24, P65, DOI 10.1177/0013124591024001006
   Levine CS, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P6013, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1812068116
   Masten A.S., 1990, Development Psychopathology, V2, P425, DOI [10.1017/S0954579400005812, DOI 10.1017/S0954579400005812]
   McCormick MP, 2013, J SCHOOL PSYCHOL, V51, P611, DOI 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.001
   McGee EO, 2015, J RES MATH EDUC, V46, P599, DOI 10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0599
   Merolla DM, 2019, SOCIOL COMPASS, V13, DOI 10.1111/soc4.12696
   Monroe C., 2006, KAPPA DELTA PI RECOR, V42, P161, DOI 10.1080/00228958.2006.10518021
   Moos R.H., 1979, EVALUATING ED ENV
   Murray G., 2016, PERFORMANCE US 15 Y
   National Urban League, 2007, STATE BLACK AM 200
   Padron Y.N., 1999, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, V4, P65, DOI DOI 10.1207/S15327671ESPR04015
   Perry T., 2003, Young gifted, and black: Promoting high achievement among African-american students
   PINTRICH PR, 1993, EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS, V53, P801, DOI 10.1177/0013164493053003024
   Reis S., 2004, ROEPER REV, V27, P110, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02783190509554299, 10.1080/02783190509554299]
   RUTTER M, 1987, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V57, P316, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541.x
   Rutter M., 1979, Prevention of psychopathology: Vol. 3. Social competence in children, V3, P49, DOI DOI 10.1196/ANNALS.1376.002
   Rutter M., 1990, Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology, P181, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1939-0025.1987.TB03541.X, 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1987.tb03541]
   Solorzano DG, 2002, QUAL INQ, V8, P23, DOI DOI 10.1177/107780040200800103
   Spencer M.B., 2006, Developmental psychopathology, Volume 1: Theory and method, V1, P627, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470939383.CH16
   Spencer M.B., 1995, BLACK YOUTH PERSPECT, P37, DOI DOI 10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_9
   Stanford Center for Education Policy Analysis, 2013, ED OPPORTUNITY MONIT
   Straus M.A., 1983, DARK SIDE FAMILIES C, P213
   Trotman F. K., 2011, J BLACK PSYCHO
   Tuitt F., 2016, Race, equity, and the learning environment: The global relevance of critical and inclusive pedagogies in higher education, VFirst
   Uguroglu, 1986, J RES DEV EDUC, V19, P1
   UGUROGLU ME, 1981, PSYCHOL SCHOOLS, V18, P279, DOI 10.1002/1520-6807(198107)18:3<279::AID-PITS2310180305>3.0.CO;2-X
   Wandix-White D, 2023, URBAN EDUC, V58, P1853, DOI 10.1177/0042085920914354
   Wang M.C., 1994, Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects, P45
   Waxman H.C., 2004, Educational resiliency: Student, teacher, and school perspectives, P37
   Waxman HC, 1996, J EDUC RES, V90, P93, DOI 10.1080/00220671.1996.9944450
   WAXMAN HC, 1983, J EDUC RES, V76, P321, DOI 10.1080/00220671.1983.10885476
   Wells A. S., 2012, REV JURID PORTUCALE, P461
   Werner E. E., 1977, KAUAIS CHILDREN COM
   WERNER EE, 1989, SCI AM, V260, P106, DOI 10.1038/scientificamerican0489-106
   Whiting S., 2013, RESILIENT RECEPTIV
   Williams JM, 2013, J COUNS DEV, V91, P291, DOI 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2013.00097.x
   WINNE PH, 1977, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V69, P668, DOI 10.1037/0022-0663.69.6.668
   Wittrock M.C., 1986, Handbook of research on teaching, P297
NR 88
TC 5
Z9 9
U1 2
U2 13
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0042-0859
EI 1552-8340
J9 URBAN EDUC
JI Urban Educ.
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 57
IS 3
BP 432
EP 462
AR 0042085921991632
DI 10.1177/0042085921991632
EA FEB 2021
PG 31
WC Education & Educational Research; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Education & Educational Research; Urban Studies
GA YX7ZO
UT WOS:000620312100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Caughman, L
   Keeler, LW
   Beaudoin, F
AF Caughman, Liliana
   Keeler, Lauren Withycombe
   Beaudoin, Fletcher
TI Real-Time Evaluation of City-University Partnerships for Sustainability
   and Resilience
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE sustainability; resilience; partnerships; collaboration; transformative;
   transition; city; university
ID COLLABORATION; FRAMEWORK
AB Cities face many challenges in their efforts to create more sustainable and resilient urban environments for their residents. Among these challenges is the structure of city administrations themselves. Partnerships between cities and universities are one way that cities can address some of the internal structural barriers to transformation. However, city-university partnerships do not necessarily generate transformative outcomes, and relationships between cities and universities are complicated by history, politics, and the structures the partnerships are attempting to overcome. In this paper, focus groups and trial evaluations from five city-university partnerships in three countries are used to develop a formative evaluation tool for city-university partnerships working on challenges of urban sustainability and resilience. The result is an evaluative tool that can be used in real-time by city-university partnerships in various stages of maturity to inform and improve collaborative efforts. The paper concludes with recommendations for creating partnerships between cities and universities capable of contributing to long-term sustainability transformations in cities.
C1 [Caughman, Liliana] Northwest Indian Coll, Nat Environm Sci, Bellingham, WA 98226 USA.
   [Keeler, Lauren Withycombe] Arizona State Univ, Coll Global Futures, Sch Future Innovat Soc, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Beaudoin, Fletcher] Portland State Univ, Inst Sustainable Solut, Portland, OR 97207 USA.
C3 Northwest Indian College; Arizona State University; Arizona State
   University-Tempe; Portland State University
RP Caughman, L (corresponding author), Northwest Indian Coll, Nat Environm Sci, Bellingham, WA 98226 USA.
EM lcaughman@nwic.edu; Lauren.Withycombe@asu.edu; beaudoin@pdx.edu
OI Caughman, Liliana/0000-0002-5395-7039; Keeler,
   Lauren/0000-0003-2665-139X
FU Global Consortium for Sustainability Outcomes (GCSO)
FX This research was funded by the Global Consortium for Sustainability
   Outcomes (GCSO) (sustainabilityoutcomes.org) under the grant titled
   CapaCities: Building Capacity in City Administrations for Sustainability
   and Resilience.
CR Acuto M, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P2, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0013-9
   [Anonymous], **NON-TRADITIONAL**
   Birch E., 2013, J HIGHER ED OUTREACH, V17, P7
   Brown LD, 2012, HEALTH EDUC BEHAV, V39, P486, DOI 10.1177/1090198111419655
   Butcher J, 2011, INNOV HIGH EDUC, V36, P29, DOI 10.1007/s10755-010-9155-7
   Caughman L, 2020, THESIS, DOI [10.15760/etd.7343, DOI 10.15760/ETD.7343]
   Durst S., 2013, Success Factors of Innovation Ecosystems-Initial Insights from a Literature Review, P27
   EPIC-N, 2020, WHOS NETW
   Faehnle M, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V34, P332, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.04.006
   Ferraris A, 2018, FUTURES, V103, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.03.012
   Greenwald HP, 2018, AM J EVAL, V39, P322, DOI 10.1177/1098214017743813
   Guyadeen D, 2018, J PLAN EDUC RES, V38, P98, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16675930
   Harris M, 2016, HIGHER EDUC, V31, P391, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_8
   Hevner A, 2010, INTEGR SER INFORM SY, V22, P121, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_10
   Keeler LW, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P529, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1117-9
   Keeler LW, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10092966
   Keeler LW, 2016, SUSTAIN SCI, V11, P749, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0364-6
   KITZINGER J, 1995, BRIT MED J, V311, P299, DOI 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
   Kula-Semos M., 2009, THESIS
   Loorbach D, 2010, GOVERNANCE, V23, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Lozano R, 2007, SUSTAIN DEV, V15, P370, DOI 10.1002/sd.322
   Luederitz C., 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V169, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.09.005, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005]
   Marek LI, 2015, AM J EVAL, V36, P67, DOI 10.1177/1098214014531068
   Margerum RD, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V41, P487, DOI 10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9
   Massey A. P., 1991, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, V3, P193, DOI 10.1109/69.87999
   Mattila P., 2019, RES DESIGN CONNECTED, V135, P151, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-5977-4_13
   Nauslar NJ, 2018, FIRE-BASEL, V1, DOI 10.3390/fire1010018
   Nolan RH, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P1039, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14987
   Olsson P, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06799-190401
   Pickrell J., 2020, SCI NEWS
   Plummer R, 2007, ECOL ECON, V61, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.025
   Polk M, 2015, FUTURES, V65, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001
   Ramaswami A., 2018, Sustainable urban systems: Articulating a long-term convergence research agenda. A Report by the Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education
   Reed MS, 2006, ECOL ECON, V59, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.008
   Rodríguez-Campos L, 2012, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V35, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.12.006
   Salimova T, 2014, QUAL INNOV PROSPER, V18, P107, DOI 10.12776/QIP.V18I1.320
   Seitanidi MM, 2010, J BUS ETHICS, V94, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0784-2
   Swartz AL, 2011, ADULT EDUC QUART, V61, P324, DOI 10.1177/0741713610392761
   Teitel L., 2008, CHILDHOOD EDUC, V85, P75, DOI DOI 10.1080/00094056.2009.10523067
   Trencher G, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.009
   United Nations, 2020, SUST DEV GOALS SUST
   Warren J.D., 2018, FALL M
   Whitmore E., 1998, New directions for evaluation, V80, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/EV.1113
   Wolfram M, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P437, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01169-y
   Woodland RH, 2012, AM J EVAL, V33, P366, DOI 10.1177/1098214012440028
NR 45
TC 6
Z9 8
U1 1
U2 25
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 21
AR 8796
DI 10.3390/su12218796
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OR3BI
UT WOS:000589348500001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Link, AC
   Zhu, YZ
   Karutz, R
AF Link, Ann-Christine
   Zhu, Yuanzao
   Karutz, Raphael
TI Quantification of Resilience Considering Different Migration
   Biographies: A Case Study of Pune, India
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE livelihood resilience; migration; urbanization; extreme events; India
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; LIVELIHOOD RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; FRAMEWORK;
   DISASTER; INDEX; SLUM
AB Urbanization proceeds globally and is often driven by migration. Simultaneously, cities face severe exposure to environmental hazards such as floods and heatwaves posing threats to millions of urban households. Consequently, fostering urban households' resilience is imperative, yet often impeded by the lack of its accurate assessment. We developed a structural equation model to quantify households' resilience, considering their assets, housing, and health properties. Based on a household survey (n = 1872), we calculate the resilience of households in Pune, India with and without migration biography and compare different sub-groups. We further analyze how households are exposed to and affected by floods and heatwaves. Our results show that not migration as such but the type of migration, particularly, the residence zone at the migration destination (formal urban or slum) and migration origin (urban or rural) provide insights into households' resilience and affectedness by extreme weather events. While on average, migrants in our study have higher resilience than non-migrants, the sub-group of rural migrants living in slums score significantly lower than the respective non-migrant cohort. Further characteristics of the migration biography such as migration distance, time since arrival at the destination, and the reasons for migration contribute to households' resilience. Consequently, the opposing generalized notions in literature of migrants either as the least resilient group or as high performers, need to be overcome as our study shows that within one city, migrants are found both at the top and the bottom of the resilience range. Thus, we recommend that policymakers include migrants' biographies when assessing their resilience and when designing resilience improvement interventions to help the least resilient migrant groups more effectively.
C1 [Link, Ann-Christine] Philipps Univ Marburg, Dept Econ Geog & Locat Res, D-30537 Marburg, Germany.
   [Zhu, Yuanzao] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Econ, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany.
   [Karutz, Raphael] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany.
C3 Philipps University Marburg; Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz Center for
   Environmental Research (UFZ); Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz Center
   for Environmental Research (UFZ)
RP Karutz, R (corresponding author), UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Urban & Environm Sociol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany.
EM ann-christine.link@uni-marburg.de; yuanzao.zhu@ufz.de;
   raphael.karutz@ufz.de
OI Karutz, Raphael/0000-0003-1598-288X; Zhu, Yuanzao/0000-0002-9801-5520
FU US National Science Foundation [ICER/EAR-1829999]; Federal Ministry of
   Education and Research (BMBF) [033WU002]
FX This work was conducted as part of the Belmont Forum Sustainable
   Urbanisation Global Initiative (SUGI)/Food-Water-Energy Nexus theme for
   which coordination was supported by the US National Science Foundation
   under grant ICER/EAR-1829999 to Stanford University. UFZ received
   funding from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under
   grant 033WU002. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or
   recommendations expressed in this material do not necessarily reflect
   the views of the funding organizations.
CR Abdrabo MA, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.09.005
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Aklin M, 2015, ENERGY, V80, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.063
   Alinovi L., 2010, Promoting Resilience through Social Protection in Sub-Saharan Africa, P28, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU11030907
   Alinovi L., 2008, AGR SURVEY METHODS, P1
   Birthal PS, 2019, AGR SYST, V173, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.03.005
   Boyle P., 2014, Exploring contemporary migration
   Brenkert AL, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V72, P57, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5930-3
   Brettell CarolineB. James F. Hollifield., 2014, MIGRATION THEORY TAL, V3rd
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Census of India, 2011, D3 MIGR PLAC LAST RE
   Census of India, PUN CIT POP CENS 201
   Chambers R., 1992, Discussion Paper - Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex
   Chun H, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122222
   Ciani F., 2014, Testing for household resilience to food insecurity: Evidence from Nicaragua
   Correspondent H., 2019, HINDUSTAN TIMES 0520
   Cronin V, 2011, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V10, P310, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.594495
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   D'Errico M., 2015, RESILIENCE ANAL BURK
   D'Errico M., 2015, RESILIENCE ANAL NIGE
   d'Errico M, 2018, FOOD SECUR, V10, P1033, DOI 10.1007/s12571-018-0820-5
   Das P, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13061066
   Das S, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P950, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01241-7
   de Haan L, 2005, DEV CHANGE, V36, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00401.x
   deHaan A, 1997, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V28, P35, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1997.mp28002004.x
   Desai R., 2020, CIRCULAR MIGRATION U, P462
   Deshingkar P, 2012, ENVIRON RES LETT, V7, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/015603
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Duncan JM, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09559-220403
   Eckstein D., 2021, Global Climate Risk Index 2021: Who Suffers Most from Extreme Weather Events? Weather-Related Loss Events in 2019 and 200-2019
   ET Online, 2018, EC TIMES 0927
   FAO, 2016, Food Agric. Organ. U. Nations, P1
   Foresight, 2011, MIGRATION GLOBAL ENV
   Gaillard JC, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V10, P332, DOI 10.1007/s13753-019-00228-y
   Gardner JS, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9038-5
   Gautam A., 2019, 42 9 DEGREES PUNE MA
   Gautam Y, 2017, MT RES DEV, V37, P436, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00035.1
   Ghaderpour E, 2020, INT J REMOTE SENS, V41, P2374, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2019.1688419
   Gonzales P, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V30, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.012
   Hari V, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P636, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01105-7
   Hayward BM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05947-180437
   Hazaymeh K, 2016, AIMS ENVIRON SCI, V3, P604, DOI 10.3934/environsci.2016.4.604
   Hernback J., 2012, Influence of Urban Form on Co-presence in Public Space A Space Syntax Analysis of Informal Settlements in Pune
   Hoffmann R, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P904, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0898-6
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   International Migration Organization, 2019, WORLD MIGRATION REPO
   Jimmy EN, 2020, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V15, P1493, DOI 10.1007/s11482-019-09739-8
   Joerin J, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P540, DOI 10.1111/disa.12058
   Kainth G.S., 2009, PUSH PULL FACTORS MI
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Kozlowska K., 2015, RESILIENCE ANAL BURK
   Krishnamurthy R, 2016, CITIES, V53, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.011
   Mallick B, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11123332
   Marschke MJ, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Mayer B, 2016, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V61, P189, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25796-9_12
   Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, 2018, EAS LIV
   National Sample Survey Office, 2008, IND EMPL UN MIGR SUR
   Nayak PK, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06656-190273
   O'Brien K, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P542, DOI 10.1177/0309132510377573
   Oberai A.S., 1989, PROBLEMS URBANISATIO
   Oriangi G., 2019, Am J Clim Change, V8, P520, DOI [10.4236/ajcc.2019.84028, DOI 10.4236/AJCC.2019.84028]
   Pennix R., 2005, INTEGRATION MIGRANTS
   Perch-Nielsen S, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V91, P375, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9416-y
   Pingali P, 2005, DISASTERS, V29, pS5, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00282.x
   PTI, 2019, EC TIMES 0926
   Pune Municipal Corporation, 2011, FIR HAZ RESP MIT PLA
   Purkayastha B, 2018, CURR SOCIOL, V66, P167, DOI 10.1177/0011392117736302
   Rajendran D, 2020, INT MIGR, V58, P30, DOI 10.1111/imig.12586
   Revathy N., 2020, Economic Affairs, V65, P23, DOI 10.30954/0424-2513.1.2020.4
   Revi A, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P207, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089157
   Sabates-Wheeler R., 2003, Migration and Social Protection: A concept paper
   Sakdapolrak P, 2016, ERDE, V147, P81, DOI 10.12854/erde-147-6
   Sharma S, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-15896-3
   Shinde KA, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P382, DOI 10.1177/0042098016652777
   Speranza CI, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005
   Srivastava R., 2011, The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, V54, P411
   Steduto P., 2012, Fao/Who, July, P1
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   United Nations, 2015, World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, DOI DOI 10.4054/DEMRES.2005.12.9
   United Nations Migration Agency, WHO IS MIGR
   WBGU, 2007, WORLD TRANS CLIM CHA
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
NR 82
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 5
U2 23
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 10
IS 11
AR 1134
DI 10.3390/land10111134
PG 21
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA XI3HQ
UT WOS:000726007600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Grabner, SM
   Tsvetkova, A
AF Grabner, Simone Maria
   Tsvetkova, Alexandra
TI Urban labour market resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic: what is the
   promise of teleworking?
SO REGIONAL STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE labour demand; regional resilience; Covid-19; teleworkability
ID REGIONAL RESILIENCE; VARIETY; CRISIS
AB The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic caused immense labour market turbulences and a large-scale turn towards teleworking. This paper contributes to the understanding of how teleworking shapes regional economic outcomes by focusing on labour market resilience in US cities during the 2020 Covid-19 emergency. It examines employment and labour demand and finds that the share of teleworkable jobs is linked to stronger employment resilience, and enhances labour demand resilience during the onset of the pandemic and in smaller cities. The paper discusses possible mechanisms and policies that can help leverage the promise of teleworking for resilient labour markets.
C1 [Grabner, Simone Maria] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Econ Policy, Milan, Italy.
   [Tsvetkova, Alexandra] OECD Trento Ctr Local Dev, Spatial Prod Lab, Trento, Italy.
C3 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart; Organisation for Economic
   Co-operation & Development (OECD)
RP Grabner, SM (corresponding author), Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Econ Policy, Milan, Italy.
EM simone.grabner@unibocconi.it; alexandra.tsvetkova@oecd.org
OI Grabner, Simone Maria/0000-0001-5278-8301
CR Acemoglu D., 2013, The Network Origins of Large Economic Downturns, DOI 10.3386/w19230
   Baek CW, 2021, REV ECON STAT, V103, P979, DOI 10.1162/rest_a_00996
   Bartik A. W., 2020, Working Paper 26989, V26989, DOI DOI 10.3386/W26989
   Bartik T., 2017, WHOLEDATA UNSUPPRESS
   BROOKS M, 2021, SOCIUS, DOI DOI 10.1177/23780231211022094
   Brussevich M., 2020, IMF Working Paper, WP/20/88, P1
   Brynjolfsson E., 2020, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   Cainelli G, 2019, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V62, P657, DOI 10.1007/s00168-019-00911-4
   Cainelli G, 2019, PAP REG SCI, V98, P755, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12377
   Cajner T, 2020, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P3, DOI 10.1353/eca.2020.0005
   Cammeraat E., 2021, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, V2021, DOI DOI 10.1787/CD75C3-7-EN
   Campello M., 2020, CORPORATE HIRING COV, DOI [10.3386/w27208, DOI 10.3386/W27208]
   Cho S.J., 2020, EMPLOYMENT IMPACTS C
   Choudhury P, 2021, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V42, P655, DOI 10.1002/smj.3251
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Clancy M., 2020, EC WORKING PAPERS, V4
   Coibion Olivier, 2020, Working Paper Series - National Bureau of Economic Research (Massachusetts)
   Cortes G.M., 2020, SSRN ELECT J
   Deller S, 2016, ECON INQ, V54, P1824, DOI 10.1111/ecin.12323
   Delventhal MJ, 2022, J URBAN ECON, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2021.103331
   Dingel JI, 2020, J PUBLIC ECON, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235
   Doran J, 2018, ENVIRON PLANN A, V50, P111, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17736067
   Doran J, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P205, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv004
   Duranton G., 2015, W21452 NBER
   Forsythe E, 2020, J PUBLIC ECON, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104238
   Frenken K, 2007, REG STUD, V41, P685, DOI 10.1080/00343400601120296
   George TJ, 2022, ORGAN DYN, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100869
   Giannakis E, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P1394, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1319464
   Grabner SM, 2022, REG STUD, V56, P1605, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2021.2002837
   Hale, 2020, Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper 31 (2020-11
   Hale T, 2021, NAT HUM BEHAV, V5, P529, DOI 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
   Han Y, 2015, REV REG STUD, V45, P131
   Hershbein B, 2018, AM ECON REV, V108, P1737, DOI 10.1257/aer.20161570
   Lagravinese R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P331, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv006
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Maselli, 2020, EUOBSERVER OPINION
   OECD, 2021, Teleworking in the COVID-19 pandemic: Trend and prospects, DOI [10.1787/72a416b6-en, DOI 10.1787/72A416B6-EN]
   OECD, PROD GAINS TEL POST
   Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020, EXPL POL OPT TEL STE
   Rothwell, 2020, POLITICS IS WRENCHIN
   Shimer R, 2012, REV ECON DYNAM, V15, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.red.2012.02.001
   Tsvetkova A., 2020, LABOUR DEMAND WEAKEN
   Xiao J, 2018, IND CORP CHANGE, V27, P15, DOI 10.1093/icc/dtx023
   Zhang SH, 2020, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V141, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2020.09.007
NR 46
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 7
U2 65
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0034-3404
EI 1360-0591
J9 REG STUD
JI Reg. Stud.
PD DEC 2
PY 2023
VL 57
IS 12
SI SI
BP 2521
EP 2536
DI 10.1080/00343404.2022.2042470
EA MAR 2022
PG 16
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography;
   Public Administration
GA X8DF4
UT WOS:000770453900001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Boeing, G
   Ha, J
AF Boeing, Geoff
   Ha, Jaehyun
TI Resilient by design: Simulating street network disruptions across every
   urban area in the world
SO TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE
LA English
DT Article
DE Street networks; Urban planning; Resilience; Disasters; Transportation
   engineering; Urban design
ID CRITICAL LINKS; ROAD NETWORKS; VULNERABILITY; ROBUSTNESS; SYSTEMS;
   ACCESSIBILITY; PERFORMANCE
AB Street networks allow people and goods to move through cities, but they are vulnerable to disasters like floods, earthquakes, and terrorist attacks. Well-planned network design can make a city more resilient and robust to such disruptions, but we still know little about worldwide patterns of vulnerability, or worldwide empirical relationships between specific design characteristics and resilience. This study quantifies and measures the vulnerability of the street networks of every urban area in the world then models the relationships between vulnerability and street network design characteristics. To do so, we simulate over 2.4 billion trips across more than 8,000 urban areas in 178 countries, while also simulating network disruption events representing floods, earthquakes, and targeted attacks. We find that disrupting high-centrality nodes severely impacts network function. All else equal, networks with higher connectivity, fewer chokepoints, or less circuity are less vulnerable to disruption ' s impacts. This study thus contributes a new global understanding of network design and vulnerability to the literature. We argue that these design characteristics offer high leverage points for street network resilience and robustness that planners should emphasize when designing or retrofitting urban networks.
C1 [Boeing, Geoff] Univ Southern Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, Dept Urban Planning & Spatial Anal, 301A Lewis Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
   [Ha, Jaehyun] Univ Southern Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, Los Angeles, CA USA.
C3 University of Southern California; University of Southern California
RP Boeing, G (corresponding author), Univ Southern Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, Dept Urban Planning & Spatial Anal, 301A Lewis Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA.
EM boeing@usc.edu; jaehyunh@usc.edu
RI HA, JAEHYUN/GSE-3186-2022; Boeing, Geoff/P-3238-2019; Boeing,
   Geoff/O-9769-2016
OI Boeing, Geoff/0000-0003-1851-6411
FU California Department of Transportation; Pacific Southwest Region
   University Transportation Center
FX This work was funded by the California Department of Transportation and
   the Pacific Southwest Region University Transportation Center. The
   authors wish to thank Yuquan Zhou for research assistance.
CR Akbarzadeh M, 2019, TRANSPORTATION, V46, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s11116-017-9814-y
   Alabbad Y, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V793, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148476
   Amaral JC, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102916
   [Anonymous], 2018, Population Division World Urbanization Prospects: Australia
   Aydin NY, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V91, P37, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3112-z
   Barrington-Leigh C, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0223078
   Barrington-Leigh C, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0180698
   Barthélemy M, 2004, EUR PHYS J B, V38, P163, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00111-4
   Barthélemy M, 2008, PHYS REV LETT, V100, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.138702
   Batty M, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P571, DOI 10.1068/b4004ed
   Bell MGH, 2000, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V34, P533, DOI 10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00042-9
   Blockley D, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-CIV EN, V165, P13, DOI 10.1680/cien.11.00046
   Boeing G, 2022, GEOGR ANAL, V54, P519, DOI 10.1111/gean.12281
   Boeing G, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P590, DOI 10.1177/2399808318784595
   Buhl J, 2006, EUR PHYS J B, V49, P513, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00085-1
   Carneiro Freire S., 2016, Development of new open and free multi-temporal global population grids at 250 m resolution, Geospatial Data in a Changing World
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Corbane C, 2017, BIG EARTH DATA, V1, P118, DOI 10.1080/20964471.2017.1397899
   De Montis A, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104207
   Dong SJ, 2019, J R SOC INTERFACE, V16, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2019.0149
   Du CY, 2024, RISK ANAL, V44, P2333, DOI 10.1111/risa.14236
   Duan YY, 2014, PHYSICA A, V411, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.073
   Ermagun A, 2023, J TRANSP GEOGR, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103710
   Faturechi R, 2015, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000212
   Florczyk A J., 2019, Description of the GHS Urban Centre Database 2015, DOI DOI 10.2760/037310
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Gauthier P, 2018, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2672, P54, DOI 10.1177/0361198118792115
   Gonçalves LAPJ, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102727
   Gu Y, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.11.003
   Iida Y., 1989, P 5 WCTR, V37, P367
   Jenelius E, 2006, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V40, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.003
   Jenelius E, 2012, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V46, P746, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2012.02.003
   Kermanshah A, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V153, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.04.007
   Kermanshah A, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2678-1
   Latora V, 2001, PHYS REV LETT, V87, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701
   Martín B, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102851
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Miller-Hooks E, 2012, COMPUT OPER RES, V39, P1633, DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2011.09.017
   Morelli AB, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102770
   Newman MEJ, 2005, SOC NETWORKS, V27, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009
   Novak DC, 2014, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V57, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.015
   Ortega E, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102691
   Pan SZ, 2021, PHYSICA A, V581, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126235
   Porta S, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P705, DOI 10.1068/b32045
   Santos JR, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P1091, DOI 10.1177/2399808321999318
   Scott DM, 2006, J TRANSP GEOGR, V14, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2005.10.003
   Shang WL, 2023, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V24, P15344, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2022.3149969
   Shang WL, 2020, COMPLEXITY, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/6025821
   Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
   Strano E, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P1071, DOI 10.1068/b38216
   Sun WJ, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P168, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663
   Tang JQ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102840
   Taylor MAP, 2006, NETW SPAT ECON, V6, P267, DOI 10.1007/s11067-006-9284-9
   Testa AC, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P29, DOI 10.3141/2532-04
   Tsang M, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102774
   Wan CP, 2018, TRANSPORT REV, V38, P479, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
   Westrum R., 2017, Resilience engineering, P55
   Wisniewski S, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102510
   Yang YF, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101886
   Zhang X, 2015, J TRANSP GEOGR, V46, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.006
   Zheng S., 2014, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-08180-914, 10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_14, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-08180-9_14]
NR 61
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 21
U2 27
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0965-8564
EI 1879-2375
J9 TRANSPORT RES A-POL
JI Transp. Res. Pt. A-Policy Pract.
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 182
AR 104016
DI 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104016
EA MAR 2024
PG 15
WC Economics; Transportation; Transportation Science & Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Transportation
GA UD9A1
UT WOS:001246229200001
OA Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ren, H
   Rong, C
   Tian, QH
   Zhang, WC
   Shao, D
AF Ren, Hao
   Rong, Chong
   Tian, Qinhu
   Zhang, Weichao
   Shao, Dan
TI Evaluation Model for Seismic Resilience of Urban Building Groups
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE urban building groups; evaluation method of seismic resilience; seismic
   resilience of buildings; functional recovery time
ID FRAMEWORK; RECOVERY
AB This paper analyzed the factors that influence the seismic resilience of urban building groups and studied the laws that influence internal factors and external factors. Based on the data from the first national comprehensive risk survey of natural disasters, a refined classification study of urban building groups was carried out. Based on the existing evaluation methods of seismic resilience of individual buildings, the recovery time was selected as the resilience evaluation index to calculate the effect of internal factors on the seismic resilience of urban building groups. Then, we studied the quantitative relationship between external factors (i.e., disaster relief capacity, population density, and economic level) and the evaluation indicators of seismic resilience of urban building groups, and we proposed the kilometer grid coefficient. Based on that, we proposed a calculation method of the effect of external factors on the seismic resilience of urban building groups. Considering the influence of internal and external factors, the evaluation model for the seismic resilience of urban building groups was established. And the model was applied in a typical city. This paper proposes a method to evaluate the seismic resilience of urban building groups, which can master the functional recovery time of urban building groups after an earthquake. Based on the proposed model, we can optimize the functional recovery path and emergency rescue path of the disaster area, as well as improve the resilience of urban building systems and the construction of resilient cities.
C1 [Ren, Hao; Tian, Qinhu; Zhang, Weichao; Shao, Dan] Shaanxi Earthquake Agcy, Xian 710068, Peoples R China.
   [Rong, Chong] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
C3 China Earthquake Administration; Shaanxi Earthquake Agency, CEA; Xi'an
   University of Architecture & Technology
RP Tian, QH (corresponding author), Shaanxi Earthquake Agcy, Xian 710068, Peoples R China.
EM renhao@sxdzj.com.cn; glorich@126.com; shaodanseis@163.com
OI Tian, Qinhu/0000-0002-5424-3361
FU The authors are grateful to all the people who helped us in this paper.
FX The authors are grateful to all the people who helped us in this paper.
CR Almufti I., 2013, REDITM RATING SYSTEM
   Ankang Municipal Government, 2022, Ankang Statistical Yearbook
   Ankang Municipal Government, 2023, Statistical Bulletin on the National Economic and Social Development of Ankang City in 2022
   [Anonymous], 2012, SEISMIC PERFORMANCE
   [Anonymous], 2011, GB/T 38591-2020
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V6, P127, DOI 10.1080/15732470802663847
   Fang D.P., 2020, J. Eng. Mech, V37, P28
   Forcellini D, 2023, STRUCTURES, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105015
   Hutt CM, 2022, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V38, P1283, DOI 10.1177/87552930211060856
   Li F, 2022, SEX RES SOC POLICY, V19, P1650, DOI 10.1007/s13178-022-00730-x
   Li G., 2021, J. Civ. Eng, V54, P1
   Lin PH, 2017, STRUCT SAF, V69, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.002
   Lin X.C., 2020, Earthq. Res, V43, P449
   Lu X.Z., 2017, Urban Disaster Reduct, V4, P29
   MOHURD, 2011, Technical Specification for High Strength Bolt Connections of Steel Structures
   National Research Council, 2011, NAT EARTHQ RES RES I
   [任军宇 Ren Junyu], 2021, [建筑结构学报, Journal of Building Structures], V42, P48
   Ruggieri S, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103903
   Ruggieri S, 2022, B EARTHQ ENG, V20, P8179, DOI 10.1007/s10518-022-01516-7
   Sun B.T., 2017, J. Civ. Eng, V50, P1
   Terao K., 2017, J. Rural Plan. Assoc, V36, P398, DOI [10.2750/arp.36.398, DOI 10.2750/ARP.36.398]
   usrc, U.S. Resiliency Council Rating Building Performance in Natural Disasters
   [王啸霆 Wang Xiaoting], 2020, [建筑结构, Building Structure], V50, P57
   Xiong C, 2020, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V35, P322, DOI 10.1111/mice.12496
   [翟长海 Zhai Changhai], 2018, [建筑结构学报, Journal of Building Structures], V39, P1
   Zhang H., 2021, Masters Thesis
NR 26
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 11
U2 57
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 10
AR 2502
DI 10.3390/buildings13102502
PG 14
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA W6CM8
UT WOS:001092485000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Khazai, B
   Anhorn, J
   Burton, CG
AF Khazai, Bijan
   Anhorn, Johannes
   Burton, Christopher G.
TI Resilience Performance Scorecard: Measuring urban disaster resilience at
   multiple levels of geography with case study application to Lalitpur,
   Nepal
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Scorecard; Indicators; Participatory decision making;
   Governance; Disaster risk management
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; TOOLS
AB Making a city disaster-resilient means understanding the capacity of communities and decision-makers to actively adapt to, cope with, and transform in view of potential threats. Urban resilience needs to be considered a multi-dimensional concept, visible at multiple levels, and highly dynamic. Various indicator frameworks rely on pre-arranged indicator sets and beneficiaries to measure resilience neglecting the need to dynamically adjust indicators to the context of specific places or sub-city levels of geography. The purpose of this paper is to introduce an approach for measuring and monitoring resilience within cities. The Resilience Performance Scorecard (RPS) is a multilevel and multi-scale self-evaluation tool that empowers stakeholders to quantitatively assess resilience parameters based on primary source information. This scorecard approach will lead to a highly contextualized resilience appraisal reflecting the goals and objectives of the local actors and cannot be substituted by a ready-to-go, generic questionnaire. To demonstrate the RPS approach as a tool to guide and enable local policy makers and communities to establish priorities for more in-depth analysis, to allocate funds, and to develop emergency and disaster management programs more effectively, we implemented the RPS with city officials and community stakeholders of Lalitpur before and after the 2015 Nepal Earthquakes.
C1 [Khazai, Bijan] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Ctr Disaster Management & Risk Reduct Technol, Karlsruhe, Germany.
   [Anhorn, Johannes] Heidelberg Univ, South Asia Inst, Heidelberg, Germany.
   [Burton, Christopher G.] Auburn Univ, Dept Geosci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA.
   [Burton, Christopher G.] Global Earthquake Model Fdn, Pavia, Italy.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Ruprecht Karls
   University Heidelberg; Auburn University System; Auburn University
RP Anhorn, J (corresponding author), Heidelberg Univ, South Asia Inst, Heidelberg, Germany.
EM khazai@kit.edu; anhorn@sai.uni-heidelberg.de; cgburtor@auburn.edu
RI Anhorn, Johannes/H-6180-2014; Khazai, Bijan/AAE-1022-2022
FU Heidelberg-Karlsruhe Research Partnership (HEiKA); Global Earthquake
   Model; National Society for Earthquake Technology (NSET) in Nepal
FX All three authors equally contributed to the development of the RPS
   methodology and the manuscript alike. The Heidelberg-Karlsruhe Research
   Partnership (HEiKA) and the Global Earthquake Model funded parts of this
   work. In particular, the authors gratefully acknowledge the support and
   collaboration of the National Society for Earthquake Technology (NSET)
   in Nepal which made the implementation of the methodology possible in
   Lalitpur. In particular, the authors thank Dr. Amod Dixit, Mr. Surya
   Shresta, Mr. Ganesh Kumar Jimee, Mr. Bijay Upadhyay and Ms. Bhubaneswari
   Parajuli for their valuable support and contributions in facilitating
   the workshops in Lalitpur, Nepal.
CR Anhorn J, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_2
   [Anonymous], GIS SEISMIC BUILDING
   [Anonymous], PLANN NORMS STAND 20
   [Anonymous], REP ID OP SPAC HUM P
   [Anonymous], STRUCT VULN ASS HOSP
   [Anonymous], ONLINE CASE STUDY SE
   [Anonymous], SOCIAL INDICATORS RE
   [Anonymous], COMM DIS RES SCOR TO
   [Anonymous], 2006, SEISMIC VULNERABILIT
   [Anonymous], P 14 WORLD C EARTHQ
   [Anonymous], PISURFP0052011 NSET
   [Anonymous], NEP HAZ RISK ASS 1
   [Anonymous], DNET STUD SEISM VULN
   [Anonymous], ENV MONOGRAPH
   [Anonymous], SHELT CONT PLAN COOR
   [Anonymous], NONSTR VULN ASS HOSP
   [Anonymous], DIS RES SCOR CIT PRE
   [Anonymous], DIS RESI SCOR CIT DE
   [Anonymous], UNISDR TERM DIS RISK
   [Anonymous], UN CIT GEND CAST ETH
   [Anonymous], 2017, IFIP ADV INF COMMUN, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68486-4_7
   [Anonymous], STUD EARTHQ DIS MIT
   [Anonymous], METR TRENDS ISS KATH
   [Anonymous], GEOPH RES ABSTR
   [Anonymous], INSP YOUR OWN HOUS G
   [Anonymous], KATHMANDU HYOGO LALI
   [Anonymous], 2017, WORKSH PART EV EARTH
   [Anonymous], 2017, MAKE CITIES MORE RES
   [Anonymous], COMM DIS RES SCOR TO
   [Anonymous], P AGU FALL M
   [Anonymous], NEP HAZ RISK ASS 2
   [Anonymous], EARTHQ CONT PLAN 200
   [Anonymous], ON LIN P RES CIT 201
   [Anonymous], WORKSH PART EV EARHQ
   [Anonymous], KEY GOV FIG NEP EART
   [Anonymous], NEP NAT BUILD COD 20
   [Anonymous], SEISM VULN PUBL SCH
   [Anonymous], DEV MODEL TOOL MEASU
   [Anonymous], TR1112
   [Anonymous], 240 IDS
   [Anonymous], SHELT RESP STRAT PLA
   [Anonymous], NEP NAT BUILD COD 10
   Arbon P., 2015, Implementation and evaluation of the Community Disaster Resilience Scorecard Toolkit and Guidelines
   Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Chambers R., 1991, SUSTAINABLE RURAL LI
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Da Silva J., 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   EMI, 2010, RISK SENS LAND US PL
   Fekete A, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   GUTSCHOW N, 2002, ERDKUNDE, V56, P15, DOI DOI 10.3112/ERDKUNDE.2002.01.02
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Khazai B., 2015, A Guide to Measuring Urban Risk Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice of Urban Indicators
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Muzzini E., 2013, URBAN GROWTH SPATIAL
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Peacock W., 2010, Advancing Resilience of Coastal Localities: Developing, Implementing, and Sustaining the Use of Coastal Resilience Indicators: A Final Report
   Pelling M, 2006, OPEN HOUSE INT, V31, P125
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.006
   Sherrieb K, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.06.001
   Thapa RB, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.007
   Thapa RB, 2010, APPL GEOGR, V30, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.002
   Tierney K., 2007, TR News, V250, P14, DOI DOI 10.17226/23168
   Tierney K, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P341, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618
   U. Nation, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
NR 72
TC 42
Z9 43
U1 8
U2 85
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD OCT
PY 2018
VL 31
BP 604
EP 616
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.012
PG 13
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA GV7ZE
UT WOS:000446353300059
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Frantzeskaki, N
AF Frantzeskaki, Niki
TI Bringing Transition Management to Cities: Building Skills for
   Transformative Urban Governance
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE cities; co-creation; skills; transition management; sustainability;
   urban resilience; systems thinking
ID SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; PATHWAYS; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK; CLIMATE;
   CITY
AB Cities are open to trialing new approaches for advancing their planning and urban governance practice. Evidence from urban research and practice shows that transition management has been widely and diversely applied for strategic planning for climate mitigation and adaptation, regeneration, as well as sectoral (energy, water, waste) and social cohesion agendas. Despite the amounting evidence of the applications of transition management, the research has not identified what it is required in terms of skills to apply such a governance framework for participatory governance in cities. In this paper, we respond to this gap by providing evidence from 11 cities across Europe that applied transition management as an approach to participatory urban governance for unpacking what transformative actions are required to strengthen urban resilience in deprived neighborhoods. Our multi-case study research and analysis reveals that a multitude of vocational and academic skills are required for the application of transition management approach including systems thinking, creativity, theory-to-practice application skills, diplomatic skills for forging partnerships and learning alliances and openness to learning-by-doing during experimentation. Transition management application in cities in the Resilient Europe project brought about positive outcomes in terms of developing new skills, embedding new knowledge about urban resilience and transition management in planning.
C1 [Frantzeskaki, Niki] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Urban Transit, Melbourne, Vic 3101, Australia.
   [Frantzeskaki, Niki] Erasmus Univ, Dutch Res Inst Transit DRIFT, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
C3 Swinburne University of Technology; Erasmus University Rotterdam;
   Erasmus University Rotterdam - Excl Erasmus MC
RP Frantzeskaki, N (corresponding author), Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Urban Transit, Melbourne, Vic 3101, Australia.; Frantzeskaki, N (corresponding author), Erasmus Univ, Dutch Res Inst Transit DRIFT, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.
EM nfrantzeskaki@swin.edu.au
RI Frantzeskaki, Niki/AAN-1044-2021
OI Frantzeskaki, Niki/0000-0002-6983-448X
FU URBACT III program; European Union URBACT Secretariat program III
FX This research was funded by URBACT III program. Specifically, the
   Resilient Europe project was funded by the European Union URBACT
   Secretariat program III, and lasted from 2015 to 2018.
CR [Anonymous], 2007, TRANSITION MANAGEMEN
   Avelino F, 2009, POLICY SCI, V42, P369, DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9102-6
   Beers PJ, 2017, SOCIOL RURALIS, V57, P415, DOI 10.1111/soru.12179
   Bos JJ, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1340, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Bulkeley H, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003
   Butler JRA, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.004
   Carlucci M, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1289, DOI 10.1177/2399808319828374
   Tàbara JD, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10010161
   Ernst L, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P2988, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.136
   Ferguson BC, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7300, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.045
   Ferguson BC, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V117, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.016
   Forrester J.W., 1969, Urban Dynamics
   Foxon Timothy J., 2009, European Environment, V19, P3, DOI 10.1002/eet.496
   Frantzeskaki N, 2017, ROU STUD SUST TRANS, P1
   Frantzeskaki N, 2018, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V29, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001
   Frantzeskaki N, 2018, FUTURE CITY, V11, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_1
   Frantzeskaki N, 2016, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P49, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_4
   Frantzeskaki Niki, 2012, International Journal of Sustainable Development, V15, P19, DOI 10.1504/IJSD.2012.044032
   Giddens Anthony, 1986, CONSTITUTION SOC OUT
   Goddard G, 2018, APPL ENERG, V225, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.025
   Harlow J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10092975
   Hebinck A, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-10054-230216
   Helfgott A, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V268, P852, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.056
   Holscher K., 2021, Urban Transformations, V3, DOI [DOI 10.1186/S42854-021-00019-Z, 10.1186/s42854-021-00019-z]
   Holscher K., 2020, Capacities for Transformative Climate Governance: A Conceptual Framework, P49, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-49040-92, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-49,040-92]
   Hölscher K, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
   Hyysalo S, 2019, DESIGN STUD, V63, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.destud.2019.05.002
   Iden J, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V116, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.002
   Kelbaugh D., 2019, The Urban Fix: Resilient Cities in the War Against Climate Change, Heat Islands and Over Population
   Kumar A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126209
   Liebmann H, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P1155, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.674348
   Loorbach D., 2014, To transition! Governance Panarchy in the New Transformation
   Loorbach D., 2015, J. Corp. Citizsh, V2015, P48, DOI DOI 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2015.JU.00008
   Loorbach D, 2017, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V42, P599, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Loorbach D, 2010, FUTURES, V42, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
   Loorbach D, 2010, GOVERNANCE, V23, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Luederitz C., 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V169, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.09.005, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005]
   Malekpour S, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V107, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.002
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Mingers J, 2010, EUR J OPER RES, V207, P1147, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.019
   Nagorny-Koring NC, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V175, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.072
   Nevens F, 2014, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V10, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.06.001
   Nevens F, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   Newell R.J., 2013, PASSION LEARNING PRO
   Newig J, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V101, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.008
   Panetti E, 2018, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V30, P993, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2018.1433295
   Pardo-Bosch F, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.018
   Peterson HM, 2022, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V24, P1713, DOI 10.1007/s10668-021-01504-y
   Poustie MS, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V105, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.008
   Roorda C., 2014, Transition management in the urban context: guidance manual
   Salvati P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P867, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.064
   Sarpong D, 2013, FUTURES, V53, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.001
   Schaeffer Caniglia B., 2018, RESILIENCE ENV JUSTI
   Schäpke N, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9050737
   Scuttari A, 2016, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V24, P463, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2015.1136634
   Soma K, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.003
   Tillie N, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061927
   Turnhout E, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
   von Wirth T, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P229, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Wittmayer JM, 2016, LOCAL ENVIRON, V21, P939, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2015.1050658
   Wolfram M, 2016, CITIES, V51, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011
   World Economic Forum, FUT JOBS REP 2020
   Zambon I, 2017, GEOGR ANN B, V99, P319, DOI 10.1080/04353684.2017.1294857
NR 64
TC 16
Z9 17
U1 4
U2 40
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 2
AR 650
DI 10.3390/su14020650
PG 27
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ZE0YC
UT WOS:000758616800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Boulanger, SOM
AF Boulanger, Saveria Olga Murielle
TI Urban Adaptation to Climate Change State of the Art: Evaluating the Role
   of Adaptation Assessment Frameworks through a Systematic and
   Bibliometric Analysis
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE urban climate adaptation; adaptation monitoring; adaptation assessment;
   bibliometric review; systematic review
ID RESILIENT CITIES; DECISION-MAKING; FLOOD RISK; SCIENCE; POLICY;
   KNOWLEDGE; CITY; OPPORTUNITIES; POLITICS; HISTORY
AB Urban adaptation and resilience are essential aspects of climate change. The latest IPCC reports of 2022 recall the importance of taking concrete actions, especially through the implementation of actions able to make cities more resilient. However, the current scientific discourse predominantly revolves around policies, theoretical aspects and specific case studies. This study aims to provide an updated analysis of the existing scientific literature, with an additional focus on the role of assessment and monitoring frameworks in urban adaptation. By employing qualitative and quantitative methodologies, supported by VOSviewer for co-occurrence network analysis, this paper reveals novel clusters and thematic groupings within the ongoing debate. Results include the identification of new clusters and thematic grouping and the identification of potential future trends.
C1 [Boulanger, Saveria Olga Murielle] Univ Bologna, Dept Architecture, I-40126 Bologna, Italy.
C3 University of Bologna
RP Boulanger, SOM (corresponding author), Univ Bologna, Dept Architecture, I-40126 Bologna, Italy.
EM saveria.boulanger@unibo.it
RI Boulanger, Saveria/AAS-4208-2020
OI BOULANGER, SAVERIA OLGA MURIELLE/0000-0003-2147-3192
CR Aina IV, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V339, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117953
   Akin M., 2023, Clean. Circ. Bioecon., V5, DOI [10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100046, DOI 10.1016/J.CLCB.2023.100046]
   Amorim-Maia AT, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 1978, ADAPTIVE ENV ASSESSM
   Antonini E., 2015, WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ, V194, P23, DOI [10.2495/SC150031, DOI 10.2495/SC150031]
   Araos M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009
   Archer D, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P345, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.918868
   Arnott JC, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.017
   Aroua N, 2016, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V73, P1145, DOI 10.2166/wst.2015.588
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Batty M., 2008, UCL WORKING PAPER SE, V131
   Bellinson R.G., 2018, The urban book series. Introduction: Innovations in multilevel governance, P183
   Belter CW, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P417, DOI 10.1002/wcc.229
   Berger AM, 2020, J LANDSC ARCHIT, V15, P6, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2020.1792648
   Birkmann J, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P185, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0111-3
   Boulanger S., 2020, RICERCHE TECNOLOGIA
   Boulanger SOM, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052701
   Broadbent AM, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V811, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151326
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Caprario J, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101060
   Carey M, 2012, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V3, P233, DOI 10.1002/wcc.171
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Carvalhaes TM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102165
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Chen C, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P403, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.007
   Clare A, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.001
   Cobo MJ, 2011, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V62, P1382, DOI 10.1002/asi.21525
   Coelho S, 2020, ENVIRON MANAGE, V66, P395, DOI 10.1007/s00267-020-01313-5
   Cuce E, 2017, APPL ENERG, V194, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.079
   da Silva LBL, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102898
   Dabrowski M, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V36, P837, DOI 10.1177/2399654417725077
   Daly C, 2002, CLIM RES, V22, P99, DOI 10.3354/cr022099
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Downes N.K., 2023, P 2 INT S DISASTER R, V283, P88
   Einecker R, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12176935
   Eisenack K, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P867, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2350
   European Environment Agency, 2020, URB AD EUR CIT TOWNS, P192
   [Field C.B. IPCC. IPCC.], 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014, P1757, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415386.011
   Flores CC, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11247144
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forino G, 2023, ENVIRON URBAN, V35, P200, DOI 10.1177/09562478221143591
   Fox A, 2023, LOCAL ENVIRON, V28, P837, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2021.1923000
   Fratini CF, 2012, URBAN WATER J, V9, P317, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2012.668913
   Fuchs R, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V2, P13, DOI 10.1177/097542531000200103
   Geldin S, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P13, DOI 10.1177/0956247818776532
   Giordano R, 2020, CLIM SERV, V17, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2019.04.004
   Glanzel W, 2002, SCIENTOMETRICS, V53, P171, DOI 10.1023/A:1014848323806
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gore Al., 1992, Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit
   Guerrero-Hidalga M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12124807
   Guo P, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010229
   Gupta J, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P636, DOI 10.1002/wcc.67
   Haunschild R, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0160393
   Heikkinen M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V257, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120474
   Hoeben AD, 2023, CLIM POLICY, V23, P609, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2022.2143314
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Hunter AM, 2014, ECOL ENG, V63, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.021
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018, Global warming of 1.5C
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kazak J. K., 2019, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering
   Keenan JM, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P297, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1565413
   Kehler S, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V146, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.012
   Kim J, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104574
   KING J, 1987, J INFORM SCI, V13, P261, DOI 10.1177/016555158701300501
   Klein J, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V53, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.012
   Kunz-Plapp T, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P977, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-977-2016
   Kythreotis AP, 2023, TERRIT POLIT GOV, V11, P39, DOI 10.1080/21622671.2020.1837220
   Lampis A, 2022, FRONT CLIM, V4, DOI 10.3389/fclim.2022.897424
   Larson KL, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P14761, DOI 10.3390/su71114761
   LEGGETT J, 1991, ENERG POLICY, V19, P161, DOI 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90131-7
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leiter T., 2019, Adaptation Metrics. Current Landscape and Evolving Practices
   Liu J, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118292
   Lorencová EK, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061906
   Maragno D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031056
   Martín Y, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114773
   Martinez-Juarez P, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030647
   Matyas D, 2021, DISASTERS, V45, P453, DOI 10.1111/disa.12430
   Mauree D, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V112, P733, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   MEO M, 1991, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V1, P124, DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(91)90019-P
   Moser SC, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P31, DOI 10.1002/wcc.11
   Olazabal M., 2020, Climate Urbanism: Towards a Critical Research Agenda, P153, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-53386-1_10, 10.1007/978-3-030-53386-110, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53386-110]
   Pablo-Romero MDP, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V176, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.124
   Penning-Rowsell E, 2020, LANDSCAPE RES, V45, P395, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2019.1694881
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pickett Stewart., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   Pielke R, 2007, NATURE, V445, P597, DOI 10.1038/445597a
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Proença SB, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12030539
   Qin H, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.05.003
   Ranjbari M, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133968
   Reinwald F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132112111
   Reyes-García V, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P109, DOI 10.1002/wcc.374
   Rist L, 2013, ENVIRON CONSERV, V40, P5, DOI 10.1017/S0376892912000240
   Roest AH, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104651
   Romero-Lankao P, 2019, FRONT SOCIOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00031
   Rozance MA, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.024
   Salata S, 2022, URBAN SCI, V6, DOI 10.3390/urbansci6030042
   Savic S, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V150, P1425, DOI 10.1007/s00704-022-04237-8
   Shah SHH, 2020, KYBERNETES, V49, P1020, DOI 10.1108/K-12-2018-0696
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13137140
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Shi CC, 2022, CLIM SERV, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100284
   Snep RPH, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V145, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.022
   Spielman SE, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V100, P417, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03820-z
   Stumpp EM, 2013, CITIES, V32, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.003
   Suchá L, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101277
   Surminski S, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P966, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000497
   Solomon DS, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P830, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1939643
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Swanson K, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P287, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i4.4399
   Szopinska E, 2019, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V28, P2845, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/92244
   Tamminga K, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093790
   Torres PHC, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100808
   USGCRP (U.S. Global Change Research Program), 2018, Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, DOI DOI 10.7930/NCA4.2018
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Van Eck N.J., 2014, MEASURING SCHOLARLY, P285, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-813
   van Raan A, 2019, SPRINGER HBK, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_10
   Mansur AV, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P1411, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1269-3
   Waller J., 2023, J CRIT INFRASTRUCT P, V3, P93
   Walters C. J., 1986, ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wang JX, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V146, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.010
   WANG WC, 1976, SCIENCE, V194, P685, DOI 10.1126/science.194.4266.685
   Williams DS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.014
   Wolff E, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V145, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.014
   Yang H, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102755
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Yazar M, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V145, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.016
   Yu YT, 2020, ANN TRANSL MED, V8, DOI 10.21037/atm-20-4235
   Zheng CJ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120689
NR 137
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 9
U2 44
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 13
AR 10134
DI 10.3390/su151310134
PG 27
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA M2OL5
UT WOS:001028625000001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Diaz-Sarachaga, JM
   Jato-Espino, D
AF Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose
   Jato-Espino, Daniel
TI Development and application of a new Resilient, Sustainable, Safe and
   Inclusive Community Rating System (RESSICOM)
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Inclusiveness; Resilience; Safety; Sustainable development; Sustainable
   development goals; Urbanization
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; URBANIZATION; CHALLENGES;
   PROSPERITY; FRAMEWORK; CITIES
AB The rising concern about sustainable development led most states worldwide to adopt the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development to achieve 17 new goals before the end of 2030. Due to the prominent role of urbanization, the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) #11 was introduced to make cities and human settlements more resilient, sustainable, safe and inclusive. The frameworks built so far to assess sustainable urban development primarily focus on sustainability, disregarding inclusiveness, safety and resilience. Under the joint consideration of these four facets, this research devised a new tool to evaluate communities and cities by selecting 61 indicators from an extensive literature review, which were weighted subsequently to ensure the balance among the four sustainability dimensions, namely society, economy, environment and governance. Data extracted from international organizations and the targets of the SDGs were used to score the indicators of the system. Mexico City, as one of the most overcrowded cities in the planet, was selected as a case study to apply the proposed tool. The research determined that the minimum thresholds set for the safety, sustainability and inclusiveness domains were not reached. In contrast, the city performed over the resilience limit. Consequently, RESSICOM was revealed as a helpful framework to identify shortcomings in cities related to the achievement of SDG #11. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Manuel Diaz-Sarachaga, Jose; Jato-Espino, Daniel] Univ Cantabria, GITECO Res Grp, Ave Castros 44, E-39005 Santander, Spain.
C3 Universidad de Cantabria
RP Jato-Espino, D (corresponding author), Univ Cantabria, GITECO Res Grp, Ave Castros 44, E-39005 Santander, Spain.
EM jatod@unican.es
RI DIAZ-SARACHAGA, JOSE MANUEL/I-3137-2019; Jato-Espino, Daniel/G-5139-2015
OI DIAZ-SARACHAGA, JOSE MANUEL/0000-0002-4709-2534; Jato-Espino,
   Daniel/0000-0002-1964-6667
CR Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   [Anonymous], 2015, A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   [Anonymous], GREEN STAR COMM
   [Anonymous], CASBEE FAM TOOLS
   [Anonymous], 2018, ISO 37120:2018 Sustainable cities and communities - Indicators for city services and quality of life, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1674-5698.2019.12.003
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], 2016, NAT SURV HOUS INC EX
   [Anonymous], 2015, INT SURV 2015
   [Anonymous], GUID LEED CERT CIT C
   [Anonymous], 2013, Global Corruption Barometer
   [Anonymous], 2016, World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development - Emerging Futures
   [Anonymous], GINI COEFF IN
   [Anonymous], 1992, REPORT UN C ENV DEV
   [Anonymous], DOWNL RAT SYST
   [Anonymous], PORTUGAL SAF SCI
   [Anonymous], 1987, Our common future-The Brundtland report
   [Anonymous], 224 ISOTC
   [Anonymous], SAIDI LIGHTS DONT GO
   [Anonymous], DIS RISK DAT
   [Anonymous], CDMX RES STRAT
   [Anonymous], 1976, UN C HUMAN SETTLEMEN
   [Anonymous], 2016, Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an Age of Anxiety
   [Anonymous], 2012, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
   [Anonymous], NAT HLTH NUTR SURV 2
   [Anonymous], 2012, CIT RES PROF PROGR
   [Anonymous], EU WAT FRAM DIR
   [Anonymous], 2018, BREEAM CERT WORKS
   [Anonymous], STAND AIR QUAL
   [Anonymous], SUMM MEX CIT
   [Anonymous], STAT GEOGR YB 2015
   [Anonymous], 2017, URB PUBL TRANS 21 CE
   [Anonymous], 2018, Indicators
   [Anonymous], 2018, INRIX GLOB TRAFF SCO
   Arts K, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V24, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.001
   Ballard R, 2005, AFR AFFAIRS, V104, P615, DOI 10.1093/afraf/adi069
   Delgado-Ramos GC, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P151, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2017.1341890
   CEER, 2017, CEER REP POW LOSS
   Cohen B, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.005
   Cutter SL, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P25, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.768076
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Ding XH, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.140
   Ernst L, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V112, P2988, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.136
   Finka M, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V42, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.016
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Fritz M, 2014, ECOL ECON, V108, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.021
   Hammond GP, 2006, NAT RESOUR FORUM, V30, P27, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2006.00155.x
   Li J, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V43, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.108
   Diaz-Sarachaga JM, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V71, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.033
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   National Academies of Science, 2012, DIRENAT IMP
   National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 2016, NFPA 1710: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments
   OECD, 2018, REG STAT IND
   OECD, 2017, GOV GLANC 2017
   Pandit A, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS19, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.010
   Pfefferbaum RL, 2013, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V19, P250, DOI 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318268aed8
   Pouw N, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V24, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.013
   Ravallion M, 2007, POPUL DEV REV, V33, P667, DOI 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00193.x
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Satterthwaite D, 1997, URBAN STUD, V34, P1667, DOI 10.1080/0042098975394
   Tannerfeldt G, 2012, More urban less poor: An introduction to urban development and management
   UN Habitat III, 2016, NEW URB AG
   United Nations, 2018, 2018 REVISION WORLD
   USGBC, 2018, LEED V4 NEIGHB DEV
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   WHO, 2017, OB OV FACTSH
   Woolf S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
NR 69
TC 20
Z9 23
U1 12
U2 96
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD JAN 10
PY 2019
VL 207
BP 971
EP 979
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.061
PG 9
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA HB5MP
UT WOS:000451105200081
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Miao, HQ
   Gao, SY
   Wang, D
AF Miao, Huiquan
   Gao, Siyuan
   Wang, Ding
TI Framework for Designing Virtual Water and Power Supply Networks with
   Interdependent Characteristics for Resilience Assessment
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE virtual city; interdependent infrastructure; water supply network; power
   supply network; resilience
ID COMMUNITY BUILDING PORTFOLIOS; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; COMPLEX NETWORKS;
   RECOVERY; FAILURES; MODEL
AB Urban water and power supply networks with interdependent characteristics are essential components of urban infrastructures and play an important role in maintaining the daily operations and post-disaster recovery of cities. The aim of this study is to provide a method for researchers of resilient cities to build virtual water and power supply networks according to their basic physical mechanisms so that they can complete the risk or resilience evaluation of benchmark cities when some confidential infrastructure information is difficult to obtain. The innovation is that a new design framework for urban virtual water and power networks with interdependent characteristics combined with geographic information is suggested based on the perspective of practical engineering. After giving an overview of the framework, this paper presents the planning and design of the water and power supply networks as well as the interdependence between them in detail. Then the water and power supply networks of a virtual city called Virtual Shangcheng City are established, which verify the feasibility and practicality of the approach. This framework can establish virtual water and power supply networks with interdependent characteristics that conform to actual engineering and urban geographic information characteristics. Moreover, it can provide an effective modeling method for water and power supply networks in the absence of data for urban resilience and disaster risk studies.
C1 [Miao, Huiquan; Gao, Siyuan] Beijing Univ Technol, Key Lab Urban Secur & Disaster Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China.
   [Miao, Huiquan; Gao, Siyuan] Beijing Univ Technol, Fac Architecture Civil & Transportat Engn, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Ding] Yanshan Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Mech, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Ding] Yanshan Univ, Key Lab Green Construct & Intelligent Maintenance, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing University of Technology; Beijing University of Technology;
   Yanshan University; Yanshan University
RP Wang, D (corresponding author), Yanshan Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Mech, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China.; Wang, D (corresponding author), Yanshan Univ, Key Lab Green Construct & Intelligent Maintenance, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China.
EM wangding@ysu.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52108427]; Beijing Natural
   Science Foundation [8222008]; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
   [2021M690278]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China, grant number 52108427, the Beijing Natural Science Foundation,
   grant number 8222008, and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation,
   grant number 2021M690278.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   Almoghathawi Y, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V185, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.006
   Amaral LAN, 2004, EUR PHYS J B, V38, P147, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00110-5
   Ash J, 2007, PHYSICA A, V380, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2006.12.058
   Bosetti L., 2016112 UN U CTR POL
   Brumbelow K., 2007, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, P15, DOI [10.1061/40927(243)469, DOI 10.1061/40927(243)469]
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Buldyrev SV, 2010, NATURE, V464, P1025, DOI 10.1038/nature08932
   Burton HV, 2016, J STRUCT ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001321
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cardoni A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101315
   China Aviation Industry Planning and Design Institute, 2005, IND CIV POW DISTR DE, V3rd
   Cimellaro G.P., 2017, P 2 INT WORKSHOP MOD
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V6, P127, DOI 10.1080/15732470802663847
   Dhulipala SLN, 2021, STRUCT SAF, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102091
   Di Nardo A., 2013, WATER SUPPLY NETWORK, DOI [10.1007/978-3-7091-1493-3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-1493-3_4]
   Di Nardo A, 2011, ENG OPTIMIZ, V43, P193, DOI 10.1080/03052151003789858
   Dube E, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101401
   Dueñas-Osorio L, 2009, STRUCT SAF, V31, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.007
   Ellingwood BR, 2016, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V1, P95, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2016.1255000
   Falkenmark M, 2010, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V136, P606, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000118
   Gabbar HA, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14227499
   Gallen S., 2002, REV MODELLING SOFTWA, V1, P18
   Gonen T., 2014, ELECT POWER TRANSMIS, V3, DOI [10.1177/002072099002700110, DOI 10.1177/002072099002700110]
   Gupta R, 2020, COMPUT ELECTR ENG, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106717
   Han Z, 2013, POWER SYSTEM ANAL
   Hejtmánek L, 2018, INT J HUM-COMPUT ST, V116, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.04.006
   Ignjatovic L, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13223157
   Information Trust Institute, 2021, ILL CTR SMART EL GRI
   Jayaram N, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005316
   Joshi G, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14196132
   Kapelan ZS, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/2004WR003787
   Kim J, 2021, J CONSTR ENG M, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002153
   Kim K, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P289, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.988597
   Lechner T., 2013, PROCEDURAL MODELING
   Li FX, 2020, IEEE POWER ENERGY M, V18, P60, DOI 10.1109/MPE.2019.2959054
   Lin PH, 2017, STRUCT SAF, V69, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.002
   Little RG, 2002, J URBAN TECHNOL, V9, P109, DOI 10.1080/106307302317379855
   Liu W, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106617
   Miao HQ, 2020, STRUCT SAF, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.101960
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development PRC The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision PRC, 2014, TECHN COD FIR PROT W
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development PRC The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision PRC, 2014, COD FIR PROT DES BUI
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development PRC The State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision PRC, 2019, COD FIR PROT DES THE
   Möderl M, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2009WR008951
   MOHURD AQSIQ, 2016, GB502822016 MOHURD A
   National Energy Administration, 2016, DLT5729 2016
   Ouyang M, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
   Prabha Kundur., 1994, Power system stability and control-7ed
   Rose A, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V5, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.08.003
   Schlabbach J., 2008, Power system engineering: planning, design, and operation of power systems and equipment
   Shafiee ME, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P2033, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-1916-6
   Shang QX, 2020, EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB, V19, P811, DOI 10.1007/s11803-020-0597-3
   Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co. Ltd, 2016, WATER SUPPLY DRAINAG, V3rd
   Shu Y., 2018, DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
   Shughrue C, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P606, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0523-8
   Tendall DM, 2015, GLOB FOOD SECUR-AGR, V6, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.gfs.2015.08.001
   Texas A&M University's Energy and Power Group, 2021, EL GRID TEST CAS REP
   Torres JM, 2009, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V94, P1259, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2009.01.008
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Urich C, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V62, P1090, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.364
   Wang YJ, 2020, STRUCT SAF, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101919
   Wang Y, 2022, IEEE SYST J, V16, P3191, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2021.3126308
   Yodo N, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P42, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2019.1710074
   Yong Liu, 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, P1, DOI 10.1109/PESGM.2015.7286556
   Zhang WL, 2018, J STRUCT ENG, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001984
   Zhuge CX, 2018, J COMPUT SCI-NETH, V29, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.09.005
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 1
U1 13
U2 44
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 12
IS 10
AR 1670
DI 10.3390/buildings12101670
PG 24
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA 5R0JM
UT WOS:000874206600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Romero-Lankao, P
   Gnatz, DM
AF Romero-Lankao, Patricia
   Gnatz, Daniel M.
TI Exploring urban transformations in Latin America
SO CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
ID SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; WATER MANAGEMENT;
   RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; CITIES; EVOLUTIONARY; ADAPTATION; FRAMEWORK;
   INSIGHTS
AB The question of how to transform behaviors, systems, cultures and institutions to move to more sustainable and resilient cities has received increased attention among scholars and decision makers. However, while sustainability and resilience are increasingly becoming core issues for different strands of scholarship, the strategies for affecting change toward more sustainable and resilient urban centers remain elusive. We use a combination of elements from socio-technical transition theory and political ecology and two Latin American cities (Mexico City and Manizales) to suggest a framework for an analysis of urban transitions in Latin America. The two cities were faced with similar triggers and pressures to create sustainability and resilience and each acted within a time of sweeping international movements. In both cases, networks of actors introduced innovative responses to their own particular set of pressures, constraints and opportunities and attempted to expand nature's life-supporting features such as ecosystem and hydrological services, while reducing threats from hazards such as floods. Yet the innovations that took place in the two cities presented very different results with regard to regime transition. Interestingly, Mexico City's success at creating an urban regime change seems to have been based on the use of a top-down approach as it was driven mainly by actors within the existing power structure with access to the power and the resources of an authoritarian state. By contrast, actors in Manizales have been largely outside the power structure and had less success in creating a city-wide transformation. This highlights the importance of power structure dynamics that can promote or prevent transformations from within or impede transformations from without.
C1 [Romero-Lankao, Patricia] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Urban Futures RAL ISP, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
   [Gnatz, Daniel M.] Nova SE Univ, Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 USA.
C3 National Center Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - USA; Nova Southeastern
   University
RP Romero-Lankao, P (corresponding author), Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Urban Futures RAL ISP, POB 3000, Boulder, CO 80307 USA.
EM priankao@ucar.edu
RI Romero-Lankao, Patricia/Q-3341-2017
OI Romero-Lankao, Patricia/0000-0001-9533-2363
FU National Science Foundation (NSF); Direct For Social, Behav & Economic
   Scie; Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0937777] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation; Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie;
   Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1229429] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX The work of Patricia Romero-Lankao is supported by the National Science
   Foundation (NSF). Any opinions, findings and conclusions,
   recommendations or omissions expressed are those of the authors and do
   not reflect the views of NSF. We want to thank three anonymous reviewers
   for their valuable suggestions and input to this paper.
CR Alberti M, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00083-2
   [Anonymous], CITIES LOW CARBON TR
   Archer MS, 2010, SOCIOL THEOR, V28, P272, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x
   Bai XM, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.011
   Betsill M, 2007, LOCAL ENV, P12
   Broto VC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Bulkeley H., 2010, CITIES LOW CARBON TR
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Fischer-Kowalski M, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Garud R, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009
   Geels FW, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Genus A, 2008, RES POLICY, V37, P1436, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006
   Haberl H, 2011, SUSTAIN DEV, V19, P1, DOI 10.1002/sd.410
   Hardoy J, 2013, ENV URBAN IN PRESS
   Hardoy J, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P401, DOI 10.1177/0956247811416435
   Hellström D, 2000, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V20, P311, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00043-3
   Heynen NikolasC., 2006, In the Nature of Cities, P1, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203027523
   Hughes S, 2013, CITIES, V32, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.007
   Kennedy CA, 2011, URB DEV SER, P15
   Krausmann F., 2013, Long Term Socio-Ecological Research, P339, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1177-815
   Lampis A, 2011, IMPACT CLIMATE CHANG
   Lankao PR, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P157, DOI 10.1177/0956247809362636
   Lawhon M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P354, DOI 10.1177/0309132511427960
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Manuel-Navarrete D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.009
   Markard J, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P955, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   MEA, 2005, MILL EC ASS EC HUM W
   Meadowcroft J, 2009, POLICY SCI, V42, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Monstadt J, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1924, DOI 10.1068/a4145
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Ramaswami A, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P801, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00566.x
   Lankao PR, 2011, POLICY SOC, V30, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.polsoc.2011.10.007
   Romero-Lankao P, 1999, OBRA HIDRAULICA CIUD
   Romero-Lankao P, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.002
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Tortolero A, 2004, TERRITORIES COMMODIT
   Turner BL, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003
   Velasquez Barrero LE, 1998, ENVIRON URBAN, V10, P9
   Velasquez L.S., 2005, REDUCING POVERTY SUS, P44
   Velasquez L.S., 2011, MEDIO AMBIENTE URBAN, V75, P27
NR 43
TC 42
Z9 46
U1 2
U2 63
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1877-3435
EI 1877-3443
J9 CURR OPIN ENV SUST
JI Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain.
PD SEP
PY 2013
VL 5
IS 3-4
BP 358
EP 367
DI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
PG 10
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 235SR
UT WOS:000325741500012
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yao, F
   Wang, Y
AF Yao, Fang
   Wang, Yan
TI Towards resilient and smart cities: A real-time urban analytical and
   geo-visual system for social media streaming data
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Geo-visualization; Real-time; Resilience; Smart city; Social media;
   Urban analytics
ID BIG DATA; CITY; SUSTAINABILITY
AB Cities worldwide are vulnerable to unpredictable extreme events such as disasters and public health crises. Urban big data and data-driven technologies have played an increasingly important role in building smart and resilient cities that can respond rapidly to these perturbations. However, many existing approaches had limited capabilities for processing big data, which has led to time-consuming and costly decision-making. Thus, we develop a real-time data-driven analytical and geo-visual system to enable smart and rapid responses to urban extreme events. The system is built on ArcGIS's GeoEvent Server and Apache Spark and processes streaming data from social media with high speed, massive volume, and multiple modalities. The system employs online topic modeling and domain-adaptive sentiment analysis to track small-scale, undefined events, visualizes their spatial and semantic dynamics, and provides early alerts for crises and emergencies via an interactive online GIS platform. The proposed system has been applied during a large-scale hurricane and demonstrated effectiveness and agility in tracking and reporting emerging small-scale crises. The developed system can be applied in various urban scenarios to enable timely situation awareness and rapid response. This research contributes to the smart city safety and building rapidity of resilient cities.
C1 [Yao, Fang] Univ Florida, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Coll Design Construct & Planning, 1480 Inner Rd, Gainesville, FL 32601 USA.
   [Wang, Yan] Univ Florida, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, POB 115706, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
   [Wang, Yan] Univ Florida, Florida Inst Built Environm Resilience, POB 115706, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; University of Florida; State
   University System of Florida; University of Florida; State University
   System of Florida; University of Florida
RP Wang, Y (corresponding author), Univ Florida, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, POB 115706, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.; Wang, Y (corresponding author), Univ Florida, Florida Inst Built Environm Resilience, POB 115706, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA.
EM fang.yao@ufl.edu; yanw@ufl.edu
OI Wang, Yan/0000-0002-3946-9418; Yao, Fang/0000-0002-5516-5318
FU National Science Foundation [1760645, 2028012, 1951816]; University of
   Florida DCP Research Seed Grant Initiative; Direct For Computer & Info
   Scie & Enginr; Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1951816]
   Funding Source: National Science Foundation; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, &
   Manufact Inn; Directorate For Engineering [2028012] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation; Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems;
   Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1760645] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
   Foundation under Grant No. 1760645, Grant No. 2028012, Grant No.
   1951816, and University of Florida DCP Research Seed Grant Initiative.
   Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in
   this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
   the views of the National Science Foundation or University of Florida.
CR Al Nuaimi E, 2015, J INTERNET SERV APPL, V6, DOI 10.1186/s13174-015-0041-5
   Allam Z, 2018, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V1, P4, DOI 10.3390/smartcities1010002
   Angelidou M, 2018, J SCI TECHNOL POLICY, V9, P146, DOI 10.1108/JSTPM-05-2017-0016
   [Anonymous], 2012, P COLING 2012
   [Anonymous], 2010, SIGMOD PODS 2010 INT
   [Anonymous], 2018, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, DOI DOI 10.1080/15230406.2017.1370391
   Arafah Y, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V70, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/70/1/012065
   Avvenuti M, 2014, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING (KDD'14), P1749, DOI 10.1145/2623330.2623358
   Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419
   Benhardus James, 2013, International Journal of Web Based Communities, V9, P122
   Bifet A, 2011, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V6926, P46, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24477-3_7
   Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993
   Blei DM, 2006, P 23 INT C MACH LEAR, P113, DOI [10.1145/1143844.1143859, DOI 10.1145/1143844.1143859]
   Boettcher A, 2012, 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS, CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS, AND CONFERENCE ON CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (GREENCOM 2012), P358, DOI 10.1109/GreenCom.2012.59
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Caragea C., 2014, ISCRAM 2014 C P 11 I, P642
   Chae J, 2014, COMPUT GRAPH-UK, V38, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.cag.2013.10.008
   Choi S., 2015, Computer science and its applications: Ubiquitous information technologies, P809, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-45402-2115, 10.1007/978-3-662-45402-2_115]
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Desroches R., 2018, Bridge, V48, P13
   Ganin Y, 2016, J MACH LEARN RES, V17
   Gao W, 2020, NEUROCOMPUTING, V383, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.11.077
   Ghani NA, 2019, COMPUT HUM BEHAV, V101, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.039
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goyal P, 2020, IEEE T COMPUT SOC SY, V7, P8, DOI 10.1109/TCSS.2019.2954116
   Hasan M, 2019, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V56, P1146, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.03.001
   Hasan M, 2018, J INF SCI, V44, P443, DOI 10.1177/0165551517698564
   Hatuka T, 2018, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V19, P160, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2018.1455216
   Hoffman M, 2010, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., V23, DOI DOI 10.5555/2997189.2997285
   Hofmann T, 1999, SIGIR'99: PROCEEDINGS OF 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, P50, DOI 10.1145/312624.312649
   Huang QY, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V66, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.06.004
   Khan Z, 2015, J CLOUD COMPUT-ADV S, V4, DOI 10.1186/s13677-015-0026-8
   Kitchin R, 2014, GEOJOURNAL, V79, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8
   Klein B., 2017, Informatik-Spektrum, V40, P35, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S00287-016-1005-2, 10.1007/s00287-016-1005-2]
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leykin D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P393, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.021
   Li C., 2012, ACM INT C INF KNOWL, P155, DOI DOI 10.1145/2396761.2396785
   Lu YF, 2015, WWW'15 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, P1211, DOI 10.1145/2740908.2741720
   MacEachren AlanM., 2010, INT CARTOGRAPHIC C, P1
   Malik KR, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P548, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.031
   Marcus A, 2011, 29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, P227
   McGowan CJ, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-36361-9
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Middleton SE, 2014, IEEE INTELL SYST, V29, P9, DOI 10.1109/MIS.2013.126
   Neirotti P, 2014, CITIES, V38, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010
   Nugroho R, 2020, KNOWL INF SYST, V62, P2485, DOI 10.1007/s10115-019-01429-z
   Palmieri F, 2016, COMPUT ELECTR ENG, V56, P810, DOI 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.02.012
   Platt S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.006
   Psyllidis A, 2015, COMM COM INF SC, V527, P21, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_2
   Serban O, 2019, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V56, P1166, DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2018.04.011
   Smith L, 2017, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V10, P370, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12154
   Soyata T, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101566
   Terpstra Teun., 2012, P 9 INT ISCRAM C VAN
   Thom D, 2012, IEEE PAC VIS SYMP, P41, DOI 10.1109/PacificVis.2012.6183572
   UN DESA Population Division, 2018, WORLDS CIT 2018
   Wachowicz M, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V59, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.12.001
   Wang Xuerui., P 12 ACM SIGKDD INT, P424
   Wang Y, 2020, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2019.100003
   Wang Y, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000782
   Wang Y, 2019, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V33, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000819
   Wang Y, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0188734
   Woetzel Jonathan., 2018, SMART CITIES DIGITAL
   Xie W, 2016, IEEE T KNOWL DATA EN, V28, P2216, DOI 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2556661
   Yang CJ, 2017, 2017 IEEE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA ANALYSIS (ICBDA), P504, DOI 10.1109/ICBDA.2017.8078684
   Yao F, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101522
   Yao F, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101419
   Yoshinaga N., 2014, P COLING 2014 25 INT, P1091
   Yu WR, 2019, IEEE T BIG DATA, V5, P506, DOI 10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2672672
   Zhang C, 2017, KDD'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, P595, DOI 10.1145/3097983.3098027
   Zhang FC, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101671
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
   Zobel CW, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V50, P394, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2010.10.001
NR 74
TC 47
Z9 51
U1 16
U2 137
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 63
AR 102448
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102448
PG 13
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA OE5PA
UT WOS:000580580900028
OA Bronze
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Snep, RPH
   Voeten, JGWF
   Mol, G
   Van Hattum, T
AF Snep, Robbert P. H.
   Voeten, Joris G. W. F.
   Mol, Gerben
   Tim Van Hattum
TI Nature Based Solutions for Urban Resilience: A Distinction Between
   No-Tech, Low-Tech and High-Tech Solutions
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE nature based solutions; water smart cities; high tech; resilient cities;
   city trees; green cities; climate adaptation; green roofs
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CITIES; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT
AB Urbanization and extreme weather require smarter urban water management. Nature-based solutions (NBS) like vegetated roofs and city trees can contribute effectively to climate resilience and future proof urban water management. However, large scale implementation is limited due to a lack of knowledge among professionals on how to capture, store, and reuse water on-site. In this paper we advocate a classification into no-tech, low-tech, and high-tech green, thereby supporting urban designers to better utilize the ability of these green elements to effectively manage water flows in different urban settings. Here, "no tech" green is considered traditional urban green, handling (rain) water like nature would. "Low-tech" green (e.g., extensive Sedum roofs) are suitable for dense urban settings with limited demand for water management and ecosystem services. More developed "high-tech" green solutions have vegetation performing even beyond natural capacities, offering full water management control options and enable city planners, architects and landscape designers to enhance urban resilience and circularity without claiming valuable urban space. We elaborate our "tech NBS" approach for city trees and vegetated roofs thereby demonstrating the classification's added value for sustainable urban design. We conclude that specifying the demanded "no/low/high" -tech level of green infrastructure in urban design plans will help to yield the most of ecosystem services using appropriate levels of available technology.
C1 [Snep, Robbert P. H.; Tim Van Hattum] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen, Netherlands.
   [Voeten, Joris G. W. F.] Urban Roofscapes, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [Mol, Gerben] Amsterdam Inst Adv Metropolitan Solut, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C3 Wageningen University & Research
RP Snep, RPH (corresponding author), Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen, Netherlands.
EM robbert.snep@wur.nl
RI Snep, Robbert/C-2458-2008
OI Snep, Robbert/0000-0002-7130-9254
FU Dutch Foundation TKI Horticulture; Wageningen University Knowledge Base
   programme: KB36 Biodiversity in a Nature Inclusive Society - Dutch
   Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality [KB36-003-008]
FX This publication is funded by the Dutch Foundation TKI Horticulture and
   its partners, and the Wageningen University Knowledge Base programme:
   KB36 Biodiversity in a Nature Inclusive Society (project number
   KB36-003-008)-that is supported by finance from the Dutch Ministry of
   Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. The paper builds upon earlier work
   on water smart cities, nature-based solutions and urban ecosystems in
   the Green Climate Solutions and Green Cities programmes at Wageningen
   Environmental Research (part ofWUR).
CR [Anonymous], 2018, UCCRN Technical Report
   Arden S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V630, P587, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.218
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Bosman, 2015, MENSELIJKE MAAT ORLY
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Cascone S, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V136, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.052
   Choo K. W., 2020, ADV SCI TECHNOLOGY I, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-13068-8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-13068-8]
   Cirkel DG, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091253
   Davies C, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V80, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.020
   Depietri Y, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_6
   Dorst H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620
   Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
   Faivre N, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Hansen R, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
   Hartig T, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P938, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf3759
   Hattum T., 2016, WATER SMART CITIES C
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Lafortezza Raffaele, 2018, Environ Res, V165, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038
   MacKinnon K., 2008, Biodiversity, climate change and adaptation: nature-based solutions from the Word Bank portfolio
   Maes J, 2017, CONSERV LETT, V10, P121, DOI 10.1111/conl.12216
   Mekonnen MM, 2016, SCI ADV, V2, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500323
   Mussinelli E, 2018, TECHNE, V15, P116, DOI 10.13128/Techne-22112
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Nikolaidis NP, 2017, NATURE, V543, P315, DOI 10.1038/543315d
   Parker J, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7040161
   Pataki DE, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P27, DOI 10.1890/090220
   Raymond CM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
   Shemie D., 2014, NAT CONSERV
   Skinner C.J., 2006, Urban Policy Res, V24, P355, DOI [DOI 10.1080/08111140600876976, 10.1080/08111140600876976]
   Solcerova A, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V111, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.10.021
   Sutton RK, 2015, ECOL STUD-ANAL SYNTH, V223, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14983-7_1
   van de Ven FHM, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.010
   Wong N.H., 2005, Archit. Sci. Rev., V48, P205, DOI [10.3763/asre.2005.4827, DOI 10.3763/ASRE.2005.4827]
NR 35
TC 36
Z9 39
U1 10
U2 105
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD DEC 18
PY 2020
VL 8
AR 599060
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.599060
PG 9
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PO5PM
UT WOS:000605221100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Evans, R
   Karecha, J
AF Evans, Richard
   Karecha, Jay
TI Staying on Top: Why is Munich so Resilient and Successful?
SO EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
ID REGIONAL INNOVATION; CLUSTER; POLICY
AB This article seeks to explain why Munich, Germany's most economically successful city in recent decades, has proved so resilient despite various challenges and shocks. It begins by discussing different theoretical understandings of resilience and our methodological approach which builds on complex adaptive systems and evolutionary economic geography perspectives. Using a blend of historical analysis and in-depth investigation of the dynamics of one of the city's most innovative clusters, we argue that Munich's resilience essentially stems from the complex interplay of Germany's distinctive political history and federal system, which has promoted multi-level governance and a strong urban system, longstanding city regional leadership and entrepreneurialism, Munich's inherent assets and diverse economy and the combined strength of its many knowledge institutions, innovation system and networks. The evidence suggests that historic, structural and locational factors and agglomeration effects largely explain Munich's rise to prominence but that sustained urban and regional leadership and effective governance and policy especially in the technological, scientific and educational spheres coupled with intelligent urban planning have played an increasingly important role in sustaining its competitiveness.
C1 [Evans, Richard; Karecha, Jay] Liverpool John Moores Univ, European Inst Urban Affairs, Liverpool L1 9AT, Merseyside, England.
C3 Liverpool John Moores University
RP Evans, R (corresponding author), Liverpool John Moores Univ, European Inst Urban Affairs, 51 Rodney St, Liverpool L1 9AT, Merseyside, England.
EM s.r.evans@ljmu.ac.uk
CR Agrawal A. K., 2012, 17793 NBER
   AMIN A, 1995, MANAGING CITIES, P91
   [Anonymous], 201113 U CAL I GOV S
   [Anonymous], PROD LOC EC CREAT RE
   [Anonymous], WORLD EC OUTL SLOW G
   Arthur B., 1996, INCREASING RETURNS P
   Asheim B., 2006, Constructing regional advantage: principles, perspectives, policies
   Asheim B., 2007, PAPERS EVOLUTIONARY
   Baumann C., 2010, PATHWAYS SUSTAINABLE
   BBSR, 2011, METROPOLITAN AREAS E
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Bonanno GA, 2004, AM PSYCHOL, V59, P20, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
   Bonnet N, 2010, EUR PLAN STUD, V18, P1345, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2010.492580
   Briguglio L., 2008, Research Paper No. 2008/55
   Camagni RP, 1995, PAP REG SCI, V74, P317
   Cardiff University, 2013, ECR2 EC CRIS RES REG
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   City of Munich, 1999, EC DEV EMPL POL CIT
   City of Munich, 2005, SHAP FUT MUN PERSPEC
   City of Munich, 2009, BIOT PHARM 2008 EUR
   City of Munich, 2006, MUN CIT KNOWL
   Cooke P., 2012, Complex adaptive innovation systems: Relatedness and transversality in the evolving region
   Cooke P, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P1889, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.723426
   Dalhammer E., 2010, ASSESSMENT REGIONAL
   Davies S., 2010, 70 U STRATHCL EUR PO
   dos Santos FT, 2011, EUR PLAN STUD, V19, P1517, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.533515
   Etzkowitz H, 2003, SOC SCI INFORM, V42, P293, DOI 10.1177/05390184030423002
   Eurofound (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions), 2011, EUR RESTR MON Q
   Florida R. C., 2002, RISE CREATIVE CLASS
   Foster K.A., 2007, Working Paper 2007-08
   Grabher G., 1993, EMBEDDED FIRM SOCIOE, P255
   Hafner S., 2007, WP27 ACRE U AMST AMS
   Hale C, 2010, PLAN PRACT RES, V25, P587, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2010.522856
   Hall PeterGeoffrey., 1998, Cities in Civilization
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Haussler C., 2006, 188 LUDW MAX U MUN I
   Heigl P., 2003, MUNCHEN ATLAS, P40
   Hill E.W., 2008, 20082004 U CAL I URB
   Hopkins Rob., 2008, TRANSITION HDB OIL D
   IW Consult, 2010, 3 GROSSST
   Jerram Leif., 2007, Germany's Other Modernity: Munich and the Building of Metropolis, 1895-1930
   Kaiser R, 2003, EUR PLAN STUD, V11, P841, DOI 10.1080/0965431032000121373
   Kaiser R., 2009, 6 EURODITE
   Kaiser R., 2007, 2 EURODITE
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Klingbeil D., 1987, MUNCHEN SOZIALGEOGRA, V55/56, P43
   Krugman Paul., 1990, RETHINKING INT TRADE
   Lasalle Investment Management, 2009, EUR REG EC GROWTH IN
   Luthi S., 2010, EUR URB REG STUD C V
   m 4, 2011, BIOT MUN
   m4, 2012, PERS MED MUN
   Martin R., 2011, ANN INT C REG STUD A
   Martin R, 2007, J ECON GEOGR, V7, P573, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbm019
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review Bellagio Initiative
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   PORTER ME, 1990, HARVARD BUS REV, V68, P73
   Robson B., 1984, ASSESSING IMPACT URB
   Rode P., 2010, MUNICH METROPOLITAN
   Rodrigues C, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P1483, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.709063
   Schreyer K., 1969, BAYERN INDUSTRIESTAA
   Sternberg R, 2002, EUR PLAN STUD, V10, P251, DOI 10.1080/09654310120114526
   Swanstrom T., 2008, URB AFF ASS ANN M BA
   Thierstein A., 2008, 44 ISOCARP C DAL MUN, P1
   Triebswetter U, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1484, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.09.003
   ULI (Urban Land Institute) and PWC (Pricewaterhousecoopers), 2009, EM TRENDS REAL EST E
   Uotila T, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P1583, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.713331
   van den Berg L., 2010, MANUFACTURING NEW UR
   van den Berg L., 2001, DEV OPPORTUNITIES MU
NR 68
TC 58
Z9 70
U1 1
U2 71
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0965-4313
EI 1469-5944
J9 EUR PLAN STUD
JI Eur. Plan. Stud.
PD JUN
PY 2014
VL 22
IS 6
BP 1259
EP 1279
DI 10.1080/09654313.2013.778958
PG 21
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA AJ8KU
UT WOS:000337953500009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Nop, S
   Thornton, A
   Tranter, P
AF Nop, Sothun
   Thornton, Alec
   Tranter, Paul
TI Towards effective stakeholder collaboration in building urban resilience
   in Phnom Penh: opportunities and obstacles
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Stakeholder collaboration; Neoliberalism; Livelihood constraints;
   Participatory governance; Urban resilience
ID INVOLVEMENT; CITIES
AB Effective stakeholder collaboration plays an integral part in addressing emerging issues concerning building the resilience of urban areas. In practice, however, stakeholder collaboration remains ineffective and insufficient. This paper argues that a pragmatic form of stakeholder collaboration is required to address issues of power imbalance in neoliberal urban governance and to effectively build robust partnerships among key actors in constructing sustainable and resilient urban areas in the Global South. Through the lens of stakeholder theory, this study aims to (1) identify key roles of the main actors for building urban resilience in Phnom Penh city, (2) explore practical mechanisms that can assist stakeholders to better collaborate, and (3) examine the main opportunities and challenges for promoting stakeholder collaboration. Using qualitative methods, key findings reveal that increasing grassroots public forums, supporting the involvement of government figures in local projects, and formulating a conducive and transparent governance system are required to underpin stakeholders' active involvement and mobilise their inputs in constructing urban resilience. We explain how the process of stakeholder collaboration is impeded by poor local understanding, livelihood constraints, insufficient information sharing and lack of coordination.
C1 [Nop, Sothun; Thornton, Alec; Tranter, Paul] UNSW Canberra, Sch Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
   [Nop, Sothun] Royal Univ Phnom Penh, Fac Dev Studies, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
   [Thornton, Alec] Univ Johannesburg, Sch Humanities, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Thornton, Alec] Univ Johannesburg, Sch Tourism & Hospitality, Johannesburg, South Africa.
C3 University of New South Wales Sydney; University of Johannesburg;
   University of Johannesburg
RP Nop, S (corresponding author), UNSW Canberra, Sch Sci, Canberra, ACT, Australia.; Nop, S (corresponding author), Royal Univ Phnom Penh, Fac Dev Studies, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
EM sothun.nop@gmail.com
OI Nop, Sothun/0000-0003-3541-1224
FU University of New South Wales (UNSW)
FX The authors sincerely thank all the FGD and KII participants for
   providing information for this research. This study has benefitted from
   funding from a University of New South Wales (UNSW). The work was
   conducted under the approval from the Human Research Ethics Advisory
   Panel, UNSW Canberra.
CR Alexander LT., 2010, FORDHAM URBAN LAW J, V38, P629
   Blunt P, 2005, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V25, P75, DOI 10.1002/pad.349
   Brenner N, 2002, ANTIPODE, V34, P349, DOI 10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Brickell K., 2017, GEOGRAPHIES FORCED E, P1, DOI DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-51127-0
   Buckup S., 2012, Building successful partnerships: A production theory of global multi-stakeholder collaboration
   Bugalski N., 2009, BRIDGES BORDERS CAMB, V2009, P1
   Casolo J, 2013, GEOPOLITICS, V18, P800, DOI 10.1080/14650045.2013.811644
   Dany V, 2017, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V19, P1167, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9788-5
   De Roeck F, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V55, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.02.006
   Dean M., 1998, Governing Australia, P1
   Diepart J.-C., 2016, INTRO CAMBODIAN SPAT
   Dweck C., 2010, Mindset
   Emmens B., 2016, CONSCIOUS COLLABORAT, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53805-5
   Fisher MR, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.057
   Flower B, 2018, ENVIRON URBAN, V30, P301, DOI 10.1177/0956247817735481
   Foucault Michel, 1983, Crit Inquiry, P208, DOI DOI 10.1086/448181
   Foucault Michel., 1995, Discipline punish: The birth of prisons, V2nd
   Fraser G, 2020, COMMUNITY DEV J, V55, P437, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bsy049
   Freeman R.E., 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
   Gaventa Jonathan., 2003, Power after Lukes: a review of the literature
   Gray B., 1989, Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems
   Knieling J., 2016, Climate adaptation governance in cities and regions: theoretical fundamentals and practical evidence, DOI [10.1002/9781118451694.ch1, DOI 10.1002/9781118451694.CH1, 10.1002/9781118451694]
   Lawrence TB, 2002, ACAD MANAGE J, V45, P281, DOI 10.5465/3069297
   Lilja M, 2014, J POLITICAL POWER, V7, P107, DOI 10.1080/2158379X.2014.889403
   Lu Y, 2018, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V17, P85, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2017.1351914
   Marana P, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.011
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Minton G, 2017, AFR J MAR SCI, V39, P423, DOI 10.2989/1814232X.2017.1398106
   Moghadam SNM, 2019, COGENT ARTS HUMANITE, V6, DOI 10.1080/23311983.2019.1592065
   Mohammed E. Y., 2013, MAKING GROWTH GREEN
   MOHR J, 1994, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V15, P135, DOI 10.1002/smj.4250150205
   Nop S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102770
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   Patel S, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V7, P1, DOI 10.1177/0975425315619044
   Peou S, 2019, ASIAN J COMP POLITIC, V4, P42, DOI 10.1177/2057891118788199
   RGC, 2018, Rectangular Strategy for Growth, Employment Growth, Equity, and Efficiency: Building a Foundation for Achieving Cambodia's Vision 2050
   RGC Royal Government of Cambodia, 2016, PHNOM PENH GREEN CIT
   RGC Royal Government of Cambodia, 2019, PHNOM PENH SUST PLAN
   Rowley TJ, 2003, ACAD MANAGE REV, V28, P204
   Sam C, 2017, STUD HIGH EDUC, V42, P1764, DOI 10.1080/03075079.2015.1124851
   Savage GT, 2010, J BUS ETHICS, V96, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-0939-1
   Savas EmanuelS., 1987, PRIVATIZATION KEY BE
   Schindler M, 2018, INT J SPAT DATA INFR, V13, P223, DOI 10.2902/1725-0463.2018.13.art15
   Soma K, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P438, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.003
   Spoann V, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051228
   Talò C, 2014, SOC INDIC RES, V117, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11205-013-0347-2
   Talocci G, 2018, INT J HOUS POLICY, V18, P290, DOI 10.1080/19491247.2017.1298365
   Taylor S., 1998, Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource
   TRIST E, 1983, HUM RELAT, V36, P269, DOI 10.1177/001872678303600304
   Walters William., 2005, EUR POLIT SCI, V4, P288, DOI [10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210038, DOI 10.1057/PALGRAVE.EPS.2210038]
   Wamsler C, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V75, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.016
   World Bank, 2018, URB DEV PHNOM PENH
   2008, MICHEL FOUCAULT-LECT, P1
NR 53
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 2
U2 31
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 25
IS 1
BP 297
EP 320
DI 10.1007/s10668-021-02055-y
EA JAN 2022
PG 24
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 7S6RG
UT WOS:000745802600003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Miller, MA
   Douglass, M
   Rigg, J
AF Miller, Michelle Ann
   Douglass, Mike
   Rigg, Jonathan
TI Governing resilient cities for planetary flourishing in the Asia-Pacific
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Anthropocene; Asia-Pacific; environmental governance; sustainability;
   urban resilience
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; POLITICS
AB For the first time in 2019, the Asia-Pacific became a majority urban region. The unprecedented pace and magnitude of urbanisation across Asia and the Pacific has exposed tens of millions of urban residents to heightened risks and vulnerabilities associated with the expanding ecological footprint of urban energy, food and water demands and the increasingly severe effects of global climate change. This special issue directs attention toward the challenges, innovations and examples of best practice in environmental governance for urban resilience in the Asia-Pacific region. Our understanding of urban resilience is tied to the concept of planetary flourishing that links the health and well-being of urban populations with sustainability behaviours that promote regeneration of the biosphere while redistributing environmental risks and benefits in more socially inclusive and equitable ways.
C1 [Miller, Michelle Ann] Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
   [Douglass, Mike] Univ Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA.
   [Rigg, Jonathan] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England.
C3 National University of Singapore; University of Hawaii System;
   University of Bristol
RP Miller, MA (corresponding author), Natl Univ Singapore, Asia Res Inst AS8, 07-22,10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, Singapore.
EM arimam@nus.edu.sg
RI Rigg, Jonathan/A-4574-2015
OI Rigg, Jonathan/0000-0002-6563-4640
FU 2016 HSS Seed Fund award by the National University of Singapore
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
   special issue was financially supported by a 2016 HSS Seed Fund award
   provided by the National University of Singapore entitled `Governing
   Asia's Urban Transition in the Anthropocene'.
CR Abramson DB, 2020, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098019843020., DOI 10.1177/0042098019843020.]
   Adger WN, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1588, DOI 10.1177/0042098020904594
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Archer D, 2016, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V8, P654, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2014-0035
   Armitage D, 2012, CONSERV LETT, V5, P245, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00238.x
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Castells M., 2010, The Power of Identity
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Cho MR, 2019, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098019838965., DOI 10.1177/0042098019838965.]
   Chu E, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P372, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2015.1019822
   Coaffee Jon., 2016, Urban Resilience: Planning for Risk, Crisis and Uncertainty, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-28884-4
   Connolly C, 2019, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098018807573., DOI 10.1177/0042098018807573.]
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Dalby S, 2007, GEOGR COMPASS, V1, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00007.x
   Das D, 2019, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098019838481., DOI 10.1177/0042098019838481.]
   Douglass M, 2018, ENV PLANNING NATURE, V1, P279
   Edwards A.R., 2010, THRIVING SUSTAINABIL
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fainstein SS, 2014, INT J URBAN SCI, V18, P1
   Friedmann J., 2002, PROSPECT CITIES
   Fuller S, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1469, DOI 10.1177/0042098019872347
   Grant G.B., 2012, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, V2012, P123
   HAMMAN P., 2017, ENV URBAIN, V11
   Harvey D, 2003, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V27, P939, DOI 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
   Hou J, 2018, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098018778671., DOI 10.1177/0042098018778671.]
   Huck A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kosoy N, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.02.002
   Lang T, 2011, GER ANNU SPAT RES PO, P15, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-12785-4_2
   Lefebvre Henri, 1992, PRODUCTION SPACE, DOI DOI 10.1027/1618-3169/A000129
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Miller F, 2019, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098019830239., DOI 10.1177/0042098019830239.]
   Miller M A., 2016, Disaster governance in urbanising Asia, P1
   Miller MA, 2019, PROGR HUMAN GEOGRAPH, DOI [10.1177/0309132519837814., DOI 10.1177/0309132519837814.]
   Miller MA, 2018, URBAN ASIAS ESSAYS F, P195
   Miller MA, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P297, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2019.1624148
   Miller MA, 2015, PAC AFF, V88, P499, DOI 10.5509/2015883499
   Miller MA, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.028
   Miller MA, 2013, PAC AFF, V86, P715, DOI 10.5509/2013864715
   Miller Michelle Ann, 2018, Crossing Borders: Governing Environmental Disasters in a Global Urban Age in Asia and the Pacific, P1
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Murdock EG, 2020, ROUTLEDGE HBK PHILOS, P301
   Ng H, 2019, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098019834248., DOI 10.1177/0042098019834248.]
   Ng MK, 2018, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098018800399., DOI 10.1177/0042098018800399.]
   Ogden L, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P341, DOI 10.1890/120327
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Phelps NA, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.02.006
   Potter E, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1536, DOI 10.1177/0042098018821304
   Potter Emily, 2019, Writing Belonging at the Millennium: Notes from the Field on Settler-Colonial Place
   Reese LA, 2008, J URBAN AFF, V30, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2008.00404.x
   Rizzo A, 2019, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098018812009., DOI 10.1177/0042098018812009.]
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Snyder S, 2014, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V203, P103
   Thomson G, 2018, URBAN STUD, DOI [10.1177/0042098018779769., DOI 10.1177/0042098018779769.]
   Tidball K, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.004
   UNESCAP, 2019, DIS RISKSC AS PAC
   United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2019, The Future of Asian & Pacific Cities Transformative Pathways towards Sustainable Urban Development
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
NR 68
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 7
U2 45
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD MAY
PY 2020
VL 57
IS 7
SI SI
BP 1359
EP 1371
AR 0042098020903955
DI 10.1177/0042098020903955
EA MAR 2020
PG 13
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA LN4MU
UT WOS:000523834300001
OA Bronze, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Balsells, M
   Barroca, B
   Becue, V
   Serre, D
AF Balsells, Mireia
   Barroca, Bruno
   Becue, Vincent
   Serre, Damien
TI Making urban flood resilience more operational: current practice
SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WATER MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE floods & floodworks; reviews; urban regeneration
ID MANAGEMENT
AB Urbanisation and climate change have increased both the probability and the severity of flooding. The risk paradigm that follows shifts from traditional to more integrated approaches, since one of the main tasks emerging for flood managers is the development of resilient cities. The concept of urban resilience is becoming more and more important, despite the numerous challenges that interfere with its implementation. The goal of this research is to study how engineering and other design disciplines can improve flood resilience on an urban neighbourhood scale. This paper presents the analysis of an overview of research aimed at operationalising urban resilience to floods. This literature highlights the fact that almost no references can be found concerning studies focused on operationalising flood resilience at the neighbourhood level and particularly through urban design practices. Indeed, through interviews conducted with several stakeholders, it was confirmed that clear cooperation between flood resilience and urban design practices at the neighbourhood level does not yet exist.
C1 [Balsells, Mireia; Becue, Vincent] Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urbanisme, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
   [Balsells, Mireia] Univ Paris Est, Ecole Ingenieurs Ville Paris, Paris, France.
   [Barroca, Bruno] Univ Paris Est, Lab Eau Environm & Syst Urbains, Dept Genie Urbain, Marne La Vallee, France.
   [Serre, Damien] RESCUESolut, Bagneux, France.
   [Serre, Damien] UrbanWater, Bagneux, France.
   [Serre, Damien] Paris Diderot Univ, RESCUESolut, Bagneux, France.
C3 University of Mons; Universite Gustave-Eiffel; Universite
   Gustave-Eiffel; Universite Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC)
RP Balsells, M (corresponding author), Univ Mons, Fac Architecture & Urbanisme, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
RI Barroca, Bruno/ABF-5436-2020
OI BARROCA, Bruno/0000-0001-6653-0803; serre, damien/0000-0002-2902-2989
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], RESILIENCE URBAN RIS
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], THESIS DELFT U TECHN
   Barroca B., 2013, SAPIENS, V6
   Batica J., 2013, INT C FLOOD RES EXP
   Beraud H, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P3671, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-3671-2012
   Bowker P., 2007, IMPROVING FLOOD PERF
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Cepri, 2009, LOG ZER DOMM FAC RIS, P55
   Colten C., 2008, Community resilience: Lessons from New Orleans and Hurricane Katrina
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   De Brujin KM, 2005, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
   De Graaf R, 2013, COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD, P301
   Dhonau M, 2013, HOMEOWNERS GUIDE FLO
   EC, 2013, GREEN PAP INS NAT MA
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Garbin D. A., 2007, Critical Thinking: Moving from Infrastructure Protection to Infrastructure Resilience, P73
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson L.H., 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Jackson S., 2010, ARCHITECTING RESILIE
   Jha AK, 2012, CITIES AND FLOODING: A GUIDE TO INTEGRATED URBAN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2
   Khaimi D, 2012, LAND USE POLICY, V30, P615
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Nossiter A., 2008, NY TIMES
   OCDE, 2014, Etude de l'OCDE sur la gestion des risques d'inondation: la Seine en Ile-de-France
   Provitolo D, 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS, P127
   Redeker C, 2008, FLOOD RESILIENT CITY, P3
   Scalingi PL, 2007, CIP Program Discussion Paper Series, P49
   Schelfaut K, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
   Serre D, 2012, P 7 INT C WAT SENS U
   Toubin M, 2014, J URBAN PLANNING DEV, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229,05014021, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229,05014021]
   van Herk S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Walker B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
NR 39
TC 23
Z9 25
U1 3
U2 73
PU ICE PUBLISHING
PI WESTMINISTER
PA INST CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1 GREAT GEORGE ST, WESTMINISTER SW 1P 3AA, ENGLAND
SN 1741-7589
EI 1751-7729
J9 P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M
JI Proc. Inst. Civil. Eng.-Water Manag.
PD APR
PY 2015
VL 168
IS 2
BP 57
EP 65
DI 10.1680/wama.14.00051
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Water Resources
GA CE9XU
UT WOS:000352197700003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cao, LH
   Pan, NJ
   Lu, YY
   Su, WJ
AF Cao, Lihong
   Pan, Nengjie
   Lu, Yaoyi
   Su, Wenjie
TI Digital Innovation and Urban Resilience: Lessons from the Yangtze River
   Delta Region
SO JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Big data analysis; Digital economy; Economic resilience; Urban economic
   resilience; Internet economy; Regional economic development
AB In the era of the digital revolution, the ascendancy of the digital economy has emerged as a pivotal catalyst for global economic transformation. This paper delves into the transformative potential of the digital economy in reshaping regional economic dynamics, transcending geographical constraints, and fortifying inter-city economic ties. By harnessing the prowess of the digital economy, industries can expedite digitalization and intelligent transformation, augmenting stability and competitiveness across industrial and supply chains. This study focuses on 40 key cities within the Yangtze River Delta, dissecting the intricate interplay between the digital economy and urban economic resilience. The empirical analysis employs panel data, fixed effect models, and mediation effect models, complemented by a spatial measurement model to unravel the spatial spillover effects of the digital economy on urban economic toughness. The findings underscore the substantive positive impact of digital economy development on urban economic resilience, across three pivotal dimensions. Additionally, spatial econometric testing affirms the substantial influence radiating to surrounding cities. To bolster urban economic resilience, it is imperative to bolster the Internet economy, foster innovation in economic structures, and seamlessly integrate the digital and real economies. This synergistic approach will lower entrepreneurship barriers, invigorate resident entrepreneurship, and fortify the city's economic resilience. Moreover, strategic integration of the digital economy into daily life, coupled with advancements in social security and infrastructure, will amplify the intermediary role of the digital economy, further augmenting urban economic robustness. This research advances a comprehensive framework for leveraging the transformative potential of the digital economy, paving the way for a resilient and agile urban economic landscape in the Yangtze River Delta region.
C1 [Cao, Lihong; Pan, Nengjie; Lu, Yaoyi] City Univ Macau, Business Coll, Macau 999078, Peoples R China.
   [Cao, Lihong; Su, Wenjie] Guangzhou Business Coll, Management Coll, Foshan 528000, Peoples R China.
C3 City University of Macau
RP Cao, LH (corresponding author), City Univ Macau, Business Coll, Macau 999078, Peoples R China.; Cao, LH (corresponding author), Guangzhou Business Coll, Management Coll, Foshan 528000, Peoples R China.
EM b22092100344@cityu.edu.mo
CR Barbera C, 2017, PUBLIC ADMIN, V95, P670, DOI 10.1111/padm.12350
   Chen M., 2017, Progress in Geography, V36, P10
   Chen S., 2022, Industrial Technol Econ, V41, P26, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2022.06.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-910X.2022.06.004]
   Guo J., 2020, Economic Forum, V8, P86
   Li W, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V361, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132237
   Luo Q, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151713055
   Ma G., 2022, Finance and Accounting Research, V7, P4
   Noy I, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10082850
   Pashapour S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V231, P1526, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.171
   Su JQ, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su131810105
   Wang WL, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su131910677
   Wang XW, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020809
   Wang XY, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052921
   Wang Y., 2022, Journal of Technical Economics, V41, P97
   [汪亚楠 Wang Yanan], 2020, [数量经济技术经济研究, Quantitative & Technical Economics], V37, P92
   Yu D., 2021, Reform, V7, P24
   Zhang R., 2022, Modern Economics & Management Forum, V3, P96, DOI [10.32629/memf.v3i2.774, DOI 10.32629/MEMF.V3I2.774]
   Zhang W., 2022, Economist, V8, P33
   Zhang W, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0257365
   Zhang X., 2021, Journal of social science of Jilin university, V61, P90
   Zhao Y. B., 2022, Soft Science, V36, P86
NR 21
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 65
U2 126
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1868-7865
EI 1868-7873
J9 J KNOWL ECON
JI J. Knowl. Econ.
PD 2024 APR 3
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s13132-024-01932-x
EA APR 2024
PG 20
WC Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics
GA MU8W0
UT WOS:001196250200002
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Beck, MB
   Walker, RV
AF Beck, Michael Bruce
   Villarroel Walker, Rodrigo
TI Nexus security: governance, innovation and the resilient city
SO FRONTIERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE cities as forces for good; climate variability; ecosystem services;
   energy and nutrient recovery; infrastructure failure; urban metabolism
ID WATER SECURITY; SCARCITY; CONSUMPTION; PHOSPHORUS; METABOLISM;
   TRANSITION; CITIES; PARIS; ISNT; FLOW
AB Nexus security is a compound mix of ideas: reconciling human needs and wants with access to multiple resources; diversity of access to those resources and services; resilience in the face of weather- and climaterelated variability; resilience likewise in the face of infrastructure failure; and the personal, individual sense of belonging. At the level of Systems Thinking there is a very close relationship between resilience in the behavior of natural (ecological) systems and resilience in the social dynamics of governance within communities, where such resilience establishes the viability of these communities over centuries, which in turn entails successful stewardship of the man-environment relationship. We use insights from this cross-system mapping - across natural, built, and human systems - to assess, first, the role of city governance in achieving nexus security (or not) and, second, the role of technological innovations in serving the same purpose. More specifically, eight principles, covering resilience and diversity of access to resources and services, are used to gauge security-enhancing features of city buildings and infrastructure. Case studies include new designs of resilient office blocks, nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) recovery systems for sanitation and wastewater treatment, and the reconstruction of urban parks for the provision of ecosystem services. Throughout the paper, matters of risk in the face of meteorological variability are prominent. We do not conclude, however, that the presence of risk implies nexus insecurity.
C1 [Beck, Michael Bruce; Villarroel Walker, Rodrigo] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
C3 University System of Georgia; University of Georgia
RP Beck, MB (corresponding author), Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA 30602 USA.
EM mbbeck@uga.edu
FU Wheatley-Georgia Research Alliance Endowed Chair in Water Quality and
   Environmental Systems at the University of Georgia
FX The work on which this paper is based is part of an international,
   inter-disciplinary network of research - the CFG Network
   (www.cfgnet.org). CFG was begun in 2006, enabled through the appointment
   at that time of Michael Bruce Beck as an Institute Scholar at the
   International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg,
   Austria. We readily acknowledge this stimulus to our work. Throughout,
   CFG has been funded by the Wheatley-Georgia Research Alliance Endowed
   Chair in Water Quality and Environmental Systems at the University of
   Georgia, in particular, in support of a Graduate Assistantship and now
   Postdoctoral Fellowship for Rodrigo Villarroel Walker. The freedom of
   enquiry enabled through this form of financial support has simply been
   invaluable.
CR [Anonymous], 2000, Towards Water Security: A Framework for Action
   [Anonymous], MAYES BROOK RESTORAT
   [Anonymous], 1986, SUSTAINABLE DEV BIOS
   [Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING NATURE
   [Anonymous], UA MAGAZINE
   [Anonymous], FRONTIER ENV SCI ENG
   [Anonymous], EARTH SYST ENG 2012
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Barles S, 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V11, P1757, DOI 10.5194/hess-11-1757-2007
   Barles S, 2007, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V375, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.12.003
   Beck MB, 2010, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V163, P31, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2010.163.1.31
   Beck M B, 2013, P ICE ENG S IN PRESS, P166
   Beck M.B., 2011, Cities as Forces of Good in the Environment: Sustainability in the Water Sector
   Beck MB, 2011, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V164, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2011.164.2.129
   Beck MB, 2005, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V20, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.05.002
   Beck MB, 1996, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V33, P1, DOI 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00205-3
   Beck MB, 2013, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V7, P626, DOI 10.1007/s11783-013-0548-6
   Billen G, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P249, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0298-1
   Calzadilla A, 2010, J HYDROL, V384, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.012
   Cook C, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.011
   Crutzen P J, 2007, BLUE RIBBON PANEL GR
   D'Arcy B, 2012, WATER, P34
   Drechsel P., 2010, URBAN AGR MAGAZINE, V23, P11
   FALKENMARK M, 1989, AMBIO, V18, P112
   Fine B, 2010, SCI SOC SER, P73
   Fitzpatrick C, 2012, WATER, P18
   Force J, 2012, WATER, P28
   Force J., 2011, TREATMENT PLANT  SEP, P12
   Fussler C., 2004, J. Corp. Citizsh, V16, P33
   Gatzweiler FW, 2006, ECOL ECON, V59, P296, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.017
   Geels F, 2005, TECHNOL SOC, V27, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008
   Geels FW, 2006, RES POLICY, V35, P1069, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2006.06.001
   Grey D, 2007, WATER POLICY, V9, P545, DOI 10.2166/wp.2007.021
   Gyawali D, 2010, SCI SOC SER, P233
   Harrington E, 2012, NATURE, V486, P189
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Ingram D, 2010, WILMOTT MAGAZINE, V48, P60
   Kim E, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P295, DOI 10.1007/s10113-011-0275-0
   Krchnak K M, STACK ENG PROC BONN2
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lietaer Bernard, 2009, SAPIENS, V2
   Londong J, 2013, SOURCE SEPARATION AND DECENTRALIZATION FOR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, P423
   Marsden T, 2012, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V4, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.004
   Maslow AH, 1943, PSYCHOL REV, V50, P370, DOI 10.1037/h0054346
   Mehta L., 2010, The Limits to scarcity: contesting the politics of allocation
   Mihelcic JR, 2011, CHEMOSPHERE, V84, P832, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.046
   Mohtar R.H., 2011, WATER SECURITY WATER, P271
   Neset TSS, 2008, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V396, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.010
   NEY STEVEN., 2009, RESOLVING MESSY POLI
   Olsson G, 2013, SOURCE SEPARATION AND DECENTRALIZATION FOR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, P179
   Pellett K., 2010, 09CBR03 BRIT COL CON
   Peterson G, 1998, ECOSYSTEMS, V1, P6, DOI 10.1007/s100219900002
   Rijsberman FR, 2006, AGR WATER MANAGE, V80, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.001
   Rittmann BE, 2013, SOURCE SEPARATION AND DECENTRALIZATION FOR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, P13
   Salingaros N.A., 2005, Principles of urban structure
   Stenström TA, 2013, SOURCE SEPARATION AND DECENTRALIZATION FOR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, P151
   Taleb Nassim Nicholas, 2012, Antifragile: things that gain from disorder
   Thompson M., 2008, RSA J, V154, P34
   Thompson M., 1990, Cultural Theory
   Thompson M., 2002, ENCY GLOBAL ENV CHAN, P384
   THOMPSON M, 1989, ENV THREATS PERCEPTI, P138
   Thompson M, 2010, SCI SOC SER, P127
   Truffer B, 2013, SOURCE SEPARATION AND DECENTRALIZATION FOR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, P209
   Villarroel Walker R, 2011, GEORG WAT RES C ATH
   Villarroel Walker R, 2010, THESIS U GEORGIA GEO
   Walker RV, 2012, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V7, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2012.084
   Walker RV, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST, V15, P809, DOI 10.1007/s11252-012-0241-8
   Whittington D, 2013, TEC Background Paper No.18
   WOLMAN A, 1965, SCI AM, V213, P179
NR 70
TC 17
Z9 20
U1 7
U2 136
PU HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
PI BEIJING
PA CHAOYANG DIST, 4, HUIXINDONGJIE, FUSHENG BLDG, BEIJING 100029, PEOPLES R
   CHINA
SN 2095-2201
EI 2095-221X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI ENG
JI Front. Env. Sci. Eng.
PD OCT
PY 2013
VL 7
IS 5
BP 640
EP 657
DI 10.1007/s11783-013-0549-5
PG 18
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 215ST
UT WOS:000324231400003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lo, AY
   Xu, BX
   Chan, F
   Su, RX
AF Lo, Alex Y.
   Xu, Bixia
   Chan, Faith
   Su, Ruixian
TI Household economic resilience to catastrophic rainstorms and flooding in
   a Chinese megacity
SO GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; flooding; community resilience; socio-economic effect;
   household adaptation; financial preparation; China
ID RISK PERCEPTIONS; INSURANCE; PREFERENCES; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT;
   RESPONSES; EXPOSURE; LOSSES
AB Megacities situated on flood plains face escalating risks of waterlogging and inundation. Tianjin is one of these megacities in China where residents are exposed to these risks and not well prepared for their consequences. Government policies should support the most vulnerable and less resilient groups. This study can inform policy-making by identifying the socio-economic characteristics of those who are financially better prepared for the consequences of catastrophic rainstorms and flooding. A structured questionnaire survey was administered to 332 Tianjin residents. Results confirm that financial conditions crucially determine household resilience to these natural hazards. Lower-income and less educated urban residents have lower resilient capacity. Weak engagement in the community, including residential committees and other organisations, is related to lower capacity to cope with the economic consequences of extreme weather events. Less resilient groups are therefore those who are subject to urban poverty and have limited social capital. Tianjin and other cities in the developing world require resilience strategies that attend to this segment of urban population.
C1 [Lo, Alex Y.] Univ Hong Kong, Kadoorie Inst, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Bixia] Griffith Univ, Griffith Sch Environm, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.
   [Chan, Faith] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog Sci, Ningbo Campus, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   [Su, Ruixian] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Urban & Environm Studies, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Hong Kong; Griffith University; Griffith University - Gold
   Coast Campus; University of Nottingham Ningbo China; Tianjin Normal
   University
RP Lo, AY (corresponding author), Univ Hong Kong, Kadoorie Inst, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
EM alexloyh@hku.hk
RI Lo, Alex/B-7948-2008; Chan, Faith Ka Shun/H-1541-2017
OI Lo, Alex/0000-0002-5953-4176; Chan, Faith Ka Shun/0000-0001-6091-6596
CR Alinovi L., 2009, Measuring household resilience to food insecurity: application to Palestinian households
   Allison EH, 2001, MAR POLICY, V25, P377, DOI 10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00023-9
   [Anonymous], 2014, NAT DAT
   BAUMANN DD, 1978, ECON GEOGR, V54, P189, DOI 10.2307/142833
   Botzen WJW, 2012, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V82, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.01.005
   Botzen WJW, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P2265, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.019
   Botzen W.J. W., 2013, MANAGING EXTREME CLI
   Bubeck P, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1327, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.009
   Bubeck P, 2012, RISK ANAL, V32, P1481, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
   Eriksen C, 2014, GEOGR RES-AUST, V52, P23, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12046
   Goulden MC, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P906, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2013.765771
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Han SQ, 2006, J HYDRODYN, V18, P552, DOI 10.1016/S1001-6058(06)60134-0
   Hanson S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P89, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
   Dang HL, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V71, P385, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0931-4
   Hu BB, 2009, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V59, P269, DOI 10.1007/s12665-009-0024-6
   Hung HC, 2009, J RISK RES, V12, P239, DOI 10.1080/13669870802497702
   Keil A, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V86, P291, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9326-4
   Kunreuther H, 1996, J RISK UNCERTAINTY, V12, P171, DOI 10.1007/BF00055792
   Lindell MK, 2008, RISK ANAL, V28, P539, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x
   Lixin Y, 2011, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V62, P1151, DOI 10.1007/s12665-010-0604-5
   Lo AY, 2015, ENVIRON VALUE, V24, P755, DOI 10.3197/096327115X14420732702653
   Lo AY, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1249, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.019
   Lo AY, 2013, AUST ECON REV, V46, P160, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2013.12009.x
   Miceli R, 2008, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V28, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.006
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Osbahr H, 2008, GEOFORUM, V39, P1951, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.07.010
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Petrolia DR, 2013, LAND ECON, V89, P227, DOI 10.3368/le.89.2.227
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Rose Adam., 2004, Disaster Prevention and Management, V13, P307, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410556528
   Wang Y, 1998, J COASTAL RES, V14, P31
   Ward PJ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P899, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9599-1
   Wilson GA, 2015, ENVIRON VALUE, V24, P227, DOI 10.3197/096327114X13947900182157
   Wolf J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.09.004
   World Bank, 2010, NAT HAZ UNNAT DIS EC
   Wu Q. Z, 2012, CHINA ANCIENT CITY, V10, P4
   Xie XL, 2014, AREA, V46, P194, DOI 10.1111/area.12098
   Xie ZL, 2010, ESTUAR COAST SHELF S, V86, P379, DOI 10.1016/j.ecss.2009.03.040
   Zaleskiewicz T., 2002, RISK DECISION POLICY, V7, P221, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1357530902000662
NR 40
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 6
U2 63
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1745-5863
EI 1745-5871
J9 GEOGR RES-AUST
JI Geogr. Res.
PD NOV
PY 2016
VL 54
IS 4
BP 406
EP 419
DI 10.1111/1745-5871.12179
PG 14
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA EA8TX
UT WOS:000386913000005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Toubin, M
   Laganier, R
   Diab, Y
   Serre, D
AF Toubin, M.
   Laganier, R.
   Diab, Y.
   Serre, D.
TI Improving the Conditions for Urban Resilience through Collaborative
   Learning of Parisian Urban Services
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Urban services; Paris; Interdependencies; Collaboration;
   Floods
ID VULNERABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; CAPACITY
AB The concept of urban resilience has taken a leading edge by incorporating the multiscalar interactions within an urban system, revealing the short- and long-term impacts, spatial dependencies, and inequalities. The issue now is to enable local authorities and urban stakeholders to grasp and apply the resilience approach. Technical networks and urban services supporting urban development (drinking water supply, public transportation, etc.) are an interesting case study to apply the resilience concept. The urban resilience approach, tested with the managers of service provision in the City of Paris, demonstrates the effectiveness of integration and collaboration. First, an autodiagnosis realized with each manager identities the service dependencies and its capacity for continuous operation in case of disturbance. Then workshops raise manager awareness of their interdependencies and feed the discussion toward technical and organizational solutions in an integrated approach. This macroscopic analysis is then completed by a territorial assessment of urban service resilience. In doing so, the spatial and temporal dimensions emphasize gaps but also margins of manoeuver in managing resilient urban services. Our results show that manager strategies can be focused on protection, adaptation, or recovery of their service. However, these are sometimes contradictory and threaten the resilience of the whole system. Indeed, in highlighting the different strategies set up by managers, the region's resilience can be discussed at different scales: the urban service, the system of urban services, the City of Paris, and the Parisian metropolis. Then we emphasize the difficulties in applying the resilience concept and suggest solutions to improve the conditions for urban resilience and sustainability. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
C1 [Toubin, M.] Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, UMR PRODIG, Ecole Ingenieurs Ville Paris,Univ Paris Est,Co Eg, F-75014 Paris, France.
   [Laganier, R.] Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, UMR PRODIG, F-75013 Paris, France.
   [Diab, Y.] Univ Paris Est, LEESU Equipe Genie Urbain, Ecole Ingenieurs Ville Paris, F-75019 Paris, France.
   [Serre, D.] RescueSolutions, F-92220 Bagneux, France.
C3 Universite Paris Cite; Sorbonne Universite; Universite Gustave-Eiffel;
   Universite Paris Cite; Sorbonne Universite; Universite
   Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC); Institut Polytechnique de Paris;
   Ecole des Ponts ParisTech; Universite Gustave-Eiffel
RP Toubin, M (corresponding author), Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, UMR PRODIG, Ecole Ingenieurs Ville Paris,Univ Paris Est,Co Eg, F-75014 Paris, France.
EM marie.toubin@eivp-paris.fr; richard.laganier@univ-paris-diderot.fr;
   youssef.diab@univ-mlv.fr; dimien.serre@rescuesolutions.fr
OI serre, damien/0000-0002-2902-2989
FU French National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-09-VILL-0010-VILL]; City of
   Paris; Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-09-VILL-0010] Funding
   Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
FX We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer and editors for their
   helpful comments. We are also grateful to IGN for authorizing the use of
   BD TOPO geographical data (authorization no80-1456). This research is
   part of Project RESILIS, led by Egis with EIVP as scientific coordinator
   (www.resilis.fr). It was funded by the French National Research Agency
   (ANR Sustainable Cities 2009, reference ANR-09-VILL-0010-VILL). We also
   wish to thank all the Parisian managers who accepted to share their
   knowledge to feed this research and particularly the City of Paris which
   funded the project Paris Resiliente, within the Paris 2030 program.
CR [Anonymous], 518 IAU
   [Anonymous], 2012, DEV DURABLE TERRITOR, DOI DOI 10.4000/DEVEL0PPEMENTDURABLE.9208
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   de Bruijne M., 2010, Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events, P13
   De Rosnay J., 1975, Le macroscope: vers une vision globale
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Eusgeld I, 2011, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V96, P679, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.010
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gunes AE, 2000, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V126, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2000)126:3(136)
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jankowski P., 2003, URBAN INFORM SYSTEMS, V15, P9
   Joerin F, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P2002, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.024
   Kovel JP, 2000, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V126, P26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2000)126:1(26)
   Kröeger W, 2008, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V93, P1781, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.005
   Kuhlicke C, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P61, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9646-y
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Lorenz DF, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P7, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9654-y
   McManus S., 2008, NAT HAZARDS REV, V9, P81, DOI [DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:2(81), 10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2008)9:2(81)]
   Miguez MG, 2009, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V135, P100, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000012
   Murray AT, 2008, GROWTH CHANGE, V39, P573, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2008.00447.x
   O'Brien R., 2001, Teoria e pratica da pesquisa acao [Theory and practice of action research]
   Ouyang M, 2011, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V96, P1462, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.002
   Ozcevik O, 2010, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V136, P169, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:2(169)
   Rinaldi SA, 2001, IEEE CONTR SYST MAG, V21, P11, DOI 10.1109/37.969131
   Robert B., 2009, Organizational Resilience: Concepts and Evaluation Method
   Robert B., 2012, RESILIENC URBAN RISK, P119
   Robinson LW, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1185, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.012
   Rose A, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.003
   Serre D., 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS
   Tierney K., 2007, TR News, V250, P14, DOI DOI 10.17226/23168
   Toubin M, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2219, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2219-2012
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
NR 34
TC 41
Z9 42
U1 3
U2 100
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD DEC
PY 2015
VL 141
IS 4
AR 05014021
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA CW6SD
UT WOS:000365126900004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Schlör, H
   Venghaus, S
   Hake, JF
AF Schloer, Holger
   Venghaus, Sandra
   Hake, Juergen-Friedrich
TI The FEW-Nexus city index - Measuring urban resilience
SO APPLIED ENERGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urbanization; Food-Energy-Water (FEW) Nexus; Resilience
ID ENERGY-WATER NEXUS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENT; CITIES; MODEL;
   CHALLENGES; EMISSIONS; FRAMEWORK; SERVICES; SUPPORT
AB Current global developments put increasing ecological, economic and social pressures on urban systems. The density of urban areas concentrates these pressures especially on food, energy and water (i.e., the FEW nexus) resources as if in a 'burning glass'. The ability to confront these challenges significantly depends on the resilience of an urban area, which is to a large degree managed by institutions with the objective of protecting social cohesion and minimizing ecological pressure. Urbanization and climate change, however, strain social cohesion by exacerbating social vulnerabilities and disproportionately affecting those already marginalized. Justice and equity are thus essential preconditions for the development of resilient urban concepts and must be considered in a comprehensive nexus management approach. For this purpose, two indices are developed based on the UN-Habitat City Prosperity Index, with a specific focus on integrating the nexus-relevant indices (i.e., the infrastructure development index and the environmental sustainability index) with a weighted equity index. The World and Region Prosperity City Index (WCPI, RCPI5) and the Nexus City Index (NXI) enable decision makers to more readily compare global and local city resiliences without reducing the underlying complexity of the analyzed FEW system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Schloer, Holger; Venghaus, Sandra; Hake, Juergen-Friedrich] Forschungszentrum Julich, IEK STE, Julich, Germany.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Research Center Julich
RP Schlör, H (corresponding author), Forschungszentrum Julich, IEK STE, Julich, Germany.
EM h.schloer@fz-juelich.de
OI Venghaus, Sandra/0000-0002-9352-6604; Schlor, Holger/0000-0001-9098-3263
CR Al-Saidi M, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V574, P1131, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.046
   [Anonymous], 2012, STAT WORLDS CIT 2012
   [Anonymous], 2015, Observatorio da Emigracao
   [Anonymous], QUIT DECL HAB 3
   [Anonymous], WEALTH WELFARE SUSTA
   [Anonymous], CONFR SCARC MAN WAT
   [Anonymous], NEXUS CITY OPERATION
   [Anonymous], 2014, WORLD POP SIT 2014
   [Anonymous], BONN2011 C WAT EN FO
   [Anonymous], 2004, ECOL SOC
   [Anonymous], J CLEAN PROD
   [Anonymous], 2006, Equity and Development
   [Anonymous], ENCY GLOBAL ENV CHAN
   [Anonymous], HAB 3 BROCH
   [Anonymous], STAT WORLDS CIT 2010
   [Anonymous], STAT DAT WAHRSCH
   [Anonymous], J HYDROL REG STUD
   [Anonymous], EC 1 PRIV POW EC DRI
   [Anonymous], UMZ MENSCHH TRANSF K
   [Anonymous], 2015, DELOITTE REV
   Assembly U. G., 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   BIRKMANN J., 2013, Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies, Vsecond
   Branscomb LM, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.004
   Brownsword RA, 2005, APPL ENERG, V82, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.10.005
   Bugliarello G, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.018
   Chen SQ, 2016, APPL ENERG, V184, P905, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.042
   Cobbinah PB, 2015, ENVIRON DEV, V13, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.11.001
   Corak M., 2016, Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016: Taking on Inequality, DOI DOI 10.1596/978-1-4648-0958-3
   Deaton A., 2013, The Great Escape
   Dicken P., 2007, Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy
   Eicker U, 2015, APPL ENERG, V155, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.094
   Elmqvist T, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
   Fang CL, 2015, APPL ENERG, V158, P519, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.095
   Fonseca JA, 2015, APPL ENERG, V142, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.068
   Hake JF, 2016, ENRGY PROCED, V88, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.155
   Kan GY, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.017
   Karabulut A, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.002
   Klingholz R., 2014, SLAVES GROWTH HIST L
   Leemans R, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V19, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.01.001
   Liu GY, 2017, APPL ENERG, V186, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.132
   Lu Y, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P2546, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.042
   Markovska N, 2016, ENERGY, V115, P1504, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.086
   Markovska N, 2016, ENERGY, V115, P1503, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.013
   Miraftab Faranak., 2015, Cities and inequalities in a global and neoliberal world
   Nair S, 2014, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V89, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.05.007
   Martínez CIP, 2015, ENERGY, V92, P612, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.003
   Ringler C, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.002
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Sampaio HC, 2013, APPL ENERG, V104, P924, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.022
   Sassen S, 2013, CITIES, V34, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.007
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   Steele W, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.004
   Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), 2011, UND NEX BACKGR PAP B
   Tan S, 2017, APPL ENERG, V185, P1919, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.041
   Venkatesh G, 2014, ENERGY, V75, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.111
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Walker RV, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V141, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.054
   Walsh E, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.008
   Wang SG, 2016, APPL ENERG, V178, P773, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.112
   Yeo IA, 2014, APPL ENERG, V119, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.060
   Yeo IA, 2013, APPL ENERG, V110, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.065
   Yin YH, 2015, APPL ENERG, V159, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.005
   Zhang Y, 2013, ENVIRON POLLUT, V178, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.052
NR 63
TC 122
Z9 141
U1 7
U2 255
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0306-2619
EI 1872-9118
J9 APPL ENERG
JI Appl. Energy
PD JAN 15
PY 2018
VL 210
BP 382
EP 392
DI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
PG 11
WC Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Chemical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA FS5DF
UT WOS:000419813100030
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Derrible, S
AF Derrible, Sybil
TI Urban infrastructure is not a tree: Integrating and decentralizing urban
   infrastructure systems
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban infrastructure planning; sustainability; resilience; integration;
   decentralization
ID WATER; FUTURE; ENERGY; RESILIENCE; FAILURES; DYNAMICS; SCIENCE; CITIES;
   NEXUS
AB In his original 1965 article, Christopher Alexander argued that master planned cities ultimately failed because the designs elaborated followed a tree structure as opposed to a more desirable semilattice structure present in organic cities. In this article, I argue that a similar claim can be made with urban infrastructure systems planning. As cities expanded and became increasingly complex in the 20th century, the responsibility to plan and design urban infrastructure was distributed to separate agencies that seldom communicate and coordinate with one another. In the global context to make cities more sustainable and resilient, a better integration of infrastructure systems may hold much potential. After recalling Alexander's main concepts, I examine how current infrastructure systems are naturally interdependent. I then discuss the role of integration, by notably proposing an integration-decentralization matrix, with four quadrants, illustrated by using practical examples. The quadrants are current paradigm, siloed distribution, localized integration, and integrated decentralization. Overall, a better integration of urban infrastructure can offer significant benefits to a city, and it may be time to seriously revisit our current urban infrastructure systems planning practice.
C1 [Derrible, Sybil] Univ Illinois, Complex & Sustainable Urban Networks CSUN Lab, Chicago, IL USA.
C3 University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Chicago;
   University of Illinois Chicago Hospital
RP Derrible, S (corresponding author), Univ Illinois, 842 W Taylor St M-C 246, Chicago, IL 60607 USA.
EM derrible@uic.edu
OI Derrible, Sybil/0000-0002-2939-6016
CR Ahmad N, 2015, J IND ECOL, V19, P321, DOI 10.1111/jiec.12266
   ALEXAND ER, 1965, Architectural Forum, V122, P58
   [Anonymous], 2006, STRUCTURE DYNAMICS N
   Bazilian M, 2011, ENERG POLICY, V39, P7896, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.039
   Blum Andrew., 2012, TUBES JOURNEY CTR IN
   Buldyrev SV, 2010, NATURE, V464, P1025, DOI 10.1038/nature08932
   Byers EA, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.005
   Chin D.A., 2014, Water-resources engineering, V3rd
   City of Chicago, 2012, CIT UNV GREEN STREET
   Dawson R, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P3085, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.0008
   Derrible S, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0142108
   Derrible S, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V108, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.09.022
   Derrible S, 2011, TRANSPORT REV, V31, P495, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2010.543709
   DHS, 2015, CRIT INFR SEC
   DNAInfo, 2016, EX IS YOUR NEIGHB
   Dueñas-Osorio L, 2007, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V13, P185, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:3(185)
   Dueñas-Osorio L, 2009, STRUCT SAF, V31, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008.06.007
   Fiksel J, 2003, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V37, P5330, DOI 10.1021/es0344819
   Fotinos D, 2003, POW ENG SOC GEN M 13, V4, P1
   Fu GH, 2014, EUR PHYS J B, V87, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2014-40876-y
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   HUD, 2015, HUD HIST
   IEA, 2014, LINK HEAT EL SYST CO
   Kennedy C, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1107
   Kenway SJ, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V63, P1983, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.070
   Kermanshah Amirhassan, 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), P29, DOI 10.1109/BigData.2014.7004428
   Khoury M, 2015, INFRASTRUCTURE COMPL, V2, P1
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
   Larsen ER, 2013, UNDERST COMPLEX SYST, P17, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8606-0_2
   Lee EJ, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P10762, DOI 10.1021/es401011k
   Liu J, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, P970, DOI 10.1126/science.aaa3145
   Makropoulos CK, 2010, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V24, P2795, DOI 10.1007/s11269-010-9580-5
   Minett J., 1975, PLANNING OUTLOOK, V16, P4, DOI DOI 10.1080/00320717508711494
   Mohareb E, 2016, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000287
   Mumford Lewis., 1961, The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects
   National Archives, 2015, REC CREAT INH TRANSP
   Neuman M, 2010, J PLAN HIST, V9, P21, DOI 10.1177/1538513209355373
   Pagani GA, 2011, IEEE T SMART GRID, V2, P538, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2011.2147810
   Pahwa S, 2013, PHYSICA A, V392, P3741, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2013.03.029
   Pande Amit., 2011, IEEE PES POW SYST C, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/PSCE.2011.5772587
   Peiravian F, 2014, P 2014 IEEE INT C BI, P1
   Perrings C, 1998, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V11, P503, DOI 10.1023/A:1008255614276
   Qin Y, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V82, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.03.013
   Rezaie B, 2012, APPL ENERG, V93, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.020
   Sage D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, P407, DOI 10.1111/disa.12114
   Scalise Carmen, 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 Structures Congress. Structures Congress 2012, P1485, DOI 10.1061/9780784412367.132
   Sedlak D., 2014, Water 4.0, V1st
   Sovacool BK, 2009, ENERG POLICY, V37, P2763, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.012
   Woods DD, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018
   Xu M, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P7928, DOI 10.1021/es3025534
NR 50
TC 47
Z9 52
U1 3
U2 59
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD MAY
PY 2017
VL 44
IS 3
BP 553
EP 569
DI 10.1177/0265813516647063
PG 17
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA EU3DB
UT WOS:000400907700009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Agyei, F
   Asibey, MO
   Cobbinah, PB
AF Agyei, Francisca
   Asibey, Michael Osei
   Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful
TI Uncertain climate futures: Cultivating 3 A resilience in urban Ghana
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Sustainable cities; Resilient victims; Flooding;
   Absorptive capacity
ID SOCIAL PROTECTION; BUILDING RESILIENCE; ADAPTATION; CITIES
AB Whilst scholars have argued that research on urban resilience in Africa is in its infancy, and on climate change in cities evolving, we argue that responses to building resilience fall short of fully embracing the radical potential of community residents' perspectives. This paper examines the absorptive, anticipatory, and adaptation/adaptive (3 A) capacities and strategies of residents toward building resilience to climate change hazards in an African city. We examine this purpose by focusing on Ahensan, one of the most climate-induced disaster-vulnerable communities in the second largest city in Ghana, Kumasi. Using a qualitative-led mixed methods research approach involving households and key informants' interviews, findings indicate that strategies employed by households were more anticipatory than absorptive and adaptive. The notable strategies employed include elevating walls and staircases to prevent flood water from entering rooms and temporarily relocating outside the neighbourhood at the onset of rainfall. Limited funds to invest in sustainable strategies, low awareness of social interventions, and poor self-mobilization from residents remain key local barriers impeding 3 A resilience efforts, particularly absorptive and adaptive capacities. Recommendations are further proffered.
C1 [Agyei, Francisca; Asibey, Michael Osei] KNUST, Coll Art & Built Environm, Dept Planning, Kumasi, Ghana.
   [Cobbinah, Patrick Brandful] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia.
C3 Kwame Nkrumah University Science & Technology; University of Melbourne
RP Asibey, MO (corresponding author), KNUST, Coll Art & Built Environm, Dept Planning, Kumasi, Ghana.
EM franciscaagyei760@gmail.com; asibeymichael@yahoo.com;
   patrick.cobbinah@unimelb.edu.au
RI Asibey, Michael/P-2396-2016; Cobbinah, Patrick/ABH-9950-2020
CR Abunyewah M., 2022, DISASTER RISK REDUCT
   Abunyewah M, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103790
   Abunyewah M, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.031
   Agyekum S, 2024, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104498
   Aleksandrova M., 2019, Ger. Dev. Inst. Discussion Paper 16/2019
   [Anonymous], 2012, Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor: Cities Building Resilience for a Changing World
   [Anonymous], 2017, World social protection report 2017/19: ILO's new report notes Chinese progress on social protection
   [Anonymous], 2022, [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2012, Background Paper for the World Bank 2012-22 Social Protection and Labor Discussion Paper
   [Anonymous], 2023, Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 C Goal in Reach
   [Anonymous], 2013, Ethiopia's productive safety net program (PSNP) integrating disaster and climate risk management
   Appau PK, 2024, CITIES, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104723
   Arthurson K, 2015, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P1, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2013.818951
   Asante FA, 2015, CLIMATE, V3, P78, DOI 10.3390/cli3010078
   Asibey M.O., 2023, SN Social Sciences, V3, P188, DOI [10.1007/s43545-023-00777-6, DOI 10.1007/S43545-023-00777-6]
   Asibey M.O., 2022, The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_23-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_23-1, 10.1007/978-3-030-38948-223-1]
   Asibey MO, 2024, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103680
   Asibey MO, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103950
   Bahadur A V., 2015, BRACED Working Paper, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.3813.2965
   Bene C., 2012, Resilience: New utopia or new tyranny? - Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes
   Boateng EA, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117433
   Cobbinah PB, 2023, J PLAN LIT, V38, P361, DOI 10.1177/08854122221128762
   Cobbinah PB, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V128, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.008
   Cobbinah PB, 2019, J URBAN MANAG, V8, P261, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2019.02.002
   de Janvry Alain., 2004, Can Conditional Cash Transfers Serve as Safety Nets to Keep Children in School and Out of the Labor Market?" Mimeo
   Chinh DT, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P753, DOI 10.1111/disa.12171
   Dulal HB, 2014, ENVIRON DEV, V10, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2014.01.003
   Fuseini I, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.020
   Harrison E, 2017, J PEASANT STUD, V44, P1022, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2016.1193011
   High Level Panel on Humanitarian Cash Transfers (HLPHCT), 2015, Doing cash differently-How cash transfers can transform humanitarian aid
   IPCC, 2023, Climate Change 2022-Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Jha Shikha., 2018, SSRN ELECT J
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lwasa S, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V30, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.012
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Merttens F., 2013, Kenya hunger safety net programme monitoring and evaluation component impact evaluation final report: 2009 to 2012
   Ner NT, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15086953
   OBrien C., 2018, Shock-Responsive Social Protection Systems Research Synthesis Report
   Okyere SA, 2024, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2024.2333738
   Oxford Policy Management (OPM), 2015, Shock-responsive Social Protection Systems Working Paper No. 1
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   ROY Manoj., 2011, Poverty and climate change in urban Bangladesh (CLIMURB): an analytical framework, DOI 10.2139/ssrn.1833503
   Satterthwaite D, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.002
   Schwan S, 2018, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V10, P43, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-01-2017-0019
   Simpson NP, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P937, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01171-x
   Sinha S, 2022, WORLD DEV, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106031
   SMITH A.B., 2024, 2023: A historic year of U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters
   Ulrichs M., 2016, How can social protection build resilience? Insights from Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda, Building Resilience and Adaptation to Climate Extremes and Disasters (BRACED) Working paper
   Ulrichs M, 2019, DISASTERS, V43, pS368, DOI 10.1111/disa.12339
   UN-ISDR, 2024, Disaster impacts 2000-2012
   UNFCCC, 2017, Exec. Comm. Wars. Int. Mech. Loss Damage
   United Nations, 2018, Climate and Environment
   Vincent K., 2024, Adaptive social protection: Making concepts a reality
   Wamsler C, 2014, ROUTL CRIT INTRO URB, P3
   Weldegebriel ZB, 2013, DEV POLICY REV, V31, P35, DOI 10.1111/dpr.12038
   Wemegah CS, 2020, SCI AFR, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00426
   World Bank, 2016, Sahel Adaptive Social Protection Program Trust Fund
   Ziervogel G, 2022, CLIM POLICY, V22, P607, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1863180
NR 59
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 3
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 1462-9011
EI 1873-6416
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLICY
JI Environ. Sci. Policy
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 163
AR 103952
DI 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103952
EA NOV 2024
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA N3Q5K
UT WOS:001363525600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jhagroe, S
AF Jhagroe, Shivant
TI Fences, seeds and bees: The more-than-human politics of community
   gardening in Rotterdam
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE more-than-human; ethics; resilience; sustainability; urban assemblage;
   urban gardening
ID SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; URBAN; RESILIENCE; CITIES; PLACE;
   ASSEMBLAGES; GOVERNANCE
AB This paper explores the more-than-human politics of a community garden in Rotterdam, as an expression of sustainable and resilient city making. Challenging the anthropocentrism underlying most research on the politics of urban sustainability/resilient and urban gardening, the paper pro-poses a more-than-human assemblage approach to urban gardening politics. I argue that urban gardens can be understood as more-than-human configurations and conceptualised as urban gar- den assemblages . Such assemblages are processes with different temporalities and types of agencies (insects, plants, soil and fences) and can be analytically understood as more-than-human: (1) relations and performances; (2) power hierarchies/resistances; and (3) ethical co-becomings. Building on participatory ethnography, interviews and (online) documents, the paper then presents an empirical account of the Gandhi-garden, a community garden in Rotterdam, embedded in the global Transition T owns movement. The empirical case shows how mundane acts of pulling weeds and using permacultural planting methods are more-than-human place-making practices. It also highlights how, for example, human-soil, human-seed and human-bee entanglements challenge urban neoliberalism while gardeners experiment with sustainable food and a non-violent economy. The paper illustrates the ethico-political expressions of more-than-human communitygardening through solidarity bonds with Palestine via olive trees and non-violence thinking, as well as some human/non-human ambivalences when dealing with dog waste and potentially harvest- stealing birds. Finally, the paper presents some reflections and contributions regarding scholarship in the fields of urban gardening, and sustainable/resilient city making.
C1 [Jhagroe, Shivant] Leiden Univ, The Hague, Netherlands.
   [Jhagroe, Shivant] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Fac Global Governance & Affairs, Campus The Hague,Turfmarkt 99, NL-2511 DP The Hague, Netherlands.
C3 Leiden University; Leiden University - Excl LUMC; Leiden University;
   Leiden University - Excl LUMC
RP Jhagroe, S (corresponding author), Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Adm, Fac Global Governance & Affairs, Campus The Hague,Turfmarkt 99, NL-2511 DP The Hague, Netherlands.
EM s.s.jhagroe@fgga.leidenuniv.nl
OI Jhagroe, Shivant/0000-0002-1487-9242
CR Aiken G, 2012, GEOGR COMPASS, V6, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00475.x
   Alexander S, 2018, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P173, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4792-3_10
   Allen Adriana., 2017, Environmental Justice and Urban Resilience in the Global South New York, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-47354-76
   Amoako C, 2020, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V21, P371, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2020.1776377
   Anguelovski I, 2019, PROG HUM GEOG, V43, P1064, DOI 10.1177/0309132518803799
   Artmann M, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P967, DOI 10.1007/s11625-021-00911-4
   Barad Karen., 2007, M UNIVERSE HALFWAY Q
   Bender T., 2010, Urban assemblages: how actor-network theory changes urban studies, P303
   Bennett J, 2004, POLIT THEORY, V32, P347, DOI 10.1177/0090591703260853
   Bennett Jane., 2010, VIBRANT MATTER
   Blok A., 2014, CITY, V18, P269, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.906715, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2014.906715]
   BOGADO D., 2019, The right to the city and social ecology: towards democratic and ecological cities, P155
   Braidotti Rosi., 2016, Resisting Biopolitics: Philosophical, Political, and Performative Strategies, P42
   Braidotti Rosi, 2019, Posthuman knowledge
   Brenner Neilcd., 2014, Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization
   Camponeschi C, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V41, P130, DOI 10.1177/23996544221117942
   Carter N, 2014, ONCOL NURS FORUM, V41, P545, DOI 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
   Certomà C, 2016, GEOGR ANN B, V98, P109, DOI 10.1111/geob.12094
   Certomà C, 2015, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P1123, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2015.1053724
   Certomà C, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P977, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.592181
   Certoma Chiara., 2015, RCC Perspectives, P13, DOI [DOI 10.5282/RCC/6920, 10.2307/26241301, DOI 10.2307/26241301]
   Clary-Lemon J., 2022, DECOLONIAL CONVERSAT
   Coaffee J, 2017, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V5, P161, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2016.1241475
   Coole D., 2010, NEW MAT ONTOLOGY AGE, P1, DOI DOI 10.1215/9780822392996
   Crossan J, 2016, ANTIPODE, V48, P937, DOI 10.1111/anti.12220
   Del Monte B, 2022, TECNOSCIENZA, V13, P47
   Durose C, 2022, URBAN STUD, V59, P2129, DOI 10.1177/00420980211031431
   Ernwein M, 2014, GEOFORUM, V56, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.016
   Evans P., 2002, LIVABLE CITIES URBAN
   Farias I., 2011, City, V15, P365, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2011.595110, 10.1080/13604813.2011.595110]
   Farias I., 2010, Urban Assemblages: How Actor- Network Theory Changes Urban Studies
   Ferguson KE, 2015, CONTEMP POLIT THEORY, V14, P79
   Foucault Michel., 2019, PENAL THEORIES I LEC
   Fox N.J., 2017, SOCIOLOGY NEW MATERI
   Fox NJ, 2020, BRIT J SOCIOL, V71, P269, DOI 10.1111/1468-4446.12734
   Franklin A, 2017, SOCIOL REV, V65, P202, DOI 10.1111/1467-954X.12396
   Frantzeskaki N, 2018, SUSTAIN SCI, V13, P1045, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0562-5
   Frantzeskaki N, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P542, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0
   Gandhituin.nl, ONS
   Gibson K., MANIFESTO LIVING ANT, P1
   Hallsmith Gwendolyn., 2011, Creating Wealth: Growing Local Economies With Local Currencies
   Haraway D., 2008, Queering the non/human, pxxiii
   Haraway D. J., 2008, When Species Meet, V3
   Heynen NikolasC., 2006, In the Nature of Cities, P1, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203027523
   Holmberg T., 2015, URBAN ANIMALS CROWDI
   Houston D, 2018, PLAN THEOR, V17, P190, DOI 10.1177/1473095216688042
   Jacobs JM, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P412, DOI 10.1177/0309132511421715
   Jhagroe S., 2016, Urban transition politics. How struggles for sustainability are (re)making urban space
   Jhagroe S, 2019, POLITICS GOV, V7, P190, DOI 10.17645/pag.v7i4.2192
   Johannessen Jim., 2015, Current Urban Studies, V03, P402, DOI [10.4236/cus.2015.34031, DOI 10.4236/CUS.2015.34031]
   Jon I, 2020, PLAN THEOR, V19, P392, DOI 10.1177/1473095220912770
   Kaika M, 2000, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V24, P120, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00239
   Kaika M, 2006, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V96, P276, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00478.x
   Kinkaid E, 2020, AREA, V52, P480, DOI 10.1111/area.12600
   Langemeyer J, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104055
   Latham A, 2004, PROG HUM GEOG, V28, P701, DOI 10.1191/0309132504ph515oa
   Latour B., 1993, WE HAVE NEVER BEEN M
   Lawhon M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P354, DOI 10.1177/0309132511427960
   Lawrence AM, 2022, PROG HUM GEOG, V46, P629, DOI 10.1177/03091325211062167
   Lien ME, 2021, ETHNOS, V86, P1, DOI 10.1080/00141844.2019.1628796
   Locke P., 2015, Multispecies ethnography
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Magnusson W, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P1561, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12144
   Maller C., 2018, Healthy Urban Environments: More-than-Human Theories
   Maller C, 2021, CITIES, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103155
   Margulies JD, 2019, POLIT GEOGR, V69, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.12.011
   McClintock N, 2014, LOCAL ENVIRON, V19, P147, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.752797
   McFarlane C., 2011, City, V15, P204, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2011.568715, 10.1080/13604813.2011.568715]
   Milbourne P, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P2901, DOI 10.1177/0042098020972281
   Moore L.J., 2013, Buzz: urban beekeeping and the power of the bee
   Müüripeal A, 2023, CITIES, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104336
   Naylor L, 2017, GEOGR REV, V107, P572, DOI 10.1111/gere.12258
   Nevens F, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   Oliver C, 2023, URBAN STUD, V60, P519, DOI 10.1177/00420980221104975
   Phillips C, 2020, AUST GEOGR, V51, P155, DOI 10.1080/00049182.2018.1505285
   Phillips J, 2021, ENVIRON PLANN A, V53, P1031, DOI 10.1177/0308518X20986807
   Pink S, 2008, ETHNOGRAPHY, V9, P175, DOI 10.1177/1466138108089467
   Ploger J., 2006, URBAN VITALIS SPACE, V9, P382
   Plumwood V, 2009, AUST HUMANIT REV, P111
   Plumwood Val., 2002, ENV CULTURE ECOLOGIC, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203996430
   Porter L, 2020, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V21, P293, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959
   Prigogine I, 1997, The End of Certainty
   Rosén AP, 2022, INT J DES, V16, P21, DOI 10.57698/v16i3.02
   Rotter-dam, MISSIE
   Rutherford J, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P1449, DOI 10.1177/0042098013500088
   SHINGNE M, 2021, GLOB URB STUD, P30
   Springgay S, 2018, ROUTL ADV RES METHOD, P1
   Steele W, 2019, GEOFORUM, V106, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.007
   Swyngedouw E., 2011, Philosophy-Supplements Only, V69, P253, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1358246111000300
   Swyngedouw E., 2017, NEW GEOGRAPHIES, V1, P20
   Swyngedouw Erik., 1996, CAPITALISM NATURE SO, V7, P65, DOI [10.1080/10455759609358679, DOI 10.1080/10455759609358679]
   Tampio N, 2009, EUR J POLIT THEORY, V8, P383, DOI 10.1177/1474885109103850
   The Guardian, 2013, GUARDIAN        0526
   Tierney K, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P1327, DOI 10.1177/0002764215591187
   Tornaghi Chiaraet., 2019, Urban Gardening as Politics
   Tracey David., 2007, GUERRILLA GARDENING
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van Dooren T, 2016, ENVIRON HUMANITIES, V8, P1, DOI 10.1215/22011919-3527695
   Voedselbank Rotterdam, 2002 2022 20 JAAR AR
   Wachsmuth D, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P1038, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1417819
   Wakefield S, 2022, CULT GEOGR, V29, P389, DOI 10.1177/14744740211029278
   Whitehead AlfredNorth., 2013, The Concept of Nature
   Widder Nathan., 2012, Political Theory after Deleuze
   Yigitcanlar T, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V45, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 105
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 6
U2 21
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 61
IS 8
BP 1488
EP 1507
DI 10.1177/00420980231208830
EA NOV 2023
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA SO7D1
UT WOS:001111329700001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liao, ZJ
   Zhang, LJ
AF Liao, Zhenjie
   Zhang, Lijuan
TI Spatio-temporal analysis and simulation of urban ecological resilience
   in Guangzhou City based on the FLUS model
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NEIGHBORHOOD; HEALTH; IMPACT
AB Prediction of urban ecological risk, which is increasing with the rapid development of China's economy, has become more complex and difficult, resulting in great damage to the safety of people's lives and property and the quality of the ecological environment. Elucidation of the change mechanism of the urban ecological resilience level from the perspective of the resilience characteristics and exploration of the spatiotemporal differences of the urban ability are necessary to prevent and resolve ecological risks. To this end, here, a model for the evaluation of urban ecological resilience was constructed by considering three aspects: resistance, adaptability, and resilience. The spatiotemporal change pattern of urban ecological resilience in Guangzhou from 2000 to 2020 was evaluated. Furthermore, a spatial autocorrelation model was used to explore the management model of Guangzhou's ecological resilience in 2020. Finally, based on the FLUS model, the spatial pattern of urban land use under the 2035 benchmark and innovation- and entrepreneurship-oriented scenarios was simulated and the spatial distribution of the ecological resilience level under different urban development scenarios was evaluated. We found that from 2000 to 2020, areas with a low ecological resilience expanded to the northeast and southeast, whereas areas with a high ecological resilience significantly decreased; from 2000 to 2010, original high-level regions in the northeast and east of Guangzhou were transformed into medium level regions. Further, in 2020, the southwestern region of the city will show a low level of resilience and high density of pollutant discharge enterprises, indicating that the ability to prevent and resolve environmental and ecological risks in this region is relatively low. Additionally, the overall ecological resilience of Guangzhou under the innovation- and entrepreneurship-oriented "City of Innovation" urban development scenario is higher than that under the benchmark scenario in 2035. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for the development of resilient urban ecological environment.
C1 [Liao, Zhenjie; Zhang, Lijuan] Guangzhou Huashang Coll, Sch Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
RP Zhang, LJ (corresponding author), Guangzhou Huashang Coll, Sch Management, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
EM 281746568@qq.com
RI Zhang, Lijuan/JYP-4629-2024
OI Zhang, Lijuan/0000-0002-2658-1574
FU Guangzhou Huashang College [2022HSDS22, 2021HSXK10]; Philosophy and
   Social Sciences of Guangzhou in the 14th Five-year Period [2021GZGJ73];
   Philosophy and Social Sciences of Guangdong Province in the 13th
   Five-year Period [GD20XGL06]; Guangzhou Science Plan Project
   [202201011273]
FX This study received support from the following sources: a Grant from the
   Guangzhou Huashang College (No. 2022HSDS22); a Grant from the Guangzhou
   Huashang College (No. 2021HSXK10); the Philosophy and Social Sciences of
   Guangzhou in the 14th Five-year Period (2021GZGJ73); the Philosophy and
   Social Sciences of Guangdong Province in the 13th Five-year Period
   (GD20XGL06); a Grant from the Guangzhou Science Plan Project (No.
   202201011273).
CR Afriyanie D, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102710
   Aoki N, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.025
   Bouzarovski S, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P2689, DOI 10.1177/0042098010385158
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chiang YC, 2018, CITIES, V74, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.001
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   Cowell MM, 2013, CITIES, V30, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.001
   Dahal KR, 2015, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V29, P475, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2014.987779
   Darabi H, 2022, POLLUTION, V8, P963, DOI 10.22059/POLL.2022.337087.1326
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Grillitsch M, 2020, PROG HUM GEOG, V44, P704, DOI 10.1177/0309132519853870
   He L., 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V720, P178
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Jha AK, 2013, Building Urban Resilience Principles, Tools, and, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
   Jiménez M, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01587-9
   Liang X, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V177, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016
   Liao JF, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V75, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.014
   Liao KH, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.014
   Liao ZJ, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0276175
   Liao ZJ, 2022, J MATH-UK, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/2873707
   Liao ZJ, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0257400
   Liu XP, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V168, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
   Luis AG., 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V92, P1
   Marsal-Llacuna ML, 2016, CITIES, V55, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.02.006
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   McClintock N, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V148, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.008
   Mngumi LE, 2021, GEOJOURNAL, V86, P339, DOI 10.1007/s10708-019-10071-9
   Moreno N, 2009, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V33, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.09.008
   Muller B, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V154, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.020
   Peng J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007
   Peterson GD, 2002, ECOSYSTEMS, V5, P329, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0077-1
   Roy M, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.022
   Samuelsson K, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V171, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009
   Sardeshpande M, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.686254
   TURNER MG, 1989, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V20, P171, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131
   van Vliet J, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN B, V39, P198, DOI 10.1068/b36015
   Wang GZ, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107540
   Wrana J, 2019, AREA DEV POLICY, V4, P455, DOI 10.1080/23792949.2019.1608838
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   [夏楚瑜 Xia Chuyu], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P116
   Yu GM, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V44, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.010
   Zhang D, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106841
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
NR 44
TC 30
Z9 30
U1 83
U2 206
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD MAY 6
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 1
AR 7400
DI 10.1038/s41598-023-33342-5
PG 15
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA L7SM6
UT WOS:001025221400001
PM 37149655
OA Green Published, gold
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Stumpp, EM
AF Stumpp, Eva-Maria
TI New in town? On resilience and "Resilient Cities"
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Sustainability; Planning theory; Environmental
   planning; Complexity; Trans-disciplinary research; Collaborative
   projects
AB Looking at the programme and the range of conferences in spatial planning around Europe in recent years, resilience seems to be the new buzzword in urban-regional matters. As such it is following sustainability, sometimes even used interchangeably. It is argued that, with a sound theoretical framework for an urban regional context still pending, it is difficult to apply resilience as a new paradigm to planning practice. Based on conceptual thoughts on resilience particularly in relation to the concept of sustainability, this contribution suggests that one challenge for urban regional resilience is the need for intensified collaboration between different disciplines as well as between science and practice. It concludes with suggestions on how to approach this challenge using existing platforms such as conferences or collaborative projects. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 Univ Stuttgart, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, ILPOE Inst Landscape Planning & Ecol, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
C3 University of Stuttgart
RP Stumpp, EM (corresponding author), Univ Stuttgart, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, ILPOE Inst Landscape Planning & Ecol, Keplerstr 11, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany.
EM ems@ilpoe.uni-stuttgart.de
CR AESOP, 1930, AESOP ANN C
   [Anonymous], ICLEI
   Burkner Hans-Joachim, 2010, WORKING PAPER
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Deppisch S., 2010, GERMAN ANN SPATIAL R
   ECCA, CONF
   EU, 2004, EV EFF NEW INSTR FRA
   Felgentreff C., 2012, SCHRIFTENREIHE FORSC
   ICLEI, 2012, C NUMB
   TURAS, WORK PROGR
NR 10
TC 64
Z9 75
U1 5
U2 86
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUN
PY 2013
VL 32
BP 164
EP 166
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.003
PG 3
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 178BX
UT WOS:000321420200021
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Krueger, EH
   Borchardt, D
   Jawitz, JW
   Klammler, H
   Yang, S
   Zischg, J
   Rao, PSC
AF Krueger, E. H.
   Borchardt, D.
   Jawitz, J. W.
   Klammler, H.
   Yang, S.
   Zischg, J.
   Rao, P. S. C.
TI Resilience Dynamics of Urban Water Supply Security and Potential of
   Tipping Points
SO EARTHS FUTURE
LA English
DT Article
DE systems dynamics modeling; coupled natural-human-engineered systems
   (CNHES); adaptive capacity; water management; stochastic shocks; Capital
   Portfolio Approach (CPA)
ID ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; REGIME SHIFTS; MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; LESSONS;
   POVERTY; METRICS; SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY; CHENNAI
AB Cities are the drivers of socioeconomic innovation and are also forced to address the accelerating risk of failure in providing essential services such as water supply today and in the future. Here, we investigate the resilience of urban water supply security, which is defined in terms of the services that citizens receive. The resilience of services is determined by the availability and robustness of critical system elements or "capitals" (water resources, infrastructure, finances, management efficacy, and community adaptation). We translate quantitative information about this portfolio of capitals from seven contrasting cities on four continents into parameters of a coupled system dynamics model. Water services are disrupted by recurring stochastic shocks, and we simulate the dynamics of impact and recovery cycles. Resilience emerges under various constraints, expressed in terms of each city's capital portfolio. Systematic assessment of the parameter space produces the urban water resilience landscape, and we determine the position of each city along a continuous gradient from water insecure and nonresilient to secure and resilient systems. In several cities stochastic disturbance regimes challenge steady-state conditions and drive system collapse. While water insecure and nonresilient cities risk being pushed into a poverty trap, cities which have developed excess capitals risk being trapped in rigidity and crossing a tipping point from high to low services and collapse. Where public services are insufficient, community adaptation improves water security and resilience to varying degrees. Our results highlight the need for resilience thinking in the governance of urban water systems under global change pressures.
C1 [Krueger, E. H.; Borchardt, D.] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Aquat Ecosyst Anal, Leipzig, Germany.
   [Krueger, E. H.; Yang, S.; Rao, P. S. C.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Jawitz, J. W.] Univ Florida, Soil & Water Sci Dept, Gainesville, FL USA.
   [Klammler, H.] Univ Florida, ESSIE, Gainesville, FL USA.
   [Klammler, H.] Univ Fed Bahia, Dept Geosci, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   [Zischg, J.] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Infrastruct, Unit Environm Engn, Innsbruck, Austria.
   [Rao, P. S. C.] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research
   (UFZ); Purdue University System; Purdue University; State University
   System of Florida; University of Florida; State University System of
   Florida; University of Florida; Universidade Federal da Bahia;
   University of Innsbruck; Purdue University System; Purdue University
RP Krueger, EH (corresponding author), UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Aquat Ecosyst Anal, Leipzig, Germany.; Krueger, EH (corresponding author), Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
EM ekrueger@princeton.edu
RI Srinivasa Rao, Prof. P/ABG-1688-2021; Klammler, Harald/J-1634-2012;
   Borchardt, Dietrich/D-1729-2009; Krueger, Elisabeth/AEW-8947-2022; Yang,
   Soohyun/HZK-4421-2023
OI Rao, P. Suresh C./0000-0002-5982-3736; Klammler,
   Harald/0000-0002-7808-721X; Borchardt, Dietrich/0000-0002-6074-2829;
   Zischg, Jonatan/0000-0002-7506-1073; Krueger,
   Elisabeth/0000-0003-0630-3363; Yang, Soohyun/0000-0002-9125-9880
FU Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ; Lynn Fellowship -
   ESE-IGP; Purdue Climate Change Research Center (PCCRC) at Purdue
   University; Lee A. Rieth Endowment in the Lyles School of Civil
   Engineering, Purdue University; NSF [1441188]; Emerging Frontiers &
   Multidisciplinary Activities; Directorate For Engineering [1441188]
   Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX Research reported here was initiated in the frame of the Network
   Synthesis Workshop Series (2015-2018). The authors thank the workshop
   hosts and organizers, mentors, and participants for fruitful
   discussions. The authors acknowledge the Jordanian Ministry of Water and
   Irrigation for assistance and Miyahuna Jordan Water Company for sharing
   data used in this study. Financial support for E. K. and D. B. was
   provided by Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ and for E.
   K. from Lynn Fellowship awarded by ESE-IGP, as well as from Purdue
   Climate Change Research Center (PCCRC) at Purdue University. PSCR
   financial support came from Lee A. Rieth Endowment in the Lyles School
   of Civil Engineering, Purdue University. This work was also supported by
   NSF Award 1441188. We thank the Editor, Patricia Romero-Lankao, and
   three anonymous referees for valuable comments, which have greatly
   helped improve the manuscript. Data supporting the conclusions are
   listed in Tables 1 and 2 and in the SI.
CR Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   [Anonymous], AMMAN WATER SUPPLY P
   [Anonymous], 2016, FRONT PAGE AFRI 1213
   [Anonymous], 2004, ECOLOGY SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00650-090205
   [Anonymous], STAT WAT MEX
   [Anonymous], ENV INNOV SOC TRANSI
   [Anonymous], TRENDS URB RES 2017
   [Anonymous], 2016, FRONT PAGE AFRI 0403
   Audefroy J. F., 2018, ADV CIVIL ENG TECHNO, V1, P6, DOI [10.31031/ACET.2018.01.000519, DOI 10.31031/ACET.2018.01.000519]
   Bell S., 2017, FUTURE CIT, V6, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42686-0
   Béné C, 2014, J INT DEV, V26, P598, DOI 10.1002/jid.2992
   Bonn T, 2013, WATER POLICY, V15, P728, DOI 10.2166/wp.2013.007
   Brown K, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905
   Bryan BA, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117600
   Carpenter SR, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Chelleri L, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.016
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Cho D, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V97, P257, DOI 10.1007/s11205-009-9501-2
   Cutter S., 2015, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
   Dadson S, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P6425, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020640
   Damkjaer S, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P513, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0912-z
   DFID, 1999, Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets, Section 2.1
   Di Baldassarre G, 2017, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V8, P1, DOI 10.5194/esd-8-225-2017
   Eakin HC, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.013
   Eakin H, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.001
   Eakin H, 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V114, pE2063, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1701666114
   Eakin H, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.006
   Edelstein MichaelR., 2004, Contaminated Communities: Coping with Residential Toxic Exposure, V2nd
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist T, 2018, SUSTAIN SCI, V13, P1549, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0611-0
   European Environment Agency (EEA), 2009, WATER RESOURCES EURO, P1, DOI [10.2800/16803, DOI 10.2800/16803]
   Ferguson BC, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7300, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.045
   Ferguson BC, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V117, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.016
   Flörke M, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P51, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Garfin GM, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.007
   Garrick D, 2014, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V39, P611, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-013012-093817
   Gawel E, 2013, WATER POLICY, V15, P19, DOI 10.2166/wp.2012.192
   Gerlach E, 2009, GEOFORUM, V40, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.11.002
   Giuffrida A., 2017, GUARDIAN
   Gopakumar G, 2009, PUBLIC WORKS MANAG P, V14, P109, DOI 10.1177/1087724X09350629
   Grimm NB, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1255
   Gunderson L.H., 2002, Panarchy
   Hadadin N, 2010, DESALINATION, V250, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2009.01.026
   Hale RL, 2015, EARTHS FUTURE, V3, P110, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000295
   Hares S., 2018, REUTERS
   Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Societ y (IHS), 2018, Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 o C, V38, P1, DOI [10.1177/0333102417738202, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
   Henzler AF, 2014, J CONTAM HYDROL, V156, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.10.005
   Hoekstra AY, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaba52
   Hoekstra AY, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3232, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1109936109
   International Resources Group (IRG), 2013, I SUPP STRENTH PROGR
   Ishtiaque A, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI [10.5751/ES-09186-220305, 10.5751/es-09186-220305]
   Jamwal N., 2019, WIRE
   Jenerette GD, 2006, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V50, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.01.004
   Joo Y, 2017, ADV ELECTRON MATER, V3, DOI 10.1002/aelm.201600455
   Jun Hwandon., 2005, Strategic valve locations in a water distribution system
   Juran L, 2017, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V33, P955, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2016.1253543
   Kirchhoff CJ, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.003
   Klammler H., 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P140, DOI 10.1007/s10669-017-9649-2
   Klassert C, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P3643, DOI 10.3390/w7073643
   Krueger E, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V56, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.009
   Lade SJ, 2013, THEOR ECOL-NETH, V6, P359, DOI 10.1007/s12080-013-0187-3
   Langhans SD, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V45, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.014
   Langmuir I, 1918, J AM CHEM SOC, V40, P1361, DOI 10.1021/ja02242a004
   Lankao PR, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P157, DOI 10.1177/0956247809362636
   Larsen TA, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P928, DOI 10.1126/science.aad8641
   Lee P.O., 2005, WAT MAINL SE AS 29 N
   Lemos MC, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.004
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Liu JG, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P466, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8
   Liu JK, 2017, IEEE J TRANSL ENG HE, V5, DOI 10.1109/JTEHM.2016.2639481
   Marlow DR, 2013, WATER RES, V47, P7150, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.046
   Maxmen A, 2018, NATURE, V554, P13, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-01134-x
   McDonald RI, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.022
   McDonald RI, 2011, AMBIO, V40, P437, DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0152-6
   McPhearson T, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P198, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw002
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Moeller K., 2008, WASSERVERSORGUNGSKON
   Muneepeerakul R, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P865, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000562
   Myagmarsuren S., 2015, Current situation analysis and recommendation on the improvement of water supply service and access to water in Ger area of Ulaanbaatar
   Padowski JC, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4913, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1461-0
   Padowski JC, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2012WR012335
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Park J, 2014, J CONTAM HYDROL, V169, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.08.005
   Parks R., 2019, 29 GRANTH I
   Potter RB, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC A, V368, P5299, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0182
   Public Utilities Board (PUB), 2017, PUB ANN REP 2016 201
   Qing D., 2008, BEIJINGS WATER CRISI
   Rao P.S. C., 2017, Decision Analysis Today, V36, P25
   Rodriguez-Iturbe I, 1999, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY, V455, P3789, DOI 10.1098/rspa.1999.0477
   Romero-Lankao P, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V90, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.004
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.002
   Roozbahani A, 2013, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V27, P923, DOI 10.1007/s00477-012-0614-9
   Rosenberg DE, 2008, WATER RESOUR RES, V44, DOI 10.1029/2007WR006519
   Rosenberg DE, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005340
   Ruet J, 2007, CITIES, V24, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2006.10.001
   Scheffer M, 2009, CRITICAL TRANSITIONS
   Scheffer M, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P11883, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1810630115
   Scheffer M, 2009, NATURE, V461, P53, DOI 10.1038/nature08227
   Sigel K, 2012, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V65, P1561, DOI 10.1007/s12665-011-1221-7
   Smit B, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P877
   Smith C., 2013, WATER SUPPLY MONROVI
   Spiller M, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V149, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.031
   Srinivasan V., 2008, THESIS STANFORD U ST
   Srinivasan V, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.002
   Srinivasan V, 2010, WATER INT, V35, P254, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2010.487931
   Subramanian M., 2019, NY TIMES
   Sukru O., 2004, Water resource systems management tools, V7, P1
   Sullivan C, 2002, WORLD DEV, V30, P1195, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00035-9
   Tellman B, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI [10.5751/ES-09712-230101, 10.5751/es-09712-230101]
   Tingting D., 2017, GUARDIAN
   Unicef, 2018, MEX EARTHQ HUM SIT R
   *UNISDR, 2017, DIS RES SCOR CIT DET
   United Nations, 2018, SUST DEV GOALS REP
   Varady RG, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.001
   Vincent K, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.009
   Vincent L, 2014, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V70, P787, DOI 10.2166/wst.2014.290
   Waters J, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.011
   Webb R, 2018, AMBIO, V47, P57, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
   Wilder M, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.008
   WORLD BANK, 2015, WAT AV PER CAP
   Wutich Amber, 2017, Water Secur, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.09.001
   Wutich A, 2008, SOC SCI MED, V67, P2116, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.042
   Ziegler AD, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P4543, DOI 10.1002/hyp.10212
   Zischg J, 2019, WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2019: HYDRAULICS, WATERWAYS, AND WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS, P484
   Zug S, 2014, WATER ALTERN, V7, P140
NR 129
TC 27
Z9 30
U1 5
U2 74
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
EI 2328-4277
J9 EARTHS FUTURE
JI Earth Future
PD OCT
PY 2019
VL 7
IS 10
BP 1167
EP 1191
DI 10.1029/2019EF001306
EA OCT 2019
PG 25
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA JM3DH
UT WOS:000492075100001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fitzgibbons, J
   Mitchell, CL
AF Fitzgibbons, Joanne
   Mitchell, Carrie L.
TI Inclusive resilience: Examining a case study of equity-centred strategic
   planning in Toronto, Canada
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Collaborative planning; Equity; Governance; Justice;
   Dialogic approaches
ID URBAN CLIMATE RESILIENCE; DISASTER RISK REDUCTION; SOCIAL-CHANGE;
   JUSTICE; PARTICIPATION; ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY; SYSTEMS; DIRECTIONS;
   FRAMEWORK
AB Existing but limited empirical research suggests that while inclusivity, equity and justice are centrally important to building resilience, City governments do not consistently prioritize equity in resultant plans. Hence, more research is needed to unearth pathways toward equitable resilience planning. The goal of this paper is to contribute to this empirical gap, asking whether and how principles of justice have been incorporated in in-situ resilience planning. We explore a case study from one participating City in the "100 Resilient Cities" (100RC) program, Toronto. Using key informant interviews and document analysis, we examine how Toronto addressed equity and inclusion throughout the "ResilientTO" public engagement process. We find that Toronto's Resilient Conversations approach supports the notion that programs that treat resilience as a process of negotiation rather than a discrete outcome can help to advance procedural justice. We analyze the benefits and limitations to applying the theory of negotiated resilience in relation to common criticisms of collaborative planning. We find that certain bureaucratic norms, such as a tendency toward project-based planning and consultation, impede the transformative potential of negotiated resilience in practice. The findings of this research can inform more procedurally just strategic planning processes in North American cities.
C1 [Fitzgibbons, Joanne] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Mitchell, Carrie L.] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
C3 University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo
RP Fitzgibbons, J (corresponding author), Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
EM jo.fitzgibbons@ubc.ca; carrie.mitchell@uwaterloo.ca
FU Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
   Insight Development Grants [430-2017-00135]; Canada Graduate
   Scholarships program; Province of Ontario's Ontario Graduate Scholarship
FX This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research
   Council of Canada (SSHRC) Insight Development Grants (#430-2017-00135)
   and Canada Graduate Scholarships program, and the Province of Ontario's
   Ontario Graduate Scholarship. These funders had no involvement in study
   design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the
   writing of the report; or the decision to submit the article for
   publication.
CR Agyeman J, 2003, URBAN IND ENVIRON, P1
   Agyeman J, 2016, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V41, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090052
   Aldunce P, 2016, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V15, P58, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2015.1134427
   Aldunce P, 2014, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V23, P252, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2013-0130
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Amar A.K., 2015, Canadian Journal of Urban Research, V24, P43
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2015, Canada's residential schools: Reconciliation, V6, DOI [10.2307/j.ctt19qghck, DOI 10.2307/J.CTT19QGHCK]
   [Anonymous], THEORY COMMUNICATIVE
   [Anonymous], 2019, TORONTOS 1 RESILIENC
   [Anonymous], 2015, TORONTO STRONG NEIGH
   Archer D, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.007
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Bazilian MD, 2018, EXTRACT IND SOC, V5, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.002
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Berkowitz, 2019, UPDATE 100 RESILIENT
   Blok A, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2803, DOI 10.1177/0042098019891050
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Bulkeley H, 2013, LOCAL ENVIRON, V18, P646, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2013.788479
   Bulkeley H, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P914, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.010
   Burt R. S., 2005, Constructing Grounded Theory
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Doberstein B, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V98, P31, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3529-z
   Ejaz M., 2018, RESILIENT CONVERSATI
   Fainstein SS, 2000, URBAN AFF REV, V35, P451, DOI 10.1177/107808740003500401
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, DATA BRIEF, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104328
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   FRASER N, 1995, NEW LEFT REV, P68
   Fraser Nancy., 1997, JUSTUS INTERRUPTUS
   Friend R, 2015, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V6, P643, DOI 10.1002/wcc.364
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Gillard R, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P251, DOI 10.1002/wcc.384
   Gillard R, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P13, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00334
   Gueye M, 2005, Community Capacity Enhancement Strategy Note: The Answer Lies Within
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Healey P, 1996, ENVIRON PLANN B, V23, P217, DOI 10.1068/b230217
   Healey P, 1998, ENVIRON PLANN A, V30, P1531, DOI 10.1068/a301531
   Höppner C, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.005
   Hulchanski B. Y. J. D., 2010, 3 CITIES TORONTO INC
   Innes JE, 1999, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V65, P9, DOI 10.1080/01944369908976031
   Innes JE, 1999, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V65, P412, DOI 10.1080/01944369908976071
   Innes JE, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P460, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975712
   IPCC, 2014, Technical Report
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Lawless JL, 2001, SOC PROBL, V48, P362, DOI 10.1525/sp.2001.48.3.362
   Lefebvre H., 1968, Anthropos
   Legacy C, 2017, PLAN THEOR, V16, P425, DOI 10.1177/1473095216667433
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Martin Carlos, 2018, Institutionalizing Urban Resilience: A Midterm Monitoring and Evaluation Report of 100 Resilient Cities
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Menzel S, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05154-180113
   Miller C, 2014, 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ETHICS IN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Nelson Mandela Foundation, 2010, HIV AIDS 2010 COMM C, P439
   Nelson Mandela Foundation, 2009, COMM CONV COMM EMBR
   Pearsall H, 2016, SOCIOL RES ONLINE, V21, DOI 10.5153/sro.3979
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P593, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
   Purcell M, 2014, J URBAN AFF, V36, P141, DOI 10.1111/juaf.12034
   Reckien D, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P159, DOI 10.1177/0956247816677778
   Redman CL, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06390-190237
   Reed SO, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P393, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501136
   Rolston I. A., 2010, CONVERSATION CONVERS
   Rolston IA, 2016, AJAR-AFR J AIDS RES, V15, P173, DOI 10.2989/16085906.2016.1204332
   Romero P, 2016, SCI TRANSL MED, V8, DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf0685
   Schlosberg D, 2012, ETHICS INT AFF, V26, P445, DOI 10.1017/S0892679412000615
   SEN A, 1979, J PHILOS, V76, P463, DOI 10.2307/2025934
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Silver H, 2010, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V34, P453, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00963.x
   STAR SL, 1989, SOC STUD SCI, V19, P387, DOI 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Stumpp EM, 2013, CITIES, V32, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.003
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2015, CIT RES IND
   VERBA S, 1993, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V23, P453, DOI 10.1017/S0007123400006694
   Verba Sidney., 1995, Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics
   Wagner CL, 2009, ENVIRON MANAGE, V44, P632, DOI 10.1007/s00267-009-9347-z
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   Yanarella ErnestJ., 2014, Sustainability: The Journal of Record, V7, P197, DOI [DOI 10.1089/SUS.2014.9782, 10.1089/sus.2014.9782]
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 81
TC 21
Z9 27
U1 4
U2 51
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 108
AR 102997
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102997
PG 14
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA PC8DR
UT WOS:000597225500001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shukla, N
   Das, A
   Mazumder, TN
AF Shukla, Nitesh
   Das, Arup
   Mazumder, Tarak Nath
TI Decoding urban form resilience and adaptation in flood prone wards of
   Surat, India: Exploring the duality of public-private discourse
SO ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban form; Resilience; Adaptation; Global south; Informality
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; IMPACTS; RISK
AB Cities in the Global South face amplified consequences of climate change due to rapid urbanization, which is predominantly informal and lacks basic infrastructure and emergency support systems. The worst affected sections are those living in informal settlements, generally located in the city's floodplains. The lack of or lag in the state's response to flood hazards creates a need for urban dwellers to adapt to these recurring disturbances. However, there is limited understanding of the implications of these localized interventions for overall urban resilience and how they interact with state-level adaptation efforts. This study explores two layers of resilience phenomena: urban form resilience and the adaptive response of different stakeholders within the urban form. Taking case study of Surat, a city situated on the western ghats of India, the study assesses urban form resilience and the patterns and costs of adaptation through a Rapid Visual Survey (RVS). The findings reveal that formal urban areas have higher resilience scores, while informal settlements exhibit lower resilience scores but more individual adaptation. Individual households alter their physical form by taking measures such as raising the plinth, raising the porch area, constructing a protection wall on the entrance, and constructing a mezzanine floor to cope with recurring flood hazards. However, the cost of these individual adaptations is significantly high for an adapting household as compared to the per household cost of state-led adaptation. The study provides a context-specific input to the ongoing discourse on collaboration between top-down and bottom-up efforts for a resilient and sustainable urban environment.
C1 [Shukla, Nitesh; Das, Arup; Mazumder, Tarak Nath] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Architecture & Reg Planning, Kharagpur 721302, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Kharagpur
RP Shukla, N (corresponding author), IIT Kharagpur, E4MS Hall Residence, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India.
EM niteshshukla2010@gmail.com; arup.das@arp.iitkgp.ac.in;
   taraknm@arp.iitkgp.ac.in
RI Das, Arup/AAS-5643-2021
FX to Neha Jaiswal for her support in translating the budget documents from
   Gujarati to English.
CR Ahmed S., 2020, The Routledge Handbook of Planning Megacities in the Global South, DOI [10.4324/9781003038160-17, DOI 10.4324/9781003038160-17]
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2018, Methodological Guide: A Guide for Calculating Resilience Capacity: Resilience and resilience capacities measurement options
   Bhalkikar A, 2021, STRUCTURES, V29, P1847, DOI 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.026
   Bhan G., 2013, Econ. Polit. Wkly., V158
   Bhat GK, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P429, DOI 10.1177/0956247813495002
   Boston M., 2024, Resilient Cities and Structures, V3, P114, DOI [10.1016/j.rcns.2024.03.005, DOI 10.1016/J.RCNS.2024.03.005]
   Brody SD, 2011, J PLAN EDUC RES, V31, P438, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11419515
   Carman JP, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102062
   Carmichael T., 2019, complex adaptive systems, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2, 10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20309-21, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2_1]
   Chen TY, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P1848, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.065
   Ciardiello F, 2023, ANN OPER RES, V325, P967, DOI 10.1007/s10479-023-05339-w
   Coase RH, 1937, ECONOMICA-NEW SER, V4, P386, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
   Dangol N, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101156
   Daniel C.B., 2019, GIS Based Road Connectivity Evaluation Using Graph Theory
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dhiman R, 2019, APPL WATER SCI, V9, DOI 10.1007/s13201-018-0881-9
   DOVEY K., 2020, Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit
   Dovey K, 2012, INT DEV PLANN REV, V34, P349, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2012.23
   Etkin D., 2014, D2014isaster Theory: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Concept and Causes, Vfirst
   Feliciotti A., 2018, Resilience and urban design: a systems approach to the study of resilience in urban form, DOI [10.48730/yrsa-7747, DOI 10.48730/YRSA-7747]
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Galik A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010526
   Guidotti R, 2016, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V1, P153, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999
   Haas S, 2021, ENVIRON URBAN, V33, P560, DOI 10.1177/0956247821993391
   IPCC, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, P3, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.001, 10.1017/9781009157896.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157926, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324]
   Irvine KN, 2023, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V9, DOI 10.1007/s40899-023-00821-6
   Jabeen H., 2017, Environmental Justice and Urban Resilience in the Global South, P153, DOI [10.1057/978-1-137-47354-79, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-47354-79]
   Jain G., 2017, IIED Working Paper
   Jamshed A, 2024, NAT HAZARDS, V120, P9297, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06267-5
   Jayaraman N., 2016, Chennai's seashore beautification and fisherfolk resistance, India
   Joshi P., 2012, International Journal of Data Mining & Knowledge Management Process, V2, P43, DOI [10.5121/ijdkp.2012.2504, DOI 10.5121/IJDKP.2012.2504]
   Kamelifar M.J., 2013, J. Civ. Eng. Urbanism (JCEU), V3, P380
   Ma ATH, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125123
   Matthews J.B.R., 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nicoletti L., 2022, Disadvantaged communities have lower access to urban infrastructure, DOI [10.48550/arXiv.2203.13784, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2203.13784]
   O'Mathuna DonalP., 2018, Advancing Global Bioethics, P27, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-92722-0_3
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Prabhu J, 2015, ASIA PAC J MANAG, V32, P843, DOI 10.1007/s10490-015-9445-9
   Prana AM, 2024, PROG PLANN, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2024.100851
   Ramendra Singh Ramendra Singh, 2012, International Journal of Rural Management, V8, P87, DOI 10.1177/0973005212461995
   Revi A, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P207, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089157
   Satterthwaite D, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.002
   Sevtsuk A., 2012, Revue internationale de geomatique-n, V222, P287, DOI [10.3166/rig.22.287-305, DOI 10.3166/RIG.22.287-305]
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2021, URBAN SCI, V5, DOI 10.3390/urbansci5010018
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharma SE, 2021, NEW POLIT ECON, V26, P1078, DOI 10.1080/13563467.2021.1899152
   Shatu F., 2021, Findings, P27391, DOI DOI 10.32866/001C.27391
   Shukla N, 2025, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V27, P2863, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-04058-3
   Siqueira-Gay J, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117732
   SMC, 2023, Geographic information system (GIS) portal Online
   SMC, 2022, MID-YEAR POPULATION ESTIMATES
   SUDA, 2017, Development Plan 2035
   Thaler T, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V55, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.007
   Thanvisitthpon N, 2017, CLIM RISK MANAG, V18, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2017.08.005
   TOI, 2020, Limbayat flooded again, most areas in waist-deep waters
   Tompkins EL, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.010
   Tonkin A., 2008, Sustainable medium-density housing. A resource book
   UN Habitat, 2022, World Cities Report
   UN-Habitat, 2023, A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF URBAN GOVERNANCE FOR PLANNING IN 10 COUNTRIES OF THE GLOBAL SOUTH: URBAN GOVERNANCE CASE STUDIES
   UN-SDG, 2018, Sustainable Cities and Communities
   Verma A., 2024, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, V49, DOI [10.1177/02560909241234200, DOI 10.1177/02560909241234200]
   Wang QC, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104745
   WILLIAMSON OE, 1981, AM J SOCIOL, V87, P548, DOI 10.1086/227496
   WRI, 2021, Seven Transformations for More Equitable and Sustainable Cities, DOI [10.46830/wrirpt.19.00124, DOI 10.46830/WRIRPT.19.00124]
   Wu Y, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11040546
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 70
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 0
U2 0
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2211-4645
EI 2211-4653
J9 ENVIRON DEV
JI Environ. Dev.
PD JUL
PY 2025
VL 55
AR 101178
DI 10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101178
EA FEB 2025
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA Y7I9I
UT WOS:001433824400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, HY
   Liu, YZ
   Hu, L
   Zhang, Z
   Chen, Y
   Tan, YC
   Han, YF
AF Chen, Hongyi
   Liu, Yanzhong
   Hu, Lin
   Zhang, Zuo
   Chen, Yong
   Tan, Yuchuan
   Han, Yufei
TI Constructing a Flood-Adaptive Ecological Security Pattern from the
   Perspective of Ecological Resilience: A Case Study of the Main Urban
   Area in Wuhan
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE SCS-CN model; flood adaptation; ecological security pattern; resilient
   city
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; CITY; EVOLUTION; RUNOFF
AB The frequent occurrence of floods in urban areas caused by climate change challenges urban resilience. This research aims to construct an ecological security pattern (ESP) that is adaptive to floods to enhance urban resilience in the hope that it will help cities cope with floods better. In this research, the main urban area of Wuhan (WUH) represents the study area. The lakes were selected as the ecological sources and the Soil Conservation Service-Curve Number (SCS-CN) model was used to calculate the runoff volume corresponding to each land type and, based on this, assign resistance values to the land types; as such, the land type surface is referred to as the runoff resistance surface, and the runoff resistance surface is then modified by ecosystem service capabilities. The Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) model was used to extract the connecting corridors between the sources. This research plan includes 18 ecological sources, 10 key ecological corridors, and 22 potential ecological corridors, with a total length of about 344.21 km. Finally, it provides a two-axis and three-core urban ecological resilience optimization strategy for decision makers and a new approach for controlling floods in urban areas from the perspective of ecological resilience.
C1 [Chen, Hongyi; Liu, Yanzhong; Hu, Lin; Chen, Yong; Tan, Yuchuan; Han, Yufei] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Resource & Environm Engn, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Zuo] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University of Science & Technology; Central China Normal
   University
RP Liu, YZ; Hu, L (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Resource & Environm Engn, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China.
EM liuyanzhong@wust.edu.cn; hulin@wust.edu.cn
RI chen, hongyi/JCE-0620-2023; han, yufei/JMQ-0388-2023
OI Zhang, Zuo/0000-0002-8892-5870
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China;  [41971237]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant Numbers: Nos. 72174071) and the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (Grant Numbers: Nos. 41971237).
CR Ali H, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-01306-1
   [Anonymous], WUHAN WATER RESOURCE
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE PROOFING ROT
   [Anonymous], ENCY CHINA CHAO SOIL
   [Anonymous], WUHAN STAT YB
   [Anonymous], YB 40 YEARS REFORM O
   [Anonymous], NEARLY 90 LAKES WUHA
   [Anonymous], WUHAN CITY MASTER PL
   [Anonymous], PLANNYC STRONGER MOR
   [Anonymous], WUHAN THOROUGHFARE 9
   Cai X., 2018, THESIS SOOCHOW U SUZ
   [陈昆仑 Chen Kunlun], 2019, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V39, P1725
   Chen WJ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102045
   Cheng T, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101058
   Dai L, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V754, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141868
   Dianat H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102561
   Fan FF, 2022, APPL GEOGR, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102619
   Fu YJ, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106030
   Guzman CD, 2019, J HYDROL, V576, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.002
   [何建华 He Jianhua], 2020, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V40, P3590
   Ji MC, 2021, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101645
   Jia HF, 2022, WATER RES, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118126
   Jiang CB, 2022, J HYDROL, V605, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127327
   Jiang H, 2021, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V36, P2135, DOI 10.1007/s10980-021-01234-6
   Koster S., 2021, Water-Energy Nexus, V4, P35, DOI [10.1016/J.WEN.2021.02.002, DOI 10.1016/J.WEN.2021.02.002, 10.1016/j.wen.2021.02.002]
   Lee B, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V532, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.051
   Leng LY, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138608
   [李锋 Li Feng], 2014, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V34, P190
   Li SC, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108026
   Li ZT, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106319
   [梁晨 Liang Chen], 2021, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V41, P4379
   Liu J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102906
   [刘洋 Liu Yang], 2010, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V30, P6980
   Ltd B, EVALUATING OPTIONS W
   Luo KS, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104317
   [陈春娣 Chen Chundi], 2015, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V35, P7367
   Morris RL, 2018, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V24, P1827, DOI 10.1111/gcb.14063
   [彭建 Peng Jian], 2018, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V38, P3741
   Peng J, 2018, HABITAT INT, V71, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.010
   Prokesová R, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V815, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151591
   Ribeiro MP, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127683
   Sanyal J, 2014, CATENA, V118, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2014.01.015
   Serret H, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V131, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.003
   Service U.S, 1971, SCS NAT ENG HDB SECT
   Shadeed S, 2010, WATER SCI ENG, V3, P1, DOI 10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.01.001
   She L, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102706
   [屠星月 Tu Xingyue], 2019, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V39, P421
   Verma S, 2020, J HYDROL, V589, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125114
   Wang J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V266, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121850
   [王凯平 Wang Kaiping], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P7871
   Wang SS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100829
   [王晓玉 Wang Xiaoyu], 2020, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V40, P3375
   [王雪然 Wang Xueran], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P1968
   [吴健生 Wu Jiansheng], 2020, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V40, P8417
   Xu CQ, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105804
   Yang JJ, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V198, P496, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.104
   Yao YT, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V367, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133061
   [于婧 Yu Jing], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P1290
   [于文金 Yu Wenjin], 2015, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V35, P1378
   Yuan Z., 1990, WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, V1st ed.
   Zhai J, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127060
   [张亮 Zhang Liang], 2021, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V41, P4632
   Zhang MJ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19041914
   Zhang ZX, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V350, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131494
   [郑群明 Zheng Qunming], 2021, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V41, P874
NR 65
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 27
U2 113
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 20
IS 1
AR 385
DI 10.3390/ijerph20010385
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA 7Q2JC
UT WOS:000909221900001
PM 36612707
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Debnath, R
   Pettit, C
   Leao, SZ
AF Debnath, Ripan
   Pettit, Christopher
   Leao, Simone Zarpelon
TI Geodesign Approaches to City Resilience Planning: A Systematic Review
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE collaborative planning; computation; geodesign; city resilience;
   sustainability; climate change
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CHALLENGES; CITIES; FRAMEWORK;
   POLITICS; LESSONS; ECOLOGY; GROWTH
AB The increased frequency of extreme events facing society is placing mounting pressure on cities and regions that need more robust resilience planning against growing uncertainty. Data augmented participatory methods, such as geodesign, offer much promise in supporting strategic planning to make our cities and regions more resilient. In that context, this study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of geodesign practices in resilience planning, through a systematic review of the selected 487 studies available from various bibliographic databases. The results indicate that a total of 75 studies were connected to resilience thinking, with a focus on climate change, floods, and sea level rise risks. A significant cluster of those resilience-related studies worked, especially, on improving sustainability. A detailed analysis of 59 relevant geodesign case studies revealed a strong underlying emphasis on disaster risk reduction and management activities. This study also noticed two prominent approaches among the analysed case studies to future city scenario planning: computational (41 studies), and collaborative (18 studies). It is recommended that an explicit integration of these two approaches into the geodesign approach can assist future city resilience planning endeavours. Thus, future research should further investigate the utility of integrating data-driven modelling and simulation within a collaborative scenario planning process, the usability of digital tools such as planning support systems within a collaborative geodesign framework, and the value of the plan's performance evaluation during resilience decision-making. Another area for future work is increased community engagement in city resilience practices. The geodesign approach can provide a comprehensive framework for bringing communities, decision-makers, experts, and technologists together to help plan for more resilient city futures. Finally, while geodesign's explicit role in empirical resilience implementations has been found to be low in this systematic review study, there are significant opportunities to support evidence-based and collaborative city resilience planning and decision-making activities.
C1 [Debnath, Ripan; Pettit, Christopher; Leao, Simone Zarpelon] Univ New South Wales, Fac Arts Design & Architecture, City Futures Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
C3 University of New South Wales Sydney
RP Debnath, R (corresponding author), Univ New South Wales, Fac Arts Design & Architecture, City Futures Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
EM r.debnath@student.unsw.edu.au; c.pettit@unsw.edu.au;
   s.zarpelonleao@unsw.edu.au
OI Debnath, Ripan/0000-0003-1472-5419; Pettit,
   Christopher/0000-0002-1328-9830
CR Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Akyol, 2016, J DIGIT LANDSC ARCHI, V1, P150, DOI [10.14627/537612018, DOI 10.14627/537612018]
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Batty M, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P1, DOI 10.1068/b4001ed
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Caperna A., 2019, ADV 21 CENTURY HUMAN, P665, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-8588-8_12, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8588-8_12]
   Cerreta M., 2018, P INT C 75 ANN DTI P
   Chadegani Arezoo Aghaei, 2013, Asian Social Science, V9, P5, DOI [10.5539/ass.v9n5p18, DOI 10.5539/ASS.V9N5P18]
   Chen S., 2016, J DIGIT LANDSC ARCHI, V1, P169
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Cocco C., 2019, PLANNING NATURE ECOS, P399
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Deal B., 2017, P EGY GEN ASS C VIEN, P18478
   Eikelboom T, 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V22, P247, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9633-4
   EPICURO, 2018, BEST PRACT AN, P1
   Erlingsson C, 2017, AFR J EMERG MED, V7, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Falco GJ, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V118, P1008, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.542
   Fraley, 2011, INCLUDING NATURAL HA
   Gahegan M, 2020, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V34, P1, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1652304
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gu Y., 2020, HDB PLANNING SUPPORT, P110
   Gu Y., 2020, J DIGIT LANDSC ARCHI, V2020, P467, DOI [10.14627/537690048, DOI 10.14627/537690048]
   Gu YX, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093306
   Hamilton WAH, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P109, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.3.109
   Harzing A., 2007, PUBLISH PERISH
   Healey P., 2003, Planning Theory, V2, P101, DOI [DOI 10.1177/14730952030022002, 10.1177/14730952030022002]
   Huang A., 2008, NZCSRSC 2008
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jiang HX, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P1639, DOI 10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w
   Kazak J.K., 2018, P 3 WORLD MULT CIV E
   Koomen, 2014, GEODESIGN INTEGRATIN, P87
   Lamond JE, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P63, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lhomme S., 2012, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Maidment, 2013, HYDRODESIGN DIGITAL
   Marcus F., 2008, HDB RES URBAN INFORM, P1
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Milojevic S, 2011, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V62, P1933, DOI 10.1002/asi.21602
   Newman G, 2020, LANDSCAPE RES, V45, P63, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2019.1569219
   Nhan N.H., 2019, ABSTR INT CARTOGR AS, V1, P270, DOI [10.5194/ica-abs-1-270-2019, DOI 10.5194/ICA-ABS-1-270-2019]
   Nyerges T, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V25, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.016
   Arias JP, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0186455
   Pare G., 2016, HDB EHEALTH EVALUATI, P157
   Peddemors Y., 2014, P 9 INT C COMP SIM R, P441
   Pettit C, 2020, OPEN CITIES | OPEN DATA: COLLABORATIVE CITIES IN THE INFORMATION ERA, P197, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-6605-5_9
   Pettit CJ, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1387, DOI 10.1177/2399808318812887
   Peyroux E, 2015, EUR J DEV RES, V27, P560, DOI 10.1057/ejdr.2015.52
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Quan S.J., 2018, P 10 INT C APPL EN I, P6515
   Raco M, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P1065, DOI 10.1177/0042098011415716
   Remoy H, 2019, URBAN PLAN, V4, P1, DOI 10.17645/up.v4i3.2484
   Ribas RP, 2015, LECT NOTES GEOINF CA, P333, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_23
   RITTEL HWJ, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF01405730
   Rivero R, 2018, DISEGNARECON, V11
   Rockefeller Foundation Arup, 2014, CIT RES FRAM CIT RES
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Russo P, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V67, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.08.009
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Sanderson D., 2019, GOOD PRACTICE REV, V12
   Schipper L, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x
   Seuring S, 2012, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V17, P544, DOI 10.1108/13598541211258609
   Singleton AD., 2017, Urban analytics
   Steiner FR, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V156, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.006
   Steinitz C., 2012, A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design
   Steinitz C, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V156, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.023
   Su PH, 2015, FRONT ARTIF INTEL AP, V276, P241, DOI 10.3233/978-1-61499-522-7-241
   Thornbush M, 2013, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V9, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.003
   Tulloch D, 2017, T GIS, V21, P635, DOI 10.1111/tgis.12245
   Twigg J., 2015, Good Practice Review, V9
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   United Nations, 2014, STESASERA352 UN WORL
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vonk G, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN A, V37, P909, DOI 10.1068/a3712
   Wagner Iwona, 2013, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002
   Wahyudi A, 2016, INT REV SPAT PLAN SU, V4, P60, DOI 10.14246/irspsd.4.2_60
   Wamsler C, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wu CL, 2018, HABITAT INT, V75, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.009
   Yamazaki D, 2018, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER, V233, P185
   Yang P.P.-J., 2014, GEODESIGN INTEGRATIN, P43
   Yang PPJ, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1474, DOI 10.1177/2399808320910164
   Zuidema S., 2019, P AGU FALL M SAN FRA
NR 89
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 11
U2 74
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JAN
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 2
AR 938
DI 10.3390/su14020938
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA YN3GB
UT WOS:000747148600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shokry, G
   Connolly, JJT
   Anguelovski, I
AF Shokry, Galia
   Connolly, James J. T.
   Anguelovski, Isabelle
TI Understanding climate gentrification and shifting landscapes of
   protection and vulnerability in green resilient Philadelphia
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation planning; Urban resilience; Green infrastructure;
   Vulnerability; Climate gentrification; Climate justice
ID NEW-YORK-CITY; URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL GENTRIFICATION;
   SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; CHANGE ADAPTATION; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE;
   POLITICAL-ECONOMY; GLOBAL CITIES; INFRASTRUCTURE; HEALTH
AB As resilience strategies become a prominent orthodoxy in city planning, green infrastructure is increasingly deployed to enhance protection from climate risks and impacts. Yet, little is known about the social and racial impacts of such interventions citywide. In response, our study uses a quantitative and spatial analytical approach to assess whether interventions we call "green resilient infrastructure" (GRI) protect social groups traditionally most at risk and/or least able to adapt to climate impacts - or conversely, if the aggregate effect is maladaptive and inequitable outcomes (i.e. shifting vulnerability or climate gentrification). First, we performed a pre-post test of GRI siting distribution relative to socio-ecological vulnerability in Philadelphia neighborhoods. Second, we examined gentrification trends in relation to GRI siting and whether these interventions contribute to increasing the socio-ecological vulnerability of historically marginalized populations. Our findings point to a strong negative association between GRI siting and increased minority population, and a strong positive association between GRI siting, gentrification, and reduced minority population. The paper contributes to a better understanding of siting inequities and urban climate injustice dynamics and offers a new conceptual frame for critical urban adaptation research and practice of the pathways that shape uneven and unjust outcomes.
C1 [Anguelovski, Isabelle] Inst Catalana Recerca & Estudis Avancats ICREA, Passeig Lluis Co 23, Barcelona 08010, Spain.
   [Shokry, Galia; Connolly, James J. T.; Anguelovski, Isabelle] Univ Autonoma Barcelona UAB, Inst Environm Sci & Technol ICTA, Carrer Columnes S-N, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
   [Shokry, Galia; Connolly, James J. T.; Anguelovski, Isabelle] Inst Hosp Mar Invest Med IMIM, Barcelona Lab Urban Environm Justice & Sustainabi, Carrer Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
C3 ICREA; Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron; Autonomous University of
   Barcelona; Hospital del Mar Research Institute
RP Shokry, G (corresponding author), Univ Autonoma Barcelona UAB, Inst Environm Sci & Technol ICTA, Carrer Columnes S-N, Barcelona 08193, Spain.; Shokry, G (corresponding author), Inst Hosp Mar Invest Med IMIM, Barcelona Lab Urban Environm Justice & Sustainabi, Carrer Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona 08003, Spain.
EM Galia.Shokry@uab.cat; JamesJohnTimothy.Connolly@uab.cat;
   Isabelle.Anguelovski@uab.cat
RI Shokry, Galia/ABP-5934-2022; Connolly, James/AAZ-6161-2021
OI Shokry, Galia/0000-0002-2959-3677
FU Maria de Maetzu Unit of Excellence grant at the Institute for
   Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA) at the Universitat Autonoma
   de Barcelona (UAB) [MDM-2015-0552]; European Research Council (ERC)
   Starting Grant GreenLULUs [GA678034]; European Union's Horizon 2020
   project, Naturvation [730243]; Juan de la Cierva MINECO program from the
   Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades
   [IJCI-2016-31100]
FX This research contributes to the Maria de Maetzu Unit of Excellence
   grant (MDM-2015-0552) at the Institute for Environmental Science and
   Technology (ICTA) at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB). It has
   received the support of the European Research Council (ERC) Starting
   Grant GreenLULUs (GA678034) and also contributes to the European Union's
   Horizon 2020 project, Naturvation (730243). In addition, James JT
   Connolly would like to acknowledge the support of the Juan de la Cierva
   MINECO program (IJCI-2016-31100) from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia,
   Innovacion y Universidades. We are also grateful to our anonymous
   referees for their invaluable comments.
CR Adams Carolyn., 1991, PHILADELPHIA NEIGHBO
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Ahern J., 2007, CITIES FUTURE INTEGR, P267, DOI 10.2166/9781780405308
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Anguelovski I., 2014, NEIGHBORHOOD REFUGE
   Anguelovski I, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P458, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN LIT, V31, P23, DOI 10.1177/0885412215610491
   Anguelovski I, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.010
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2003, RISE RUSTBELT REPRIN
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE DOUBL
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2017, CONCORD SAUNTERER
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], THESIS
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], [No title captured]
   Aylett A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.005
   Baptiste AK, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V136, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Bassett E, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P435, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2010.509703
   BEAUREGARD RA, 1990, URBAN AFF REV, V25, P420, DOI 10.1177/004208169002500305
   Benedict M.A., 2001, Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for the 21st Century
   Bennett NJ, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P907, DOI 10.1007/s10113-015-0839-5
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brownlow A, 2006, GEOFORUM, V37, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.02.009
   Bulkeley H, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
   Bulkeley H, 2013, T I BRIT GEOGR, V38, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Carmichael CE, 2019, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V32, P588, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2018.1550229
   Carmin J, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11430951
   Checker M, 2011, CITY SOC, V23, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x
   Christman Z, 2018, LAND-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/land7040145
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   Chu E, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P372, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2015.1019822
   Cinner JE, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.001
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Connolly JJ, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001
   Connolly JJT, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P8, DOI 10.1111/cico.12282
   Curran W, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P1027, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.729569
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Dauvergne Peter., 2016, Environmentalism of the Rich
   de Sherbinin A, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P39, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076725
   Ding L, 2016, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V61, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.004
   Dodman D, 2009, ENVIRON URBAN, V21, P185, DOI 10.1177/0956247809103016
   Dooling S, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x
   Douglas O, 2017, CITIES, V66, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011
   Easton S, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P286, DOI 10.1177/0042098019851953
   Eriksen SH, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
   Essoka JonathanD., 2010, The Western Journal of Black Studies, V34, P299
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Finewood MH, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P909, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813
   Flanagan BE, 2011, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V8, DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1792
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Freeman L, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P39, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976337
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Fritz M, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_1
   Füssel HM, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.009
   Garrison JD, 2021, J PLAN EDUC RES, V41, P6, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18772072
   Garrison JD, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P914, DOI 10.1177/2399808317737071
   Gould KA, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P12, DOI 10.1111/cico.12283
   Graham L, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.001
   Haase D, 2017, HABITAT INT, V64, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.005
   Hardy RD, 2017, GEOFORUM, V87, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.005
   Heckert M, 2018, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V4, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00027
   Heckert M, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P3010, DOI 10.1068/a4595
   Heynen N, 2006, URBAN AFF REV, V42, P3, DOI 10.1177/1078087406290729
   Hodson M, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00832.x
   Hughes S, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.003
   Huq S, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P3, DOI 10.1177/0956247807078058
   Hwang J, 2016, URBAN AFF REV, V52, P98, DOI 10.1177/1078087415570643
   Hyra D.S., 2017, RACE CLASS POLITICS
   Hyra D, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1753, DOI 10.1177/0042098014539403
   Immergluck D, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P546, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041
   Immergluck D, 2009, URBAN STUD, V46, P1723, DOI 10.1177/0042098009105500
   Juhola S, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V55, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.014
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Keenan JM, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32
   Kondo MC, 2015, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V105, pE114, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302314
   Kremer P, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.012
   Lennon M, 2014, TOWN PLAN REV, V85, P563, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2014.35
   Li L, 2018, CITIES, V74, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013
   Lyytimki J., 2008, Environmental Sciences, V5, P161, DOI DOI 10.1080/15693430802055524
   Maantay J, 2002, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V110, P161, DOI 10.1289/ehp.02110s2161
   Mahon L, 2018, WORLD DEV, V107, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.035
   Mandarano L, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P1338, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2017.1345878
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Mees H., 2011, Climate Law, V2, P251, DOI [DOI 10.3233/CL-2011-036, 10.3233/CL-2011-036, 10.1163/CL-2011-036]
   Mohai P, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115008
   Mohai P, 2009, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V34, P405, DOI [10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348, 10.1146/annurev.environ.082508-094348]
   Newburn DA, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P1345, DOI 10.1002/2015WR018063
   Newman K, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P23, DOI 10.1080/00420980500388710
   O'Brien K, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P73, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639
   Owens A, 2012, CITY COMMUNITY, V11, P345, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01412.x
   Palmer MA, 2015, SCIENCE, V349, P584, DOI 10.1126/science.aac7778
   Pauleit S, 2011, URBAN ECOLOGY: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND APPLICATIONS, P272
   Pearsall H, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN C, V28, P872, DOI 10.1068/c08126
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pellow DN, 2000, AM BEHAV SCI, V43, P581, DOI 10.1177/00027640021955441
   Phillips M, 2018, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V8, P3, DOI 10.1177/2043820617752009
   PWD, 2009, GREEN CIT CLEAN WAT
   Ranganathan M, 2021, ANTIPODE, V53, P115, DOI 10.1111/anti.12555
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Sovacool BK, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P616, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2665
   Summers JK, 2017, GEOHEALTH, V1, P151, DOI 10.1002/2016GH000047
   Taylor M, 2015, ROUT EXPLOR DEV STUD, P1
   Teicher HM, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V25, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.04.008
   The Pew Charitable Trust, 2016, PHIL CHANG NEIGHB GE
   Thompson M, 2015, ANTIPODE, V47, P1021, DOI 10.1111/anti.12154
   Tibbetts J, 2005, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V113, pA464, DOI 10.1289/ehp.113-a464
   Triguero-Mas M, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V77, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2015.01.012
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   Turner MD, 2016, GEOFORUM, V68, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.006
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van den Berg M, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P441, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.678313
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Woodru SC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P796, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3012
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   Young R, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P2571, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.048
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Zografos C, 2016, URBAN CLIM, V17, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.06.003
   Zografos C, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.002
NR 130
TC 139
Z9 155
U1 15
U2 217
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 31
AR 100539
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA LJ8NN
UT WOS:000530418300003
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, F
   Fang, YY
   Deng, HD
   Wei, FZ
AF Wang, Fang
   Fang, Yuanyang
   Deng, Handuo
   Wei, Fangzhen
TI How community medical facilities can promote resilient community
   constructions under the background of pandemics
SO INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; Resilience; Healthcare facilities; Community governance; Urban
   planning
ID COVID-19; DESIGN; HEALTH
AB Nowadays, urban and community resilience have become the core issues of urban theoretical research and construction practices. While there are many studies on climate change, natural hazards and environmental pollution, relatively less attention has been paid to public and human health. However, the current COVID-19 pandemic, which is a major global public health crisis, is posing severe challenges to the resilience of cities and communities in the context of high-mobility, high-density and high-intensity, as well as expands the connotation of community resilience to public health. To compensate for the lack of current research, this study examined the characteristics of community medical facilities in response to pandemics at urban, community and individual multi-spatial scales based on a thorough review of current research and relevant practice. It also emphasized the significant role played by community medical facilities in improving resilient community constructions in the face of large-scale public health emergencies. These characteristics were fully utilized to explore ways to build and govern the 'resilience' of communities in the future, help people to survive better as well as develop in complex and changeable external environments.
C1 [Wang, Fang; Fang, Yuanyang] Peking Univ, NSFC DFG Sino German Cooperat Grp Urbanizat & Loc, Coll Architecture & Landscape, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Deng, Handuo] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Wei, Fangzhen] Peking Univ, Peking Univ Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; Peking University
RP Wei, FZ (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Peking Univ Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM pkuh-wfz@pku.edu.cn
RI DENG, HANDUO/MEO-0206-2025
OI Wei, Fangzhen/0000-0002-3709-5803; Deng, Handuo/0000-0003-2177-1106
FU Peking University's Humanities and Social Sciences Special Project [34]
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: from the
   Peking University's Humanities and Social Sciences Special Project
   (Grant No. 34).
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Agarwal G, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008110
   Agarwal Gina, 2015, BMC Res Notes, V8, P113, DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1061-8
   Bajc K, 2018, LANDSC ARCHIT FRONT, V6, P14, DOI 10.15302/J-LAF-20180402
   Bene C., 2013, IDS Working Paper - Institute for Development Studies
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bunker A, 2021, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V30, P535, DOI 10.1177/1420326X19897965
   Casella F, 2021, IEEE CONTR SYST LETT, V5, P1079, DOI 10.1109/LCSYS.2020.3009912
   Castellanos-GonzSSlez ME., 2020, REGION STUD MARINE S, V35, P101115
   Chang SE, 2004, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V20, P739, DOI 10.1193/1.1775796
   Community Resilience System Initiative Steering Committee, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
   D'Ambrosio F, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589249
   Doyle A, 2021, INT J E-PLAN RES, V10, P18, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa2
   Farsalinos Konstantinos, 2021, Toxicol Rep, V8, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.12.001
   Fraser T, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V37, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.006
   Goei A, 2020, J PUBLIC HEALTH MAN, V26, P613, DOI 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001257
   Gray SF, 2018, LANDSC ARCHIT FRONT, V6, P98, DOI 10.15302/J-LAF-20180410
   Halperin J, 2021, J AMBUL CARE MANAG, V44, P2, DOI 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000362
   Hill E., 2018, EXPLORING REGIONAL E
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hosseini MR, 2020, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V29, P1181, DOI 10.1177/1420326X20935644
   Hwang BG, 2018, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V94, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.06.016
   段进, 2020, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V44, P115
   Kimhi S, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101843
   Lakhouit A, 2020, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V29, P1186, DOI 10.1177/1420326X20950432
   Li LY, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101776
   [梁晗业 Liang Hanye], 2017, [中药药理与临床, Pharmacology and Clinics of Chinese Materia Medica], V33, P38
   Ludwick T, 2020, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V35, P1039, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czaa049
   Mali NV, 2021, INT J E-PLAN RES, V10, P116, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa10
   May CK, 2019, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V169, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.12.007
   Meyer MichelleA., 2013, SOCIAL CAPITAL COLLE
   Miao Q, 2021, WORLD DEV, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105128
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTER DESIGN
   Odendaal N, 2021, INT J E-PLAN RES, V10, P124, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa11
   Peng C., 2017, URBAN PLAN INT, V32, P60, DOI [10.22217/upi.2016.127, DOI 10.22217/UPI.2016.127]
   Penkler M, 2020, LANCET DIABETES ENDO, V8, P664, DOI 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30237-0
   Qiang Y, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102115
   Qin HL., 2020, URBAN RURAL DEV, V19, P12
   Raj VAA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102371
   Robinson P, 2021, INT J E-PLAN RES, V10, P59, DOI 10.4018/IJEPR.20210401.oa5
   Salimi M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101948
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   South J, 2020, PERSPECT PUBLIC HEAL, V140, P305, DOI 10.1177/1757913920949582
   Sun CJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102390
   Sun L., 2020, BEIJING PLANN REV, V05, P76
   Tapsuwan S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.034
   Tian CS, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101144
   Valeriani G, 2020, HEALTHCARE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/healthcare8040445
   Wang AS., 1994, DISASTER REDUCTION C, V4, P2
   Wang W, 2020, CHEST, V158, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.515
   Wang Y, 2022, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V31, P1193, DOI 10.1177/1420326X20942938
   World Health Organization (WHO), STAT 2 M INT HLTH RE
   Xiang MM., 2016, BEAUTY TIMES, V07, P117
   [臧鑫宇 Zang Xinyu], 2019, [科技导报（北京）, Science & Technology Review], V37, P94
NR 54
TC 12
Z9 13
U1 8
U2 73
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 1420-326X
EI 1423-0070
J9 INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON
JI Indoor Built Environ.
PD APR
PY 2022
VL 31
IS 4
BP 1018
EP 1027
AR 1420326X211048537
DI 10.1177/1420326X211048537
EA JAN 2022
PG 10
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Public,
   Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering; Public, Environmental &
   Occupational Health
GA 0I8NR
UT WOS:000747969500001
PM 35431637
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wamsler, C
   Brink, E
   Rivera, C
AF Wamsler, Christine
   Brink, Ebba
   Rivera, Claudia
TI Planning for climate change in urban areas: from theory to practice
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Climate change; Disaster; Risk reduction; Urban planning;
   Urban resilience; Urban transformation
ID CHANGE ADAPTATION; STRATEGIES; RESILIENCE
AB Climate change poses a serious threat to sustainable urban development, placing many cities at risk. As a consequence, city authorities are increasingly facing the challenge of finding ways to include adaptation strategies into their work, although related knowledge and competence is still scarce and fragmented. With the aim to contribute to knowledge development and organizational learning, the objective of this paper is to critically review and compare current theoretical and practical approaches to adaptation planning in cities. In order to do so, first the conceptual characteristics and features of a climate resilient city are identified. Second, the reciprocal linkages between climate-related disasters, urban form and city planning processes are analysed by considering the life cycle of disasters from causes, to short- and long-term impacts, to post-disaster response and recovery. Finally, urban adaptation measures proposed for both developed and so-called developing countries are assessed. On the basis of the identified differences, gaps and synergies between the theoretical and practical approaches to adaptation planning, the implications for improving sustainable urban transformation are discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Wamsler, Christine; Brink, Ebba] Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden.
   [Rivera, Claudia] Lund Univ, Ctr Risk Assessment & Management LUCRAM, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden.
C3 Lund University; Lund University
RP Wamsler, C (corresponding author), Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, POB 170, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden.
EM christine.wamsler@lucsus.lu.se
OI Rivera Escorcia, Claudia Marina/0009-0004-6554-7637; Brink,
   Ebba/0000-0001-5865-2536
CR Alam M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P81, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076911
   [Anonymous], ID AD OPT
   [Anonymous], SEM EU AD STRAT
   [Anonymous], 2011, Cities and Climate Change: Global Report on Human Settlements 2011
   [Anonymous], PCVA PART CAP VULN A
   [Anonymous], BACKGR DOC TERR AG E
   [Anonymous], FACING URBAN CHALLEN
   [Anonymous], OPERATIONAL FRAMEWOR
   [Anonymous], WE CLASS COUNTR WORL
   [Anonymous], WORKING PAPER SERIES
   [Anonymous], PART WORKB COMM BAS
   [Anonymous], IMAGES MAN CLASSIC T
   [Anonymous], LIV ASS TOOL KIT LAT
   [Anonymous], 2004, African regional strategy on disaster risk reduction
   [Anonymous], BUR CIRS PREV REC
   [Anonymous], 2007, ENH URB SAF SEC GLOB
   [Anonymous], RED RISK DIS OUR COM
   [Anonymous], CLIM VULN CAP AN HDB
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG AD DIS RI
   [Anonymous], 2012, How To Make Cities More Resilient: A Handbook For Local Government Leaders
   [Anonymous], ECORESSOURCES CONSUL
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   [Anonymous], PUTT LIV PERSP PRACT
   [Anonymous], KLIMAANPASSUNGSSTRAT
   [Anonymous], CEDRA CLIM CHANG ENV
   [Anonymous], FLOATING HOUSES MOSQ
   [Anonymous], ENERGY EFFICIENT SIT
   [Anonymous], WORLD DIS REP FOC UR
   [Anonymous], WORLD C DIS RED UN K
   [Anonymous], 2010, STAT WORLDS CIT 2010
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG PROOG URB
   [Anonymous], LOG GOV DIS RISK RED
   [Anonymous], BETT TERMS GLANC KEY
   [Anonymous], 2012, Making cities resilient report 2012
   [Anonymous], URB FLOW MAN AR TRAI
   [Anonymous], 2012, URBAN ADAPTATION CLI
   [Anonymous], ADAPTIVE CA IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], 2005, Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction
   [Anonymous], DEC SUPP TOOL ASS EN
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG IN PRESS
   [Anonymous], 2011 DIS NUMB
   [Anonymous], HIRTS STICHWORTERBUC
   [Anonymous], STAT WORLD 2007 OUR
   [Anonymous], 2007, UN FRAMEWORK CONVENT
   [Anonymous], 405 IDS
   [Anonymous], 2012 2011 WORLD DIS
   [Anonymous], 1 INT CIRCLE WORKSH
   [Anonymous], RES CIT C BONN GERM
   [Anonymous], UK AD WIZ
   [Anonymous], 1966, Time
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Beck S, 2009, PEER Climate Change Initiative-Project 2. UFZ-Bericht 1/2009
   Benson C., 2007, TOOLS MAINSTREAMING
   Bicknell J., 2009, Adapting Cities to Climate Change: Understanding and Addressing the Development Challenges
   Biesbroek GR, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005
   Boin A., 2014, Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events
   Bosher L., 2008, HAZARDS BUILT ENV AT
   Brenner Neil., 2006, GLOBAL CITIES READER
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Carmin JoAnn., 2012, Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey
   Coppola D., 2006, Introduction to international disaster management
   Davoudi S., 2010, PLANNING CLIMATE CHA
   Emmanuel M.Rohinton., 2005, URBAN APPROACH CLIMA
   European Commission, 2009, COMM STAFF WORK DOC
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Gagnon-Lebrun F., 2006, PROGR ADAPTATION CLI
   Givoni Baruch., 1998, CLIMATE CONSIDERATIO
   Greiving S, 2012, EUR PLAN STUD, V20, P27, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.638493
   Hall P., 2000, URBAN FUTURE 21
   Holden S., 2004, MAINSTREAMING HIV AI
   Jabeen H, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P415, DOI 10.1177/0956247810379937
   Kazmierczak A., 2010, Adaptation to climate change using green and blue infrastructure: A data base of case studies
   Koch-Nielsen H., 2002, STAY COOL DESIGN GUI, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315074429
   Konya A., 1980, DESIGN PRIMER HOT CL
   Legates R.T., 2000, The City Reader
   Massey E., 2008, Assessing adaptation in 29 European countries (No. W-08/20)
   Morss RE, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-060809-100145
   Mumford L., 1968, CITY HIST ITS ORIGIN
   O'Brien Karen., 2008, Environmental Change and Globalization: Double Exposures, V1
   Olgay V., 1963, Design with climate: Bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Ribeiro M., 2009, Design of guidelines for the elaboration of Regional Climate Change Adaptations Strategies. Study for European Commission - DG Environment - Tender DG ENV. G.1/ETU/2008/0093r
   Roaf S., 2005, ADAPTING BUILDINGS C
   Roggema R, 2009, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: A SPATIAL CHALLENGE, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9359-3
   Salmon Cleveland., 1999, Architectural Design for Tropical Regions
   Stephenson A., 2008, BENCHMARK RESILIENCE
   Stern N, 2008, AM ECON REV, V98, P1, DOI 10.1257/aer.98.2.1
   Tacoli C., 2012, Urbanization and Emerging Population Issues Working Paper 7
   Turpeinen H, 2008, EARTH PLANET SC LETT, V269, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.02.017
   UNISDR, 2009, TERM DIS RISK RED
   United Nations, 2004, Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives
   Wamsler C, 2014, ROUTL CRIT INTRO URB, P1
   Wamsler C, 2006, OPEN HOUSE INT, V31, P4
   Wamsler C, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04645-170202
   Wamsler C, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P28, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01248.x
   Wirth L, 1938, AM J SOCIOL, V44, P1, DOI 10.1086/217913
   Wisner B., 2004, AT RISK, V2nd
   Zolli A., 2012, Resilience: Why things bounce back
NR 99
TC 217
Z9 247
U1 10
U2 250
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD JUL 1
PY 2013
VL 50
BP 68
EP 81
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.008
PG 14
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA 165NM
UT WOS:000320490600007
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Robazza, G
   Priego-Hernández, J
   Caputo, S
   Melis, A
AF Robazza, Guido
   Priego-Hernandez, Jacqueline
   Caputo, Silvio
   Melis, Alessandro
TI Temporary Urbanism as a Catalyst for Social Resilience: Insights from an
   Urban Living Lab Practice-Based Research
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE temporary urbanism; urban living lab; placemaking; social resilience;
   co-creation; public space
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; DESIGN THINKING; PUBLIC ART; INNOVATION; LESSONS;
   SPACES
AB This research paper investigates the impact of Urban Living Labs (ULLs) on social resilience within urban communities, with a specific focus on the Multicultural City ChatterBox project in Portsmouth, the UK. Drawing on a rich body of literature and empirical data collected through ethnographic research methods, including interviews, focus groups, and participant observations, this study explores how participatory placemaking and co-creation activities foster community resilience. The ChatterBox project, a collaborative effort between the local community and researchers, led to the construction of a temporary timber pavilion in an underutilized urban space, serving as a vibrant hub for social interaction and engagement among diverse community groups. Our findings reveal that ULLs significantly contribute to enhancing social resilience by empowering communities, fostering a sense of belonging, and facilitating the development of social networks. Through the process of co-design and co-creation, participants not only gained a deeper understanding and ownership of their urban environment but also developed valuable skills and knowledge, thus strengthening their capacity to adapt to societal challenges. Furthermore, this study highlights the role of ULLs in bridging gaps between different community groups, thereby promoting inclusivity and social cohesion. The Multicultural City ChatterBox project exemplifies how ULL interventions can serve as catalysts for social innovation, offering flexible and adaptive solutions to urban challenges while simultaneously enriching the social fabric of cities. This paper contributes to the growing discourse on urban resilience, placemaking, and community-led urban development, providing valuable insights for policymakers, urban planners, and community organizers seeking to foster resilient and vibrant urban communities.
C1 [Robazza, Guido] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Architecture, Portsmouth PO1 2DJ, England.
   [Priego-Hernandez, Jacqueline] Univ Portsmouth, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Portsmouth PO1 2BZ, England.
   [Caputo, Silvio] Univ Kent, Kent Sch Architecture & Planning, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England.
   [Melis, Alessandro] New York Inst Technol, Sch Architecture & Design, Old Westbury, NY 11568 USA.
C3 University of Portsmouth; University of Portsmouth; University of Kent;
   New York Institute Technology
RP Robazza, G (corresponding author), Univ Portsmouth, Sch Architecture, Portsmouth PO1 2DJ, England.
EM guido.robazza@port.ac.uk; jacqueline.priego@port.ac.uk;
   s.caputo@kent.ac.uk; amelis@nyit.edu
RI Robazza, Guido/KQV-0861-2024
OI Caputo, Silvio/0000-0002-8344-0321; Robazza, Guido/0000-0001-7606-4674;
   melis, alessandro/0000-0003-0764-5859
FU University of Portsmouth
FX Chatterbox has been seed-funded by the University of Portsmouth (CCI
   Research, Innovation & Impact Accelerator Fund 2018-19) and the
   Portsmouth City Council, with match funding, and in-kind contributions
   from both institutions.
CR Afacan Y, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106443
   [Anonymous], 2019, Design Council's Evolved Double Diamond
   [Anonymous], Urban resilience
   [Anonymous], 2019, The Sciences of the Artificial
   [Anonymous], 2003, Cultural Studies, Theory and Practice
   Armitage D, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P995, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Askins K, 2011, ENVIRON PLANN D, V29, P803, DOI 10.1068/d11109
   Baccarne B., 2014, P 25 ISPIM INN C
   Baibarac C, 2019, CODESIGN, V15, P91, DOI 10.1080/15710882.2017.1399145
   Bannon LE., 2013, Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203108543, 10.4324/9780203108543-10, DOI 10.4324/9780203108543-10]
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Boyer B., 2011, Studio: Recipes for Systemic Change
   Brand D., 2019, EarthquakesImpact, Community Vulnerability and Resilience, P157
   Braun V., 2012, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, P57, DOI [10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613, DOI 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613, DOI 10.4135/9781526405555.N2, DOI 10.1037/13620-004]
   Braun V, 2021, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V18, P328, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brown K, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905
   Bulkeley H, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P317, DOI 10.1177/0969776418787222
   Cannon T., 2008, WIDER Research Paper, P34
   Chasanidou D, 2015, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V9186, P12, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_2
   Concilio G, 2019, SPRINGERBR APPL SCI, P85, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-00123-0_5
   Cousin G., 2006, PLANET, V17, P4, DOI DOI 10.11120/PLAN.2006.00170004
   Creswell J. W., 2013, Qualitative Inquiry and Research design: Choosing among Five Approaches, V3
   Cronin A., 2016, RES SOCIAL LIFE, P301
   Figueiredo YDD, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V113, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873
   Drydyk J., 2013, Journal of Global Ethics, V9, P249, DOI [10.1080/17449626.2013.818374, DOI 10.1080/17449626.2013.818374]
   Edwards-Schachter ME, 2012, REV POLICY RES, V29, P672, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00588.x
   Eggins S., 2004, Analysing casual conversation
   England's Most Disadvantaged Groups, 2016, Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers
   European Network of Living Labs, About us
   Faulkner L, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-09784-230124
   Foster AE, 2014, J DOC, V70, P1015, DOI 10.1108/JD-03-2014-0053
   Gilchrist A., 2009, The Well-Connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development, V2nd ed., P1
   Glavovic B., 2003, Contesting development: pathways to better practice. Proceedings of 3rd Biennial Conference of the Aotearoa New Zealand International Development Network, P289
   Groat L., 2013, Architectural Research Methods, V2nd ed
   Guinard P, 2018, CITY SOC, V30, P117, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12157
   Harteveld M., 2021, The Evolving Scholar
   Hauberg J., 2011, AE. Rev. Lusfona Arquit. E Educ. Archit. Educ. J, V5, P47
   Hawryszkiewycz I, 2020, PROC EUR CONF KNOWL, P1003, DOI 10.34190/EKM.20.703
   Heathcote D., 1995, DRAMA LEARNING DOROT
   Huybrechts L, 2017, CODESIGN, V13, P145, DOI 10.1080/15710882.2017.1355042
   IDEO Tools|IDEO.Org, About us
   Iwiska K.L., 2017, Towards Better Participatory Planning: Guide to Place-Making
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jovchelovitch S., 2013, Underground sociabilities: Identity, culture and resistance in Rio De Janeiro's favelas
   Kelkar NikitaPrakash., 2016, STRATEGIC DESIGN RES, V9, P54, DOI [DOI 10.4013/SDRJ.2016.92.01, 10.4013/sdrj.2016.92.01]
   Khanlou N, 2014, INT J MENT HEALTH AD, V12, P64, DOI 10.1007/s11469-013-9470-1
   Lara-Hernandez J.A., 2020, Temporary Appropriation in Cities, P11, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-32120-82, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-32120-82]
   Leichenko Robin., 2008, Environmental change and globalization: Double exposures, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195177329.001.0001
   Lenskjold TU, 2015, DES ISSUES, V31, P67, DOI 10.1162/DESI_a_00352
   Liang DN, 2022, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V29, P60, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2021.1911873
   Macpherson H, 2012, CULT GEOGR, V19, P523, DOI 10.1177/1474474012442820
   Madsen W., 2019, Journal of Applied Arts & Health, V10, P25, DOI 10.1386/jaah.10.1.25_1
   Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674
   Malterud K, 2016, QUAL HEALTH RES, V26, P1753, DOI 10.1177/1049732315617444
   Manzini E, 2015, DES THINK DES THEOR, P1
   Markusen A, 2019, ROUTL STUD HUM GEOGR, P11
   Matarasso Francois., 1997, Use or Ornament? The Social Impact of Participation in the Arts
   Melis A., 2021, Sci. Res. Pap, DOI [10.37199/f40002208, DOI 10.37199/F40002208]
   Merriam, 2016, QUALITATIVE RES GUID
   Morgan DL, 1996, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V22, P129, DOI 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.129
   Naumann S., 2018, Urban Planet: Knowledge Towards Sustainable Cities, P197, DOI [10.1017/9781316647554.012, DOI 10.1017/9781316647554.012]
   NESTA DIY Toolkit|Nesta, About us
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Ostanel E., 2017, J. Urban Regen. Renew, V11, P79
   Oswald ME, 2004, COGNITIVE ILLUSIONS: A HANDBOOK ON FALLACIES AND BIASES IN THINKING, JUDGEMENT AND MEMORY, P79
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Petrescu D, 2016, BUILD RES INF, V44, P717, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
   Polaine A, 2013, Service Design: From Insight to Implementation
   portsmouth, Portsmouth Demography-JSNA Report-Portsmouth City Council
   Puerari E, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061893
   Razzouk R, 2012, REV EDUC RES, V82, P330, DOI 10.3102/0034654312457429
   Robazza G., 2020, J. Public Space, V5, P283, DOI [10.32891/jps.v5i4.1388, DOI 10.32891/JPS.V5I4.1388]
   Robazza G., 2021, J. Public Space, V6
   Robazza G., 2021, AMPS Proceedings Series 24.2. Cities in a Changing World, Proceedings of the AMPS 221, Virtual, P263
   Sanders E., 2008, CODESIGN, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1080/15710880701875068
   Sara R, 2021, CODESIGN, V17, P493, DOI 10.1080/15710882.2020.1761985
   Schneekloth L., 1995, Placemaking: The Art and Practice of Building Communities
   Sennett Richard., 1970, USES DISORDER PERSON
   Sezer C., 2017, Built Environment, V43, P165, DOI [10.2148/benv.43.2.165, DOI 10.2148/BENV.43.2.165]
   Slater J., 2012, Somerstown and North Southsea Area Action Plan
   Smith MH, 2015, EUR UNION INT AFFAIR, P11
   Steen K., 2017, Urban Living Labs A Living Lab Way of Working
   Theodori G.L., 2004, J COMMUNITY DEV SOC, V35, P73, DOI DOI 10.1080/15575330409490133
   Tschimmel K, 2012, ISPIM C P, P1, DOI DOI 10.13140/2.1.2570.3361
   unhabitat, UN-HABITAT Resilience and Risk Reduction|UN-Habitat
   Vaughan L, 2017, PRACTICE-BASED DESIGN RESEARCH, P1
   Venable-Thomas M., 2018, Ph.D. Thesis
   Voorberg WH, 2015, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V17, P1333, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Yue A., 2020, Handbook on the Geographies of Creativity, P111
   Zebracki M, 2018, CITY SOC, V30, P14, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12153
   Zebracki M, 2018, CITY SOC, V30, P5, DOI 10.1111/ciso.12152
NR 93
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 23
U2 27
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 14
IS 6
AR 1513
DI 10.3390/buildings14061513
PG 22
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA WJ1N1
UT WOS:001254412800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dianat, H
   Wilkinson, S
   Williams, P
   Khatibi, H
AF Dianat, Heiman
   Wilkinson, Suzanne
   Williams, Peter
   Khatibi, Hamed
TI Choosing a holistic urban resilience assessment tool
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Resilient cities; Resilience assessments; Resilience
   assessment tools evaluation; Complex adaptive systems
ID DISASTER RESILIENCE; ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; REGIME SHIFTS; INDICATORS;
   SURROGATES; UNDERSTAND; LANDSCAPE; FRAMEWORK
AB Those involved in making resilience strategies and planning are struggling to understand the dynamic and complexity of urban areas and should be presented with a systematic tool, both in assessment and planning, to help them make important choices about which actions, plans, and policies to implement. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that these methods are based on sound theory and are simple and comprehensible. Proper and accurate measurement of resilience are the steppingstones in developing effective resilience plan. Recently, there has been efforts to create tools to measure resilience in urban areas. Several tools have been created, however, there is a lack of evidence-based analysis into these assessment tools. This study is going to address this gap by finding a systemic and holistic approach to assess resilience. The aim is to determine the criteria required for assessing the resilience of the urban complex system by asking series of questions. Furthermore, existing urban resilience assessment tools evaluated to determine whether they can measure urban resilience holistically. Any method to assess resiliency in complex urban systems has to take a holistic approach. The whole urban system needs to be studied to be able to determine the overall behaviour of the system. The Auckland region was chosen to demonstrate how the study's concepts can be applied. Following consideration of specific resiliency criteria, 28 questions were developed evaluate the assessment tools. The Disaster Resilience Scorecard was chosen as the best measuring tool for the determined criteria to be ran within a city.
C1 [Dianat, Heiman] HEIMAN PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   [Wilkinson, Suzanne] Massey Univ, Sch Built Environm, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
   [Dianat, Heiman; Khatibi, Hamed] Univ Auckland, Civil & Environm Engn, Auckland, New Zealand.
C3 Massey University; University of Auckland
RP Dianat, H (corresponding author), HEIMAN PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
EM h.dianat@auckland.ac.nz
RI Khatibi, Hamed/AAS-5181-2021; Wilkinson, Suzanne/AAI-1922-2020
OI Khatibi, Hamed/0000-0002-4486-1342; Dianat, Heiman/0000-0001-5513-5189
CR A. Council, 2016, AUCKL CIV DEF EM MAN
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Ahern NR, 2006, COMPR CHILD ADOLES N, V29, P103, DOI 10.1080/01460860600677643
   AKLC, 2017, MAORI TAMAKI MAKAURA
   [Anonymous], 1994, Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos
   [Anonymous], 2001, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI
   [Anonymous], 2009, The Resilient City: Defining What San Francisco Needs from Its Seismic Mitigation Policies
   [Anonymous], 1986, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
   [Anonymous], Making Cities Resilient: Summary for Policymakers 2013
   [Anonymous], 2016, The Economist
   Arup & Rockefeller Foundation, 2017, City Resilience Index
   Balsells M., 2015, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M
   Barkham R.J., 2013, RESILIENT CITIES GRO
   BATTy M., 2009, Cities as complex systems: scaling, interaction, networks, dynamics and urban morphologies, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69
   Batty M., 2007, Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agentbased models, and fractals
   Batty M., 2012, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come to Age. An Overview with implications to Urban Planning and Design
   Bennett EM, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P945, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0141-3
   Bergamini Nadia., 2013, UNU‐IAS policy report
   Bettencourt L, 2010, NATURE, V467, P912, DOI 10.1038/467912a
   Biggs R., 2015, PRINCIPLES BUILDING
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Cabell JF, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04666-170118
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Carter MR, 2006, J DEV STUD, V42, P178, DOI 10.1080/00220380500405261
   Chiong R, 2008, INT J COMPUT APPL T, V32, P216, DOI 10.1504/IJCAT.2008.020957
   Coetzee C, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P196, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2015-0153
   Crépin AS, 2012, ECOL ECON, V84, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.003
   Cruz S.S., 2012, Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_4, 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_4]
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   da Silva J., 2015, CITY RESILIENCE INDE
   Davies J, 2015, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V28, P328, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2014.970734
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DE ROO., 2012, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age, P207
   De Roo G., 2016, COMPLEXITY PLANNING, P52
   Dent E.B., 2001, J COMPLEXITY ISSUES, V3, P90
   Dianat H., INT J DISASTER RISK, V65
   Dianat H., 2019, INDICATORS ACTION CA
   Du Pleassis C., 2009, APPROACH STUDYING UR
   du Plessis., 2008, Exploring Sustainability Science-A Southern African Perspective, P59
   Du Plessis C., 2008, UNDERSTANDING CITIES
   Emmer R., 2008, Coastal resiliency index: A community self-assessment
   Environment, 2019, ENV CLIMATE CHANGE I
   Fletcher CS, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V201, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.10.011
   Fletcher C.S., 2006, P 50 ANN M ISSS 2006
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2011, AMBIO, V40, P719, DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2016, INCREASING RESILIENC
   Frankenberger T., 2013, Community resilience: Conceptual framework and measurement feed the future learning agenda, P1
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Grosvenor, 2014, RES CIT GROSV RES RE
   Gusdorf F, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.06.005
   Hansell RIC, 1997, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V46, P175
   Haraldsson H.V, 2000, SYSTEM DYNAMIC COURS
   Healey P, 2006, RTPI LIB SER, P1
   Heinzlef C, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.003
   Hirsch GB, 2007, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V39, P239, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9114-3
   HOLLAND JH, 1992, DAEDALUS, V121, P17
   Holland JH, 2012, SIGNALS AND BOUNDARIES: BUILDING BLOCKS FOR COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS, P1
   Holland JH, 1995, Hidden orderhow adaptation builds complexity
   HUNTER JE, 1990, J APPL PSYCHOL, V75, P334, DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.334
   Innes JudithEleanor., 2010, Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy
   Jane J., 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   Johansson J, 2017, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V37, P54, DOI 10.1109/MCG.2016.49
   Johnson Jeffrey., 2012, COMPLEXITY THEORIES, P153
   Johnson S., 2002, Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities, and Software
   Kalra N., 2014, WORLD BANK
   Khatibi H., 2021, INDICATORS BANK SMAR
   Khatibi H., 2021, RESILIENT SMART CITY
   Khazai B., 2015, A Guide to Measuring Urban Risk Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice of Urban Indicators
   Kimberlin CL, 2008, AM J HEALTH-SYST PH, V65, P2276, DOI 10.2146/ajhp070364
   Lade SJ, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1603043
   Lade SJ, 2012, PLOS COMPUT BIOL, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002360
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Lhomme S., 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS
   LoBiondo-Wood G., 2017, Nursing Research-E-Book: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice
   Long T., 2000, Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, V4, P30, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1054/cein.2000.0106, 10.1054/cein.2000.0106, DOI 10.1054/CEIN.2000.0106]
   Luvuno L, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072221
   Lynch C., 2018, CityStrength Diagnostic: Methodological Guidebook
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review Bellagio Initiative
   Meadows D. H., 2008, THINKING SYSTEMS
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miles SB, 2011, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V38, P36, DOI 10.1559/1523040638136
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Morley P., 2015, P 5 INT C BUILD RES
   Nel D, 2018, INT PLAN STUD, V23, P250, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2018.1439370
   Ness B, 2007, ECOL ECON, V60, P498, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023
   Neumayer E, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.011
   Norberg J., 2008, Complexity theory for a sustainable future
   Ostrom E, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P15181, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0702288104
   Pascale R.T., 1999, Surfing the edge of chaos
   Pickett STA, 2001, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V32, P127, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
   Portugali J, 2011, UNDERST COMPLEX SYST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19451-1
   Quinlan AE, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P677, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12550
   R. Alliance, 2010, ASSESSING RESILIENCE
   R. Foundation Arup, 2014, CITY RESILIENCE FRAM
   Reif Benjamin., 1973, Models in Urban and Regional Planning
   Roggema R, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P2525, DOI 10.3390/su4102525
   Standardization I. O. f., 2014, SUSTAINABLE DEV COMM
   StatsNZ, 2016, POPULATION ESTIMATES
   StatsNZ, 2018, NAT ACC INC EXP YEAR
   STERMAN JD, 1994, SYST DYNAM REV, V10, P291, DOI 10.1002/sdr.4260100214
   Swanson J, 2002, J OPER RES SOC, V53, P472, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-Habitat, 2017, CIT RES PROF PROGR
   UNISDR, 2012, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction Report
   van Oudenhoven FJW, 2011, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V22, P154, DOI 10.1108/14777831111113356
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Walker B, 2012, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wilber K., 2001, A brief history of everything, V2nd
   Williams P., 2016, UN CITY DISASTER RES, P248
NR 115
TC 37
Z9 37
U1 22
U2 186
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD MAR
PY 2022
VL 71
AR 102789
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
EA JAN 2022
PG 18
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA ZR7WQ
UT WOS:000767990400008
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ottenburger, SS
   Cox, R
   Chowdhury, BH
   Trybushnyi, D
   Omar, EA
   Kaloti, SA
   Ufer, U
   Poganietz, WR
   Liu, WJ
   Deines, E
   Müller, TO
   Möhrle, S
   Raskob, W
AF Ottenburger, Sadeeb S.
   Cox, Rob
   Chowdhury, Badrul H.
   Trybushnyi, Dmytro
   Omar, Ehmedi Al
   Kaloti, Sujay A.
   Ufer, Ulrich
   Poganietz, Witold-R.
   Liu, Weijia
   Deines, Evgenia
   Mueller, Tim O.
   Moehrle, Stella
   Raskob, Wolfgang
TI Sustainable urban transformations based on integrated microgrid designs
SO NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
ID RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; MUNICIPAL
AB The impacts of natural hazards on infrastructure, enhanced by climate change, are increasingly more severe emphasizing the necessity of resilient energy grids. Microgrids, tailored energy systems for specific neighbourhoods and districts, play a pivotal role in sustaining energy supply during main grid outages. These solutions not only mitigate economic losses and well-being disruptions against escalating hazards but also enhance city resilience in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11. However, disregarding socioeconomic factors in defining microgrid boundaries risks perpetuating inequalities and impeding progress towards other SDG 11 targets, including fair democratic participation. Our approach integrates social and technical indicators to bolster urban microgrid planning. Through a case study in a US county, we illustrate how integrated microgrid planning effectively intertwines urban resilience, well-being and equity while promoting sustainable development. This study underscores the importance of integrated microgrid planning for sustainable and resilient urban transformation amid environmental and societal challenges.
   Improving the resilience of energy systems to natural hazards cannot rely only on strengthening technical aspects of energy grids. This study shows how integrating technical and socioeconomic dimensions in the design of microgrids can enhance the resilience and equity of energy systems and promote well-being.
C1 [Ottenburger, Sadeeb S.; Trybushnyi, Dmytro; Omar, Ehmedi Al; Deines, Evgenia; Mueller, Tim O.; Moehrle, Stella; Raskob, Wolfgang] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Thermal Energy Technol & Safety ITES, Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany.
   [Cox, Rob; Chowdhury, Badrul H.; Kaloti, Sujay A.] Univ North Carolina Charlotte UNCC, Energy Prod & Infrastructure Ctr EP, Charlotte, NC USA.
   [Ufer, Ulrich; Poganietz, Witold-R.] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Technol Assessment & Syst Anal ITAS, Karlsruhe, Germany.
   [Liu, Weijia] Natl Renewable Energy Lab NREL, Energy Syst Integrat, Golden, CO USA.
C3 Helmholtz Association; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Helmholtz
   Association; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; United States Department
   of Energy (DOE); National Renewable Energy Laboratory - USA
RP Ottenburger, SS (corresponding author), Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Thermal Energy Technol & Safety ITES, Eggenstein Leopoldshafen, Germany.
EM ottenburger@kit.edu
RI Liu, Weijia/M-2044-2019; Chowdhury, Badrul/HPE-1030-2023
OI Ufer, Ulrich/0000-0001-5462-2903; Al Omar, Ehmedi/0009-0000-1818-8230;
   Chowdhury, Badrul/0000-0001-7300-1256; Poganietz,
   Witold-Roger/0000-0002-5839-1206; Mohrle, Stella/0000-0002-7611-5360
FU KIT Energy Center; Helmholtz Association; US Department of Energy
FX This work was supported by the KIT Energy Center and the Helmholtz
   Association. We gratefully acknowledge the support and funding from the
   US Department of Energy for the project 'Planning an Affordable,
   Resilient, and Sustainable Grid in North Carolina' (R.C., B.H.C. and
   S.A.K.).
CR Adams J, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102718
   Ajoulabadi A, 2020, ENERGY, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117024
   Al Omar E., 2024, ZENODO
   Amann J, 2021, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V44, P715, DOI 10.1080/01900692.2021.1912089
   [Anonymous], 2014, 2014 NCFMP LIDAR STA
   [Anonymous], 2018, Hurricane Florence
   [Anonymous], 2019, HURRICANE DORIAN
   [Anonymous], 2023, DISASTER SUPPLEMENTA
   ARROW KJ, 1962, REV ECON STUD, V29, P155, DOI 10.2307/2295952
   Barry E F., 2011, Journal of homeland security and emergency management, DOI DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1792
   Bartz-Beielstein T, 2014, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V4, P178, DOI 10.1002/widm.1124
   Becker S, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P1093, DOI 10.1177/0308518X19881164
   Bhusal N, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P18064, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968586
   Bódis K, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109309
   Bogdanov D, 2021, APPL ENERG, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116273
   Bommareddy S, 2022, 52ND ANNUAL IEEE/IFIP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS WORKSHOP VOLUME (DSN-W 2022), P72, DOI 10.1109/DSN-W54100.2022.00022
   Borgström S, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P463, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-01142-1
   Bower W.I., 2014, The advanced microgrid. integration and interoperability
   Carpenter SR, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P3248, DOI 10.3390/su4123248
   Casey JA, 2020, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V7, P371, DOI 10.1007/s40572-020-00295-0
   Chatterjee C, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.005
   Chilvers J, 2016, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V18, P585, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483
   Clark SS, 2023, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V8, P356, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2022.2157116
   Clark Susan Spierre, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P339, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8
   Cox R., 2024, PLANNING AFFORDABLE
   Cox W, 2013, 2013 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES (ISGT)
   Dargin JS, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0234381
   Day R, 2016, ENERG POLICY, V93, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.019
   Dehghanian P, 2017, MIDWEST SYMP CIRCUIT, P1364, DOI 10.1109/MWSCAS.2017.8053185
   Hadjipaschalis I, 2009, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V13, P1513, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.028
   Hatziargyriou N, 2022, OXF OPEN ENERGY, V2, DOI 10.1093/ooenergy/oiac013
   Helbing D, 2013, NATURE, V497, P51, DOI 10.1038/nature12047
   Hick R, 2012, J SOC POLICY, V41, P291, DOI 10.1017/S0047279411000845
   Jain G, 2022, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1038/s42949-022-00050-4
   Jeffers R.F., 2018, Analysis of microgrid locations benefiting community resilience for puerto rico, DOI [10.2172/1481633, DOI 10.2172/1481633]
   Judson E, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102732
   Katina PF, 2013, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V9, P211, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2013.054980
   Keith M, 2023, NAT SUSTAIN, V6, P115, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-00979-5
   Le K, 2021, INT J EDUC DEV, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102441
   Liddiard R, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V123, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.238
   Limberger J. D., 2019, NEW HANOVER COUNTY H
   Lucas A, 2014, FRONT PHYS-LAUSANNE, V2, DOI 10.3389/fphy.2014.00005
   Magnusson D, 2016, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V22, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.004
   Mansour T., 2015, Commutation Relations, Normal Ordering, and Stirling Numbers
   Markhvida M, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P538, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0508-7
   Martins A, 2020, ENERGY REP, V6, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.007
   Mertens K., 2014, Photovoltaics. Fundamentals, Technology, and Practice, V2nd
   Moreno C, 2021, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V4, P93, DOI 10.3390/smartcities4010006
   Münzberg T, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.027
   National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2023, NRELCOMSTOCK
   NC Clean Energy Technology Center, 2019, PLANNING AFFORDABLE
   New Hanover County, 2023, COMMON MAPS
   Niggli L, 2022, PLOS CLIM, V1, DOI 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000057
   North Carolina Department of Public Safety, 2022, EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
   Obolensky M.A. B., 2019, Infrastructure Disruptions: How Instability Breeds Household Vulnerability (No. 8902)
   Okamoto Y, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-03050-z
   Ottenburger SS, 2023, RISK ANAL, V43, P2158, DOI 10.1111/risa.14102
   Ottenburger SS, 2019, INT CONF INFORM COMM, DOI 10.1109/ict-dm47966.2019.9032982
   Panteli M, 2017, P IEEE, V105, P1202, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2691357
   Persson M, 2015, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V45, P689, DOI 10.1017/S0007123413000409
   Petit F., 2020, Grid Modernization: Metrics Analysis (GMLC1.1) - Resilience
   Sachs JD, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P805, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
   Scheller F, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V105, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.005
   Sedgh SA, 2021, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2020.100418
   Sheikholeslami M, 2022, IET RENEW POWER GEN, V16, P1699, DOI 10.1049/rpg2.12473
   Soininen N, 2021, LEG ASPEC SUS DEV, V26, P77, DOI 10.1163/9789004465442_005
   Spierre Clark S., 2022, Impact of Infrastructure Disruptions on Puerto Rican Household Capabilities, Health, and Well-Being
   Vitéz B, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13051088
   Wahlund M, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102482
   Ward H., 2002, From their lives: A manual on how to conduct focus groups of low-income parents
   Warneryd M, 2022, SUSTAIN FUTURES, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100079
   Yang WJ, 2022, APPL ENERG, V313, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118793
NR 72
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 14
U2 27
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2398-9629
J9 NAT SUSTAIN
JI Nat. Sustain.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 7
IS 8
DI 10.1038/s41893-024-01395-7
EA JUL 2024
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA D4T2X
UT WOS:001268725000002
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wilkes-Allemann, J
   Kopp, M
   van der Velde, R
   Bernasconi, A
   Karaca, E
   Cepic, S
   Tomicevic-Dubljevic, J
   Bauer, N
   Petit-Boix, A
   Brantschen, EC
   Cueva, J
   Lepold, S
   Saha, S
   Zivojinovic, I
AF Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee
   Kopp, Mira
   van der Velde, Rene
   Bernasconi, Andreas
   Karaca, Elisabeth
   Cepic, Slavica
   Tomicevic-Dubljevic, Jelena
   Bauer, Nicole
   Petit-Boix, Anna
   Brantschen, Evelyn Coleman
   Cueva, Jessica
   Lepold, Sina
   Saha, Somidh
   Zivojinovic, Ivana
TI Envisioning the future-Creating sustainable, healthy and resilient
   BioCities
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Forest urbanism; Urban planning; BioCities; Transformation
AB Numerous challenges - from population increase to climate change - threaten the sustainable development of cities and call for a fundamental change of urban development and green-blue resource management. Urban forests are vital in this transition, as they provide various ecosystem services and allow to re-shape and re-think cities. Based on a Europe-wide community effort with diverse experts centered around urban forests and urban greening, we propose five key research fields to generate the knowledge required to unlock fundamental changes in urban development and green-blue resource management: circular bioeconomy, climate resilience, gover-nance, social and human environment, and biodiversity. To support the design of greener, cooler, more inclusive and resilient cities, all these research fields require inter-and transdisciplinary collaboration, engaging stake-holders in transforming urban engagement and functioning. We summarise main inter-, trans-und multi-disciplinary research paths for each field and the cross-cutting knowledge areas that can help to address the challenges many cities face (e.g., modelling and assessment of the urban microclimate). For transforming cities further knowledge is needed on e.g., urban innovation, transition, participation, and more. Finally, we address how the identified research gaps can be implemented (e.g., international coordinated research effort, interdis-ciplinary networks).
C1 [Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee; Brantschen, Evelyn Coleman] Bern Univ Appl Sci, Sch Agr Forest & Food Sci, Forest Sci Grp, Langgasse 85, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
   [Kopp, Mira; Petit-Boix, Anna; Lepold, Sina] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Chair Societal Transit & Circular Econ, Tennenbacher Str 4, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany.
   [van der Velde, Rene] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Urbanism, Res Fellowship Urban Forestry, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
   [Bernasconi, Andreas] Pan Bern AG, Hirschengraben 24, CH-3001 Bern, Switzerland.
   [Karaca, Elisabeth; Zivojinovic, Ivana] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci BOKU, Inst Forest Environm & Nat Resource Policy, Feistmantelstr 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria.
   [Cepic, Slavica; Tomicevic-Dubljevic, Jelena] Univ Belgrade, Fac Forestry, Dept Landscape Architecture & Hort, Kneza Viseslava 1, Belgrade 11030, Serbia.
   [Bauer, Nicole] Swiss Fed Inst Forest, Snow & Landscape Res WSL, Zurcherstr 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
   [Cueva, Jessica; Saha, Somidh] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Technol Assessment & Syst Anal ITAS, Karlstr 11, D-76133 Karlsruhe, Germany.
   [Lepold, Sina] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany.
   [Zivojinovic, Ivana] Forest Policy Res Network, European Forest Inst, Feistmantelstr 4, A-1180 Vienna, Austria.
   [Zivojinovic, Ivana] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci BOKU, Ctr Bioecon, Peter Jordan Str 82-II, A-1190 Vienna, Austria.
   [Lepold, Sina] Univ Jena, Chair Environm Polit, Bachstr 18k, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
C3 University of Freiburg; Delft University of Technology; BOKU University;
   University of Belgrade; Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology Domain;
   Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research; Helmholtz
   Association; Karlsruhe Institute of Technology; Helmholtz Association;
   Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research (UFZ); BOKU University;
   Friedrich Schiller University of Jena
RP Wilkes-Allemann, J (corresponding author), Bern Univ Appl Sci, Sch Agr Forest & Food Sci, Forest Sci Grp, Langgasse 85, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
EM jerylee.wilkes@bfh.ch
RI Petit-Boix, Anna/I-6525-2015; Saha, Somidh/F-6264-2012; Kopp,
   Mira/MHQ-2224-2025; Zivojinovic, Ivana/C-6830-2019
OI Zivojinovic, Ivana/0000-0001-9900-7066; Tomicevic-Dubljevic,
   Jelena/0000-0001-7905-5722; Kopp, Mira/0000-0002-8650-6816; Cepic,
   Slavica/0000-0002-5055-0188
FU EFI
FX This paper steams from the project financed by the European Forest
   Institute Network Fund "Green Book of BioCities 2020". We are grateful
   to EFI supporting our project. The views expressed in this publication
   do not necessarily represent those of the European Forest Institute.
   Furthermore, we thank all experts and researchers who participated in
   all workshops throughout this project without whom the thorough
   identification of paths would have been impossible. We are also very
   grateful for the comments of two anonymous reviewer who gave useful
   inputs on how to improve this manuscript.
CR Ashton J., 1986, Health Promotion, V1, P319, DOI 10.1093/heapro/1.3.319
   Batty M, 2018, INVENTING FUTURE CITIES, P1, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/11923.001.0001
   Batty M., 2009, Cities as Complex Systems: Scaling, Interaction, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69]
   Beatley T, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P3328, DOI 10.3390/su5083328
   Boeri S., 2016, C P
   Concepción ED, 2015, OIKOS, V124, P1571, DOI 10.1111/oik.02166
   Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
   Government Office for Science, 2017, TOOLS FUT THINK FOR
   Guallart V., 2023, TRANSFORMING BIOCITI
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kamal-Chaoui L., 2009, COMPETITIVE CITIES C
   Kennedy CA, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P5985, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1504315112
   Mayring P., 2019, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-21308-4_42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-21308-442]
   Meyer H., 2006, ONTWERP OPENBARE RUI
   Scarascia-Mugnozza G., 2023, TRANSFORMING BIOCITI
   Seto KC, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P923
   Shell, 2008, EXPL FUT SCEN EXPL G
   Suzuki H, 2010, ECO2 CITIES: ECOLOGICAL CITIES AS ECONOMIC CITIES, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8046-8
   United Nations (Department of Economic and Social Affairs - Population Division), 2018, STESASERA352 UN DEP
   Wilkes-Allemann J., 2022, EUR I, DOI [10.36333/rs4, DOI 10.36333/RS4]
NR 20
TC 5
Z9 7
U1 10
U2 48
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD JUN
PY 2023
VL 84
AR 127935
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127935
EA APR 2023
PG 16
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban
   Studies
GA G1AQ6
UT WOS:000986572200001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liang, CM
   Zhang, X
   Xu, J
   Pan, GY
   Wang, Y
AF Liang, Changmei
   Zhang, Xiang
   Xu, Jin
   Pan, Guoyan
   Wang, Yao
TI An integrated framework to select resilient and sustainable sponge city
   design schemes for robust decision making
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Sustainability; Sponge city; Design schemes selection; SWMM
ID LOW-IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT;
   SYSTEM; CONSTRUCTION; MITIGATION; LEVEL
AB To mitigate the impacts of rapid urbanization and climate change on hydrology and water quality, the new concept of urban stormwater management, sponge city, has been proposed to increase the city's resilience. Although 30 cities in China have been chosen to implement sponge city construction, there is a lack of a quantitative evaluation method to help decision makers select resilience and sustainability schemes. This paper proposes a new integrated framework in selecting the resilient and sustainable sponge city design schemes. The developed framework consists of the following 10 indicators: resilience, flood volume, flood duration time, hydraulic performance index, annual runoff volume control, rainfall usage, pollution control, social acceptability, greenhouse gas emission, and cost. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was used to simulate the rainfall-runoff process to calculate the indicators. The multi-criteria analysis methods of the improved AHP were used to calculate the weights of indictors, while the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to rank the design schemes. The proposed framework was then applied to Xining, China, as a case study. The performances of three sponge city design schemes (51, S2, and S3) with different sponge city construction areas and different low impact development (LID) controls were analyzed for the LID construction project. The results identified 51 as the best scheme where 50% permeable pavement and 30% rain barrel are implemented in residential areas. In contrast, S3 had the lowest scores, with the largest LID construction area. This integrated framework will assist policy-makers in the selection of optimal sponge city design schemes.
C1 [Liang, Changmei; Zhang, Xiang; Xu, Jin; Pan, Guoyan; Wang, Yao] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
   [Liang, Changmei; Zhang, Xiang; Xu, Jin; Pan, Guoyan; Wang, Yao] Hubei Prov Key Lab Water Syst Sci Sponge City Con, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
   [Liang, Changmei; Zhang, Xiang; Xu, Jin; Pan, Guoyan; Wang, Yao] Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University
RP Zhang, X (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.; Zhang, X (corresponding author), Hubei Prov Key Lab Water Syst Sci Sponge City Con, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.; Zhang, X (corresponding author), Hubei Prov Collaborat Innovat Ctr Water Resources, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China.
EM zhangxiang@whu.edu.cn
RI Wang, Yao/HNI-1369-2023; Zhang, Xiangyu/ABC-2896-2021
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41890823]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China, grant number: 41890823.
CR Ahiablame LM, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V119, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.019
   Almhab A., 2008, 2008 Second Asia International Conference on Modeling & Simulation, P350, DOI 10.1109/AMS.2008.42
   [Anonymous], 2014, SPONG CIT CONSTR TEC
   [Anonymous], 2015, STORM WAT MAN MOD VE
   Bastiaanssen WGM, 1998, J HYDROL, V212, P198, DOI [10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00253-4, 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00254-6]
   Behzadian M, 2012, EXPERT SYST APPL, V39, P13051, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
   Bennis S, 2003, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V129, P504, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2003)129:7(504)
   Birgani YT, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P2817, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-1960-2
   Butler D, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V89, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.198
   Calabrese A, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V121, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.005
   Casal-Campos A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P9008, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b01193
   Cipolla SS, 2016, ECOL ENG, V95, P876, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.07.009
   Cook C, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.011
   Davis AP, 2009, J ENVIRON ENG, V135, P109, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109)
   Hwang C. L., 1979, Multiple objective decision makingmethods and applications. A state of the art survey
   Jia H., 2015, EWRI CURR, V14, P8
   Joyce J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.026
   Kong FH, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V95, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.021
   Li JK, 2017, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V31, P4745, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1776-5
   Li Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024
   Liang CM, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041163
   Liao ZL, 2015, DESALIN WATER TREAT, V56, P2817, DOI 10.1080/19443994.2014.964327
   Liu J, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P1069, DOI 10.3390/w6041069
   Liu YZ, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V511, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.077
   Mei C, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V639, P1394, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.199
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Nazemi A, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P925, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.011
   Palla A, 2015, J HYDROL, V528, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050
   Panagopoulos Y, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2823, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.035
   Qin HP, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V129, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026
   Sweetapple C, 2018, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V77, P1757, DOI 10.2166/wst.2018.070
   Sweetapple C, 2017, J ENVIRON ENG, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001171, 10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0001171]
   Teixeira AHDC, 2009, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V149, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.09.014
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   Vaidya OS, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V169, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Wang H, 2018, SCI CHINA TECHNOL SC, V61, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11431-017-9170-5
   Wang MM, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V201, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.034
   Warsta L, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P954, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2017.1325496
   Xiang L., 2016, THESIS
   Xie JQ, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V95, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.027
   Yang S., 2013, METHOD MODEL RES GHG
   Yang Y, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V223, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.021
   Zhuang BY, 2013, J HYDRAUL ENG, V139, P527, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000676
NR 43
TC 43
Z9 44
U1 23
U2 226
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 119
AR 106810
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106810
PG 11
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OD4JB
UT WOS:000579817600026
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xiong, YJ
   Tang, H
   Tian, XB
AF Xiong, Yajun
   Tang, Hui
   Tian, Xiaobo
TI Research on Structural Toughness of Railway City Network in Yellow River
   Basin and Case Study of Zhengzhou 7-20 Rainstorm Disaster
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE railroad urban network; resilience assessment; vulnerability analysis;
   interference resilience analysis; yellow river basin
ID RESILIENCE
AB With the gradual networking of inter-city relations and the increase in acute impact and chronic stress, the measurement of the resilience of urban network structures is particularly prominent. Based on the construction of the urban network by passenger train trips in the Yellow River Basin, this paper analyzes and assesses the characteristics of the structural resilience of the urban network, and probes into the network resilience and urban response under the circumstances of node failure and line failure in Zhengzhou. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) The urban network in the Yellow River Basin was clearly hierarchical, with a significant spatial distribution of "low in the north and high in the south", and the overall characteristics of "robustness" in small areas and "fragility" in large areas. The network connection forms were diversified and open. The network transmission efficiency was high, and the edge cities depended on the core cities with prominent characteristics, and the risk load of regional core cities rose. (2) The network structure was "robust" as it maintained high operational efficiency and connectivity under random attacks. Under deliberate attacks, the city network operated efficiently with a small increase in connectivity before the 60% threshold, and after the threshold, the overall network started to split into many sub-networks, and the network fragmentation gradually increased until the network collapsed. (3) Zhengzhou node failure and line failure states in the Yellow River Basin urban network were resilient, in the sense that when suffering important nodes and lines going down it could still maintain good network operation efficiency, and the core nodes in the impact of natural disasters could adapt to the destructive nature of the network through the urban network structure self-regulation.
C1 [Xiong, Yajun; Tang, Hui; Tian, Xiaobo] Cent China Normal Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China.
   [Tang, Hui] Hunan City Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Yiyang 413000, Peoples R China.
C3 Central China Normal University; Hunan City University
RP Tang, H; Tian, XB (corresponding author), Cent China Normal Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China.; Tang, H (corresponding author), Hunan City Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Yiyang 413000, Peoples R China.
EM tanghui202086@163.com; txbct3@126.com
FU Project for Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province
   [20YBQ024]; Key Laboratory of Key Technologies of Digital Urban-Rural
   Spatial Planning of Hunan Province [2018TP1042]
FX This work was supported by the Project for Philosophy and Social Science
   Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 20YBQ024) and the Key Laboratory of
   Key Technologies of Digital Urban-Rural Spatial Planning of Hunan
   Province (No. 2018TP1042).
CR Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Chan HY, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102945
   Fang C, 2020, P I MECH ENG O-J RIS, V234, P235, DOI 10.1177/1748006X19889149
   Ge Y, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101723
   [郭卫东 Guo Weidong], 2022, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V41, P1371
   Helbing D, 2013, NATURE, V497, P51, DOI 10.1038/nature12047
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195404
   Huang X., 2015, CITY PLANNING REV, P50
   Janic M, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.011
   Kendra JM, 2003, DISASTERS, V27, P37, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00218
   [李梦程 Li Mengcheng], 2021, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V41, P84
   [李艳 Li Yan], 2019, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V38, P1694
   Lordan O, 2016, PHYSICA A, V445, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.053
   [陆大道 Lu Dadao], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P2431
   Maguire B, 2007, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V22, P16
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Mudigonda S, 2019, J TRANSP SAF SECUR, V11, P491, DOI 10.1080/19439962.2018.1436105
   Otuoze SH, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031371
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2019, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V39, P68
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2018, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V37, P1193
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2015, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P84
   Shi JL, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19042070
   [魏石梅 Wei Shimei], 2021, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V76, P1394
   [魏冶 Wei Ye], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P488
   [吴迪 Wu Di], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P1133
   [吴迪 Wu Di], 2017, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V36, P719
   Wu Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106088
   [谢永顺 Xie Yongshun], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1619
   Zhang L, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102570
   [赵金丽 Zhao Jinli], 2021, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V31, P59
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zhu Y, 2016, TRANSPORT RES REC, P70, DOI 10.3141/2599-09
NR 35
TC 5
Z9 6
U1 3
U2 52
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 19
AR 12515
DI 10.3390/su141912515
PG 17
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 5G8OV
UT WOS:000867252300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Barzaman, S
   Shamsipour, A
   Lakes, T
   Faraji, A
AF Barzaman, Sepideh
   Shamsipour, Aliakbar
   Lakes, Tobia
   Faraji, Abdollah
TI Indicators of urban climate resilience (case study: Varamin, Iran)
SO NATURAL HAZARDS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban climate resilience; ANP; UHI; Environmental planning; Varamin city
ID NETWORK MEASUREMENT PROCESSES; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; PROCESS ANP;
   SUSTAINABILITY; TEMPERATURE
AB Natural and man-made disasters caused by global climate change affect inhabitant health and well-being in the urban environments. One of the main issues in environmental planning in any form of residential area is monitoring the resilience of such disasters. This challenge has become more complicated when considering socio-ecological aspects of human-environmental systems and different types of land use and land cover in the resilience assessment process. In the present study, the resilience of Varamin, Iran, concerning climate change has been investigated through Analytic Network Process (ANP). The prominent components and indicators of climate resilience in the city were extracted using various datasets, field surveys, interviewing 44 urban planning experts through a questionnaire, and the Delphi method. Four components and 33 indicators were obtained based on the climatic resilience factor and integrated using the ANP model. A total of 393 citizens of Varamin city were invited to complete a questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed based on four environmental, socio-economical, infrastructural, and institutional components. According to the survey, the highest priority in climate resilience was for people who live in primary settlements. The city officials must pay special attention to these areas to make the city resilient and consider it a priority in their planning. Also, the climate change risks factor in resilience from the citizens' point of view was 2.15, which is less than the desired average and indicates habitat vulnerability against climate change. In addition, socio-economical and infrastructural components had higher resilience than environmental and institutional components. According to the suggestions of the citizens, the cooperation of government, local institutions, and educational organizations is effective in reducing and adapting to the effects of climate change and improving urban resilience.
C1 [Barzaman, Sepideh; Faraji, Abdollah] Univ Zanjan, Fac Literature, Dept Geog, Zanjan, Iran.
   [Shamsipour, Aliakbar] Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Phys Geog, Tehran, Iran.
   [Lakes, Tobia] Univ Humboldt Berlin, Dept Geog, Berlin, Germany.
C3 University Zanjan; University of Tehran
RP Shamsipour, A (corresponding author), Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Phys Geog, Tehran, Iran.
EM sepidehraha99@gmail.com; shamsipr@ut.ac.ir; tobia.lakes@hu-berlin.de;
   af1390@yahoo.com
RI Shamsipour, Aliakbar/AAE-6605-2020
FU municipality of Varamin city
FX The authors would like to express their gratitude to the municipality of
   Varamin city for all their supports.
CR Aldrich D. P., 2010, J. Homel. Secur.
   [Anonymous], 2019, TEHRAN ENV DEP
   [Anonymous], 2005, Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters
   [Anonymous], 2003, 966 WMO
   Atta-Ur-Rahman, 2015, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P295, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55369-4_16
   Bastaminia A., 2019, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V8, P209
   Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419
   Becker P., 2014, Sustainability science: Managing risk and resilience for sustainable development
   Bokaie M, 2019, INT J URBAN SCI, V23, P269
   Bottero M, 2010, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V21, P618, DOI 10.1108/14777831011067926
   Butsch C., 2009, The megacity resilience framework
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Dadashpour H., 2015, CRISIS MANAG, V4, P84
   Dai L, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P10056, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1418415112
   Farzad Behtash MR., 2013, J FINE ARTS ARCHITEC, V18, P33
   Feldmeyer D, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106861
   Feldmeyer D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102931
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Friedman M, 1937, J AM STAT ASSOC, V32, P675, DOI 10.2307/2279372
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Garschagen M, 2011, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V45, P141, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0934-8_9
   George D., 2010, SPSS WINDOWS STEP ST
   Hassink R., 2020, International Encyclopedia of Human Geography
   He JF, 2007, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V90, P217, DOI 10.1007/s00704-006-0273-1
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kalafatis SE, 2018, POLICY STUD J, V46, P700, DOI 10.1111/psj.12206
   Kiani A., 2013, GEOGR RES-AUST, V4, P195
   Kim D, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040405
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Liu CY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102640
   Manaflouyan S., 2020, Q NEW ATTITUDES HUM, V45, P509
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Moghbel M, 2019, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V137, P2463, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2735-7
   Narieswari L., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V399, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/399/1/012020
   Naseri M., 2016, POLIC SOC CULT STRAT, V21, P21
   Ng, 2014, URBAN CLIMATIC MAP S
   Oke, 1987, BOUNDARY LAYER CLIMA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203407219
   PEYKARJOU K, 2015, EUR ONLINE J NAT SOC, V4, P219
   Pickett S.T. A., 2013, Em Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, P7, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-91
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Prasad N, 2009, CLIMATE RESILIENT CITIES: A PRIMER ON REDUCING VULNERABILITIES TO DISASTERS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7766-6
   Ranta E, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106980
   Rodin Judith., 2014, RESILIENCE DIVIDEND
   Romero-Lankao P, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P670, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.002
   Saaty R.W., 2016, Decision making in complex environments: The analytic network process (ANP) for dependence and feedback, including a tutorial for the SuperDecisions software and portions of the encyclicon of applications, VI.
   Saaty TL, 2010, APPL OPTIM, V103, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_4
   Saaty TL, 2008, EUR J PURE APPL MATH, V1, P122
   Sardi M., 2019, The International Archives of The Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, VXLII-4/W16, P603, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-4-w16-603-2019, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-4-W16-603-2019]
   Sasanpour F., 2018, J SPAT ANAL ENV HAZA, V4, P85
   Shukri Firoozjah, 2017, PHYS DEV PLAN, V2, P44
   Statistical center of Iran, 2017, STAT CTR IRAN
   Timashev SA, 2017, IOP CONF SER-MAT SCI, V262, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/262/1/012197
   Timmerman P., 1981, ENV MONOGRAPH, P1
   UN, 2014, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG
NR 55
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 22
U2 92
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 0921-030X
EI 1573-0840
J9 NAT HAZARDS
JI Nat. Hazards
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 112
IS 1
BP 119
EP 143
DI 10.1007/s11069-021-05174-x
EA MAR 2022
PG 25
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA 1G9SX
UT WOS:000769875200004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jin, S
   Stokes, G
   Hamilton, C
AF Jin, Saebom
   Stokes, Gerald
   Hamilton, Clovia
TI Empirical evidence of urban climate adaptation alignment with
   sustainable development: Application of LDA
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban adaptation; Urban climate resilience; Sustainable city; Latent
   Dirichlet allocation; Topic model
ID LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; GLOBAL CLIMATE; CITIES; VULNERABILITY; RESILIENCE;
   DISCOURSE; RESOURCE; COLLAPSE; IMPACTS; POLICY
AB Cities are critical sites for climate action. Population and infrastructure are concentrated in urban areas and their susceptibility to climate change impacts makes them a pivotal place to embark on adaptation plans and stra-tegies. In the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) affirms that urban adaptation allows sustainable development and resilience. However, without evidence, this affirmation fails to acquire credibility and objectivity. As an attempt to provide the evidence for the assertion, this study examines the current actions in urban centers to determine if there is an alignment between adaptation and development. The study employs text mining techniques to analyze 400 urban project descriptions from Cit-ies100 reports (2015-2019) of the C40 network. With Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a machine learning algorithm for topic model analysis, the study identifies 17 major topics. Using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis to further characterize the findings, it finds an alignment of adaptation with urban sustainable and resilient development in several major cities. In this way, the paper makes a contribution to a global un-derstanding of urban adaptation as well as demonstrates a way of adopting the grey literature into the urban adaptation studies.
C1 [Jin, Saebom] SUNY Stony Brook, Coll Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Technol & Soc, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
   [Jin, Saebom] SUNY Korea, Incheon, South Korea.
   [Stokes, Gerald] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Technol & Soc, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
   [Hamilton, Clovia] SUNY Korea, Dept Technol & Society, 119-2 Songdomunhwaro Yeonsugu, Incheon, South Korea.
   [Jin, Saebom] 119-2 Songdomunhwaro Yeonsugu, Incheon 21985, South Korea.
C3 State University of New York (SUNY) System; Stony Brook University;
   State University of New York (SUNY) System; Stony Brook University
RP Jin, S (corresponding author), SUNY Stony Brook, Coll Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Technol & Soc, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
EM saebom.jin@stonybrook.edu; gerald.stokes@stonybrook.edu
FU Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, under the SUNY Korea's ICT
   Consilience Creative program [IITP-2020-2011-1-00783]
FX This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, under
   the SUNY Korea's ICT Consilience Creative program
   (IITP-2020-2011-1-00783) supervised by the Institute for Information &
   commu-nications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) .
CR Acosta-Michlik L, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.006
   Airoldi EM, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P20899, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1013452107
   AlSumait L, 2009, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V5781, P67, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04180-8_22
   Anguelovski I., 2018, City, V22, P417, DOI [10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126]
   Anguelovski I, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017
   [Anonymous], 2015, Regional Environmental Change, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10113-014-0708-7, 10.1007/s10584-014-1228-7, DOI 10.1007/S00044-014-1133-7]
   [Anonymous], 2009, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2009, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 710 December 2009, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10708-008-9161-9
   [Anonymous], 2009, Integrating climate change into development cooperation, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264054950-EN
   [Anonymous], 2020, WORLD BANK LIST EC
   [Anonymous], 2009, P 26 INT C MACH LEAR, DOI DOI 10.1145/1553374.1553515
   Araos M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009
   Assembly U. G., 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   Ayensu E, 1999, SCIENCE, V286, P685, DOI 10.1126/science.286.5440.685
   Ayers J, 2009, ENVIRONMENT, V51, P22, DOI 10.3200/ENV.51.4.22-31
   Banuri T., 2000, CLEAN DEV MECH SUSTA, P73
   Bassett TJ, 2013, GEOFORUM, V48, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Berkes F., 2002, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957
   Berrang-Ford L, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V124, P441, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1078-3
   Berrang-Ford L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012
   Bhatasara S, 2018, J INTEGR ENVIRON SCI, V15, P87, DOI 10.1080/1943815X.2018.1450766
   Blei DM, 2003, J MACH LEARN RES, V3, P993, DOI 10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993
   Boussalis C, 2019, CLIMATE, V7, DOI 10.3390/cli7030045
   Boussalis C, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V36, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.12.001
   Burch S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
   Burmeister H., 2019, FINANCING ADAPTATION
   Carpenter SR, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P451, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Chaney Allison., 2021, P INT AAAI C WEB SOC, V6, P419
   Chang J., 2009, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V22, P288, DOI DOI 10.5555/2984093.2984126
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   Chuang J, 2012, P SIGCHI C HUMAN FAC, P443, DOI DOI 10.1145/2207676.2207738
   Chuang J, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKING CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED VISUAL INTERFACES, P74, DOI 10.1145/2254556.2254572
   Clapp C., 2010, 29 OECD, DOI [10.1787/19970900, DOI 10.1787/19970900]
   Cohen S, 1998, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V8, P341, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(98)00017-X
   Dupuis J, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1476, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022
   Dupuis J, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05965-180431
   Eriksen SH, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
   Ferrell O.C., 2017, Business ethics: Ethical decision making cases, V7th
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Folke C., 2002, SOCIAL ECOLOGICAL RE, V155, P451
   Ford JD, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P10729, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1614023113
   Ford JD, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P801, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0648-2
   Ford JD, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05732-180340
   Fortuna B, 2005, INFORM-J COMPUT INFO, V29, P497
   Fünfgeld H, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P603, DOI 10.1068/c1234
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Gardner M. J., 2010, NIPS WORKSH CHALL DA
   Geneletti D, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.003
   Gretarsson B, 2012, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, V3, DOI 10.1145/2089094.2089099
   Griffiths TL, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P5228, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0307752101
   Grün B, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V40, P1
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P51, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9976-5
   Handayani W, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   IPCC, 2012, SPECIAL REPORT WORKI, DOI [10.13140/2.1.3117.9529, DOI 10.13140/2.1.3117.9529]
   ISO, 2020, GUID ADDR CLIM CHANG
   Jackson JBC, 2001, SCIENCE, V293, P629, DOI 10.1126/science.1059199
   Kithiia J, 2010, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, P17, DOI 10.1080/19463131003607630
   Kithiia J, 2010, CITIES, V27, P466, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.08.001
   Klepp S., 2018, A critical approach to climate change adaptation: discourses, policies and practices, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315165448
   Kousky C, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.08.002
   Krasnov F, 2019, MACH LEARN KNOW EXTR, V1, DOI 10.3390/make1010025
   Lankao PR, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.016
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lesnikowski A, 2021, ENVIRON POLIT, V30, P753, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2020.1814045
   Lesnikowski A, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.576
   Levin S., 1998, Environment and Development Economics, V3, P221, DOI [10.1017/s1355770x98240125, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X98240125]
   Lindgren M, 2021, MITIGATION ADAPTATIO
   Ludwig D., 1997, CONSERV ECOL, V1, P7, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-00012-010107
   Lynam T, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08778-210416
   MacKenzie D., 2003, NEW SCI         0613
   Maizland Lindsay., 2021, Council on Foreign Relations
   Marshall N. A., 2010, A framework for social adaptation to climate change: sustaining tropical coastal communitites and industries
   McNamara KE, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P443, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2016.1216954
   Measham TG, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P889, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
   Mees H., 2011, Climate Law, V2, P251, DOI [DOI 10.3233/CL-2011-036, 10.3233/CL-2011-036, 10.1163/CL-2011-036]
   Milich L., 1999, J ENVIRON DEV, V8, P258, DOI DOI 10.1177/107049659900800304
   Moser SC, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V87, pS309, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9384-7
   OECD, 2004, ENVEPOCGFSDRD200415F
   OECD, 2003, COMENVEPOCIEASLT2003, P4
   Palutikof JP, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V101, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.018
   Panichella A, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2013), P522, DOI 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606598
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Perry World House, 2019, B ATOM SCI
   Roberts D, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P521, DOI 10.1177/0956247808096126
   Roberts ME, 2014, AM J POLIT SCI, V58, P1064, DOI 10.1111/ajps.12103
   Robinson J. B., 2001, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, V1, P130, DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2001.000974
   Romsdahl RJ, 2017, ENVIRON COMMUN, V11, P515, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2016.1275732
   Sacchelli Sandro, 2016, Wine Economics and Policy, V5, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.wep.2016.08.001
   Sacchelli S, 2016, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V8, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.090
   Sanchez-Rodriguez R, 2009, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V1, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.005
   Schipper ELF, 2020, WORLD DEV PERSPECT, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100205
   Schipper L., 2007, TYNDALL CTR WORKING, V107
   Shaw K, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P1, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2010.544296
   Sherman M, 2016, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V7, P707, DOI 10.1002/wcc.416
   Sievert C., 2014, P WORKSH INT LANG LE, P63, DOI [DOI 10.3115/V1/W14-3110, 10.3115/v1/W14-3110]
   Solecki W, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P557, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456472
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Taddy M, 2012, PMLR, V22, P1184
   Teh YW, 2006, J AM STAT ASSOC, V101, P1566, DOI 10.1198/016214506000000302
   TERI, 2006, CLIMATE CHANGE SUSTA
   Viguié V, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P334, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1434
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   World Commission On Environment and Development, 1987, OUR COMMON FUTURE, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0376892900016702
   Yohe GW, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P811
NR 108
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 13
U2 57
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD MAY
PY 2023
VL 136
AR 104254
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104254
EA MAR 2023
PG 17
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA A2GY3
UT WOS:000953379400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, LL
   Bian, LL
   Leon, AS
   Yin, ZD
   Hu, BC
AF Wang, Lili
   Bian, Linlong
   Leon, Arturo S.
   Yin, Zeda
   Hu, Beichao
TI Integrating Policy Instruments for Enhanced Urban Resilience: A Machine
   Learning and IoT-Based Approach to Flood Mitigation
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; flood risk management; policy instruments; Internet of
   Things; machine learning; genetic algorithm; resilience governance
ID VULNERABILITY; PERSPECTIVE; CITIES
AB In the context of global urbanization, the interconnected architecture of economic, social, and administrative activities in modern cities cultivates a complex web of interdependencies. This intricacy amplifies the impacts of natural disasters such as urban flooding, presenting unprecedented challenges in risk management and disaster responsiveness. To address these challenges, this study defines the concept of urban flood resilience and outlines its practical applications in flood risk management, proposing an integrated resilience governance framework. The framework systematically enhances urban flood management by combining structural flood mitigation methods with advanced technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT) and non-structural decision-support tools powered by Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs). This integrated approach aims to improve early flood warning systems, optimize urban infrastructure planning, and reduce flood-related risks. The case study of the Cypress Creek watershed validates the framework's effectiveness under specific scenarios, achieving reductions of 25% in inundation area, 30% in peak flow, and 20% in total flood volume. These results not only demonstrate the framework's efficacy in mitigating flood impacts but also provide empirical support for developing resilient urban governance models, highlighting the essential role of adaptive policy instruments in urban flood management.
C1 [Wang, Lili] Heilongjiang Univ, Sch Govt Management, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Lili] Mudanjiang Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Mudanjiang 157012, Peoples R China.
   [Bian, Linlong; Leon, Arturo S.; Yin, Zeda; Hu, Beichao] Florida Int Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
C3 Heilongjiang University; Mudanjiang Normal University; State University
   System of Florida; Florida International University
RP Wang, LL (corresponding author), Heilongjiang Univ, Sch Govt Management, Harbin 150080, Peoples R China.; Wang, LL (corresponding author), Mudanjiang Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Mudanjiang 157012, Peoples R China.; Bian, LL (corresponding author), Florida Int Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
EM liliwang@mdjnu.edu.cn; lbian@fiu.edu; arleon@fiu.edu; zyin005@fiu.edu;
   bhu007@fiu.edu
RI Yin, Zeda/AEW-7998-2022; Leon, Arturo/N-7504-2013
OI Wang, Lili/0000-0003-3345-0203; Hu, Beichao/0009-0001-6321-5151; Leon,
   Arturo/0000-0002-7117-7351
FU Science Research Foundation of Mudanjiang Normal University; National
   Social Science Foundation of China [20BZZ042, 20BZS090]; U.S. National
   Science Foundation through NSF/ENG/CBET [1805417];  [MNUYB202306]
FX The first author of this research was funded by the Science Research
   Foundation of Mudanjiang Normal University, grant number MNUYB202306,
   and was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China, grant
   number 20BZZ042 and 20BZS090. The second and third authors of this
   research were funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation through
   NSF/ENG/CBET, grant number 1805417.
CR Andoh RobertY.G., 2002, Global Solutions for Urban Drainage
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P273, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.298
   Aroca-Jiménez E, 2018, J HYDROL, V565, P386, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.029
   Bahadur A.V., The Resilience Renaissance? Unpacking of Resilience for Tackling Climate Change and Disasters
   Bian LL, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13182487
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Dobson M, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160708012
   Doocy Shannon, 2013, PLoS Curr, V5, DOI [10.1371/currents.dis.f4deb457904936b07c09daa98ee8171a, 10.1371/currents.dis.67bd14fe457f1db0b5433a8ee20fb833]
   Einhäupl P, 2019, WASTE MANAGE, V98, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.009
   Flotemersch JE, 2016, RIVER RES APPL, V32, P1654, DOI 10.1002/rra.2978
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fuchs S., 2018, Vulnerability and resilience to natural hazards
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Glaus A, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01705-7
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Haque CE, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11122654
   Heinzlef C, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.003
   Helbing D, 2013, NATURE, V497, P51, DOI 10.1038/nature12047
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Huang GY, 2023, HABITAT INT, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102880
   Huang GY, 2022, HABITAT INT, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102645
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Kusler J., 2004, Multi-Objective Wetland Restoration in Watershed Contexts
   Leon AS, 2021, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105198
   Leon AS, 2020, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104618
   Leon AS, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10030325
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Li DZ, 2024, SOC INDIC RES, V171, P937, DOI 10.1007/s11205-023-03304-5
   Li DZ, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110953
   Li DZ, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123179
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Mitchell JK, 1999, CRUCIBLES OF HAZARD: MEGA-CITIES AND DISASTERS IN TRANSITION, P15
   National Research Council, 2012, Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative
   Nordbeck R, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081675
   Pidgeon N, 2000, SAFETY SCI, V34, P15, DOI 10.1016/S0925-7535(00)00004-7
   Proag V, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P369, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00952-6
   Qin L, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P157680, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950270
   Reghezza M., 2006, Ph.D. Thesis
   Rogge KS, 2016, RES POLICY, V45, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
   Sayers P., 2013, FLOOD RISK MANAGEMEN
   Tang Y, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P1305, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02502-x
   Tang Y, 2020, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V34, P1693, DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02518-3
   Taylor CM, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V646, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.217
   THAMPAPILLAI DJ, 1985, WATER RESOUR RES, V21, P411, DOI 10.1029/WR021i004p00411
   Toubin M., 2014, Encyclo. Rev. De Lcole Dr. Sci. Des Socits ED 624, V4, P165, DOI [10.3406/coloc.2015.2945, DOI 10.3406/COLOC.2015.2945]
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Verma V., 2022, P WORLD ENV WAT RES, P1
   Vivek V., 2022, P WORLD ENV WAT RES
   Zevenbergen C., 2016, Resource Guide on Resilience
NR 51
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 10
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 23
AR 3364
DI 10.3390/w16233364
PG 19
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA P4D3Q
UT WOS:001377431500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Huang, XZ
   Yao, RM
   Halios, CH
   Kumar, P
   Li, BZ
AF Huang, Xizhen
   Yao, Runming
   Halios, Christos H.
   Kumar, Prashant
   Li, Baizhan
TI Integrating green infrastructure, design scenarios, and
   social-ecological-technological systems for thermal resilience and
   adaptation: Mechanisms and approaches
SO RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
LA English
DT Article
DE Thermal adaptation; Comfort theory; Heat stress mitigation; Urban
   resilience; Resilient city; Nature-based solution; Urban ecosystem
   service; Sustainability; Urban systems
ID URBAN HEAT; CLIMATE INFORMATION; MITIGATION MEASURES; COMFORT; CITIES;
   VULNERABILITY; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; BUILDINGS; MORTALITY
AB Urbanization and urban overheating present significant heat exposure risks to city dwellers, underscoring the urgent need to enhance the thermal resilience of social-ecological-technological systems. However, understanding how humans interact with the urban environment to design thermally comfortable adaptation spaces and formulate effective resilience strategies remains unclear. Therefore, the overarching aim of this study is to investigate critical factors and generate actionable insights that can inform the development of effective strategies for enhancing thermal resilience in urban environments. An integrative review approach was conducted combining a scoping review and a bibliometric analysis. The principal findings highlight the significance of green infrastructure, urban canyons, and building stock scenarios in designing comfortable microclimates. Behavioural adaptation for access to the design scenarios plays an important role in achieving thermal comfort. Key driving forces influencing design scenarios are identified, including social vulnerability protection and economic resource feasibility in the social system, air pollutant reduction and biodiversity protection in the ecological system, and cooling effectiveness and energy efficiency in technological systems. Stakeholder and expert involvement are necessary to develop interventions and strategies for strengthening thermal resilience. The proposed frameworks attempt to provide a comprehensive understanding of human-urban interaction and adaptation mechanisms and offer a general approach to developing interventions and strategies for thermal resilience. The findings contribute to providing planning and design strategies by improving the ability of the built environment and humans to adapt to escalating climate warming and the rise in extreme heatwave events, thereby supporting the sustainability and well-being of urban populations.
C1 [Huang, Xizhen; Yao, Runming; Halios, Christos H.] Univ Reading, Sch Built Environm, Reading RG6 6BU, England.
   [Huang, Xizhen; Yao, Runming; Li, Baizhan] Chongqing Univ, Joint Int Res Lab Green Bldg & Built Environm, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Xizhen; Yao, Runming; Li, Baizhan] Chongqing Univ, Natl Ctr Int Res Low Carbon & Green Bldg, Minist Sci & Technol, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
   [Kumar, Prashant] Univ Surrey, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Global Ctr Clean Air Res GCARE, Sch Sustainabil Civil & Environm Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England.
   [Kumar, Prashant] Univ Surrey, Inst Sustainabil, Guildford GU2 7XH, England.
C3 University of Reading; Chongqing University; Chongqing University;
   University of Surrey; University of Surrey
RP Yao, RM (corresponding author), Univ Reading, Sch Built Environm, Reading RG6 6BU, England.
EM r.yao@reading.ac.uk
RI Kumar, Prashant/C-6357-2011
OI Kumar, Prashant/0000-0002-2462-4411; Halios,
   Christos/0000-0001-8301-8449; Yao, Runming/0000-0003-4269-7224
FU NERC-funded TAPAS Network [NE/V002341/1]; National Natural Science
   Foundation of China [52278090]; Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing,
   China [cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0156]; SuDBE Centre (Sustainable Development of
   Building and Environment) at Chongqing University [EP/W034034/1,
   NE/X002799/1]; UKRI (EPSRC); NERC; AHRC - RECLAIM Network Plus project
   [EP/W034034/1]; NERC-funded Green Cities project [NE/X002799/1];
   UGPN-NBS - UGPN-NBS project
FX RY acknowledges the support from the NERC-funded TAPAS Network
   (NE/V002341/1) , the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
   No. 52278090) , the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China
   (Grant No. cstc2021ycjh-bgzxm0156) . XH acknowl-edges the support from
   the SuDBE Centre (Sustainable Development of Building and Environment)
   at Chongqing University; PK acknowledges the support received through
   the UKRI (EPSRC, NERC, AHRC) funded RECLAIM Network Plus project
   (EP/W034034/1) , the NERC-funded Green Cities project (NE/X002799/1) ,
   and the UGPN-NBS funded UGPN-NBS project.
CR Abu Ali M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084260
   Alcamo J., 2008, Developments in integrated environmental assessment
   Amini H, 2021, EUR J FUTURES RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40309-021-00170-7
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Amores TRP, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127886
   Andric I, 2020, ENERGY REP, V6, P2476, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.006
   Badura T, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104215
   Balany F, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159057
   Baldwin AN, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V113, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.056
   Bartesaghi-Koc C, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111564
   Bartesaghi-Koc C, 2021, SOL ENERGY, V216, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.043
   Beck HE, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214
   Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Benmarhnia T, 2015, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V26, P781, DOI 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000375
   Berger C, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V193, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.02.020
   Bochenek AD, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11090974
   Bouw K, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111030
   Brager GS, 1998, ENERG BUILDINGS, V27, P83, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(97)00053-4
   Brown R., 2010, DESIGN MICROCLIMATE
   Campbell I, 2021, Beating the Heat: A Sustainable Cooling Handbook for Cities
   Canfield J., 2018, Evaluating Landscape Performace: A Guidebook for Metrics and Methods Selection
   Carrus G, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022
   Cascone S, 2023, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/atmos14040685
   Chen CM, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0223994
   Chen CM, 2017, J DATA INFO SCI, V2, P1, DOI 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
   Chen L, 2012, CITIES, V29, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.006
   Coccolo S, 2016, URBAN CLIM, V18, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.08.004
   Creswell J. W., 2017, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
   de Dear R., 1998, Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference
   Degirmenci K, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102873
   Del Serrone G, 2022, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/atmos13101586
   Depecker P, 2001, BUILD ENVIRON, V36, P627, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(00)00044-5
   Diem PK, 2024, REMOTE SENS APPL, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101081
   Dixon TJ, 2021, URBAN FUTURES
   Emmanuel R, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.012
   Erlwein S, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108233
   Erlwein S, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P5, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i1.3481
   Fang XN, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Gál T, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101600
   Gatto E, 2021, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/atmos12040500
   Gatto E, 2020, FORESTS, V11, DOI 10.3390/f11020228
   Gholamzadehmir M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102480
   Grimm NB, 2008, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V6, P264, DOI 10.1890/070147
   Grimmond CSB, 2010, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V1, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.016
   Han BL, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V880, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162908
   Han SY, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V411, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137211
   Hassler U, 2014, Resilience in the built environment, V42, P119
   Hatvani-Kovacs G, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V25, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.05.001
   He BJ, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112976
   He BJ, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112350
   He XY, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106739
   Herath HMPIK, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V29, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.013
   Herath P, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V874, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162476
   Hong TZ, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110806
   Huang JM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12103952
   Huang X, 2024, Preprint)
   Huang XZ, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110586
   Iping A, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V27, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.12.014
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103820
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103744
   Iwaniec DM, 2021, Resilient Urban Futures, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-41, 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_1]
   Jing SL, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V146, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.038
   Keeler BL, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P29, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
   Kelly C, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104556
   Kolbe K, 2019, TRANSPORT POLICY, V80, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.007
   Kolokotsa D, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12050537
   Kottek M, 2006, METEOROL Z, V15, P259, DOI 10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
   Kumar P, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105181
   Lai DY, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V742, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140092
   Li BZ, 2014, ENERG BUILDINGS, V82, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.06.032
   Li B, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091481
   Li JW, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V170, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106614
   Li J, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122555
   Liu F, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15040921
   Liu LM, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104433
   Liu ZJ, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V648, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.128
   Liu ZX, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107939
   Macintyre HL, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P678, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.062
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   Mastrucci A, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109834
   McGregor G.R., 2015, Heatwaves and health: guidance on warning-system development
   McPhearson T, 2022, ONE EARTH, V5, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007
   McPhearson T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V70, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mills G, 2010, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V1, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.015
   Ming R, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V284, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112834
   Moench M., 2011, Catalyzing Urban Climate Resilience
   Moher D, 2010, Int J Surg, V8, P336
   Naeem S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041049
   Nazarian N, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2022EF002682
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Nicol JF, 2002, ENERG BUILDINGS, V34, P563, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00006-3
   Nikolopoulou M, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00084-1
   Nikolopoulou M, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P227, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00093-1
   Oke T.R., 2017, Urban climates
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   OKE TR, 1988, ENERG BUILDINGS, V11, P103, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6
   Oliveira B, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12061182
   Palusci O, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V807, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150490
   Parisi AV, 2014, PHOTOCHEM PHOTOBIOL, V90, P479, DOI 10.1111/php.12237
   Park J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14042146
   Peterson GD, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P358, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pigliautile I, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V147, P1663, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.082
   Potchter O, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V833, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155128
   Ramyar R, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101554
   Ramyar R, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V44, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126398
   Raymond CM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
   Robson C., 2016, Real world research, V4th Ed
   Sadeghi M, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108546
   Santamouris M, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109482
   Santamouris M, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V26, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.047
   Santamouris M., 2001, Energy and Climate Change in the Urban Built Environment, P48
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shi DC, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102065
   Snyder H, 2019, J BUS RES, V104, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Tiwari A, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115898
   Torabi E, 2018, CITIES, V72, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.008
   Tuomimaa J, 2023, CLIM RISK MANAG, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2023.100533
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   United Nations, 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   Wang YF, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124995
   Wiegels R, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100961
   Wollschläger N, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11091385
   Wu JS, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155903
   Xu TT, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109454
   Xu ZW, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V89-90, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.007
   Yao RM, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109020
   Yao RM, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V14, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2014.09.007
   Yao RM, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P2089, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.014
   Zhang HJ, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110811
   Zhang JL, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104150
   Zhang JL, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109469
   Zhao YL, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113668
   Zheng TH, 2022, ENERGY, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123721
   Zheng XD, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128018
   Zölch T, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V20, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.011
NR 139
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 11
U2 11
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1364-0321
EI 1879-0690
J9 RENEW SUST ENERG REV
JI Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
PD APR
PY 2025
VL 212
AR 115422
DI 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115422
EA FEB 2025
PG 14
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Energy & Fuels
GA X0U2F
UT WOS:001422599600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shi, L
AF Shi, Linda
TI From Progressive Cities to Resilient Cities: Lessons from History for
   New Debates in Equitable Adaptation to Climate Change
SO URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW
LA English
DT Review
DE progressivism; urban spatial politics; racial justice; climate
   resilience; Green New Deal
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; POLITICS; GENTRIFICATION; POLICY; CITY
AB Planners and activists are identifying ways to promote equitable adaptation that counter climate injustice. This article explores how this progressive turn in adaptation compares with past progressive movements. I argue urban progressive politics have cyclical tendencies toward liberalism and radicalism, and that the evolution of planning for climate adaptation mirrors these waves. I review 10 recent guidance documents that recommend strategies for enhancing racially just adaptation. I then assess how these recommendations advance the three pillars of progressive reforms: redistribution, expansion of democracy, and structural reform. I find that proposed strategies for racially just resilience are a welcome advance from mainstream, unjust resilience planning. However, history suggests that the focus on procedural justice for oppressed communities seen in recent discourse may limit their scope and durability. I conclude with suggestions for areas where climate activists and scholars can expand given emerging political space for ambitious thinking under a Green New Deal.
C1 [Shi, Linda] Cornell Univ, Dept City & Reg Planning, 213 W Sibley Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.
C3 Cornell University
RP Shi, L (corresponding author), Cornell Univ, Dept City & Reg Planning, 213 W Sibley Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.
EM lindashi@cornell.edu
OI Shi, Linda/0000-0002-2444-367X
CR Addams Jane., 1910, 20 YEARS HULL HOUSE
   Adger W.N., 2006, Fairness in adaptation to climate change, P1
   Adger WN, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596667.002
   Ajibade I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.029
   Anguelovski I, 2019, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V43, P133, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12725
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], SOCIAL VULNERABILI 1
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE READY BOSTON
   Araos M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Aylett A., 2014, Progress and Challenges in the Urban Governance of Climate Change Results of a Global Survey
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Bay Localize, 2012, MAPP OUR FUT WORK PL
   Beard V., 2003, Planning Theory, V2, P13, DOI DOI 10.1177/1473095203002001004
   Bernstein A, 2019, J FINANC ECON, V134, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.03.013
   Bolstad E., 2017, EE News
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Capek S.M., 1992, Community versus commodity: Tenants and the American city
   Carmin J, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11430951
   Carmin JoAnn., 2012, Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey
   Carter ED, 2016, LOCAL ENVIRON, V21, P3, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2014.912622
   Center for American Progress, 2016, RES MIDW CIT IMPR EQ
   Chu E., 2017, OXFORD RES ENCY CLIM
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   City of Boston, 2017, RES BOST EQ CONN CIT
   Clavel P., 2010, ACTIVISTS CITY HALL
   Clavel P, 1986, PROGRESSIVE CITY PLA
   Compact, 2012, REG CLIM ACT PLAN
   Davis JohnEmmeus., 2010, The community land trust reader, P3
   DeLeon Richard Edward, 1992, Left Coast City: Progressive Politics in San Francisco, 1975-1991
   Dooling S, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x
   Douglass M., 2016, ASIA RES I WORKING P, V248
   Early Steve, 2017, THESE TIMES     0807
   Environmental Support Center, 2009, EV MOV ENV JUST CLIM
   Eriksen SH, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P523, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.014
   Eubanks Virginia, 2016, NATION
   Fraser N, 2016, NORA, V24, P281, DOI 10.1080/08038740.2016.1278263
   Frug GeraldE., 1999, City making: Building communities without building walls
   Gendron Richard., 2009, LEFTMOST CITY
   Georgetown Climate Center, EQ AD PORT
   Georgetown Climate Center, 2017, OPP EQ AD CIT WORKSH
   Ghiridharadas Anand, 2018, WINNERS TAKE ALL ELI
   Gordon David, 1984, MARXISM METROPOLIS N, P54
   Gould KA, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P12, DOI 10.1111/cico.12283
   Gunn-Wright R., 2019, NEW CONSENSUS FEB
   Hall Peter., 2002, Cities of Tomorrow, V3d
   HARVEY D, 1989, GEOGR ANN B, V71, P3, DOI 10.2307/490503
   Harvey David., 2001, Geographische Revue, V2, P23, DOI DOI 10.1038/D-NB.INFO/1217929630/34
   Heynen N, 2016, PROG HUM GEOG, V40, P839, DOI 10.1177/0309132515617394
   Hirt S.A., 2018, 100 YEARS ZONING FUT, P3
   Hodson M, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P193, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00832.x
   Hofstadter Richard, 1968, AGE REFORM BRYAN FDR
   Hughes S, 2017, URBAN AFF REV, V53, P362, DOI 10.1177/1078087416649756
   Imbroscio D., 1997, Reconstructing city politics: Alternative economic development and urban regimes
   Imbroscio D, 2013, URBAN AFF REV, V49, P787, DOI 10.1177/1078087413495362
   International Organization for Migration, 2019, MIGRATION CLIMATE CH
   Javeline D, 2014, PERSPECT POLIT, V12, P420, DOI 10.1017/S1537592714000784
   Katznelson Ira., 1982, City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States
   Keenan JM, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32
   King Mel., 1981, CHAIN CHANGE STRUGGL
   Klein N, 2009, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
   Koslov L, 2016, PUBLIC CULTURE, V28, P359, DOI 10.1215/08992363-3427487
   Krumholz N., 1990, MAKING EQUITY PLANNI
   Link ArthurS., 1983, AM HIST SERIES
   Logan J.R., 2007, Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place
   Lowe A., 2009, ASK CLIMATE QUESTION
   Marantz NJ, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P251, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1092093
   Marcuse P., 2016, DEFENSE HOUSING
   Masson-Delmotte V.P., 2018, CLIM CHANG 2014 IMP, P32, DOI [10.1017/9781009157926.005, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324]
   McKibben B, 2014, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V61, P46
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 2015, EQ BUILD RES AD PLAN
   National Association of Climate Resilience Planners, 2017, COMM DRIV CLIM RES P
   Nugent Walter., 2010, Progressivism: A Very Short Introduction
   O'Brien K, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P73, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639
   Orfield M., 1997, Metropolitics: A Regional Agenda for Community Stability
   Oriaku Ali, 2019, ARCHITECTS NEWS 0122
   Preston BL, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P467, DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9503-x
   Pulido L, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V1, P76, DOI 10.1177/2514848618770363
   Reyes Damaris, 2015, COMMUNICATION
   Rivlin Gary., 1992, Fire on the Prairie: Chicago's Harold Washington and the Politics of Race
   Robinson Cedric., 2000, BLACK MARXISM MAKING
   Rothstein Richard, 2017, The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
   Sassen S, 2002, ENVIRON URBAN, V14, P13, DOI 10.1177/095624780201400102
   Savitch HV, 2017, URBAN AFF REV, V53, P381, DOI 10.1177/1078087416630626
   Shi L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.002
   Shi LD, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P191, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1074526
   Shi Linda, CITIES
   Simonet G., 2015, NATURES SCI SOC, V23, P52, DOI [10.1051/nss/2015018, DOI 10.1051/NSS/2015018]
   Stein S, 2018, J URBAN AFF, V40, P770, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2017.1403854
   Stone CN, 2017, URBAN AFF REV, V53, P3, DOI 10.1177/1078087416674328
   Stradling David, 1999, Smokestacks and Progressives: Environmentalists, Engineers, and Air Quality in America, 1881-1951
   The Kresge Foundation, 2015, PATHW RES TRANSF CIT
   Thompson J. P., 2017, New Labor Forum, V26, P18
   Trigoboff Sara., 2019, THESIS
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   U.S. Department of Energy, 2017, DOELM1472 US DEP EN
   Urban Sustainability Directors Network, 2017, GUID EQ COMM DRIV CL
   Urban Sustainability Directors Network, 2018, RES HUBS SHIFT POW C
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Yarina Lizzie., 2018, Places Journal
   Young I.M., 1990, JUSTICE POLITICS DIF, P39
NR 102
TC 43
Z9 49
U1 0
U2 52
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 1078-0874
EI 1552-8332
J9 URBAN AFF REV
JI Urban Aff. Rev.
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 57
IS 5
BP 1442
EP 1479
AR 1078087419910827
DI 10.1177/1078087419910827
EA FEB 2020
PG 38
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA UP2EL
UT WOS:000517045000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, YQ
   Liu, QL
   Li, XC
   Zhang, XL
   Qiu, ZX
AF Zhang, Yueqian
   Liu, Quanlong
   Li, Xinchun
   Zhang, Xiaolin
   Qiu, Zunxiang
TI Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and critical factors
   identification of urban resilience under public health emergencies
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; spatial-temporal evolution characteristics; critical
   factors; complex network
AB Public health emergencies have a massive impact on the safety of people's lives and property and the sustainable development of cities. Much scholarly attention has focused on the index system, measurement method, and operation mechanism of urban resilience. But those debates typically overlook the particularity of public health emergencies and the new features of urban data and dynamic intelligence. Building on this literature, this study takes 26 cities in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomerations from 2000 to 2022 as research samples to scientifically propose a six-dimensional evaluation index system (economic, social, ecological, infrastructure, organizational, and institutional) by meta-analysis. This study also discusses the spatial-temporal static (dynamic) evolution law in depth based on the comprehensive weight of the CRITIC method and entropy method, and spatial Markov chain. Finally, with the help of combining the interpretative structural model and the complex network, critical factors are quantitatively identified from two aspects of node local and network global. This study proposes a novel approach to understanding urban resilience in public health emergencies. Furthermore, the evaluation index system, spatial-temporal evolution characteristics, and critical factor identification provide theoretical references and policy recommendations in developing safe development strategies for high-quality, safe, and resilient cities.
C1 [Zhang, Yueqian; Liu, Quanlong; Li, Xinchun; Zhang, Xiaolin; Qiu, Zunxiang] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Quanlong] Univ RD 1, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Mining & Technology
RP Liu, QL (corresponding author), Univ RD 1, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM qll2016@cumt.edu.cn
CR Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Babazadeh M, 2019, SYST CONTROL LETT, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.sysconle.2019.104547
   Bikomeye JC, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18168420
   Cao JZ, 2021, CITIES, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103077
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Cashman AC, 2011, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V4, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01087.x
   Chen DB, 2012, PHYSICA A, V391, P1777, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2011.09.017
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Cui P, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19169993
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   DIAKOULAKI D, 1995, COMPUT OPER RES, V22, P763, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Eldosouky A, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107243
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Friedman ThomasL., 2020, The New York Times
   Bernal EF, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11123486
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   [侯孟阳 Hou Mengyang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2168
   Hou X, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/6687869
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Jiang Z.W., 2018, A study on the correlative factors of teachers' emotional labor based on meta-analysis
   Kitsak M, 2010, NAT PHYS, V6, P888, DOI [10.1038/nphys1746, 10.1038/NPHYS1746]
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Liang ZF, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18042082
   Liu Y., 2023, Sustainability, V15
   Liu YY, 2011, NATURE, V473, P167, DOI 10.1038/nature10011
   Liu Y, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12071453
   Luo W, 2023, APPL GEOGR, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102923
   Namtirtha A, 2022, EXPERT SYST APPL, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117791
   Pigott TD, 2006, EVAL PROGRAM PLANN, V29, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.06.002
   Menéndez EP, 2020, DISP, V56, P64, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2020.1906059
   Qiao H, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010038
   Quintiliani L, 2022, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V27, P69, DOI 10.1080/13548506.2021.1891266
   Rose A, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102317
   Rosenthal R., 1986, Educational Researcher, V15, P18, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X015008018, 10.3102/0013189X015008018]
   Ruan YR, 2017, ACTA PHYS SIN-CH ED, V66, DOI 10.7498/aps.66.038902
   Samuelsson K, 2021, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V7, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2021.735221
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Wang Jia-Sheng, 2012, Computer Engineering, V38, P74, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3428.2012.10.021
   Wang X-F., 2006, Complex Network Theory and its Application, DOI DOI 10.1364/OL.37.000470
   Wang ZH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103581
   Warfield J.N., 1976, Societal systems: Planning, policy, and complexity
   Watts DJ, 1998, NATURE, V393, P440, DOI 10.1038/30918
   Williams O, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0110121
   Wilson DB, 2001, PSYCHOL METHODS, V6, P413, DOI 10.1037//1082-989X.6.4.413
   [肖俐平 XIAO Liping], 2008, [武汉大学学报. 信息科学版, Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University], V33, P379
   Xu WT, 2018, J TRANSP GEOGR, V70, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.05.017
   You XT, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V113, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05368-x
   Zhang JM, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265
   Zhang Y., 2009, Foreign Economics & Management, V31, P1
   Zhang Y. Y., 2022, Frontiers in Public Health, V10
   Zhao Yihuan, 2009, Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, V35, P1076
NR 52
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 79
U2 176
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 102
AR 105221
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105221
EA JAN 2024
PG 21
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA KD6I2
UT WOS:001178056100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shao, ZY
   Li, YX
   Gong, HF
   Chai, HX
AF Shao, Zhiyu
   Li, Yuexin
   Gong, Huafeng
   Chai, Hongxiang
TI From risk control to resilience: developments and trends of urban roads
   designed as surface flood passages to cope with extreme storms
SO FRONTIERS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Review
DE Major drainage; Flood mitigation; Resilient city; Stormwater model;
   Urban flooding
ID STABILITY; FATALITIES; VEHICLES; INSTABILITY; CRITERIA; NETWORK;
   PATTERN; MODEL; WIDTH; TIME
AB Urban roads can be designated as surface flood passages to transport excess runoff during extreme storms, thereby preventing local flooding, which is known as the major drainage system. However, this practice poses significant risks, including human loss and property damage, due to the high flow rate and velocity carried by roads. Moreover, urban roads with low flood-resilience may significantly hamper the transportation function during severe storms, leading to dysfunction of the city. Therefore, there is an urgent need to transform risk-oriented flood passages into resilient urban road-based flood passages. This paper presents a systematic review of existing methodologies in designing a road network-based flood passage system, along with the discussion of new technologies to enhance system resilience. The study also addresses current knowledge gaps and future directions. The results indicate that flood management measures based on the urban road network should integrate accessibility assessment, lifeline and emergency planning to ensure human well-being outcomes. Furthermore, the special needs and features of vulnerable groups must be taken into serious consideration during the planning stage. In addition, a data-driven approach is recommended to facilitate real-time management and evaluate future works.
C1 [Shao, Zhiyu; Li, Yuexin; Chai, Hongxiang] Chongqing Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.
   [Shao, Zhiyu; Li, Yuexin; Chai, Hongxiang] Chongqing Univ, Key Lab Ecol Environm, Minist Educ Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.
   [Gong, Huafeng] TY Lin Int Engn Consulting China Co Ltd, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing University; Chongqing University
RP Shao, ZY (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.; Shao, ZY (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Key Lab Ecol Environm, Minist Educ Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China.
EM shaozhiyu@cqu.edu.cn
RI hongxiang, chai/AAW-2976-2021; Shao, Zhiyu/HCI-2889-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) General Program
   [52270087]
FX This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (NSFC) General Program (Grant No. 52270087).
CR ABT SR, 1989, WATER RESOUR BULL, V25, P881
   Aerts JCJH, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P193, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0085-1
   Ahmed MA, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12616
   Arrighi C, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V654, P1010, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.191
   Arrighi C, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P515, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-515-2017
   Ashley ST, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P805, DOI 10.1175/2007JAMC1611.1
   Bentivoglio R, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P4345, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-4345-2022
   Berkhahn S, 2019, J HYDROL, V575, P743, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.066
   Bermúdez M, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P2801, DOI 10.1007/s11269-018-1959-8
   Bernardini G, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104563
   Bocanegra RA, 2021, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V14, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12738
   Bonham A.J., 1967, LOW LEVEL CAUSEWAYS
   Bruwier M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V622, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.325
   Bruwier M, 2020, J HYDROL, V582, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124493
   Chang TJ, 2018, J HYDROL, V559, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.066
   Chanson H, 2014, Human body stability in floodwaters: the 2011 flood in Brisbane CBD, V1, P1
   Chanson H, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8090341
   Chu HB, 2020, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104587
   CIRIA, 2006, Designing for Exceedance in Urban Drainage-Good
   Coles D, 2017, J HYDROL, V546, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.013
   Cox R J., 2010, Revision Project 10: Appropriate safety criteria for people (Report P10/S1/006)
   Darabi H, 2019, J HYDROL, V569, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.002
   de Vitry MM, 2019, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V23, P4621, DOI 10.5194/hess-23-4621-2019
   Dewals B, 2023, J HYDROL, V619, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129231
   Dong BL, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103205
   Dong SJ, 2022, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V3, DOI 10.1038/s43247-022-00366-0
   Dong SJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102398
   CabralI ELD, 2018, ACTA CIR BRAS, V33, P1110, DOI 10.1590/s0102-865020180120000009
   Dottori F, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P781, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0257-z
   Fahad MGR, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.024
   Feng W, 2022, ENG APPL COMP FLUID, V16, P2285, DOI 10.1080/19942060.2022.2141329
   FitzGerald G, 2010, EMERG MED AUSTRALAS, V22, P180, DOI 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01284.x
   Frame JM, 2022, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V26, P3377, DOI 10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022
   Fu GT, 2023, WIRES WATER, V10, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1613
   Gordon A.D., 1973, Car Stability on Road Causeways
   Gori A, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P171, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01272-7
   Green D, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P1, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-1-2017
   Guidolin M, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V84, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.07.008
   Guo P, 2018, J HYDROINFORM, V20, P1310, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2018.161
   Guo ZF, 2021, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V14, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12684
   Haider S, 2019, ARAB J SCI ENG, V44, P8489, DOI 10.1007/s13369-019-03849-z
   Hao HY, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V220, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104352
   Hashemi-Beni L, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P2127, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3051873
   Hofmann J, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13162255
   Hu WY, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P841, DOI 10.1177/2399808318809711
   Huang YJ, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V16, DOI 10.1007/s11783-022-1545-4
   Iqbal U, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102030
   Islam AMT, 2021, GEOSCI FRONT, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.006
   Jonkman SN, 2008, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V44, P1208, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00217.x
   Karim F, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15030566
   Keller R.J., 1993, SAFETY ASPECTS DESIG
   Kesserwani G, 2010, J HYDRAUL ENG, V136, P662, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000222
   Kharazi BA, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101628
   Knight KL, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13111563
   Kotz M, 2022, NATURE, V601, P223, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-04283-8
   Kramer M, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V17, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.04.003
   Lazzarin T, 2022, J HYDROL, V607, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127485
   Lee YH, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12082271
   Li XF, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127034
   Lin JY, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110438
   Liu XH, 2021, APPL INTELL, V51, P9015, DOI 10.1007/s10489-021-02303-8
   Löwe R, 2017, J HYDROL, V550, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.009
   Lu XH, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V321, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115991
   Luo PP, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105478
   Ma C, 2022, J HYDROL, V608, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127693
   Ma Y, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12822
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS817, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12262
   Martínez-Gomariz E, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P1259, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2242-z
   Mignot E, 2008, J HYDRAUL ENG, V134, P701, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2008)134:6(701)
   Milanesi L, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P7793, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019182
   Mouhcine E, 2018, 4 INT C OPT APPL ICO, P1
   Mudashiru RB, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126846
   Munawar HS, 2021, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103916
   Musolino G, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V112, P1941, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05251-9
   Mustafa A, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V225, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.090
   Nanía LS, 2014, J HYDRAUL ENG, V140, P77, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000802
   Nania LS, 2011, J HYDRAUL ENG-ASCE, V137, P1298, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000423
   Panos CL, 2021, J HYDROL, V596, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126101
   Petrucci O, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11081682
   Pregnolato M, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000372
   Prein AF, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P48, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3168, 10.1038/nclimate3168]
   Pyatkova K, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V244, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.013
   Rivière N, 2014, J HYDRAUL ENG, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000835
   Russo B, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V69, P251, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0702-2
   Russo B, 2009, Design of surface drainage systems according to hazard criteria related to flooding of urban areas
   Salvati P, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P867, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.064
   Shand T D., 2011, Appropriate Safety Criteria for Vehicles: Literature Review (Stage 2)
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V85, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.023
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Shu CW, 2011, J HYDRAUL RES, V49, P709, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2011.616318
   Sit M, 2020, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V82, P2635, DOI 10.2166/wst.2020.369
   Sourghali MH, 2020, IJST-T CIV ENG, V44, P271, DOI 10.1007/s40996-019-00295-7
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Tellman B, 2021, NATURE, V596, P80, DOI 10.1038/s41586-021-03695-w
   Teng J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V90, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006
   Teo FY, 2012, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V10, P149, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2012.674040
   Thieken AH, 2005, WATER RESOUR RES, V41, DOI 10.1029/2005WR004177
   Torres MA, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105530
   Tsang M, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102774
   Wang YT, 2019, WATER RES, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
   Wu JB, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V694, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133586
   Wu ZN, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V716, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137077
   Xia JQ, 2014, J HYDRAUL RES, V52, P93, DOI 10.1080/00221686.2013.875073
   Xia JQ, 2011, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V26, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.02.017
   Yang H, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V16, DOI 10.1007/s11783-022-1532-9
   Yin J, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P2239, DOI 10.1177/2399808320971304
   Yin J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020349
   Yin J, 2016, J HYDROL, V537, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.037
   Yu DP, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P728, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-0516-7
   Yu WQ, 2022, IEEE ACCESS, V10, P109729, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3213798
   Zhang ML, 2021, J HYDROL, V603, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127105
   Zhang W, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P1283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2134-7
   Zhu Y, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141610250
NR 113
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 31
U2 104
PU HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
PI BEIJING
PA CHAOYANG DIST, 4, HUIXINDONGJIE, FUSHENG BLDG, BEIJING 100029, PEOPLES R
   CHINA
SN 2095-2201
EI 2095-221X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI ENG
JI Front. Env. Sci. Eng.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 18
IS 2
AR 22
DI 10.1007/s11783-024-1782-9
PG 18
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA Z6HY6
UT WOS:001113080100003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, SC
   Peng, FL
   Qiao, YK
   Dong, YH
AF Liu, Si-Cong
   Peng, Fang -Le
   Qiao, Yong-Kang
   Dong, Yun-Hao
TI Quantitative evaluation of the contribution of underground space to
   urban resilience: A case study in China
SO UNDERGROUND SPACE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban underground space (UUS); Urban resilience; Resilience evaluation;
   Resilient development
ID SYSTEMS
AB Urban underground space (UUS) development has been acknowledged as a positive contribution to urban resilience (UR). Such contribution has been qualitatively addressed in recent years, but only quantitatively discussed in few studies. Quantitative evaluation methods for UR are widely used in China and around the world, but the role of underground space is barely included. This paper provides a way to bridge this gap on the city scale. A UR evaluation framework was carefully constructed that covers the basic aspects and elements of UR. The contributions of UUS to UR were identified and integrated into the UR evaluation framework, and the measurement methods for each indicator related to UUS were determined. A case study of 19 sample cities in China were conducted using the integrated evaluation model. Correlation analysis and clustering analysis were further adopted to interpret the evaluation results, mainly with three indicators reflecting the level of UUS development, namely UUS area (m2), UUS density (104 m2/km2) and UUS area per capita (m2/ person). The results showed a strong correlation between UUS area and UR. The average proportion of UR provided by UUS in the 19 sample cities was 16.46%, while the maximum figure reached 29.20%. The sample cities were clustered into four categories based on the relationship between the proportion of UR provided by UUS, UUS area, and GDP per capita, where both high and low UUS area tend to provide less proportion of resilience than the medium UUS area. Corresponding suggestions for UUS utilization were proposed to assist cities in achieving urban resilience.
C1 [Liu, Si-Cong; Peng, Fang -Le; Qiao, Yong-Kang; Dong, Yun-Hao] Tongji Univ, Res Ctr Underground Space, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
   Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
C3 Tongji University; Tongji University
RP Peng, FL (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Res Ctr Underground Space, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
EM pengfangle@tongji.edu.cn
RI Dong, Yun-Hao/AAS-7086-2021; Liu, Sicong/J-7094-2013; Qiao,
   Yong-Kang/ABE-6708-2021
OI Dong, Yun-Hao/0000-0003-3159-3526
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52090083, 42071251]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant Nos. 52090083 and 42071251) .
CR Admiraal H, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.02.001
   Bobylev N, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104041
   Bobylev N, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.024
   Bobylev N, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.022
   Broere W, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012
   Bruneau M, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P41, DOI 10.1193/1.2431396
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Chen Z., 2011, Master Planning of Urban Underground Space
   China Association of Metros, 2021, China Urban Rail Transit Annual Statistical Analysis Report
   Chinese Academy of Engineering Chinese Society for Rock Mechanics & Engineering & Urban Planning Society of China, 2021, China Urban Underground Space Development Blue Book
   Cui JQ, 2019, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V87, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2018.12.023
   Cui JQ, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.004
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Datola G, 2022, ECOL MODEL, V465, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109851
   Dong YH, 2023, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V139, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105209
   Dong YH, 2023, APPL GEOGR, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102897
   Dong YH, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111313
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Frisk EL, 2022, ECOSYST SERV, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101493
   Gerges F, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V859, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160187
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   He L, 2012, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V32, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.008
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C. S., 2002, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, pxv, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511541957.002, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.002]
   Huang Y., 2021, China Emergency Management, P58
   Jiao LD, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101543
   Lai YN, 2023, UNDERGR SPACE, V12, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.03.001
   Li GJ, 2021, CITIES, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103206
   Li Y., 2017, Planner, V33, P5, DOI 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0022.2017.08.001
   Liu C., 2021, Annual report on urban management of China
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu SC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
   Ma CX, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102569
   MEE, 2018, Limits and measurement methods for emissions from diesel fuelled heavy-duty vehicles (CHINA 6)
   MEE, 2020, Limits and measurement methods for emissions from light-duty vehicles (CHINA 6)
   MEE, 2021, China Mobile Source Environmental Management Annual Report
   Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China, 2020, Baseline emission factors of China's regional power grids for emission reduction projects in 2019
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, 2013, GB 50157-2013
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   Nanjing Transportation, 2020, Competitive consultation announcement for the research on standardized unit conversion coefficient of subway vehicle
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   Peng F., 2023, SMART CONSTR SUSTAIN, V1, P3, DOI [10.1007/s44268-023-00003-5, DOI 10.1007/S44268-023-00003-5]
   Peng FL, 2021, FRONT STRUCT CIV ENG, V15, P20, DOI 10.1007/s11709-021-0716-x
   [彭芳乐 Peng Fangle], 2019, [地学前缘, Earth Science Frontiers], V26, P57
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Qiao YK, 2024, UNDERGR SPACE, V14, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.05.005
   Qiao YK, 2022, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104573
   Qiao YK, 2022, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104325
   Qiao YK, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101757
   Qiao YK, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V45, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.015
   Qiao YK, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.037
   Qiu B. X., 2020, Regional Economic Review, P1
   Rockefeller Foundation & ARUP, 2014, City resilience framework
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shan YL, 2022, SCI BULL, V67, P1910, DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2022.08.024
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, 2021, GB/T 40947-2021
   Sterling R, 2013, ADVANCES IN UNDERGROUND SPACE DEVELOPMENT, P43, DOI 10.3850/978-981-07-3757-3_key6
   Tariq H, 2021, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V11, P722, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-03-2020-0053
   UNDRR, 2020, Technical report
   van der Leeuw SE, 2005, MICRO MESO MACRO: ADDRESSING COMPLEX SYSTEMS COUPLINGS, P227, DOI 10.1142/9789812701404_0013
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   [王寿生 Wang Shousheng], 2022, [地下空间与工程学报, Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering], V18, P733
   Wang ZJ, 2022, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103275
   Zhang JM, 2023, CITIES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104265
   Zhang Y. Y., 2021, Planners, V37, P5
   Zhao JW, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.011
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
NR 71
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 30
U2 71
PU KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
PI BEIJING
PA 16 DONGHUANGCHENGGEN NORTH ST, Building 5, Room 411, BEIJING, DONGCHENG
   DISTRICT 100009, PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 2096-2754
EI 2467-9674
J9 UNDERGR SPACE
JI Undergr. Space
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 17
BP 1
EP 24
DI 10.1016/j.undsp.2023.11.007
PG 24
WC Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA LT6N9
UT WOS:001189093100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Samuelsson, K
   Colding, J
   Barthel, S
AF Samuelsson, Karl
   Colding, Johan
   Barthel, Stephan
TI Urban resilience at eye level: Spatial analysis of empirically defined
   experiential landscapes
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
ID SPACE SYNTAX; SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY; DENSITY; ENVIRONMENT; CITIES;
   ISSUES; KEY
AB An unresolved issue in creating resilient cities is how to obtain sustainability benefits from densification while not eroding the capacity of social-ecological systems to generate wellbeing for urban dwellers. To understand how different relationships between urban form and wellbeing together play out, we analysed geocoded experiential data (1460 experiences from 780 respondents) together with variables of the physical environment. Through statistical and spatial analysis, we operationalised resilience principles to assess what urban environments provide "resilience at eye level" - a diversity of experiences and a level of connectivity between them that limit adverse outcomes. We found 8 typologies of experiential landscapes - distinct compositions of 11 categories of experiences. Our analysis shows that typologies with experiences supportive of wellbeing are diverse and exist in environments that balance residents and workplaces, avoid extreme spatial integration and/or density and have accessible nature. Typologies with many experiences hindering wellbeing fail in one or several of these respects. Our findings suggest that resilience principles can act as a guiding heuristic for urban densification that does not compromise human wellbeing.
C1 [Samuelsson, Karl; Barthel, Stephan] Univ Gavle, Dept Comp & Geospatial Sci, Kungsbacksvagen 47, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden.
   [Colding, Johan] Univ Gavle, Dept Bldg Engn Energy Syst & Sustainabil Sci, Gavle, Sweden.
   [Colding, Johan] Royal Swedish Acad Sci, Beijer Inst Ecol Econ, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Barthel, Stephan] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden.
C3 University of Gavle; University of Gavle; Royal Swedish Academy of
   Sciences; Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics; Stockholm University
RP Samuelsson, K (corresponding author), Univ Gavle, Dept Comp & Geospatial Sci, Kungsbacksvagen 47, S-80176 Gavle, Sweden.
EM karl.samuelsson@hig.se; johan.colding@beijer.kva.se;
   stephan.barthel@hig.se
RI Colding, Johan/AAB-7047-2019; Samuelsson, Karl/AAA-8709-2019; barthel,
   stephan/AAE-8367-2019
OI Colding, Johan/0000-0001-7644-7448; barthel,
   stephan/0000-0003-2637-2024; Samuelsson, Karl/0000-0002-7936-3722
FU FORMAS/The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural
   Sciences and Spatial Planning; Experiential Analyses for Urban Social
   Sustainability (ZEUS) [2016-01193]; Department of Building, Energy and
   Environmental Engineering at the University of Gavle; Swedish Research
   Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
   (FORMAS) [2017-00937]; MISTRA for the Stockholm Resilience Centre;
   Formas [2017-00937, 2016-01193] Funding Source: Formas
FX Karl Samuelsson's work is enabled by funds from FORMAS/The Swedish
   Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial
   Planning. The project is called Spatial and Experiential Analyses for
   Urban Social Sustainability (ZEUS) (reference number: 2016-01193). Johan
   Colding's work has been funded by the Department of Building, Energy and
   Environmental Engineering at the University of Gavle and also partly
   through a research grant (reference number: 2017-00937) received from
   the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and
   Spatial Planning (FORMAS). We also would like to thank the Beijer
   Institute of Ecological Economics, and funding secured from MISTRA for
   the Stockholm Resilience Centre for funding this work.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alcock I, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P1247, DOI 10.1021/es403688w
   Andersson E, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P445, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
   [Anonymous], 2015, Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316014240
   Bafna S, 2003, ENVIRON BEHAV, V35, P17, DOI 10.1177/0013916502238863
   Bar M, 2007, TRENDS COGN SCI, V11, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.005
   Berkes F., 2009, Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change
   Biggs D, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Biggs R., 2015, Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in socialecological systems, P105, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781316014240.006, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316014240.006]
   Bramley G, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN B, V36, P30, DOI 10.1068/b33129
   Brown G, 2014, APPL GEOGR, V46, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004
   Brown G, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P190, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2012.741045
   CONNELL JH, 1978, SCIENCE, V199, P1302, DOI 10.1126/science.199.4335.1302
   Csardi G, 2006, Inter J Complex Syst., V1695
   Dakos V., 2015, Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems, P80, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316014240.005
   Dempsey N, 2012, PROG PLANN, V77, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2012.01.001
   Durand CP, 2011, OBES REV, V12, pe173, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00826.x
   EVANS GW, 1992, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V12, P163, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80068-4
   Gibson J. J., 1979, The ecological approach to visual perception, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315740218
   Giusti M., 2017, IS YOUR STOCKHOLM PU, DOI [10.1126/science, DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE]
   Goines L, 2007, SOUTH MED J, V100, P287, DOI 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3180318be5
   Golding J., 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   HILLIER B, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN B, V20, P29, DOI 10.1068/b200029
   Hillier B., 2009, P 7 INT SPAC SYNT S, DOI 10.1016/0022-2860(82)85250-2
   Hillier B., 2007, Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Holling CS, 1996, CONSERV BIOL, V10, P328, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jacobs J., 1992, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM, DOI DOI 10.2307/794509
   Kaaronen RO, 2017, FRONT PSYCHOL, V8, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01974
   KAPLAN S, 1995, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V15, P169, DOI 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
   Katz VS, 2016, AM BEHAV SCI, V60, P59, DOI 10.1177/0002764215601712
   Korpela KM, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P572, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973133
   Kwan Mei-Po., 2003, J GEOGR SYST, V5, P129, DOI DOI 10.1007/S101090300107
   Kyttä M, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P34, DOI 10.1177/0265813515600121
   Lewis J, 2014, POLCA POLYTOMOUS VAR, DOI [10.18637/jss.v042.i10, DOI 10.18637/JSS.V042.I10]
   Lowe B., 2003, Navagating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, P83, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.007
   MacKerron G, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P992, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010
   Marcus L., 2015, P 10 INT SPAC SYNT S
   Marcus L., 2017, PLACE SYNTAX TOOL QG
   Marcus L, 2016, J URBAN DES, V21, P439, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2016.1184565
   Marcus L, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06939-190455
   MAY RM, 1972, NATURE, V238, P413, DOI 10.1038/238413a0
   Nordh H, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
   Nyström M, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P406, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0019-y
   Pain R, 2002, GEOFORUM, V33, P105, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00025-2
   Penn A, 2003, ENVIRON BEHAV, V35, P30, DOI 10.1177/0013916502238864
   Pyko A, 2017, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V125, DOI [10.1289/ehp1910, 10.1289/EHP1910]
   QGIS Development Team, 2017, QGIS GEOGR INF SYST
   Raymond CM, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V153, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.005
   Samuelsson K, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V171, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009
   Scrucca L, 2016, R J, V8, P289
   Soga M, 2016, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V14, P94, DOI 10.1002/fee.1225
   Stahle A, 2005, Space Syntax 5th International Symposium, Vol 1, Proceedings, P131
   Walker BH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05063-170330
   Wyles KJ, 2019, ENVIRON BEHAV, V51, P111, DOI 10.1177/0013916517738312
   Zhou Y., 2017, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, P114, DOI [10.1073/pnas.1606035114201606035, DOI 10.1073/PNAS.1606035114201606035]
NR 58
TC 37
Z9 38
U1 5
U2 78
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD JUL
PY 2019
VL 187
BP 70
EP 80
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.03.015
PG 11
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA HX8OT
UT WOS:000467665900007
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pregnolato, M
   West, C
   Evans, B
   Lam, MY
   Chen, A
   Ahmadian, R
   Djordjevic, S
AF Pregnolato, M.
   West, C.
   Evans, B.
   Lam, Man-Yue
   Chen, A. S.
   Ahmadian, R.
   Djordjevic, S.
TI Using multi-stakeholder causal mapping to explore priorities for
   infrastructure resilience to flooding
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
ID URBAN; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; SYSTEMS; RISK; MAPS
AB Urban resilience to natural hazards could make our cities less vulnerable to adverse weather events. However, the implementation of resilience actions is currently not effective, as mechanisms to facilitate collaboration among involved stakeholders are missing. This paper for the first time explores causal mapping as a method to disassemble major issues of urban resilience into a more manageable understanding, and thus identify key objectives, barriers and opportunities in thinking "resilient cities". In this study, a cognitive-mapping-based workshop was held to elicit information from stakeholders in the remit of urban resilience to flooding. The statements and connections identified during the workshop led a consolidated map, analysed using the StrategyFinder software. This analysis highlighted barriers related to data availability, silo-based approaches and lack of funding; it also evidenced shared goals, such as the need to protect the built environment and minimise impact from flooding. Overall, causal mapping resulted a powerful analytical tool for improving understanding of the complex dynamics of urban resilience, identifying key variables and relationships, as well as eliciting information from stakeholders. Furthermore, this approach facilitated systems thinking, communication and collaboration. This enhanced understanding is fundamental for advancing strategies for future planning, contributing to urban sustainability and liveability.
C1 [Pregnolato, M.] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, England.
   [West, C.] Mott MacDonald, 10 Temple Back, Bristol BS1 6FL, England.
   [Evans, B.; Chen, A. S.; Djordjevic, S.] Univ Exeter, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter EX4 4QF, England.
   [Lam, Man-Yue; Ahmadian, R.] Cardiff Univ, Sch Engn, Cardiff CF24 3AA, Wales.
   [Pregnolato, M.] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Hydraul Engn, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands.
C3 University of Bristol; The Mott MacDonald Group; University of Exeter;
   Cardiff University; Delft University of Technology
RP Pregnolato, M (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Dept Hydraul Engn, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands.
EM m.pregnolato@tudelft.nl
RI Chen, Albert/E-2735-2010; Ahmadian, Reza/AAC-9113-2019; Pregnolato,
   Maria/J-2337-2019; Djordjevic, Slobodan/P-8853-2015; Ahmadian,
   Reza/D-6242-2013
OI Evans, Barry/0000-0003-1316-2087; Chen, Albert S./0000-0003-3708-3332;
   Ahmadian, Reza/0000-0003-2665-4734; Pregnolato,
   Maria/0000-0003-0796-9618; Lam, Man Yue/0000-0001-7259-968X
FU GW4 Building Communities Generator Fund; Engineering and Physical
   Sciences Research Council (ESPRC) LWEC [EP/R00742X/2]
FX This study was supported by the GW4 Building Communities Generator Fund;
   MP was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research
   Council (ESPRC) LWEC (Living With Environmental Change) Fellowship
   (EP/R00742X/2) . The authors gratefully thank all the workshop ' s
   participants; authors also gratefully thank Dr Igor Pyrko for advice and
   suggestions about the paper.
CR Abuabara L, 2018, J OPER RES SOC, V69, P220, DOI 10.1057/s41274-017-0204-9
   Ackermann F, 2005, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V14, P355, DOI 10.1007/s10726-005-8917-6
   Ackermann F, 2020, J OPER RES SOC, V71, P1, DOI 10.1080/01605682.2018.1542960
   Ackermann F, 2014, EUR J OPER RES, V238, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.035
   Ackermann F, 2011, LONG RANGE PLANN, V44, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001
   Ackermann F, 2010, SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO MANAGING CHANGE: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P135, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_4
   Ahmad S, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103076
   Alves PBR, 2022, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V15, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12839
   [Anonymous], 2022, About Us
   Arrighi C, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P1955, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-1955-2021
   Asadzadeh A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104637
   Bai XM, 2018, NATURE, V555, P19, DOI 10.1038/d41586-018-02409-z
   Brun I, 2014, EUR J MARKETING, V48, P572, DOI 10.1108/EJM-04-2012-0207
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Cantelmi R., 2021, Environment Systems & Decisions, V41, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09795-8
   Carluccio S., 2019, Workshop Summary
   Carmin J., 2009, WORLD BANK URB RES S, V29
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   de Bruijn KM, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V81, P99, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2074-2
   De Bruijn K.M., 2018, J. Geosci. Environ. Prot, V06, P290, DOI [10.4236/gep.2018.64018, DOI 10.4236/GEP.2018.64018]
   Dieste O, 2011, IEEE T SOFTWARE ENG, V37, P283, DOI 10.1109/TSE.2010.33
   Dilling L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   Durrenberger G., 1997, Focus Groups in Integrated AssessmentA Manual for a Participatory Tool, pWP
   Eden C, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V159, P673, DOI 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00431-4
   Eden C, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V152, P615, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00061-4
   Eden C., 1992, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V1, P199, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00126263
   Eden C.L., 1989, RATIONAL ANAL PROBLE
   Eden C, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V271, P1145, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.05.061
   Eden C, 2013, EURO J DECIS PROCESS, V1, P7, DOI 10.1007/s40070-013-0005-6
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2014, SOLUTIONS, V5, P26
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Hallegatte S., 2015, Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 7357
   Henao F, 2016, EUR J OPER RES, V253, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.02.044
   Hickey AM, 2003, 11TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, P169
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Kapucu N., 2021, Urban Governance, V1, P10, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2021.09.001
   Lami IM, 2019, RIV ESTET, P222, DOI 10.4000/estetica.5769
   LIDZ CW, 1995, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V52, P1034
   Liles J., 2012, Ba Times
   Linstone HA, 2002, The Delphi Method Techniques and Applications
   Mahajan S, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103942
   Marana P, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101531
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Pacheco C, 2018, IET SOFTW, V12, P365, DOI 10.1049/iet-sen.2017.0144
   Pacheco C, 2012, J SYST SOFTWARE, V85, P2171, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2012.04.075
   Paprotny D, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V101, P933, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-03902-3
   Pescaroli G, 2023, DISASTERS, V47, P320, DOI 10.1111/disa.12551
   Pidd M., 2009, TOOLS THINKING MODEL
   Pregnolato M., 2021, Water-Wise Cities and Sustainable Water Systems - Concepts, Technologies, and Applications, DOI [10.2166/9781789060768, DOI 10.2166/9781789060768]
   Pregnolato M., 2022, MSc thesis
   Pyrko I., 2017, Paper no. 1446
   Pyrko I, 2019, MANAGE LEARN, V50, P482, DOI 10.1177/1350507619860854
   Pyrko I, 2019, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V28, P233, DOI 10.1007/s10726-019-09614-9
   Rees D, 2018, HEALTH SYST, V7, P51, DOI 10.1057/s41306-017-0029-4
   Sechi GJ, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V14, P171, DOI 10.1007/s13753-023-00483-0
   Sharifi A, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.006
   Shaw D, 2019, EUR J OPER RES, V276, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.030
   Shaw D, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V263, P1019, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.051
   Spanellis A, 2021, EUR J OPER RES, V292, P784, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.003
   Tanaka Y, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101702
   Tavella E, 2017, EUR J OPER RES, V258, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.08.065
   Tubaldi E, 2022, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V22, P795, DOI 10.5194/nhess-22-795-2022
   UNDP, 2021, Urban Risk Management and Resilience Strategy
   UNDRR, 2019, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
   United Nations, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, P1
   Wang YL, 2019, INT J PROD ECON, V211, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.002
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Wehrle R, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102665
NR 72
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 5
U2 25
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD FEB 1
PY 2024
VL 101
AR 104189
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104189
EA JAN 2024
PG 27
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA GW9W8
UT WOS:001155838500001
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bellini, E
   Bellini, P
   Cenni, D
   Nesi, P
   Pantaleo, G
   Paoli, I
   Paolucci, M
AF Bellini, Emanuele
   Bellini, Pierfrancesco
   Cenni, Daniele
   Nesi, Paolo
   Pantaleo, Gianni
   Paoli, Irene
   Paolucci, Michela
TI An IoE and Big Multimedia Data Approach for Urban Transport System
   Resilience Management in Smart Cities
SO SENSORS
LA English
DT Article
DE smart resilient city; big multimedia data; complex system; big data
   analysis; disaster resilience; evidence driven decision support system;
   functional resonance analysis method; Internet of Everything; tree value
   logic
ID CITY; TAXONOMY
AB Today, the complexity of urban systems combined with existing and emerging threats constrains administrations to consider smart technologies and related huge amounts of data generated as a means to take timely and informed decisions. The smart city needs to be prepared for both expected and unexpected situations, and the possibility to mitigate the effect of the uncertainty behind the causes of disruptions through the analysis of all the possible data generated by the city open new possibility for resilience operationalization. This article aims at introducing a new conceptualization for resilience and presenting an innovative full stack solution to exploit Internet of Everything (IoE) and big multimedia data in smart cities to manage resilience of urban transport systems (UTS), which is one of the most critical infrastructures of the city. The approach is based on a novel data driven approach to resilience engineering and functional resonance analysis method (FRAM), to understand and model an UTS in the context of smart cities and to support evidence driven decision making. The paper proposes an architecture taking into account: (a) different kinds of available data generated in the smart city, (b) big data collection and semantic aggregation and enrichment; (c) data sense-making process composed by analytics of different data sources like social media, communication networks, IoT, user behavior; (d) tools for knowledge driven decisions able to combine different information generated by analytics, experience, and structural information of the city into a comprehensive and evidence driven decision model. The solution has been applied in Florence metropolitan city in the context of RESOLUTE H2020 research project of the European Commission.
C1 [Bellini, Emanuele] Univ Campania, Dept Math & Phys, I-81100 Caserta, Italy.
   [Bellini, Pierfrancesco; Cenni, Daniele; Nesi, Paolo; Pantaleo, Gianni; Paoli, Irene; Paolucci, Michela] Univ Florence, Distributed Syst & Internet Technol Lab DISIT, I-50121 Florence, Italy.
C3 Universita della Campania Vanvitelli; University of Florence
RP Bellini, E (corresponding author), Univ Campania, Dept Math & Phys, I-81100 Caserta, Italy.
EM Emanuele.bellini@unicampania.it; pierfrancesco.bellini@unifi.it;
   Daniele.Cenni@unifi.it; paolo.nesi@unifi.it; gianni.pantaleo@unifi.it;
   irene.paoli@unifi.it; michela.paolucci@unifi.it
RI Bellini, Emanuele/AAC-4441-2019; Cenni, Daniele/E-1571-2016; Bellini,
   Pierfrancesco/D-5923-2015; paolucci, michela/J-1539-2016; Pantaleo,
   Gianni/J-1864-2016
OI Cenni, Daniele/0000-0002-9761-9111; Bellini,
   Pierfrancesco/0000-0002-8167-1003; paolucci,
   michela/0000-0003-0643-171X; nesi, paolo/0000-0003-1044-3107; Pantaleo,
   Gianni/0000-0002-9235-437X
FU European Commission [653460]
FX This research has been developed in the context of RESOLUTE H2020
   research project of the European Commission under grant agreement no.
   653460 (http://www.resolute-eu.org).
CR Ackoff R.L., 1989, Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, V16, P3
   Akter S, 2019, ANN OPER RES, V283, P939, DOI 10.1007/s10479-017-2584-2
   [Anonymous], 2017, INT S SENS NETW SYST
   Arena F., 2020, Bull. Electr. Eng. Inf, V9, DOI [10.11591/eei.v9i4.2359, DOI 10.11591/EEI.V9I4.2359]
   Arnold RD, 2015, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V44, P669, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
   Badii C, 2017, 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART COMPUTING (SMARTCOMP), P93
   Badii C, 2017, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V75, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2017.05.001
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Bartolozzi M, 2015, 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY/SOCIALCOM/SUSTAINCOM (SMARTCITY), P117, DOI 10.1109/SmartCity.2015.57
   Batty M, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P769, DOI 10.1126/science.1151419
   Bellini E, 2017, RISK, RELIABILITY AND SAFETY: INNOVATING THEORY AND PRACTICE, P2110
   Bellini E., 2013, Information Technologies for Performing Arts, Media Access, and Entertainment, P90
   Bellini E., 2016, 2016 IEEE INT SMART, P1, DOI [10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580833, DOI 10.1109/ISC2.2016.7580833]
   BELLINI E., 2018, Routledge Handbook of Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, V1st, P685
   BELLINI E, 2020, ENVIRON SYST DECIS, V40, P321, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10669-020-09765-0
   Bellini E, 2020, IEEE SYST J, V14, P1234, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2905713
   Bellini E, 2017, ACM T INTERNET TECHN, V18, DOI 10.1145/3137572
   Bellini P, 2018, 2018 IEEE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA COMPUTING SERVICE AND APPLICATIONS (IEEE BIGDATASERVICE 2018), P137, DOI 10.1109/BigDataService.2018.00028
   Bellini P, 2018, 2018 4TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COLLABORATION AND INTERNET COMPUTING (CIC 2018), P364, DOI 10.1109/CIC.2018.00055
   Bellini P, 2017, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT, V42, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.08.005
   Bellini P, 2014, J VISUAL LANG COMPUT, V25, P827, DOI 10.1016/j.jvlc.2014.10.023
   Bizer C., 2010, P INT SEM WEB C ISWC
   Blockley D., 2000, DOING IT DIFFERENTLY
   Caragliu A, 2011, J URBAN TECHNOL, V18, P65, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
   Carroll J.M., 1995, SCENARIO BASED DESIG, P1
   Ceravolo P, 2019, CONF BUS INFORM, P249, DOI 10.1109/CBI.2019.00035
   Cimellaro G.P., 2012, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS, P16
   Crisci A., 2017, PREDICTING TV PROGRA, DOI [10.1007/s11042-017-4880-x, DOI 10.1007/S11042-017-4880-X]
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Dorasamy M, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P1834, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.008
   Feng Q, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V186, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.024
   Flax L., 2016, IRGC RESOURCE GUIDE
   Forzieri Giovanni, 2017, Lancet Planet Health, V1, pe200, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30082-7
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   González MC, 2008, NATURE, V453, P779, DOI 10.1038/nature06958
   Häring I, 2017, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P21, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_2
   Harmon B.A., 2014, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, DOI [10.1007/978-94-007-7161-1_2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7161-1_2]
   Hartigan J. A., 1979, Applied Statistics, V28, P100, DOI 10.2307/2346830
   Holler J, 2014, FROM MACHINE-TO-MACHINE TO THE INTERNET OF THINGS: INTRODUCTION TO A NEW AGE OF INTELLIGENCE, P1
   Holling CS., 2002, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI, P63
   Hollnagel, 2014, SAFETY 1 SAFETY 2
   Hollnagel E, 2012, FRAM: THE FUNCTIONAL RESONANCE ANALYSIS METHOD: MODELLING COMPLEX SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS, P1
   Hollnagel E., 2008, FRAM WORKSH EC MIN P
   Hollnagel E., 2018, The functional resonance analysis method and manual (version 2)
   Hollnagel E, 2017, Safety-II in Practice: Developing the Resilience Potentials
   Hollnagel E., 2011, RESILIENCE ENG PRACT
   Hollnagel E., 2017, Resilience engineering, P347
   Hollnagel E., 2016, Resilience Engineering Perspectives, V2, P139, DOI 10.1201/9781315244389
   Huan Z., 2018, INT C COMPUTATIONAL, V644, P654
   Jamali M, 2019, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V44, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.005
   Jiang S, 2012, DATA MIN KNOWL DISC, V25, P478, DOI 10.1007/s10618-012-0264-z
   Jovanovic A.S., 2017, URBAN GOVERNANCE INF, P285
   Jovanovuc A., 2017, SMART RSILIENCE IN A
   Kotoulas S., 2014, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3199081, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3199081]
   Kumari A, 2019, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V128, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.12.013
   Kumari A, 2018, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V124, P169, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2018.09.014
   Leveson N, 2004, SAFETY SCI, V42, P237, DOI 10.1016/S0925-7535(03)00047-X
   Linkov I, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P1772, DOI 10.1111/risa.12991
   Lorenz B., 2005, DELIVERABLE REWERSE
   Martelli C, 2015, INT J KNOWL LEARN, V10, P1, DOI 10.1504/IJKL.2015.071042
   Martelli C, 2013, 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL-IMAGE TECHNOLOGY & INTERNET-BASED SYSTEMS (SITIS), P998, DOI 10.1109/SITIS.2013.161
   Matos E., 2017, Beyond the Internet of Things: Everything Interconnected, P1
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   National Academy of Sciences, 2012, DISASTER RESILIENCE
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Patel D, 2019, ADV INTELL SYST, V670, P39, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-8971-8_4
   Patriarca R, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V102, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.005
   Patriarca R, 2017, SAFETY SCI, V91, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.016
   Rosa LV, 2015, COGN TECHNOL WORK, V17, P559, DOI 10.1007/s10111-015-0337-z
   Sangiambut S, 2016, URBAN PLAN, V1, P141, DOI 10.17645/up.v1i2.644
   Scharffe F., 2012, AAAI WORKSH SEM CIT
   Shelestov A., 2018, P 18 INT C DATA SCI, P134
   Slim H., 2019, AM J IND BUS MANAG, V9, P1345, DOI DOI 10.4236/AJIBM.2019.96089
   Sofia D, 2020, ENERG POLICY, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111137
   Suzuki R., Pvclust: Hierarchical Clustering with p-Values via Multi-scale Bootstrap Resampling R Package Version 1.2-2
   Tanwar Sudeep, 2018, Future Internet Technologies and Trends. First International Conference, ICFITT 2017. Proceedings. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (LNICST 220), P116, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-73712-6_12
   Tanwar S, 2018, LECT NOTE NETW SYST, V19, P23, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5523-2_3
   Tsekourakis I, 2012, COMM COM INF SC, V329, P1
   Vinnem J., 2018, SAFETY RELIABILITY S
   W3C-OGC, TIME ONTOLOGY OWL
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wang SY, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P106997, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932259
   Wang X., 2010, SPR GEOL, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58325-9_1
   Wilson JR, 2009, ERGONOMICS, V52, P774, DOI 10.1080/00140130802642211
   Woltjer R., 2006, P 3 S RES ENG KALM S
NR 85
TC 24
Z9 25
U1 9
U2 44
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1424-8220
J9 SENSORS-BASEL
JI Sensors
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 21
IS 2
AR 435
DI 10.3390/s21020435
PG 34
WC Chemistry, Analytical; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Instruments
   & Instrumentation
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Chemistry; Engineering; Instruments & Instrumentation
GA PX9WJ
UT WOS:000611701900001
PM 33435451
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dan, ZH
   Zhou, BL
   Zhou, YK
AF Dan, Zhaohui
   Zhou, Bingling
   Zhou, Yuekuan
TI Optimal infrastructures and integrative energy networks for sustainable
   and energy-resilient city renaissance
SO APPLIED ENERGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart and sustainable city; E -mobility energy integration; Cross-sector
   energy interaction; Smart energy management; Energy resilience to
   climate change
ID HYDROGEN; STORAGE; SYSTEM; BUILDINGS; CLIMATE; CONSUMPTION; MICROGRIDS;
   MANAGEMENT
AB The transition to sustainable energy systems is being driven across building, transportation, and power grid sectors to achieve sustainable development goals. Collaborative, multi-sector energy systems at the city level promote energy sharing and interactions, leading to enhanced urban renewable energy share and reduced carbon emissions compared to single-sector measures. While most research has concentrated on single-sector measures, limited attention has been given to cross-sector energy interactions in the context of urban electrification and hydrogenation. This review presents a multidisciplinary analysis of the interplay between energy dynamics and carbon reduction potential across sectors, highlighting: 1) building consumers and prosumers; 2) building energy management and scale updates; 3) charging infrastructure location methods; 4) climate models and energy resilience enhancement strategies; and 5) applications of artificial intelligence. This review also emphasizes the role of charging stations and hydrogen refuelling stations as critical nodes in urban cross-sector energy network. Several future research directions are identified, including: 1) the development of resilient indicators for city- scale, cross-sector energy systems; 2) the planning of charging station that consider cross-sector energy system updates and climate change impacts; 3) strategies for energy sharing and interactions within urban cross-sector energy system; 4) profit mechanisms to incentivize energy investors and consumers. This review offers urban planners and researchers with insightful recommendations for the design, planning and management of future urban energy infrastructure, emphasizing the importance of integrated, multi-sector approaches for achieving sustainability and resilience.
C1 [Dan, Zhaohui; Zhou, Bingling; Zhou, Yuekuan] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol Guangzhou, Sustainable Energy & Environm Thrust, Funct Hub, Guangzhou 511400, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Yuekuan] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Yuekuan] HKUST Shenzhen Hong Kong Collaborat Innovat Res In, Shenzhen, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Yuekuan] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Emerging Interdisciplinary Areas, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (Guangzhou); Hong Kong
   University of Science & Technology; Hong Kong University of Science &
   Technology
RP Zhou, YK (corresponding author), Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol Guangzhou, Sustainable Energy & Environm Thrust, Funct Hub, Guangzhou 511400, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
EM yuekuan.zhou@outlook.com
RI Zhou, Yuekuan/ABE-4194-2020
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [52408137];
   Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation General Project
   [2024A1515012166]; Yangcheng Scholars Leading Talent Training Project
   [2024312133]; Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)
   [G0101000059]; Project of Hetao Shenzhen-Hong Kong Science and
   Technology Innovation Cooperation Zone [HZQB-KCZYB-2020083]
FX This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (NSFC) (52408137) , Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation
   General Project (2024A1515012166) , and Yangcheng Scholars Leading
   Talent Training Project (2024312133) . This research is also supported
   by The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)
   startup grant (G0101000059) . This work was supported in part by the
   Project of Hetao Shenzhen-Hong Kong Science and Technology Innovation
   Cooperation Zone (HZQB-KCZYB-2020083) .
CR Abbasizadeh A, 2024, Reliab Eng Syst Saf, P243
   Acharya S, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P214434, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041074
   Ahmad F, 2022, ENERGY REP, V8, P2314, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.180
   Ahmad T, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783
   Ahmadi S, 2022, Energ Strat Rev, P40
   Ahmed A, 2022, ENERG BUILDINGS, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111755
   Alirezazadeh A, 2021, Sustain Energy Technol Assess, P43
   An J, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111851
   Ang YQ, 2020, APPL ENERG, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115738
   [Anonymous], 2023, goe.. What is bidirectional charging and why Isnt it the EV game-changer You might think Yet!
   Arabzadeh V, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110090
   Arghandeh R, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.193
   Ashrafi R, 2021, INT J ELEC POWER, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106824
   Assareh E, 2023, J BUILD ENG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105727
   Bayram IS, 2020, COMPAT POW ELECTR, P409, DOI 10.1109/CPE-POWERENG48600.2020.9161639
   Bitencourt L, 2021, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107391
   Bodkhe RG, 2023, INT J ELECTROCHEM SC, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100108
   Cai PC, 2023, ENERGY, V283, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128471
   Chantzis G, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113255
   Chen F, 2022, Neural Comput & Applic, P1
   Chen L, 2024, ENVIRON CHEM LETT, V22, P751, DOI 10.1007/s10311-023-01675-2
   Chen L, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110932
   Das L, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109918
   Data OWi, 2024, Tracking global data on electric vehicles
   Deb S, 2022, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V23, P6571, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2021.3058419
   Dias JB, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109556
   Erdogan S, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101127
   Feldpausch-Parker AM, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V82, P1961, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.015
   Feng KR, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102458
   Göhlich D, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020839
   Gopinath R, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102411
   Gordon JA, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112481
   Gunnarsdottir I, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110294
   Hannan MA, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110022
   Harris D, 2024, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V25, P1131, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2023.3318928
   He SY, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V160, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.012
   Hossain E, 2021, APPL ENERG, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116709
   Hosseini M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103634
   Hu S, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V181, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113316
   Hu S, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106807
   Huang P, 2020, APPL ENERG, V268, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114983
   Huang P, 2020, APPL ENERG, V258, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114109
   Hussain A, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103788
   IEA, 2023, Empowering urban energy transitions (executive summary)
   IEA, 2023, Tracking electric vehicles
   IEA, 2019, The future of hydrogen, DOI 10.1787/1-0514c4-en
   International Energy Agency (IEA), 2023, Tracking buildings
   Ioakimidis CS, 2018, ENERGY, V148, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.128
   Iyer L. S., 2021, Transportation Engineering, V5, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TRENG.2021.100083
   Jandaghian Z, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102025
   Jasiunas J, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476
   Jiang T, 2022, IEEE T SMART GRID, V13, P2744, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2022.3157856
   Jiang YW, 2024, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V54, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.128
   Kapica J, 2024, Renew Sust Energ Rev, P189
   Kchaou-Boujelben M, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103376
   Kermani M, 2021, RENEW ENERG, V171, P1115, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.008
   Khardenavis A, 2021, ENERGY, V235, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121424
   Kikstra JS, 2022, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V15, P9075, DOI 10.5194/gmd-15-9075-2022
   Kim J, 2019, IEEE T SMART GRID, V10, P4996, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2018.2872521
   Kim S, 2022, TRANSPORTMETRICA B, V10, P340, DOI 10.1080/21680566.2021.1997672
   Kinay ÖB, 2021, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V144, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.trb.2020.12.001
   Krarti M, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111309
   Kuvvetli Y, 2020, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V45, P30845, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.126
   Kyriakou DG, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104776
   Li HL, 2020, ENERGY, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118465
   Li JY, 2023, ENERGY AI, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100208
   Liu J, 2021, APPL ENERG, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116733
   Liu L, 2017, NAT ENERGY, V2, DOI 10.1038/nenergy.2017.109
   Lokar J, 2020, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V45, P34566, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.170
   Lopez J, 2018, IEEE T IND INFORM, V14, P3745, DOI 10.1109/TII.2018.2826226
   Lu MX, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109545
   Luo LZ, 2020, ENERGY, V192, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116631
   Mahmud K, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109840
   Mansour-Saatloo A, 2021, Sustain Cities Soc, P74
   Maranghi S, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106074
   Marczinkowski HM, 2019, ENERGY, V175, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.103
   Mariano-Hernández D, 2021, J BUILD ENG, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101692
   Marvuglia A, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109788
   Mascherbauer P, 2022, ENERGY, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123665
   Melaina M., 2013, Hydrogen Station Cost Estimates
   Metais MO, 2022, Renew Sust Energ Rev, P153
   Nik VM, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.107
   O'Dwyer E, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102412
   Pal A, 2021, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2020.100422
   Park K, 2022, APPL ENERG, V328, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120111
   Patange OS, 2022, ENERGY, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124508
   Pena-Bello A, 2021, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114220
   Perera ATD, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.113038
   Perera ATD, 2021, APPL ENERG, V285, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116430
   Perez-Davila O, 2023, Contribution Road Trans Decarbonization Energy, V267
   Petkov I, 2020, APPL ENERG, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115197
   Pinto G, 2021, ENERGY, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120725
   Piselli C, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V162, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.043
   Planas E, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V43, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.067
   Rajamand S, 2022, SUSTAIN ENERGY TECHN, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101922
   Rayegan S, 2024, ENERG BUILDINGS, V324, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114863
   Reis IFG, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111013
   Ronanki D, 2024, IEEE J EM SEL TOP P, V12, P242, DOI 10.1109/JESTPE.2023.3336997
   Rosales-Asensio E, 2019, ENERGY, V172, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.02.043
   Rose PK, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102358
   Ryu H, 2023, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V48, P36223, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.064
   Saheb T, 2022, SUSTAIN COMPUT-INFOR, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.suscom.2022.100699
   Salata F, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103518
   Sanic DC, 2022, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V47, P35068, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.090
   Sayedahmed HA, 2020, P INT C ADV INT SYST, P803
   Shahidehpour M, 2016, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, P1
   Shandiz SC, 2020, ENERGY, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117856
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Sola A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101872
   Song YJ, 2022, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V47, P24533, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.134
   Sorensen ÅL, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110923
   Sovacool BK, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109963
   Staffell I, 2019, ENERG ENVIRON SCI, V12, P463, DOI 10.1039/c8ee01157e
   Tan L, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2389, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04429-3
   Thomas P, 2022, J ENERGY STORAGE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2022.105468
   Transmission CoEtRotNsEP, 2017, Enhancing the resilience of the nation's electricity system
   Wang XY, 2024, APPL ENERG, V359, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122723
   Wang YZ, 2016, IEEE T POWER SYST, V31, P1604, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2429656
   Watson PL, 2022, Weather Clim Extremes, P37
   Wu Y, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111409
   Wu Y, 2022, INT J ELEC POWER, V139, DOI 10.1016/j.ijepes.2022.108005
   Wu ZY, 2023, APPL ENERG, V351, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121514
   Xu L, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111642
   Xu X, 2021, J Clean Prod, P315
   Yang DZ, 2022, SOL ENERGY, V232, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2021.12.011
   Younesi A, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112397
   Yousefi M, 2021, IEEE T IND INFORM, V17, P430, DOI 10.1109/TII.2020.2971530
   Yu BL, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113247
   Yumiki S, 2022, SUSTAIN ENERGY GRIDS, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.segan.2022.100664
   Zhan S., 2021, Energy and Built Environment, V2, P167, DOI [10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.08.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENBENV.2020.08.001]
   Zhang CB, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-37373-4
   Zhang JR, 2024, APPL ENERG, V371, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123742
   Zhao G, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103744
   Zhao PJ, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P940, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.11.005
   Zhao YJ, 2022, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V47, P19338, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.102
   Zheng SQ, 2022, ENERGY, V248, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123634
   Zhou Y, 2019, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev, P114
   Zhou Y, 2020, Renew Sust Energ Rev, P130
   Zhou Y, 2022, Energy Rev, P1
   Zhou YK, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112649
   Zhou YK, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V162, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112444
   Zhou YK, 2022, APPL ENERG, V318, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119131
   Zhou YK, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106786
   Zhu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127325
NR 144
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 11
U2 11
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0306-2619
EI 1872-9118
J9 APPL ENERG
JI Appl. Energy
PD JUN 1
PY 2025
VL 387
AR 125612
DI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125612
EA MAR 2025
PG 22
WC Energy & Fuels; Engineering, Chemical
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Energy & Fuels; Engineering
GA Z8E4Z
UT WOS:001441172100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Villagra, P
   Rojas, C
   Ohno, R
   Xue, M
   Gómez, K
AF Villagra, Paula
   Rojas, Carolina
   Ohno, Ryuzo
   Xue, Ma
   Gomez, Karina
TI A GIS-base exploration of the relationships between open space systems
   and urban form for the adaptive capacity of cities after an earthquake:
   The cases of two Chilean cities
SO APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Open space; Urban form; Spatial analysis; Adaptation; Resilience;
   Earthquake
AB In human environments subjected to natural hazards, places such as plazas, parks and free areas can, after a catastrophe, be places for refuge which can satisfy survival needs and support adaptation. The relationships of such an open space system and the urban form, are explored in this study by focussing on the spatial context of two Chilean cities affected by earthquakes. Data was collected in interviews with people from emergency organisations using the Projecting Mapping Technique, and subjected to Content and Geographic Information System analyses to identify the type, utility and distribution of the open space system for earthquake recovery. The objective was to evaluate, by means of different spatial indexes, the extent the open space system of these cities impact on measures associated with urban resilience, namely overlap in governance and diversity. Findings suggest that the regularity of the grid and city density affect the adaptive capacity of cities, hence, resilience. Findings also shed light on a methodological approach, including participatory and geographical data, through which these resilient aspects can be explored and evaluated in other human environments prone to earthquakes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Villagra, Paula; Gomez, Karina] Univ Austral Chile, Inst Ciencias Ambientales & Evolutivas, Valdivia, Region De Los R, Chile.
   [Rojas, Carolina] Univ Concepcion, Fac Arquitectura Urbanismo & Geog, Dept Geog, Concepcion, Region Del Bio, Chile.
   [Ohno, Ryuzo; Xue, Ma] Tokyo Inst Technol, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch Sci & Engn, Tokyo, Japan.
C3 Universidad Austral de Chile; Universidad de Concepcion; Institute of
   Science Tokyo; Tokyo Institute of Technology
RP Villagra, P (corresponding author), Univ Austral Chile, Inst Ciencias Ambientales & Evolutivas, Edificio Emilio Pugin 326,Campus Isla Teja, Valdivia, Region De Los R, Chile.
EM paula.villagra@uach.cl; crojasque@gmail.com; rohno@n.cc.titech.ac.jp;
   soppsnow@hotmail.com; karina.gomez.alarcon@gmail.com
RI Ohno, Ryuzo/LQK-3646-2024; Rojas, Carolina/AAS-1325-2020; xue,
   ma/JDC-5632-2023; Villagra, Paula/J-3632-2014
OI Rojas, Carolina/0000-0001-9505-4252; Villagra, Paula/0000-0001-6428-3933
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Allan R, 2011, J LANDSCAPE ARCH AUG, P34
   [Anonymous], 1985, [No title captured]
   [Anonymous], 2005, WORLD C DIS RED KOB
   [Anonymous], 1995, INTERACTIVE SPATIAL
   [Anonymous], 2004, Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Disaster Response
   AUHS, 1997, STUD PLANN ARR OP SP, V19
   Blanco H, 2009, PROG PLANN, V72, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2009.09.001
   Cabinet Office Government of Japan, 2011, INT SURV EV BEH 2011
   Cervero R, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1478, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
   Chou JS, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P2031, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0461-5
   Dai DJ, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V37, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.10.006
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dunford M, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P998, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.001
   Gaudreau K., 2010, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V28, P233, DOI 10.3152/146155110X12772982841122
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Green R, 2005, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V25, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.09.007
   Guarda Gabriel., 2001, NUEVA HIST VALDIVIA
   Hutter G, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9901-x
   Ishikawa M., 2002, ANN GEOPHYS, V45
   Ishimoto H., 2000, P ANN C I SOC SAF SC
   Jacobs J., 1993, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   McGrath B., 2007, Designing Urban Patch Dynamics
   Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism (MLIT), 2012, QUEST SURV EV ROUT S
   ONEMI, 2001, MET BAS EL PLAN COM
   Ostrom E, 1999, ANNU REV POLIT SCI, V2, P493, DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
   Perez L., 2007, Scripta Nova, VXI
   Pitilakis K., 2011, Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain
   Resilience Alliance, 2010, Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners revised version 2.0
   Tachikawa G., 1997, P AIJ ANN C
   Valdivia M, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V45, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.015
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Yin R.K., 2004, The Case Study Anthology
   Zhou HJ, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V53, P21, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9407-y
NR 35
TC 68
Z9 80
U1 5
U2 77
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0143-6228
EI 1873-7730
J9 APPL GEOGR
JI Appl. Geogr.
PD MAR
PY 2014
VL 48
BP 64
EP 78
DI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.010
PG 15
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA AE5BX
UT WOS:000334003900007
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xiong, YN
   Li, CY
   Zou, MZ
   Xu, Q
AF Xiong, Yanni
   Li, Changyou
   Zou, Mengzhi
   Xu, Qian
TI Investigating into the Coupling and Coordination Relationship between
   Urban Resilience and Urbanization: A Case Study of Hunan Province, China
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; urbanization; sustainable development; coupling and
   coordination relationship; spatio-temporal dynamics; ESDA; grey
   prediction model; urban systems
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENT; CHALLENGES; STRATEGY; HAZARDS; MODEL
AB In the context of accelerated urbanization, constructing resilient cities is an effective approach to tackling risks, such as extreme weather, and various urban challenges. The coupling and coordinated development of urbanization and urban resilience is a prominent embodiment of urban sustainable development and high-quality development capacity. In this study, Hunan Province, China, which is frequently affected by various disasters, is selected as a representative for examining the coupling and coordination relationship between urban resilience and urbanization level. The panel data are adopted to construct a dual-system evaluation framework integrating urban resilience and urbanization level based on the entropy weight-coefficient of variation (CV)-CRITIC method. The coupling coordination degree of this dual-system evaluation framework is calculated with the coupling model in physics and GM (1, 1) grey prediction model. Additionally, the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of the coupling coordination degree are investigated and analyzed by ArcGIS and Geoda software. The following are indicated from the results: (1) The resilience of all cities is related to their geographical location and is characterized by a decrease from east to west; in addition, the resilience level of most cities presents a downward trend with time. (2) The urbanization level of most cities develops stably with time, but there is a growing gap in the urbanization level between regions. (3) There is a strong correlation between urban resilience and urbanization level in all cities; the unbalanced coupling and coordinated development emerge, specifically manifested by the polarization phenomenon. Eventually, a circle-difference spatial distribution pattern that starts from the central urban agglomeration and gradually decreases to the periphery is formed. (4) The prediction results of the coupling coordination degree suggest that there is an increasingly distinct polarization trend for the coupling and coordinated development between cities, and it is necessary to pay attention to those cities with a declined predicted value. (5) There is a significant positive spatial autocorrelation and agglomeration effects in the distribution of the coupling coordination degree of all cities, and the correlation is getting stronger with each passing year; the correlation mode is mainly characterized by homogeneity and supplemented by heterogeneity. Finally, several suggestions are proposed in this paper, in an attempt to lead the coordinated development of regions by novel urbanization and thus promote the sustainable development of cities. The methods and insights adopted in this study contribute to investigating the relationship between urban resilience and urbanization in China and other regions worldwide.
C1 [Xiong, Yanni; Li, Changyou; Zou, Mengzhi; Xu, Qian] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China.
C3 Central South University
RP Li, CY (corresponding author), Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China.
EM xyn1030@126.com; 204812385@csu.edu.cn; zoumengzhi07@163.com;
   xqxq1022@163.com
OI Li, Changyou/0000-0002-9119-6429
CR [Anonymous], 2018, SHANGHAI URBAN PLAN, V3, P129
   Assarkhaniki Z, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101840
   Bai L., 2018, URBAN ARCHIT, V35, P19
   Barasa E, 2018, INT J HEALTH POLICY, V7, P491, DOI 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.06
   Barrett CB, 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P14625, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1320880111
   Bozza A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9010103
   Cao W., 2012, China Popul. Resour. Environ, V22, P141
   Cardoso MA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062349
   Chen J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102892
   Chen MX, 2010, J GEOGR SCI, V20, P17, DOI 10.1007/s11442-010-0017-0
   Chen PY, 2019, ENTROPY-SWITZ, V21, DOI 10.3390/e21030269
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Chen YY, 2019, SOFT COMPUT, V23, P1541, DOI 10.1007/s00500-017-2876-0
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Cheng ZH, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P2935, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.103
   Chu L., 2020, J IND TECHNOL EC, V39, P145, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-910X.2020.09.018
   Cui M., 2015, Econ. Geogr, V35, P72
   Da K., 2020, J SHENYANG JIANZHU U, V22, P595
   Delgado A, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V77, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.011
   Dong MH, 2014, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V24, P620, DOI 10.1007/s11769-014-0685-2
   Eisenack K, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102439
   El-Kholei AO, 2019, ALEX ENG J, V58, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.aej.2019.04.004
   Fan C, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.10.002
   Fan WC, 2022, ENG OPTIMIZ, V54, P830, DOI 10.1080/0305215X.2021.1901087
   Fang C., 2019, World Reg. Stud, V28, P77, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9479.2019.06.2018403
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Fuchs S, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P3183, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
   Gao YP, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244024
   Gao ZC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12104212
   Geng YQ, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-08598-3
   Gorgij AD, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6589-6
   Gu CL, 2019, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V62, P1351, DOI 10.1007/s11430-018-9359-y
   Guan XL, 2018, HABITAT INT, V71, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.009
   He JQ, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V77, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.017
   [贺三维 He Sanwei], 2018, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V38, P95
   Holden E, 2017, SUSTAIN DEV, V25, P213, DOI 10.1002/sd.1647
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   [贾琦 Jia Qi], 2015, [干旱区资源与环境, Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment], V29, P8
   Jiang Zhihua, 2004, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transport Science & Engineering), P305
   Keen M, 2019, URBAN POLICY RES, V37, P324, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2019.1626710
   Kong YD, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105534
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   [李琛 Li Chen], 2022, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V29, P389
   Li J, 2012, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V43, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.108
   Li Q, 2019, GEOTECH GEOL ENG, V37, P1493, DOI 10.1007/s10706-018-0702-9
   Limnios EAM, 2014, EUR MANAG J, V32, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2012.11.007
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Lu XZ, 2019, APPL SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/app9173497
   Ma LB, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.007
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nerini FF, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P674, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0334-y
   Niu JK, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13041983
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Oliver TH, 2015, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V30, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009
   Payne PR, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12026-260102
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Qasim S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.009
   Qiu M, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108346
   Rod B, 2020, J MANAGE ENG, V36, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000795
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shi YJ, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17051587
   Song QJ, 2018, ENERG POLICY, V121, P346, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.037
   Tonne C, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106236
   Wang L, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102181
   Wang Q., 2015, Econ Geogr, V35, P161, DOI [10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.12.023, DOI 10.15957/J.CNKI.JJDL.2015.12.023]
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   [王少剑 Wang Shaojian], 2021, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V76, P973
   [王毅 Wang Yi], 2015, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V34, P97
   Weng G.M., 2016, Econ. Geogr, V36, P178
   Xiao YP, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10082953
   Xu D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030822
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   [杨保清 Yang Baoqing], 2020, [地域研究与开发, Areal Research and Development], V39, P70
   Yang C, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102271
   Yang X., 2021, URBAN ISSUES, V3, P29, DOI DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.210303
   Yang Y, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12280-260220
   Yi LX, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V87, P1223, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2781-y
   Börekçi DY, 2021, J MANAGE ORGAN, V27, P422, DOI 10.1017/jmo.2018.72
   Zhang FT, 2021, ASIA PAC J TOUR RES, V26, P811, DOI 10.1080/10941665.2021.1925715
   Zhang X, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V693, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.342
   Zhang XR, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12176835
   Zhang YJ, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061766
   Zhao LM, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9050859
   Zhong M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041521
   [周倩 Zhou Qian], 2020, [水土保持研究, Research of Soil and Water Conservation], V27, P286
   Zhu J.H., 2020, SOFT SCI, V34, P72, DOI [10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2020.02.12, DOI 10.13956/J.SS.1001-8409.2020.02.12]
NR 90
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 7
U2 135
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAY
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 10
AR 5889
DI 10.3390/su14105889
PG 26
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 1T7EX
UT WOS:000804892600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hemmati, M
   Ellingwood, BR
   Mahmoud, HN
AF Hemmati, Mona
   Ellingwood, Bruce R.
   Mahmoud, Hussam N.
TI The Role of Urban Growth in Resilience of Communities Under Flood Risk
SO EARTHS FUTURE
LA English
DT Review
DE Climate Change; Flood; Resilience; Risk-informed Decisions;
   Socioeconomic Development; Urbanization
ID LAND-USE CHANGES; SEA-LEVEL RISE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EXTREME EVENTS; PORT
   CITIES; URBANIZATION; IMPACT; ADAPTATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK
AB Flood risk to urban communities is increasing significantly as a result of the integrated effects of climate change and socioeconomic development. The latter effect is one of the main drivers of rising flood risk has received less attention in comparison to climate change. Economic development and population growth are major causes of urban expansion in flood-prone areas, and a comprehensive understanding of the impact of urban growth on flood risk is an essential ingredient of effective flood risk management. At the same time, planning for community resilience has become a national and worldwide imperative in recent years. Enhancements to community resilience require well-integrated and enormous long-term public and private investments. Accordingly, comprehensive urban growth plans should take rising flood risk into account to ensure future resilient communities through careful collaboration between engineers, geologists, socialists, economists, and urban planners within the framework of life-cycle analysis. This paper highlights the importance of including urban growth in accurate future flood risk assessment and how planning for future urbanization should include measurement science-based strategies in developing policies to achieve more resilient communities.
C1 [Hemmati, Mona; Ellingwood, Bruce R.; Mahmoud, Hussam N.] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
C3 Colorado State University System; Colorado State University Fort Collins
RP Mahmoud, HN (corresponding author), Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
EM hussam.mahmoud@colostate.edu
RI Mahmoud, Hussam/JFL-0657-2023
OI Mahmoud, Hussam/0000-0002-3106-6067; Hemmati, Mona/0000-0003-1283-0231
FU U.S. National Institute of Science and Technology [70NANB15H044];
   Colorado State University (NIST) [70NANB15H044]
FX The research herein was funded by the Center for Risk-Based Community
   Resilience Planning, a Center of Excellence funded through a cooperative
   agreement between the U.S. National Institute of Science and Technology
   and Colorado State University (NIST Financial Assistance Award Number:
   70NANB15H044). The views expressed are those of the author/presenter and
   may not represent the official position of the National Institute of
   Standards and Technology or the US Department of Commerce. The authors
   would like to sincerely thank the reviewers and the editor, Dr. Michael
   Ellis, for all of their comments that are reflection on the
   multidisciplinary nature of the article. All data sources used in this
   study can be found in References Munich Re (20202020), U.S. Census
   Bureau, (20192019), and FEMA, (20192019).
CR Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   Alfieri L, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P171, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000485
   [Anonymous], 2012, Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative
   Berke P, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P310, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.976585
   Birkland TA., 2003, Natural Hazards Review, V4, P46, DOI [10.1061/(asce)1527-6988(2003)4:1(46), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:1(46)]
   Bouwer LM, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P463, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.002
   Brody S, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P1252, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.802228
   Brody SD, 2007, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V73, P330, DOI 10.1080/01944360708977981
   Brody SD, 2011, J PLAN EDUC RES, V31, P438, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11419515
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bubeck P, 2017, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V10, P436, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12151
   BURBY RJ, 1981, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V47, P289, DOI 10.1080/01944368108976511
   Carter TR, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P133
   de Sherbinin A, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P39, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076725
   Dessai S., 2008, UNCERTAINTY CLIMATE, V2007
   Du JK, 2012, J HYDROL, V464, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.057
   Ellingwood B. R., 1992, MCGRAW HILL INT SERI, V1992, P89
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2005, RISK MAN SER FEMA DI
   Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2017, COMM RAT SYST FACT S
   Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2017, COMM RAT SYST COORD
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Ghanbari M, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P162, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001089
   Glavovic BC, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V54, P679, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9494-9
   Gori A, 2019, J HYDROL, V568, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.053
   Güneralp B, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V31, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.002
   Gupta K, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0211
   Hallegatte S, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P802, DOI [10.1038/nclimate1979, 10.1038/NCLIMATE1979]
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Hanson S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P89, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9977-4
   Highfield WE, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P186, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01840.x
   Hirabayashi Y, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P816, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1911, 10.1038/nclimate1911]
   Jongman B, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P823, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.004
   Koliou M, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P131, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547
   Kreibich H, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P953, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000606
   Kron W, 2005, WATER INT, V30, P58, DOI 10.1080/02508060508691837
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
   Kwadijk JCJ, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P729, DOI 10.1002/wcc.64
   Lin PH, 2016, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V1, P108, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2016.1254997
   McDaniels T, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
   McEwen L, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.018
   McPhillips LE, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P441, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000686
   Merz B, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P509, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
   Moftakhari HR, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P214, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000494
   Muis S, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V538, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.068
   O'Donnell EC, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0216
   Office of the Press Secretary, 2013, WHIT HOUS PRES POL D
   Pelletier JD, 2015, EARTHS FUTURE, V3, P220, DOI 10.1002/2014EF000290
   Pumo D, 2017, J HYDROL, V554, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.002
   Sadiq AA, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000320
   Sadiq AA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1413, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1776-9
   Sharma A, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P8545, DOI 10.1029/2018WR023749
   Slater LJ, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V43, P12428, DOI 10.1002/2016GL071199
   Suriya S, 2012, J HYDROL, V412, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.008
   Tyler J, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V96, P1223, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03606-3
   U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2002, SERV PUBL FLOOD DAM
   U.S. Census Bureau, 2019, URB RUR AR HIST US C
   Wahl T, 2016, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V121, P1274, DOI 10.1002/2015JC011057
   Ward PJ, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P642, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3350, 10.1038/nclimate3350]
   Wijesekara GN, 2012, J HYDROL, V412, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.04.018
   Winsemius HC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P381, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2893, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2893]
   Zhang C, 2015, J STRUCT ENG, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001225
   Zhang W, 2018, NATURE, V563, P384, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0676-z
NR 63
TC 103
Z9 117
U1 14
U2 172
PU AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PI WASHINGTON
PA 2000 FLORIDA AVE NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20009 USA
EI 2328-4277
J9 EARTHS FUTURE
JI Earth Future
PD MAR
PY 2020
VL 8
IS 3
AR UNSP e2019EF001382
DI 10.1029/2019EF001382
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology &
   Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric
   Sciences
GA KX9OS
UT WOS:000522205300009
PM 32715013
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Slater, T
   Birchall, SJ
AF Slater, Tara
   Birchall, S. Jeff
TI Growing resilient: The potential of urban agriculture for increasing
   food security and improving earthquake recovery
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban greening; Disaster management; Urban planning; Food system
   resilience; Local food production; Vancouver Canada
ID COMMUNITY GARDENS; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; CITIES
AB Following an earthquake, urban agriculture has been shown to improve recovery by increasing food security and providing numerous community and social benefits. However, many communities often do not consider urban agriculture within their earthquake or disaster preparedness programs. This work explores the intersection be-tween those two realms, considering how their integration may increase food security and improve resilience following an earthquake. Through a case study focusing on the City of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, this research involved a four-step strategic scan of planning and earthquake management documents to determine whether Vancouver has captured the benefit of urban agriculture for earthquake recovery. Results revealed that this benefit has yet to be realized, however there is ample opportunity to do so given the City's advances in urban agriculture. This research seeks to provide planners, city officials and emergency management with insight into the potential of urban agriculture for earthquake preparedness. More broadly, this work seeks to add to the discussion by exploring a tangible integration of two realms that are often planned in isolation, yet could have positive impacts if combined. This paper concludes with specific interventions for how urban agriculture can be utilized for earthquake recovery in order to build resilience.
C1 [Slater, Tara; Birchall, S. Jeff] Univ Alberta, Sch Urban & Reg Planning, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, 1-26 Earth Sci Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
C3 University of Alberta
RP Slater, T (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Sch Urban & Reg Planning, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, 1-26 Earth Sci Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
EM tkslater@ualberta.ca
RI Birchall, S Jeff/HOF-3329-2023
CR [Anonymous], 2013, EARTHQ PREP STRAT
   Azunre GA, 2019, CITIES, V93, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006
   Barthel S, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1321, DOI 10.1177/0042098012472744
   Barthel S, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018
   Barthel S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001
   Baum F, 2018, BMJ OPEN, V8, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025358
   Biehl E, 2018, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V8, P39, DOI [10.5304/jafscd.2018.08B.008, 10.5304/jafscd.2018.08b.008]
   Brower RS, 2000, ADMIN SOC, V32, P363, DOI 10.1177/00953990022019470
   Brown N, 2015, BUILDING DISASTER RE
   Camps-Calvet M, 2015, PARTECIP CONFL, V8, P417, DOI 10.1285/i20356609v8i2p417
   Castillo SR, 2013, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V3, P155, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2013.033.001
   Chan J, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005
   City of Baltimore, 2018, DISASTER PREPAREDNES
   City of Vancouver, 2019, RES NEIGHB PROGR
   City of Vancouver, 2021, BOUL GARD GUID
   City of Vancouver, 2020, ZON DEV BYL 3575
   City of Vancouver, 2015, GREEN CIT 2020 ACT P
   City of Vancouver, 2013, VANC FOOD STRAT
   City of Vancouver, 2019, URB FARM GUID
   City of Vancouver, 2014, HLTH CIT STRAT
   City of Vancouver, 2021, COMM GARD ORCH
   City of Vancouver, 2009, URB AGR GUID PUBL RE
   City of Vancouver, 2019, RES VANC 10 23
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dubová L, 2019, GEOSCAPE, V13, P68, DOI 10.2478/geosc-2019-0005
   Fletcher EI, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126823
   Forrester IT, 2017, J HUNGER ENVIRON NUT, V12, P136, DOI 10.1080/19320248.2016.1157549
   Fox-Kämper R, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.023
   French EL, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.001
   Horst M, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P277, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2017.1322914
   Masterson M., 2020, URBAN FOOD SYSTEM RE
   Moench M, 2014, DEV PRACT, V24, P447, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2014.909385
   Noor K.B., 2008, American Journal of Applied Sciences, V5, P1602, DOI DOI 10.3844/AJASSP.2008.1602.1604
   Okvat HeatherA., 2013, Greening in the Red Zone, P73
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Sardeshpande M, 2021, CITIES, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103031
   Shimpo N, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V38, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.002
   Sioen GB, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14070748
   Smith JP, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126897
   Society V. U. F, 2021, POL POSS REC CIT VAN
   Society V. U. F., 2020, VANC URB FARM CENS 2
   Spittlehouse JK, 2014, AUST NZ J PSYCHIAT, V48, P756, DOI 10.1177/0004867414527522
   Statistics Canada, 2016, British Columbia Province and British Columbia Province (Table). Census Profile. 2016 Census
   Tirivangasi HM, 2018, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V10
   Tobin GA., 2013, Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards, P293, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4, 10.1007/978-1-4020-4399-4_123]
   Toth A, 2016, URBAN ECOSYST, V19, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11252-015-0489-x
   Tsuboyama-Kasaoka N, 2014, ASIA PAC J CLIN NUTR, V23, P505, DOI 10.6133/apjcn.2014.23.4.23
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation, 2015, PARK BOARD URB AGR P
   Walker BB, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P2075, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04390-1
   Wesener A., 2020, URBAN RESILIENCE GLO, P77
   Wesener A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020657
   WHO, 2004, Food and Nutrition Needs in Emergencies
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   Zasada I, 2020, URBAN ECOSYST, V23, P403, DOI 10.1007/s11252-019-00921-2
NR 55
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 6
U2 85
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 131
AR 103930
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103930
EA AUG 2022
PG 9
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 4Y1FL
UT WOS:000861278100003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Morelli, AB
   Cunha, AL
AF Morelli, Andre Borgato
   Cunha, Andre Luiz
TI Measuring urban road network vulnerability to extreme events: An
   application for urban floods
SO TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Transport resilience; Transport vulnerability; Complex urban systems;
   Flood impacts; Flood vulnerability
ID RESILIENCE; CITIES
AB This paper aims to propose a convenient metric to evaluate the vulnerability of road networks to extreme events in small to medium-sized cities. We present the efficiency of alternative metric, which centers on how obstructions caused by a disaster tends to increase path lengths in the system. A case study was conducted as proof of concept to evaluate the impact of floods on individual modes of transportation in Sa?o Carlos, a medium-sized city in Brazil. The results show that walking and cycling tend to be more robust modes in the city while motorized individual transport tends to be more vulnerable and show that longer trips tend to be more vulnerable to floods, evidencing that car-oriented policy can worsen the network?s vulnerabilities. In contrast, compact city planning that encourages walking or cycling for relatively short distances may be more resilient to flooding.
C1 [Morelli, Andre Borgato; Cunha, Andre Luiz] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Transportat Engn, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Av Trabalhador Saocarlense 400, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
C3 Universidade de Sao Paulo
RP Morelli, AB (corresponding author), Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Transportat Engn, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Av Trabalhador Saocarlense 400, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
EM andre.morelli@usp.br
RI Barbosa Nunes da Cunha, Andre Luiz/U-4375-2019
OI Barbosa Nunes da Cunha, Andre Luiz/0000-0002-0520-0621
FU Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil
   (CAPES) [001]
FX This study was financed in part by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de
   Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
CR Appert M., 2013, MEASURING URBAN ROAD, P1
   Azolin LG, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102386
   Banister D, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1538, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009
   Barthélemy M, 2004, EUR PHYS J B, V38, P163, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00111-4
   Beheshtian A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P1299, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.039
   Berche B, 2009, EUR PHYS J B, V71, P125, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3
   Boeing G, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P590, DOI 10.1177/2399808318784595
   Boeing G, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V65, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
   Boeing Geoff, 2019, The Morphology and Circuity of Walkable and Drivable Street Networks, P271, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_12, 10.1007/978-3-0-30-12381-912, DOI 10.1007/978-3-0-30-12381-912, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-12381-912]
   Chan R, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000200
   Chen YB, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V139, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.028
   Martins MCD, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.004
   Ganin AA, 2017, SCI ADV, V3, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1701079
   Gil J, 2008, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V118, P335, DOI 10.2495/FRIAR080321
   Ip WH, 2011, IEEE SYST J, V5, P189, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2010.2096670
   Kasmalkar IG, 2020, SCI ADV, V6, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aba2423
   Leu G, 2010, ATRF 2010 33 AUSTR T
   Litman T, 2006, J TRANSP ENG, V132, P11, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:1(11)
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Morelli A.B., 2019, ART SUBM 33 C PESQ E
   Moriarty P, 2008, J CLEAN PROD, V16, P1717, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.025
   Newman P, 2009, AUST PLAN, V46, P59, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2009.9995295
   Ortega E, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102691
   Rodríguez-Núñez E, 2014, J TRANSP GEOGR, V35, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.008
   Singh RB, 2011, ASIAN GEOGR, V28, P147, DOI 10.1080/10225706.2011.629417
   Stevaux JC, 2010, DEV EARTH S, V13, P245, DOI 10.1016/S0928-2025(08)10013-X
   Tabari H, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2
   Tsang M, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102774
   Westrum R, 2012, RESILIENCE ENG CONCE, P55
   Wisniewski S, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102510
   Yen Y, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V48, P169, DOI 10.1177/2399808319857726
   Yu Gao, 2009, Journal of Computer Applications, V29, P2191, DOI 10.3724/SP.J.1087.2009.02191
NR 32
TC 57
Z9 62
U1 22
U2 148
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1361-9209
EI 1879-2340
J9 TRANSPORT RES D-TR E
JI Transport. Res. Part D-Transport. Environ.
PD APR
PY 2021
VL 93
AR 102770
DI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102770
EA MAR 2021
PG 11
WC Environmental Studies; Transportation; Transportation Science &
   Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Transportation
GA RK4EB
UT WOS:000638249600003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Du, ZW
   Zhang, HO
   Huang, GZ
   Jin, LX
AF Du, Zhiwei
   Zhang, Hongou
   Huang, Gengzhi
   Jin, Lixia
TI Local State Responses to Crisis-Induced Shrinkage in the World's
   Factory Dongguan, China: Regional Resilience Perspective
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Regional resilience; Urban shrinkage; Shrinking cities; Adaptive cycle;
   Financial crisis; Globalization
ID PEARL RIVER DELTA; URBAN SHRINKAGE; ECONOMIC RESILIENCE;
   EXO-URBANIZATION; CITIES; GROWTH; ADAPTATION; DIVERSITY; PATTERNS;
   THINKING
AB Since the beginning of the 21st century, the phenomenon of urban shrinkage, accompanied by symptoms of a structural crisis in urban areas, has spread on a global scale. The recent 2008 global economic crisis has been proven to have accelerated urban shrinkage in many previously prosperous cities. The city of Dongguan, which is known as the World's Factory, suffered a manufacturing downturn and labor outflow induced by the crisis; however, it exhibited high resilience as it displayed a quick recovery in the postcrisis period. The notion of regional resilience and its potential applications can explain why urban and regional economies resist and adjust to internal and external challenges in a long-term development process. Based on the adaptive cycle analytical framework, this study focused on specific policies and plans initiated by the Dongguan municipality when it faced the financial crisis and its implementation effects. It contributes to current knowledge by elaborating on how the local state reacted to and coped with crisis-induced shrinkage and by providing a valuable case for exploring the dynamic evolution of shrinkage and resurgence in the context of globalization. Three main resilient strategies are identified: (1) moving toward a more diversified industrial structure; (2) highlighting endogenous momentums in economic transition; and (3) advancing the equalization of social welfare for local residences. Moreover, it provides implications for the urban planning community on how to respond to uncertainty and vulnerability from the perspective of regional resilience.
C1 [Du, Zhiwei; Zhang, Hongou; Jin, Lixia] Guangdong Open Lab Geospatial Informat Technol, Key Lab Guangdong Utilizat Remote Sensing & Geog, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Du, Zhiwei; Zhang, Hongou; Huang, Gengzhi; Jin, Lixia] Guangzhou Inst Geog, Room 501,100,Xianliezhong Rd, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Du, Zhiwei; Jin, Lixia] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Huang, Gengzhi] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
C3 Guangdong Academy of Sciences; Guangzhou Institute of Geography,
   Guangdong Academy of Sciences; Southern Marine Science & Engineering
   Guangdong Laboratory; Southern Marine Science & Engineering Guangdong
   Laboratory (Guangzhou); Sun Yat Sen University
RP Zhang, HO (corresponding author), Guangdong Open Lab Geospatial Informat Technol, Key Lab Guangdong Utilizat Remote Sensing & Geog, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, Peoples R China.; Zhang, HO (corresponding author), Guangzhou Inst Geog, Room 501,100,Xianliezhong Rd, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
EM chiwai_do@foxmail.com; hozhang@gdas.ac.cn; hgzhi3@mail.sysu.edu.cn;
   jlx906@163.com
RI jin, li/IWU-4648-2023
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41801122]; Natural Science
   Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011120]; Southern Marine
   Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou)
   [GML2019ZD0301]; GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development
   [2018GDASCX-0101, 2019GDASYL-0104004, 2020GDASYL-20200104002]
FX This research has been partly funded by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 41801122), the Natural Science Foundation of
   Guangdong Province (No. 2019A1515011120), the Southern Marine Science
   and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (No. GML2019ZD0301),
   and the GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development (Nos.
   2018GDASCX-0101, 2019GDASYL-0104004, and 2020GDASYL-20200104002).
CR [Anonymous], UNEVEN RE DEV CITIES
   [Anonymous], 2007, 8 U CAL BUILD RES RE
   Armstrong Harvey., 2000, Regional Economics and Policy
   Audirac I, 2018, CITIES, V75, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.012
   Banica A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122289
   Bartholomae F, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P2701, DOI 10.1177/0042098016657780
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Briguglio L, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P229, DOI 10.1080/13600810903089893
   Bristow G, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Carpenter SR, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P941, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0170-y
   Chan KW, 1999, CHINA QUART, P818, DOI 10.1017/S0305741000001351
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Cooke P, 2012, NEW HORIZ REG SCI, P1
   Cowell MM, 2013, CITIES, V30, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.001
   Cruz S.S., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, V106
   Cunningham-Sabot E., 2009, FUTURE SHRINKING CIT, P17
   Davies A, 2010, GEOGR RES-AUST, V48, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00627.x
   Dawley S, 2008, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V15, P265, DOI 10.1177/0969776408090543
   DBS (Dongguan Bureau of Statistics), 2018, DONGG STAT YB DONGG STAT YB
   Du ZW, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102767
   Du ZW, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1662-6
   Dubeaux S, 2018, CITIES, V75, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.015
   Eraydin Ayda., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING
   Evenhuis E, 2017, GEOGR COMPASS, V11, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12333
   Fan C.C., 2008, CHINA URBANIZES, P65
   FHKI (Federation of Hong Kong Industries), 2015, HONG KONG IND WAY FO
   Fingleton B, 2012, J REGIONAL SCI, V52, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x
   Frenken K, 2007, J ECON GEOGR, V7, P635, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbm018
   Giannakis E, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P1394, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1319464
   Glaeser EL, 2005, J ECON GEOGR, V5, P119, DOI 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh058
   Grabher G., 1993, EMBEDDED FIRM SOCIOE, P255
   Grossmann K, 2013, CITIES, V35, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.007
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hadjimichalis C, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P208, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2013.834044
   Hartt M, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P2946, DOI 10.1177/0042098017730013
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   Hattori K, 2017, CITIES, V69, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.02.011
   He SY, 2017, CITIES, V60, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.009
   Hill E., 2008, I URBAN REGIONAL DEV
   Hollander JB, 2011, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V21, P349, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2011.585164
   Hollander JustinB., 2009, Progress in Planning, V72, P223
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hospers GJ, 2014, EUR PLAN STUD, V22, P1507, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.793655
   Hospers GJ, 2013, URBAN DES INT, V18, P78, DOI 10.1057/udi.2012.29
   Hu XH, 2017, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V10, P527, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsx012
   Hudson R, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN A, V37, P581, DOI 10.1068/a36274
   Hudson R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P11, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp026
   Kakderi C, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P1435, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1322041
   Kotilainen J, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P53, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.820086
   Li H, 2018, GEOGR J, V184, P398, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12266
   Li L., 2012, Economics Research International, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2012/961694, 10.1155/2012/961694]
   Li X, 2020, CHINA ECON REV, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101382
   Lin GCS, 2006, EURASIAN GEOGR ECON, V47, P28, DOI 10.2747/1538-7216.47.1.28
   Long Y, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN A, V48, P220, DOI 10.1177/0308518X15621631
   Martin R, 1998, ECON GEOGR, V74, P201, DOI 10.2307/144374
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Martinez-Fernandez C, 2016, PROG PLANN, V105, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2014.10.001
   Martinez-Fernandez C, 2012, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V36, P213, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01092.x
   Mykhnenko V, 2008, INT PLAN STUD, V13, P311, DOI 10.1080/13563470802518958
   Oswalt P., 2006, ATLAS SHRINKING CITI
   Pallagst K, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P164, DOI 10.1177/0042098019885549
   Pallagst Karina., 2009, The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context, P81
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   PIMM SL, 1984, NATURE, V307, P321, DOI 10.1038/307321a0
   Prior T, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1575, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.016
   Rink D., 2012, Governance of shrinkage: Lessons learnt from analysis for urban planning and policy
   Schilling J, 2008, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V74, P451, DOI 10.1080/01944360802354956
   Silverman RM, 2020, J URBAN AFF, V42, P294, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2018.1448226
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Sit VFS, 1997, URBAN STUD, V34, P647, DOI 10.1080/0042098975961
   Sousa S, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P12, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.820082
   UN-Habitat, 2008, STAT WORLDS CIT 2008 STAT WORLDS CIT 2008
   Van den Berg D., 1982, STUDY GROWTH DECLINE, V36, P24
   Walker BH, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Wiechmann T, 2015, EUR PLAN STUD, V23, P1, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2013.820077
   Wiechmann T, 2012, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V36, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01095.x
   Wolfe DA, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P139, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp032
   Wolfe DavidA., 2016, Growing Urban Economies: Innovation, Creativity and Governance in Canadian City-Regions
   Yang C, 2007, ECON GEOGR, V83, P395
   Yang C, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V32, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.013
   Yeung G., 2001, FOREIGN INVESTMENT S
NR 84
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 8
U2 98
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 147
IS 3
AR 05021021
DI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000697
PG 9
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA TH8DH
UT WOS:000672313600007
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mai, X
   Zhan, CQ
   Chan, RCK
AF Mai, Xin
   Zhan, Chaoqun
   Chan, Roger C. K.
TI The nexus between (re)production of space and economic resilience: An
   analysis of Chinese cities
SO HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Economic resilience; Resistance; Recoverability; Spatial fix;
   Fixed-asset investment; China
ID REGIONAL RESILIENCE; URBAN; CRISIS; EUROPE; IMPACT; SHANGHAI; GROWTH;
   CITY; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; ADAPTABILITY
AB The uneven geography of economic resilience is generally considered to be dependent on local-specific attributes such as economic structure, human actions, and institutional arrangements. Going beyond these internal attributes, this study draws insights from Harvey's spatial fix concept and explores the impact of the (re)production of space on economic resilience across 285 prefectural-level cities in China in relation to the economic crisis of 2008. Economic resilience was measured by the cities' resistance to decline during the crisis period (2007-2009) and its recoverability in the period immediately afterwards (2009-2016). For each period, we used regression models to assess the relative impact of fixed-asset investment, economic structure, and local government spending on the cities' economic resistance or recoverability. The (re)production of space, as measured by fixed asset investment in urban space, was found to have a consistently positive and significant effect on economic resilience across the cities. In addition, the manufacturing sector showed a positive and significant effect on the cities' resistance to decline whereas the service sector was key to their recoverability during the post-crisis period. Our analysis extends the perception of space in regional resilience by corroborating the proposition that the built environment can serve as a resource system for sustained and resilient growth. The robustness test confirmed that the spatial-fix effect on economic resilience was consistently significant across Chinese cities regardless of spatial and temporal variations in local contexts.
C1 [Mai, Xin] South China Normal Univ, Sch Geog, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Zhan, Chaoqun] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Coll, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Chan, Roger C. K.] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 South China Normal University; Sun Yat Sen University; University of
   Hong Kong
RP Zhan, CQ (corresponding author), 135 Xingang Xi Rd, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China.
EM maixin@m.scnu.edu.cn; zhanchq@mail.sysu.edu.cn; hrxucck@hku.hk
RI ZHAN, Chaoqun/AAK-3527-2020; Chan, Roger/A-4755-2010; MAI,
   XIN/ACG-0749-2022
OI ZHAN, Chaoqun/0000-0003-4469-1627
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [72003208, 42001197]; China
   Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652933, 2019T120759, 2020M672909];
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Sun Yat-sen
   University [19wkpy59]
FX The author (s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: This paper
   was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant
   No. 72003208 and 42001197) , the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
   (Grant No. 2019M652933, 2019T120759, and 2020M672909) , and the
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Sun Yat-sen
   University (Grant No. 19wkpy59) . We are indebted to Dr. Teng Zhong, Hua
   Li and Lejia Cheng for their assistance in data curation. We benefited
   from suggestions by three referees and the editor. All errors remain
   ours.
CR Au CC, 2006, J DEV ECON, V80, P350, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.04.002
   Bailey D, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P1797, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.893056
   BEAUREGARD RA, 1994, ENVIRON PLANN A, V26, P715, DOI 10.1068/a260715
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Brakman S, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P225, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv005
   Brenner N, 1998, ENVIRON PLANN D, V16, P459, DOI 10.1068/d160459
   Bristow G., 2020, Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience, DOI [10.1128/AEM.01906-10, DOI 10.1128/JB.00542-10]
   Bristow G, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P923, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2013.854879
   Brown L, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P1347, DOI 10.1177/0042098015624870
   Capello R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P951, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu053
   Chan RCK, 2017, URBAN GEOGR, V38, P666, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1139909
   Charney I, 2001, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V25, P740, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00342
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Clark J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P121, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp034
   Cole MA, 2011, J REGIONAL SCI, V51, P121, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00674.x
   Courvisanos J, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P629, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1034669
   Cowell MM, 2013, CITIES, V30, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.001
   Crespo J, 2014, J ECON GEOGR, V14, P199, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbt006
   Cuadrado-Roura JR, 2016, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V9, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv036
   Davies S, 2011, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V4, P369, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsr019
   Di Caro P, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P235, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0858-x
   Dissart JC, 2003, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V26, P423, DOI 10.1177/0160017603259083
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Du ZW, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1662-6
   Dubé J, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P615, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1020291
   Duval R., 2008, OECD Journal: Economic Studies, V1
   Eliasson G., 1991, Journal of Evolutionary Economics. doi, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01202338
   Evenhuis E., 2020, Handbook on regional economic resilience, P69, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781785360862.00010
   Fardoust S., 2012, Policy Research Working Papers, DOI [10.1596/1813-9450-6221, DOI 10.1596/1813-9450-6221]
   Fingleton B, 2012, J REGIONAL SCI, V52, P109, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00755.x
   Gao JL, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.021
   Gherhes C, 2018, SMALL BUS ECON, V51, P577, DOI 10.1007/s11187-017-9946-7
   Glaeser EL, 2005, J ECON GEOGR, V5, P119, DOI 10.1093/jnlecg/lbh058
   Glassman J, 2007, ECON GEOGR, V83, P349
   Groot SPT, 2011, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V4, P437, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsr024
   Harvey D., 1981, ANTIPODE, V13, P1
   Harvey D., 1978, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V2, P101, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2427.1978.TB00738.X
   Hassink R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P45, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
   He SJ, 2019, GEOFORUM, V106, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.017
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu X., 2020, Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience, P54, DOI [DOI 10.4337/9781785360862.00009, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785360862.00009]
   Hu XH, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P3466, DOI 10.1177/0042098018817223
   Hu XH, 2017, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V10, P527, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsx012
   Huang DX, 2018, HABITAT INT, V75, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.03.002
   Huggins R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P313, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu035
   Jessop B., 2006, David Harvey: A Critical Reader, P142
   Kluge J, 2018, J REGIONAL SCI, V58, P204, DOI 10.1111/jors.12349
   Lahirushan K.P.K.S., 2015, Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci., V9, P3152
   Li LY, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104472
   Lin GCS, 2003, LAND USE POLICY, V20, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0264-8377(03)00007-3
   Lin GCS, 2002, CITIES, V19, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00039-2
   Lin GCS, 2018, AREA DEV POLICY, V3, P24, DOI 10.1080/23792949.2017.1349543
   Mai X, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11226333
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Palaskas T, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P973, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbv027
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Ray DM, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P952, DOI 10.1177/0308518X16681788
   Reggiani A, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.012
   Sensier M, 2016, SPAT ECON ANAL, V11, P128, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2016.1129435
   Shen J, 2017, ANTIPODE, V49, P761, DOI 10.1111/anti.12302
   Sheppard E, 2004, ANTIPODE, V36, P470, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00426.x
   Shin H.B., 2012, CITY ANAL URBAN TREN, V16, P728
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Tan J., 2020, Evidence from resource-based cities in China, V106, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2020.102906]
   Vanolo Alberto., 2015, City, Culture and Society, V6, P69, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2015.01.003
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang JJ, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P981, DOI 10.1177/0308518X19887478
   Wang J, 2012, LAND USE POLICY, V29, P737, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.010
   Wei YHD, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V163, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.019
   Wei YD, 2015, GEOGR REV, V105, P156, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12063.x
   Williams N, 2014, ENTREP REGION DEV, V26, P257, DOI 10.1080/08985626.2014.894129
   Wu F, 1999, ENVIRON PLANN A, V31, P1757, DOI 10.1068/a311757
   Wu SY, 2010, J POLICY MODEL, V32, P804, DOI 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.05.011
   Wu YF, 2016, CITIES, V53, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.004
   Yu HC, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124754
   Zhan SH, 2017, GEOFORUM, V85, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.07.021
   Zhang LY, 2003, URBAN STUD, V40, P1549, DOI 10.1080/0042098032000094423
   Zhou Y, 2011, J ECON GEOGR, V11, P119, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbp065
   Zhou YX, 2000, URBAN GEOGR, V21, P205, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.21.3.205
   Zhu JM, 2004, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V28, P424, DOI 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00527.x
NR 82
TC 26
Z9 28
U1 7
U2 103
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0197-3975
EI 1873-5428
J9 HABITAT INT
JI Habitat Int.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 109
AR 102326
DI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102326
EA FEB 2021
PG 10
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning;
   Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA QQ5IY
UT WOS:000624558200004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lhomme, S
   Serre, D
   Diab, Y
   Laganier, R
AF Lhomme, S.
   Serre, D.
   Diab, Y.
   Laganier, R.
TI Analyzing resilience of urban networks: a preliminary step towards more
   flood resilient cities
SO NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
AB In Europe, river floods have been increasing in frequency and severity. These circumstances require the management of flood risk by integrating new concepts like urban resilience. Nevertheless, urban resilience seems to have no accurate meanings. That is why researchers are primarily concerned with defining resilience. Nevertheless, focus on research object seems to be more important than focus on conceptual debate ( Resilience of what? Rather than what is resilience?). Thus the methodology designed here is focused on urban considerations. In fact, a system approach emphasizes technical networks' importance concerning urban resilience. Principles and assumptions applied in this research finally lead to the analysis of how urban networks are able to face natural hazards. In this context, a Web-GIS has been developed for analyzing resistance capacity, absorption capacity and recovery capacity of different technical networks. A first application has been carried out on a French agglomeration in order to analyze road network absorption capacity. This application is very specific but, thanks to this example, it is already possible to highlight the methodology's usefulness.
C1 [Lhomme, S.; Serre, D.; Diab, Y.] Univ Paris EST EIVP, Paris, France.
   [Lhomme, S.; Laganier, R.] Univ Paris Diderot PRODIG, Paris, France.
   [Diab, Y.] Univ Paris EST LEESU, Paris, France.
C3 Universite Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC); AgroParisTech
RP Lhomme, S (corresponding author), Univ Paris EST EIVP, Paris, France.
EM serge.lhomme@eivp-paris.fr
OI Serge, LHOMME/0009-0006-9291-9576; serre, damien/0000-0002-2902-2989
CR Albert R, 2004, PHYS REV E, V69, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.025103
   [Anonymous], 2005, URBAN FLOOD MANAGEME
   [Anonymous], ADV URBAN FLOOD MANA
   Batty M., 2009, Cities as Complex Systems: Scaling, Interaction, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies, DOI [10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_69]
   Financial Inclusion
   Boin A., 2014, Designing Resilience: Preparing for Extreme Events
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Buhl J, 2006, EUR PHYS J B, V49, P513, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00085-1
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   De Bruijn K. M., 2005, THESIS DELFT U
   Duen~as-Osorio L., 2005, THESIS GEORGIA I TEC
   EA-UK (Environment Agency United Kingdom), 2007, 2007 SUMM FLOOD REV
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Garber L, 2000, COMPUTER, V33, P12, DOI 10.1109/MC.2000.839316
   Gastner MT, 2006, EUR PHYS J B, V49, P247, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00046-8
   Gleyze J. F., 2005, THESIS U PARIS 7
   Gunes AE, 2000, J URBAN PLAN D-ASCE, V126, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2000)126:3(136)
   Hines P, 2010, CHAOS, V20, DOI 10.1063/1.3489887
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kinney R, 2005, EUR PHYS J B, V46, P101, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00237-9
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Lembo A. J. Jr., 2008, Natural Hazards Review, V9, P61, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:2(61)
   Lhomme S., 2010, GIS DEV URBAN RESILI
   Lhomme S., 2011, METHODOLOGY PRODUCE, P724
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Matisziw TC, 2009, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V43, P307, DOI 10.1007/s00168-008-0235-x
   Mayunga Joseph S., 2007, SUMMER ACAD SOCIAL V
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Reghezza M., 2012, CYBERGEO
   Serulle N.U., 2010, THESIS UTAH STATE U
   Solé RV, 2008, PHYS REV E, V77, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.026102
   Wang JW, 2009, SAFETY SCI, V47, P1332, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.02.002
   Wasserman Stanley., 2004, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
   Winkler J, 2010, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V95, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2009.11.002
   ZEVENBERGEN Chris., 2010, Urban flood management
   Zhang JH, 2012, SAFETY SCI, V50, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.005
NR 40
TC 123
Z9 139
U1 22
U2 176
PU COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
PI GOTTINGEN
PA BAHNHOFSALLEE 1E, GOTTINGEN, 37081, GERMANY
SN 1561-8633
EI 1684-9981
J9 NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS
JI Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
PY 2013
VL 13
IS 2
BP 221
EP 230
DI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
PG 10
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA 118ES
UT WOS:000317006600002
OA gold, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Subramanyam, N
AF Subramanyam, Nidhi
CA Social Awareness and Voluntary Education SAVE
TI Untapped transformative potential in decentralised groundwater systems
   that improve households' resilience in India's water-scarce urban
   environments
SO HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Off -grid groundwater systems; Borewells; Transformative resilience;
   Gendered water access; Everyday water governance; Secondary cities;
   India
ID INSECURITY; GOVERNANCE; INSIGHTS; THINKING; DEMAND; GENDER; DIARY
AB Off-grid, decentralised water infrastructures are increasingly being promoted to help cities meet their water delivery targets and build resilient water systems in the face of changing water availability. Against this background, this paper examines how integrating off-grid, decentralised groundwater systems with centralized piped supply helps water utilities and urbanites achieve transformative resilience under conditions of chronic water scarcity in the secondary city of Tiruppur, India. Empirical findings on users' water access practices from off-grid systems like municipal or private borewells to remain resilient, their role in the everyday governance of these systems, and the costs of building resilience through borewells-obtained through a participatory action research project where 94 households recorded month-long water access using a 'water and waste calendar'-reveal that Tiruppur's public borewells are an affordable and mostly inclusive resilience building measure but are far from being transformative. Moreover, diverse arrangements for their everyday governance unevenly enable user participation, impose invisible costs on female members of borewell-reliant households, and create differentiation in service quality across the city. The paper argues that the potential to achieve transformative resilience through off-grid sources like borewells remains untapped in Tiruppur and concludes with some reflections to pursue just and inclusive resilience.
C1 [Subramanyam, Nidhi] Univ Toronto, Dept Geog & Planning, Toronto, ON, Canada.
C3 University of Toronto
RP Subramanyam, N (corresponding author), Dept Geog & Planning, 100 St George St, Room 5023 Sidney Smith Hall, Toronto, ON M5S 3G3, Canada.
EM nidhi.subramanyam@utoronto.ca
RI Subramanyam, Nidhi/ABB-2079-2021
OI Subramanyam, Nidhi/0000-0003-1177-360X
FU Office of Engagement Initiatives [20.ns684]; Mario Einaudi Center for
   International Studies at Cornell University, USA
FX The participatory action research project was funded through a generous
   Engaged Graduate Student Grant provided by the Office of Engagement
   Initiatives (Grant #20.ns684) and a research travel grant from the Mario
   Einaudi Center for International Studies at Cornell University, USA.
CR Acey CS, 2019, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V43, P313, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12715
   Adams EA, 2024, SOC CULT GEOGR, V25, P582, DOI 10.1080/14649365.2023.2183245
   Apoorva R, 2018, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V8, P278, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2018.127
   Bishop S, 2015, ACME, V14, P688
   Biswas D, 2021, DEV PRACT, V31, P248, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2020.1836128
   Bjorkman L., 2015, Pipe politics, contested waters: Embedded infrastructures of millennial Mumbai, DOI [10.1515/9780822375210, DOI 10.1515/9780822375210]
   Census of India. (2011). Tamil Nadu: Town directory, 2011, about Us
   Chakava Y, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.01.012
   Chelleri L, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.016
   Choudhary N, 2020, J WATER HEALTH, V18, P579, DOI 10.2166/wh.2020.024
   Crozier A, 2024, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V9, P386, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2024.2340378
   Dakyaga F, 2023, URBAN GEOGR, V44, P1369, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2022.2106054
   Daly S, 2021, J WATER HEALTH, V19, P370, DOI 10.2166/wh.2021.205
   Das D, 2018, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V9, P178, DOI 10.1177/0975425318783550
   Das P, 2014, INT DEV PLANN REV, V36, P265, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2014.16
   Dickin S, 2022, WIRES WATER, V9, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1602
   Drew G, 2021, WATER INT, V46, P900, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2021.1963031
   Furlong K, 2017, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V41, P888, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12582
   Grasham CF, 2022, ENVIRON RES-INFRASTR, V2, DOI 10.1088/2634-4505/ac9c8d
   Grasham CF, 2021, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V4, DOI 10.1038/s41545-021-00133-2
   Harris L, 2017, J GENDER STUD, V26, P561, DOI 10.1080/09589236.2016.1150819
   Hoque SF, 2020, WATER ECON POLICY, V6, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X19500115
   Hoque SF, 2018, WATER POLICY, V20, P725, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.179
   Johannessen Å, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-08870-220101
   Kasper M, 2023, URBAN STUD, V60, P2400, DOI 10.1177/00420980221144575
   Kayser GL, 2019, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V97, P438, DOI 10.2471/BLT.18.223305
   Kooy M, 2018, HABITAT INT, V73, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.10.006
   Lahiri-Dutt K, 2015, ACME, V14, P652
   Lawhon M, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P720, DOI 10.1177/0042098017720149
   Leigh NG, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030918
   Lele S, 2018, WATER POLICY, V20, P12, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.002
   Lele S, 2018, WATER INT, V43, P281, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2017.1416442
   Lemanski C, 2023, LANDSCAPE RES, V48, P174, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2021.1972952
   Mason LR, 2012, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V4, P20, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00037.1
   Misra S., 2019, Citywide inclusive water supply, DOI [10.1596/32046, DOI 10.1596/32046]
   Nijhawan A, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14081293
   Rajput R., 2023, Habitat International, V133, DOI [10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102754, DOI 10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2023.102754]
   Revi A., 2015, ASSAR Working Paper
   Rodina L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.016
   Rodina L, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V26-27, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.001
   Roque AD, 2023, WATER SECUR, V20, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2023.100151
   Rusca M, 2018, HABITAT INT, V73, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.002
   Solomon D. S., 2018, Econ. Polit. Wkly., V53, P38
   Spencer J. N. H., 2022, Planning for water security in Southeast Asia: Community-based infrastructure during the urban transition
   Spencer JH, 2008, J PLAN EDUC RES, V28, P213, DOI 10.1177/0739456X08321793
   Stoler J, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101202
   Subramanyam N., 2021, Planning the urban futures of a small city and its rural past: Governance and water infrastructures in Tiruppur, DOI [10.7298/CYGH-QK34, DOI 10.7298/CYGH-QK34]
   Subramanyam N, 2024, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V25, P165, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2024.2345870
   Sultana F, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.002
   Times News Network, 2020, TIMES INDIA
   Truelove Y, 2021, ENVIRON PLANN D, V39, P1009, DOI 10.1177/02637758211055483
   Truelove Y, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V39, P231, DOI 10.1177/2399654420972117
   Truelove Y, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.004
   Wutich A, 2023, WIRES WATER, V10, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1680
   Wutich A, 2009, FIELD METHOD, V21, P49, DOI 10.1177/1525822X08325673
   Yu C, 2012, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V66, P2731, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.489
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Zozmann H, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14071009
NR 58
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 3
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0197-3975
EI 1873-5428
J9 HABITAT INT
JI Habitat Int.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 151
AR 103140
DI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103140
EA JUL 2024
PG 11
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning;
   Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA ZA6K6
UT WOS:001272607400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Antoniucci, V
   Marella, G
AF Antoniucci, Valentina
   Marella, Giuliano
TI Small town resilience: Housing market crisis and urban density in Italy
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Housing market; Urban density; Multivariate regression; Real estate;
   Resilience
ID PRICES; GROWTH; DYNAMICS; INCOME; CITIES; POLICIES; DEMAND; FUTURE;
   CREDIT; SPRAWL
AB Since the 1990s, city development has been promoted through densification processes by both local authorities and private investors in Europe and USA. This trend began in a boom phase of the real-estate market, sustained by high market demand and high prices. The aim of the present study is to see how the market has responded to six years of economic recession in Italy and whether urban form has a relationship with housing market performance. Is urban density still preferable in terms of the economic sustainability of investments? Or has the demand side of the market changed its behaviour? To elucidate this issue, we perform a multivariate regression and a cluster analysis on housing price variations from 2008 to 2014 with a dataset of economic and urban structure variables concerning the 114 most important Italian cities. The results suggest that housing market in less dense cities is more resilient and affordable than in denser cities during a recession phase. This phenomenon should be taking into account by local public authorities addressing and promoting urban development. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Antoniucci, Valentina; Marella, Giuliano] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn DICEA, Via Venezia 1, I-30151 Padua, Pd, Italy.
C3 University of Padua
RP Antoniucci, V (corresponding author), Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn DICEA, Via Venezia 1, I-30151 Padua, Pd, Italy.
EM valentina.antoniucci@unipd.it; giuliano.marella@unipd.it
OI ANTONIUCCI, VALENTINA/0000-0001-8794-436X
CR Aalbers M, 2009, AREA, V41, P34, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00877.x
   Abraham J.M., 1994, Journal of Housing Economics, V3, P186, DOI DOI 10.1006/JHEC.1994.1008
   Alonso W, 1971, Pap Reg Sci Assoc, V26, P67
   Alonso W., 1964, Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent, DOI DOI 10.4159/HARVARD.9780674730854
   ANAS A, 1978, J URBAN ECON, V5, P66, DOI 10.1016/0094-1190(78)90037-2
   [Anonymous], BROOK PANEL EC ACT
   [Anonymous], EUROPEAN CITIES DEV
   [Anonymous], URBAN GROWTH PRICE L
   [Anonymous], CENS ALL ED 2011
   [Anonymous], GLOBAL REAL ESTATE C
   [Anonymous], SCI REGIONALI
   [Anonymous], STRUCTURE CHANGE SPA
   [Anonymous], NATL BUREAU EC RES W
   [Anonymous], OSS CONG IND COSTR
   [Anonymous], APPL MATH SCI
   [Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT PRE
   ARNOTT RJ, 1979, Q J ECON, V93, P471, DOI 10.2307/1884466
   BECK N, 1995, AM POLIT SCI REV, V89, P634, DOI 10.2307/2082979
   BECKMANN MJ, 1969, J ECON THEORY, V1, P60, DOI 10.1016/0022-0531(69)90012-X
   Brueckner JK, 2000, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V23, P160, DOI 10.1177/016001700761012710
   Burchell R., 1995, Land, infrastructure
   Burdett R., 2011, Living in the endless city
   Burton E, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN B, V29, P219, DOI 10.1068/b2713
   Capello R, 2000, URBAN STUD, V37, P1479, DOI 10.1080/00420980020080221
   CAPOZZA DR, 1989, J URBAN ECON, V26, P295, DOI 10.1016/0094-1190(89)90003-X
   CASE KE, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P125
   Davidoff T, 2006, J URBAN ECON, V59, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2005.04.001
   Dawkins CJ, 2002, LAND USE POLICY, V19, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00038-2
   DIPASQUALE D, 1994, J URBAN ECON, V35, P1, DOI 10.1006/juec.1994.1001
   DiPasquale D., 1996, Urban Economics and Real Estate Market
   Engelhardt GV, 1996, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V26, P313, DOI 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02118-3
   Felice E, 2011, ECON HIST REV, V64, P929, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2010.00568.x
   Fernández-Kranz D, 2006, J REAL ESTATE FINANC, V32, P449, DOI 10.1007/s11146-006-6962-9
   Fujita K., 2013, CITIES CRISIS NEW CR
   FUJITA M, 1982, J URBAN ECON, V12, P22, DOI 10.1016/0094-1190(82)90003-1
   Fujita M, 2010, JPN ECON REV, V61, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2009.00504.x
   Galster G, 2001, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V12, P681, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2001.9521426
   Glaeser E. L., 2011, TRIUMPH CITY URBAN S
   Glaeser E.L., 2004, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, V2004, P47, DOI [DOI 10.1353/URB.2004.0005, 10.1353/urb.2004.0005]
   Glaeser E. L., 2001, Journal of Economic Geography, V1, P27
   Glaeser EL, 2010, J REGIONAL SCI, V50, P221, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00635.x
   Glaeser EL, 2006, J ECON GEOGR, V6, P71, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbi003
   Goodhart C, 2008, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V24, P180, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grn009
   Goodman AC, 2005, J HOUS ECON, V14, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.jhe.2005.09.001
   HARRISON D, 1974, J URBAN ECON, V1, P61, DOI 10.1016/0094-1190(74)90024-2
   Hartmann P, 2015, J MONEY CREDIT BANK, V47, P69, DOI 10.1111/jmcb.12192
   Henderson JV, 1996, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V19, P31, DOI 10.1177/016001769601900203
   Holden D, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P3027, DOI 10.1177/0042098012474518
   Kasanko M, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V77, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.003
   Mayer CJ, 2000, J URBAN ECON, V48, P85, DOI 10.1006/juec.1999.2158
   Mikhed V, 2009, J HOUS ECON, V18, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.jhe.2009.03.001
   MILLS ES, 1970, URBAN STUD, V7, P5, DOI 10.1080/00420987020080011
   Millward H, 2006, LAND USE POLICY, V23, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.02.004
   Muth R., 1969, CITIES HOUSING
   Nelson AC, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P411, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976391
   Ortalo-Magné F, 2006, REV ECON STUD, V73, P459, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2006.383_1.x
   PEISER RB, 1989, LAND ECON, V65, P193, DOI 10.2307/3146665
   Potepan MJ, 1996, REAL ESTATE ECON, V24, P219, DOI 10.1111/1540-6229.00688
   Reis JP, 2016, URBAN GEOGR, V37, P246, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2015.1096118
   Riddel M, 2004, J HOUS ECON, V13, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.jhe.2004.04.002
   Romero J, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN C, V30, P467, DOI 10.1068/c11193r
   Simmie J., 1992, Land Use Policy, V9, P36, DOI [10.1016/0264-8377(92)90033-s, DOI 10.1016/0264-8377(92)90033-S]
   Sudhira H.S., 2004, INT, V5, P29, DOI [10.1016/j.jag.2003.08.002, DOI 10.1016/J.JAG.2003.08.002]
   THOMPSON WR, 1968, ISSUES URBAN EC
   Tsai YH, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P141, DOI 10.1080/0042098042000309748
   WHEATON WC, 1977, AM ECON REV, V67, P620
NR 66
TC 35
Z9 35
U1 3
U2 65
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD DEC 31
PY 2016
VL 59
BP 580
EP 588
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.004
PG 9
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA EB6TX
UT WOS:000387519600052
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Gupta, A
   De, B
AF Gupta, Aman
   De, Bhaskar
TI Blue space resilient urban planning to enhance severely distressed
   thermal environment
SO PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH
LA English
DT Article
DE Heat island; Urban blue space; Water resilience; Artificial recharge;
   City planning
ID HEAT-ISLAND; CLIMATE; IMPACT; TEMPERATURE
AB Water resilience is a vital aspect of current smart city planning. Maintaining the quality and volume of urban blue spaces can benefit local ecology, environment, and social well-being. The application of geospatial techniques provides an opportunity to achieve such goals in a spatially and temporally effective manner. While researchers often highlight city-level environmental problems, location-based solutions are insufficient, particularly for the rapidly sprawling Asian cities-the current work aimed to examine the water-resilient urban planning scopes for an Indian tropical megacity. The work assessed a major environmental hazard, i.e., urban heat island, which appeared to cover 9.6 %-17.4 % of the area of the city region during the summer months. The importance of blue spaces in mitigating heat islands was quantified using data from nearly 150 waterbodies, including a river, a vast wetland, and multiple lakes and urban tanks. Linear and logarithmic models established how the cooling effect increases with larger water bodies. Blue space ranging between 1.8 km2 and 2.3 km2 was recommended as the smallest yet effective size for future recreational zones. Incorporating ambient wind patterns further aided in deciding the locations of blue wedges that can be key for heat island mitigation. Moreover, to substantially amplify the blue resource recharge rate in a cost-effective manner, a multi-parameter decision analysis was carried out. Overlay of five surface characteristics contributed to planning sites for surface infiltration systems. The entire framework of the work was built to achieve sustainable development goals.
C1 [Gupta, Aman; De, Bhaskar] IIEST, Dept Architecture & Planning, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Engineering Science Technology Shibpur (IIEST)
RP De, B (corresponding author), IIEST, Dept Architecture & Planning, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India.
EM bde.arch@faculty.iiests.ac.in
RI Gupta, Aman/HKF-7739-2023; De, Bhaskar/O-1778-2017
OI Gupta, Aman/0000-0002-7402-6794; De, Bhaskar/0000-0001-5215-6267
CR Ampatzidis P, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V730, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139068
   [Anonymous], 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI [10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101052, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101052]
   Armanuos AM, 2023, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V195, DOI 10.1007/s10661-023-11946-8
   Azhar GS, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0091831
   Badach J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159688
   Banerjee S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V721, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137741
   Barría P, 2021, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V21, DOI 10.1007/s10113-021-01750-w
   Britton E, 2020, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V35, P50, DOI 10.1093/heapro/day103
   Burgan HI, 2013, PAMUKKALE U J ENG SC, V19, P127, DOI 10.5505/pajes.2013.46855
   censusindia, 2014, District Census Handbook, Kolkata, 2014. Census of India 2011-West Bengal-series 20, V20
   Chapman S, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P1921, DOI 10.1007/s10980-017-0561-4
   Chaudhary P., 2019, ISPRS Ann. Photogramm., Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci., V4, P5, DOI [DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ANNALS-IV-5-W2-25-2019, 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W5-5-2019, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ANNALS-IV-2-W5-5-2019]
   Cheng ZH, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P1792, DOI 10.1007/s10668-022-02123-x
   Chu D., 2020, Fractional Vegetation Cover. Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover in Mountain Region: A Comprehensive Study at the Central Tibetan Plateau, P195, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-7580-4_10, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-7580-4_10]
   De Troeyer K, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109848
   Derdouri A, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13183654
   Dimitrova A, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106170
   Dong ZZ, 2021, EARTHS FUTURE, V9, DOI 10.1029/2021EF001992
   Doorga JRS, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102683
   Dutta K, 2018, ISPRS ANN PHOTO REM, V4-5, P71, DOI 10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-5-71-2018
   Dutta K, 2023, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V89, DOI 10.14358/PERS.23-00009R2
   Dutta K, 2021, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V193, DOI 10.1007/s10661-021-08969-4
   Farkas A., 2009, 7th International Conference on Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking, P169
   Fauzia, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-90898-w
   Gao L, 2020, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V159, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.11.018
   Gargiulo C., 2023, Resilient and Sustainable Cities, P473, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-323-91718-6.00017-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-91718-6.00017-7]
   Gupta A, 2024, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V68, P2083, DOI 10.1007/s00484-024-02733-2
   Gupta A, 2024, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V15, P3409, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2024.370
   Gupta A, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16083395
   Gupta A, 2024, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V89, P382, DOI 10.2166/wst.2024.014
   Gutman G, 1998, INT J REMOTE SENS, V19, P1533, DOI 10.1080/014311698215333
   Han JW, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109954
   Hirano Y, 2012, ENERGY, V37, P371, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.018
   Huang BZ, 2024, NAT HAZARDS, V120, P2005, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06266-6
   Hunter RF, 2023, LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, V8, pE735, DOI 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00156-1
   Isazade V., 2021, J Clean WAS (JCleanWAS), V5, P78, DOI [10.2680/jcleanwas.02.2021.78.84, DOI 10.2680/JCLEANWAS.02.2021.78.84]
   Kaaviya R, 2021, ECOL PROCESS, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13717-021-00341-1
   Kim SW, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V779, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146389
   Kumar P, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V818, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151788
   Kumari P, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100763
   Lee SH, 2009, LANDSC ECOL ENG, V5, P183, DOI 10.1007/s11355-009-0067-6
   Liu P, 2020, J SENSORS, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/5863164
   Liu ZX, 2023, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V74, P747, DOI 10.1071/MF22167
   McDougall CW, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104446
   McDougall CW, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V737, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140196
   Mishra HS, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126575
   Mitchell D, 2016, ENVIRON RES LETT, V11, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/11/7/074006
   Motta M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102154
   Nimish G, 2020, REMOTE SENS APPL, V18, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100299
   Palme M, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V145, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.069
   Pasanen TP, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105016
   Pathak S, 2020, J HYDROL, V591, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125216
   Pathak S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208449
   Pitman SD, 2015, T ROY SOC SOUTH AUST, V139, P97, DOI 10.1080/03721426.2015.1035219
   Rahman MN, 2022, CLIMATE, V10, DOI 10.3390/cli10010003
   Rausch L, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10020216
   Santamouris M, 2021, SOL ENERGY, V216, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.031
   Shaban A, 2006, HYDROGEOL J, V14, P433, DOI 10.1007/s10040-005-0437-6
   Shao M, 2023, ENERGY, V262, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125476
   Singh Durgesh Kumar, 2019, Lakes & Reservoirs: Research and Management, V24, P115, DOI 10.1111/lre.12262
   Singh S, 2021, INT J CLIMATOL, V41, pE1831, DOI 10.1002/joc.6814
   Smith N, 2021, CITIES, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103413
   Cordao MJDS, 2020, URBAN WATER J, V17, P642, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2020.1804596
   Su MA, 2021, ISCIENCE, V24, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102495
   Tan XY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102711
   Uddin ASMS, 2022, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V147, P891, DOI 10.1007/s00704-021-03872-x
   Umer YM, 2019, J HYDROL, V577, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123945
   van den Bogerd N, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104232
   Vert C, 2020, ENVIRON RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109812
   Vishwakarma A, 2021, GROUNDWATER SUST DEV, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100501
   Völker S, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P355, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.04.05
   Wong KV, 2013, J ENERG RESOUR-ASME, V135, DOI 10.1115/1.4023176
   Xu HQ, 2006, INT J REMOTE SENS, V27, P3025, DOI 10.1080/01431160600589179
   Yu ZW, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126630
NR 74
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 16
U2 16
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1474-7065
EI 1873-5193
J9 PHYS CHEM EARTH
JI Phys. Chem. Earth
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 137
AR 103804
DI 10.1016/j.pce.2024.103804
EA NOV 2024
PG 12
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA M8H3M
UT WOS:001359884400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sharifi, E
   Larbi, M
   Omrany, H
   Boland, J
AF Sharifi, Ehsan
   Larbi, Martin
   Omrany, Hossein
   Boland, John
TI Climate change adaptation and carbon emissions in green urban spaces:
   Case study of Adelaide
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Resilience; Adaptation; Urban greenery; Adelaide; Carbon
   emissions
ID ELECTRICITY DEMAND; HEAT; TEMPERATURE; RESILIENCE; CITIES
AB Concentrations of building mass and insufficient greenery in cities are identified to contribute significantly to extended heat stress in the built environment, commonly known as the urban heat island (UHI) effect. This paper presents a scenario-based modelling built on climate change projections and potential alterations of urban greenery in 2030 and 2090 in Adelaide, South Australia. The model is based on regional climate change scenarios, potential urban surface cover alternatives and resulted urban microclimate variations in Adelaide. Projected energy demand variations and corresponding carbon emission are calculated in each scenario. Results indicate that an ideal urban landscape transformation scenario with 30% tree canopy can effectively decrease the surface temperature by 1 degrees C in winter and 3 degrees C in summer by 2090. It is estimated that having greener and more heat resilient public spaces could save a total carbon emission of 140,000 tone CO2e in Adelaide annually compared to a business-as-usual scenario. Urban greenery may be used as a mean of increased urban life resilience to climate change by reducing surface temperature, increasing urban resilience and decreasing the energy demand during summer. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Sharifi, Ehsan; Larbi, Martin; Omrany, Hossein] Univ Adelaide, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
   [Boland, John] Univ South Australia, Sch Informat Technol & Math Sci, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
C3 University of Adelaide; University of South Australia
RP Sharifi, E (corresponding author), Univ Adelaide, Room 475,Horace Lamb Bldg,North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
EM ehsan.sharifi@adelaide.edu.au; amartin.larbi@adelaide.edu.au;
   hossein.omrany@adelaide.edu.au; john.boland@unisa.edu.au
RI Sharifi, Ehsan/KCK-7717-2024; Sharifi, Ehsan/P-1402-2016; Boland,
   John/B-3046-2008
OI Sharifi, Ehsan/0000-0003-1309-925X; Boland, John/0000-0003-1132-7589
FU CRC LCL; City of Adelaide
FX This study is linked to the Urban Microclimates project (RP 2005),
   facilitated by the CRC for Low Carbon Living. It is supported by the CRC
   LCL's partners including the City of Adelaide. Methods compliance with
   Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research is approved by
   UniSA's Human Research Ethics Committee in 2013 (PR 31464).
CR [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE SO S
   [Anonymous], POP EST PROJ AUSTR I
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG AUSTR TEC
   [Anonymous], 2014, BENCHMARKING AUSTR U
   Bessec M, 2008, ENERG ECON, V30, P2705, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.02.003
   Boland JW, 2010, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V138, P275, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1129-2_10
   BOM, 2008, CLIM AUSTR
   Bosselmann P., 2008, URBAN TRANSFORMATION
   Braganza K., 2015, UNDERSTANDING RECENT, P40
   Bröde P, 2012, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V56, P471, DOI 10.1007/s00484-011-0452-3
   Coutts AM, 2016, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V124, P55, DOI 10.1007/s00704-015-1409-y
   CSIRO, 2014, STAT CLIM ASP VIC
   DESA, 2014, WORLD URB PROSP HIGH
   Dewha, 2008, EN US AUSTR RES SECT
   Franco G, 2008, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V87, pS139, DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9364-y
   Gartland L.M., 2012, Heat Islands: Understanding and Mitigating Heat in Urban Areas
   Gehl J., 2011, Public spaces public life study: City of Adelaide 2011
   Gehl J., 2013, STUDY PUBLIC LIFE
   Hatvani-Kovacs G, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V169, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.10.039
   Ichinose T, 2008, URBAN ENERGY TRANSITION: FROM FOSSIL FUELS TO RENEWABLE POWER, P365, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-045341-5.00015-3
   Mirasgedis S, 2006, ENERGY, V31, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2005.02.016
   Moral-Carcedo J, 2005, ENERG ECON, V27, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2005.01.003
   Moughtin C., 2005, URBAN DESIGN GREEN D
   NGAF, 2014, DEP ENV, V1, P1
   OCE, 2015, AUSTR EN UPD
   Osmond P., 2017, GUIDES URBAN COOLING
   PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia, 2011, Protecting human health and safety during severe and extreme heat waves: A national framework
   Santamouris M, 2015, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V512, P582, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.060
   Santamouris M, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V19, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2015.02.001
   Sharifi E., 2016, OUTDOOR ACTIVITY CHO, P94
   Sharifi E, 2018, ARCHIT SCI REV, V61, P191, DOI 10.1080/00038628.2018.1482824
   Sharifi E, 2017, LECT NOTES GEOINF CA, P433, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_24
   Sharifi E, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P1833, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1091294
   Sharmin E., 2016, INTRO CHAPTER METAL, P1
   Sivam A., 2010, NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN
   Tapper N., 2015, LOW CARBON CITIES TR, P361
   Watterson I., 2015, PROJECTIONS ATMOSPHE, P91
   Williams S, 2012, ENVIRON INT, V40, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2011.11.011
NR 38
TC 49
Z9 49
U1 16
U2 197
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD MAY 1
PY 2020
VL 254
AR 120035
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120035
PG 9
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA KT3BV
UT WOS:000518890800022
OA Bronze
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kiss, T
   Kiss, VM
AF Kiss, Tibor
   Kiss, Viktor Miklos
TI Develop resilience - a System-Level dynamic indicator for testing the
   Long-Term impact of planned projects based on a Watershed and a city
   strategy example
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Sustainable city; Ecological Network Analysis; Cone Spring; Urban
   planning; System dynamics; Pecs; Hungary
ID SUSTAINABILITY; ECOLOGY; PECS
AB The aim of this paper is to develop a system-level dynamic indicator for testing the long-term effectiveness of planned projects in a system. The indicator developed in this paper is a system dynamics model, which adds a dynamic component to the static structure of the flow matrix of Ecological Network Analysis (ENA). It offers the capability to tailor the model to the condition of individual systems.
   The paper creates a resilient energy-flow structure for Cone Spring Watershed and uses the table of results formulated in the article "Ecology-related resilience in urban planning - a complex approach for P ecs" (Kiss and Kiss, 2018), in which a method based on ENA was developed which helps with the creation of a resilient and sustainable system. A general system dynamics model - adding dynamics to an arbitrary static resilient structure - is developed first. The practical use of this dynamic indicator is demonstrated by means of an ecological example (Cone Spring Watershed) and a non-ecological example (the resilient and sustainable city strategy of P ecs, Hungary). The model is able to test the long-term effectiveness of the planned investment strategies and allocates the investment budget accordingly.
C1 [Kiss, Tibor] Univ Pecs, Fac Business & Econ, Rakoczi Ut 80, H-7622 Pecs, Hungary.
   [Kiss, Tibor] Blue Econ Res Ctr, Pecs, Hungary.
   [Kiss, Viktor Miklos] Metropolitan State Univ Denver, 890 Auraria Pkwy 310, Denver, CO 80204 USA.
C3 University of Pecs; Metropolitan State University of Denver
RP Kiss, VM (corresponding author), Metropolitan State Univ Denver, 890 Auraria Pkwy 310, Denver, CO 80204 USA.
EM kisst@ktk.pte.hu; vkiss@msudenver.edu
OI Kiss, Tibor/0000-0001-9663-8241
FU National Research, Development and Innovation Office [K 132276]
FX The research was supported by the National Research, Development and
   Innovation Office (No. K 132276) in Hungary. The authors would like to
   thank C S Chadwick and Gerard Morris for their help in language editing.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Ahmadian N, 2020, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106977
   Ali-Toudert F, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V73, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.09.046
   Anthopoulos L., 2013, ELECT J E GOVT, V11, pP326
   Bossel H, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V5
   Bossel H., 2007, System zoo 1 simulation models-elementary systems, physics, engineering
   Bouska KL, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V101, P1094, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.002
   Chen B, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V47, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.021
   de Jong M, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V134, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.083
   Fath B, 2014, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, Vxxx, P1
   Fath BD, 2007, ECOL MODEL, V208, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.029
   Fath Brian D., 2012, Ecological Questions, V16, P77, DOI 10.2478/v10090-012-0008-0
   Forrester J.W., 1999, Urban Dynamics
   FUTAGAMI K, 1993, ECON LETT, V41, P99, DOI 10.1016/0165-1765(93)90119-W
   Gibbons LV, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105698
   Jackson M.C., 2016, LARGE SCALE ECOLOGY, V55, P2
   John B, 2015, CITIES, V48, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.001
   Kiss T, 2018, ECOL ECON, V144, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.004
   Kiss VM, 2015, ENERGY, V80, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.079
   Li T, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V723, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138113
   Maani K.E., 2007, Systems thinking, system dynamics: Managing change and complexity
   Maedows D., 1999, LEVERAGE POINTS PLAC
   Maranghi S, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106074
   Mavrommati G, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P275, DOI 10.1007/s13280-013-0432-4
   Meadows D. H., 2008, THINKING SYSTEMS
   Ness B, 2007, ECOL ECON, V60, P498, DOI [10.1016/j., DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023]
   Rotmans J, 2000, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V20, P265, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00039-1
   Rusiawan W, 2015, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V28, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.042
   Saunders WSA, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.013
   Senge PM, 2006, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA, P100
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shouping G., 2005, TSINGHUA SCI TECHNOL, V10, P265
   Spieles DJ, 2003, ECOL MODEL, V161, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00342-3
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Sterman J.D., 2000, BUSINESS DYNAMICS
   Suh S, 2005, ECOL MODEL, V189, P251, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.011
   The World Bank, 2010, ECO2 CITIES GUIDE EC
   TILLY LJ, 1968, ECOL MONOGR, V38, P169, DOI 10.2307/1942291
   Tóth G, 2019, RESOURCES-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/resources8040159
   Tsolakis N., 2015, RES SUSTAIN CITIES S, V17, DOI [10.1016/j. scs.2015.03.002, DOI 10.1016/J.SCS.2015.03.002]
   Ulanowicz RE, 1999, J MARINE SYST, V19, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0924-7963(98)90017-3
   Ulanowicz RE, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V293, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.014
   Ulanowicz RE, 2009, ECOL MODEL, V220, P1886, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.04.015
   Ulanowicz RE, 2009, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.005
   World Bank, 2010, ECO2 CITIES ECOLOGIC
   Yigitcanlar T, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034
NR 46
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 21
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD OCT
PY 2021
VL 129
AR 107970
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107970
EA JUL 2021
PG 18
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA TV4KB
UT WOS:000681690100006
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Béné, C
   Mehta, L
   McGranahan, G
   Cannon, T
   Gupte, J
   Tanner, T
AF Bene, Christophe
   Mehta, Lyla
   McGranahan, Gordon
   Cannon, Terry
   Gupte, Jaideep
   Tanner, Thomas
TI Resilience as a policy narrative: potentials and limits in the context
   of urban planning
SO CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Review
DE resilience; urbanization; climate change; discourse; policy narrative
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; FOOD SECURITY; GOVERNANCE; CITIES; CITY; SUSTAINABILITY;
   PERSPECTIVE; ADAPTATION; RISK; VULNERABILITY
AB The aim of this paper is to analyse the emergence of the concept of 'urban resilience' in the literature and to assess its potentials and limitations as an element of policy planning. Using a systematic literature review covering the period 2003-2013 and a combination of techniques derived from narrative analysis, we show that diverse views of what urban resilience means and how it is best used (as a goal or as a conceptual/analytical framework) compete in the literature. Underlying these views are various (and sometimes diverging) interpretations of what the main issues are and what forms of policies or interventions are needed to address these issues. Urban planners need to be better aware of these different interpretations if they want to be in a position to use resilience appropriately and spell out what resilience can bring to their work. The review also highlights that the notion of urban resilience often lacks adequate acknowledgement of the political economy of urbanization and consequently does not challenge the status quo which, some argue, is socially unjust and environmentally unsustainable. As such it runs the risk to be seen as simply making marginalized urban communities more resilient to the shocks and inequity created by the current dominant paradigm.
C1 [Bene, Christophe] Int Ctr Agr Trop, Decis & Policy Anal Program DAPA, Cali, Colombia.
   [Mehta, Lyla; McGranahan, Gordon; Cannon, Terry; Gupte, Jaideep] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton, E Sussex, England.
   [Tanner, Thomas] Overseas Dev Inst, London, England.
C3 University of Sussex
RP Béné, C (corresponding author), Int Ctr Agr Trop, Decis & Policy Anal Program DAPA, Cali, Colombia.
EM c.bene@cgiar.org
RI Cannon, Terry/HII-6413-2022; Bene, Chris/ACK-2643-2022
OI Bene, Christophe/0000-0002-7078-9241
FU IDS Horizon Scanning Initiative under the IDS Strengthening
   Evidence-based Policy programme - DFID; ESRC [ES/I021620/1] Funding
   Source: UKRI
FX The authors would like to thank Jim Sumberg (IDS) and the participants
   to the 'Resilience in Urban Development Planning: Foresight workshop'
   (14-15 Nov 2013). Part of this research was funded by an IDS Horizon
   Scanning Initiative under the IDS Strengthening Evidence-based Policy
   programme supported by DFID. The views expressed here however do not
   necessarily reflect the UK Government's official policies.
CR Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Agrawal A, 2003, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V32, P243, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
   Agudelo-Vera CM, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V64, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.01.014
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   [Anonymous], 2007, 4199 WORLD BANK
   [Anonymous], 2010, REPORT NO 54947 GLB
   [Anonymous], 2007, CHARACTERISTICS DISA
   [Anonymous], 2004, ECOL SOC
   [Anonymous], 2014, Economist
   [Anonymous], WORLD DIS REP FOC CO
   [Anonymous], 2011, DEF DIS RES DFID APP
   [Anonymous], ETHIQUE PUBLIQUE
   [Anonymous], 2002, CONSERVATION ECOLOGY
   [Anonymous], 13 STEPS I DEV STUD
   [Anonymous], 2013, RUR URB LINK MDGS
   [Anonymous], 2007, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMEN
   Antrobus D, 2011, URBAN RES PRACT, V4, P207, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2011.579777
   Bahadur A. V., 2010, 1 CSR I DEV STUD
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Barthel S, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018
   BAUD I.S.A., 2009, 4 INT C INT FOR URB, P1069
   Bene C., 2012, IDS working papers, V405, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X, 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x, 10.1111/1.2040-0209.2012.00405.x, DOI 10.1111/1.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Béné C, 2016, FOOD SECUR, V8, P123, DOI 10.1007/s12571-015-0526-x
   Béné C, 2014, J INT DEV, V26, P598, DOI 10.1002/jid.2992
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Berkes J., 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change
   Bouzarovski S, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P2689, DOI 10.1177/0042098010385158
   Boyle C, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P4836, DOI 10.1021/es903749d
   Boyle P, 2012, CAN REV SOCIOL, V49, P350, DOI 10.1111/j.1755-618X.2012.01301.x
   Bridgman T, 2002, POLICY SCI, V35, P141, DOI 10.1023/A:1016139804995
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Bull-Kamanga L, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P193, DOI 10.1177/095624780301500109
   Burch S, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P7575, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.070
   Callister W D., 2019, Fundamentals of materials science and engineering: an integrated approach
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Carpenter SR, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.007
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Cola F, 2005, TECHNOLOGIES DOSSIER
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cote M., 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, P1
   Crichton D, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P2731, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.2081
   Da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAINA, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012
   Davidson DJ, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P1135, DOI 10.1080/08941921003652940
   DE Bruijn K., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P199, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232]
   de Zeeuw H, 2011, J AGR SCI-CAMBRIDGE, V149, P153, DOI 10.1017/S0021859610001279
   Doughty MRC, 2004, BUILD ENVIRON, V39, P1223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.03.008
   Duit A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Felli Romain., 2016, RES POLITICAL EC, V31, P267
   Ferre C., 2011, WORKING PAPER SERIES
   Field C. B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT WORKI
   Fischer Frank., 1993, ARGUMENTATIVE TURN P
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gasper R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.009
   GLANTZ MD, 1996, RESILIENCE DEV
   Gleeson B, 2008, URBAN STUD, V45, P2653, DOI 10.1177/0042098008098198
   Gordon RB, 2006, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V103, P1209, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0509498103
   Harpham T, 2009, HEALTH PLACE, V15, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.03.004
   HOLLING CS, 1973, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V4, P2
   Hooghe L, 2003, AM POLIT SCI REV, V97, P233
   Hornborg A, 2009, INT J COMP SOCIOL, V50, P237, DOI 10.1177/0020715209105141
   Huitema D, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Interagency Resilience Working Group (IRWG), 2012, CHAR RES BUILD INT R
   Jansson Å, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.013
   Jansson Å, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Khailani DK, 2013, LAND USE POLICY, V30, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.003
   Klein RJT, 1998, GEOGR J, V164, P259, DOI 10.2307/3060615
   Kreimer A., 2003, DISASTER RISK MANAGE
   Lavell A, 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Leduc W., 2009, P SASBE C DELFT NETH
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Malalgoda C., 2013, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V4, P72, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299017, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299017]
   Martin-Breen P., 2012, RESILIENCE LIT REV
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Mitlin D., 2013, URBAN POVERTY GLOBAL
   Monteiro A, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V414, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.009
   Olsson P, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11, DOI 10.5751/ES-01595-110118
   Ostrom E, 2010, ENVIRON CONSERV, V37, P451, DOI 10.1017/S0376892910000834
   Otto-Zimmermann Konrad, 2011, P 2 WORLD C AD CLIM
   Pearson LJ, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.020
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Razafindrabe G.A., 2009, ASIAN J ENV DISASTER, V1, P101, DOI DOI 10.3850/S179392402009000088
   Resilience Alliance, 2007, RES PROSP RES ALL IN
   Resilientcity.org, 2010, RESILIENCE
   Rijke J, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V25, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012
   Rockström J, 2009, NATURE, V461, P472, DOI 10.1038/461472a
   Roe E, 1994, NARRATIVE POLICY ANA
   ROE EM, 1989, J POLICY ANAL MANAG, V8, P251, DOI 10.2307/3323382
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Rotmans JR., 2001, FORESIGHT J FUTURE S, V3, P15, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14636680110803003, 10.1108/14636680110803003]
   Shah F., 2012, WORKB PLANN URB RES
   Smith TF, 2011, FUTURES, V43, P673, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.008
   Tanner T., 2009, IDS Working Paper
   Tobin G.A., 1999, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V1, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-28679900002-9
   Tompkins EL, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-HABITAT, 2011, STAT WORLDS CIT 2010
   United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), 2013, STREETS PUBL SPAC DR
   Urban Climate Change Research Network UCCRN, 2011, CLIM CHANG CIT 1 ASS
   van de Meene SJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1117, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003
   von Grebmer K., 2013, 2013 GLOBAL HUNGER I
   Walker B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Wallace R, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.07.006
   Wang CH, 2009, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V135, P528, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2009)135:6(528)
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   WCDR, 2005, BUILD RES NAT COMM D
   Zakharenka A, 2021, Importance of Roadside Tree Planting in Bangladesh
NR 115
TC 107
Z9 108
U1 5
U2 182
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1756-5529
EI 1756-5537
J9 CLIM DEV
JI Clim. Dev.
PY 2018
VL 10
IS 2
BP 116
EP 133
DI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
PG 18
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA GA2GD
UT WOS:000428134300003
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU McElvain, B
AF McElvain, Beki
TI "Fixing" finance? The dialectical publics of resilient disaster
   governance in Mexico city
SO URBAN GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE Publics; counterpublics; disaster governance; development finance;
   spatial fix
ID CLIMATE; NEOLIBERALISM; METABOLISM
AB Urban disaster governance in global Southern cities is shaped by relationships with development finance institutions. As state capacity wanes, development finance is seen as an agenda-setting driver of "resilience" and "innovation" but needs an accommodating state to function at the urban scale. This study complicates claims that development finance can "fix" overaccumulated capital in global Southern cities through resilience efforts. In Mexico City, "anti-neoliberalism" rhetoric and an austerity campaign make it difficult for the World Bank to carry out an established resilience agenda, revealing limits to institutional reach in politically uncertain spaces. I theorize this as a variegated relationship between fixity and uncertainty that is modulated by a public and counterpublic dialectic. By investigating (1) attempts to expand a municipal contingency fund and (2) ideological organizational activism, this study interrogates discourses that produce institutional arrangements and sites of opposition, where they frustrate the fix and constrain possibilities for radical action.
C1 [McElvain, Beki] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept City & Reg Planning, 228 Bauer Wurster Hall 1850, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Berkeley
RP McElvain, B (corresponding author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept City & Reg Planning, 228 Bauer Wurster Hall 1850, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
EM bmcelvain@berkeley.edu
RI McElvain, Beki/JXX-5246-2024
OI McElvain, Beki/0000-0002-2505-6161
FU Global Metropolitan Studies; Network for a New Political Economy at the
   University of California, Berkeley
FX Part of this research was funded by Global Metropolitan Studies and the
   Network for a New Political Economy at the University of California,
   Berkeley.
CR Ackerman E. F., 2021, POLITICA GOBIERNO, V28, pArticl
   Animal Politico, 2021, ANIMAL POLITICO
   Animal Politico, 2020, ANIMAL POLITICO
   [Anonymous], 2011, FONDEN: Mexicos Natural Disaster Fund -A Review
   Bankoff G, 2019, DISASTERS, V43, P221, DOI 10.1111/disa.12312
   Best J, 2013, THIRD WORLD Q, V34, P109, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2013.755356
   Best J, 2008, INT POLIT SOCIOL, V2, P355, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00056.x
   Bigger P, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P36, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1749023
   Bigger P, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P601, DOI 10.1177/2514848619876539
   Bok R, 2019, PROG HUM GEOG, V43, P1087, DOI 10.1177/0309132518804352
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Burawoy M, 1998, SOCIOL THEOR, V16, P4, DOI 10.1111/0735-2751.00040
   Cardenas V., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.005
   CDMX Fonaden, 2022, FONADEN TRANSPARENCI
   CDMX Jefatura de Gobierno, 2021, PODER EJECUTIVO GACE
   CDMX Resilience Office, 2016, CDMX RES STRAT
   Christophers B, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P88, DOI 10.1177/0308518X18819004
   Comite Tecnico, 2022, SES 2018 2022 COM TE
   Congreso C. D. M. X., 2021, PROPOSICION CONPUNTO
   Laurell AC, 2015, INT J HEALTH SERV, V45, P246, DOI 10.1177/0020731414568507
   Dresser D., 1996, DIMENSIONES POLITICA, P211
   Ekers M, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P17, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309963
   Ekers M, 2017, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V107, P1370, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309962
   El Ouardi M, 2023, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V47, P201, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.13153
   Evans S., 2021, MEXICOS CAT BOND COV
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fitch, 2021, FITCH RATINGS
   Fraser N., 1990, Habermas and the Public Sphere, V25, P56, DOI DOI 10.2307/466240
   Fraser Nancy., 2014, Transnationalizing the Public Sphere
   Freud S., 1939, PSYCHOANALYTIC REV 1, V26, P237
   Gallegos Z., 2018, EL PAIS         0702
   Goldman Michael., 2005, Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in the Age of Globalization
   Grove KJ, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P611, DOI 10.1111/anti.12066
   Habermas Jurgen., 1990, STRUCTURAL TRANSFORM
   Hanrahan B, 2019, J LAT AM CULT STUD, V28, P113, DOI 10.1080/13569325.2019.1608517
   Harvey David., 2001, Geographische Revue, V2, P23, DOI DOI 10.1038/D-NB.INFO/1217929630/34
   Harvey David., 1982, The Limits to Capital
   Hernandez E., 2021, EL UNIVERSAL    0901
   Hilbrandt H, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P1415, DOI 10.1177/0308518X20909391
   Huber MatthewT., 2022, Climate Change as Class War: Building Socialism on a Warming Planet
   Huerto Roma Verde, 2023, HIKURI INFORM, V5
   Johnson L, 2013, GEOFORUM, V45, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.04.003
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Klenk N. L., 2018, CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC, P261, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_14
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Leyshon A, 2007, THEOR CULT SOC, V24, P97, DOI 10.1177/0263276407084699
   MacDonald G, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P2011, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1800300
   Mann G, 2019, DISSENT, V66, P65, DOI 10.1353/dss.2019.0055
   McClintock N, 2014, LOCAL ENVIRON, V19, P147, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.752797
   McElvain B, 2023, ENVIRON PLANN D, V41, P253, DOI 10.1177/02637758231161613
   McElvain Beki, 2023, C AM ASS GEOGR ANN M
   Mechler R., 2016, DISASTER RISK MANAGE
   Miraftab F, 2009, PLAN THEOR, V8, P32, DOI 10.1177/1473095208099297
   Mora P. K., 2020, AMPLIA SHEINBAUM REC
   Moreno-Carranco M., 2020, ARDETH MAGAZINE POWE, V6
   Navarro M. F., 2019, FORBES MEXICO   1119
   Palacio R. R., 2021, El Financiero
   RC, 2022, 100 RES CIT
   Roldan N., 2020, ANIMAL POLITICO
   Soto J., 2019, RESISTENCIA AMBIENTA
   Swyngedouw E, 2010, THEOR CULT SOC, V27, P213, DOI 10.1177/0263276409358728
   Taylor ZJ, 2020, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V13, P405, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsaa015
   Tierney K, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P1327, DOI 10.1177/0002764215591187
   Tracey C., 2020, N 1 MAGAZINE    1006
   Van Dijk TeunA., 1993, DISCOURSE SOC, V4, P249, DOI DOI 10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Vazquez F. R., 2003, PARTIDO REVOLUCIONAR, V41
   Villanueva D., 2020, CALIFICADORA MOODYS
   Warner M, 2002, PUBLIC CULTURE, V14, P49, DOI 10.1215/08992363-14-1-49
   Watts M, 2015, GEOGR RES-AUST, V53, P288, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12131
   Watts MJ, 2019, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V9, P186, DOI 10.1177/2043820619826798
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Westman L., 2020, Climate Urbanism: Towards a Critical Research Agenda, P83, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53386-1_6, 10.1007/978-3-030-53386-16]
   World Bank, 2020, WORLD BANK CATASTROP
   World Bank IBRD, 2021, WHO WE ARE INT BANK
   Zeiderman A, 2016, PUBLIC CULTURE, V28, P389, DOI 10.1215/08992363-3427499
NR 75
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 1
U2 6
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0272-3638
EI 1938-2847
J9 URBAN GEOGR
JI Urban Geogr.
PD MAY 27
PY 2024
VL 45
IS 5
BP 776
EP 797
DI 10.1080/02723638.2023.2234780
EA JUL 2023
PG 22
WC Geography; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography; Urban Studies
GA TX3Q8
UT WOS:001027143600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Nhamo, L
   Rwizi, L
   Mpandeli, S
   Botai, J
   Magidi, J
   Tazvinga, H
   Sobratee, N
   Liphadzi, S
   Naidoo, D
   Modi, AT
   Slotow, R
   Mabhaudhi, T
AF Nhamo, Luxon
   Rwizi, Lameck
   Mpandeli, Sylvester
   Botai, Joel
   Magidi, James
   Tazvinga, Henerica
   Sobratee, Nafiisa
   Liphadzi, Stanley
   Naidoo, Dhesigen
   Modi, Albert T.
   Slotow, Rob
   Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe
TI Urban nexus and transformative pathways towards a resilient Gauteng
   City-Region, South Africa
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptation; Circular economy; Migration; Sustainability; Urbanisation;
   Urban planning
ID URBANIZATION; FOOD
AB The challenges emanating from the rapid urbanisation of the Gauteng City-Region in South Africa require innovative strategies to transform the urbanised province into a climate action and adaptation centre. We provide an analysis of the impacts of rapid urbanisation in the Gauteng City-Region, highlighting major challenges related to (i) land use management, (ii) service delivery (water, energy, food, and waste and sanitation), and (iii) social cohesion, applying geospatial techniques to assess spatio-temporal changes and variations in land surface temperatures. Massive impervious surfaces, rising temperatures, flooding and heatwaves are compounding the challenges associated with rapid urbanisation in the city region. We provide an outline of the response pathways towards a sustainable and resilient city-region and inform policy on formulating coherent adaptation urban planning strategies. If not well managed, rapid urbanisation could be a huge environmental and human health risk and a threat to sustainable cities by 2030. Nexus planning is proposed to provide the basis to achieve urban resilience as it integrates distinct, but interlinked sectors, considering both ecological and built infrastructures, in a balanced and integrated manner.
C1 [Nhamo, Luxon; Mpandeli, Sylvester; Liphadzi, Stanley; Naidoo, Dhesigen] Water Res Commiss South Africa WRC, ZA-0081 Pretoria, South Africa.
   [Rwizi, Lameck] Univ South Africa UNISA, Coll Agr & Environm Sci CAES, ZA-1710 Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Botai, Joel; Tazvinga, Henerica] South Africa Weather Serv SAWS, ZA-0157 Pretoria, South Africa.
   [Magidi, James] Tshwane Univ Technol, Geomat Dept, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa.
   [Sobratee, Nafiisa; Slotow, Rob] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Sch Life Sci, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
   [Nhamo, Luxon; Botai, Joel; Naidoo, Dhesigen; Modi, Albert T.; Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Transformat Agr & Food Syst CTAFS, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
   [Mpandeli, Sylvester; Liphadzi, Stanley] Univ Venda, Sch Environm Sci, ZA-0950 Thohoyandou, South Africa.
   [Slotow, Rob] UCL, Dept Genet Evolut & Environm, London WC1E 6BT, England.
   [Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Water Resources Res CWRR, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
C3 University of South Africa; Tshwane University of Technology; University
   of Kwazulu Natal; University of Kwazulu Natal; University of Venda;
   University of London; University College London; University of Kwazulu
   Natal
RP Nhamo, L (corresponding author), Water Res Commiss South Africa WRC, ZA-0081 Pretoria, South Africa.; Mabhaudhi, T (corresponding author), Univ KwaZulu Natal, Ctr Transformat Agr & Food Syst CTAFS, Sch Agr Earth & Environm Sci, ZA-3209 Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
EM luxonn@wrc.org.za; mabhaudhi@ukzn.ac.za
RI Mpandeli, Sylvester/KDP-0391-2024; Tazvinga, Henerica/X-5332-2019;
   Magidi, James/AAN-9324-2020; Nhamo, Luxon/H-4000-2019; Sobratee,
   Nafiisa/KPB-0004-2024; Slotow, Rob/AAM-9053-2020; Mabhaudhi,
   Tafadzwanashe/AAF-2418-2019
OI Tazvinga, Henerica/0000-0002-7538-6169; Modi,
   Albert/0000-0002-6887-1721; Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe/0000-0002-9323-8127
FU Water Research Commission (WRC) through the Research and Development
   Branch
FX This work was supported by the Water Research Commission (WRC) through
   the Research and Development Branch.
CR Albrechts L., 2020, CITY TERRIT ARCHIT, V7, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40410-019-0111-2, DOI 10.1186/S40410-019-0111-2]
   [Anonymous], 2016, ENV RESOURCE MANAGEM
   [Anonymous], 2020, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), P9
   Avtar R, 2019, RESOURCES-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/resources8030136
   Baffi S, 2018, ADV GEOGR EVIRON SCI, P285, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-7799-9_13
   Beard V. A, 2016, MORE EQUAL CITY FRAM, P48
   Bobbins K., 2015, Journal of Public Administration, V50, P32
   Burrows JP, 1999, J ATMOS SCI, V56, P151, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<0151:TGOMEG>2.0.CO;2
   Castelli F, 2018, J TRAVEL MED, V25, DOI 10.1093/jtm/tay040
   Chakwizira J, 2018, RESTRUCTURING GAUTEN, P83
   Chen Z, 2018, GENOM PROTEOM BIOINF, V16, P451, DOI 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.08.004
   Chhetri N, 2019, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/aaf9f9
   Colavitti AM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062434
   Collier P, 2017, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V33, P355, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grx035
   Colloff MJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V68, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.007
   Compaan P, 2011, GAUTENG CONSERVATION, P89
   Dorsey J. W., 2003, Environmental Practice, V5, P69, DOI 10.1017/S1466046603030187
   Dos Santos S, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P497, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.157
   Elmqvist T, 2016, ROUT INT HANDB, P139
   Few R, 2017, PALGR COMMUN, V3, DOI 10.1057/palcomms.2017.92
   González-Sánchez R, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062459
   Gorelick N, 2017, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V202, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
   GPG, 2017, GROW GAUT TOG GGT 20, P90
   Granderson AA, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V3, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2014.05.003
   Gu C, 2019, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, P1
   Guneralp Burak, 2013, P437
   Hewitt CN, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P62, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01164-3
   Hua LZ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020475
   Hunter NB, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9d00
   Jacob D., 2018, GLOBAL WARMING 1 5
   Johnson OW, 2017, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V5, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00024
   Kim D, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040405
   Kumar P, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105181
   Landau L. B., 2008, GAUTENG 2055 TREND P, P32
   Lehmann Steffen., 2018, CITY CULTURE SOC, V13, P46, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2017.10.003
   Louw Q, 2019, SAIEE AFR RES J, V110, P209, DOI 10.23919/SAIEE.2019.8864147
   Mabhaudhi T, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16162970
   Mabhaudhi T, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8060235
   Martin B., 2012, ENERGY WATER NEXUS E, P34
   McGranahan G, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P13, DOI 10.1177/0956247815627522
   McKinney M. L., 2008, Urban Ecosystems, V11, P161, DOI 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
   Meyer N, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195514
   Mpandeli S, 2019, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2019.100240
   Mpandeli S, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102306
   Murray A, 2017, J BUS ETHICS, V140, P369, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
   Nhamo L, 2019, WATER SA, V45, P75, DOI 10.4314/wsa.v45i1.09
   Nhamo L, 2020, ENVIRON RES, P7
   Nhamo L, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.010
   Nhamo L, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050567
   Oliveira E, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10040949
   Omrani H, 2020, DATA BRIEF, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105089
   Owusu-Ansah FE, 2016, AFR J PRIM HEALTH CA, V8
   Pereira L. M, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23
   Rahman HMT, 2019, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00002
   Riffat S., 2016, A SpringerOpen Journal, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S40984-016-0014-2
   SANBI, 2018, PRESS BIOD PROV LEV, P71
   Satterthwaite D, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.025
   Satterthwaite D, 2010, PHILOS T R SOC B, V365, P2809, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2010.0136
   SCHMIDT SK, 2018, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V25
   Sharmina M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V59, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.008
   Simatele D, 2015, S AFR GEOGR J, V97, P243, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2014.924873
   Sperling Joshua B., 2017, Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, V4, P173, DOI 10.1007/s40518-017-0085-1
   Star J, 2016, CLIM RISK MANAG, V13, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2016.08.001
   StatsSA, 2019, Q LAB FORC SURV Q 3, P131
   Stepinac M, 2020, APPL SCI-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10155060
   Theys N, 2017, ATMOS MEAS TECH, V10, P119, DOI 10.5194/amt-10-119-2017
   Todes A, 2018, PROG PLANN, V123, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2017.03.001
   UNGA, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, VGeneral Assembly (UNGA) United Nations (UN), P35
   Van Bavel J, 2013, FACTS VIEWS VIS OBGY, V5, P281
   Webb R, 2018, AMBIO, V47, P57, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0934-6
   Wolf AT, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P241, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041006.101434
   Yuan F, 2007, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V106, P375, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.003
NR 72
TC 29
Z9 30
U1 5
U2 45
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 116
AR 103266
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103266
EA MAY 2021
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA TM9RL
UT WOS:000675883700002
PM 37674556
OA Green Accepted, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hemmati, M
   Mahmoud, HN
   Ellingwood, BR
   Crooks, AT
AF Hemmati, Mona
   Mahmoud, Hussam N.
   Ellingwood, Bruce R.
   Crooks, Andrew T.
TI Shaping urbanization to achieve communities resilient to floods
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE urbanization; adaptation policies; flood risk; resilience; urban
   planning
ID CELLULAR-AUTOMATON MODEL; SAN-FRANCISCO; LAND-USE; IMPACT
AB Flood risk is increasing in urban communities due to climate change and socioeconomic development. Socioeconomic development is a major cause of urban expansion in flood-prone regions, as it places more physical, economic, and social infrastructure at risk. Moreover, in light of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by the United Nations, it has become an international imperative to move toward sustainable cities. Current approaches to quantify this risk use scenario-based methods involving arbitrary projections of city growth. These methods seldom incorporate geographical, social, and economic factors associated with urbanization and cannot mimic city growth under various urban development plans. In this paper, we introduce a framework for understanding the interactions between urbanization and flood risk as an essential ingredient for flood risk management. This framework integrates an urban growth model with a hazard model to explore flood risk under various urban development scenarios. We then investigate the effectiveness of coupling nonstructural flood mitigation measures-in terms of urban planning policies and socioeconomic incentives-with urban growth processes to achieve sustainable and resilient communities. Using this framework, we can not only simulate urban expansion dynamics through time and its effect on flood risk but also model the growth of a region under various urban planning policies and assess the effectiveness of these measures in reducing flood risk. Our analysis reveals that while current urban development plans may put more people and assets at flood risk, the nonstructural strategies considered in this study mitigated the consequences of floods. Such a framework could be used to assist city planners and stakeholders in examining tradeoffs between costs and benefits of future land development in achieving sustainable and resilient cities.
C1 [Hemmati, Mona] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY 10964 USA.
   [Hemmati, Mona; Mahmoud, Hussam N.; Ellingwood, Bruce R.] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
   [Crooks, Andrew T.] Univ Buffalo, Dept Geog, Buffalo, NY USA.
C3 Columbia University; Colorado State University System; Colorado State
   University Fort Collins; State University of New York (SUNY) System;
   University at Buffalo, SUNY
RP Hemmati, M (corresponding author), Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY 10964 USA.; Hemmati, M; Mahmoud, HN (corresponding author), Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA.
EM Hussam.mahmoude@colostate.edu
RI Mahmoud, Hussam/JFL-0657-2023; Crooks, Andrew/L-2018-2017
OI Hemmati, Mona/0000-0003-1283-0231; Crooks, Andrew/0000-0002-5034-6654;
   Mahmoud, Hussam/0000-0002-3106-6067
FU U.S. National Institute of Science and Technology [70NANB15H044];
   Colorado State University (NIST) [70NANB15H044]; National Science
   Foundation under CRISP Collaborative Research Grant [CMMI-1638284]
FX The research herein was funded, in part, by the Center for Risk-Based
   Community Resilience Planning, a Center of Excellence funded through a
   cooperative agreement between the U.S. National Institute of Science and
   Technology and Colorado State University (NIST Financial Assistance
   Award No. 70NANB15H044). Partial support was also provided by the
   National Science Foundation under CRISP Collaborative Research Grant
   CMMI-1638284. These supports are gratefully acknowledged. The authors
   would like to thank the professional staff of the City of Boulder and
   Boulder County, CO, for the information that they provided during the
   course of this study. The views expressed herein are those of the
   authors and may not represent the official position of the National
   Institute of Standards and Technology, the U.S. Department of Commerce,
   or the City of Boulder. The authors sincerely appreciate the reviewers
   and the associate editor of the journal, Professor Freddie Taylor, for
   all of their comments that allowed us to improve the manuscript
   substantially.
CR Al-shalabi M, 2013, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V70, P425, DOI 10.1007/s12665-012-2137-6
   Andrade-Núñez MJ, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aad2e3
   Batty M., 2005, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals
   Batty M., 2012, GENERIC FRAMEWORK CO, P19
   Benenson I, 2004, GEOSIMULATION AUTOMA
   Berke P, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P310, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.976585
   Brody S, 2014, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V57, P1252, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2013.802228
   Brody SD, 2011, J PLAN EDUC RES, V31, P438, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11419515
   Christin Z., 2017, WHY WE CONTINUE DEV
   Clarke KC, 1998, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V12, P699, DOI 10.1080/136588198241617
   Clarke KC, 1997, ENVIRON PLANN B, V24, P247, DOI 10.1068/b240247
   Crooks A., 2019, Agent-Based Modelling and Geographic Information Systems: A Practical Primer, V1
   Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2018, HAZUS FLOOD MOD TECH
   French S.P., 2014, WIT T ECOLOGY ENV, V191, P501, DOI DOI 10.2495/SC140421
   French SP, 2010, NAT HAZARDS REV, V11, P49, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2010)11:2(49)
   Ghanbari M, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P162, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001089
   Gori A, 2019, J HYDROL, V568, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.053
   Guneralp B, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6669
   Haer T, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102009
   Haer T, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0770
   Heidari H, 2021, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V3, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ac0617
   Heidari H, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001657
   Hemmati M, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001382
   Heppenstall Alison J., 2012, Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems Internet, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4
   Kreibich H, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P953, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000606
   Mahtta R, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab59bf
   Nofal OM, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101903
   Nofal OM, 2022, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V7, P171, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
   Pumo D, 2017, J HYDROL, V554, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.002
   Sadiq AA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1413, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1776-9
   Schneider A, 2014, ENVIRON RES LETT, V9, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024008
   Swain DL, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001778
   WHITE R, 1993, ENVIRON PLANN A, V25, P1175, DOI 10.1068/a251175
   Zhang W, 2018, NATURE, V563, P384, DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0676-z
NR 34
TC 25
Z9 26
U1 3
U2 62
PU IOP PUBLISHING LTD
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 16
IS 9
AR 094033
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1e3c
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA UK7ZZ
UT WOS:000692185900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Olivadese, M
   Dindo, ML
AF Olivadese, Marianna
   Dindo, Maria Luisa
TI Water, Ecosystem Services, and Urban Green Spaces in the Anthropocene
SO LAND
LA English
DT Review
DE water systems; nature-based solutions; ancient wisdom; Anthropocene;
   ecological sustainability; human needs
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   URBANIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; IMPACTS; ECOLOGY; HEALTH; POLICY
AB As urban centers worldwide face the escalating impacts of climate change, rapid urbanization, and increasing water scarcity, the need for sustainable water management practices to enhance urban resilience in the Anthropocene has become critical. This study explores how ancient water management practices-including Roman aqueducts, Maya rainwater harvesting systems, and ancient Chinese flood control techniques-can be adapted to address contemporary water challenges in modern cities. We evaluate these historical practices through a lens of contemporary environmental pressures, including climate change, urbanization, and resource scarcity. By integrating ancient methods with modern technologies, we propose adaptive solutions to enhance urban water resilience. Case studies from five cities (Singapore, Copenhagen, Mexico City, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia) illustrate how modern green infrastructure, inspired by ancient techniques, is being successfully implemented to manage stormwater, mitigate urban flooding, and improve water conservation. By integrating historical practices with modern technologies-such as advanced filtration systems and water recycling-these cities are enhancing their water resilience and sustainability. The findings suggest that urban planners can draw valuable lessons from historical systems to design adaptive, climate-resilient cities that balance human needs with ecological sustainability. This paper concludes with actionable recommendations for future urban planning, emphasizing the importance of decentralized water systems, nature-based solutions, and community engagement to ensure sustainable urban water management in the Anthropocene.
C1 [Olivadese, Marianna; Dindo, Maria Luisa] Univ Bologna, Dept Agr & Food Sci, Viale Fanin 42, I-40127 Bologna, Italy.
C3 University of Bologna
RP Dindo, ML (corresponding author), Univ Bologna, Dept Agr & Food Sci, Viale Fanin 42, I-40127 Bologna, Italy.
EM marianna.olivadese2@unibo.it; marialuisa.dindo@unibo.it
RI Olivadese, Marianna/KIK-2342-2024; Dindo, Maria/AAV-3256-2020
OI Olivadese, Marianna/0009-0008-6228-8923
CR Adamopoulou JP, 2023, Eur J Sustain Dev Res, V7, DOI [10.29333/ejosdr/13297, DOI 10.29333/EJOSDR/13297]
   Adham A, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8050198
   Al-Kodmany K, 2018, J URBAN TECHNOL, V25, P95, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2018.1521584
   Angelakis AN, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13084237
   [Anonymous], 2017, Climate Change and Storytelling
   [Anonymous], 2021, Nature-Based Solutions in Europe: Policy, Knowledge and Practice for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction
   [Anonymous], 2018, The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018: Nature -Based Solutions for Water
   [Anonymous], 1988, Science and Civilisation in China. 1: Introductory Orientations
   [Anonymous], 2020, Water and Climate Change
   Atwood M., 2009, YEAR FLOOD
   Barr K., 2020, JSPG, V17, DOI [10.38126/JSPG170202, DOI 10.38126/JSPG170202]
   Bedla D, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107871
   Biswas A.K., 2022, Water Resources Development and Management, P3
   Biswas AK, 2016, WATER RESOUR DEV MAN, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-981-287-976-9_1
   Brears R.C., 2023, Blue and Green Cities, P115
   [Brondizio E.S. IPBES IPBES], 2019, IPBES secretariat, P1144
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Butzer KW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P3632, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1114845109
   Campisano A, 2017, WATER RES, V115, P195, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.056
   Cao SY, 2010, J HYDRO-ENVIRON RES, V4, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jher.2009.09.003
   Carson R., 2002, SILENT SPRING
   Cheng YH, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12071301
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   Crutzen PJ, 2002, NATURE, V415, P23, DOI 10.1038/415023a
   Davis P., 2016, Changing Perceptions of Nature
   Deming D, 2020, GROUNDWATER, V58, P152, DOI 10.1111/gwat.12958
   Dharmarathne G, 2024, RESULTS ENG, V22, DOI 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102123
   Dieperink C, 2023, CITIES, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104216
   Ebel R, 2020, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V30, P13, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH04310-19
   Elhassnaoui I., 2021, Insights Reg. Dev., V3, P80
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2018, URBAN PLANET KNOWLED
   Figueroa F, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159641
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Gill RichardsonB., 2000, GREAT MAYA DROUGHTS
   Gill SE, 2007, Built Environ, V33, P115, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115
   Gleick P., 1993, Water in Crisis: A Guide 10 the World's Fresh Water Resources
   Gleick P., 2018, The Worlds Water, VVolume 9
   Gleick P.H., 2012, The World's Water
   Gong C, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105020
   Hartig T, 2014, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V35, P207, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443
   Hassani A., 2021, Ph.D. Thesis
   Hillel D., 1994, RIVERS EDEN STRUGGLE
   Hodge AT., 1992, ROMAN AQUEDUCTS WATE
   IPCC, 2023, Climate Change 2021The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   JACOBSEN T, 1958, SCIENCE, V128, P1251, DOI 10.1126/science.128.3334.1251
   Jacobsen Thorkild., 1976, TREASURES DARKNESS H
   Junqueira JR, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104051
   Kabat P, 2009, NAT GEOSCI, V2, P450, DOI 10.1038/ngeo572
   Kabisch N, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
   Khoo T C., 2009, Water Management in 2020 and Beyond, P237, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89346-2_12, 10.1007/978-3-540-89346-212, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-89346-212]
   Kingsolver Barbara., 2012, FLIGHT BEHAV
   Klijn F, 2018, GEOSCIENCES, V8, DOI 10.3390/geosciences8060224
   Kumar M.Dinesh., 2009, Water management in India: what works, what doesn't
   Langeveld JG, 2022, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V4, P272, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2022.019
   Leigh NG, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030918
   Lerer SM, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9110883
   Li K, 2006, IRRIG DRAIN, V55, P291, DOI 10.1002/ird.234
   Lightfoot DR, 1996, J ARID ENVIRON, V33, P321, DOI 10.1006/jare.1996.0068
   Liu ZX, 2023, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V74, P747, DOI 10.1071/MF22167
   Luan IOB, 2010, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V26, P65, DOI 10.1080/07900620903392190
   Lucero LJ, 2023, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V120, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2306870120
   Mai LR, 2024, LEIDEN J INT LAW, V37, P535, DOI 10.1017/S0922156524000062
   Mamassis N., 2012, Evolution of Water Supply Throughout the Millennia
   Manuel M., 2018, Water History, V10, P13, DOI 10.1007/s12685-017-0200-7
   Martín EG, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V738, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693
   Mays LW, 2010, ANCIENT WATER TECHNOLOGIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8632-7
   McDonald RI, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.022
   McFarland AR, 2019, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V5, P643, DOI [10.1039/c8ew00498f, 10.1039/C8EW00498F]
   McGrane SJ, 2016, HYDROLOG SCI J, V61, P2295, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2015.1128084
   McMichael AJ, 2006, LANCET, V367, P859, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3
   Mell I., 2023, Planning with Landscape: Green Infrastructure to Build Climate-Adapted Cities, VVolume 35, P1
   Mills DM, 2009, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V51, P26, DOI 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817d32da
   Monteiro CM, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15152787
   Monteleone MC, 2007, WA SCI TECHNOL, V7, P113, DOI 10.2166/ws.2007.013
   Muhie SH, 2022, J AGR FOOD RES, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100446
   Needham J., 2004, Science and Civilisation in China
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Olivadese M, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13050605
   Olivadese M, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11122214
   Ortloff C.R., 2022, WATER ENG ANCIENT SO
   Palomo I, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013
   Pathirana A, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V149, P57, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2059-0
   Pazola A, 2024, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V28, P2949, DOI 10.5194/hess-28-2949-2024
   Pearsall Deborah M., 2008, Encyclopedia of Archaeology, V1
   Piccini C., 2023, Soil Management for Sustainable Agriculture and Ecosystem Services
   Possehl G.L., 2002, INDUS CIVILIZATION C
   Prosser T, 2015, FRESHW SCI, V34, P1186, DOI 10.1086/682566
   Raimondi A, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15081518
   Ramyar R, 2021, CITIES, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103316
   Robinson K.S., 2017, New York 2140: Romanzo
   Rockström J, 2009, NATURE, V461, P472, DOI 10.1038/461472a
   Silva ACRD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103475
   Scarborough VernonL., 2003, The Flow of Power: Ancient Water Systems and Landscapes
   Scarborough VL, 1998, LAT AM ANTIQ, V9, P135, DOI 10.2307/971991
   Schlosberg D, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P37, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.755387
   Shade C, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-12076-250437
   Sommese F, 2024, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/buildings14072190
   Staccioli R.A., 2002, Acquedotti, Fontane e Terme di Roma Antica: I Grandi Monumenti che Celebrarono il Trionfo Dellacqua Nella Citt Pi Potente Dellantichit; Tradizioni Italiane, V1st ed.
   Steffen W, 2011, PHILOS T R SOC A, V369, P842, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
   Sussams LW, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V147, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.003
   Sze J, 2008, SOCIOL COMPASS, V2, P1331, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00131.x
   Teweldebrihan MD, 2024, GLOB J ENVIRON SCI M, V10, P1359, DOI 10.22034/gjesm.2024.03.25
   Thornton PK, 2014, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V20, P3313, DOI 10.1111/gcb.12581
   Torres LimaP., 1994, Agriculture and Human Values, V11, P37, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01534447
   Tortajada C, 2006, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V22, P227, DOI 10.1080/07900620600691944
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2019, World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision
   United Nations Environment Programme, 2021, Reducing Consumer Food Waste Using Green and Digital Technologies, P1
   van der Leeuw SE, 2005, CR GEOSCI, V337, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.018
   Waldrop MM, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P17134, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1912802116
   Warner JF, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102481
   Waters CN, 2016, SCIENCE, V351, P137, DOI 10.1126/science.aad2622
   Wong THF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P673, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.436
   Woo H., 2023, Water Projects and Technologies in Asia: Historical Perspectives
   Wung Hee Moh, 2009, Structural Engineering International, V19, P17, DOI 10.2749/101686609787398399
   Yadav A.K., 2024, Integrated Management of Water Resources in India: A Computational Approach: Optimizing for Sustainability and Planning
   Zambrano L, 2020, ECOL RESTOR, V38, P114, DOI 10.3368/er.38.2.114
   Zheng XG, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062431
NR 118
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 8
U2 8
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 11
AR 1948
DI 10.3390/land13111948
PG 27
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA N6P1L
UT WOS:001365525700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rao, FJ
   Summers, RJ
AF Rao, Fujie
   Summers, Robert J.
TI Planning for retail resilience: Comparing Edmonton and Portland
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Retail resilience; Community sustainability; Urban planning; Edmonton;
   Portland
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; SUBURBS TALK; INNER-CITY; LAND-USE; MALL;
   NEIGHBORHOODS; PERSPECTIVE; COMMUNITY; POLITICS; REGIME
AB Commercial retail areas within cities have traditionally not only satisfied the demands for various goods and services, but have also contributed to elements of community sustainability and livability as a form of public good. Since the end of World War II, innovations in retail formats have occurred as retailers seek to maximize their financial efficiency. However, this often has consequences for community sustainability and livability. This research employs resilience theory to examine how cities have coped with retail innovations through a comparative case study of Edmonton (Alberta, Canada) and Portland (Oregon, USA). Through historical document review and interviews with senior planners in both cities, it is found that adaptive retail management which emphasize principles over visions, which feature an active, informed, and highly organized public and a polycentric planning system encouraging planning diversity and consensus building can contribute to more resilient retail outcomes that preserve a broader range of retail and public functions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Rao, Fujie] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
   [Summers, Robert J.] Univ Alberta, Earth & Atmospher Sci, 1-23 ESB, Edmonton, AB T5N 1W1, Canada.
C3 University of Melbourne; University of Alberta
RP Summers, RJ (corresponding author), Univ Alberta, Earth & Atmospher Sci, 1-23 ESB, Edmonton, AB T5N 1W1, Canada.
EM frao@student.unimelb.edu.au; robert.summers@ualberta.ca
RI Rao, Fujie/AAH-5242-2019; Summers, Robert/N-7948-2018
OI Summers, Robert/0000-0002-7511-2352; Rao, Fujie/0000-0002-6828-6944
CR Abbott C, 1997, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V8, P11, DOI 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521245
   Abbott C, 2003, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V14, P383
   Abbott C., 1983, PORTLAND PLANNING PO
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Alexander N., 1999, EMERGENCE MODERN RET, P1750
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   [Anonymous], J AM PLANNING ASS
   Architectural Forum, 1943, PLANN YOU, P63
   Baker RGV, 2010, GEOGR RES-AUST, V48, P65, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2009.00622.x
   Barata-Salgueiro T, 2014, CITIES, V36, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.01.007
   Beck U., 1992, RISK SOC NEW MODERNI
   Bernard F., 1989, DOWNTOWN INC AM REBU
   Berry B.J., 1958, Pap Reg Sci, V4, P107, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1435-5597.1958.TB01625.X
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Christaller W, 1933, WISSENSCHAFTLICHE BU
   City of Edmonton, 2007, BUS REV ZON HDB GUID
   City of Edmonton, 1998, STRATHC AR RED PLAN
   City of Edmonton, 1983, SUMM NEIGHB AR STRUC
   City of Edmonton, 1967, EDM GEN PLAN
   City of Edmonton, 1990, GEN MUN PLAN
   City of Edmonton, 1998, MUN DEV PLAN
   City of Edmonton, 1982, GEN MUN PLAN
   City of Portland, 1972, PLANN GUID PORTL DOW
   City of Portland, 2005, AM CASC STAT PORTL I
   City of Portland, 1943, PORTL IMPR
   City of Portland, 2009, METR 2040 GROWTH CON
   City of Portland, 2013, 2010 CENS DAT PORTL
   Climenhaga D. J., 1997, THESIS CARLETON U
   Consultants Urbanics, 1983, W EDM MALL IMP STUD
   Corbusier Le, 1943, CHARTE ATHENES TRANS
   Crawford Margaret, 1992, VARIATIONS THEME PAR
   Dawson J., 1985, SHOPPING CTR DEV
   Deitrick S., 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P426
   Dennis C., 2002, J RETAIL CONSUM SERV, V9, P185, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00021-2, 10.1016/S0969-6989, DOI 10.1016/S0969-6989]
   Dobson J., 2015, J URBAN REGENERATION, V8, P347
   Duany A., 2010, Suburban nation: the rise of sprawl and the decline of the American Dream
   Edmonton Journal, 1973, EDMONTON J      1124
   FAIRBAIRN KJ, 1991, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V35, P261, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1991.tb01100.x
   Fernandes JR, 2014, CITIES, V36, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.006
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Francis J, 2012, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V32, P401, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.07.002
   Frieden B.J., 1991, Downtown, Inc: How America Rebuilds Cities
   Gibbs RobertJ., 2012, Principles of Urban Retail Planning and Development
   Giddens Anthony., 2009, SOCIOLOGY, V6th
   Giddings B, 2011, URBAN DES INT, V16, P202, DOI 10.1057/udi.2011.6
   Goldstein BruceEvan., 2012, Collaborative Resilience: Moving Through Crisis to Opportunity
   Grant J, 2002, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V68, P71, DOI 10.1080/01944360208977192
   Greenburg K., 2012, Walking home: The life and lessons of a city builder
   Griffen A., 2010, THE OREGONIAN   0518
   Gruen V., 1960, Shopping town USA
   Guy C., 2007, Planning for retail development
   Hagerman C, 2007, CITIES, V24, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2006.12.003
   Hall P.G., 2002, Urban and regional planning
   Harvey David, 1973, SOCIAL JUSTICE CITY, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0047279400001094
   Hodge Gerald, 2013, PLANNING CANADIAN CO
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   HOPKINS JSP, 1990, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V34, P2, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1990.tb01064.x
   Innes J.E., 2004, Planning Theory, V3, P5, DOI 10.1177/1473095204042315
   Innes JE., 2004, Planning Theory Practice, V5, P419, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1464935042000293170, 10.1080/1464935042000293170]
   Jacobs Jane, 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   JOHNSON DB, 1991, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V35, P249, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1991.tb01099.x
   Jones Ken., 2000, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, V7, P233
   Kärrholm M, 2014, CITIES, V36, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.012
   Kirby A, 2008, POLIT GEOGR, V27, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.06.010
   Kotin A, 1997, URBAN STUD, V34, P1971, DOI 10.1080/0042098975178
   Kramer A., 2008, Retail development, ULI development handbook series, V4th
   Kuban Ron., 2005, EDMONTONS URBAN VILL
   Lang RE, 1997, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V8, P1, DOI 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521244
   Lang T, 2012, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V70, P285, DOI 10.1007/s13147-012-0170-2
   Leo C, 1998, J URBAN AFF, V20, P363, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.1998.tb00428.x
   LEO C, 1995, J URBAN AFF, V17, P277, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.1995.tb00348.x
   Levy J.M., 2011, Contemporary urban planning
   Losch A., 1954, The economics of location
   Lowe M, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P449, DOI 10.1080/00420980500035139
   Lu PW, 2013, CITIES, V35, P200, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.001
   Marston S., 2001, TIJDSCHRIFT EC SOCIA, V93, P83
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Masson J. K., 1977, P ANN M W POL SCI AS
   Miles R, 2009, J URBAN AFF, V31, P491, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00457.x
   Moses Robert., 1970, Public Works: A Dangerous Trade
   Murtagh B., 2004, Planning Theory Practice, V5, P453, DOI [10.1080/1464935042000293198, DOI 10.1080/1464935042000293198]
   Oregon Secretary of State, 2013, OR BLUE BOOK METR
   Ostrom E, 2005, UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY, P1
   Parnell M., 1974, Everyperson's guide to neighborhood defense or rape of the block
   Porter ME, 1997, ECON DEV Q, V11, P11, DOI 10.1177/089124249701100102
   Raco M, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P1065, DOI 10.1177/0042098011415716
   Ratner KA, 2013, CITIES, V30, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.08.007
   Richmond HR, 1997, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V8, P53, DOI 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521246
   Robinson F, 2005, LOCAL ECON, V20, P13, DOI 10.1080/0269094042000313584
   Scheffer M, 2001, NATURE, V413, P591, DOI 10.1038/35098000
   Simons P., 2003, EDMONTON J B, pB11
   Smith P. J., 1995, EDMONTON LIFE CITY, P243
   SMITH PJ, 1991, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V35, P295, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1991.tb01104.x
   Smoyer-Tomic KE, 2006, PROF GEOGR, V58, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00570.x
   Song Y, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P239, DOI 10.1177/0160017604273854
   Song Y, 2004, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V70, P210, DOI 10.1080/01944360408976371
   Statistics Canada, 2013, CENSUS PROFILE 2011
   Thomas CJ, 2003, APPL GEOGR, V23, P47, DOI 10.1016/S0143-6228(02)00068-1
   Tims D., 2003, THE OREGONIAN   0830
   Tims D., 2007, THE OREGONIAN   0719, pB05
   Tsou KW, 2013, CITIES, V32, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.003
   Tuan Y.-F., 1979, Landscapes of Fear
   Wheeler S., 2003, LOCAL ENVIRON, V8, P317, DOI 10.1080/13549830306656
   Yin R. K., 2014, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
   Young RF, 2011, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V77, P368, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2011.616996
   Zukin Sharon., 2010, Naked City, DOI 10.17323/1726-3247-2018-1-62-91
NR 107
TC 32
Z9 32
U1 0
U2 43
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD OCT
PY 2016
VL 58
BP 97
EP 106
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.002
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA DZ1NS
UT WOS:000385605700010
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Deal, B
   Pan, HZ
   Pallathucheril, V
   Fulton, G
AF Deal, Brian
   Pan, Haozhi
   Pallathucheril, Varkki
   Fulton, Gale
TI Urban Resilience and Planning Support Systems: The Need for Sentience
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE Sentience; urban resilience; planning support systems; urban dynamics
ID SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SIMULATION; MODELS
AB Developing resilience in built human environments is a complex undertaking. It requires decision support tools that can convey complexities in meaningful and understandable ways. Building smart cities and generating big data, however, is not enough. In order to improve decision-making and ultimately inform resilient communities we need to be able to translate big data at scales and in ways that are useful and approachable. In this paper we argue that creating more resilient communities calls for planning support systems (PSSs) that go beyond the ones we have today. We call for PSSs that possess a greater degree of sentiencethat (a) possess a greater awareness of application context and user needs; (b) are capable of iterative learning; (c) are capable of spatial and temporal reasoning; (d) understand rules; and (e) are accessible and interactive. We consider the questions: How might intelligent or sentient information delivery systems allow for more strategic, context-aware, resilient, and ultimately sustainable communities? What primary design considerations would make such a system possible and useful given that, as of yet, no technology exists that is fully sentient?
C1 [Deal, Brian; Pan, Haozhi; Pallathucheril, Varkki; Fulton, Gale] Univ Illinois, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Room 228 Temple Buell Hall,611 Taft Dr, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.
C3 University of Illinois System; University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
RP Deal, B (corresponding author), Univ Illinois, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Room 228 Temple Buell Hall,611 Taft Dr, Champaign, IL 61820 USA.
EM deal@illinois.edu
RI Pan, Haozhi/A-6408-2017
OI Pallathucheril, Varkki/0000-0002-4577-9906
FU Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr; Office of Advanced
   Cyberinfrastructure (OAC) [1429699] Funding Source: National Science
   Foundation
CR ABDELZAHER T, 2004, 24 INT C DISTR COMP
   Addlesee M, 2001, COMPUTER, V34, P50, DOI 10.1109/2.940013
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Batty M, 2012, EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP, V214, P481, DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
   Batty M., 2013, JOINT AESOP ACSP C D
   Bell M., 2002, 5 PRINCIPLES ORG RES
   Berke PR, 2002, J PLAN LIT, V17, P21, DOI 10.1177/088122017001002
   Berkes F., 2008, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC
   Bostrom A, 2008, RISK GOV SOC, V14, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-71158-2
   Bostrom A., 2002, RISK COMMUNICATION M
   Brail R.K., 2001, PLANNING SUPPORT SYS
   Brail RichardK., 2008, Planning Support Systems for Cities and Regions
   Budthimedhee K, 2002, J PLAN LIT, V17, P227, DOI 10.1177/088541202762475964
   Bulkeley H., 2005, Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and Global Environmental Governance, V4
   Bulkeley H, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P136, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   Cao W, 2003, INT J ADV MANUF TECH, V21, P739, DOI 10.1007/s00170-002-1316-0
   COMFORT LK., 2001, Journal of contingencies and crisis management, V9, P144
   Conati C., 2008, WORK C ADV VIS INT A
   Cox DonnaJ., 1990, ACAD COMPUTING, V4, P20
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   de Roo G., 2007, FUZZY PLANNING ROLE
   Deal B, 2004, ECOL ECON, V51, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.008
   Deal B., 2009, Sustainability, V1, P346
   Deal B., 2010, International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, V16, P353
   Deal B., 2008, PLANNING SUPPORT SYS, P61
   Deal B, 2009, GEOJOURNAL LIB, V95, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8952-7_2
   Ernstson H., 2008, THESIS
   Ervin S., 2011, DIG LANDSC ARCH C DE
   Estrom M., 1984, DIGITAL IMAGE PROCES
   Fiksel J., 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, V2, P14
   Flaxman Michael., 2010, Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture, Anhalt University of Applied Science, V2, P28
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fortner B, 2008, CIVIL ENG, V78, P44, DOI 10.1061/ciegag.0000174
   Fraser EDG, 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V13, P137, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(03)00022-0
   Geertman S., 2003, PLANNING SUPPORT SYS
   Geertman S., 2013, Planning support systems for sustainable urban development
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goodchild M.F., 2010, Cartographic Perspectives, P7, DOI [10.14714/CP66.93, DOI 10.14714/CP66.93]
   Harrison C., 2011, 55 ANN M ISSS 2011 H
   HARTER A, 1999, 5 ANN ACM IEEE INT C
   Henricksen K, 2006, SOFTWARE PRACT EXPER, V36, P1307, DOI 10.1002/spe.760
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, PANARCHY, P3
   Hopper A, 2000, PHILOS T ROY SOC A, V358, P2349, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2000.0652
   Kindberg T., 2000, Proceedings of the 9th wokshop on ACM SIGOPS European workshop: beyond the PC, P195
   Liu JG, 2007, SCIENCE, V317, P1513, DOI 10.1126/science.1144004
   Mahdavi A, 2004, ADVANCED BUILDING SIMULATION, P159
   Mahdavi A., 2001, International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, V9, P35
   MALM W, 1981, ATMOS ENVIRON, V15, P1875, DOI 10.1016/0004-6981(81)90223-7
   Masucci AP, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0069469
   Norberg J., 2008, Complexity theory for a sustainable future
   ONSTAD DW, 1988, ECOL MODEL, V43, P111, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(88)90075-0
   ORLAND B, 1992, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V21, P257, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90035-X
   Paroutis S, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.041
   Portugali J., 2000, SELF ORG CITY
   Power DJ, 2009, SPRINGER HANDBOOK OF AUTOMATION, P1539, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-78831-7_87
   Rozenfield A., 1982, DIGITAL PICTURE PROC
   Saha D, 2003, COMPUTER, V36, P25, DOI 10.1109/MC.2003.1185214
   SCHAEFFER PV, 1987, ENVIRON PLANN A, V19, P1221, DOI 10.1068/a191221
   Schilit B., 1994, 1 WORKSH MOB COMP SY
   Timm SN, 2016, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V19, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.020
   VOORHEES AM, 1959, J AM I PLANNERS, V25, P57, DOI 10.1080/01944365908978304
   Wickens C.D., 1992, ENG PSYCHOL HUMAN PE
   Wilson E., 2010, SPATIAL PLANNING CLI, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203846537
   Wu M., 2004, ECOOP 04 WORKSH COMP
   Zimmerman R, 2001, J URBAN TECHNOL, V8, P97, DOI 10.1080/106307301753430764
NR 68
TC 45
Z9 50
U1 1
U2 58
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1063-0732
EI 1466-1853
J9 J URBAN TECHNOL
JI J. Urban Technol.
PD JAN
PY 2017
VL 24
IS 1
BP 29
EP 45
DI 10.1080/10630732.2017.1285018
PG 17
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA EU7WW
UT WOS:000401247900003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Li, JD
   Strong, C
   Wang, J
   Burian, S
AF Li, Jiada
   Strong, Courtenay
   Wang, Jun
   Burian, Steven
TI An Event-Based Resilience Index to Assess the Impacts of Land
   Imperviousness and Climate Changes on Flooding Risks in Urban Drainage
   Systems
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE urban drainage flooding; impact study; urban infill; SWMM; flood
   resilience
ID URBANIZATION; RUNOFF; MANAGEMENT; CITY; ADAPTATION; HOHHOT; SAFE
AB Assessing the resilience of urban drainage systems requires the consideration of future disturbances that will disrupt the system's performance and trigger urban flooding failures. However, most existing resilience assessments of urban drainage systems rarely consider the uncertain threats from future urban redevelopment and climate change, which leads to the underestimation of future disturbances toward system performance. This paper fills in the gap of assessing the combined and relative impacts of future impervious land cover and rainfall changes on flooding resilience in the context of a densely infilled urban catchment served by an urban drainage system in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. An event-based resilience index is proposed to measure climate change and urbanization impacts on urban floods. Compared with the traditional resilience metric, the event-based resilience index can consider climatic and urbanized impacts on each urban flooding event; the new resilience index assist engineers in harvesting high-resolution infrastructure adaptation strategies at vulnerable spots from the system level to the junction level. Impact comparison for the case study shows that impervious urban surface changes induce greater effects on the system performance curves by magnifying the maximum failure level, lengthening the recovery duration, and aggravating the flooding severity than rainfall intensity changes. A nonlinear logarithmic resilience correlation is found; this finding shows that flooding resilience is more sensitive to the land imperviousness change due to urban redevelopment than rainfall intensity changes in the case study. This research work predicts the system response to the disturbances induced by climate change and urban redevelopment, improving the understanding of impact analysis, and contributes to the advancement of resilient urban drainage systems in changing environments.
C1 [Li, Jiada] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA.
   [Strong, Courtenay] Univ Utah, Dept Atmospher Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA.
   [Wang, Jun] Shandong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Jinan 250061, Peoples R China.
   [Burian, Steven] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
C3 Colorado State University System; Colorado State University Fort
   Collins; Utah System of Higher Education; University of Utah; Shandong
   University; University of Alabama System; University of Alabama
   Tuscaloosa
RP Li, JD (corresponding author), Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA.
EM jiadali2017@gmail.com; court.strong@utah.edu; wangjunwater@sdu.edu.cn;
   sburian@ua.edu
RI Li, Jiada/AAW-9898-2020; Wang, Jun/ABF-4016-2020
OI Wang, Jun/0000-0002-3041-7363; Strong, Courtenay/0000-0001-5866-4377;
   Burian, Steven/0000-0003-0523-4968
FU U.S. Western Water Assessment: a NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric
   Administration) [NA21OAR4310309]; National Natural Science Foundation of
   China [52109025]; Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
   [ZR2021QE001]; Future Plan for Young Talent in Shandong University;
   Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University
FX This research received funding provided by the U.S. Western Water
   Assessment: a NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)
   funded Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessment (RISA) with Grant
   Number of NA21OAR4310309. This work was also supported by the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China (No.52109025), the Natural Science
   Foundation of Shandong Province (No.ZR2021QE001), the Future Plan for
   Young Talent in Shandong University, and the Fundamental Research Funds
   of Shandong University.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Anandhi A, 2011, WATER RESOUR RES, V47, DOI 10.1029/2010WR009104
   [Anonymous], 2007, IPCC TGICA GEN GUIDE
   [Anonymous], USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
   Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P16, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.251
   Blackmore JM, 2008, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V134, P224, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2008)134:3(224)
   Brekke L., 2013, Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate and Hydrology Projections: Release of Downscaled CMIP5 Climate Projections, Comparison with Preceding Information, and Summary of User Needs
   Butler D, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V35, P53, DOI 10.2166/wst.1997.0330
   Butler D, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, P63, DOI 10.1002/gch2.1010
   Cao SL, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15030580
   Casal-Campos A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P9008, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b01193
   Cherry L, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071882
   Choi W, 2009, CLIM RES, V40, P89, DOI 10.3354/cr00826
   Dong X, 2017, WATER RES, V124, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.038
   Du JK, 2012, J HYDROL, V464, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.057
   Dunkerley D, 2008, HYDROL PROCESS, V22, P5024, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7122
   Graham LP, 2007, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V81, P293, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9215-2
   Hamdi R, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P1959, DOI 10.1002/joc.2207
   Hay LE, 2000, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V36, P387, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04276.x
   Hekl JA, 2016, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V2, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000815
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Huong HTL, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P379, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-379-2013
   Hwang H, 2015, J HYDROINFORM, V17, P193, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2014.111
   Juan-García P, 2017, WATER RES, V115, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.047
   Jung IW, 2011, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V15, P617, DOI 10.5194/hess-15-617-2011
   Jung M, 2015, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V71, P653, DOI 10.2166/wst.2014.341
   Kaspersen PS, 2017, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V21, P4131, DOI 10.5194/hess-21-4131-2017
   Kastridis A, 2020, HYDROL PROCESS, V34, P4920, DOI 10.1002/hyp.13913
   Kim Y, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V145, P397, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2090-1
   Kong FH, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V95, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.021
   Leandro J, 2020, WATER RES, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115502
   Lee EH, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000775, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000775]
   Li J., 2023, AUTHOREA, DOI [10.22541/au.167785759.90321760/v1, DOI 10.22541/AU.167785759.90321760/V1]
   Li J., 2023, AUTHOREA, DOI [10.22541/au.167785759.93593964/v1, DOI 10.22541/AU.167785759.93593964/V1]
   Li J., 2023, AUTHOREA, DOI [10.22541/au.167813477.72417257/v1, DOI 10.22541/AU.167813477.72417257/V1]
   Li J., 2023, AUTHOREA, DOI [10.22541/au.167785760.02452517/v1, DOI 10.22541/AU.167785760.02452517/V1]
   Li J., 2023, AUTHOREA, DOI [10.22541/au.167813477.75392188/v1, DOI 10.22541/AU.167813477.75392188/V1]
   Li JD, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130992
   Li JD, 2022, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V8, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000978
   Li JD, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113191
   Li JD, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V732, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138931
   Li JD, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020412
   Li JD, 2019, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V27, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C466
   Li JD, 2019, WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2019: WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER; URBAN WATER RESOURCES; AND MUNICIPAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE, P46
   Madsen H, 2014, J HYDROL, V519, P3634, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.003
   Mohammadiun S, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P281, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1690657
   Mugume S., 2014, 13 INT C URBAN DRAIN, DOI [10.13140/2.1.3291.1047, DOI 10.13140/2.1.3291.1047]
   Mugume S.N., 2015, THESIS U EXETER EXET
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Nelson KC, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01599.x
   NOAA Climate Prediction Center, About us
   Ntelekos AA, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V103, P597, DOI 10.1007/s10584-009-9789-6
   Oberascher M, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13141902
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Panos CL, 2020, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V56, P790, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12867
   Panos CL, 2018, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V4, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000863
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Park Jeryang, 2011, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, V7, P396, DOI 10.1002/ieam.228
   Pond M.C., TEAR DOWNS CONTROLLI
   Putro B, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V548, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.132
   Rossman L., 2015, Storm Water Management Model User's Manual Version 5.1 353
   Salerno F, 2018, WATER RES, V144, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.058
   Semadeni-Davies A, 2008, J HYDROL, V350, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.028
   Smith K, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P6096, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00488.1
   U.S. EPA, EST CHANG IMP AR IA
   Wang S, 2019, WATER RES, V162, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.050
   Wang YT, 2019, WATER RES, V163, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114852
   Wilby RL, 2000, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V27, P1199, DOI 10.1029/1999GL006078
   Xiong LH, 2019, IRRIG DRAIN, V68, P152, DOI 10.1002/ird.2316
   Yao L, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.041
   Yazdi J, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P721, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1835-y
   Zhou QQ, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V658, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.184
   Zhou QQ, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P305, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-305-2018
   Zhou QQ, 2016, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V73, P167, DOI 10.2166/wst.2015.478
NR 75
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 15
U2 59
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 14
AR 2663
DI 10.3390/w15142663
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA N7NU3
UT WOS:001038843200001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rodina, L
   Harris, L
   Ziervogel, G
   Wilson, J
AF Rodina, L.
   Harris, L.
   Ziervogel, G.
   Wilson, J.
TI Resilience counter-currents: Water infrastructures, informality, and
   inequities in Cape Town, South Africa
SO WORLD DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Water resilience; Cape Town; Social justice; Inequality; Informality
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; KHAYELITSHA; POLITICS; CITIES; TRANSFORMATION;
   ANTHROPOCENE; CITIZENSHIP; GOVERNANCE; SERVICES; THINKING
AB In 2017 and 2018, Cape Town faced historically unprecedented water shortages. With the imminent possibility of running out of water, the city 's leadership prioritized reducing water demand and expanding new water sources, while also reinvigorating the goal of seeking to build system -level water resilience for the longer term. Beyond the context of Cape Town, the crisis captured global attention, highlighting ongoing and future water security challenges, the realities of climate change, and the critical need to foster transitions towards more resilient water futures. Given that much of the discourse and implementation around water resilience remains squarely focused on the biophysical and engineering aspects of water supply and distribution systems, despite repeated calls for the need for greater attention to issues of equity and power, there remains little understanding of the ways that persistent inequities might serve or inhibit possibilities for urban socio-hydrological (or water) resilience. This paper draws on examples from Cape Town to argue that patterns and legacies of inequality, marginalization, and exclusion erode and inhibit possibilities for water resilience. Providing needed empirical evidence on the nature of these linkages, we theorize that deeply rooted inequities and related dynamics act as "counter -currents "- - trends that undermine and present persistent challenges to efforts to enhance socio-hydrological resilience. Documenting examples of disconnections between the state and civil society as well as disconnected socioecological systems, we argue that these persistent inequities mean that efforts to achieve socio-hydrological resilience are likely to remain elusive. It is only by foregrounding these processes that it will be possible to make cities more resilient in the face of ongoing and future water -related risks, uncertainties, and climatic and environmental change.
C1 [Rodina, L.; Harris, L.] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Ziervogel, G.] Univ Cape Town, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, Rondebosch, South Africa.
   [Ziervogel, G.] Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, Rondebosch, South Africa.
   [Wilson, J.] Environm Monitoring Grp, Cape Town, South Africa.
C3 University of British Columbia; University of Cape Town; University of
   Cape Town
RP Rodina, L (corresponding author), Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
EM l.rodina@alumni.ubc.ca; lharris@ires.ubc.ca; gina@csag.uct.ac.za
RI Ziervogel, Gina/AAG-2945-2019
OI Ziervogel, Gina/0000-0003-4219-6809
FU Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of
   British Columbia (Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies); University
   of British Columbia (Liu Institute for Global issues)
FX <STRONG> </STRONG>This research was made possible by funding from the
   Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, as well as the
   University of British Columbia (Peter Wall Institute for Advanced
   Studies and Liu Institute for Global issues) . This research benefited
   from valuable feedback from Drs. Kai Chan and Stephanie Chang, the EDGES
   research collaborative, and the Program on Water Governance at the
   University of British Columbia.
CR Ahlers R, 2014, WATER ALTERN, V7, P1
   Alexander P, 2010, REV AFR POLIT ECON, V37, P25, DOI 10.1080/03056241003637870
   Allen A., 2017, Environmental Justice and Urban Resilience in the Global South, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23340460.2020.1797521, 10.1080/23340460.2020.1797521, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-47354-7]
   Armitage N., 2014, Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) for South Africa: Framework and Guidelines (No. TT 588/14), P1
   Arnold CA, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09734-220414
   Atallah D.G., 2019, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818825305, DOI 10.1177/0022167818825305, 10.1177/0022167818825305]
   Bene C., 2012, 405 IDS, V2012, DOI [10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Biermann M, 2016, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V4, P59, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2015.1094170
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Boelens R, 2023, J PEASANT STUD, V50, P1125, DOI 10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Bourblanc M, 2017, WATER ALTERN, V10, P303
   Brewis A, 2019, ECON ANTHROPOL, V6, P208, DOI 10.1002/sea2.12143
   BROOKS G, 1992, SIGPLAN NOTICES, V27, P1, DOI [10.1145/143103.143108, 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.213043]
   Bruce A., 2020, Human dimensions of urban water resilience: Perspectives from Cape Town, V9
   Brunn SD, 2013, HABITAT INT, V39, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.017
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   City of Cape Town, 2012, Trends and Change-10 years: Census 2001-Census 2011, P1
   Cole HD, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102459
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Croese S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020550
   Cutter SL, 2016, GEOGR J, V182, P110, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12174
   Deitz S, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P1092, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2018.1530587
   Dube K, 2022, J OUTDOOR REC TOUR, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.jort.2020.100319
   Dugard J., 2013, Symbols or Substance: The Role and Impact of Socio-Economic Rights Strategies in South Africa, P1
   DWAF, 2007, Summary report: Western Cape Water Supply System: Reconciliation Strategy Study
   Enqvist J., 2021, Water Resilience, P193
   Enqvist J, 2022, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V38, P108, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2020.1841605
   Enqvist JP, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1354
   Ensor J, 2021, WORLD DEV, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105360
   Ernstson H, 2014, REG STUD, V48, P1563, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.892573
   Ernstson H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
   Finn BM, 2023, URBAN STUD, V60, P405, DOI 10.1177/00420980221098946
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Flaminio S., 2022, Progress in Environmental Geography
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Fox A, 2023, LOCAL ENVIRON, V28, P837, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2021.1923000
   Galaz V., 2009, Resilience ScienceFebruary 9
   Galvin M., 2022, Water and Sanitation Woes, Community Despondency, and Empty Democracy in South Africa Environment, Power and Justice: Southern African Histories, P53
   Garcia A, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.762
   Grabowski ZJ, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V96, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.007
   Grove K, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1613, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1715778
   Harris LM, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V38, P290, DOI 10.1177/2399654419859365
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Hellberg S, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P186, DOI 10.1177/2514848619853551
   Hordijk M, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P130, DOI 10.1177/0956247813519044
   Huchzermeyer M, 2004, HABITAT INT, V28, P333, DOI 10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00058-4
   Huchzermeyer M., 2003, Urban Forum, V14, P80, DOI [10.1007/s12132-003-0004-y, DOI 10.1007/S12132-003-0004-Y]
   Jaglin S, 2002, ENVIRON URBAN, V14, P231, DOI 10.1177/095624780201400119
   Jepson Wendy, 2017, Water Security, V1, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.07.001
   Jepson W, 2014, GEOFORUM, V51, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.002
   Jürgens U, 2013, HABITAT INT, V39, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.10.011
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Kaiser G., 2018, Civil Engineering, V2018, P8
   Klassen S, 2020, WORLD DEV, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105104
   Kooy M, 2014, WATER ALTERN, V7, P35
   Krievins K., 2015, Resilience in a watershed governance context: A Primer, P1
   Kroll Florian, 2022, Cities, V131, P104004, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104004
   Latchmore T, 2018, J WATER HEALTH, V16, P893, DOI 10.2166/wh.2018.107
   Lawhon M, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P720, DOI 10.1177/0042098017720149
   Lawhon M, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P1611, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2016.1162288
   Lawhon M, 2013, GEOGR COMPASS, V7, P128, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12027
   Lawhon M, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P497, DOI 10.1111/anti.12051
   Linton J, 2014, GEOFORUM, V57, P170, DOI [10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.003]
   Luker E., 2017, Policy Brief: The Future of Drought Management for Cape Town. Summary for Policy Makers, P1
   Luker E., 2017, Transitioning towards water supply diversification: possibilities for groundwater in Cape Town, South Africa
   Luker E, 2019, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V35, P917, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2018.1509787
   Maciejewski, 2021, Urban ecology in the global south, P347
   Mahlanza L., 2016, Urban Forum, V27, P363
   Matikinca P, 2020, WATER POLICY, V22, P483, DOI 10.2166/wp.2020.169
   Matin N, 2018, WORLD DEV, V109, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020
   McDonald D. A., 2002, Privatizing Cape Town: Service delivery and policy reforms since 1996, P1
   McDonald DA, 2007, QUEENS QUART, V114, P395
   McDonald DavidA., 2008, WORLD CITY SYNDROME
   Mcfarlane C, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P89, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.649951
   Meehan K, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1486
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Millington N, 2021, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V45, P116, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12899
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Molla N, 2021, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V2, DOI 10.1038/s43247-021-00093-y
   Nightingale AJ, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P343, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Orimoloye IR, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02148
   Orthofer A., 2016, Research Project on Employment, Income Distribution and Inclusive Growth, P1
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P708, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.012
   Parnell S, 2016, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V40, P236, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12278
   Patel S, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P13, DOI 10.1177/0956247812438366
   Pauli BJ, 2020, WIRES WATER, V7, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1420
   Peirson AE, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13158598
   Peloso M, 2014, WATER ALTERN, V7, P121
   Pierce J, 2016, ERDE, V147, P284, DOI 10.12854/erde-147-25
   Pieterse E., 2004, URBAN FORUM, V15, P1
   Pieterse E., 2010, COUNTER CURRENTS EXP
   Pieterse E, 2011, SOC DYNAMICS, V37, P5, DOI 10.1080/02533952.2011.569994
   Radonic L, 2021, WATER ALTERN, V14, P60
   Ranganathan M., 2018, The Oxford Handbook of Water Politics and Policy, V310, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199335084.013.23, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199335084.013.23]
   Robards MD, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.004
   Roberts D, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN, V32, P547, DOI 10.1177/0956247820946555
   Rockström J, 2014, ECOHYDROLOGY, V7, P1249, DOI 10.1002/eco.1562
   Rockstrom J., 2014, Building water resilience for human prosperity
   Rodina L, 2019, ECOL SOC, V24, DOI 10.5751/ES-11302-240428
   Rodina L, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1376
   Rodina L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.016
   Rodina L, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1334
   Rodina L, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V26-27, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.001
   Rodina L, 2016, WATER ALTERN, V9, P336
   Rodina L, 2016, GEOFORUM, V72, P58, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.04.003
   Roy A, 2005, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V71, P147, DOI 10.1080/01944360508976689
   Roy A, 2009, PLAN THEOR, V8, P76, DOI 10.1177/1473095208099299
   Satterthwaite D, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.002
   Savelli E, 2021, J HYDROL, V594, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125953
   Schlosberg David., 2007, DEFINING ENV JUSTICE, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199286294.001.0001]
   Shackleton CM., 2021, Urban Ecology in the Global South. Cities and Nature, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-67650-6
   Shah S.H., Environment and Planning F
   Shah Sameer H, 2023, Environ Plan F Philos Theory Models Method Pract, V2, P369, DOI 10.1177/26349825231156900
   Simpson NP, 2019, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V11, P257, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2019.1642203
   Social Justice Coalition, 2014, Our toilets are dirty: Report of the social audit into the janitorial service for communal flush toilets in Khayelitsha
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Sutherland C., 2019, Human Geography, V12, P33, DOI DOI 10.1177/194277861901200103
   Swyngedouw Eric., 2004, Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power
   Tapela B. N., 2012, Social Water Scarcity and Water Use, P1
   Taylor A., 2014, Strengthening Climate Resilience in African Cities: A Framework for Working with Informality. African Centre for Cities
   The Housing Development Agency, 2013, Western Cape: Informal settlements Status (2013), P1
   Thomé L, 2012, ADV MATER SCI ENG, V2012, DOI 10.1155/2012/905474
   Thompson L., 2010, Citizenship and Social Movements: Perspectives from the Global South
   TISSINGTON Kate., 2012, Informal settlement upgrading in South Africa: linkages to livelihood creation, informal sector development and economic opportunity generation, P1
   Tyhotyholo T, 2023, UTIL POLICY, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2023.101573
   Vogel C, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P1561, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1389-4
   von Schnitzler A, 2008, J S AFR STUD, V34, P899, DOI 10.1080/03057070802456821
   Wakefield S, 2022, CULT GEOGR, V29, P389, DOI 10.1177/14744740211029278
   Welch C, 2018, National GeographicMarch, 5,
   Welsh M, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P15, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12012
   Wilson GA, 2018, GEOGR J, V184, P89, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12232
   Wilson J., 2017, The Daily MaverickSept 14,
   Wilson J., 2012, Water demand management's shadow side: Tackling inequality and scarcity of water provision in Cape Town
   Yates JS, 2018, WORLD DEV, V110, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.021
   Ziervogel G., 2019, UNPACKING CAPE TOWN
   Ziervogel G, 2022, CLIM POLICY, V22, P607, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1863180
   Ziervogel G, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P733, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2020.1850629
   Ziervogel G, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P494, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1141-9
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Ziervogel G, 2016, S AFR GEOGR J, V98, P1, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2014.924867
NR 143
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 4
U2 6
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0305-750X
EI 1873-5991
J9 WORLD DEV
JI World Dev.
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 180
AR 106619
DI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106619
EA APR 2024
PG 14
WC Development Studies; Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Business & Economics
GA SD0S4
UT WOS:001232408700001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, JF
   Lv, ZH
   Cao, Y
   Wang, SF
   Zhen, ZL
AF Wang, Jinfang
   Lv, Zhihong
   Cao, Ye
   Wang, Shifeng
   Zhen, Zhilei
TI Spatial-temporal evolution and influencing factors of ecological
   resilience in urban agglomerations: a case study of Shanxi section of
   the Yellow River Basin
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Yellow River Basin; urban ecological resilience; spatiotemporal
   evolution; high quality development; influencing factors
AB Scientific assessment of the development status and factors influencing the urban ecological resilience of the Yellow River Basin (YRB) is highly significant for promoting its development. This study constructed an evaluation index system for urban ecological resilience considering the four dimensions of pressure, state, response, and innovation. The spatiotemporal ecological resilience of the urban agglomeration (UA) in the Shanxi section of the YRB from 2012 to 2021 was studied using kernel density estimation, Dagum Gini coefficient, and standard deviation ellipse, and the influencing factors of urban ecological resilience were analyzed using a geographic detector. This research revealed that (1) the ecological resilience of cities in the Shanxi section of the YRB experienced a fluctuation process of rise-fall-rise. The urban ecological resilience generally reflected a gradient decreasing spatial pattern of Central Shanxi UA > South Shanxi UA > North Shanxi UA, and gradually changed from the dual core of "Taiyuan-Jincheng City" to the single core of Taiyuan City. (2) The migration trajectory of urban ecological resilience center of gravity fluctuated in the direction of "northwest-southeast," and moved 12.63 km to the southeast overall. (3) The water supply per ten thousand Yuan GDP, occupied area of construction land per ten thousand Yuan GDP, green coverage rate in built-up areas, ratio of research and experimental development funds (R&D) to GDP, proportion of science and technology expenditure in local fiscal expenditure, and patent licensing quantity index have a high influence on urban ecological toughness at all stages. This influence was further strengthened by the interaction between factors. This study provides an important scientific basis for shaping high-quality development advantages in the YRB and creating a resilient and livable environment.
C1 [Wang, Jinfang; Cao, Ye; Zhen, Zhilei] Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Taigu, Peoples R China.
   [Lv, Zhihong] Jinzhong Coll Informat, Sch Arts Commun, Taigu, Shanxi, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Shifeng] Shanxi Hongyida Construct Technol Co Ltd, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi, Peoples R China.
C3 Shanxi Agricultural University
RP Zhen, ZL (corresponding author), Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Taigu, Peoples R China.
EM zhencheng@sxau.edu.cn
FU Planning Subject of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Shanxi Province
   [2023YY069]; Research Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences at
   Shanxi Universities [2023W048]
FX The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the
   research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research
   was funded by the Planning Subject of Philosophy and Social Sciences in
   Shanxi Province (No.2023YY069) and the Research Project of Philosophy
   and Social Sciences at Shanxi Universities (No. 2023W048).
CR Al-Housani MI, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15097537
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Bottero M, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9080242
   Chen HZ, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V348, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131377
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Fan Z. Y., 2023, Research on evolution of spatial-temporal patterns and influencing factors of urban resilience in Chinas loess plateau, DOI [10.27204/d.cnki.glzhu.2023.000579, DOI 10.27204/D.CNKI.GLZHU.2023.000579]
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Huang J, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110763
   Jia HH, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109745
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Li GZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110667
   Liao ZJ, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-33342-5
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mohamed BH, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132413750
   Qiao Q, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15061523
   Scheffer M, 2015, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V46, P145, DOI 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054242
   Shi CC, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11060921
   Song Y., 2017, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. XLII2/W7, P129, DOI [10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W7-129-2017, DOI 10.5194/ISPRS-ARCHIVES-XLII-2-W7-129-2017]
   Taelman SE, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10072184
   Tong YJ, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15064828
   Wang JF, 2010, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V24, P107, DOI 10.1080/13658810802443457
   [王劲峰 Wang Jinfeng], 2017, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V72, P116
   Wang MX, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.328
   [王松茂 Wang Songmao], 2024, [干旱区地理, Arid Land Geography], V47, P93
   Wang YY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109859
   Wu JG, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018
   Yang M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710585
   YUILL RS, 1971, GEOGR ANAL, VB 53, P28, DOI 10.2307/490885
   Zambom AZ., 2013, Int Econom Rev, V5, P20
   Zhang LY, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11010122
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zhou Y, 2022, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V31, P2381, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/144098
NR 33
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 41
U2 109
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD MAR 21
PY 2024
VL 12
AR 1385604
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1385604
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MU9J5
UT WOS:001196263900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Childers, DL
   Cadenasso, ML
   Grove, JM
   Marshall, V
   McGrath, B
   Pickett, STA
AF Childers, Daniel L.
   Cadenasso, Mary L.
   Grove, J. Morgan
   Marshall, Victoria
   McGrath, Brian
   Pickett, Steward T. A.
TI An Ecology for Cities: A Transformational Nexus of Design and
   Ecology to Advance Climate Change Resilience and Urban Sustainability
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
ID ORGANIZATIONAL-STRUCTURE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GOVERNANCE; STEWARDSHIP;
   PROGRAM; SCIENCE; TREES; LAND
AB Cities around the world are facing an ever-increasing variety of challenges that seem to make more sustainable urban futures elusive. Many of these challenges are being driven by, and exacerbated by, increases in urban populations and climate change. Novel solutions are needed today if our cities are to have any hope of more sustainable and resilient futures. Because most of the environmental impacts of any project are manifest at the point of design, we posit that this is where a real difference in urban development can be made. To this end, we present a transformative model that merges urban design and ecology into an inclusive, creative, knowledge-to-action process. This design-ecology nexus-an ecology for cities-will redefine both the process and its products. In this paper we: (1) summarize the relationships among design, infrastructure, and urban development, emphasizing the importance of joining the three to achieve urban climate resilience and enhance sustainability; (2) discuss how urban ecology can move from an ecology of cities to an ecology for cities based on a knowledge-to-action agenda; (3) detail our model for a transformational urban design-ecology nexus, and; (4) demonstrate the efficacy of our model with several case studies.
C1 [Childers, Daniel L.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Cadenasso, Mary L.] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
   [Grove, J. Morgan] US Forest Serv, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
   [Marshall, Victoria; McGrath, Brian] Parsons New Sch Design, New York, NY 10011 USA.
   [Pickett, Steward T. A.] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; University of
   California System; University of California Davis; United States
   Department of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service; Cary
   Institute of Ecosystem Studies
RP Childers, DL (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
EM dan.childers@asu.edu; mlcadenasso@ucdavis.edu; jmgrove@gmail.com;
   marshalv@newschool.edu; mcgrath@newschool.edu;
   picketts@caryinstitute.org
OI Cadenasso, Mary/0000-0002-6521-067X; Grove, J.
   Morgan/0000-0002-7803-074X; Childers, Daniel/0000-0003-3904-0803;
   Pickett, Steward/0000-0002-1899-976X
FU U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1140070]; NSF [1026865, 1027188,
   0844778]; Division Of Environmental Biology; Direct For Biological
   Sciences [1026865] Funding Source: National Science Foundation; Division
   Of Environmental Biology; Direct For Biological Sciences [1140070,
   1140077, 1027188, 0844778] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX The authors of this paper are members of the Urban Sustainability
   Research Coordination Network that is supported by the U.S. National
   Science Foundation (NSF) through Grant No. 1140070. Additional support
   has been provided by the NSF to DLC through the CAP LTER Program (Grant
   No. 1026865), to MLC, JMG, BM, and STAP through the BES LTER Program
   (Grant No. 1027188), and to MLC through Grant No. 0844778.
CR Adaman F, 2012, DEV CHANGE, V43, P395, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01760.x
   Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   Agyeman J, 2003, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V590, P35, DOI 10.1177/0002716203256565
   Agyeman J., 2005, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNIT
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Anderies JM, 2013, POLICY STUD J, V41, P513, DOI 10.1111/psj.12027
   ANDERSON LM, 1988, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V15, P153, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90023-0
   Andrews KT, 2005, MOBILIZATION, V10, P213
   [Anonymous], 2012, World Urbanization Prospects, P50
   [Anonymous], 2006, BUBBLE DESIGNING COM
   Bargmann J., 2013, Resilience in ecology and urban design: Linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, V3, P347
   BEATLEY T, 2000, GREEN URBANISM LEARN, P491
   Boone C., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P47, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_3
   Boone CG, 2014, STRUNGMANN FORUM REP, P313
   Boyden S., 1981, ECOLOGY CITY ITS PEO
   Bulkeley H., 2003, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203219256
   Childers DL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   City of Phoenix, TREE SHAD MAST PLAN
   City of Seattle, CIT SEATTL COMPR PLA
   Daily GC, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P21, DOI 10.1890/080025
   Desimini J., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P307
   DICASTRI F, 1981, AMBIO, V10, P52
   Ellin N., 2013, Resilience in ecology and urban design: Linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, P63
   Ernstson H, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Falxa-Raymond N, 2013, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V12, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.003
   Felson A., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design, V3, P365, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9
   Felson AJ, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P549, DOI 10.2307/3868611
   Felson AJ, 2013, BIOSCIENCE, V63, P882, DOI 10.1525/bio.2013.63.11.7
   Felson AJ, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P362, DOI 10.1890/130061
   Fiksel J., 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, V2, P14
   Fisher D F., 2014, Sociological Methods. Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, P179, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203814550.CH15
   Fisher DR, 2012, ENVIRON POLIT, V21, P26, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.643367
   Forman R.T. T., 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge
   Gibson Robert B., 2006, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, V8, P259, DOI 10.1142/S1464333206002517
   Glover TD, 2005, LEISURE SCI, V27, P75, DOI 10.1080/01490400590886060
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Grove J.M., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P355
   Hager GW, 2013, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V11, P28, DOI 10.1890/120069
   Hardt Michael., 2011, COMMONWEALTH
   HOLLING CS, 1992, ECOL MONOGR, V62, P447, DOI 10.2307/2937313
   Huang GL, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P1753, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.006
   Hunt DVL, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P2993, DOI 10.3390/su6052993
   Jordan A, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN C, V26, P17, DOI 10.1068/cav6
   Kempton W, 2001, RURAL SOCIOL, V66, P557, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00084.x
   Larson EK., 2013, Resilience in ecology and urban design: Linking theory and practice for sustainable cities, P183, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_9
   LAWTON JH, 1995, LINKING SPECIES & ECOSYSTEMS, P141
   Leach Melissa, 2010, Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social
   Lemos MC, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004
   Lord C L., 2010, Environmental Law, V40, P551
   Loucks O.L., 1994, The Ecological City: Preserving and Restoring Urban Biodiversity, P49
   Marshall V., 2014, J ENV DES PLAN, V10, P113
   McGrath B., 2012, Urban design ecologies
   [McGrath B. Columbia University Urban Design Program Columbia University Urban Design Program], 2007, Designing patch dynamics
   McHarg I., 1992, DESIGN NATURE
   Melosi M.V., 2000, The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present, P600
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Miss M., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   Mitsch W.J., 2000, WETLANDS
   Morales D.J., 1980, J ARBORICULT, V6, P305, DOI DOI 10.48044/JAUF.1980.074
   Mostafavi Moshen., 2010, Ecological Urbanism
   Mouffe Chantal., 2008, Open. Cahier on Art and the Public Domain, V14, P6
   Newman P., 2008, CITIES SUSTAINABLE E
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   North A., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   Novotny V, 2013, BUILD RES INF, V41, P589, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.804764
   Papaneck Victor, 2005, Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, VSecond
   Peters K, 2010, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V9, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Pickett S.T.A., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design: Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, P499
   Pickett STA., 1997, Urban Ecosystems, V1, P185, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1018531712889
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Pickett STA, 2011, URBAN ECOSYST, V14, P319, DOI 10.1007/s11252-011-0166-7
   Pickett Stewart., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U
   Rhodes RAW, 1996, POLIT STUD-LONDON, V44, P652, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Robinson J.B., 2006, Science Public Policy, V33, P151, DOI DOI 10.3152/147154306781779064
   Rozzi R., 2014, Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: Values, philosophy, and action
   Schellnhuber HJ, 2005, ENVIRONMENT, V47, P10, DOI 10.3200/ENVT.47.8.10-25
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7687, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1117622109
   Shane D.G, 2011, URBAN DESIGN SINCE 1
   Shannon Kelly., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design [electronic resource]: Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, P163, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_8
   Sirianni C., 2001, CIVIC INNOVATION AM
   Spirn AnneWhiston., 1984, GRANITE GARDEN URBAN
   Spirn AnneWhiston., Ecological Urbanism: A Framework For The Design Of Resilient Cities
   Steiner F, 2014, LAND-BASEL, V3, P342, DOI 10.3390/land3010342
   Stoker G, 1998, INT SOC SCI J, V50, P17, DOI 10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Svendsen E., 2013, Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design: Linking Theory and Practice for Sustainable Cities, Future City 3, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9, 10.1007/978-94-007- 5341-9_13, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5341-9_13]
   Svendsen E.S., 2009, US FOR SERV GEN TECH, P58
   Svendsen Erika., 2005, The Urban Ecology Collaborative assessment
   Sze J., 2013, RESILIENCE ECOLOGY U, P289
   Tanner CJ, 2014, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V12, P574, DOI 10.1890/140019
   Tingstad AH, 2014, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V140, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000403
   Vale L.J., 2005, RESILIENT CITY MODER, P376
   Waldheim C., 2006, LANSCAPE URBANISM
   Weber EP, 2000, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V13, P237, DOI 10.1080/089419200279081
   Wolf KL, 2005, J FOREST, V103, P396
   Wu J, 2013, RESIL ECOL URBAN LIN, V3, P211
NR 96
TC 165
Z9 201
U1 7
U2 178
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2015
VL 7
IS 4
BP 3774
EP 3791
DI 10.3390/su7043774
PG 18
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA CH0MV
UT WOS:000353715400014
OA Green Submitted, Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, Y
   Han, JC
   Li, J
   Zhou, Y
   Wang, KY
   Huang, YF
AF Zhou, Yang
   Han, Jingcheng
   Li, Jie
   Zhou, Ya
   Wang, Keyi
   Huang, Yuefei
TI Building resilient cities with stringent pollution controls: A case
   study of robust planning of Shenzhen City's urban agriculture system
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient cities; Urban agriculture planning; Pollution control; Robust
   optimization; Decision-making under uncertainty; Shenzhen city
ID EVOLUTIONARY RESILIENCE; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; EMISSIONS;
   UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; DEMAND
AB Building sustainable and resilient cities has become one of the most pressing development challenges facing the world today. Ever-increasing environmental pressures - from emission reduction to pollution prevention - underline the need to balance economic progress with the concern for the environment. Finding new ways of facilitating economic growth within environmental constraints is central to urban sustainable development. In this study, we develop a robust-optimization-based urban agriculture planning (ROB-UAP) model to help decision makers make decisions that are both economically viable and environmentally sustainable. The model enables consideration of more stringent pollution controls in response to the inherent uncertainty in the complex system. Shenzhen City, as the economic engine of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area, also faces challenges of urban sustainability transitions. The proposed model is applied to the planning problem of Shenzhen City's urban agriculture system to support environment-oriented agricultural restructuring. We produce six risk-based scenarios to help evaluate the trade-offs between economic returns and environmental impacts. The results show that under expected economic conditions the overall output of the system could be increased by at least 8%, indicating that agricultural restructuring could indeed contribute to the economic growth of the city. In addition, the total amount of the major pollutants could be more or less reduced in the riskaverse and risk-tolerant scenarios; thereby delivering robust decision-making is essential for enabling environmentally low-impact outcomes in planning practices.
C1 [Zhou, Yang; Han, Jingcheng; Wang, Keyi] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Chem & Environm Engn, Water Sci & Environm Engn Res Ctr, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Yang; Huang, Yuefei] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Jie] Pearl River Hydraul Res Inst, Dept Resources & Environm, Guangzhou 510610, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Ya] Guangdong Univ Technol, Inst Environm & Ecol Engn, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
C3 Shenzhen University; Tsinghua University; Guangdong University of
   Technology
RP Zhou, Y (corresponding author), Shenzhen Univ, Coll Chem & Environm Engn, Water Sci & Environm Engn Res Ctr, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.; Huang, YF (corresponding author), Tsinghua Univ, Dept Hydraul Engn, State Key Lab Hydrosci & Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
EM philipszhou@msn.com; yuefeihuang@tsinghua.edu.cn
RI Li, Jie/GNP-6986-2022; Han, Jing-Cheng/E-8433-2010; Zhou,
   Ya/GLV-3914-2022; Zhou, Yang/U-5398-2017
OI Zhou, Yang/0000-0002-8349-5090; Zhou, Ya/0000-0002-1960-8900; Han,
   Jing-Cheng/0000-0002-3918-9854
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809007]; Open Research
   Fund Program of State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering
   [sklhse-2021-A02]; Key-Area Research and Development Program of
   Guangdong Province [2019B110205005]; Fundamental Research Funds for the
   Shenzhen University [2110822]
FX The authors are grateful to the seven anonymous reviewers for their
   constructive comments that have improved the overall presentation of
   this paper. This work was funded by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (51809007), the Open Research Fund Program of State
   Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering (sklhse-2021-A02), the
   Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province
   (2019B110205005) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Shenzhen
   University (2110822).
CR Alonso-Ayuso A, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V267, P1051, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.12.022
   [Anonymous], 2018, WORLD URBANIZATION P
   Bakhtiari PH, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101922
   BEA (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis), 2019, LOC AR GROSS DOM PRO
   Bertsimas D, 2004, OPER RES, V52, P35, DOI 10.1287/opre.1030.0065
   Bertsimas D., 2019, INFORMS J. Optim, V1, P2, DOI [DOI 10.1287/IJOO.2018.0001, 10.1287/ijoo.2018.0001]
   Chen JP, 2018, APPL ENERG, V229, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.140
   Chen XJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V24, P24243, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-0027-x
   Cortinovis C, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100946
   CPG (Chiba Prefectural Government), 2020, ANN REP CHIB PREF AC
   Cullingworth B, 2015, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING IN THE UK, 15TH EDITION, P1
   Danilina V, 2020, J ENVIRON INFORM, V36, P1, DOI 10.3808/jei.201900410
   Davoudi S, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V120, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.011
   Davoudi S, 2016, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V12, P711, DOI 10.1002/ieam.1823
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dieleman H, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS156, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.082
   Dijst M, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V132, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.014
   Fischer J, 2009, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V24, P549, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.020
   Golpîra H, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.151
   Gorissen BL, 2015, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V53, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2014.12.006
   Han J.C, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V169
   Hanks RW, 2020, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2018.10.013
   Jackson PL, 2019, MANAGE SCI, V65, P794, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2969
   Karan E, 2016, ENERGY, V106, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.076
   Knoke T, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.021
   KPG (Kanagawa Prefectural Government), 2020, ANN REP KAN PREF ACC
   La Rosa D, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V41, P290, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.014
   Li B, 1995, WATER-SUI, V11
   Li B, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123441
   Li Z, 2013, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V73, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.008
   Liu LR, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V200, P922, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.298
   Martin DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109380
   Minciardi R, 2008, WASTE MANAGE, V28, P2202, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.003
   Moret S, 2020, EUR J OPER RES, V280, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.06.015
   Ning C, 2019, APPL ENERG, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113857
   Pan LM, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P409, DOI 10.1002/2014WR015380
   Perelman L, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P6795, DOI 10.1002/wrcr.20539
   SBGP (Statistics Bureau of Guangdong Province), 2019, GUANGD STAT YB 2019
   Sepehri A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164
   Sepehri A, 2018, CHEM ENG PROCESS, V128, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.cep.2018.04.006
   Shi YR, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V301, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126917
   Shrestha NK, 2020, J ENVIRON INFORM, V35, P56, DOI 10.3808/jei.201900407
   Spataru A, 2020, J RURAL STUD, V74, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.009
   SPG (Saitama Prefectural Government), 2020, ANN REP SAIT PREF AC
   Sreekanth J, 2016, J HYDROL, V533, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.001
   Thomsen M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103742
   TMG (Tokyo Metropolitan Government), 2019, ANN REPORT TOKYO MET
   von Schneidemesser E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V688, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.309
   Wang KY, 2020, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/feart.2020.00086
   Wang S, 2015, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000492
   Xin XY, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P2295, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b05533
   Xin XY, 2016, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V142, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000951
   Xu XL, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117731
   Yang J, 2016, APPL ENERG, V177, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.126
   Zhou Y, 2018, APPL ENERG, V228, P1683, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.038
   Zhou Y, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010033
   Zhou Y, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P1855, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1093924
   Zhou Y, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V124, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.081
NR 59
TC 13
Z9 14
U1 9
U2 82
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD AUG 15
PY 2021
VL 311
AR 127452
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127452
EA MAY 2021
PG 13
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA TB7DE
UT WOS:000668103800007
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Del Pozo, PB
   Lopez-Gonzalez, A
AF Benito Del Pozo, Paz
   Lopez-Gonzalez, Alejandro
TI URBAN RESILIENCE AND THE ALTERNATIVE ECONOMY: A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
   APPLIED TO NORTHERN SPAIN*
SO GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; alternative economic practices; sustainability; Leon;
   northern Spain
ID DIVERSE ECONOMIES; GEOGRAPHIES
AB In urban contexts of prolonged economic crisis, there emerge new forms of economies that express a different way for producers and consumers to have an active presence in the market and be agents in the city's economy. The initiative is taken above all by the most vulnerable groups, which seek creative unconventional responses to their situation, with or without the intervention of public authorities. This reaction is interpreted in this study as urban resilience, and it is linked to the concept of sustainability and a series of alternative economic practices that should be analyzed via a specific methodology that allows us to understand their nature and scope. As a result, our research question is twofold. First, can operative criteria be established to identify and typify these new forms of urban economy? And, related to the previous question, what influence does the phenomenon have on medium-sized cities? We define medium-sized cities as cities that have a population of between 50,000 and 250,000 people as well as activities and functions that position the city dynamically within the surrounding urban system (Andres Lopez 2008). To these ends, this investigation spans three phases: a theoretical-conceptual review; definition of criteria and classification of alternative or resilient economic practices; and a case study focused on the city of Leon in northern Spain, for the purpose of understanding the phenomenon and its relative scope.
C1 [Benito Del Pozo, Paz; Lopez-Gonzalez, Alejandro] Univ Leon, Fac Filosofia & Letras, Dept Geog & Geol, Human Geog, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.
   [Benito Del Pozo, Paz] Univ Leon, Assoc Spanish Geographers, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.
   [Benito Del Pozo, Paz] Univ Leon, Royal Geog Soc, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.
   [Lopez-Gonzalez, Alejandro] Assoc Spanish Geographers, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.
C3 Universidad de Leon; Universidad de Leon; Universidad de Leon
RP Del Pozo, PB (corresponding author), Univ Leon, Fac Filosofia & Letras, Dept Geog & Geol, Human Geog, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.; Del Pozo, PB (corresponding author), Univ Leon, Assoc Spanish Geographers, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.; Del Pozo, PB (corresponding author), Univ Leon, Royal Geog Soc, Campus Vegazana S-N, Leon 24071, Spain.
EM paz.benito@unileon.es; alejandro.lopez@unileon.es
RI López-González, Alejandro/L-4870-2014
CR Albertos J.M., 2014, Geografia de la crisis economica en Espana
   ALVAREZ CANTALAPIEDRA S., 2012, Revista de Economia Critica, P277
   [Anonymous], 2012, Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales
   [Anonymous], 2014, DIMENSION EC DESARRO
   Becona E., 2006, REV PSICOPATOLOG A P, V11, P125, DOI [DOI 10.5944/RPPC.VOL.11.NUM.3.2006.4024, 10.5944/rppc.vol.11.num.3.2006.4024]
   del Pozo PB, 2017, SCRIPTA NOVA, V21, P1
   Bioteau E., 2014, ANN GEOGRAPHIE, V697, P890
   Borja J., 1997, Local y Global. La Gestion de las Ciudades en la Era de la Informacion
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brugmann J, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247812437130
   Capel H, 2016, FINISTERRA, V51, P25, DOI 10.18055/Finis8876
   Climent E., 2017, NATURALEZA TERRITORI, P988
   Conill J., 2012, Otra vida es posible: Praticas economicas alternativas durante la crisis
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Cueto B., 2017, CRISIS EC RESILIENCI
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Etxezarreta M., 2014, OTRA EC MARCHA, P11
   Felber C., 2014, OTRA EC MARCHA, P20
   Fuller D., 2003, Alternative Economic Spaces, P55
   Gaspar J, 2016, FINISTERRA, V51, P5, DOI 10.18055/Finis8875
   Gendron C., 2004, CAHIERS ARUC ES, V17, P1
   Gibson-Graham JK, 2008, PROG HUM GEOG, V32, P613, DOI 10.1177/0309132508090821
   Gibson-Graham J.K., 2010, Handbook of Local and Regional Development, P226
   Gil alvarez E., 2017, LURRALDE INVESTIGACI, V40, P15
   Gonzalez Reverte F., 2002, REV ELECT GEOGRAFIA, VVI
   González-Rodríguez AM, 2017, ALPINE BOT, V127, P97, DOI 10.1007/s00035-017-0189-7
   Gritzas G, 2016, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V23, P917, DOI 10.1177/0969776415573778
   Hall P. A., 2013, Social Resilience in the Neoliberal Era
   Healy S., 2008, ALTERNATIVE EC MANUS
   Jonas A.E.G., 2010, INTERROGATING ALTERI, P3
   Jones A, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P605, DOI 10.1177/0309132513502151
   Jones A, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P366, DOI 10.1177/0309132510375585
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   López GA, 2008, SCRIPTA NOVA, V12
   Maguire B, 2007, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V22, P16
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mendez R., 2017, CUAD GEOGR, V56, P193
   Mendez R, 2015, BIBLIO 3W-BARC, V20
   OMS, 2016, CONS SHANGH CIUD SAL
   PASCUAL H, 2018, RECERCA REV PENSAMEN, V23, P193, DOI DOI 10.6035/RECERCA.2018.23.9
   Romero P, 2016, SCI TRANSL MED, V8, DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf0685
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Rueda S., 2012, El Libro Verde de Sostenibilidad Urbana y Local en la Era de la Informacion realizado en el marco del Convenio de colaboracion entre el
   Hernández JLS, 2017, ERIA, V37, P67
   SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ J. L., 2019, ESPACIOS PRACTICAS E
   Sanchez-Hernandez J. L., 2009, B ASOC GEOGR ESP, V49, P185
   Solana Miguel, 2016, ESPACIOS GLOBALES LU
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   ubeda J., 2015, HUERTOS URBANOS PERI
   VALENZUELA H, 2013, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V59, P523
   WHO, 2016, SHANGH CONS HLTH CIT
   World Urban Forum, 2014, WORLD URBAN FORUM 7
NR 52
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 2
U2 21
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
PI PHILADELPHIA
PA 530 WALNUT STREET, STE 850, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 USA
SN 0016-7428
EI 1931-0846
J9 GEOGR REV
JI Geogr. Rev.
PD JUL 2
PY 2020
VL 110
IS 3
BP 322
EP 340
DI 10.1080/00167428.2019.1684195
PG 19
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA ME3NJ
UT WOS:000544565500004
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU McClymont, K
   Cunha, DGF
   Maidment, C
   Ashagre, B
   Vasconcelos, AF
   de Macedo, MB
   dos Santos, MFN
   Gomes, MN
   Mendiondo, EM
   Barbassa, AP
   Rajendran, L
   Imani, M
AF McClymont, Kent
   Fernandes Cunha, Davi Gasparini
   Maidment, Chris
   Ashagre, Biniam
   Vasconcelos, Anai Floriano
   de Macedo, Marina Batalini
   Nobrega dos Santos, Maria Fernanda
   Gomes Junior, Marcus Nobrega
   Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario
   Barbassa, Ademir Paceli
   Rajendran, Lakshmi
   Imani, Maryam
TI Towards urban resilience through Sustainable Drainage Systems: A
   multi-objective optimisation problem
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Green infrastructure; Multi-objective optimisation; Resilience;
   Sustainable drainage systems; Urban planning; Quality of life
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; MANAGEMENT; AREA; DEGRADATION; FRAMEWORK; RAINFALL;
   POVERTY; IMPACT; CITY
AB The necessity of incorporating a resilience-informed approach into urban planning and its decision-making is felt now more than any time previously, particularly in low and middle income countries. In order to achieve a successful transition to sustainable, resilient and cost-effective cities, there is a growing attention given to more effective integration of nature-based solutions, such as Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS), with other urban components. The experience of SuDS integration with urban planning, in developed cities, has proven to be an effective strategy with a wide range of advantages and lower costs. The effective design and implementation of SuDS requires a multi-objective approach by which all four pillars of SuDS design (i.e., water quality, water quantity, amenity and biodiversity) are considered in connection to other urban, social, and economic aspects and constraints. This study develops a resilience-driven multi-objective optimisation model aiming to provide a Pareto-front of optimised solutions for effective incorporation of SuDS into (peri)urban planning, applied to a case study in Brazil. This model adopts the SuDS's two pillars of water quality and water quantity as the optimisation objectives with its level of spatial distribution as decision variables. Also, an improved quality of life index (iQoL) is developed to re-evaluate the optimal engineering solutions to encompass the amenity and biodiversity pillars of SuDS. Rain barrels, green roofs, bio-retention tanks, vegetation grass swales and permeable pavements are the suitable SuDS options identified in this study. The findings show that the most resilient solutions are costly but this does not guarantee higher iQoL values. Bio-retention tanks and grass swales play effective roles in promotion of water quality resilience but this comes with considerable increase in costs. Permeable pavements and green roofs are effective strategies when flood resilience is a priority. Rain barrel is a preferred solution due to the dominance of residential areas in the study area and the lower cost of this option.
C1 [McClymont, Kent; Ashagre, Biniam; Rajendran, Lakshmi; Imani, Maryam] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, Essex, England.
   [Maidment, Chris] Univ Reading, Real Estate & Planning, Reading RG6 6UD, Berks, England.
   [Vasconcelos, Anai Floriano] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Nat Sci Ctr, BR-18290000 Sao Paulo, Brazil.
   [Fernandes Cunha, Davi Gasparini; de Macedo, Marina Batalini; Gomes Junior, Marcus Nobrega; Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, BR-13560590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
   [Barbassa, Ademir Paceli] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Ctr Exact Sci & Technol, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
   [Nobrega dos Santos, Maria Fernanda] Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Architecture Arts & Commun, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP, Brazil.
C3 Anglia Ruskin University; University of Reading; Universidade Federal de
   Sao Carlos; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Universidade Federal de Sao
   Carlos; Universidade Estadual Paulista
RP Imani, M (corresponding author), Anglia Ruskin Univ, Sch Engn & Built Environm, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, Essex, England.
EM maryam.imani@aru.ac.uk
RI Rajendran, Lakshmi/AAT-2757-2021; Imani, Maryam/T-1187-2019;
   Vasconcelos, Anaí/AAB-7684-2019; Maidment, Christopher/KIB-7453-2024;
   Mendiondo, Eduardo Mario/C-7317-2012; Gasparini Fernandes Cunha,
   Davi/AAW-3867-2020; N. Gomes Jr., Marcus/K-8738-2018; Ashagre,
   Biniam/F-9065-2019
OI Maidment, Christopher/0000-0002-9158-6910; Mendiondo, Eduardo
   Mario/0000-0003-2319-2773; Imani, Maryam/0000-0003-3059-7648; Nobrega
   dos Santos, Maria Fernanda/0000-0002-7879-2349; Gasparini Fernandes
   Cunha, Davi/0000-0003-1876-3623; N. Gomes Jr.,
   Marcus/0000-0002-8250-8195; Rajendran, Lakshmi/0000-0002-4974-4663;
   Ashagre, Biniam/0000-0002-7063-6755
FU Research England through the Quality Related - Global Challenges
   Research Funding at Anglia Ruskin University [RE522]; CNPq (Conselho
   Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) [300899/2016-5]
FX This research project has been funded and supported by Research England
   through the Quality Related - Global Challenges Research Funding at
   Anglia Ruskin University (Code: RE522). The team sincerely appreciates
   the project advisors, Andrew Leadbetter from Peterborough City Council
   in the UK, Dr Marta Lamparelli from Sao Paulo State's Environment Agency
   (CETESB), Pedro Caballero from Sao Carlos Civil Defence office, Prof
   Renata Bovo Peres from Federal University of Sao Carlos, Prof Renato
   Luiz Sobral Anelli from University of Sao Paulo for their continuous and
   in-kind support throughout the project. DGF Cunha thanks CNPq (Conselho
   Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) for the research
   productivity grant (Process Number 300899/2016-5).
CR Aguilar-Barajas I, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.021
   [Anonymous], 2007, The SUDS Manual
   [Anonymous], 2016, RIORESILIENT RESILIE
   [Anonymous], 2003, CHALL SLUMGLOB REP
   [Anonymous], 2015, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
   Arnold DV, 2002, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V6, P30, DOI [10.1109/4235.985690, 10.1023/A:1015059928466]
   Astaraie-Imani M, 2013, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V4, P232, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2013.078
   Bevacqua E, 2019, SCI ADV, V5, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aaw5531
   Capps KA, 2016, FRESHW SCI, V35, P429, DOI 10.1086/684945
   Casal-Campos A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P9008, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b01193
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   CIRIA, 2015, 993 CIRIA RP
   de Abreu RC, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P8407, DOI 10.1029/2019GL083003
   de Koning K, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101981
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dias Pons NA, 2007, ENVIRON GEOL, V53, P727, DOI 10.1007/s00254-007-0685-y
   Fava MC, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12498
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Fu GT, 2008, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V23, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.06.003
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Hallegatte S, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P250, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3253
   HUFF FA, 1967, WATER RESOUR RES, V3, P1007, DOI 10.1029/WR003i004p01007
   IPCC C.o., 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jia HF, 2013, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V185, P7915, DOI 10.1007/s10661-013-3144-0
   Jongman B, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04396-1
   Keating K., 2015, SC080039R9 ENV AG
   Lamond JE, 2015, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V168, P101, DOI 10.1680/udap.13.00022
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lim HS, 2016, J HYDROL, V538, P842, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.063
   Mendelsohn R, 2012, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V2, P205, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE1357
   Mendes RM, 2018, GEOTECH GEOL ENG, V36, P599, DOI 10.1007/s10706-017-0303-z
   Mugume SN, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P727, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2016.1253754
   Municipality of Sao Paulo, 2012, MAN DREN MAN DEAG PL, V2012
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Qin HP, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V129, P577, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026
   Sanchez-Rodriguez R, 2009, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V1, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2009.10.005
   Sisto NP, 2016, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V91, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2015.08.015
   Stanganini F., 2018, BRAZILIAN J URBAN MA, V10, P118, DOI [10.1590/ 2175-3369.010.SUPL1.AO14., DOI 10.1590/2175-3369.010.SUPL1.AO14]
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UK Statutory Instruments, 2004, ENV ASS PLANS PROGR
   UN-Habitat, 2013, STAT WORLDS CIT 2012
   UN-HABITAT, 2010, STAT WORLDS CIT 2010
   Wang MM, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V201, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.034
   Woods Ballard B., 2015, THE SUDS MANUAL, pC753
   Zhang YY, 2019, WATER RES, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114888
NR 48
TC 60
Z9 62
U1 16
U2 195
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD DEC 1
PY 2020
VL 275
AR 111173
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173
PG 10
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OH3NA
UT WOS:000582474500009
PM 32866923
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sharifi, A
   Aboagye, PD
   Zhang, MY
   Murayama, A
AF Sharifi, Ayyoob
   Aboagye, Prince Dacosta
   Zhang, Mingyuan
   Murayama, Akito
TI A participatory foresight approach to envisioning post-pandemic urban
   development pathways in Tokyo
SO HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19 pandemic; Cities; Envisioning development pathways; Urban
   planning; Urban resilience; Smart city
ID Q-METHODOLOGY; AUTOMATED VEHICLES; TRANSPORT; MOBILITY; LOCKDOWN;
   HEALTH; CITY
AB Ensuring sustainable urban futures demands varied approaches, particularly with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, which presents a unique situation and experience for reimagining urban futures. A considerable number of scientific inquiries have adopted participatory foresight approaches to imagining sustainable urban development pathways. However, not many have used a similar approach to envision urban development pathways in a post-COVID-19 era. Based on available evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 on urban forms and lifestyles and citizens ' experiences during the pandemic, such a study is imperative to better understand how people from different demographic groups envision an ideal post -pandemic city. Using the Greater Tokyo Area as a case study, we adopted the Q methodology to determine post -pandemic urban development pathways from the subjective viewpoints of diverse stakeholders. We identified four development pathways for an ideal postpandemic city. The first pathway is a resilient city with good neighborhood accessibility and sustainable urban regeneration. The second and third pathways, shared by younger people, focus on pro -environmental climate change mitigation (city compactness, shared mobility) and pro -urban resilience, respectively. The final pathway imagines a post -pandemic city that is accessible, safe, and smart. We found that different age groups perceive their ideal cities differently, especially when emphasizing the nexus between pandemics and cities. The study illustrates the need to adopt more participatory approaches in designing future urban development pathways since varied perspectives of an ideal city exist among different age demographics. These approaches promote equitable, inclusive, and transparent urban planning, advancing community support for policymaking and implementation.
C1 [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima City, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon.
   [Aboagye, Prince Dacosta] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Hiroshima, Japan.
   [Zhang, Mingyuan] Lund Univ, Lund, Sweden.
   [Murayama, Akito] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
C3 Hiroshima University; Lebanese American University; Hiroshima
   University; Lund University; University of Tokyo
RP Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima City, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.; Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Lebanese Amer Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beirut, Lebanon.
EM sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp; d214421@hiroshima-u.ac.jp;
   meienskayaryabinushka@gmail.com; murayama@up.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp
RI Aboagye, Prince Dacosta/IQS-1353-2023; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI Sharifi, Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613; Murayama,
   Akito/0000-0003-2389-939X; Aboagye, Prince Dacosta/0000-0002-0310-8610
FU JSPS KAKENHI [22K04493]; Toyota Foundation [D21 -R- 0040]
FX This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 22K04493 and a
   grant from Toyota Foundation (Grant No. D21 -R- 0040) .
CR Aboagye PD, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101550
   Alberti M, 2020, BIOSCIENCE, V70, P772, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biaa079
   Alidadi M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104743
   Ammar A, 2020, NUTRIENTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/nu12061583
   Antoci A, 2022, J ECON BEHAV ORGAN, V201, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.06.031
   Balk D, 2022, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V8, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2022.949433
   Banasick S., 2019, The Journal of Open Source Software, V4, P1360, DOI DOI 10.21105/JOSS.01360
   Bronkhorst B. V., 2023, The transformative power of cities: Tackling climate change through green, resilient, and inclusive urban development
   Brown SR, 1996, QUAL HEALTH RES, V6, P561, DOI 10.1177/104973239600600408
   Burhamah W, 2020, J AFFECT DISORDERS, V277, P977, DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.014
   Campos I, 2016, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V17, P537, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2016.1215511
   Collste D, 2023, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/acce25
   Crossley E., 2021, Global tourism and COVID-19, P82
   Damio S.M., 2016, Asian Journal of University Education, V12, P105
   Dickinson H, 2014, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V16, P830, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2012.757353
   Du JH, 2021, INT J TRANSP SCI TEC, V10, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.11.003
   Fan PL, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V187, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.014
   Gade D.S., 2021, INT J MANAG TECHNOL, V6, P189, DOI [10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0140, DOI 10.47992/IJMTS.2581.6012.0140]
   Ghosal S, 2020, DIABETES METAB SYND, V14, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.03.014
   González-González E, 2023, CITIES, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104159
   González-González E, 2019, CITIES, V94, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.034
   Green A, 2021, GEOFORUM, V127, P257, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.11.002
   Gualtieri G, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115682
   Hernández JRE, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
   Ho CQ, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V117, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.025
   Huttunen S, 2022, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102714
   Krishnamurthy Sukanya., 2019, Cities Health, V3, P86, DOI [10.1080/23748834.2019.1586327, DOI 10.1080/23748834.2019.1586327]
   Li Y, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V235, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.044
   Liang LW, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117649
   Maher R, 2019, GEOFORUM, V107, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.013
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Mohajerani A, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V197, P522, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.095
   Molenveld A., 2020, Handbook of research methods and applications in comparative policy analysis, V333
   Mouratidis K, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105772
   Orjuela JP, 2023, HABITAT INT, V142, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102965
   Pierce M, 2020, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V7, P883, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4
   Raje F, 2007, TRANSPORT POLICY, V14, P467, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.006
   Robbins P., 2009, Q method analysis
   Rosa AB, 2021, EUR J FUTURES RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40309-021-00171-6
   Sepasgozar SME, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11040151
   Sharifi A., 2021, COVID-19: Systemic risk and resilience, P285
   Sharifi A, 2024, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, DOI 10.1038/s42949-024-00151-2
   Sharifi A, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104207
   Sharifi A, 2022, ISCIENCE, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105297
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharifi A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P1269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
   Shokouhyar S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102714
   Shorfuzzaman M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102582
   Smith G, 2018, RES TRANSP ECON, V69, P592, DOI 10.1016/j.retrec.2018.04.001
   Son C, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/21279
   Soria-Lara JA, 2021, J TRANSP GEOGR, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102907
   Stead D, 2019, CITIES, V92, P125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.020
   Takabatake T, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11101781
   TMG, 2024, Tokyo's history, geography, and population
   UN-Habitat, 2021, What is Urbanization?
   van den Bosch M, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
   van den Ende M. A., 2021, Towards a Climate-Resilient Future Together. A Toolbox with Participatory Foresight Methods, Tools and Examples from Climate and Food Governance
   Van Exel N. J. A., 2005, Q methodology: A sneak preview
   van Hoof J, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107922
   van Kuijk RJ, 2022, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V166, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.008
   Watts S., 2012, Theory, Method and Interpretation
   World Bank, 2023, Urban Development'
   Zhu JR, 2022, HABITAT INT, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102627
NR 63
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 15
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0197-3975
EI 1873-5428
J9 HABITAT INT
JI Habitat Int.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 149
AR 103108
DI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103108
EA MAY 2024
PG 11
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning;
   Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA TV8F9
UT WOS:001244120000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hyde-Smith, L
   Roelich, K
   Mdee, A
   Zhan, Z
   Evans, B
AF Hyde-Smith, Leonie
   Roelich, Katy
   Mdee, Anna
   Zhan, Zhe
   Evans, Barbara
TI Blinded by the 'green-halo'? Equity in financing climate adaptation of
   urban sanitation
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING E-NATURE AND SPACE
LA English
DT Article
DE Sanitation; finance; green finance; climate finance; subsidies;
   adaptation; resilience; climate justice
ID DEVELOPMENT GOALS; WATER; IMPACTS; ENGLAND; FINANCIALIZATION;
   INFRASTRUCTURE; RESPONSES; POLITICS; CITIES; MARKET
AB Adapting urban sanitation systems to changing climate conditions will require substantial investments. However, there is a gap in understanding the funding strategies for such adaptation measures, especially amid concerns that resilience measures might reinforce existing urban sanitation inequalities. Through cross-case document analysis and complementary key informant interviews, we examined the sanitation adaptation investments in eight cities, focusing on their funding arrangements and social and intergenerational equity implications. Debt financing of sanitation adaptation often relies on repayment through customer bills with only opaque considerations of the affordability for different socio-economic customer groups. The lack of appropriate accounting for the lifecycle costs of resilient infrastructure threatens to mortgage future generations. There is no convincing evidence that 'greening' of adaptation financing either shifts or redistributes the financial risk more equitably nor does it make the repayment of the investments substantially cheaper for customers. We conclude that a public sector funding approach is most appropriate to ensure social and intergenerational equity within climate-resilient sanitation systems.
C1 [Hyde-Smith, Leonie; Zhan, Zhe; Evans, Barbara] Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, England.
   [Roelich, Katy] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds, England.
   [Mdee, Anna] Univ Leeds, Sch Polit & Int Studies, Leeds, England.
C3 University of Leeds; University of Leeds; University of Leeds
RP Evans, B (corresponding author), Univ Leeds, Sch Civil Engn, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, England.
EM B.E.Evans@leeds.ac.uk
RI Hyde-Smith, Leonie/GZK-4988-2022
OI Zhan, Zhe/0000-0001-5843-7027; Evans, Barbara/0000-0001-9815-3141; Mdee,
   Anna/0000-0002-8260-1840; Hyde-Smith, Leonie/0000-0003-0237-4121
FU UKRI Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRC) as part
   of the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Water and Waste
   Infrastructure and Services Engineered for Resilience (Water-WISER)
   [EP/S022066/1]
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work
   was supported by the UKRI Engineering and Physical Science Research
   Council (EPSRC) (grant number EP/S022066/1) through a PhD studentship
   received by the first author (L.H.-S.) as part of the EPSRC Centre for
   Doctoral Training in Water and Waste Infrastructure and Services
   Engineered for Resilience (Water-WISER).
CR Adama O, 2018, GEOJOURNAL, V83, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10708-016-9761-8
   Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   AfDB, 2022, ZAMBIA LUSAKA SANITA
   AfDB, 2015, LUS SAN PROGR CLIM R
   Allen J, 2013, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V6, P419, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rst010
   Anand H., 2021, PRESENTATION RESILIE, V15
   Andersson K, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121289
   Andres Luis., 2019, Doing More with Less: Smarter Subsidies for Water Supply and Sanitation
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 1997, Combined Sewer Overflows - Guidance for Financial Capability Assessment and Schedule Development
   [Anonymous], 2019, Considering climate change in urban sanitation: conceptual approaches and practical implications
   [Anonymous], 2020, Zambia water supply and sanitation sector diagnostic: Narrowing the gap between policy and practice
   [Anonymous], 2020, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020
   [Anonymous], 2022, Introduction to Climate Finance | UNFCCC
   [Anonymous], 2016, The Case Against the Thames Tideway Tunnel
   Ashley RM, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V52, P265, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0142
   Bafford B., 2017, WHAT MATTERS INVESTI, P228
   Bakker K, 2005, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V95, P542, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00474.x
   Bakker K, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN D, V31, P280, DOI 10.1068/d5111
   Bakker KJ, 2003, GEOFORUM, V34, P359, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00092-1
   Bakker KJ, 2001, T I BRIT GEOGR, V26, P143, DOI 10.1111/1475-5661.00012
   Banga J, 2019, J SUSTAIN FINANC INV, V9, P17, DOI 10.1080/20430795.2018.1498617
   Barraqué B, 2020, UTIL POLICY, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2019.100981
   Bayliss K, 2023, NEW POLIT ECON, V28, P155, DOI 10.1080/13563467.2022.2084521
   Bayliss K, 2021, COMPET CHANG, V25, P478, DOI 10.1177/1024529420964933
   Bayliss K, 2014, REV RADICAL POL ECON, V46, P292, DOI 10.1177/0486613413506076
   Beecher JA, 2020, WATER ECON POLICY, V6, DOI 10.1142/S2382624X20710010
   Berube Alan., 2016, City and Metropolitan Inequality on the Rise, Driven by Declining Incomes
   Betancourt M., 2021, CAPITALS WATERWAYS C, V102
   Bigger P, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P601, DOI 10.1177/2514848619876539
   Biswas AK., 2021, CONVERSATION
   Biza A, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V5, P605, DOI 10.1177/2514848621996583
   Bowles BOL., 2021, INFRASTRUCTURE MORAL, V41, P5, DOI DOI 10.1108/S0190-128120210000041001
   Brasileiro A., 2020, THE MIAMI HERALD
   Brown J, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008215
   Brown L., 2013, REACH STRENGTHENING
   Brugger A., 2021, MAPS WORKING PAPER S, V2, P1
   Buchner Barbara., 2015, GLOBAL LANDSCAPE CLI
   Cardoso DS, 2022, WATER RESOUR RES, V58, DOI 10.1029/2022WR032206
   Cava E., 2017, SPENDING MONEY CLEAN
   Charles K., 2010, Vision 2030 the Resilience of Water Supply and Sanitation in the Face of Climate Change
   Christophers B, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V1, P144, DOI 10.1177/2514848618770369
   Cousins JJ, 2021, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V23, P581, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2021.1893164
   Da WL., 2018, RESILIENT SINGAPORE
   Dai LP, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P578, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1373637
   Danert K, 2020, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V10, P1, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2020.139
   DC Water, 2014, 600 WATER ANNOUNCES
   DC Water, FACT SHEET 600 WATER
   DC Water, 2017, CLEAN RIVERS IMPERVI
   Dickin S, 2020, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V3, DOI 10.1038/s41545-020-0072-8
   Dodman D., 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, V1, P907
   Dodman D, 2008, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V39, P67
   Dorfleitner G, 2022, REV MANAG SCI, V16, P797, DOI 10.1007/s11846-021-00458-9
   Douglas I, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P187, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089156
   EPA, 2022, EPA PROP GUID SUPP W
   EPA, 2021, BOSTON RAISES WASTEW
   Espinoza J., 2017, FINANCIAL TIMES 0504
   Evans B., 2009, The public funding for sanitation. The many faces of sanitation subsides
   Fankhauser S, 2011, CLIM DEV, V3, P94, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2011.582267
   Feifel K., 2021, PROACTIVE INCORPORAT
   Ferriman A, 2007, BRIT MED J, V334, P111, DOI 10.1136/bmj.39097.611806.DB
   Furlong K, 2020, T I BRIT GEOGR, V45, P406, DOI 10.1111/tran.12352
   Furlong KM, 2021, WIRES WATER, V8, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1503
   Gambrill M, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00201
   García-Lamarca M, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V5, P207, DOI 10.1177/2514848620973708
   Gerlach E., 2020, INCLUSIVE GREEN CITY
   GIZ, CLIMATE FRIENDLY SAN
   Goodfellow T, 2020, REV AFR POLIT ECON, V47, P256, DOI 10.1080/03056244.2020.1722088
   Gorelick J, 2018, ENVIRON URBAN, V30, P103, DOI 10.1177/0956247817741853
   Grafe F.-J., 2019, City, V23, P606, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2019.1689730, https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1689730, 10.1080/13604813.2019, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2019]
   Grafe FJ, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13169130
   Grafe FJ, 2020, REG STUD REG SCI, V7, P214, DOI 10.1080/21681376.2020.1778515
   Grasham CF, 2021, NPJ CLEAN WATER, V4, DOI 10.1038/s41545-021-00133-2
   Greater London Authority, 2023, EC FAIRNESS INCOME I
   Griffiths J, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0222
   Grunwald Michael, 2014, Time Magazine
   Hallegatte S, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P250, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3253
   Harris A., 2021, THE MIAMI HERALD
   Harris A., 2022, THE MIAMI HERALD
   Hilbrandt H, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P1415, DOI 10.1177/0308518X20909391
   Hughes S., 2012, TIMES
   Hyde-Smith L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V56, P5306, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.1c07424
   Inman P., 2022, The Guardian
   Jeuland M, 2013, HOW MUCH HAVE GLOBAL PROBLEMS COST THE WORLD?: A SCORECARD FROM 1900 TO 2050, P303
   Jones PA., 2016, The Invisible Crisis: Water Unaffordability in the United States
   Jones R, 2020, GEOFORUM, V114, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.014
   Joseph G., 2024, FUNDING WATER SECURE
   Kappauf L., 2018, LUSAKA ZAMBIA SFD RE
   Karpf A, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P161, DOI 10.1038/s41558-017-0062-0
   Kennedy S., 2017, WASHINGTON POST
   Klink J, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1676, DOI 10.1177/0042098019844390
   Kumar A, 2021, FRONT WATER, V3, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2021.727368
   Lea R., 2016, TIMES
   Li H, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9090594
   Liang X, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135261
   Liang X, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030669
   Lo S, 2019, HEALTH SYST REFORM, V5, P366, DOI 10.1080/23288604.2019.1669948
   Loftus A, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2280, DOI 10.1177/0042098017736713
   Long J, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P721, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2020.1841470
   Long J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P992, DOI 10.1177/0042098018770846
   LSE, 2018, WHAT IS CLIMATE FINA
   Mack EA, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0169488
   Malloy JT, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V160, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02705-6
   Mara D, 2018, J WATER SANIT HYG DE, V8, P1, DOI 10.2166/washdev.2017.048
   Mason N., 2020, Just add water: a landscape analysis of climate finance for water (Issue October)
   McDonald DA, 2021, WATER ALTERN, V14, P117
   McFarlane C, 2008, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V32, P415, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00793.x
   McFarlane C, 2019, DEV CHANGE, V50, P1239, DOI 10.1111/dech.12533
   Miami-Dade County, 2022, MIAMI DADE COUNTY LA
   Miami-Dade County, 2020, PLAN ACT REP RISK BA
   Mikhael G., 2021, Climate Resilient Urban Sanitation: Accelerating the Convergence of Sanitation and Climate Action
   Miles M.B., 1995, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, DOI DOI 10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
   Netusil N.R., 2021, The Coming Storm: How US Cities Are Managing Stormwater from Increasingly Extreme Rainfall Events
   Nilsson D, 2008, J MOD AFR STUD, V46, P133, DOI 10.1017/S0022278X07003102
   Ntsama U.Y. O., 2021, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, V6, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40991-020-00056-0, DOI 10.1186/S40991-020-00056-0]
   Oates L., 2020, BUILDING CLIMATE RES
   OCleireacain C., 2012, CLEANER RIVERS NATL
   OECD, 2019, EVIDENCE BLENDED FIN
   OECD, 2011, Benefits of Investing in Water and Sanitation, an Oecd Perspective
   OECD, 2009, STRATEGIC FINANCIAL
   Owen A, 2020, CLIM POLICY, V20, P1193, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2020.1773754
   Peal A, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00001
   Peng Y., 2021, USING NATURE RESHAPE
   Pryke M, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P1326, DOI 10.1177/0042098017742288
   PUB, 2023, DEEP TUNNEL SEWERAGE
   Ramseur J.L., 2018, Wastewater Infrastructure: Overview, Funding, and Legislative Developments R44963
   Reckien D, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P159, DOI 10.1177/0956247816677778
   Rezal A., 2022, San Francisco Chronicle
   Roberts JT, 2021, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V11, P180, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-00990-2
   Roelich KE., 2015, FINANCING INFRASTRUC
   Ross I., 2018, EQUALITY WATER SANIT, P137
   Rusca M, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P1159, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1956875
   Rycerz A., 2020, GREENING GREY WHY 60
   Schlosberg D, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P359, DOI 10.1002/wcc.275
   SFPUC, 2021, SSIP FY20 21 ANN REP
   SFPUC, 2022, SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVE
   SFPUC, 2022, WAST ENT CAP IMPR PR
   SFPUC, 2018, WAST ENT GREEN BONDS
   Sherpa AM, 2014, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V5, P487, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2014.003
   Shokry G, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539
   Sörqvist P, 2015, FOOD QUAL PREFER, V43, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.001
   Sovacool BK, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P616, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2665
   Strande L, 2023, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V57, P15771, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.3c04431
   SWA, 2019, ADAPTING CLIMATE CHA
   Swanson K, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P287, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i4.4399
   Sylvester R, 2023, WATER POLICY, V25, P492, DOI 10.2166/wp.2023.253
   Tait SJ, 2008, URBAN WATER J, V5, P77, DOI 10.1080/15730620701737470
   Tan A., 2021, STRAITS TIMES   0423
   Thames Water, 2013, APPL DEV CONSENT SUS
   The World Bank, 2017, CAN FINANCING GAP BE
   The World Bank, 2018, WATER SCARCE CITIES
   Tideway, 2021, SUSTAINABLE FINANCE
   Tideway, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY REPOR
   Tideway, 2017, INVESTOR PRESENTATIO
   Tideway, 2022, ANN REP 2021 22
   Timperley J, 2021, NATURE, V598, P400, DOI 10.1038/d41586-021-02846-3
   UN CESCR, 2010, EC1220101 UN CESCR
   UN Water, FINANCING WATER SANI
   UNC EFC, 2017, NAVIGATING LEGAL PAT
   UNFCCC, 2015, UN FRAM CONV CLIM CH
   2023, ENSURING ACCESS CLIM
   UTS-ISF, 2023, COASTAL CLIMATE IMPA
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Van de Lande L., 2015, Eliminating discrimination and inequalities in access to water and sanitation
   Van Welie MJ, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V137, P259, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.059
   Walton B., 2021, CIRCLE BLUE WATERNEW
   Wang SS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100829
   Weikmans R, 2017, DEV PRACT, V27, P458, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2017.1307325
   WHO and UNICEF, 2019, Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2017: special focus on inequalities
   Willetts J., 2024, SINGAPORE INT WATER
   Willetts J., 2022, URBAN SANITATION CLI
   Willetts J, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P2129, DOI 10.1177/23998083221098740
   Williams J, 2021, ANTIPODE, V53, P1873, DOI 10.1111/anti.12755
   Wolf J, 2023, LANCET, V401, P2060, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00458-0
   World Bank, 2011, FINANCING RESILIENT
   World Health Organization, 2022, Strong systems and sound investments: evidence on and key insights into accelerating progress on sanitation
   Zevenbergen C, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091230
   Zhang SY, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10060766
   Zhang X, 2022, WATER POLICY, V24, P500, DOI 10.2166/wp.2022.283
NR 179
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 3
U2 3
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 2514-8486
EI 2514-8494
J9 ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT
JI Environ. Plan. E-Nat. Space
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 8
IS 1
SI SI
BP 278
EP 305
DI 10.1177/25148486241287446
EA NOV 2024
PG 28
WC Environmental Studies; Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography
GA Z0U4D
UT WOS:001348275400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Henstra, D
AF Henstra, Daniel
TI Toward the Climate-Resilient City: Extreme Weather and Urban Climate
   Adaptation Policies in Two Canadian Provinces
SO JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS
LA English
DT Article
ID DISASTER RISK REDUCTION; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; MANAGEMENT; EVENTS;
   INFRASTRUCTURE; CHALLENGES; IMPACTS; CITIES; FLOODS
AB Extreme weather events, such as unusually high or low temperatures, severe winds and heavy precipitation, pose a threat to people and property in cities, and are expected to become more frequent and intense as a result of climate change. Managing this risk requires effective climate adaptation policies - strategic courses of action designed to strengthen urban resilience to climate-related stress. City governments have a key role to play in adaptation policy design, but they appear to face challenges in marshalling political commitment and technical capacity. This article examines elements of urban climate adaptation policy targeting extreme weather and analyzes the policy development process in two major Canadian cities, Toronto and Halifax.
C1 Univ Waterloo, Dept Polit Sci, Master Publ Serv Program, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
C3 University of Waterloo
RP Henstra, D (corresponding author), Univ Waterloo, Dept Polit Sci, Master Publ Serv Program, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
EM dhenstra@uwaterloo.ca
OI Henstra, Daniel/0000-0003-0224-9152
CR [Anonymous], GOV ROL CLIM CHANG A
   [Anonymous], COMM ACT GUID CLIM C
   [Anonymous], HEAT AL EXTR HEAT AL
   [Anonymous], TORONTO STAR 1026
   [Anonymous], GREAT MAR BLIZZ WHIT
   [Anonymous], GREEN MUN FUNDS INV
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   [Anonymous], SCAN CLIMATE CHANGE
   [Anonymous], ONT MOST EXP WEATH D
   [Anonymous], 9 ENV CAN
   [Anonymous], CANADIAN UNDERWRITER
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG RISK MAN
   [Anonymous], MUNICIPAL RISK ASSES
   [Anonymous], ADAPTING CHANGING CL
   [Anonymous], PORTR CAN POP 2006 H
   [Anonymous], 2007, AR4 CLIM CHANG 2007
   [Anonymous], CHANG IS AIR TOR COM
   [Anonymous], REP PUBL ENG CLIM CH
   [Anonymous], SUPP HOUS ADM
   [Anonymous], NATL POST 0714
   [Anonymous], P CONSTR BUILD RES C
   [Anonymous], HRM REG MUN PLANN ST
   [Anonymous], POLICY OPT
   [Anonymous], TIME TACKLE TORONTOS
   [Anonymous], P ENG I CAN CLIM CHA
   [Anonymous], MITIGATION ADAPTATIO
   [Anonymous], DEV RISK MAN GUID
   [Anonymous], MOV FRAM ACT CLIM CH
   [Anonymous], AH STORM PREP TOR CL
   [Anonymous], HURRICANE JUAN STORM
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG CLEAN AIR
   [Anonymous], CLIM CHANG AD STRAT
   Birkland T., 1996, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, V14, P221
   Birkland T.A., 2006, LESSONS DISASTER
   BOHLE HG, 1994, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V4, P37, DOI 10.1016/0959-3780(94)90020-5
   Bosher L, 2007, ENG CONSTR ARCHIT MA, V14, P434, DOI 10.1108/09699980710780746
   Burby RaymondJ., 2000, Natural Hazards Review, V1, P99, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(99)]
   Burch S, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P7575, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.070
   Burton I, 2002, CLIM POLICY, V2, P145, DOI 10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00038-4
   Carmin J., 2009, Achieving urban climate adaptation in Europe and central Asia
   Chang SE, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9039-4
   Christensen K.M., 2007, J DISABIL POLICY STU, V17, P249, DOI DOI 10.1177/10442073070170040801
   Conde C., 2004, Adaptation Policy Frameworks for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and measures, P47
   Corfee-Morlot J, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9980-9
   Cunderlik JM, 2005, HYDROLOG SCI J, V50, P631, DOI 10.1623/hysj.2005.50.4.631
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Deyle R., 1998, Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, P119
   ETKIN DA, 1995, NAT HAZARDS, V12, P19, DOI 10.1007/BF00605279
   Few Roger., 2006, Public Participation and Climate Change Adaptation
   Flannigan MD, 2005, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V72, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-5935-y
   Ford J., 2008, International Public Policy Review, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1504/IJPP.2008.017123
   Fünfgeld H, 2010, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V2, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.07.001
   Füssel HM, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V75, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3
   Hallegatte S, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003
   Hare B, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V75, P111, DOI 10.1007/s10584-005-9027-9
   Hasegawa T, 2004, BUILD RES INF, V32, P61, DOI 10.1080/0961321032000148488
   Hellström T, 2007, SAFETY SCI, V45, P415, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.007
   Hengeveld H., 2005, An Introduction to Climate Change: A Canadian Perspective
   Henstra D, 2005, CAN PUBLIC POL, V31, P303, DOI 10.2307/3552443
   Henstra D., 2009, Climate change and extreme weather: designing adaptation policy
   Henstra D, 2010, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V70, P236, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02130.x
   Hunt A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6
   Hunt J, 2004, BUILD RES INF, V32, P55, DOI 10.1080/0961321032000150449
   Johnson CL, 2005, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V21, P561, DOI 10.1080/07900620500258133
   Jones R., 2004, Adaptation Policy Framework for Climate Change: Developing Strategies, Policies and Measures, P91
   Kharin VV, 2005, J CLIMATE, V18, P1156, DOI 10.1175/JCLI3320.1
   King D., 2000, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V8, P223
   Kingdon John W., 2011, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
   Larsson N, 2003, BUILD RES INF, V31, P231, DOI 10.1080/09613210320000976
   Lemmen D.S., 2008, IMPACTS ADAPTATION C
   Lorenzoni I, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V77, P73, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
   Loukas A, 1999, NORD HYDROL, V30, P231
   McBean G, 2004, NAT HAZARDS, V31, P177, DOI 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000020259.58716.0d
   McDaniels T, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
   McEntire D., 2004, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V13, P140, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560410534289
   McEntire D.A., 2005, Disaster Prevention and Management, V14, P206, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653560510595209
   McIntire D., 2001, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V10, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09653560110395359, 10.1108/09653560110395359]
   Measham TG, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P889, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
   Mehdi B., 2006, ADAPTING CLIMATE CHA
   Mercer J, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P247, DOI 10.1002/jid.1677
   Moser SC, 2011, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V42, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0567-8_3
   Mukheibir P, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P143, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076912
   Noble D., 2005, An overview of the risk management approach to adaptation to climate change in Canada
   O'Brien G, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P64, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00307.x
   Parry M.L., 2007, TECHNICAL SUMMARY CL, P23
   Paton D., 2001, Disaster Prevent Manag, V10, P270, DOI [10.1108/EUM0000000005930, DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000005930, https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005930]
   Penney J., 2008, Climate Change Adaptation in the City of Toronto: Lessons for Great Lakes Communities
   Penney Jennifer., 2007, CITIES PREPARING CLI
   Perry RW, 2005, PUBLIC PERS MANAGE, V34, P175, DOI 10.1177/009102600503400204
   Poumadère M, 2005, RISK ANAL, V25, P1483, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00694.x
   Prasad N, 2009, CLIMATE RESILIENT CITIES: A PRIMER ON REDUCING VULNERABILITIES TO DISASTERS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7766-6
   Reisinger A, 2011, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V42, P303, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0567-8_22
   Satterthwaite D., 2009, ADAPTING CITIES CLIM, P3
   Sheppard SRJ, 2011, FUTURES, V43, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009
   Simonsson L, 2011, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, V42, P321, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0567-8_23
   Smit B., 2003, CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT, DOI [10.1142/97818609458160002, DOI 10.1142/9781860945816_0002]
   Snover A.K., 2007, PREPARING CLIMATE CH
   SOLECKI WD, 1994, ENVIRON MANAGE, V18, P587, DOI 10.1007/BF02400861
   Storbjörk S, 2007, LOCAL ENVIRON, V12, P457, DOI 10.1080/13549830701656960
   Sullivan K, 2008, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V23, P37
   Thomalla F, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x
   van Aalst MK, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002
   Wagner G, 2012, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V110, P507, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0067-z
   Wakeford C., 2006, Municipal World, V116, P17
   White R, 1997, NAT HAZARDS, V16, P135, DOI 10.1023/A:1007934511961
   Wigley TML, 2005, SCIENCE, V307, P1766, DOI 10.1126/science.1103934
   WOTTON BM, 1993, FOREST CHRON, V69, P187, DOI 10.5558/tfc69187-2
   Yohe GW, 2006, AMBIO, V35, P89, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2006)35[89:RDUICP]2.0.CO;2
NR 108
TC 57
Z9 63
U1 8
U2 115
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1387-6988
EI 1572-5448
J9 J COMP POLICY ANAL
JI J. Comp. Policy Anal.
PY 2012
VL 14
IS 2
SI SI
BP 175
EP 194
DI 10.1080/13876988.2012.665215
PG 20
WC Public Administration
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public Administration
GA 935ZV
UT WOS:000303561600006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hale, JD
   Sadler, J
AF Hale, James David
   Sadler, Jon
TI Resilient ecological solutions for urban regeneration
SO PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING
   SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE environment; sustainability; urban regeneration
ID SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; LANDSCAPE PATTERN; GRADIENT ANALYSIS;
   ADAPTABILITY; CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; ECOSYSTEMS; CITIES
AB There is a need for biological conservation at the global scale, and urban conservation has the potential to support the delivery of this wider goal. Despite historic trends, efforts are underway to protect and enhance the quality, quantity and accessibility of green infrastructure within cities, including biodiversity features within new developments. However, there are questions over their long-term persistence and function. This paper applies an urban futures resilience analysis to a case study site to illustrate how such concerns may be explored and addressed in practice. The analysis identifies vulnerable sustainability solutions and clarifies the aspects that may be improved. The results suggest that the resilience of these solutions is questionable, even though resilience has clearly been considered. In particular, future compliance with, and enforcement of, planning conditions is questionable. The resilience of these ecological solutions may be improved by including some redundancy, designing for low maintenance, incorporating microclimate buffers and locating features in areas unlikely to be subject to future disturbance. The establishment of endowment funds or other dedicated funding mechanisms should also be explored. The paper also recommends that a futures-based resilience analysis be included within the development planning process.
C1 [Hale, James David; Sadler, Jon] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
C3 University of Birmingham
RP Hale, JD (corresponding author), Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England.
OI Hale, James/0000-0001-9662-1853; Sadler, Jonathan P./0000-0003-0443-4458
FU UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
   [EP/F007426]; EPSRC [EP/F007426/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The authors wish to acknowledge the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences
   Research Council (EPSRC) for financial support for this Sustainable
   Urban Environments (SUE) research project under grant EP/F007426 and
   officers from Lancaster City Council for support with the development of
   this case study.
CR Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   [Anonymous], 2005, ENG SUSTAINABILITY, DOI DOI 10.1680/ENSU.2005.158.2.105
   [Anonymous], GREEN SPAC BETT PLAC
   [Anonymous], 2010, WORLD URB PROSP 2009
   Boyko CT, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.004
   Bramley GA, 2006, P GLOB PLAC LOC SP P
   Butchart SHM, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1164, DOI 10.1126/science.1187512
   Cadenasso ML, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P80, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[80:SHIUER]2.0.CO;2
   DCLG, 2010, Code for Sustainable Homes -Technical Guide
   Defra (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs), 2007, GUID LOC AUTH IMPL B
   Dunn RR, 2006, CONSERV BIOL, V20, P1814, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00533.x
   Entec, 2001, ENV IMP STAT LUN E
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Fuller RA, 2009, BIOL LETTERS, V5, P352, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0010
   Hermy M, 2011, ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK OF URBAN ECOLOGY, P289
   Irwin EG, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P20672, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0705527105
   James P, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001
   LCC, 2008, COR STRAT 2003 2021
   LCC, 2007, LUN E MAST DES COD R
   LCC (Lancaster City Council), 2004, 4 LCC
   Luck M, 2002, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V17, P327, DOI 10.1023/A:1020512723753
   Lundholm JT, 2010, J APPL ECOL, V47, P966, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01857.x
   MCDONNELL MJ, 1990, ECOLOGY, V71, P1232, DOI 10.2307/1938259
   McKinney M. L., 2008, Urban Ecosystems, V11, P161, DOI 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4
   McKinney ML, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P883, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
   MEA (MillenniumEcosystemAssessment), 2005, EC HUM WELLB BIOD SY
   Miller JR, 2005, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V20, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.013
   Niemelä J, 1999, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V8, P119, DOI 10.1023/A:1008817325994
   Oberndorfer E, 2007, BIOSCIENCE, V57, P823, DOI 10.1641/B571005
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   RASKIN P, 1998, 8 POLESTAR STOCKH EN
   RIBA, 2007, RIBA OUTL PLAN WORK
   Rogers CDF, 2012, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V165, P5, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2012.165.1.5
   Sadler J., 2010, Urban ecology, P230
   Sadler J, 2011, URBAN ECOLOGY: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND APPLICATIONS, P286
   Stone EL, 2009, CURR BIOL, V19, P1123, DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.058
   Tratalos J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003
   UKNEA, 2011, UK NAT EC ASS SYNTH
   UKNEA, 2011, UK NAT EC A IN PRESS
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Waring P, 2011, SNOWDONIA BAT MITIGA
   Williams Carol., 2010, Biodiversity for Low and Zero Carbon Buildings: A Technical Guide for New Build
   Zhang LQ, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.006
NR 44
TC 19
Z9 22
U1 1
U2 91
PU ICE PUBLISHING
PI WESTMINISTER
PA INST CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1 GREAT GEORGE ST, WESTMINISTER SW 1P 3AA, ENGLAND
SN 1478-4629
EI 1751-7680
J9 P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU
JI Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Eng. Sustain.
PD MAR
PY 2012
VL 165
IS 1
BP 59
EP 67
DI 10.1680/ensu.2012.165.1.59
PG 9
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering
GA 917UF
UT WOS:000302203400005
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bristow, DN
   Kennedy, CA
AF Bristow, David N.
   Kennedy, Christopher A.
TI Urban Metabolism and the Energy Stored in Cities Implications for
   Resilience
SO JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
LA English
DT Article
DE energy cycling; energy stock; industrial ecology; residence time; urban
   metabolism; vulnerability
AB Using the city of Toronto as a case study, this article examines impacts of energy stocks and flexible demand in the urban metabolism on the resilience of the city, including discussion of directions for further study of the resiliency of the urban metabolism. An important element developed is the nominal residence time of the energy stocks. This value defines how long an energy stock lasts under typical patterns of energy use. The findings suggest that the residence times of many sources of energy overcome vulnerability when energy supply shocks last on the order of hours or a few days, but that the measure is limited to assessing only certain types of commonly used energy sources in aggregate terms. Discussion is included on the uncertainty of this measure and on the metabolic and resiliency implications of new technologies intended to reduce energy use and improve sustainability of cities and the use of the urban metabolism as a means of comparison. The methodology employed highlights how waste energy could be used to increase the resiliency of the city's water supply, but also how the study of the urban metabolism would benefit from a more disaggregate form in the study of sustainable and resilient cities.
C1 [Bristow, David N.; Kennedy, Christopher A.] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada.
C3 University of Toronto
RP Bristow, DN (corresponding author), Univ Toronto, Dept Civil Engn, 35 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada.
EM david.bristow@mail.utoronto.ca
OI Kennedy, Christopher/0000-0001-8812-4451
FU Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FX This work was supported, in part, by the Natural Sciences and
   Engineering Research Council of Canada. The authors thank Alexander Hay
   of the Center for Resilience of Critical Infrastructure at the
   University of Toronto (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and the anonymous
   reviewers for their insights and assistance.
CR Albert R, 2004, PHYS REV E, V69, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.025103
   Allen TFH, 1999, SYST RES BEHAV SCI, V16, P403, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199909/10)16:5<403::AID-SRES335>3.0.CO;2-R
   [Anonymous], BIG STORY 1108
   [Anonymous], MORBIDITY MORTALITY
   [Anonymous], 2001, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI
   [Anonymous], 2012, SUSTAIN SCI
   [Anonymous], ENCY GLOBAL ENV CHAN
   [Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING CANADA
   [Anonymous], 2012, Energi Sustain. Cities.: Assess. Urban Energy, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9780203110126, 10.4324/9780203110126]
   [Anonymous], FAOSTAT FOOD BAL SHE
   [Anonymous], ENERGY NEW REALITY F
   [Anonymous], LEV HOUS FOOD INS AG
   [Anonymous], 2009, POW LIV GREEN TOR SU
   [Anonymous], WEATHERWISE PARTN FO
   [Anonymous], 2006 TRANSP TOM SURV
   [Anonymous], 2012, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
   [Anonymous], ONT US POW OUT CRIT
   [Anonymous], TOR SUST EN PLAN EN
   Bristow D, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P1885, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.067
   Bristow DN, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V250, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.11.005
   City of Toronto, 2010, EV TREE COUNTS PORTR
   Grewal SS, 2012, CITIES, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.003
   Grubler A., 2012, GLOB ENERGY ASSESSME, P1307
   HASHIMOTO T, 1982, WATER RESOUR RES, V18, P14, DOI 10.1029/WR018i001p00014
   Heidrich ES, 2011, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V45, P827, DOI 10.1021/es103058w
   Hipel KW, 2010, J SYST SCI SYST ENG, V19, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11518-010-5122-1
   Keirstead J, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P4870, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.025
   Kennedy C, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P1965, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022
   Kennedy C, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1107
   Kennedy C, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P7297, DOI 10.1021/es900213p
   Kennedy Christopher., 2011, EVOLUTION GREAT WORL
   Krogmann U, 2007, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V43, P1414, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00100.x
   Lasseter RH, 2004, IEEE POWER ELECTRON, P4285
   Lopes JAP, 2006, IEEE T POWER SYST, V21, P916, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2006.873018
   Martin JG, 1998, CAN J FOREST RES, V28, P1648, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-28-11-1648
   NEWCOMBE K, 1978, AMBIO, V7, P3
   Pendall R, 2012, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V22, P271, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2011.648208
   Rees W.E., 1997, LOCAL ENVIRON, V2, P303, DOI [10.1080/13549839708725535, DOI 10.1080/13549839708725535]
   Sahely HR, 2003, CAN J CIVIL ENG, V30, P468, DOI 10.1139/L02-105
   SCHNEIDER ED, 1994, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V19, P25, DOI 10.1016/0895-7177(94)90188-0
   Shizas I, 2004, J ENERG ENG, V130, P45, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2004)130:2(45)
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   VandeWeghe JR, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P133, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1220
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Warren-Rhodes K, 2001, AMBIO, V30, P429, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2001)030[0429:ETITUM]2.0.CO;2
   WOLMAN A, 1965, SCI AM, V213, P179
   Wong B, 2006, 2006 IEEE EIC CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P541
NR 48
TC 44
Z9 47
U1 10
U2 84
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1088-1980
EI 1530-9290
J9 J IND ECOL
JI J. Ind. Ecol.
PD OCT
PY 2013
VL 17
IS 5
BP 656
EP 667
DI 10.1111/jiec.12038
PG 12
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA 232AZ
UT WOS:000325461500004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Huang, YJ
   Cheng, S
   Yang, FQ
   Chen, C
AF Huang, Yu-Jie
   Cheng, Shuo
   Yang, Fu-Qiang
   Chen, Chao
TI Analysis and Visualization of Research on Resilient Cities and
   Communities Based on VOSviewer
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Review
DE resilient cities; resilient communities; bibliometrics; knowledge graph;
   VOSviewer
ID BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; URBAN RESILIENCE;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; SAFETY; QUALITY; SCIENCE; IMPACT
AB To objectively grasp the current situation and development trend of resilient cities or communities (RC) research. The articles in Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection databases from 1995 to 2022 were used as a sample, and bibliometrics was used to statistically analyze the year of publication and number of articles, highly cited documents and keyword hotness in this field. VOSviewer was used to explore the knowledge graph of RC research documents. The results show that: the development process is roughly divided into 3 periods: no attention (1995-2004), starting (2005-2014), and rapid growth (2015-2021). The journal "Sustainability" and "International journal of disaster risk reduction" are the key journals publishing RC research. Serre and Shaw are the most productive authors. The USA is still the leading country in this field of RC. Colorado State Univ, Texas a&m Univ, and Delft Univ Technol are the main research institutions. The keyword analysis indicates the hot topics in different periods. Moreover, several limitations and some recommendations for future research on RC are also given based on this.
C1 [Huang, Yu-Jie; Cheng, Shuo; Yang, Fu-Qiang] Fuzhou Univ, Coll Environm & Safety Engn, Fuzhou 350116, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Chao] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Safety & Secur Sci Grp, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands.
   [Chen, Chao] Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Petr Engn, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China.
C3 Fuzhou University; Delft University of Technology; Southwest Petroleum
   University
RP Yang, FQ (corresponding author), Fuzhou Univ, Coll Environm & Safety Engn, Fuzhou 350116, Peoples R China.; Chen, C (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Safety & Secur Sci Grp, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands.; Chen, C (corresponding author), Southwest Petr Univ, Sch Petr Engn, Chengdu 610500, Peoples R China.
EM huangyujie199871@163.com; jessecheng712@gmail.com; fqouyang82@163.com;
   c.chen-1@tudelft.nl
RI Chen, Chao/AAB-6879-2020
OI Chen, Chao/0000-0002-1443-8017; huang, yujie/0000-0002-8938-8245
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874100]
FX This research study was funded by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China, grant number 51874100.
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Anugerah AR, 2022, HELIYON, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09270
   Barnett J, 2001, WORLD DEV, V29, P977, DOI 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00022-5
   Bond A, 2015, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V151, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.12.030
   Chen D, 2016, ECOL ENG, V90, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.026
   Dastjerdi MS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100794
   Eljaoued Wissem, 2020, Procedia Computer Science, V176, P2625, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.305
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Fletcher D, 2013, EUR PSYCHOL, V18, P12, DOI 10.1027/1016-9040/a000124
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hayes S, 2019, TRANSPORT REV, V39, P677, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2019.1612480
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   ICLEI, RES CIT 2018 EB OL
   Jennings Barbara J., 2013, Environment Systems & Decisions, V33, P184, DOI 10.1007/s10669-013-9440-y
   Klimek P, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V113, P404, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.017
   Lee AV, 2013, NAT HAZARDS REV, V14, P29, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000075
   Li J, 2015, SAFETY SCI, V74, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.003
   Mcglade J., 2006, IND RESILIENCE DECLI, P47
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V244, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.027
   Pan XL, 2018, J INFORMETR, V12, P481, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.005
   Pawar B, 2021, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104366
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   [邱东阳 Qiu Dongyang], 2020, [中国安全科学学报, China Safety Science Journal（CSSJ）], V30, P27
   Romanelli JP, 2018, ECOL ENG, V120, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.06.015
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Smith DR, 2007, IND HEALTH, V45, P730, DOI 10.2486/indhealth.45.730
   Su M, 2021, EXPERT SYST APPL, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115728
   Taddeo R, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V653, P765, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.412
   Thomalla F, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P39, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00305.x
   Ugolini D, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V22, P6957, DOI 10.1007/s11356-014-3925-1
   van Nunen K, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V108, P248, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Walter G, 2003, MED J AUSTRALIA, V178, P280, DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05196.x
   Whipple EC, 2013, INFORM HEALTH SOC CA, V38, P1, DOI 10.3109/17538157.2012.678451
   Wildavsky A., 1988, Searching for safety
   Wu F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V204, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.067
   Xie L, 2020, WORLD NEUROSURG, V137, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   Yang F.Q, 2021, J FUZHOU U, V49, P121
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Yang YF, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V120, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.022
   Zou X, 2018, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V118, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.010
NR 45
TC 41
Z9 42
U1 24
U2 250
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 12
AR 7068
DI 10.3390/ijerph19127068
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA 2K1VY
UT WOS:000816133100001
PM 35742316
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, HQ
   Chen, N
   Wang, XH
AF Liu, Haiqing
   Chen, Na
   Wang, Xinhao
TI Exploring spatial patterns of sustainability and resilience of
   metropolitan areas in the US using self-organizing maps
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Sustainability; Resilience; Indicators; Self-organizing map;
   Metropolitan statistical areas
ID REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN RESILIENCE; TRANSPORT SUSTAINABILITY;
   COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; INDICATORS; INDEX; CAPACITY; SYSTEMS; DISASTERS;
   FRAMEWORK
AB Promoting sustainability and resilience is critical for long-term development of cities. However, there are still no consistent approaches to identify and measure sustainability and resilience in urban regions even though many indicators have been widely used. In addition, the relationships between urban regional sustainability and the sustainability of its components are unclear. To address these two knowledge gaps, we have constructed three sets of indicators to measure regional sustainability, transportation sustainability, and urban resilience. We then developed an approach based on Self-Organizing Map to cluster and compare selected US Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) with publicly available data, exploring the clustering and spatial patterns and relationships between sustainability and resilience. Our results have shown that regional sustainability and transportation sustainability are not the same but closely related, however, the measures and spatial distribution patterns of MSA sustainability and resilience do not always match. This study highlights the need to investigate the consistency of sustainability and resilience measures before formulating policies to promote sustainable and resilient urban development.
C1 [Liu, Haiqing; Wang, Xinhao] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Planning, Cincinnati, OH USA.
   [Chen, Na] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Chinese Publ Adm Res, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Na] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Govt, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
C3 University System of Ohio; University of Cincinnati; Sun Yat Sen
   University; Sun Yat Sen University
RP Chen, N (corresponding author), 135, Xingang Xi Rd, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China.
EM chenn85@mail.sysu.edu.cn
RI Liu, Haiqing/K-8034-2018
CR Alonso A, 2015, ECOL INDIC, V48, P578, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.022
   Arribas-Bel D, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P362, DOI 10.1068/b37014
   Awasthi A, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P12270, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.005
   Black JA, 2002, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V128, P184, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2002)128:4(184)
   Black W.R., 1996, J TRANSP GEOGR, V4, P151, DOI [10.1016/0966-6923(96)00020-8, DOI 10.1016/0966-6923(96)00020-8]
   Blowfield M., 2013, Business and Sustainability
   Brundtland GH., 1987, OUR COMM FUT, V4, P17
   Bruneau M, 2004, P INT WORKSH PERF BA
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082331
   Buzasi A., 2015, Periodica Polytechnica - Transportation Engineering, V43, P138, DOI DOI 10.3311/PPTR.7825
   Buzási A, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P616, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01817-w
   Cai H, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8020046
   Campbell DE, 1998, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V51, P531, DOI 10.1023/A:1006043721115
   Chapple Karen., 2013, Planting the Seeds for a Sustainable Future: HUD's Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant Program
   Chen N, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102365
   Chen SY, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113160
   Chen W, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V88, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.069
   Chon TS, 2011, ECOL INFORM, V6, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.11.002
   Chun H, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122222
   Cottrell M, 2001, ADVANCES IN SELF-ORGANISING MAPS, P7
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davidescu AAM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11123331
   Deboeck G., 1998, VISUAL EXPLORATIONS
   Ding Y., 2014, PROCEDIA ENV SCI, V22, P131, DOI [10.1016/j.proenv.2014.11.013, DOI 10.1016/J.PROENV.2014.11.013]
   Dornelles AZ, 2020, GLOB SUSTAIN, V3, DOI 10.1017/sus.2020.15
   Du MB, 2020, HABITAT INT, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102206
   Echebarria C, 2016, PAP REG SCI, V95, pS27, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12110
   Elmqvist T., 2014, RESILIENT SUSTAINABL, P19, DOI [10.4324/9780203593066, DOI 10.4324/9780203593066]
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Fiksel J., 2006, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, V2, P14
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Frick Karen., 2015, California Journal of Politics and Policy, V7
   Fu Xin, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P367, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9693-6
   Gilbert R., 2003, SUSTAINABLE TRANSPOR
   Graymore MLM, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.08.016
   Graymore MLM, 2008, ECOL ECON, V67, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.002
   Graymore MLM, 2009, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P453, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.08.006
   Guzzo D, 2024, ECOL ECON, V217, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108050
   Haghshenas H, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V15, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.010
   Halkos GE, 2015, OPER RES-GER, V15, P1, DOI 10.1007/s12351-015-0170-4
   Heberling MT, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V111, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.03.055
   Hecht A. D., 2017, Jacobs journal of environmental sciences, P1
   Hellström D, 2000, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V20, P311, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00043-3
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hung HC, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
   Jad'ud'ová J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041273
   Jeon CM, 2005, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V11, P31, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(31)
   Jeon CM, 2013, TRANSPORT POLICY, V25, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.10.004
   Khacef L, 2020, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V12533, P474, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63833-7_40
   Kim D, 2018, FUTURES, V102, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.05.001
   KOHONEN T, 1990, P IEEE, V78, P1464, DOI 10.1109/5.58325
   Kohonen T, 2013, NEURAL NETWORKS, V37, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.018
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Krueger R, 2008, REG STUD, V42, P1263, DOI 10.1080/00343400801968403
   Kuscahyadi F, 2017, AIP CONF PROC, V1857, DOI 10.1063/1.4987118
   Lam NSN, 2015, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V42, P315, DOI 10.1080/15230406.2015.1040999
   Lamond JE, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P63, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
   Lee ACD, 2015, HABITAT INT, V45, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.027
   Litman T., 2011, Well measured developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning, V4
   Litman T., 2006, Intern. J. Global Environ. Iss., V6, P331, DOI [DOI 10.1504/IJGENVI.2006.010889, 10.1504/ijgenvi.2006.010889]
   Liu HQ, 2021, TRANSPORT RES REC, V2675, P1655, DOI 10.1177/03611981211009519
   Lizarralde G, 2015, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V15, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2014.12.004
   Loo BPY, 2008, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V2, P177, DOI 10.1080/15568310701517331
   Lynch A., 2019, The 2019 US Cities Sustainable Development Report
   Mandinia I, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89, P738, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.019
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Markolf SA, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101181
   Martin G., 2019, Sustainability prospects for autonomous vehicles: Environmental, social, and urban
   Mascarenhas A, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V92, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.005
   MathWorks, Cluster Data with a Self-Organizing Map - MATLAB & Simulink
   May AD, 2013, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V7, P170, DOI 10.1080/15568318.2013.710136
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Ngossaha J, 2017, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V50, P7481, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1064
   Munda G, 2011, REG STUD, V45, P261, DOI 10.1080/00343401003713316
   Naganathan H, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V35, P799, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.011
   Nelson DR, 2007, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V32, P395, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348
   Nogués S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V225, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.328
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V244, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.027
   Oses U, 2018, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000406
   Peacock WalterG., 2010, ADV RESILIENCE COAST
   Phillis YA, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V64, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.03.002
   Prashar S, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1609, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0320-4
   Pravitasari A.E., 2018, Environ. Ecol. Res, V6, P157, DOI [10.13189/eer.2018.060303, DOI 10.13189/EER.2018.060303]
   Qiu W, 2018, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V20, P1185, DOI 10.1007/s10098-018-1540-4
   Rajak S, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V71, P503, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.031
   Ramos TB, 2009, J CLEAN PROD, V17, P1101, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.024
   Roostaie S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V232, P1158, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.382
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Ryu J, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.020
   Salem A., 2023, ROLE DESIGN CONSTRUC, P105
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Sdoukopoulos A, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V67, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.11.020
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Seto KC, 2016, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V41, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
   Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
   Shim JH, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P14153, DOI 10.3390/su71014153
   Siebeneck L, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V79, P955, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1886-4
   Skytt T, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V100, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.08.065
   Smetana S, 2015, REG SCI POLICY PRACT, V7, P163, DOI 10.1111/rsp3.12068
   Smetana S, 2016, GEOGR ANAL, V48, P391, DOI 10.1111/gean.12102
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Sultana S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P279, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1395635
   Tanguay GA, 2010, ECOL INDIC, V10, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.013
   United Nations, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203, P1
   Ürge-Vorsatz D, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P174, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0100-6
   van Zeijl-Rozema A, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P475, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.025
   Wackernagel M, 1998, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V51, P511, DOI 10.1023/A:1006094904277
   Wang CD, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V114, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.121
   Wood R, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1877, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.006
   Yang Q, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P9282, DOI 10.3390/su6129282
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhang J, 2012, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V361-363, P1476, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.361-363.1476
   Zhang MM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224442
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zheng J, 2013, RES TRANSP BUS MANAG, V7, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.rtbm.2013.02.001
   Zheng Y, 2018, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V9, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2018.12.002
NR 121
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 37
U2 47
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 155
AR 105414
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105414
EA SEP 2024
PG 15
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA G1G5N
UT WOS:001314190400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Farrelly, MA
   Brown, RR
AF Farrelly, Megan Anne
   Brown, Rebekah Ruth
TI Making the implicit, explicit: time for renegotiating the urban water
   supply hydrosocial contract?
SO URBAN WATER JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE alternative water supplies; co-management; community receptivity;
   hydrosocial contract; practitioner perceptions; resilience
ID RECYCLED WATER; POTABLE REUSE; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS; CITIES;
   COPRODUCTION; CONSULTATION; PERCEPTIONS; TRANSITIONS; ENTRAPMENT
AB Today's modern cities' 'big-pipes in, big-pipes out' potable water supply approach does not offer society the resilience for adaptation to future climate challenges. One approach towards building resilience would involve cities adopting diverse, alternative water supplies; such as recycled wastewater, greywater and stormwater, within a fit-for-purpose philosophy, incorporating a mix of centralised and decentralised technologies. Globally, modern cities have limited on-ground experience with such complex approaches, despite ad-hoc policy rhetoric to the contrary and multiple technological options. Through considering the implicit and technocratic hydrosocial contract underpinning the current 'big pipes' approach, it appears the judgement and advice of 'water experts' is a significant determinant regarding opportunities for realising more resilient water supplies. Contrasting primary and secondary survey data from water experts and communities across Australian cities in relation to their receptivity to alternative water supplies; it is evident that community members are far more receptive than water experts expect. Thus, this difference in perception is potentially a significant barrier to realising a resilient approach. Path-dependant decision-making and practice is pervasive throughout the urban water field, and while the physical artefact of the traditional water supply system remains largely invisible and disconnected from communities, it is the implicit hydrosocial contract that keeps water experts disconnected from communities. Based on evidence presented in this paper, shifting the current hydrosocial contract to a more resilient approach is vulnerable to business as usual. Recommendations are offered for fundamentally reshaping this contract through deliberative processes that work towards enabling co-governance, co-design and co-management of this alternative and complex water supply approach into the future.
C1 [Farrelly, Megan Anne; Brown, Rebekah Ruth] Monash Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Ctr Water Sensit Cities, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia.
C3 Cooperative Research Centre for Water Sensitive Cities (CRCWSC); Monash
   University
RP Farrelly, MA (corresponding author), Monash Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Ctr Water Sensit Cities, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia.
EM Megan.Farrelly@monash.edu
RI Farrelly, Megan/G-8128-2011
OI Farrelly, Megan/0000-0002-0453-059X; Brown, Rebekah/0000-0002-8689-7562
FU Monash Water for Liveability; Australian Research Council [LP0669145];
   Victorian Government's Smart Water Fund; Australian Research Council
   [LP0669145] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
FX We gratefully acknowledge the industry partners of Monash Water for
   Liveability, the Australian Research Council (LP0669145), and the
   Victorian Government's Smart Water Fund for contributing financial
   support for this research. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for
   their helpful feedback.
CR ACIL Tasman, 2005, RES ACC REC WAT IMP
   [Anonymous], 4610 0 WAT ACC AUSTR
   [Anonymous], 1999, PROG ENV SCI
   [Anonymous], 1995, I ORG
   [Anonymous], 48 COOP RES CTR WAT
   [Anonymous], 2906 CSIRO LAND WAT
   Ashley R., 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, V156, P41
   Baggett S, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.075
   Bakker K, 2005, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V95, P542, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00474.x
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Baumann DuaneA., 1983, Applied Geography, V3, P79, DOI DOI 10.1016/0143-6228(83)90007-3
   Bovaird T, 2007, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V67, P846, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   BROWN R, 2006, P 7 INT C URB DRAIN, P119
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P839, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.028
   Brown RR, 2008, AUSTRALAS J WAT RESO, V12, P73, DOI 10.1080/13241583.2008.11465336
   Brown R, 2009, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V25, P15, DOI 10.1080/07900620802586090
   Brown R, 2011, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V25, P4037, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-9886-y
   Brown RR, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V41, P221, DOI 10.1007/s00267-007-9046-6
   Brown RL, 2007, CONCISE GUIDE TO MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES: BUSINESS, LEGAL, FINANCE, ACCOUNTING, TAX AND PROCESS ASPECTS, P1
   Browne A, 2007, STRUCTURING DIMENSIO
   Clarke JM, 2006, AUSTRALAS J WAT RESO, V10, P261, DOI 10.1080/13241583.2006.11465301
   CSIRO, 1994, 9443 CSIRO AUSTR RES
   CSIRO, 1994, 942 CSIRO AUSTR RES
   Denley J., 1994, WATER REUSE MOST REL, P1
   Dillon P., 2000, WASTE MANAGEMENT ENV, V11, P27
   Dillon P., 2001, P WAT REC AUSTR 2000, P99
   Dolnicar S, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.080
   Dolnicar S, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, P888, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.02.003
   Duffy A., 2009, P GLOB CIT WAT FUT S
   Elzen B, 2005, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V72, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.04.002
   Farrelly M, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007
   Fischer F., 1995, TECHNOCRACY POLITICS
   Fischer F., 2000, Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Friend HD, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.076
   GELDOF GD, 1995, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V32, P7, DOI 10.2166/wst.1995.0004
   Hurlimann A., 2006, WATER J AUSTR WATER, V33, P58
   Hurlimann A., 2007, Water: Journal of the Australian Water Association, V34, P58
   Hurlimann A., 2003, WATER J AUSTR WATER, V31, P40
   Hurlimann AC, 2008, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V57, P891, DOI 10.2166/wst.2008.167
   Hurlimann AC, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.077
   Hurlimann A, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V61, P2137, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.007
   Hurlimann A, 2010, WATER RES, V44, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.020
   Hurlimann Anna C., 2007, Environmentalist, V27, P83, DOI 10.1007/s10669-007-9019-6
   Keath N., 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P1721
   Khan SJ, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.079
   Kooiman J., 2000, Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, V2, P359, DOI [10.1080/14719030000000022, DOI 10.1080/14719030000000022]
   Law IB, 1996, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V33, P71, DOI 10.1016/0273-1223(96)00408-8
   Leviston Z., J APPL PSYC IN PRESS
   Lohman L., 1987, IMPL WAT REUS P WAT
   Lundqvist J., 2001, FRONTIERS URBAN WATE, P344
   Maksimovic Cedo., 2001, Frontiers in Urban Water Management
   Marks J., 2004, WATER-SUI, P46
   Marks J., 2006, WATER, V33, P151
   Marks JS, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.074
   Marks JS, 2005, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V18, P557, DOI 10.1080/08941920590947995
   Marks J, 2008, J SOCIOL, V44, P83, DOI 10.1177/1440783307085844
   MCKAY J., 2003, WATER J AUSTR WATER, V30, P45
   Mitchell B, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN A, V37, P1335, DOI 10.1068/a37224
   Moss T, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1480, DOI 10.1068/a4116
   Mostert E, 2008, WATER INT, V33, P293, DOI 10.1080/02508060802275757
   Nancarrow BE, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P3199, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.759
   Nancarrow B.E., 2007, Technical Report No. 1
   Nancarrow BE, 2010, URBAN WATER J, V7, P197, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2010.484500
   Newman P, 2001, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V43, P93, DOI 10.2166/wst.2001.0188
   Ohlsson L., 1999, 9 MEWREW U LOND SCH
   Ostrom E, 1996, WORLD DEV, V24, P1073, DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Ostrom E, 2010, AM ECON REV, V100, P641, DOI 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Po M., 2004, 5403 COMM SCI IND RE
   Po M., 2005, Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship
   Radcliffe JC, 2010, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V62, P792, DOI 10.2166/wst.2010.362
   Ralph Stone and Company, 1974, WAST RECL SOC TECHN
   Rauch W, 2005, ENVIRON MANAGE, V35, P396, DOI 10.1007/s00267-003-0114-2
   Russell S, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.081
   Russell S, 2009, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V22, P56, DOI 10.1080/08941920801910666
   Russell S, 2009, WATER POLICY, V11, P21, DOI 10.2166/wp.2009.007
   Ryan AM, 2009, J HYDROL, V379, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.002
   Sofoulis Z., 2011, WATERLINES REPORT SE
   Stenekes N, 2006, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V31, P107, DOI 10.1177/0162243905283636
   Walker W, 2000, RES POLICY, V29, P833, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6
   Warner J., 2000, 24 PRET U AFR WAT IS
   Wong T., 2008, WATER J AUSTR WATER, V35, P52
   Wong THF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P673, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.436
   Wong THF, 2006, AUSTRALAS J WAT RESO, V10, P213, DOI 10.1080/13241583.2006.11465296
   Yu C., 2011, P 12 INT C URB DRAIN
NR 87
TC 24
Z9 28
U1 0
U2 49
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1573-062X
EI 1744-9006
J9 URBAN WATER J
JI Urban Water J.
PY 2014
VL 11
IS 5
BP 392
EP 404
DI 10.1080/1573062X.2013.793729
PG 13
WC Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Water Resources
GA AI8RO
UT WOS:000337191800006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, J
   Liu, WY
   Lin, Y
   Wei, BY
   Liu, YH
AF Zhou, Jie
   Liu, Wenyi
   Lin, Yu
   Wei, Benyong
   Liu, Yaohui
TI The Evaluation and Comparison of Resilience for Shelters in Old and New
   Urban Districts: A Case Study in Kunming City, China
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE shelters; resilience; old and new urban districts; disaster; urban
   safety
ID CHALLENGES
AB As a critical resource in emergency response and a pivotal element in disaster prevention and risk reduction, shelters play a central role in the holistic continuum of rescue and relief efforts. However, existing research often overlooks the comprehensive assessment and enhancement of shelter resilience. This study proposes a novel safety-robustness-accessibility (SRA) model aimed at evaluating and enhancing the overall resilience of shelters in the face of disasters. Firstly, a resilience assessment system for shelters was established, leveraging multi-source data and encompassing diverse dimensions, including safety, robustness, and accessibility. Subsequently, the entropy weight method was utilized to determine the weights of the assessment indicators. The case study and comparative analysis were conducted on shelters situated in two urban areas, old and new, in Kunming City, China, namely Wuhua District and Chenggong District. The findings reveal a higher quantity of shelters in Wuhua District compared to Chenggong District; however, the overall resilience level is relatively low, predominantly categorized as "Mid-Low" grade, constituting a substantial 57.94%. Conversely, shelters in Chenggong District exhibit a relatively high resilience level, predominantly classified as "Medium" grade, accounting for 33.77%. This study furnishes valuable data references and specific strategies aimed at enhancing the resilience of urban shelters against disasters. It offers crucial insights for urban planning and management to strengthen shelter resilience, thereby contributing to the development of a more resilient and sustainable urban future.
C1 [Zhou, Jie; Wei, Benyong] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Jie; Wei, Benyong] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Seism & Volcan Hazards, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Wenyi; Lin, Yu; Liu, Yaohui] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Surveying & Geoinformat, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
C3 China Earthquake Administration; Institute of Geology, CEA; China
   Earthquake Administration; Shandong Jianzhu University
RP Liu, WY; Liu, YH (corresponding author), Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Surveying & Geoinformat, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
EM zhoujie@ies.ac.cn; 2022165113@stu.sdjzu.edu.cn;
   2022165107@stu.sdjzu.edu.cn; bywei1982@163.com; liuyaohui20@sdjzu.edu.cn
RI Zhou, Jie/KRP-4117-2024; Liu, Yaohui/GYE-0883-2022; Wei,
   Benyong/AGR-2419-2022
OI Liu, Wenyi/0000-0003-2069-0865; Liu, Yaohui/0000-0002-3041-3557; Wei,
   Benyong/0000-0003-3510-278X; lin, Yu/0000-0002-0322-8858
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China
FX No Statement Available
CR Ahmed T, 2024, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V38, P1897, DOI 10.1007/s00477-024-02661-y
   Alawi M, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15021092
   Asgary A, 2019, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V10, P130, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2018-0044
   Bashawri A, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P924, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)01019-3
   Buszta J, 2023, RESOURCES-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/resources12090106
   Cao FF, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110643
   Chen W, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15061261
   Cheng Y, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116461
   Cui P, 2021, GEOGR SUSTAIN, V2, P216, DOI 10.1016/j.geosus.2021.09.001
   Fang DP, 2020, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002815
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Patro SGK, 2015, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1503.06462
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Indirli M., 2023, GEOHAZARDS DISASTER, P293
   Indirli M, 2019, GEOGR ANTHROPOCENE, V2, P194
   Jiang RJ, 2023, COMMUN EARTH ENVIRON, V4, DOI 10.1038/s43247-023-01049-0
   Khan MTI, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V118, P611, DOI 10.1007/s11069-023-06021-x
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kumar R, 2021, J MATER RES TECHNOL, V10, P1471, DOI 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.114
   Liu KN, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102873
   Liu WY, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105109
   Liu YH, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12071469
   Liu YH, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101591
   Liu YH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103649
   Lu XY, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-01757-7
   Ma YJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11020399
   Malekinezhad H, 2021, ACTA GEOPHYS, V69, P841, DOI 10.1007/s11600-021-00586-6
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   Mazhin SA, 2021, J EDUC HEALTH PROMOT, V10, DOI 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1525_20
   Ni XW, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15086719
   Schweizer PJ, 2019, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V28, P854, DOI 10.1108/DPM-09-2019-0282
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Wei YX, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101813
   Wu B, 2023, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101911
   Wu LH, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151410936
   Wu YY, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151712751
   Wu YY, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103754
   Yi GX, 2008, CHINESE J GEOPHYS-CH, V51, P1719
   Yin HY, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104691
   Yu B, 2020, IEEE J-STARS, V13, P6454, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3035926
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhang ZX, 2022, SCI DATA, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41597-022-01168-x
   Zhao LJ, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112098
   Zhiqiang Lin, 2021, 2021 IEEE 4th Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), P299, DOI 10.1109/IMCEC51613.2021.9482106
   Zhu YX, 2020, MATH PROBL ENG, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/3564835
NR 45
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 21
U2 31
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 7
AR 3022
DI 10.3390/su16073022
PG 14
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NM7Y0
UT WOS:001200946500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, YH
   Liu, WY
   Zhang, XY
   Lin, Y
   Zheng, GQ
   Zhao, Z
   Cheng, H
   Gross, L
   Li, XL
   Wei, BY
   Su, F
AF Liu, Yaohui
   Liu, Wenyi
   Zhang, Xinyu
   Lin, Yu
   Zheng, Guoqiang
   Zhao, Zhan
   Cheng, Hao
   Gross, Lutz
   Li, Xiaoli
   Wei, Benyong
   Su, Fei
TI Nighttime light perspective in urban resilience assessment and
   spatiotemporal impact of COVID-19 from January to June 2022 in mainland
   China
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; COVID-19; NPP-VIIRS nighttime light data; Moran's I
   statistics; Remote sensing; Mainland China
ID UNITED-STATES; DMSP-OLS
AB The outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has resulted in large threats and damage to society and the economy. In this study, we evaluate and verify the comprehensive resilience and spatiotemporal impact of the COVID-19 epidemic from January to June 2022 in mainland China based on multisource data. First, we adopt a combination of the mandatory determination method and the coefficient of variation method to determine the weight of the urban resilience assessment index. Furthermore, Beijing, Shanghai, and Tianjin were selected to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the resilience assessment results based on the nighttime light data. Finally, the epidemic situation was dynamically monitored and verified with population migration data. The results show that urban comprehensive resilience of mainland China is shown in the distribution pattern of higher resilience in the middle east and south and lower resilience in the northwest and northeast. Moreover, the average light intensity index is inversely proportional to the number of newly confirmed and treated cases of COVID-19 in the local area. This study provides a scientific reference to improve the comprehensive resilience of cities to achieve the goals of sustainable development (SDGs 11): make cities and human settlements resilient and sustainable.
C1 [Liu, Yaohui; Liu, Wenyi; Zhang, Xinyu; Lin, Yu; Zheng, Guoqiang; Zhao, Zhan; Su, Fei] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Surveying & Geoinformat, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Yaohui] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geodesy & Geomatics, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Yaohui; Gross, Lutz] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia.
   [Liu, Yaohui; Wei, Benyong] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Cheng, Hao] Wuhan Univ, Sch Remote Sensing & Informat Engn, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Xiaoli] China Earthquake Networks Ctr, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China.
   [Wei, Benyong] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Seism & Volcan Hazards, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
C3 Shandong Jianzhu University; Shandong University of Science &
   Technology; University of Queensland; China Earthquake Administration;
   Institute of Geology, CEA; Wuhan University; China Earthquake
   Administration; China Earthquake Networks Center, CEA; China Earthquake
   Administration
RP Zheng, GQ (corresponding author), Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Surveying & Geoinformat, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
EM liuyaohui20@sdjzu.edu.cn; gqzheng@sdjzu.edu.cn
RI Benyong, Wei/AGR-2419-2022; Xinyu, Zhang/IYS-2841-2023; li,
   xiaoli/HTR-6961-2023; Liu, Yaohui/GYE-0883-2022
OI Liu, Yaohui/0000-0002-3041-3557; Liu, Wenyi/0000-0003-2069-0865
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Amiral J., 2020, ANN CLIN IMMUNOL MIC, V2
   Barnawi A, 2021, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V124, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2021.05.019
   Chakraborty I, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Elvidge CD, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13050922
   Fan XW, 2019, INT J REMOTE SENS, V40, P2386, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2018.1460512
   Gillespie TW, 2014, REMOTE SENS LETT, V5, P286, DOI 10.1080/2150704X.2014.900205
   Han XH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141911929
   Hashitera S., 1999, Proceedings of the 20th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, V2, P1291
   Hause AM, 2022, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V71, P249, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7107e1
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kabanda TH, 2022, S AFR GEOGR J, V104, P539, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2022.2028667
   Kompaniyets L, 2022, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V71, P993, DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7131a3
   Kooraki S, 2020, J AM COLL RADIOL, V17, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.02.008
   Levin N, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111443
   Li W, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.006
   Li X, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10040588
   Liu H, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14095559
   Liu YH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103649
   Liu YH, 2023, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V14, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2023.2173663
   Liu YH, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101577
   Liu YH, 2019, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V10, P958, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2018.1524400
   Lo CP, 2002, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V92, P225, DOI 10.1111/1467-8306.00288
   Miyah Youssef, 2022, ScientificWorldJournal, V2022, P5578284, DOI 10.1155/2022/5578284
   MORAN PAP, 1948, J ROY STAT SOC B, V10, P243
   Naseem M, 2020, J PRIM CARE COMMUNIT, V11, DOI 10.1177/2150132720963634
   Organization WH., 2022, COVID-19 Weekly Epidemiological Update, Edition 108, 7 September 2022, VEdition 99
   Pan WB, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062547
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Pokhrel S., 2021, Higher Education for the Future, V8, P133, DOI [DOI 10.1177/2347631120983481, DOI 10.1177/234763112098348]
   Rothan HA, 2020, J AUTOIMMUN, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   de Miguel AS, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V224, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.01.035
   Schwind N, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P239, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_12
   Shirowzhan S, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9040240
   Song ML, 2022, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V35, P58, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-03-2021-0153
   Terblanche T, 2022, JAMBA-J DISASTER RIS, V14, DOI 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1264
   Wang XT, 2019, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V8, DOI 10.3390/ijgi8120580
   Wang XJ, 2022, GEOHEALTH, V6, DOI 10.1029/2021GH000555
   Wu MQ, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11020122
   Yin J, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10010011
   Yin RY, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P5111, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3078237
   You XT, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V113, P1751, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05368-x
   Zhang YM, 2022, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2022.102855
   Zhao XZ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10101526
   Zheng QM, 2019, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V153, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.019
   Zheng YM, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103338
   Zhou KY, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11050601
NR 50
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 8
U2 68
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 50
AR 101591
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101591
EA JUL 2023
PG 23
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA N4VX5
UT WOS:001037018900001
PM 37362004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cowell, M
   Cousins, T
AF Cowell, Margaret
   Cousins, Tiffany
TI Equity and the Chief Resilience Officer in the era of 100 Resilient
   Cities: A qualitative comparative analysis of US resilience strategies
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Governance; Equity; Fuzzy set QCA
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; REGIONAL RESILIENCE; POLITICS; ISOMORPHISM; CHALLENGE;
   IMPACTS; JUSTICE; AGENDA; RIGHTS
AB This research analyzes resilience strategy documents for United States cities that participated in the Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) program. The empirical subjects of this study are the 22 United States cities where resilience strategies were completed as of May 2021. Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), this research investigates whether there is a relationship between: 1) a city's Chief Resilience Officer's (CRO) professional training; 2) the threats identified in each city's resilience strategies; and 3) whether or not the strategies emphasize equity priorities. Because of the focus on a joint causal system, the fsQCA method allows interaction effects among each characteristic, rather than holding constant a set of independent variables to ascertain the effect of a cause on a dependent variable. This research therefore seeks to ascertain whether certain types of identified threats, in combination with a CRO's professional background, relate to the prioriti-zation of equity in resilience strategy documents. The results of the analysis by intermediate solution shows two causal condition combinations (or recipes) relating to equity as a priority. First, equity was more likely to be a priority in places with a CRO who was not trained in the social sciences. Second, equity was also more likely to be a priority in cities that identified climate and natural hazards as well as infrastructure and non-environmental challenges. Our analysis suggests that analyzing both the contents of resilience strategies and the leadership involved in the development of said plans is an important contribution to the field, especially as we collectively grapple with how best to confront myriad and evolving challenges of the 21st century.
C1 [Cowell, Margaret; Cousins, Tiffany] Virginia Tech, Arlington, VA 22203 USA.
C3 Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
RP Cowell, M (corresponding author), Virginia Tech, Res Ctr, Off 6-018,MC0804,900 N Glebe Rd, Arlington, VA 22203 USA.
EM mmcowell@vt.edu
FU National Science Foundation [1735139]; Division Of Graduate Education;
   Direct For Education and Human Resources [1735139] Funding Source:
   National Science Foundation
FX This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
   Foundation under Grant Number 1735139. Any opinions, findings, and
   conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of
   the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
   Science Foundation.
CR Agyeman J, 2003, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V590, P35, DOI 10.1177/0002716203256565
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2009, ALTERN J
   Anzia SF, 2011, AM J POLIT SCI, V55, P478, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00512.x
   Bahadur AV, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.004
   Barnes TD, 2021, LEGIS STUD QUART, V46, P119, DOI 10.1111/lsq.12286
   Berke P, 2009, J PLAN LIT, V23, P227, DOI 10.1177/0885412208327014
   Brint S, 2021, AGE EXPERTS
   Brunetta G, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P27, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_3
   Callahan David, 2017, The Givers: Wealth, Power, and Philanthropy in a New Gilded Age
   Carnes N, 2012, LEGIS STUD QUART, V37, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00033.x
   Carnes Nicholas., 2013, White-Collar Government: the Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making
   Cech E. A., 2019, ASEE ANN C EXPOSITIO, P1
   Cech EA, 2014, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V39, P42, DOI 10.1177/0162243913504305
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Corburn J, 2012, PLOS MED, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001285
   Cowell M, 2020, HDB REGIONAL EC RESI
   Cowell MM, 2013, CITIES, V30, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.04.001
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dawkins CJ, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P414, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15627193
   DiMaggio PJ, 2000, ADV STRATEG MANAGE, V 17, P143, DOI 10.2307/2095101
   Evetts J, 2006, CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF EXPERTISE AND EXPERT PERFORMANCE, P105
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Fitzgibbons J, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102997
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Gooden S. T., 2017, STATE LOCAL GOVT REV, V49, P37, DOI [10.1177/0160323X17720268, DOI 10.1177/0160323X17720268]
   Greckhamer T, 2018, STRATEG ORGAN, V16, P482, DOI 10.1177/1476127018786487
   Greckhamer T, 2013, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V38, P49, DOI 10.1108/50733-558X(2013)0000038007
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   KEATING WD, 1991, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V57, P136, DOI 10.1080/01944369108975483
   Kilburn HW, 2004, URBAN AFF REV, V39, P633, DOI 10.1177/1078087403262861
   Kort M, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P777, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614674
   Kraus S, 2018, INT ENTREP MANAG J, V14, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11365-017-0461-8
   Lee SSY, 2014, EPIDEMIOL HEALTH, V36, DOI 10.4178/epih/e2014038
   Liao L, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P60, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2019.1667262
   Loh CG, 2021, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V87, P181, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1829498
   Makse T, 2021, POLICY STUD J, V49, P359, DOI 10.1111/psj.12380
   Marx A., 2006, Towards more robust model specification in QCA results from a methodological experiment
   McMillan R, 2022, ENVIRON URBAN, V34, P170, DOI 10.1177/09562478211035644
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mizruchi MS, 1999, ADMIN SCI QUART, V44, P653, DOI 10.2307/2667051
   Moloney S, 2021, CITIES, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103017
   Monzón A, 2013, CITIES, V30, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.002
   Peck J.Theodore., 2015, FAST POLICY EXPT STA
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P329
   Portz J., 2004, Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools, P96
   Ragin C., 2007, The Sage handbook of social science methodology, P67, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781848607958
   Ragin C. C., 2000, Fuzzy-Set Social Science
   Ragin CC, 2006, POLIT ANAL, V14, P291, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpj019
   Reckhow S., 2012, Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics
   Reingold B, 2019, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V52, P426, DOI 10.1017/S1049096519000052
   Resilient Cities, FAQ
   Russo I, 2019, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V49, P99, DOI 10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2018-0056
   Sanchez AX, 2018, PALGR COMMUN, V4, DOI 10.1057/s41599-018-0074-z
   Schilling J, 2013, CITY 21ST CENTURY, P244
   Sellberg MM, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P906, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Talen E, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102962
   Tanner T., 2017, Challenges for resilience policy and practice
   Teodoro MP, 2014, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V24, P983, DOI 10.1093/jopart/muu039
   Therrien MC, 2020, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V11, P320, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12192
   Thornley A, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P1947, DOI 10.1080/00420980500279950
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   van Veenstra Anne Fleur, 2011, Electronic Government, V8, P226, DOI 10.1504/EG.2011.039838
   Verweij S, 2019, J PLAN LIT, V34, P300, DOI 10.1177/0885412219841490
   Verweij S, 2013, EVALUATION-US, V19, P40, DOI 10.1177/1356389012470682
   Vis B, 2012, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V41, P168, DOI 10.1177/0049124112442142
   White R., 2015, Modeling Cities and Regions as Complex Systems From Theory to Planning Applications
   Whitford AB, 2010, INT PUBLIC MANAG J, V13, P321, DOI 10.1080/10967494.2010.529378
   Williams A., 2017, PROBLEM URBAN PHILAN
   Wolfmeyer M., 2017, CRIT EDUC, V8
   Zapata MA, 2015, J PLAN EDUC RES, V35, P245, DOI 10.1177/0739456X15589967
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 82
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 9
U2 63
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 131
AR 103946
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103946
EA AUG 2022
PG 8
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 4Y1FL
UT WOS:000861278100009
OA Bronze
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Weinstein, L
   Rumbach, A
   Sinha, S
AF Weinstein, Liza
   Rumbach, Andrew
   Sinha, Saumitra
TI Resilient Growth: Fantasy Plans and Unplanned Developments in India's
   Flood-Prone Coastal Cities
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE flood risk; flooding; climate change; climate resilience; India;
   Kolkata; Mumbai; disaster mitigation; resilience
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLITICAL ECOLOGY; RISK; ADAPTATION; CITY; INFORMALITY;
   KOLKATA
AB Academic and policy literatures on urban climate resilience tend to emphasize 'good planning' as the primary means for addressing the growing risk of flooding in Asia's coastal megacities. Cities have come to rely on disaster and climate resilience plans to future-proof their landscapes and protect vulnerable populations. Yet while data is collected, models are built and plans are drafted, environmentally destructive development practices continue unabated and often unchallenged. This article examines and seeks to explain the contradictions between a growing awareness of the risks of climate-induced flooding in resilience plans and the continuation of development practices widely acknowledged to exacerbate those risks. It analyzes these contradictions in the context of Mumbai and Kolkata, India's largest coastal cities, which are facing the severest threats from climate-induced flooding. Based on analyses of key resilience planning documents and both planned and unplanned developments in some of Mumbai's and Kolkata's most ecologically sensitive areas, our analysis reveals that resilience planning, promoted by the central government and international consultants, and presented in locally produced 'fantasy plans', fails to address the risks of climate-change-related flooding owing to tendencies to sidestep questions of politics, power and the distributional conflicts that shape urban development. We conclude that efforts to reduce urban flood risk would benefit from the research, methods and analytic concepts used to critically study cities, but significant gaps remain between these fields.
C1 [Weinstein, Liza] Northeastern Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
   [Rumbach, Andrew] Univ Colorado, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, 1250 14th St,Suite 2000, Denver, CO 80202 USA.
   [Sinha, Saumitra] H-1-3 Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India.
C3 Northeastern University; University of Colorado System; University of
   Colorado Denver
RP Weinstein, L (corresponding author), Northeastern Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, 360 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
EM l.weinstein@neu.edu; andrew.rumbach@ucdenver.edu; ss3472@cornell.edu
RI Rumbach, Andrew/AAA-1827-2020; Weinstein, Liza/JFT-0970-2023
OI Rumbach, Andrew/0000-0001-6780-4546; Weinstein,
   Liza/0009-0008-8948-0712; Sinha, Saumitra/0000-0001-8469-4895
CR Adams W.M., 2003, Green development: Environment and sustainability in the Third World
   Aerts JCJH, 2014, SCIENCE, V344, P472, DOI 10.1126/science.1248222
   Aggarwal RM, 2013, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V37, P1902, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12032
   Alok R., 2017, INDIAN EXPRESS
   [Anonymous], TIMES INDIA
   [Anonymous], India Development Foundation of Overseas Indians, DOI 10.4324/9781315745909
   [Anonymous], MUMB MAR ENQ MUMB FL
   [Anonymous], 2017, Hindustan Times
   [Anonymous], 2012, Times of India
   [Anonymous], 2005, HINDU
   [Anonymous], 2013, Turn Down the Heat: Climate Extremes, Regional Impacts, and the Case for Resilience
   [Anonymous], 2013, 12 5 YEAR PLAN 2012
   [Anonymous], ASS CLIM CHANG VULN
   [Anonymous], 2008, NAT ACT PLAN CLIM CH
   [Anonymous], 2002, Tenth Five Year Plan, 2002-2007
   [Anonymous], 1990, Calcutta: The Living City
   [Anonymous], 2007, MUMBAI MIRROR   0125
   [Anonymous], 2017, The Telegraph
   Arabindoo P., 2016, City, V20, P800, DOI [10.1080/13604813.2016.1239410, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2016.1239410]
   Arabindoo P, 2011, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V35, P379, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00943.x
   Atteridge A, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P68, DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0242-5
   Banerjee S., 2012, S ASIAN CHRONICLE, V2, P93
   Banerjee T., 2005, COMP PLANNING CULTUR
   Barkham P., 2016, The Guardian
   Basu J., 2017, E KOLKATA WETLANDS F
   Baud IsabelleSuzanne Antoinette., 2009, New forms of urban governance in India: shifts, models, networks and contestations
   Bhan G., 2013, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V48, P59
   Birkland T.A., 1997, DISASTER AGENDA SETT
   BROOKS G, 1992, SIGPLAN NOTICES, V27, P1, DOI [10.1145/143103.143108, 10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.213043]
   Chandran R., 2018, RELIEFWEB       0511
   Chatterjee B, 2018, HINDUSTAN TIMES
   Chattopadhyaya H., 1990, MARSH TOWNSHIP E CAL
   Chu E, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P281, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614174
   Clarke L.B., 1999, Mission improbable
   Cornea NL, 2017, GEOGR COMPASS, V11, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12310
   Datta A, 2015, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V5, P3, DOI 10.1177/2043820614565748
   Davies R., 2014, FLOODLIST       0725
   DCE IIT (Department of Civil Engineering IIT Bombay), 2008, MUMB FLOOD ACT GOD I
   Dembowski H., 2001, Taking the State to Court: Public Interest Litigation and the Public Sphere in Metropolitan India
   Doshi S., 2014, Ecologies of Urbanism in India, DOI [10.5790/hongkong/9789888139767.003.0009, DOI 10.5790/HONGKONG/9789888139767.003.0009]
   Doshi V., 2016, The Guardian
   Douglas Mary, 1966, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
   Faleiro S., 2006, TELKHA MAGAZINE 0624
   Fernandes S, 2017, Hindustan Times
   Follmann A, 2015, HABITAT INT, V45, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.02.007
   Forester John., 1988, Planning in the Face of Power
   Gadgil M., 2016, MUMBAI MIRROR   1024
   Ganapatye M., 2017, INDIA TODAY
   Garschagen M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P37, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0812-6
   Ghertner D.A., 2015, Rule by Aesthetics: World-Class City Making in Delhi
   Ghosal A., 2017, HINDUSTAN TIMES
   Ghosh D., 2016, J GEOGRAPHY ENV EART, V5, P1, DOI [DOI 10.9734/JGEESI/2016/23527, 10.9734/JGEESI/2016/23527]
   Ghosh D., 2005, ECOLOGY TRADITIONAL
   Gill SE, 2007, Built Environ, V33, P115, DOI DOI 10.2148/BENV.33.1.115
   Government of Maharashtra, 2006, FACT FIND COMM MUMB, VII
   Government of Maharashtra, 2006, FACT FIND COMM MUMB, VI
   Government of Maharashtra, 2005, DIS RISK MAN PROF
   Government of West Bengal, 2012, W BENG STAT ACT PLAN
   Govindarajan V., 2017, Scroll
   Gupta K., 2007, Urb. Wat. J, V4, P183, DOI DOI 10.1080/15730620701464141
   Jha AK, 2012, CITIES AND FLOODING: A GUIDE TO INTEGRATED URBAN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2
   Kirtane G., 2011, MAKING SEWER RIVER A
   Kolkata Municipal Corporation, 2014, ACT PLAN MIT FLOOD C
   Krishnamurthy RR, 2014, J COAST CONSERV, V18, P657, DOI 10.1007/s11852-014-0339-7
   Kudva N, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1614, DOI 10.1068/a41101
   Kundu R., 2010, THESIS
   McFarlane C, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P2795, DOI 10.1177/0042098012452460
   MCGM (Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai), 2018, GREAT MUMB DEV PLAN
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   Mitra S., 2017, ROUTLEDGE COMPANION
   Mukherji R., 2012, INDIA WATER POR 1012
   Mukhopadhyay Partha., 2009, Economic and Political Weekly, V54, P59
   Nagarik Mancha, 2017, SAV SUST E KOLK WETL
   NEERI (National Environmental Engineering Research Institute), 2011, CURR STAT MITH RIV P
   Niyogi S., 2015, TIMES INDIA
   Pal A, 2006, ENVIRON URBAN, V18, P501, DOI 10.1177/0956247806069628
   Pandey R, 2012, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V17, P487, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9338-2
   Parker T., 2009, GEOGR MAG, V81, P38
   Parnell S, 2007, AREA, V39, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00760.x
   Pelling M, 1999, GEOFORUM, V30, P249, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00015-9
   Pelling M, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P383, DOI 10.1177/0956247811410012
   Pinjarkar V, 2014, TIMES INDIA
   Prabhu C., 2005, FRONTLINE
   Prasad P., 2016, THE QUINT       0609
   PWC, 2016, Roadmap for low carbon and climate resilient Kolkata
   Rajadhayakshal M., 2012, TIMES INDIA
   Ranganathan M, 2015, ANTIPODE, V47, P1300, DOI 10.1111/anti.12149
   Ranger N, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P139, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9979-2
   Rayl S., 2017, TIMES INDIA
   Revi A, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P207, DOI 10.1177/0956247808089157
   Revi Aromar., 2005, Economic and Political Weekly, V40, P3911
   Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, SUMM EV
   Roy A, 2011, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V35, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x
   Roy A, 2009, PLAN THEOR, V8, P76, DOI 10.1177/1473095208099299
   Rumbach A., 2017, J URBAN AFF, V39, P1
   Sahu P, 2011, J EARTH SYST SCI, V120, P435, DOI 10.1007/s12040-011-0077-2
   SANDRP (South Asia Network on Dams River and People), 2014, MAH STAT ACT PLAN CL
   Sarkar S., 2017, REAL ESTATE CHOKES K
   SCOPE (Society for Creative Opportunities and Participatory Ecosystems), 2017, NOT SINGL SIGN POST
   Sekharl V.C., 2005, TIMES INDIA
   Shatkin G, 2019, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V43, P208, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12758
   Singh R., 2015, SCROLL
   Vass K.K., 2006, CIFRI ANN REPORT 200
   Weinstein L, 2008, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V32, P22, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00766.x
NR 104
TC 35
Z9 36
U1 3
U2 34
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0309-1317
EI 1468-2427
J9 INT J URBAN REGIONAL
JI Int. J. Urban Reg. Res.
PD MAR
PY 2019
VL 43
IS 2
BP 273
EP 291
DI 10.1111/1468-2427.12743
PG 19
WC Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA HN1IB
UT WOS:000459939600004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sharifi, E
   Sivam, A
   Boland, J
AF Sharifi, Ehsan
   Sivam, Alpana
   Boland, John
TI Resilience to heat in public space: a case study of Adelaide, South
   Australia
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE summer heatwave; heat resilience; outdoor thermal discomfort; heat
   stress; outdoor activities
ID OUTDOOR URBAN SPACES; THERMAL COMFORT; GREEN SPACE; CLIMATE; HEALTH;
   HOT; MICROCLIMATE; TEMPERATURE; MORTALITY; ADAPTATION
AB During summer heatwaves, heat load exacerbates in urban heat islands (especially in hot climates) and threatens public life in cities. This paper examines the links between urban microclimates, outdoor thermal discomfort and public life through an exploratory case study. Heat resilience is highlighted as the ability of the space to support its normal activities when experiencing out-of-comfort temperatures. It also reports on the correlations between heat sensitive outdoor activities and urban greenery in three disparate case studies in Adelaide. Results indicate that necessary and optional activities start to decline after the apparent temperature reaches the threshold of 28 degrees C-32 degrees C, while activities in public spaces with more urban greenery show higher resilience to heat stress. Research findings propose heat resilience as a quality indicator in public space and support the application of urban greenery to make urban settings more resilient to heat stress.
C1 [Sharifi, Ehsan] Univ South Australia, Sch Informat Technol & Math Sci, Div Informat Technol Engn & Environm, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
   [Sivam, Alpana] Univ South Australia, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Div Informat Technol Engn & Environm, Adelaide, Australia.
   [Boland, John] Univ South Australia, Sch Informat Technol & Math Sci, Div Informat Technol Engn & Environm, Adelaide, Australia.
C3 University of South Australia; University of South Australia; University
   of South Australia
RP Sharifi, E (corresponding author), Univ South Australia, Sch Informat Technol & Math Sci, Div Informat Technol Engn & Environm, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
EM ehsan.sharifi@unisa.edu.au
RI Sharifi, Ehsan/KCK-7717-2024; Sivam, Alpana/D-2091-2010; Boland,
   John/B-3046-2008; Sharifi, Ehsan/P-1402-2016
OI Boland, John/0000-0003-1132-7589; Sharifi, Ehsan/0000-0003-1309-925X;
   Sivam, Alpana/0000-0001-8632-5751
FU CRC for Low Carbon Living; city of Adelaide; city of Sydney; city of
   Melbourne
FX This paper draws on the work of the authors at the University of South
   Australia. It is a part of an ongoing research project on Urban
   Microclimates of Australian Cities, supported by the CRC for Low Carbon
   Living and the cities of Adelaide, Sydney and Melbourne. The research is
   approved by UniSA's Human Research Ethics Committee (PR 31464). The
   authors appreciate the generous and constructive assistance of the
   editorial board of Journal of Environmental Planning and Management and
   the anonymous reviewers in finalising this manuscript.
CR Aljawabra F, 2010, INTELL BUILD INT, V2, P198, DOI 10.3763/inbi.2010.0046
   [Anonymous], BUILDING ENV ACTIVE
   [Anonymous], LOW CARBON CITIES
   [Anonymous], HUMAN HLTH CLIMATE C
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE VULNE
   [Anonymous], DESIGNING CITIES CRI
   [Anonymous], EXTREME WEATHER EVEN
   [Anonymous], J EPIDEMIOLOGY COMMU
   [Anonymous], CAN CTR SCI ED
   [Anonymous], 2015, LOW CARBON CITIES TR
   [Anonymous], 2013, DEFINING HEATWAVES H
   [Anonymous], SOLUTIONS CLIMATE CH
   [Anonymous], ENV DESIGN GUIDE
   [Anonymous], 2010, HUMAN RIGHTS CLIMATE
   [Anonymous], 1982, Environmental Engineering
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE S AUS
   AULICIEMS A, 1969, International Journal of Biometeorology, V13, P147
   Bencheikh H, 2012, ENRGY PROCED, V18, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.013
   BOSSELMANN P, 1995, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V61, P226, DOI 10.1080/01944369508975635
   Bosselmann P., 2008, URBAN TRANSFORMATION
   Bryman A., 2008, Social research method, V3rd
   Burton E., 2006, Inclusive Urban Design: Streets for life, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780080456454
   Montero JC, 2013, INT J ENVIRON HEAL R, V23, P377, DOI 10.1080/09603123.2012.733941
   Chen L, 2012, CITIES, V29, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.08.006
   COOPER I, 1982, APPL ENERG, V11, P243, DOI 10.1016/0306-2619(82)90023-X
   Correa E, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V58, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.007
   DEDEAR RJ, 1991, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V34, P259, DOI 10.1007/BF01041840
   Dobbins Michael., 2009, URBAN DESIGN PEOPLE
   Eliasson I, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V82, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.020
   Erell E., 2011, Urban microclimate: designing the spaces between buildings
   Gartland L.M., 2012, Heat Islands: Understanding and Mitigating Heat in Urban Areas
   Gehl J., 2001, NEW CITY SPACES
   Gehl J., 2010, CITIES PEOPLE
   Gehl J., 2011, Public spaces public life study: City of Adelaide 2011
   Gehl J., 2013, STUDY PUBLIC LIFE
   Gehl J., 1987, Life Between Buildings-Using Public Space
   Gehl J., 2002, Public Spaces Public Life Studies
   Givoni Baruch., 1998, CLIMATE CONSIDERATIO
   Groenewegen PP, 2006, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-6-149
   Helfer Stephan, 2008, Turkish Journal of Botany, V32, P485
   Hu W, 2007, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V18, pS113
   Ichinose T, 2008, URBAN ENERGY TRANSITION: FROM FOSSIL FUELS TO RENEWABLE POWER, P365, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-045341-5.00015-3
   Jane J., 1961, DEATH LIFE GREAT AM
   Johansson E, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1326, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.022
   Kjellstrom T, 2009, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V2, DOI [10.3402/gha.v2i0.2047, 10.3402/gha.v2i0.1958]
   Lang J., 1987, CREATING ARCHITECTUR
   Lang J.T., 2005, Urban design: A typology of procedures and products
   Lillebye E, 2001, ADV ARC SER, V12, P3
   Lin RT, 2009, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V2, P52, DOI 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2024
   Lin TP, 2011, INT J CLIMATOL, V31, P302, DOI 10.1002/joc.2120
   Lin TP, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.06.002
   Lin TP, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P2017, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.02.004
   Lomas KJ, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V55, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.12.006
   Lynch Y., 2014, Where are all the trees? An analysis of tree canopy cover in urban Australia
   McMichael AJ., 2003, HUMAN HLTH CLIMATE C
   Moughtin C., 2005, URBAN DESIGN GREEN D
   Moughtin C., 2003, URBAN DESIGN STREET, V3rd
   Neuman W.L., 2011, Strategies of research design. Social research methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches, VSeventh
   Nicol F., 1993, THERMAL COMFORT HDB
   Nikolopoulou M, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P95, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00084-1
   Nikolopoulou M, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P227, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00093-1
   Nikolopoulou M., 1999, Architectural Science Review, V42, P27, DOI DOI 10.1080/00038628.1999.9696845
   Nikolopoulou M., 2004, Environmental diversity in architecture, P101
   Nikolopoulou M, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P3691, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.09.008
   Nikolopoulou M, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1455, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.031
   Nikolopoulou M, 2012, APPLIED URBAN ECOLOGY : A GLOBAL FRAMEWORK, P106
   Nitschke M, 2007, MED J AUSTRALIA, V187, P662, DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01466.x
   Nordbo A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V13, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.05.004
   Oke TR, 2006, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V84, P179, DOI [10.1007/s00704-005-0153-0, 10.1007/S00704-005-0153-0]
   OKE TR, 1988, ENERG BUILDINGS, V11, P103, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6
   Olgyay V., 1963, DESIGN CLIMATE
   Parsons K, 2009, GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, V2, P39, DOI 10.3402/gha.v2i0.2057
   Ryan P, 2004, SUSTAIN DEV, V12, P223, DOI 10.1002/sd.235
   Santos MA, 2005, SUSTAIN DEV, V13, P326, DOI 10.1002/sd.259
   Sharifi E., 2014, Journal of Sustainable Development, V7, P23, DOI DOI 10.5539/JSD.V7N3P23
   Shashua-Bar L, 2004, INT J CLIMATOL, V24, P1729, DOI 10.1002/joc.1092
   Spagnolo J, 2003, BUILD ENVIRON, V38, P721, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00209-3
   Stathopoulos T, 2004, BUILD ENVIRON, V39, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.001
   Steadman R. G., 1994, Australian Meteorological Magazine, V43, P1
   STEADMAN RG, 1979, J APPL METEOROL, V18, P861, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0861:TAOSPI>2.0.CO;2
   STEADMAN RG, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P1674, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1674:AUSOAT>2.0.CO;2
   Steffen W., 2014, HEATWAVES: HOTTER, LONGER
   Szokolay S., 2008, Introduction to architectural science, the basis of sustainable design, V2nd
   Thom E.C., 1959, WEATHERWISE, V12, P57, DOI [10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960, DOI 10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960]
   Tseliou A, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P1346, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.11.009
   Van Hoof J, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.023
   Walton D, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P3166, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.004
   Wang ZJ, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P2406, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.08.010
   Wendt D, 2007, SPORTS MED, V37, P669, DOI 10.2165/00007256-200737080-00002
   Whyte W., 2001, SOCIAL LIFE SMALL UR
   Williams S, 2012, ENVIRON INT, V40, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2011.11.011
   Williams S, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V414, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.038
NR 92
TC 30
Z9 32
U1 6
U2 72
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0964-0568
EI 1360-0559
J9 J ENVIRON PLANN MAN
JI J. Environ. Plan. Manag.
PY 2016
VL 59
IS 10
BP 1833
EP 1854
DI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1091294
PG 22
WC Development Studies; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Public Administration
GA DS6LO
UT WOS:000380893500006
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Li, Y
   Ye, SS
   Wu, QZ
   Wu, YJ
   Qian, SH
AF Li, Yan
   Ye, Shishang
   Wu, Qingzhou
   Wu, Yunjiang
   Qian, Shihui
TI Analysis and countermeasures of the "7.20" flood in Zhengzhou
SO JOURNAL OF ASIAN ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban flood; causes of flood; countermeasures of floods; water system
AB The "7.20" extreme rainstorm in Zhengzhou caused a serious urban flood. The reasons are as follows: In addition to being affected by global climate change, the rapid urbanization of Zhengzhou in the last 40 years has caused tremendous changes in the city's water system, underlying surface, urban topography, vertical system, urban underground facilities, all of which will directly or indirectly become factors of urban floods. Then, in response to the increasing frequency of urban floods, it is proposed to develop an overall flood resilience strategy led by the urban stream network; to establish a "large sponge city system of watersheds" and a resilient city's disaster prevention concept; and to improve the urban flood emergency management system. This is done to adjust measures to local conditions and collaborate with various departments to improve the disaster response capacity of urban floods.
C1 [Li, Yan; Ye, Shishang; Wu, Qingzhou; Wu, Yunjiang; Qian, Shihui] South China Univ Technol, Sch Architecture, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Yan] SCUT Co LTD, Architectural Design & Res Inst, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Yunjiang] South China Agr Univ, Sch Water conservancy & Civil Engn, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
C3 South China University of Technology; South China Agricultural
   University
RP Wu, QZ (corresponding author), South China Univ Technol, Sch Architecture, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
EM qzwu@scut.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878282]; Open Project of
   the State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science [2021ZB17]
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China under Grant 51878282 and the Open Project of the State Key
   Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science under Grant 2021ZB17.
CR Bai Y., 2018, RISK PREVENTION CONT
   Chen J., 2022, PRACTICE THEORY SEZS, P73, DOI [10.19861/j.cnki.tqsjyll.20220414.008, DOI 10.19861/J.CNKI.TQSJYLL.20220414.008]
   Chen S., 2022, China Flood & Drought Management, V32, P56, DOI [10.16867/j.issn.1673-9264.2022145, DOI 10.16867/J.ISSN.1673-9264.2022145]
   Chen W., 2021, CHINA WATER RESOURCE, P18
   [陈文龙 Chen Wenlong], 2021, [水利学报, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering], V52, P659
   Chen Z.Y., 2022, Water Resour. Hydropower Eng, V53, P1
   Compilation Committee of Zhengzhou Water Affairs Records, 2014, ZHENGZH WAT AFF REC
   CUI H., 2023, J CATASTROPHOLOGY, V38, P1
   Ewater, 2021, URBAN FLOOD RISK MAN
   Guo P., 2022, METEOROL ENV SCI, V45, P86
   Guo Y., 2022, Journal of China Hydrology, V42, P1, DOI [DOI 10.19797/J.CNKI.1000-0852.20220030, 10.19797/j.cnki.1000-0852.20220030]
   Han Y., 2021, J ZHANG GLOBAL WARMI
   He Y., 2021, P 2021 ANN C CHINESE, P333
   Huang J., 2022, Journal of Public Management, V19, P52, DOI [10.16149/j.cnki.23-1523.20220511.002, DOI 10.16149/J.CNKI.23-1523.20220511.002]
   Information Office the People's Government of Henan Province, 10 PRESS C FLOOD CON
   Ji H., 2008, GUANGDONG WATER RESO, V9, P10
   Li H., 2021, SHANGHAI URBAN MANAG, V30, P87
   Li N., 2019, FIRE PROTECTION TODA, V4, P3
   Liu S., 2017, CHINA FLOOD DROUGHT
   Ministry of Emergency Management of People's Republic of China, 2021, NAT FLOOD CONTR DROU
   Qiu, 2022, W CHINA, V31, P47
   Qiu B., 2021, CHINA ANCIENT CITY, V35, P1
   Ren H., 2022, J HOHAI U NAT SCI, P1
   Shu Y., 2015, Urban Underground Space Planning and Design
   Song Y., 2018, Journal of Institute of Disaster Prevention, V20, P71
   Su Aifang, 2021, Torrential Rain and Disasters, V40, P445, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1004-9045.2021.05.001
   Wang M., 2021, YANGTZE RIVER TECHNI, V5, P8
   Wang S., 2013, SCI TECHNOLOGY PROGR
   Wang Z., 2022, YELLOW RIVER, V44, P44
   [王振亚 Wang Zhenya], 2022, [河海大学学报. 自然科学版, Journal of Hohai University. Natural Sciences], V50, P17
   Wu Q., 2014, CITY PLANNING REV, V8, P71
   [吴庆洲 Wu Qingzhou], 2012, [灾害学, Journal of Catastrophology], V27, P111
   WU Z., 2022, DROUGHT MANAGEMENT, V32, P27, DOI [10.16867/j.issn.1673-9264.2022051, DOI 10.16867/J.ISSN.1673-9264.2022051]
   Xu W., 2022, China Flood & Drought Management, V32, P5, DOI [10.16867/j.issn.1673-9264.2022140, DOI 10.16867/J.ISSN.1673-9264.2022140]
   Yang D., 2013, CHINA FLOOD DROUGHT, V23, P7
   Yao YJ, 2022, CELL CYCLE, V21, P1360, DOI 10.1080/15384101.2022.2051122
   Zhang Q., 2019, CHINA FLOOD DROUGHT, V29, P58
   Zhang Y., 2009, EMERGENCY SYSTEM RES
   Zhengzhou Municipal People's Government, 2021, THERE ARE 29 PONDING
   Zhong Y., 2022, CHINA RURAL WATER HY, P1
   Zhu Z., 2014, INVESTIGATION PROTEC
NR 41
TC 12
Z9 13
U1 14
U2 74
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1346-7581
EI 1347-2852
J9 J ASIAN ARCHIT BUILD
JI J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng.
PD NOV 2
PY 2023
VL 22
IS 6
BP 3782
EP 3798
DI 10.1080/13467581.2023.2208195
EA MAY 2023
PG 17
WC Architecture; Construction & Building Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index (A&amp;HCI)
SC Architecture; Construction & Building Technology
GA W8MY4
UT WOS:000989692800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shi, WH
   Tian, J
   Namaiti, A
   Xing, XX
AF Shi, Weihao
   Tian, Jian
   Namaiti, Aihemaiti
   Xing, Xiaoxu
TI Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of the Coupling
   Coordination between Urbanization and Urban Resilience: A Case Study of
   the 167 Counties in Hebei Province
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE coupling coordination; urbanization; urban resilience; driving factors;
   counties; Hebei Province
ID ENVIRONMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; INDICATORS; FRAMEWORK; SHANGHAI; RESOURCE;
   IMPACTS; ECONOMY; SYSTEM; GROWTH
AB Urban resilience, as an important ability to deal with disasters in the process of urbanization, has been paid more and more attention as the result of the increasing risks that are caused by rapid urbanization. China is taking the county level as the basic unit to promote new-type urbanization and constructing resilient cities has become one of the development strategies. However, to achieve this strategy researchers need to analyze the interaction between county urbanization and urban resilience and its driving mechanism, which have been paid little attention. Therefore, this paper selected 167 counties in Hebei Province as the investigation subject. Based on the statistical data from 2010 to 2020, a comprehensive index system was developed to quantify the degree of coupling coordination between urbanization and urban resilience, and the spatial Durbin model was used to analyze the driving mechanism of it. The study shows that: Firstly, the urbanization level of counties rose year after year, with there being a geographical distribution that was "lower from southeast to northwest". The level of urban resilience increased year after year, showing a geographical distribution that was "higher from south to north" and a "core-edge" feature that was localized. Secondly, the coupling coordination degree increased steadily, and the overall level changed from a basic imbalance to a mild imbalance. In space, it is bounded by "Pingquan City-Pingshan County", which showed the distribution of "high in the east and low in the west, high in the center and low on the outskirts". Thirdly, the coupling coordination degree has spatial spillover effect. Government financial expenditure, innovation level, industrial upgrading level and urban shape index all influence the coupling coordination degree positively, with a successively decreasing impact, while the urban compactness has significant negative impacts. This study indicates that the regional differences exist in the coupling coordination degree, and the counties in different development stages need to adopt different strategies to promote the coordinated development of urbanized and resilient cities. Inter-regional support is also necessary in this process. Meanwhile, it is necessary for the government to govern various urban elements, especially in terms of their urban form.
C1 [Shi, Weihao; Tian, Jian; Namaiti, Aihemaiti] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
   [Xing, Xiaoxu] Renmin Univ China, Sch Appl Econ, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China.
C3 Tianjin University; Renmin University of China
RP Tian, J; Namaiti, A (corresponding author), Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
EM tianjian@tju.edu.cn; ahmat@tju.edu.cn
RI Weihao, Shi/LXV-4265-2024; Namaiti, Aihemaiti/HTP-6877-2023
OI Namaiti, Aihemaiti/0000-0001-8701-4808; Weihao, Shi/0009-0005-7832-3314;
   , Weihao Shi/0000-0002-4779-1183; Tian, Jian/0000-0001-9537-1178
FU National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD1100300]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [52078320, 52078330]
FX This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant
   number: 2018YFD1100300), National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (NSFC) (grant number 52078320 and 52078330).
CR Abdrabo MA, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P554, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.09.005
   [Anonymous], 100 Resilient Cities
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Anselin L, 1996, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V26, P77, DOI 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
   Arup Partners International Limited, 2014, CIT RES IND CIT RES
   Assarkhaniki Z, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101840
   Borsekova K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.012
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Cai J, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V776, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145837
   Delgado-Ramos GC, 2017, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V9, P151, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2017.1341890
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen DL, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V105, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.05.059
   Chen J., 2020, OPEN J SOC SCI, V8, P600, DOI [10.4236/jss.2020.84043, DOI 10.4236/JSS.2020.84043]
   Chen JD, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00736-3
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Chen ZQ, 2021, EARTH SYST SCI DATA, V13, P889, DOI 10.5194/essd-13-889-2021
   Childers DL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   Chu A, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V68, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.07.019
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Coaffee Jon., 2016, Urban Resilience: Planning for Risk, Crisis and Uncertainty, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-137-28884-4
   CohenShacham E., 2016, Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges, DOI 10.2305/iucn.ch.2016.13.en
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Dong T, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V671, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.269
   Du ZW, 2019, J GEOGR SCI, V29, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s11442-019-1662-6
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Feng WL, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104072
   Feng XH, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10121305
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Feng ZM, 2008, J GEOGR SCI, V18, P237, DOI 10.1007/s11442-008-0237-8
   Fleischhauer M, 2008, NATO SCI PEACE SECUR, P273, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8489-8_14
   Gao YP, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244024
   Gharai F, 2018, BAGH E NAZAR, V14, P19
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Guidotti R, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V185, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.008
   Guo YZ, 2022, J RURAL STUD, V93, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.007
   He JQ, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V77, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.017
   He SW, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104576
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu MM, 2018, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V27, P1085, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/76242
   Hu ZW, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2205, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04538-7
   Hung HC, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.029
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kammouh O, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0001004
   Kong L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-20891-x
   Lauer M, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.011
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   LeSage J, 2009, STAT TEXTB MONOGR, P1
   Li L, 2018, RESOUR POLICY, V55, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.10.017
   Li LN, 2019, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000528
   Li MM, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111138
   Li YF, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V98, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.025
   Lin BQ, 2021, ENERG ECON, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105292
   Liu JP, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107394
   Liu SC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
   Liu YB, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P1599, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.004
   Liu Y, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111042
   Liu Y, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS299, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.044
   Long HL, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V209, P440, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.047
   Lu J, 2019, HABITAT INT, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102039
   Luo X, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14071083
   Lv TG, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8120178
   Mallick SK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103196
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mu XF, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P1766, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-2022-5
   PAVITT K, 1985, SCIENTOMETRICS, V7, P77, DOI 10.1007/BF02020142
   Qiang Y, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102115
   Rasoulkhani K, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207674
   Ren F, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103183
   Rose A, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.003
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Shang J, 2018, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V135, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.029
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharifi A, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V147, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.040
   Shi T, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V742, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139228
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Sun Q, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P1385, DOI 10.1007/s10668-017-9926-8
   Tao Y, 2020, CITIES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102581
   The National Development and Reform Commission, SUGG PROM NEW TYP UR
   Tian L, 2017, CITIES, V60, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.01.002
   Tobin G.A., 1999, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V1, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-28679900002-9
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Wang C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V194, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.125
   Wang SJ, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V45, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.006
   Wang ZB, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V243, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.088
   Woolf S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.003
   Wu MM, 2021, J HYDROL, V599, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126393
   Wu X., 2021, DISASTER PROBABILITY, P3
   Yin K, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V36, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.003
   Yoon DK, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P436, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1016142
   Yu BB, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110239
   Yu JQ, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104143
   Zhang J, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16142496
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhou T, 2018, CITIES, V75, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.001
NR 97
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 19
U2 98
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 19
IS 20
AR 13128
DI 10.3390/ijerph192013128
PG 27
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA 5P4LB
UT WOS:000873122800001
PM 36293708
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pelling, M
   Comelli, T
   Cordova, M
   Kalaycioglu, S
   Menoscal, J
   Upadhyaya, R
   Garschagen, M
AF Pelling, Mark
   Comelli, Thaisa
   Cordova, Marco
   Kalaycioglu, Sibel
   Menoscal, Jonathan
   Upadhyaya, Rachana
   Garschagen, Matthias
TI Normative future visioning for city resilience and development
SO CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Normative future visioning; multi-stakeholder planning; climate change
   adaptation; transformation; inclusion; urban resilience; cities
ID CLIMATE ADAPTATION; URBAN VISIONS; SCENARIOS; CITIES; RISK
AB This paper argues for normative visioning as an underdeveloped component of adaptation planning. Multi-stakeholder and normative approaches to future visioning offer generative moments when creativity can meet the power to act required for critical, including transformative, adaptation. Including normative methods with community and city actors in adaptation planning allows for alternative narratives of development to arise as a basis for deeper conversation and potential action on the root causes of vulnerability and risk. A specific visioning approach is tested for four megacities - Istanbul, Kathmandu, Nairobi and Quito. Relations between current and future states of development and resilience are found to be both aligned (congruent or contingent) and in opposition (countervailing or constrained) shaping strategy for policy setting. These data are combined with additional work from London, Kolkata, New York and Lagos to pilot a City Resilience Challenge Index (CRCI), indicating to policy-makers whether and how cities are currently moving away from, rather than towards, envisioned trajectories of vulnerability reduction and adaptation. In the future, the CRCI might provide a global tool to track the progress of cities towards climate resilient development and, by doing so, to increase ambition and galvanize action.
C1 [Pelling, Mark; Comelli, Thaisa] UCL, Inst Risk & Disaster Reduct, Room 33,2nd Floor,South Wing, London, England.
   [Cordova, Marco; Menoscal, Jonathan] FLACSO Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
   [Kalaycioglu, Sibel] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Sociol, Ankara, Turkiye.
   [Upadhyaya, Rachana] Southasia Inst Adv Studies, Kathmandu, Nepal.
   [Garschagen, Matthias] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Geog, Munich, Germany.
C3 University of London; University College London; FLACSO Ecuador; Middle
   East Technical University; University of Munich
RP Pelling, M (corresponding author), UCL, Inst Risk & Disaster Reduct, Room 33,2nd Floor,South Wing, London, England.
EM mark.pelling@ucl.ac.uk
FU UK Research and Innovation - Global Challenges Research Fund
   [NE/S009000/1]; Belmont Forum [G8MUREFU3FP-2201-075]
FX The research reported on in this paper was made possible through two
   research projects: Tomorrow's Cities, the Mult-Hazard Urban Risk
   Transitions Hub (NE/S009000/1), funded by UK Research and Innovation -
   Global Challenges Research Fund; and Transformation and Resilience of
   Urban Coasts (G8MUREFU3FP-2201-075), funded by the Belmont Forum and in
   the UK though the Natural Environment Research Council.
CR Ajibade I., 2016, J EXTREME EVENTS, V3
   Albrechts L, 2003, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V69, P113, DOI 10.1080/01944360308976301
   Albrechts L, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN B, V42, P510, DOI 10.1068/b130104p
   [Anonymous], 2015, Planning and conflict
   Baibarac C, 2019, CODESIGN, V15, P91, DOI 10.1080/15710882.2017.1399145
   Ballard R, 2017, TRANSFORMATION, V95, P111, DOI 10.1353/trn.2017.0024
   Balug K, 2019, GEOFORUM, V102, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.014
   Bandola-Gill J, 2023, EVID POLICY, V19, P275, DOI 10.1332/174426421X16420955772641
   Bizikova L, 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE AND POLICY:THE CALCULABILITY OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE CHALLENGE OF UNCERTAINTY, P171, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-17700-2_8
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   Chu E, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P372, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2015.1019822
   Couclelis H, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN A, V37, P1353, DOI 10.1068/a3785
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Davis DE, 2011, J PLAN EDUC RES, V31, P241, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11404240
   Dixon T, 2018, LOCAL ECON, V33, P777, DOI 10.1177/0269094218800677
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Friedmann J., 1987, Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action
   Gaffikin F, 2006, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V7, P159, DOI 10.1080/14649350600673070
   Galasso C, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102158
   Garschagen M., IN PRESS
   Garschagen M., 2018, QUALITATIVE VULNERAB
   Garschagen M, 2021, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V169, DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03209-7
   Garschagen M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P37, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0812-6
   Glaas E, 2019, AMBIO, V48, P515, DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1109-9
   Harrison P, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P319, DOI 10.1080/00420980500418368
   IPCC, 2022, Microbes and Climate Change Science
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103744
   Jasanoff S., 2004, STATES KNOWLEDGE COP, P1, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203413845
   John B, 2015, CITIES, V48, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.001
   Legacy C, 2017, PLAN THEOR, V16, P425, DOI 10.1177/1473095216667433
   Lemp JD, 2008, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V134, P97, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:3(97)
   Lord S, 2016, FUTURES, V77, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2015.12.003
   Marx C, 2011, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V35, P1012, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01000.x
   McPhearson T, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.004
   Nalau J, 2022, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102527
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pelling M., 2016, J Extreme Events, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737616500123
   Pelling M., 2017, SPECIAL ISSUE EDITOR, V3, DOI [10.1142/S2345737616020036, DOI 10.1142/S2345737616020036]
   Pelling M, 2022, PROG HUM GEOG, V46, P121, DOI 10.1177/03091325211059569
   Ratcliffe J, 2011, FUTURES, V43, P642, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.005
   Rigon A., 2021, Inclusive urban development in the global south: Intersectionality, inequalities, and community, V1
   Ringland G., 1998, SCENARIO PLANNING MA
   Robin E, 2021, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V45, P869, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12981
   Robinson J, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN A, V40, P74, DOI 10.1068/a39127
   Rumbach A, 2017, J URBAN AFF, V39, P783, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2017.1282771
   Sandercock L., 1998, Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history, V2
   Scolobig A, 2023, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V23, DOI 10.1007/s10113-023-02066-7
   Sene Kevin., 2008, Flood warning, forecasting and emergency response
   Sheikh H, 2023, REG STUD, V57, P642, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2022.2045266
   Sheppard SRJ, 2011, FUTURES, V43, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009
   Shipley R, 2002, ENVIRON PLANN A, V34, P7, DOI 10.1068/a3461
   Shipley R, 1999, ENVIRON PLANN B, V26, P573, DOI 10.1068/b260573
   Shipley R., 2004, Planning Practice and Research, V19, P195, DOI DOI 10.1080/0269745042000284412
   Shipley R, 2006, PLAN PRACT RES, V21, P223, DOI 10.1080/02697450600944715
   Shipley Robert., 2000, INT PLAN STUD, V5, P225, DOI DOI 10.1080/13563470050020202
   Solecki W, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09102-220238
   Solecki William., 2016, Journal of Extreme Events, V3, P1650020, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737616500202
   UN-Habitat, 2021, Global Environment for Cities-GEO for Cities: Towards Green and Just Cities
   UN-Habitat, 2012, VIS PART PLANN TOOL
   UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2022, Human Development Report 2021-22: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives: Shaping our Future in a Transforming World
   Uwasu M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114746
   Uyesugi JL, 2005, INT PLAN STUD, V10, P305, DOI 10.1080/13563470500378895
   Van der Heijden K., 1996, SCENARIOS ART STRATE
   van Vliet M, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P43, DOI 10.1007/s11027-013-9479-6
   Wamsler C, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P151, DOI 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2006.00313.x
   Watson V., 2003, PLANNING THEORY PRAC, V4, P395, DOI DOI 10.1080/1464935032000146318
   Watson V, 2016, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V17, P663, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2016.1230364
   Watson V, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P215, DOI 10.1177/0956247813513705
   Watson V, 2013, PLAN THEOR, V12, P81, DOI 10.1177/1473095212446301
   Werners SE, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V126, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.017
   Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
NR 72
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 6
U2 23
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1756-5529
EI 1756-5537
J9 CLIM DEV
JI Clim. Dev.
PD APR 20
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 4
BP 335
EP 348
DI 10.1080/17565529.2023.2223564
EA JUN 2023
PG 14
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA PU0B8
UT WOS:001017536600001
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, R
   Li, X
   Zhang, ZZ
AF Liu, Rui
   Li, Xin
   Zhang, Zizhe
TI Urban Resilience of Large Public Health Events Based on NPP-VIIRS
   Nighttime Light Images: A Case Study of 35 Large Cities in China
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE NPP-VIIRS; COVID-19; nighttime light; urban resilience; public health
ID URBANIZATION DYNAMICS
AB The COVID-19 outbreak directly and severely threatens global public health. Non-drug interventions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have significantly altered urban socioeconomic activity. Understanding the different levels of city resilience to the impact of COVID-19 on urban human activities is essential. In this paper, 35 large cities in China were selected as research areas, and based on NPP-VIIRS night light images, the spatial pattern changes in human activities during the epidemic period from the end of December 2019 to December 2022 were explored. The results are as follows: (1) In the first two months of the epidemic, the luminous value of large cities showed an extensive range of decline, and the decline in different urban functional places was different. (2) There is a significant positive correlation between the urban population and the luminous change value. The closer the relationship between urban places and human activities, the stronger the correlation between the population and the luminous change value of urban places. (3) In the middle and later stages of the epidemic, the night light value of all cities showed an upward trend, but there was a difference. (4) The increase in the number of confirmed cases in the middle and later stages of the epidemic could hardly lead to a significant decrease in the value of night light on a monthly scale unless the city had a relatively large area and a relatively strict lockdown policy in that month. This study will help inform future strategies and decisions to effectively combat epidemics and the construction of resilient cities.
C1 [Liu, Rui] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Geomat & Urban Spatial Informat, Beijing 102616, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Xin] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Exhibit Hall Rd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Zizhe] GanSu CSCEC Municipal Engn Invest & Design Inst Co, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.
C3 Beijing University of Civil Engineering & Architecture; Beijing
   University of Civil Engineering & Architecture
RP Li, X (corresponding author), Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Exhibit Hall Rd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
EM 2108160221002@stu.bucea.edu.cn; lixin2@bucea.edu.cn; 18392392339@163.com
RI Zhang, Zizhe/MGB-5562-2025
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; Beijing Energy
   Conservation & Sustainable Urban and Rural Development Provincial and
   Ministry Co-consruction Collaboration Innovation Center, Beijing Key
   Laboratory of Green Building and Energy-efficiency Technology; 
   [52208069]
FX This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (52208069), Beijing Energy Conservation & Sustainable Urban and Rural
   Development Provincial and Ministry Co-consruction Collaboration
   Innovation Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Building and
   Energy-efficiency Technology.
CR Aljadani A, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P29681, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-12713-3
   Anand A, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13020314
   Bahmanyar A, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101683
   Cao CY, 2013, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V10, P1582, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2262258
   Chand TRK, 2009, INT J REMOTE SENS, V30, P647, DOI 10.1080/01431160802345685
   Chen X, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P3702, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-15928-6
   Doll CNH, 2010, ENERG POLICY, V38, P5661, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.014
   Du MB, 2024, APPL ENERG, V359, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122658
   El-Gohary H, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219260
   Elvidge CD, 2009, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V35, P1652, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.01.009
   Lan T, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P2740, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3060038
   Li X, 2015, INT J REMOTE SENS, V36, P3446, DOI 10.1080/01431161.2015.1059968
   Li X, 2013, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V5, P3057, DOI 10.3390/rs5063057
   Liu J, 2022, APPL ENERG, V317, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119136
   Liu Q, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141592
   Liu YH, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101591
   Liu Z, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18922-7
   Ma T, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V124, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.018
   Magazzino C, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V286, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112241
   Mansour S, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102627
   March D, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22423-6
   Ren HY, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138995
   Santiago-Iglesias E, 2024, CITIES, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105276
   Shao ZF, 2021, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V87, P197, DOI 10.14358/PERS.87.3.197
   Small C, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V96, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.02.002
   Xiong PP, 2023, ENG APPL ARTIF INTEL, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106820
   Xu L, 2023, MAR POLLUT BULL, V189, DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114730
   Yan GD, 2024, APPL SCI-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/app14010400
   Yin RY, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P5111, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3078237
   Zhang QL, 2011, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V115, P2320, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.04.032
   Zhao XZ, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10101526
   Zheng QM, 2018, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V65, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2017.09.015
NR 32
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 11
U2 12
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 17
AR 7483
DI 10.3390/su16177483
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA F7L3W
UT WOS:001311587000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, FY
   Dong, LL
   Shao, ZY
AF Liu, Fanyi
   Dong, Lili
   Shao, Zhiyu
TI EXPLORING THE RESILIENT DESIGN OF SPONGE TRANSFORMATION IN OLD
   COMMUNITIES OF MOUNTAINOUS CITIES: A CASE STUDY OF Y DISTRICT IN C CITY
SO ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE mountainous cities; old communities; resilience; sponge transformation
   design strategies
AB In recent years, along with the frequent occurrence of climate extremes and rapid urbanization, the renovation of old communities has become a focus of attention. However, most of the related researches have been focused on one corner of theory and practice respectively. For example, in recent years, resilient city construction and sponge city construction have become hot spots, focusing on the weakest link of the city and the most grassroots carrier - old community renovation research is relatively small and fragmented. This study focuses on old communities in the main urban areas of mountainous cities with complex terrain and climate, high population density and difficulty of transformation, via working out the annual runoff control rate and other storm waterresilience indices of the old communities after retrofitting design through theoretical calculation and InfoWorks_ICM model simulation. The results indicate sponge reconstruction combined with upgrade of conventional drainage facilities are able to improve waterlogging in old communities effectively, so as to put forward sponge transformation design methods, mechanisms and strategies, as well as enhancement of conventional drainage facilities from resilient perspective if necessary, providing reference for the retrofitting of old communities in the main urban areas of mountainous cities
C1 [Liu, Fanyi; Shao, Zhiyu] Chongqing Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
   [Dong, Lili] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
C3 Chongqing University; Chongqing Jiaotong University
RP Liu, FY (corresponding author), Chongqing Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Chongqing, Peoples R China.
EM 2052713623@qq.com
RI Shao, Zhiyu/HCI-2889-2022
FX This paper is one of the stage results of the academic project of
   Chongqing Municipal Development and Reform Commission for the year 2022,
   "Chongqing's Policy Research on Creating 'First Shop, First Brand, First
   Show, First Release' Economy" (No. FGWXSW2022-2-33) and Chongqing
   Municipal Development and Reform Commission for the year 2020 "Study on
   Measures to Enhance Tourism Per Capita Consumption in Chongqing" (No.
   FGWXSW2020-1-51) . This paper is modified based on partial content of
   Liu Fanyi's master's degree thesis of Chongqing Jiaotong University,
   "Research on the design of sponge transformation of old communities in
   Yuzhong District"
CR Charlesworth SM, 2021, J REFUG STUD, V34, P3494, DOI 10.1093/jrs/fez082
   Chen P., 2020, Chinese Landscape Architecture, V36, P77
   [陈宣先 Chen Xuanxian], 2018, [世界地震工程, World Earthquake Engineering], V34, P78
   [陈圆 Chen Yuan], 2021, [给水排水, Water & Wastewater Engineering], V47, P35
   Cheng T, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V42, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101058
   Crovella T, 2023, ENVIRON ENG MANAG J, V22, P1703, DOI 10.30638/eemj.2023.145
   Gao WC, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V233, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/233/5/052046
   Huang Xianming, 2020, Science & Technology Review, V38, P40
   Jamaludin SN, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V153, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.070
   Johnson R, 2007, NOV 6 INT C SUST TEC
   Ke Y.Y., 2022, Constr. Econ, V43, P63
   [李俊奇 Li Junqi], 2015, [中国给水排水, China Water & Wastewater], V31, P6
   [栗玉鸿 Li Yuhong], 2022, [西部人居环境学刊, Journal of Human Settlements in West China], V37, P22
   Li Zhengzhao, 2022, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V62, P266, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2021.22.037
   Lv B., 2017, Case Study ofSponge City Construction in Mountainous Areas
   Masoomi H, 2019, ASCE-ASME J RISK U A, V5, DOI 10.1061/AJRUA6.0000998
   Quintana-Romero T, 2022, J HYDROL, V604, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127246
   Reinwald F, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V323, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012082
   Shao Y., 2015, URBAN PLANNING INT, V30, P48, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-0232.2017.03.007
   Shen L., 2021, Urban Problems, V313, P45
   Shubin R., 2019, Springer Briefs in Architectural Design and Technology, DOI [10.1007/978-981-13-0713-39, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0713-39]
   Wang YC, 2018, J URBAN MANAG, V7, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2018.11.004
   Wei W., 2020, Landscape Architecture, V27, P80
   Xu C., 2022, China Collective Economy, V14, pxxx
   Yang Q., 2019, Chongqing Architecture, V5, P15
   Yu K., 2016, People's TribuneAcademic Frontiers, V21, P6
   Zhang H., 2022, Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic University, V41, P52
   [赵银兵 Zhao Yinbing], 2019, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V39, P4638
   [郑艳 Zheng Yan], 2018, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V28, P31
   [周伟奇 Zhou Weiqi], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P5137
   Zhu Z.W., 2021, PEOPLES TRIB, V57, P74, DOI [10.13789/j.cnki.wwe1964.2021.10.001, DOI 10.13789/J.CNKI.WWE1964.2021.10.001]
NR 31
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 13
U2 15
PU GH ASACHI TECHNICAL UNIV IASI
PI IASI
PA 71 MANGERON BLVD, IASI, 700050, ROMANIA
SN 1582-9596
EI 1843-3707
J9 ENVIRON ENG MANAG J
JI Environ. Eng. Manag. J.
PD MAY
PY 2024
VL 23
IS 5
DI 10.30638/eemj.2024.073
PG 224
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA F0R4T
UT WOS:001306977400003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shi, CY
   Li, Y
   Li, HJ
   Qiu, H
   Xu, TY
AF Shi, Chunyan
   Li, You
   Li, Haijian
   Qiu, Hong
   Xu, Tongyu
TI Towards sustainable urban water management: an ecological compensation
   framework for sponge cities
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Review
DE sponge city initiative; public payment; ecosystem service; ecological
   compensation
ID LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION;
   FLOOD RISK-MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE;
   STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; CITY; CHINA; IMPLEMENTATION
AB Rapid urbanization and climate change have intensified water-related challenges in urban areas, requiring innovative solutions for sustainable water management. This study critically examines China's sponge city initiative, which integrates green infrastructure and ecological principles to enhance urban water resilience. The research identifies key challenges, including inadequate planning, design inconsistencies, and financial sustainability issues, which hinder the full realization of ecosystem service benefits. To address these gaps, we propose a novel ecological compensation framework that integrates the ecosystem services framework with urban planning and public payment mechanisms. Our four-step methodology leverages low impact development practices to enhance policy efficacy, aligning urban development with ecological integrity and sustainability. By transitioning from ecosystem service recognition to a publicly funded compensation model, this approach ensures the financial viability of sponge city projects, fosters broad societal participation, and supports resilient urban development. Importantly, the developed framework is adaptable, making it applicable to sponge city initiatives worldwide. It offers a flexible, evidence-based strategy for cities facing similar water management challenges, promoting ecological resilience while ensuring long-term financial sustainability. This study contributes to global urban water management discourse, providing a scalable model that supports integrated, community-backed urban planning and sets a new standard for sponge city development.
C1 [Shi, Chunyan] Jilin Jianzhu Univ, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Changchun 130118, Peoples R China.
   [Shi, Chunyan; Xu, Tongyu] Univ Kitakyushu, Fac Environm Engn, Kitakyushu 8080135, Japan.
   [Li, You] Ritsumeikan Univ, Asia Japan Res Inst, Ibaraki 5678570, Japan.
   [Li, Haijian] Changchun Water Grp Co Ltd, Lan Jia Sewage Treatment Plant, Changchun 130000, Peoples R China.
   [Qiu, Hong] China Railway ErYuan Engn Grp Co Ltd, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China.
C3 Jilin Jianzhu University; University of Kitakyushu; Ritsumeikan
   University
RP Xu, TY (corresponding author), Univ Kitakyushu, Fac Environm Engn, Kitakyushu 8080135, Japan.
EM xutongyu0409@outlook.com
RI Xu, Tongyu/JHT-6002-2023
FU the National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of
   Kitakyushu [24BABA10041]; Ritsumeikan University International
   Collaborative Research Promotion Program [52470077]; National Natural
   Science Foundation of China [20230203116SF]; Jilin Provincial Science
   and Technology Department [D202414]; Jilin Province Foreign Expert
   Program
FX We would like to express our gratitude to the editor and anonymous
   reviewers for their valuable comments on enhancing the manuscript.
   Additionally, we would like to thank Professor Weijun Gao, an
   academician of the Japan Academy of Engineering, along with Professors
   FUKUDA Hiroatsu and Bart Julien Dewancker from the University of
   Kitakyushu, for their guidance and support throughout this research.
   This work was supported by the Ritsumeikan University International
   Collaborative Research Promotion Program (No. 24BABA10041), the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52470077), the Jilin Provincial
   Science and Technology Department (No. 20230203116SF), and the Jilin
   Province Foreign Expert Program (No. D202414).
CR (ADREM) A.D.R.E.M. (IFRC) I.F.R.C.R.C.S. University B.N. China N.D.R.C., 2023, 2023 Global natural disaster assessment report, pp 46
   Ahern J., 2007, CITIES FUTURE INTEGR, P267, DOI 10.2166/9781780405308
   Andersson E, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P445, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
   Arik AD, 2024, WATER RESOUR RES, V60, DOI 10.1029/2023WR035743
   Barbosa AE, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P6787, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.029
   Barry ES, 2022, PERSPECT MED EDUC, V11, P281, DOI 10.1007/s40037-022-00725-9
   Bolund P, 1999, ECOL ECON, V29, P293, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Brent DA, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P4907, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019776
   Brown G., 2012, URISA Journal, V24, P7
   Burszta-Adamiak E., 2014, The financial mechanisms of urban stormwater management
   Cai BM, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V207, P1112, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.077
   Cai YM, 2023, J WATER PROCESS ENG, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103828
   Campbell W., 2022, Western kentucky university stormwater utility survey 2022
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P99, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00251-y
   Chan FKS, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
   Chen SY, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.748231
   Chen WY, 2008, CITIES, V25, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2008.06.002
   Cheshmehzangi A, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127028
   Chikhi F, 2024, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V38, P2251, DOI 10.1007/s11269-024-03784-1
   Chui TFM, 2016, WATER ENVIRON J, V30, P62, DOI 10.1111/wej.12159
   Clary J, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V45, P65, DOI 10.2166/wst.2002.0118
   Cooper H.M., 1988, Knowledge in Society, V1, P104, DOI [10.1007/BF03177550, DOI 10.1007/BF03177550]
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   County P.G.J.P.G.C.G., 1993, Watershed Protection Branch
   Cuperus R, 1999, BIOL CONSERV, V90, P41, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00007-5
   Davis AP, 2012, J HYDROL ENG, V17, P604, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000467
   de Groot RS, 2010, ECOL COMPLEX, V7, P260, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Dietz ME, 2007, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V186, P351, DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z
   Ding L, 2019, CITIES, V93, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.007
   Dong SC, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P286, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0863-0
   Duncan R., 2001, Bridging the Gap: Meeting the Worlds Water and Environmental Resources Challenges
   Eckart K, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254
   EM-DAT, 2022, The international disaster database centre for research on the epidemiology of disasters
   Escobedo FJ, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P2078, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010
   Fang CL, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V689, P820, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.430
   Fang XN, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843
   Fedorchak A, 2017, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V53, P1483, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.12590
   Feng C, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V425, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138930
   Ferrans P, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V806, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150447
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Fratini CF, 2012, URBAN WATER J, V9, P317, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2012.668913
   Fu HP, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112209
   Godyn I, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14233817
   Guan X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V303, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127022
   Guo JG, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-40084-x
   Haines-Young R., 2010, Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, P110, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511750458.007, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007, 10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007]
   Hansen AS, 2021, LANDSCAPE RES, V46, P128, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2020.1833320
   Ice G, 2004, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V130, P684, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:6(684)
   Jensen DMR, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12166317
   Jia HC, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102724
   Jiang K, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V138, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110521
   Jiang Y, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016
   Kabisch N, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
   Kaplowitz MD, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.013
   Kim G, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.022
   Kosoy N, 2007, ECOL ECON, V61, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.016
   Koster S., 2021, Water-Energy Nexus, V4, P35, DOI [10.1016/J.WEN.2021.02.002, DOI 10.1016/J.WEN.2021.02.002, 10.1016/j.wen.2021.02.002]
   Kutsyuruba B., 2023, Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods, P139
   Li FR, 2022, WATER SUPPLY, V22, P1638, DOI 10.2166/ws.2021.327
   Lin J., 2023, City Built Environ, V1, P19, DOI [10.1007/s44213-023-00024-x, DOI 10.1007/S44213-023-00024-X]
   Liu Jiahong, 2023, Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), P38, DOI 10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2023.02.019
   Liu K., 2016, China Daily, V15, P2016
   Liu W, 2015, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V15, P490, DOI 10.2166/ws.2014.134
   Liu Y., 2016, City, V4, P54
   Liu Y, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V375, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134191
   Lloyd S.D., 2002, WATER SENSITIVE URBA
   Cadavid CL, 2013, WATER RESOUR RES, V49, P4114, DOI 10.1002/wrcr.20317
   Zavala MAL, 2018, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V18, P1946, DOI 10.2166/ws.2018.018
   Lovell ST, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y
   Luo L, 2024, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V89, P1282, DOI 10.2166/wst.2024.049
   Lyytimaki J., 2009, Hopping on One legThe Challenge of Ecosystem Disservices for Urban Green Management
   Ma YC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139078
   Marando F, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103564
   McFarland AR, 2019, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V5, P643, DOI [10.1039/c8ew00498f, 10.1039/C8EW00498F]
   MEM, 2023, Master of Engineering Management Programs Consortium
   Meng XL, 2022, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V159, P1164, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2022.02.003
   MHURD, 2015, Notice of the ministry of finance, ministry of housing and urban-rural development and ministry of water resources on carrying out the pilot work of central financial support for sponge city construction
   MHURD, 2022, The three departments notified to carry out the second batch of the "14th Five-Year Plan"to systematically promote the construction of sponge cities
   MHURD, 2023, Notice of the general office of the ministry of housing and urban-rural development on the national standard "technical requirements for rainwater pretreatment for sponge city construction (Draft)"
   Milou A., 2008, Stormwater LID Alternatives for Low Income Settlements in Central America: The Case of Ocotillo Anexo, Honduras
   Mitchell VG, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V37, P589, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0252-1
   Mostafa MG, 2008, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V3, DOI 10.2166/WPT.2008068
   Mottaghi M, 2016, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V11, P118, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2016.016
   Mouritz MJ., 1996, Sustainable urban water systems: policy and professional praxis
   Nastran M, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V37, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.008
   Niemelä J, 2010, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V19, P3225, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
   Olmstead SM, 2014, ENERG ECON, V46, P500, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.005
   Pataki DE, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P27, DOI 10.1890/090220
   Popescu VD, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0113648
   Porse E, 2022, WATER POLICY, V24, P998, DOI 10.2166/wp.2022.024
   Prudencio L, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a
   Qiao XJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101963
   Radcliffe JC, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00001-0
   Ramyar R, 2021, CITIES, V117, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103316
   Rulleau B, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P309, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1155976
   Schirpke U, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104813
   Shi CY, 2024, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V89, P2164, DOI 10.2166/wst.2024.123
   Shi CY, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15040771
   Song C., 2022, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022.100010
   Staff C P., 1999, Urban Stormwater: Best-Practice Environmental Guidelines
   Tang SJ, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V753, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142007
   Tang WZ, 2022, CHEMOSPHERE, V295, DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133875
   Tasca FA, 2018, WATER SCI TECHNOL, P287, DOI 10.2166/wst.2018.112
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   Tratalos J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003
   United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of General Counsel, 1976, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Adjudicatory Hearing Proceedings: Decisions of the Administrator and Decisions of the General Counsel
   Ureta J, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102815
   Van Oijstaeijen W, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110603
   van Schaick J, 2011, EUR PLAN STUD, V19, P1775, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.614387
   Vatn A, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1245, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018
   Villarroya A, 2013, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V42, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.002
   Visentin C, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.034
   Wang H, 2018, SCI CHINA TECHNOL SC, V61, P317, DOI 10.1007/s11431-017-9170-5
   Wang M, 2023, ENVIRON RES, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116701
   Wang Y, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120479
   Wang YT, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V122, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.002
   water S, 2024, Stormwater service charges
   Western Kentucky University, 2023, Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2023
   Whelans C., 1994, Department of Planning and Urban Development of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
   Wong CP, 2015, ECOL LETT, V18, P108, DOI 10.1111/ele.12389
   Wong NH, 2021, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V2, P166, DOI 10.1038/s43017-020-00129-5
   Xia J, 2017, SCI CHINA EARTH SCI, V60, P652, DOI 10.1007/s11430-016-0111-8
   Xie YH, 2016, ATMOS RES, V169, P318, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.10.016
   Yin DK, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124963
   Yoo J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141610211
   Yu B, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V55, P729, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.038
   Yu B, 2012, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V13, P891, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.083
   Zhai J, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127060
   Zhang K, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V646, P1219, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.355
   Zheng TH, 2022, ENERGY, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123721
   Zhu W, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14215505
   Zhu ZH, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.046
   Zölch T, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V157, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
NR 133
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 29
U2 29
PU IOP Publishing Ltd
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD DEC 1
PY 2024
VL 19
IS 12
AR 123002
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/ad8edf
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA N1Y4F
UT WOS:001362368300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, XF
AF Zhang, Xiufan
TI Research on the dynamic mechanism of digital economy system coupling to
   enhance urban ecological resilience
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Digital economy; System coupling; Urban ecological resilience; Dynamic
   mechanism
ID INNOVATION; PERSPECTIVE; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; CHALLENGES;
   INDUSTRY; MODELS; IMPACT
AB Urban ecological environment resilience is an important characteristic that should be possessed in the process of urban development. It is conducive to coping with the challenges of multiple risks and disturbances such as climate change, resolving chronic pressure, improving the ability to resist disaster risk, self-adjustment, and recovery, to maintain the structure and function stability of the urban system. The digital economy is a new economic form caused by the new technological revolution, which may effectively promote economic ecology and ecological economization. We clarify the elements of the digital economic system, construct the coupling evaluation index system of "digital infrastructure-industrial digitization-digital industrialization," and establish the coupling degree model to analyze the characteristics of the integration interaction, coordination, and self-organization of the digital economy subsystem. Based on emergency management theory, adaptive management concept, and resilient city theory, an evaluation index system is constructed from four levels of prevention, resistance, adaptation, and recovery to measure urban ecological resilience. Taking 278 cities in China from 2011 to 2021 as the research object, we established a spatial econometric model to explore the dynamic mechanism of digital economy system composition and coupling coordination to enhance urban resilience and summarize the theoretical model form. Based on this, we further propose countermeasures and suggestions for improving urban ecological resilience by using a digital economic system.
C1 [Zhang, Xiufan] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
RP Zhang, XF (corresponding author), Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310000, Peoples R China.
EM zhangxiufan@hrbeu.edu.cn
RI Zhang, Xiufan/JXX-6282-2024
OI Zhang, Xiufan/0000-0002-0641-2853
FU Philosophy and Social Sciences Planning Project of Zhejiang Province
FX The author thanks the funding. The author also wants to thank the
   editors and the reviewers for their instructions and comments.
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Ashmore FH, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V54, P408, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.09.004
   Brand F, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.013
   Cai X, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V746, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140810
   Cong LW, 2021, MANAGE SCI, V67, P6480, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2021.3986
   Dakos V, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5767
   Davidson K, 2019, CITIES, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.012
   Di Vaio A, 2020, J BUS RES, V121, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019
   Du KR, 2021, ENERG ECON, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247
   Fu Z., 2023, Environment, Development and Sustainability, P1
   Fu Z, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8a5c
   Gao YJ, 2020, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V48, P862, DOI 10.1002/jcop.22303
   Ghobakhloo M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119869
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gulliver R, 2021, AUST J SOC ISSUES, V56, P269, DOI 10.1002/ajs4.135
   He XH, 2022, MAR POLICY, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104868
   Henfridsson O, 2013, MIS QUART, V37, P907, DOI 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.11
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu W., 2020, Sci Total Environ, V766, P11
   Izzo F, 2022, INT J MANPOWER, V43, P910, DOI 10.1108/IJM-04-2021-0255
   Jiang Y., 2021, Ind Mark Manag, V97, P245
   Kadir BA, 2020, INT J IND ERGONOM, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102936
   Kamposiori C, 2022, DIGIT SCHOLARSH HUM, V37, P469, DOI 10.1093/llc/fqab088
   Komninos N, 2019, J URBAN TECHNOL, V26, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368
   Kusumastuti RD, 2022, TECHNOL SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101876
   Lange S, 2020, ECOL ECON, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106760
   Lee J., 2013, Oper Res, V53, P387
   Li JL, 2022, MANAG DECIS ECON, V43, P616, DOI 10.1002/mde.3406
   Li ZHX, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148058
   Lievens A, 2021, IND MARKET MANAG, V95, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.04.007
   Lin JY, 2020, CHINA WORLD ECON, V28, P26, DOI 10.1111/cwe.12340
   Lin JY, 2012, NEW STRUCTURAL ECONOMICS: A FRAMEWORK FOR RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT AND PLOICY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8955-3
   Litvinenko VS, 2020, NAT RESOUR RES, V29, P1521, DOI 10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4
   Liu CX, 2022, MAR POLICY, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104837
   Ma D, 2022, J BUS RES, V145, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.041
   Ma JT, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18073695
   Manny L, 2021, POLICY SCI, V54, P943, DOI 10.1007/s11077-021-09438-y
   Mehryar S, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101047
   Nelson RR, 2018, RES POLICY, V47, P1388, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.012
   Nishant R, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104
   Njoh AJ, 2018, UTIL POLICY, V50, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2017.10.005
   Noble MM, 2019, MAR POLICY, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103657
   Oberfield E, 2021, ECONOMETRICA, V89, P703, DOI 10.3982/ECTA12807
   Ode E, 2020, J INNOV KNOWL, V5, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002
   Orlandi LB, 2021, J BUS RES, V123, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.047
   Ovrelid E, 2019, J INF TECHNOL-UK, V34, P221, DOI 10.1177/0268396219831994
   Pan WR, 2022, J BUS RES, V139, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.061
   Ramaswamy V, 2018, J MARKETING, V82, P19, DOI 10.1509/jm.15.0365
   Modol JR, 2021, J INF TECHNOL-UK, V36, P342, DOI 10.1177/02683962211013362
   Sarfraz M, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010072
   Saura JR, 2022, J BUS RES, V142, P242, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.052
   Shen Y, 2019, J INF SCI, V45, P691, DOI 10.1177/0165551518811459
   Simoes JCM, 2020, MANAGE DECIS, V58, P2327, DOI 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1253
   Song Y, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V26, P21835, DOI 10.1007/s11356-019-05532-0
   Sorescu A, 2021, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V49, P627, DOI 10.1007/s11747-021-00793-z
   Sun WJ, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P2631, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04124-3
   Sun YP, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V190, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.099
   Tang C, 2021, ENERG ECON, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105576
   Tang Y, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P41299, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-25155-w
   Tapscott D., 1999, Innov. J, V1, P156, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199924)18:1
   Teece DJ, 2018, RES POLICY, V47, P1367, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015
   Tr A., 2020, IND MARKET MANAG, V86, P180, DOI [10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.019, DOI 10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2019.11.019]
   Tranos E, 2013, CITIES, V30, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.001
   Verhoef PC, 2021, J BUS RES, V122, P889, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
   Vittiglio V., 2021, Sustainability, V13, P1
   Wang JL, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P9990, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-16381-1
   Wang XZ, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V311, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114835
   Wang XT, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11236604
   Washington-Allen RA, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Wehrle M, 2020, J BUS LOGIST, V41, P356, DOI 10.1111/jbl.12259
   Wen SY, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V371, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133491
   Wielgos DM, 2021, J ACAD MARKET SCI, V49, P762, DOI 10.1007/s11747-021-00771-5
   Wu HT, 2020, ENERG ECON, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104880
   Xiang XJ, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106515
   Xu HZ, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105735
   Yigitcanlar T, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20102988
   Yin S, 2022, SYSTEMS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/systems10030072
   Ys A., 2021, Cities, V112, P103141
   Yu X, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V753, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142004
   Zhang JP, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V93, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106706
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zhang XD, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V199, P1005, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.028
   Zhang YY, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106862
   Zheng QQ, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V294, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112934
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 85
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 36
U2 87
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 0944-1344
EI 1614-7499
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R
JI Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
PD 2024 FEB 26
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s11356-024-32606-5
EA FEB 2024
PG 21
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA JK5Y9
UT WOS:001173086700013
PM 38409381
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bonnefond, M
AF Bonnefond, Mathieu
TI Hydraulic modeling as a condition of resilient urban projects in
   flood-prone area?
SO HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU
LA French
DT Article
DE Hydraulic modeling; Urban resilience; Flood risk; Urban development
   project
AB This paper analyses hydraulic modeling as a proof of the facts, its outputs in urban design process and its importance in local resilience construction More precisely, we focus on the outputs of hydraulic modeling in terms of rules' production, collective action, urban design, etc. At the level of urban projects, this approach by the facts enables to identify the role of modeling in the implementation of urban resilience in face of the flood risk. Indeed, the mobilization of these technical tools by stakeholders sets the foundations of technical resilience or even global resilience in a flood-prone area. This research was carried out within the framework of the "PRECIEU" project (RTD french program). In this project, we sought to analyze urban resilience as a proof of the facts at the scale of the urban estate's project. In this paper, we show, through the study of two cases in the Loire basin (Angers and Romorantin), how hydraulic modeling evolves in its role, from the foundation of the definition of the rules of development to a necessary condition for the construction of resilient neighborhoods. Then we explain how this tool is not restricted to its technical dimension but also participates to the construction of local collective action. We highlight its role in the negotiation process between government agency, local government and urbanists. We describe how models contribute to the renewal of flood risk management, from a approach by the rules towards a more dynamic approach focusing on projects, lifting barriers between the various actors of the city and proposing ways to better adapt the urban estates to the flood risk.
C1 [Bonnefond, Mathieu] CNRS, Conservatoire Natl Arts & Metiers, LTSER Zone Atelier Loire, EA 4630,Lab Geomat & Foncier, 1 Bd Pythagore, F-72000 Le Mans, France.
C3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); heSam Universite;
   Conservatoire National Arts & Metiers (CNAM)
RP Bonnefond, M (corresponding author), CNRS, Conservatoire Natl Arts & Metiers, LTSER Zone Atelier Loire, EA 4630,Lab Geomat & Foncier, 1 Bd Pythagore, F-72000 Le Mans, France.
EM mathieu.bonnefond@lecnam.net
RI BONNEFOND, Mathieu/AAC-5884-2019
CR [Anonymous], 2006, These de doctorat
   [Anonymous], 2013, ETUDE HYDRODYNAMIQUE
   BARROCA B., 2006, THESIS
   Barroca B, 2013, ECHOGEO, P24
   Barroca B., 2012, VERTIGO REV ELECT SC, V12
   Barroca B., 2008, DEV DURABL TERRITORI, V11
   Beck U., 2001, SOC RISQUESUR VOIE D
   Bernardara P., 2005, U EAU CONSELL GEN MA, P119
   Daniel-Lacombe E., 2016, COMMUNIQUE DE PR JUI
   Degardin F., 1999, VALORISER ZONES INON
   Degoutte G., 2005, INGENIERIES EAU AGR
   Durand S., 2014, THESIS
   FRIEDBERG E., 1997, Le Pouvoir et la Regle. Dynamiques de laction
   Gralepois M., 2015, DEV DURABLE TERRITOI, V6
   Grether Atelier, 2013, PLAN GUIDE ANGERS RI
   Ingallina P., 2002, ANN GEOGR, V623, P98
   Lascoumes P., 2012, SOCIOLOGIE ACTION PU, V2012
   Novarina G., 2003, ANTHROPOS COLL, P233
   November V, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN A, V40, P1523, DOI 10.1068/a4194
   Reghezza M., 2012, CYBERGEO EUROPEAN J
   Rode S., 2017, CYBERGEO EUROPEAN J
   Rode S., 2018, TOWN PLANNING REV TP, V89
   Serre D., 2011, MEMOIRE HABILITATION
NR 23
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 3
U2 20
PU EDP SCIENCES S A
PI LES ULIS CEDEX A
PA 17, AVE DU HOGGAR, PA COURTABOEUF, BP 112, F-91944 LES ULIS CEDEX A,
   FRANCE
SN 0018-6368
EI 1958-5551
J9 HOUILLE BLANCHE
JI Houille Blanche-Rev. Int.
PD JUN
PY 2018
IS 3
BP 25
EP 33
DI 10.1051/lhb/2018029
PG 9
WC Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Water Resources
GA GR1ZH
UT WOS:000442356000004
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Schäffler, A
   Swilling, M
AF Schaeffler, Alexis
   Swilling, Mark
TI Valuing green infrastructure in an urban environment under pressure -
   The Johannesburg case
SO ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
LA English
DT Article
DE Green infrastructure; Ecosystem services; Urban green spaces;
   Resilience; South Africa
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FOOD SECURITY; RESILIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE;
   POVERTY; BIODIVERSITY; GARDENS; ECOLOGY; POLICY
AB This article considers the importance of robust planning for green infrastructure in fast changing Southern African cities. A key theme is the extent to which ecosystem services are valued publicly, and the opportunity costs of not investing in the green infrastructure. We explore green infrastructure through pairing insights of social-ecological resilience with perspectives on urban infrastructure transitions. By converging these views, we show how green infrastructure can be viewed as an innovative response to challenged urban environments.
   Through a Johannesburg case study, a number of ecosystem services constitute sources of resilience for an otherwise constrained city. While this is positive and to be valorised, many South African cities are in the midst of service delivery protests, so that resilient ecosystems, and the citizen networks that sustain these, are largely overlooked in planning processes.
   This article offers three key conclusions. First, a proper understanding of green infrastructure requires blending insights from social-ecological system thinking and infrastructure transition scholarship. Second, there is a paucity of knowledge around ecosystem services in Johannesburg, and that the planning to facilitate ecosystem service valuation is largely inadequate. Third, addressing this requires ecosystem valuations relevant to the unique conditions in developing world cities such as Johannesburg. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 [Schaeffler, Alexis] Gauteng City Reg Observ, Johannesburg, South Africa.
   [Swilling, Mark] Univ Stellenbosch, Sustainabil Inst, ZA-7613 Die Boord, South Africa.
   [Swilling, Mark] Univ Stellenbosch, Sch Publ Leadership, ZA-7613 Die Boord, South Africa.
C3 Stellenbosch University; Stellenbosch University
RP Schäffler, A (corresponding author), Private Bag 3, Johannesburg, South Africa.
EM alexis.schaffler@gcro.ac.za; Mark.Swilling@spl.sun.ac.za
CR AfriGIS/Matrix Marketing/Spatial Technologies, 2010, BIZCOUNT DAT BUS SIC
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Angel S., 2011, Making Room for a Planet of Cities
   [Anonymous], RESTORING NATURAL CA
   [Anonymous], 2011, GAUTENG
   [Anonymous], STAT AFR CIT 2010 GO
   [Anonymous], model for multifunctional green infrastructure
   [Anonymous], ENVPC2003017 CSIR
   [Anonymous], 2001, Census 2001
   Bai XM, 2010, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V2, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.008
   Barthel S, 2005, ECOL SOC, V10
   Barthel S., 2004, SUSTAINING URBAN ECO, P1
   Barthel S., 2008, THESIS STOCKHOLM U S
   Barthel S, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018
   Barthel S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001
   Beall J, 2000, ENVIRON URBAN, V12, P107, DOI 10.1177/095624780001200108
   Benedict M. A., 2002, Renewable Resources Journal, V20, P12
   Bohensky E., 2004, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES G
   Bond P., 2007, CTR CULT CONT BARC 2
   Boraine A, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P259, DOI 10.1080/00420980500416990
   Brunner PH, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P11, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1293
   Camaren P., 2011, METH CAS UND DEV PAR
   Charlton S., 2010, Urban Forum, V21, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12132-010-9076-7
   Chee YE, 2004, BIOL CONSERV, V120, P549, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.03.028
   Choumert J, 2008, LANDSCAPE RES, V33, P331, DOI 10.1080/01426390802045996
   City of Johannesburg, 2010, SPAT DEV FRAM
   City of Johannesburg: Johannesburg City Parks, 2010, CIT JOH JOH CIT PARK
   City of Johannesburg: Johannesburg City Parks, 2010, MAJ PROJ
   City of Johannesburg: Johannesburg City Parks, 2010, GREEN SOW
   City of Johannesburg: Johannesburg City Parks, 2010, URB FOR GROWS SOW
   City of Johannesburg: Johannesburg City Parks Financial Departments, 2010, COMMUNICATION
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cowling RM, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P9483, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0706559105
   Da Cunha P., 2001, CITIES PROTECTED ARE, V11
   de Lange W.J., 2009, SECURING SUSTAINABLE
   De Wit M., 2009, METHODOLOGY VALUE NA
   Du Plessis C., 2008, WORLD SUST BUILD C S
   Egyedi T., 2011, STANDARDS TRANSITION, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/SIIT.2011.6083606
   Ernstson H., 2008, Rhizomia: actors, networks and resilience in urban landscape
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Folke C, 2004, ANNU REV ECOL EVOL S, V35, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Herder PM, 2011, FUTURES, V43, P961, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2011.06.005
   Hodson M., 2010, RES POLICY, P1
   Hodson M, 2009, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V21, P515, DOI 10.1080/09537320902819213
   Hoy L.H., 2009, THESIS U S AFRICA
   Inter-Ministerial Committee on Acid Mine Drainage (AMD), 2010, MIN WAT MAN WITW GOL
   James P, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.001
   Jansson Å, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.013
   Jansson Å, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Kambites C, 2006, PLAN PRACT RES, V21, P483, DOI 10.1080/02697450601173413
   Kirnbauer MC, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.11.002
   Kosoy N, 2010, ECOL ECON, V69, P1228, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002
   Krausmann F, 2008, J IND ECOL, V12, P637, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00065.x
   Kremen C, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P540, DOI 10.2307/3868610
   Kremen C, 2005, ECOL LETT, V8, P468, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x
   Kroll F., 2010, COMMUNICATION
   McCarthy T., 2010, The Decanting of Acid Mine Water in the Gauteng City-Region: Analysis, Prognosis and Solutions
   McPherson E. G., 1997, Urban Ecosystems, V1, P49, DOI 10.1023/A:1014350822458
   MEA (MillenniumEcosystemAssessment), 2005, EC HUM WELLB BIOD SY
   Neary DG, 2005, USDA FOR SERV P RMRS, VII, P316
   Palmer M, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P1251, DOI 10.1126/science.1095780
   Parnell S, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P337, DOI 10.1080/00420980500406710
   Richter L.M., 2009, URBAN FORUM, V20, P319, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12132-009-9065-X
   Sandström UG, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V75, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.016
   Sanyal S., 2011, END POPULATION GROWT
   Satterthwaite D, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P307, DOI 10.1177/0956247808096114
   Schaffler A., 2010, THESIS STELLENBOSCH
   Simon D., 2010, URBAN FORUM, V21, P235, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S12132-010-9093-6, DOI 10.1007/s12132-010-9093-6]
   Smith A, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Statistics South Africa (StatsSA), 2010, CENS 2001 HOUS DWELL
   StatsSA, 2010, MID POP EST
   Swilling M, 2007, INT C URB CHALL BRAZ
   The Business Trust Support Programme for Accelerated Infrastructure Development (SPAID), 2010, INFR EXP TRACK
   Turner RK, 2003, ECOL ECON, V46, P493, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7
   Turpie JK, 2008, ECOL ECON, V65, P788, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024
   Turton A., 2006, WATER RESOURCES DEV, V22, P213
   UNEP-WCMC, 2011, CBD TECHNICAL SERIES
   UNHabitat, 2008, ECOBUDGET
   Vandermeulen V, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.010
   Walmsley A, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V76, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.036
   Weiersbye I., 2007, GLOBAL REV COST COMP, P156
   Weiersbye I., 2007, EAGLE B U WITWATERSR
   Weisz H, 2010, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V2, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.010
   Wolf K.L., 2004, Urban Agriculture Magazine, V13, P31
   YEANG K, 2008, ARCHIT DESIGN SEP, P128
NR 87
TC 220
Z9 244
U1 5
U2 278
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0921-8009
EI 1873-6106
J9 ECOL ECON
JI Ecol. Econ.
PD FEB
PY 2013
VL 86
BP 246
EP 257
DI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.008
PG 12
WC Ecology; Economics; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Business & Economics
GA 128XR
UT WOS:000317803500031
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pellerey, V
   Moghadam, ST
   Lombardi, P
AF Pellerey, Virginia
   Moghadam, Sara Torabi
   Lombardi, Patrizia
TI A systematic review of justice integration to climate resilience:
   Current trends and future directions
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Review
DE Climate resilience; Justice; Trend analysis; Meta-analysis; Inclusive
   climate actions
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; CHANGE ADAPTATION; KNOWLEDGE
   SYSTEMS; THERMAL INEQUITY; PUBLIC-HEALTH; EQUITY; POLICY; CITY; RISK
AB Climate resilience has been adopted as a systematic approach for facing climate change. Although the concept of resilience received criticism for failing to address the issues of power imbalance and conservatism, recent approaches include diverse justice perspectives as pathways to address these concerns. However, the lack of clarity regarding the diverse definitions of justice and their relationship to climate resilience hinders our understanding of how to effectively integrate urban climate resilience and justice. This study offers a systematic review of literature on justice and climate resilience in the urban context with the intent of (i) identifying articles addressing justice and climate resilience and classifying them according to the form of justice and resilience framing, (ii) studying trends in the current literature, (iii) identifying research gaps, and (iv) reflecting on the possibility for integration between justice and resilience in different phases of the resilience-building process and proposing future insights. In particular, the results emphasize the importance of (1) enhancing system thinking using people-centered approaches, (2) focusing on the social implications of climate actions, and (3) evaluating different timeframes. The study concludes by suggesting policymaking and research strategies for facilitating the transition toward just and climate-resilient cities.
C1 [Pellerey, Virginia; Moghadam, Sara Torabi; Lombardi, Patrizia] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg Urban Studies & Planning DIST, Viale Mattioli 39, I-10125 Turin, Italy.
C3 Polytechnic University of Turin
RP Pellerey, V (corresponding author), Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg Urban Studies & Planning DIST, Viale Mattioli 39, I-10125 Turin, Italy.
EM virginia.pellerey@polito.it
RI Pellerey, Virginia/KHV-2970-2024; TORABI MOGHADAM, SARA/AAM-1702-2020
OI Pellerey, Virginia/0000-0003-4105-4622
CR Abuwaer N., 2023, Sustainable Cities in a Changing Climate, P185, DOI [10.1002/9781394201532.ch12, DOI 10.1002/9781394201532.CH12]
   Agache I, 2022, ALLERGY, V77, P1389, DOI 10.1111/all.15229
   Almulhim AI, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105172
   Amorim-Maia AT, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104836
   Amorim-Maia AT, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101053
   Amorim-Maia AT, 2024, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V34, P256, DOI 10.1002/eet.2075
   Anderson B, 2022, COMICS GRID-J COMICS, V12, DOI 10.16995/cg.6552
   Anguelovski I, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1743, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   Araos M, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P1454, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.09.001
   Archer D, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.007
   Arthurson K, 2015, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P1, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2013.818951
   Balk D, 2022, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V8, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2022.949433
   Barrett BFD, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111197
   Basta C, 2016, PLAN THEOR, V15, P190, DOI 10.1177/1473095215571399
   Bautista E, 2015, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P664, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2014.949644
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bentley M, 2014, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V29, P528, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dat028
   Bergonzini C, 2024, CITIES, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104876
   Bhardwaj A, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V4, P1139, DOI 10.1177/2514848620949096
   Bonds A, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1285, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1462968
   Boso A, 2022, GEOGR REV, V112, P667, DOI 10.1080/00167428.2020.1845955
   Brousseau JJ, 2024, LOCAL ENVIRON, V29, P1644, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2024.2386964
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Bulkeley H, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Byskov MF, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1700774
   Calderón-Argelich A, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104130
   Campbell LK, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V224, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104445
   Cañizares JC, 2024, ETHICS POLICY ENV, V27, P63, DOI 10.1080/21550085.2023.2197824
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Carvalho C, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V221, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104369
   Cavalcanti E.R., 2022, Rev. Direito Cidade, V14, DOI [10.12957/rdc, DOI 10.12957/RDC]
   Chang HS, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V28, P66435, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-15708-2
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Cheng CW, 2019, ECOWISE, P249, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0571-9_13
   Cheng CW, 2017, URBAN PLAN, V2, P34, DOI 10.17645/up.v2i4.1045
   Chiesi L, 2022, SOC SCI-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/socsci11100451
   Chu EK, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V51, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.02.009
   Clark SS, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132011238
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Colenbrander S, 2018, CLIM POLICY, V18, P902, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2017.1388212
   Collado JRN, 2023, INT DEV PLANN REV, V45, P203, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2022.10
   Corburn J, 2022, URBAN SCI, V6, DOI 10.3390/urbansci6020036
   Cousins JJ, 2021, ECOL ECON, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106874
   Dawodu A, 2022, SUSTAIN FUTURES, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100064
   Domingue SJ, 2020, ENVIRON SOCIOL, V6, P19, DOI 10.1080/23251042.2019.1666960
   Douglass M, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V1, P271, DOI 10.1177/2514848618797333
   Duvat VKE, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102236
   Eakin HC, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.743
   Feola G, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V24, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011
   Fiack D, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103235
   Fieuw W, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020948
   Fitzgerald J, 2022, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V88, P508, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2021.2013301
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Friend R, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.001
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Fuentealba R, 2020, URBAN PLAN, V5, P274, DOI 10.17645/up.v5i3.3210
   Fuller S, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1469, DOI 10.1177/0042098019872347
   Alves MWFM, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V202, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.091
   Garcia A, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.762
   Goodwin S, 2023, NAT SUSTAIN, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-01036-x
   Gower A, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.644418
   Grabowski ZJ, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104591
   Grabowski ZJ, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V96, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.03.007
   Granberg M, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031201
   Grasham CF, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1344
   Greiving S, 2022, TOWN PLAN REV, V93, P111, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2021.26
   Grove K, 2024, CLIM DEV, V16, P739, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2023.2255566
   Grove K, 2020, GEOFORUM, V117, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.014
   Haque MN, 2024, ECOSYST SERV, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101617
   Herath S, 2024, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V6, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2024.1244187
   Hernández JRE, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V432, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139735
   Herreros-Cantis P, 2021, ECOL APPL, V31, DOI 10.1002/eap.2390
   Hill K, 2016, URBAN PLAN, V1, P103, DOI 10.17645/up.v1i4.771
   Hoang T., 2019, Green for Whom? Exploring Ecotourism as a Climate-Adaptation Strategy in Trang An, P179, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-98968-6_9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-98968-6_9]
   Holden M, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P295, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_15
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hölscher K, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043
   Hughes S, 2022, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V15, P83, DOI 10.1089/env.2021.0045
   IPCC, 2024, Climate Change 2023: AR6 Synthesis Report (SYR)
   Jiang ZF, 2024, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V15, P1076, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2024.480
   Jurjonas M, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104547
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kato-Huerta J, 2023, LOCAL ENVIRON, V28, P1388, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2023.2221431
   Khan MTI, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132937
   Khirfan L, 2020, METHODSX, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100984
   Kim H, 2023, HEALTH PLACE, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103113
   Kim H, 2018, GEOFORUM, V96, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.08.006
   Kinol A, 2023, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V176, DOI 10.1007/s10584-023-03486-4
   Kmoch L, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V245, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105022
   Kuhl L, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.008
   Lee S, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151410866
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Li L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13073876
   Liu T, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104371
   Mabon L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.025
   Mabon L, 2020, SINGAPORE J TROP GEO, V41, P432, DOI 10.1111/sjtg.12341
   MacDonald C., 2012, CANADIAN J ACTION RE, V13, P34, DOI DOI 10.33524/CJAR.V13I2.37
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Mahon L, 2018, WORLD DEV, V107, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.035
   Marí-Dell'Olmo M, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191912764
   Maxim A, 2021, ENVIRON RES-INFRASTR, V1, DOI 10.1088/2634-4505/ac33ef
   Mccloy MWD, 2024, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2024.1302002
   McMillan R, 2022, ENVIRON URBAN, V34, P170, DOI 10.1177/09562478211035644
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meixler MS, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104659
   Méndez M, 2020, GEOFORUM, V116, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.007
   Mendez MA, 2015, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P637, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2015.1038227
   Meyer MA, 2018, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V9, P402, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2017-0015
   Michael K, 2019, CLIM DEV, V11, P667, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2018.1531745
   Miller F, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P1570, DOI 10.1177/0042098019830239
   Mitchell BC, 2018, LOCAL ENVIRON, V23, P796, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2018.1474861
   Mitchell BC, 2014, GEOGR REV, V104, P459, DOI 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12039.x
   Moglia M, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.009
   Mohtat N, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104834
   Mohtat N, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.919724
   Moller-Jensen L, 2023, J URBAN AFF, V45, P505, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2022.2108436
   Moretti JA, 2024, ENVIRON URBAN, V36, P33, DOI 10.1177/09562478241230814
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Mou Y, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125719
   Mullenbach LE, 2024, J URBAN AFF, V46, P701, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2022.2091449
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Nelson KS, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102278
   Newell P, 2021, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V12, DOI 10.1002/wcc.733
   Nielsen AB, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104799
   Oscilowicz E, 2025, J URBAN AFF, V47, P347, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2023.2180381
   Ossewaarde R, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P1119, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-1119-2021
   Palliwoda J, 2022, ECOL SOC, V27, DOI 10.5751/ES-13129-270208
   Pappalardo SE, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104831
   Pierce JC, 2011, ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P566, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2011.589580
   Pineda-Pinto M, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P167, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01553-7
   Porter L, 2020, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V21, P293, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2020.1748959
   Ranganathan M, 2021, ANTIPODE, V53, P115, DOI 10.1111/anti.12555
   Reckien D, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P159, DOI 10.1177/0956247816677778
   Rice JL, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V5, P625, DOI 10.1177/2514848621999286
   RITTEL HWJ, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF01405730
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V83, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.009
   Rosa M, 2023, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V28, DOI 10.1007/s11027-023-10045-w
   Rosan CD, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.947452
   Rudge K, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101018
   Rumbach A, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V1, P340, DOI 10.1177/2514848618792821
   Sardeshpande M, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.686254
   Schlör H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V210, P382, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.026
   Schlosberg D, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P359, DOI 10.1002/wcc.275
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V750, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141642
   Sharifi A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813
   Sharifi A, 2019, CITIES, V93, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.010
   Sharma SE, 2023, GEOFORUM, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103817
   Shen SW, 2020, NAT HAZARDS REV, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000341
   Shi L, 2021, URBAN AFF REV, V57, P1442, DOI 10.1177/1078087419910827
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Shokry G, 2025, J URBAN AFF, V47, P121, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2022.2160339
   Shokry G, 2022, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V32, P211, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2021.1944269
   Shokry G, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539
   Snep RPH, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V145, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.022
   Solecki W, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.03.001
   Sovacool BK, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa9c6d
   Steele W, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.004
   Strange KF, 2024, LOCAL ENVIRON, V29, P865, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2024.2315992
   Suárez M, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104923
   Suleimany M, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101612
   Summers JK, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16030963
   Swanson K, 2023, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V24, P207, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2023.2189288
   Swanson K, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P287, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i4.4399
   Tagtachian D, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1111856
   Taylor J, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191811192
   Thomalla F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051458
   Torabi Moghadam S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V165, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.142
   Trundle A, 2023, URBAN GEOGR, V44, P492, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2022.2143692
   Truong DD, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.880254
   Tschakert P, 2023, WORLD DEV, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106247
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Uitermark J, 2017, PLAN THEOR, V16, P32, DOI 10.1177/1473095215599027
   UN-Habitat, 2024, Resilience
   United Nations General Assembly, 2024, Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development
   Van Neste SL, 2025, URBAN GEOGR, V46, P43, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2024.2336852
   Vercillo S, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1045, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01631-w
   Veronesi M, 2022, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V14, P388, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2022.2096616
   Vieira LC, 2021, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V45, P344, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2020.1812788
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
   Wijsman K, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V98, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.017
   Williams DS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P476, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.014
   Wohldmann EL, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.941635
   Wood BT, 2018, RESOURCES-BASEL, V7, DOI 10.3390/resources7020036
   Wright S, 2022, THIRD WORLD Q, V43, P561, DOI 10.1080/01436597.2021.1987210
   Wu CF, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13152021
   Yazar M, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1265332
   Yazar M, 2024, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V26, P30, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2023.2279059
   Yazar M, 2022, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V4, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2022.932070
   Yazar M, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101079
   Ye XY, 2022, COMPUT URBAN SCI, V2, DOI 10.1007/s43762-022-00035-0
   Zavar E, 2021, CURR RES ENVIRON SUS, V3, DOI 10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100043
   Zhu YH, 2023, AGU ADV, V4, DOI 10.1029/2022AV000816
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Zimm C, 2024, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V14, P22, DOI 10.1038/s41558-023-01869-0
NR 201
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 12
U2 12
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 59
AR 102250
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102250
EA DEC 2024
PG 27
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA R6A8N
UT WOS:001392262200001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jowell, A
   Wulfovich, S
   Kuyan, S
   Heaney, C
AF Jowell, Ashley
   Wulfovich, Sharon
   Kuyan, Sianga
   Heaney, Catherine
TI Ethnic identity, resilience, and well-being: a study of female Maasai
   migrants
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE Rural-to-urban migration; Ethnic identity; Resilience; Maasai; Climate
   change; Education
AB Migration is an increasingly prevalent worldwide phenomenon. In recent years, Maasai men and women have migrated from their traditional rural villages to cities in Tanzania in growing numbers. This study explores the experience of rural-to-urban migration among female Maasai migrants and how this experience affects ethnic identity, resilience, and well-being.
   Thirty-one female Maasai migrants were interviewed in Swahili, Maa, or English. Researchers used a rigorous multi-pass, qualitative coding process to analyze interview transcripts.
   Migration-driving factors, specifically a desire for education (leading to permanent migrants) and a need to support one's family (resulting in circular migrants), influence how Maasai women adapt and respond to challenges in the city. Circular migrants hold closely to their traditional ethnic identity and remain isolated from city life, while permanent migrants modulate their ethnic identity and integrate into urban society.
   Increasing connections among female Maasai migrants might create a more resilient community leading to improved health. Pilot workshops with this aim are being implemented.
C1 [Jowell, Ashley] Stanford Univ, Dept Human Biol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
   [Wulfovich, Sharon] Stanford Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
   [Kuyan, Sianga] Future Warriors Project, Arusha, Tanzania.
   [Heaney, Catherine] Stanford Univ, Stanford Prevent Res Ctr, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
C3 Stanford University; Stanford University; Stanford University
RP Jowell, A (corresponding author), Stanford Univ, Dept Human Biol, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA.
EM ajowell@stanford.edu; sharonws@stanford.edu; sianga.kuyan@gmail.com;
   cheaney@stanford.edu
OI Jowell, Ashley/0000-0002-6292-5864; Heaney,
   Catherine/0000-0002-6326-3807
FU Stanford Undergraduate Advising and Research Major Grant
FX This study was funded by the Stanford Undergraduate Advising and
   Research Major Grant.
CR [Anonymous], 1946, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V61, P1268
   [Anonymous], 2010, URB IND PEOPL MIGR R
   Black R, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, pS3, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.001
   Cervan-Gil D, 2016, HOST SOC INTEGRATION
   Coast E, 2002, HUM ECOL, V30, P79, DOI 10.1023/A:1014567029853
   GETU M., 2013, Impacts of climate change and variability on pastoralist women in sub-Saharan Africa
   Heaney AK, 2016, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V61, P641, DOI 10.1007/s00038-015-0759-7
   Heaney C. A., 2008, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED T, P189, DOI DOI 10.1177/109019818501200106
   Homewood K, 2009, STUD HUM ECOL ADAPT, V5, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-87492-0
   Masten AS, 2001, AM PSYCHOL, V56, P227, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
   May A, 2007, DEV CHANGE, V38, P275, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00412.x
   McCoy S, 2003, PERS SOC PSYCHOL B, V29, P1005, DOI 10.1177/0146167203253466
   Miles M.B., 1994, QUALITATIVE DATA ANA
   Noy C, 2008, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V11, P327, DOI 10.1080/13645570701401305
   Phinney JS, 2001, J SOC ISSUES, V57, P493, DOI 10.1111/0022-4537.00225
   Smith TB, 2011, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V58, P42, DOI 10.1037/a0021528
   Spear Thomas., 1993, BEING MAASAI ETHNICI
   Strauss AL, 1990, BASICS QUALITATIVE R
   Tajfel H., 1981, HUMAN GROUPS SOCIAL, V12, P237, DOI 10.2307/2066820
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2016, INT MIGR REP 2015 HI
   United Nations Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2013, UN DECL RIGHTS IND P
NR 21
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 29
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
SN 1661-8556
EI 1661-8564
J9 INT J PUBLIC HEALTH
JI Int. J. Public Health
PD JUL
PY 2018
VL 63
IS 6
BP 703
EP 711
DI 10.1007/s00038-018-1124-4
PG 9
WC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
GA GK4EI
UT WOS:000436108100004
PM 29868928
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Qiu, T
   Chen, XS
   Su, D
   Lin, XT
AF Qiu, Tong
   Chen, Xiangsheng
   Su, Dong
   Lin, Xingtao
TI Long-Term Urban Epidemic and Disaster Resilience: The Planning and
   Assessment of a Comprehensive Underground Resilience Core
SO BUILDINGS
LA English
DT Article
DE comprehensive underground resilience core; disaster resilience; epidemic
   resilience; long-term epidemic-disaster management; underground space
   environment; underground parking
ID COVID-19 EPIDEMIC; PERFORMANCE; HOSPITALS; MECHANISM; SHELTERS;
   DYNAMICS; SUBWAY; SYSTEM; AREAS; CITY
AB This study utilizes the enclosed and stable environment of underground space for long-term sustainable planning for urban epidemics and disasters. Owing to the COVID-19 epidemic, cities require long-term epidemic-disaster management. Therefore, this study proposed a strategy for integrating multiple functions to plan a comprehensive Underground Resilience Core (URC). A planning and assessment methods of URC were proposed. With this methodology, epidemic- and disaster- URCs were integrated to construct a comprehensive-URC in underground spaces. The results show: (1) Epidemic-resilient URCs adopting a joint progressive approach with designated hospitals can rapidly suppress an epidemic outbreak. (2) The regularity of the morphology of underground spaces determines the area of the URC. Bar-shaped underground spaces have the potential for planning disaster-URCs. (3) The URC planning efficiency ranking is as follows: Bar shapes lead overall, T shapes are second under seismic resilience, and Cross shapes are second under epidemic resilience. (4) The potential analysis of planning a comprehensive-URC in the underground parking in Chinese cities showed that the recovery time can be advanced from 29% to 39% and the comprehensive resilience can be improved by 37.63%. The results of this study can serve as sustainable urban planning strategies and assessment tools for long-term epidemic-disaster management.
C1 [Qiu, Tong; Chen, Xiangsheng; Su, Dong; Lin, Xingtao] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
   [Qiu, Tong; Chen, Xiangsheng; Su, Dong; Lin, Xingtao] Shenzhen Key Lab Green Efficient & Intelligent Con, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
   [Qiu, Tong; Chen, Xiangsheng; Su, Dong; Lin, Xingtao] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Key Lab Resilient Infrastruct Coastal Cities MOE, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
C3 Shenzhen University; Shenzhen University
RP Chen, XS (corresponding author), Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.; Chen, XS (corresponding author), Shenzhen Key Lab Green Efficient & Intelligent Con, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.; Chen, XS (corresponding author), Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Key Lab Resilient Infrastruct Coastal Cities MOE, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
EM 1950471009@email.szu.edu.cn; xschen@szu.edu.cn; sudong@szu.edu.cn;
   xtlin@szu.edu.cn
RI Qiu, Tong/KIB-3242-2024; Chen, Xiangsheng/GLU-5124-2022
OI Qiu, Tong/0000-0002-8443-509X; Su, Dong/0000-0002-6175-6827; Chen,
   Xiangsheng/0000-0002-0880-579X
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51938008]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (NSFC) (project number: 51938008).
CR Alam E, 2019, PROG DISASTER SCI, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100019
   An XH, 1997, CEMENT CONCRETE COMP, V19, P241, DOI 10.1016/S0958-9465(97)00014-0
   [Anonymous], 2022, HAIKE NEWS SHANGHAI
   Bar-El Y, 2014, MED HEALTH CARE PHIL, V17, P155, DOI 10.1007/s11019-013-9517-x
   Barua U, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101836
   Bhadoria AS, 2020, LANCET, V396, P1631, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32161-9
   Breçani R, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101444
   BUCEA, 1998, DES COD GAR
   Chen YH, 2022, J BUILD ENG, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103246
   Cuadros DF, 2021, ANN EPIDEMIOL, V59, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.007
   Curkovic M, 2021, SPAT SPATIO-TEMPORAL, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.sste.2021.100402
   Dong R, 2020, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103298
   Gbadamosi AQ, 2020, PROG DISASTER SCI, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100130
   Haiyang, 2020, BJNEWS
   Haverkort JJM, 2017, INJURY, V48, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.025
   Henry D, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V99, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002
   Hu WJ, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P7516, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1844333
   Kitamura F, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101519
   Li HY, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.007
   Li WT, 2020, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103351
   Liang LW, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117649
   Liu SC, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102206
   Lu CC, 2019, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V87, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2019.02.007
   Luo LP, 2022, INT J MIN SCI TECHNO, V32, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.09.009
   Pengpai_News, 2020, MANY BEDS ARE THERE
   Ro B, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103474
   Sandoval E, 2020, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103474
   Sayed MA, 2019, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.017
   Simic V, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103669
   Sogabe T, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102648
   Taheri B, 2023, ELECTR POW SYST RES, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108804
   Tsinidis G, 2017, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V62, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.003
   Wang SW, 2022, FUEL, V327, DOI 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125171
   Xie HP, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103651
   Xu G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103485
   Xu JH, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V20, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.10.009
   Xu YX, 2022, TRANSPORT POLICY, V116, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.10.020
   Yu YZ, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.110788
   Zhang T, 2021, ENGINEERING-PRC, V7, P948, DOI 10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.020
   Zhang WJ, 2023, EUR J OPER RES, V304, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.026
   Zhang WT, 2019, HABITAT INT, V83, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.002
   Zhang YH, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2021.103933
   Zhilong C., 2021, BLUE BOOK URBAN UNDE
   Zhong ZL, 2020, SOIL DYN EARTHQ ENG, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106044
NR 44
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 15
U2 50
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2075-5309
J9 BUILDINGS-BASEL
JI BUILDINGS-BASEL
PD MAY 16
PY 2023
VL 13
IS 5
AR 1292
DI 10.3390/buildings13051292
PG 19
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA H6EO2
UT WOS:000996875000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Du, YA
   Wang, QX
   Hu, A
   Xin, YJ
AF Du, Yanan
   Wang, Qingxi
   Hu, An
   Xin, Yueji
TI Influence evaluation of producer services agglomeration on economic
   resilience: Evidence from China's cities
SO ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Producer services; economic resilience; diversification; specialization;
   industrial structure upgrading
ID LOCAL GROWTH; REGIONS; CRISIS
AB As a new engine of economic development after urbanization's structural deceleration stage in China, producer services agglomeration on urban economic resilience (ER) requires analysis. Using data from 264 prefecture-level cities and above in China after the global financial crisis, we examine producer services' impact in terms of diversification (PSD) and specialization (PSS) on urban ER, and also the mediating effect of industrial structure upgrading (ISU). The results show that Cities with more diversified producer services are more resilient to crises, while the effect direction of PSS is the opposite. ISU is partly how PSD and PSS affect ER. Finally, producer services agglomeration's impact on ER has significant regional heterogeneity. PSD is very conducive to urban ER in the economically developed eastern region and the less developed western region. The more specialized the development of producer services in eastern and north-eastern regions, the less conducive it is to enhancing ER. Our findings can help stabilize China's economy and achieve high-quality economic development.
C1 [Du, Yanan; Wang, Qingxi; Hu, An; Xin, Yueji] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Du, Yanan] Yancheng Teachers Univ, Business Sch, Yancheng, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang University of Technology; Yancheng Teachers University
RP Wang, QX (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
EM wqx1976@zjut.edu.cn
RI Hu, An/HPF-6861-2023; qi, wang/JUV-2984-2023
OI Hu, An/0000-0002-9992-5366
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Social Science
   Foundation of China; Jiangsu University Philosophy and Social Science
   Research;  [42101159];  [17BJL074];  [2020SJA1869]
FX This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. 42101159), the National Social Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No.17BJL074) and Jiangsu University Philosophy and Social
   Science Research (Grant No.2020SJA1869).
CR Aghion P, 2015, ANNU REV ECON, V7, P557, DOI 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115412
   Balland PA, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P167, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv007
   BARON RM, 1986, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P1173, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Burren D, 2013, MACROECON DYN, V17, P477, DOI 10.1017/S1365100511000289
   Cainelli G, 2019, PAP REG SCI, V98, P755, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12377
   [陈红霞 Chen Hongxia], 2019, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V39, P128
   [陈梦远 Chen Mengyuan], 2017, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V36, P1435
   Cheng L, 2020, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V23, P2602, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2019.1711029
   Christopher SC, 2016, GROWTH CHANGE, V47, P631, DOI 10.1111/grow.12159
   Combes PP, 2000, J URBAN ECON, V47, P329, DOI 10.1006/juec.1999.2143
   Cuadrado-Roura JR, 2016, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V9, P153, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv034
   Doran J, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P644, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1088642
   Faggian A, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P393, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0822-9
   Fan F, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125060
   Han F., 2020, Manag World, V36, P72, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.02.008, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-5502.2020.02.008, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2020.0022]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong Y, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123455
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Li M., 2012, J MANAGEMENT WORLD, V1, P21, DOI [10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2012.01.004, DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2012.01.004]
   Lin GCS, 2002, CITIES, V19, P299, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00039-2
   Liu D, 2019, ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ, V32, P3773, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1674178
   Lundquist KJ, 2008, SERV IND J, V28, P463, DOI 10.1080/02642060801917588
   Mai X, 2021, HABITAT INT, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102326
   Mai X, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11226333
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   Martin R, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P141, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsv012
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Neffke F, 2011, ECON GEOGR, V87, P237, DOI 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Peng C, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.942057
   Ren YJ, 2019, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V37, P6389, DOI 10.3233/JIFS-179218
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Tan JT, 2020, GROWTH CHANGE, V51, P362, DOI 10.1111/grow.12352
   Tóth G, 2022, ECON GEOGR, V98, P355, DOI 10.1080/00130095.2022.2035715
   Martínez YU, 2019, PAP REG SCI, V98, P2211, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12464
   Wang ZX, 2021, REG STUD, V55, P1228, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2021.1872779
   Wen T., 2020, SCI TECHNOLOGY MANAG, V40, P143, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2020.21.018, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-7695.2020.21.018]
   Xie WC, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.745465
   XU Y., 2019, Financ. Trade Econ, V40, P110
   Yu B., 2019, Comparative Economic Social Systems, V2, P30
   Yu Z, 2022, SINGAP ECON REV, V67, P1117, DOI 10.1142/S0217590822450011
   Zhao J, 2021, AUST ECON PAP, V60, P736, DOI 10.1111/1467-8454.12229
NR 43
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 15
U2 85
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1331-677X
EI 1848-9664
J9 ECON RES-EKON ISTRAZ
JI Ekon. Istraz.
PD 2022 NOV 23
PY 2022
DI 10.1080/1331677X.2022.2151491
EA NOV 2022
PG 19
WC Economics
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics
GA 6T1KK
UT WOS:000893440600001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fu, XY
   Li, CS
AF Fu, Xinyu
   Li, Chaosu
TI How resilient are localities planning for climate change? An evaluation
   of 50 plans in the United States
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Climate change; Adaptation planning; Plan quality
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; URBAN RESILIENCE; GOVERNMENT RESPONSE; DISASTER
   RECOVERY; CHANGE ADAPTATION; GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY;
   UNCERTAINTY; POLITICS
AB Resilience has increasingly become the principal management priority and planning goal for cities, especially for climate change adaptation. Yet few studies have evaluated whether and how well resilience are integrated into climate change adaptation planning. In this study, we first conceptualized resilience as five key elements (i.e., system, collaboration, uncertainty, coping capacity, and adaptive capacity) and developed a coding protocol based on these key elements. We then used it to evaluate a sample of 50 climate change plans in the United States (US) that has a major adaptation component. We found that the concept of resilience has not been adequately embedded in US climate change plans and that the predominant notions of resilience has limited influence on how well plans integrate resilience. We also found that standalone adaptation plans outperform hybrid plans in addressing uncertainty and fostering systems thinking. Ultimately, major barriers exist in translating the concept of resilience into climate change planning practice. We further offer implications for cities to more effectively plan for climate resilience.
C1 [Fu, Xinyu] Univ Waikato, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Environm Planning Program, Hamilton, New Zealand.
   [Li, Chaosu] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol Guangzhou, Urban Governance & Design Thrust, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Chaosu] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Publ Policy, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Waikato; Hong Kong University of Science & Technology
   (Guangzhou); Hong Kong University of Science & Technology
RP Li, CS (corresponding author), Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol Guangzhou, Urban Governance & Design Thrust, Guangzhou, Peoples R China.
EM chaosuli@ust.hk
RI Fu, Xinyu/ABA-6804-2020; Fu, Xinyu/R-5560-2017; Li, Chaosu/I-8419-2016
OI Fu, Xinyu/0000-0002-3591-4158; Li, Chaosu/0000-0002-1146-2361
FU Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)
   [G0101000016]; University of Waikato ALPSS Division Contestable Research
   Grant 2021; start-up funding of The Hong Kong University of Science and
   Technology (Guangzhou) [G0101000016]
FX The author discloses receipt of the following financial support for the
   research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: University of
   Waikato ALPSS Division Contestable Research Grant 2021, and the start-up
   funding of The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
   (Guangzhou) (G0101000016) .
CR Abbott J, 2005, J PLAN EDUC RES, V24, P237, DOI 10.1177/0739456X04267710
   Adger WN, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P757, DOI 10.1002/wcc.133
   Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Albers M, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P1598, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.722961
   [Anonymous], 2017, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, DOI DOI 10.1007/s11027-016-9725-9
   Baker I, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.009
   Bassett E, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P435, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2010.509703
   Bellinson R, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P76, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1493916
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Berbés-Blázquez M, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V141, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-1897-0
   Berke P, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P310, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.976585
   Berke PR, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P901, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1453354
   Berke PR, 2021, RISK ANAL, V41, P1248, DOI 10.1111/risa.13202
   Berke PhilipR., 2006, URBAN LAND USE PLANN, V5th
   Berke PR, 2000, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V66, P21, DOI 10.1080/01944360008976081
   Chakraborty A, 2011, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V77, P251, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2011.582394
   Coaffee J, 2015, TOWN PLAN REV, V86, P249, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2015.16
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Derissen S, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Doherty M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.001
   Editorial, 2019, NATURE SUSTAINABILIT, V2, P249, DOI [10.1038/s41893-019-0284-4, DOI 10.1038/S41893-019-0284-4]
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Fu XY, 2020, CITIES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102717
   Fu XY, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V155, P393, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02488-5
   Fu XY, 2019, CITIES, V88, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.007
   Fu XY, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P249, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1151771
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Hallegatte S, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.12.003
   Higbee M, 2016, INTEGRATING HAZARD M
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hollnagel E., 2006, Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts
   Hopkins L.D, 2001, URBAN DEV ILLOGIC MA, V166
   Howes M, 2015, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V58, P757, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2014.891974
   Hutter G, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V55, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.028
   Keenan JM, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V88, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.06.015
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Laukkonen J, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.003
   Leck H, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P1221, DOI 10.1177/0042098012461675
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li CS, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P1679, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1085840
   Little RG, 2002, J URBAN TECHNOL, V9, P109, DOI 10.1080/106307302317379855
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Masnavi MR, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P567, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1860-2
   McEvoy D, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P280, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787710
   McPhearson T., 2020, Transformative climate governance, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-49040-9_3, 10.1007/978-3-030-49040-9_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-49040-93]
   Measham TG, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P889, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P329
   Preston BL, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P407, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9270-x
   Rana IA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101839
   de Murieta ES, 2021, CITIES, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103018
   Scott M, 2013, GEOGR COMPASS, V7, P597, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12066
   Sellberg MM, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V217, P906, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012
   Sharifi A, 2018, LECT N ENERG, V65, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-75798-8_1
   Shi L, 2021, URBAN AFF REV, V57, P1442, DOI 10.1177/1078087419910827
   Shi LD, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P191, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1074526
   Smit B, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Song Y, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P2192, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1282346
   Southwick SM, 2014, EUR J PSYCHOTRAUMATO, V5, DOI 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25338
   Stevens MR, 2014, J PLAN EDUC RES, V34, P77, DOI 10.1177/0739456X13513614
   Stults M, 2020, J PLAN EDUC RES, V40, P416, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18769134
   Tang ZH, 2010, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V53, P41, DOI 10.1080/09640560903399772
   Tyler S, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P420, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.08.004
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Woodruff S, 2021, CITIES, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103239
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
NR 78
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 10
U2 58
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD SEP 15
PY 2022
VL 318
AR 115493
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115493
PG 7
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 4Z5LI
UT WOS:000862249600004
PM 35724570
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, HH
   Du, S
   Zhong, YH
   Liu, SR
   Xu, TT
   Zhao, Y
   He, WL
   Xue, HY
   He, YF
   Gao, XY
   Jiang, RF
AF Wang, Huihui
   Du, Shuai
   Zhong, Yuhao
   Liu, Suru
   Xu, Tingting
   Zhao, Yue
   He, Wanlin
   Xue, Hanyu
   He, Yifeng
   Gao, Xiaoyong
   Jiang, Ruifeng
TI Unveiling the impact mechanism of urban resilience on carbon dioxide
   emissions of the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration in China
SO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE Carbon dioxide emissions; Urban resilience; Data envelopment analysis;
   Spillover effects
ID EFFICIENCY; ENERGY; GROWTH; ADAPTATION; CHALLENGES; MITIGATION;
   STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; ENTROPY; POLICY
AB With the increasingly severe global climate change situation, the construction of low-carbon and resilient cities is expected to be an effective means of accelerating the achievement of carbon peak and carbon neutrality goals. As a major global economic and carbon-emitting power, it is necessary to advocate for China to accelerate the construction of low-carbon and resilient cities. We have formulated a comprehensive methodological framework to appraise the effects of urban resilience (UR) on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. This study first constructs a "social-economic-institutional-ecological-engineering" UR assessment framework. Based on this framework, we establish an evaluation system for the UR of the urban agglomeration to explore the dynamic evolution of its spatial and temporal patterns. And then this study uses the SBM-DEA method that includes undesirable outputs to measure the carbon emission efficiency of the urban agglomeration. Finally, the spatial Durbin model is used to analyze the spatial spillover effects of UR on CO2 emissions, and the mechanism of CO2 emission spatial effects is theoretically explained by introducing geographical laws. The results show that the overall UR level in the region increased from 0.107 in 2000 to 0.318 in 2020, with an average carbon emission efficiency of 0.82, but still at a relatively low level. Moreover, there are significant differences in the regional level, with Guangzhou and Shenzhen and their surrounding cities showing significantly higher levels compared to other cities. Regarding the spillover effects analysis, CO2 emissions exhibit significant spatial spillover effects between cities. Improving UR can reduce urban CO2 emissions, but it may also have negative spillover effects on surrounding cities. This research can provide a new perspective for improving the study of regional CO2 emissions reduction and its influencing mechanisms while also offering important references for accelerating the construction of UR and achieving regional carbon peak targets.
C1 [Wang, Huihui; Du, Shuai; Zhong, Yuhao; Liu, Suru; Xu, Tingting; Zhao, Yue; He, Wanlin; Xue, Hanyu; He, Yifeng; Gao, Xiaoyong; Jiang, Ruifeng] Beijing Normal Univ, Adv Inst Nat Sci, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Huihui] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Huihui] Beijing Normal Univ, Guangdong Higher Educ Inst, Key Lab Coastal Water Environm Management & Water, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China.
   [Du, Shuai; Xu, Tingting; He, Yifeng; Gao, Xiaoyong; Jiang, Ruifeng] Beijing Normal Univ, Huitong Coll, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China.
   [Zhong, Yuhao; Liu, Suru; Zhao, Yue] Beijing Normal Univ, Zhixing Coll, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China.
   [He, Wanlin] Zhuhai Architectural Design Inst, Zhuhai 519000, Peoples R China.
   [Xue, Hanyu] Zhuhai Inst Urban Planning & Design, Res Inst Urban Renewal, Zhuhai 519100, Peoples R China.
   [Gao, Xiaoyong] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Singapore 117570, Singapore.
C3 Beijing Normal University; Beijing Normal University; Beijing Normal
   University; Beijing Normal University; Beijing Normal University;
   National University of Singapore
RP Wang, HH (corresponding author), Beijing Normal Univ, Adv Inst Nat Sci, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China.
EM wanghui@bnu.edu.cn
RI Zhong, Yuhao/MIQ-2951-2025
OI yue, zhao/0009-0004-9696-744X; Du, Shuai/0000-0002-6028-9139
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42201241]; National Key
   Research and Development Project of China [2021YFC3101700]; Huihui Wang
   from Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing Normal University
   at Zhuhai [310432104]
FX This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (No. 42201241) , the National Key Research and
   Development Project of China (No. 2021YFC3101700) , and the startup fund
   to Huihui Wang from Advanced Institute of Natural Sciences, Beijing
   Normal University at Zhuhai (No. 310432104) . The authors would like to
   thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive
   comments.
CR Ali I, 2023, SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG, V28, P284, DOI 10.1108/SCM-02-2021-0059
   ANDERSEN P, 1993, MANAGE SCI, V39, P1261, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
   Armitage D, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04940-170415
   Bai D., 2021, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res, P1
   Berk I, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V36, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.051
   Cai BF, 2019, APPL ENERG, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113579
   CHARNES A, 1978, EUR J OPER RES, V2, P429, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Chen C.H., 2023, Energy
   Chen H, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105457
   Chen JD, 2020, SCI DATA, V7, DOI 10.1038/s41597-020-00736-3
   Chen J, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V153, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.141
   Chen XL, 2023, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V238, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109469
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Cortekar J, 2016, CLIM SERV, V4, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2016.11.002
   Datola G, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104821
   Dhakal S, 2009, ENERG POLICY, V37, P4208, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.020
   Dhingra R, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V85, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.107
   Elhorst JP, 2010, SPAT ECON ANAL, V5, P9, DOI 10.1080/17421770903541772
   FARE R, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P66, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2004.00089.x
   Firman T, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.11.011
   Fu HY, 2023, CITIES, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104385
   Fünfgeld H, 2010, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V2, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.07.001
   Geden O, 2019, CLIM POLICY, V19, P487, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2018.1536600
   Ghani M.Z.A., 2018, Plan. Malaysia, V16, P1
   Ghosh S, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V336, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130417
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Grafakos S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V154, P87, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02394-w
   Guo QT, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V177, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113523
   Han S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107145
   Hao Rui-jun, 2022, Huanjing Kexue, V43, P5305, DOI 10.13227/j.hjkx.202112066
   [贺山峰 He Shanfeng], 2022, [长江流域资源与环境, Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin], V31, P1988
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hölscher K, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P791, DOI 10.1007/s10113-018-1329-3
   Hsu PF, 2008, QUAL QUANT, V42, P181, DOI 10.1007/s11135-006-9040-8
   Hu XF, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103709
   Hu XW, 2021, REG SUSTAIN, V2, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.regsus.2021.10.001
   Huang JH, 2014, J CLEAN PROD, V67, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.003
   Jiao LD, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101543
   Jie T, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104510
   Jin G, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119856
   Jozi SA, 2012, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V184, P6913, DOI 10.1007/s10661-011-2468-x
   Kim KG, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59618-1_1
   Kingir S., 2016, Elektron. Sos. Bilim. Derg, V15, P1046, DOI [10.17755/esosder.258835, DOI 10.17755/ESOSDER.258835]
   Kohler S., 2021, Sustain. Manag. Forum | NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum, V29, P143
   Li D, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106954
   Li X, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V397, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136449
   Liu JB, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11050604
   Liu LN, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107186
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu W, 2016, CITIES, V51, P131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.010
   [鲁钰雯 Lu Yuwen], 2022, [科技导报, Science & Technology Review], V40, P56
   Ma L, 2014, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V6, P9853, DOI 10.3390/rs6109853
   Mallick SK, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103196
   Malmquist S., 1953, TRABAJOS ESTADISTICA, V4, P209, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF03006863
   Meng LN, 2014, ENERGY, V71, P468, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.103
   MORAN PAP, 1948, J ROY STAT SOC B, V10, P243
   Negev M, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101146
   Pan YD, 2011, SCIENCE, V333, P988, DOI 10.1126/science.1201609
   Poon STF, 2018, Plan. Malaysia, V16, P75, DOI 10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i5.412
   Qian HQ, 2021, NAT SUSTAIN, V4, P417, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00669-0
   Roope LSJ, 2019, SCIENCE, V364, P41, DOI 10.1126/science.aau4679
   Rosenstock TS, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/021003
   Sensier M, 2016, SPAT ECON ANAL, V11, P128, DOI 10.1080/17421772.2016.1129435
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Singh Sangita, 2023, Journal of Soil, Plant and Environment, V2, P79, DOI 10.56946/jspae.v2i1.186
   Song ML, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104777
   Song Q, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15021538
   Stefanakis AI, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11246981
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Tang D., 2023, Sustain. Cities Soc
   Tang HL, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V254, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120011
   TOBLER WR, 1970, ECON GEOGR, V46, P234, DOI 10.2307/143141
   Tone K, 2002, EUR J OPER RES, V143, P32, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00324-1
   Tone K., 2004, DEALING UNDESIRABLE, P44
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Tzeng GH, 2011, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING: METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, P1
   Urquizo J., 2019, E3S WEB C, V115, P1
   Verol A.P., 2020, Sustainability, V12, P1
   Wang H., 2023, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., V104
   Wang H., 2023, J. Clean. Prod.
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   Wang HH, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V838, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156020
   Wang J., 2021, MANAGE WORLD WASTE, V37, P148, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2021.10.007, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2021.10.007]
   Wang L, 2023, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103372
   Wang M, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V278, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111401
   Wang SB, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19042386
   Wang SJ, 2022, CHIN SCI B-CHIN, V67, P670, DOI 10.1360/TB-2021-0681
   Wei W, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V321, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128933
   Wu F, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V49, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.035
   Wu Y, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V349, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119441
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   Xu XB, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V142, P3607, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.107
   Yan B, 2022, ECON MODEL, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105745
   Yang SB, 2023, ENERG ECON, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106523
   Yang XH, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V401, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136663
   Yu HJ, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P9642, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-22552-5
   Yuan DB, 2021, SENSORS-BASEL, V21, DOI 10.3390/s21227561
   Zeng SB, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363
   Zhang QL, 2016, IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V54, P5821, DOI 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2572724
   Zhang WS, 2023, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V192, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106913
   Zhang Y., 2020, Water, V13, P1
   Zhang Y, 2019, SUSTAIN DEV, V27, P130, DOI 10.1002/sd.1884
   Zhao PJ, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V741, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140026
   [赵睿 Zhao Rui], 2020, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V75, P695
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zhao ZY, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P743, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.116
   Zhou Q, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104084
   Zhu Y, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103892
NR 110
TC 14
Z9 14
U1 50
U2 118
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
PI NEW YORK
PA STE 800, 230 PARK AVE, NEW YORK, NY 10169 USA
SN 0195-9255
EI 1873-6432
J9 ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES
JI Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 105
AR 107422
DI 10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107422
EA JAN 2024
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA IM6Y0
UT WOS:001166794000001
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, CG
   Zhou, YJ
   Yin, SG
AF Zhang, Changgan
   Zhou, Yijing
   Yin, Shanggang
TI Interaction mechanisms of urban ecosystem resilience based on
   pressure-state-response framework: A case study of the Yangtze River
   Delta
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Ecological resilience; Urban ecosystem resilience;
   Pressure-State-Response framework; Panel vector autoregressive model
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; LANDSCAPE; HEALTH; SYSTEMS; INFRASTRUCTURE;
   SERVICES; INDEXES; CITY
AB The unprecedented pace of urbanization has intensified environmental concerns, underscoring the critical importance of bolstering urban ecosystem resilience (UER) in contemporary cities. This study presents a Pressure-State-Response framework for evaluating the UER within the Yangtze River Delta region spanning 2012 to 2021. Utilizing spatial visualization techniques and the panel vector auto-regressive model, spatial differentiation patterns and interaction mechanisms among sub-dimensions are examined. Findings indicate an overall positive trajectory of UER, characterized by decreasing Pressure, noteworthy steady growth in State, and rising Response. Spatially, Pressure is higher in the north and lower in the south, with large cities becoming new centers of high pressure; State is higher in the southwest mountains and lower in the northeast plains; Responses center around Shanghai, expanding toward the southwest and northwest. The complex interactions between Pressure, State, and Response form a nested cycle of UER, indicating that the UER in the Yangtze River Delta is evolving towards a more rational development trend, where the tight mechanism of societal Response plays a key role. The implications underscore the urgent need for tailored regional governance strategies that leverage spatial variations, balance human impact on ecosystems, and optimize dimensional interactions for resilient city development. This research contributes a comprehensive framework for understanding and enhancing ecological resilience in the Yangtze River Delta region, offering valuable insights into regional governance and long-term urban ecological sustainability amidst global environmental challenges.
C1 [Zhang, Changgan; Zhou, Yijing; Yin, Shanggang] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Jinhua 321004, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang Normal University
RP Yin, SG (corresponding author), Zhejiang Normal Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Jinhua 321004, Peoples R China.
EM yinshanggang@zjnu.edu.cn
OI Changgan, Zhang/0009-0009-1266-2486
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42301231]; Humanity and
   Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China
   [23YJCZH282]; Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
   [ZCLQ24D0101]; Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project of
   Jinhua [2023-4-029]
FX This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
   [grant number 42301231] ; Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation
   of Ministry of Education of China [grant number 23YJCZH282] ; Zhejiang
   Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number
   ZCLQ24D0101] and Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project
   of Jinhua [grant number 2023-4-029] .
CR Adger WN, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P358, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0358:MRLTAS]2.0.CO;2
   Baho DL, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09427-220317
   Beck MB, 2013, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V7, P640, DOI 10.1007/s11783-013-0549-5
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Bennett EM, 2009, ECOL LETT, V12, P1394, DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
   Berger AR, 1998, SOC INDIC RES, V44, P255, DOI 10.1023/A:1006888532080
   BOTEQUILHA-LEITAO A., 2012, Challenges, V3, P1, DOI [10.3390/challe3010001, DOI 10.3390/CHALLE3010001]
   Botequilha-Leitao A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102089
   Brand F, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P605, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.013
   Broadstock DC, 2021, FINANC RES LETT, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Caro C, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106426
   Carpenter SR, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18031056
   Cheng HR, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V804, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150053
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Corry RC, 2005, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V72, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.04.003
   Costanza R, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P149, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0149:MOEP]2.3.CO;2
   [崔学刚 Cui Xuegang], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P1079
   Dakos V, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5767
   de Roo G, 2018, PROG PLANN, V125, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2017.04.002
   Derissen S, 2011, ECOL ECON, V70, P1121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.003
   Deutsch L, 2003, ECOL ECON, V44, P205, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00274-4
   DIAKOULAKI D, 1995, COMPUT OPER RES, V22, P763, DOI 10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
   Du KR, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V146, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.010
   Fan F, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17176095
   Fang GC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V727, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138710
   Feng RD, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106857
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fu HB, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V578, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.201
   Fu SK, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-29451-3
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C. S., 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature
   Hossain ML, 2021, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V30, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01768
   Hu XS, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V89, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006
   Hudec O, 2018, CITIES, V73, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.004
   Hughey KFD, 2004, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V70, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.020
   Kapucu N., 2021, Urban Governance, V1, P10, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.UGJ.2021.09.001
   Kirch PV, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P409, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.102403.140700
   Kupfer JA, 2012, PROG PHYS GEOG, V36, P400, DOI 10.1177/0309133312439594
   Lee CC, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V443, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141082
   Lewison RL, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V56, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.001
   Li F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.079
   Li GZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110667
   Li XG, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20021629
   Li Y, 2021, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V145, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111131
   Liao CJ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V90, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.036
   Liao ZJ, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-33342-5
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Liu LN, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V827, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154157
   Liu N, 2020, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V32, P923, DOI 10.1080/09537325.2020.1729977
   Liu Y., 2021, Mountain city fusion, happy to live in Chuzhou
   Liu YX, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V881, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163535
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Ma N, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19031611
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Meerow S., 2021, Geographic Perspectives on Urban Sustainability, P43, DOI [10.4324/9781003130185, DOI 10.4324/9781003130185]
   Nathwani J, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   Peng J, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V143, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007
   Pickett STA, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.022
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Pu ZN, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119930
   Riitters KH, 1996, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V11, P197, DOI 10.1007/BF02071810
   Salomon AK, 2019, ECOL SOC, V24, DOI 10.5751/ES-11044-240316
   Shi YJ, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103141
   Shuai S, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V261, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110227
   Taylor L, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V158, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.024
   Turner MD, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P616, DOI 10.1177/0309132513502770
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   UNGAR S, 1994, CAN REV SOC ANTHROP, V31, P288
   van der Jagt APN, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V233, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.083
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Wang H, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V858, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159906
   Wang J, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118133
   Wu SB, 2023, NAT COMMUN, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41467-023-41620-z
   Wu WB, 2021, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102525
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   Xia CH, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104223
   [夏楚瑜 Xia Chuyu], 2022, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V42, P116
   Xiao W, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105843
   [修春亮 Xiu Chunliang], 2018, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V73, P2315
   Xu HQ, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11202345
   Young OR, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.004
   Yu HC, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V414, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137559
   Zhang QR, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12051089
   Zhang ZH, 2023, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V38, P1807, DOI 10.1007/s10980-023-01657-3
   Zhao RD, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102997
   Zhao YW, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V99, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.023
NR 92
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 47
U2 70
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 166
AR 112263
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112263
EA JUN 2024
PG 15
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA XD0J7
UT WOS:001259626400001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wada, A
   Towhata, I
   Tamura, K
   Zhe, Q
AF Wada, Akira
   Towhata, Ikuo
   Tamura, Kazuo
   Zhe, Qu
TI A complete introduction to the SCJ proposal and its commentary on the
   development of seismically resilient cities
SO EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION
LA English
DT Article
DE large earthquake; large city; urban disaster; resilience society;
   earthquake engineering
AB In modern society, the population, wealth and social functions are increasingly concentrated in a few large cities. Such concentration brings about efficiency while at the same time it increases the vulnerability of the society. To address this issue, the Science Council of Japan (SCJ) published a proposal entitled Shape Cities and Societies Safer against Severe Earthquakes. It makes a variety of suggestions for enhancing the seismic resilience of large cities, including: (1) comprehensive thinking based on the latest scientific knowledge and rich imagination; (2) selection of sites suitable for residence and social activities; (3) introducing the urban seismic coefficient; (4) promoting the enhancement of the seismic performance of buildings and civil structures; (5) easing the concentration of population and functions; (6) building communities that enable shelter and escape; (7) resilient technology of information and communication system and its effective utilization; (8) preparation and implementation of emergency response after earthquakes; (9) development and application of new structural seismic technology; (10) learning from domestic and foreign earthquake disasters and launching of international cooperation and knowledge sharing and (11) taking actions from a multidisciplinary perspective. The proposal is introduced in this paper.
C1 [Wada, Akira] Tokyo Inst Technol, Tokyo 1528550, Japan.
   [Towhata, Ikuo] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo 1538914, Japan.
   [Tamura, Kazuo] Chiba Inst Technol, Fac Engn, Chiba 2750016, Japan.
   [Zhe, Qu] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
C3 Institute of Science Tokyo; Tokyo Institute of Technology; University of
   Tokyo; Chiba Institute of Technology; China Earthquake Administration;
   Institute of Engineering Mechanics, CEA
RP Zhe, Q (corresponding author), China Earthquake Adm, Inst Engn Mech, Harbin 150080, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China.
EM quz@iem.ac.cn
RI Qu, Zhe/B-3364-2012
OI Qu, Zhe/0000-0002-6368-2147
FU Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China
   Earthquake Administration [2016A05]
FX Supported by: Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering
   Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration under Grant No. 2016A05
CR Academic Society Liaison Corresponding to the Great East Japan Earthquake, 2014, JOINT STAT 30 DIS RE
   BCJ, 2013, INTR BUILD STAND LAW
   Cabinet Office Japan, 2017, White Paper: Disaster Management in Japan
   MLIT, 2013, STAND POS VOL STRUCT
   MLIT, 2006, BAS PERF STAND GOV B
   MLIT, 2001, JAP HOUS PERF LAB ST
   Onishi Takashi, 2016, 2016 KUM EARTHQ APR
   Shanghai Earthquake Agency, 2012, 12 5 YEAR PLAN PROT
   United Nations Foundation, 2015, SUST DEV GOALS SDGS
NR 9
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 0
U2 23
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA
SN 1671-3664
EI 1993-503X
J9 EARTHQ ENG ENG VIB
JI Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib.
PD OCT
PY 2018
VL 17
IS 4
BP 677
EP 691
DI 10.1007/s11803-018-0468-3
PG 15
WC Engineering, Civil; Engineering, Geological
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA GY3TY
UT WOS:000448479600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chang, H
   Yu, DJ
   Markolf, SA
   Hong, CY
   Eom, S
   Song, W
   Bae, D
AF Chang, Heejun
   Yu, David J.
   Markolf, Samuel A.
   Hong, Chang-yu
   Eom, Sunyong
   Song, Wonsuh
   Bae, Deghyo
TI Understanding Urban Flood Resilience in the Anthropocene: A
   Social-Ecological-Technological Systems (SETS) Learning Framework
SO ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; resilience; social learning; urban floods; urbanization
AB Urban flooding is a major concern in many cities around the world. Together with continuous urbanization, extreme weather events are likely to increase the magnitude and frequency of flood hazards and exposure in populated regions. This article examines the changing pathways of flood risk management (FRM) in Portland, Oregon; Seoul, South Korea; and Tokyo, Japan, which have different histories of land development and flood severity. We used city governance documents to identify how FRM strategies have changed in the study cities. Using a combined framework of social learning with an integrated social-ecological-technological systems (SETS) lens, we show what components of SETS have been emphasized and how FRM strategies have diversified over time. In response to historical flood events, these cities built hard infrastructure such as levees to reduce flood risks. The recent paradigm shift in urban FRM, such as the adoption of socioecological elements in SETS, including floodplain restoration, green infrastructure, and public education, is a response to making cities more resilient or transformative to the anticipated future extreme floods. The pathways that cities have taken and the main emphasis across SETS elements differ by city, however, suggesting that opportunities exist for learning from each city's experience collectively to tackle global flooding issues.
C1 [Chang, Heejun] Portland State Univ, Dept Geog, Portland, OR 97201 USA.
   [Yu, David J.] Purdue Univ, Lyles Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Yu, David J.] Purdue Univ, Dept Polit Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA.
   [Markolf, Samuel A.] Arizona State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Sustainable Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
   [Hong, Chang-yu] Jeju Res Inst, Dept Urban Environm Res, Jeju 02115, South Korea.
   [Eom, Sunyong] Univ Tokyo, Ctr Spatial Informat Sci, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778568, Japan.
   [Song, Wonsuh] Waseda Univ, Sch Educ, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1698050, Japan.
   [Bae, Deghyo] Sejong Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 05006, South Korea.
C3 Portland State University; Purdue University System; Purdue University;
   Purdue University System; Purdue University; Arizona State University;
   Arizona State University-Tempe; University of Tokyo; Waseda University;
   Sejong University
RP Chang, H (corresponding author), Portland State Univ, Dept Geog, Portland, OR 97201 USA.
EM changh@pdx.edu; davidyu@purdue.edu; smarkolf@asu.edu;
   503changyu@gmail.com; eomsunyong@csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp;
   geosong@aoni.waseda.jp; dhbae@sejong.ac.kr
RI Chang, Heejun/AGF-1404-2022; Eom, Sunyong/ABD-4964-2020
OI Markolf, Samuel/0000-0003-4744-0006; Yu, David J./0000-0001-9929-1933;
   Eom, Sunyong/0000-0002-8164-7097; Chang, Heejun/0000-0002-5605-6500
FU U.S. National Science Foundation [SES 1444755, CIS-1913665]; Korea
   Environment Industry & Technology Institute through the Advanced Water
   Management Research Program - Korea Ministry of Environment [83079]; Abe
   Fellowship Program; Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership;
   Center for the Environment at Purdue University through its C4E seed
   grant program
FX This work was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (SES
   1444755, CIS-1913665), Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute
   through the Advanced Water Management Research Program, funded by the
   Korea Ministry of Environment (Grant 83079), a grant from the Abe
   Fellowship Program administered by the Social Science Research Council
   in cooperation with and with funds provided by the Japan Foundation
   Center for Global Partnership, and the Center for the Environment at
   Purdue University through its C4E seed grant program. Any opinions,
   findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material
   are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
   sponsoring agencies.
CR Aerts J, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P759, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2343
   Ahilan S, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS986, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12251
   Allen TR, 2019, PUBLIC WORKS MANAG P, V24, P110, DOI 10.1177/1087724X18798380
   Anderson B, 2015, POLITICS-OXFORD, V35, P60, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12079
   [Anonymous], 2019, FRAMING CHALLENGE UR, DOI DOI 10.17226/25381
   [Anonymous], 2019, Climate Data Online
   Argyris C., 1978, ORG LEARNING THEORY
   Bae S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101186
   Barros V, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, pIX
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Biggs R., 2015, PRINCIPLES BUILDING
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Bureau of Construction Tokyo Metropolitan Government., 2019, RET BAS TOK
   Chan FKS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.217
   Chandler D, 2014, RESILIENCE, V2, P47, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   Chang H., 2020, GEOPHYS RES LETT, DOI [10.1029/2019JC015928, DOI 10.1029/2019JC015928]
   Chang H, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P938, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2010.497110
   Chang HJ, 2008, GEOGR COMPASS, V2, P1549, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00136.x
   Cho S, 2011, A Z ITU J FAC ARCHIT, V8, P169
   City of Portland, 1991, JOHNSON CREEK BASIN
   City of Portland, 2011, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN G
   City of Portland, 2019, WILLING SELLER PROGR
   City of Portland, 2018, 2035 COMPREHENSIVE P
   City of Portland, 2019, FLOOD INSURANCE RESO
   Coates R, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1301, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2019.1701977
   den Boer J, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102032
   Di Baldassarre G, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P3295, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013
   Fahy B, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101117
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fuchs S, 2017, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V107, P382, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1235494
   Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, 1984, REG PLANN ATL JAP
   Goodchild B, 2018, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V20, P434, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1433997
   2018, [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315661407
   Grove K, 2020, GEOFORUM, V117, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.014
   Grove K, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1613, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1715778
   Grove KJ, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P570, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.740357
   Johannessen Å, 2019, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V29, P144, DOI 10.1002/eet.1843
   Kim D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11143917
   Kim Jonggil, 2013, POST MINJOONG ART SH
   Korea Meteorological Administration, 2019, DAILY PRECIPITATION
   Korea Ministry of Environment, 2019, ENV SPAT INF SERV
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Luo PP, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V48, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.015
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   Matsuda I., 2011, LAND DEV DISASTER MI
   McGinnis M.D., 2017, ELINOR OSTROM BLOOMI, V3
   McPhearson T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V70, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
   Merz B, 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, V51, P6399, DOI 10.1002/2015WR017464
   Morrison A, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, P291, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12315
   Morrison A, 2018, CAN WATER RESOUR J, V43, P33, DOI 10.1080/07011784.2018.1428501
   Multnomah County, 2017, MULTIJURISDICTIONAL
   Multnomah County, 2009, MULTNOMAH COUNTY HAZ
   Nakamura S, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P5504, DOI 10.1029/2017WR022509
   NISHI M, 2016, J EXTREME EVENTS, V3
   Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2016, FINANC MANAGE
   Ostrom E, 2005, UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY, P1
   Ostrom E, 2009, SCIENCE, V325, P419, DOI 10.1126/science.1172133
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pelling M, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN A, V40, P867, DOI 10.1068/a39148
   Pelling M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0
   Pressure for expanding construction investment due to successive disaster, 2019, NIKKEI
   Reed MS, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Simon S, 2016, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V6, P3, DOI 10.1177/2043820615624047
   Solecki W, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09102-220238
   Syed M, 2015, EMERG ADULTHOOD, V3, P375, DOI 10.1177/2167696815587648
   Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2018, LAND US TOK SPEC WAR
   Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2019, LAND US TOK TAM ISL
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Yu DJ, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1509, DOI 10.1111/risa.13494
   Yu DJ, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P1336, DOI 10.1002/2016WR019746
   Yu DJ, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V37, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.009
   Zevenbergen C, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0212
NR 73
TC 23
Z9 24
U1 10
U2 77
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 2469-4452
EI 2469-4460
J9 ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR
JI Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr.
PD DEC 6
PY 2020
VL 111
IS 3
BP 837
EP 857
DI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1850230
EA DEC 2020
PG 21
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA QY1IB
UT WOS:000612980900001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hein, C
   Schubert, D
AF Hein, Carola
   Schubert, Dirk
TI Resilience, Disaster, and Rebuilding in Modern Port Cities
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN HISTORY
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; sustainability; vulnerability; disaster; rebuilding; port
   cities
AB Resilience has become a buzzword used to describe the capacity of cities to bounce back after disasters. It carries the hope of a robust and more sustainable future. Disasters can strike any region, but port cities face complex and particular risks due to their location at the intersection of sea and land, and their role in an international maritime system. This introduction to the special section on resilience, disaster and rebuilding in modern port cities first examines resilience as a concept and course of action in a heterogenous theory landscape. It then explores different dimensions of resilience-environmental, economic, institutional, social and spatial-and their importance in port city historiography. The articles collected in this special section explore case studies from three continents. Together, they demonstrate that there is no such thing as the resilient (port) city. But, they also show that the combination of maritime and urban interests can lead to creative planning for resilience, particularly when port and city authorities pursue the same strategies. In view of contemporary challenges, this special section demonstrates the value of further research on port city resilience and vulnerability. The section raises an important question: Is it possible to balance the wide-ranging economic interests of port actors and their view of waters as sites for shipping with those of local actors concerned about water quality and ecosystems?
C1 [Hein, Carola] Delft Univ Technol, 01 OOST 700,Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
   [Schubert, Dirk] HCU Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
C3 Delft University of Technology
RP Hein, C (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, 01 OOST 700,Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
EM C.M.Hein@tudelft.nl
RI Hein, Carola/D-3508-2015
OI Hein, Carola/0000-0003-0551-5778
CR Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Baker JL, 2012, URB DEV SER, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8845-7
   Beck U., 1992, RISK SOC NEW MODERNI
   Coaffee J., 2016, URBAN RESILIENCE PLA
   Crespo Joan, 2010, J ECON GEOGR, V14, P199
   Davis ColinJ., 2003, WATERFRONT REVOLTS N
   Davis Diane E., 2012, URBAN RESILIENCE SIT, P9
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2013, DISP, V49, P4
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DEME Group, MAJ ELB DEEP CONTR A
   DEPPISCH S, 2017, URBAN REGIONS NOW TO
   Domhoff William G., 2005, POWER LOCAL LEVEL GR
   Eraydin Ayda, 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, p[2, 21]
   Faulwasser Julius, 1892, GROSSE BRAND WIEDERA
   Goodin-Smith Oona, 2019, PHILADELPHIA OIL REF
   Greiving Stefan, 2018, SPATIAL PLANNING RES
   Hall P., 1980, GREAT PLANNING DISAS
   Hall PeterGeoffrey., 1998, Cities in Civilization
   Hein C., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster, P213
   Hein C, 2016, PORTUS ONLINE MA JUN, V2016
   Hein C, 2018, J URBAN HIST, V44, P887, DOI 10.1177/0096144217752460
   Hein C, 2016, WIRES WATER, V3, P419, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1141
   Hein Carola, DISASTER REBUILDING
   Hill Edward., 2008, EXPLORING REGIONAL E
   Ho TF, 2017, J URBAN HIST, V43, P543, DOI 10.1177/0096144217694608
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jacobs Jane., 1961, The Economy of Cities
   Kingston J, 2012, NISSAN I ROUTL JPN S, P1
   McCarthy Terry., 1988, The Great Dock Strike 1889
   McGreavy B, 2016, ENVIRON COMMUN, V10, P104, DOI 10.1080/17524032.2015.1014390
   Merk O., 2013, The competitiveness of global port-cities: Synthesis report, DOI [10.1787/5k40hdhp6t8s-en, DOI 10.1787/5K40HDHP6T8S-EN]
   Mers Gilbert., 1988, Working the Waterfront: The Ups and Downs of a Rebel Longshoreman
   MOLOTCH H, 1976, AM J SOCIOL, V82, P309, DOI 10.1086/226311
   Pike A, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P59, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
   Sanderson D., 2016, Urban Disaster Resilience - New Dimensions from International Practice in the Built Environment
   Schubert Dick, 2012, FLAMMABLE CITIES URB, P212
   Stadt Offenbach am Main, 2018, BIK OFF UNS STADT ER
   Vale Lawrence, 2016, CRITICAL RESILIENCE, V2
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
NR 40
TC 13
Z9 15
U1 7
U2 51
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0096-1442
EI 1552-6771
J9 J URBAN HIST
JI J. Urban Hist.
PD MAR
PY 2021
VL 47
IS 2
SI SI
BP 235
EP 249
AR 0096144220925097
DI 10.1177/0096144220925097
EA JUN 2020
PG 15
WC History; History Of Social Sciences; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI); Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index (A&amp;HCI)
SC History; Social Sciences - Other Topics; Urban Studies
GA QP8AG
UT WOS:000537156900001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lu, JH
   Liu, JH
   Yu, YD
   Liu, C
   Su, X
AF Lu, Jiahui
   Liu, Jiahong
   Yu, Yingdong
   Liu, Chuang
   Su, Xin
TI Network Structure Optimization Method for Urban Drainage Systems
   Considering Pipeline Redundancies
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE China; Pipeline redundancies; Structure optimization method; Urban
   drainage systems; Urban hydrology; Urban resilience
ID OPTIMAL-DESIGN; OPTIMAL LAYOUT; RESILIENCE; ALGORITHM; ROOFS; MODEL
AB Redundancy is an important attribute of a resilient urban drainage system. While there is a lack of knowledge on where to increase redundancy and its contribution to resilience, this study developed a framework for the optimal network structure of urban drainage systems that considers pipeline redundancies. Graph theory and adaptive genetic algorithms were used to obtain the initial layout and design of the urban drainage system. The introduction of additional water paths (in loop)/redundancies is suggested by the results of complex network analysis to increase resilience. The drainage performances of the urban drainage system with pipeline redundancies, and without redundancies, were compared. The proposed method was applied to the study area in Dongying City, Shandong Province, China. The results show that the total overflow volume of the urban drainage system with pipeline redundancies under rainfall exceeding the design standard (5 years) is reduced by 20-30%, which is substantially better than the network without pipeline redundancies.
C1 [Lu, Jiahui; Liu, Jiahong; Yu, Yingdong; Liu, Chuang; Su, Xin] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jiahong] Foshan Univ, Sch Transportat & Civil Engn & Architecture, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jiahong] Minist Water Resources, Gineering & Technol Res Ctr Water Resources & Hyd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
C3 China Institute of Water Resources & Hydropower Research; Foshan
   University
RP Liu, JH (corresponding author), China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China.; Liu, JH (corresponding author), Foshan Univ, Sch Transportat & Civil Engn & Architecture, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China.; Liu, JH (corresponding author), Minist Water Resources, Gineering & Technol Res Ctr Water Resources & Hyd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
EM liujh@iwhr.com
RI Liu, Jiahong/AAG-1319-2021
FU Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [51739011, 52192671];
   Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation
   of Water Cycles in River Basins [SKL2022TS11]
FX This study was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science
   Foundation (Grant No. 51739011 and 52192671) and the Research Fund of
   the State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycles in
   River Basins (Grant No. SKL2022TS11).
CR [Anonymous], 1975, Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with application to biology, control, and artificial intelligence
   Bakhshipour AE, 2019, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V145, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001103, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001103]
   Bartos M, 2019, ADV WATER RESOUR, V127, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.03.016
   Bastian M., 2009, P INT AAAI C WEBL SO, V3, P361, DOI [10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937, DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V3I1.13937]
   Brandes U, 2001, J MATH SOCIOL, V25, P163, DOI 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249
   Butler D., 2018, Urban Drainage
   Carter T, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V80, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.06.005
   Chen SS, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124418
   Cheng YS, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V12, P111, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00310-w
   Di B., 2017, WATER SUPPLY DRAINAG
   Duque N, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12123337
   Farahmand H, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101663
   FREEMAN LC, 1977, SOCIOMETRY, V40, P35, DOI 10.2307/3033543
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Haghighi A, 2013, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V139, P693, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000294
   Hassan WH, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P865, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1843-y
   Hesarkazzazi S, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12041003
   Hu FY, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V12, P72, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00301-x
   Jenelius E, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V49, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.02.003
   [柯庆 Ke Qing], 2016, [中国给水排水, China Water & Wastewater], V32, P6
   Kwon SH, 2021, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001350
   La Rosa D, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101885
   Lu JH, 2021, URBAN WATER J, V18, P522, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2021.1893369
   Mair M, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9020146
   Mentens J, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V77, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.010
   Moeini R, 2017, AIN SHAMS ENG J, V8, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2016.03.003
   Mora-Melià D, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041130
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER SCI TECH-W SUP, V15, P1343, DOI 10.2166/ws.2015.098
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Navin PK, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P3627, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1378-7
   Ng JY, 2020, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001167
   Ngamalieu-Nengoue UA, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050935
   Palumbo A, 2014, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V31, P79, DOI 10.1080/10286608.2013.820277
   Reyes-Silva JD, 2020, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V81, P40, DOI 10.2166/wst.2020.070
   Rossman L., 2015, Storm Water Management Model User's Manual Version 5.1 353
   Sen MK, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125526
   Shao ZY, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9100747
   Sitzenfrei R, 2021, WATER RES, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117359
   Sitzenfrei R, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2020WR027929
   Steele JC, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P1605, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1191-8
   Sun XJ, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102563
   Tao T, 2014, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V11, P1473, DOI 10.1007/s13762-013-0330-0
   Turan ME, 2019, ADV CIV ENG, V2019, DOI 10.1155/2019/8527180
   Wang MM, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112472
   Wang S, 2019, WATER RES, V162, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.050
   Yang YF, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101886
   Yazdi J, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P721, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1835-y
   Yeh SF, 2013, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P1636, DOI 10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962687
   Zhang W., 2022, WATER RESOURCES POWE, V40, P55
NR 49
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 22
U2 98
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 2095-0055
EI 2192-6395
J9 INT J DISAST RISK SC
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci.
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 13
IS 5
BP 793
EP 809
DI 10.1007/s13753-022-00445-y
PG 17
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA 5M9WB
UT WOS:000871442600012
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tye, MR
   Wilhelmi, O
   Boehnert, J
   Faye, E
   Milestad, R
   Pierce, AL
   Laborgne, P
AF Tye, Mari R.
   Wilhelmi, Olga
   Boehnert, Jennifer
   Faye, Emily
   Milestad, Rebecka
   Pierce, Andrea L.
   Laborgne, Pia
TI Examining urban resilience through a food-water-energy nexus lens to
   understand the effects of climate change
SO ISCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
ID GOVERNANCE; PRINCIPLES; VULNERABILITY; ENVIRONMENT; CHALLENGES;
   MANAGEMENT; EXTREMES; INDEXES; RISKS; SCALE
AB Urban centers located on the coast expose some of the most vulnerable populations to the effects of climate change. In addition to the challenges faced by high population densities and interdependent social-ecological systems, there is an increasing demand for resources. Exposing the pinch points that are already sensitive to extreme weather, highlights the urban systems that will be least resilient in the face of climate change. We map the projected changes in water availability onto the components of the food-water-energy Nexus at several spatial scales. Resilience thinking acknowledges the different spatial scales at which governance operates, resilience occurs, and Nexus systems function. We use a case study to illustrate how the effects of climate change at locations remote from the city could impact resilience of urban communities in multiple ways through cascading effects from the Nexus. This article underscores the need to examine resilience from multiple spatial and governance angles.
C1 [Tye, Mari R.] NSF Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA.
   [Tye, Mari R.] Johns Hopkins, Whiting Sch Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
   [Wilhelmi, Olga; Boehnert, Jennifer] NSF Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Res Applicat Lab, Boulder, CO USA.
   [Faye, Emily] Univ Freiburg, Fac Environm & Nat Resources, Freiburg, Germany.
   [Faye, Emily; Laborgne, Pia] European Inst Energy Res, Karlsruhe, Germany.
   [Milestad, Rebecka] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Dept Sustainable Dev Environm Sci & Engn, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Pierce, Andrea L.] Univ Delaware, Biden Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Newark, DE USA.
   [Laborgne, Pia] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, ITAS, Karlsruhe, Germany.
C3 Johns Hopkins University; University of Freiburg; Royal Institute of
   Technology; University of Delaware; Helmholtz Association; Karlsruhe
   Institute of Technology
RP Tye, MR (corresponding author), NSF Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Climate & Global Dynam Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA.; Tye, MR (corresponding author), Johns Hopkins, Whiting Sch Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
EM maritye@ucar.edu
RI Tye, Mari/AAF-8901-2020; Pierce, Andrea L./JXW-6969-2024
OI Pierce, Andrea L./0000-0001-9941-5764
FU Sustainable Global Urban Initiative (SUGI) Food-Water-Energy Nexus
   program; European Union [730254]; U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
   [1830933]; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
   [01UV1803A]; Swedish Energy Agency [830254]; NSF [1852977]
FX This study was conducted in the Creating Interfaces project, funded
   within the framework of the Sustainable Global Urban Initiative (SUGI)
   Food-Water-Energy Nexus program. This program has been set up by the
   Belmont Forum and the Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) Urban Europe
   and has received funding from the European Union's Horizon, 2020
   research and innovation program under grant agreement #730254 and the
   following national funding agencies: The U.S. National Science
   Foundation (NSF) funded this work under grant #1830933, the German
   Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) funded this work under
   grant #01UV1803A, the Swedish Energy Agency funded this work under grant
   #830254. The NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored
   by NSF under Cooperative Agreement No. 1852977. Data were produced and
   analyzed on the Cheyenne high-performance computing system
   (https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX) , provided by the Computational and
   Information Systems Laboratory (CISL) at NSF NCAR.
CR Agudelo-Vera CM, 2011, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V92, P2295, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.016
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   [Anonymous], 2021, Fact Sheet: The Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal
   Balaican D, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V141, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.12.013
   Barthel S, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Bilková K, 2017, MORAV GEOGR REP, V25, P95, DOI 10.1515/mgr-2017-0009
   Blekking J, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122191
   Boyer D, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P12035, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b03176
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Brugger J, 2016, B AM METEOROL SOC, V97, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00289.1
   Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   CMRA, 2023, Climate mapping for resilience and adaptation
   Creating Interfaces EIFER, 2020, Creating Interfaces
   de Bruijn K, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V70, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.001
   de Loë RC, 2017, NAT RESOUR J, V57, P75
   DNREC, 1998, Piedmont Basin Preliminary Assessment Report
   DNREC (Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control), 2021, Delaware's Climate Action Plan
   Endo A, 2017, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V11, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.11.010
   Falkenmark M, 2019, J HYDROL X, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.hydroa.2018.100009
   Florentin D, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2242, DOI 10.1177/0042098018798974
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Grafton RQ, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P907, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0376-1
   Grafton RQ, 2016, ASIA PAC POLICY STUD, V3, P275, DOI 10.1002/app5.128
   Grothmann T., 2021, Building Resilience to Natural Hazards in the Context of Climate Change: Knowledge Integration, Implementation and Learning Studien zur Resilienzforschung, P173, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978, 10.1007/978]
   Guillaume JHA, 2015, WATER-SUI, V7, P4200, DOI 10.3390/w7084200
   Hogeboom RJ, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.630395
   Howell J., 2020, Delaware Today
   Karabulut A, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.002
   Karl TR, 1999, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V42, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1005491526870
   Krinner G, 2018, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V11, P5027, DOI 10.5194/gmd-11-5027-2018
   Kunkel KE., 2022, State climate summaries for the United States 2022
   Laborgne Pia, 2021, Urban Transform, V3, P11, DOI 10.1186/s42854-021-00026-0
   Lazrus H, 2012, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V4, P103, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00015.1
   Mach KJ, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.01.002
   Marandi A, 2021, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V11, P465, DOI 10.1007/s13412-021-00712-2
   McGirr HK, 2016, GEOGR RES-AUST, V54, P3, DOI 10.1111/1745-5871.12156
   Meerow S, 2022, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V88, P319, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2021.1977682
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meuwissen MPM, 2019, AGR SYST, V176, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102656
   Mguni P, 2020, J INTEGR ENVIRON SCI, V17, DOI 10.1080/1943815X.2020.1866617
   Moss R., 2008, Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies
   Moss S., 2015, Master's Thesis
   Mpandeli S, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102306
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8060203
   Newell JP, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0767
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P615, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00888-6
   Peterson T.C., 2001, Report on the activities of the working group on climate change detection and related rapporteurs 1998-2001, Rep. WCDMP-47
   Pierce A.L., 2020, PREPRINT, DOI [10.31219/osf, DOI 10.31219/OSF]
   Pierce A.L., 2022, HDB WATER ENERGY FOO, P193
   Pierce A.L., 2021, Case Report for Wilmington
   Pierce DW, 2014, J HYDROMETEOROL, V15, P2558, DOI 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0082.1
   Ramaswami A, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P120, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.003
   Raub KB, 2021, GLOB SUSTAIN, V4, DOI 10.1017/sus.2021.20
   Raub KB, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116316
   Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121224
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   The White House, 2022, Fact sheet: the inflation reduction Act supports workers and families
   Thonicke K, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001221
   Tye M., 2023, WATER AVAILABILITY M, DOI [10.17605/OSF.IO/M7NXD, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/M7NXD]
   Tye M. R., 2021, The Impacts of Future Weather and Climate Extremes on United States' Infrastructure: Assessing and Prioritizing Adaptation Actions
   Tye M.R., 2024, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. egusphere-2023-2326
   Tye MR, 2022, EARTH SYST GOV-NETH, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.esg.2022.100143
   Tye MR, 2015, PROC INST CIV ENG-FO, V168, P71, DOI 10.1680/feng.14.00002
   U.S. Census Bureau, 2022, QuickFacts: Wilmington city, Delaware
   UDWRC, 2021, Piedmont Basin (ArcGIS StoryMaps)
   UN, 2019, DEP EC SOCIAL AFFAIR
   Wahl D, 2021, SUSTAIN SCI, V16, P663, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00893-9
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
   Weitz N, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V45, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.006
   Wendel J., 2018, KICK OFF M JPI URBAN
   White DD, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122204
   Wilby RL, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12092510
   Wilhelmi O.V., 2018, Wilmington Story Map
   Wilhelmi O.V., 2019, AAG ANN M
   Wilmington Department of Public Works (DPW), 2022, Preparing today for tomorrow's climate risks
   Woetzel J., 2020, Could Climate Become the Weak Link in Your Supply Chain?
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P218, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18810131
   Zhang XB, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P851, DOI 10.1002/wcc.147
NR 82
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 18
U2 29
PU CELL PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA 50 HAMPSHIRE ST, FLOOR 5, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
EI 2589-0042
J9 ISCIENCE
JI iScience
PD JUL 19
PY 2024
VL 27
IS 7
AR 110311
DI 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110311
EA JUL 2024
PG 16
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA YK4D9
UT WOS:001268360800001
PM 39092181
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Feagan, M
   Muñoz-Erickson, TA
   Hobbins, R
   Baja, K
   Chester, M
   Cook, EM
   Grimm, N
   Grove, M
   Iwaniec, DM
   Iyer, S
   McPhearson, T
   Méndez-Lázaro, P
   Miller, C
   Sauter, D
   Solecki, W
   Tomateo, C
   Troxler, T
   Welty, C
AF Feagan, Mathieu
   Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
   Hobbins, Robert
   Baja, Kristin
   Chester, Mikhail
   Cook, Elizabeth M.
   Grimm, Nancy
   Grove, Morgan
   Iwaniec, David M.
   Iyer, Seema
   McPhearson, Timon
   Mendez-Lazaro, Pablo
   Miller, Clark
   Sauter, Daniel
   Solecki, William
   Tomateo, Claudia
   Troxler, Tiffany
   Welty, Claire
TI Co-producing new knowledge systems for resilient and just coastal
   cities: A social-ecological-technological systems framework for data
   visualization
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate change; Coastal cities; Knowledge co-production; Knowledge
   systems; Social-ecological-technological systems; Urban resilience; Data
   visualization
ID URBAN RESILIENCE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COPRODUCTION; GOVERNANCE; SCIENCE;
   INTEGRATION; FUTURES
AB With increasing frequency and severity, coastal cities are facing the effects of extreme weather events, such as sea-level rise, storm surges, hurricanes, and various types of flooding. Recent urban resilience scholarship suggests that responding to the cascading complexities of climate change requires an understanding of cities as social-ecological-technological systems, or SETS. Advances in data visualization, sensors, and analytics are making it possible for urban planners to gain more comprehensive views of cities. Yet, addressing climate complexity requires more than deploying the latest technologies; it requires transforming the institutional knowledge systems upon which cities rely for preparation and response in a climate-changed future. While debates in the theory and practice of knowledge co-production offer a rich contextual starting point, there are few practical examples of what it means to co-produce new knowledge systems capable of steering urban resilience planning in fundamentally new directions. This paper helps address this gap by offering a case study approach to co-producing new knowledge systems for SETS data visualization in three US coastal cities. Through a series of innovation spaces - dialogues, labs, and webinars - with residents, data experts, and other city stakeholders from multiple sectors, we show how to apply a knowledge systems approach to better understand, represent, and support cities as SETS. To illustrate what a redesigned knowledge system for urban resilience planning entails, we document the key steps and activities that led to a new prototype SETS platform that works with a wider range of ways of knowing - including community-based expertise, interdisciplinary research contributions, and various municipal actors' know-how - to build anticipatory capacity for visualizing and navigating the complex dynamics of a climate-changed future. Our findings point to new roles for activity-based learning, conflict, and SETS visualization technologies in connecting, amplifying, and reorganizing the knowledge assets of community perspectives previously ignored. We conclude with a new understanding of how innovation towards coastal city resilience resides within the co-production process for (re)designing knowledge systems to make them more robust and responsive to cross-sector and cross-city learning.
C1 [Feagan, Mathieu] Univ Waterloo, Fac Environm, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
   [Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.] US Forest Serv, Int Inst Trop Forestry, USDA, Jardin Bot Sur, Calle Ceiba, Rio Piedras, PR 00926 USA.
   [Hobbins, Robert] Univ Colorado, CU Denver Business Sch, 1475 Lawrence St, Denver, CO 80202 USA.
   [Baja, Kristin] Urban Sustainabil Directors Network, Port Washington, WI USA.
   [Chester, Mikhail] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Cook, Elizabeth M.] Columbia Univ, Barnard Coll, Dept Environm Sci, 3009 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 USA.
   [Grimm, Nancy] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Grove, Morgan] Urban Forests Human Hlth & Environm Qual, Suite 350,5523 Res Pk Dr, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA.
   [Iwaniec, David M.] Georgia State Univ, Urban Studies Inst, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA.
   [Iyer, Seema] Univ Baltimore, 1420 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon; Tomateo, Claudia] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, 79 Fifth Ave,16th Fl, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [Mendez-Lazaro, Pablo] Univ Puerto Rico, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Environm Hlth Dept, Med Sci Campus, San Juan, PR USA.
   [Miller, Clark] Arizona State Univ, Sch Future Innovat Soc, POB 875603, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Sauter, Daniel] New Sch, Parsons Sch Design, 2 West 13th St,Floor 4, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [Solecki, William] CUNY Hunter Coll, 695 Pk Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA.
   [Solecki, William] CUNY, Grad Ctr, Earth & Environm Sci Program, New York, NY USA.
   [Troxler, Tiffany] Florida Int Univ, 11200 SW 8th ST,AHC5 368, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
   [Welty, Claire] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty UMBC, 1000 Hilltop Circle,TRC 102, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA.
C3 University of Waterloo; United States Department of Agriculture (USDA);
   United States Forest Service; University of Colorado System; University
   of Colorado Denver; Arizona State University; Arizona State
   University-Tempe; Barnard College; Columbia University; Arizona State
   University; Arizona State University-Tempe; University System of
   Georgia; Georgia State University; University System of Maryland;
   University of Baltimore; The New School; University of Puerto Rico;
   University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus; Arizona State
   University; Arizona State University-Tempe; The New School; City
   University of New York (CUNY) System; Hunter College (CUNY); City
   University of New York (CUNY) System; State University System of
   Florida; Florida International University; University System of
   Maryland; University of Maryland Baltimore County
RP Feagan, M (corresponding author), Univ Waterloo, Fac Environm, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
EM Mathieu.feagan@uwaterloo.ca; tischa.a.munoz-erickson@usda.gov;
   robert.hobbins@ucdenver.edu; baja@usdn.org; mchester@asu.edu;
   ecook@barnard.edu; nbgrimm@asu.edu; morgan.grove@usda.gov;
   diwaniec@gsu.edu; siyer@ubalt.edu; timon.mcphearson@newschool.edu;
   pablo.mendez1@upr.edu; clark.miller@asu.edu; sauter@newschool.edu;
   wsolecki@hunter.cuny.edu; tomateoc@newschool.edu; troxlert@fiu.edu;
   weltyc@umbc.edu
RI Hobbins, Robert/AAH-4736-2019; McPhearson, Timon/JOZ-3799-2023; Iwaniec,
   David/M-7993-2014; MunozErickson, Tischa/AAG-8476-2019; Grimm,
   Nancy/D-2840-2009
OI Chester, Mikhail/0000-0002-9354-2102; Grimm, Nancy/0000-0001-9374-660X
FU National Science Foundation (NSF) [1737626]; SCC-Planning: Building
   resilient coastal cities through smart and connected communities
   [1737626]; NSF Urban Resilience to Extremes Weather-Related Events
   Sustainability Research Network [1444755]; Growing Convergence Network:
   SETS Convergence [193493]
FX <STRONG> </STRONG>This work was supported by the National Science
   Foundation (NSF) 1737626, SCC-Planning: Building resilient coastal
   cities through smart and connected communities (Grant #1737626) , the
   NSF Urban Resilience to Extremes Weather-Related Events Sustainability
   Research Network (Grant #1444755) and the Growing Convergence Network:
   SETS Convergence (Grant #193493) .
CR Angheloiu C, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102808
   Baja K., 2022, Climate adaptation and resilience across scales, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781003030720-6
   Bakhtiari V, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104958
   Branny A, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101168
   Brenner Neilcd., 2014, Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization
   Caniglia G, 2023, GAIA, V32, P167, DOI 10.14512/gaia.32.1.15
   Caniglia G, 2023, NAT SUSTAIN, V6, P493, DOI 10.1038/s41893-022-01040-1
   Cardullo P, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P813, DOI 10.1177/0263774X18806508
   Carter N, 2014, ONCOL NURS FORUM, V41, P545, DOI 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
   Cash DW, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8086, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231332100
   Chang HJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102786
   Chester MV, 2023, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V3, DOI 10.1038/s42949-023-00120-1
   Chester MV, 2020, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V8, DOI 10.1525/elementa.2020.078
   Chester MV, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P488, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0741-0
   Considine C., 2017, American Journal of Climate Change, V6, DOI DOI 10.4236/AJCC.2017.62020
   Cook E. M., 2021, Resilient urban futures, P99, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_7, 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_7]
   Eakin H., 2018, Journal of Extreme Events, P1850015, DOI [10.1142/s234573761850015x, DOI 10.1142/S234573761850015X, 10.1142/S234573761850015X]
   Fazey I, 2020, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724
   Feagan Mathieu, 2023, Urban Transform, V5, P6, DOI 10.1186/s42854-023-00051-1
   Feagan M, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V101, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.014
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Frantzeskaki N, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
   Gim C, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101203
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Grossi G, 2017, CITIES, V69, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.012
   Hamstead Z., 2021, Resilient Urban Futures, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_6
   Helmrich AM, 2021, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V143, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105124
   Hobbins R., 2021, Resilient Urban Futures, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_5
   Hofmeister M, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105113
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103744
   Iwaniec DM, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V20, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.03.001
   Iwaniec DM, 2021, Resilient Urban Futures, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-41, 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_1]
   Iyer S. D., 2015, Innovations in the public and nonprofit sectors: A public solutions handbook, P91
   Keeler BL, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P29, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
   Kim Y, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101153
   Klenk N, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V54, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017
   Le Coz J, 2016, J HYDROL, V541, P766, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.036
   Liberty I, 2013, Rutgers Clime: Center on Law, Inequality and Metropolitan Equity
   Lugo AE, 2019, SPRINGERBRIEF ENERG, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02387-4
   Marasinghe R, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105047
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   McAllister T., 2019, Data, information, and tools needed for community resilience planning and decision-making, DOI DOI 10.6028/NIST.SP.1240
   McPhearson T, 2022, ONE EARTH, V5, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007
   McPhearson T, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mendez-Lazaro P., 2018, Laboratorio de Innovacion de Santurce: Ciudades Costeras Resilientes-Programa de Comunidades Conectadas e Inteligentes. Reporte Final
   Miller Clark., 2018, RIGHTFUL PLACE SCI D
   Miller CA, 2013, SCI CULT-UK, V22, P135, DOI 10.1080/09505431.2013.786989
   Miller TR, 2018, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, V34, P46
   Munoz-Erickson TA., 2021, Resilient urban futures, P159, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_11, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_11]
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8060203
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V37, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.014
   Najafi MR, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102516
   Nesti G, 2018, POLICY SOC, V37, P310, DOI 10.1080/14494035.2017.1374692
   Norstrom AV, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P182, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
   Paska D, 2018, ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, P17
   Pearsall H, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101156
   Pereira L, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P161, DOI 10.1007/s11625-019-00749-x
   Pineda-Pinto M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104228
   Pitidis V, 2024, CITIES, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105015
   Ramsey MM, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.013
   Rosenzweig B, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.020
   Sajjad M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102850
   Sauter D., 2021, The urban book seriesResilient urban futures, DOI [10.1007/ 978-3-030-63131-4_10, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_10]
   Schumann G., 2023, Increasing climate resilience through visualization
   Sheppard S. R. J., 2012, Visualizing climate change: a guide to visual communication of climate change and developing local solutions
   Solecki W, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00015-z
   Tengö M, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P579, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
   Troxler T., 2018, Final report
   Troxler TG., 2021, J. Extrem. Events, V8, P2150019, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737621500196
   Turnhout E, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
   Walker BH, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11647-250211
   Webb J, 2023, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V7, pE86, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00305-9
   Welty C., 2018, Final report
   Whyte K, 2017, ENGL LANG NOTES, V55, P153, DOI 10.1215/00138282-55.1-2.153
   Wijsman K, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V98, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.017
   Winner Langdon., 1986, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology
   Wolff A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102695
   Woods C, 2017, GEOGR JUST SOC TRANS, P1
   Wyborn C, 2019, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V44, P319, DOI [10.1146/annurev-environ-101718033103, 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103]
   Yao F, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102448
   Yumagulova L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.022
NR 82
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 29
U2 29
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 156
AR 105513
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105513
EA NOV 2024
PG 16
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA M0I4T
UT WOS:001354467500001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dobson, S
AF Dobson, Skye
TI Community-driven pathways for implementation of global urban resilience
   goals in Africa
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Informal settlements; Slums; Community-based adaptation
AB With one billion people worldwide now living in slums and projections suggesting a threefold increase by 2050, the magnitude of implementation challenges facing stakeholders to new global urban, poverty-reduction and climate change commitments are clear. In Africa, where urban growth is almost synonymous with slum growth, entrenched inequality and impoverishment produces multidimensional risk accumulation and threatens the continent's ability not only to implement new commitments, but also to sustain the achievements made to date. This paper, developed from a practitioner viewpoint, argues that an under-utilized and under-resourced strategy for urban risk-reduction and resilience-building is community-driven slum upgrading. It suggests that African cities pursuing a resilient development agenda can significantly increase their implementation capacity through partnership with organized communities.
C1 [Dobson, Skye] SDI, 4 Seymour St, ZA-7925 Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
RP Dobson, S (corresponding author), SDI, 4 Seymour St, ZA-7925 Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
EM skye@sdinet.org
CR [Anonymous], ROCK FDN CIT RES IND
   Baptist C, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P59, DOI 10.1177/0956247811435888
   Bolnick J, 2016, WILL MONEY COME SDI
   Bulgaski N., EVALUATION INSPECTIO
   Bull-Kamanga L, 2003, ENVIRON URBAN, V15, P193, DOI 10.1177/095624780301500109
   Colenbrander S., 2016, IIED Working Paper
   Dobson S, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P605, DOI 10.1177/0956247815598520
   Farman D., 2012, COMP CASE STUDY FISA
   Nimusiima C., 2012, 10 YEARS OKWEGATTA H
   Papeleras R, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P463, DOI 10.1177/0956247812453247
   Patel S., 2014, UNPUB
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P381, DOI 10.1177/0956247813500902
   SDI, ANN REPORT
   Weru J, 2004, ENVIRON URBAN, V16, P47, DOI 10.1177/095624780401600105
NR 15
TC 22
Z9 23
U1 0
U2 25
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD DEC
PY 2017
VL 26
BP 78
EP 84
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.028
PG 7
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA FP8UL
UT WOS:000417921500010
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, YJ
   Li, Q
   Li, WL
   Zhang, Y
   Pei, XW
AF Liu, Yijun
   Li, Qin
   Li, Wenlong
   Zhang, Yang
   Pei, Xingwang
TI Progress in urban resilience research and hotspot analysis: a global
   scientometric visualization analysis using CiteSpace
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilient city; Urban resilience; Disaster governance; CiteSpace;
   Bibliometric methods
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; CO-BENEFITS; LOW-CARBON; CITIES; RISK; MANAGEMENT;
   SUSTAINABILITY; VULNERABILITY; ADAPTATION; INDICATORS
AB Increasing global climate change has led to increasingly sudden, abnormal, and complex natural disasters. Global disaster governance is facing complex and severe challenges. Urban resilience research (URR) can help cities withstand disasters and quickly recover from adversities through the rational allocation of resources. Consequently, URR has attracted considerable attention from urban ecology researchers. Over the past decade, despite an increasing number of articles reported on URR, there has been no systematic theoretical framework, no comprehensive review of the research, and no clarity on how different perspectives have evolved. This research selects 1647 articles related to global urban resilience from the Web of Science Core Collection and performs a global scientometric visualization analysis using CiteSpace and ArcGIS software. In this study, we visually display the most productive institutions, authors, and sources in URR. Additionally, we explain how research topics have changed over time and analyze research frontiers. The results show that (1) URR has accelerated globally in the last decade; (2) research hotspots are mainly concentrated in environmental science and ecology, science and technology, and water resources; and (3) URR is gradually becoming a multidisciplinary research field. Our research reveals the status and future trends of URR through quantitative visualization methods, helping to address some emerging and unexpected risks and vulnerabilities.
C1 [Liu, Yijun; Li, Wenlong] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Xian, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Qin] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Yang] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China.
   [Pei, Xingwang] Zhongtian Northwest Construct Investment Grp Co L, Xian, Peoples R China.
C3 Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology; Beijing University of
   Civil Engineering & Architecture; Xi'an University of Architecture &
   Technology
RP Liu, YJ (corresponding author), Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Xian, Peoples R China.
EM liuyijun@xauat.edu.cn
RI Li, Wenlong/ABG-6190-2021
FU NSFC [51908452, 51808424]; Beijing Education Science "13th Five-Year
   plan" project "Practice Research of Symbiosis Concept in Historical
   District Protection Planning and Design Course" [CDDB19167]
FX This research was funded by the NSFC (51908452, 51808424) and the
   Beijing Education Science "13th Five-Year plan" project "Practice
   Research of Symbiosis Concept in Historical District Protection Planning
   and Design Course" (Grant No. CDDB19167). The funders had no role in the
   design of the study.
CR Adger NA, 2003, BUILDING RESILIENCE
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Ancuta C, 2015, CARPATH J EARTH ENV, V10, P67
   Andersson E, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   [Anonymous], 2014, Principles and Applications of Analyzing a Citation Space.
   Aoki N, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.025
   Bagheri M, 2019, APPL ENERG, V239, P1212, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.031
   Barthel S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Camps-Calvet M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
   Chen CM, 2017, J DATA INFO SCI, V2, P1, DOI 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
   Chen CM, 2004, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V101, P5303, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0307513100
   Chen CM, 1999, INFORM PROCESS MANAG, V35, P401, DOI 10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5
   Chen CM, 2001, COMPUTER, V34, P65, DOI 10.1109/2.910895
   Clemente M, 2015, RESILIENCE VS VULNER, DOI [10.6092/2281-4574/3729, DOI 10.6092/2281-4574/3729]
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Ding L, 2015, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V89-90, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2015.08.004
   Douglass M, 2002, ENVIRON URBAN, V14, P53, DOI 10.1177/095624780201400105
   DURANT RH, 1994, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V84, P612, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.84.4.612
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Georgeson L, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P584, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2944, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2944]
   González DP, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V94, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.004
   He B., 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V208, DOI [10.1016/j.buildenv.2021b.108587, DOI 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2021B.108587]
   He BJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103361
   He BJ, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V86, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.003
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu K, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9080802
   Korhonen J, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.006
   [李鹤 LI He], 2011, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V30, P920
   Li SJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.020
   Li TK, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030556
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   [吕永龙 Lu Yonglong], 2019, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V39, P1125
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McGrail S, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P8649, DOI 10.3390/su7078649
   McNally A, 2009, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V90, pS286, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.029
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Nan, 2017, CITY PLANNING REV, V41, P9
   Ostendorf B, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.10.003
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pelling M, 2002, INT DEV PLANN REV, V24, P59, DOI 10.3828/idpr.24.1.4
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Raymond CM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Rogers CE, 2000, CLIM RES, V14, P235, DOI 10.3354/cr014235
   Salgado-Gálvez MA, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P1995, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-2056-4
   Seelig S, 2011, CITIES, V28, P545, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.001
   Smith P, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P42, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2870, 10.1038/nclimate2870]
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Wang XJ, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125224
   Wei GE, 2021, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106646
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Xu WP, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18010088
   Yan Z., 2017, CITY, V6, P22
   Zeng Z, 2013, ECOL INDIC, V34, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.012
   Zhang XR, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P9924, DOI 10.3390/su7089924
   Zhao DX, 2022, CATENA, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105791
   Zhao DX, 2020, SOIL TILL RES, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.still.2020.104618
   Zhao ZQ, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13214338
NR 70
TC 20
Z9 20
U1 9
U2 225
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 0944-1344
EI 1614-7499
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R
JI Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 29
IS 42
BP 63674
EP 63691
DI 10.1007/s11356-022-20138-9
EA APR 2022
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 4O6HB
UT WOS:000785939700016
PM 35461416
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Moro, E
   Frank, MR
   Pentland, A
   Rutherford, A
   Cebrian, M
   Rahwan, I
AF Moro, Esteban
   Frank, Morgan R.
   Pentland, Alex
   Rutherford, Alex
   Cebrian, Manuel
   Rahwan, Iyad
TI Universal resilience patterns in labor markets
SO NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
LA English
DT Article
AB Cities are the innovation centers of the US economy, but technological disruptions can exclude workers and inhibit a middle class. Therefore, urban policy must promote the jobs and skills that increase worker pay, create employment, and foster economic resilience. In this paper, we model labor market resilience with an ecologically-inspired job network constructed from the similarity of occupations' skill requirements. This framework reveals that the economic resilience of cities is universally and uniquely determined by the connectivity within a city's job network. US cities with greater job connectivity experienced lower unemployment during the Great Recession. Further, cities that increase their job connectivity see increasing wage bills, and workers of embedded occupations enjoy higher wages than their peers elsewhere. Finally, we show how job connectivity may clarify the augmenting and deleterious impact of automation in US cities. Policies that promote labor connectivity may grow labor markets and promote economic resilience. Recent technological, social, and educational changes are profoundly impacting our work, but what makes labour markets resilient to those labour shocks? Here, the authors show that labour markets resemble ecological systems whose resilience depends critically on the network of skill similarities between different jobs.
C1 [Moro, Esteban] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Matemat, Leganes, Spain.
   [Moro, Esteban] Univ Carlos III Madrid, GISC, Leganes, Spain.
   [Moro, Esteban; Frank, Morgan R.; Pentland, Alex] MIT, Media Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
   [Moro, Esteban; Pentland, Alex] MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
   [Moro, Esteban; Frank, Morgan R.; Pentland, Alex] MIT, Sociotech Syst Res Ctr, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
   [Frank, Morgan R.] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Comp & Informat, Dept Informat & Networked Syst, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
   [Frank, Morgan R.] Stanford Univ, Inst Human Ctr AI, Digital Econ Lab, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.
   [Rutherford, Alex; Cebrian, Manuel; Rahwan, Iyad] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Humans & Machines, Berlin, Germany.
C3 Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; Universidad Carlos III de Madrid;
   Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Massachusetts Institute of
   Technology (MIT); Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT);
   Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE); University
   of Pittsburgh; Stanford University; Max Planck Society
RP Moro, E (corresponding author), Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Matemat, Leganes, Spain.; Moro, E (corresponding author), Univ Carlos III Madrid, GISC, Leganes, Spain.; Moro, E (corresponding author), MIT, Media Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.; Moro, E (corresponding author), MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.; Moro, E (corresponding author), MIT, Sociotech Syst Res Ctr, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.; Rahwan, I (corresponding author), Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Ctr Humans & Machines, Berlin, Germany.
EM emoro@math.uc3m.es; rahwan@mpib-berlin.mpg.de
RI Rahwan, Iyad/ABB-2422-2020; Frank, Morgan/L-3124-2016; Moro,
   Esteban/AAB-1159-2019
OI Rutherford, Alexis/0000-0003-3717-543X; Rahwan,
   Iyad/0000-0002-1796-4303; MORO, ESTEBAN/0000-0003-2894-1024; Cebrian,
   Manuel/0000-0002-3681-7982
FU Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT); Ministerio de Economia y
   Competividad (Spain) [FIS2016-78904-C3-3-P, PID2019-106811GB-C32]
FX This work was supported by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
   (MIT) and the Ministerio de Economia y Competividad (Spain) through
   Project FIS2016-78904-C3-3-P and PID2019-106811GB-C32.
CR Alabdulkareem A, 2018, SCI ADV, V4, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aao6030
   Autor D., 2019, ELY LECT
   Autor D. H., 2003, The changing task composition of the US labor market: An update of Autor, Levy, and Murnane
   Barnichon R, 2015, AM ECON J-MACROECON, V7, P222, DOI 10.1257/mac.20140116
   BERRYMAN AA, 1992, ECOLOGY, V73, P1530, DOI 10.2307/1940005
   Bleakley H, 2012, J URBAN ECON, V72, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2012.04.003
   Brynjolfsson E, 2018, AEA PAP P, V108, P43, DOI 10.1257/pandp.20181019
   Cropp R, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P2019
   Delgado M, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P1785, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.007
   DOUGLAS PH, 1976, J POLIT ECON, V84, P903, DOI 10.1086/260489
   Dworkin JD, 2019, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V6, DOI 10.1098/rsos.182124
   Elhorst JP, 2014, SPRINGERBR REG SCI, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8
   Ellison G, 1999, AM ECON REV, V89, P311, DOI 10.1257/aer.89.2.311
   Frank MR, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P6531, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1900949116
   Frank MR, 2018, J R SOC INTERFACE, V15, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2017.0946
   Frey CB, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V114, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
   Gao JX, 2016, NATURE, V530, P307, DOI 10.1038/nature16948
   Gathmann C, 2010, J LABOR ECON, V28, P1, DOI 10.1086/649786
   Guerrero OA, 2015, ECON LETT, V136, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.08.009
   Guerrero OA, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0060808
   Huang XQ, 2013, SCI REP-UK, V3, DOI 10.1038/srep01219
   Jiang JJ, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, pE639, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1714958115
   Lotka AJ, 1910, J PHYS CHEM-US, V14, P271, DOI 10.1021/j150111a004
   MATSUDA H, 1992, PROG THEOR PHYS, V88, P1035, DOI 10.1143/PTP.88.1035
   Millington R, 2019, EMERG TOP LIFE SCI, V3, P221, DOI 10.1042/ETLS20180113
   Mitchell T, 2017, NATURE, V544, P290, DOI 10.1038/544290a
   MORTENSEN DT, 1994, REV ECON STUD, V61, P397, DOI 10.2307/2297896
   Muneepeerakul R, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0073676
   Neffke F., 2008, PAPERS EVOLUTIONARY, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RESPOL.2008.04.012
   O*NET Program, O NET DAT
   Petrongolo B, 2001, J ECON LIT, V39, P390, DOI 10.1257/jel.39.2.390
   Saavedra S, 2014, J R SOC INTERFACE, V11, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2014.0693
   Sahin A, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P3529, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.11.3529
   Shutters ST, 2015, PALGR COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1057/palcomms.2015.10
   Shutters ST, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0196915
   Shutters ST, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P3439, DOI 10.1177/0042098015616892
   Shutters ST., 2016, SMALL WARS J, V26, P21
   U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, STAND OCC CLASS
   U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2017, METR NONM AR OCC EMP
   U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LOC AR UN STAT
NR 40
TC 31
Z9 33
U1 13
U2 71
PU NATURE RESEARCH
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2041-1723
J9 NAT COMMUN
JI Nat. Commun.
PD MAR 30
PY 2021
VL 12
IS 1
AR 1972
DI 10.1038/s41467-021-22086-3
PG 8
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA RJ9QN
UT WOS:000637938900006
PM 33785734
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, JZ
   Yan, JC
   Ding, KY
   Li, Q
   Liu, YA
   Liu, XL
   Peng, R
AF Wang, Jingzhao
   Yan, Jincheng
   Ding, Keyuan
   Li, Qian
   Liu, Yehao
   Liu, Xueliang
   Peng, Ran
TI A Reflection on the Response to Sudden-Onset Disasters in the
   Post-Pandemic Era: A Graded Assessment of Urban Transportation
   Resilience Taking Wuhan, China as an Example
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE transportation resilience; Maximum Willingness Distance; travel mode
   shift; sudden-onset disasters; Wuhan
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; NETWORKS; WEATHER; IMPACT; ENERGY
AB The COVID-19 pandemic has led to thinking about the response to sudden-onset disasters, for which the transportation resilience of urban areas is crucial. The purpose of paper is to provide a graded assessment of urban transportation resilience to help city managers target policies and plans. Wuhan, the first city in China to be severely hit by COVID-19, was selected as the case study for this research. Based on an extensive survey of the travel characteristics of residents in central urban areas, the concept of "travel mode shift" was combined to classify residents into four modes, including non-motorized conventional travel, non-motorized over-distance travel, motorized adaptable travel and motorized non-substitutable travel. The potential transportation stoppages in different levels of epidemic impact were then divided into three scenarios, corresponding to each of the city's three levels of transportation resilience. The concept of MWD (Maximum Willingness Distance) in active travel mode was further developed, which was divided into WMWD (Walking Maximum Willingness Distance) and RMWD (Riding Maximum Willingness Distance). Finally, a hierarchical assessment model of urban transportation resilience is developed based on the MWD distance threshold. Besides, the average income level of urban residents was also included in the assessment system. The following research conclusions were drawn: (1) The degree of transportation resilience in Wuhan showed an "S-curve" relationship with RMWD, with thresholds at RMWD = 2.5 km, 11 km and 23 km respectively. (2) The resilience of transportation in the suburbs of the city was weaker than in the city center, and the gap between the two increases as the RMWD increases, but the share of motorized transportation in short distance trips in the city center was still higher than desirable. (3) The upper-income groups in the city had more flexible travel options, while the lower income groups were less resilient to travel. Based on the results of the study, it is recommended that city managers can identify areas of low resilience and critical distance thresholds that may lead to sudden changes in transportation resilience in the event of a sudden disaster. This will lead to the development of improved policies. The special needs of socially disadvantaged groups should also be taken more into account in this process.
C1 [Wang, Jingzhao; Yan, Jincheng; Ding, Keyuan; Liu, Yehao; Liu, Xueliang; Peng, Ran] Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Qian] Yanshan Univ, Sch Architectural Engn & Mech, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Qian] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Humanities & Arts, Macau 999078, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Ran] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Transportat & Logist Engn, Wuhan 430063, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Ran] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, State Key Lab Green Bldg Western China, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan Institute of Technology; Yanshan University; Macau University of
   Science & Technology; Wuhan University of Technology; Xi'an University
   of Architecture & Technology
RP Peng, R (corresponding author), Wuhan Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.; Peng, R (corresponding author), Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Transportat & Logist Engn, Wuhan 430063, Peoples R China.; Peng, R (corresponding author), Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, State Key Lab Green Bldg Western China, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
EM pengran@wit.edu.cn
RI Keyuan, Ding/ITT-4352-2023
OI Peng, Ran/0000-0002-3461-4524; Ding, Keyuan/0000-0003-0186-5383; Wang,
   Jingzhao/0000-0002-4856-0176
FU Science and Technology Project of the Ministry of Housing and
   Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China [2021-K137];
   Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China
   [LSKF202110]; Hubei Province Transportation Technology Project
   [2020-186-3-1]; Graduate Innovative Fund ofWuhan Institute of Technology
   [CX2020090]
FX This research was funded by "the Science and Technology Project of the
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic
   of China, grant numbers 2021-K137"; "the Opening Fund of State Key
   Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, grant number LSKF202110";
   "the Hubei Province Transportation Technology Project, grant number
   2020-186-3-1" and the Graduate Innovative Fund ofWuhan Institute of
   Technology, grant number CX2020090.
CR Arellana J, 2020, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/8867316
   [Arup Ove Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation Partners and the Rockefeller Foundation], 2014, City Resilience Framework, City Resilience Index
   Capolongo S., 2020, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V30, P165, DOI [10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.427, DOI 10.1093/EURPUB/CKAA165.427]
   Caprì S, 2016, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V45, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.005
   Chan R, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000200
   Changkun Chen, 2022, Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), V62, P1016, DOI 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2022.22.025
   Martins MCD, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.004
   Fairbairn W, 1865, TREATIES IRON SHIP B
   Fernandes V.A, 2017, TRANSPORTES, V25, P112, DOI [10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1079, DOI 10.14295/TRANSPORTES.V25I4.1079]
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Fuller D, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-66
   Gere JM, 1997, Mechanics of materials
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Koetse MJ, 2009, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V14, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2008.12.004
   Krumdieck S, 2010, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V44, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.002
   Li SG, 2020, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/2010875
   Li X, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186712
   Liu F.Y., 2020, PLANNERS, V36, P6
   Liu XN, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010376
   Mallet M., 1856, On the Physical Conditions involved in the Construction of Artillery: An Investigation of the Relative and Absolute Values of the Materials Principally Employed and of Some Hitherto Unexplained Causes of the Destruction of the Canon in Service
   McAslan Alastair., 2010, The Concept of Resilience: Understanding its Origins, Meaning and Utility
   Merriman M., 1885, TXB MECH MAT BEAMS C
   Murano Y, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-81806-3
   Newman P., 2011, World Transport Policy and Practice, V17, P31
   [彭然 Peng Ran], 2022, [南方建筑, South Architecture], P78
   Ran P., 2022, MOD URBAN RES, V4, P122
   Rastogi R, 2011, CURR SCI INDIA, V100, P1340
   Saunders MJ, 2008, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V42, P874, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2008.01.031
   Saunders MJ, 2009, INT J SUSTAIN TRANSP, V3, P71, DOI 10.1080/15568310701648037
   Seddighi H, 2020, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V14, pE42, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.279
   Serdar MZ, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103452
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Stamos I, 2015, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V34, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.002
   TILMAN D, 1994, NATURE, V367, P363, DOI 10.1038/367363a0
   Tredgold T., 1818, PHILOS MAG, V51, P214
   Wang SW, 2014, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V6, P1821, DOI 10.3390/su6041821
   Yang L.X., 2021, J SHANGHAI U SCI, V38, P10
NR 38
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 4
U2 39
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 14
IS 17
AR 10957
DI 10.3390/su141710957
PG 20
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 4K2AU
UT WOS:000851760400001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ning, WP
   Wang, SM
AF Ning, Wenping
   Wang, Songmao
TI The coupling coordination and driving factors of tourism economy and
   urban ecological resilience: A case study of Shandong Province, China
SO ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Tourism economy; Urban ecological resilience; Coupling coordination;
   Shandong Province
AB The strategic coordination of tourism economy and urban ecological resilience (TE-UER) system is essential for advancing sustainable tourism and resilient city building. This paper utilized the coupling coordination degree (CCD) approach, exploratory spatiotemporal data analysis to assess the coordination state and spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of TE-UER. A geodetector was also employed to investigate the affecting factors of the TE-UER coordination relationship. The data were collected from 2011 to 2020, and 17 prefecture-level cities in Shandong Province, China, which are typical and representative of the TE and UER, were selected as case studies. The research found that the CCD of TE-UER in Shandong Province evolved positively, but the spatial differentiation was obvious, presenting the spatial layout of "high in east, low in west". The HL agglomeration located Jinan was severe and there was no sign of improvement. Besides, the probability of spatiotemporal transition was 22.2% while that of spatiotemporal transition cohesion was 87.6%. Thus, the spatial transfer inertia of CCD of cities was evident. Furthermore, the interrelationships of the factors of the CCD of TE-UER mainly include the interactions of double enhancement and nonlinear enhancement. And factors such as economic growth and foreign investment affect the CCD of TE-UER and there was significant spatiotemporal heterogeneity in these factors. This study incorporated tourism economics and urban ecological resilience into a unified theoretical analysis framework, enriched the research perspectives and contents of tourism economics and urban ecology, and not only provided a theoretical basis for the interactive study of tourism and ecological environment, but also had important practical and guiding significance for the high-quality development of regional tourism and resilient management of urban ecosystems under the background of sustainability.
C1 [Ning, Wenping] Shandong Agr Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Tai An 271000, Shandong, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Songmao] Shanghai Business Sch, Sch Hotel Management, Shanghai 201400, Peoples R China.
C3 Shandong Agricultural University; Shanghai Business School
RP Wang, SM (corresponding author), Shanghai Business Sch, Sch Hotel Management, Shanghai 201400, Peoples R China.
EM 2234620348@qq.com; 1095929778@qq.com
FU National Social Science Fund of China [23FJYB037]; Natural Science
   Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2023MD077]
FX This work was supported by National Social Science Fund of China [number
   23FJYB037] and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [number
   ZR2023MD077].
CR Azam M, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V190, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.168
   Baho DL, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-09427-220317
   Chien MC, 2017, APPL ECOL ENV RES, V15, P43, DOI 10.15666/aeer/1502_043053
   Franco AA, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V900, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165573
   Guan HM, 2022, MATH PROBL ENG, V2022, DOI 10.1155/2022/9518122
   Gullion C, 2015, INT J TOUR CITIES, V1, P184, DOI 10.1108/IJTC-08-2014-0018
   Guo LJ, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V320, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115812
   Chen HB, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V27, P38241, DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-09004-8
   Hassan TH, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19074410
   Hoberg R, 2021, CURR ISSUES TOUR, V24, P1918, DOI 10.1080/13683500.2020.1808597
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong WY, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104057
   Li GZ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110667
   Lin FY, 2023, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ace761
   Liu JJ, 2019, J TRAVEL RES, V58, P594, DOI 10.1177/0047287518771223
   Liu YM, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph182312818
   Mance D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187243
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Memoli V, 2019, GEODERMA, V337, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.009
   Pan Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18041601
   Pickett STA, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P143, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   PIMM SL, 1984, NATURE, V307, P321, DOI 10.1038/307321a0
   Rey SJ, 2011, LETT SPAT RESOUR SCI, V4, P81, DOI 10.1007/s12076-010-0048-2
   Rey SJ, 2006, GEOGR ANAL, V38, P67, DOI 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00675.x
   [孙剑锋 Sun Jianfeng], 2019, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V39, P207
   Sun YY, 2020, ANN TOURISM RES, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102928
   [孙阳 Sun Yang], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P151
   Tong Y, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19031824
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   [王松茂 Wang Songmao], 2022, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V42, P51
   Wang YJ, 2023, ANN TOURISM RES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2023.103659
   Yuan Y, 2022, ECOL ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106486
   Zekan B, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130624
   Zhao SH, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1111828
   Zhu K, 2023, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1148868
   Zhu QS, 2023, MATH BIOSCI ENG, V20, P15898, DOI 10.3934/mbe.2023708
   Zhu SY, 2020, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V10, DOI 10.1002/widm.1388
NR 37
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 39
U2 39
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1387-585X
EI 1573-2975
J9 ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN
JI Environ. Dev. Sustain.
PD 2024 OCT 11
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s10668-024-05510-8
EA OCT 2024
PG 23
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA I4O2J
UT WOS:001330060400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rözer, V
   Mehryar, S
   Surminski, S
AF Rozer, Viktor
   Mehryar, Sara
   Surminski, Swenja
TI From managing risk to increasing resilience: a review on the development
   of urban flood resilience, its assessment and the implications for
   decision making
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Review
DE flood resilience; urban; decision making
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; COASTAL CITIES; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DISASTER RESILIENCE;
   VULNERABILITY; SYSTEMS; CITY; COMMUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; LESSONS
AB Driven by urban growth in hazard prone areas such as along coasts or rivers as well as by climate change induced sea-level rise and increase in extreme rainfall, flood risk in urban areas is increasing. Better understanding of risks, risk drivers and its consequences in urban areas have revealed shortcomings in the existing flood risk management approaches. This has led to a paradigm shift in dealing with floods from managing the risk to reduce damages, to making urban communities resilient to flooding. Often described as a complex and at times confusing concept, this systematic review identifies and summarises the different dimensions and approaches of urban flood resilience and how they are applied in practice. Our analysis shows that urban flood resilience as a concept has evolved over the last two decades. From an engineering concept with a strong focus on ensuring that the built environment can withstand a flood to a more recent definition as a transformative process with the aim to enable all parts of the urban system to live with floods and learn from previous shocks. This evolved understanding is also reflected in the increasing number of dimensions considered in urban flood resilience assessments and decision support tools. A thematic analysis of the challenges in conceptualising and applying urban flood resilience reported in the literature has revealed a number of issues including around fairness and equity of the applied approaches, a lack of data and widely accepted methods as well as uncertainty around changing risks as a result of climate change. Based on these findings we propose a new research agenda, focusing on meta studies to identify the key dimensions and criteria for urban flood resilience, supporting a transparent and evidence-led operationalization.
C1 [Rozer, Viktor; Mehryar, Sara; Surminski, Swenja] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Grantham Res Inst Climate Change & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England.
C3 University of London; London School Economics & Political Science
RP Rözer, V (corresponding author), London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Grantham Res Inst Climate Change & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England.
EM V.roezer@lse.ac.uk
RI Mehryar, Sara/GSE-2683-2022
OI Rozer, Viktor/0000-0002-2883-5347; Surminski, Swenja/0000-0003-1270-5545
CR Adeyeye K, 2017, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V8, P494, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2016-0044
   Afriyanie D, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102710
   Al S, 2022, J URBAN DES, V27, P270, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2021.1977112
   Baklanov A, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V23, P330, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.05.004
   Balaban S, 2016, ASSESSMENT FLOOD RIS
   Balica SF, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P73, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0234-1
   Banica A, 2020, J URBAN REG ANAL, V12, P53, DOI 10.37043/JURA.2020.12.1.4
   Barreiro J, 2021, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V7, P197, DOI 10.28991/cej-2021-03091647
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Braun V, 2021, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V18, P328, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Bruneau M, 2006, J APPL SEC RES, V1, P159, DOI 10.1300/J460v01n04_14
   Cashman AC, 2011, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V4, P33, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01087.x
   Chan FKS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.217
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V110, P2397, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05030-y
   Chang HJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102786
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chen KF, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11040830
   Cobbinah PB, 2018, FUTURES, V101, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2018.06.005
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   Dada A, 2021, CLIMATE, V9, DOI 10.3390/cli9100152
   DE Bruijn K., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P199, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232]
   de Haan J, 2006, ECOL COMPLEX, V3, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
   Deubelli TM, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd42d
   Dewi SP, 2021, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V623, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/623/1/012067
   DFID, 1999, TECHN REP
   Dolif G, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V65, P1831, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0448-2
   Douven W, 2012, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V55, P1289, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2011.644848
   Drosou N, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11061234
   Duy PN, 2018, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000419
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Fenner R, 2020, PHILOS T R SOC A, V378, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0199
   Fisher L, 2015, NATURE, V518, P35, DOI 10.1038/518035a
   Ford JD, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V106, P327, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0045-5
   Forrest SA, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102843
   Fu GT, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12061789
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Ghasemzadeh B, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13147852
   Ghofrani Z, 2016, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V204, P493, DOI 10.2495/SC160421
   Gu D., 2019, Exposure and vulnerability to natural disasters for world's cities
   Guerreiro SB, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaaad3
   Guptha GC, 2021, REMOTE SENS APPL, V23, DOI 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100601
   Hegger DLT, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Howarth C, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V163, P499, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02821-3
   Iturriza M, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102688
   Jerolleman A., 2019, Disaster recovery through the lens of justice
   Jeuken A, 2015, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V6, P711, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2014.141
   Joyce J, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.026
   Karamouz M, 2019, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001043
   Karamouz M, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000724, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000724]
   Keating A, 2017, DEV POLICY REV, V35, P65, DOI 10.1111/dpr.12201
   Keating A, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P77, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-77-2017
   Laeni N, 2019, CITIES, V90, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.002
   Lassa JA, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P161, DOI 10.1177/0956247814552233
   Laurien F, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100443
   Lee EH, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060428
   Lerer SM, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9110883
   Li H, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9090594
   Liao KH, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.014
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liu WK, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V83, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/83/1/012029
   Ma YC, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V729, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139078
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   Marcus L., 2011, 18 INT SEM URB FORM
   Martello MV, 2021, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102908
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review' Bellagio Initiative
   McClymont K, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1641474
   McEvoy D, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1594666
   McEwen L, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P329, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.018
   Mehryar S, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101047
   Mochizuki J, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P361, DOI 10.1111/disa.12239
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Morelli A, 2021, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105867
   Muller M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P99, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076726
   Newman G, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17020486
   Nirupama N, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0045-9
   Ogie RI, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V68, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.11.004
   Pandangwati T, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V79, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/79/1/012012
   Duy PN, 2019, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V15, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.11.001
   Piatek L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229725
   Pluchinotta I, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102709
   Rendon C, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102774
   Restemeyer B, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P920, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1189403
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Reynard NS, 2017, PROG PHYS GEOG, V41, P222, DOI 10.1177/0309133317702566
   Righi AW, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.007
   Rijke J, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V25, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012
   Roggema R., 2020, NATURE DRIVEN URBANI, P1
   Ruan JE, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102578
   Sajjad M, 2021, APPL GEOGR, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102367
   Saunders B, 2018, QUAL QUANT, V52, P1893, DOI 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   Scheffer M., 2009, CRITICAL TRANSITIONS, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400833276
   Shi LD, 2018, HABITAT INT, V77, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.006
   Sitinjak E, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.029
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Su YS, 2017, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V8, P110, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2015-0055
   Surminski S, 2017, EARTHS FUTURE, V5, P966, DOI 10.1002/2016EF000497
   Tas M, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P443, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501134
   Taylor FE, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103771
   Tayyab M, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13101864
   UNDESA, 2018, TECHN REP
   UNDRR, 2020, TECHN REP
   Vicari R, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P1485, DOI 10.5194/nhess-19-1485-2019
   Vousdoukas MI, 2018, NAT COMMUN, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04692-w
   Wang SS, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100829
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Westra S, 2014, REV GEOPHYS, V52, P522, DOI 10.1002/2014RG000464
   Wisner B, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V11, P239, DOI 10.1007/s13753-020-00263-0
   Wolff C, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-70928-9
   Xiang CY, 2019, WATER POLICY, V21, P19, DOI 10.2166/wp.2018.021
   Yang QT, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197865
   Yazdi J, 2018, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V32, P721, DOI 10.1007/s11269-017-1835-y
   Yu SY, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P417, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1752776
   Yumagulova L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.022
   Yusuf JE, 2018, J CONTEMP WAT RES ED, V164, P112, DOI 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2018.03287.x
NR 116
TC 27
Z9 28
U1 57
U2 186
PU IOP Publishing Ltd
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD DEC 1
PY 2022
VL 17
IS 12
AR 123006
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/aca8bc
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 6Z5WY
UT WOS:000897847900001
OA gold, Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Croce, S
   Vettorato, D
AF Croce, Silvia
   Vettorato, Daniele
TI Urban surface uses for climate resilient and sustainable cities: A
   catalogue of solutions
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban surface use; Climate resilience; Sustainability; Green solutions;
   Water solutions; Urban agriculture; Cool materials; Renewable energy
   systems
ID OF-THE-ART; BUILDING-INTEGRATED AGRICULTURE; FLOATING PHOTOVOLTAIC
   PLANTS; VERTICAL GREENERY SYSTEMS; RETAINING PAVER BLOCK; COOL ROOF
   SYSTEM; HEAT-ISLAND; FOOD-PRODUCTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS;
   ENERGY-PERFORMANCE
AB In the current scenario of massive urbanization and global climate change, the urban surfaces and their characteristics have a key role, as they significantly influence the quality of life in urban areas, as well as their environmental conditions. To shed light on the role of urban surfaces in fostering climate resilient and sustainable cities, this paper proposes a catalogue of solutions for the urban surface use. The catalogue presents the main surface uses suitable for the built environment, and discusses the potential conflicts and synergies among them in the view of a multiple and integrated utilization of urban surfaces. Reviewing studies published in the last 15 years, this study aims to answer three major questions: (i) which solutions do exist, (ii) where can these be applied, and (iii) which benefits do they provide. The discussion demonstrates that the use of urban surfaces might lead the development of multiple opportunities for improving the existing urban environments and supporting not only environmental, but also social and economic resilience. Finally, it emphasizes the need for specific quantitative and qualitative approaches to address the multi-disciplinary challenges posed by the design and implementation of surface uses, and the evaluation of their contribution to site-specific objectives.
C1 [Croce, Silvia; Vettorato, Daniele] EURAC Res, Inst Renewable Energy, Bolzano, Italy.
   [Croce, Silvia] Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Padua, Italy.
C3 European Academy of Bozen-Bolzano; University of Padua
RP Croce, S (corresponding author), EURAC Res, Inst Renewable Energy, Bolzano, Italy.; Croce, S (corresponding author), Univ Padua, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Padua, Italy.
EM silvia.croce@eurac.edu
OI Croce, Silvia/0000-0003-1345-8769; VETTORATO,
   DANIELE/0000-0002-5482-1723
CR Ackerman K, 2014, ECON SOC REV, V45, P189
   Ahmad S, 2019, INT J ENERG RES, V43, P1974, DOI 10.1002/er.4350
   Akbari H, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V133, P834, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.067
   Akbari H, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V55, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02.055
   Al-Kodmany K, 2018, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/buildings8020024
   Al-Waeli AHA, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V77, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.126
   Aleksandrowicz O, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.04.002
   Alexandri E., 2006, PLEA 2006
   Alsanius B.W., 2017, ROOFTOP URBAN AGR, P103
   Altan H, 2019, INT J LOW-CARBON TEC, V14, P267, DOI 10.1093/ijlct/ctz008
   [Anonymous], 2015, EMERGING ISSUES CHAL, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-8150-7.CH008
   Anupam BR, 2020, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V247, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118553
   Arborea, 2019, BIOSOLAR LEAF
   Armson D, 2012, THESIS U MANCHESTER, P134
   Atiganyanun S, 2018, ACS PHOTONICS, V5, P1181, DOI 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01492
   Augeri MG, 2019, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V11, DOI 10.1186/s12544-019-0353-9
   Azunre GA, 2019, CITIES, V93, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006
   Bani-Hani Ehab Hussein, 2018, Energy Engineering, V115, P61, DOI 10.1080/01998595.2018.11969276
   Baniassadi A, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100495
   Bao T, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V228, P418, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.142
   Baral A, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V190, P722, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.155
   Barsanti L, 2018, ALGAL RES, V31, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.algal.2018.02.001
   Baumann T, 2019, SOL ENERGY, V190, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.014
   Becchio C, 2011, WHOLE COST ANAL BUIL
   Bell Simon, 2007, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V6, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.005
   Benis K, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V147, P589, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.130
   Berman E, 2016, GENDER PLACE CULT, V23, P1508, DOI 10.1080/0966369X.2016.1190194
   Biyik E, 2017, ENG SCI TECHNOL, V20, P833, DOI 10.1016/j.jestch.2017.01.009
   Bortolini L, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.007
   Bottero M, 2018, ADV OPER RES, V2018, DOI 10.1155/2018/9276075
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Braquinho C., 2015, A typology of urban green spaces, ecosystem provisioning services and demands
   Brohm D, 2012, ACTA HORTIC, V937, P1041
   Buehler D, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8111108
   Bunting SW, 2015, EARTHSCAN FOOD AGRIC, P312
   Burton B., 1992, J THERM INSUL BUILD, V16, P134
   Calise F, 2020, ENERGY, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116439
   Caplow T., 2007, P 2 PALENC C 28 AIVC, P172
   Carnielo E, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V60, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.11.004
   Carter JG, 2018, CITIES, V77, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.01.014
   Cascone S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11113020
   Castellani B, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V154, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.078
   Castleton HF, 2010, ENERG BUILDINGS, V42, P1582, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.004
   Cazzaniga R, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P1730, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.269
   Cerón I, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V58, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.013
   Cerón-Palma I, 2012, J URBAN TECHNOL, V19, P87, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2012.717685
   Cervera-Sarda R., 2014, Construction and Building Research, P209
   Chàfer M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155888
   Chemisana D, 2014, APPL ENERG, V119, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.027
   Chen J, 2009, BUILD ENVIRON, V44, P1899, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.01.002
   Chung MH, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V116, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.12.056
   Cilliers EJ, 2015, J URBAN DES, V20, P349, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1031213
   Ciriminna R, 2019, ENERGY TECHNOL-GER, V7, DOI 10.1002/ente.201900128
   Colagrande S, 2020, LECT NOTES CIVIL ENG, V48, P114, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-29779-4_11
   Coma J, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V111, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.014
   Comino E, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119416
   Corcelli F, 2019, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V144, P321, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.040
   Cossu M, 2016, APPL ENERG, V162, P1042, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.002
   Croce S., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V290, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/290/1/012113
   Daniel M, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V23, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.11.001
   Davidson K, 2019, CITIES, V92, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.012
   de Almeida AT, 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P5092, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.047
   Delponte I, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12010382
   Despommier D, 2013, TRENDS BIOTECHNOL, V31, P388, DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.008
   Devany L, 2006, COBRA 2006
   Dezfooli AS, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V149, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.016
   Dhariwal J, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V150, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.016
   Ferreira AJD, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V5, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.06.004
   Doherty M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V66, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.001
   ecoLogicStudio, 2019, PHOTOSYNTHETICA
   Efthymiou C, 2016, SOL ENERGY, V130, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.01.054
   Eigenbrod C, 2015, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V35, P483, DOI 10.1007/s13593-014-0273-y
   Elrayies GM, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P1175, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.032
   Evanson D., 2019, WORLDS 1 BIOSOLAR LE
   Fabiani C, 2019, APPL ENERG, V247, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.020
   FAO, 2019, URB AGR FAOS ROL URB
   Feldman A, 2019, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V5, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000880
   Fujii H, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V168, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.221
   Garcia DJ, 2016, COMPUT CHEM ENG, V91, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.003
   Gasparatos A, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V70, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030
   Ghosh A, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V276, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123343
   Goddek S, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P4199, DOI 10.3390/su7044199
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gould D, 2012, WOODHEAD PUBL SER EN, P147
   greencity solutions, 2020, WORLDS 1 BIOT FILT Q
   Grewal SS, 2012, CITIES, V29, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.003
   Guitart D, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
   Guo PX, 2019, J THERM SCI, V28, P1150, DOI 10.1007/s11630-019-1239-9
   Hatt BE, 2007, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V55, P201, DOI 10.2166/wst.2007.110
   He J, 2008, ENERG BUILDINGS, V40, P968, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.08.003
   He YP, 2019, ENERGY, V185, P585, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.029
   Hendel M, 2016, URBAN CLIM, V16, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.02.003
   Herman K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061857
   Hirsh S, 2019, THESE BUS STOPS ARE
   Hu AX, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P290, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2843, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2843]
   Hu JY, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V192, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.040
   Ilgen S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050983
   Im J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11226483
   Ishugah TF, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V37, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.053
   Jacobs C, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V32, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100607
   Jakubcova E., 2020, Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, V51, P99
   Jaramillo P, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P907, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.005
   Jelle BP, 2012, SOL ENERG MAT SOL C, V100, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.12.016
   Johnsson J, 2020, APPL ENERG, V260, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114286
   Karlessi T, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.09.003
   Karras G, 2016, ACTA HORTIC, V1108, P279, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1108.36
   Kaufman MA, 2016, INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT 2016: PROJECTS AND PRACTICES FOR PROSPERITY, P683
   Kellett J, 2011, URBAN POLICY RES, V29, P23, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2010.514848
   Kindangen JI, 2017, AIP CONF PROC, V1818, DOI 10.1063/1.4976887
   Kolokotsa D, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V154, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.004
   Kosoric V, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V111, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.056
   Kyriakodis GE, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.02.002
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Leistner P, 2019, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V323, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012067
   Levinson R, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V152, P752, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.007
   Levinson R, 2010, SOL ENERG MAT SOL C, V94, P946, DOI 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.12.012
   Li L, 2018, CITIES, V74, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013
   Li T, 2019, SCIENCE, V364, P760, DOI 10.1126/science.aau9101
   Li W.C., 2014, INT J SUSTAIN BUILT, V3, P127, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.05.001, DOI 10.1016/J.IJSBE.2014.05.001]
   Li YX, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P21147, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2007799117
   Liao KH, 2017, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P203, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_10
   Lim X, 2020, NATURE, V577, P18, DOI 10.1038/d41586-019-03911-8
   Lin BB, 2017, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P155, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_8
   Littke H, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.010
   Lobaccaro G, 2019, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V108, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.041
   Lobaccaro G, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V149, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.015
   Lobaccaro G, 2012, ENRGY PROCED, V30, P1173, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.130
   Lorenz Stephan., 2015, Environmental Sociology, V1, P116, DOI DOI 10.1080/23251042.2015.1008383
   Lu SL, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V127, P159, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.080
   Ma T, 2019, ENERG CONVERS MANAGE, V183, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.035
   Mandal J, 2018, SCIENCE, V362, P315, DOI 10.1126/science.aat9513
   Manso M, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V41, P863, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.203
   Maurer C, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V154, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.065
   Mauri L, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V171, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.073
   Mayrand F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10040985
   Montazeri H, 2015, BUILD ENVIRON, V83, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.022
   Moraci F, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030755
   Moren MSP, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V147, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.082
   Moren MSP, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V146, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.051
   Morini E, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.11.007
   Nagle L, 2017, J GREEN BUILD, V12, P23, DOI 10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.23
   Nations U., 2017, World population projected to reach 9.8 billion in 2050, and 11.2 billion in 2100, DOI [10.1017/CB09781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CB09781107415324.004]
   Neumann HM, 2012, PROG PHOTOVOLTAICS, V20, P639, DOI 10.1002/pip.1199
   O'Sullivan CA, 2019, AGR SYST, V174, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.05.007
   Orsini F, 2020, J CONSUM PROT FOOD S, V15, P203, DOI 10.1007/s00003-020-01293-y
   Palau-Salvador G, 2019, CITIES, V92, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.005
   Palermo SA, 2020, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V410, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012013
   dos Santos MJPL, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V20, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.10.004
   Park D, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P1104, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9658
   Park J.-E., 2008, ANN INT M AM SOC AGR, V6, P3612
   Pérez G, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V39, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.055
   Perini K., 2017, URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, P63
   Perini K, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106708
   Pineda IT, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219029
   Pisello AL, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V144, P660, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.068
   Pisello AL, 2017, SOL ENERG MAT SOL C, V160, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.036
   Pringle AM, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V80, P572, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.191
   Pugh TAM, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P7692, DOI 10.1021/es300826w
   Qin YH, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P948, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.250
   Qin YH, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.177
   Raji B, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V45, P610, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.011
   Raman AP, 2014, NATURE, V515, P540, DOI 10.1038/nature13883
   Ranjan KR, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V32, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.020
   Read J, 2008, WATER RES, V42, P893, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.036
   Revesz M, 2018, SOL ENERGY, V174, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.037
   Richards MA, 2018, REGREENING THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: NATURE, GREEN SPACE, AND SUSTAINABILITY, P1
   Richards PJ, 2017, ECOL ENG, V100, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.12.013
   Riley B, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V673, P281, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.065
   Romeo D, 2018, PROC CIRP, V69, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.048
   Rosa-Clot M, 2017, ENRGY PROCED, V134, P664, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.585
   Rosenzweig C, 2010, NATURE, V467, P909, DOI 10.1038/467909a
   Rossi F, 2015, APPL ENERG, V145, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.129
   Rosso F, 2019, J PHYS CONF SER, V1343, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1343/1/012198
   Rotilio M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122211
   Rupprecht CDD, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P597, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.002
   Russo A, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V242, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.026
   Saadon S, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V150, P981, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.122
   Sadineni SB, 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P3617, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.014
   Safikhani T, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V40, P450, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.166
   Sanger P., 2016, INNOVATION CLIMATE C, P131
   Sanjuan-Delmas D, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V177, P326, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.147
   Santamouris M, 2017, SOL ENERGY, V154, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.006
   Santamouris M, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V26, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.047
   Santamouris M, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V53, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.022
   Santamouris M, 2011, SOL ENERGY, V85, P3085, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.023
   Santamouris M, 2018, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/buildings8120168
   Sawle Y, 2016, COGENT ENG, V3, DOI 10.1080/23311916.2016.1189305
   Schindler BY, 2016, ISR J ECOL EVOL, V62, P68, DOI 10.1080/15659801.2015.1048617
   Shafique M, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V90, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.006
   Sharifi A, 2015, APPL ENERG, V160, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.061
   Sharmin T, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V34, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.07.006
   Shekhar A, 2018, IEEE J PHOTOVOLT, V8, P1066, DOI 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2820998
   Shooshtarian S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P647, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.005
   Shukla AK, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V140, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.015
   Sikorski P, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V35, P148, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.017
   Skar SLG, 2020, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V2, P1, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2019.931
   Snep RPH, 2020, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V8, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2020.599060
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Spanaki A, 2011, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P3523, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2011.05.007
   Speak AF, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.007
   Specht K, 2014, AGR HUM VALUES, V31, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10460-013-9448-4
   Stathopoulos T, 2018, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V179, P146, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.05.018
   Sun YY, 2020, RENEW ENERG, V145, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.061
   Syafii NI, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V34, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.012
   Synnefa A, 2007, SOL ENERGY, V81, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2006.08.005
   Synnefa A., 2016, URBAN CLIMATE MITIGA, P67
   Szala K, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102282
   Tablada A, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10103762
   Talaei M, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101011
   Taveres-Cachat E, 2019, APPL ENERG, V247, P731, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.033
   Thomaier S, 2015, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V30, P43, DOI 10.1017/S1742170514000143
   Toboso-Chavero S, 2018, J IND ECOL, P1, DOI [10.1111/jiec.12829,00(0), DOI 10.1111/JIEC.12829,00(0)]
   Tong CW, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V127, P1028, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.06.065
   Toparlar Y, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V80, P1613, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.248
   Tsoka S, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V42, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.016
   Ulpiani G, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V156, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.007
   Ulpiani G, 2019, APPL ENERG, V239, P1091, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.231
   Valderrama C, 2016, STORING ENERGY: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES, P273, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803440-8.00014-2
   Vilar A.A., 2020, Sustaining Resources for Tomorrow, P185
   Vuckovic M, 2018, CLIMATE, V6, DOI 10.3390/cli6010007
   Vuckovic M, 2017, ENERG BUILDINGS, V145, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.003
   Wagner M, 2019, LAND-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/land8080123
   Wang CH, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V32, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.04.010
   Wang H, 2018, APPL ENERG, V212, P1083, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.125
   Wang JS, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V151, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.01.033
   Wild TC, 2011, WATER ENVIRON J, V25, P412, DOI 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00236.x
   Wu F, 2019, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V15, P832, DOI 10.1002/ieam.4187
   Xiang B, 2020, SOL ENERGY, V199, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2020.02.021
   Yang JC, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V47, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.092
   Yang YK, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109537
   Yang YK, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V122, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.015
   Yi Y, 2019, COATINGS, V9, DOI 10.3390/coatings9120802
   Zhai Y, 2017, SCIENCE, V355, DOI 10.1126/science.aai7899
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   Zheng X, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120708
   Zhu XY, 2019, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116818
   Zölch T, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V20, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.011
NR 237
TC 48
Z9 48
U1 4
U2 65
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 75
AR 103313
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103313
EA SEP 2021
PG 26
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA WJ3UG
UT WOS:000708972900006
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mguni, P
   Abrams, A
   Herslund, LB
   Carden, K
   Fell, J
   Armitage, N
   Dollie, A
AF Mguni, Patience
   Abrams, Amber
   Herslund, Lise Byskov
   Carden, Kirsty
   Fell, Jessica
   Armitage, Neil
   Dollie, Aaisha
TI Towards water resilience through Nature-based Solutions in the Global
   South? Scoping the prevailing conditions for Water Sensitive Design in
   Cape Town and Johannesburg
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Nature-based Solutions; Water Sensitive Design; Strategic Niche
   Management; Global South; Water resilience; Environmental governance
ID STRATEGIC NICHE MANAGEMENT; LOW-CARBON TRANSITIONS; SUSTAINABILITY
   TRANSITIONS; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; FLOOD-RISK; URBAN; GOVERNANCE;
   CITIES; INNOVATION; ENERGY
AB Water Sensitive Design (WSD) is gaining attention as a Nature-based Solution (NbS) to urban water problems. It incorporates green infrastructure with engineered urban water systems through innovative design of the built environment and urban landscape. In Africa, Johannesburg and Cape Town are two cities engaging with WSD at a policy level. This paper uses the Strategic Niche Management (SNM) approach in a comparative analysis of ongoing engagement with WSD in Johannesburg and Cape Town. We explore the extent to which this engagement signals the launch of the transition towards water resilience. WSD represents a niche that is in synergy with the visions of sustainable urban (water and environmental) management in both cities. Results indicate a progressive engagement with WSD by different actors at regime and niche levels. However, the lack of coordination and capacity deficiencies due to limited social networks and higher order learning are challenges that constrain take-off and further consolidation of the WSD approach in the transition towards water resilient futures. Furthermore, we find urban governance practitioners struggle with reconciling the pursuit of visions of sustainability to be realised through nature-based urban development with the pressing infrastructure deficits that persist in most African cities.
C1 [Mguni, Patience; Herslund, Lise Byskov] Univ Copenhagen, Inst Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
   [Abrams, Amber; Carden, Kirsty; Fell, Jessica; Armitage, Neil] Univ Cape Town, Future Water Inst, New Engn Bldg 1 Madiba Circle,Upper Campus, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa.
   [Dollie, Aaisha] Resilience Consulting, Cape Town, South Africa.
C3 University of Copenhagen; University of Cape Town
RP Mguni, P (corresponding author), Univ Copenhagen, Inst Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
EM pamg@ign.ku.dk; amber.abrams@uct.ac.za; lihe@ign.ku.dk;
   kirsty.carden@uct.ac.za; fell.jessica@gmail.com;
   neil.armitage@uct.ac.za; resilience.consulting@outlook.com
RI Herslund, Lise/C-9518-2015; Carden, Kirsty/ABC-2415-2021; Armitage,
   Neil/H-2180-2014; Abrams, Amber/AAC-7533-2022; Mguni,
   Patience/P-3706-2014; Carden, Kirsty/G-2678-2015
OI Abrams, Amber/0000-0003-1416-7891; Mguni, Patience/0000-0003-4501-6025;
   Carden, Kirsty/0000-0003-2760-2418
FU Danida Fellowship Centre, Denmark [DFC-18-M05-KU]
FX We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers who gave valuable comments
   for the paper. This paper is produced as part of the 'Pathways to Water
   Sensitive South African Cities' project-a collaboration between the
   University of Copenhagen and the University of Cape Town. The project is
   funded by Danida Fellowship Centre (Grant number: DFC-18-M05-KU),
   Denmark.
CR Akallah JA, 2020, WATER ALTERN, V13, P886
   Albert C, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V182, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003
   Arapostathis S, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V32, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.05.001
   Armitage N., 2014, Water Research Commission of South Africa TT 588/ 14
   Avelino F, 2016, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V18, P628, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
   Bakker S, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1059, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.007
   Beukers E, 2021, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V40, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.004
   Bichai F, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1276
   Bos JJ, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V15, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.10.002
   Bos JJ, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V67, P1708, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.031
   Bos JJ, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1340, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Brown RR, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P701, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.013
   Bulkeley H, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P317, DOI 10.1177/0969776418787222
   Bulkeley H, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P1471, DOI 10.1177/0042098013500089
   Bush J, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V35, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.015
   Carden K., 2016, WIT T BUILT ENV, V165, P51, DOI DOI 10.2495/UW160051
   Carden K, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P110, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i4.4575
   City of Cape Town, 2019, OUR SHARED WATER FUT
   City of Cape Town (CoCT), 2019, CAP TOWN RES STRAT
   Cousins JJ, 2021, ECOL ECON, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106874
   Cousins JJ, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1300
   CRC for Water Sensitive Cities, 2020, CAP TOWN APPL WAT SE
   Dadson SJ, 2017, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY, V473, DOI 10.1098/rspa.2016.0706
   De Groot J, 2021, ENVIRON URBAN, V33, P255, DOI 10.1177/0956247820970094
   de Haan FJ, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.005
   Dignum M, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.010
   Dóci G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103621
   Domènech L, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V15, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.01.001
   Dorst H, 2021, CITIES, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103283
   Enqvist JP, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1354
   Fisher-Jeffes L, 2017, S AFR J SCI, V113, P72, DOI 10.17159/sajs.2017/20160153
   Fitchett A, 2017, WATER SA, V43, P310, DOI 10.4314/wsa.v43i2.14
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz042
   Frantzeskaki N, 2018, FUTURE CITY, V11, P43, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_2
   Frantzeskaki N, 2018, FUTURE CITY, V11, P63, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_3
   Frantzeskaki N, 2009, FUTURES, V41, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2009.04.009
   Furlong C, 2017, WIT TRANS BUILT ENV, V170, P85, DOI 10.2495/CC170091
   Garud R, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P980, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009
   GCRO GDARD, 2019, WAT SEC PERSP GAUT C
   GDARD, 2020, GAUT SUST DRAIN SYST
   Geels F, 2006, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V18, P375, DOI 10.1080/09537320600777143
   Geels Frank., 2006, Science and Public Policy, V33, P265, DOI [10.3152/147154306781778984, DOI 10.3152/147154306781778984]
   Geels FW, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Geels FW, 2014, THEOR CULT SOC, V31, P21, DOI 10.1177/0263276414531627
   Geels FW, 2005, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V72, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014
   Gliedt T, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V174, P1247, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.054
   Grandin J, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V36, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.008
   Grigg NS, 2019, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V35, P181, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1401919
   Grin J, 2020, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V22, P682, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1776099
   Habtemariam LW, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.006
   Hamann R, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.017
   de Haan J, 2011, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V78, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008
   Herslund L, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101573
   Herslund L, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.008
   Hodson M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9020299
   Hoffmann S, 2020, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V54, P5312, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b05222
   Huxley R, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V33, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.04.001
   Jaglin S., 2014, ROUTLEDGE HDB CITIES, V1st, P434, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203387832.CH37
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Khanyile, 2019, APPLYING GREEN INFRA
   Köhler J, 2019, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V31, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Kronsell A, 2018, EUR PLAN STUD, V26, P988, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631
   Lang A., 2018, DAY ZERO AN RISK RES
   Lennon M, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P745, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.944113
   Loorbach D, 2017, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V42, P599, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Loorbach D, 2006, ENVIRON POLICY, V44, P187
   Lottering N, 2015, WATER SA, V41, P1, DOI [10.4314/wsa.v41i1.1, 10.4314/wsa.v41il1]
   Luederitz C., 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V169, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.09.005, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005]
   Maas S., 2018, COCREATING SUSTAINAB
   Madonsela B, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020292
   Mahlanza L., 2016, Urban Forum, V27, P363
   Manders TNT, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.011
   Markard J, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab9468
   Matschoss K, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120288
   Meckling J, 2017, NAT ENERGY, V2, P918, DOI 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8
   Mguni P, 2015, WATER POLICY, V17, P126, DOI 10.2166/wp.2014.047
   Mguni P., 2015, Sustainability Transitions In the Developing World: Exploring The Potential For Integrating Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems In the Sub-saharan Cities University of Copenhagen
   Mguni P, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102086
   Mguni P, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, pS241, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2309-x
   Mukhtarov F, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P288, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1627864
   Mulligan J, 2020, ANTHROPOCENE, V29, DOI 10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100227
   Nastar M, 2018, AFR STUD-UK, V77, P504, DOI 10.1080/00020184.2018.1459287
   Pel B, 2021, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V41, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.016
   Pereira L, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P6027, DOI 10.3390/ijerph120606027
   Pesch U, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P1922, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17705383
   Poustie MS, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V105, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.008
   Quitzau MB, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.042
   Radcliffe JC, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00001-0
   Raven R., 2012, Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity?, P125
   Rodina L, 2019, WIRES WATER, V6, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1376
   Rodina L, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.016
   Schot J, 2008, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V20, P537, DOI 10.1080/09537320802292651
   Sekulova F, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103136
   Sengers F, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V145, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   Seyfang G, 2014, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V13, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004
   Smith A, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Smith A, 2007, TECHNOL ANAL STRATEG, V19, P427, DOI 10.1080/09537320701403334
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Stiles J, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.001
   Swilling M., 2019, The Age of Sustainability, V1st, DOI [10.4324/9780429057823, DOI 10.4324/9780429057823]
   The Housing Development Agency-HDA, 2013, GAUT INF SETTL STAT
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   Trapp JH, 2017, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V76, DOI 10.1007/s12665-017-6461-8
   Turnheim B, 2019, RES POLICY, V48, P1412, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.002
   van de Meene SJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1117, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003
   van der Jagt APN, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V35, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.005
   van der Laak WWM, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P3213, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.009
   van Mierlo B, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V34, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.002
   von Wirth T, 2019, EUR PLAN STUD, V27, P229, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
   Washbourne CL, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V129, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.016
   Watson V., 2006, PLAN THEOR, V5, P31, DOI DOI 10.1177/1473095206061020
   Watson V, 2013, PLAN THEOR, V12, P81, DOI 10.1177/1473095212446301
   Wittmayer JM, 2016, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_2
   Wolfram M, 2019, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V21, P30, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1512051
   Wolski P., 2018, Significance, V15, P24, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1740-9713.2018.01127.X, DOI 10.1111/J.1740-9713.2018.01127]
   Yang KJ, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V36, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.07.002
   Yang Q, 2019, ACM T INTEL SYST TEC, V10, DOI 10.1145/3298981
   Yuana SL, 2020, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V37, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.009
   Zevenbergen C, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091230
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 122
TC 10
Z9 10
U1 9
U2 43
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 1462-9011
EI 1873-6416
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLICY
JI Environ. Sci. Policy
PD OCT
PY 2022
VL 136
BP 147
EP 156
DI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.020
PG 10
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 2O1CJ
UT WOS:000818804400008
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Doost, DM
   Brunetta, G
   Caldarice, O
AF Mohabat Doost, Danial
   Brunetta, Grazia
   Caldarice, Ombretta
TI In Search of Equitable Resilience: Unravelling the Links between Urban
   Resilience Planning and Social Equity
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE social equity; equitable resilience; resilience planning; European
   cities
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; JUSTICE
AB Building resilient cities is becoming increasingly vital due to the rise in urban challenges such as climate change, socioeconomic disparities, and pandemics. While the concept of resilience is gaining popularity, many scholars argue that existing resilience plans do not adequately address social equity issues. Therefore, this study investigates the incorporation of equity into resilience planning by conducting a case study analysis of ten European resilience strategies. The employed methodology is summative content analysis, and the approach is inductive. For each resilience strategy, the incorporation of three equity dimensions-distributional, procedural, and recognitional-is examined. The results show significant variation in addressing equity dimensions across the case studies. Although some plans do not effectively address equity, others integrate it more comprehensively and successfully. Thus, we argue that resilience planning can potentially contribute to social equity issues, although currently, this contribution is not sufficient. We recommend a number of strategies by which future resilience planning can enhance its contribution. These are: promoting structural transformations, considering the political processes of resilience building, adopting participatory approaches to co-create resilience plans, fostering trust and accountability between citizens and governing bodies, favouring a systemic view, and prioritising the upstream inequality factors for building capacity.
C1 [Mohabat Doost, Danial; Brunetta, Grazia; Caldarice, Ombretta] Politecn Torino, Responsible Risk Resilience Ctr R3C, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Viale Mattioli, 39, I-10125 Turin, TO, Italy.
C3 Polytechnic University of Turin
RP Caldarice, O (corresponding author), Politecn Torino, Responsible Risk Resilience Ctr R3C, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Viale Mattioli, 39, I-10125 Turin, TO, Italy.
EM danial.mohabat@polito.it; grazia.brunetta@polito.it;
   ombretta.caldarice@polito.it
OI CALDARICE, OMBRETTA/0000-0001-6172-908X; Brunetta,
   Grazia/0000-0003-1868-2700
CR [Anonymous], Web Page: Home-RESCCUE: RESCCUE
   Babbie E., 2010, The practice of social research
   Barry B., 1999, FAIRNESS FUTURITY, P93
   Berg AG, 2017, IMF ECON REV, V65, P792, DOI 10.1057/s41308-017-0030-8
   Bonds A, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1285, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1462968
   Bristol City, 2016, 100 Resilient Cities
   Brunetta G, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082286
   Byrne J., 2012, The occupy handbook
   City of Athens, 2017, 100 Resilient Cities, P226
   City of Paris, 2017, 100 Resilient Cities, P125
   City of Rome, 2020, 100 Resilient Cities
   City of The Hague, 2019, 100 Resilient Cities
   City of Thessaloniki, 2020, 100 Resilient Cities
   Davoudi S, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P3, DOI 10.1111/cico.12281
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dodman D., 2018, Addressing the Most Vulnerable FirstPro-Poor Climate Action in Informal Settlements, VVolume 46
   Doost DM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114443
   Dusek J, 2023, ADM SCI, V13, DOI 10.3390/admsci13060154
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Gemeente Rotterdam, 2016, 100 Resilient Cities, P1
   General Assembly, 2015, Report of the General Assembly of the United Nations Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
   Glasgow City, 2016, 100 Resilient Cities
   Greater London Authority, 2020, 100 Resilient Cities, P99
   Greater Manchester Resilience Forum, 2021, 100 Resilient Cities
   Hallegatte S, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P250, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3253
   Harvey David., 1996, JUSTICE NATURE GEOGR
   Hsieh HF, 2005, QUAL HEALTH RES, V15, P1277, DOI 10.1177/1049732305276687
   IPCC, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE 2021, P3, DOI [10.1017/9781009325844, DOI 10.1017/9781009157896.001, 10.1017/9781009157896.001, DOI 10.1017/9781009157926, 10.1017/CBO9781107415324, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324]
   Jerneck A, 2008, CLIM POLICY, V8, P170, DOI 10.3763/cpol.2007.0434
   Kondracki NL, 2002, J NUTR EDUC BEHAV, V34, P224, DOI 10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   McNiff K., 2018, What is qualitative research?
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Miller David, 1999, Principles of social justice
   Minton Beddoes Z., For Richer, for Poorer-The Economist Special Report
   Mutambik I, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151310490
   Powers M, 2019, RES HANDB CLIM LAW, P246
   Rawls J., 1971, A Theory of Justice, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674042605
   Resilient Cities-The Rockefeller Foundation, ABOUT US
   Roy M, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V180, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.011
   Schlosberg D, 2004, ENVIRON POLIT, V13, P517, DOI 10.1080/0964401042000229025
   Schlosberg David., 2009, DEFINING ENV JUSTICE, DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
   Srebalová M, 2022, LAWS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/laws11050067
   Swyngedouw E, 2003, ANTIPODE, V35, P898, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2003.00364.x
   Titscher S., 2000, METHODS TEXT DISCOUR
   UN DESA, 2015, Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development
   United Nations CDP (committee for Development Policy), 2018, Leaving No One Behind
   United Nations Secretary-General Deputy Secretary-General's Remarks, People and Climate. Just Transition in Practice
   UNSDG, Leave No One behind
   Walzer M., 1983, Philosophy, V59, P413
NR 52
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 9
U2 23
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 18
AR 13818
DI 10.3390/su151813818
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA S9FH9
UT WOS:001074147000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Knodt, M
   Stöckl, A
   Steinke, F
   Pietsch, M
   Hornung, G
   Stroscher, JP
AF Knodt, Michele
   Stoeckl, Anna
   Steinke, Florian
   Pietsch, Martin
   Hornung, Gerrit
   Stroscher, Jan-Philipp
TI Power blackout: Citizens? contribution to strengthen urban resilience
SO ENERGY POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Power blackout; Power resources; Renewable energies; Share electricity;
   Common good; Resilience; Crisis management
AB A long-lasting, large-scale power blackout has a huge impact on the infrastructure of public life, as well as on critical infrastructure including electricity and water supply. At the same time, it can be observed that the share of renewable energies, and thus the possibility of self-sufficiency, has increased enormously in recent years. This contribution focuses on the question to what extend citizens are willing to share their electricity resources in order to make their city more resilient. In reference to Ostrom's concept of club or common goods, it can be shown if and how the private good of citizen's electricity resources can be transformed into a club or even a common good. Drawing on survey data from the city of Darmstadt we investigated the willingness to share electricity and to participate in participatory formats to enhance urban resilience.
C1 [Knodt, Michele; Stoeckl, Anna; Steinke, Florian; Pietsch, Martin] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Karolinenpl 5, D-64289 Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany.
   [Knodt, Michele; Stoeckl, Anna] Inst Polit Sci, Landwehrstr 50A, D-64293 Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany.
   [Steinke, Florian; Pietsch, Martin] Energy Informat Networks & Syst, Landgraf Georg Str 4, D-64293 Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany.
   [Hornung, Gerrit; Stroscher, Jan-Philipp] Univ Kassel, Monchebergstr 19, D-34127 Kassel, Hesse, Germany.
   [Hornung, Gerrit; Stroscher, Jan-Philipp] Dept Publ Law IT Law & Environm Law, Henschelstr 4, D-34127 Kassel, Hesse, Germany.
C3 Technical University of Darmstadt; Technical University of Darmstadt;
   Universitat Kassel
RP Stöckl, A (corresponding author), Tech Univ Darmstadt, Karolinenpl 5, D-64289 Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany.
EM knodt@pg.tu-darmstadt.de; Stoeckl@pg.tu-darmstadt.de;
   florian.steinke@eins.tu-darmstadt.de;
   martin.pietsch@eins.tu-darmstadt.de; gerrit.hornung@uni-kassel.de;
   jan-philipp.stroscher@uni-kassel.de
OI Steinke, Florian/0000-0003-3012-9991; Stroscher,
   Jan-Philipp/0000-0002-8208-4409; Knodt, Michele/0000-0001-6055-4281
CR Batson C.D., 1991, ALTRUISM QUESTION SO
   Batson C.Daniel., 2011, Altruism in Humans, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195341065.001.0001
   BBK, 2019, PRAX BEV
   BERG J, 1995, GAME ECON BEHAV, V10, P122, DOI 10.1006/game.1995.1027
   Brisbois M. C., 2023, Energy Democracies for Sustainable Futures, P83, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-822796-1.00009-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-822796-1.00009-7]
   Byrd H, 2014, J URBAN TECHNOL, V21, P85, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2014.940706
   Christmann G., 2018, POLITISCHES KRISENMA, P183, DOI [10.1007/978-3-658-20811-0_10, DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-20811-0_10]
   Cox M, 2019, ROUTL HANDBK, P27
   DAWES RM, 1980, ANNU REV PSYCHOL, V31, P169, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.001125
   Desouza KC, 2008, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V59, P333, DOI 10.1002/asi.20747
   Dunn-Cavelty M, 2009, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V2, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.08.006
   Eibl M., 2017, ALGORITHMUS WIEDERAU
   Eid M., 2011, STAT FORSCHUNGSMETHO
   Fischer M., 2021, IT SICHERHEITSRECHT, P234
   Guckelberger A., 2021, IT SICHERHEITSRECHT, P554
   HARDIN G, 1968, SCIENCE, V162, P1243, DOI 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   Helfrich S., 2011, WAS MEHR WIRD WENN W
   Hirschl B., 2018, VULNERABILITAT RESIL
   Hornung G., 2021, IT SICHERHEITSRECHT
   Huang P, 2021, ENERGY, V222, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119931
   Knauf A., 2020, URBANE RESILIENZ GEG
   Knodt M, 2022, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V30, P307, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12386
   Krings S, 2020, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V78, P575, DOI 10.2478/rara-2020-0034
   Labaka L, 2016, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V103, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.005
   Nowak MA, 2005, NATURE, V437, P1291, DOI 10.1038/nature04131
   Ostrom E., 2015, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316423936
   Perger T, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102634
   Pietsch M, 2020, 2020 RESILIENCE WEEK (RWS), P48, DOI [10.1109/RWS50334.2020.9241251, 10.1109/rws50334.2020.9241251]
   Piliavin J.A., 1981, EMERGENCY INTERVENTI
   Poteete AR, 2010, WORKING TOGETHER: COLLECTIVE ACTION, THE COMMONS, AND MULTIPLE METHODS IN PRACTICE, P1
   Pursiainen C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V27, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.08.006
   Roth F., 2018, POLITISCHES KRISENMA, P245
   Schmidthaler M., 2011, BLACKOUTS OSTERREICH
   Schroeder D.A., 1995, PSYCHOL HELPING ALTR
   Sedlmeier P., 2018, Forschungsmethoden und Statistik fur Psychologen und Sozialwissenschaftler
   Silvius A.J. G., 2008, Proceedings of the 22nd IPMA World Congress "Project Management to Run", 9 - 11 November 2008, P1
   Simpson-Porco JW, 2013, AUTOMATICA, V49, P2603, DOI 10.1016/j.automatica.2013.05.018
   Stollorz V., 2011, POLIT ZEITGESCH, V61, P3
   Vieira J., 2020, Perceived threat and acute anxiety predict increased everyday altruism during the COVID-19 pandemic, DOI DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/N3T5C
   Vierschilling C., 2021, WHAT IS KRITIS WHO D
   Zimmermann H., 2005, FINANZWISSENSCHAFT
   Zolli A., 2012, Resilience: Why things bounce back
NR 42
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 2
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4215
EI 1873-6777
J9 ENERG POLICY
JI Energy Policy
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 174
AR 113433
DI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113433
EA JAN 2023
PG 9
WC Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 8I5BZ
UT WOS:000921750400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Madajewicz, M
AF Madajewicz, Malgosia
TI Who is vulnerable and who is resilient to coastal flooding? Lessons from
   Hurricane Sandy in New York City
SO CLIMATIC CHANGE
LA English
DT Article
DE Social vulnerability; Resilience; Indicators; Extreme events; Hazards;
   Coastal flooding
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; DISASTER RESILIENCE; MODEL;
   KATRINA; PANEL
AB Social vulnerability and resilience indices identify populations who are at risk from hazards in order to guide policy to build resilience. This study investigates which of the indicators that commonly comprise the indices reflect vulnerability and resilience to coastal flooding in urban areas based on primary data that document the impacts of and recovery from Hurricane Sandy in New York City. The study constructs measures of vulnerability and resilience that are independent of proposed indicators and uses regression analysis to investigate which indicators influence these measures. The analysis finds that (1) middle- and low-income homeowners are less financially resilient than are poorer renters. The recovery cost middle- to low-income homeowners 2.4 times their annual per capita incomes, while renters paid out about half of their per capita incomes. Resilience increases with income but conditional on ownership of assets that are at risk. (2) Disabled and/or chronically ill residents are more vulnerable and less resilient by many outcome measures. (3) Non-white households experience longer disruptions of access to food. (4) Information, hazard-specific capacities of community groups, and pre-hazard access to services such as food and health care are important indicators of vulnerability and resilience. (5) The evidence that other commonly proposed indicators are correlated with independent measures of vulnerability and resilience to flooding is weak. The study yields hypotheses for further research on how relevant indicators differ across hazards and contexts.
C1 [Madajewicz, Malgosia] Columbia Univ, Ctr Climate Syst Res, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025 USA.
C3 Columbia University
RP Madajewicz, M (corresponding author), Columbia Univ, Ctr Climate Syst Res, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025 USA.
EM mm1174@columbia.edu
OI Madajewicz, Malgosia/0000-0003-2585-0338
FU National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal and Ocean
   Climate Applications [NA12OAR4310107]; NOAA Coastal Resilience Networks;
   NOAA Climate Program Office Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments
   program [NA15OAR4310147]; National Aeronautics and Space Administration
   (NASA) [NNX14AD48G]
FX The research was funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
   Administration (NOAA) Coastal and Ocean Climate Applications grant
   NA12OAR4310107 "Building resilience to storm surges and sea level rise:
   A comparative study of coastal zones in New York City and Boston";
   subaward from a NOAA Coastal Resilience Networks grant to the Trust for
   Public Land "Climate Resilient Cities Pilot Project: New York City.
   Green Infrastructure and Coastal Protection for Staten Island and
   Jamaica Bay;" NOAA Climate Program Office Regional Integrated Sciences
   and Assessments program grant NA15OAR4310147 that funds the Consortium
   for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast; and National Aeronautics and
   Space Administration (NASA) Interdisciplinary Research in Earth Science
   grant NNX14AD48G "Vulnerability of the U.S. Atlantic coast to hazards
   associated with extreme winter storms."
CR Adger W.N., 2004, New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity
   [Anonymous], 2013, A Stronger, More Resilient New York
   Blaikie P., 1994, RISK NATURAL HAZARDS
   Brooks N, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.006
   Casey K, 2012, Q J ECON, V127, P1755, DOI 10.1093/qje/qje027
   Chandra A, 2005, ROLE NONGOVERNMENTAL
   Clark G.E., 1998, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V3, P59, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009609710795
   Collins TW, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108772
   Collins TW, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P311, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1121-9
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Deaton A., 1997, The World Bank, DOI [10.1596/0-8018-5254-4, DOI 10.1596/0-8018-5254-4]
   Dixon L., 2013, Flood Insurance in New York City Following Hurricane Sandy
   Elliott JR, 2006, SOC SCI RES, V35, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.02.003
   Eriksen S., 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P495, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0021859610000687K
   Flores AB, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101521
   Frumhoff P.C., 2007, Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: science, impacts
   Grineski SE, 2020, DISASTERS, V44, P408, DOI 10.1111/disa.12368
   Horton R, 2015, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1336, P36, DOI 10.1111/nyas.12593
   Klinenberg E, 1999, THEOR SOC, V28, P239, DOI 10.1023/A:1006995507723
   Kling JR, 2007, ECONOMETRICA, V75, P83, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00733.x
   Lane K, 2013, J ENVIRON PUBLIC HEA, V2013, DOI 10.1155/2013/913064
   Ludy J, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V61, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   McGhee D, 2017, QUANTIFYING SUCCESS
   Morath D., 2009, SOCIAL VULNERABILITY
   Morello-Frosch R, 2011, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V4, P71, DOI 10.1089/env.2010.0029
   Ngo E.B., 2001, NAT HAZARDS REV, V2, P80, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:2(80)
   Orton P, 2019, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1439, P95, DOI 10.1111/nyas.14011
   Parker B., 2010, POWER SEA TSUNAMIS S
   Peacock WalterGillis., 1997, HURRICANE ANDREW ETH
   Rappaport EN, 2014, B AM METEOROL SOC, V95, P341, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00074.1
   Rosenzweig C, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.003
   Sherrieb K, 2010, SOC INDIC RES, V99, P227, DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9576-9
   Subaiya S, 2014, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V104, P632, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301668
   Whiteacre PT, 2009, PUBLIC HLTH EFFECTS
   Winderl Thomas., 2014, DISASTER RESILIENCE
   Wolter KM, 2007, STAT SOC BEHAV SC, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-35099-8
   Wooldridge JM, 2010, ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF CROSS SECTION AND PANEL DATA, 2ND EDITION, P3
   Wu SY, 2002, CLIM RES, V22, P255, DOI 10.3354/cr022255
   Zahran S, 2008, DISASTERS, V32, P537, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2008.01054.x
NR 43
TC 13
Z9 16
U1 5
U2 54
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0165-0009
EI 1573-1480
J9 CLIMATIC CHANGE
JI Clim. Change
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 163
IS 4
SI SI
BP 2029
EP 2053
DI 10.1007/s10584-020-02896-y
EA DEC 2020
PG 25
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA PT4IO
UT WOS:000599011400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Banica, A
   Corodescu-Rosca, E
   Kourtit, K
   Nijkamp, P
AF Banica, Alexandru
   Corodescu-Rosca, Ema
   Kourtit, Karima
   Nijkamp, Peter
TI Actionable policy responses to disaster threats - A comparative study on
   resilience and sustainability in global cities
SO LAND USE POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Global cities; Disasters; Threats; Resilience; Blessing in disguise
   hypothesis; Sustainability
ID NATURAL DISASTERS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; RISK; CITY; TRANSFORMATION;
   PERSPECTIVE; EARTHQUAKE; CAPABILITY; UNPACKING
AB This paper examines the hypothesis that preventive urban policy responses to disaster threats are likely to play a positive role in the resilient development of cities, not only by strengthening disaster mitigation and responserelated adjustment mechanisms, but also by enhancing sustainability and liveability in urban areas. The study aims to test whether pressing disaster challenges for large cities prompt responses that lead to more positive outcomes than in a 'without situation'. We argue that the 'Blessing in Disguise' (BiD) hypothesis applies also to potential threats, and not just to actual disasters. In our empirical study, the development trajectories of 40 global cities - represented by the comprehensive GPCI database - are addressed from the perspective of six distinct main categories of performance variables (Economy, R&D, Liveability, Cultural Interaction, Accessibility, and Environment). The research seeks to explore the linkages between the various GPCI performance indicators and urban GDP at risk using correlation and multiple regression tools, while the systemic interactions among all variables are subsequently analysed by means of Social Network Analysis. The results highlight that the larger and poorer cities appear to be more threatened by natural disasters, while, for the wealthiest cities, manmade disasters are a more significant threat. Manmade threats also appear to be more linked to the main GPCI category scores; in particular, Economy, Cultural Interaction and, especially, R&D appear to be positively correlated with the magnitude of urban threats, while Liveability and Environment are less prominently (or negatively) influenced. Therefore, urban innovative policy response - in a broad sense - is an important driver of proactive resilience and positive sustainability outcomes. In conclusion, the governance of global cities should organically and strategically integrate resilience, sustainability and liveability as a common guide for short- and long-term urban development, by adopting targeted policies that anticipate and manage urban threats, from both a structural and non-structural perspective, so as to develop adaptive urban morphological and land-use functions.
C1 [Banica, Alexandru; Corodescu-Rosca, Ema] Alexandru Ioan Cuza Univ, Iasi, Romania.
   [Banica, Alexandru] Romanian Acad, Iasi Branch, Bucharest, Romania.
   [Kourtit, Karima] Open Univ Netherlands OU, Heerlen, Netherlands.
   [Nijkamp, Peter] Univ Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
   [Nijkamp, Peter] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 Alexandru Ioan Cuza University; Romanian Academy; University of Rijeka;
   Tsinghua University
RP Kourtit, K (corresponding author), Open Univ Netherlands OU, Heerlen, Netherlands.
EM k_kourtit@hotmail.com
RI Banica, Alexandru/A-4171-2018; Ema, Corodescu-Rosca/AGZ-5193-2022;
   karima, karima/AAH-3200-2019
OI Nijkamp, Peter/0000-0002-4068-8132
FU Romanian Ministry of Investment through the National Recovery and
   Resilience Plan [CF23/27.07.2023]; EU NextGeneration programme
   [101094546]; HORIZON-CL2-2022-TRANSFORMATIONS-01 Programme [101094546]
FX Karima Kourtit and Alexandru BANICA acknowledge support from the City
   Focus: Future Organisation of Changes in Urbanisation and
   Sustainability' (CF23/27.07.2023) , financed by the Romanian Ministry of
   Investment through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan
   (PNRR-III-C9-2023-I8_round) and supported by the EU NextGeneration
   programme. Karima Kourtit acknowledges support from the
   HORIZON-CL2-2022-TRANSFORMATIONS-01 Programme, under grant agreement No.
   101094546.
NR 133
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 10
U2 10
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-8377
EI 1873-5754
J9 LAND USE POLICY
JI Land Use Pol.
PD MAY
PY 2025
VL 152
AR 107482
DI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107482
EA FEB 2025
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA X8Q5G
UT WOS:001427924600001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhou, SQ
   Diao, HF
   Wang, M
   Jia, WY
   Wang, YK
   Liu, ZY
   Gan, W
   Zhou, MM
   Wu, ZQ
   Zhao, ZC
AF Zhou, Shiqi
   Diao, Haifeng
   Wang, Mo
   Jia, Weiyi
   Wang, Yuankai
   Liu, Zhiyu
   Gan, Wei
   Zhou, Mimi
   Wu, Zhiqiang
   Zhao, Zichen
TI Knowledge mapping and emerging trends of urban resilient infrastructure
   research in urban studies: Precedent work, current progress and future
   perspectives
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban resilient infrastructure; Resilient city; CiteSpace; Climate
   change; Bibliometric analysis; Evolution trends
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE;
   BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; CITIES; URBANIZATION; SIMULATION; MANAGEMENT;
   FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS
AB Urban Resilient Infrastructure (URI) has emerged as a critical factor in maintaining the equilibrium of urban systems in the face of external perturbations. URI was introduced as a promising approach for mitigating the impact of climate hazards and environmental problems. Despite its increasing importance, the existing literature on URI has inadequately provided a comprehensive understanding of the patterns governing its evolution. To address this gap, this study analyzed 958 documents on URI published between 2000 and 2022, using CiteSpace software to examine the theoretical and practical applications of URI from multiple dimensions. Our findings reveal that the field has undergone a transformation since 2016, characterized by an increasing number of publications and a shift towards a multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approach. Researchers have expanded their focus from examining single climate disasters to evaluating the full life cycle impacts of urban ecology, social economics, and community health. The nature-based solutions cluster was the largest corpus of publications and aligns with the themes of global climate change and ecosystem services. Theoretical models such as social-economic adaptability and ecosystem restoration were the primary basis for research in this field. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence has advanced the theoretical framework and methodological approaches of URI. The utilization of complex algorithms and network analyses in the development of technical models has enabled the acquisition of sophisticated insights into the underlying mechanisms of urban resilience in diverse contexts and scenarios. The study underscored the need for a comprehensive and integrated approach to urban infrastructure planning and management that considered social, economic, and environmental dimensions. It also contributed to a better understanding of the evolving field of URI and provides practical insights for policymakers, urban planners, and researchers interested in building more resilient and sustainable cities.
C1 [Zhou, Shiqi] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Design, Dept Landscape Architecture, Dongchuan Rd 800, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Shiqi; Liu, Zhiyu; Zhao, Zichen] Tongji Univ, Coll Design & Innovat, Shanghai 200093, Peoples R China.
   [Diao, Haifeng; Jia, Weiyi; Gan, Wei; Zhou, Mimi; Wu, Zhiqiang] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Shanghai 200093, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Mo] Guangzhou Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Yuankai] UCL, Bartlett Sch Architecture, 22 Gordon St, London, England.
C3 Shanghai Jiao Tong University; Tongji University; Tongji University;
   Guangzhou University; University of London; University College London
RP Jia, WY (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Shanghai 200093, Peoples R China.; Wang, M (corresponding author), Guangzhou Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China.
EM zhoushiqi1965@outlook.com; diaohaifeng@tongji.edu.cn;
   landwangmo@outlook.com; jwy@tongji.edu.cn; ucbqy55@ucl.ac.uk;
   zyliu0917@gmail.com; ganwei1989up@gmail.com; amy1025charlotte@gmail.com;
   wus@tongji.edu.cn; zzichen0719@outlook.com
RI Gan, Wei/GRX-2750-2022; zhou, mimi/AAA-2869-2022; Wang,
   Mo/ABC-9345-2020; zhou, shiqi/LLL-2747-2024; WU, zhiqiang/G-4354-2010;
   Wang, Yuankai/HKM-7504-2023
OI Wang, Mo/0000-0001-8752-6256
FU Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China
   [2023A1515030158]; Guangzhou City School (Institute) Enterprise Joint
   Funding Project, China [2024A03J0317]; National Key R & D Program of
   China [2022YFC3800205]; Chinese Academy of En- gineering consulting
   project [2022PP04]
FX This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic
   Research Foundation, China [grant number 2023A1515030158] , Guangzhou
   City School (Institute) Enterprise Joint Funding Project, China [grant
   number 2024A03J0317] , National Key R & D Program of China [grant number
   2022YFC3800205] and Chinese Academy of En- gineering consulting project
   [grant number 2022PP04] .
CR Abolbashari MH, 2014, POWDER TECHNOL, V267, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.07.028
   AbouKorin SAA, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Aria M, 2017, J INFORMETR, V11, P959, DOI 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
   Azam A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V295, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126496
   Bautista-Puig N., 2022, Cities, V126, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2022.103715]
   Berland A, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V162, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.017
   Berrang-Ford L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012
   Boateng EA, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117433
   Brown JM, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V163, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.007
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Ferrer ALC, 2018, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V128, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.07.017
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Chung ES, 2011, HYDROL PROCESS, V25, P544, DOI 10.1002/hyp.7781
   Collier P, 2016, OXFORD REV ECON POL, V32, P391, DOI 10.1093/oxrep/grw016
   Crawley DB, 2007, BUILDING SIMULATION 2007, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, P1115
   Cui XZ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V93, P704, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.056
   Datola G, 2019, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V11622, P108, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_9
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   De Iuliis M, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107320
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dhar TK, 2017, URBAN CLIM, V19, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.12.004
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Dodson J, 2017, URBAN POLICY RES, V35, P87, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1284036
   Eckart K, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Francis R, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.07.004
   Gissi E, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P191, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.002
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Gu CL, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P544, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.002
   Guo P, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010229
   Guo YC, 2022, J HYDROL, V605, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127367
   Han SY, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10101099
   Han XH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141911929
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huang GY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103210
   Huang WJ, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V71, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.04.003
   Huang YJ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19127068
   Ishak A, 2010, APPL MATH COMPUT, V217, P837, DOI 10.1016/j.amc.2010.06.026
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jabareen Yosef, 2008, Environment Development and Sustainability, V10, P179, DOI 10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z
   Jiang XT, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108750
   Kato-Huerta J, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V138, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.034
   Kim Y, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su122410227
   Kuller M, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V96, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.003
   Kumar P, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105181
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li M, 2022, AGR WATER MANAGE, V259, DOI 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107235
   Li XQ, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V352, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131472
   Lin JY, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110438
   Liu HQ, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V196, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107794
   Liu XP, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V168, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
   Liu YJ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P63674, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-20138-9
   Mabon L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.025
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Merigó JM, 2017, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V73, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.004
   Moosavi S, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V138, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.10.004
   Mukherjee S, 2017, DATA BRIEF, V13, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2017.05.031
   Mustafa A, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V225, P193, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.090
   Nelson KC, 2009, J APPL ECOL, V46, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01599.x
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   ODonnell EC., 2021, Journal of the British Academy, V9, P143, DOI [10.5871/jba/009s7.143, DOI 10.5871/JBA/009-9.143]
   Omer AM, 2008, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V12, P2265, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001
   Ouyang M, 2014, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V121, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040
   Pagano A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V28, P435, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.005
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Ronchi S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101907
   Salimi M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101948
   Shao HM, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10070711
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Steele W, 2017, URBAN POLICY RES, V35, P1, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2017.1283751
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Tang WP, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141710502
   Tang YC, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103037
   Tsatsou A, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V394, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136325
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Visseren-Hamakers IJ, 2021, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V53, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.06.002
   Wang J, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12102714
   Wang L, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102181
   Wang SP, 2023, J HYDROL, V617, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129063
   Wang XJ, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125224
   Wang YK, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15030568
   Wang ZL, 2015, J HYDROL, V527, P1130, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.008
   Wang ZL, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110483
   Wang ZY, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9110632
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Wu CW, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12050516
   Xing WR, 2020, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104430
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhang D, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121537
   Zhang YX, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13010004
   Zhou SQ, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104235
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V44, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.05.001
NR 100
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 36
U2 76
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD MAY 1
PY 2024
VL 452
AR 142087
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142087
EA APR 2024
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA SJ6J4
UT WOS:001234122400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yang, L
   Iwami, M
   Chen, YS
   Wu, MB
   van Dam, KH
AF Yang, Liu
   Iwami, Michiyo
   Chen, Yishan
   Wu, Mingbo
   van Dam, Koen H.
TI Computational decision-support tools for urban design to improve
   resilience against COVID-19 and other infectious diseases: A systematic
   review
SO PROGRESS IN PLANNING
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban design; Urban planning; Decision -support tool; COVID-19;
   Infectious disease; Computer modelling; Resilience
ID VIRUS TRANSMISSION; EPIDEMIC; NETWORK; CITIES; FLATS; MODEL
AB The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need for decision-support tools to help cities become more resilient to infectious diseases. Through urban design and planning, non-pharmaceutical interventions can be enabled, impelling behaviour change and facilitating the construction of lower risk buildings and public spaces. Computational tools, including computer simulation, statistical models, and artificial intelligence, have been used to support responses to the current pandemic as well as to the spread of previous infectious diseases. Our multidisciplinary research group systematically reviewed state-of-the-art literature to propose a toolkit that employs computational modelling for various interventions and urban design processes. We selected 109 out of 8,737 studies retrieved from databases and analysed them based on the pathogen type, transmission mode and phase, design intervention and process, as well as modelling methodology (method, goal, motivation, focus, and indication to urban design). We also explored the relationship between infectious disease and urban design, as well as computational modelling support, including specific models and parameters. The proposed toolkit will help designers, planners, and computer modellers to select relevant approaches for evaluating design decisions depending on the target disease, geographic context, design stages, and spatial and temporal scales. The findings herein can be regarded as stand-alone tools, particularly for fighting against COVID-19, or be incorporated into broader frameworks to help cities become more resilient to future disasters.
C1 [Yang, Liu] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Liu] Southeast Univ, Res Ctr Urban Design, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Iwami, Michiyo] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, Dept Infect Dis, London, England.
   [Chen, Yishan] China IPPR Int Engn CO LTD, Architecture & Urban Design Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Mingbo] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Wu, Mingbo] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [van Dam, Koen H.] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, Dept Chem Engn, London, England.
   [Yang, Liu] Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, Si Pai Lou 2, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 Southeast University - China; Southeast University - China; Imperial
   College London; Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geographic
   Sciences & Natural Resources Research, CAS; Chinese Academy of Sciences;
   University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS; Imperial College London;
   Southeast University - China
RP Yang, L (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Sch Architecture, Si Pai Lou 2, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM yangliu2020@seu.edu.cn
RI wu, mingbo/N-4869-2018; Yang, Liu/J-7573-2017; Chen,
   yishan/KIG-5120-2024
OI Yang, Liu/0000-0002-3363-8620; van Dam, Koen/0000-0002-4879-9259
FU National Natural Science Foundation China [5210081743]; Natural Science
   Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20210260]; China Postdoctoral Science
   Foundation [2021M690612]; Fundamental Research Funds for the Central
   Universities [2242021R20003]
FX Acknowledgments Dr Liu Yang is supported by the National Natural Science
   Foundation China (No. 5210081743) , the Natural Science Foundation of
   Jiangsu Province (No. BK20210260) , the China Postdoctoral Science
   Foundation (No. 2021M690612) , and the Fundamental Research Funds for
   the Central Universities (No. 2242021R20003) . Dr Koen H van Dam works
   on Climate Compatible Growth (CCG) , a ?38 m UK ODA-funded research
   programme. The authors thank Prof Jianguo Wang (South-east University,
   China) and Dr Bani Anvari (University College London, UK) for giving
   insightful suggestions and research ideas for the project. The search
   terms of this review were refined through test runs of searching in
   October/November 2020 with assistance from two library managers (Rebecca
   S Jones and Georgina Wildman) at Imperial College London. We benefited
   with the support from Dr M. Trent Herdman (Medical Entomology and
   Zoonoses Ecology, UK Health Security Agency) at the revision stage.
CR ACM, ACM COMP CLASS SYST
   Adiga A, 2020, J INDIAN I SCI, V100, P793, DOI 10.1007/s41745-020-00200-6
   Adly AS, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/19104
   Alimohamadi Yousef, 2021, J Prev Med Hyg, V62, pE311, DOI 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2021.62.2.1627
   Alvarez-Pomar Lindsay, 2021, ScientificWorldJournal, V2021, P6616654, DOI 10.1155/2021/6616654
   [Anonymous], Covidence
   Badr HS, 2020, LANCET INFECT DIS, V20, P1247, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3
   Balocco C, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208737
   Barbosa H, 2018, PHYS REP, V734, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2018.01.001
   Batty M., 1976, URBAN MODELING ALGOR
   Bian L, 2013, T GIS, V17, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01329.x
   Block P, 2020, NAT HUM BEHAV, V4, P588, DOI 10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6
   Brodeur A, 2021, J ECON SURV, V35, P1007, DOI 10.1111/joes.12423
   Brooks SK, 2020, LANCET, V395, P912, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8
   2005, [No title captured]
   Calder M, 2018, ROY SOC OPEN SCI, V5, DOI 10.1098/rsos.172096
   Campisi T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12218829
   Carmona M., 2021, PUBLIC PLACES URBAN, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315158457
   Cartenì A, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104999
   Chen CM, 2006, J AM SOC INF SCI TEC, V57, P359, DOI 10.1002/asi.20317
   Chu DK, 2020, LANCET, V395, P1973, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
   Coclite D, 2021, FRONT MED-LAUSANNE, V7, DOI 10.3389/fmed.2020.594269
   Coeytaux R., 2014, Evidence Map of Yoga for High-Impact Conditions Affecting Veterans (US Department of Veterans Affairs Evidence-based Synthesis Program)
   D'angelo D, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105067
   Da Silva J, 2011, CHARACTERISTICS SAFE
   Dabachine Y, 2020, J AIR TRANSP MANAG, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101917
   De Las Heras A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229320
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Di Mascio P., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P1
   Domino SP, 2021, INT J COMPUT FLUID D, V35, P743, DOI 10.1080/10618562.2021.1905801
   Dragoicea M, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P185526, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3029320
   Elavarasan RM, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102789
   Eubank S, 2020, B MATH BIOL, V82, DOI 10.1007/s11538-020-00726-x
   Farthing TS, 2021, EPIDEMICS-NETH, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100524
   Figueiredo L., 2018, OECD REG DEV WORK PA, V02, P66, DOI DOI 10.1787/6F1F6065-EN
   Forsyth A, 2020, WHAT ROLE PLANNING D
   Gao NP, 2008, BUILD ENVIRON, V43, P1805, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.023
   Gkiotsalitis K, 2022, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V18, P807, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2021.1896593
   Gomez J, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0245787
   Grantz KH, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18190-5
   Hamidi S, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V205, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103952
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Hao QY, 2020, KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, P3485, DOI 10.1145/3394486.3412860
   Harweg T, 2023, J PUBLIC HEALTH-HEID, V31, P221, DOI 10.1007/s10389-021-01489-y
   Hernandez-Mejia G, 2020, MATH BIOSCI, V328, DOI 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108434
   Honey-Roses Jordi, 2021, CITIES HLTH, V5, P263, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074, 10.31219/osf.io/rf7xa, DOI 10.31219/OSF.IO/RF7XA]
   Hong B, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2021258118
   Hunter E, 2017, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V20, DOI 10.18564/jasss.3414
   Iravani H, 2020, J URBAN DES, V25, P218, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2018.1554997
   Jorritsma J, 2020, CHAOS SOLITON FRACT, V139, DOI 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109965
   Kain MP, 2021, EPIDEMICS-NETH, V34, DOI [10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100430, 10.1101/2020.06.30.20143115]
   Kakodkar P, 2020, CUREUS J MED SCIENCE, V12, DOI 10.7759/cureus.7560
   Kaplan EH, 2020, M&SOM-MANUF SERV OP, V22, P645, DOI 10.1287/msom.2020.0891
   Karimi E, 2015, HEALTH CARE MANAG SC, V18, P318, DOI 10.1007/s10729-014-9310-2
   Kierzkowski A, 2020, J AIR TRANSP MANAG, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101868
   Klinker Jens, 2021, Stud Health Technol Inform, V279, P113, DOI 10.3233/SHTI210097
   Komperda J, 2021, PHYS FLUIDS, V33, DOI 10.1063/5.0043934
   Kudela J, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P149402, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016724
   Kudryashova OB, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244983
   Lai KY, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V46, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.008
   Lak Azadeh, 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, P71, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.34.71
   Lant T, 2008, 2008 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, P1305, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736203
   Larson RC, 2010, STUD HEALTH TECHNOL, V153, P311, DOI 10.3233/978-1-60750-533-4-311
   Lee EK, 2009, INTERFACES, V39, P476, DOI 10.1287/inte.1090.0463
   Lee VJ, 2009, BMC MED, V7, DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-7-76
   Leiva GC., 2020, Revista Brasileira de Estudos de Populacao, V37, P1, DOI DOI 10.20947/S0102-3098A0118
   Leng JW, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102405
   Li HY, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-84245-2
   Li X, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17186712
   Li Y, 2005, INDOOR AIR, V15, P96, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00318.x
   Li ZB, 2021, PHYS FLUIDS, V33, DOI 10.1063/5.0046870
   Lim T, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2413, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.04.015
   Maghdid Halgurd S, 2020, SN Comput Sci, V1, P271, DOI 10.1007/s42979-020-00290-0
   Mahdizadeh Gharakhanlou Navid, 2020, Inform Med Unlocked, V20, P100403, DOI 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100403
   Mao L, 2010, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V34, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.03.004
   Matthew RA, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P109, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976728
   Meadows D.H., 1985, The Electronic Oracle: Computer Models and Social Decisions
   Megahed NA, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110471
   Megahed NA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102350
   Miller C, 2016, PROG PLANN, V106, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2015.02.002
   Milne GJ, 2013, BMJ OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002518
   Mohammadi A, 2021, SAFETY SCI, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105066
   Moughtin C., 2003, URBAN DESIGN STREET, V3rd
   Nasser M, 2020, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V110, P753, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305609
   Nguyen CT, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P153479, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018140
   Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160]
   Pang JJ, 2021, TSINGHUA SCI TECHNOL, V26, P759, DOI 10.26599/TST.2021.9010026
   Patil R, 2021, APPL NETW SCI, V6, DOI 10.1007/s41109-020-00346-3
   Pavón RM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12239974
   Perlman Y, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104987
   Perra N, 2021, PHYS REP, V913, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.02.001
   Petersen E, 2020, LANCET INFECT DIS, V20, pE238, DOI 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30484-9
   Pettit CJ, 2015, APPL SPAT ANAL POLIC, V8, P93, DOI 10.1007/s12061-015-9133-7
   Porgo TV, 2019, RES SYNTH METHODS, V10, P125, DOI 10.1002/jrsm.1333
   Prieto DM, 2012, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-251
   [邱建 Qiu Jian], 2020, [城市规划, City Planning Review], V44, P13
   Nguyen QC, 2020, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V17, DOI 10.3390/ijerph17176359
   Rader B, 2020, NAT MED, V26, DOI 10.1038/s41591-020-1104-0
   Rahman MM, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12219101
   Rahman MR, 2021, MODEL EARTH SYST ENV, V7, P2059, DOI 10.1007/s40808-020-00962-z
   Rahmani AM, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102568
   Ramchandani A, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P159915, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3019989
   Renardy M, 2020, J THEOR BIOL, V507, DOI 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110461
   Rezaei Mahdi, 2020, Applied Sciences, V10, DOI 10.3390/app10217514
   Rice L, 2023, URBAN DES INT, V28, P97, DOI 10.1057/s41289-020-00142-6
   Richards P, 2015, PLOS NEGLECT TROP D, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003567
   Ridenhour BJ, 2011, PLOS ONE, V6, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029640
   Ronchi E, 2020, SAFETY SCI, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104834
   Roy S, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P26196, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058206
   Satheesan MK, 2020, BUILD SIMUL-CHINA, V13, P887, DOI 10.1007/s12273-020-0623-4
   Scarpone C, 2020, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12942-020-00225-1
   Selvakarthi D, 2021, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT 2021), P980, DOI 10.1109/ICICT50816.2021.9358749
   Sen N, 2021, PHYS FLUIDS, V33, DOI 10.1063/5.0045289
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Shearer FM, 2020, PLOS MED, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003018
   Shorfuzzaman M, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102582
   Shuvo SB, 2020, KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, P3451, DOI 10.1145/3394486.3412859
   Silalahi FES, 2020, BMC HEALTH SERV RES, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05896-x
   Silva GF, 2020, IEEE INT SM C CONF, DOI 10.1109/isc251055.2020.9239083
   Small M, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P109719, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001298
   Spencer JH, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V193, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103681
   Subahi AF, 2021, COMPUT SYST SCI ENG, V36, P13, DOI 10.32604/csse.2021.014376
   Sun CJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102390
   Sun Q, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V763, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143033
   Sung Hyun-Gun, 2016, [Journal of Korea Planning Association, 국토계획], V51, P165
   Swinarski D, 2021, BUILD SERV ENG RES T, V42, P82, DOI 10.1177/0143624420966257
   Tang L, 2020, INT STAT REV, V88, P462, DOI 10.1111/insr.12402
   Tannier C, 2016, PROG PLANN, V108, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2015.04.001
   Tupper P, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P32038, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2019324117
   UN-Habitat, 2020, UN-habitat COVID-19 response plan
   UN-Habitat & WHO, 2020, INT HLTH URB TERR PL
   Van Kerkhove MD, 2012, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V90, P306, DOI 10.2471/BLT.11.097949
   Vazquez-Prokopec GM, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0058802
   Wang JG, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102511
   Wang JS, 2010, 2010 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATICS
   Wei H, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P164705, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022395
   WHO, 2018, Managing epidemics: key facts about major deadly diseases
   Wolff RF, 2019, ANN INTERN MED, V170, P51, DOI 10.7326/M18-1376
   World Health Organization, 2019, Annex C: Force Health and Protection
   World Health Organization, 2017, WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2017.1
   Xia HD, 2015, ARTIF INTELL MED, V65, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.06.003
   Xu QC, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229385
   Xu WP, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18010088
   Yamakawa M, 2021, J AEROSOL SCI, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105769
   Yang L, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229677
   Yang Y., 2021, BUILDINGS CITIES, V2
   Yang YY, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127136
   Ye Y, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127126
   Yu HC, 2017, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V26, P514, DOI 10.1177/1420326X16631596
   Zhou JP, 2006, ICAT 2006: 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL REALITY AND TELEXISTENCE - WORSHOPS, PROCEEDINGS, P589
NR 172
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 4
U2 92
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0305-9006
EI 1873-4510
J9 PROG PLANN
JI Prog. Plan.
PD FEB
PY 2023
VL 168
AR 100657
DI 10.1016/j.progress.2022.100657
EA FEB 2023
PG 28
WC Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public Administration
GA 8W3HB
UT WOS:000931227300001
PM 35280114
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Goldstein, BE
   Wessells, AT
   Lejano, R
   Butler, W
AF Goldstein, Bruce Evan
   Wessells, Anne Taufen
   Lejano, Raul
   Butler, William
TI Narrating Resilience: Transforming Urban Systems Through Collaborative
   Storytelling
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE collaboration; governance; narratives; networks; new urbanism;
   resilience; sustainability
ID FIRE; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE; TRAP
AB How can communities enhance social-ecological resilience within complex urban systems? Drawing on a new urbanist proposal in Orange County, California, it is suggested that planning that ignores diverse ways of knowing undermines the experience and shared meaning of those living in a city. The paper then describes how narratives lay at the core of efforts to reintegrate the Los Angeles River into the life of the city and the US Fire Learning Network's efforts to address the nation's wildfire crisis. In both cases, participants develop partially shared stories about alternative futures that foster critical learning and facilitate co-ordination without imposing one set of interests on everyone. It is suggested that narratives are a way to express the subjective and symbolic meaning of resilience, enhancing our ability to engage multiple voices and enable self-organising processes to decide what should be made resilient and for whose benefit.
C1 [Goldstein, Bruce Evan] Univ Colorado, Environm Design Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
   [Goldstein, Bruce Evan] Univ Colorado, Environm Studies Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
   [Wessells, Anne Taufen] Univ Washington, Urban Studies Program, Tacoma, WA 98402 USA.
   [Lejano, Raul] Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China.
   [Lejano, Raul] New York Univ, Environm Conservat Educ Program, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [Butler, William] Florida State Univ, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
C3 University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder;
   University of Colorado System; University of Colorado Boulder;
   University of Washington; University of Washington Tacoma; University of
   Hong Kong; New York University; State University System of Florida;
   Florida State University
RP Goldstein, BE (corresponding author), Univ Colorado, Environm Design Program, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
EM brugo@colorado.edu; atw5@uw.edu; rplejano@yahoo.com; wbutler@fsu.edu
RI Lejano, Raul/H-4459-2012
OI Lejano, Raul/0000-0001-6949-7252; Butler, William/0000-0001-5535-2298
FU Northern Research Station of the US Forest Service; Nature Conservancy
FX This research was made possible in part through funding by the Northern
   Research Station of the US Forest Service and The Nature Conservancy.
CR Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Alberti M, 2005, INT REGIONAL SCI REV, V28, P168, DOI 10.1177/0160017605275160
   Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   [Anonymous], 1995, FRAME REFLECTION RES
   [Anonymous], 2012, LA RIV RAMBL ENT BAC
   Arellano G., 2010, SANTA ANAS RENAISSAN
   Armitage Derek., 2007, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMEN, P1
   Bartlebaugh Y., 2011, IT WAS CARPETED CEME
   Bollens ScottA., 1999, URBAN PEACE BUILDING
   BREMoND C., 1973, La Logique du recit
   Bruner J., 1990, Acts of meaning
   Bulkeley H, 2005, POLIT GEOGR, V24, P875, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
   Butler WH, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   *CIT SANT AN, 2007, SANT AN REN SPEC PLA
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Crane TA, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Cronon W., 1991, Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West
   DENEUFVILLE JI, 1987, POLICY SCI, V20, P181, DOI 10.1007/BF00156584
   Dominguez C., 2011, GREAT RIVER
   Feldman MS, 2006, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V66, P89, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00669.x
   Finnegan R., 1998, TALES CITY STUDY NAR
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Folke Carl, 2003, NAVIGATING SOCIAL EC, P352, DOI [10.1017/cbo9780511541957.020, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957.020]
   Forester J., 1999, DELIBERATIVE PLANNIN
   Friedmann J., 1987, Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action
   Golding A., 1998, The Los Angeles River: Reshaping Our Urban Landscape
   Goldstein BE, 2010, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V11, P523, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2010.525374
   Goldstein BE, 2008, HUM ECOL, V36, P15, DOI 10.1007/s10745-007-9133-6
   Goldstein BE, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P935, DOI 10.1080/08941920903012494
   Goldstein BE, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P238, DOI 10.1080/01944361003646463
   Goldstein BE, 2009, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V52, P1013, DOI 10.1080/09640560903327443
   Gonzalez E., 2012, CULTURALLY ORI UNPUB
   Gonzalez E., 2012, GRASSROOTS NEW UNPUB
   González ER, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P2946, DOI 10.1068/a41360
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Gumprecht Blake., 1999, The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Re-Birth
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Harrison P, 2008, RTPI LIB SER, P1
   Jasanoff S., 2008, REFR RES S BRIGHT
   Jones KT, 1998, POLIT GEOGR, V17, P25, DOI 10.1016/S0962-6298(97)00049-8
   Kaufman S, 2010, COLLABORATIVE RESILIENCE: MOVING THROUGH CRISIS TO OPPORTUNITY, P61
   Kinzig A.P., 2006, ECOLOGY SOC, V11
   Knox Paul., 2008, METROBURBIA US
   Lejano R, 2013, AM COMP ENVIRON POLI, P1
   Lejano RP, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P1469, DOI 10.1080/00420980600831684
   Lejano RP, 2009, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V12, P653, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.09.005
   Lewin K, 1946, J SOC ISSUES, V2, P34, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
   Light A., 2003, J Soc Phil, V34, P44, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-9833.00164
   MacAdams Lewis., 1995, Whole Earth Review, V85, p62+
   Nasser E. H., 2005, US TODAY
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Pelling M, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P329
   Portugali J., 2010, RES CIT AESOP COMPL
   Rees W, 1996, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V16, P223, DOI 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
   Reyes E. P., 2004, PUBLIC LETT SEEKING
   Rockström J, 2009, NATURE, V461, P472, DOI 10.1038/461472a
   Rodriguez L., 2011, LA RIVER FIELD GUIDE
   Rojas J. B., 2011, WILL LATINO LED REDE
   Sandercock L., 2003, Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st century
   Sandercock Leonie., 2003, Planning Theory and Practice, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1464935032000057209, 10.1080/1464935032000057209]
   STEPS (Social Technological and Environmental Pathways to Sustainability) Centre, 2008, STEPS CTR S BRIGHT J
   Swyngedouw E, 2000, ENVIRON PLANN D, V18, P63, DOI 10.1068/d9s
   Throgmorton J.A., 2003, Planning Theory, V2, P125
   van Hulst M, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P299, DOI 10.1177/1473095212440425
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wessells A. T., 2007, CONSTRUCTING WATERSH
   Wessells AT, 2010, NAT RESOUR J, V50, P539
   Wilkinson C., 2010, Critical Planning, P25
NR 73
TC 95
Z9 110
U1 5
U2 102
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD MAY
PY 2015
VL 52
IS 7
SI SI
BP 1285
EP 1303
DI 10.1177/0042098013505653
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA CE5EL
UT WOS:000351853200005
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Siehr, SA
   Sun, MM
   Nucamendi, JLA
AF Siehr, Stephanie A.
   Sun, Minmin
   Aranda Nucamendi, Jose Luis
TI Blue-green infrastructure for climate resilience and urban
   multifunctionality in Chinese cities
SO WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE blue-green infrastructure; Chinese cities; climate resilience; sponge
   city; urban multifunctionality
ID CHANGE ADAPTATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; CHALLENGES; URBANIZATION; RESOURCES
AB Climate disruption and rapid urbanization present numerous challenges to infrastructure and communities in Chinese cities, from flooding and coastal erosion, to drought and pollution. This review article focuses on the utilization of Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI)-a suite of nature-based strategies combining hydrological functions (blue) with vegetated landscaping (green)-to provide climate resilience and urban multifunctionality in China's large, high-density cities. Chinese cities are utilizing BGI in new construction, in neighborhood retrofits, and in revival of ancient nature-based infrastructure. The literature gives most attention to BGI in China's Sponge City Initiative that addresses the pluvial flooding crisis. Quantitative monitoring of BGI shows progress in stormwater-related functions and to a lesser extent with rainwater utilization to address water scarcity. Other studies document multifunctional aspects of BGI, including cooling and energy-saving functions of urban trees and green roofs, and green space expansion with parks that serve as retention basins. However, significant challenges and potential remain. China's urban infrastructure, including BGI, needs stronger design to be robust under extreme conditions as climate disruption intensifies. There is potential for BGI to more fully address habitat fragmentation, extreme heat, sea-level rise and other climate and urbanization hazards. Further research and pilot projects are needed to characterize and quantify the benefits of multifunctional BGI. More integrated planning across city sectors, with greater incorporation of ecological and social functions, will help Chinese cities achieve multiple goals: providing carbon-neutral and climate-resilient infrastructure, improving air and water quality, regenerating ecosystems, and enhancing urban quality of life.
   This article is categorized under:
   Energy and Urban Design > Climate and Environment
   Energy and Climate > Systems and Infrastructure
   Energy and Urban Design > Systems and Infrastructure
C1 [Siehr, Stephanie A.] Univ San Francisco, Environm Program, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA.
   [Siehr, Stephanie A.] Univ San Francisco, Energy Program, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA.
C3 University of San Francisco; University of San Francisco
RP Siehr, SA (corresponding author), Univ San Francisco, Environm Program, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA.; Siehr, SA (corresponding author), Univ San Francisco, Energy Program, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA.
EM sasiehr@usfca.edu
FU University of San Francisco Faculty Development Fund
FX University of San Francisco Faculty Development Fund
CR Añel JA, 2017, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/atmos8110209
   [Anonymous], 2015, MAPP CHOIC CARB CLIM
   [Anonymous], 2021, EURONEWS        1120
   Arup & Rockefeller Foundation, 2017, City Resilience Index
   Bao C, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P531, DOI 10.1007/s11269-011-9930-y
   Boko M, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P433
   Brornbal D, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V85, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.020
   Browder Greg., 2019, Integrating Green and Gray: Creating Next Generation Infrastructure
   Byrne JA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.013
   Cao SX, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V39, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.12.004
   Catalano C., 2017, BIOSOLAR ROOFS SYMBI
   Chan FKS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.217
   Chan FKS, 2022, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V3, P99, DOI 10.1038/s43017-021-00251-y
   Coffel ED, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abd4a8
   Cun CX, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103600
   Dong RC, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020284
   Dreiseitl Herbert., 2016, STRENGTHENING BLUE G
   Duan WL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, P401, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2207-2
   Edwards PET, 2013, MAR POLICY, V38, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.020
   European Commission. DG Environment News Alert Service, 2012, MULT GREEN INFR SCI
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Heckert M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V19, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.011
   Hermaputi R.L., 2017, Indonesian J. Plann. Developm, V1, P1, DOI [10.14710/ijpd.2.1.1-10, DOI 10.14710/IJPD.2.1.1-10]
   Huangshi City, 2018, HUANGSH RES STRAT
   Jiang CB, 2020, J HYDROL, V585, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124803
   Jiang Y, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V80, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.016
   Konecky B. L, 2020, INSIDECLIMATE N 0817, DOI 10.5194/essd-2020-5
   Kozak D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062163
   Kulp SA, 2019, NAT COMMUN, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-12808-z
   Lamond J, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V191, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103639
   Li BQ, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P413, DOI 10.1177/0956247813490907
   Li N, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091189
   Li Q, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.024
   Li YT, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P472, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1804667115
   Liao KH, 2017, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P203, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_10
   Liu HL, 2014, HABITAT INT, V41, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.06.005
   Liu L, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102024
   Loftus Anne-Claire., 2011, Adapting urban water systems to climate change - A handbook for decision makers at the local level
   Ma T, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-14532-5
   Mao N., 2021, ADV SOCIAL SCI ED HU, V551, P332
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Piao SL, 2010, NATURE, V467, P43, DOI 10.1038/nature09364
   Ren T, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V791, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148334
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Ruckelshaus MH, 2016, COAST MANAGE, V44, P504, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2016.1208882
   Rui YH, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10030240
   Sandalow D., 2019, CHINAS VULNERABILITY
   SF BCDC, 2011, AD RIS TID ASS CLIM
   Su BD, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P10600, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1802129115
   Su D, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V685, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.382
   Tang S, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P983, DOI 10.1007/s11269-015-1206-5
   Tang YT, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12451
   Nguyen TT, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.168
   Tyson A., 2021, On Climate Change, Republicans Are Open to Some Policy Approaches, Even as They Assign the Issue Low Priority
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   UNEP, 2019, Guidelines for conducting Integrated environmental assessments
   Vincent SU, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9110841
   Wang B, 2019, FRONT ENG MANAG, V6, P52, DOI 10.1007/s42524-019-0002-y
   Wang JX, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V85, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.018
   Wang M, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P192, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2016.1258355
   Wei K, 2020, INNOVATION-AMSTERDAM, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100038
   Wei MH, 2019, EKOLOJI, V28, P4181
   Xu YS, 2018, J HYDROL, V563, P900, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.075
   Yin P, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V121, P898, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.016
   Zhang GW, 2020, ADV CLIM CHANG RES, V11, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.accre.2020.08.003
   Zou P., 2018, LANDSCAPE RES NOTES
NR 67
TC 25
Z9 25
U1 36
U2 226
PU WILEY PERIODICALS, INC
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA ONE MONTGOMERY ST, SUITE 1200, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 USA
SN 2041-8396
EI 2041-840X
J9 WIRES ENERGY ENVIRON
JI Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ.
PD SEP
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 5
AR e447
DI 10.1002/wene.447
EA JUN 2022
PG 17
WC Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Energy & Fuels
GA 4J5XD
UT WOS:000803987200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Li, JD
   Burian, SJ
AF Li, Jiada
   Burian, Steven J.
TI Evaluating real-time control of stormwater drainage network and green
   stormwater infrastructure for enhancing flooding resilience under future
   rainfall projections
SO RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart city; Urban drainage modeling; Rainfall nonstationarity; Nonlinear
   dynamical control; Continuous flood modeling; Stormwater management
ID WATER MANAGEMENT; URBAN; SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; SAFE
AB Traditional stormwater control measures are designed to handle system loadings induced by fixed-size storm events. However, climate change is predicted to alter the frequency and intensity of flooding events, stimulating the need to explore another more adaptive flooding solution like real-time control (RTC). This study assesses the performance of RTC to mitigate impacts of climate change on urban flooding resilience. A simulated, yet realistic, urban drainage system in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, shows that RTC improves the flooding resilience by up to 17% under climatic rainfall changes. Compared with green stormwater infrastructure (GSI), RTC exhibits a lower resistibility, lower flooding failure level, and higher recovery rate in system performance curves. Results articulate that keeping RTC's performance consistent under 'back-to-back' storms requires a tradeoff between upstream dynamical operation and downstream flooding functionality loss. This research suggests that RTC provides a path towards smart and resilient stormwater management strategy.
C1 [Li, Jiada] Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA.
   [Burian, Steven J.] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA.
C3 Colorado State University System; Colorado State University Fort
   Collins; University of Alabama System; University of Alabama Tuscaloosa
RP Li, JD (corresponding author), Colorado State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA.
EM jiadali2017@gmail.com
RI Li, Jiada/AAW-9898-2020
FU U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [835866-01]; Marie Curie Actions
   (MSCA) [835866] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
FX This research was funded by the project (835866-01) of Prediction of
   Nonlinear Climate Variations Impacts on Eutrophication and Ecosystem
   Processes and Evaluation of Adaptation Measures in Urban and Urbanizing
   Watersheds from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Bakhshipour AE, 2021, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V147, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001389
   Bowes BD, 2021, J HYDROINFORM, V23, P529, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2020.080
   Brasil J, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13050651
   Butler D, 2014, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V89, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.198
   Butler D, 2017, GLOB CHALL, V1, P63, DOI 10.1002/gch2.1010
   Casal-Campos A, 2018, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V52, P9008, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.8b01193
   Cheng M. S, 2009, LOW IMPACT DEV URBAN, DOI [10.1061/41009(333)89, DOI 10.1061/41009(333)75]
   Davenport FV, 2021, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V118, DOI 10.1073/pnas.2017524118
   Department of Environmental Quality U., 2018, GUID LOW IMP DEV UT
   Dong X, 2017, WATER RES, V124, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.038
   Feng YC, 2016, J HYDROL, V542, P744, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.044
   Hansen CH, 2017, J HYDROL ENG, V22, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001555
   Heineman M.C., 2004, Proc. 2004 World Water Environmetal Resour. Congr. Crit. Transitions Water Environmetal Resour. Manag, P3455, DOI [DOI 10.1061/40737(2004)395, 10.1061/40737, DOI 10.1061/40737]
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hou XS, 2020, J HYDROL, V588, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125055
   Humphrey J.H., 2009, CITY OF ST. GEORGE stormwater design
   Hwang H, 2015, J HYDROINFORM, V17, P193, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2014.111
   Lewellyn C., 2017, Water Environ. Fed. Tech. Exhib. Conf. 2017, P4726, DOI DOI 10.2175/193864717822156668
   Li J., 2020, EarthArXiv, DOI DOI 10.31223/OSF.IO/Y43J7
   Li J., 2023, PREPRINT
   Li JD, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15142663
   Li JD, 2022, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V8, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000978
   Li JD, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V296, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113191
   Li JD, 2019, H2OPEN J, V2, P71, DOI 10.2166/h2oj.2019.006
   Li JD, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V732, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138931
   Li JD, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020412
   Li JD, 2019, J WATER MANAG MODELL, V27, DOI 10.14796/JWMM.C466
   Li JD, 2019, WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2019: WATER, WASTEWATER, AND STORMWATER; URBAN WATER RESOURCES; AND MUNICIPAL WATER INFRASTRUCTURE, P46
   Marchese D., 2018, Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, V9, P4298, DOI [DOI 10.2175/193864718825139005, 10.2175/193864718825139005]
   McDonnell Bryant E, 2020, J Open Source Softw, V5, P1, DOI 10.21105/joss.02292
   Mohammadiun S, 2020, HYDROLOG SCI J, V65, P281, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2019.1690657
   Mugume S., 2014, 13 INT C URBAN DRAIN, DOI [10.13140/2.1.3291.1047, DOI 10.13140/2.1.3291.1047]
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Mullapudi A, 2020, ADV WATER RESOUR, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103600
   NOAA, 2010, NAT WEATH SERV
   O'Neill BC, 2016, GEOSCI MODEL DEV, V9, P3461, DOI 10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Rathnayake U, 2019, J HYDROL, V579, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124150
   Rossman L., 2015, SWMM 5 1 STORM WATER
   Sadler JM, 2020, J HYDROL, V583, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124571
   Salerno F, 2018, WATER RES, V144, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.058
   Schmitt ZK, 2020, URBAN WATER J, V17, P467, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2020.1764062
   Schütze M, 2004, J HYDROL, V299, P335, DOI [10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00375-0, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.010]
   Sharior S, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P422, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.012
   Shishegar S, 2019, J HYDROL, V577, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124000
   SLCDPU, 2018, STORM WAT FLOOD CONT
   Smith K, 2015, J CLIMATE, V28, P6096, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00488.1
   Tavakol-Davani H, 2016, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V2, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000805
   Tavakol-Davani HE, 2019, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V5, P1157, DOI [10.1039/c8ew00789f, 10.1039/C8EW00789F]
   Teutschbein C, 2012, J HYDROL, V456, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052
   Tousi EG, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103014
   Troutman SC, 2020, ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES, V6, P1357, DOI [10.1039/C9EW00882A, 10.1039/c9ew00882a]
   United States Department of Agriculture, 2009, DES RAINF DISTR BAS
   Wang S, 2019, WATER RES, V162, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.050
   Wong BP, 2018, WATER RESOUR RES, V54, P7309, DOI 10.1029/2018WR022657
   Wright DB, 2019, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V46, P8144, DOI 10.1029/2019GL083235
   Xu WD, 2020, WATER RESOUR RES, V56, DOI 10.1029/2020WR027856
   Zhang DZ, 2021, WATER RES, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116475
NR 60
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 22
U2 90
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0921-3449
EI 1879-0658
J9 RESOUR CONSERV RECY
JI Resour. Conserv. Recycl.
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 198
AR 107123
DI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107123
EA AUG 2023
PG 12
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA P7NR0
UT WOS:001052508900001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Su, J
   Wu, X
   Huang, GQ
   He, T
AF Su, Jia
   Wu, Xi
   Huang, Guangqiu
   He, Tong
TI Assessment Model of the Resilience of Industrial Pollutant Emissions to
   Urban Atmospheric Systems from the Perspective of Cross-Domain
   Transmission
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Cross-domain flows; Industrial pollutants; Time-delay functions; Petri
   nets; Urban atmospheric environmental system performance; Urban
   atmospheric environmental system resilience
ID RISK
AB Building resilient urban atmospheric systems is of great importance to sustainable urban development. In order to clarify the impact of the cross-domain flow of pollutants on the resilience of urban atmospheric systems, this paper first defines the concept of resilience of an urban atmospheric system, characterizes the resilience based on the system performance in stages, and proposes a method to quantitatively assess the system resilience. Finally, a Petri net with a time-delay function is constructed to calculate the resilience level of each place under different pollutant emissions and analyze the impact of different pollutant emissions on the resilience of the places, taking the Guanzhong Urban Agglomeration as the research object. The results show that the resilience of atmospheric environmental systems in Tianshui, Pingliang, Qingyang, Linfen, Tongchuan, and Yuncheng is not affected by the cross-domain transmission of pollutants while the resilience of atmospheric environmental systems in Baoji, Xianyang, Xi'an, Shangluo, and Weinan was affected by the transboundary transport of pollutants in varying degrees. In addition, studies have shown that the cross-domain transport of pollutants does not always represent a negative impact on cities, and that transport at the right time can improve the resilience of urban atmospheric environmental systems, such as in Xianyang and Shangluo. The method provides a scientific assessment system for studying the resilience level of urban atmospheric systems from the perspective of cross-domain transport of industrial pollutants.
C1 [Su, Jia; Wu, Xi; Huang, Guangqiu] Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
   [He, Tong] State Grid Huitongjincai Beijing Informat Technol, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China.
   [He, Tong] State Grid Elect Commerce Co Ltd, State Grid Financial Technol Grp, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China.
C3 Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology
RP Wu, X (corresponding author), Xian Univ Architecture & Technol, Sch Management, Xian 710055, Peoples R China.
EM sujia9108@163.com; xjdwxyyc@163.com; huangnan93@163.com;
   hetong@sgdt.sgcc.com.cn
CR Al Nasiri N, 2020, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V11, P10, DOI 10.1177/0975425320906307
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Bastaminia A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P269, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.020
   Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
   Chen ZY, 2018, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V18, P5343, DOI 10.5194/acp-18-5343-2018
   Cheng L., 2020, Res. Dev, V211, P56, DOI [10.13483/j.cnki.kfyj.2020.06.008, DOI 10.13483/J.CNKI.KFYJ.2020.06.008]
   Díaz G, 2020, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V32, P405, DOI 10.1007/s00521-018-3850-1
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Ge Y, 2010, INT J APPL EARTH OBS, V12, P419, DOI 10.1016/j.jag.2010.05.003
   González DP, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V94, P262, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.03.004
   Gunderson L. H., 2003, Adaptive dancing: Interactions between social resilience and ecological crises, P33
   [何俊 He Jun], 2020, [计算机工程, Computer Engineering], V46, P124
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Kuang C., 2015, China Environ, V12, P36
   Lamichhane S, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V287, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125040
   Li C, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V211, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.045
   Li J., 2020, International journal of transportation science and technology, V9, P277, DOI [10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.01.005, DOI 10.1016/J.IJTST.2020.01.005]
   [李沛洁 Li Peijie], 2018, [化工学报, CIESC Journal], V69, P3517
   [刘凯 Liu Kai], 2019, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V29, P50
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Luo JC, 2022, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V23, P10763, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2021.3095661
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Mu-dan Z., 2021, J. Safety Environ, V21, P1849, DOI [10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2020.0855, DOI 10.13637/J.ISSN.1009-6094.2020.0855]
   Nan C, 2017, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V157, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.013
   Nogal M, 2019, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V185, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.013
   Peterson J, 1984, Petri Net Theory and the Modeling of Systems
   Porfiriev BN, 2017, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V16, P165, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2017.1280000
   Sahu SK, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V761, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144131
   Saja AMA, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101096
   Tie XX, 2015, ATMOS ENVIRON, V100, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.038
   Twumasi-Boakye R, 2018, J TRANSP ENG A-SYST, V144, DOI 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000186
   Wang P., 2019, Mod. Urban Res, V7, P91
   Wang S, 2016, J ENVIRON SCI, V40, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.008
   Wendling Z.A., 2020, ENV PERFORMANCE INDE
   Wu YY, 2021, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107612
   Xiao W, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105843
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yan H., 2019, Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis, V52, P92
   [杨晓燕 Yang Xiaoyan], 2021, [岩矿测试, Rock and Mineral Analysis], V40, P273
   Yoo JM, 2014, ATMOS ENVIRON, V82, P226, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.022
   Zhang B., 2022, Ind. Innovation, V96, P43
   Zhang DM, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V106, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.03.023
   Zhang Y, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15010128
NR 44
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 9
U2 17
PU ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
PI RESTON
PA 1801 ALEXANDER BELL DR, RESTON, VA 20191-4400 USA
SN 0733-9488
EI 1943-5444
J9 J URBAN PLAN DEV
JI J. Urban Plan. Dev
PD MAR 1
PY 2024
VL 150
IS 1
AR 05023046
DI 10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4581
PG 25
WC Engineering, Civil; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Engineering; Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA FC7O2
UT WOS:001143617200019
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shen, PY
   Wang, ML
   Ma, H
   Ma, N
AF Shen, Pengyuan
   Wang, Meilin
   Ma, Hang
   Ma, Nan
TI On the two-way interactions of urban thermal environment and air
   pollution: A review of synergies for identifying climate-resilient
   mitigation strategies
SO BUILDING SIMULATION
LA English
DT Review
DE outdoor spaces; outdoor thermal comfort; urban overheating; air
   pollution; physics-based model; climate resilience
ID HEAT-ISLAND MITIGATION; STREET CANYON; BOUNDARY-LAYER;
   NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; RELATIVE-HUMIDITY; PEDESTRIAN-LEVEL; ANTHROPOGENIC
   AEROSOLS; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; FLOW CHARACTERISTICS; CITY BREATHABILITY
AB The urban environment is threatened by urban heat island (UHI) effect and air pollution events which have been worsened by population increase, heat waves, and wildfire smoke. It is important to understand that urban air quality and thermal environment are mutually dependent, meaning that the alteration in one can affect the other. This two-way interaction is described in our review through a detailed analysis of physics-based models and their synergistic processes. Then, drawing on the literature, we categorized mitigation plans into four major strategies: modification of urban morphology, integration of urban greenery, incorporation of water bodies, and utilization of cooling materials. The identified mitigation strategies were evaluated for their effectiveness in achieving various reduction targets, such as overheating, strong wind events, and gaseous and aerosol pollutants. These assessment results can be helpful in developing a practical guide for establishing climate-resilient buildings and cities. This study also conducts a co-benefits and conflicts analysis associated with these mitigation strategies, discussing their application potentials for designers, planners, and policymakers in preparing cities to become thermally resilient and healthy. The review emphasizes the need for the formulation of numerical coupling models that will address the "thermo-pollutant" coupling to better comprehend the magnitude of synergies.
C1 [Shen, Pengyuan] Tsinghua Univ, Shenzhen Int Grad Sch, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China.
   [Shen, Pengyuan; Wang, Meilin; Ma, Hang] Harbin Inst Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China.
   [Ma, Nan] Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA.
C3 Tsinghua University; Harbin Institute of Technology; Worcester
   Polytechnic Institute
RP Ma, N (corresponding author), Worcester Polytech Inst, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Worcester, MA 01609 USA.
EM nma1@wpi.edu
RI Shen, Pengyuan/AAE-7977-2019
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [52008132]
FX Pengyuan Shen acknowledges his work was supported by the National
   Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [Grant No. 52008132].
CR Abhijith KV, 2017, ATMOS ENVIRON, V162, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.014
   Abreu-Harbich LV, 2014, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V115, P333, DOI 10.1007/s00704-013-0886-0
   Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   Ali-Toudert F, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.013
   Allegrini J, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V59, P315, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.08.029
   Andreou E, 2013, RENEW ENERG, V55, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.040
   Baklanov A, 2010, ADV SCI RES, V4, P115, DOI 10.5194/asr-4-115-2010
   Balogun AL, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100989
   Bart IL, 2010, LAND USE POLICY, V27, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.03.003
   Bergin M.H., 2000, From weather forecasting to exploring the solar system
   Bird RB, 2013, ADV WATER RESOUR, V62, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.05.010
   Bollasina MA, 2011, SCIENCE, V334, P502, DOI 10.1126/science.1204994
   Buccolieri R, 2019, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/atmos10030144
   Cai XM, 2012, BOUND-LAY METEOROL, V142, P443, DOI 10.1007/s10546-011-9681-6
   Carreras H, 2015, ENVIRON POLLUT, V206, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.06.037
   Chang CR, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P672, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.08.001
   Chatzidimitriou A, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V33, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.019
   Chen L, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107525
   Chen L, 2018, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V123, P4323, DOI 10.1002/2017JD027501
   Cheng XL, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JD015081
   Cheng Y, 2015, ENVIRON POLLUT, V197, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.028
   Cohen P, 2014, ENVIRON POLLUT, V195, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.08.015
   Cowherd C., 2006, P 15 INT EMISSION IN
   Crutzen PJ, 2004, ATMOS ENVIRON, V38, P3539, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.032
   Dallman A, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V80, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.05.014
   Du YX, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V123, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.036
   Echeverria Serur C., 2013, FAST ITERATIVE METHO
   Elias T, 2009, ATMOS RES, V92, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.01.006
   Fallmann J, 2016, ATMOS ENVIRON, V125, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.094
   Fan JW, 2015, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V42, P6066, DOI 10.1002/2015GL064479
   Fang K., 2011, P TRANSPORTATION RES
   Fisher B, 2006, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V6, P555, DOI 10.5194/acp-6-555-2006
   Fu QY, 2008, ATMOS ENVIRON, V42, P2023, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.002
   Fu XW, 2017, ATMOS ENVIRON, V165, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.06.031
   Fu XX, 2016, J ENVIRON SCI, V40, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2015.12.001
   Georgakis C, 2006, ENERG BUILDINGS, V38, P367, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2005.07.009
   Geros V, 2005, ENERG BUILDINGS, V37, P243, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.06.024
   Gómez-Amo JL, 2014, ATMOS ENVIRON, V98, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.008
   Gu ZL, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P2657, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.06.028
   Guo W, 2022, INDOOR BUILT ENVIRON, V31, P109, DOI 10.1177/1420326X20977614
   Gustafsson MSM, 2024, ATMOS ENVIRON, V323, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120397
   Hang J, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101299
   Hang J, 2017, ENVIRON POLLUT, V220, P72, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.024
   Hang J, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V416, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.016
   Hang JA, 2010, BUILD ENVIRON, V45, P2754, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.004
   Hansel NN, 2016, COPD, V13, P372, DOI 10.3109/15412555.2015.1089846
   He BJ, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101472
   He X, 2019, SPECTROCHIM ACTA A, V219, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.saa.2019.04.046
   Hernández-Pérez I, 2017, WOOD PUBL SER CIVIL, P119, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-101128-7.00004-6
   Hong C., 2023, CITY BUILT ENV, V1, P4, DOI 10.1007/s44213-022-00004-7
   Hu HB, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109483
   Hu NL, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111200
   Huang H, 2000, ATMOS ENVIRON, V34, P689, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00333-7
   Huang JP, 2014, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V119, P11398, DOI 10.1002/2014JD021796
   Jacobson MZ, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL027838
   Jamei E, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V791, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148407
   Jamei E, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V54, P1002, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.104
   Janhäll S, 2015, ATMOS ENVIRON, V105, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.052
   Järvi L, 2011, J HYDROL, V411, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.001
   Jazcilevich AD, 2002, ATMOS ENVIRON, V36, P2297, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00197-8
   Jiang L, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102835
   Jiang YQ, 2013, ATMOS ENVIRON, V70, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.039
   Jiang ZW, 2021, J ENVIRON SCI, V105, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.jes.2020.12.035
   Jin ML, 2010, ADV METEOROL, V2010, DOI 10.1155/2010/681587
   Johansson E, 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V41, P1326, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.05.022
   Jung S, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14030714
   Karakounos I, 2018, ENERG BUILDINGS, V158, P1266, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.035
   Khodakarami J, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V57, P965, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.166
   Kong L, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V31, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.018
   Kruger EL, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P621, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.09.006
   Kurppa M, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9020065
   Lai DY, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.062
   Lau KM, 2008, B AM METEOROL SOC, V89, P369, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-89-3-369
   Lau KKL, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V114, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.035
   Lau KM, 2006, CLIM DYNAM, V26, P855, DOI [10.1007/s00382-006-0114-z, 10.1007/s00382-006-0114-2]
   Li HD, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V636, P818, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.254
   Li WJ, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V157, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.04.049
   Li XX, 2006, ATMOS ENVIRON, V40, P5640, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.055
   Li XX, 2016, ATMOS ENVIRON, V144, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.069
   Li ZT, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108627
   Li ZT, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107890
   Li ZT, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107534
   Li ZT, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107028
   Ling ZH, 2013, ATMOS ENVIRON, V76, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.051
   Liu YS, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-71338-7
   Liu Ziyi, 2024, Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, V31, P28507, DOI 10.1007/s11356-024-33012-7
   Louka P, 2000, ATMOS ENVIRON, V34, P2613, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00477-X
   Lu MR, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104741
   LUBIN D, 1994, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V21, P37, DOI 10.1029/93GL03374
   Madalozzo DMS, 2014, APPL MATH MODEL, V38, P5883, DOI 10.1016/j.apm.2014.04.041
   Malm WC, 2000, ATMOS ENVIRON, V34, P3373, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00108-4
   Manteghi G., 2019, Journal Of Advanced Research, V58, P15
   Mei SJ, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109831
   Mei SJ, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101700
   Méndez-Lázaro P, 2018, INT J BIOMETEOROL, V62, P709, DOI 10.1007/s00484-017-1319-z
   Meng X, 2012, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V435, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.008
   Miao CP, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102042
   Mika J, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V30, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.05.013
   Moradpour M, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100686
   Morakinyo TE, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V130, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.08.087
   Ng WY, 2014, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V468, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.077
   Niachou K, 2008, BUILD ENVIRON, V43, P1373, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.046
   Nice KA, 2024, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V6, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2024.1337449
   Nouri AS, 2018, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/atmos9030108
   Nuruzzaman M., 2015, INT J ENV MONITORING, V3, P67, DOI DOI 10.11648/J.IJEMA.20150302.15
   O'Lenick CR, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V660, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.002
   Offerle B, 2003, J APPL METEOROL, V42, P1157, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1157:PONARF>2.0.CO;2
   Oh W, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106484
   Okaze T, 2017, COMPUT FLUIDS, V159, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.09.005
   Oke T.R., 2017, Urban Climates, DOI [DOI 10.1017/9781139016476, 10.1017/9781139016476]
   OKE TR, 1988, ENERG BUILDINGS, V11, P103, DOI 10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6
   OLIVER JE, 1979, GEOGR REV, V69, P486, DOI 10.2307/214824
   Park CY, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V183, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.022
   Paz S, 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, DOI 10.3390/ijerph13040438
   Pearce JL, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P1328, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.051
   Perini K, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P495, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.03.003
   Piracha A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159234
   Pu WW, 2015, ATMOS RES, V153, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.10.010
   Pugh TAM, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P7692, DOI 10.1021/es300826w
   Pushpawela B, 2019, ATMOS RES, V215, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.023
   Quan JN, 2013, PARTICUOLOGY, V11, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.partic.2012.04.005
   Ramanathan V, 2001, SCIENCE, V294, P2119, DOI 10.1126/science.1064034
   Rani B., 2011, Journal of Advanced Scientific Research, V2, P28
   Algeciras JAR, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V101, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.02.026
   Rui LY, 2019, BUILD SIMUL-CHINA, V12, P183, DOI 10.1007/s12273-018-0498-9
   Rui LY, 2018, FORESTS, V9, DOI 10.3390/f9040224
   Sagrado APG, 2002, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V90, P321
   Santamouris M, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V26, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.047
   Santamouris M, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V53, P128, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.022
   Nouri AS, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V37, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.031
   Sarrat C, 2006, ATMOS ENVIRON, V40, P1743, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.11.037
   Shi PJ, 2019, ATMOS RES, V215, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.08.013
   Shi RF, 2008, ATMOS ENVIRON, V42, P1083, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.071
   Sicard P, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V243, P163, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.049
   Soulhac L, 2010, J WIND ENG IND AEROD, V98, P903, DOI 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.09.004
   Sun TZ, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V131, P335, DOI 10.1007/s00704-016-1972-x
   Syafii NI, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V34, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.06.012
   Synnefa A, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.06.014
   Tan JH, 2009, ATMOS RES, V94, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.05.016
   Touchaei AG, 2016, ATMOS ENVIRON, V132, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.033
   Tse KT, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V117, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.011
   Tursic J, 2004, ATMOS ENVIRON, V38, P2789, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.036
   Ulpiani G, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V751, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141727
   Vardoulakis S, 2003, ATMOS ENVIRON, V37, P155, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00857-9
   Wang XY, 2023, APPL THERM ENG, V222, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119865
   Wang YP, 2014, ENVIRON ENG SCI, V31, P272, DOI 10.1089/ees.2013.0430
   Watanabe S, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V82, P556, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.002
   Weber S, 2006, ATMOS ENVIRON, V40, P7565, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.002
   Weerasuriya AU, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102146
   Wen CY, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V112, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.048
   Widawski A, 2015, ENVIRON SOCIO-ECON S, V3, P30, DOI 10.1515/environ-2015-0060
   Xie XM, 2006, ATMOS ENVIRON, V40, P6396, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.050
   Xie XM, 2005, BUILD ENVIRON, V40, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.07.013
   Xu BH, 1997, CHEM ENG SCI, V52, P2785, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00081-X
   Xue YP, 2024, EXP THERM FLUID SCI, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2024.111255
   Yang XL, 2019, BUILD ENVIRON, V154, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.003
   Yang XL, 2024, APPL SCI-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/app14093856
   Yang X, 2011, ACTA METEOROL SIN, V25, P527, DOI 10.1007/s13351-011-0411-2
   Yassin MF, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P5220, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.060
   Yin J, 2019, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V124, P3350, DOI 10.1029/2018JD029848
   Yin S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11051355
   Yuan C, 2014, BUILD ENVIRON, V71, P245, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.10.008
   Yuan M, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V220, P1014, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.236
   Zahari NM, 2018, AIP CONF PROC, V2030, DOI 10.1063/1.5066875
   Zaki SA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031053
   Zang L, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16224422
   Zhang H, 2016, INT J CLIMATOL, V36, P4029, DOI 10.1002/joc.4613
   Zhang H, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P1675, DOI 10.1007/s00382-011-1131-0
   Zhang K, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V712, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135553
   Zhang YW, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P3352, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.055
   Zhang YW, 2018, AEROSOL AIR QUAL RES, V18, P780, DOI 10.4209/aaqr.2017.09.0303
   Zhao CS, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL026653
   Zhao LY, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V206, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108291
   Zhao YL, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113668
   Zheng Y, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V674, P140, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.418
   Zhuang BL, 2013, ATMOS ENVIRON, V79, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.004
   Zieger P, 2013, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V13, P10609, DOI 10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013
NR 177
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 25
U2 25
PU TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
PI BEIJING
PA B605D, XUE YAN BUILDING, BEIJING, 100084, PEOPLES R CHINA
SN 1996-3599
EI 1996-8744
J9 BUILD SIMUL-CHINA
JI Build. Simul.
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 18
IS 2
BP 259
EP 279
DI 10.1007/s12273-024-1210-x
EA DEC 2024
PG 21
WC Thermodynamics; Construction & Building Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Thermodynamics; Construction & Building Technology
GA X8H7K
UT WOS:001372648000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Frantzeskaki, N
   Childers, DL
   Pickett, S
   Hoover, FA
   Anderson, P
   Barau, A
   Ginsberg, J
   Grove, M
   Lodder, M
   Lugo, AE
   McPhearson, T
   Muñoz-Erickson, TA
   Quartier, M
   Schepers, S
   Sharifi, A
   van de Sijpe, K
AF Frantzeskaki, Niki
   Childers, Daniel L.
   Pickett, Steward
   Hoover, Fushcia-Ann
   Anderson, Pippin
   Barau, Aliyu
   Ginsberg, Joshua
   Grove, Morgan
   Lodder, Marleen
   Lugo, Ariel E.
   McPhearson, Timon
   Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.
   Quartier, Mien
   Schepers, Selina
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
   van de Sijpe, Katrien
TI A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and
   relevant future for the field and for cities
SO AMBIO
LA English
DT Article
DE Cities; Co-production; Transdisciplinary; Transformation; Urban
ID TECHNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; LAND TELECONNECTIONS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CITIZEN
   SCIENCE; INFRASTRUCTURE; SUSTAINABILITY; RESILIENCE; CHALLENGES;
   BENEFITS; KNOWLEDGE
AB This paper builds on the expansion of urban ecology from a biologically based discipline-ecology in the city-to an increasingly interdisciplinary field-ecology of the city-to a transdisciplinary, knowledge to action endeavor-an ecology for and with the city. We build on this "prepositional journey" by proposing a transformative shift in urban ecology, and we present a framework for how the field may continue this shift. We conceptualize that urban ecology is in a state of flux, and that this shift is needed to transform urban ecology into a more engaged and action based field, and one that includes a diversity of actors willing to participate in the future of their cities. In this transformative shift, these actors will engage, collaborate, and participate in a continuous spiral of knowledge -> action -> knowledge spiral and back to knowledge loop, with the goal of co producing sustainable and resilient solutions to myriad urban challenges. Our framework for this transformative shift includes three pathways: (1) a repeating knowledge -> action -> knowledge spiral of ideas, information, and solutions produced by a diverse community of agents of urban change working together in an "urban sandbox"; (2) incorporation of a social-ecological-technological systems framework in this spiral and expanding the spiral temporally to include the "deep future," where future scenarios are based on a visioning of seemingly unimaginable or plausible future states of cities that are sustainable and resilient; and (3) the expansion of the spiral in space, to include rural areas and places that are not yet cities. The three interrelated pathways that define the transformative shift demonstrate the power of an urban ecology that has moved beyond urban systems science and into a realm where collaborations among diverse knowledges and voices are working together to understand cities and what is urban while producing sustainable solutions to contemporary challenges and envisioning futures of socially, ecologically, and technologically resilient cities. We present case study examples of each of the three pathways that make up this transformative shift in urban ecology and discuss both limitations and opportunities for future research and action with this transdisciplinary broadening of the field.
C1 [Frantzeskaki, Niki] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Vening Meinesz Bldg A,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Childers, Daniel L.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, WCPH 442,POB 877904, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Pickett, Steward; Ginsberg, Joshua; McPhearson, Timon] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
   [Hoover, Fushcia-Ann] Univ North Carolina Charlotte, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA.
   [Anderson, Pippin] Univ Cape Town, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, Private Bag X3, ZA-7707 Cape Town, South Africa.
   [Barau, Aliyu] Bayero Univ Kano, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, PMB 3011, Kano, Nigeria.
   [Grove, Morgan] US Forest Serv, Baltimore Urban Field Stn, USDA, 5523 Res Pk Dr,Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA.
   [Lodder, Marleen] Erasmus Univ, Dutch Res Inst Transit, Burg Oudlaan 50,Mandeville Bldg,T16-42, NL-3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands.
   [Lugo, Ariel E.; Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A.] US Forest Serv, Forest Serv, Int Urban Field Stn, USDA, 1201 Calle Ceiba, Rio Piedras, PR 00926 USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, 79 Fifth Ave,16 Fl, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Quartier, Mien; Schepers, Selina; van de Sijpe, Katrien] Dept Environm & Sustainable Dev, Stadspl 1, B-3600 Genk City, Belgium.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, 1-5-1 Kagamiyama, Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima 7398529, Japan.
C3 Utrecht University; Arizona State University; Arizona State
   University-Tempe; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; University of
   North Carolina; University of North Carolina Charlotte; University of
   Cape Town; Bayero University; United States Department of Agriculture
   (USDA); United States Forest Service; Erasmus University Rotterdam -
   Excl Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam; United States Department
   of Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service; The New School;
   Stockholm University; Hiroshima University
RP Frantzeskaki, N (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Vening Meinesz Bldg A,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
EM n.frantzeskaki@uu.nl; dan.childers@asu.edu; picketts@caryinstitute.org;
   fhoover@uncc.edu; pippin.anderson@uct.ac.za; asbarau.urp@buk.edu.ng;
   ginsbergj@caryinstitute.org; morgan.grove@usda.gov; lodder@drift.eur.nl;
   timon.mcphearson@newschool.edu; mien.quartier@genk.be;
   selina.schepers@genk.be; sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp;
   Katrien.VanDeSijpe@Genk.be
RI MunozErickson, Tischa/AAG-8476-2019; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013;
   McPhearson, Timon/JOZ-3799-2023; Frantzeskaki, Niki/AAN-1044-2021;
   Barau, Aliyu/AIA-9411-2022
OI Frantzeskaki, Niki/0000-0002-6983-448X; Hoover,
   Fushcia-Ann/0000-0002-9067-0504
FU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme [730222]; Science Innovation Fund of
   Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies [DEB-2224662]; U.S. National Science
   Foundation [1444755, 1927167, 193493]; NSF; Central Arizona-Phoenix LTER
   Program; SETS Convergence project; USDA Forest Service; University of
   Puerto Rico
FX This paper emerged from "Preparing Urban Ecology to Contribute to
   Positive Urban Futures:" A Workshop in the Cary Conference Series. This
   virtual meeting held in 2021 was supported by the Science Innovation
   Fund of Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies and has allowed the diverse
   author team to begin and continue dialog since that time to plan and
   write this paper jointly. NF, ML, SS, KS, MQ acknowledge that the
   research presented in the paper is from the European Horizon 2020
   research project on nature-based solutions for urban transitions
   CONNECTING NATURE (Grant #730222). DLC was supported by the Central
   Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research program which has been
   supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation for 26 years (current
   grant: DEB-2224662). STAP acknowledges support via the Baltimore
   Ecosystem Study, NSF DEB 1855277; DLC acknowledges support from the
   Central Arizona-Phoenix LTER Program, NSF DEB-1832016 and DEB-2224662.
   TME acknowledges support from the SETS Convergence project, NSF
   ENG-1934933. TM acknowledges support from NSF grants 1444755, 1927167,
   and 193493. The work in Puerto Rico by the USDA Forest Service was done
   in collaboration with the University of Puerto Rico. The findings and
   conclusions in this article are those of the author(s) and should not be
   construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government
   determination or policy.
CR Alonso-Yanez G, 2019, GLOB SUSTAIN, V2, DOI 10.1017/sus.2019.2
   Andersson E, 2022, ECOL SOC, V27, DOI 10.5751/ES-13580-270418
   Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001
   Artmann M, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.059
   Barau AS, 2013, URBAN ECOSYST, V16, P783, DOI 10.1007/s11252-012-0276-x
   Barau AS., 2020, CITIES HLTH, V2020, P1
   Beckstedde E, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113656
   Beers PJ, 2017, SOCIOL RURALIS, V57, P415, DOI 10.1111/soru.12179
   Bonney R, 2021, BIOSCIENCE, V71, P448, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biab041
   Bonney R, 2009, BIOSCIENCE, V59, P977, DOI 10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
   Boone Catherine., 2014, PROPERTY POLITICAL O, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139629256
   Boone CG, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P1723, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00823-9
   Boone CG, 2014, STRUNGMANN FORUM REP, P313
   Branny A, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101168
   Breed CA, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128085
   Brink E, 2018, SUSTAIN SCI, V13, P765, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0499-0
   Brondizio ES, 2016, SUSTAIN SCI, V11, P591, DOI 10.1007/s11625-016-0368-2
   Bruckermann T, 2022, INT J SCI EDUC PART, V12, P75, DOI 10.1080/21548455.2022.2028925
   Buzási A, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P616, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01817-w
   Cadenasso ML, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY, P29
   Chang HJ, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102786
   Chester MV, 2023, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V3, DOI 10.1038/s42949-023-00120-1
   Chester MV, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P488, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0741-0
   Childers DL, 2019, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V7, DOI 10.1525/elementa.385
   Childers DL, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P3774, DOI 10.3390/su7043774
   Childers DL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   Collier M.J., 2023, Nature-Based Solutions, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100060, DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2023.100060]
   Connop S, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.013
   Conte A, 2023, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V66, P2388, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2020.1822306
   Cook E., 2022, URBAN SYSTEMS LAB, DOI [10.5281/zenodo.7319637, DOI 10.5281/ZENODO.7319637]
   Cook E. M., 2021, Resilient urban futures, P99, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_7, 10.1007/978-3-030-63131-4_7]
   Cortinovis C, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103842
   Croeser T, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127337
   De Luca C, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12535-260438
   Dentoni D, 2016, J BUS ETHICS, V135, P35, DOI 10.1007/s10551-015-2728-8
   Descombes George, 2019, STIEMERVALLEI MASTER
   Dixon T. J., 2022, Research, Journal of Sustainability, DOI [10.20900/jsr20220015, DOI 10.20900/JSR20220015]
   Elliott RM, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P569, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01223-9
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Feagan Mathieu, 2023, Urban Transform, V5, P6, DOI 10.1186/s42854-023-00051-1
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz042
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Frantzeskaki N, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.008
   Frantzeskaki N, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
   Gagné SA, 2020, AMBIO, V49, P1490, DOI 10.1007/s13280-019-01281-z
   Gordon IJ, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P647, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0357-4
   Grabowski ZJ, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104591
   Greving H, 2023, BIOSCIENCE, V73, P206, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biad003
   Grey T., 2023, Urban Transform, V5, P1, DOI [10.1186/s42854-023-00053-z, DOI 10.1186/S42854-023-00053-Z]
   Grimm NB, 2016, ROUT INT HANDB, P203
   Grimm NB, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1255
   Grimm NB., 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P7
   Grove M, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P524, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1365585
   Güneralp B, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P445, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.08.003
   Gutierrez-Velez VH, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101177
   Hill AV., 2022, PROCESS DESIGN EXPLO
   Hill R, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P910, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.009
   Hof A, 2013, LAND-BASEL, V2, P252, DOI 10.3390/land2020252
   Holscher K., 2020, COPRODUCING NATURE B
   Hölscher K, 2024, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V152, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103652
   Hoover F-A., 2023, CONSERVATION CITIES
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103744
   Jamshed A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101601
   Kabisch N., 2019, Urban Transformations, V1, P2, DOI [10.1186/s42854-019-0002-6, DOI 10.1186/S42854-019-0002-6]
   Kabisch N, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1388, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w
   Krueger EH, 2022, ENVIRON RES LETT, V17, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac78f4
   Lefebvre H., 2003, URBAN REVOLUTION TRA
   Li JY, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12838-260435
   Lin T, 2015, URBAN ECOSYST, V18, P599, DOI 10.1007/s11252-014-0413-9
   Lugo AE, 2019, SPRINGERBRIEF ENERG, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02387-4
   Lugo AE., 2018, Social-ecological-technological effects of Hurricane Maria on Puerto Rico: Planning for resilience under extreme events
   Lugo AE, 2020, ECOSYSTEMS, V23, P1726, DOI 10.1007/s10021-020-00491-x
   Lwasa Shuaib., 2022, Urban Systems and Other Settlements, by IPCC
   Mabrouk M, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118260
   Mahmoud IH, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V3, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2021.690458
   Mansur AV, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V131, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.013
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   Marshall VJ., 2020, PATCH ATLAS INTEGRAT, DOI [10.12987/9780300249392, DOI 10.12987/9780300249392]
   McHale MR, 2018, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V4, P115, DOI 10.1080/20964129.2018.1480905
   McHale MR, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P5211, DOI 10.3390/su7055211
   McPhearson T, 2022, ONE EARTH, V5, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007
   McPhearson T, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x
   McPhearson T, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P198, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw002
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Mehvar S, 2021, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V21, P1383, DOI 10.5194/nhess-21-1383-2021
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8060203
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Ossola A, 2021, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2021.620620
   Patel Z., 2022, Methodological Innovations, V15, P374, DOI [10.1177/20597991221129779, DOI 10.1177/20597991221129779]
   Pelling M, 2024, CLIM DEV, V16, P335, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2023.2223564
   Pereira L, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P161, DOI 10.1007/s11625-019-00749-x
   Pickett STA, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P8, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01310.x
   Pickett STA, 2022, ECOSPHERE, V13, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.4231
   Pickett STA, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0574-9
   Pickett STA., 1997, Urban Ecosystems, V1, P185, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1018531712889
   Pickett STA, 2024, AMBIO, V53, P845, DOI 10.1007/s13280-024-02001-y
   Pickett STA, 2022, URBAN ECOSYST, V25, P765, DOI 10.1007/s11252-021-01190-8
   Pickett STA, 2020, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V18, P535, DOI 10.1002/fee.2279
   Pineda-Pinto M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V215, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104228
   Rademacher A, 2019, URBAN ECOSYST, V22, P65, DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0751-0
   Raska P, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V310, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725
   Raymond CM, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V144, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.021
   Roberts JD, 2022, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V9, P211, DOI 10.1007/s40572-022-00343-x
   Schaefer M, 2022, URBAN ECOSYST, V25, P1805, DOI 10.1007/s11252-022-01268-x
   Schell CJ, 2020, SCIENCE, V369, P1446, DOI 10.1126/science.aay4497
   Schepers S, 2019, INTERACT DES ARCHIT, P87, DOI 10.55612/s-5002-041-007
   Scoggins M, 2022, FRESHW SCI, DOI 10.1086/721150
   Seto KC, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7687, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1117622109
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   Vano S, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126957
   Varum CA, 2010, FUTURES, V42, P355, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.021
   Visconti C, 2023, HABITAT INT, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102748
   Wang ZF, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P1532, DOI 10.1007/s13280-020-01445-2
   Ward S, 2019, URBAN WATER J, V16, P56, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2019.1633674
   Wellmann T, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P489, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01801-4
   Wickenberg B, 2024, LOCAL ENVIRON, V29, P118, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2023.2254797
   Woroniecki S, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102132
   Zhou WQ, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-020-00011-9
NR 118
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 28
U2 52
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 0044-7447
EI 1654-7209
J9 AMBIO
JI Ambio
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 53
IS 6
SI SI
BP 871
EP 889
DI 10.1007/s13280-024-01992-y
EA APR 2024
PG 19
WC Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA OU5Z9
UT WOS:001205925500004
PM 38643343
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, XS
   Jiang, SL
   Xu, LS
   Xu, HG
   Guan, NN
AF Chen, Xiansheng
   Jiang, Shuoliang
   Xu, Longshun
   Xu, Huange
   Guan, Ningning
TI Resilience assessment and obstacle factor analysis of urban areas facing
   waterlogging disasters: a case study of Shanghai, China
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Waterlogging; Urban resilience; AHP-TOPSIS; Shanghai; Barrier factor
ID CITIES; FRAMEWORK
AB In recent years, accelerated global warming, rainstorms, typhoons, and other natural disasters have been frequently observed, bringing immeasurable direct and indirect economic losses to urban areas. Determining how to further enhance the resilience of urban areas has become an important topic in economic and social development. Therefore, based on waterlogging scenarios, this study uses a more accurate research method combining the subjective evaluation AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method and objective evaluation TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method to evaluate the urban resilience of 16 districts of the Shanghai megacity as the research objects and divides the resilience grade results using the ArcGIS natural breakpoint method. The results show that (1) the overall resilience of all districts in Shanghai needs to be further improved. Among the 16 districts in Shanghai, Pudong New Area has the highest urban resilience level. There are more areas with moderate and above-moderate resilience levels, while some areas with low and moderate resilience levels are distributed mainly in the downtown area of Shanghai. (2) Through the analysis of obstacles to the development of urban resilience in the districts of Shanghai, such obstacles tend to be the same under the waterlogging disaster scenarios. Compared to ecological and social policy resilience indices, economic resilience indices and infrastructure resilience indices significantly impact the resilience of urban districts under waterlogging scenarios. The above conclusions can not only help improve the direction of urban resilience governance in various districts of Shanghai but also provide empirical theoretical experience for the resilient construction of urban areas in the future.
C1 [Chen, Xiansheng; Jiang, Shuoliang; Xu, Longshun; Guan, Ningning] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Management, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 201600, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Huange] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Publ Adm, 999 Chengdu Pi All Dist,Rhinoceros Rd, Chengdu 611756, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
C3 Shanghai University of Finance & Economics; Southwest Jiaotong
   University
RP Jiang, SL (corresponding author), Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Publ Econ & Management, 777 Guoding Rd, Shanghai 201600, Peoples R China.
EM chenxs2002@163.com; jiang.shuoliang@mail.shufe.edu.cn
RI xu, longshun/IST-4747-2023; Chen, Xiansheng/GWU-5160-2022
OI Chen, Xiansheng/0000-0002-5661-2407
FU Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Planning Fund Project: "Pudong
   New Area to build a Leading area of Socialist Modernization
   Construction" [2021BZZ002]; Youth Project of Humanities and Social
   Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education [22YJC630172]
FX Partial financial support was received from the Shanghai Philosophy and
   Social Science Planning Fund Project: "Pudong New Area to build a
   Leading area of Socialist Modernization Construction" (grant number
   2021BZZ002) and Youth Project of Humanities and Social Sciences
   Foundation of Ministry of Education: Research on the Mechanism and
   Policy Effect of Cross-basin Horizontal Ecological Compensation on
   Enterprises' High-quality Development (grant number 22YJC630172).
CR Abubakar IR, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104105
   Boulos MNK, 2015, INT J HEALTH GEOGR, V14, DOI 10.1186/1476-072X-14-3
   Chen XS, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V106, P829, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04493-9
   Comfort LK, 2006, URBAN AFF REV, V41, P501, DOI 10.1177/1078087405284881
   Croese S, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020550
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Folke C, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P1018, DOI 10.2307/2269584
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Gotham KF, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16, DOI 10.5751/ES-04292-160312
   Han XH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141911929
   Hangebruch N, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14148303
   Hatuka T, 2018, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V19, P160, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2018.1455216
   Huang YJ, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19127068
   Ilgen S, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11050983
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jawad M, 2024, J OPER RES SOC, V75, P85, DOI 10.1080/01605682.2023.2174905
   Kiener J, 2018, HOUS THEORY SOC, V35, P410, DOI 10.1080/14036096.2018.1481141
   Li GJ, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104954
   Liang X, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030669
   Liao LP, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11111896
   Liu LN, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V379, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134400
   Macharis C, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V153, P307, DOI 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X
   Malalgoda C, 2016, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V25, P628, DOI 10.1108/DPM-11-2015-0260
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Mell IC, 2018, LANDSCAPE RES, V43, P289, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2017.1314452
   Naef P, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P2012, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2038069
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Ruan JE, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102578
   Shari A, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V293, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125912
   Anh TT, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.012
   Wang L, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102181
   Wu CL, 2018, HABITAT INT, V75, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.009
   Xu H, 2017, J BUILD ENG, V12, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.06.018
   Yang YF, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V42, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.07.013
   Zhang XW, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V661, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.074
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
NR 37
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 27
U2 104
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 0944-1344
EI 1614-7499
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R
JI Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
PD MAY
PY 2023
VL 30
IS 24
BP 65455
EP 65469
DI 10.1007/s11356-023-26861-1
EA APR 2023
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA S2EF8
UT WOS:000985266700004
PM 37084059
OA Bronze
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chang, HJ
   Pallathadka, A
   Sauer, J
   Grimm, NB
   Zimmerman, R
   Cheng, CW
   Iwaniec, DM
   Kim, Y
   Lloyd, R
   McPhearson, T
   Rosenzweig, B
   Troxler, T
   Welty, C
   Brenner, R
   Herreros-Cantis, P
AF Chang, Heejun
   Pallathadka, Arun
   Sauer, Jason
   Grimm, Nancy B.
   Zimmerman, Rae
   Cheng, Chingwen
   Iwaniec, David M.
   Kim, Yeowon
   Lloyd, Robert
   McPhearson, Timon
   Rosenzweig, Bernice
   Troxler, Tiffany
   Welty, Claire
   Brenner, Ryan
   Herreros-Cantis, Pablo
TI Assessment of urban flood vulnerability using the
   social-ecological-technological systems framework in six US cities
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban flood; Vulnerability; Social-ecological-technological systems;
   Resilience; Mapping
ID DECISION-MAKING; RISK; INFRASTRUCTURE; ADAPTATION; RESILIENCE; CITY;
   PROVINCE; HAZARDS; IMPACT; CHINA
AB As urban populations continue to grow through the 21st century, more people are projected to be at risk of exposure to climate change-induced extreme events. To investigate the complexity of urban floods, this study applied an interlinked social-ecological-technological systems (SETS) vulnerability framework by developing an urban flood vulnerability index for six US cities. Indicators were selected to reflect and illustrate exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity to flooding for each of the three domains of SETS. We quantified 18 indicators and normalized them by the cities' 500-yr floodplain area at the census block group level. Clusters of flood vulnerable areas were identified differently by each SETS domain, and some areas were vulnerable to floods in more than one domain. Results are provided to support decision-making for reducing risks to flooding, by considering social, ecological, and technological vulnerability as well as hotspots where multiple sources of vulnerability coexist. The spatially explicit urban SETS flood vulnerability framework can be transferred to other regions facing challenging urban floods and other types of environmental hazards. Mapping SETS flood vulnerability helps to reveal intersections of complex SETS interactions and inform policy-making for building more resilient cities in the face of extreme events and climate change impacts.
C1 [Chang, Heejun; Pallathadka, Arun] Portland State Univ, Dept Geog, Portland, OR 97201 USA.
   [Sauer, Jason; Grimm, Nancy B.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Zimmerman, Rae; Brenner, Ryan] NYU, Wagner Grad Sch Publ Serv, 550 1St Ave, New York, NY 10012 USA.
   [Cheng, Chingwen] Arizona State Univ, Design Sch, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Iwaniec, David M.; Lloyd, Robert] Georgia State Univ, Urban Studies Inst, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA.
   [Kim, Yeowon] Global Inst Sustainabil & Innovat, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
   [Kim, Yeowon; McPhearson, Timon; Herreros-Cantis, Pablo] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, New York, NY 10003 USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Rosenzweig, Bernice] Sarah Lawrence Coll, Environm Sci, Bronxville, NY 10708 USA.
   [Troxler, Tiffany] Florida Int Univ, Inst Environm, Earth & Environm Dept, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
   [Troxler, Tiffany] Florida Int Univ, Inst Environm, Sea Level Solut Ctr, Miami, FL 33199 USA.
   [Welty, Claire] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Dept Chem Biochem & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA.
   [Welty, Claire] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Ctr Urban Environm Res & Educ, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA.
C3 Portland State University; Arizona State University; Arizona State
   University-Tempe; New York University; Arizona State University; Arizona
   State University-Tempe; University System of Georgia; Georgia State
   University; The New School; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies;
   Stockholm University; Sarah Lawrence College; State University System of
   Florida; Florida International University; State University System of
   Florida; Florida International University; University System of
   Maryland; University of Maryland Baltimore County; University System of
   Maryland; University of Maryland Baltimore County
RP Chang, HJ (corresponding author), Portland State Univ, Dept Geog, Portland, OR 97201 USA.
EM changh@pdx.edu
RI Sauer, Jason/HHN-2259-2022; Pallathadka, Arun/AAA-4600-2022; Chang,
   Heejun/AGF-1404-2022; Cheng, Chingwen/A-7152-2010; McPhearson,
   Timon/JOZ-3799-2023; Grimm, Nancy/D-2840-2009; Iwaniec,
   David/M-7993-2014
OI Lloyd, Robert/0000-0002-5771-9900; Cheng, Chingwen/0000-0002-9724-2190;
   Chang, Heejun/0000-0002-5605-6500; McPhearson,
   Timon/0000-0002-9499-0791; Sauer, Jason/0000-0001-7826-1444; Grimm,
   Nancy/0000-0001-9374-660X; Iwaniec, David/0000-0002-0410-4152
FU National Science Foundation [1444755, 1832016, 1934933, 1927468,
   1927167]; Directorate For Engineering; Div Of Civil, Mechanical, &
   Manufact Inn [1934933] Funding Source: National Science Foundation;
   Division Of Environmental Biology; Direct For Biological Sciences
   [1832016] Funding Source: National Science Foundation; Office Of
   Internatl Science &Engineering; Office Of The Director [1927468] Funding
   Source: National Science Foundation; Office Of The Director; Office Of
   Internatl Science &Engineering [1927167] Funding Source: National
   Science Foundation
FX This material is based upon work supported by the National Science
   Foundation under Award Numbers (SES cooperative agreement 1444755,
   1832016, 1934933, 1927468, and 1927167). We appreciate city
   practitioners who graciously shared the GIS data used for analysis.
   Thank you also to those who reviewed the initial version of the
   manuscript and offered useful feedback at the Virtual All Hands workshop
   in April 2020.
CR Adelekan IO, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V56, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9564-z
   [Anonymous], 1999, Chile-Mexico FTA
   ASFPM, 2020, FLOOD MAPP NAT COST
   ASKINS RA, 1995, SCIENCE, V267, P1956, DOI 10.1126/science.267.5206.1956
   Bevers M, 1999, THEOR POPUL BIOL, V55, P61, DOI 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1392
   Blessing R, 2017, NAT HAZARDS REV, V18, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000242, 10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000242]
   Bolin B., 2005, Human Ecology Review, V12, P156
   Borden KA, 2007, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V4, DOI 10.2202/1547-7355.1279
   Chakraborty J, 2019, SOC SCI MED, V226, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.039
   Chan FKS, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V76, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.005
   Chang H, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P837, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1850230
   Cheng C., 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Urban Resilience, V1st ed., P83
   Cheng CW, 2019, ECOWISE, P249, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0571-9_13
   Cheng CW, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.05.019
   Childers DL, 2019, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V7, DOI 10.1525/elementa.385
   Cho SY, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P633, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2869-4
   Collins TW, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108772
   Cooley AK, 2021, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V12, P1135, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2020.043
   Cutter S.L., 2016, Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience Measurement and Tools
   Cutter SL, 2003, SOC SCI QUART, V84, P242, DOI 10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Danielson TM, 2017, FOREST ECOL MANAG, V404, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.08.009
   Erena SH, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V97, P495, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03654-9
   Ewers RM, 2007, CONSERV BIOL, V21, P926, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00720.x
   Fahy B., 2019, International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research, V6, P5
   Fahy B, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101117
   FEMA, 2020, FEMA FLOOD MAP SERV
   Ferrari S, 2019, RESILIENT CIT, P147, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-76944-8_10
   Foster S, 2019, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1439, P126, DOI 10.1111/nyas.14009
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz042
   Gimenez-Maranges M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102061
   Grimm NB, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1255
   Grove K, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1613, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1715778
   Grove M, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P524, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1365585
   Gu HH, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V41, P170, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.047
   Guidotti R, 2016, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V1, P153, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2016.1254999
   Han YP, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V700, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134462
   Highfield WE, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P186, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01840.x
   Hong CY, 2020, RIVER RES APPL, V36, P2078, DOI 10.1002/rra.3728
   Iwaniec D.M., 2021, RESILIENT URBAN FUTU, P95
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103820
   Iwaniec DM, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103744
   IYENGAR NS, 1982, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V17, P2047
   Janssen E, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P99, DOI 10.1002/2013EF000185
   Jolliffe I., 2002, Principal Component Analysis, DOI 10.1007/b98835
   KAISER HF, 1958, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V23, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF02289233
   Kasperson J.X., 2001, SEI RISK VULNERABILI
   Keeler BL, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P29, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
   Khajehei S, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-57349-z
   Kiaghadi A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V53, P4832, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.9b00792
   Kim Y, 2017, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V145, P397, DOI 10.1007/s10584-017-2090-1
   Kirby RH, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V10, P233, DOI 10.1007/s13753-019-0222-0
   Kundzewicz Z. W., 2018, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P1, DOI 10.1080/
   Kunkel KE, 2020, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V59, P125, DOI 10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0185.1
   La Rosa D, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101885
   Laudan J, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P2163, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-2163-2017
   Llopis J., 2017, 109 UTC SPOTL U TRAN
   Luke A, 2018, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V18, P1097, DOI 10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
   Ma CY, 2020, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V110, P196, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305438
   Manturuk K, 2010, J URBAN AFF, V32, P471, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00494.x
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   Martínez-Morales MA, 2005, BIOL CONSERV, V121, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.015
   McPhearson T, 2016, BIOSCIENCE, V66, P198, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw002
   Mohtar WHMW, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102088
   MORAN PAP, 1950, BIOMETRIKA, V37, P17, DOI 10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.17
   Müller A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P2107, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2017, FORESTS, V8, DOI 10.3390/f8060203
   Muthusamy M, 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/rs11050577
   Nasiri H, 2019, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V16, P2249, DOI 10.1007/s13762-018-1797-5
   Nasiri H, 2016, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V2, P331, DOI 10.1007/s40899-016-0051-x
   Ouma YO, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P1515, DOI 10.3390/w6061515
   Palla A, 2015, J HYDROL, V528, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050
   Papathoma-Köhle M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
   Polish Financial Supervision Authority, 2016, REC C CONC RISK MAN
   Polsky C, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P472, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.005
   Pratt B, 2012, J HAZARD MATER, V209, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.12.068
   Pregnolato M, 2017, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V23, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000372
   Qiang Y, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V232, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.039
   Qiang Y, 2017, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V107, P1332, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1320214
   Römer H, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2103, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2103-2012
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Ruangpan L, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P243, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020
   Rufat S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013
   Salazar-Briones C, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12020608
   Sterzel T, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0220936
   Swain DL, 2020, EARTHS FUTURE, V8, DOI 10.1029/2020EF001778
   Tanaka T, 2020, J HYDROL, V584, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124706
   ten Veldhuis JAE, 2011, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V7, P809, DOI 10.1080/15732470902985876
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   UNESCO World Water Assessment Programme, 2012, World Water Assessment Programme: The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk
   Watson RT, 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE 2001: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, pIX
   Weisshuhn P, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P904, DOI 10.1007/s00267-018-1023-8
   Wilbanks TJ, 2014, NCA REGION INPUT REP, P1, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-556-4
   Wilson BJ, 2019, ECOLOGY, V100, DOI 10.1002/ecy.2672
   Wing OEJ, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaac65
   York A, 2014, J URBAN AFF, V36, P833, DOI 10.1111/juaf.12076
   Zhang YLJ, 2020, OCEAN DYNAM, V70, P621, DOI 10.1007/s10236-020-01351-x
   Zong YQ, 2000, NAT HAZARDS, V22, P165, DOI 10.1023/A:1008119805106
NR 97
TC 133
Z9 146
U1 46
U2 255
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD MAY
PY 2021
VL 68
AR 102786
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102786
EA MAR 2021
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA RI3HW
UT WOS:000636799500002
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Anh, TT
   Phong, TVG
   Mulenga, M
AF Tran Tuan Anh
   Tran Van Giai Phong
   Mulenga, Martin
TI Community consultation for climate resilient housing: A comparative case
   study in Vietnam
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Post-disaster housing reconstruction; Climate resilient housing;
   Community consultation; Vietnam
ID DISASTER; RECONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKE; PARTICIPATION; CONSTRUCTION;
   PEOPLE; TURKEY
AB Community consultation has been mentioned in literature as one of key requirements for developing climate resilient housing but issues related to its real function and linkage to the effectiveness of resilient housing in a given context or community are still problematic. This article reports on a comparative case study between two climate-change prone cities in Vietnam: Hue and Da Nang, to examine consultation-related issues in the Vietnam context through the lens of post-disaster housing reconstruction. The comparison was carried out against the ISET (2012) urban climate resilience framework. The research outcomes demonstrated an absence of community consultation for the self-built housing, the importance of social relationship in building resilient housing, a big gap between at-risk grassroots communities and technically professional services, and a lack of urban governance for a safe and resilient construction. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Tran Tuan Anh] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Tran Tuan Anh] Hue Univ, Hue City, Vietnam.
   [Tran Van Giai Phong] ISET, Hue City, Vietnam.
   [Mulenga, Martin] IIED, London, England.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT); Hue University
RP Anh, TT (corresponding author), Hue Univ, 3-175 Tran Phu, Hue City, Vietnam.
EM ttuananh81@gmail.com
RI Mulenga, Martin/M-8069-2013; Tran, Thi Lan Anh/K-5369-2013
FU International Institute of Environment and Development
FX This paper presents the key outcome of a research project funded by the
   International Institute of Environment and Development in 2013.
CR Alexander B., 2006, Disaster Prevention and Management, V15, P31, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09653560610654220, 10.1108/09653560610654220]
   Amaratunga D, 2011, POST-DISASTER RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: REBUILDING FOR RESILIENCE, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781444344943
   [Anonymous], UND COMM RES PROGR F
   [Anonymous], IMP STUD DEV LOC CAP
   [Anonymous], CLIM RES FRAM PUTT R
   [Anonymous], 2007, UN FRAMEWORK CONVENT
   [Anonymous], 2012, INT ENCY HOUSING HOM
   Archer D, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P351, DOI 10.1177/0956247811410011
   Barakat Sultan., 2003, Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster
   Barenstein J.D., 2006, HOUSING RECONSTRUCTI
   Boen Teddy., 2005, Cultural Considerations for Post Disaster Reconstruction Post-Tsunami Challenges
   Bosher L, 2011, DISASTERS, V35, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2010.01189.x
   Chang Y, 2010, BUILD RES INF, V38, P247, DOI 10.1080/09613211003693945
   Cosgrave J., 2008, RESPONDING EARTHQUAK
   Davidson CH, 2007, HABITAT INT, V31, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2006.08.003
   Davis I, 2011, ENV HAZARDS, V10, P193
   Ganapati NE, 2009, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V75, P41, DOI 10.1080/01944360802546254
   Guarnacci U, 2012, ENVIRON DEV, V2, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.010
   Jha AK, 2010, SAFER HOMES, STRONGER COMMUNITIES: A HANDBOOK FOR RECONSTRUCTING AFTER NATURAL DISASTERS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8045-1
   Karunasena Gayani, 2010, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V1, P173, DOI 10.1108/17595901011056631
   Lawther PM, 2009, INT J STRATEG PROP M, V13, P153, DOI 10.3846/1648-715X.2009.13.153-169
   Lizarralde G., 2010, Rebuilding After Disasters: From Emergency to Sustainability
   Lizarralde G, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.08.001
   Lyons M., 2010, PUTTING PEOPLE CTR R
   Lyons M., 2010, BUILDING BACK BETTER
   Maly E, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V3, P56, DOI 10.1007/s13753-012-0007-1
   Marcillia SR, 2012, PROCD SOC BEHV, V36, P61, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.007
   Matsumaru R, 2012, IATSS RES, V36, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.07.001
   Minamoto Y, 2010, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V19, P548, DOI 10.1108/09653561011091887
   Nakagawa S., 2004, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, V22, P5, DOI DOI 10.1177/028072700402200101
   Ozden A.T., 2006, DEV MODEL COMMUNITY
   Pardasani M., 2006, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V15, P79
   Pearce L, 2003, NAT HAZARDS, V28, P211, DOI 10.1023/A:1022917721797
   Pendall R, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P71, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp028
   Petal M., 2008, HAZARDS BUILT ENV AT, P191
   Pomeroy RS, 2006, MAR POLICY, V30, P786, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.02.003
   Schilderman T., 2010, PUTTING PEOPLE CTR R
   Schilderman T, 2011, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V10, P218, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2011.598497
   Shaw Judith., 2010, Design and Delivery of Post-Disaster Housing Resettlement Programs: Case Studies from Sri Lanka and India
   Sliwinski A., 2010, REBUILDING DISASTERS
   Steinberg F., HABITAT INT, V31, P150
   Tas N, 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V42, P3418, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.09.002
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN, 2006, EXPL KEY CHANG DEV
   UNEP SKAT, 2007, TSUN SUST BUILD GUID
   UNISDR, 2009, TERM DIS RISK RED
NR 46
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 3
U2 53
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD DEC
PY 2014
VL 10
BP 201
EP 212
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.012
PN A
PG 12
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA CM5NC
UT WOS:000357733900016
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Connelly, A
   O'Hare, P
   White, I
AF Connelly, Angela
   O'Hare, Paul
   White, Iain
TI "The best flood I ever had": Contingent resilience and the (relative)
   success of adaptive technologies
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Flood risk management; Innovation; Adaptive technologies; Climate
   resilience; Climate change adaptation
ID SMART CITIES; POLICY; POLITICS; COMMUNITIES; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION;
   SOCIOLOGY; INSIGHTS; THINKING; FAILURE
AB The practical operationalisation of resilience within cities is strongly linked to technology, such as better construction materials or redesigning urban form. Institutional and private sector actors often focus on issues relating to the technological innovation journey, such as 'pathways' to implementation or 'barriers' to market uptake, rather than whether adaptive technologies are the most appropriate resilience solution. These discourses frame urban resilience from the perspective of an innovation journey where technologies are perceived to succeed if there is high uptake. However, given the multi-perspective and multi-scale nature of urban resilience, the idea of 'success' inevitably has complex spatial, temporal and scalar dimensions. The paper uses the case of property level flood resilience (PFR) technologies in the United Kingdom to introduce the notion of 'contingent resilience' as a means to understand the trade-offs that are part of assessing and evaluating climate resilient technologies. We reveal that there are fundamental contradictions in what is deemed as a 'success' depending on who is framing the problem, when the judgement is made, or where the scale of analysis lies. Above all, the paper highlights the importance of illuminating the struggles that do not just define success, but that spatially and temporally redistribute climate resilience in a hidden manner.
C1 [Connelly, Angela] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Manchester Sch Architecture, Chatam 804,Oxford Rd, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England.
   [O'Hare, Paul] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, E415 John Dalton Bldg,Oxford Rd, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England.
   [White, Iain] Univ Waikato, Arts & Social Sci, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.
C3 Manchester Metropolitan University; Manchester Metropolitan University;
   University of Waikato
RP Connelly, A (corresponding author), Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Manchester Sch Architecture, Chatam 804,Oxford Rd, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England.
EM angela.connelly@mmu.ac.uk; paul.a.ohare@mmu.ac.uk; iainw@waikato.ac.nz
RI Connelly, Angela/HII-7115-2022; White, Iain/N-8461-2014
FU European Union's seventh framework programme [244102]; University of
   Manchester Strategic Research Investment Fund; British Standards
   Institute
FX This work was supported by the European Union's seventh framework
   programme [grant agreement no. 244102]; The University of Manchester
   Strategic Research Investment Fund, and the British Standards Institute.
CR Adaptation Sub-Committee, 2019, PROGR PREP CLIM CHAN
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Anguelovski I, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P26139, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1920490117
   [Anonymous], 1987, SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION
   [Anonymous], 1974, FRAME ANAL ESSAY ORG
   [Anonymous], 2013, EU STRAT AD CLIM CHA
   [Anonymous], 2016, The Property Flood Resilience Action Plan
   [Anonymous], 2012, GOVERNING SUSTAINABL
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   Barry Andrew., 2001, Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society
   Beck U., 1992, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity
   Beck U., 1999, World Risk Society
   Beilin R, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1205, DOI 10.1177/0042098015574955
   Bickerstaff K, 2009, GEOFORUM, V40, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.07.004
   Bijker W.E., 1987, New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technological Systems
   British Standards Institution (BSI), 2014, 118812014 BSI PAS
   Buck NT, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P501, DOI 10.1177/0042098015597162
   Burby RJ, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P171, DOI 10.1177/0002716205284676
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Castree N, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P763, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2339
   CATTON WR, 1978, AM SOCIOL, V13, P41
   Chelleri L, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P181, DOI 10.1177/0956247814550780
   Communities and Local Government (CLG), 2012, TECHN GUID NAT PLANN
   Corner A, 2014, PHILOS T R SOC A, V372, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2014.0063
   Coutard O, 2007, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V32, P713, DOI 10.1177/0162243907303600
   Davoudi S., 2018, The Resilience Machine
   de Laet M, 2000, SOC STUD SCI, V30, P225, DOI 10.1177/030631200030002002
   Dryzek JohnS., 2012, The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses
   Edensor T, 2016, ARCHAEOL ORIEANTAT, P348
   ENTMAN RM, 1993, J COMMUN, V43, P51, DOI 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Flyvbjerg B, 2002, J PLAN EDUC RES, V21, P353, DOI 10.1177/0739456X0202100401
   Flyvbjerg B., 1998, RATIONALITY POWER DE
   FOUCAULT M, 1971, SOC SC INFORM, V10, P7, DOI 10.1177/053901847101000201
   Fünfgeld H, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P603, DOI 10.1068/c1234
   Geels FW, 2000, FUTURES, V32, P867, DOI 10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00036-7
   Geels FW, 2004, RES POLICY, V33, P897, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Giddens Anthony, 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity in the late Modern Age, P243
   Graham S, 2007, THEOR CULT SOC, V24, P1, DOI 10.1177/0263276407075954
   Gray John., 2004, HERESIES
   Gupta T., 2014, BBC NEWS
   HAAS PM, 1992, INT ORGAN, V46, P1, DOI 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Hajer M., 2002, Eur. Political Sci., V2, P61, DOI [DOI 10.1057/EPS.2002.49, 10.1057/eps.2002.49]
   Hajer M., 2005, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V7, P175, DOI DOI 10.1080/15239080500339646
   HM Government, 2011, EN TRANS GREEN EC GO
   Hodson M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9020299
   Hodson M, 2007, RISK AND THE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES, P198
   Hodson Mike., 2014, After Sustainable Cities
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5 C IPCC
   Jacobs JM, 2007, URBAN STUD, V44, P609, DOI 10.1080/00420980601131910
   Jaffe AB, 2005, ECOL ECON, V54, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027
   Jasanoff S., 2012, SCI PUBLIC REASON
   Jasanoff S., 2004, States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, DOI 10.4324/9780203413845
   Jasanoff S., 2005, DESIGNS NATURE
   JBA Consulting, 2014, FD2668 JBA CONS
   Johnson CL, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P513, DOI 10.1080/07900620801923146
   KAIKA M, 2005, CITY OF FLOWS
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Klein N, 2009, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
   Latour B, 2003, THEOR CULT SOC, V20, P35, DOI 10.1177/0263276403020002002
   Mathews S, 2005, TECHNOETIC ARTS, V3, P73, DOI 10.1386/tear.3.2.73/1
   May P., 2015, SURVEYING FLOOD RESI
   McConnell A, 2010, J PUBLIC POLICY, V30, P345, DOI 10.1017/S0143814X10000152
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Newman J, 2015, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V30, P342, DOI 10.1177/0952076714565832
   O'Hare P, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P1175, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15602022
   O'Hare P, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P275, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787721
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pidgeon N, 2010, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V27, P211, DOI 10.1080/10286608.2010.482660
   Pitt M., 2008, LEARNING LESSONS 200
   Rowling M., 2018, CITIES SEEK CASH TEC
   Swyngedouw Erik., 2015, LIQUID POWER CONTEST
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Viitanen J, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN A, V46, P803, DOI 10.1068/a46242
   Wachinger G, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P1049, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
   White I, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS468, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12239
   White I., 2015, Environmental Planning in Context
   White I, 2021, HOUSING STUD, V36, P213, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2019.1697801
   White I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.018
   White I, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P934, DOI 10.1068/c12117
   White I, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2885, DOI 10.1177/0042098019886764
NR 82
TC 5
Z9 5
U1 3
U2 44
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD NOV
PY 2020
VL 106
AR 102842
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102842
PG 9
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA NY8LZ
UT WOS:000576635800004
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ochoa, WAA
   Neto, AI
   Vitorio, PC Jr
   Calabokis, OP
   Ballesteros-Ballesteros, V
AF Abujder Ochoa, Walter Antonio
   Iarozinski Neto, Alfredo
   Vitorio, Paulo Cezar
   Calabokis, Oriana Palma
   Ballesteros-Ballesteros, Vladimir
TI The Theory of Complexity and Sustainable Urban Development: A Systematic
   Literature Review
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Review
DE sustainable urban development; Complexity Theory; urban resilience;
   sustainable
ID FRAMEWORK; THINKING; CITIES; DESIGN
AB Urbanization is a rapidly accelerating global phenomenon that challenges sustainable development, requiring innovative frameworks for understanding and managing urban complexity. This study explores the application of Complexity Theory in sustainable urban development, framing cities as Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS), where dynamic social, economic, environmental, and technological interactions generate emergent behaviors. A systematic literature review was conducted, analyzing 91 studies retrieved from Scopus that explicitly link Complexity Theory to urban sustainability. Key findings reveal trade-offs, such as balancing economic growth with ecological preservation and social equity, while emphasizing the role of self-organization and adaptive governance in enhancing urban resilience. Concrete examples include the application of fractal analysis in urban planning to predict sprawl and optimize infrastructure and the use of system dynamics models to align smart city initiatives with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Wider co-benefits identified include improved public health through integrated green infrastructure and the reinforcement of social cohesion via participatory urban planning. This research concludes that embracing Complexity Theory enables a holistic approach to urban sustainability, fostering adaptable, resilient systems that can better manage uncertainty. This study highlights the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and innovative policy frameworks to navigate the multifaceted challenges of modern urbanization.
C1 [Abujder Ochoa, Walter Antonio] Univ Catolica Boliviana San Pablo, Ctr Invest Ciencias Exactas & Ingn CICEI, Dept Ingn & Ciencias Exactas, Carrera Ingn Civil, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
   [Abujder Ochoa, Walter Antonio; Iarozinski Neto, Alfredo] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Grad Program Civil Engn PPGEC, Construct Civil Area, Construct Management & Sustainabil, BR-81280340 Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
   [Vitorio, Paulo Cezar] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Grad program Civil Engn PPGEC, Via Conhecimento,Km 1, BR-85503390 Pato Branco, PR, Brazil.
   [Calabokis, Oriana Palma; Ballesteros-Ballesteros, Vladimir] Fdn Univ Los Libertadores, Fac Engn & Basic Sci, Bogota 1112211, Colombia.
C3 Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana; Universidade Tecnologica
   Federal do Parana
RP Ochoa, WAA (corresponding author), Univ Catolica Boliviana San Pablo, Ctr Invest Ciencias Exactas & Ingn CICEI, Dept Ingn & Ciencias Exactas, Carrera Ingn Civil, Cochabamba, Bolivia.; Ochoa, WAA (corresponding author), Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Grad Program Civil Engn PPGEC, Construct Civil Area, Construct Management & Sustainabil, BR-81280340 Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
EM wabujder@ucb.edu.bo; iarozinski@professores.utfpr.edu.br;
   paulocjunior@utfpr.edu.br; opalmac@libertadores.edu.co;
   vladimir.ballesteros@libertadores.edu.co
RI Neto, Alfredo/C-7130-2015; Vitorio Junior, Paulo Cezar/D-9423-2017
OI Ballesteros Ballesteros, Vladimir/0000-0002-6920-789X; Palma Calabokis,
   Oriana/0000-0003-0346-2609; Vitorio Junior, Paulo
   Cezar/0000-0003-4109-0834; Abujder Ochoa, Walter
   Antonio/0000-0002-1185-5309
CR Aboria S., 2024, How Urban Morphology Affects Energy Consumption and Building Energy Loads? Strategies Based on Urban Ventilation, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-46491-123, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-46491-123]
   Alberini C, 2021, INT J TOUR CITIES, V7, P1076, DOI 10.1108/IJTC-02-2021-0028
   Alcantara M.N.P.A., 2023, Resilient and Sustainable Cities, P263, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-323-91718-6.00023-2, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-323-91718-6.00023-2]
   Allen PM, 2008, ARCHIT ENG DES MANAG, V4, P5, DOI 10.3763/aedm.2008.S907
   Almosawi F., 2024, Civ. Eng. Archit, V12, P1678, DOI [10.13189/cea.2024.120331, DOI 10.13189/CEA.2024.120331]
   [Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL REPORT URBAN, DOI [DOI 10.1373/CLINCHEM.2011.163634, 10.1373/clinchem.2011.163634]
   Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
   Batty M., 1994, FRACTAL CITIES GEOME
   Berger ESC, 2024, SMALL BUS ECON, V62, P471, DOI 10.1007/s11187-023-00762-6
   Bian J, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15081714
   Bibri S.E., 2020, Advances in the Leading Paradigms of Urbanism and their Amalgamation: Compact Cities, EcoCities, and DataDriven Smart Cities, P143, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-41746-86, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-41746-86]
   Botequilha-Leitao A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102089
   Brockman C.Kahkonen., 2012, P MCRP C 2012 MONTRE, P716
   Chen MM, 2024, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V366, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121847
   Chen TY, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13040483
   Cheng LX, 2021, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/rs13224640
   Chu D., 2014, Appl. Mech. Mater, V584, P280, DOI [10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.584-586.280, DOI 10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/AMM.584-586.280]
   Couto ED, 2025, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V27, P1619, DOI 10.1007/s10668-023-03936-0
   Crawford R., 2016, What can Complexity Theory Tell Us About Urban Planning?
   Cristiano S, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V2, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2020.00012
   Davidson KM, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P213, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.565464
   Durón-González F, 2023, INGENIERIA-BOGOTA, V28, P1, DOI 10.14483/23448393.19021
   Eggert AL, 2024, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107026
   El Faouri BF, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16145833
   Erranta S., 2015, P C INT C COMP URB P
   Erzaij K., 2020, J. Crit. Rev, V7, P2777
   Fang XN, 2024, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V927, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172219
   Frantzeskaki N, 2021, AMBIO, V50, P1650, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01521-1
   Geldenhuys H.J., 2020, P 29 INT C INT ASS M
   Girmscheid G., 2008, Project Perspectives, V29, P22, DOI [DOI 10.3929/ETHZ-A-005994701, 10.3929/ethz-a-005994701, 10.3929/ETHZ-A-005994701]
   Couret DG, 2022, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V14, P409, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2022.2059487
   Harms P., 2024, Urban Transform, V6, P9, DOI [10.1186/s42854-024-00066-2, DOI 10.1186/S42854-024-00066-2]
   Hoffmann EM, 2023, SUSTAIN SCI, V18, P1739, DOI 10.1007/s11625-023-01331-2
   Hussien A, 2023, ECOL ENG, V190, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.106925
   Jiao LD, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090910
   Kalisch D., 2016, A Holistic Approach to Understand Urban Complexity, V9860, P31, DOI [10.1007/978-3-662-53416-83, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-53416-83]
   Khalil H.A., 10 INT ENERGY CONVER, DOI 10.2514/6.2012-4248
   Kim KG, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P77, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-59618-1_2
   Kutty AA, 2020, SUSTAIN DEV, V28, P1347, DOI 10.1002/sd.2088
   Lafhaj Z, 2024, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/buildings14030680
   Li Q, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102490
   Li Y, 2024, HUM SOC SCI COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1057/s41599-024-03598-x
   Liao ZW, 2023, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V5, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2023.1115648
   Liu ZT, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107266
   Loeffler R, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111453
   Luo L, 2017, J CONSTR ENG M, V143, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001306
   Man XM, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9110672
   Manesh S.V., 2012, Trans. Ecol. Environ, V155, P1743, DOI [10.2495/SC120532, DOI 10.2495/SC120532]
   Manesh SV, 2011, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V21, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.1991
   Marchettini N., 2004, The Sustainable City III: URBAN Regneration and Susainability
   Marcotullio PJ, 2023, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V9, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1194813
   Marcus L, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13010008
   Montiel-Hernández MG, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16010391
   Mulyana W., 2023, Environmental Governance in Indonesia, P243, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-15904-614, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-15904-614]
   Munagala Lalitha, 2023, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1210/1/012027
   Nel D., 2012, P SAPI PLANN AFR C G, P17
   Nel D, 2018, INT PLAN STUD, V23, P250, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2018.1439370
   Nigra M., 2017, P 21 INT C ENG DES I
   Nikolic M, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12050696
   Ota Hiroto, 2022, Sustainable Architecture and Building Environment: Proceedings of ICSDEMS 2020. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering (161), P79, DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-2329-5_10
   Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160]
   Pan W, 2015, HABITAT INT, V48, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.004
   Pannanen A., 2005, P 1 INT C BUILT ENV
   Paranagamage P, 2010, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V163, P101, DOI 10.1680/udap.2010.163.3.101
   Parisi D., 2021, New Metropolitan Perspectives, P2042
   Pogaar K., 2021, Sustainable Transformation of City StreetsTowards a Holistic Approach, P273, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-61118-724, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-61118-724]
   Pombinho M, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16010260
   Radoslav R, 2012, J ENVIRON PROT ECOL, V13, P2249
   Sacco PL, 2013, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V37, P1688, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01159.x
   Salat S., 2012, Urban Complexity, Scale Hierarchy, Energy Efficiency and Economic Value Creation, DOI [10.2495/SC120091, DOI 10.2495/SC120091]
   Sampaio RF, 2007, REV BRAS FISIOTER, V11, P83, DOI 10.1590/S1413-35552007000100013
   Shen LY, 2012, CITIES, V29, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.008
   Smith S.T., 2024, Resilient Urban Environments: Planning for Livable Cities, P235, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-55482-713, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-55482-713]
   Spiliotopoulou M, 2022, DISCOV SUSTAIN, V3, DOI 10.1007/s43621-022-00081-y
   Stroink ML, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V2, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2020.00031
   Swamy RN, 2001, P I CIVIL ENG-STR B, V146, P371
   Tadi M., 2014, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan, V9, P514, DOI [10.2495/SDP-V9-N4-514-537, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V9-N4-514-537]
   Taylor J., 2021, The Significance of Urban Systems on Sustainability and Public Health, DOI [10.5334/bc.181, DOI 10.5334/BC.181]
   Nguyen TT, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-05906-4
   Tundo A, 2024, LECT NOTES CIVIL ENG, V467, P301, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_28
   van Meerkerk I, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P1630, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.722963
   Villari B, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su142013237
   Wang XL, 2014, CHINA WORLD ECON, V22, P30, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-124X.2014.12051.x
   Wang YR, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16135795
   Wood H.L., 2010, Ph.D. Dissertation
   Wu JG, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018
   Wu JW, 2023, PLOS ONE, V18, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0293207
   Xu H, 2011, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V280, P58, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.280.58
   Yehorchenkova N, 2024, HELIYON, V10, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33389
   Yin K, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V36, P665, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.003
   Zhang XL, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V134, P425, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.036
   Zhang ZH, 2023, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1096964
   Zheng JW, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9122336
   Zijp MC, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P2490, DOI 10.3390/su7032490
NR 94
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 25
U2 25
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 17
IS 1
AR 3
DI 10.3390/su17010003
PG 42
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA R8M1D
UT WOS:001393910500001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Gnecco, I
   Pirlone, F
   Spadaro, I
   Bruno, F
   Lobascio, MC
   Sposito, S
   Pezzagno, M
   Palla, A
AF Gnecco, Ilaria
   Pirlone, Francesca
   Spadaro, Ilenia
   Bruno, Fabrizio
   Lobascio, Maria Cristina
   Sposito, Sabrina
   Pezzagno, Michele
   Palla, Anna
TI Participatory Mapping for Enhancing Flood Risk Resilient and Sustainable
   Urban Drainage: A Collaborative Approach for the Genoa Case Study
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilient planning; stakeholder participation; participatory
   mapping; sustainable urban drainage system; flood risk
ID KNOWLEDGE; PPGIS
AB Planning for resilient cities requires an evidence-based understanding of flood risk and the involvement of stakeholders and local actors. The paper addresses research developed within the URCA!-Urban Resilience to Climate Change: to activate the participatory mapping and decision support tool for enhancing sustainable urban drainage-project. A top-down/bottom-up participatory and flexible methodology for the conception of participatory mapping aimed at the planning and installation of sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) on the territory is then developed. The innovative methodology is applied and tested in the case study of the Sampierdarena district in Genoa, northern Italy. This research paper illustrates the development of a participatory map (Pmap) that can support the implementation of SUDS as mitigation/adaptation strategies, integrating technical assessment and containing community visions and expectations. Findings concerning the connections between proposed SUDS locations and their frequencies confirm the relevance of the commercial area and the main traffic lanes along, confirming that all zones characterized by intense vehicular and pedestrian flow are suitable for SUDS as a solution to contribute to urban flood resilience. The georeferenced and intergenerational Pmap may be integrated into a decision support system to be developed as a guidance tool for the public administration.
C1 [Gnecco, Ilaria; Pirlone, Francesca; Spadaro, Ilenia; Bruno, Fabrizio; Lobascio, Maria Cristina; Sposito, Sabrina; Palla, Anna] Univ Genoa, Dept Civil Chem & Environm Engn, I-16145 Genoa, Italy.
   [Bruno, Fabrizio] Univ Pavia, Higher Univ Sch Pavia, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.
   [Pezzagno, Michele] Univ Brescia, Dept Civil Environm Architectural Engn & Math, I-25123 Brescia, Italy.
C3 University of Genoa; University of Pavia; University of Brescia
RP Gnecco, I (corresponding author), Univ Genoa, Dept Civil Chem & Environm Engn, I-16145 Genoa, Italy.
EM ilaria.gnecco@unige.it; francesca.pirlone@unige.it;
   ilenia.spadaro@unige.it; fabrizio.bruno@edu.unige.it;
   mariacristina.lobascio@edu.unige.it; sabrina.sposito@edu.unige.it;
   michele.pezzagno@unibs.it; anna.palla@unige.it
RI Pirlone, Francesca/GOV-4485-2022; Spadaro, Ilenia/MBV-9571-2025;
   Sposito, Sabrina/AAT-6496-2021; Palla, Anna/I-6666-2013; Gnecco,
   Ilaria/L-7293-2015
OI Palla, Anna/0000-0003-0708-6794; Gnecco, Ilaria/0000-0001-6690-5038;
   SPOSITO, SABRINA/0009-0000-9142-3911; SPADARO,
   ILENIA/0000-0002-8454-2629; PIRLONE, FRANCESCA/0000-0001-5429-4284;
   Bruno, Fabrizio/0009-0000-4421-9598
FU Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR)
FX It is intended to thank the main institutions involved within the
   participatory process: Municipality of Genova, the District of Genova
   Centro-Ovest, Emilio Salgari School, Calasanzio School, the
   Comprehensive School Institute Sampierdarena, Einaudi-Casaregis High
   School.
CR Abarquez I., 2006, Community-Based Disaster Risk Management: Field Practictioners Handbook, P159
   Agarwal MK, 2021, SOCIETIES, V11, DOI 10.3390/soc11030080
   Allegretti A., 2015, Appl. Anthropol, V35, P11
   Amadei B., 2020, CHALLENGES, V11, P28, DOI [10.3390/challe11020028, DOI 10.3390/CHALLE11020028]
   [Anonymous], Geoportale del Comune di Genova
   [Anonymous], Naturvation Project (NATure-Based URban InnoVATION): Cities-Nature-Innovation
   [Anonymous], Linee Guida per la Progettazione dei Sistemi Urbani di Drenaggio Sostenibile nel Territorio Comunale
   [Anonymous], Linee Guida Volontarie per l'uso Sostenibile del Suolo per i Professionisti dell'area Tecnica-Indirizzi per la Tutela del Suolo dai Processi di Impermeabilizzazione e Dalla Perdita di Materia Organica
   [Anonymous], Linee Guida per la Gestione del Verde Urbano e Prime Indicazioni per una Pianificazione Sostenibile
   Aranda NR, 2023, APPL GEOGR, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102940
   Bakowska-Waldmann E, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10090581
   Brandt K, 2020, GEOGR J, V186, P198, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12330
   Brown G, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V177, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.011
   Brown G, 2018, APPL GEOGR, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.002
   Cai YZ, 2021, TRIPLE HELIX-NETH, V8, P217, DOI 10.1163/21971927-12340004
   Cai YZ, 2021, TRIPLE HELIX-NETH, V7, P189, DOI 10.1163/21971927-bja10003
   Carayannis EG, 2021, J KNOWL ECON, V12, P2050, DOI 10.1007/s13132-021-00778-x
   Carayannis EG, 2012, SPRINGERBRIEF BUS, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1
   Cheung W, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V74, P56, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.07.006
   Cochrane L., 2020, Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, P1
   Collier M.J., 2023, Nature-Based Solutions, V3, DOI [10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100060, DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2023.100060]
   Colvin RM, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V52, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032
   Cox DTC, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V185, P28, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.01.008
   Denwood T, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P2324, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2065964
   Dixon B, 2021, APPL GEOGR, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102393
   Dossche R., 2021, AGEI Geotema, V21, P99
   Eaton-González R, 2021, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V10, DOI 10.3390/ijgi10040206
   European Commission, Environment, Water Framework Directive
   European Commission, Environment, Floods Directive
   Fagerholm N, 2022, GAIA, V31, P46, DOI 10.14512/gaia.31.1.10
   Fagerholm N, 2021, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V35, P1848, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2020.1869747
   Ferreira V, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020640
   Gaillard J., 2009, Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change, V60, P109
   Gebremedhin ET, 2020, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V13, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12602
   Geekiyanage D, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13168992
   Gimenez-Maranges M, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V255, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120191
   Gottwald S, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103778
   Gottwald S, 2016, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V30, P2321, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2016.1170837
   Gough C, 2023, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V23, DOI 10.1186/s12889-023-15093-0
   Growgreen Project, A Partnership for Greener Cities to Increase Livability, Sustainability and Business Opportunities
   HARTIG T, 1993, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V25, P17, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90120-3
   Hasche N., 2020, J SMALL BUSINESS ENT, V32, P523, DOI [10.1080/08276331.2019.1643134, DOI 10.1080/08276331.2019.1643134]
   Haworth BT, 2018, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/feart.2018.00183
   Hirata E., 2018, Journal of Flood Risk Management, V11, pS98, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12181
   Holguin N, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13111490
   Houessou-Dossou EAY, 2019, HYDROLOGY-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/hydrology6040090
   Huber J., 2010, Low Impact Development: A Design Manual for Urban Areas, P1
   Infrastrutture Verdi per l'Adattamento ai Cambiamenti Climatici, Strategie e Indicazioni Progettuali per la Gestione Sostenibile delle Acque Meteoriche Urbane nell'Area Mediterranea Nord-Occidentale
   International Fund Agricultural Development, Good Practices in Participatoy Mapping
   ISTAT, 2022, Censimenti Permanenti, Popolazione e Abitazioni
   ISTAT, 2019, Commissioni Riunite, 9a Commissione Agricoltura e Produzione Agroalimentare e 13a Commissione Territorio, Ambiente, Beni Ambientali del Senato della RepubblicaAllegato Statistico
   Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT), About us
   IUCN, 2020, Guidance for using the IUCN global standard for nature-based solutions, Vfirst, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2020.09.EN, 10.2305/iucn.ch.2020.09.en]
   Keul AG, 2018, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V10, P501, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0064.1
   Klonner C, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7090359
   Konig J., 2020, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_91-1
   Kyttä M, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104868
   Le De L., 2020, Aust. Inst. Disaster Resil, V35, P34
   Lin YT, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12040706
   Linee Guida sull'adozione di Tecniche di Drenaggio, 2018, Urbano Sostenibile per una Citta Piu Resiliente ai Cambiamenti Climatici
   Maceda E.A., 2009, Shima Int. J. Res. Into Isl. Cult, V3, P46
   McClymont K, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V275, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111173
   Moghadas M, 2022, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V11, DOI 10.3390/ijgi11020114
   de Lima APM, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14137952
   Municipality of Genoa, Piano Urbanistico Comunale Vigente
   Municipality of Genoa, 2022, Direzione Rigenerazione UrbanaUrban Center e Centro Storico, Genova Green Strategy
   Municipality of Genoa, 2022, Economic Development Department Urban Agenda Green Transition Office, Genoa 2050Action Plan for a Lighthouse
   Nofal OM, 2022, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V7, P171, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1722546
   O'Grady MJ, 2019, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V12, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12520
   O'Neill E, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V76, P1573, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8
   Opach T, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V50, P1806, DOI 10.1177/23998083221136557
   Palla A, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS663, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12246
   Palla A, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16052170
   Pirlone F, 2020, TEMA, P305, DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/6856
   Rall E, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.016
   Red Cross/Red Crescent Climate Centre, Annual Report 2007-Red Cross Red Crescent Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change
   Reichel C, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V5, P41, DOI 10.1007/s13753-014-0013-6
   Saraiva M, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P1122, DOI 10.1177/0265813516659071
   Seddon N., 2021, Guidelines for Successful, Sustainable Nature-Based Solutions
   See LS, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12071880
   Simpson D., 2020, Thematic Brief Nature-Based Solutions
   Spadaro I., 2022, P 24 NAT C SIU IT SO
   Sullivan-Wiley KA, 2019, APPL GEOGR, V105, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.02.008
   Taylor FE, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103771
   The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2023, AR6 Synthesis Report Climate Change
   Ufficio delle Pubblicazioni dell'Unione Europea, Guidelines for Co-Creation and Co-Governance of Nature-Based Solutions
   Ugolini F, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104575
   UNaLab, Urban Nature Labs
   UNDRR, Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022
   Urban GreenUP, Renaturing Urban Plants
   van Heel BF, 2023, CHILD GEOGR, V21, P378, DOI 10.1080/14733285.2022.2071600
   Visconti C, 2023, HABITAT INT, V135, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102748
   von Kotze A., 1996, REDUCING RISK PARTIC
   Ward PJ, 2013, ENVIRON RES LETT, V8, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044019
   Weng QH, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V117, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.030
   Zhao CJ, 2011, BUILD ENVIRON, V46, P1174, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.009
   Zingraff-Hamed A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208625
NR 97
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 8
U2 16
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 5
AR 1936
DI 10.3390/su16051936
PG 27
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KW2R3
UT WOS:001182938900001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kumar, V
   Bandyopadhyay, S
   Ramamritham, K
   Jana, A
AF Kumar, Vaibhav
   Bandyopadhyay, Santanu
   Ramamritham, Krithi
   Jana, Arnab
TI Pinch analysis to reduce fire susceptibility by redeveloping urban built
   forms
SO CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Fire resilience; Cost optimization; Linear regression; Urban built
   forms; Pinch analysis; Developing countries
ID RISK
AB Fire disasters pose a severe threat to the functionality of the cities and their sustainable development. Lack of analytical approach in research literature hinders the development of a fire-resilient city. A novel analytical framework is proposed in this paper to reduce the overall fire susceptibility of a city through a cost-effective redevelopment of the existing urban built forms (UBF). The proposed framework involves a regression model to capture the linear relationship between the fire susceptibility of an area and the built-up variables at a granular scale. Additionally, extended pinch analysis is incorporated in the framework to minimize the financial expenses incurred during the redevelopment, for the reduction in fire susceptibility of a city. The applicability of the proposed framework is demonstrated through a case study involving the southern region of Mumbai, India. The results suggest medium-rise buildings should be the main constituent for the UBF in Mumbai to reduce its fire susceptibility cost-effectively. Based on the illustrated case study, specific policies are recommended. The proposed novel methodology endorses a holistic decision-making process, applicable in developing fire-resilient cities in developing countries.
   [GRAPHICS]
   .
C1 [Kumar, Vaibhav; Jana, Arnab] Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
   [Bandyopadhyay, Santanu] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Energy Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
   [Ramamritham, Krithi] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT
   System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) - Bombay; Indian Institute
   of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT)
   - Bombay
RP Jana, A (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol, Ctr Urban Sci & Engn, Mumbai 400076, Maharashtra, India.
EM vaibhay.kumar.cs10@gmail.com; santanub@iitb.ac.in; krithi@iitb.ac.in;
   arnab.jana@iitb.ac.in
RI Kumar, Vaibhav/AAX-3174-2020; Bandyopadhyay, Santanu/F-8344-2014; Jana,
   Arnab/C-4116-2016
OI Kumar, Vaibhav/0000-0002-0047-0681; Jana, Arnab/0000-0001-8210-1566
CR [Anonymous], 2019, DEM WORLD URB AR
   Bandyopadhyay S, 2020, PROC INTEGR OPTIM, V4, P171, DOI 10.1007/s41660-020-00106-x
   Bandyopadhyay S, 2015, CHEM ENGINEER TRANS, V45, P1753, DOI 10.3303/CET1545293
   Basu R, 2017, PROC INTEGR OPTIM, V1, P213, DOI 10.1007/s41660-017-0015-0
   *BUR IND STAND, 2016, NAT BUILD COD IND 20, V2
   Burton E., 2013, Achieving sustainable urban form
   Central Public Works Department, 2019, SCHED RAT 2018
   Chang D.L., 2018, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., V4, P1
   Choei NY, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9020048
   Corcoran J, 2011, J GEOGR SYST, V13, P193, DOI 10.1007/s10109-009-0102-z
   Forkuo EK, 2013, GIS BASED FIRE EMERG, V2, P9
   Guay F., 2019, Int. J. Urban Civ. Eng, V13, P386
   Hohmann E.C., 1971, THESIS
   Hosseinali F, 2013, CITIES, V31, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.09.002
   Jain S, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V221, P339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.162
   Jana A, 2016, HABITAT INT, V57, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.005
   Jennings CR, 2013, FIRE SAFETY J, V62, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.07.002
   Jia X, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11226263
   Jia XX, 2020, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V157, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104749
   Klemes JJ, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V98, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.030
   Kropf K, 2014, URBAN MORPHOL, V18, P41
   Kumar V, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P1084, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2020.1756463
   Kumar V, 2022, GEOCARTO INT, V37, P543, DOI 10.1080/10106049.2020.1723718
   Kumar V, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AND DEVELOPMENT (ICTD), DOI 10.1145/3287098.3287099
   Li FX, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104620
   Malik J, 2020, J BUILD ENG, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101045
   Martin I, 2019, COMPUT GRAPH-UK, V84, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.cag.2019.08.003
   Middel A, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V183, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.12.001
   *MIN HOM AFF, 2011, FIR HAZ RISK AN COUN
   Ministry of Urban Development, 2014, GEN BUILD REQ
   Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), 2015, URB REG DEV PLANS FO
   Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, 2005, FIR HAZ RESP MIT PLA, P97
   Nyong-Bassey BE, 2020, ENERGY, V193, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116622
   Ongpeng JMC, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V240, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118222
   Pillai HK, 2007, CHEM ENG SCI, V62, P6212, DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2007.07.031
   Singh M, 2019, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V41, P2704, DOI 10.1080/15567036.2019.1568642
   Subramanian D, 2019, PROC INTEGR OPTIM, V3, P273, DOI 10.1007/s41660-018-0071-0
   Tan RR, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P2107, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1101-7
   Tan RR, 2015, CHEM ENGINEER TRANS, V45, P1741, DOI 10.3303/CET1545291
   Taridala S, 2017, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V79, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/79/1/012035
   Tishi TR, 2019, GEOJOURNAL, V84, P1417, DOI 10.1007/s10708-018-9923-y
   Town and Country Planning Organisation Ministry of Urban Development Government of India, 2016, MOD BUILD BYE LAWS 2
   Walmsley MRW, 2015, ENERGY, V92, P569, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.069
   Wang F, 2017, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V122, P353, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.03.010
   Zhang XX, 2020, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V9, DOI 10.3390/ijgi9040218
   Zhang XX, 2018, ISPRS INT J GEO-INF, V7, DOI 10.3390/ijgi7010007
NR 46
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 0
U2 14
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1618-954X
EI 1618-9558
J9 CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR
JI Clean Technol. Environ. Policy
PD SEP
PY 2020
VL 22
IS 7
BP 1531
EP 1546
DI 10.1007/s10098-020-01895-y
EA JUL 2020
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA MX7TJ
UT WOS:000547355600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Collier, MJ
   Nedovic-Budic, Z
   Aerts, J
   Connop, S
   Foley, D
   Foley, K
   Newport, D
   McQuaid, S
   Slaev, A
   Verburg, P
AF Collier, Marcus J.
   Nedovic-Budic, Zorica
   Aerts, Jeroen
   Connop, Stuart
   Foley, Dermot
   Foley, Karen
   Newport, Darryl
   McQuaid, Siobhan
   Slaev, Aleksander
   Verburg, Peter
TI Transitioning to resilience and sustainability in urban communities
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Transition strategy; Sustainability
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; INFORMATION INTEGRATION; LANDSCAPE
   DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; RESEARCH PRIORITIES; GREEN SPACE;
   HEALTH; ECOLOGY; GARDENS
AB Adapting to the challenges of rapid urban growth and societal change will require mechanisms for efficient transitioning to an embedded resilience. This has become central to the exploration of methods for achieving truly sustainable urban growth. However, while transitioning and resilience are useful descriptors, they can be abstract or conflicting ideals and their meanings obscured by a lack of concrete examples, both being barriers to many planning objectives. In this paper, we hold a lens over key issues in transitioning to resilience in urban areas by outlining emerging challenges that may offer directions towards operationalising how cities might transition to a more resilient future, while ensuring that communities are at the center of the process. The emerging and challenging areas - geospatial ICI, green infrastructure planning, novel design using collaborative responses, climate planning, limiting urban sprawl and short-circuit economic approaches - are explored as viable facets for devising and sustaining urban transition strategies. We conclude with a discussion on the need for developing a synergistic approach in practice to facilitate transition. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Collier, Marcus J.; Nedovic-Budic, Zorica] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Geog Planning & Environm Policy, Dublin 4, Ireland.
   [Aerts, Jeroen; Verburg, Peter] Free Univ Amsterdam, IVM, Inst Environm Studies, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [Connop, Stuart; Newport, Darryl] Univ E London, Sustainabil Res Unit, London E16 2RD, England.
   [Foley, Dermot] Dermot Foley Landscape Architects, Dublin 8, Ireland.
   [Foley, Karen] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Architecture & Landscape, Dublin 4, Ireland.
   [McQuaid, Siobhan] European Business & Innovat Ctr Network, B-1150 Brussels, Belgium.
   [Slaev, Aleksander] Varna Free Univ, Fac Architecture, Varna 9007, Bulgaria.
C3 University College Dublin; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; University of
   East London; University College Dublin; Varna Free University
RP Collier, MJ (corresponding author), Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Geog Planning & Environm Policy, Dublin 4, Ireland.
EM Marcus.Collier@UCD.ie
RI Aerts, Jeroen/M-8431-2013; Collier, Marcus/G-3557-2010; Verburg,
   Peter/Z-1582-2019; Slaev, Aleksandar D./P-7698-2016; Verburg,
   Peter/A-8469-2010
OI Newport, Darryl/0000-0003-3942-9747; Collier,
   Marcus/0000-0002-6853-9980; Slaev, Aleksandar D./0000-0001-9172-5776;
   Connop, Stuart/0000-0003-3050-7649; Verburg, Peter/0000-0002-6977-7104
CR Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Adger WN, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P757, DOI 10.1002/wcc.133
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   AHERN J, 1995, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V33, P131, DOI 10.1016/0169-2046(95)02039-V
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P1169, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1169:IHIEOA]2.0.CO;2
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Allenby B, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1034, DOI 10.1126/science.1111534
   [Anonymous], ANN REV ECOL SYST
   [Anonymous], 2019, Our Common Future
   [Anonymous], 2010, REFERENCE FRAMEWORK
   [Anonymous], 2012, CIT BIOD OUTL
   [Anonymous], 1997, GOVERNANCE SUSTAINAB
   [Anonymous], 2005, SWIMMING UPSTREAM CO
   [Anonymous], EUR 2020
   [Anonymous], 1999, ESDP EUR SPAT DEV PE
   [Anonymous], 2022, The Nature Recovery Network. GOV.UK
   Antrobus D, 2011, URBAN RES PRACT, V4, P207, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2011.579777
   Antrop M, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V67, P9, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00026-4
   Beierle T. C., 2000, 0056 RES FUT
   Beierle TC, 2002, RISK ANAL, V22, P739, DOI 10.1111/0272-4332.00065
   Bell Simon, 2007, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V6, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.005
   Berkes F, 2006, HUM ECOL, V34, P479, DOI 10.1007/s10745-006-9008-2
   BERTAUD A, 2004, WINDS SOC CHANGE REM
   Borgström ST, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Bouwer LM, 2007, SCIENCE, V318, P753, DOI 10.1126/science.1149628
   Buccella A, 2009, COMPUT GEOSCI-UK, V35, P710, DOI 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.033
   Budhathoki NR, 2008, GEOJOURNAL, V72, P149, DOI 10.1007/s10708-008-9189-x
   Budhathoki NamaRaj., 2010, Geomatica, V64, P11, DOI [10.5623/geomat-2010-0003, DOI 10.5623/GEOMAT-2010-0003]
   Burgess J, 2000, ECOL ECON, V35, P119, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00172-5
   Cameron RWF, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.002
   Clarke K.C., 2007, Classics from IJGIS. Twenty years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Systems and Science, P413, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-39918-6_82, 10.1201/9781420006377]
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Collier MJ, 2009, J RURAL STUD, V25, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.12.002
   Collier MJ, 2008, LANDSCAPE RES, V33, P439, DOI 10.1080/01426390801948406
   Connop S., 2009, BARKING RIVERSIDE GR
   Connop S., 2011, ESSEX NAT, V28, P49
   Cook EM, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST, V15, P19, DOI 10.1007/s11252-011-0197-0
   Cook MB, 2006, J CLEAN PROD, V14, P1455, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.018
   Coutinho-Rodrigues J, 2011, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V51, P720, DOI 10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.010
   Curry N., 2001, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V44, P561, DOI 10.1080/09640560120060966
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   de Vries S, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN A, V35, P1717, DOI 10.1068/a35111
   Dunnett N., 2008, Planting green roofs and living walls
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Ernstson H, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   EUKN (European Union Knowledge Network), 2007, LEIPZ CHART SUST EUR
   European Commission (EC), 1990, GREEN PAP URB ENV
   Fisher B, 2008, BIOL CONSERV, V141, P1167, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P1018, DOI 10.2307/2269584
   Forster A., 2012, AESOP 2012 ANK TURK
   Fry GLA, 2001, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V57, P159, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00201-8
   Gidley J. M., 2009, Environmental Policy and Governance, V19, P427, DOI 10.1002/eet.524
   Goddard MA, 2010, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V25, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Groenewegen PP, 2006, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-6-149
   Guitart D, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
   Haase D, 2012, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V35, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.012
   Hakimpour F., 2003, USING ONTOLGIES RESO
   Haklay M. M., 2010, INTERACTING GEOSPATI, P107
   Hamin EM, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.005
   Healey Pasty., 2006, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, V2nd
   Hirt S, 2007, URBAN GEOGR, V28, P755, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.28.8.755
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hopkins LD, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN B, V32, P597, DOI 10.1068/b31178
   Hostetler M, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.011
   Huang SCL, 2010, LANDSCAPE RES, V35, P551, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2010.504916
   Hubacek K, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010
   Hunter MCR, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.013
   Innes JE., 2004, Planning Theory Practice, V5, P419, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1464935042000293170, 10.1080/1464935042000293170]
   Kadas Gyongyver, 2006, Urban Habitats, V4, P66
   Kaplan R., 1983, EXPERIENCE NATURE PS
   Kennedy C, 2011, ENVIRON POLLUT, V159, P1965, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.022
   Krisjane Z., 2009, FOLIA GEOGRAPHICA, V14, P56
   Lacasta J, 2007, DATA KNOWL ENG, V63, P947, DOI 10.1016/j.datak.2007.06.002
   Lakes T, 2012, ECOL INDIC, V13, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.05.016
   Lawrence RJ, 2004, FUTURES, V36, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.001
   Lee ACK, 2011, J PUBLIC HEALTH-UK, V33, P212, DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068
   Leontidou Lila., 1990, MEDITERRANEAN CITY T
   Ling C, 2007, LANDSCAPE RES, V32, P285, DOI 10.1080/01426390701318171
   Longley P., 2010, GEOGRAPHIC INFORM SY
   Lüthi C, 2010, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, P49, DOI 10.1080/19463131003654764
   MA, 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
   Maas J, 2006, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V60, P587, DOI 10.1136/jech.2005.043125
   Marafa L, 2002, ENVIRONMENTALIST, V22, P377
   Masser I., 2005, GIS worlds: creating spatial data infrastructures, V1st
   Merz B, 2004, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V4, P153, DOI 10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004
   Naveh Z, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V50, P7, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00077-3
   Nedovic-Budic Z., 2004, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V28, P329, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00042-5
   Nedovic-Budic Zorica, 2009, URISA Journal, V21, P5
   Nedovic-Budic Z, 2010, MANUAL OF GEOSPATIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2ND EDITION, P689, DOI 10.1201/9781420087345-c35
   Novák J, 2007, GEOGR ANN B, V89B, P147, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00245.x
   Nyerges T.L., 2009, Regional and Urban GIS: A Decision Support Approach
   Ostrom E, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Palang H, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V50, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00081-5
   Petrov LO, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V92, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.01.011
   Pickett STA, 2008, J ECOL, V96, P8, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01310.x
   Porter Douglas R., 1995, Collaborative Planning for Wetlands and Wildlife, Issues and Examples
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P593, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
   Primmer E, 2006, FOREST POLICY ECON, V8, P838, DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.01.002
   Raik D.B., 2006, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V49, P321, DOI DOI 10.1080/09640560600598304
   Salvemini M. F. V., 2011, PLAN4ALL PROJECT INT
   Sawhney M, 2004, MIT SLOAN MANAGE REV, V45, P34
   Selman P., 2004, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V47, P365, DOI 10.1080/0964056042000216519
   Sheppard SRJ, 2005, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V8, P637, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002
   Silva C.N., 2010, Handbook of Research on E-planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring
   Simmons Mark T., 2008, Urban Ecosystems, V11, P339, DOI 10.1007/s11252-008-0069-4
   Slee B, 2007, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V120, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.034
   Sui D, 2011, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V25, P1737, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2011.604636
   Takano T, 2002, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V56, P913, DOI 10.1136/jech.56.12.913
   Tammaru T, 2004, EURASIAN GEOGR ECON, V45, P212, DOI 10.2747/1538-7216.45.3.212
   Treby EJ, 2006, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V81, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.010
   Twiss J, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1435, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1435
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   ULRICH RS, 1984, SCIENCE, V224, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.6143402
   USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2009, GREEN SERV MOR SUST
   Van Berkel DB, 2012, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V27, P641, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9730-7
   van de Meene SJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1117, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003
   Van Halen C., 2005, Methodology for Product Service System Innovation: How to Develop Clean Clever and Competitive Strategies in Companies
   Vigar G., 2002, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V45, P517, DOI DOI 10.1080/09640560220143530
   Vlek C, 2007, J SOC ISSUES, V63, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x
   Vos W, 1999, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V46, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2
   Wang H, 2007, GOV INFORM Q, V24, P736, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.002
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P319
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wu JG, 2002, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V17, P355, DOI 10.1023/A:1020561630963
NR 128
TC 161
Z9 184
U1 13
U2 323
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD JUL
PY 2013
VL 32
SU 1
SI SI
BP S21
EP S28
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
PG 8
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 226RY
UT WOS:000325054900004
OA Green Submitted, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Debnath, R
   Pettit, C
   van Delden, H
   Perez, P
AF Debnath, Ripan
   Pettit, Christopher
   van Delden, Hedwig
   Perez, Pascal
TI Collaborative modelling for goal-oriented scenario planning: A
   resilience planning case study in the context of greater Sydney
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban growth model; Collaborative modelling; Bushfire; Flood; Urban
   heat; Greater Sydney
ID LAND-USE; URBAN-GROWTH; FRAMEWORK; GEODESIGN; FUTURE; ISLAND
AB Worldwide, natural hazards have an increasing impact on ever expanding urbanised areas. Therefore, authorities need more sophisticated planning support systems (PSS) to enhance city resilience. This study explored the potential of a Cellular Automata-based model developed using Metronamica PSS for goal-oriented and collaborative resilience planning in the context of Greater Sydney, Australia. The process was embedded within a geodesign framework and participants (n = 19) collaborated in developing and validating four scenarios for 2050. The mitigating effects on the risks of bushfire, flood, and urban heat were analysed to support decision-making. The resulting Bushfire resilience scenario was significantly different from a present policy abiding, Business-As-Usual, scenario. This should encourage planners to consider the issue more closely. The study identified potential locations for resilient future growth, although additional land will be required by 2050, while medium-density developments were found to lessen urban heat impact. The research showed that city resilience scenarios can be constructed collaboratively using an advanced computer-based model, and stakeholders can understand such complex models, and participate in their improvement if the data and models are adequately shared. Future research can extend this approach by engaging the wider community in the scenario planning process.
C1 [Debnath, Ripan; Pettit, Christopher] Univ New South Wales, City Futures Res Ctr, Sydney 2052, Australia.
   [van Delden, Hedwig] Res Inst Knowledge Syst RIKS, Hertogsingel 11B, NL-6211 NC Maastricht, Netherlands.
   [Pettit, Christopher; Perez, Pascal] Univ Wollongong, SMART Infrastructure Facil, Wollongong 2522, Australia.
   [Perez, Pascal] Univ Melbourne, Australian Urban Res Infrastructure Network AURIN, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
C3 University of New South Wales Sydney; Maastricht University; University
   of Wollongong; University of Melbourne
RP Debnath, R (corresponding author), Univ New South Wales, City Futures Res Ctr, Sydney 2052, Australia.
EM r.debnath@student.unsw.edu.au; pettit@unsw.edu.au; hvdelden@riks.nl;
   pascal@uow.edu.au
RI van Delden, Hedwig/B-4276-2010
OI van Delden, Hedwig/0000-0001-6976-4832
FU UNSW's University International Postgraduate Award (UIPA)
FX Acknowledgement We would like to thank Dr Rohan Wickramasuriya
   Denagamage for his contributions to the land use model development. We
   are also grateful to the workshop participants for their critical inputs
   on the modelling PSS and its outputs, which are presented here. This
   work was developed as part of a PhD research project, which was
   supported by the UNSW's University International Postgraduate Award
   (UIPA) .
CR ABS, 2017, Projections
   Acheampong RA, 2015, J TRANSP LAND USE, V8, P11, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2015.806
   Allington GRH, 2018, ECOL SOC, V23, DOI 10.5751/ES-10034-230209
   [Anonymous], 2018, Resilient Sydney - A strategy for city resilience 2018
   [Anonymous], 2017, Planning Knowledge and Research
   ARNSTEIN SR, 1969, J AM I PLANNERS, V35, P216, DOI 10.1080/01944366908977225
   BATTY M, 1971, NATURE, V231, P425, DOI 10.1038/231425a0
   Batty M, 2013, ENVIRON PLANN B, V40, P1, DOI 10.1068/b4001ed
   Castella JC, 2005, ECOL SOC, V10
   Chen K., 2005, PLANNING NATURAL HAZ
   Couclelis H, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN A, V37, P1353, DOI 10.1068/a3785
   Debnath R, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020938
   DPE, 2019, Population Projections
   DPE, 2022, Departmental Support
   DPE, 2022, Western Sydney Aerotropolis Precinct Plan
   Dulal HB, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P494, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.02.001
   Eikelboom T, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V144, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.08.011
   Ferreira A., 2017, Applied Mobilities, P16, DOI 10.1080/23800127.2017.1283121
   Gahegan M, 2020, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V34, P1, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1652304
   Garcia-Alvarez D., 2022, Mapping and Forecasting Land Use, P223
   Garcia-Alvarez D, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105411
   Geertman S, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1326, DOI 10.1177/2399808320936277
   Giuliano G, 2019, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V63, P377, DOI 10.1007/s00168-019-00957-4
   Golasa P, 2021, ENERGIES, V14, DOI 10.3390/en14133784
   Goodspeed R, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN B, V43, P444, DOI 10.1177/0265813515614665
   GSC, 2020, Pulse of Greater Sydney 2020 - Measuring what Matters in the Metropolis
   GSC, 2018, Our Greater Sydney 2056, Western City District Plan - Connecting Communities (Draft)
   Gu YX, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093306
   Guan Qingfeng., 2005, CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC, V32, P369, DOI DOI 10.1559/152304005775194746
   Guzman LA, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104445
   Hagen-Zanker A, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V86, P284, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.04.002
   Hagen-Zanker A, 2009, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V23, P61, DOI 10.1080/13658810802570317
   Harvey EP, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V74, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.07.004
   Hatvani-Kovacs G, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V25, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.05.001
   Herold M, 2003, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V86, P286, DOI 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0
   Hewitt R, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V52, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.019
   Hu YH, 2015, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V120, P9932, DOI 10.1002/2015JD023653
   Jiang HX, 2022, GEOJOURNAL, V87, P1639, DOI 10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w
   Jiang HX, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1343, DOI 10.1177/2399808320934824
   Jusuf SK, 2007, HABITAT INT, V31, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.02.006
   Klosterman RE, 1999, ENVIRON PLANN B, V26, P393, DOI 10.1068/b260393
   Klosterman RE, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN B, V32, P477, DOI 10.1068/b3204ed
   LEE DB, 1973, J AM I PLANNERS, V39, P163, DOI 10.1080/01944367308977851
   Lestrelin G, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V78, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.11.003
   Li XC, 2016, SCI BULL, V61, P1637, DOI 10.1007/s11434-016-1111-1
   Liang X, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V177, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016
   Long Y., 2021, Data Augmented Design: Embracing New Data for Sustainable Urban Planning and Design, P15
   MacLachlan A, 2017, URBAN SCI, V1, DOI 10.3390/urbansci1040038
   Maier HR, 2016, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V81, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.014
   Malek Z, 2015, MT RES DEV, V35, P126, DOI 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00082.1
   McGarigal K., 2014, FRAGSTATS HELP
   MONSERUD RA, 1992, ECOL MODEL, V62, P275, DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-W
   NSW EPA, 2023, EPA Climate Change Policy
   Oxley MC, 2013, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.03.004
   Pan HZ, 2022, J URBAN TECHNOL, V29, P33, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2022.2031431
   Perez P., 2017, MODSIM 2017
   Pettit C., 2018, City, Culture and Society, V12, P13, DOI [10.1016/J.CCS.2017.10.002, DOI 10.1016/J.CCS.2017.10.002, 10.1016/j.ccs.2017.10.002]
   Pettit C, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V47, P1490, DOI 10.1177/2399808320924678
   Pettit CJ, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1387, DOI 10.1177/2399808318812887
   Punt EP, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101485
   Reed MS, 2013, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V128, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016
   Riddell GA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101437
   RIKS, 2013, Metronamica Documentation
   Roe I., 2022, ABC NEWS
   Russo P, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V67, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.08.009
   Sidiqui P, 2016, INT WORKS EARTH OB, DOI 10.1109/EORSA.2016.7552800
   Steffen W., 2014, Counting the costs: climate change and coastal flooding
   Steinitz C., 2012, A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design
   Suchá L, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V45, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101277
   TfNSW, 2018, Greater Sydney Services and Infrastructure Plan
   van Delden H, 2011, 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), P127
   Van Delden H., 2018, Geomatic Approaches for Modeling Land Change Scenarios, P511
   van Dijk T, 2021, PLAN THEOR, V20, P6, DOI 10.1177/1473095220913073
   van Vliet J, 2013, ECOL MODEL, V261, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.03.019
   van Vliet J, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P1367, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.017
   Vaz ED, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.007
   Verburg PH, 2006, GLO CH IGBP, P117
   Vermeiren K, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P199, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.006
   Voinov A, 2010, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V25, P1268, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007
   Wade Matt, 2016, The Sydney Morning Herald
   Walz A, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.001
   Wan JK, 2022, ECOTOX ENVIRON SAFE, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113521
   Wang SQ, 2021, INT J DIGIT EARTH, V14, P1213, DOI 10.1080/17538947.2021.1946178
   Williamson W, 2020, INT PLAN STUD, V25, P355, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2019.1626221
   Wu CL, 2018, HABITAT INT, V75, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.04.009
   Zhang L, 2019, COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2019: SMART CITIES, SUSTAINABILITY, AND RESILIENCE, P490
NR 86
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 1
U2 8
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JAN
PY 2024
VL 100
AR 104205
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104205
EA DEC 2023
PG 17
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA EV3Y2
UT WOS:001141680400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU AbouKorin, SAA
   Han, HY
   Mahran, MGN
AF AbouKorin, Salma Antar A.
   Han, Haoying
   Mahran, Mahran Gamal N.
TI Role of urban planning characteristics in forming pandemic resilient
   cities-Case study of Covid-19 impacts on European cities within England,
   Germany and Italy
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE COVID-19; Resilience; City size; City density; City form; City
   connectivity
AB In recent decades, the world has witnessed a variety of emerging infectious diseases, some of which developed to pandemic world threatening outbreaks, the ongoing COVID-19 is known to be taking the lead in claiming lives around the globe and thus, urging people to trail its increasing figures. Therefore, this research aims to emphasize the role of urban planning in containing such outbreaks through running a series of analytical and statistical studies on European cities, worst inflicted region, to analyze the main urban features they share and that may be propagating the disease spread according to their population size, density, form, intracity connec-tivity and intercity connectivity. This study, as far as we know of, is the first practice to evaluate both the in-dividual and combined impacts of these factors on recorded rates of infections. According to the context of this research, it is concluded that the diversity found in urban features are, to a large degree, related to cities being more vulnerable than others. Intracity connectivity through public transport is found to be the possible prime factor of this study, and is followed by population size, density, and intercity connectivity. Urban morphology seems to also contribute to such outbreak, with both radial and grid cities being associated to higher infections rates as to linear cities. Henceforth, setting priorities in post-pandemic urban planning schemes is essential for planning resilient cities that are capable to thrive and maintain functionality with lowest possible infections amid else possible diseases that are to follow in severity.
C1 [AbouKorin, Salma Antar A.; Han, Haoying; Mahran, Mahran Gamal N.] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Civil Engn & Architecture, Inst Urban & Rural Planning Theories & Technol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [AbouKorin, Salma Antar A.; Mahran, Mahran Gamal N.] El Minya High Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Architecture, Al Minya, Egypt.
   [Han, Haoying] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Balance Architecture, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang University; Zhejiang University
RP Han, HY (corresponding author), Zhejiang Univ, Anzhong Bldg,866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China.
EM salma.antar@mhiet.edu.eg; hanhaoying@zju.edu.cn;
   mahran.gamal@mhiet.edu.eg
RI naguib, Mahran/HZM-0901-2023; Han, Haoying/KHZ-9674-2024
OI Mahran, Mahran/0000-0002-5187-0466; Han, Haoying/0000-0003-4933-9665
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778560]; Center for
   Balance Architecture of Zhejiang University [20203512-02B]
FX This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Project No.: 51778560) and the Center for Balance Architecture of
   Zhejiang University (Project No: K Heng 20203512-02B, Index and planning
   methods of resilient cities).
CR Adiga A, 2020, EVALUATING IMPACT IN, DOI [10.1101/2020.02.20.20025882, DOI 10.1101/2020.02.20.20025882]
   Almeida C, 2020, URBAN PLANNING COVID
   [Anonymous], 2020, Washington Post, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.17931.44322
   Antyufeev A., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V687, P055025, DOI DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/687/5/055025
   Berg R. v., 2020, WILL COVID 19 AFFECT
   Bettencourt, 2020, COVID 19 ATTACK RATE, DOI [10.1101/2020.03.22.20041004v2, 10.1101/2020.03.22.20041004]
   Bettencourt LMA, 2013, SCIENCE, V340, P1438, DOI 10.1126/science.1235823
   Brennan, 2020, YOU BUILD CITY PANDE
   Burns J, 2020, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD013717
   Carozzi F., 2020, URBAN DENSITY COVID
   Cartenì A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V741, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140489
   CDC, 2012, LESS 3 MEAS RISK PRI, P6
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, GUID BUS EMPL RESP C
   Cheng C, 2020, COVID 19 GIVING MORE
   Chinazzi M, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P395, DOI [10.1126/science.aba9757, 10.1101/2020.02.09.20021261]
   CityLab, 2020, PAND AR URB PLANN PR
   Connolly C, 2020, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V10, P213, DOI 10.1177/2043820620934209
   Constable H, 2020, YOU BUILD CITY PANDE
   Davoudi S., 2020, EXPERT PERSPECTIVES
   Department for Transport U. K., 2020, COR COVID 19 SAF TRA
   El-Gazzar A., 2019, PATH CIT RES INT C
   Ellis E. G., 2020, How Smart City Planning Could Slow Future Pandemics
   Fang W., 2020, Sustainable Cities
   Florida R., 2020, The geography of coronavirus. Retrieved from Bloomberg Green
   Frost J., 2018, INTERPRET R SQUARED
   Goscé L, 2018, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12940-018-0427-5
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Jahangiri M, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138872
   Kadi Nadjat, 2020, Bull Natl Res Cent, V44, P138, DOI 10.1186/s42269-020-00393-x
   Kelly H, 2011, B WORLD HEALTH ORGAN, V89, P540, DOI 10.2471/BLT.11.088815
   Khavarian-Garmsir AR, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102911
   Kraemer MUG, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P493, DOI 10.1126/science.abb4218
   Lak Azadeh, 2020, Med J Islam Repub Iran, V34, P71, DOI 10.34171/mjiri.34.71
   Litman T, 2020, LESSONS PANDEMICS DI
   Matthews K, 2018, CITY PLANNING CAN AF
   Muggah R., 2020, CONVERSATION 0512
   Nairobi, 2020, EXP DISC CENTR ROL U
   Otsuki S, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0163418
   Pafka E, 2020, CORONAVIRUS FORCES U
   Pie V, 2019, PROBLEMS SOLUTIONS R
   Ratho A., 2020, RETHINKING CITIES PO
   Ribeiro HV, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0239699
   Secretary-General, 2019, PROGR SUST DEV GOALS
   Steuteville R, 2019, WHY CHOOS GRID
   Tesoriere G., 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, P1, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU12218829
   Therese K, 2020, POPULATION DENSITY B, V16, P4, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0249271, DOI 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0249271]
   Tian HY, 2020, SCIENCE, V368, P638, DOI 10.1126/science.abb6105
   UN HABITAT, 2021, CIT PAND MOR JUST GR
   UN-HABITAT, 2020, COVID 19 DEM URG NEE
   United Nations, 2020, Management for the COVID-19 Virus. Technical Brief
   United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2016, URB DEV EM FUT
   Wasdani KP, 2020, LOCAL ENVIRON, V25, P414, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2020.1754375
   Wei Y, 2021, CITIES, V110, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103010
   Zhang YH, 2020, TRANSPORT POLICY, V94, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.012
NR 54
TC 50
Z9 50
U1 3
U2 98
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD NOV
PY 2021
VL 118
AR 103324
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324
EA JUL 2021
PG 11
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA WD5BI
UT WOS:000704955500008
PM 34539022
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Brown, H
   Proust, K
   Newell, B
   Spickett, J
   Capon, T
   Bartholomew, L
AF Brown, Helen
   Proust, Katrina
   Newell, Barry
   Spickett, Jeffery
   Capon, Tony
   Bartholomew, Lisa
TI Cool Communities-Urban Density, Trees, and Health
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE trees; cities; health; climate change; Urban Heat Island (UHI)
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; EXTREME HEAT; MORTALITY; TEMPERATURE; ADAPTATION;
   STRATEGIES; VEGETATION; CITIES
AB A move towards more compact and climate-resilient cities is being encouraged around the world. As part of these plans, there is a need to manage the potential conflict between increasing urban densities and the extent of tree canopy in cities. Reductions in tree canopy are a major contributor to the urban heat island (UHI) effect, which will act to reduce rather than increase climate resilience in many cities. A systems thinking approach called Collaborative Conceptual Modelling was used to study the interaction between urban infill, tree canopy, and human health in Perth, Australia. The results indicated that under current planning policies and development practices, the behaviour of the system is dominated by the drive towards higher housing densities. While this may result in the attainment of urban infill targets, it is likely to lead to a reduction in tree canopy, higher temperatures, and a decrease in a range of other benefits provided by trees. Recommended actions to overcome this behaviour were determined by the identification of leverage points in the system. These included a shift to a sustainable development paradigm that places greater value on the environmental and social benefits provided by trees and a greater emphasis on a climate-resilient future. Market and legislative mechanisms should be integrated into the city's greening strategy and development plans to ensure the protection of existing trees and the inclusion of new trees on public and private land.
C1 [Brown, Helen; Spickett, Jeffery; Bartholomew, Lisa] Curtin Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, WHO Collaborating Ctr Environm Hlth Impact Assess, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
   [Proust, Katrina; Newell, Barry] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
   [Capon, Tony] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
C3 Curtin University; Australian National University; University of Sydney
RP Brown, H (corresponding author), Curtin Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, WHO Collaborating Ctr Environm Hlth Impact Assess, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
EM h.brown@curtin.edu.au; Katrina.proust@anu.edu.au;
   barry.newell@anu.edu.au; j.spickett@curtin.edu.au;
   tony.capon@sydney.edu.au; larkinlisaj@gmail.com
OI Capon, Anthony/0000-0003-0354-6810; Brown, Helen/0000-0001-9873-5969
FU CSIRO Urbanism, Climate Adaptation and Health Research Cluster;
   Australian Postgraduate Award; Curtin University Postgraduate
   Scholarship
FX This research was funded by CSIRO Urbanism, Climate Adaptation and
   Health Research Cluster. H.B. was supported by an Australian
   Postgraduate Award and a Curtin University Postgraduate Scholarship.
CR Andersen DF, 1997, SYST DYNAM REV, V13, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199722)13:2<107::AID-SDR120>3.3.CO;2-Z
   [Anonymous], 2008, IMPACTS CLIMATE CHAN
   [Anonymous], 2006, London's Urban Heat Island: A Summary for Decision Makers
   [Anonymous], HLTH IMPACTS CLIMATE
   [Anonymous], THE ANGRY SUMMER
   [Anonymous], 1995, WIND CLIMATE CITIES, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-3686-2_5
   Antunes P, 2013, J NETW COMPUT APPL, V36, P1466, DOI 10.1016/j.jnca.2013.03.014
   Basu R, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V8, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-8-40
   Bi P, 2011, ASIA-PAC J PUBLIC HE, V23, p27S, DOI 10.1177/1010539510391644
   Brown H., 2013, HLTH IMPACTS CLIMATE
   Brunner J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P231, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2012.733525
   Carey G, 2015, BMJ OPEN, V5, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002
   CHANDLER TJ, 1962, GEOGR J, V128, P279, DOI 10.2307/1794042
   Checkland P.Scholes., 1990, SOFT SYSTEMS METHODO
   Coates L, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V42, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.003
   Coutts AM, 2008, INT J CLIMATOL, V28, P1943, DOI 10.1002/joc.1680
   Department of Planning & Western Australian Planning Commission, 2013, CAP CIT PLANN FRAM
   Department of the Environment, 2011, STAT ENV REP
   Dhar TK, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P602, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1178107
   Dyball R., 2015, UNDERSTANDING HUMAN
   Folland C., 2001, OBSERVED CLIMATE VAR, P99
   Fouillet A, 2006, INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA, V80, P16, DOI 10.1007/s00420-006-0089-4
   Friel S, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0188872
   Goh YM, 2012, ACCIDENT ANAL PREV, V48, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.010
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Hart M, 2009, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V95, P397, DOI 10.1007/s00704-008-0017-5
   Jenerette GD, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P353, DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9032-z
   Jones T., 2005, NATURAL HAZARD RISK
   Kim D., 2007, SYSTEM ARCHETYPE BAS
   Kim H, 2009, SYST DYNAM REV, V25, P207, DOI 10.1002/sdr.422
   Krogstie J, 2006, EUR J INFORM SYST, V15, P91, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000598
   Li Q, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aab53a
   Lopez R, 2004, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V94, P1574, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.94.9.1574
   Lynn BH, 2009, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V48, P199, DOI [10.1175/2008JAMC1774.1, 10.1175/2008.1AMC1774.1]
   Maedows D., 1999, LEVERAGE POINTS PLAC
   McMichael AJ, 2008, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V37, P1121, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyn086
   Meadows D. H., 2008, THINKING SYSTEMS
   Nairn J. R., 2013, 60 CTR AUSTR CLIM RE
   Newell Barry, 2007, N S W Public Health Bull, V18, P214, DOI 10.1071/NB07028
   Newell Barry, 2012, INTRO COLLABORATIVE
   Office of the Environmental Protection Authority, 2015, RISKS AND REM
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Oleson KW, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V129, P525, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0936-8
   Oppl S, 2017, INF SYST E-BUS MANAG, V15, P717, DOI 10.1007/s10257-016-0324-9
   Proust K, 2012, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V9, P2134, DOI 10.3390/ijerph9062134
   Rydin Y, 2012, LANCET, V379, P2079, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60435-8
   Schwarz K, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0122051
   Senge PM, 2006, 5 DISCIPLINE ART PRA, P100
   Spickett JT, 2011, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V31, P297, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.07.001
   Sterman J.D., 2000, BUSINESS DYNAMICS
   Stocker T.F., 2013, CLIMATE CHANGE 2013
   Stone B., 2005, AM PLAN ASS, V71, P13
   Stone B, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V107, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.014
   Taha H, 1997, ENERG BUILDINGS, V25, P99, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(96)00999-1
   United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), 2018, REV WORLD URB PROSP
   Vennix JAM, 1999, SYST DYNAM REV, V15, P379, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199924)15:4<379::AID-SDR179>3.0.CO;2-E
   WA Planning Commission, 2012, URB GROWTH MON
   WA Planning Commission, 2014, URB FOR PERTH PEEL
   WA Planning Commission, 2018, PERTH PEEL 3 5 MILL
   Western Australia Local Government Association (WALGA), 2017, URB TREE CAN SURV
   Wheeler A, 2011, PLANNING URBAN HLTH
   Wolstenholme EF, 2003, SYST DYNAM REV, V19, P7, DOI 10.1002/sdr.259
   Yamamoto Y., 2006, SCI TECHNOLOGY TREND, V54, P65
   Zhao L, 2014, NATURE, V511, P216, DOI 10.1038/nature13462
   Zhou Y, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V52, P639, DOI 10.1007/s11069-009-9406-z
NR 65
TC 25
Z9 26
U1 7
U2 54
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD JUL
PY 2018
VL 15
IS 7
AR 1547
DI 10.3390/ijerph15071547
PG 16
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA GU7XC
UT WOS:000445543500254
PM 30037129
OA Green Submitted, gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Yan, JL
AF Yan, Jiale
TI Climate governance and industrial ecological transformation
SO CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE climate governance; difference-in-differences model; energy efficiency;
   industrial ecological transformation; technological advancement
ID EXTREME WEATHER EVENTS; INNOVATION
AB To deal with the increasing number of climate disasters and the negative impacts of climate change, cities need to improve their climate resilience. This may influence the process of industrial ecological transformation. This paper uses the pilot policy of the climate-resilient city construction (CRCC) in 2017 as a natural experiment. Using data from 278 cities in China from 2012 to 2021, we use the difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the impact of climate governance on the industrial ecological transformation (IET). The results are as follows. First, climate governance actions can promote the industrial ecological transformation, and this positive effect is still significant after robustness tests. Second, the mechanism suggests that climate-resilient city construction facilitates the industrial ecological transformation of cities by promoting technological advancement and improving urban energy efficiency. Third, there is obvious heterogeneity in the impact of climate-resilient city construction on industrial ecological transformation. It has a stronger effect in non-old industrial bases and central cities. In addition, we further examined the results using the double machine learning model (DML). This paper provides an important reference for improving the regional coordinated development mechanism of climate policies and continuously promoting the climate-resilient city construction.
C1 [Yan, Jiale] Univ Calif Berkeley, Coll Letters & Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
C3 University of California System; University of California Berkeley
RP Yan, JL (corresponding author), Univ Calif Berkeley, Coll Letters & Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
EM morningyjl@berkeley.edu
RI Yan, Jiale/AIF-4021-2022
CR Addis TL, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15043235
   Alimonti G, 2024, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V23, P186, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2023.2239807
   Bazbauers AR, 2022, CLIM DEV, V14, P689, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2021.1974331
   Birkmann J, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P637, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9319-2
   Cai ZP, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P227, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i3.4208
   Calabrese R, 2024, EUR J OPER RES, V314, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2023.11.022
   Chernozhukov V, 2018, ECONOMET J, V21, pC1, DOI 10.1111/ectj.12097
   den Hond F, 2000, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V1, P60
   Deutz P., 2004, Business Strategy and the Environment, V13, P347, DOI DOI 10.1002/BSE.416
   Ding YJ, 2006, ANN GLACIOL-SER, V43, P97, DOI 10.3189/172756406781812005
   Du H, 2024, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V33, P2571, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/175016
   Erkman S., 1997, J CLEAN PROD, V5, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(97)00003-6
   Frame DJ, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P781, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02729-y
   Fu L, 2021, CHIN J URBAN ENV STU, V09, DOI 10.1142/S2345748121500056
   Han F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13179673
   Hertwich EG, 2005, J IND ECOL, V9, P85, DOI 10.1162/1088198054084635
   Hou L, 2024, LAND DEGRAD DEV, V35, P4726, DOI 10.1002/ldr.5253
   Hu GQ, 2021, ENERG ECON, V98, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
   Huang QY, 2024, J SEX RES, DOI 10.1080/00224499.2024.2338743
   Huber J., 2000, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, V2, DOI [10.1002/1522-7200(200010/12)2:4andlt;269::AID-JEPP58andgt;3.0.CO;2-U, DOI 10.1080/714038561, https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-7200(200010/12)2:4%3C269::AID-JEPP58%3E3.0.CO;2-U]
   Kang B, 2021, REV FISH BIOL FISHER, V31, P599, DOI 10.1007/s11160-021-09668-6
   Korhonen J, 2004, J CLEAN PROD, V12, P809, DOI 10.1016/j.jelepro.2004.02.026
   Kourtit K, 2023, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101599
   Lai MY, 2024, APPL ECON, V56, P1817, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2023.2177601
   Lee T, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.09.003
   Li M., 2024, POL J ENVIRON STUD
   Li XR, 2024, CLIM POLICY, V24, P378, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2023.2260352
   Li X, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19159399
   Lindvall D, 2023, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V15, P267, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2023.2253755
   Liu MS, 2021, GEOFORUM, V121, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.017
   Liu Z, 2020, APPL ENERG, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115206
   Long Y, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P94290, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-29041-3
   Lowe E.A., 1995, J CLEAN PROD, V3, P47
   Lowenthal MD, 1998, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V24, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00028-7
   Mehmood Saima, 2024, Energy and Built Environment, V5, P464, DOI 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.03.001
   Mirza MMQ, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, P233, DOI 10.1016/S1469-3062(03)00052-4
   Newell JP, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P702, DOI 10.1177/0309132514558442
   Niamir L, 2023, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V5, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2023.1137641
   Patterson JJ, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P374, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1510767
   Pichler M, 2021, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102180
   Raihan A., 2023, J. Environ. Sci. Econ, V2, P36, DOI 10.56556/jescae.v2i3.587
   Si L., 2021, GANSU SOCIAL SCI, V4, P149
   Sun YF, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110468
   Tol RSJ, 2024, ENERG POLICY, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113922
   Wang H, 2024, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V35, P569, DOI 10.1177/0958305X221127018
   Wen JH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V14, P1, DOI 10.1007/s13753-023-00472-3
   Westman L, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V50, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.008
   Westman LK, 2019, POLIT GEOGR, V70, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.01.002
   Xu JP, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V17, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.04.001
   Yan JL, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V429, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139511
   Yazar M, 2023, J URBAN AFF, V45, P1265, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2021.1915151
   Zeng SB, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363
   Zhang MX, 2024, POL J ENVIRON STUD, V33, DOI 10.15244/pjoes/177976
   Zhao S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107184
NR 54
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 39
U2 47
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1535-3958
EI 1535-3966
J9 CORP SOC RESP ENV MA
JI Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag.
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 32
IS 1
BP 718
EP 728
DI 10.1002/csr.2987
EA SEP 2024
PG 11
WC Business; Environmental Studies; Management
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA R6Q1Z
UT WOS:001319970700001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Georgiadis, C
   Patias, P
   Verde, N
   Tsioukas, V
   Kaimaris, D
   Georgoula, O
   Kocman, D
   Athanasopoulou, E
   Speyer, O
   Raudner, A
   Karl, M
   Gerasopoulos, E
AF Georgiadis, Charalampos
   Patias, Petros
   Verde, Natalia
   Tsioukas, Vassilios
   Kaimaris, Dimitris
   Georgoula, Olga
   Kocman, David
   Athanasopoulou, Eleni
   Speyer, Orestis
   Raudner, Astrid
   Karl, Matthias
   Gerasopoulos, Evangelos
TI State-of-play in addressing urban environmental pressures: Mind the gaps
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart cities; Gap analysis; User needs; State of the art; Legal
   framework; Air quality & health; Disasters; Migration; Urban growth
AB The creation of Smart Cities is an emerging research and application field that has the objective to increase city resilience and improve the quality of life for citizens. In this paper an extensive and thorough gap analysis that was performed in the framework of the SMURBS1 project is presented. The gap analysis identified 117 gaps in the legal, methodological, and technological framework, in the thematic areas of air quality, disasters, urban growth and migration. The identified gaps can be used by policy makers in local, regional, national, or even at EU or UN level to form new policies that will bridge these gaps and lead to the creation of resilient and sustainable smart cities.
C1 [Georgiadis, Charalampos; Patias, Petros; Verde, Natalia; Tsioukas, Vassilios; Kaimaris, Dimitris; Georgoula, Olga] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Univ Box 465, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   [Kocman, David] Jozef Stefan Inst, Dept Environm Sci, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
   [Athanasopoulou, Eleni; Speyer, Orestis; Gerasopoulos, Evangelos] Natl Observ Athens, Inst Environm Res & Sustainable Dev, Athens 15236, Greece.
   [Raudner, Astrid] Italian Inst Environm Protect & Res, Dept Geol Survey Italy, Ispra, Italy.
   [Karl, Matthias] Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Chem Transport Modelling, D-21502 Geesthacht, Germany.
C3 Aristotle University of Thessaloniki; Slovenian Academy of Sciences &
   Arts (SASA); Jozef Stefan Institute; National Observatory of Athens;
   Italian Institute for Environmental Protection & Research (ISPRA);
   Helmholtz Association; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
RP Georgiadis, C (corresponding author), Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Univ Box 465, Thessaloniki, Greece.
EM harrisg@civil.auth.gr
RI Verde, Natalia/ABE-1605-2020; Patias, Petros/K-9209-2013; Karl,
   Matthias/AFM-7170-2022; Gerasopoulos, Evangelos/D-8808-2014;
   Athanasopoulou, Eleni/C-9429-2017
OI Athanasopoulou, Eleni/0000-0003-2650-4349; Kocman,
   David/0000-0001-6297-2823; Karl, Matthias/0000-0002-0821-018X; Speyer,
   Orestis/0000-0001-5252-7080
FU EU [689443]
FX The study received support by ERA-PLANET (www.era-planet.eu)
   trans-national project SMURBS (www.smurbs.eu) (grant agreement no.
   689443), funded under the EU Horizon 2020 Framework Program.
CR Ahad MA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301
   Allen C, 2019, SUSTAIN SCI, V14, P421, DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0596-8
   [Anonymous], SMART CITYS STATE AR
   [Anonymous], CITYKEYS H2020
   [Anonymous], 2015, SMART CIT OV GUID
   [Anonymous], 2019, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   [Anonymous], POLICY LEGAL FRAMEWO
   [Anonymous], GAP ANAL FINAL REPOR
   [Anonymous], US NEEDS REP
   Arias M, 2018, TRANSBOUND EMERG DIS, V65, P235, DOI 10.1111/tbed.12695
   Barot F, 2017, INT J SMART HOME, V11, P9
   Bosch P., 2017, CITYkeys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities
   Burkov EA, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 XX IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND MEASUREMENTS (SCM), P34, DOI 10.1109/SCM.2017.7970487
   Chamoso P, 2018, WIREL COMMUN MOB COM, DOI 10.1155/2018/3086854
   Gerasopoulos E., 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY
   Giffinger R., 2007, CITY RANKING EUROPEA, P1
   Guo H., 2020, Man Digit Earth, P852, DOI [10.1007/978-981-32-9915-3, DOI 10.1007/978-981-32-9915-3]
   Ismagilova E, 2019, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V47, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004
   Lai CS, 2020, CLEAN TECHNOL-BASEL, V2, P290, DOI 10.3390/cleantechnol2030019
   Lancheros E, 2018, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/rs10071098
   Madry S., 2015, SPACE SYSTEMS DISAST, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4939-1513-2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1513-2]
   Matevosyan H, 2017, IEEE GEOSC REM SEN M, V5, P19, DOI 10.1109/MGRS.2017.2720263
   Mathieu P.-P., 2018, Earth Observation Open, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-65633-5
   Mohanty SP, 2016, IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M, V5, P60, DOI 10.1109/MCE.2016.2556879
   Mora L, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V142, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.035
   Peris-Ortiz M., 2017, SUSTAINABLE SMART CI, P9, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40895-8]
   Prakash M, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12101646
   Salam A., 2020, INTERNET THINGS SUST, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-35291-2_1., DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-35291-2]
   Sánchez-Corcuera R, 2019, INT J DISTRIB SENS N, V15, DOI 10.1177/1550147719853984
   SMURBS, 2021, PORTF SMART URBAN SO
   SMURBS, 2020, US NEEDS REP
   UN, 2020, DEV DES NEWS POP 201
   Welbergen J.A., 2012, MAR TROP SCI RES FAC, DOI [10.13140/2.1.4290.9760, DOI 10.13140/2.1.4290.9760]
   Westraadt L, 2018, ACM INT CONF PR SER, P145, DOI 10.1145/3278681.3278699
   Yigitcanlar T, 2021, J URBAN TECHNOL, V28, P135, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2020.1753483
   Yin CT, 2015, SCI CHINA INFORM SCI, V58, DOI 10.1007/s11432-015-5397-4
NR 36
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 1
U2 15
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1462-9011
EI 1873-6416
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLICY
JI Environ. Sci. Policy
PD JUN
PY 2022
VL 132
BP 308
EP 322
DI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.030
EA MAR 2022
PG 15
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 2P9XA
UT WOS:000820083100008
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Díaz-Caravantes, RE
   Zuniga-Teran, A
   Martín, F
   Bernabeu, M
   Stoker, P
   Scott, C
AF Diaz-Caravantes, Rolando E.
   Zuniga-Teran, Adriana
   Martin, Facundo
   Bernabeu, Marta
   Stoker, Philip
   Scott, Christopher
TI Urban water security: a comparative study of cities in the arid Americas
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE Argentina; cities; Mexico; urban growth; urban water security; USA;
   water management
ID RESILIENT WATER; TUCSON; GROUNDWATER; RECHARGE; ARIZONA; DROUGHT; DESERT
AB In this study we analyse how three cities in the arid Americas have addressed urban growth while facing water scarcity: Hermosillo, Mexico; Mendoza, Argentina; and Tucson, USA. We use the urban water security framework to examine five domains of water management: sociodemographic, economic, technological, ecological and governance (SETEG). Our analysis indicates that, in spite of water scarcity, urban growth has been promoted in the three cities. We argue that this expansion, although encouraged for economic development, is not sustainable in the long term. In the three cities, groundwater plays a major role in water supply, but growth has negatively affected riparian ecosystems, the health of the aquifers and access to domestic water. In order to pursue water security, several options are essential to enhance social-ecological system resilience. These include limits or reduction of urban expansion, reuse of treated effluent for riparian conservation, and community conservation efforts such as rainwater harvesting and other green infrastructure practices.
C1 [Diaz-Caravantes, Rolando E.] El Colegio Sonora Ctr Studies Hlth & Soc, Ave Obregon 54, Hermosillo 83010, Sonora, Mexico.
   [Zuniga-Teran, Adriana; Scott, Christopher] Univ Arizona, Udall Ctr Studies Publ Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
   [Zuniga-Teran, Adriana] Univ Arizona, Sch Landscape Architecture & Planning, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
   [Martin, Facundo; Bernabeu, Marta] Inst Human Social & Environm Sci INCIHUSA, CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina.
   [Martin, Facundo] Univ Nacl Cuyo, Dept Geog, Mendoza, Argentina.
   [Stoker, Philip] Univ Arizona, Coll Architecture Planning & Landscape Architectu, Planning & Landscape Architecture, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
   [Scott, Christopher] Univ Arizona, Sch Geog & Dev, Tucson, AZ USA.
   [Scott, Christopher] Univ Arizona, Consortium Arizona Mexico Arid Environm, Tucson, AZ USA.
C3 University of Arizona; University of Arizona; Consejo Nacional de
   Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET); INCIHUSA - Instituto
   de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales & Ambientales; University Nacional Cuyo
   Mendoza; University of Arizona; University of Arizona; University of
   Arizona
RP Díaz-Caravantes, RE (corresponding author), El Colegio Sonora Ctr Studies Hlth & Soc, Ave Obregon 54, Hermosillo 83010, Sonora, Mexico.
EM rdiaz@colson.edu.mx; aazuniga@email.arizona.edu;
   fdmartingarcia@gmail.com; mbernabeu@mendoza-conicet.gob.ar;
   philipstoker@email.arizona.edu; cascott@email.arizona.edu
RI Zuniga-Teran, Adriana/HIK-2468-2022
OI Diaz-Caravantes, Rolando E./0000-0002-4117-2197; Zuniga-Teran,
   Adriana/0000-0003-2912-2469; Martin, Facundo/0000-0003-0709-249X
FU Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research - NSF [CRN3056,
   GEO-1128040]; Lloyd's Register Foundation; NSF [DEB-1010495]
FX The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the
   research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Partial
   funding for this research was provided by the Inter-American Institute
   for Global Change Research CRN3056 Project (supported by NSF Grant No.
   GEO-1128040). We further acknowledge the Lloyd's Register Foundation, a
   charitable foundation helping protect life and property by supporting
   engineering-related education, public engagement and the application of
   research, and NSF Grant No. DEB-1010495.
CR ADWS, 2010, AR WAT ATL, V8
   AguaH, 2017, AG CAL
   AguaH, 2017, ENF PLAN ESC REF CAP
   Al-Sabbry MM, 2002, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V38, P119, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01540.x
   [Anonymous], 2015, Estadisticas del Agua en Mexico
   [Anonymous], 2010, Censo 2010
   Brooks DB, 2011, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V27, P315, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2011.571235
   Bustos R, 2007, CONFLICTO SOCIAL USO
   Carlson MA, 2011, J HYDROL, V409, P196, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.020
   CEA, 2018, SIST IND
   City of Tucson, PUBL PRIV UT
   CONAGUA, 2013, PROGR DET ACC GEST I
   CTWD, 2013, 2012 UPD WAT PLAN 20
   CTWD, 2004, WAT PLAN 2000 2050
   CTWD, 2017, XER LANDSC SCREEN RE
   DEIE, 2016, ENC COND VID
   del Castillo J. M., 1994, ESTUDIOS SOCIALES, VV, P65
   DGI, 2016, AQ VOL EMB
   Diaz-Caravantes R E, 2015, 5 C MEX EC SAN LUIS
   Díaz-Caravantes RE, 2014, WATER ALTERN, V7, P499
   Díaz-Caravantes RE, 2012, GEOGR J, V178, P42, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00435.x
   EPAS, 2019, ENT PROV AG SAN
   Fasciolo G, 2010, AUDITORIA GEN OBRAS
   Galizia J, 2015, URBAN WATER CHALLENG, P19
   Garfin G., 2014, Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, DOI [10.7930/J08G8HMN, DOI 10.7930/J08G8HMN, 10.7930/J08G8HMN.]
   Gleick PH, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1524, DOI 10.1126/science.1089967
   Hirt P, 2017, J SOUTHWEST, V59, P264, DOI 10.1353/jsw.2017.0017
   Huang YJ, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P3900, DOI 10.3390/su7043900
   Jepson Wendy, 2017, Water Security, V1, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.07.001
   Jobbágy EG, 2011, ECOL APPL, V21, P678, DOI 10.1890/09-1427.1
   Kasabov N, 2016, 2016 IEEE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (IS), P15, DOI 10.1109/IS.2016.7737434
   Killian CD, 2019, HYDROGEOL J, V27, P2167, DOI 10.1007/s10040-019-01981-6
   Kim JW, 2015, ISPRS J PHOTOGRAMM, V107, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.03.013
   Kirk JP, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P2424, DOI 10.1002/joc.4855
   LEIVA JC, 1989, GLAC QUAT G, V6, P143
   Livingston M, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V64, P131, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00217-7
   Llop A., 2002, GUIA SALINIZACION AG
   Loera Burnes Edmundo, 2017, Estud. front, V18, P25, DOI 10.21670/ref.2017.36.a02
   Masiokas MH, 2008, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V60, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.07.031
   Megdal SB, 2015, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V107, P46, DOI 10.5942/jawwa.2015.107.0136
   Megdal SB, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P1500, DOI 10.3390/w6061500
   PAG, 2006, 208 PLAN AR WAT QUAL
   PAG, DEM PIM ASS GOV
   Paton FL, 2014, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V60, P302, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.06.018
   Pima County, 2017, SON DES CONS PLAN
   Pineda N., 2008, La gestion de los recursos hidricos: realidades y perspectivas, P121
   Rojas F, APPL SPATIAL ANAL PO
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.002
   Romo Leon J R, 2014, PROGRAMA MEDIDAS PRE
   Salazar-Adams A., 2016, COLEGIO SONORA MEXIC, P197
   Scott CA, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P280, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2013.754660
   Scott CA, 2012, WATER-SUI, V4, P848, DOI 10.3390/w4040848
   Scott CA, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.02.003
   SEMARNAT, 2001, AR NAT PROT MEX CON
   Sivapalan M, 2014, EARTHS FUTURE, V2, P225, DOI 10.1002/2013EF000164
   TECHO, 2016, REL AS INF
   Thomure T., 2015, The importance of the Tucson water regional reclaimed water system to the economic vitality of the city of Tucson-Pima County region
   Tillman FD, 2016, B ENVIRON CONTAM TOX, V97, P543, DOI 10.1007/s00128-016-1882-8
   Torres L, 2003, TLS-TIMES LIT SUPPL, P17
   UN DESA, 2018, WORLD URB PROSP KEY
   UNICIPIO, 2018, PLAN ACC AR METR MEN
   United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs, 2019, 2019 revision of world population prospects
   Vammen K, 2015, URBAN WATER CHALLENG
   Vasquez-Del Castillo D A, 2013, REV CIENCIAS BIOL SA, VXV, P39
   Vazquez J.L.M., 2014, DESPOJO AGUA CUENCA
   D'Inca MV, 2013, GEO UERJ, V1, P256
   Villalba R., 2005, ADV GLOB CHANGE RES, P157, DOI 10.1007/1- 4020-3508-X
   Whitten G, 2014, IEMSS 2014 P INT C E, P1
   Zuniga-Teran A.A., 2019, RESILIENT WATER SERV
NR 69
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 2
U2 52
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD APR
PY 2020
VL 32
IS 1
BP 275
EP 294
AR 0956247819900468
DI 10.1177/0956247819900468
EA MAR 2020
PG 20
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA LM6XA
UT WOS:000523842100001
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pickett, STA
   Cadenasso, ML
   Grove, JM
AF Pickett, STA
   Cadenasso, ML
   Grove, JM
TI Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the
   ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE ecosystem; ecological resilience; integration; paradigm; urban design;
   urban ecology; urban planning
ID ECOSYSTEM
AB Urban designers, ecologists, and social scientists have called for closer links among their disciplines. We examine a promising new tool for promoting this linkage-the metaphor of "cities of resilience." To put this tool to best use, we indicate how metaphor fits with other conceptual tools in science. We then present the two opposing definitions of resilience from ecology, and give reasons why one is more appropriate for linking with design. Additional specific tools and insights that are emerging from, or being increasingly used in, ecology can further support the linkage with urban design. These include recognizing the role of spatial heterogeneity in both ecological and social functioning of urban areas, the integrating power of watersheds, social and ecological patch dynamics of cities, the utility of spatial mosaic models to capture function, the use of an integrated "human ecosystem" modeling framework, and the consequent perspective of metropolitan areas as integrated ecological-social systems. Three additional tools are related to the adaptability of people and human institutions. First is the recognition of a "learning loop" in metropolitan ecosystems in which people respond to and affect ecological change, the use of urban design as experiments whose ecological and social outcomes can be measured, and finally the potency of a dialog between professionals and citizens, communities, and institutions, to support both research and design. The metaphor of resilience, and its technical specifications, draw these diverse strands for linking ecology and planning together. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
C1 Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
   USDA, Forest Serv, S Burlington, VT 05403 USA.
C3 Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; United States Department of
   Agriculture (USDA); United States Forest Service
RP Inst Ecosyst Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA.
EM picketts@ecostudies.org
OI Grove, J. Morgan/0000-0002-7803-074X; Cadenasso,
   Mary/0000-0002-6521-067X
FU Direct For Biological Sciences; Div Of Biological Infrastructure
   [1052875] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
CR Adams CA, 2002, ECOLOGY AND DESIGN: FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING, P113
   Allen TFH., 1992, Toward a Unified Ecology
   [Anonymous], SOCIAL SCI APPL ASIA
   [Anonymous], 1995, Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem
   [Anonymous], 1984, LEARNING FIELD GUIDE
   [Anonymous], system: disturbance, development and the steady state based on
   BAND LE, 1993, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V63, P93, DOI 10.1016/0168-1923(93)90024-C
   BERKOWITZ AR, 2003, NEW FRONTIER SCI ED
   Black P.E., 1991, WATERSHED HYDROLOGY
   Boone C., 2003, Historical Geography, V31, P151
   Brun S. E., 2000, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V24, P5, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00040-X
   Burch W.R., 1993, Unasylva, V44, P19
   Burch WilliamR., 1984, MEASURING SOCIAL IMP
   Cadenasso ML, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P717, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0717:AIASAT]2.0.CO;2
   Cadenasso ML, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P750, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0750:AFFATO]2.0.CO;2
   Corner J, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P81
   Costanza R., 1995, Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, P169
   Cronon W, 1995, UNCOMMON GROUND, P69
   Doran PD., 1998, STATUS TRENDS NATION, P11
   Field D. R, 1988, RURAL SOCIOLOGY ENV
   Forman R., 1986, Landscape Ecology
   Forman RTT, 2002, ECOLOGY AND DESIGN: FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING, P85
   Golley F. B., 1993, A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology
   Gottdiener Mark., 2000, NEW URBAN SOCIOLOGY, V2nd
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Grove J.M., 2003, Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A new frontier for science and education
   GROVE JM, UNPUB SOCIAL ECOLOGY
   GROVE JM, 1996, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
   Grove MorganJ., 1997, URBAN ECOSYST, V1, P259, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1018591931544
   Gunderson L.H., 1995, BARRIERS BRIDGES REN, P489
   Hewlett J.D., 1969, An outline of forest hydrology
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jacobs Jane., 1962, DEATH LIFE GREAT AME
   Johnson BR, 2002, ECOLOGY AND DESIGN: FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING, P1
   Johnson M, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P167
   Karr JR, 2002, ECOLOGY AND DESIGN: FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING, P133
   LAW NL, IN PRESS J ENV QUAL
   Lee R.G., 1992, Watershed Management, P73
   Likens GE., 1992, ECOSYSTEM APPROACH U
   LIKENS GE, 1984, VERH INT VEREIN LIMN, V22, P1
   Logan JohnR. Harry L. Molotch., 1987, URBAN FORTUNES POLIT
   Lyle J.T., 1999, DESIGN HUMAN ECOSYST
   Machlis GE, 1997, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V10, P347, DOI 10.1080/08941929709381034
   MALER KG, 1994, INVESTING IN NATURAL CAPITAL, P233
   McHarg I., 1992, DESIGN NATURE
   McHarg IL, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P321
   Meyer EK, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P45
   MUSACCHIO L, 2002, CIT RES 4 THEM S UND, P38
   Ndubisi F, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P9
   Ndubisi Forster., 2002, Ecological planning a historical and comparative synthesis
   Olin L, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P109
   *OLMST BROTH, 1904, DEV PUBL GROUNDS GRE
   Picket S.T., 1985, ECOLOGY NATURAL DIST
   Pickett S. T., 2007, Ecological Understanding: The Nature of Theory and the Theory of Nature, V2nd ed., DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-554522-8.X5001-8
   Pickett S. T. A., 1995, P261
   Pickett S.T. A., 2000, ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUEN, P33
   PICKETT STA, 1995, SCIENCE, V269, P331, DOI 10.1126/science.269.5222.331
   Pickett STA, 2001, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V32, P127, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012
   Pickett STA, 2002, ECOSYSTEMS, V5, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0051-y
   Pickett STA, 1999, OIKOS, V87, P479, DOI 10.2307/3546812
   Pickett STA., 1997, Urban Ecosystems, V1, P185, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1018531712889
   Pickett Steward T.A., 1992, P65
   Pulliam HR, 2002, ECOLOGY AND DESIGN: FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING, P51
   Spirn AnneWhiston., 1984, GRANITE GARDEN URBAN
   Spirn AW, 2002, ECOLOGY AND DESIGN: FRAMEWORKS FOR LEARNING, P29
   STEINER F, 2002, HUMAN ECOLOGY FOLLOW, P237
   Tansley AG, 1935, ECOLOGY, V16, P284, DOI 10.2307/1930070
   Thompson G., 1997, Ecological Desing And Planning, P1
   VAYDA AP, 1993, HUMANS AS COMPONENTS OF ECOSYSTEMS, P61
   Vogt KA, 2002, CAM STU LAN, P143
   Vroom MJ, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P293
   Whyte W.F. E., 1991, PARTICIPATORY ACTION
   Whyte WilliamFoote., 1991, SOCIAL THEORY ACTION
   Woodward JH, 1997, WILEY S SUS DES, P201
   Yair A., 1987, PROGR DESERT RES, P145
NR 75
TC 463
Z9 569
U1 21
U2 514
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD OCT 30
PY 2004
VL 69
IS 4
BP 369
EP 384
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
PG 16
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA 855SE
UT WOS:000223993200003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Azolin, LG
   da Silva, ANR
   Pinto, N
AF Azolin, Luiza Gagno
   Rodrigues da Silva, Antonio Nelson
   Pinto, Nuno
TI Incorporating public transport in a methodology for assessing resilience
   in urban mobility
SO TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Urban mobility; Public transport; Active modes; Brazil
ID VULNERABILITY; SYSTEMS; CITIES
AB Resilience has gained importance in the current research and policy agendas as it incorporates concepts of adaptation and transformation. Urban areas are complex systems exposed to different shocks, which have impacts on its various components. Research in transport has already incorporated the concept of resilience with more or less sophisticated approaches that are intensive on data and technical expertise. There is a need to explore the incorporation of resilience in simpler and less data intensive methods that can be easily applied in a wider range of contexts. One of the aims of this research is to develop a method that can use commonly available mobility management tools allowing smaller urban areas to analyse and plan for resilience. We present a new development of a method to assess resilience in transport systems with a commonly used mobility management tool (the origin-destination matrix) for calculating an overall measurement of resilience. The method assumes that car trips are transferred to active modes or to the available public transport routes in the event of any disruption in the system. We consider different scenarios of availability of public transport in case of disruptive events. We applied the method to two urban areas in Brazil. The variation of the contribution of the public transport presents patterns comparable between the two cases. The spatial distribution of trips shows the relative importance of resilient trips and the cities' spatial structure. The inclusion of public transport routes has an impact on the levels of accessibility of lower income users.
C1 [Azolin, Luiza Gagno; Rodrigues da Silva, Antonio Nelson] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Transportat Engn, Av Trabalhador Saocarlense 400, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
   [Pinto, Nuno] Univ Manchester, Manchester Urban Inst, Spatial Policy & Anal Lab, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England.
C3 Universidade de Sao Paulo; University of Manchester
RP da Silva, ANR (corresponding author), Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Transportat Engn, Av Trabalhador Saocarlense 400, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.
EM luiza.azolin@gmail.com; anelson@sc.usp.br; nuno.pinto@manchester.ac.uk
RI ; Pinto, Nuno/H-2218-2011; Rodrigues da Silva, Antonio
   Nelson/D-1596-2016
OI Azolin, Luiza/0000-0001-8421-3211; Pinto, Nuno/0000-0003-4955-1543;
   Rodrigues da Silva, Antonio Nelson/0000-0003-0996-8600
FU Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP/The University of Manchester
   [2017/50309-9]; National Council for Scientific and Technological
   Development -CNPq [308436/2015-6, 130795/2018-6]; Fundacao de Amparo a
   Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [17/50309-9] Funding Source:
   FAPESP
FX This research was supported by Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP/The
   University of Manchester (Grant 2017/50309-9) and National Council for
   Scientific and Technological Development -CNPq (Grants 308436/2015-6 and
   130795/2018-6).
CR [Anonymous], 2020, NAT REV EARTH ENV, V1, P1, DOI 10.1038/s43017-019-0017-2
   Berche B, 2009, EUR PHYS J B, V71, P125, DOI 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3
   Berdica K., 2002, TRANSPORT POLICY, V9, P117, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00011-2
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cariolet JM, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101746
   Chan R, 2016, NAT HAZARDS REV, V17, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000200
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Cox A, 2011, TRANSPORT POLICY, V18, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.004
   D'Lima M, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.017
   Martins MCD, 2019, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V77, P352, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.004
   Donovan B, 2017, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V79, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.002
   Duy P.N., 2019, VIETNAM TRAVEL BEHAV, V15, DOI [10.1016/j.tbs.2018.11.001, DOI 10.1016/J.TBS.2018.11.001]
   Fernandes I, 2019, OP CIT, P11
   Fernandes V.A, 2017, TRANSPORTES, V25, P112, DOI [10.14295/transportes.v25i4.1079, DOI 10.14295/TRANSPORTES.V25I4.1079]
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hong J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195404
   Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2010, CENS DEM 2010
   Jin JG, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V63, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.01.002
   Krumdieck S, 2010, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V44, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2010.02.002
   Leobons CM, 2019, TRANSP RES PROC, V37, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.199
   Leung A, 2018, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V65, P796, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2017.10.011
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Lopes daSilva B., 2019, REV U VALE RIO VERDE, V17, P1, DOI [10.5892/ruvrd.v17i1.5063, DOI 10.5892/RUVRD.V17I1.5063]
   Mattioli G, 2019, J TRANSP GEOGR, V78, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.009
   Mattsson LG, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.002
   Reggiani A, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.012
   Santos T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020647
   Seeliger L, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P2108, DOI 10.3390/su5052108
   Ta C, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P19, DOI 10.3141/2097-03
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Wiersma J, 2017, TRANSPORT POLICY, V55, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.12.004
   Zhao PJ, 2010, HABITAT INT, V34, P236, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.09.008
NR 35
TC 26
Z9 31
U1 11
U2 122
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1361-9209
J9 TRANSPORT RES D-TR E
JI Transport. Res. Part D-Transport. Environ.
PD AUG
PY 2020
VL 85
AR 102386
DI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102386
PG 19
WC Environmental Studies; Transportation; Transportation Science &
   Technology
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Transportation
GA MY6HF
UT WOS:000558515200008
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Marin, J
AF Marin, Juliette
TI Global resilience models and territories of the South. A critical review
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban resilience; Sustainability; Global south; Literature review
ID POLITICAL ECOLOGY; URBAN RESILIENCE; RISK; DISASTERS; CITIES;
   ADAPTATION; INDICATORS; DISCOURSES; LANDSCAPE; THINKING
AB The resilience of cities, regions and other territorial scales is defined by various conceptual frameworks and has since the 2000s constituted a growing scientific and technical field. Although literature points out the difficulty of implementing such a vague and ambiguous concept, a range of metrics, methodological frameworks and principles have emerged, using tools like composite indicators, qualitative assessment or stochastic modelling. Among these models some have been applied globally over the last ten years, for e.g. the City Resilience Framework developed for the 100 Resilient Cities network. This article proposes a discussion of these global resilience models in order to contribute to our understanding of how they are constructed, how they function, and their potential to transform territories. By using literature review and qualitative content analysis, four axes of inquiry are developed: translations and adaptations of the notion of resilience within hegemonic networks; socio-technical markers of resilience models; resilience as a device of neoliberal governmentality; the position of Latin America within the production of knowledge concerning resilience. This manuscript main contribution is to put into question some gaps or biases in our scientific outputs and models that we might be reproducing or legitimating, and that are worth cross-examine. Three key findings are: Evidenced biases in disciplinary associations of resilience; Evidenced gaps in using closed-form of modelling resilience that invisibilize important assumptions of territories and despolitize the concept; The North-South divide resilience knowledge production is not only quantitative but also expressed in the core of models and tools.
C1 [Marin, Juliette] Univ Chile, Fac Arquitectura & Urbanismo, Terr Espacio & Soc, Av Portugal 84, Santiago, Region Metropol, Chile.
   [Marin, Juliette] Ecole Hautes Etud Sci Sociales, Ctr Etud Mouvements Sociaux, 54 Bd Raspail, F-75006 Paris, France.
C3 Universidad de Chile; Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche
   Medicale (Inserm)
RP Marin, J (corresponding author), Univ Chile, Fac Arquitectura & Urbanismo, Terr Espacio & Soc, Av Portugal 84, Santiago, Region Metropol, Chile.
EM juliette.marin@uchile.cl
OI Marin, Juliette/0000-0001-7356-1026
FU Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR) 2, Chile [FONDAP/ANID
   15110009]; Proyecto FONDECYT Regular [1190855]
FX This study was conducted with the support of the Center for Climate and
   Resilience Research (CR) 2, Chile, FONDAP/ANID 15110009, and of the
   Proyecto FONDECYT Regular N?1190855 "Naturalezas, territorios y paisajes
   forestales: imaginario verde y nuevas desigualdades socio-ambientales en
   la geografia social". The author would like to thank Paul Salter for his
   support in the translation of the original Spanish text, Enrique Aliste
   for his thorough reading, and the reviewers for their valuable and
   detailed comments that helped to improve the manuscript.
CR A. Sevilla Hegemonia gubernamentalidad territorio, 2013, EMPIRIA REV METODOLO, P49, DOI [10.5944/empiria.27.2014.10862, 0, DOI 10.5944/EMPIRIA.27.2014.10862,0]
   a Svitkov, 2017, RESILIENCE DEFENSE D, V1
   Adams Vincanne., 2013, Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina
   Ajibade I, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V26, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.029
   Akrich M., 2006, SOCIOLOGIE TRADUCTIO, P267
   Aldunce P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090905
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Aliste E, 2018, FRONT PSYCHOL, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01177
   Aliste E, 2013, REV GEOGR NORTE GD, P199
   ALLEN Adriana., 2020, Reder. Vol, V4, P1, DOI [10.55467/reder.v4i2.46, DOI 10.55467/REDER.V4I2.46]
   Angeler DG, 2016, J APPL ECOL, V53, P617, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12649
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2015, REV GEOGR VENEZ
   Arup, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Astudillo Pizarro Francisco, 2019, Cuad. Geogr. Rev. Colomb. Geogr., V28, P303, DOI 10.15446/rcdg.v28n2.73520
   Atallah D.G., 2019, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818825305, DOI 10.1177/0022167818825305, 10.1177/0022167818825305]
   Atallah DG, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.027
   Aven T, 2013, SAFETY SCI, V57, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.016
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Barrios R. E., 2017, ANTHR CONT NORTH AM
   Barros V R., 2014, Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX
   BECK U., 1998, SOC RIESGO
   Bergstrom J, 2018, SAFETY SCI, V110, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.013
   Bocco G., 2019, INVEST GEOGR-MEX, V100
   Bracke Sarah., 2016, VULNERABILITY RESIST, P52, DOI [DOI 10.1215/9780822373490-004, DOI 10.2307/J.CTV11VC78R.8]
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bruneau M., 2006, OVERVIEW RESILIENCE
   Butchart SHM, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1164, DOI 10.1126/science.1187512
   Button G.V., 2008, CAPITALIZING CATASTR
   Cardona O., 2004, MAPPING VULNERABILIT
   Chandler D, 2014, RESILIENCE, V2, P47, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   Chiapello Eve, 2019, SOCIOLOGIA HERRAMIEN
   Christmann G., 2019, RESILIENCE SOCIAL CU, P121
   Conde Cecilia., 2007, Revista Ambiente y Desarrollo (CIPMA), V23, P23
   CREDEN, 2016, HAC CHIL RES FRENT D, P1
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   DeVerteuil G., 2016, CITY, V20, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714, https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1125714]
   Di Meo Guy., 1998, Geographie sociale et territoires
   Elmqvist T, 2003, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V1, P488, DOI 10.2307/3868116
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Evans Brad., 2014, RESILIENT LIFE ART L
   Exterckoter RK, 2016, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V62, P275, DOI 10.5565/rev/dag.318
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fernandez M.A., 1996, DEGRADACION AMBIENTA
   Fernandez Maria., 1996, Ciudades en riesgo: degradacion ambiental, riesgos urbanos y desastres en America Latina
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Fröhlich K, 2018, EUR PLAN STUD, V26, P1763, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1494137
   Gellert de Pinto., 2012, Boletin Cientifico Sapiens Research, V2, P13
   Gonzva M, 2017, RES SYST URB PROP CA
   Gunewardena Nandini., 2008, Capitalizing on Catastrophe: Neoliberal Strategies in Disaster Reconstruction
   Haesbaert Rogerio., 2004, O mito da desterritorializacao: do 'fim dos territorios' a multiterritorialidade
   Hardoy J, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.01.004
   Helbing D, 2013, NATURE, V497, P51, DOI 10.1038/nature12047
   Huck A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.008
   Contardo JI, 2018, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V9, P170, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2016-0034
   Janssen MA, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Johnson C, 2011, NEOLIBERAL DELUGE: HURRICANE KATRINA, LATE CAPITALISM, AND THE REMAKING OF NEW ORLEANS, P1
   Johnson C.A., 2018, POWER CITIES GLOBAL, P91
   Jorquera N., 2017, HACIA DONDE VA VIVIE, P215
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Keucheyan R, 2018, DEV CHANGE, V49, P484, DOI 10.1111/dech.12367
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kull CA, 2015, GEOFORUM, V61, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.004
   Lai KY, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V46, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.008
   Latour Bruno., 2001, ESPERANZA PANDORA EN
   Lavell Allan., Los conceptos, estudios y practica en torno al tema de 2005 los riegos y desastres en America Latina: evolucion y cambio, 1980-2004: el rol de la red, sus miembros y sus instituciones de apoyo
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   MACIAS J. M., 1992, REV MEX SOCIOL, P3
   Marin J, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101639
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   Mavelli L, 2019, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V7, P224, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2019.1605661
   Mayunga J.S., 2007, Understanding and applying the concept of community disaster resilience: a capital-based approach, DOI DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV.ENERGY.32.051807.090348
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Metzger P., 2013, Territorios, V28, P21
   Mignolo Walter., 2000, LOCAL HIST GLOBAL DE
   Mongeon P, 2016, SCIENTOMETRICS, V106, P213, DOI 10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
   Montero S, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2263, DOI 10.1177/0042098018798555
   Moraci F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187743
   Morgan M, 1999, MODELS MEDIATORS
   MUSSET Alain., 2011, Ciudades nomadas del Nuevo Mundo, Mexico
   Naef P, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12208469
   Nielsen L., 2018, 248 DCE AALB U
   Nu  nez A., 2019, REV AUSTRAL CIENCIAS, DOI [10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2018.n35-09, DOI 10.4206/REV.AUSTRAL.CIENC.SOC.2018.N35-09]
   Olsson L, 2015, SCI ADV, V1, DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1400217
   Onetto Pavez Mauricio, 2017, Temblores de tierra en el Jardin del Eden. Desastre, memoria e identidad en Chile, siglos XVI-XVIII
   Pacha J., 2018, Medio Ambiente y Urbanizacion, V88, P11
   Parker JN, 2012, AM SOCIOL REV, V77, P21, DOI 10.1177/0003122411433763
   Pu B., 2016, Current Urban Studies, P36, DOI DOI 10.4236/cus.2016.41004
   Quijano A, 2000, INT SOCIOL, V15, P215, DOI 10.1177/0268580900015002005
   Rashidi K, 2018, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V23, P507, DOI 10.1007/s11027-017-9747-y
   Rebotier J, 2013, TERRITORIOS, P127
   Reghezza-Zitt M, 2012, CYBERGEO, DOI 10.4000/cybergeo.25554
   Rigg J, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V32, P175, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.007
   Toledo HR, 2015, MAGALLANIA, V43, P7
   Sabatier L., URBAN RISKS, V4, DOI [10.21494/ISTE.OP.2021.0633, DOI 10.21494/ISTE.OP.2021.0633]
   Sahady A., 2019, 11 SEM INT INV URB B
   Sandoval-Díaz José, 2020, Polis, V19, P214, DOI 10.32735/s0718-6568/2020-n56-1527
   Sauret N., 2017, SENS PUBLIC
   Schiappacasse P, 2018, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V76, P51, DOI 10.1007/s13147-018-0520-9
   Seneviratne SI, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P109
   Sharma N., 2018, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V3, P49, DOI DOI 10.1080/23789689.2017.1345257
   Souza M.L. de., 1995, Geografia: conceitos e temas
   Sovacool BK., 2016, POLITICAL EC CLIMATE
   Stamm C., 2014, Revista F@ro, V2, P66
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   Sterk M, 2017, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V28, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.09.003
   Svampa M, 2015, S ATL Q, V114, P65, DOI 10.1215/00382876-2831290
   Svitková K, 2018, SOCIOL CAS, V54, P933, DOI 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.436
   Taylor M, 2015, ROUT EXPLOR DEV STUD, P1
   Tennant J., 2019, 10 MYTHS OPEN SCHOLA
   The Rockefeller Foundation Arup Group, 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   The Rockefeller Foundation & Arup Group, 2015, CIT RES IND UND MEAS
   Thorén H, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P112, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1406842
   Tierney K, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P1327, DOI 10.1177/0002764215591187
   Torabi E, 2018, CITIES, V72, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.008
   Toscana, 2017, VULN RES CONJ URB
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vera P., 2014, MAGISTER GEOGRAFIA M
   Villagra P, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V88, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2908-1
   Villagra P, 2016, REV GEOGR NORTE GD, P55, DOI 10.4067/S0718-34022016000200005
   Walker J, 2011, SECUR DIALOGUE, V42, P143, DOI 10.1177/0967010611399616
   Walker WE, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P955, DOI 10.3390/su5030955
   Webber S, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P343, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1774349
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Xu L, 2013, SCIENTOMETRICS, V96, P911, DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-0957-0
   Xue XL, 2018, NAT HAZARDS, V90, P477, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-3040-y
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 130
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 2
U2 29
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD DEC
PY 2021
VL 66
AR 102541
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102541
EA SEP 2021
PG 14
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA WD0QJ
UT WOS:000704652100003
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhang, J
   Yuan, JD
   Wang, YC
AF Zhang, Jie
   Yuan, Jiade
   Wang, Yuchun
TI Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of coupling
   coordination between urban resilience and high-quality development in
   Yangtze River Delta Area, China
SO FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; high-quality development; coupling coordination;
   spatio-temporal evolution; Yangtze River Delta Area
ID MANAGEMENT; ECONOMY; CITIES; SYSTEM; IMPACT
AB The coordination relationship between urban resilience and high-quality development is of paramount importance for improving disaster-alleviated resilient governance and sustainable development in response to the globalized crisis. However, few studies have investigated the coupling between urban resilience and high-quality development. Therefore, based on the analysis of the coupling and coordination mechanism between urban resilience and high-quality development, this paper innovatively calculates the indicators of urban resilience and high-quality development of 41 cities in the Yangtze River Delta Area (YRDA) from 2005 to 2020. Moreover, we explore the spatiotemporal patterns, evolution characteristics of the coupling coordination degree (CCD) between urban resilience and high-quality development using the entropy method, coupling coordination model, kernel density estimation curve, and further analyze the influence factors with the spatial econometric models. The results revealed that urban resilience maintained a steady growth, while high-quality development displayed a trend of an initial increase and a subsequent decline. The coupling coordination degree continued to rise and the regional difference decreased conspicuously, manifesting a robust developing trend. From the perspective of spatial patterns, the coupling coordination degree, which was characterized by "being high in the east and low in the west, tended to be balanced in the north and south and was prominent in the middle of the distribution." Furthermore, economic strength, industrial structure, transportation facilities, and government intervention exerted a dominant influence on the development of coupling coordination degree, resulting in the spatial spillover effects as well. This study can reveal the interactive relationship between urban resilience and high-quality development can as well as help Yangtze River Delta Area provide a benchmark for promoting economic and social development while focusing on prevention and control of risk.
C1 [Zhang, Jie; Yuan, Jiade; Wang, Yuchun] Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Hefei, Peoples R China.
   [Yuan, Jiade] Anhui Prov Construction & Real Estate Law Res Ctr, Hefei, Peoples R China.
C3 Anhui Jianzhu University
RP Yuan, JD; Wang, YC (corresponding author), Anhui Jianzhu Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Hefei, Peoples R China.; Yuan, JD (corresponding author), Anhui Prov Construction & Real Estate Law Res Ctr, Hefei, Peoples R China.
EM yjd@ahjzu.edu.cn; wyc0101@ahjzu.edu.cn
FU Anhui Jianzhu University Introduces Talents (Doctoral) for Scientific
   Research Initiation Project [2019QDR13]; Humanities and Social Sciences
   Key Projects of Universities of Anhui Province [SK 2021A0355]; National
   Social Science Foundation Project of China [22CRK008]
FX This study was supported by the Anhui Jianzhu University Introduces
   Talents (Doctoral) for Scientific Research Initiation Project Approval
   (Grant No.2019QDR13); Humanities and Social Sciences Key Projects of
   Universities of Anhui Province (Grant No. SK 2021A0355); National Social
   Science Foundation Project of China (Grant No. 22CRK008).
CR [Anonymous], 2023, Xinhua News
   Bahadur AV, 2015, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V7, P196, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2015.1060595
   Baltagi B.H., 2006, SPATIAL EC ANAL, V1, P175, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/17421770601009817, DOI 10.1080/17421770601009817]
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chen Y, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph181910231
   Chen Y, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106771
   Clark C, 1945, ECONOMETRICA, V13, P97, DOI 10.2307/1907009
   Cui Y, 2022, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106699
   Deng Y, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P27909, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18424-z
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Dong YL, 2022, ENVIRON INT, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107002
   [杜悦 Du Yue], 2022, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V42, P62
   Falco GJ, 2015, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V118, P1008, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.542
   Fan YP, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.027
   Fritz JJ, 2006, TECHNOL SOC, V28, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.006
   Gao F., 2021, SHANGHAI J EC, V12, P14, DOI [10.19626/j.cnki.cn31-1163/f.2021.12.002, DOI 10.19626/J.CNKI.CN31-1163/F.2021.12.002]
   Gao K, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V317, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115483
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huo K, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.871482
   Jiang L, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107994
   Li BX, 2023, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V25, P1809, DOI 10.1007/s10668-022-02129-5
   Li WW, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V256, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120453
   Li XS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P20318, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17175-1
   Li YY, 2023, ENERG ECON, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106679
   Li Z, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V184, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.112
   Liu J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14042178
   Liu WJ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V204, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.244
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Ma DB, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11101813
   Martin JL, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P6105, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1525003113
   Martin R, 2015, J ECON GEOGR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
   McNeill J.R. Peter Engelke., 2016, The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miao SL, 2022, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102332
   Moore M, 2003, INT J HYG ENVIR HEAL, V206, P269, DOI 10.1078/1438-4639-00223
   Pi JC, 2016, CHINA ECON REV, V41, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.08.009
   Ranasinghe U, 2020, SAF HEALTH WORK-KR, V11, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.03.009
   Ren XH, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V330, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117125
   Reuter C, 2017, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V121, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.038
   Shamsuddin S, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102763
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Sun J., 2020, P 2020 INT C URBAN E, V370, P379, DOI [10.1109/ICUEMS50872.2020.00086, DOI 10.1109/ICUEMS50872.2020.00086]
   [孙久文 Sun Jiuwen], 2022, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V41, P1864
   Sun RL, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101768
   Sun XM, 2023, ENERG ECON, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106492
   Wang HC, 2015, J GEOCHEM EXPLOR, V155, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.04.013
   Wang R, 2020, MATH PROBL ENG, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/5476089
   Wang Ziyi., 2023, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraivanja, V36, P2167730, DOI [10.1080/1331677X.2023.2167730, DOI 10.1080/1331677X.2023.2167730]
   Wang ZR, 2023, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122326
   Wen FH, 2022, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101999
   Xia ZQ, 2019, J CHIN POLIT SCI, V24, P341, DOI 10.1007/s11366-019-09604-3
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang C, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102271
   Yang FC, 2022, MOB INF SYST, V2022, DOI [10.1155/2022/9921309, 10.1155/2022/8915162]
   Yang J., 2019, CTR CITY WIND ENV SP
   Yang Y, 2021, ECOL SOC, V26, DOI 10.5751/ES-12280-260220
   Zhang AR, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P50523, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056486
   Zhang Y, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V373, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133874
   Zhang Y, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V761, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143275
   Zhou XG, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V318, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115537
NR 61
TC 7
Z9 8
U1 21
U2 110
PU FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
PI LAUSANNE
PA AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
EI 2296-665X
J9 FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ
JI Front. Environ. Sci.
PD MAY 26
PY 2023
VL 11
AR 1174875
DI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1174875
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA I7GA6
UT WOS:001004421700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Anjum, M
   Min, H
   Sharma, G
   Ahmed, Z
AF Anjum, Mohd
   Min, Hong
   Sharma, Gaurav
   Ahmed, Zubair
TI Advancing Sustainable Urban Development: Navigating Complexity with
   Spherical Fuzzy Decision Making
SO SYMMETRY-BASEL
LA English
DT Article
DE spherical fuzzy sets; SWARA-WASPAS; smart city; sustainable; urban
   landscapes
ID RESILIENT CITIES; CITY; WASPAS
AB This study explores the complexities of urban planning and addresses major issues by carefully weighing four options for smart city technology, community-based development, green infrastructure investment, and transit-oriented development. Unlike traditional evaluations, our study applies the novel SWARA-WASPAS model to spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs), thus identifying and navigating the uncertainty present in decision making. This methodological approach improves the accuracy of our assessment by providing detailed information about the advantages and disadvantages of each option. Our study offers useful insights for urban policymakers and planners using carefully weighted criteria and employing a methodical ranking procedure. The aim is to provide insights for decisions that promote equity, environmental consciousness, resilience, and symmetry in urban environments. The application of the SWARA-WASPAS approach not only advances the field but also provides a strong basis for informed decision making. This improves the accuracy of our evaluations and provides detailed insights into each option's pros and cons. Our study uses weighted criteria and systematic ranking to advise urban policymakers and planners. Our main goal is to help urban populations make resilient, environmentally responsible, equitable, and symmetrical decisions. Our research aims to further the conversation on sustainable urban development by offering a framework based on data that addresses the difficulties associated with dynamic urban environments. In the end, we want our humanized viewpoint to speak to a wider audience and inspire a shared dedication to creating cities that flourish in the face of changing urban environments.
C1 [Anjum, Mohd] Aligarh Muslim Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Aligarh 202002, India.
   [Min, Hong] Gachon Univ, Sch Comp, Seongnam 13120, South Korea.
   [Sharma, Gaurav] Seth Jai Parkash Mukand Lal Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Radaur 135133, India.
   [Ahmed, Zubair] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Zool, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
C3 Aligarh Muslim University; Gachon University; King Saud University
RP Min, H (corresponding author), Gachon Univ, Sch Comp, Seongnam 13120, South Korea.
EM mohdanjum@zhcet.ac.in; hmin@gachon.ac.kr
RI Anjum, Mohd/AFW-2718-2022
OI Min, Hong/0000-0002-9099-0890
FU Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation
   of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2021R1F1A1055408]
FX This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program
   through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the
   Ministry of Education (No.2021R1F1A1055408).
CR Abid M., 2023, Int J Knowl Innov Stud, V1, P1, DOI 10.56578/ijkis010101
   Abu Bakar A, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V85, P484, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.377
   Akdag HC, 2023, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V44, P8343, DOI 10.3233/JIFS-222648
   Akram M, 2023, AIMS MATH, V8, P10619, DOI 10.3934/math.2023539
   Alessandria F, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V223, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.274
   Ali J, 2023, IEEE ACCESS, V11, P46454, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3271141
   Ali J, 2021, COMPUT APPL MATH, V40, DOI 10.1007/s40314-021-01670-9
   Anafi J., 2023, J. Green Econ. Low Carbon Dev, V2, P137, DOI [10.56578/jgelcd020303, DOI 10.56578/JGELCD020303]
   Ashraf S, 2020, KOREAN J MATH, V28, P343, DOI 10.11568/kjm.2020.28.2.343
   Ashraf S, 2019, INT J FUZZY SYST, V21, P2448, DOI 10.1007/s40815-019-00681-3
   Ashraf S, 2019, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V36, P2829, DOI 10.3233/JIFS-172009
   ATANASSOV KT, 1986, FUZZY SET SYST, V20, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Ayyildiz E, 2021, ENVIRON MANAGE, V67, P449, DOI 10.1007/s00267-020-01381-7
   Badalpur M, 2021, INT J CONSTR MANAG, V21, P910, DOI 10.1080/15623599.2019.1595354
   Barton H, 2013, J URBAN HEALTH, V90, pS129, DOI 10.1007/s11524-011-9649-3
   Baykasoglu A, 2020, KYBERNETES, V49, P885, DOI 10.1108/K-01-2019-0052
   Cuong BC, 2015, 2015 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (KSE), P132, DOI 10.1109/KSE.2015.20
   Cuong BC, 2014, Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, V30, P409, DOI DOI 10.15625/1813-9663/30/4/5032
   De Leeuw E., 2001, GLOBAL CHANGE HUMAN, V2, P34, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1011991014805
   Dede V, 2023, GEOHERITAGE, V15, DOI 10.1007/s12371-022-00777-7
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Fan JP, 2022, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V43, P2789, DOI 10.3233/JIFS-213227
   Flynn A, 2016, HABITAT INT, V53, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.004
   Ghoushchi SJ, 2022, IEEE ACCESS, V10, P86750, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3199359
   Görçuen ÖF, 2024, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103542
   Gundogdu FK, 2019, INFORMATICA-LITHUAN, V30, P269, DOI 10.15388/Informatica.2019.206
   Gündogdu FK, 2019, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V36, P337, DOI 10.3233/JIFS-181401
   Gutberlet J, 2015, HABITAT INT, V46, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.004
   Hunt DVL, 2016, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V55, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.015
   Jana C., 2023, Journal of Industrial Intelligence, V1, P110, DOI 10.56578/jii010204
   Kahraman C., 2021, Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, V392, P3
   Kersuliene V, 2010, J BUS ECON MANAG, V11, P243, DOI 10.3846/jbem.2010.12
   Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M, 2020, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/math8122202
   Khan A. A., 2023, Int J. Knowl. Innov Stud, V1, P108689, DOI [10.56578/ijkis010102, DOI 10.56578/IJKIS010102]
   Gündogdu FK, 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V24, P4607, DOI 10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w
   Latif SA, 2013, PROCD SOC BEHV, V85, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.392
   Li B., 2016, Int. J. Appl. Math., V48, P1
   Lin S, 2023, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/math11020482
   Liu YZ, 2024, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V11, P25694, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3380068
   Liu YS, 2023, IEEE COMMUN MAG, V61, P102, DOI 10.1109/MCOM.001.2200809
   Ma SS, 2023, CYBORG BIONIC SYST, V4, DOI 10.34133/cbsystems.0067
   Mahmood T, 2019, NEURAL COMPUT APPL, V31, P7041, DOI 10.1007/s00521-018-3521-2
   Marans RW, 2015, HABITAT INT, V45, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.019
   Meijering JV, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V43, P132, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.02.026
   Paji V., 2023, J Intell Manag Decis, V2, P46, DOI DOI 10.56578/JIMD020201
   Pan JY, 2023, SOC SCI MED, V338, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116296
   Paul T. K., 2023, J. Ind. Intell, V1, P30, DOI DOI 10.56578/JII010103
   Nguyen PH, 2022, CMC-COMPUT MATER CON, V72, P2055, DOI 10.32604/cmc.2022.025532
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Roseland M, 1997, CITIES, V14, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00003-6
   Seker S, 2022, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V47, P3171, DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.232
   Stevic Z, 2022, Journal of Intelligent Management Decision, V1, P78, DOI DOI 10.56578/JIMD010201
   Stevic Ä, 2022, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/math10040635
   Sun G, 2020, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V21, P2409, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2019.2918255
   Sun G, 2018, IEEE T VEH TECHNOL, V67, P7550, DOI 10.1109/TVT.2018.2828651
   Sun R, 2023, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V10, P12777, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3256008
   Taniguchi E, 2014, PROCD SOC BEHV, V151, P310, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.029
   Turkoglu H, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V202, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.203
   Ullah K, 2018, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/sym10060193
   Ulutas A, 2021, LOGISTICS-BASEL, V5, DOI 10.3390/logistics5040082
   Walravens N, 2015, TELEMAT INFORM, V32, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.004
   Wang D, 2019, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V20, P3623, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2018.2878253
   Wang Y, 2024, IEEE T IND ELECTRON, V71, P6407, DOI 10.1109/TIE.2023.3288188
   Wei YG, 2015, HABITAT INT, V46, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.015
   Xiao Z, 2023, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V24, P10843, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2023.3276704
   Xiao Z, 2023, IEEE T CYBERNETICS, V53, P2346, DOI 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3117705
   Xu B, 2022, IEEE T VEH TECHNOL, V71, P9422, DOI 10.1109/TVT.2022.3182017
   Xu HT, 2024, RESOUR POLICY, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104994
   Xu XF, 2023, COMPUT IND ENG, V175, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108835
   Yang HQ, 2024, COMPLEX INTELL SYST, V10, P23, DOI 10.1007/s40747-023-01099-z
   Yang HQ, 2022, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/rs14020303
   ZADEH LA, 1965, INFORM CONTROL, V8, P338, DOI 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Zavadskas EK, 2012, ELEKTRON ELEKTROTECH, V122, P3, DOI 10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810
   Zavadskas E.K., 2013, Econ. Comput. Econ. Cybern. Stud. Res, V47
   Zhang H, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16020833
   Zhang HY, 2023, ARTIF INTELL REV, V56, P10275, DOI 10.1007/s10462-023-10409-3
   Zhang XL, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V122, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.038
   Zhang XZ, 2023, IEEE T TRANSP ELECTR, V9, P5165, DOI 10.1109/TTE.2022.3194034
   Zou W, 2022, IEEE INTEL TRANSP SY, V14, P198, DOI 10.1109/MITS.2020.2970185
NR 79
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 10
U2 13
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-8994
J9 SYMMETRY-BASEL
JI Symmetry-Basel
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 6
AR 670
DI 10.3390/sym16060670
PG 23
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA WQ6I4
UT WOS:001256373300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Luo, FH
   Liu, YX
   Peng, J
   Wu, JS
AF Luo, Fanghan
   Liu, Yanxu
   Peng, Jian
   Wu, Jiansheng
TI Assessing urban landscape ecological risk through an adaptive cycle
   framework
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban landscape ecological risk; Adaptive cycle; Resilience; Risk
   adaptive phase; Beijing City
ID RESILIENCE; ISLAND; CHINA; INDEX
AB Cities are suffering various ecological risks due to rapid urbanization and global climate change. Urban landscape ecological risk assessment is conducive to identifying high risk areas and guiding risk prevention. However, few studies have characterized the dynamic processes of landscape ecological risk. In this study, taking Beijing City as a case study, the adaptive cycle in resilience theory was incorporated into a risk assessment framework using such three criteria as potential, connectedness, and resilience, together with integrating exposure and disturbance effects of risk sources. This framework contributed to understanding the complex interactions between landscapes and risk effects from a holistic and dynamic view. The results showed that the ecological risk of "potential" and "connectedness" weakened radially from downtowns to outer suburbs. The distributions of "resilience", "exposure", "disturbance", and the final risk, all exhibited a concentric pattern of the higher risk, highest risk, and lowest risk sequentially from downtowns to outer suburbs. The results reflected the facts that residents living in downtowns had taken ecological restoration measures to reduce risk, while continuous urban constructions in outer suburbs increased the risk. In terms of the adaptive cycle phases of ecological risk, Yanqing, Miyun, Huairou, Mentougou, Fangshan and Pinggu districts were in the reorganization alpha-phase; Daxing, Changping, Shunyi and Tongzhou districts were in the exploitation r-phase; Dongcheng, Xicheng, Fengtai, Haidian, Chaoyang and Shijingshan districts were in the conservation K-phase. The results provided scientifically spatial guidance for implementing resilient urban planning, in order to realize sustainable development of metropolitan areas.
C1 [Luo, Fanghan; Peng, Jian; Wu, Jiansheng] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Lab Earth Surface Proc, Minist Educ, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Luo, Fanghan; Peng, Jian; Wu, Jiansheng] Peking Univ, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Sch Urban Planning & Design, Key Lab Environm & Urban Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Yanxu] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
C3 Peking University; Peking University; Beijing Normal University
RP Peng, J (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM jianpeng@urban.pku.edu.cn
RI Peng, Jian/AAO-6397-2020; Liu, Yanxu/JOZ-4430-2023; Wu,
   Jiansheng/GLS-1168-2022
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41330747]
FX This research is financially supported by National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (41330747).
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Anderies JM, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Angeler DG, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0146053
   [Anonymous], 2004, ECOL SOC
   [Anonymous], 1998, J OBJECT TECHNOL
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL INDICATOR
   [Anonymous], ECOLOGY SOC
   [Anonymous], ECOLOGY SOC
   Bai Y, 2012, J ENVIRON SCI, V24, P419, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60790-0
   Bauch CT, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P14560, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1604978113
   Bunce M, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.11.005
   Burkhard B, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P2878, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.05.016
   Camarasa-Belmonte AM, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V104, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.009
   Carreño ML, 2012, B EARTHQ ENG, V10, P547, DOI 10.1007/s10518-011-9302-2
   Chaffin BC, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V165, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.003
   Cheng WM, 2016, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V257, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.01.003
   Chow WTL, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P517, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00011.1
   Cumming GS, 2005, ECOSYSTEMS, V8, P975, DOI 10.1007/s10021-005-0129-z
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Donjadee S, 2013, PADDY WATER ENVIRON, V11, P573, DOI 10.1007/s10333-012-0350-2
   dos Santos FT, 2011, EUR PLAN STUD, V19, P1517, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2011.533515
   Estoque RC, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P943, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0498-7
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Grundmann P, 2012, ENERG POLICY, V48, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.051
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Ingalls ML, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08124-210106
   Jiang ZY, 2008, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V112, P3833, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.006
   Jing WL, 2015, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V7, P12419, DOI 10.3390/rs70912419
   Lei YD, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P609, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0831-7
   Li BL, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V50, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00078-5
   Li Y., 2017, J CLEAN PROD, P1
   [刘焱序 Liu Yanxu], 2015, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V70, P1052
   Ma T, 2012, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V124, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2012.04.018
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mo WB, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V574, P1000, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.048
   Müller F, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V65, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.10.066
   Olsson P., 2006, ECOL SOC, V11, P18, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-01595-110118
   Paukert CP, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.05.008
   [彭建 Peng Jian], 2015, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V70, P664
   Piet GJ, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V68, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.009
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P329
   Rawluk A, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08245-210117
   Resnick M.D., 2011, Encyclopedia of Adolescence, V1, P299
   Saura S, 2009, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V24, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.005
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shiau TA, 2013, ECOL INDIC, V34, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.001
   Singh R, 2014, HYDROLOG SCI J, V59, P29, DOI 10.1080/02626667.2013.819431
   Su YX, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V19, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.013
   Tarazona JV, 2013, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V9, pE85, DOI 10.1002/ieam.1445
   Van den Brink PJ, 2016, MAR FRESHWATER RES, V67, P429, DOI 10.1071/MF15111
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Wang XQ, 2010, CHINESE SCI BULL, V55, P1657, DOI 10.1007/s11434-010-3088-5
   WISCHMEIER WH, 1971, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V26, P189
   Xie WX, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V84, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.055
   Zhou WQ, 2017, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V32, P15, DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0432-4
NR 59
TC 108
Z9 128
U1 29
U2 373
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD DEC
PY 2018
VL 180
BP 125
EP 134
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014
PG 10
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA HA0KG
UT WOS:000449896300014
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lyu, Q
   Liu, SJ
   Shang, ZY
AF Lyu, Qiang
   Liu, Sujuan
   Shang, Zhouyuan
TI Securing Urban Landscape: Cybersecurity Mechanisms for Resilient Smart
   Cities
SO IEEE ACCESS
LA English
DT Article
DE Computer security; Security; Genetic algorithms; Convolutional neural
   networks; Optimization; Internet of Things; Resilience; Cyberattack;
   Artificial intelligence; Cybersecurity; smart cities; convolutional
   neural networks (CNNs); genetic algorithms (GAs); threat detection;
   threat detection
ID ATTACKS
AB This article explores a novel approach to enhancing cybersecurity in smart cities by integrating Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Genetic Algorithms (GAs). The primary objective is to develop a robust cybersecurity framework capable of effectively detecting and responding to a wide range of cyber threats in interconnected urban infrastructures. The proposed CNN-GA framework, resembles a well-manicured garden, where leverages the advanced threat detection capabilities of CNNs as the precision-trimmed hedges and the optimization power of GAs as the strategically placed pathways to create a synergistic solution that improves detection accuracy, reduces response times, and enhances overall system resilience. The study demonstrates that the CNN-GA framework significantly outperforms traditional cybersecurity methods. Key findings include a detection rate of 92% for various threat types and an average response time of 1.2 seconds, compared to 80% and 3.5 seconds, respectively, for traditional methods. Additionally, the framework achieves a 45% improvement in system resilience during attacks and optimizes defense strategies to reduce deployment costs while increasing overall effectiveness. The implications of this approach are profound for securing urban infrastructures in smart cities. By combining deep learning with evolutionary algorithms, the CNN-GA framework offers a dynamic and adaptive solution to address the complex and evolving nature of cyber threats. This integration not only enhances the security posture of smart cities but also provides a foundation for future advancements in urban cybersecurity. The results advocate for the broader adoption of such integrated approaches to ensure the resilience and safety of smart city infrastructures (sustainable landscaping, green roof, etc) in the face of increasing cyber risks.
C1 [Lyu, Qiang] Dalian Minzu Univ, Coll Architecture, Dalian 116600, Liaoning, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Sujuan] Tianjin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Artificial Intelligence, Tianjin 300457, Peoples R China.
   [Shang, Zhouyuan] Youchuangbosi Dalian Creat Design Co Ltd, Dalian 116021, Liaoning, Peoples R China.
C3 Dalian Minzu University; Tianjin University Science & Technology
RP Lyu, Q (corresponding author), Dalian Minzu Univ, Coll Architecture, Dalian 116600, Liaoning, Peoples R China.
EM DLlv10@163.com
CR Al-Sakran H, 2019, 2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW TRENDS IN COMPUTING SCIENCES (ICTCS), P189
   Alahi MEE, 2023, SENSORS-BASEL, V23, DOI 10.3390/s23115206
   Arcadio CGLA, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P29824, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-24261-5
   Bordel B, 2018, IEEE ACCESS, V6, P34896, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848100
   Chen JT, 2023, IEEE T AUTOM SCI ENG, V20, P624, DOI 10.1109/TASE.2022.3164860
   Ganjkhani M, 2023, IEEE T POWER DELIVER, V38, P1499, DOI 10.1109/TPWRD.2022.3230946
   Jafari M, 2022, IEEE ACCESS, V10, P81220, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195053
   Kavousi-Fard A, 2024, SOL ENERGY, V274, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2024.112561
   Kim J, 2013, J KOREAN MED SCI, V28, P1716, DOI 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.12.1716
   Kumar A, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P89395, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2990190
   Leng JW, 2023, IEEE T SYST MAN CY-S, V53, P4715, DOI 10.1109/TSMC.2023.3257172
   Li J, 2020, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V7, P5103, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2975654
   Li YS, 2021, J MOD POWER SYST CLE, V9, P919, DOI 10.35833/MPCE.2020.000267
   Mafuta AD, 2023, IEEE SYST J, V17, P87, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3163235
   Mao J, 2020, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V7, P8025, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2997779
   Mohammad N, 2019, IEEE ACCESS, V7, P152585, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947638
   Razmjouei P, 2021, IEEE SENS J, V21, P15839, DOI 10.1109/JSEN.2020.3022536
   Razmjoui P, 2024, IEEE T IND INFORM, V20, P158, DOI 10.1109/TII.2023.3257294
   Sadhu PK, 2022, SENSORS-BASEL, V22, DOI 10.3390/s22197433
   Vilkelyte Z., 2024, P IEEE OP C EL EL IN, P1
   Wang BY, 2024, AD HOC NETW, V164, DOI 10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103628
   Wang YT, 2022, IEEE GLOB COMM CONF, P3521, DOI 10.1109/GLOBECOM48099.2022.10000872
   Zaidan AA, 2023, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V10, P21647, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2023.3308953
   Zhuo W, 2017, IEEE ACCESS, V5, P16314, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2737957
NR 24
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 2169-3536
J9 IEEE ACCESS
JI IEEE Access
PY 2025
VL 13
BP 10966
EP 10977
DI 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3522078
PG 12
WC Computer Science, Information Systems; Engineering, Electrical &
   Electronic; Telecommunications
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Computer Science; Engineering; Telecommunications
GA T2G9Z
UT WOS:001403270400020
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lin, SS
   Zheng, XJ
AF Lin, Song-Shun
   Zheng, Xin-Jiang
TI Enhancing smart city assessment: An advanced MCDM approach for urban
   performance evaluation
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart city evaluation; Fuzzy decision support; Multi-criteria
   decision-making modelling; Complex spherical fuzzy set; Consensus
   measurement
ID DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION FUSION; SUSTAINABILITY; FRAMEWORK; MODEL;
   TECHNOLOGIES; CITIES
AB Urban centers in the 21st century face significant challenges impacting future urban living. The numerous indicators and inherent complexity involved in assessing urban performance in smart cities necessitate the application of multi-criteria evaluation methods, which are frequently associated with fuzziness and uncertainties. Thus, this study introduces an innovative decision support approach that integrates complex spherical fuzzy set to enhance decision-making for smart city evaluation. By incorporating a consensus measurement mechanism for judgments, the reliability of results is improved. The methodology assesses smart city performance by calculating a level index using criteria of resilience, sustainability, and urban livability, along with eighteen sub-criteria for comprehensive benchmarking. Results highlight pollution control, energy and environmental resources, community well-being, eco-friendly transport, and social cohesion as critical factors for smart city performance. Singapore demonstrates high-level performance due to its integration of advanced technologies and community-focused strategies. The evaluated results obtained via the developed approach offer valuable insights for urban planners aiming to promote sustainable, resilient, and livable urban development.
C1 [Lin, Song-Shun] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Ocean & Civil Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China.
   [Lin, Song-Shun] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore.
   [Zheng, Xin-Jiang] Fuzhou Univ, Zijin Sch Geol & Min, Dept Geotech & Geol Engn, Fuzhou, Peoples R China.
C3 Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National University of Singapore; Fuzhou
   University
RP Zheng, XJ (corresponding author), Fuzhou Univ, Zijin Sch Geol & Min, Dept Geotech & Geol Engn, Fuzhou, Peoples R China.
EM xinjiangzheng@fzu.edu.cn
CR Abdelgawad M, 2010, J CONSTR ENG M, V136, P1028, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000210
   Alghamdi M, 2024, SOFT COMPUT, V28, P447, DOI 10.1007/s00500-023-08219-4
   Ali SA, 2023, FUTURE INTERNET, V15, DOI 10.3390/fi15120398
   ATANASSOV KT, 1986, FUZZY SET SYST, V20, P87, DOI 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
   Bakhtiari V, 2024, EXPERT SYST APPL, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121426
   Bao ZY, 2023, APPL ENERG, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120512
   Bao ZY, 2021, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103447
   bca.gov, 2005, Green Mark certification scheme (GMCS)
   Chang YL, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104120
   channelnewsasia, 2024, Broadband network (BN)
   Chen CW, 2023, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V13, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2022.100108
   Chen HQ, 2017, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V26, P125, DOI 10.1002/bse.1902
   Chen Y, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102211
   Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSAS), 2024, About us
   Deng W, 2019, CITIES, V89, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.028
   Deveci M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104426
   Dittrich R, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V245, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.077
   Dong XJ, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041321
   Dong YH, 2021, TUNN UNDERGR SP TECH, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.tust.2021.104108
   Eggers W.D., 2021, Forces of change: Smart cities
   El-Abbasy MS, 2013, J CONSTR ENG M, V139, P755, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000647
   Elzarka HM, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V35, P430, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.025
   ENGLISH JM, 1976, TRANSPORT RES, V10, P1, DOI 10.1016/0041-1647(76)90094-0
   European Smart Cities Model (ESCM), 2024, About us
   Fatimah YA, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V469, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143084
   GDPR, 2024, About us
   Ghanavati F, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V111, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105579
   Gomes L. F. A. M., 1991, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, V16, P113
   Gu TT, 2024, J KNOWL ECON, DOI 10.1007/s13132-024-02114-5
   Gündogdu FK, 2019, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V36, P337, DOI 10.3233/JIFS-181401
   IEA, 2020, About Us
   innovationorigins, 2024, Smart City Index (SCI)
   International Organization for Standardization, 2024, (ISO) 37120
   Jimenéz-Caldera J, 2024, CITIES, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105008
   Kutty AA, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V378, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134203
   Lerner A, 2024, J RURAL STUD, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103342
   Li Y, 2016, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V110, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.03.023
   Li Y, 2024, ENVIRON INT, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108742
   Liu SW, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103429
   Liu XX, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128064
   Liu Y, 2020, EXPERT SYST APPL, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738
   Llamazares B, 2018, EUR J OPER RES, V269, P1041, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.054
   Loo BPY, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V106, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.003
   Mahmudah RSN, 2024, CLEAN ENG TECHNOL, V19, DOI 10.1016/j.clet.2024.100737
   McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), 2018, About us
   Monterio J, 2024, CITIES, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105040
   ONESERVICE (OS), 2024, About us
   Opoku-Mensah E, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V434, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139824
   Opricovic S, 2004, EUR J OPER RES, V156, P445, DOI 10.1016/s0377-2217(03)00020-1
   Osei-Kyei R, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102316
   Otay I, 2024, EXPERT SYST APPL, V250, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123874
   Patil R, 2024, MULTIMED TOOLS APPL, DOI 10.1007/s11042-024-18242-8
   Patil SK, 2014, EXPERT SYST APPL, V41, P679, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.093
   Peng FL, 2021, FRONT STRUCT CIV ENG, V15, P20, DOI 10.1007/s11709-021-0716-x
   Roustaei M, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105446
   Saaty T.L., 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI [10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
   Schröder M, 2019, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V73, P40, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.08.002
   Shao QG, 2023, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V25, P3027, DOI 10.1007/s10098-023-02547-7
   Sheikh WT, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103972
   Shuhan W, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105439
   Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology (SMART), 2024, About us
   Singh S, 2024, COMPUT URBAN SCI, V4, DOI 10.1007/s43762-024-00125-1
   sla, 2014, Virtual Singapore-a 3D city model platform for knowledge sharing and community collaboration (VS)
   Smart Nation Engagement Programmes (SNEP), 2024, About us
   Smart Nation Sensor Platform (SNSP), 2024, About us
   Smart Nation Singapore(SNG), 2024, About us
   SolarNova Programme (SNP), 2014, About us
   Su R, 2024, APPL ENERG, V364, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123231
   Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 2024, About us
   Tan S, 2017, APPL ENERG, V185, P1919, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.03.041
   Tao YQ, 2025, J ROCK MECH GEOTECH, V17, P1555, DOI 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.02.048
   Tao YQ, 2024, J ROCK MECH GEOTECH, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.09.0341674-7755
   Ullah K, 2020, COMPLEX INTELL SYST, V6, P15, DOI 10.1007/s40747-019-0103-6
   United Nations, 2018, About us
   von der Tann L, 2020, UNDERGR SPACE, V5, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.undsp.2019.03.003
   World Economic Forum (WEF), 2021, About us
   Wu YN, 2014, APPL ENERG, V136, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.032
   Xu ZS, 2016, INFORM FUSION, V28, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2015.07.001
   Yager RR, 2014, IEEE T FUZZY SYST, V22, P958, DOI 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
   Yager RR, 2013, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 JOINT IFSA WORLD CONGRESS AND NAFIPS ANNUAL MEETING (IFSA/NAFIPS), P57, DOI 10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375
   Yang CX, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106662
   Yang Yi, 2024, Resources Policy, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105073
   Ye Zhoujing, 2024, Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, V4, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.iotcps.2024.01.002
   Yigitcanlar T, 2015, HABITAT INT, V45, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.033
   Yoon SW, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V63, P145, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00186-X
   Yu G, 2024, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105479
   Zhang L, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V131, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.153
   Zhang PF, 2021, INFORM FUSION, V68, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2020.11.004
   Zhang Y, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107705
   Zhou Haizuo, 2023, International Journal of Geomechanics, DOI 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-8306
   Zhou HZ, 2023, ACTA GEOTECH, V18, P6759, DOI 10.1007/s11440-023-01875-8
NR 91
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 18
U2 18
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 118
AR 105930
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105930
EA DEC 2024
PG 19
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA R4B1L
UT WOS:001390913600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Coles, R
   Costa, S
AF Coles, Richard
   Costa, Sandra
TI Food growing in the city: Exploring the productive urban landscape as a
   new paradigm for inclusive approaches to the design and planning of
   future urban open spaces
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban agriculture; Landscape planning; Food growing; Urban governance;
   Resilient communities and cities
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; COMMUNITY GARDENS; ALLOTMENT; RESILIENCE
AB This special issue considers food growing in the city. It presents a series of papers which explore the interface between urban growing initiatives and the planned city, and identifies the development of the movement in different world regions and situations. It explores the characteristics of different food growing and urban gardening scenarios regarding the inherent properties of the urban agriculture/food growing complex as an urban movement, its drivers and the niche that it occupies within the city. The papers address circumstances of food growing in highly developed western planning systems, typically represented in Europe, but also other global regions which show different historical and development contexts. These demonstrate that urban food growing initiatives are largely activist-led and tend to fall outside of, or conflict with current city planning models. Where these initiatives are incorporated, they have the potential to provide effective urban landscape solutions that respond to local circumstances, new markets, engendering social and environmental improvement. Taken together, the papers suggest that urban agriculture models need to be recognised more widely within mainstream urban planning and the urban development process.
C1 [Coles, Richard; Costa, Sandra] Birmingham City Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Fac Arts Design & Media, Birmingham B4 7BD, W Midlands, England.
C3 Birmingham City University
RP Coles, R (corresponding author), Birmingham City Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Fac Arts Design & Media, Birmingham B4 7BD, W Midlands, England.
EM Richard.coles@bcu.ac.uk
OI costa, sandra/0000-0002-0694-8199
CR Adams D., 2014, GEOGRAFRISKA ANNAL B, V95, P375
   [Anonymous], CUIZINE, DOI DOI 10.7202/1015492AR
   [Anonymous], 2012, COST ACTION TU1201
   [Anonymous], 2000, HORTTECHNOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.21273/H0RTTECH.10.1.40
   [Anonymous], 2015, J URBAN PLANNING DEV
   [Anonymous], CARROT CITY, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
   Armstrong D, 2000, HEALTH PLACE, V6, P319, DOI 10.1016/S1353-8292(00)00013-7
   Barthel S., 2013, FOOD GREEN SPACE CIT
   Bell S, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P1
   Bendt P, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.003
   Biel Robert., 2013, Imagining the Future City: London 2062, P97, DOI [10.5334/bag, DOI 10.5334/BAG]
   Breuste J. H, 2010, URBAN BIODIVERSITY D
   Brinkmann K, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.003
   Bullivant L., 2012, MASTER PLANNING FUTU
   Camps-Calvet M, 2015, PARTECIP CONFL, V8, P417, DOI 10.1285/i20356609v8i2p417
   Caputo S, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P229
   Certomà C, 2017, PLAN THEOR, V16, P51, DOI 10.1177/1473095215598177
   Cilliers EJ, 2015, J URBAN DES, V20, P349, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2015.1031213
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Coles R. W., 2014, WELL BEING COMPLETE, V2, P1
   Jiménez AC, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN D, V32, P342, DOI 10.1068/d13077p
   Costa S, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P201
   CROUCH D, 1989, AREA, V21, P261
   Crouch D., 2005, GROWING COMMUNITY GO
   DeSilvey C, 2003, CULT GEOGR, V10, P442, DOI 10.1191/1474474003eu284oa
   Drilling M, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P35
   Ernstson H, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005
   Fuseini I, 2015, LAND USE POLICY, V47, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.020
   Gerometta J, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P2007, DOI 10.1080/00420980500279851
   Hardman M., 2014, INFORMAL URBAN AGR S
   Hawkins JL, 2011, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V21, P577, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.21.5.577
   Hinchliffe Steve., 2006, SCI CULT-UK, V15, P123, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09505430600707988, 10.1080/09505430600707988]
   Ioannou B, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P62
   Kabisch N, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
   Matos R.S., 2013, Advances in landscape architecture
   Noori S, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P291
   Perez-Vazquez A., 2005, AGROPOLIS: the social, political and environmental dimensions of urban agriculture, P239
   Reynolds Richard., 2008, GUERRILLA GARDENING
   Roy A, 2011, STUD URBAN SOC CH, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781444346800
   RUAF Foundation, 2013, CIT LINK CIT URB AGR
   Scott A, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V169, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.004
   Shepard B., 2013, Environmental social work, P121
   Speak AF, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P772, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.007
   Spilková J, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V52, P232, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.031
   UN, 2014, WORLD URB PROSP 2014
   van den Berg AE, 2010, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V9, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-9-74
   Viljoen A, 2012, SUSTAINABLE FOOD PLANNING: EVOLVING THEORY AND PRACTICE, P1, DOI 10.3920/978-8686-826-1
   Viljoen A., 2005, CONTINUOUS PRODUCTIV
   Zammit A, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P254
NR 49
TC 20
Z9 24
U1 4
U2 212
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD FEB
PY 2018
VL 170
BP 1
EP 5
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.10.003
PG 5
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA FR9SC
UT WOS:000419412400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Finn, D
   Chandrasekhar, D
   Xiao, Y
AF Finn, Donovan
   Chandrasekhar, Divya
   Xiao, Yu
TI A Region Recovers: Planning for Resilience after Superstorm Sandy
SO JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE disasters; Hurricane Sandy; New York; long-term recovery; resilience
ID DISASTER RECOVERY; UNITED-STATES; HAZARD MITIGATION; URBAN RESILIENCE;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADAPTATION; CITY
AB 2012's Superstorm Sandy had a devastating impact on the New York City metropolitan region, including the suburban Long Island coast and the New Jersey shore. Given the size, density, complexity, and diversity of the region, many approaches have been used to address poststorm recovery. Planning has been central to these efforts. Using in-depth interviews with recovery stakeholders, this analysis of the planning responses to Sandy illustrates what an emergent model of resilient recovery planning looks like and highlights the kinds of resources and approaches that help facilitate this approach. We argue that preexisting planning capacity, strong political leadership, and nongovernmental funding support were critically important aspects of resilience-focused Sandy recovery planning processes.
C1 [Finn, Donovan] SUNY Stony Brook, Sustainabil Studies Program, Environm Design Policy & Planning, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
   [Finn, Donovan] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
   [Chandrasekhar, Divya] Univ Utah, Dept City & Metropolitan Planning, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
   [Xiao, Yu] Portland State Univ, Toulan Sch Urban Studies & Planning, Portland, OR 97207 USA.
C3 State University of New York (SUNY) System; Stony Brook University;
   State University of New York (SUNY) System; Stony Brook University; Utah
   System of Higher Education; University of Utah; Portland State
   University
RP Finn, D (corresponding author), SUNY Stony Brook, Sustainabil Studies Program, Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, W0512 Melville Lib, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
EM donovan.finn@stonybrook.edu
OI Chandrasekhar, Divya/0000-0003-2591-6923
FU National Science Foundation [1333132, 1559664, 1333155, 1335109]; Div Of
   Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn; Directorate For Engineering [1559664,
   1335109] Funding Source: National Science Foundation; Div Of Civil,
   Mechanical, & Manufact Inn; Directorate For Engineering [1333132,
   1333155] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
   material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation
   under Grant Numbers: 1333132, 1559664, 1333155, and 1335109. Any
   opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this
   material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
   views of the National Science Foundation.
CR Alesch D.J., 2012, Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters, V30, P197
   American Planning Association. n. d, WHAT IS PLANN
   [Anonymous], ONENYC
   [Anonymous], 2015, ONE NEW YORK PLAN ST
   [Anonymous], 2013, Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Strategy
   [Anonymous], 2011, National Disaster Recovery Framework: Strengthening Disaster Recovery for the Nation
   Bailin D., 2014, Hoboken's Post Sandy Resilience: Learning from the Past, Rebuilding for the Future
   Barbee Daniel G., 1985, PROGRAM ENV BEHAV MO, V14l
   Benfield Aon, HURRICANE SANDY EVEN
   BERKE PR, 1993, DISASTERS, V17, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb01137.x
   Berke PR, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P192, DOI 10.1177/0002716205285533
   Berkowitz Michael, 2018, PUERTO RICOS PATH RE
   Birkmann J, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P637, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9319-2
   Bisker J., 2016, REBUILD DESIGN
   BOLIN R, 1991, DISASTERS, V15, P24, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1991.tb00424.x
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Chandrasekhar D, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1249, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1492907
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   City of Hoboken, 2017, CIT HOB MAST PLAN GR
   City of Hoboken. n. d, COMM RES PLAN
   City of Long Beach, 2017, CIT LONG BEACH COMP
   City of New York, 2007, PLANYC GREEN GREAT N
   Comerio MC, 2014, CITYSCAPE, V16, P51
   Dahlhamer JM, 1998, SOCIOL SPECTRUM, V18, P121, DOI 10.1080/02732173.1998.9982189
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dynes Russell R, 1976, 2851 US DEP DEF ADV
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fan L., 2013, Disaster as Opportunity? Building Back Better in Aceh, Myanmar and Haiti
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2011, LESS COMM REC 7 YEAR
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2013, HURR SAND FEMA ACT R
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2018, FEMA FACT SHEET MIT
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Finch C, 2010, POPUL ENVIRON, V31, P179, DOI 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8
   Finn D., 2018, The Environmental Law Reporter, V48, P10494
   Finn D., 2016, Spatial Planning and Resilience Following Disasters, P117, DOI DOI 10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447323587.003.0007
   Fothergill A, 2004, NAT HAZARDS, V32, P89, DOI 10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9
   Fothergill A, 1999, DISASTERS, V23, P156, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00111
   Gall M, 2011, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V3, P2157, DOI 10.3390/su3112157
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Graham L, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.001
   Gundlach Justin, 2016, ENVIRON LAW REP, V46, P10282
   Haas J.E., 1977, RECONSTRUCTION FOLLO
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Johnson L.A., 2017, After Great Disasters: An In-Depth Analysis of How Six Countries Managed Community Recovery
   Kelly Stephanie B., 2004, Community Planning
   Kim K, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P289, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.988597
   Leicht HollyM., 2017, Rebuild the Plane Now: Recommendations for Improving Government's Approach to Disaster Recovery and Preparedness
   Makarewicz Carrie, 2016, COMING HOME DISASTER, P99
   Mammen David, 2011, Creating Recovery: Values and Approaches in New York After 9/11
   McDonnell Simon., 2016, A Managed-Participatory Approach to Community Resilience: A Case Study of New York State's Response to Extreme Weather Events
   Meerow S, 2017, ENVIRON PLANN A, V49, P2619, DOI 10.1177/0308518X17735225
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mitchell JK, 2006, ANN AM ACAD POLIT SS, V604, P228, DOI 10.1177/0002716205286044
   Mitigation Assessment Team Report Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey and New York, 2013, MIT ASS TEAM REP HUR
   Moore M.H., 2006, KATRINA PUBLIC EXPEC
   National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, US BILL DOLL WEATH C
   National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, 2019, US BILL DOLL WEATH C
   NELSON M, 2007, CITYSCAPE, V9, P23
   New Jersey Future, 2015, DEEP HELP SAND AFF C
   New York City Department of City Planning, 2014, COAST CLIM RES RETR
   New York City Department of City Planning, 2013, COAST CLIM RES URB W
   New York City Department of City Planning, 2013, COAST CLIM RES DES F
   New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, 2017, RES EDG COMM PLAN
   Nonko Emily, 2017, CURBED          1027
   Olshansky R.B., 2009, PROG PLANN, V72, P200
   Olshansky R.B., 2006, BUILD ENVIRON, V32, P354
   Olshansky R.B., 2010, Clear as mud: Planning for the rebuilding of New Orleans
   Olshansky R, 2008, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V74, P273, DOI 10.1080/01944360802140835
   Olshansky RB, 2012, NAT HAZARDS REV, V13, P173, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000077
   Peacock WalterG., 2007, HDB DISASTER RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_15
   Pereira Sydney, 2019, REVAMPED E SIDE FLOO
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Popkin Roy, 1990, 69 GEORG WASH U CTR
   Quarantelli E. L., 1999, preliminary paper 286
   Rubin C.B., 1985, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, V3, P9
   RUBIN CB, 1985, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V45, P57, DOI 10.2307/3134998
   Rumbach A, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P2045, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1116981
   Ryan Joe, 2015, NEWSDAY         0507
   Sandy Regional Assembly, 2013, REC GROUND STRAT COM
   Schwab James, 1998, 483484 AM PLANN ASS
   Schwab James C., 2014, Planning Advisory Service Report 576
   Shi LD, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P191, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1074526
   Smith G.P., 2012, PLANNING POSTDISASTE
   Smith G, 2018, RISK HAZARDS CRISIS, V9, P205, DOI 10.1002/rhc3.12133
   Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency, 2013, STRONG MOR RES NEW Y
   Spoto MaryAnn, 2015, NJ              0522
   State of New York, GUID NEW YORK RIS CO
   Theodos B., 2017, TAKING STOCK COMMUNI
   Together North Jersey, 2013, HOB GREEN INFR STRAT
   US Department of Homeland Security, 2015, NAT PREP GOAL
   Warerkar Tanay, 2016, CURBED NEW YORK 0912
   Webb G.R., 2002, ENV HAZARDS, V4, P45, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-2867(03)00005-6
   WOLENSKY RP, 1991, LOCAL GOV STUD, V17, P15, DOI 10.1080/03003939108433570
   Xiao Y, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P76, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18804328
   Xiao Y, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P2523, DOI 10.1177/0042098011428178
   Yin R. K., 2014, CASE STUDY RES DESIG
NR 98
TC 19
Z9 22
U1 1
U2 6
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0739-456X
EI 1552-6577
J9 J PLAN EDUC RES
JI J. Plan. Educ. Res.
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 43
IS 1
BP 136
EP 149
AR 0739456X19864145
DI 10.1177/0739456X19864145
EA JUL 2019
PG 14
WC Regional & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Public Administration; Urban Studies
GA 9C8TG
UT WOS:000478442300001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ruszczyk, HA
AF Ruszczyk, Hanna A.
TI Ambivalence towards discourse of disaster resilience
SO DISASTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE community; disaster; disaster risk reduction (DRR); policy and practice;
   resilience; urban
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; RISK REDUCTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FRAMEWORK;
   POLITICS; CITIES
AB This paper investigates empirically how the international aid community (IAC)-donors and practitioners-considers and implements disaster resilience in a specific country setting, Nepal, and throughout the rest of the world. A key finding is that there is ambivalence about a concept that has become a discourse. On a global level, the IAC utilises the discourse of resilience in a cautiously positive manner as a bridging concept. On a national level, it is being used to influence the Government of Nepal, as well as serving as an operational tool of donors. The mythical resilient urban community is fashioned in the IAC's imaginary; understanding how people create communities and what type of linkages with government urban residents desire to develop their resilience strategies is missing, though, from the discussion. Disaster resilience can be viewed as another grand plan to enhance the lives of people. Yet, regrettably, an explicit focus on individuals and their communities is lost in the process.
C1 [Ruszczyk, Hanna A.] Univ Durham, Dept Geog, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
   [Ruszczyk, Hanna A.] Univ Durham, Inst Hazard Risk & Resilience, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
C3 Durham University; Durham University
RP Ruszczyk, HA (corresponding author), Univ Durham, Dept Geog, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England.; Ruszczyk, HA (corresponding author), Univ Durham, Inst Hazard Risk & Resilience, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England.
EM h.a.ruszczyk@durham.ac.uk
CR Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Aldrich DanielP., 2012, Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery, DOI 10.7208/chicago/9780226012896.001.0001
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Anderson B, 2015, POLITICS-OXFORD, V35, P60, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12079
   [Anonymous], 2011, [No title captured]
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Bahadur A., 2010, 1 U SUSS STRENGTH CL
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Bahadur AV, 2013, CLIM DEV, V5, P55, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.762334
   Béné C, 2017, WORLD DEV, V97, P212, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.011
   Berry K., 2015, GENDER HIMALAYA FEMI, P1
   Bradshaw S, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS54, DOI 10.1111/disa.12111
   Brown K., 2012, Climate change and the crisis of capitalism: A chance to reclaim self, society and nature, P37, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203146118
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brown Katrina., 2016, RESILIENCE DEV GLOBA
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Buckle P., 2006, Disaster resilience, V88, P88
   Bulmer M, 2015, ETHNIC RACIAL STUD, V38, P1, DOI 10.1080/01419870.2015.966735
   Cannon T., 2014, WORLD DISASTERS REPO, P8
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Cardona O., 2004, MAPPING VULNERABILIT
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chandler D., 2014, RESILIENCE GOVERNANC
   Cleaver F., 2001, Participation: the new tyranny?, P36
   de Beer F, 2013, COMMUNITY DEV J, V48, P555, DOI 10.1093/cdj/bss058
   Escobar A., 1995, ENCOUNTERING DEV MAK
   Esposito R, 2013, COMMONAL, P1
   Evans B, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P83, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.770703
   Fernando GA, 2012, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V82, P367, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01163.x
   Gaillard Jean-Christophe., 2007, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V16, P522
   Government of Nepal Central Bureau of Statistics, 2012, POV NEP 2010 11
   Government of Nepal National Planning Commission, 2017, NAT REV SUST DEV GOA
   Government of Nepal National Planning Commission and the United Nations Development Programme, 2011, MILL DEV GOALS NEEDS
   Hutter G, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V67, P1, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9901-x
   International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, 2015, NEP EARTHQ 2015 DIS
   Jones S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V15, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.011
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Katz C., 2004, GROWING GLOBAL EC RE
   Kelly U, 2017, RESILIENCE, V5, P10, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2016.1228156
   Kirbyshire A., 2017, RESILIENCE SCAN 007C
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Leach M., 2008, 13 STEPS CTR U SUSS
   Levine S., 2014, Assessing resilience: why quantification misses the point
   Lizarralde G, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS76, DOI 10.1111/disa.12109
   Manyena S.B., 2009, THESIS
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Matyas D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS1, DOI 10.1111/disa.12107
   McFarlane C, 2017, URBAN GEOGR, V38, P1393, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1243386
   Mitchell T., 2012, Resilience: A risk management approach
   Mochizuki J, 2018, DISASTERS, V42, P361, DOI 10.1111/disa.12239
   Monday J.L., 2002, Natural Hazards Informer
   Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium, 2013, FLAGSH 4 HDB NEP 9 M
   Nightingale A.J., 2015, PRACTICING FEMINIST, P182
   O'Malley P, 2010, ECON SOC, V39, P488, DOI 10.1080/03085147.2010.510681
   Oven K., 2017, REV 9 MINIMUM CHARAC
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pugh J, 2014, AREA, V46, P313, DOI 10.1111/area.12118
   Ride A., 2011, Community Resilience in Natural Disasters
   Rigg J, 2016, GEOFORUM, V76, P63, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.08.014
   Rival Laura., 2009, QUESTION RESILIENCE, P293
   Ruszczyk H.A., 2017, THESIS
   Ruszczyk H.A., 2014, THESIS
   Ruszczyk HA, 2018, ENVIRON URBAN, V30, P317, DOI 10.1177/0956247817744927
   Schipper E.L. F., 2015, Overseas Development Institute - Working, P30, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2430.0882
   Schipper L, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00304.x
   Scott J.C, 2020, Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
   Slater T., 2014, OPEN DEMOCRACY  0128
   Solnit Rebecca, 2009, PARADISE BUILT HELL
   Swyngedouw E., 1997, PERSPECT ECON CHANGE, P137
   Tanner T., 2017, 519 OV DEV I
   Tobin G.A., 1999, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V1, P13, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1464-28679900002-9
   Twigg J., 2007, Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community: A guidance note
   United Nations Development Programme, 2017, NEP POV RED
   United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2005, HYOG FRAM ACT 2005 2
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 2015, NEP NUMB CAS DISTR H
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Voss Martin., 2015, Cultures and Disasters. Understanding Cultural Framings in Disaster Risk Reduction, P255
   Wilson GA, 2012, GEOFORUM, V43, P1218, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.008
   Wisner B., 2004, At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters
   World Bank, 2016, NEP DEV UPD JAN 2016
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
NR 82
TC 21
Z9 25
U1 1
U2 19
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 0361-3666
EI 1467-7717
J9 DISASTERS
JI Disasters
PD OCT
PY 2019
VL 43
IS 4
BP 818
EP 839
DI 10.1111/disa.12385
EA JUL 2019
PG 22
WC Environmental Studies; Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA IY2MG
UT WOS:000477164600001
PM 31322759
OA Green Published, hybrid, Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jones-Crank, JL
AF Jones-Crank, J. Leah
TI Pathways for FEW nexus collaboration in US city resilience planning
SO ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE governance; Qualitative Comparative Analysis; resilience; urban
   sustainability
ID FOOD-ENERGY-WATER; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; GOVERNANCE; PERSPECTIVE;
   INSIGHTS; CAPACITY
AB The food-energy-water (FEW) nexus has been argued as an approach to improve system resilience and sustainability theoretically. However, there is limited empirical understanding of which governance factors lead to FEW nexus collaboration in practice. The purpose of this study is to investigate the conditions associated with FEW nexus collaboration in cities in resilience planning: does it arise from risk of resource insecurity, pre-existing governance mechanisms, or both? The study analyzed the 22 cities in the United States that are part of the Resilient Cities Network using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The results show that food, energy, and water insecurity are not sufficient to explain FEW nexus collaboration in resilience planning. However, the results do show that FEW nexus collaboration is present in resilience planning in (a) cities that do experience water insecurity and employ two of three investigated governance conditions-policy coherence, stakeholder participation, or institutional support-or (b) that employ all three governance conditions, regardless of whether or not they experience water insecurity. It concludes that the risk of resource insecurity alone is not sufficient to explain cities' implementation of FEW nexus collaborations and provides policy recommendations for increased FEW nexus collaboration in practice.
C1 [Jones-Crank, J. Leah] Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
C3 University of Waterloo
RP Jones-Crank, JL (corresponding author), Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
FX Acknowledgments: The author would like to thank Ben Orlove for his
   support of this research. Funding: This research did not receive any
   specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or
   not-for-profit sectors.
CR Albrecht TR, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c6
   Allan T, 2015, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V31, P301, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2015.1029118
   Allouche J, 2015, WATER ALTERN, V8, P610
   Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   Ansell C, 2008, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V18, P543, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Benson D, 2015, WATER ALTERN, V8, P756
   Bielicki JM, 2019, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V7, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00007
   Bizikova L., 2013, WATER ENERGY FOOD SE
   CDP, 2021, 2021 Cities climate hazards
   Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Dusa A., 2019, QCA with R: A Comprehensive Resource
   Estoque RC, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V854, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158612
   Fidelman P, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V76, P103, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.018
   Finley JW, 2014, J AGR FOOD CHEM, V62, P6255, DOI 10.1021/jf501496r
   Food Research and Action Center (FRAC), 2019, Households participating in SNAP by county, 2015-2019
   Gain AK, 2015, WATER INT, V40, P895, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2015.1087616
   Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy, Our cities
   Hoff H., UNDERSTANDING NEXUS
   Hogeboom RJ, 2021, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V9, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2021.630395
   Howarth C, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V61, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.014
   Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2012, IEEE Std 13662012, DOI [10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6209381, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2012.6209381]
   Jones JL, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V127, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.025
   Kapucu N, 2023, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V46, P18, DOI 10.1080/01900692.2021.1967981
   Keskinen M, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8050193
   Kliskey A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13042160
   Leck H, 2015, GEOGR COMPASS, V9, P445, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12222
   Lele U, 2013, AQUAT PR, V1, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2013.07.005
   Liu JG, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P466, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0135-8
   Lv YX, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P124170, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-29863-1
   Mabli James., 2013, MEASURING EFFECT SUP
   Molenveld A, 2021, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V23, P1683, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2021.1879912
   Mouraviev N, 2020, EARTHSCAN STUD NATUR, P161
   Newell JP, 2019, ENVIRON RES LETT, V14, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab0767
   Oana I. E., 2021, Qualitative comparative analysis using R: A beginners, DOI [10.1017/9781009006781, DOI 10.1017/9781009006781]
   Oana IE, 2018, R J, V10, P507
   Opejin AK, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12031112
   Ostrom E, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P550, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V92, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.017
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.003
   Pappas IO, 2021, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
   Rasul G, 2016, ENVIRON DEV, V18, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.12.001
   Rihoux B., 2009, Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, DOI [10.4135/9781452226569, DOI 10.4135/9781452226569]
   Ringler C, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P617, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.002
   Roidt M, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V237, P609, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.106
   Romero-Lankao P, 2019, FRONT SOCIOL, V4, DOI 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00031
   Romero-Lankao P, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V90, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.004
   Schneider C. Q., 2012, Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139004244
   Schreiner B, 2015, AQUAT PR, V5, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.10.011
   Srigiri SR, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.725116
   Stephan RM, 2018, WATER INT, V43, P472, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2018.1446581
   Sullivan A, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V91, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.10.011
   Susnik J., 2023, Cambridge Prisms: Water, V1, DOI [10.1017/wat.2023.1, DOI 10.1017/WAT.2023.1]
   Thomann E, 2022, SWISS POLIT SCI REV, V28, P557, DOI 10.1111/spsr.12503
   U.S. Energy Information Administration (US EIA), 2020, Annual electric power industry report, Form EIA-861 detailed data files
   University of Notre Dame, 2019, U.S. urban adaptation assessment
   Urbinatti AM, 2020, J INTEGR ENVIRON SCI, V17, P21, DOI 10.1080/1943815X.2020.1749086
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Wang J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14137751
   Yuan MH, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V155, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111937
   Zhu J, 2020, LAND-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/land9120504
NR 60
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 9
PU Resilience Alliance
PI Dedham
PA 231 Bussey St., Beckwith and Brown, Dedham, Massachusetts, UNITED STATES
SN 1708-3087
J9 ECOL SOC
JI Ecol. Soc.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 29
IS 3
AR 5
DI 10.5751/ES-15187-290305
PG 22
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA ZE9M3
UT WOS:001273737600002
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cousins, JJ
AF Cousins, Joshua J.
TI Just nature-based solutions and the pursuit of climate resilient urban
   development
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Climate resilient development; Nature -based solutions; Climate justice;
   Urban resilience; Co -production; Transformation
ID POLITICAL ECOLOGY; GREEN SPACE; JUSTICE; SUSTAINABILITY; GOVERNANCE;
   INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSFORMATION; COPRODUCTION; RECOGNITION; CHALLENGES
AB Nature -based solutions (NbS) offer pathways towards climate resilient development. For cities, these pathways translate to a host of benefits to address the climate crisis, including climate change adaptation and mitigation, biodiversity protection and enhancement, and human well-being. In urban spaces, NbS are also about the design and re -design of the urban built and natural environment. This presents a need to create the institutions and governance mechanisms that allow for the co -production and co -design of NbS alongside local communities in ways that serve to address justice and legacies of inequality. In this perspective, I examine three areas of focus to deliver just nature -based solutions: problem , process , and progress . Problem focuses on the types of relationships nature -based solutions seek to transform -the race and class -based inequalities embedded in urban form. Process addresses how nature -based solutions can deliver justice through design and co -production. Finally, progress is about developing indicators and measuring progress towards achieving just nature -based solutions and how they reflect diverse and pluralistic value systems. Collectively these should move just NbS towards the repair of social and ecological exploitation in and beyond the city.
C1 [Cousins, Joshua J.] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm Studies, 106 Marshall Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
C3 State University of New York (SUNY) System; State University of New York
   (SUNY) College of Environmental Science & Forestry
RP Cousins, JJ (corresponding author), SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm Studies, 106 Marshall Hall, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA.
EM jcousins@esf.edu
OI Cousins, Joshua/0000-0003-1835-6024
CR Adams C, 2023, LAND USE POLICY, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106661
   Agyeman J, 2003, URBAN IND ENVIRON, P1
   Ajibade I, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P2230, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2062290
   Albert C, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V182, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003
   Anguelovski I, 2023, AMBIO, V52, P45, DOI 10.1007/s13280-022-01771-7
   Anguelovski I, 2022, NAT COMMUN, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1
   Anguelovski I, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1743, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579
   Anguelovski I, 2019, PROG HUM GEOG, V43, P1064, DOI 10.1177/0309132518803799
   Arango-Quiroga J, 2023, PLOS CLIM, V2, DOI 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000194
   Bigger P., 2017, Capitalism Nature Socialism, V28, P68, DOI DOI 10.1080/10455752.2016.1273962
   Bigger P, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P601, DOI 10.1177/2514848619876539
   Broto VC, 2022, CURR RES ENVIRON SUS, V4, DOI 10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100179
   Broto VC, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005
   Bush J, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V143, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.023
   Castellar JAC, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V779, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146237
   Chelleri L, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102985
   Cnra, 2022, Nature-based climate solutions: California's Smart lands strategy
   Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges, V97, P2016, DOI DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Cottrell C, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V135, P162, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.003
   Cousins JJ, 2021, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V23, P581, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2021.1893164
   Cousins JJ, 2021, ECOL ECON, V180, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106874
   Cousins JJ, 2017, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V107, P1144, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1293501
   Derickson KD, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P838, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1996219
   Diep L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P542, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.020
   Dilling L, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   Dooling S, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x
   Dorst H, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V220, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104335
   Dorst H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Ernstson H, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.012
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Fastiggi M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P1262, DOI 10.1177/0042098020907277
   Leal W, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V121, P18, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.018
   Finewood MH, 2016, ANTIPODE, V48, P1000, DOI 10.1111/anti.12238
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Frantzeskaki N, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
   Galecka-Drozda A, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127345
   Gilmore RuthWilson., 2022, ABOLITION GEOGRAPHY
   Grove K, 2020, GEOFORUM, V117, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.014
   Grove K, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1613, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1715778
   Haase A, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P726, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.001
   Hardy D, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P867, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1989282
   Hendricks MD, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V38, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.039
   Henrique KP, 2021, PROG HUM GEOG, V45, P1169, DOI 10.1177/0309132520962856
   Heynen N, 2006, URBAN AFF REV, V42, P3, DOI 10.1177/1078087406290729
   Heynen N, 2021, ANTIPODE, V53, P21, DOI 10.1111/anti.12666
   Hoover FA, 2021, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V23, P665, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2021.1945916
   Hurlimann AC, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102890
   Jasanoff Sheila, 2004, STATES KNOWLEDGE CO, P1
   Jessup K, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127300
   Kabisch N, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1388, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kiss B, 2022, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V32, P247, DOI 10.1002/eet.1987
   Kremer P, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08445-210229
   Lemos MC, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004
   Lewis JS, 2024, POLIT GEOGR, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102963
   Mabon L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.025
   Manning E, 2020, Thought Act, P1
   Marvin S., 2018, Urban living labs: Experimenting with city futures
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Melanidis MS, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V132, P273, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.028
   Mills-Novoa M, 2023, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102655
   Morris E, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V146, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.05.004
   Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
   Nelson DR, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V45, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.001
   Nightingale AJ, 2022, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V13, DOI 10.1002/wcc.740
   Palomo I, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P730, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.013
   Pascual U, 2023, NATURE, V620, P813, DOI 10.1038/s41586-023-06406-9
   Pearsall H, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101156
   Puskás N, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104065
   Quinton J, 2022, PROG HUM GEOG, V46, P960, DOI 10.1177/03091325221104478
   Randle S, 2022, AM ANTHROPOL, V124, P77, DOI 10.1111/aman.13650
   Ranganathan M, 2021, ANTIPODE, V53, P115, DOI 10.1111/anti.12555
   Reed G, 2022, CLIM POLICY, V22, P514, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2022.2047585
   Rice JL, 2020, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V44, P145, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12740
   Rivera DZ, 2022, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V23, P807, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2022.2147340
   Romero-Lankao P, 2018, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V8, P754, DOI 10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0
   Schipper ELF, 2021, CLIM DEV, V13, P467, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2020.1799738
   Scoones I, 2016, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V41, P293, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039
   Seddon N, 2022, SCIENCE, V376, P1410, DOI 10.1126/science.abn9668
   Sekulova F, 2021, CITIES, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103136
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Shokry G, 2025, J URBAN AFF, V47, P121, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2022.2160339
   Singh PK, 2021, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102277
   Sowinska-Swierkosz B, 2021, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V787, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147615
   Sowinska-Swierkosz Barbara., 2022, Nature-Based Solutions, V2, P100009, DOI [10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022.100009, DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022.100009]
   Stange EE, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104310
   Sultana F, 2022, POLIT GEOGR, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638
   Taiwo Olufe?Ami., 2022, RECONSIDERING REPARA, DOI [DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780197508893.001.0001, 10.1093/oso/9780197508893.001.0001]
   Torres PHC, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V143, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.02.017
   Toxopeus H, 2020, CITIES, V105, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102839
   Tozer L, 2023, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V113, P599, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2130867
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   Turnhout E, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
   van der Jagt APN, 2021, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V2, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2020.583833
   Vieira J, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.006
   Vincent K, 2022, PROG HUM GEOG, V46, P890, DOI 10.1177/03091325221079054
   Vincent K, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P877, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-00910-w
   Wachsmuth D, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P1038, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1417819
   Wendling LA, 2018, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V6, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00069
   Wickenberg B, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V125, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.016
   Wijsman K, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V136, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.06.018
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Wyborn C, 2019, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V44, P319, DOI [10.1146/annurev-environ-101718033103, 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103]
   Xie LJ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V132, P119, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.02.017
   Xie LJ, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V110, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.002
   Zhang ZZ, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127434
NR 108
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 45
U2 78
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 247
AR 105054
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105054
EA MAR 2024
PG 7
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA QD9G1
UT WOS:001219052100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ner, NT
   Okyere, SA
   Abunyewah, M
   Frimpong, LK
   Kita, M
AF Ner, Nikko Torres
   Okyere, Seth Asare
   Abunyewah, Matthew
   Frimpong, Louis Kusi
   Kita, Michihiro
TI The Resilience of a Resettled Flood-Prone Community: An Application of
   the RABIT Framework in Pasig City, Metro Manila
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE disaster resilience; RABIT framework; Manggahan Residences; Metro
   Manila; resettlement
ID INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS; URBAN RESILIENCE; ADAPTATION; VULNERABILITY;
   GOVERNANCE; INDICATOR; POLICY
AB Resilience measurement is an emerging topic in the field of disaster risk reduction. However, its application in Global South cities has proven to be a challenge due to the uniqueness of southern urbanisms and data challenges. As a result, the Resilience Benchmarking Assessment and Impact Toolkit (RABIT) framework has recently been developed to support resilience assessment in informal, marginalized, and disaster-prone contexts of southern cities. This paper asserts the relevance of the RABIT framework and uses it to assess the resilience of Manggahan residences, a resettled marginalized community in Pasig City, Metro Manila. Drawing on a quantitative approach and using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), the study revealed that scale, robustness, and learning attributes of the RABIT framework are strong contributors to the community's resilience. Self-organization, diversity, and redundancy have similar levels of contribution. Equality and rapidity were found to have the weakest relative contribution. The study findings emphasize the need to view resilience in resettled communities holistically and adopt an integrated and comprehensive approach that considers the multiple aspects of everyday life to proactively build adaptive and future resilient capacities.
C1 [Ner, Nikko Torres; Kita, Michihiro] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Div Global Architecture, Osaka 5650871, Japan.
   [Okyere, Seth Asare] Univ Arizona, Sch Landscape Architecture & Planning, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
   [Abunyewah, Matthew] Charles Darwin Univ, Australasian Ctr Resilience Implementat Sustainabl, Darwin, NT 0810, Australia.
   [Frimpong, Louis Kusi] Univ Environm & Sustainable Dev, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, EY0329-2478, Somanya, Eastern Region, Ghana.
C3 The University of Osaka; University of Arizona; Charles Darwin
   University
RP Ner, NT (corresponding author), Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Div Global Architecture, Osaka 5650871, Japan.
EM nernikko@gmail.com; sethrumsfel@gmail.com; matthew.abunyewah@cdu.edu.au;
   lkfrimpong@uesd.edu.gh; kita@arch.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp
OI Ner, Nikko/0000-0001-9938-0127; Okyere, Seth Asare/0000-0001-9028-2491;
   Frimpong, Louis Kusi/0000-0002-3363-6086; Abunyewah,
   Matthew/0000-0002-6649-6489
CR Abunyewah M. O.-K., 2022, Disaster Risk Reudction for resileince: Disaster management strategies, P435
   Abunyewah M, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101492
   Abunyewah M, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.031
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
   Aldrich DP, 2023, JPN J POLIT SCI, V24, P30, DOI 10.1017/S1468109922000366
   Aldrich DP, 2017, RETHINKING RESILIENC, P357, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50171-0_23, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-50171-023]
   Alexander DE, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2707, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013
   Alvarez M., 2019, RADICAL HOUSING J, V1, P49, DOI DOI 10.54825/JEJO3330
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Amoako C, 2019, CITIES, V89, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.006
   [Anonymous], 2017, Building Safe and Secure Communities
   [Anonymous], 2020, MIL ENGL LOC MAP XYZ
   Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Atwii F., 2022, World Risk Report 2022
   Bakkensen LA, 2017, RISK ANAL, V37, P982, DOI 10.1111/risa.12677
   Beauchamp E, 2019, DISASTERS, V43, pS295, DOI 10.1111/disa.12342
   Berkes F, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V61, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.004
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Bn C., 2012, IDS WORKING PAPERS, V2012, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X, 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Borie M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V54, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
   Carmen E, 2022, AMBIO, V51, P1371, DOI 10.1007/s13280-021-01678-9
   Chapman DA., 2018, Psychology and climate change: Human perceptions, impacts, and responses, P267, DOI [DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1596063, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00011-4, 10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00011-4]
   Clare A, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.07.001
   Clark-Ginsberg A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101714
   COSA, 2017, Simpler resilience measurement tools to diagnose and improve how households fare in difficult circumstances from conflict to climate change
   Costello A.B., 2005, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval, V10, P7, DOI 10.7275/jyj1-4868
   Cui K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V10, P439, DOI 10.1007/s13753-019-00240-2
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   David J., LACK PUBLIC SPACES L
   Derakhshan S, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14116927
   Dianat H, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102789
   Doberstein B, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V253, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109753
   Erdiaw-Kwasie MO, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101098
   Fatemi MN, 2021, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V12, P500, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-08-2020-0094
   Fayazi M, 2013, ARCHNET-IJAR, V7, P146
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   FORNELL C, 1981, J MARKETING RES, V18, P39, DOI 10.2307/3151312
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Galuszka J, 2021, INT DEV PLANN REV, V43, P175, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2020.8
   Gao JX, 2016, NATURE, V530, P307, DOI 10.1038/nature16948
   Gilbuena R, 2013, IAHS-AISH P, V357, P32
   Graveline MH, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V13, P330, DOI 10.1007/s13753-022-00419-0
   Hair JF, 2012, LONG RANGE PLANN, V45, P312, DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011
   Haley J., 2021, SSRN ELECT J, P1, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3821218, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3821218]
   Hayton JC, 2004, ORGAN RES METHODS, V7, P191, DOI 10.1177/1094428104263675
   Heeks R., 2014, The Journal of Community Informatics, V11, DOI [https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v11i1.2846, DOI 10.15353/JOCI.V11I1.2846]
   Holden WN, 2018, INTEGRATING DISASTER SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT: GLOBAL CASE STUDIES IN MITIGATION AND RECOVERY, P407, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812056-9.00024-5
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Igup I., 2021, APOAMFS WOMEN LIVELI
   Intergov Panel Clim Chg, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245
   Jiang T, 2022, IEEE T SMART GRID, V13, P2744, DOI 10.1109/TSG.2022.3157856
   Jones L, 2019, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V10, DOI 10.1002/wcc.552
   Juliawati M, 2022, J PATIENT SAF, V18, P486, DOI 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000980
   Keating A., 2014, OPERATIONALIZING RES, P43
   Keating A, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P77, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-77-2017
   Kerr SE, 2018, RESILIENCE: THE SCIENCE OF ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE, P267, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-811891-7.00022-0
   Khazai B., 2015, A Guide to Measuring Urban Risk Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice of Urban Indicators
   Khazai B, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P604, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.012
   Lucini B., 2013, Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ, V4, P58, DOI [10.1108/17595901311299008, DOI 10.1108/17595901311299008]
   Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674
   Maningo R.M., 2022, AGENCY EVERYDAY POLI
   Maningo R.M., 2022, SOC TRANSFORM J GLOB, V9, P125, DOI [10.13185/STJGS2021.09107, DOI 10.13185/STJGS2021.09107]
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Marks D, 2022, J INTEGR ENVIRON SCI, V19, P141, DOI 10.1080/1943815X.2022.2127774
   Marzi S, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0221585
   Marzi S, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V223, P1023, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.060
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mehmood H., DATA DROUGHT GLOBAL
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Nakhaei M, 2016, IRAN RED CRESCENT ME, V18, DOI 10.5812/ircmj.25050
   NAMRIA, 2013, FLOOD HAZ MAP METR
   Ner NT, 2022, PROG DISASTER SCI, V16, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2022.100249
   Ntontis E, 2019, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V27, P2, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12223
   Okyere A.S., 2015, J SUSTAINABLE DEV AF, V17, P101
   Okyere S.A., 2019, GEOGRAPHY CLIMATE CH, P391
   Okyere S. A., 2023, Urban Governance, V3, P228
   Ospina A.V., 2016, BENCHMARKING URBAN C
   Ospina A.V., 2016, RESILIENCE ASSESSMEN
   Pantouvakis A, 2016, MARIT ECON LOGIST, V18, P496, DOI 10.1057/mel.2015.6
   Patel Sonny S, 2017, PLoS Curr, V9, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.db775aff25efc5ac4f0660ad9c9f7db2
   Peacock WalterGillis., 2010, Advancing the resilience of coastal localities: developing, implementing and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: a final report, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.35146.80324
   Philippine Statistics Authority, 2020, CENS POP HOUS 2020 C
   Porio E, 2014, ASIAN J SOC SCI, V42, P75, DOI 10.1163/15685314-04201006
   Samuels P., 2016, ADVICE EXPLORATORY F, DOI [DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.5013.9766, 10.13140/RG.2.1.5013.9766]
   Saravanan V, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102621
   Schipper L., 2015, A comparative overview of resilience measurement frameworks analysing indicators and approaches
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shen GQ, 2019, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V10, P912, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2018.1552630
   Shiraishi R., 2022, J. Architect. Plann., V87, P260
   Singh G., 2017, Navigating Informality: Perils and Prospects in Metro Manila's Slums
   Smith LI., 2002, Computer Science Technical Report No. OUCS-2002-12
   Streiner D.L., 2012, GUIDE STAT PERPLEXED, P110
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Tadgell A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.005
   Tariq H, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102358
   Twigg J., 2009, Characteristics of a disaster-resilient community
   UN-Habitat, 2020, The New Urban Agenda
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   Vallarta B.B, FLOODING MAJOR WATER
   Vaneeckhaute LE, 2017, COMMUNITY DEV, V48, P735, DOI 10.1080/15575330.2017.1369443
   Wardekker A, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103258
   Wilkin J, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071943
   World Bank Philippines, 2017, URB REV FOST COMP SU
NR 108
TC 6
Z9 6
U1 9
U2 36
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 8
AR 6953
DI 10.3390/su15086953
PG 23
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA F5YT7
UT WOS:000983106400001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Sun, HH
   Zhen, F
AF Sun Honghu
   Zhen Feng
TI Spatial Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Urban Resilience from
   the Perspective of Daily Activity: A Case Study of Nanjing, China
SO CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE urban resilience; daily activity; contradiction between supply and
   demand; big data; spatial characteristics; Nanjing; China
ID ECOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; RESIDENTS; METAPHOR; CITIES
AB Based on the connotation of urban resilience and the main contradictions of China's urbanization, urban resilience is placed within the main daily activities contradictory scene of the urban man-land system to build a theoretical framework of urban activity resilience. Relying on geographic big data, this study identifies the spatial characteristics of activity resilience, reveals the impact of activity environment on activity resilience in Nanjing, and proposes countermeasures. The main conclusions are as follows. 1) Activity resilience presents a composite spatial structure of circles and clusters, and most areas are resilient but at a low level. 2) There are significantly positive and negative global autocorrelation between activity resilience and activity scale, and activity stability. Simultaneously, there also exists a local spatial autocorrelation with the opposite positive and negative trends. 3) Activity environment has a significant effect on activity resilience, and the degree and direction of influence among different dimensions and regions are heterogeneous. 4) For activity resilience, it is necessary to increase the matching degree between the scale and stability of activities, and reduce the excessive concentration and flow of activities. For the activity environment, it is necessary to improve the accessibility of the ecological environment, strengthen the high-quality supply of the infrastructure environment, optimize the balance of the location environment, and promote the inclusiveness of the social environment.
C1 [Sun Honghu; Zhen Feng] Nanjing Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China.
   [Sun Honghu; Zhen Feng] Nanjing Univ, Prov Engn Lab Smart City Design Simulat & Visuali, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
C3 Nanjing University; Nanjing University
RP Zhen, F (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China.; Zhen, F (corresponding author), Nanjing Univ, Prov Engn Lab Smart City Design Simulat & Visuali, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China.
EM zhenfeng@nju.edu.cn
RI zhen, Feng/ABD-6136-2021
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Amap, 2018, CHINAS MAJOR URBAN T
   [Anonymous], 2017, 19 CPC NAT C
   Batty Michael, 2013, Dialogues Hum Geogr, V3, P274, DOI 10.1177/2043820613513390
   Brown C, 2018, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V20, P23, DOI 10.1007/s10668-016-9891-7
   Brunsdon C, 1996, GEOGR ANAL, V28, P281, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Cavallaro M, 2014, COMPUT-AIDED CIV INF, V29, P608, DOI 10.1111/mice.12080
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   Dale MRT, 2009, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST, V14, P188, DOI 10.1198/jabes.2009.0012
   Desouza KC, 2013, CITIES, V35, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.003
   Ding L, 2015, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V6, P1539, DOI 10.3390/atmos6101539
   Fang YP, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   [郭永锐 Guo Yongrui], 2015, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V34, P100
   Hashem IAT, 2016, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V36, P748, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.002
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   León J, 2014, HABITAT INT, V43, P250, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.04.006
   [李广东 Li Guangdong], 2016, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V71, P49
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Michelle AM, 2017, HABITAT INT, V69, P68, DOI [10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.09.001, DOI 10.1016/J.HABITATINT.2017.09.001]
   O'Brien K, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P729, DOI 10.1177/0309132512452500
   Ostadtaghizadeh A., 2015, PLOS CURR-TREE LIFE, V7, P423
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Porta S, 2008, URBAN DES INT, V13, P41, DOI 10.1057/udi.2008.1
   Qin X, 2016, HABITAT INT, V53, P360, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.12.006
   [宋小冬 Song Xiaodong], 2017, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P25
   Sun HH, 2019, HABITAT INT, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.05.002
   Tang Z, 2015, TOURISM MANAGE, V46, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.001
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Wang B, 2018, CITIES, V79, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.020
   Wei ZC, 2021, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V31, P54, DOI 10.1007/s11769-020-1159-3
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Xu YY, 2018, ACTA ECOL SIN, V38, P5297, DOI [10.5846/stxb201709081620, DOI 10.5846/stxb201709081620]
   [岳文泽 Yue Wenze], 2020, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V75, P2730
   Zhang XL, 2018, CITIES, V72, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.009
   [赵瑞东 Zhao Ruidong], 2020, [地理科学进展, Progress in Geography], V39, P1717
   Zhen F, 2017, CITIES, V60, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.014
NR 45
TC 10
Z9 11
U1 7
U2 67
PU SPRINGER
PI NEW YORK
PA ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600, NEW YORK, NY, UNITED STATES
SN 1002-0063
EI 1993-064X
J9 CHINESE GEOGR SCI
JI Chin. Geogr. Sci.
PD JUN
PY 2021
VL 31
IS 3
BP 387
EP 399
DI 10.1007/s11769-021-1201-0
PG 13
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA RZ0JR
UT WOS:000648287300001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Peng, YR
   Wang, Z
   Zhang, YH
   Wang, W
AF Peng, Yanran
   Wang, Zhong
   Zhang, Yunhui
   Wang, Wei
TI Facilitating or Hindering? The Impact of Low-Carbon Pilot Policies on
   Socio-Ecological Resilience in Resource-Based Cities
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE low-carbon pilots; resource-based cities; socio-ecological resilience;
   spatial spillover effect
ID INNOVATION; COMMUNITY
AB Low-carbon pilot policies are essential for the green transformation of resource-based cities, helping them mitigate the "carbon curse" and the "resource curse" while promoting sustainable socio-ecological development. Focusing on a panel of 114 resource-based cities in China, spanning from 2003 to 2022, this study employs a range of methodologies, including kernel density estimation, the Difference-in-Differences Model, Spatial Difference-in-Differences, Mediation Analysis, K-means Clustering, and Dual Machine Learning to assess the consequences of low-carbon pilot policies on socio-ecological resilience. The findings indicate that the socio-ecological resilience of the study area has generally improved, though there is noticeable polarization. Low-carbon pilot policies significantly enhance the resilience of resource-based cities by 0.4%, and they exhibit a positive spatial spillover effect of 1.1%. However, the long-term effects of the policies on economic resilience were not significant, and the policies did not have a direct impact on the social resilience of the pilot cities; however, they did promote social resilience in neighboring regions. Finally, the effectiveness of low-carbon pilots varies, with more pronounced benefits in declining and mature resource cities, particularly in those with medium ecological and economic resilience, and low social resilience. Green finance, industrial transformation, and carbon emission efficiency are identified as key strategies for improving socio-ecological resilience. The above findings provide insights for policymakers seeking to foster inclusive, resilient, and sustainable urban development in China.
C1 [Peng, Yanran; Wang, Zhong; Zhang, Yunhui; Wang, Wei] China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
C3 China University of Geosciences
RP Wang, Z (corresponding author), China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China.
EM pengyanran@cug.edu.cn; wangzhong@cug.edu.cn; zyh1018761686@cug.edu.cn;
   hongruwang0708@163.com
FU National Social Science Fund of China;  [23BGL248]
FX This research was funded by the National Social Science Fund of China,
   grant number No. 23BGL248.
CR Afriyanie D, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102710
   [Anonymous], 2013, Circular of the state council on printing and issuing the national plan for sustainable development of resource-based cities (2013-2020)
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Chen YT, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.885976
   Cui HY, 2024, ENERG POLICY, V192, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114234
   Development and Reform, Commission on the Third Batch of National Low-Carbon Cities Pilot Workepartmental Government AffairsChina
   ELLIS HS, 1985, J ECON HIST, V45, P770, DOI 10.1017/S0022050700035026
   Farley J, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P389, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.065
   Feng SL, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V468, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143118
   Feng Y, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104273
   Fu LY, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V434, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139882
   Grafton RQ, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P907, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0376-1
   Gu RD, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19137997
   Han HF, 2025, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105864
   He M, 2024, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D, V71, P417, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2024.08.013
   Hukkalainen M, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V35, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.018
   Jiao WT, 2021, RESOUR POLICY, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101867
   Li B, 2017, RESOUR POLICY, V51, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.11.003
   Li GZ, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141610434
   Li SN, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V89, P1248, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2023.08.007
   Li WW, 2024, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V31, P8863, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-31685-0
   Liu EN, 2021, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101022
   Liu X, 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V324, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116353
   Lu M, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12020302
   Luo SY, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16198368
   Luo YG, 2024, ECON ANAL POLICY, V83, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2024.06.014
   Ma JT, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18073695
   Mundaca L, 2018, APPL ENERG, V218, P292, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.146
   Ning X, 2024, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, DOI 10.1007/s10668-024-05609-y
   Oliveira BM, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109113
   Pan A, 2022, ENERG ECON, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106129
   Parkhill KA, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V53, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.014
   Qu F, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104423
   Renaud FG, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P749, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9505-x
   Shao S, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107286
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shi CC, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11060921
   Sun Y, 2023, CITIES, V141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104458
   Talubo JP, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14074102
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   Tan JT, 2017, CHINESE GEOGR SCI, V27, P471, DOI 10.1007/s11769-017-0878-6
   Wang CA, 2023, ENERG ECON, V124, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106676
   Wang D, 2024, CITIES, V153, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105316
   Wang PF, 2024, CITIES, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104646
   Wang QH, 2023, NAT RESOUR RES, V32, P1809, DOI 10.1007/s11053-023-10211-6
   Wang SS, 2024, J KNOWL ECON, DOI 10.1007/s13132-024-02140-3
   Wang T, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111748
   Wang ZR, 2024, FRONT ENG MANAG, V11, P194, DOI 10.1007/s42524-024-0307-3
   Weitzel EC, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19159601
   Wu JX, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113796
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   Xiong B, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151712989
   Xu X, 2023, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V20, DOI 10.3390/ijerph20010413
   Yang SB, 2023, ENERG ECON, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106636
   Yang SB, 2023, ENERG ECON, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106523
   Yin J, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192114467
   Yip CM, 2018, J ENVIRON ECON MANAG, V89, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.03.004
   Zeng SB, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V332, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117363
   Zhang JR, 2022, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/atmos13091355
   Zhang W, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16229842
   Zhang YY, 2024, INT REV ECON FINANC, V93, P1074, DOI 10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.012
   Zhang YY, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106862
   Zhang ZY, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V474, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143587
   Zheng YX, 2023, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1214070
   Zou C, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V83, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103954
NR 66
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 24
U2 24
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD JAN
PY 2025
VL 14
IS 1
AR 147
DI 10.3390/land14010147
PG 28
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA T6H3C
UT WOS:001405985300001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mosso, B
   Nino, A
   Salata, S
AF Mosso, Beatrice
   Nino, Andrea
   Salata, Stefano
TI How to Plan Climate-Adaptive Cities: An Experimental Approach to Address
   Ecosystem Service Loss in Ordinary Planning Processes
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE urban planning; climate change; ecosystem services; soil; urban
   climate-adaptation; vulnerability and risk
ID GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; URBAN; MODEL; RESILIENCE; CATCHMENT; INDICATOR;
   KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; RUNOFF; FUTURE
AB Global climate change, combined with socio-economic issues such as conflicts, inflation, energy crises, and inequality, is reshaping urban governance. Cities, which host most of the global population, are highly exposed to climate-related risks, especially those associated with the degradation of ecosystem services. These risks are manifested, among other factors, as the alteration and degradation of the habitat quality, heightened hydraulic vulnerability, and intensified urban heat islands phenomena. Addressing these challenges requires innovative planning tools to integrate ecosystem-based strategies to enhance urban resilience and support sustainable transformation processes. This paper attempts to do this by introducing ecosystem zoning, an experimental tool designed to integrate ecosystem services into urban planning and its regulatory framework. Applied to the city of Torino, this approach offers a biophysical classification of municipal territory through a mapping of habitat quality, cooling capacity, carbon sequestration, and stormwater retention. The resulting classification provides an overview of the different ecosystem characterizations of the urban fabric and informs site-specific interventions to maintain or enhance ecosystem services and guide urban regeneration processes. By embedding ecosystem services into planning regulations, the project supports sustainable urban development while mitigating climate impacts. The proposed tool contributes to the broader discourse on creating resilient, ecologically sustainable cities and demonstrates the potential of integrating scientific research into urban decision-making processes.
C1 [Mosso, Beatrice; Salata, Stefano] Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies DAStU, LabPPTE, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
   [Nino, Andrea] Politecn Torino, Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning DIST, I-10125 Turin, Italy.
C3 Polytechnic University of Milan; Polytechnic University of Turin
RP Mosso, B (corresponding author), Politecn Milan, Dept Architecture & Urban Studies DAStU, LabPPTE, I-20133 Milan, Italy.
EM beatrice.mosso@polimi.it; andrea.nino@polito.it;
   stefano.salata@polimi.it
RI Salata, Stefano/B-9186-2018
CR Ahn Y, 2019, ENERG BUILDINGS, V196, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.018
   Alam M, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.035
   Ali-Toudert F, 2018, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V134, P1413, DOI 10.1007/s00704-018-2621-3
   Arcidiacono A., 2015, Ecosystem Services Assessment Using Invest as a Tool to Support Decision Making Process: Critical Issues and Opportunities, V9158
   Assennato F, 2018, Ph.D. Thesis
   Attolico A, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P528, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00972-1
   Barbosa B, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12052294
   Biswal BK, 2022, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106578
   Blecic I, 2020, PLAN THEOR, V19, P172, DOI 10.1177/1473095219873365
   Borrego C, 2016, ATMOS ENVIRON, V131, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.017
   BOX GEP, 1979, J AM STAT ASSOC, V74, P1, DOI 10.2307/2286713
   Brenner N., 2013, Implosions/Explosions Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization, P576
   Brenner N., 2015, City, V19, P151, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712
   Caldarice O., 2021, Atti Rass. Tec, V154, P29
   Caldarice O., 2019, Valori Valutazioni, V22, P67
   Calliari E, 2022, CLIM RISK MANAG, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100450
   Cassatella C, 2013, URBAN RES PRACT, V6, P219, DOI 10.1080/17535069.2013.810933
   Colavitti AM, 2013, EUR PLAN STUD, V21, P167, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2012.722913
   Comoli V., 1992, Piano Regolatore Generale di Torino, Qualit e Valori Della Struttura Storica di Torino, Parte Seconda Il Processo di Formazione Della Citt Contemporanea, P75
   Congedo L, 2016, J MAPS, V12, P1195, DOI 10.1080/17445647.2016.1145151
   Cortinovis C., 2018, One Ecosystem, V3, pe25477, DOI 10.3897/oneeco.3.e25477
   Cortinovis C, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V70, P298, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.017
   Dasgupta D., 2023, IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, V1st ed.
   Davoudi S, 2021, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-73399-5_2
   De Sy V, 2013, GEOMORPHOLOGY, V190, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.02.012
   De Valck J, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V65, P186, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.009
   Delo G, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12031658
   Dizdaroglu D, 2016, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V59, P1982, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2015.1103211
   Duarte GT, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0154573
   Dworczyk C, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12010052
   Egegård CH, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13020143
   Fabricius C., 2016, Resilience, Development and Global Change, VVolume 71
   Fletcher DH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14127079
   García-Ayllón S, 2019, APPL SCI-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/app9153182
   Ghirardelli F., 2024, BDC Boll. Cent. Calza Bini, V24, P63
   Giaimo C., 2016, P 9 INT C IMPR EN EF, P43
   Golicnik B, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V94, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.016
   Grillenzoni C, 2004, J AGR BIOL ENVIR ST, V9, P158, DOI 10.1198/1085711043541
   Grillenzoni C, 2016, J CLASSIF, V33, P262, DOI 10.1007/s00357-016-9205-7
   Grilo F, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V724, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138182
   Hamel P, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V24, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.008
   Heath LS, 2002, ENVIRON POLLUT, V116, P373, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5
   Herreros-Cantis P, 2021, ECOL APPL, V31, DOI 10.1002/eap.2390
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   ISTAT, Italian Census
   Italian National Institute of Statistics Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat), 1973, Istituto Centrale di Statistica
   Ariza SLJ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11082312
   Kienast F, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015
   Kopperoinen L, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1361, DOI 10.1007/s10980-014-0014-2
   Kousis I, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-88344-y
   Kwon YJ, 2021, CITIES, V116, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103276
   Larsen L, 2015, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V13, P486, DOI 10.1890/150103
   Li YB, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V419, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138152
   Maes J, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
   Malgwi MB, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102148
   Maragno D, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031334
   McPhearson T, 2022, ONE EARTH, V5, P505, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.007
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Mubareka S, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.08.012
   Mutani G, 2019, INT J HEAT TECHNOL, V37, P936, DOI 10.18280/ijht.370402
   Nowak DJ, 2002, ENVIRON POLLUT, V116, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00214-7
   O'Sullivan F, 2020, FRONT SUSTAIN CITIES, V2, DOI 10.3389/frsc.2020.572527
   Orgiazzi A, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V545, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.092
   Pasztor L., 2017, Soil Mapping and Process Modeling for Sustainable Land Use Management, P293, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805200-6.00009-8
   Pristeri G, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151511542
   Puttilli M., 2011, Torino: Storia di una Citt (Museo Torinodal 18/03/2011 al 31/12/2011)
   Romano B, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V38, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.001
   Ronchi S., 2021, P 3 WORLD C SOC URB, P164
   Ronchi S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102459
   Ronchi S, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101907
   Salata S, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12030702
   Salata S, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14063420
   Salata S, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13105697
   Salata S, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107758
   Salata S, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13052494
   Santoloni R., 2011, Ri-Vista Ric. Per La Progett. Del Paesaggio, V9, P41
   Scoones I, 2020, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V42, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004
   Sjöman JD, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.007
   Staccione A, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V131, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.017
   Stürck J, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V63, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.06.009
   Tallis H.T., 2011, VEST 2.0 Beta Users Guide
   Tang YH, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101406
   Ternavasio M, 2008, Crocetta. Storia Di Un Quartiere
   Terzi F, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P433, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1591355
   United Nations, 2015, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL
   van Griensven A, 2006, J HYDROL, V324, P10, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008
   Venter ZS, 2021, ECOSYST SERV, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101314
   Wang Y, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191912910
   Zölch T, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V157, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
NR 90
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD MAR 4
PY 2025
VL 14
IS 3
AR 532
DI 10.3390/land14030532
PG 28
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 0PZ0H
UT WOS:001453247100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU McEvoy, D
   Iyer-Raniga, U
   Ho, S
   Mitchell, D
   Jegatheesan, V
   Brown, N
AF McEvoy, Darryn
   Iyer-Raniga, Usha
   Ho, Serene
   Mitchell, David
   Jegatheesan, Veeriah
   Brown, Nick
TI Integrating Teaching and Learning with Inter-Disciplinary Action
   Research in Support of Climate Resilient Urban Development
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate actions; urban climate resilience; sustainable urban
   development; capacity building; SIDS
ID ADAPTATION; ISLAND; FRAMEWORK; POLICY
AB The capital cities of the South Pacific are experiencing rapid urbanisation pressures as increasing numbers of people migrate to the primary cities either in search of employment and greater access to healthcare and education, or as a consequence of environmental 'push' factors. However, the limited capacity of municipal Governments to respond to the scale and pace of change is leading to a growth of informal settlements in peri-urban locations. Factors of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity combine to make these informal settlements the most vulnerable areas to natural hazards. In response to this critical urban resilience agenda, this paper looks at how participatory action research is providing inter-disciplinary scientific support for the implementation of urban resilience and climate actions in Honiara, Solomon Islands. Adaptation measures involve a combination of hard and soft actions; as well as activities designed to strengthen local capacity to respond to contemporary resilience challenges. Addressing the adaptive capacity component, this paper also highlights the opportunities for Australian universities to integrate teaching and learning with action research to achieve a substantive real-world impact in the Pacific region, as well as illustrating the capacity strengthening benefits that can be achieved through sustained engagement and collaborative partnerships with local organisations.
C1 [McEvoy, Darryn; Jegatheesan, Veeriah; Brown, Nick] RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
   [Iyer-Raniga, Usha] RMIT Univ, Sch Property Construct & Project Management, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
   [Ho, Serene; Mitchell, David] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT); Royal Melbourne
   Institute of Technology (RMIT); Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
   (RMIT)
RP McEvoy, D (corresponding author), RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
EM darryn.mcevoy@rmit.edu.au; usha.iyer-raniga@rmit.edu.au;
   serene.ho2@rmit.edu.au; david.mitchell@rmit.edu.au;
   jega.jegatheesan@rmit.edu.au; nick.brown@rmit.edu.au
RI Brown, Nick/AAZ-2796-2020; McEvoy, Darryn/K-8015-2017; Mitchell,
   David/N-4148-2016
OI McEvoy, Darryn/0000-0003-4144-4137; Ho, Serene/0000-0002-0652-6279;
   Brown, Nick/0000-0002-2562-2258; Iyer-Raniga, Usha/0000-0002-3088-8739;
   Mitchell, David/0000-0002-8782-6440; Jegatheesan,
   Veeriah/0000-0002-8038-4854
FU UNFCCC Adaptation Fund
FX UNFCCC Adaptation Fund, administered by UN-Habitat.
CR [Anonymous], 2009, ECOSYSTEM BASED ADAP, DOI DOI 10.1093/JSS/XXXIII.1.1
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
   Birkmann J, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P171, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0108-y
   Blackshaw T., 2010, SAGE KEY CONCEPTS SE, P55, DOI https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279076.n8
   Carmin J, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11430951
   Clarke T, 2019, ISL STUD J, V14, P59, DOI 10.24043/isj.80
   Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges, DOI [10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN]
   Ensor J, 2015, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V6, P509, DOI 10.1002/wcc.348
   Forsyth T, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P439, DOI 10.1002/wcc.231
   Friend R, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V7, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.001
   Hawtin M., 2007, Community Profiling: A practical guide, V2nd
   Henly-Shepard S, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P343, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1328-8
   Kaijser A, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P417, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.835203
   Kelman I, 2011, ISL STUD J, V6, P59
   Kiddle GL, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9101878
   McEvoy D., 2017, GREATER PORT VILA SO
   McEvoy D, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1594666
   Parnell S, 2007, AREA, V39, P357, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2007.00760.x
   SPREP, 2018, A synthesis report by the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme, Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) 1-14
   Trundle A., 2016, HONIARA URBAN RESILI
   Trundle A, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P53, DOI 10.1177/0956247818816654
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-HABITAT, 2014, PLANN CLIM CHANG STR
   Warrick O, 2017, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V17, P1039, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-1036-x
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
NR 28
TC 8
Z9 9
U1 1
U2 17
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD DEC
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 23
AR 6701
DI 10.3390/su11236701
PG 15
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KD9MV
UT WOS:000508186400173
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Singh, U
   Upadhyay, SP
AF Singh, Uttam
   Upadhyay, Surya Prakash
TI Fractured smart cities: Missing links in India's smart city mission
SO ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-URBAN ANALYTICS AND CITY SCIENCE
LA English
DT Article
DE Fractured smart cities; smart city mission; resilience; evidence-based
   planning; data-driven approach
ID GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION
AB The postscripts of smart cities have been written before its prelude. Inserting smart technologies in infrastructure to improve urban environments, smart cities emphasize data-driven approaches and evidence-based planning. While it asks for production of new vocabularies, new ways of thinking, and proposes new methodologies, smart cities have trivialized baseline surveys. The insignificance to baseline survey hides the existing and functioning cities and leads to appropriation of "smart in the box" technologies. The omission of baseline survey fails to revamp planning and governance techniques as well as management and delivery of urban services. India's Smart City Mission runs through a similar fate. Despite changes in vision and approach towards urban improvement, Smart City Mission suffers from methodological apathy and produces fractured smart cities. In doing so, the paper explores how the idea of normative smart city shrouds urban complexities and heterogeneities and proposes solutions without comprehending the functional and existing cities. Drawing on cases of urban water and solid waste management in Smart City Dharamshala, this paper discusses how fissures in normative and functional smart cities are continually produced through broken, incomplete, and erroneous data that, ultimately, fails in creating robust and resilient cities.
C1 [Singh, Uttam; Upadhyay, Surya Prakash] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Mandi, India.
   [Singh, Uttam] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Room 112,B-25,North Campus, Mandi 175075, India.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Mandi; Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT
   System); Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) - Mandi
RP Singh, U (corresponding author), Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Room 112,B-25,North Campus, Mandi 175075, India.
EM uttammsw2008@gmail.com
RI Singh, Dr. Uttam/JFB-2624-2023
OI Singh, Uttam/0000-0001-7955-2614; Prakash Upadhyay,
   Surya/0000-0001-9948-0494
CR Ahluwalia IJ., 2011, REPORT INDIAN INFRAS
   Aijaz R., 2021, Indias Smart Cities Mission, 2015-2021: A Stocktaking
   Albino V, 2015, J URBAN TECHNOL, V22, P3, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2014.942092
   Anand A., 2018, An open switch fault detection strategy using mean voltage prediction for cascaded h-bridge multilevel inverters, P1
   Aurigi A, 2021, J URBAN TECHNOL, V28, P55, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2019.1704203
   Bajpai N., 2021, 62 ICT
   Ballestero A, 2019, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V48, P405, DOI 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011428
   Batty M, 2012, EUR PHYS J-SPEC TOP, V214, P481, DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
   Batty M, 2012, CITIES, V29, pS9, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.008
   Bibri SE, 2021, EUR J FUTURES RES, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4
   Brandt T., 2016, P AIS PRE ICIS WORKS, P1
   Caragliu A, 2011, J URBAN TECHNOL, V18, P65, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117
   Chatterton Paul., 2019, Unlocking Sustainable Cities: A Manifesto for Real Change
   Choudhury B., 2022, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V57, P81
   Chourabi H., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P2289, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615
   Chow JYJ., 2018, MONITORING MOBILITY
   Cocchia A, 2014, PROGR IS, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2
   Colding J, 2019, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V2, P512, DOI 10.3390/smartcities2040031
   Correia D., 2020, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, P79, DOI [10.2495/SDP200071, DOI 10.2495/SDP200071]
   CSE, 2020, SFD LIT DHAR IND
   Datta A, 2015, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V5, P3, DOI 10.1177/2043820614565748
   Desdemoustier J, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V142, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.029
   DSCL, 2021, DEV E TOIL DHAR OPER
   Fletcher AL, 2020, FORESIGHT, V22, P689, DOI 10.1108/FS-04-2020-0036
   Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Ghosh B, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V40, P318, DOI 10.1177/23996544211027583
   Giffinger R., 2007, SMART CITIES RANKING
   Granier Benoit, 2016, Information Polity, V21, P61, DOI 10.3233/IP-150367
   Harvey D., 2003, Macalester International, V13, P7
   HLRN, 2018, CITIES MISSION SMART
   HPTDC, 2019, FIN EST DOM FOR TOUR
   Ismagilova E, 2022, INFORM SYST FRONT, V24, P393, DOI 10.1007/s10796-020-10044-1
   Kapoor, 2020, EASE LIVING INDEX 20
   Kapoor A., 2021, EC TIMES 0310
   Kar AK, 2019, INFORM SYST FRONT, V21, P495, DOI 10.1007/s10796-019-09930-0
   Khan S., 2018, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V26, P13
   Kourtit K, 2012, INNOVATION-ABINGDON, V25, P93, DOI 10.1080/13511610.2012.660331
   Leszczynski A, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN A, V48, P1691, DOI 10.1177/0308518X16651445
   Lim SB, 2022, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V5, P71, DOI 10.3390/smartcities5010005
   Luque A., 2014, Urban Retrofitting for Sustainability: Mapping the Transition to 2050, P159
   Luque-Ayala A, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P2105, DOI 10.1177/0042098015577319
   Lynch K., 1981, Theory of good city form
   Masik G, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102970
   Mitchell WJ, 2000, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1765, P1
   Mohan L., 2022, TRIBUNE 0224
   MoHUA, 2015, SMART CITY MISS TRAN
   MoHUA, 2012, REP COMPTR AUD GEN I
   Mora L, 2021, J URBAN TECHNOL, V28, P1, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2020.1834831
   Nexus Novus, 2015, W FREE HIMAC PRAD FE
   Öberg C, 2017, IMP J, V11, P468, DOI 10.1108/IMP-06-2015-0024
   Orlove B, 2010, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V39, P401, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105045
   Padmapriya V., 2021, Blockchain for Smart Cities, P17, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-824446-3.00015-6
   Praharaj S, 2018, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, P1, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V13-N2-171-186
   Ramaprasad A, 2017, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V10428, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_2
   Rittel HJ., 1969, PANEL POLICY SCI
   Sahil K., 2021, Int. J. Chem. Stud, V9, P572, DOI [10.22271/chemi.2021.v9.i1h.11289, DOI 10.22271/CHEMI.2021.V9.I1H.11289]
   SCP, SMART CITY CHALL STA
   Shapiro JM, 2006, REV ECON STAT, V88, P324, DOI 10.1162/rest.88.2.324
   Thakur S v State of Himachal Pradesh, 2019, NATL GREEN TRIB PRIN
   United Nation, 2017, NEW URBAN AGEND
   Valdez AM, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P3385, DOI 10.1177/0042098017747857
   Zanella A, 2015, ANN OPER RES, V226, P695, DOI 10.1007/s10479-014-1666-7
NR 62
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 10
U2 33
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 2399-8083
EI 2399-8091
J9 ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN
JI Env. Plan. B-Urban Anal. City Sci.
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 50
IS 7
BP 1790
EP 1805
DI 10.1177/23998083221144321
EA DEC 2022
PG 16
WC Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning; Urban
   Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Public Administration;
   Urban Studies
GA X0LV6
UT WOS:000894562100001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chen, HR
   Zhou, RY
   Chen, H
   Lau, A
AF Chen, Hengrui
   Zhou, Ruiyu
   Chen, Hong
   Lau, Albert
TI Static and dynamic resilience assessment for sustainable urban
   transportation systems: A case study of Xi 'an, China
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience; Percolation theory; Bayesian network; Urban transportation
   system
ID NETWORK RESILIENCE; BAYESIAN NETWORK; FRAMEWORK
AB Resilient transportation provides a new perspective for constructing sustainable cities. Although current studies have analyzed transportation resilience from different perspectives, accurately assessing the resilience of urban transport systems remains a significant challenge. This paper proposes a framework to evaluate the static and dynamic resilience of urban transportation systems. Based on systemic thinking and sustainability perspectives, we establish a Bayesian network model that comprehensively considers social, economic, organizational, and technological dimensions to assess the static resilience of urban transportation systems. We adopt percolation theory to determine the minimum required performance (MRP) of road network and explore the spatial distribution of dynamic resilience based on traffic performance under traffic congestion. Results show that the transportation resilience of Xi'an showed a continuous growth trend between 2010 and 2020, from 0.37 to 0.64. In addition, the primary task of enhancing resilience is to improve the system's restorative capacity, adaptive capacity, and resourcefulness. The MRP of the road network is 0.37. The areas with larger resilience loss and percolation time are concentrated along the Second and Third Ring Expressway and in the south and southwest areas. The resilience of the urban center area is more potent. The time of the response process is twice that of the recovery process. The above results could help managers and decision-makers have a comprehensive and clear understanding of the transportation resilience and have practical significance for constructing a sustainable urban transportation system.
C1 [Chen, Hengrui; Zhou, Ruiyu; Chen, Hong] Changan Univ, Coll Transportat Engn, Xian, Peoples R China.
   [Lau, Albert] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Trondheim, Norway.
C3 Chang'an University; Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU)
RP Chen, H (corresponding author), Changan Univ, Coll Transportat Engn, Xian, Peoples R China.
EM hchen@chd.edu.cn
RI Chen, Hengrui/JZC-8327-2024
OI Chen, Hengrui/0000-0001-5195-3416
FU 111 project of Sustainable Trans- portation for Urban Agglomeration in
   Western China [B20035]
FX The work is supported by the 111 project of Sustainable Trans- portation
   for Urban Agglomeration in Western China (No. B20035) .
CR Abudayyeh D, 2021, TRAVEL BEHAV SOC, V22, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.08.005
   Afrin T, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12114660
   [Anonymous], 2012, Risk assessment and Decision Analysis with Bayesian Networks
   Baggag A, 2018, EPJ DATA SCI, V7, DOI 10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0139-7
   Biringer B., 2013, Critical Infrastructure System Security and Resiliency, DOI DOI 10.1201/B14566
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Cats O, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.013
   Chen HR, 2022, PHYSICA A, V600, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127592
   Chen HR, 2021, MATH PROBL ENG, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5524356
   Chen HR, 2020, J ADV TRANSPORT, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/8881545
   Chen XZ, 2015, TRANSPORT RES REC, P37, DOI 10.3141/2532-05
   Gonçalves LAPJ, 2020, J TRANSP GEOGR, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102727
   Gu Y, 2020, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2019.11.003
   Hossain NUI, 2019, INT J CRIT INFR PROT, V25, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcip.2019.02.002
   Hosseini S, 2016, COMPUT IND ENG, V93, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2016.01.007
   Jenelius E, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V117, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.026
   Jin JG, 2014, TRANSPORT RES E-LOG, V63, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.tre.2014.01.002
   Koliou M, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P131, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547
   Leobons CM, 2019, TRANSP RES PROC, V37, P322, DOI 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.199
   Li DQ, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V142, P556, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.021
   Li DQ, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P669, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1419185112
   Li DQ, 2014, SCI REP-UK, V4, DOI 10.1038/srep05381
   Liu ZZ, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V348, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131350
   Liu ZZ, 2022, PHYSICA A, V586, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126465
   Lu QC, 2018, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V117, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.015
   Markolf SA, 2019, TRANSPORT POLICY, V74, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.003
   Pan SZ, 2021, PHYSICA A, V581, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2021.126235
   Reggiani A, 2015, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V81, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.012
   Sun WJ, 2020, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V5, P168, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2018.1448663
   Ta C, 2009, TRANSPORT RES REC, P19, DOI 10.3141/2097-03
   Tang JQ, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102840
   Tang JQ, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0190616
   Tierney K., 2007, TR News, V250, P14, DOI DOI 10.17226/23168
   Twumasi-Boakye R, 2019, TRANSPORTMETRICA A, V15, P455, DOI 10.1080/23249935.2018.1504832
   Wan CP, 2018, TRANSPORT REV, V38, P479, DOI 10.1080/01441647.2017.1383532
   Wang HW, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102619
   Wu XG, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V134, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.021
   Zhang LM, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P8673, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1814982116
   Zhang XD, 2015, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V29, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000417
   Zhou RY, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P75553, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3082188
   Zhou YM, 2019, IEEE T INTELL TRANSP, V20, P4262, DOI 10.1109/TITS.2018.2883766
NR 41
TC 20
Z9 22
U1 53
U2 302
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD SEP 25
PY 2022
VL 368
AR 133237
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133237
EA AUG 2022
PG 13
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA 3Z7SD
UT WOS:000844615900006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Brugmann, J
AF Brugmann, Jeb
TI Financing the resilient city
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE adaptation; cities; financing; investment; performance; property;
   resilience; risk
AB This paper presents a strategy for scaling climate change adaptation within urban areas. The strategy specifically focuses on the requirements for mobilizing large amounts of capital for adaptation and other urban risk reduction above and beyond the amounts that will likely be mobilized through new international adaptation funds. The paper, based on a report published by ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability,(1) proposes a re-framing of the urban adaptation and disaster reduction challenge. The approach shifts the adaptation focus from risk reduction as a primary end in itself to a broader development focus on financing the performance of urban assets, areas and/or systems. This emphasis is elaborated through the concept of "resilience", an urban design and investment metric that measures the ability of urban areas and their individual assets to perform for users and their investors under a wide range of conditions. The paper argues that such a performance-oriented approach provides a business logic that can attract conventional, private investment flows to climate and disaster risk reduction measures and thereby "mainstream" them.
RP Brugmann, J (corresponding author), 401 Richmond St W,Studio 204, Toronto, ON M5V 3A8, Canada.
EM jeb@jebbrugmann.com
CR Abramovitz J., 2001, Worldwatch Paper No. 158
   [Anonymous], 2010, WORLD URB PROSP 2009
   [Anonymous], 2008, SCI DAILY       0414
   Brugmann J., 2011, Financing the Resilient City: A demand driven approach to development, disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation
   Brugmann Jeb., 2009, Welcome to the Urban Revolution: How Cities are Changing the World
   Burton C, 2009, BUILDING RESILIENT C
   Hoornweg D, 2011, URB DEV SER, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8493-0
   Mileti D.S., 1999, DISASTER DESIGN
   Moon K., 2009, E P 45 ISOCARP C 200
   Neligan M, 2011, AUSTR FLOOD LOSS COU
   Sipkin S A, 2006, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V87, P365
   Tett G, 2007, FINANCIAL TIMES 0410
   The Global Environmental Facility (n.d.), FIN AD
   Woetzel J., 2009, PREPARING CHINAS URB
NR 14
TC 62
Z9 72
U1 0
U2 54
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD APR
PY 2012
VL 24
IS 1
BP 215
EP 232
DI 10.1177/0956247812437130
PG 18
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA 932XW
UT WOS:000303324800015
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Schuetze, T
   Chelleri, L
AF Schuetze, Thorsten
   Chelleri, Lorenzo
TI Integrating Decentralized Rainwater Management in Urban Planning and
   Design: Flood Resilient and Sustainable Water Management Using the
   Example of Coastal Cities in The Netherlands and Taiwan
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change; flooding; freshwater scarcity; decentralized rainwater
   management; climate resilience; urban development; Almere; Hsingchu
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRANSFORMABILITY; ADAPTABILITY; ADAPTATION; IMPACT
AB Urbanized delta areas worldwide share a growing tendency of exposure to water stress induced by the effects of climate change and anthropogenic factors, threatening the operation of infrastructure systems and future urban development. The important synergistic impacts coexisting with freshwater scarcity are increasing urbanization rates, subsiding soils, saltwater intrusion in aquifers and rivers, coastal erosion, and increased flooding. Innovative design strategies and concepts for the integration of decentralized rainwater management measures can contribute to the integrated and climate resilient planning of urban spaces that are threatened by climate change scenarios that worsen the security of urban infrastructures and the future availability of fresh water. Decentralized rainwater management, including retention, storage, and reuse strategies that are integrated into spatial planning and urban design, can reduce flood risks while simultaneously enhancing freshwater availability. This paper discusses a paradigm shift in urban water management, from centralized to decentralized management (that is, from threats to opportunities), using the example of two case studies. Concepts and strategies for building climate resilient cities, which address flood control, the protection of freshwater resources, and the harmonization of a natural and more sustainable water balance, are presented for Almere (Rhine Schelde Delta, The Netherlands) and Hsingchu (Dotzpu Delta, Taiwan).
C1 [Schuetze, Thorsten] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Architecture, Suwon 440746, South Korea.
   [Chelleri, Lorenzo] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Geog, Barcelona, Spain.
C3 Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU); Autonomous University of Barcelona
RP Schuetze, T (corresponding author), Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Architecture, Suwon 440746, South Korea.
EM t.schuetze@skku.edu; lorenzo.chelleri@uab.es
RI Schuetze, Thorsten/ABA-5119-2021
OI Schuetze, Thorsten/0000-0001-7849-2330; Chelleri,
   Lorenzo/0000-0003-0229-5028
FU High-Tech Urban Development Program [11 High-tech Urban G04]; Ministry
   of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs of the Korean government;
   International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China
   [2010DFA74490]
FX This paper was supported by a grant (11 High-tech Urban G04) from the
   High-Tech Urban Development Program funded by the Ministry of Land,
   Transport, and Maritime Affairs of the Korean government.This paper was
   also supported by the International Science & Technology Cooperation
   Program of China (2010DFA74490).
CR Adger WN, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P77, DOI [10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.03.001, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005]
   [Anonymous], 2000, Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilienc
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007, P52
   Brauw H. D, 2009, LECT NOTES DELFT U T
   Brouwer R, 2008, LECT NOTES DELFT U T
   Chen Y.C, 2008, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
   De Sherbinin A, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P26
   Fuchs R, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN ASIA, V2, P13, DOI 10.1177/097542531000200103
   Gnadlinger J, 2008, IWA WORLD WAT C EXH, P1
   Gunderson LH, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Hoogheemraadschap Hollands Noorderkwartier, 2005, WAT STAD ZON
   Hoyer J., 2011, WATER SENSITIVE URBA, P115
   KNMI Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut, 2008, GEM NEERSL MM VERD V
   Kopinga J, 1985, P 5 METROPOLITAN TRE, P72
   Lu H.-H, TAIPEI WATER CONSERV
   Lu HY, 2006, ENVIRON GEOL, V50, P885, DOI 10.1007/s00254-006-0260-y
   McDonald RI, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P6312, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1011615108
   McDonnell RA, 2008, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V24, P131, DOI 10.1080/07900620701723240
   McGranahan G, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P17, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076960
   Ministry of Transport Public Works and Water Management, 2000, DIFF APPR WAT WAT MA, P72
   Newman P., 2009, Resilient cities: responding to peak oil and climate change
   Nicholls R.J., 1995, GEOJOURNAL, V37, P369, DOI [10.1007/BF00814018, DOI 10.1007/BF00814018]
   Nicholls RJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V328, P1517, DOI 10.1126/science.1185782
   Schuetze T, 2011, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V64, P722, DOI 10.2166/wst.2011.688
   Schuetze T., 2008, EVERY DROP COUNTS EN, P197
   Schuetze T, 2008, 100 ANNIVERSARY SEOU, P111
   Schuetze T, 2006, IWA WORLD WAT C RAIN
   Schultz E, 1992, LECT NOTES DELFT U T
   Sharma D, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P451, DOI 10.1177/0956247810377390
   Syvitski JPM, 2009, NAT GEOSCI, V2, P681, DOI 10.1038/NGEO629
   Tanner T, 2009, URBAN GOVERNANCE ADA, V1, P47
   Tjallingii S, 2007, MORE URBAN WATER DES, P240
   United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2007, GEO 4 ENV DEV, P421
   Van der Vlies A., 2006, EFFECTS CLIMATE CHAN, P7213
   van Stokkom HTC, 2005, WATER INT, V30, P76, DOI 10.1080/02508060508691839
   Vörösmarty CJ, 2003, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V39, P169, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8181(03)00023-7
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Wheeler S.M., 2004, PLANNING SUSTAINABIL
   Wildschut J.P, 1954, GREAT CITIES WORLD T, P111
NR 40
TC 28
Z9 31
U1 5
U2 162
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD JUN
PY 2013
VL 5
IS 2
BP 593
EP 616
DI 10.3390/w5020593
PG 24
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA 169HD
UT WOS:000320769800016
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Tozer, L
   Bulkeley, H
   Xie, LJ
AF Tozer, Laura
   Bulkeley, Harriet
   Xie, Linjun
TI Transnational Governance and the Urban Politics of Nature-Based
   Solutions for Climate Change
SO GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS
LA English
DT Article
ID ECOSYSTEM-BASED ADAPTATION; GREEN; CARBON; CITY
AB Multiple visions for how urbanism can respond to the climate crisis and foster sustainability have emerged on the international agenda, including the ecocity, low-carbon city, smart city, and resilient city. These competing visions have been joined by one deploying "nature-based solutions." We examine how nature-based solutions are emerging as a linchpin holding together the nature and climate agendas and what this means for where and by whom nature-based solutions are forming part of transnational urban governance. We argue that this field is animated by four frames connecting urban nature and climate: nature for resilience, nature for mitigation, the integrated benefits of nature, and nature first. Diverse actors, from conservation organizations to design firms to transnational municipal networks, draw on these frames and adopt new governance arrangements such that what it means to govern climate in the city is shifting. How this emerging nature-climate governance complex is structured will generate new momentum for governing urban nature over the coming decade.
C1 [Tozer, Laura] Univ Toronto Scarborough, Dept Phys & Environm Sci, Scarborough, ON, Canada.
   [Bulkeley, Harriet] Univ Durham, Dept Geog, Durham, England.
   [Bulkeley, Harriet] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Xie, Linjun] Univ Nottingham, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Ningbo, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Toronto; University Toronto Scarborough; Durham
   University; Utrecht University; University of Nottingham Ningbo China
RP Tozer, L (corresponding author), Univ Toronto Scarborough, Dept Phys & Environm Sci, Scarborough, ON, Canada.
RI Xie, Linjun/AAD-8176-2019; Bulkeley, Harriet/Y-3348-2019
OI Xie, Linjun/0000-0002-9169-8744; Bulkeley, Harriet/0000-0001-9912-5687
FU Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union [730243]
FX Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union
   (grant agreement 730243).
CR Abbott KW, 2022, REV INT ORGAN, V17, P263, DOI 10.1007/s11558-021-09431-3
   Agence francaise de developpement, 2018, SPONG CIT
   Amazon,, 20 MOR CO AR GLOB JO
   Aminetzah Daniel, WHY INVESTING NATURE
   Anguelovski I, 2019, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V43, P133, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12725
   [Anonymous], 2009, Convention on Biological Diversity Technical Series, V41
   [Anonymous], 2020, Nature-Based Solutions | Environment - Research and Innovation - European Commission
   Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network, 2021, EXPL ACCCRN NETW
   Aykut SC, 2021, INT POLITICS, V58, P501, DOI 10.1057/s41311-021-00325-0
   Brink E, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V36, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.11.003
   Broto V. Castan, 2020, Climate urbanism: Towards a critical research agenda 2020, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-53386-1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53386-1]
   Bulkeley H, 2021, ENVIRON POLIT, V30, P266, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713
   Bulkeley H, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P136, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
   C40 Cities Cool City Network, 2016, GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE
   Carbon Neutral Cities Alliance, GAM CHANG FUND LAUNC
   Carton W, 2020, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V11, DOI 10.1002/wcc.671
   Chan S, 2021, GLOB POLICY, V12, P245, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12932
   Chausson A, 2020, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V26, P6134, DOI 10.1111/gcb.15310
   Chong J, 2014, INT ENVIRON AGREEM-P, V14, P391, DOI 10.1007/s10784-014-9242-9
   Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021, CLIMATE CHANGE BIODI
   Cool Coalition, 2019, WHAT WE DO
   Demuzere M, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025
   Depietri Y, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_6
   Devine JA, 2020, ANTIPODE, V52, P911, DOI 10.1111/anti.12624
   Dorst H, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620
   Energy Cities, URB GARD CIT PROJ
   Energy Cities, 2019, PAR GREEN PROGR
   European Commission, 2015, Towards an EU Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-Based Solutions Re-Naturing Cities. Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities, DOI DOI 10.2777/479582
   Farand Chloe., 2021, Climate Home News
   Geneletti D, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.003
   Gifford L, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V161, P291, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02653-1
   GLOBAL SUMMIT OF REFUGEES, 2018, CITIES4FORESTS CIT L
   Gordon DJ, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V30, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.011
   Gordon DE, 2020, Cities on the world stage: the politics of global urban climate governance, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108125888
   Government of Ireland, 2019, CLIM ACT PLAN 2019 T
   Hajer M., 2005, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V7, P175, DOI DOI 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Hale T, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V20, P73, DOI 10.1162/glep_a_00561
   Hay I., 2005, Qualitative research methods in human geography, V2nd
   Hughes Hughes S. S., 2019, Repowering Cities: Governing Climate Change Mitigation in New York City, Los Angeles, and Toronto
   ICLEI, 2021, OUR PATHW OUR APPR
   Johnson Craig., 2018, The Power of Cities in Global Climate Politics: Saviors, Supplicants or Agents of Change?
   Jongman B., 2019, SUSTAINABLE CITIES B
   Lang DJ, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P25, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
   Lövbrand E, 2011, CRIT POLICY STUD, V5, P187, DOI 10.1080/19460171.2011.576531
   McVittie A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V32, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.12.014
   Mori AS, 2013, BIOL REV, V88, P349, DOI 10.1111/brv.12004
   Ojea E, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.006
   Pauleit S, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P29, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_3
   Roberts D, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P167, DOI 10.1177/0956247811431412
   Rottereng JKS, 2018, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V18, P52, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00444
   Science Based Targets Network,, BIOD WHY SET SCI BAS
   Science Based Targets Network, SCI BAS TARG NETW
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2008, ID PROP EL CONT PAR
   Vandergeest P, 2015, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF POLITICAL ECOLOGY, P162
   VanDerHeijden J, 2019, EARTH SYST GOV CUP, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108632157
   Wakefield S, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P761, DOI 10.1177/2514848619887461
   Waller L, 2020, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V11, DOI 10.1002/wcc.649
   Wamsler C, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V137, P71, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1660-y
   Wamsler C, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07489-200230
   Williams L, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101935
   World Bank, 2020, The World Bank in China
   Woroniecki S, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102132
NR 63
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 5
U2 50
PU MIT PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA ONE ROGERS ST, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142-1209 USA
SN 1526-3800
EI 1536-0091
J9 GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT
JI Glob. Environ. Polit.
PD AUG 1
PY 2022
VL 22
IS 3
BP 81
EP 103
DI 10.1162/glep_a_00658
PG 23
WC Environmental Studies; International Relations; Political Science
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; International Relations; Government &
   Law
GA 3E6SW
UT WOS:000830113400006
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, J
   He, Y
   Feng, R
   Lyu, B
AF Liu, Jian
   He, Ye
   Feng, Rui
   Lyu, Bin
TI Building safer and more resilient cities in China: A novel approach
   using a dynamic nonhomogeneous Gray model for data-driven
   decision-making
SO PLOS ONE
LA English
DT Article
ID SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; CO2
   EMISSIONS; ARIMA; PREDICTION; ACCIDENTS; FORECAST; IMPACT; GAS
AB Urban resilience is crucial for sustainable development and resident safety in a changing environment with potential risks. Given China's rapid urbanization, constructing resilient cities that anticipate risks, mitigate disaster impacts, and swiftly recover from crises is paramount. This study explores a key area of urban construction: building safety. We apply the dynamic nonhomogeneous grey model (DNMGM(1,1)) to simulate the building death toll and use a traffic accident death toll dataset for validation. Unlike traditional models, DNMGM(1,1) can integrate and respond to new data points in real-time, thus producing accurate predictions when facing new trends or fluctuations in the data. The research findings indicate that with a dataset size of 6, the DNMGM(1,1) model achieves average relative errors of 9.26% and 7.29% when predicting fatalities in both construction and traffic accidents. This performance demonstrates superior prediction accuracy compared to traditional grey models. This method uses prediction models to support the construction of elastic cities, providing strong data support and decision-making tools for planning and resource allocation. Specific interventions and policy frameworks based on this study by urban planners and policymakers can promote resilient urban development. Future efforts should strive to enhance its robustness and adaptability in different fields.
C1 [Liu, Jian; He, Ye; Feng, Rui; Lyu, Bin] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Civil & Resource Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Jian] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Minist Educ, Key Lab High Efficient Min & Safety Met Mines, Beijing, Peoples R China.
   [Feng, Rui] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Res Inst MacroSafety Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
C3 University of Science & Technology Beijing; University of Science &
   Technology Beijing; University of Science & Technology Beijing
RP Feng, R (corresponding author), Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Civil & Resource Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China.; Feng, R (corresponding author), Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Res Inst MacroSafety Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China.
EM fengr@ustb.edu.cn
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [52004139]; Key
   Technologies Research and Development Program [2017YFC0804901];
   Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
   [FRF-TP-22-120A1]
FX This study was funded by grants from the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China (52004139), the Key Technologies Research and
   Development Program (2017YFC0804901), and Fundamental Research Funds for
   the Central Universities (No. FRF-TP-22-120A1).
CR Akbari E, 2018, J NANOELECTRON OPTOE, V13, P1610, DOI 10.1166/jno.2018.2410
   Al-Abayechi YF, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P2554, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-10-013
   Alzahrani SI, 2020, J INFECT PUBLIC HEAL, V13, P914, DOI 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.001
   An YM, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V92, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104466
   Balal M., 2023, Forecasting solar power generation utilizing machine learning models in Lubbock, DOI DOI 10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-04-02
   Bashir ZA, 2009, IEEE T POWER SYST, V24, P20, DOI 10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2008606
   Baxhuku V, 2023, CIV ENG J-TEHRAN, V9, P3123, DOI 10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-12-011
   Cao GH, 2016, ENERGY, V115, P734, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.065
   Chakraborty A, 2019, INT J INJ CONTROL SA, V26, P283, DOI 10.1080/17457300.2019.1627463
   Chang JC, 2020, J MATH-UK, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/1034639
   Chen MC, 2011, ADV MATER RES-SWITZ, V287-290, P3116, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.287-290.3116
   Christodoulos C, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P558, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.01.009
   Chu FL, 2014, TOUR MANAG PERSPECT, V12, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.tmp.2014.08.003
   DENG JL, 1982, SYST CONTROL LETT, V1, P288, DOI 10.1016/S0167-6911(82)80025-X
   Ding S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V162, P1527, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.167
   Gao HR, 2023, INT J COMPUT INT SYS, V16, DOI 10.1007/s44196-023-00333-3
   Hofmann SZ, 2021, PROG DISASTER SCI, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100189
   Hsu LC, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P7898, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.004
   Jaillon L, 2009, WASTE MANAGE, V29, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.015
   Javanmard ME, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104623
   Kong Xinhai, 2018, [Journal of Systems Science and Information, 系统科学与信息学报], V6, P376
   Li G, 2010, APPL ENERG, V87, P2313, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.12.013
   Li SY, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9071181
   Liu SH, 2021, MATH PROBL ENG, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/6635462
   Ma Y., 2013, The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, P171, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-38391-518, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38391-518]
   Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China National Bureau of Statistics, Annual data for China's construction industry (2021-2022)
   National Bureau of Statistics, Annual data for China's construction industry (2021-2022)
   Qi YW, 2023, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V5, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/acd0f7
   Shalabh A., 2013, J MULTIVARIATE ANAL, V114, P161, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.jmva.2012.07.017
   Shaqiri F, 2023, ELECTRICITY-BASEL, V4, P185, DOI 10.3390/electricity4020012
   Tang Hui, 2010, 2010 Second IITA International Conference on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (IITA-GRS 2010), P92, DOI 10.1109/IITA-GRS.2010.5603274
   Tong Ming-yu, 2015, Control and Decision, V30, P1841, DOI 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2014.1195
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Wable AD, 2023, COGENT ENG, V10, DOI 10.1080/23311916.2022.2107760
   Wang Q, 2018, ENERGY, V163, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.127
   Wang Q, 2019, ENERGY, V183, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.139
   Wang Q, 2017, ENERG POLICY, V108, P696, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.041
   Wang Q, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V74, P715, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.007
   Wang SW, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101819
   Wang Y., 2003, Theory and Practice of System Engineering, P120
   Wang ZX, 2020, PHYSICA A, V542, DOI 10.1016/j.physa.2019.123341
   Wu LF, 2015, ENERGY, V79, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.052
   Yao JT, 2000, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V28, P455, DOI 10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00066-3
   Yuan CQ, 2016, ENERGY, V100, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.001
   Zaranezhad A, 2019, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V131, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.psep.2019.08.031
   Zeng B., 2010, Statistics Information, V25, P30
   [曾波 Zeng Bo], 2011, [系统工程理论与实践, Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice], V31, P297
   Zhang B, 2023, OCEAN ENG, V272, DOI 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113911
   Zhang Ying, 2023, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2449/1/012027
NR 49
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 4
U2 4
PU PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
PI SAN FRANCISCO
PA 1160 BATTERY STREET, STE 100, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 USA
SN 1932-6203
J9 PLOS ONE
JI PLoS One
PD DEC 5
PY 2024
VL 19
IS 12
AR e0310554
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0310554
PG 19
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA Q2K7C
UT WOS:001383041800039
PM 39636915
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Krelling, AF
   Lamberts, R
   Malik, J
   Hong, TZ
AF Krelling, Amanda F.
   Lamberts, Roberto
   Malik, Jeetika
   Hong, Tianzhen
TI A simulation framework for assessing thermally resilient buildings and
   communities
SO BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Thermal resilience; Building performance simulation; Building
   resilience; Community resilience
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; CITIES; HEAT
AB The increasing frequency and severity of weather extremes caused by climate change evidence the need to assess buildings beyond their typical thermal and energy performance under normal operation. It is also essential to evaluate thermal resilience to safeguard occupants' health during extreme events and power outages. This study proposes a simulation framework to evaluate and enhance the thermal resilience of buildings against indoor overheating using an integrated set of performance metrics. This work also addresses how to aggregate resilience profiles of single buildings into the urban scale, supporting the evaluation of thermally resilient communities. This is the first step to connecting building and urban scales in a resilience analysis, seeking to further address other stakeholders' needs in the future. The application of the framework is exemplified through a case study considering three different climates in Brazil. This analysis allowed identifying cases with poor thermal resilience and essential dependence on air conditioning to guarantee the survivability of occupants during extreme hot weather. Nonetheless, by only changing the envelope's thermal transmittance and thermal mass, buildings' thermal autonomy increased up to 65% points and cooling loads were reduced by up to 61% in the hottest climate, Sa similar to o Luis. However, additional strategies are necessary to mitigate remaining indoor extreme thermal conditions, such as solar shading and increased air movement.
C1 [Krelling, Amanda F.; Lamberts, Roberto] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Lab Energy Efficiency Bldg, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
   [Krelling, Amanda F.; Malik, Jeetika; Hong, Tianzhen] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Berkeley, CA USA.
C3 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC); United States Department
   of Energy (DOE); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
RP Krelling, AF (corresponding author), Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Lab Energy Efficiency Bldg, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
EM amanda.krelling@posgrad.ufsc.br
RI Malik, Jeetika/KBA-0130-2024; Fraga Krelling, Amanda/ABQ-4698-2022;
   Hong, Tianzhen/D-3256-2013; Lamberts, Roberto/F-9756-2013
OI Fraga Krelling, Amanda/0000-0003-2585-4320; Malik,
   Jeetika/0000-0003-0398-5303; Hong, Tianzhen/0000-0003-1886-9137;
   Lamberts, Roberto/0000-0001-6801-671X
FU Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support and Evaluation of Graduate
   Education (CAPES) [001]
FX This work was supported by the Brazilian Federal Agency for the Support
   and Evaluation of Graduate Education (CAPES) , Financing Code 001.
CR ABNT-Brazilian National Standards Organization, 2021, TR 15575-1-1-Residential Buildings-Performance-Part 1-1: Standard Database of Weather Files for the Evaluation of Thermal Performance Using the Computer Simulation Procedure
   ABNT - Brazilian National Standards Organization, 2021, NBR 15575 - Residential buildings - Performance
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Alam M, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V22, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.01.006
   Anderies JM, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P130, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ergonomics of the thermal environment _ Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria
   ASHRAE - American Society of Heating Refrigerating and air-conditioning engineers, 2020, Standard 55-Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy
   ASHRAE-American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2020, standard 169-climatic data for building design standards
   Attia S, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V239, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110869
   Ayyagari S., 2020, Hours of Safety in Cold Weather: A Framework for Considering Resilience in Building Envelope Design and Construction, P10
   Baniassadi A, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V139, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.024
   Bezerra P, 2022, ENERG POLICY, V171, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113268
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Cantatore E, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031422
   Carlucci S, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V246, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111049
   Carlucci S, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106768
   Carlucci S, 2012, ENERG BUILDINGS, V53, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.06.015
   CCOHS-Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, 2019, Humidex Rating and Work
   CEN-European Committee for Standardization, 2019, PD CEN/TR 16798-2-Energy Performance of Buildings-Ventilation for Buildings-Part 2: Interpretation of the Requirements in EN 16798-1-Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment, Lighting and Acoustics (Module M1-6)
   CEN-European Committee For Standardization, 2007, EN 15251-Indoor Environmental Input Parameters for Design and Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Addressing Indoor Air Quality, Thermal Environment, Lighting and Acoustics
   Chiesa G, 2018, TECHNE, V15, P237, DOI 10.13128/Techne-22086
   CIBSE, 2013, TM52 LIM THERM COMF
   Clarke NJ, 2020, SMART SUSTAIN BUILT, V9, P144, DOI 10.1108/SASBE-09-2017-0041
   Crawley D.B., 2015, Rethinking the TMY: Is the 'Typical' meteorological year best for building performance simulation?, P8
   Crawley DB, 2020, BUILD SIMUL CONF PR, P4801, DOI 10.26868/25222708.2019.210594
   da Silva J, 2012, INT J URBAN SUSTAIN, V4, P125, DOI 10.1080/19463138.2012.718279
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Eletrobras, 2019, Electrical Appliances Possession and Usage Habits Research for the Residential Sector-PPH Brazil 2019-Executive Summary
   Eli LG, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111047
   Ferrando M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102408
   Flores-Larsen S, 2022, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V167, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112795
   Flores-Larsen S, 2023, BUILD ENVIRON, V230, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.109990
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Gasparrini A, 2015, LANCET, V386, P369, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62114-0
   GlobalABC-Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction IEA-International Energy Agency UNEP-United Nations Environment Programme, 2020, GlobalABC Regional Roadmap for Buildings and Construction in Latin America: towards a Zero-Emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector
   Grafakos S, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109623
   Hair J.F., 2009, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
   Hamdy M, 2017, BUILD ENVIRON, V122, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.031
   Hobson BW, 2021, J BUILD PERFORM SIMU, V14, P730, DOI 10.1080/19401493.2021.1894485
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holzer P., 2023, IEA EBC Annex 80-Dynamic simulation guideline for the performance testing of resilient cooling strategies: Version 2
   Homaei S, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V201, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108022
   Homaei S, 2020, APPL ENERG, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114868
   Hong T., 2016, Urban Comput, V1, DOI DOI 10.1145/12345.67890
   Hong TZ, 2021, URBAN CLIM, V38, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100871
   Hong TZ, 2020, BUILD ENVIRON, V168, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106508
   IBGE-Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, 2019, General Characteristics of Housing Units and Residents, P2020
   IEA-International Energy Agency, 2018, Definition and Simulation of Occupant Behavior in Buildings-Annex 66 Final Report
   IEA-International Energy Agency, 2019, IEA EBC Annex 80 on Resilient Cooling for Residential and Small Non-residential Buildings
   Intergov Panel Clim Chg, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139177245
   International Energy Agency, 2018, The Future of Cooling
   ISO-International Organization for Standardization, 2009, PD ISO Guide 73-Risk Management-Vocabulary
   ISO - International Organization for Standardization, 2019, ISO 37123-sustainable cities and communities-indicators for resilient cities
   ISO-International Organization for Standardization, 2016, ISO 37100-Sustainable Cities and Communities-Vocabulary
   ISO-International Organization for Standardization, 2017, ISO 7243-Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment-Assessment of Heat Stress Using the WBGT (Wet Bulb Globe Temperature) Index
   ISO-International Organization for Standardization, 2019, ISO 37105-Sustainable Cities and Communities-Descriptive Framework for Cities and Communities
   Jain AK, 1999, ACM COMPUT SURV, V31, P264, DOI 10.1145/331499.331504
   Ji WJ, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108714
   Ji WJ, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V211, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109780
   Katal A, 2019, APPL ENERG, V250, P1402, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.192
   Kephart JL, 2022, NAT MED, V28, P1700, DOI 10.1038/s41591-022-01872-6
   Kesik T, 2022, SCI TECHNOL BUILT EN, V28, P742, DOI 10.1080/23744731.2022.2043069
   Kesik Ted., 2019, Thermal Resilience Design Guide
   Ko WH, 2018, BUILD ENVIRON, V145, P153, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.038
   Kotireddy R, 2018, APPL ENERG, V212, P428, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.066
   Krelling AF, 2023, ENERG BUILDINGS, V281, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112770
   Lara RA, 2015, ENERG BUILDINGS, V95, P160, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.03.036
   Maechler Martin, 2023, CRAN
   Masson-Delmotte V., 2021, Working Group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
   Masterton J.M., 1979, HUMIDEX: a method of quantifying human discomfort due to excessive heat and humidity
   Miller W, 2021, CITY ENVIRON INTERAC, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100065
   Mirzabeigi S., 2022, The impact of building retrofitting on thermal resilience against power failure: a case of air-conditioned house
   Moazami Amin, 2019, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V609, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/609/7/072068
   Mohseni S, 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10.3390/en13153970
   Munn R. E., 1986, Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, P292
   Niza IL, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V221, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109310
   NOAA-National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2022, NWS The Heat Index Equation
   O'Brien W, 2017, J BUILD PERFORM SIMU, V10, P653, DOI 10.1080/19401493.2016.1243731
   Ouzeau G., 2016, Climate Services, V4, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cliser.2016.09.002
   Pasimeni MR, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V95, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.02.002
   Patel S, 2021, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V37, P2638, DOI 10.1177/87552930211020020
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   PIMM SL, 1984, NATURE, V307, P321, DOI 10.1038/307321a0
   Privitera R, 2018, EUR PLAN STUD, V26, P812, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1426735
   R. R Core Team, 2020, LANG ENV STAT COMP
   Rahif R, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108599
   Rahif R, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111463
   Ramos G, 2021, BUILD RES INF, V49, P496, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2020.1804314
   Ren XF, 2018, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V28, P79, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2016.1247105
   Ritchie Hannah., 2021, Natural Disasters
   Rouleau J, 2019, ENERGY, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115978
   RStudio Team RStudio, 2021, Integrated Development Environment for R
   Salvati A, 2020, J BUILD PERFORM SIMU, V13, P209, DOI 10.1080/19401493.2019.1707876
   Samuelson HW, 2020, ENERGY, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117886
   Shirkhorshidi AS, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0144059
   Stevenson F, 2016, BUILD RES INF, V44, P789, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1207371
   Sun KY, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V252, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111383
   Terés-Zubiaga J, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104301
   Triana MA, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V87, P524, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.041
   Tromeur E, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P1811, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-1811-2012
   UNEP-United Nations Environment Programme, 2021, A Practical Guide to ClimateResilient Buildings & Communities
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Wang Z, 2020, ENERG BUILDINGS, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110017
   Wang Z, 2020, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109593
   WMO-World Meteorological Organization WHO-World Health Organization, 2015, Heatwaves and Health, Guidance on Warning-System Development
   World Health Organization, 2018, WHO Housing and Health Guidelines
NR 111
TC 16
Z9 16
U1 12
U2 38
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0360-1323
EI 1873-684X
J9 BUILD ENVIRON
JI Build. Environ.
PD NOV 1
PY 2023
VL 245
AR 110887
DI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110887
EA OCT 2023
PG 16
WC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Engineering, Civil
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Engineering
GA W6KK3
UT WOS:001092693600001
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shokry, G
   Anguelovski, I
   Connolly, JJT
   Maroko, A
   Pearsall, H
AF Shokry, Galia
   Anguelovski, Isabelle
   Connolly, James J. T.
   Maroko, Andrew
   Pearsall, Hamil
TI "They Didn't See It Coming": Green Resilience Planning and Vulnerability
   to Future Climate Gentrification
SO HOUSING POLICY DEBATE
LA English
DT Article
DE climate gentrification; vulnerability; climate justice; resilience;
   green infrastructure; adaptation planning
ID URBAN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL GENTRIFICATION; SOCIAL
   VULNERABILITY; VACANT LAND; STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE; CITY; ADAPTATION;
   JUSTICE; HEALTH; SUSTAINABILITY
AB As cities strive to protect vulnerable residents from climate risks and impacts, recent studies have identified a challenging link between these measures and gentrification processes that reconfigure, but do not necessarily eliminate, climate insecurities. Green resilient infrastructure (GRI) may especially increase the vulnerability of lower income communities of color to gentrification, an issue that remains underexplored. Drawing on the forerunner green city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as our case study, this article adopts a novel intersectional approach to assess overlapping and interdependent factors in generating vulnerability and resilience using spatial quantitative data and qualitative interviews with community-based organizers, nonprofits, and municipal stakeholders. More specifically, this article develops a new methodology to assess vulnerability to future climate gentrification and contributes to debates on the role of urban development, housing, and sustainability practices in climate justice dynamics. It also informs strategies that can reduce social and racial inequities in the context of climate adaptation planning.
C1 [Shokry, Galia; Anguelovski, Isabelle; Connolly, James J. T.] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Barcelona, Spain.
   [Anguelovski, Isabelle] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Catalana Recerca & Estudis Avancats, Barcelona, Spain.
   [Connolly, James J. T.] Univ British Columbia, Sch Community & Reg Planning, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Maroko, Andrew] CUNY, Grad Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Policy, Dept Environm Occupat & Geospatial Hlth Sci, New York, NY USA.
   [Pearsall, Hamil] Temple Univ, Geog & Urban Studies Dept, Philadelphia, PA USA.
C3 Autonomous University of Barcelona; Autonomous University of Barcelona;
   ICREA; University of British Columbia; City University of New York
   (CUNY) System; Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education
   (PCSHE); Temple University
RP Shokry, G (corresponding author), Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Barcelona, Spain.
EM galia.shokry@uab.cat
RI Connolly, James/AAZ-6161-2021; Shokry, Galia/ABP-5934-2022
OI Maroko, Andrew/0000-0002-9398-2386; Shokry, Galia/0000-0002-2959-3677;
   Anguelovski, Isabelle/0000-0002-6409-5155
FU European Research Council (ERC) [GA678034]; Maria de Maeztu Unit of
   Excellence [CEX2019-000940-M]
FX This work was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) [grant
   number GA678034]; and the Maria de Maeztu Unit of Excellence [grant
   number: CEX2019-000940-M] awarded to the Institute for Environmental
   Science and Technology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
CR Adams Carolyn., 1991, PHILADELPHIA NEIGHBO
   Adger WN, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P268, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Agyeman Julian., 2013, Introducing Just Sustainabilities: Policy, Planning, and Practice
   Al-Kodmany A., 2005, THESIS
   Anderson B.E., 2018, STATE BLACK PHILADEL
   Anguelovski I., 2018, City, V22, P417, DOI [10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126, DOI 10.1080/13604813.2018.1473126]
   Anguelovski I, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1743, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579
   Anguelovski I, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P26139, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1920490117
   Anguelovski I, 2019, PROG HUM GEOG, V43, P1064, DOI 10.1177/0309132518803799
   Anguelovski I, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P458, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1349987
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2013, Urban Land Use
   [Anonymous], 2003, RISE RUSTBELT REPRIN
   Arbaci S, 2012, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V19, P287, DOI 10.1177/0969776412441110
   Aylett A, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.005
   Banuelos R., 2013, NOT CULLY ANTIDISPLA
   Baptiste AK, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V136, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012
   Bates L., 2013, PORTLAND STATE U LIB, DOI 10.15760/report-01
   BCNUEJ, 2021, POL PLANN TOOLS URB
   BEAUREGARD RA, 1990, ENVIRON PLANN A, V22, P855, DOI 10.1068/a220855
   Bezanson K., 2006, PUBLIC POLICY SOCIAL
   Bigger P, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P601, DOI 10.1177/2514848619876539
   Black SE, 1999, Q J ECON, V114, P577, DOI 10.1162/003355399556070
   Blok A, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P2803, DOI 10.1177/0042098019891050
   Boger JC, 2005, SCHOOL RESEGREGATION: MUST THE SOUTH TURN BACK, P305
   Boulton C, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V178, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.029
   Branas CC, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P2946, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1718503115
   Brand AL, 2020, J PLAN LIT, DOI 10.1177/0885412220928575
   Brown K, 2014, PROG HUM GEOG, V38, P107, DOI [10.1177/0309132513498837, 10.1177/0361684313496549]
   Brown-Saracino J., 2013, GENTRIFICATION DEBAT, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315881096
   Brownlow A, 2006, GEOFORUM, V37, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.02.009
   Bulkeley H, 2013, T I BRIT GEOGR, V38, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Bunce S, 2009, LOCAL ENVIRON, V14, P651, DOI 10.1080/13549830903097740
   Byrne J, 2012, GEOFORUM, V43, P595, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.10.002
   Byrne J, 2009, PROG HUM GEOG, V33, P743, DOI 10.1177/0309132509103156
   Candipan J, 2020, SOCIOL EDUC, V93, P215, DOI 10.1177/0038040720910128
   Carmichael CE, 2019, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V32, P588, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2018.1550229
   Carmin J, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11430951
   Checker M, 2011, CITY SOC, V23, P210, DOI 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2011.01063.x
   Connolly JJ, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P76, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.07.001
   Connolly JJT, 2019, CITIES, V91, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.011
   Connolly JJT, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P8, DOI 10.1111/cico.12282
   Cote M, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P475, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425708
   COVINGTON J, 2016, URBAN AFFAIRS Q DOI
   Cucchiara M, 2008, J EDUC POLICY, V23, P165, DOI 10.1080/02680930701853088
   Cutter SL, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P713, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00219
   Dawkins C, 2016, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V26, P801, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2016.1138986
   Derakhti L, 2020, URBAN SCI, V4, DOI 10.3390/urbansci4020020
   Dillon L, 2014, ANTIPODE, V46, P1205, DOI 10.1111/anti.12009
   Ding L, 2016, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V61, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.09.004
   Dooling S, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x
   Douglas O, 2017, CITIES, V66, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.03.011
   Eakin H, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.001
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Essoka JonathanD., 2010, The Western Journal of Black Studies, V34, P299
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Ferrick T., 2017, NEXT CITY
   Figlio DN, 2004, AM ECON REV, V94, P591, DOI 10.1257/0002828041464489
   Finewood MH, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P909, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813
   Finney C, 2014, BLACK FACES, WHITE SPACES: REIMAGINING THE RELATIONSHIP OF AFRICAN AMERICANS TO THE GREAT OUTDOORS, P1
   Fitzgerald J, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P256, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2016.1191063
   Fitzgibbons J, 2021, CITIES, V108, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102997
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   Garcia-Lamarca M, 2021, URBAN STUD, V58, P90, DOI 10.1177/0042098019885330
   GCC, 2016, GEORG CLIM CTR GREEN
   Godwin R., 2010, School choice tradeoffs: Liberty, equity, and diversity
   Gould K. A., 2017, Green Gentrification: Urban Sustainability and the Struggle for Environmental Justice
   Gould KA, 2018, CITY COMMUNITY, V17, P12, DOI 10.1111/cico.12283
   Graham L, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.001
   Grubesic TH, 2014, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V104, P1134, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.958389
   Hackworth J, 2001, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V92, P464, DOI 10.1111/1467-9663.00172
   Hardy RD, 2017, GEOFORUM, V87, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.10.005
   Harper ET, 2020, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V44, P55, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12842
   HARVEY D, 1989, GEOGR ANN B, V71, P3, DOI 10.2307/490503
   Heckert M, 2018, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V4, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00027
   Heckert M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V19, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.12.011
   Heckert M, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P3010, DOI 10.1068/a4595
   Heynen N, 2006, URBAN AFF REV, V42, P3, DOI 10.1177/1078087406290729
   Hughes S, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V14, P17, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.06.003
   Hunter MarcusAnthony., 2013, Black Citymakers: How the Philadelphia Negro Changed Urban America
   Hwang J, 2016, URBAN AFF REV, V52, P98, DOI 10.1177/1078087415570643
   Hyra D, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1753, DOI 10.1177/0042098014539403
   Immergluck D, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P546, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041
   Immergluck D, 2009, URBAN STUD, V46, P1723, DOI 10.1177/0042098009105500
   Jarvis H, 2005, TIME SOC, V14, P133, DOI 10.1177/0961463X05050302
   Johns CM, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1377, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1496072
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Keenan JM, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aabb32
   Kimelberg SM, 2013, URBAN EDUC, V48, P198, DOI 10.1177/0042085912449629
   Kirk DS, 2011, AM J SOCIOL, V116, P1190, DOI 10.1086/655754
   Kondo MC, 2020, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V4, pE149, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30058-9
   Kotsila P, 2021, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V4, P252, DOI 10.1177/2514848620901437
   Langemeyer J, 2020, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V109, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.021
   Lees L., 2008, The Gentrification Reader
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Levy D., 2006, FACE GENTRIFICATION
   Li L, 2018, CITIES, V74, P126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.013
   Long JH, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P149, DOI 10.1177/0042098014560501
   Maantay J, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.09.009
   Maantay JA, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15102233
   Mackenzie C., 2013, VULNERABILITY NEW ES, P1
   Madden S., 2010, THESIS MIT
   Mandarano L, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P1338, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2017.1345878
   Mathbor GM, 2007, INT SOC WORK, V50, P357, DOI 10.1177/0020872807076049
   McClintock N, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P579, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1365582
   MCDONALD SC, 1986, CRIME JUSTICE, V8, P163, DOI 10.1086/449122
   McGovern SJ, 2013, J PLAN EDUC RES, V33, P310, DOI 10.1177/0739456X13481246
   McKittrick Katherine., 2007, BLACK GEOGRAPHIES PO, P1
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Mitchell A., 2009, SPATIAL MEASUREMENTS
   Mohai P, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115008
   Newburn DA, 2016, WATER RESOUR RES, V52, P1345, DOI 10.1002/2015WR018063
   Newman K, 2006, URBAN STUD, V43, P23, DOI 10.1080/00420980500388710
   O'Brien K, 2004, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V14, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001
   Papachristos AV, 2011, CITY COMMUNITY, V10, P215, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2011.01371.x
   Park LisaSun-Hee., 2011, SLUMS ASPEN IMMIGRAN
   Pattillo M, 2013, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V39, P509, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145611
   Pearsall H, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V195, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103708
   Pearsall H, 2017, APPL GEOGR, V79, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.010
   Pearsall H, 2016, SOCIOL RES ONLINE, V21, DOI 10.5153/sro.3979
   Pearsall H, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P1013, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.714762
   Pearsall H, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN C, V28, P872, DOI 10.1068/c08126
   Pearson R, 2015, FEMINIST REV, P8, DOI 10.1057/fr.2014.42
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pellow DN, 2016, DU BOIS REV, V13, P221, DOI 10.1017/S1742058X1600014X
   PEW Charitable Trusts, 2020, STAT HOUS AFF PHIL
   Pew Charitable Trusts, 2016, Philadelphia's Changing Neighborhoods
   Philadelphia OOS, 2009, GREENW PHIL
   Pollack CE, 2009, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V99, P1833, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161380
   Pulido L, 2017, PROG HUM GEOG, V41, P524, DOI 10.1177/0309132516646495
   Pulido Laura., 2016, CAPITALISM NATURE SO, V27, P12, DOI DOI 10.1080/10455752.2016.1146782
   PWD, 2009, GREEN CIT CLEAN WAT
   Quastel N, 2012, URBAN GEOGR, V33, P1055, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.33.7.1055
   Quercia R, 2008, HOUSING STUD, V23, P461, DOI 10.1080/02673030802020627
   Rainham D, 2010, SOC SCI MED, V70, P668, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.035
   Ranganathan M., 2019, ANTIPODE, V52, P270
   Ransome Y, 2017, JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF, V76, P13, DOI 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001463
   Reynolds CL, 2014, J REGIONAL SCI, V54, P1, DOI 10.1111/jors.12035
   Richardson J., 2020, GENTRIFICATION DISIN
   Richardson JasonBruce Mitchell Juan Franco., 2019, SHIFTING NEIGHBORHOO
   Rigolon A, 2018, CITIES, V81, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.016
   Roberts, 2012, THESIS
   Rosan ChristinaPearsall., 2017, GROWING SUSTAINABLE
   Ruhm CJ, 2011, FUTURE CHILD, V21, P37
   Safransky S, 2017, ANTIPODE, V49, P1079, DOI 10.1111/anti.12225
   Safransky S, 2014, GEOFORUM, V56, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.003
   Schaller S, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P54, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1276719
   Shaw WendyS., 2005, Gentrification in a Global Context
   Shi L, 2021, URBAN AFF REV, V57, P1442, DOI 10.1177/1078087419910827
   Shokry G, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V31, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100539
   SMITH N, 1979, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V45, P538, DOI 10.1080/01944367908977002
   Smith N., 2013, Gentrification of the City
   Smith Neil., 2005, The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City
   Stokes RJ, 2014, LOCAL ENVIRON, V19, P402, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2013.788484
   Taub RichardP., 1984, PATHS NEIGHBORHOOD C
   Teicher HM, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V25, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2018.04.008
   Tozer L, 2020, CITIES, V107, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102892
   Triguero-Mas M, 2015, ENVIRON INT, V77, P35, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2015.01.012
   Tubridy D, 2021, EUR PLAN STUD, V29, P369, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2020.1757625
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   U.S. EPA O, 2015, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Uittenbroek CJ, 2016, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V8, P38, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2014-0069
   Vale L., 2016, INT PLANNING HIST SO, DOI 10.7480/IPHS.2016.2.1692
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Van Zandt S, 2012, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V22, P29, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2011.624528
   Weber R, 2010, ECON GEOGR, V86, P251
   Weininger E.B., 2014, Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools
   While A, 2004, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V28, P549, DOI 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00535.x
   Whitehead M, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P1348, DOI 10.1177/0042098013480965
   Whittle HJ, 2015, SOC SCI MED, V143, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.027
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Woodru SC, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P796, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE3012
   Wynne L, 2021, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V31, P395, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2020.1772337
   Ziervogel G, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P123, DOI 10.1177/0956247816686905
   Zografos C, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102613
   ZUKIN S, 1987, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V13, P129, DOI 10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.001021
NR 177
TC 33
Z9 40
U1 5
U2 99
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1051-1482
EI 2152-050X
J9 HOUS POLICY DEBATE
JI Hous. Policy Debate
PD JAN 2
PY 2022
VL 32
IS 1
SI SI
BP 211
EP 245
DI 10.1080/10511482.2021.1944269
EA SEP 2021
PG 35
WC Development Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Urban Studies
GA YN0ZJ
UT WOS:000694746400001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Serre, D
   Heinzlef, C
AF Serre, Damien
   Heinzlef, Charlotte
TI Assessing and mapping urban resilience to floods with respect to
   cascading effects through critical infrastructure networks
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban flooding; Critical infrastructure networks; Cascading effects;
   Resilience strategies; Climate change
ID INDICATOR-BASED APPROACH; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; DISASTERS; CITIES; MODEL
AB The urban environment is very concerned by network failures. These failures are propagating risks in area generally considered as non-vulnerable. There are various causes of possible disruptions in critical infrastructure networks (CIs), such as natural hazards, technological hazards, accidents, human errors and terrorism. However, in the last years it became harder to identify the possible failures of complex networks and to forecast their effects on the urban environment. New challenges such as climate change and the ageing of CIs are likely to increase the difficulty to secure the lifelines, raising the potential of damages and economic losses caused by failures. This paper suggests some new methods to assess and map resilience levels to floods taking into account critical infrastructure networks as risk propagators at different spatial scales. The conclusions support the development of innovative strategies and decision support systems for new resilient urban environments.
C1 [Serre, Damien; Heinzlef, Charlotte] Univ Avignon, UMR ESPACE 7300, 74 Rue Louis Pasteur,Case 19, F-84029 Avignon 1, France.
   [Heinzlef, Charlotte] Fac Architecture & Urbanism, Rue dHavre 88, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
C3 Avignon Universite
RP Serre, D (corresponding author), Univ Avignon, UMR ESPACE 7300, 74 Rue Louis Pasteur,Case 19, F-84029 Avignon 1, France.
EM damien.serre@univ-avignon.fr; charlotte.heinzlef@univ-avignon.fr
OI serre, damien/0000-0002-2902-2989; Heinzlef,
   Charlotte/0000-0002-9984-1402
CR [Anonymous], 2016, RESOURCE GUIDE RESIL
   [Anonymous], 2002, CATASTROPHES NATUREL
   [Anonymous], 2013, GREEN PAP INS NAT MA
   [Anonymous], 2006, MEASURING VULNERABIL
   [Anonymous], 2004, NEW INDICATORS VULNE
   [Anonymous], HABITER TERRITOIRES
   Balsells M, 2015, P I CIVIL ENG-WAT M, V168, P57, DOI 10.1680/wama.14.00051
   Barroca B., 2013, BARRIERS RESILIENCE, V6, P1
   Boin A., 2007, J CCM, V15, P50, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00504.X
   Caisse Centrale de Reassurance, 2017, OUR IRM CCR EV ENV 1
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   CYRULNIK Boris, 2012, Resilience: connaissances de base
   Dauphine A., 2007, Annales de geographie no, V2, P115, DOI [10.3917/ag.654.0115, DOI 10.3917/AG.654.0115]
   Eidsvig UMK, 2014, B ENG GEOL ENVIRON, V73, P307, DOI 10.1007/s10064-014-0571-2
   Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2013, HURR SAND NEW JERS N
   Fekete A, 2009, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V9, P393, DOI 10.5194/nhess-9-393-2009
   Galland J.P., 2010, Metropolis, V2010, P6, DOI [10.3917/flux.081.0006, DOI 10.3917/FLUX.081.0006]
   Holand IS, 2011, NORSK GEOGR TIDSSKR, V65, P1, DOI 10.1080/00291951.2010.550167
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kunz M, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2579, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2579-2013
   Le Haut Comite Francais pour la Defense Civile, 2013, RET SUIT OUR SAND RE
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Mann M. E., 2017, GUARDIAN
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Milman A, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P758, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.002
   Müller A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P2107, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011
   Nguyen KV, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05427-180313
   Nones M, 2016, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V14, P195, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2016.1149074
   Opach T., 2013, CARTOGRAPHICA, V48, P113, DOI DOI 10.3138/CARTO.48.2.1840
   Pescaroli G, 2017, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V25, P56, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12118
   Pescaroli G, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160707003
   Quenault B., 2014, Developpement Durable et Territoires, V5, P38, DOI DOI 10.4000/DEVELOPPEMENTDURABLE.10683
   Reghezza-Zitt M., 2016, RESILIENCE IMPERATIV
   Reghezza-Zitt M, 2012, CYBERGEO, DOI 10.4000/cybergeo.25554
   Rufat S, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013
   Serre D, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS69, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12253
   Serre D, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2675, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2675-2013
   Serre D., 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS
   Serre D, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_13
   Tate E, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V63, P325, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0152-2
   The Rockefeller Foundation, 2015, CIT RES IND
   Toubin M, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   VINET F., 2017, FLOODS
   ZEVENBERGEN Chris., 2010, Urban flood management
NR 48
TC 122
Z9 127
U1 26
U2 218
PU ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
PI AMSTERDAM
PA PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD SEP
PY 2018
VL 30
SI SI
BP 235
EP 243
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
PN B
PG 9
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA GP6PN
UT WOS:000441004800009
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Khan, DM
   Veerbeek, W
   Chen, AS
   Hammond, MJ
   Islam, F
   Pervin, I
   Djordjevic, S
   Butler, D
AF Khan, D. M.
   Veerbeek, W.
   Chen, A. S.
   Hammond, M. J.
   Islam, F.
   Pervin, I.
   Djordjevic, S.
   Butler, D.
TI Back to the future: assessing the damage of 2004 Dhaka flood in the 2050
   urban environment
SO JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Damage assessment; Dhaka city; extreme event; flood risk; urban
   flooding; urban growth; urbanisation
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; GROWTH; MANAGEMENT
AB Planning to make a city flood resilient needs proper assessment of future conditions. Urban growth models are being used as a planning tool for city development. Within the project Collaborative Research in Flood Resilience in Urban Areas (CORFU), flood management strategies suitable for cities with varied geographic and socio-economic conditions have been developed. In the paper, we adopted urban growth model to project the possible future conditions of Dhaka City, the rapidly developing capital of Bangladesh. Bangladesh lies in the delta of the Himalayan Mountain range and experiences frequent flooding. In 2004 an extreme nationwide flood event occurred, which caused major damage to Dhaka City. If the same event were to occur in 2050, it can be expected that the damage would increase significantly. Through the application of the urban growth, hydraulic and damage assessment models, we were able to determine the damage that can be expected to happen in 2050. The paper also describes the key factors that are important to determine this impact and the associated uncertainties.
C1 [Khan, D. M.; Islam, F.; Pervin, I.] Inst Water Modelling, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
   [Veerbeek, W.] UNESCO IHE Inst Water Educ, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Chen, A. S.; Hammond, M. J.; Djordjevic, S.; Butler, D.] Univ Exeter, Exeter, Devon, England.
C3 IHE Delft Institute for Water Education; University of Exeter
RP Khan, DM (corresponding author), Inst Water Modelling, New DOS, House 496,Rd 32, Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh.
EM dmk@iwmbd.org
RI Chen, Albert/E-2735-2010; Butler, David/I-2991-2012; Djordjevic,
   Slobodan/P-8853-2015
OI Butler, David/0000-0001-5515-3416; Djordjevic,
   Slobodan/0000-0003-1682-1383; Chen, Albert S./0000-0003-3708-3332
FU European Commission [244047]
FX Research on the CORFU (Collaborative Research on Flood Resilience in
   Urban areas) project was funded by the European Commission through
   Framework Programme 7, Grant Number 244047. We would also like to thank
   the valuable comments by reviewers whose comments helped to improve the
   manuscript.
CR Adikari Y, 2010, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V3, P185, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01068.x
   Alam M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P81, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076911
   Angel S., 2007, ASPRS ANN C FLOR 7 1
   [Anonymous], 2014, UN Population Division data as of
   [Anonymous], 2000, 1998 FLOOD IMPACT EN
   [Anonymous], 2005, INVESTIGATION HYDROL
   [Anonymous], 2006, IMPACTS FLOOD URBAN
   [Anonymous], 2006, Water Resour, DOI [10.1134/S0097807806040014, DOI 10.1134/S0097807806040014]
   Brown RR, 2005, ENVIRON MANAGE, V36, P455, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0217-4
   Chen A.S., 2015, ENV MODEL SOFTW
   Demographia, 2014, DEM WORLD URB AR
   Dewan AM, 2014, SPRING GEOGR, P99, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6735-5_6
   Dewan AM, 2009, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V150, P237, DOI 10.1007/s10661-008-0226-5
   Djordjevic S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P864, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.008
   Hammond M.J., 2012, INT C URB DRAIN MOD
   Haque A.K.E., 2014, DEV DAMAGE FUNCTIONS
   Hasnat M.A., 2006, OPTIONS FLOOD RISK D, P121
   Herold M., 2005, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V29, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.12.001
   Homer C, 2004, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V70, P829, DOI 10.14358/PERS.70.7.829
   Hossain A.N.H., 2006, OPTIONS FLOOD RISK D, P55
   Islam A.K.M.S., 2008, HYDROLOGICAL ASPECTS
   Islam K.M. N., 2005, Flood loss potentials in non-agricultural sectors: assessment methods and standard loss database for Bangladesh
   Lau CL, 2010, T ROY SOC TROP MED H, V104, P631, DOI 10.1016/j.trstmh.2010.07.002
   Merz B, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1697, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
   Messner F., 2007, EVALUATING FLOOD DAM
   Montgomery MR, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P761, DOI 10.1126/science.1153012
   Montz B. E., 2008, Natural Hazards Review, V9, P150, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2008)9:3(150)
   Pathirana A, 2014, ATMOS RES, V138, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.10.005
   Penning-Rowsell E., 2005, The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: a Handbook of Assessment Techniques
   Schlitte F., 2013, URBAN FLOOD RESILIEN, P27
   Siddiqui K. U., 2006, OPTIONS FLOOD RISK D
   TOBIN GA, 1995, WATER RESOUR BULL, V31, P359, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb04025.x
   TURNER MG, 1990, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V4, P21, DOI 10.1007/BF02573948
   UN Habitat, 2007, 21 SESS GOV COUNC 16
   Veerbeek W., 2012, P 9 INT C URB DRAIN, P3
   Veerbeek W, 2015, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V50, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.11.003
   Weng QH, 2001, ENVIRON MANAGE, V28, P737, DOI 10.1007/s002670010258
   Wiitala S.W., 1961, Some aspects of the effect of urban and suburban development upon runoff (No. 61-172)
   Xian G, 2005, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V97, P203, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2005.04.017
   Zevenbergen C, 2008, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V1, P81, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2008.00010.x
NR 40
TC 19
Z9 19
U1 0
U2 45
PU WILEY
PI HOBOKEN
PA 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
SN 1753-318X
J9 J FLOOD RISK MANAG
JI J. Flood Risk Manag.
PD JAN
PY 2018
VL 11
SU 1
BP S43
EP S54
DI 10.1111/jfr3.12220
PG 12
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA FU2OS
UT WOS:000423690200005
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rodríguez-Rojas, MI
   Garrido-Jiménez, FJ
   Abarca-Alvarez, FJ
   Vallecillos-Siles, MR
AF Rodriguez-Rojas, Maria I.
   Garrido-Jimenez, Francisco Javier
   Abarca-Alvarez, Francisco Javier
   Vallecillos-Siles, Manuel Ricardo
TI Advances in the Integration of Sustainable Drainage Systems into Urban
   Planning: A Case Study
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS); climate change; urban planning;
   regulations; Spain; France; Italy
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; WATER;
   URBANIZATION; PERFORMANCE; CITIES
AB Climate change is arguably the greatest challenge facing cities today. Its severe consequences have created the need for sustainable urban planning. In this regard, Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) have contributed in recent years to alleviating environmental problems caused by soil sealing and enhancing the resilience of cities to climate change. However, in most cases, the level of implementation is limited to solving environmental problems caused by inadequate urban planning. To change this, in recent years some countries have proposed recommendations to integrate these systems into their urban planning regulations, but these have been general and have not defined specific measures. This paper proposes to achieve this goal by using case studies of three countries with similar characteristics (Spain, Italy and France). A common framework for the integration of SuDS in planning has been proposed that can be exported to other similar places. The urban scales of intervention have been defined (city, neighborhood and street), as well as the actions to be carried out (analysis, planning and regulatory measures) and the urban plans to which they should be applied. This proposal represents an advancement in the application of SuDS as a primary control measure. This breakthrough will significantly improve the resilience of the cities of the future, making them more resilient to the effects of weather and climate change.
C1 [Rodriguez-Rojas, Maria I.] Univ Granada, Higher Sch Civil Engn, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Granada 18071, Spain.
   [Garrido-Jimenez, Francisco Javier] Univ Almeria, Dept Engn, Almeria City Planning Board, Almeria 04120, Spain.
   [Abarca-Alvarez, Francisco Javier] Univ Granada, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Higher Sch Civil Engn, E-18071 Granada, Spain.
   [Vallecillos-Siles, Manuel Ricardo] Univ Almeria, City Almeria Sustainabil Area, Dept Econ & Business, Almeria 04120, Spain.
C3 University of Granada; Universidad de Almeria; University of Granada;
   Universidad de Almeria
RP Rodríguez-Rojas, MI (corresponding author), Univ Granada, Higher Sch Civil Engn, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Granada 18071, Spain.
EM mabel@ugr.es; fjgarri@ual.es; fco.abarca@ugr.es; mrvalle@ual.es
RI Rodríguez-Rojas, M.I./AAB-2732-2019; Abarca-Alvarez,
   Francisco/S-8608-2016
OI Rodriguez Rojas, Maria Isabel/0000-0001-5187-5032; Garrido-Jimenez,
   Francisco Javier/0000-0001-7712-1749
CR Ahiablame LM, 2012, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V223, P4253, DOI 10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
   Aletba SRO, 2021, J TRAFFIC TRANSP ENG, V8, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.jtte.2021.02.001
   [Anonymous], 2004, Intergovernmental Agreement on a National Water Initiative
   BALLARD B., 2015, The SuDS Manual
   Baptista M, 2005, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V51, P99, DOI 10.2166/wst.2005.0037
   BMT WBM, 2011, Evaluating Options for Water Sensitive Urban Design-A National Guide: Prepared by the Joint Steering Committee for Water Sensitive Cities: In Delivering Clause 92(ii) of the National Water Initiative
   Burns MJ, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V105, P230, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.012
   Cai Z, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V39, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.033
   Carvalho P, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V338, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130652
   Charlesworth SM, 2013, J WATER SUPPLY RES T, V62, P534, DOI 10.2166/aqua.2013.051
   Chen AL, 2014, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V13, P646, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.006
   CIRIA C713, 2012, Retrofitting to Manage Surface Water
   CIRIA C723, 2013, Water Sensitive Urban Design in UK
   Corts, Valencianes Resolucion 997/IX, Sobre la Incorporacion de Medidas de Prevencion y Tecnicas Relacionadas con el uso de Sistemas de Drenaje Sostenible
   Costadone L, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128131
   Coutts A., 2019, Determine the Microclimate Influence of Harvesting Solutions and Water Sensitive Urban Design at the Micro-Scale
   Degeai JP, 2022, CATENA, V219, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106623
   Dickie S., 2019, Planning for SuDS-Making it Happen (C687)
   EC European Commission, 2021, Urban Agenda for the EU-Multi-Level Governance in Action
   EU, European Union Facts and Figures on Life in the European Union
   European Commission EC, 2012, Commission Staff Working Document
   Ferrans P, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V806, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150447
   Fini A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.032
   Ghodsi SH, 2020, J HYDROL, V580, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124266
   Gil-Guirado S, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V807, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150777
   Green Peace, Reverdecer las Ciudades los Espacios Urbanos y su Impacto en la Salud y el Bienestar
   Hoban A, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P25, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00002-2
   Jones S, 2014, GEOGR J, V180, P191, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12059
   Ken G., 2011, The Social Indicator Planning and Evaluation System (SIPES) for Nonpoint Source Management: A Handbook for Watershed Projects, V3rd
   Korgaonkar Y, 2018, FRONT BUILT ENVIRON, V4, DOI 10.3389/fbuil.2018.00058
   Kriptsov V., 2019, Blue-Green Infrastructure-Perspectives on Planning, Evaluation and Collaboration (C780a)
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14172612
   Ministere de la Transition, 2022, Ecologique Urbanisme et Amenagement du Territoire
   Ministere de la Transition Ecologique, 2021, Gestion Durable des Eaux Pluviales: Le Plan D'action
   Ministerio de Transportes y Movilidad Sostenible, 2023, El Planeamiento Urbanistico Espanol
   Ministerio del Interno, 2013, Pianificazione e Governo del Territorio
   Navarro-Leblond M, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18189511
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   Ojeda MGV, 2022, J HYDROL, V615, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128628
   Oliva F, 2015, CIUDADES, V18, P127
   Palla A, 2015, J HYDROL, V528, P361, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050
   Perales-Momparler S, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS113, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.153
   Perales-Momparler S, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.039
   Pistocchi A, 2015, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V4, P398, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.06.021
   Poirier C, 2024, ACTA ASTRONAUT, V214, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.10.029
   Radcliffe JC, 2019, APPROACHES TO WATER SENSITIVE URBAN DESIGN: POTENTIAL, DESIGN, ECOLOGICAL HEALTH, URBAN GREENING, ECONOMICS, POLICIES, AND COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812843-5.00001-0
   Rodríguez-Rojas MI, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V205, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.075
   Rodriguez-Rojas M.I., 2019, ROP, V3607, P14
   Rodriguez-Rojas M.I., 2017, Guia para la Integracion de los Sistemas Urbanos de Drenaje Sostenible en el Proyecto Urbano
   Rodriguez-Rojas MI, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19148713
   Roseboro A, 2021, FRONT WATER, V3, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2021.725174
   Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, 2018, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V25, P19228, DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-9170-7
   Semadeni-Davies A, 2008, J HYDROL, V350, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.028
   SNAI, 2024, Agenzia per la Coesione Territoriale
   susdrain, SUSDRAIN Types of SuDS
   UN, United Nations Human Development Report 2021-2022
   Van Mechelen C, 2015, ECOL ENG, V82, P571, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.011
   Vitale C, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V146, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.04.015
   Wong THF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P673, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.436
   Wong TH F., 2012, Stormwater Management in a Water Sensitive City
   Zhou QQ, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P976, DOI 10.3390/w6040976
NR 61
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 7
U2 11
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD APR
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 7
AR 2658
DI 10.3390/su16072658
PG 11
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA NM2X5
UT WOS:001200816000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Kaika, M
AF Kaika, Maria
TI "Don't call me resilient again!': the New Urban Agenda as
   immunology ... or ... what happens when communities refuse to be
   vaccinated with "smart cities' and indicators
SO ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION
LA English
DT Article
DE conflict; dissensus; Habitat III; inclusiveness; indicators; New Urban
   Agenda; political ecology; resilience; safety; smart cities; social
   innovation; sustainability; Sustainable Development Goal 11
AB The Habitat III Conference's New Urban Agenda hails a paradigm shift for pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, the new call for safe, resilient, sustainable and inclusive cities remains path dependent on old methodological tools (e.g. indicators), techno-managerial solutions (e.g. smart cities), and institutional frameworks of an ecological modernization paradigm that did not work. Pursuing a new urban paradigm within this old framework can only act as immunology: it vaccinates citizens and environments so that they can take larger doses of inequality and degradation in the future; it mediates the effects of global socio-environmental inequality, but does little towards alleviating it. Indeed, an increasing number of communities across the world now decline these immunological offers. Instead, they rupture path dependency and establish effective alternative methods for accessing housing, healthcare, sanitation, etc. I argue that real smart solutions and real social innovation are to be found not in consensus-building exercises, but in these dissensus practices that act as living indicators of what/where urgently needs to be addressed.
C1 [Kaika, Maria] Univ Amsterdam, Urban Reg & Environm Planning, Dept Human Geog Planning & Int Dev GPIO, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [Kaika, Maria] Univ Manchester, Geog, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, Lancs, England.
C3 University of Amsterdam; University of Manchester
RP Kaika, M (corresponding author), Dept Human Geog Planning & Int Dev GPIO, POB 15629, NL-1001 NC Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM M.Kaika@uva.nl
FU European Union [289374]
FX This research was supported by the European Union's Seventh Framework
   Programme (Marie Curie Actions) under Grant 289374 (ENTITLE).
CR Amnesty International, 2016, UN AR EM ANN REP 201
   [Anonymous], 1998, LOS ANGELES GLOBALIZ
   [Anonymous], EUROPEAN PLANNING ST
   [Anonymous], 2016, E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1
   [Anonymous], COMMUNITIES TRANSITI
   [Anonymous], 2016, DUTCH NEWS      0511
   Arup and The Rockefeller Foundation, 2014, CIT RES IND CIT RES
   Barnett C, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P87, DOI 10.1177/0956247815621473
   Bouzarovski S, 2016, WORKING PAPER
   Bouzarovski S, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P2689, DOI 10.1177/0042098010385158
   Bronowski J., 1956, SCI HUMAN VALUES
   Brown A, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P531, DOI 10.1177/0956247812456490
   Buckley RM, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P64, DOI 10.1177/0956247815622131
   Crouch C, 2009, BRIT J POLIT INT REL, V11, P382, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2009.00377.x
   Cugurullo F, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P2417, DOI 10.1177/0042098015588727
   Datta A, 2015, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V5, P3, DOI 10.1177/2043820614565748
   Desmond M, 2012, AM J SOCIOL, V118, P88, DOI 10.1086/666082
   Dooling S, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x
   Ernstson Henrik, 2014, STOP CALLING ME RESI
   Esposito R, 2013, COMMONAL, P1
   Feldman Josh, 2015, Mediaite
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   García-Lamarca M, 2016, T I BRIT GEOGR, V41, P313, DOI 10.1111/tran.12126
   Greenfield A, 2015, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V5, P40, DOI 10.1177/2043820614565869
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Guzman Arana Silvia, 2015, SMART SUSTAINABLE CI
   Habitat III Programme, 2016, MEASURING NEW URBAN
   Harris A, 2015, DIALOGUES HUM GEOGR, V5, P23, DOI 10.1177/2043820614565865
   Heynen N, 2006, URBAN AFF REV, V42, P3, DOI 10.1177/1078087406290729
   Hoelscher K, 2016, INT AREA STUD REV, V19, P28, DOI 10.1177/2233865916632089
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Kaika M, 2016, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V23, P556, DOI 10.1177/0969776414528928
   Kaika Maria., 2011, NEW BLACKWELL COMPAN, P96, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444395105
   KOMNINOS N., 2015, AGE INTELLIGENT CITI
   Lobina Hall David, DEV PRACTICE, V15, P286
   López-Marrero T, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P229, DOI 10.1177/0956247810396055
   Luca Di Bella Arturo Ruggiero, CONSTRUCTION POLITIQ
   Manyena SB, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P433
   Maria Kaika, 2012, CITY, V16, P422
   Martinez-Alier J., 1997, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, V8, P91, DOI DOI 10.1080/10455759709358725
   Miriam Greenberg, 2016, SITUATING SUSTAINABI
   Muchhala Bhumika, 2016, DG INDICATORS CHALLE
   Odemerho FO, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P139, DOI 10.1177/0956247814558194
   Olsson P, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06799-190401
   Orach K, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V40, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.002
   Patel S, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P223, DOI 10.1177/0956247815617440
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Perry F., 2016, The Guardian
   Pieterse E., 2011, Development, V54, P309
   RANCIERE Jacques., 1995, La mesentente. Politique et philosophie
   Satterthwaite D, 2016, ENVIRON URBAN, V28, P3, DOI 10.1177/0956247816637501
   Satterthwaite D, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P291, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501421
   Smit B, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
   Swyngedouw E, 2014, SPACE POLITY, V18, P122, DOI 10.1080/13562576.2013.879774
   Swyngedouw Erik, THEORY CULTURE UNPUB
   Swyngedouw Erik, 2011, POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY, V30, P270
   U. Nations, 2015, RES AD GEN ASS UN DO
   United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III), 2016, UN C HOUS S IN PRESS
   United Nations Economic and Social Council, 2016, E201624ECN UN EC SOC
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, IND MON GLOB TARG SE
   Velicu I, 2017, GEOFORUM, V84, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.10.012
   Walker R., 2009, The country in the city: the greening of the San Francisco Bay Area
   Wilson D, 2008, SOC CULT GEOGR, V9, P841, DOI 10.1080/14649360802441473
   Wollmann Hellmut Marcou Gerard (editors), 2010, PROVISION PUBLIC SER
   Yigitcanlar T, 2014, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V89, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034
NR 65
TC 295
Z9 323
U1 7
U2 235
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0956-2478
EI 1746-0301
J9 ENVIRON URBAN
JI Environ. Urban.
PD APR
PY 2017
VL 29
IS 1
BP 89
EP 102
DI 10.1177/0956247816684763
PG 14
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA ET2FX
UT WOS:000400086300006
OA Bronze
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rijke, J
   Farrelly, M
   Brown, R
   Zevenbergen, C
AF Rijke, J.
   Farrelly, M.
   Brown, R.
   Zevenbergen, C.
TI Configuring transformative governance to enhance resilient urban water
   systems
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
LA English
DT Article
DE Adaptive governance; Australia; Governance; Pattern; Resilience; Urban;
   Transformative governance; Transition; Water management; Water sensitive
   city
ID FLOOD RISK-MANAGEMENT; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;
   COMPLEXITY THEORY; TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE; RESOURCES; PERSPECTIVE;
   ORGANIZATIONS; ADAPTATION
AB Governance reforms are required to establish adaptive and resilient urban water resource management that takes into account complexity, uncertainty and immediate and long term change. This paper details the outcomes of a qualitative, social science research project, drawing on insights from Australian urban water practitioners (n = 90) across three Australian cities to explore the effectiveness of governance reforms in the contemporary urban water context. The perceived effectiveness of current urban water governance strategies were assessed through the first application of a fit-for-purpose governance framework, which helps to assess whether the (anticipated) outcomes match the intended purposes of proposed and applied governance strategies. The research provides important insights regarding the need for a mix of centralised and decentralised, and formal and informal, governance approaches to support effective governance of water infrastructure during different stages of adapting to drought and transitioning to a water sensitive city that is resilient to immediate and gradual change. The research insights suggest that decentralised and informal governance approaches are particularly effective in early stages of transformation processes (i.e. adaptation and transition processes), whilst formal and centralised approaches become more effective during later stages of transformation. As such, we have identified a pattern of effective governance configurations during consecutive stages of transformation processes that could provide policy makers guidance in overcoming urban water governance challenges. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Rijke, J.; Farrelly, M.; Brown, R.] Monash Univ, Monash Water Liveabil, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia.
   [Rijke, J.; Zevenbergen, C.] UNESCO IHE, Flood Resilience Grp, NL-2601 DA Delft, Netherlands.
   [Rijke, J.; Zevenbergen, C.] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Monash University; IHE Delft Institute for Water Education; Delft
   University of Technology
RP Rijke, J (corresponding author), Monash Univ, Monash Water Liveabil, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia.
EM j.rijke@unesco-ihe.org
RI Farrelly, Megan/G-8128-2011
OI Brown, Rebekah/0000-0002-8689-7562; Farrelly, Megan/0000-0002-0453-059X
CR Acheson JM, 2006, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V35, P117, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123238
   Adger WN, 2011, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V2, P757, DOI 10.1002/wcc.133
   Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Agrawal A, 2003, ANNU REV ANTHROPOL, V32, P243, DOI 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093112
   [Anonymous], 2010 METR WAT PLAN
   [Anonymous], ADELAIDE WATER CITY
   [Anonymous], 2007, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMEN
   Berkhout F., 2004, System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability, P48, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781845423421.00013
   Biswas AK, 2004, WATER INT, V29, P248, DOI 10.1080/02508060408691775
   Bodin O, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Bodin Ö, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Bos JJ, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1340, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Brown R., 2007, FACILITY ADV WATER B
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P847, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.029
   Brown RR, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V59, P839, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.028
   Brown RR, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V41, P221, DOI 10.1007/s00267-007-9046-6
   de Haan J, 2006, ECOL COMPLEX, V3, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.02.003
   Degenne A., 1999, Introducing Social Networks
   DW, 2010, Water for Good: a plan to ensure our water future to 2050
   Edelenbos J, 2006, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V16, P417, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mui049
   Elzen B, 2005, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V72, P651, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.04.002
   Farrelly M, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P721, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.007
   Farrelly M., 2012, 7 INT C WAT SENS URB
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C., 1998, 2 IHDPPOGE CHANG
   Folke C, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Foxon Timothy J., 2009, European Environment, V19, P3, DOI 10.1002/eet.496
   Geels FW, 2007, RES POLICY, V36, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Geels FW, 2002, RES POLICY, V31, P1257, DOI 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Gunderson L., 1999, Conservation Ecology, V3, P1
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   de Haan J, 2011, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V78, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008
   Harding R, 2006, DESALINATION, V187, P229, DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2005.04.082
   Herrfahrdt-Pähle E, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04565-170208
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C. S., 2002, Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Systems of Humans and Nature
   HOOD C, 1991, PUBLIC ADMIN, V69, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Hooghe L, 2003, AM POLIT SCI REV, V97, P233
   Hoyer Jacqueline., 2011, WATER SENSITIVE URBA
   Huitema D, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
   Huntjens P, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015
   Kjaer AnneMette., 2004, Governance
   Klijn E.H., 1997, MANAGING COMPLEX NET, P98
   LEAVITT HJ, 1951, J ABNORM SOC PSYCH, V46, P38, DOI 10.1037/h0057189
   Lieberherr E, 2011, PROCD SOC BEHV, V14, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.026
   Loorbach D., 2007, Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development
   Loorbach D, 2010, GOVERNANCE, V23, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Loucks DP, 2000, WATER INT, V25, P3, DOI 10.1080/02508060008686793
   Marion R, 2008, LEADERSH HORIZ, P1
   Mitchell VG, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V37, P589, DOI 10.1007/s00267-004-0252-1
   Morison P., 2010, MANAGEMENT URBAN STO
   National Water Commission, 2011, URB WAT AUSTR FUT DI
   Newman P, 2001, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V43, P93, DOI 10.2166/wst.2001.0188
   Olsson P, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11, DOI 10.5751/ES-01595-110118
   Ostrom E, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P15176, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0701886104
   Ostrom E, 2010, ENVIRON CONSERV, V37, P451, DOI 10.1017/S0376892910000834
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2007, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V21, P49, DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P571, DOI [10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006, 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.004]
   Pierre JonPeters., 2000, Governance, Politics and the State
   Rijke J., 2011, 12 INT C URB DRAIN P
   Rijke J, 2012, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V22, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010
   Rip A., 1998, HUMAN CHOICE CLIMATE, V2
   Rotmans JR., 2001, FORESIGHT J FUTURE S, V3, P15, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14636680110803003, 10.1108/14636680110803003]
   Scheffer M, 2009, CRITICAL TRANSITIONS
   Schneider M, 2006, LEADERSHIP QUART, V17, P351, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006
   Smith A, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Taylor A, 2011, LEADERSHIP QUART, V22, P412, DOI 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.014
   Tompkins EL, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   van de Meene SJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P1117, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003
   van Herk S, 2011, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V4, P306, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01113.x
   van Herk S, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P543, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Voss JP, 2006, REFLEXIVE GOVERNANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, P1
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wong THF, 2009, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V60, P673, DOI 10.2166/wst.2009.436
NR 75
TC 144
Z9 165
U1 9
U2 227
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1462-9011
EI 1873-6416
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLICY
JI Environ. Sci. Policy
PD JAN
PY 2013
VL 25
BP 62
EP 72
DI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 062JC
UT WOS:000312914900006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Potter, K
   Vilcan, T
AF Potter, Karen
   Vilcan, Tudor
TI Managing urban flood resilience through the English planning system:
   insights from the 'SuDS-face'
SO PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL
   AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES
LA English
DT Article
DE urban flood resilience; planning; sustainable (urban) drainage systems;
   SuDS; England
ID RISK-MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE; ENGLAND
AB In academic and professional circles, 'resilience thinking' has emerged as the dominant paradigm in flood risk management, which emphasizes the need to plan and design cities that can absorb water and replicate natural processes more closely. In this paper, we explore how planners in England are expected to respond to the resilience agenda against the realities in practice, zoning in on the delivery of sustainable (urban) drainage systems (SuDS). Our exploration highlights that, while SuDS are being implemented, they are largely characterized by a 'bog standard' design. We found that there are three main institutional factors that are constraining the implementation of SuDS: the lack of legislative backing, the power afforded to private commercial interests in the neoliberalized planning process, compounded by the severe lack of resources in local authorities. What is missing at the moment is SuDS process and design that is flexible, integrated, collaborative and innovative. There are clear implications that, without the necessary institutional support, resilience thinking will remain largely aspirational, and professionals will struggle to gain traction and translate the larger flood resilience policy agenda into England's future climate-resilient places.
   This article is part of the theme issue 'Urban flood resilience'.
C1 [Potter, Karen; Vilcan, Tudor] Open Univ, Dept Publ Leadership & Social Enterprise, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England.
C3 Open University - UK
RP Potter, K (corresponding author), Open Univ, Dept Publ Leadership & Social Enterprise, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England.
EM karen.potter@open.ac.uk
OI Potter, Karen/0000-0003-4750-0056
FU Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P004180/1,
   EP/P004210/1]; EPSRC [EP/P004210/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX The authors acknowledge the receipt of funding from the Engineering and
   Physical Sciences Research Council, grant nos EP/P004180/1 and
   EP/P004210/1.
CR Andrew RF, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9120953
   [Anonymous], 2005, Technical Report
   [Anonymous], BUILDING FLOOD RESIL
   [Anonymous], 2019, Draft National Strategy for 4IR
   Begg C, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN C, V33, P685, DOI 10.1068/c12216
   Bell J, 2015, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V17, P516, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2014.986567
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   de Haan FJ, 2015, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V15, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.005
   DTLR (Department for Transport Local Government and the Regions), 2001, 25 DTLR STAT OFF
   Hutter G, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P294, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787706
   ICE, 2018, SUDS ROUT MAPS ICE A
   Kuhlicke C, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P114
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Ministry of Housing Communities & Local Government, 2019, 48 CP MIN HOUS COMM
   Novotny V., 2010, WATER CENTRIC SUSTAI
   O'Hare P, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P275, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787721
   O'Neill E, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P129
   Pitt M., 2008, Learning lessons from the 2007 floods, P505
   Porter L, 2011, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V12, P477, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2011.626296
   Potter K, 2016, TOWN PLAN REV, V87, P125, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2016.11
   Rode S, 2018, TOWN PLAN REV, V89, P167, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2018.10
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Scott M, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P103, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.761904
   Scott V, 2014, HEALTH POLICY PLANN, V29, P59, DOI 10.1093/heapol/czu073
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   UN-Habitat, 2019, RESILIENCE
   van Buuren A, 2018, REV POLICY RES, V35, P907, DOI 10.1111/ropr.12300
   Vilcan T, J FLOOD RISK MANAGE
   White I., 2005, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, V7, P25, DOI 10.1080/15239080500251866
   White I, 2008, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V161, P151, DOI 10.1680/udap.2008.161.4.151
   White I, 2013, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V14, P106
   Woods Ballard B., 2015, CIRIA
NR 34
TC 20
Z9 20
U1 3
U2 41
PU ROYAL SOC
PI LONDON
PA 6-9 CARLTON HOUSE TERRACE, LONDON SW1Y 5AG, ENGLAND
SN 1364-503X
EI 1471-2962
J9 PHILOS T R SOC A
JI Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A-Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
PD APR 3
PY 2020
VL 378
IS 2168
SI SI
AR 20190206
DI 10.1098/rsta.2019.0206
PG 18
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA KO6JB
UT WOS:000515653700009
PM 32063165
OA Bronze, Green Published, Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Abunada, Z
   Dawoud, O
   Kiymaz, G
AF Abunada, Ziyad
   Dawoud, Osama
   Kiymaz, Given
TI Sustainability, resilience, and smartness: A novel city characterization
   approach using ZOG-diagram
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Sustainability; Resilience; Smart cities; Transition; ZOG diagram
ID CITIES; INFRASTRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT; FUTURE
AB The transition of cities toward smartness has accelerated in recent years, yet the interplay between smartness, sustainability, and resilience (SSR) remains underexplored, posing challenges in establishing comprehensive indicators for smart city development. This study introduces a multidimensional approach to analyze and visualize the interconnections between SSR parameters, which can be incorporated with multidimensional SSR frameworks in order to offer a unified, quantitative perspective. This study was initiated by integrating a comprehensive dataset of 31 Chinese cities and employing a multivariate linear regression model. The model showed a high-quality performance with an R-squared value of 0.9977, showcasing exceptional predictive accuracy. The proposed method introduces the ZOG diagram-a ternary plot that uniquely captures the ideal equilibrium among SSR indices. This diagram allows cities to be classified based on their SSR performance, identifying deviations from ideal development and providing actionable insights for policymakers. Additionally, the Biased Development Coefficient (kappa) is introduced as a metric that quantifies development disparities and assess alignment with balanced SSR growth. By incorporating these advancements, the approach enables realtime monitoring, classification, and strategic planning for urban development, surpassing the limitations of existing methodologies. This study offers high capabilities and potential for understanding SSR interdependencies, laying the groundwork for universally applicable frameworks to evaluate smart city performance and guide sustainable, resilient urban transformation.
C1 [Abunada, Ziyad; Dawoud, Osama] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.
   [Abunada, Ziyad] Cent Queensland Univ, Ctr Hydrogen & Renewable Energy, Gladstone Marina Campus, Gladstone, Qld 4680, Australia.
   [Kiymaz, Given] Florida Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4700 Res Way, Lakeland, FL 33805 USA.
C3 Central Queensland University; Central Queensland University; Florida
   Polytechnic University
RP Abunada, Z; Dawoud, O (corresponding author), Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Engn & Technol, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia.; Abunada, Z (corresponding author), Cent Queensland Univ, Ctr Hydrogen & Renewable Energy, Gladstone Marina Campus, Gladstone, Qld 4680, Australia.; Kiymaz, G (corresponding author), Florida Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4700 Res Way, Lakeland, FL 33805 USA.
EM z.abunada@cqu.edu.au; o.dawoud@cqu.edu.au; gkiymaz@floridapoly.edu
RI Dawoud, Osama/AAN-8912-2020
FX that could have appeared to influence the submitted work titled
   "Sus-tainability, Resilience, and Smartness: A Novel Multidimensional
   City Characterization Approach." The research presented is free from any
   external pressures, conflicts of interest, or commercial affiliations
   that might bias the findings or conclusions of this work. All authors
   agree on this submission.
CR [Anonymous], 1987, USDA Textural Soil Classification
   Ates M, 2023, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V14, P266, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2021-0064
   Atici U, 2011, EXPERT SYST APPL, V38, P9609, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.156
   Bibri SE, 2017, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V31, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
   Chang D.L., 2018, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., V4, P1
   de Falco S, 2019, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V26, P205, DOI 10.1177/0969776418783813
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Ebolor A, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V383, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135300
   Esmaeilian B, 2018, WASTE MANAGE, V81, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.047
   Faroqi H., 2022, IJSDP, V17, P1943, DOI [10.18280/ijsdp.170630, DOI 10.18280/IJSDP.170630]
   Field A., 2013, DISCOVERING STAT USI
   FRANKE R, 1982, COMPUT MATH APPL, V8, P273, DOI 10.1016/0898-1221(82)90009-8
   Gallotti R, 2021, COMPLEXITY, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/1782354
   Castro AIG, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13169480
   Hao H, 2023, ENG STRUCT, V277, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115477
   Hollands RG, 2015, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V8, P61, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsu011
   Huovila A, 2019, CITIES, V89, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029
   ICCA, Assessment Report on Smart City Development Level Report (6th Report)
   Irvine KN, 2022, URBAN SCI, V6, DOI 10.3390/urbansci6010007
   Jin RY, 2018, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V170, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.063
   Kodag S., 2023, Disaster Advances, V16, P29, DOI [10.25303/1605da029037, DOI 10.25303/1605DA029037]
   Kutty AA, 2023, CITIES, V137, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104293
   Kuzior A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141912645
   Liu JJ, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V370, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133248
   Machado C, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V199, P214, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.072
   Naser MZ, 2018, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V90, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.004
   Ng ST, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V196, P939, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.034
   Obianyo II, 2020, CONSTR BUILD MATER, V263, DOI 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120677
   Okonta E.D., 2023, Smart Cities Software Application for Sustainability and Resilience, DOI 10.2139ssrn.4627094
   Prabowo OM, 2023, IEEE ACCESS, V11, P120157, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3327305
   Lopez LJR, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010181
   Gil-Garcia JR, 2016, GOV INFORM Q, V33, P524, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2016.03.002
   Sharifi A, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1536, DOI 10.1177/23998083211058798
   Sharifi A, 2020, URBAN SYSTEMS DESIGN: CREATING SUSTAINABLE SMART CITIES IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS ERA, P345, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816055-8.00011-7
   Sharifi A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P1269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
   Vaidya OS, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V169, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   van den Buuse D, 2019, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V142, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.029
   Voda A.I., 2019, Smart Cities: Issues and Challenges, P199, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-816639-0.00012-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-816639-0.00012-0]
   WATSON GS, 1951, ANN MATH STAT, V22, P446, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177729592
   Yigitcanlar T, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104187
   Yigitcanlar T, 2018, CITIES, V81, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
   Zheng BH, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10093063
   Zhu SY, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636
NR 43
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 1
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD MAR 10
PY 2025
VL 496
AR 145080
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145080
EA FEB 2025
PG 12
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA Z1H6T
UT WOS:001436506500001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Long, NV
   Cheng, YN
   Le, TDN
AF Nguyen Van Long
   Cheng, Yuning
   Tu Dam Ngoc Le
TI Flood-resilient urban design based on the indigenous landscape in the
   city of Can Tho, Vietnam
SO URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Indigenous landscape; Can Tho City; Agricultural landscape; Floods;
   Urban design; Urban resilience
ID ECOLOGICAL WISDOM; MEKONG DELTA; VULNERABILITY; IMPACTS; FUTURE
AB Natural conditions and indigenous culture are fundamental factors creating the hydrological landscape system of the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. A study of the indigenous landscape is critical to understanding the interaction between human activities and natural processes, thereby enhancing the delta's ability to cope with climate change and to control floods. This paper uses a case study of Can Tho City (CTC) to analyze the spatial distribution pattern of the local landscape system and explores how indigenous knowledge contributes to the sustainability of this landscape. The outcomes show (1) the complexity of balancing territorial organization and agriculture needs and (2) the combination between these two factors and local knowledge of flood resilience making it possible to preserve a landscape system concerning complex hydrological dynamics, in the downstream section of the Mekong River Basin. This paper argues that knowledge of indigenous agriculture cultivation and the functioning of local landscape system should be respected and used in the process of urban design to maintain sustainability over time. A scenario is discussed to emphasize the balance needed between a human-made environment and natural hydrodynamics to preserve the local landscape system and thereby enhance urban resilience to floods and climate change.
C1 [Nguyen Van Long] Southeast Univ, Architect Sch, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Cheng, Yuning] Southeast Univ, Landscape Planning & Design Inst, Landscape Dept, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
   [Tu Dam Ngoc Le] MienTrung Univ Civil Engn, Fac Architecture, Urban & Reg Planning, Phu Yen, Vietnam.
C3 Southeast University - China; Southeast University - China
RP Cheng, YN (corresponding author), Southeast Univ, Landscape Planning & Design Inst, Landscape Dept, Nanjing, Peoples R China.
EM lomanscape@outlook.com; cyn999@126.com; ledamngoctu@muce.edu.vn
RI Le, Tu/JAC-0550-2023; Long, Nguyen/KJL-2480-2024
OI Le, Tu Dam Ngoc/0000-0002-7604-5374
CR Abdulkareem M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P176, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.009
   Adger WN, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1036, DOI 10.1126/science.1112122
   Andersen TK, 2013, GEOGR COMPASS, V7, P95, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12025
   BATICA J, 2015, METHODOLOGY FLOOD RE
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Colten CE, 2009, NAT HAZARDS, V48, P355, DOI 10.1007/s11069-008-9267-x
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   DE Bruijn K., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P199, DOI [10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232]
   De Nijs A, 2010, P PROD US DISS URB K, P487
   Folke C, 2003, PHILOS T R SOC B, V358, P2027, DOI 10.1098/rstb.2003.1385
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   *GSO, 2016, RETR 2016 POP HOUS C
   Gurnell A, 2007, GEOGR COMPASS, V1, P1118, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00058.x
   Nguyen HH, 2016, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V16, P2303, DOI 10.1007/s10113-016-0941-3
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Huong HTL, 2013, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V17, P379, DOI 10.5194/hess-17-379-2013
   Jia HF, 2011, ECOL COMPLEX, V8, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.03.002
   Johannessen Å, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI 10.5751/ES-08870-220101
   Käkönen M, 2008, AMBIO, V37, P205, DOI 10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[205:MDATCM]2.0.CO;2
   Klein RJT, 1998, GEOGR J, V164, P259, DOI 10.2307/3060615
   Le Anh Tuan C.T.H., 2007, FLOOD SALINITY MANAG, P61
   LE T, 2013, FLOOD ADAPTIVE CITIE
   Lennon M, 2014, J URBAN DES, V19, P745, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2014.944113
   LEOPOLD LB, 1994, J CONTEMP WAT RES ED, V95, P2
   LEOPOLD LB, 2011, J CONT WATER RES ED, V1
   Liao KH, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.014
   Liao KH, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V71, P723, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0923-4
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liu W, 2014, ECOL MODEL, V291, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.012
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   *MIN ENV NAT RES, 2012, UPD CLIM CHANG SCEN
   NGUYEN VL, 2018, ENV URBANIZATION ASI
   Son NT, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.010
   Nienhuis PH, 2001, HYDROBIOLOGIA, V444, P85, DOI 10.1023/A:1017509410951
   Ostrom E, 2004, ECOL ECON, V49, P488, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.010
   Parker D.J., 2000, FLOODS, VI., P3
   SHANNON K, 2012, K SHANNON B DEMEULDE
   SHANNON K, 2011, NORDIC J ARCHITECTUR
   SHANNON K, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN STRU, V3, P54
   SHANNON S, 2011, NEW GEOGRAPHIES, V4
   SHANNON S, 2010, JOVIS
   *SIURP, 2013, PROP REV CANTH 2030
   Solomon S, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: THE PHYSICAL SCIENCE BASIS, P1
   Sutton-Grier AE, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V51, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.006
   Tabacchi E, 2000, HYDROL PROCESS, V14, P2959, DOI 10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2959::AID-HYP129>3.0.CO;2-B
   Thy Pham Thi Mai, 2010, Geoinformatics, V21, P147, DOI 10.6010/geoinformatics.21.147
   Trogrlic RS, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10050553
   *VIETN NETH COORP, 2011, MEK DELT PLAN SYNTH
   Xiang WN, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.008
NR 52
TC 12
Z9 12
U1 12
U2 76
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1083-8155
EI 1573-1642
J9 URBAN ECOSYST
JI Urban Ecosyst.
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 23
IS 3
BP 675
EP 687
DI 10.1007/s11252-020-00941-3
EA FEB 2020
PG 13
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences; Urban
   Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban
   Studies
GA LL6ZL
UT WOS:000516179200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mendizabal, M
   Heidrich, O
   Feliu, E
   García-Blanco, G
   Mendizabal, A
AF Mendizabal, Maddalen
   Heidrich, Oliver
   Feliu, Efren
   Garcia-Blanco, Gemma
   Mendizabal, Alaitz
TI Stimulating urban transition and transformation to achieve sustainable
   and resilient cities
SO RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
LA English
DT Review
DE Transition; Transformation; Triggers of change; Barriers; Climate change
   adaptation; Conceptual framework
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; DEJA-VU; PATHWAYS;
   MANAGEMENT; POLICY; TECHNOLOGY; COMPLEXITY; MITIGATION; BARRIERS
AB Political decision-makers need to consider the various challenges and opportunities that climate change can bring, and they must take decisions under high uncertainty to achieve resilient cities. Here, we synthesise the push and pull approaches reported in the literature and employed in practice to achieve sustainable and resilient cities.
   First, we present a literature review which identified the major research fields on transition theories, frameworks and methods that underpin this concept. We analyse the conditions for change, identify enablers or triggers for change at governance level for transitioning a city towards sustainability and resilience. We discuss the theories, frameworks and methods which can be used to address the urban climate change challenge at city level.
   Second, we present an empirical approach based on stakeholder participation that we conducted to detect the conditions for change. We report on the design and implementation of stakeholder exercises that helped us detecting the conditions for changes.
   Third, we combine the information obtained from these stakeholder exercises with that extracted from the literature in order to provide a fuller picture on how stimulate the transition and transformation to achieve sustainable and resilient cities. Based on our literature review and empirical approach, we formulate an integrated conceptual model for transition that enables the design of adaptation (and mitigation) strategies that consider the triggers of change. Uniquely we identified 8 triggers of change, including authority and political leadership, learning from disasters, co-responsibility, increased public-private interface, social participation and the living lab approach to innovation. The proposed model can be applied to the whole city or to a certain sector of the city (e.g. energy). We demonstrate that triggers of change help to overcome planning and implementation barriers and move the socio-ecological and socio-technical systems of any city towards those of a resilient city.
C1 [Mendizabal, Maddalen; Feliu, Efren; Garcia-Blanco, Gemma] Tecnalia Res & Innovat, Tecnalia Energy & Environm Div, Edificio 700,Parque Tecnol Bizkaia, E-48160 Derio, Spain.
   [Heidrich, Oliver] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England.
   [Heidrich, Oliver] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England.
   [Heidrich, Oliver] Newcastle Univ, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England.
   [Mendizabal, Alaitz] Univ Basque Country, Financial Econ Dept 2, Plaza Onati 1, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Spain.
   [Mendizabal, Maddalen] Edificio 700,Parque Tecnol Bizkaia, E-48160 Derio, Spain.
C3 Newcastle University - UK; Newcastle University - UK; Newcastle
   University - UK; University of Basque Country
RP Mendizabal, M (corresponding author), Edificio 700,Parque Tecnol Bizkaia, E-48160 Derio, Spain.
EM maddalen.mendizabal@tecnalia.com
OI Heidrich, Oliver/0000-0002-6581-5572; Feliu Torres,
   Efren/0000-0003-1205-4885; Garcia Blanco, Gemma/0000-0002-7835-4373
FU European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (Project RAMSES
   "Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and Sustainable Development for
   Cities") [308497]; European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation
   programme (RESIN-Climate Resilient Cities and Infrastructures project)
   [653522]; H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [653522] Funding Source:
   H2020 Societal Challenges Programme
FX We thank the participants in the stakeholders' dialogue, who have played
   a crucial role in this research. They worked hard in the SD, for which
   we are very grateful. We also thank the ICLEI for organising the event
   so well and achieving high attendance. This work was supported by the
   European Community's Seventh Framework Programme: Grant Agreement No.
   308497, Project RAMSES "Reconciling Adaptation, Mitigation and
   Sustainable Development for Cities", 2012-2017. In addition, this study
   has received partial funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020
   research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 653522
   (RESIN-Climate Resilient Cities and Infrastructures project).
CR Adger WN, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V93, P335, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z
   Ali G, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V26, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.042
   [Anonymous], 2012, How To Make Cities More Resilient: A Handbook For Local Government Leaders
   [Anonymous], COMMUNITY ARENA COCR
   [Anonymous], 2003, SUSTAIN DEV
   Bassett TJ, 2013, GEOFORUM, V48, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.010
   Biesbroek GR, 2013, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V13, P1119, DOI 10.1007/s10113-013-0421-y
   BLOESCH J, 2015, PROBL EKOROZW, V10, P7
   Bosello F., 2012, Climate change, adaptation
   Burch S, 2014, CLIM POLICY, V14, P467, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2014.876342
   Burch S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P287, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
   Butler JRA, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.004
   Cajot S, 2015, ENRGY PROCED, V78, P3366, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.752
   Carter JG, 2015, PROG PLANN, V95, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2013.08.001
   Chaffin BC, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06824-190356
   De Stefano L, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V195, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.042
   Drift, 2011, URB TRANS MAN MAN NA
   Fath BD, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07467-200224
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Frantzeskaki N., 2012, GUIDANCE MANUAL KEY
   Frantzeskaki N, 2009, FUTURES, V41, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2009.04.009
   Garmestani AS, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05180-180109
   Grin John, 2010, Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson L, 2006, POLICY SCI, V39, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11077-006-9027-2
   Haasnoot M, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006
   Heidrich O, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V168, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
   Holling CS, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P390, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
   Hoppe T, 2015, ENERGY SUSTAIN SOC, V5, DOI 10.1186/s13705-015-0047-7
   Jano-Ito MA, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V55, P567, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.153
   Karpouzoglou T, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V57, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.011
   Kates RW, 2012, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V109, P7156, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1115521109
   Kenny J., 2014, PRACT RESP CLIM CHAN, P26
   Klein RJT, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P899
   Leck H, FOSTERING MULTISCALA, DOI [10.1177/0042098012461675, DOI 10.1177/0042098012461675]
   Lenk S, 2017, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V17, P765, DOI 10.5194/nhess-17-765-2017
   Loorbach D, 2010, GOVERNANCE, V23, P161, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Lorenz S, 2014, GEOFORUM, V51, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.003
   Marcus J, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V16, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.012
   Markard J, 2012, RES POLICY, V41, P955, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Masson V, 2014, URBAN CLIM, V10, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2014.03.004
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Mendizabal M., 2017, TRANSITION HDB THIS
   Mimura N, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P869
   Moallemi EA, 2014, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V33, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.006
   Moser SC, 2010, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V107, P22026, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1007887107
   Nevens F, 2013, J CLEAN PROD, V50, P111, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   OSTROM E, 1992, AM POLIT SCI REV, V86, P404, DOI 10.2307/1964229
   Park SE, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.003
   Paschen JA, 2014, RES POLICY, V43, P1083, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.006
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P1
   Pietrapertosa F, 2018, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V81, P3041, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.116
   Quist JN, 2013, SUSTAIN CONSUM TRANS
   Reckien D, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0135597
   Reeder T, EXPERT PERSPECT SER
   Reimer MH, 2012, P 3 INT C SUST TRANS, P29
   Rijke J, 2013, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V25, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.09.012
   Romero-Lankao P, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P358, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.008
   Roorda C., 2012, Transition management in urban context-guidance manual, collaborative evaluation version
   Roorda C., 2014, Transition management in the urban context: guidance manual
   Rosenzweig Cynthia., 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE CITIE
   Rotmans JR., 2001, FORESIGHT J FUTURE S, V3, P15, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14636680110803003, 10.1108/14636680110803003]
   Schapke N, 2011, FDN COMMON APPROACH
   Sharifi A, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V60, P1654, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.028
   Shaw A, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.002
   Shum KL, 2017, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V73, P1380, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.005
   Smith A, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Smith A, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Smith P, 2008, SOCIOLOGICA, DOI 10.2383/26565
   Stringer LC, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Terenzi A., 2015, RAMSES STAKEHOLDER D
   Timmermans JS, 2015, P 36 IAHR WORLD C HA
   Turnheim B, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P239, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010
   United Nations Department of Economic Social Affairs (UN DESA), 2014, WORLD URB PROSP
   US DoI (U.S. Department of the Interior), 2012, ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
   Vergragt PJ, 2011, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V78, P747, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010
   Walker BJA, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P2250, DOI 10.1177/0042098014544759
   Walker RV, 2017, ENVIRON DEV, V21, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2016.11.006
   Westley F., 2002, PANARCHY UNDERST TRA, P334
   Willows R, 2003, UK CLIMATE IMPACTS P
   Wise RM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
   Yuan JH, 2012, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V16, P5660, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.046
NR 82
TC 64
Z9 66
U1 10
U2 159
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 1364-0321
EI 1879-0690
J9 RENEW SUST ENERG REV
JI Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.
PD OCT
PY 2018
VL 94
BP 410
EP 418
DI 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.003
PG 9
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Energy & Fuels
GA GV7MF
UT WOS:000446310000030
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Monstadt, J
   Coutard, O
AF Monstadt, Jochen
   Coutard, Olivier
TI Cities in an era of interfacing infrastructures: Politics and
   spatialities of the urban nexus
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE environment; sustainability; governance; green; infrastructure;
   politics; resilient and smart cities; technology; smart cities; urban
   and infrastructural change
ID SPLINTERING URBANISM; LOCAL-AUTHORITIES; ENERGY; WATER; TECHNOLOGY;
   POLICY; WASTE; TRANSITIONS; ELECTRICITY; RETHINKING
AB Over the last few years, nexus-thinking has become a buzzword in urban research and practice. This also applies to recent claims of greater integration or coordination of urban infrastructures that have traditionally been managed separately and have been unbundled. The idea is to better address their growing sociotechnical complexity, their externalities and their operation within an urban system of systems. This article introduces a collection of case studies aimed at critically appraising how concepts of nexus and infrastructure integration have become guiding visions for the development of green, resilient or smart cities. It assesses how concepts of nexus and calls for higher interconnectivity and 'co-management' within and across infrastructure domains often forestall more politically informed discussions and downplay potential risks and institutional restrictions. Based on an urban political and sociotechnical approach, the introduction to this special issue centres around four major research gaps: 1) the tensions between calls for infrastructure re-bundling and the urban trends and realities driven by infrastructure restructuring since the 1990s; 2) the existing boundary work in cities and urban stakeholders' practices in bringing fragmented urban infrastructures together; 3) the politics involved in infrastructural and urban change and in aligning urban infrastructures that often defy managerial rhetoric of resource efficiency, smartness and resilience; and 4) the spatialities at play in infrastructural reconfigurations that selectively promote specific spaces and scales of metabolic autonomy, system operation (and failure), networked interconnectivities and system regulation. We conclude by outlining directions for future research.
C1 [Monstadt, Jochen] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Utrecht, Netherlands.
   [Coutard, Olivier] Ecole Natl Ponts & Chausse, LATTS, Champs Sur Marne, France.
C3 Utrecht University; Universite Gustave-Eiffel; Institut Polytechnique de
   Paris; Ecole des Ponts ParisTech; Centre National de la Recherche
   Scientifique (CNRS)
RP Monstadt, J (corresponding author), Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, Fac Geosci, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
EM j.monstadt@uu.nl
RI Monstadt, Jochen/AAE-5440-2022
OI Coutard, Olivier/0000-0002-3064-5526; Monstadt,
   Jochen/0000-0001-9146-1571
FU German Research Foundation (DFG) [MO 1804/6-1]; French National Research
   Agency [ANR-14-CE22-0013]; Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
   [ANR-14-CE22-0013] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche
   (ANR)
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The work
   on the special issue and this article was supported by a grant from the
   German Research Foundation (DFG, MO 1804/6-1) and by the French National
   Research Agency (ANR-14-CE22-0013).
CR Affolderbach J, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P1942, DOI 10.1177/0042098015583784
   Amin Ash., 2002, CITIES REIMAGINING U
   Anand Nikhil., 2017, HYDRAULIC CITY WATER
   [Anonymous], SERVICES EAU AFRIQUE
   [Anonymous], 2009, 09141 HARV BUS SCH
   Brenner N., 2014, Implosions/ Explosions. Towards a study of planetary urbanization, P14
   Broto VC, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2261, DOI 10.1177/0042098018815600
   Bulkeley H., 2011, Cities and the low carbon transition
   Cairns R, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V64, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.007
   Castells M., 1996, Rise of The Network Society
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Choay Francoise., 1994, La Ville: Art et architecture en Europe 1870-1993, P26
   Collier SJ, 2008, ENVIRON PLANN D, V26, P7, DOI 10.1068/d446t
   Cousins JJ, 2015, GEOFORUM, V58, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.011
   Coutard O., 2016, Beyond the networked city: infrastructure reconfigurations and urban change in the North and South
   Coutard O, 2007, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V32, P713, DOI 10.1177/0162243907303600
   Coutard O, 2008, GEOFORUM, V39, P1815, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.10.008
   de Bercegol R, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2297, DOI 10.1177/0042098018770592
   Dupuy Gabriel, 2008, Urban Networks-Network Urbanism
   EEA (European Environment Agency), 2015, 252015 EEA
   Florentin D, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2242, DOI 10.1177/0042098018798974
   Frank Susanney., 2006, HYDROPOLIS WASSER ST
   Gandy Matthew., 2006, HIST GEOGRAPHY, V34, P14
   GIZ ICLEI, 2014, OP URB NEXUS RES EFF
   Graham S., 2003, The Cybercities Reader
   Graham S., 2001, SPLINTERING URBANISM
   Graham Stephen., 2010, DISRUPTED CITIES INF, P1
   Graham StephenColin McFarlane., 2015, INFRASTRUCTURAL LIVE
   Guma PK, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2333, DOI 10.1177/0042098018813041
   Hansman RJ, 2006, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V2, P146, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2006.009434
   Hommels A, 2005, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V30, P323, DOI 10.1177/0162243904271759
   Hughes T.P., 1983, NETWORKS POWER ELECT, DOI DOI 10.56021/9780801828737
   Latham A, 2004, PROG HUM GEOG, V28, P701, DOI 10.1191/0309132504ph515oa
   Lenhart J, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V107, P593, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.026
   Little RG, 2002, J URBAN TECHNOL, V9, P109, DOI 10.1080/106307302317379855
   Loftus A, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2280, DOI 10.1177/0042098017736713
   Lorrain L, 2018, VILLES SOBRES NOUVEA
   Lovins Amory., 2001, Brittle Power: Energy Policy for National Security
   Luque A, 2014, SUSTAINABLE CITIES, P75
   Luque-Ayala A., 2016, Energy, Power and Protest on the Urban Grid: Geographies of the Electric City, V1st
   Luque-Ayala A, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P2105, DOI 10.1177/0042098015577319
   Macrorie R, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2207, DOI 10.1177/0042098018812728
   Medd W., 2005, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V13, P44, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2005.00455.X
   Melosi M.V., 2000, The Sanitary City: Urban Infrastructure in America from Colonial Times to the Present
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2353, DOI 10.1177/0042098018808483
   Monstadt J, 2017, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V41, P104, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12436
   Monstadt J, 2015, ENERG POLICY, V78, P213, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.10.022
   Monstadt J, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN A, V41, P1924, DOI 10.1068/a4145
   Moss T, 2000, J URBAN TECHNOL, V7, P63, DOI 10.1080/713684106
   Moss T, 2018, URBAN STUD, V56, P2224
   Odendaal N, 2011, URBAN STUD, V48, P2375, DOI 10.1177/0042098010388951
   Offner JM, 2000, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V24, P165, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.00241
   RAFFESTIN C., 1980, Pour une Geographie du Pouvoir
   Rohracher H, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2372, DOI 10.1177/0042098018815618
   Rutherford J, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P2389, DOI 10.1080/00420980500379529
   Rutherford J, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P1449, DOI 10.1177/0042098013500088
   Rutherford J, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P1353, DOI 10.1177/0042098013500090
   Scheinberg A, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P188, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.08.004
   Schramm S, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2315, DOI 10.1177/0042098018797844
   Scott C.A., 2015, GOVERNING NEXUS WATE, P15, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05747-7_2, 10.1007/978-3-319-05747-7.pdf, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-05747-72]
   Shove E., 2018, INFRASTRUCTURES PRAC
   Stein Christian., 2014, Governance of the nexus: from buzz words to a strategic action perspective
   Vertesi J, 2014, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V39, P264, DOI 10.1177/0162243913516012
   Williams JD, 2014, PREPARING TO TEACH WRITING: RESEARCH, THEORY, AND PRACTICE, 4TH EDITION, P1
   Williams J, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V37, P652, DOI 10.1177/0263774X18803370
   Wilts H, 2016, NACHHALTIGE INNOVATI
NR 66
TC 39
Z9 41
U1 6
U2 42
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD AUG
PY 2019
VL 56
IS 11
SI SI
BP 2191
EP 2206
DI 10.1177/0042098019833907
PG 16
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA IK3ZR
UT WOS:000476527400001
OA hybrid, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Laeni, N
   van den Brink, M
   Arts, J
AF Laeni, Naim
   van den Brink, Margo
   Arts, Jos
TI Institutional Conditions for Inclusive, Flood Resilient Urban Deltas: A
   Comparative Institutional Analysis of Two International Resilience
   Programs in Southeast Asia
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE flood resilience; inclusive flood resilience; institutional analysis;
   institutional conditions; rules; international programs; southeast Asia
ID POLITICAL ECOLOGY; WATER GOVERNANCE; DUTCH; MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION;
   FRAMEWORK; CITIES; DESIGN
AB Policy makers in Southeast Asian flood-vulnerable regions are confronted with various institutional challenges when planning for inclusive flood resilience. This paper focuses on the role of international resilience programs and investigates how these programs can enable institutional transformation. The key question is which institutional conditions promote the development and implementation of inclusive flood resilience strategies by international resilience programs. The Mekong Delta Plan in Vietnam (MDP) and the Water as Leverage for Resilient Cities Asia (WaL) program in Semarang, Indonesia, are selected as the cases for a comparative analysis. To structure the comparative analysis of these programs, the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework is adopted and operationalized for the institutional analysis of inclusive flood resilience planning. The findings illustrate that whereas the MDP was able to involve decision makers from the national government and international financial institutions for mobilizing funding and technical support, the strength of the WaL program was its enabling environment for the cocreation of context-specific flood resilience proposals. Overall, this study concludes that the institutional conditions that enable project financing and the implementation of long-term and integrated flood resilience solutions are determined by engagement with national governments and by ownership of the solutions at both the national and local levels.
C1 [Laeni, Naim; van den Brink, Margo; Arts, Jos] Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, Landleven 1, NL-9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands.
C3 University of Groningen
RP Laeni, N (corresponding author), Univ Groningen, Fac Spatial Sci, Dept Spatial Planning & Environm, Landleven 1, NL-9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands.
EM n.laeni@rug.nl; m.a.van.den.brink@rug.nl; jos.arts@rug.nl
RI Laeni, Naim/GQI-0621-2022
OI van den Brink, Margo/0000-0001-8247-3044; Arts, Jos/0000-0002-6896-3992;
   Laeni, Naim/0000-0003-1683-589X
CR Alexander M, 2018, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V18, P397, DOI 10.1007/s10113-017-1195-4
   Alexander M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V64, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.004
   Anderies JM, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P130, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
   Andersson K, 2009, PUBLIC ADMIN DEVELOP, V29, P341, DOI 10.1002/pad.552
   Cascading Semarang, 2018, CASC SEMR STEPS INCL
   Clement F, 2010, POLICY SCI, V43, P129, DOI 10.1007/s11077-009-9100-8
   Dai LP, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P652, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1372273
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Driessen PPJ, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10111595
   Driessen PPJ, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08921-210453
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Furedi F, 2008, SOC POLICY ADMIN, V42, P645, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00629.x
   Gersonius B, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08752-210428
   Government of the Netherlands, 2019, CLIM AGR HAG
   Government of The Netherlands Government of Vietnam, 2013, MEK DELT PLAN
   Handayani W, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101073
   Hasan S, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1583, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1592745
   Hegger DLT, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   Hijdra A, 2015, TRANSPORT POLICY, V42, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.05.004
   Vo HTM, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1454, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1571328
   Keil R, 2005, URBAN GEOGR, V26, P640, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.26.7.640
   Korbee D, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P1545, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1623014
   Kuang D, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V271, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111025
   Laeni N, 2021, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V23, P16, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792858
   Laeni N., 2021, Climate Resilient Urban Areas, P155, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_8, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_8]
   Laeni N, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su122310104
   Lebel L, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Lebel L, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0118-4
   Leverage W.A, 2019, WAT LEV TEAM APPR FA
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Lochhead H, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V180, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.160
   Marks D, 2020, INT DEV PLANN REV, V42, P273, DOI 10.3828/idpr.2019.7
   Marks D, 2015, PAC AFF, V88, P623, DOI 10.5509/2015883623
   Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2017, MEK DELT INT CLIM RE
   Mobilia M, 2017, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V10406, P455, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_32
   Molenveld A, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11122563
   Mullenite J, 2016, GEOGR COMPASS, V10, P378, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12279
   One Resilient Semarang, 2018, ON RES SEM
   Ostrom E, 1999, ANNU REV POLIT SCI, V2, P493, DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493
   Ostrom E., 2002, SIDA STUDIES EVALUAT, V2
   Ostrom E, 2010, AM ECON REV, V100, P641, DOI 10.1257/aer.100.3.641
   Ostrom E, 2011, J I ECON, V7, P317, DOI 10.1017/S1744137410000305
   Ostrom E, 2011, POLICY STUD J, V39, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2013, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V5, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009
   Restemeyer B, 2015, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V16, P45, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Rosenzweig BR, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1302
   Seijger C, 2019, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V19, P1131, DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01464-0
   Sörensen J, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8080332
   Spijkerboer RC, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V209, P1593, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.008
   van den Brink M, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V186, P13, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.018
   van den Hurk M, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V36, P416, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.017
   van Geet MT, 2019, TRANSPORT POLICY, V73, P84, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.001
   van Staveren MF, 2018, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V20, P267, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1348287
   Vinke K., 2017, REGION RISK HUMAN DI
   Vitale C, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104575
   Water as Leverage, WAT LEV RES CIT AS
   Weger J, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V100, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.011
   Wesselink A, 2015, INT J WATER GOV, V3, P25, DOI 10.7564/15-IJWG90
   Wiering M, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V44, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.006
   World Bank, 2019, TRANSF VIETN AGR GAI
NR 60
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 2
U2 18
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD SEP
PY 2021
VL 13
IS 18
AR 2478
DI 10.3390/w13182478
PG 22
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA UW1PU
UT WOS:000699937700001
OA gold, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ji, ZY
   Huang, YT
AF Ji, Zhiying
   Huang, Yuting
TI Does digital transformation promote economic resilience? Urban-level
   evidence from China
SO HELIYON
LA English
DT Article
DE Digital transformation; Economic resilience; Mechanisms
ID ORGANIZATIONAL RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; NETWORKING
AB Improving economic resilience has become a regional development goal of policymakers. This study aims to investigate the effects of digital transformation on urban economic resilience and its underlying mechanisms. Based on a sample of 287 prefecture -level cities in China, We find that digital transformation helps improve urban economic resilience, which is robust to different estimations, e.g., 2SLS and staggered DID. Additionally, further analysis indicates that improving the efficiency and stimulating the level of innovation that is associated with digital transformation are likely to be the main mechanisms behind this effect. Our results reveal the following several policy implications. Firstly, formulating policies to develop digital technology and to promote its application is of great significance for achieving a sustainable and resilient economic growth in an increasingly uncertain environment. Secondly, the government should focus on promoting market -oriented reform, reducing government intervention, protecting intellectual property rights, and creating an innovative environment to maximize the effect of digital technology. Thirdly, during the normal periods, accelerating the digitalization process will promote the balanced development among urbans.
C1 [Ji, Zhiying; Huang, Yuting] Shanghai Univ, SILC Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
C3 Shanghai University
RP Ji, ZY (corresponding author), Shanghai Univ, SILC Business Sch, Shanghai, Peoples R China.
EM jizhiying@shu.edu.cn
FU National Social Science Fund of China [22BJY061]
FX The work is fully supported by the National Social Science Fund of China
   (No. 22BJY061) .
CR Abidi N, 2023, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102522
   Al-Hakimi MA, 2021, HELIYON, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08145
   Baker AC, 2022, J FINANC ECON, V144, P370, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.01.004
   Belhadi A, 2022, INT J PROD ECON, V249, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108516
   Berger ESC, 2021, J BUS RES, V125, P436, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.020
   Briguglio L, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P229, DOI 10.1080/13600810903089893
   Castro GD, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V280, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204
   Cette G, 2022, ECON INNOV NEW TECH, V31, P669, DOI 10.1080/10438599.2020.1849967
   Chaurasia SS, 2020, J KNOWL MANAG, V24, P2491, DOI 10.1108/JKM-04-2020-0319
   Chen YT, 2022, J BUS RES, V139, P1138, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.050
   Christopherson S, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P3, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
   Corodescu-Rosca E, 2023, CITIES, V132, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104090
   de Treville S, 2017, J OPER MANAG, V49-51, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jom.2017.02.001
   Delavari V, 2020, J ENTERP INF MANAG, V33, P161, DOI 10.1108/JEIM-02-2019-0034
   Di Vaio A, 2020, J BUS RES, V121, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019
   Doran J, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P644, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1088642
   Dormady NC, 2022, INT J PROD ECON, V244, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108371
   Du YA, 2023, INT REV FINANC ANAL, V88, DOI 10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102709
   Duan WQ, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121944
   Dzator J, 2023, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102524
   Eckstein D, 2015, INT J PROD RES, V53, P3028, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2014.970707
   ElMassah S, 2020, ECOL ECON, V169, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106490
   Enerlan GP, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V84, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103447
   Ezcurra R, 2019, PAP REG SCI, V98, P1267, DOI 10.1111/pirs.12417
   Gaglio C, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V182, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121785
   Gal P., 2019, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, V1533
   Ghazy N, 2022, TECHNOL SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102052
   Goodman-Bacon A, 2021, J ECONOMETRICS, V225, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
   Guandalini I, 2022, J BUS RES, V148, P456, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003
   Guo F, 2022, CHINA ECON REV, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101722
   Haller SA, 2015, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V39, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.10.003
   Hausmann R, 2007, J ECON GROWTH, V12, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4
   Hou SY, 2023, HELIYON, V9, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21086
   Hu XH, 2022, CITIES, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103440
   Huang Q., 2019, China Ind. Econ, V8, P5, DOI [10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.08.001, DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2019.08.001]
   Iansiti M, 2014, HARVARD BUS REV, V92, P90
   Islam S.M., 2022, J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, V18, pe00347, DOI [10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00347, DOI 10.1016/J.JBVI.2022.E00347]
   Ji ZY, 2020, J CLEAN PROD, V267, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122136
   Jiang YW, 2019, INT J TOUR RES, V21, P882, DOI 10.1002/jtr.2312
   Lai C., 2011, Evaluation of Energy Saving and Emission Reduction of Anhui Based on Variance Coefficient Approach, China Population, Resources and Environment
   Nguyen LTM, 2021, CHINA FINANC REV INT, V11, P349, DOI 10.1108/CFRI-12-2020-0177
   Lazaroiu G, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12187705
   Lazaroiu G, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12052110
   Levinsohn J, 2003, REV ECON STUD, V70, P317, DOI 10.1111/1467-937X.00246
   Li CY, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V80, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101269
   Li RR, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V85, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103890
   Ma XY, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V434, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140079
   Mafabi S, 2015, INT J ORGAN ANAL, V23, P564, DOI 10.1108/IJOA-07-2012-0596
   Martin R, 2016, REG STUD, V50, P561, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Matt DT, 2023, EUR MANAG J, V41, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.emj.2022.01.001
   Mileti D., 1999, DISASTERS DESIGN REA, DOI DOI 10.17226/5782
   Nica E, 2023, MATHEMATICS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/math11091981
   Nunn N, 2014, AM ECON REV, V104, P1630, DOI 10.1257/aer.104.6.1630
   Olley GS, 1996, ECONOMETRICA, V64, P1263, DOI 10.2307/2171831
   Paiola M, 2021, J BUS RES, V132, P507, DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.047
   Pal R, 2014, INT J PROD ECON, V147, P410, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.031
   Petach L, 2021, J BANK FINANC, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106077
   Reggiani A., 2002, Networks and Spatial Economics, V2, P211, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1015377515690, 10.1023/A:1015377515690]
   Rose A, 2011, ENVIRON INNOV SOC TR, V1, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.003
   Scuotto V, 2017, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V42, P409, DOI 10.1007/s10961-016-9517-0
   Shi CC, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V372, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133737
   Shin I, 2006, SMALL BUS ECON, V26, P241, DOI 10.1007/s11187-005-0215-9
   Si YF, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2194, DOI 10.1111/grow.12555
   Simione F., 2021, IMF Working Pap., V2021, P1, DOI [10.5089/9781513582542.001, DOI 10.5089/9781513582542.001]
   Skare M, 2024, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V199, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123045
   Soufi HR, 2022, SOCIO-ECON PLAN SCI, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101101
   Stewart R., 2021, J Econ Asymmetries, V24, pe00218, DOI [10.1016/j.jeca.2021.e00218, DOI 10.1016/J.JECA.2021.E00218]
   Talwar S, 2021, INT J PROD RES, V59, P3509, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2020.1868599
   Tan JT, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
   U. Nations, SUSTAINABLE DEV GOAL
   Wang Q, 2024, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2023.102699
   Wang Q, 2025, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V36, P1005, DOI 10.1177/0958305X231220520
   Wang Q, 2024, SUSTAIN DEV, V32, P1700, DOI 10.1002/sd.2743
   Wang Q, 2024, GEOSCI FRONT, V15, DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101644
   Wang Q, 2025, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V36, P729, DOI 10.1177/0958305X231183914
   Wang Q, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123838
   Wei W, 2020, ECON MODEL, V91, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.econmod.2019.12.022
   Wintoki MB, 2012, J FINANC ECON, V105, P581, DOI 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005
   Wu L, 2020, MANAGE SCI, V66, P2017, DOI 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3281
   Xie SH, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V434, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140123
   Yi X., 2018, Journal of Financial Research, V461, P47
   Yu FF, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V414, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137645
   Zhao Y., 2018, MODERN EC MANAGE FOR, V15, P504
   Zhou Q, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104983
   Zoppelletto A, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V179, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121645
NR 86
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 30
U2 94
PU CELL PRESS
PI CAMBRIDGE
PA 50 HAMPSHIRE ST, FLOOR 5, CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 USA
EI 2405-8440
J9 HELIYON
JI Heliyon
PD FEB 29
PY 2024
VL 10
IS 4
AR e26461
DI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26461
EA FEB 2024
PG 16
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA ML8R6
UT WOS:001193873600001
PM 38420385
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mukherjee, M
   Takara, K
AF Mukherjee, Mahua
   Takara, Kaoru
TI Urban green space as a countermeasure to increasing urban risk and the
   UGS-3CC resilience framework
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban green space; Green resilient infrastructure; Ecosystem services;
   Urban risk resilience; Urban climate resiliency model; UGS-3CC
   resilience framework
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BENEFITS
AB Urban green space is an asset to a city. It facilitates social interactions, health and wellbeing, recreation and alternate livelihoods. If created, nurtured and enhanced, urban green space can extend the resilience and security of energy, health, water, food, and biodiversity systems. Urban green spaces are an alternative or complementary alternative to engineered infrastructure to ameliorate quality of life and can attenuate urban heat island (UHI) impact and improve urban water management significantly. Performance-based monitoring can evaluate the efficiency of urban green spaces as a measure against heat and water stress. Increasing vulnerability exposes a large number of urban populations and assets to risks. Urban green spaces, when networked with other blue-green spaces, show improved efficiency as an urban risk resiliency (URR) measure. Despite its potential as a URR tool, the deployment of urban green spaces is quite limited, especially in developing countries. Challenges include a lack of integrated strategies, green-engineering design and instrumented monitoring, management best practices and incentives to change. This article reviews urban green space types and their resilience capacity and proposes the UGS-3CC framework, which is an urban climate resiliency model based on blue-green networking.
   The framework responds to the design, implementation and management challenges of urban green spaces by using a contextual concept, core competency and contribution calculation.
C1 [Mukherjee, Mahua] IIT Roorkee, Dept Architecture & Planning, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh, India.
   [Takara, Kaoru] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto, Japan.
C3 Indian Institute of Technology System (IIT System); Indian Institute of
   Technology (IIT) - Roorkee; Kyoto University
RP Mukherjee, M (corresponding author), IIT Roorkee, Dept Architecture & Planning, Roorkee, Uttar Pradesh, India.
EM mahuafap@iitr.ac.in; takara.kaoru.7v@kyoto-u.ac.jp
RI Takara, Kaoru/AAR-5083-2020
CR ADB, 2015, Green city development tool kit
   Ahern J., 2007, CITIES FUTURE INTEGR, P267, DOI 10.2166/9781780405308
   Akbari H, 2001, SOL ENERGY, V70, P295, DOI 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00089-X
   [Anonymous], 2010, OPEN ATMOS SCI J, DOI DOI 10.2174/1874282301004010088
   [Anonymous], 2012, ATLAS HLTH CLIMATE, P40
   Berko Jeffrey, 2014, Natl Health Stat Report, P1
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Chen WY, 2010, GEOGR J, V176, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00358.x
   CORRELL MR, 1978, LAND ECON, V54, P207, DOI 10.2307/3146234
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   De Ridder K, 2015, URBAN CLIM, V12, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2015.01.001
   De U., 2013, J Ind Geophys Union, V17, P153
   Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (Defra), 2020, BIOD 2020 STRAT ENGL
   Ely M., 2014, Green Infrastructure, Botanic Gardens of South Australia
   European Commission, 2012, MULT FUNCT GREEN INF
   Field C.B., 2012, SPECIAL REPORT IPCC
   Huttner S., 2008, Ber Meteor Inst Albert-Ludwigs-Univ Freiburg, V18, P307
   Jha A. K., 2012, CITIES FLOODING GUID, P27
   Jim CY, 2006, ENVIRON MANAGE, V38, P338, DOI 10.1007/s00267-005-0166-6
   KANTER RM, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P151
   Kato S., 2011, J 2011 INT S CITY PL, V2011, P161
   Kazemi F, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V101, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.006
   Kong F., 2005, J. Int. Dev. Coop., V11, P97, DOI DOI 10.15027/29763
   Konijnendijk C.C., 2013, A report for IPFRA, V70, P1
   Louv R., 2008, Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder
   Mayer P, 2010, NATURE, V467, P153, DOI 10.1038/467153b
   McHarg I. L., 1979, DESIGN NATURE
   McKenna D., REPORT EUROPEAN COMM
   MEA, 2020, MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM
   Meiklejohn K., 2010, HABITAT CORRIDORS LA
   Mishra V, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024005
   Morris J., 2010, EC ASSESSMENT FRESHW
   Mukherjee M., 2015, P 6 ANN C INT SOC IN
   Murari KK, 2015, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V15, P569, DOI 10.1007/s10113-014-0660-6
   Naumann S, 2011, 0703072010577182ETUF
   NDMA, 2010, NAT DIS MAN GUID MAN, P40
   NOAA, 2015, SUMM HEAT WAV ARR EU
   Oke, 1987, BOUNDARY LAYER CLIMA, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203407219
   Pataki DE, 2011, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V9, P27, DOI 10.1890/090220
   PAYNE L, 1998, ANN M GER SOC AM PHI
   Pyke C, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V103, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.006
   Ruedy R., 2012, NEW CLIMATE DICE PUB
   Scalenghe R, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V90, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.011
   Souch C. A., 1993, Journal of Arboriculture, V19, P303
   Takara K., 2015, LIVING LAND, P115
   TEEB, 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach. Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015, SENDAI FRAMEWORK DIS, DOI A/CONF.224/CRP.1
   Walker C., 2004, The public value of urban parks
   Wolf K. L., P 11 NAT URB FOR C W, P141
   Wong NH, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P353, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00108-1
   Zhang BA, 2012, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V100, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.015
   Zhou XL, 2012, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V23, P173, DOI 10.1108/14777831211204921
   Zwiers FW, 2011, J CLIMATE, V24, P881, DOI 10.1175/2010JCLI3908.1
NR 54
TC 35
Z9 41
U1 39
U2 253
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JUN
PY 2018
VL 28
BP 854
EP 861
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.027
PG 8
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA GD1TK
UT WOS:000430284000079
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ho, S
   Baptista, MD
   McEvoy, D
AF Ho, Serene
   Baptista, Mariana Dias
   McEvoy, Darryn
TI Community profiling to support inclusive urban community-based climate
   adaptation: experiences of a survey-based approach in urban informal
   settlements in Honiara, Solomon Islands
SO CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban climate resilience; community-based adaptation; community
   profiling; surveys; urban informal settlements; Solomon Islands; Pacific
ID CHANGE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES; RESILIENCE
AB Urban centres in the Pacific region are fast growing, with cities presenting as complex sites of risk and vulnerability. Within these cities, urban informal settlement communities are often some of the most vulnerable to climate change and impacts and urban climate planning needs to explicitly consider the priority needs of these often-marginalized communities if strategies are to be equitable. Hence, inclusive urban community-based adaptation is now a critical component of overall adaptation. In support of this important urban agenda, this paper describes a community profiling method that was developed to elicit key contextual data in support of locally appropriate climate action planning for informal settlements in Honiara, the capital city of Solomon Islands. The paper details the methodology that was developed, and uses a sample dataset to demonstrate the breadth and richness of the constructed community profile and the insights it reveals about community vulnerabilities. The paper argues that the proposed community profiling method offers organizations and practitioners invested in local engagement a practical tool to inform locally driven, climate resilient urban planning and development and can be translated for use in other Global South contexts.
C1 [Ho, Serene] RMIT Univ, Sch Sci Geospatial Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
   [Baptista, Mariana Dias] Univ Sheffield, Dept Urban Studies, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England.
   [McEvoy, Darryn] RMIT Univ, Sch Engn, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
C3 Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT); University of Sheffield;
   Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT)
RP Ho, S (corresponding author), GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia.
EM serene.ho2@rmit.edu.au
RI McEvoy, Darryn/K-8015-2017; Dias Baptista, Mariana/ITU-5243-2023
OI McEvoy, Darryn/0000-0003-4144-4137; Dias Baptista,
   Mariana/0000-0002-2287-1881
FU UNFCCC Adaptation Fund
FX This work was supported by UNFCCC Adaptation Fund.
CR Adaptation Fund, 2017, PROP SOL ISL
   [Anonymous], 2018, The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response, V4th, P113
   Archer D, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P345, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.918868
   Australian Bureau of Meteorology & CSIRO, 2011, CLIMATE CHANGE PACIF, V2
   Ayers J, 2009, ENVIRONMENT, V51, P22, DOI 10.3200/ENV.51.4.22-31
   Baker JL, 2012, URB DEV SER, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8845-7
   Baum S., 2009, RES MONOGRAPH, V11, P68
   Becker M, 2012, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V80-81, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2011.09.004
   Black R, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, pS3, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.001
   Blackshaw T., 2010, SAGE KEY CONCEPTS SE, P55, DOI https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279076.n8
   Bundnis Entwicklung Hilft & Ruhr University Bochum, 2021, WORLDRISKREPORT 2021
   Cardona OD, 2012, MANAGING THE RISKS OF EXTREME EVENTS AND DISASTERS TO ADVANCE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION, P65
   Carloni A S., 2005, Rapid guide for missions: Analysing local institutions and livelihoods
   Connelly A., 2015, 4 RESIN
   DasGupta R, 2015, J COAST CONSERV, V19, P85, DOI 10.1007/s11852-014-0369-1
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Füssel HM, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002
   Füssel HM, 2006, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V75, P301, DOI 10.1007/s10584-006-0329-3
   Funfgeld H., 2012, LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE
   Gaillard JC, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P218, DOI 10.1002/jid.1675
   Gero A, 2011, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V11, P101, DOI 10.5194/nhess-11-101-2011
   Gibb C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.007
   Green D, 2012, LOCAL ENVIRON, V17, P295, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2012.665857
   Gustafson S, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P152, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2016.1223593
   Hawtin M., 2007, Community Profiling: A practical guide, V2nd
   IPCC, 2018, GLOB WARM 1 5OC I
   Kaijser A, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P417, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2013.835203
   Keen M., 2015, PACIFIC URBANISATION
   Kiddle G., 2016, PRICED OUT MARKET IN
   Kirkby P, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P577, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1372265
   Komugabe-Dixson AF, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100973
   Locke JT, 2009, GEOGR J, V175, P171, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00317.x
   Love S, 2007, J AGRIC EDUC EXT, V13, P177, DOI 10.1080/13892240701427540
   McEvoy D, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P1, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1594666
   Mcleod E, 2018, MAR POLICY, V93, P178, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.011
   McNamara KE, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P628, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0813-1
   Mearns R, 2010, NEW FRONT SOC POLICY, P1
   Mortreux C, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.09.006
   Mpanje D., 2018, Journal of International Humanitarian Action, V3, P1, DOI [10.1186/s41018-018-0032-9, DOI 10.1186/S41018-018-0032-9]
   National Statistics Office, 2020, PROV COUNT 2019 NAT
   Nkem JN, 2013, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V18, P513, DOI 10.1007/s11027-012-9372-8
   O'Brien K, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P73, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639
   O'Brien KL, 2000, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V10, P221, DOI 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2
   Payne G., 2004, KEY CONCEPTS SOCIAL, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781849209397
   Preston BL, 2011, SUSTAIN SCI, V6, P177, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0129-1
   Tan Y, 2015, LOCAL ENVIRON, V20, P1265, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2014.901306
   The Asia Foundation, 2012, CLIM CHANG PERC SURV
   The World Bank, 2018, SOL ISL POV EQ BRIEF
   Toni F, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P575, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.004
   Trundle A., 2016, HONIARA URBAN RESILI
   Trundle A, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P53, DOI 10.1177/0956247818816654
   Twelvetrees, 1991, COMMUNITY WORK, DOI [10.1007/978-1-349-21262-0, DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-21262-0]
   UN Habitat, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE VULNE
   UN-Habitat, 2007, State of Michigan 2006-2007 State Aid Financial Status Report: Payment
   Williams C, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P82, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2476
   ,, 2007, Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Group I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers
NR 56
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 0
U2 17
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1756-5529
EI 1756-5537
J9 CLIM DEV
JI Clim. Dev.
PD APR 21
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 4
BP 325
EP 339
DI 10.1080/17565529.2022.2083547
EA JUN 2022
PG 15
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA J5FZ8
UT WOS:000812881600001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Taylor, Z
   Fitzgibbons, J
   Mitchell, CL
AF Taylor, Zack
   Fitzgibbons, Joanne
   Mitchell, Carrie L.
TI Finding the future in policy discourse: an analysis of city resilience
   plans
SO REGIONAL STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; planning theory; futures; foresight; urban planning practice
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; URBAN RESILIENCE; PLANNING PRACTICE;
   UNCERTAINTY; STRATEGIES; FEAR; DIFFUSION; FRAMEWORK; EMOTIONS; INSIGHTS
AB Managing future uncertainty is the essence of planning. How planners conceptualize the future therefore has important practical and normative implications as contemporary decisions have long-term impacts that may be irreversible and distribute costs and benefits across society. A discourse analysis of strategies prepared under the 100 Resilient Cities programme reveals that while they are ostensibly forward-looking and cognizant of uncertainty, most presume a knowable future (epistemic certainty) and focus on well-understood or recently experienced risks. Few acknowledge the future's inherent unknowability (ontic uncertainty). Those that do emphasize community self-help; others describe top-down, government-led initiatives. Most strategies also present an image of societal consensus, downplaying the potential for legitimate disagreement over means and ends (discursive uncertainty). These findings suggest that new conceptualizations of future uncertainty have had limited impacts on planning practice.
C1 [Taylor, Zack] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Polit Sci, London, ON, Canada.
   [Fitzgibbons, Joanne] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
   [Mitchell, Carrie L.] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
C3 Western University (University of Western Ontario); University of
   British Columbia; University of Waterloo
RP Taylor, Z (corresponding author), Univ Western Ontario, Dept Polit Sci, London, ON, Canada.
EM zack.taylor@uwo.ca; jo.fitzgibbons@ubc.ca; carrie.mitchell@uwaterloo.ca
RI Taylor, Zack/U-1183-2019
OI Fitzgibbons, Joanne/0000-0002-8926-7945; Taylor,
   Zack/0000-0001-9372-2704
FU Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada
   [430-2017-00135]
FX This work was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research
   Council (SSHRC) of Canada [Insight Development Grant number
   430-2017-00135].
CR 100 Resilient Cities, WHAT IS URB RES
   Abbott J, 2005, J PLAN EDUC RES, V24, P237, DOI 10.1177/0739456X04267710
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Aldunce P, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P999, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614734
   [Anonymous], FUTURES
   Arup International Development, 2015, City Resilience Index
   Baumgartner F.R., 2009, AGENDAS INSTABILITY
   Beck U., 1992, RISK SOC NEW MODERNI
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Berkes F, 2007, NAT HAZARDS, V41, P283, DOI 10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
   Birkmann J, 2010, SUSTAIN SCI, V5, P171, DOI 10.1007/s11625-010-0108-y
   Brown K, 2011, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V36, P321, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-052610-092905
   Burch S., 2017, Journal of Extreme Events, V4, P1750003, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737617500038
   Campbell H, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P135, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11436347
   Carmin J., 2013, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, DOI DOI 10.1787/5K3TTG88W8HH-EN
   Carta C, 2018, INT STUD REV, V20, P343, DOI 10.1093/isr/viy020
   Chandler D, 2014, RESILIENCE, V2, P47, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.878544
   CHRISTENSEN KS, 1985, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V51, P63, DOI 10.1080/01944368508976801
   Coaffee J, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P323, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787693
   Cole S, 2001, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V67, P372, DOI 10.1080/01944360108976246
   Corisco F., 2012, FUTURE CITIES REGION, P13
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Cziko G., 1989, EDUC RESEARCHER, V18, P17, DOI [DOI 10.3102/0013189X018003017, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018003017]
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Derr V, 2019, J PLAN EDUC RES, V39, P7, DOI 10.1177/0739456X17723436
   Dircke P, 2015, WATER PRACT TECHNOL, V10, P674, DOI 10.2166/wpt.2015.080
   Drucker P., 2000, The Age of Discontinuity; Guidelines to Our changing Society
   Eraydin A., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, V106, P39, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Fainstein SS, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1268, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1448571
   Fastenrath S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11030693
   Feldman L, 2018, RISK ANAL, V38, P585, DOI 10.1111/risa.12868
   Finucane ML, 2000, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V13, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, DATA BRIEF, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104328
   Fitzgibbons J, 2019, WORLD DEV, V122, P648, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.021
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forrester J. W., 1968, Principles of systems
   Giddens Anthony., 2002, Runaway World: How Globalisation is Reshaping Our Lives
   Gillard R, 2016, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V16, P13, DOI 10.1162/GLEP_a_00334
   GRANOVETTER MS, 1973, AM J SOCIOL, V78, P1360, DOI 10.1086/225469
   Hall P., 1980, GREAT PLANNING DISAS
   Harris LM, 2018, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V6, P196, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Healey P, 2006, RTPI LIB SER, P1
   Healey Pasty., 2006, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, V2nd
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling Crawford S., 1996, ENG ECOLOGICAL CONST, P33
   Hollnagel E., 2006, Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts
   Hopkins L.D., 2007, Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects
   Howlett M, 2014, POLITICS GOV, V2, P57, DOI 10.17645/pag.v2i2.149
   INAYATULLAH S, 1990, FUTURES, V22, P115, DOI 10.1016/0016-3287(90)90077-U
   Innes JE, 1999, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V65, P412, DOI 10.1080/01944369908976071
   ISSERMAN AM, 1985, TOWN PLANN REV, V56, P483, DOI 10.3828/tpr.56.4.g24261722hq10208
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Jon I, 2020, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V21, P94, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2019.1692896
   Joseph J, 2013, RESILIENCE, V1, P38, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.765741
   Kaika M, 2017, ENVIRON URBAN, V29, P89, DOI 10.1177/0956247816684763
   Kato S, 2008, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V51, P543, DOI 10.1080/09640560802117028
   Kingdon John W., 2011, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
   Krippendorff K., 2018, Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology
   Laeni N, 2019, CITIES, V90, P157, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.02.002
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lemp JD, 2008, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V134, P97, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2008)134:3(97)
   LINDBLOM CE, 1959, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V19, P79, DOI 10.2307/973677
   Lipper B., 2016, DEV RESILIENCE STRAT
   Madni AM, 2009, IEEE SYST J, V3, P181, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397
   Marris P., 1987, Meaning and action: Community planning and conceptions of change, V2nd
   Martin Carlos, 2018, Institutionalizing Urban Resilience: A Midterm Monitoring and Evaluation Report of 100 Resilient Cities
   Martin R, 2012, J ECON GEOGR, V12, P1, DOI 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
   Masten AS, 2001, AM PSYCHOL, V56, P227, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227
   Meerow S, 2019, LOCAL ENVIRON, V24, P793, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2019.1645103
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Meijnders AL, 2001, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V31, P754, DOI 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01412.x
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Munn R. E., 1986, Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, P292
   Nabi RL, 2018, SCI COMMUN, V40, P442, DOI 10.1177/1075547018776019
   Olsson P, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11, DOI 10.5751/ES-01595-110118
   Ong AD, 2006, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V91, P730, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.730
   Panteli M, 2017, IEEE SYST J, V11, P1733, DOI 10.1109/JSYST.2015.2389272
   Peck J, 2011, PROG HUM GEOG, V35, P773, DOI 10.1177/0309132510394010
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Perrings C, 1998, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V11, P503, DOI 10.1023/A:1008255614276
   Pizzo B, 2015, CITIES, V43, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.015
   Porter L, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P593, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.731210
   Rhodes RAW., 2008, OXFORD HDB PUBLIC PO
   RITTEL HWJ, 1973, POLICY SCI, V4, P155, DOI 10.1007/BF01405730
   Rocchetta S, 2019, REG STUD, V53, P1421, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1577552
   SABATIER PA, 1988, POLICY SCI, V21, P129, DOI 10.1007/BF00136406
   Sharkansky I., 1999, J COMP POLICY ANAL, V1, P117, DOI [10.1080/13876989808412618, DOI 10.1080/13876989808412618]
   Shipan CR, 2008, AM J POLIT SCI, V52, P840, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
   Skurka C, 2018, J COMMUN, V68, P169, DOI 10.1093/joc/jqx008
   Sorensen A, 2018, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V19, P21, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2017.1408136
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Svitková K, 2018, SOCIOL CAS, V54, P933, DOI 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.436
   Taleb NassimNicholas., 2004, Fooled By Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and the Markets
   Unterterrainer W., 2017, WIT T ECOLOGY ENV, V217, P225, DOI [10.2495/SDP180211, DOI 10.2495/SDP180211]
   van Dijk T.A., 1993, DISCOURSE SOC, V4, P131, DOI DOI 10.1177/0957926593004002001
   Wachs M, 2001, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V67, P367, DOI 10.1080/01944360108976245
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Walker W.E., 2003, Integrated assessment, V4, P5, DOI DOI 10.1076/IAIJ.4.1.5.16466
   WEIR M, 1992, POLIT SCI QUART, V107, P249, DOI 10.2307/2152658
   Westley FR, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05072-180327
   Wilkinson C, 2012, PLAN THEOR, V11, P148, DOI 10.1177/1473095211426274
   WITTE K, 1992, COMMUN MONOGR, V59, P329, DOI 10.1080/03637759209376276
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   Woodruff SC, 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V139, P445, DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1822-y
   Zandvoort M, 2018, PLAN THEOR, V17, P96, DOI 10.1177/1473095216684530
NR 106
TC 15
Z9 18
U1 6
U2 32
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0034-3404
EI 1360-0591
J9 REG STUD
JI Reg. Stud.
PD MAY 4
PY 2021
VL 55
IS 5
SI SI
BP 831
EP 843
DI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1760235
EA MAY 2020
PG 13
WC Economics; Environmental Studies; Geography; Regional & Urban Planning
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Business & Economics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography;
   Public Administration
GA RP5GL
UT WOS:000541284200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Gómez-Villarino, MT
   Ruiz-Garcia, L
AF Gomez-Villarino, Maria Teresa
   Ruiz-Garcia, Luis
TI Adaptive design model for the integration of urban agriculture in the
   sustainable development of cities. A case study in northern Spain
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban agriculture; Urban design; Sustainable development; Ecosystem
   service; Assessment indicators
AB Cities face major sustainability challenges but they also have the potential to provide solutions. The scientific community attributes urban agriculture a multi-functional character by virtue of its ability to provide a huge variety of ecosystem services relevant to urban sustainability and resilience. However, this scientific knowledge has not just reached urban planning and urban design planners and translates into the absence of a determined commitment to incorporate agriculture in the city. In this paper, we developed a transdisciplinary applied research for inserting urban agriculture into the design of environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. Supported by the European Union LIFE Program in the city of Lugo, Spain, we establish a framework that integrates scientific knowledge, professional practice and the participation of stakeholders and decision-makers to promote the design of an innovative agricultural space with demonstrative character, easily correctable, adaptable and replicable in other cities. The battery of ecosystem service indicators created to monitor and evaluate the proposal will, in turn, quantify the effective provision of ecosystem services by the design of the urban agricultural space and to help gaining support of decision-makers and citizens for urban agriculture.
C1 [Gomez-Villarino, Maria Teresa; Ruiz-Garcia, Luis] Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Agr Food & Biosyst Engn, Agroforestry Engn Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain.
C3 Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
RP Gómez-Villarino, MT (corresponding author), Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Agr Food & Biosyst Engn, Agroforestry Engn Dept, Madrid 28040, Spain.
EM teresa.gomez.villarino@upm.es; luis.ruiz@upm.es
RI GOMEZ VILLARINO, MARIA TERESA/ABF-8963-2021; Ruiz García,
   Luis/AAF-9877-2019
OI GOMEZ VILLARINO, MARIA TERESA/0000-0002-8720-3593
FU European Commission [LIFE 14 CCA/ES/00489]
FX This research received grant from the European Commission Project LIFE
   14 CCA/ES/00489 "Life Lugo + Biodinamico".
CR Ahern J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alaimo K, 2008, J NUTR EDUC BEHAV, V40, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.12.003
   Altieri M. A., 1999, Agriculture and Human Values, V16, P131, DOI 10.1023/A:1007545304561
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5
   [Anonymous], 1978, ADAPTIVE ENV ASSESSM
   Artmann M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10061937
   Azunre GA, 2019, CITIES, V93, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006
   Bagley C, 2011, AUST J EDUC, V55, P37, DOI 10.1177/000494411105500105
   Barles S, 2010, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V53, P439, DOI 10.1080/09640561003703772
   Barrico L, 2012, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V106, P88, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.011
   Blair RB, 1996, ECOL APPL, V6, P506, DOI 10.2307/2269387
   Blair RB, 1997, BIOL CONSERV, V80, P113, DOI 10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00056-0
   Borysiak J, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P323, DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0595-4
   Boutin C, 2002, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V11, P1, DOI 10.1023/A:1014023326658
   Breuste JH, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000264
   Cabral I, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V23, P44, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.008
   Camps-Calvet M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
   Caputo P, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V161, P1588, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.631
   Chatzimentor A, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103775
   Clinton N, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P40, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000536
   Cohen DA, 2011, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V8, P1117, DOI 10.1123/jpah.8.8.1117
   Colding J, 2011, URBAN ECOLOGY: PATTERNS, PROCESSES, AND APPLICATIONS, P228
   Costanza R, 1997, NATURE, V387, P253, DOI 10.1038/387253a0
   De la Sota C, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.004
   Dieleman H, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS156, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.082
   Ferreira AJD, 2018, CURR OPIN ENV SCI HL, V5, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.06.004
   Fan YL, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P1202, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.008
   Fisher B, 2009, ECOL ECON, V68, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
   Fjortoft I, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V48, P83, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00045-1
   Galluzzi G, 2010, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V19, P3635, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9919-5
   Golden S., 2013, Urban agriculture impacts: social, health, and economic
   Gomez-Baggethun Erik, 2013, P175
   Gregory JH, 2006, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V61, P117
   Gren Å, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V40, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.031
   Guitart D, 2012, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V11, P364, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007
   Hatchett L, 2015, J PREV INTERV COMMUN, V43, P135, DOI 10.1080/10852352.2014.973253
   Horst M, 2017, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V83, P277, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2017.1322914
   Korpela KM, 2008, HEALTH PLACE, V14, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.008
   Langemeyer J, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.013
   Lichtfouse E, 2011, SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, VOL 2, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_1
   Lin BB, 2017, ADV 21ST CENT HUMAN, P155, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-4113-6_8
   Lin BB, 2015, BASIC APPL ECOL, V16, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2015.01.005
   Lovell S. T., 2010, Sustainability, V2, P2499, DOI 10.3390/su2082499
   Lovell ST, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y
   Lowenstein DM, 2014, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V23, P2857, DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0752-0
   Mackiewicz B, 2019, QUAEST GEOGR, V38, P121, DOI 10.2478/quageo-2019-0020
   McClintock N, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P191, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsq005
   McDougall R, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P129, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1809707115
   McHarg I., 1992, DESIGN NATURE
   McPhearson T, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.012
   Metson GS, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120726
   Miller-Robbie L, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6bfe
   Mohareb E, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa889b
   Mok HF, 2014, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V34, P21, DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0156-7
   Niemelä J, 2010, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V19, P3225, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
   Orsini F, 2013, AGRON SUSTAIN DEV, V33, P695, DOI 10.1007/s13593-013-0143-z
   Park SA, 2014, HORTTECHNOLOGY, V24, P58, DOI 10.21273/HORTTECH.24.1.58
   Petit-Boix A, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10040998
   Pettygrove M, 2018, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V108, P591, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2017.1402672
   Rottle N., 2017, BASICS LANDSCAPE ARC
   Russo A, 2017, AGR ECOSYST ENVIRON, V242, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.026
   Siegner AB, 2020, AGROECOL SUST FOOD, V44, P566, DOI 10.1080/21683565.2019.1690615
   Specht K, 2014, AGR HUM VALUES, V31, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10460-013-9448-4
   Tallis H, 2009, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1162, P265, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
   Tornaghi C, 2017, ANTIPODE, V49, P781, DOI 10.1111/anti.12291
   Ugai T, 2016, PROCD SOC BEHV, V216, P850, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.082
   Villarreal EL, 2005, ECOL ENG, V25, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.008
   Vitiello D., 2009, Community gardening in Philadelphia: 2008 harvest report, P68
   Wilhelm JA, 2018, RENEW AGR FOOD SYST, V33, P481, DOI 10.1017/S1742170517000205
   Yang B, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.010
NR 73
TC 30
Z9 30
U1 2
U2 66
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD FEB
PY 2021
VL 65
AR 102595
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102595
EA JAN 2021
PG 8
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA QE3KF
UT WOS:000616107400006
OA Green Accepted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cao, FF
   Xu, XF
   Zhang, CL
   Kong, WB
AF Cao, Feifeng
   Xu, Xinfa
   Zhang, Conglin
   Kong, Weibo
TI Evaluation of urban flood resilience and its Space-Time Evolution: A
   case study of Zhejiang Province, China
SO ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience; Flooding; Evaluation; Indicators; Space -time
   aggregation
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; RISK
AB Urban floods have become increasingly frequent in recent years, highlighting the need for resilience evaluation and the identification of strategies to improve urban flood resilience. In this study, a system of resilience evaluation indicators is proposed to quantitatively evaluate the level of urban flood resilience. The entropy method used to calculate the resilience index and the space-time permutation scan method used to analyze the space-time aggregation characteristics of urban resilience levels are combined to establish a methodology for evaluating urban flood resilience. An evaluation indicator system for urban flood resilience is proposed, encompassing aspects of natural, economy, society, and infrastructure. This system attuned to the local needs of urban flood resilience evaluation, tests the applicability of the Guide for Safety Resilient City Evaluation (GB/T 40947-2021) in this study. Moreover, it incorporates key common indicators extracted from prior studies on urban flood resilience evaluation. Zhejiang Province, a flood-prone area in China, is selected as the study area, and the proposed evaluation indicator system is used to evaluate the urban flood resilience levels in Zhejiang and their space-time trends from 2011 to 2020. The results show that resilience levels have improved in the natural, economic, and infrastructure aspects, while the resilience levels of social aspect remain high. From 2011 to 2014, two distinct aggregation patterns emerged, delineated as inland-type and coastal-type aggregation areas. An analysis of both patterns was conducted, considering an array of influencing indicators, such as green coverage rate in built-up areas, population age structure index, gross domestic product, density of resident population in built-up areas, and per capita disposable income. The period from 2014 to 2020, however, did not reveal any significant aggregation characteristics. This study provides a reference for establishing an urban flood resilience evaluation indicator system and an in-depth understanding of urban flood resilience, and targeted recommendations to bolster urban flood resilience in the study area.
C1 [Cao, Feifeng; Xu, Xinfa] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Civil Engn, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Conglin] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China.
   [Kong, Weibo] Zhejiang Yongbang Emergency Technol Co Ltd, Hangzhou 310030, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   [Zhang, Conglin] 15, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang University of Technology; Chinese Academy of Sciences
RP Zhang, CL (corresponding author), 15, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China.
EM zhangconglin@casisd.cn
FU Key Project of the Ministry of Water Resources of China [E2031019];
   Zhejiang Province emergency rescue team construction and emergency scene
   disposal capacity research project [ZJ-2170684-04]; Zhejiang Province
   Science and Technology Plan Project [2016C33006]; General Scientific
   Research Projects of Education of Province [Y201941076]
FX This research was funded by the Key Project of the Ministry of Water
   Resources of China: Research on the Guidelines and Measures for Flood
   Control Management in Territorial Space, grant number E2031019; Zhejiang
   Province emergency rescue team construction and emergency scene disposal
   capacity research project, grant number ZJ-2170684-04; Zhejiang Province
   Science and Technology Plan Project, grant number 2016C33006; General
   Scientific Research Projects of Education of Province, number
   Y201941076.
CR Abenayake CC, 2018, ENVIRON DEV, V27, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.envdev.2018.08.002
   Admas BF, 2022, RESOUR ENVIRON SUST, V8, DOI 10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100059
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Chacowry A, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P826, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.019
   Chen J, 2013, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM, V40-4-W3, P47, DOI 10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-4-W3-47-2013
   Ecosystems S., 2007, URBAN RESILIENCE RES
   Hadipour V, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V188, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105077
   Haque MM, 2022, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102861
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jacinto R, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V744, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140973
   Jenks G. F., 1967, Int Yearbook Cartogr, V7, P186
   Kang H, 2010, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V45, P291, DOI 10.1007/s00168-009-0303-x
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Kulldorff M, 2005, PLOS MED, V2, P216, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020059
   Leandro J, 2020, WATER RES, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115502
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Li DZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P46306, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-19142-w
   Li GF, 2013, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V27, P1683, DOI 10.1007/s00477-013-0706-1
   Li ZM, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101140
   Liu D, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118406
   Luo Y, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V105, P667, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04330-z
   Lwin KK, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101745
   Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China, 2020, CHINA FLOOD DROUGHT
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Motesharrei S, 2016, NATL SCI REV, V3, P470, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nww081
   Ndehedehe CE, 2023, RESOUR ENVIRON SUST, V12, DOI 10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100105
   Qasim S, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V18, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.03.009
   Rumson AG, 2020, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V185, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105004
   Saravanan V, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102621
   Sarmah T, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101659
   Shannon C, 1949, MATH THEORY COMMUNIC
   Song J, 2019, CITIES, V95, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
   Song K, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V242, P1970, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.057
   Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China, 2021, 409472021 GBT STAND
   Tu Y, 2022, EXPERT SYST APPL, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118488
   United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), 2009, TERM DIS RISK RED
   Waghwala RK, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V40, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101155
   Wang P, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V109, P2575, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-04933-0
   Wang TC, 2009, EXPERT SYST APPL, V36, P8980, DOI 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035
   Yang J., 2022, SSRN ELECT J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4144165, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4144165]
   Yang YY, 2021, J HYDROL, V600, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126470
   Yu SY, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V230, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104605
   Yuan ZW, 2021, RESOUR ENVIRON SUST, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100042
   Zhejiang Provincial Development and Reform Commission, 2021, ZHEJ PROV 14 5 YEAR
   Zhu SY, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V147, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109959
NR 45
TC 35
Z9 38
U1 90
U2 265
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 1470-160X
EI 1872-7034
J9 ECOL INDIC
JI Ecol. Indic.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 154
AR 110643
DI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110643
EA JUL 2023
PG 10
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA N9FY6
UT WOS:001039997100001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Rhodes, AM
   Schechter, R
AF Rhodes, Alison M.
   Schechter, Rachel
TI Fostering Resilience Among Youth in Inner City Community Arts Centers:
   The Case of the Artists Collective
SO EDUCATION AND URBAN SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE multicultural education; urban education; students; teachers
ID RISK; DANCE; VIOLENCE; STRESS; RACE
AB Growing up in an inner city environment can inhibit healthy development and have detrimental consequences for children and adolescents such as increased risks for many social and psychological problems. This article explores the role of community arts centers in fostering resilience among youth living in the inner city. A review of the literature of risk factors associated with growing up in an inner city environment provides a rationale for the need for interventions that promote resilience by creating a refuge from the surrounding poverty and violence, and which strengthen youth's personal and social resources. We examine the case of the Artists Collective, an inner city community arts center in Hartford, Connecticut, and propose that there are three components of community arts centers that contribute to youths' resilience. First, features of the physical space promote resilience. Second, they are a place where prosocial relationships and social capital contributing to resilient functioning can be formed. Finally, we hypothesize that learning about and participating in the arts fosters resilience through the development of person-level protective factors such as self-efficacy, improved emotional regulation, social skills, coping skills, and ethnic pride.
C1 [Rhodes, Alison M.] Boston Coll, Grad Sch Social Work, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
   [Schechter, Rachel] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA 02155 USA.
C3 Boston College; Tufts University
RP Rhodes, AM (corresponding author), Boston Coll, Grad Sch Social Work, 503 Huron Ave,5, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA.
EM rhodesal@bc.edu
CR Aisenberg E., 2000, CHILDREN ADOLESCENT, V17, P341
   [Anonymous], NY TIMES
   [Anonymous], 2003, RESILIENCE VULNERABI, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788
   [Anonymous], 2011, POV RIS INC FALL CON
   [Anonymous], 2011, When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor
   Arrington E.G., 2000, J CHILD FAM STUD, V9, P221, DOI [10.1023/A:1009423106045, DOI 10.1023/A:1009423106045]
   BERROL CF, 1992, AM J DANCE THER, V14, P19, DOI 10.1007/BF00844132
   Brody GH, 2002, CHILD DEV, V73, P274, DOI 10.1111/1467-8624.00405
   Cauce A.M., 2003, RESILIENCE VULNERABI, P343, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511615788, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.016]
   Caughy MO, 2006, CHILD DEV, V77, P1220, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00930.x
   Davis J., 1993, Safe havens: Portraits of educational effectiveness in community art centers that focus on education in economically disadvantaged communities
   DeCarlo A., 2003, Social Work with Groups, V26, P45
   Elliott DS, 2006, GOOD KIDS FROM BAD NEIGHBORHOODS: SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL CONTEXT, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521682215
   Farr M, 1997, ART PSYCHOTHER, V24, P183, DOI 10.1016/S0197-4556(97)00004-X
   Furstenberg FrankF., 1999, Managing to Make It: Urban Families and Adolescent Success
   Gorman-Smith D, 2005, RESILIENCE IN CHILDREN, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITIES: LINKING CONTEXT TO PRACTICE AND POLICY, P137, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23824-7_9
   Harvard Graduate School of Education ( Producer), 1996, JL BRYANT LECT SER
   Heenan D, 2006, DISABIL SOC, V21, P179, DOI 10.1080/09687590500498143
   Hendon C, 2008, CHILD CARE HLTH DEV, V34, P141, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00746.x
   Howard DE, 2002, J ADOLESCENT HEALTH, V31, P455, DOI 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00404-4
   Jaffee SR, 2007, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL, V19, P631, DOI 10.1017/S0954579407000326
   JESSOR R, 1993, AM PSYCHOL, V48, P117, DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.117
   Kibour Y, 2001, Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol, V7, P47, DOI 10.1037/1099-9809.7.1.47
   Lewis MD, 2006, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1094, P164, DOI 10.1196/annals.1376.017
   Linnehan F, 2005, J VOCAT BEHAV, V66, P501, DOI 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.02.003
   Lobo YB, 2006, SOC DEV, V15, P501, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00353.x
   Luthar S.S., 2003, Resilience and vulnerability-.Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities, P104, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.007
   Macy Robert D, 2003, New Dir Youth Dev, P51
   Macy Robert D, 2003, New Dir Youth Dev, P11
   Masten A.S., 2003, RESILIENCE VULNERABI, P1
   Masten AS, 2007, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL, V19, P921, DOI 10.1017/S0954579407000442
   Maton KI, 2005, RESILIENCE IN CHILDREN, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITIES: LINKING CONTEXT TO PRACTICE AND POLICY, P119, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23824-7_8
   McGee Z.T., 2003, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, V19, P293, DOI DOI 10.1177/1043986203254527
   Owens E.B., 2003, RESILIENCE VULNERABI, P267
   Plant EA, 2004, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V72, P41, DOI 10.1037/0022-006X.72.1.41
   President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, 2010, 1 LAD M OB PRES 2010
   Putnam R., 1999, BOWLING ALONE
   Romeo RD, 2006, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1094, P202, DOI 10.1196/annals.1376.022
   Sandler I., 2003, Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities, P213, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.011
   Schore JR, 2008, CLIN SOC WORK J, V36, P9, DOI 10.1007/s10615-007-0111-7
   Seitz V, 2005, RESILIENCE IN CHILDREN, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITIES: LINKING CONTEXT TO PRACTICE AND POLICY, P65, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23824-7_5
   Sieger Karin, 2004, Trauma Violence Abuse, V5, P243, DOI 10.1177/1524838004264342
   Szalacha L.A., 2003, RESILIENCE VULNERABI, P414, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.019
   Utsey SO, 2008, J COUNS PSYCHOL, V55, P49, DOI 10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.49
   Vanderbilt-Adriance E, 2006, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V1094, P359, DOI 10.1196/annals.1376.050
   Voisin DR, 2007, J SOC WORK EDUC, V43, P51, DOI 10.5175/JSWE.2007.200400473
   Werner EE, 2005, RESILIENCE IN CHILDREN, FAMILIES, AND COMMUNITIES: LINKING CONTEXT TO PRACTICE AND POLICY, P3, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23824-7_1
   West J, 2004, ANN BEHAV MED, V28, P114, DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2802_6
   Wilson W.J., 1987, TRULY DISADVANTAGED
   Wilson WJ, 2003, ETHNIC RACIAL STUD, V26, P1096, DOI 10.1080/0141987032000132522
   Yates T., 2003, Resilience and vulnerability, P243, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.012
NR 51
TC 25
Z9 36
U1 2
U2 63
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 0013-1245
EI 1552-3535
J9 EDUC URBAN SOC
JI Educ. Urban Soc.
PD NOV
PY 2014
VL 46
IS 7
BP 826
EP 848
DI 10.1177/0013124512469816
PG 23
WC Education & Educational Research; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Education & Educational Research; Urban Studies
GA AR9SM
UT WOS:000343916200004
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Gu, HY
   Guo, GY
   Li, CM
AF Gu, Huangying
   Guo, Guanyu
   Li, Chengming
TI Treating the Symptoms as Well as the Root Causes: How the Digital
   Economy Can Mitigate the Negative Impacts of Land Resource Mismatches on
   Urban Ecological Resilience
SO LAND
LA English
DT Article
DE land resource mismatch; urban ecological resilience; digital economy;
   digital government; digital infrastructure
ID CHINA; POLICY; EXPANSION; EMISSIONS
AB In the era of the digital economy (DE), the traditional economic growth paradigm is no longer applicable. To explore whether the DE can improve the urban ecological problems left behind by rough economic growth, this study examines the effects of land resource mismatch (LRM) on urban ecological resilience (UER) and evaluates the mitigating influence of the DE. This analysis utilizes data from 280 prefectural-level cities in China over the period from 2007 to 2021 and reveals that LRM significantly undermines UER, with this conclusion remaining robust across a series of tests. Additionally, the detrimental impact of LRM on UER is more pronounced in megacities, cities with high levels of economic development, and those with a lower degree of advanced industrial structure. In further analysis, this study finds that the digital economy can optimize the allocation of land resources, thereby enhancing urban ecological resilience, which has the effect of "treating the root causes". In addition, digital government and digital infrastructure, as key elements of the digital economy, also mitigate the negative impacts of land resource misallocation on urban ecological resilience, having the effect of "treating the symptoms". Finally, this study proposes policy suggestions such as optimizing ecological layout, deepening land reform, and promoting digital government and infrastructure construction to provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance for local governments to enhance UER and help build a new model of greener, more resilient, and sustainable urban development.
C1 [Gu, Huangying; Guo, Guanyu; Li, Chengming] Minzu Univ China, Sch Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
   [Gu, Huangying; Guo, Guanyu; Li, Chengming] Minzu Univ China, China Inst Vitalizing Border Areas & Enriching Peo, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
C3 Minzu University of China
RP Li, CM (corresponding author), Minzu Univ China, Sch Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.; Li, CM (corresponding author), Minzu Univ China, China Inst Vitalizing Border Areas & Enriching Peo, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China.
EM 23300127@muc.edu.cn; 23300103@muc.edu.cn; 202101033@muc.edu.cn
RI Li, Chengming/GYD-4374-2022; Gu, Huangying/LKN-4924-2024; Guo,
   Guanyu/HNB-8331-2023
OI guo, guan yu/0009-0008-3396-9586; Gu, Huangying/0009-0005-2130-1376
FU National Social Science Foundation of China;  [23BJL084]
FX This paper was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No. 23BJL084).
CR Ayoub AT, 1998, J ARID ENVIRON, V38, P397, DOI 10.1006/jare.1997.0346
   Bai TT, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V344, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118528
   Bollen KA, 2012, ANNU REV SOCIOL, V38, P37, DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150141
   Brynjolfsson E., 2014, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies
   Chen M, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12062819
   Chen T, 2016, J DEV ECON, V123, P86, DOI 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.08.005
   Chen W, 2019, CITIES, V93, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.009
   Chen Zeyu, 2024, Resources Policy, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105107
   Cheng XX, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10030644
   Coffin AW, 2007, J TRANSP GEOGR, V15, P396, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.006
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   da Silva GM, 2013, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V38, P1036, DOI 10.1002/esp.3390
   Dian J, 2024, ENERG ECON, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107223
   Ding CH, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14010216
   Ding CR, 2003, LAND USE POLICY, V20, P109, DOI 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00073-X
   Du JF, 2014, REG SCI URBAN ECON, V48, P180, DOI 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.07.002
   Du WJ, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V299, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113565
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gao BY, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12010092
   Gao F, 2024, RESOUR POLICY, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104914
   Gao F, 2023, RESOUR POLICY, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104156
   Gao XC, 2021, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V23, P2101, DOI 10.1007/s10098-021-02107-x
   Guan HP, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141811378
   Guo WB, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11164366
   Harrison T.M., 2012, ACM INT C PROCEEDING, V17, P83, DOI DOI 10.3233/IP-2012-0269
   Hertzberg M, 2017, ENERG ENVIRON-UK, V28, P530, DOI 10.1177/0958305X17706177
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hu J, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V337, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117755
   Huang XJ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V87, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.043
   Huang YZ, 2020, ENVIRON POLLUT, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114674
   Huang ZJ, 2015, HABITAT INT, V47, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.007
   Huang ZH, 2017, CITIES, V60, P323, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.006
   Huo P, 2022, RES INT BUS FINANC, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101797
   Jetzek T, 2014, J THEOR APPL EL COMM, V9, P100, DOI 10.4067/S0718-18762014000200008
   Jones C.I., 2011, Misallocation, economic growth, and input-output economics
   Kim M, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9071086
   Li HJ, 2024, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123604
   Li JF, 2024, PLOS ONE, V19, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0297449
   Li K, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V52, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.185
   Li L.X., 2016, Management World, V2016, P86, DOI [DOI 10.19744/J.CNKI.11-1235/F.2016.08.008, 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2016.08.008]
   Lin M, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12020447
   Liu S., 2023, Land System Reform and Chinas Economic Development, P391, DOI [10.1007/978-981-99-6733-914, DOI 10.1007/978-981-99-6733-914]
   Liu YS, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V40, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.013
   Liu Y, 2023, ECON ANAL POLICY, V80, P143, DOI 10.1016/j.eap.2023.08.005
   Lu Z, 2010, ATMOS CHEM PHYS, V10, P6311, DOI 10.5194/acp-10-6311-2010
   Luo K, 2022, ENERG ECON, V112, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106127
   MacBean A, 2007, WORLD ECON, V30, P292, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00883.x
   MacKinnon DP, 2015, PERS SOC PSYCHOL REV, V19, P30, DOI 10.1177/1088868314542878
   McAslan Alastair., 2010, The Concept of Resilience: Understanding its Origins, Meaning and Utility
   Motesharrei S, 2016, NATL SCI REV, V3, P470, DOI 10.1093/nsr/nww081
   Moulton BR, 2000, UNDERSTANDING THE DIGITAL ECONOMY, P34
   Oboni F., 2021, Convergent Leadership-Divergent Exposures: Climate Change, Resilience, Vulnerabilities, and Ethics, P19, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-74930-92, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-74930-92]
   Peng LX, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P806, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1973-x
   Peng SG, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11101630
   Shankman D, 2003, PROF GEOGR, V55, P434, DOI 10.1111/0033-0124.5504003
   Shi D., 2018, China Industrial Economy, V6, P117, DOI DOI 10.19581/J.CNKI.CIEJOURNAL.2018.06.008
   Singh N., 2020, Urban Ecology eds, P317, DOI [10.1016/b978-0-12-820730-7.00017-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-820730-7.00017-3]
   Tredgold T., 1818, Philosophical Magazine, V51, P214, DOI [10.1080/14786441808637536, DOI 10.1080/14786441808637536]
   Wang J, 2022, HABITAT INT, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102598
   Wang SG, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13040404
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   Wang W., 2018, Land Use Reforms: Towards Sustainable Development in China, P29, DOI [10.1007/978-981-10-6286-52, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6286-52]
   Wang XA, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P51749, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-26038-w
   Worlanyo AS, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V279, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111623
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   Xiang HX, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V290, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112618
   Xie R, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V122, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106353
   Xu JL, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-29458-w
   Xu X, 2019, GROWTH CHANGE, V50, P1423, DOI 10.1111/grow.12334
   Xu Z, 2017, APPL ECON, V49, P4851, DOI 10.1080/00036846.2017.1296547
   Yang J, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141811685
   Yang YY, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V427, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139248
   Yao TT, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.102008
   Yuan SJ, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V165, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120533
   Zhai TL, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V708, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135153
   Zhang CG, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V166, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112263
   Zhang QR, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12051089
   Zhang WK, 2023, ENERG ECON, V127, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107085
   Zhang YZ, 2024, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V16, DOI 10.3390/su16093611
   Zhang YJ, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P14805, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-23135-0
   Zhao XM, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V415, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137670
   Zhou D, 2023, ENERG POLICY, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113800
   Zhou GY, 2024, LAND-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/land13070960
   Zhu QS, 2023, MATH BIOSCI ENG, V20, P15898, DOI 10.3934/mbe.2023708
NR 84
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 29
U2 33
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-445X
J9 LAND-BASEL
JI Land
PD SEP
PY 2024
VL 13
IS 9
AR 1463
DI 10.3390/land13091463
PG 21
WC Environmental Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA H4X2R
UT WOS:001323479800001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Walters, P
AF Walters, Peter
TI The problem of community resilience in two flooded cities: Dhaka 1998
   and Brisbane 2011
SO HABITAT INTERNATIONAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Community resilience; Community; Disaster; Cities; Urban
ID RESPONSES; PARTICIPATION
AB This paper critiques the concept of urban community resilience by making a comparison of a flood disaster in two very different cities, Dhaka in Bangladesh and Brisbane in Australia. Community resilience is a concept that has emerged in the social sciences from ecological literature as a way of assessing and measuring the ability of communities to respond to and adapt following a disaster. In the literature the term 'resilience' is well defined, but 'community' is often presented as unproblematic. The flood recovery in Brisbane was the result of a strong public realm, strong institutions and a relatively low level of social inequality, with local community as a desirable, but not necessary, feature. In Dhaka the presence of strong local community was of little help to residents already living in absolute poverty; it is difficult to be resilient if its measure is decreasing long-term vulnerability. The absence of these city-wide institutions and a strong public realm meant that the poor in Dhaka were isolated; fated to rely on their own meagre resources. In neither case could resilience or the lack of it, be explained by local community. The effects of a trauma such as a flood cannot be understood by making general assumptions about communities as 'stand alone' phenomena with essentialised characteristics independent of context in which they are found. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
C3 University of Queensland
RP Walters, P (corresponding author), Univ Queensland, Sch Social Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia.
EM p.walters@uq.edu.au
OI Walters, Peter/0000-0002-1831-1494
FU Australian Research Council [DP120100990]
FX This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery
   Award grant DP120100990.
CR Al-Amin AQ, 2013, INT J GLOBAL WARM, V5, P67, DOI 10.1504/IJGW.2013.051483
   Alam M, 2007, ENVIRON URBAN, V19, P81, DOI 10.1177/0956247807076911
   Aldrich D.P., 2012, Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery, P1, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226012896.001.0001
   Anderson Benedict, IMAGINED COMMUNITIES
   [Anonymous], O REG POP GROWTH AUS
   [Anonymous], 2013, HUM DEV IND
   [Anonymous], 2013, REG ENV CHANGE
   [Anonymous], DISASTERS
   [Anonymous], AUSTR FINANCIAL REV
   [Anonymous], AUSTR J COMMUNICATIO
   [Anonymous], BANGLADESH E J SOCIO
   [Anonymous], SOCIAL INDICATORS RE
   [Anonymous], RES MONOGRAPH SERIES
   [Anonymous], FACT SHEET BRISB CIT
   [Anonymous], INTERACTION
   [Anonymous], DISASTER RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], CENS 2011
   [Anonymous], COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], I GOV STUD BRAC
   Assheuer T, 2013, ERDKUNDE, V67, P21, DOI 10.3112/erdkunde.2013.01.03
   Bankoff G, 2007, CONTINUITY CHANGE, V22, P327, DOI 10.1017/S0268416007006315
   Banks N, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P361, DOI 10.1177/0956247808096116
   Barrios RE, 2014, DISASTERS, V38, P329, DOI 10.1111/disa.12044
   Bean Clive., 2005, AUSTR SOCIAL ATTITUD, P122
   Bourdieu P., 1979, HDB THEORY RES SOCIO, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15
   Braun B, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V58, P771, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9752-5
   Bushnell S, 2007, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V22, P3
   Carah N, 2012, MEDIA INT AUST, P137
   Coaffee J, 2008, NEW SECUR CHALL, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230583337
   Coles E., 2004, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, V19, P6
   Cumming GS, 2011, SPATIAL RESILIENCE IN SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0307-0
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davis Mike., 2006, PLANET SLUMS
   Dewan Ashraf., 2013, DHAKA MEGACITY GEOSP
   Donoghue EM, 2007, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V20, P899, DOI 10.1080/08941920701561114
   Flyvbjerg B., 2001, MAKING SOCIAL SCI MA
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2012, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V22, P640, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.02.005
   Haque AN, 2012, ENVIRON URBAN, V24, P197, DOI 10.1177/0956247811433538
   Hayes J., 2012, 8 ANN C INT I INFR R, P51
   Hossain S, 2012, HABITAT INT, V36, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.05.007
   Jabeen H, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P415, DOI 10.1177/0956247810379937
   Landau J, 2007, FAM PROCESS, V46, P351, DOI 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00216.x
   Lofland Lyn H., 1998, The Public Realm: Exploring the Citys Quintessential Social Territory
   López-Marrero T, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P229, DOI 10.1177/0956247810396055
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   McCold P., 1998, Contemporary Justice Review, V1, P71
   Minnery J, 2009, PLAN PRACT RES, V24, P471, DOI 10.1080/02697450903327170
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   O'Neill P, 2005, GEOGR RES-AUST, V43, P19, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2005.00295.x
   Patterson O, 2010, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V29, P127, DOI 10.1007/s11113-009-9133-x
   Putnam R., 1999, BOWLING ALONE
   Rashid SF, 2000, DISASTERS, V24, P240, DOI 10.1111/1467-7717.00145
   Roy M, 2009, HABITAT INT, V33, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.022
   Shaw R, 2011, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V6, P1
   Smith JW, 2012, HUM ECOL, V40, P341, DOI 10.1007/s10745-012-9470-y
   Sonn CC, 1998, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V26, P457, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199809)26:5<457::AID-JCOP5>3.3.CO;2-7
   Stalenberg B., 2009, Built Environ, V35, P471, DOI [10.2148/benv.35.4.471, DOI 10.2148/BENV.35.4.471]
   Talen E., 2000, Journal of Planning Literature, V15, P171, DOI [10.1177/08854120022092971, DOI 10.1177/08854120022092971]
   Thiele LP, 2002, J POLIT, V64, P274, DOI 10.1086/jop.64.1.2691680
   Tonnies Ferdinand., 1963, COMMUNITY SOC GEMEIN
   Ungar M, 2012, SOCIAL ECOLOGY OF RESILIENCE: A HANDBOOK OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3
   van den Honert RC, 2011, WATER-SUI, V3, P1149, DOI 10.3390/w3041149
   Walters P, 2008, URBAN POLICY RES, V26, P397, DOI 10.1080/08111140801986517
   Wellman B, 1996, SOC NETWORKS, V18, P347, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00282-0
   Wolff KurtH., 1964, SOCIOLOGY G SIMMEL
   World Bank, 2007, Paper 17
   ZILLER A., 2004, Urban Policy Research, V22, P465, DOI DOI 10.1080/0811114042000296353
NR 67
TC 33
Z9 34
U1 1
U2 92
PU PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND
SN 0197-3975
EI 1873-5428
J9 HABITAT INT
JI Habitat Int.
PD DEC
PY 2015
VL 50
BP 51
EP 56
DI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.004
PG 6
WC Development Studies; Environmental Studies; Regional & Urban Planning;
   Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Development Studies; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA CV4QK
UT WOS:000364251400006
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Mosleh, L
   Negahban-Azar, M
   Pavao-Zuckerman, M
AF Mosleh, Leila
   Negahban-Azar, Masoud
   Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell
TI Stormwater Green Infrastructure Resilience Assessment: A
   Social-Ecological Framework for Urban Stormwater Management
SO WATER
LA English
DT Article
DE stormwater green infrastructure; climate resilience; ecosystem services;
   challenges; assessment framework; socio-ecological
ID COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; DRAINAGE
   SYSTEMS; DESIGN; BARRIERS; POLICY; CITIES; CITY; SUSTAINABILITY
AB Urban areas are increasingly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Stormwater Green infrastructure (SWGI) is seen as an approach to increase the climate resilience of urban areas, because they can buffer precipitation changes brought on by climate change. However, SWGI features themselves need to be resilient to climate change to be able to contribute to the resilience of cities. Thus, we aimed to develop a SWGI resilience assessment framework that could be used to identify challenges and to inform decisionmakers' efforts to enhance resilience. We developed a resilience assessment framework based upon a resilience matrix approach to recognize effective resilience categories for SWGI by reviewing the literature on critical functionality and barriers to implementation and operation. These categories for SWGI included policy, design, maintenance, economic factors and social factors that influence SWGI functionality. We then identified specific aspects under each category that could be used for assessing SWGI resilience, recognizing that SWGI has critical functionalities and factors controlling its viability. Unlike other SWGI assessment frameworks that are focused on ecosystem services as a final outcome, we worked from a socio-ecological perspective in order to include socio-economic and policy factors and design and planning aspects that affect service provision. Developing a resilience assessment framework is critical for management because it can reveal the specific challenges facing SWGI resilience that have traditionally been overlooked, such as maintenance and social factors. This specific framework can also lead to efficient planning and management by identifying interrelations and hierarchical relationships of categories that influence resilience. Application of this framework will rely upon expert input to connect broad dimensions with specific indicators for SWGI to local priorities in resilience planning.
C1 [Mosleh, Leila; Negahban-Azar, Masoud; Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell] Univ Maryland, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA.
   [Mosleh, Leila] Univ Tehran, Sch Urban Planning, Tehran 1416634793, Iran.
C3 University System of Maryland; University of Maryland College Park;
   University of Tehran
RP Pavao-Zuckerman, M (corresponding author), Univ Maryland, Dept Environm Sci & Technol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA.
EM mpzucker@umd.edu
OI Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell/0000-0002-9657-2892
FU Babbitt Dissertation Fellowship from the Lincoln Institute of Land
   Policy; NSF CHN-L [1518376]; USDA NIFA Hatch project through the
   Maryland Agricultural Experimentation Station
FX This project was funded in part by a Babbitt Dissertation Fellowship
   from the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (L.M.) and an NSF CHN-L (#
   1518376) grant and a USDA NIFA Hatch project through the Maryland
   Agricultural Experimentation Station (M.P.-Z.).
CR Ahern J, 2017, CITIES FUTUR INTEGR, V13, P267
   Ahern J, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P254, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Al-Kodmany K, 1999, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V45, P37, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9
   Andreucci M.B., 2013, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, V179, P413, DOI [10.2495/SC130351, DOI 10.2495/SC130351]
   [Anonymous], 2014, ANN REPORT
   [Anonymous], 2001, Washburn Law J
   [Anonymous], 2011, Barriers and Gateways to Green Infrastructure
   Asleson BC, 2009, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V45, P1019, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00344.x
   Auffret AG, 2015, AMBIO, V44, pS51, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0588-6
   Austin AT, 2004, OECOLOGIA, V141, P221, DOI 10.1007/s00442-004-1519-1
   Baptiste AK, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V136, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.11.012
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Brown RA, 2011, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V137, P132, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000167
   Buerge IJ, 2006, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V40, P4096, DOI 10.1021/es052553l
   Buijs AE, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V22, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002
   Burroughs S, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V180, P1034, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.263
   Byrne J, 2009, AUST PLAN, V46, P35, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2009.10753420
   Calliari E, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V656, P691, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.341
   Campbell LK, 2016, ENVIRON MANAGE, V57, P1262, DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0680-8
   Carter JG, 2018, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V61, P1535, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1355777
   Carter T, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V42, P151, DOI 10.1007/s00267-008-9095-5
   Center for Neighborhood Technology Home Page, GREEN VAL STORMW MAN
   Chan J, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005
   Charlesworth SM, 2003, GEOGRAPHY, V88, P99
   Charlesworth SM, 2014, WATER RESOURCES IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT: MANAGEMENT ISSUES AND SOLUTIONS, P151
   Choi C, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112583
   Conine A, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V68, P271, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00159-2
   Copeland C., 2016, Green Infrastructure and Issues in Managing Urban Stormwater
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Dapolito Dunn A., 2007, GREEN LIGHT GREEN IN
   De la Sota C, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.004
   Dennis M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.009
   Dhakal KP, 2017, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V203, P171, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.065
   Dong X, 2017, WATER RES, V124, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.038
   Dunn A.D., 2010, Siting Green Infrastructure: Legal and Policy Solutions to Alleviate Urban Poverty and Promote Healthy Communities
   Felson AJ, 2005, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V3, P549, DOI 10.2307/3868611
   Fernández-Alvarez R, 2017, ECON SOC TERRIT, V17, P399
   Flynn K. M., 2012, Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries, P3662, DOI 10.1061/9780784412312.368
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Foster J., 2011, Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics, P1
   Fox-Lent Cate, 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P209, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9555-4
   Frankenberger T., 2013, Community resilience: Conceptual framework and measurement feed the future learning agenda, P1
   Frantzeskaki N, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P542, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0
   Fryd O, 2012, WATER POLICY, V14, P865, DOI 10.2166/wp.2012.025
   Gashu K, 2019, URBAN ECOSYST, V22, P657, DOI 10.1007/s11252-019-00852-y
   Giese E, 2019, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V145, DOI [10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001099, 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001099]
   Gould K., 2016, Green Gentrification | Urban sustainability and the struggle for enviromental justice
   Green TL, 2016, ECOSYSTEMS, V19, P1051, DOI 10.1007/s10021-016-9986-x
   Hansen R, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.042
   Hansen R, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P516, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0510-2
   Hatt BE, 2008, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V42, P2535, DOI 10.1021/es071264p
   Hoang L, 2016, URBAN WATER J, V13, P739, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2015.1036083
   Hoornweg D, 2012, DIR DEV, P3
   Hoover FA, 2021, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V23, P665, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2021.1945916
   Hoover Fushcia-Ann, 2021, Socioecol Pract Res, V3, P55, DOI 10.1007/s42532-020-00070-3
   Hostetler M, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.011
   Jaffe M, 2010, ENVIRON PRAC, V12, P357, DOI 10.1017/S1466046610000475
   Jayasooriya VM, 2014, WATER AIR SOIL POLL, V225, DOI 10.1007/s11270-014-2055-1
   Junqueira JR, 2023, WATER ENVIRON J, V37, P242, DOI 10.1111/wej.12832
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kaluarachchi Y, 2021, FRONT ENG MANAG, V8, P98, DOI 10.1007/s42524-020-0136-y
   Karamouz Mohammad, 2014, World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2014: Water Without Borders. 2014 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Proceedings, P911
   Keeley M, 2013, ENVIRON MANAGE, V51, P1093, DOI 10.1007/s00267-013-0032-x
   Kennedy J., 2008, MEASURING EC IMPACTS, P267
   Kozine I, 2018, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V14, P199, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2018.094405
   Krasny ME, 2014, ECOSYST SERV, V7, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.002
   Kronenberg J, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.002
   Kumar P, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V58, P514, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.018
   Kwiatkowski M, 2007, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V43, P1208, DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00104.x
   Lee RS, 2016, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V2, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000813
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Lennon M, 2014, TOWN PLAN REV, V85, P563, DOI 10.3828/tpr.2014.35
   Lewellyn C, 2016, J HYDROL ENG, V21, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001257
   Li H, 2008, J ENVIRON ENG-ASCE, V134, P409, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:6(409)
   Lin B, 2015, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V14, P952, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.003
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Linkov Igor, 2013, Environment Systems & Decisions, V33, P471, DOI 10.1007/s10669-013-9485-y
   Linkov I, 2013, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V47, P10108, DOI 10.1021/es403443n
   Lohmus Mare, 2015, Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, V5, P30082, DOI 10.3402/iee.v5.30082
   Lovell ST, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1447, DOI 10.1007/s10980-013-9912-y
   Lucas WC, 2015, J HYDROL, V520, P473, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.029
   Lynn K., 2011, Social vulnerability and climate change: synthesis of literature, DOI [10.2737/PNW-GTR-838, DOI 10.2737/PNW-GTR-838]
   Madureira H, 2014, URBAN DES INT, V19, P38, DOI 10.1057/udi.2013.11
   Maron M, 2017, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V32, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2016.12.011
   Matsler M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145
   Matthews T, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010
   [Mays L.W. UNESCO-IHP. UNESCO-IHP.], 2009, Integrated Urban Water Management: Arid and Semi-Arid Regions
   McCall MK, 2005, GEOGR J, V171, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00173.x
   McDonald LeighAnne., 2005, J CONSERVATION PLANN, V1, P6
   McPhillips LE, 2021, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V6, P133, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2020.1754625
   McRae AM, 2016, ENG ECON, V61, P190, DOI 10.1080/0013791X.2016.1186255
   Meerow S, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V159, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.005
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mell I., 2008, FORUM EJ, V8, P69
   Mell I, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18041527
   Mell Ian., 2016, Global green infrastructure: lessons for successful policy-making, investment and management, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315720968
   Mguni P, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V82, pS241, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2309-x
   Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005, INTR CONC FRAM
   Mori AS, 2013, BIOL REV, V88, P349, DOI 10.1111/brv.12004
   Nassauer JI, 2008, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V23, P633, DOI 10.1007/s10980-008-9226-7
   National Research Council, 2012, Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative
   Naumann Sandra., 2011, Design, implementation and cost elements of Green Infrastructure projects
   Norton BA, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V134, P127, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018
   Novotny V., 2010, WATER CENTRIC SUSTAI
   O'Neill E, 2011, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V12, P312, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2011.583146
   Ostadtaghizadeh Abbas, 2015, PLoS Curr, V7, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed
   Ozdemiroglu E., 2013, Green Infrastructure - Valuation Tools Assessment - NECR126
   Pamukcu-Albers P, 2021, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V36, P665, DOI 10.1007/s10980-021-01212-y
   Pappalardo V, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V26, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.015
   Pitt Robert., 2002, Global Solutions for Urban Drainage, P1, DOI [10.1061/40644(2002)14, DOI 10.1061/40644(2002)14]
   Raymond CM, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V77, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008
   Renschler CS., 2010, A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: The PEOPLES resilience framework
   Rosati Julie Dean, 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P196, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9548-3
   Ross MRV, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P419, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-121012-100957
   Russell RC, 1999, ECOL ENG, V12, P107, DOI 10.1016/S0925-8574(98)00057-3
   Samora-Arvela A, 2017, J SPAT ORGAN DYN, V5, P176
   Schiappacasse Paulina., 2015, Urbani Izziv, V26, pS13, DOI DOI 10.5379/URBANI-IZZIV-EN-2015-26-SUPPLEMENT-001
   Selman P., 2009, Sustainability: Science, Practice & Policy, V5, P45
   Semenza JC, 2007, J URBAN HEALTH, V84, P8, DOI 10.1007/s11524-006-9124-8
   Shafer K., 2011, GREEN SOLUTIONS WEAV
   Sharifi A, 2016, ADV SCI TECH SEC APP, P259, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9_13
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharma AK, 2012, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V65, P340, DOI 10.2166/wst.2012.858
   Shearer AW, 2005, ENVIRON PLANN B, V32, P67, DOI 10.1068/b3116
   Smiley KT, 2016, ENVIRON JUSTICE, V9, P1, DOI 10.1089/env.2015.0030
   Staddon Chad, 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P330, DOI 10.1007/s10669-018-9702-9
   Stevens A., 2016, STAYING GREEN STRATE
   TEEB, 2010, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations
   The Water Research Foundation, 2009, US GUID BMP LID WHOL
   Thorne CR, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS960, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12218
   Tian Shaojing., 2011, Managing Stormwater Runoff with Green Infrastructure: Exploring Practical Strategies to Overcome Barriers in Citywide Implementation
   Tompkins EL, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Traver RG, 2017, FRONT ENV SCI ENG, V11, DOI 10.1007/s11783-017-0973-z
   Tress B, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V64, P161, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00219-0
   United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2018, WHAT GREEN INFR
   Urban Land Institute, 2018, 10 PRINC BUIILD RES
   urian BS J., 2010, RBAN COSYSTEM COLOGY, P277, DOI 10.2134/agronmonogr55.c14
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   van Bohemen H, 2002, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V59, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00010-5
   Veen E. J., 2015, Community gardens in urban areas: a critical reflection on the extent to which they strengthen social cohesion and provide alternative food
   Viti M, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V841, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156636
   Vogel JR, 2015, WATER ENVIRON RES, V87, P849, DOI 10.2175/106143015X14362865226392
   Wadzuk B.M., 2012, Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, P231
   WALKER BH, 1992, CONSERV BIOL, V6, P18, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610018.x
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Weber T, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V77, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.002
   Yadav P, 2012, URBAN ECOSYST, V15, P499, DOI 10.1007/s11252-012-0230-y
   Young RF, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V109, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.004
   Zuniga-Teran AA, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P710, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1605890
NR 152
TC 6
Z9 7
U1 22
U2 59
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2073-4441
J9 WATER-SUI
JI Water
PD MAY 6
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 9
AR 1786
DI 10.3390/w15091786
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences; Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Water Resources
GA G3JA8
UT WOS:000988148000001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Moghadas, M
   Asadzadeh, A
   Vafeidis, A
   Fekete, A
   Kötter, T
AF Moghadas, Mahsa
   Asadzadeh, Asad
   Vafeidis, Athanasios
   Fekete, Alexander
   Koetter, Theo
TI A multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience in
   Tehran, Iran
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban flood resilience; Composite indicator; AHP; TOPSIS; Tehran
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; INDICATORS; VALIDATION; FRAMEWORK; TOPSIS; MODEL
AB Operationalizing the concept of urban disaster resilience is a major milestone toward understanding both the characteristics that contribute to the resilience of cities to natural hazards and the interactions required to build and sustain it. While the measurement of urban disaster resilience has recently gained much attention, there is so far no optimal approach for operationalizing this concept and therefore there is a need to conduct more empirical studies on what constitutes disaster resilience and how to assess it. In this study, a resilience assessment focuses on the inherent characteristics and capacities of Tehran in the context of flash floods from surface water or from the overflow of rivers. The measurement approach is based on constructing a composite index based on six resilience dimensions social, economic, institutional, infrastructural, community capital and environmental of community flood resilience. This follows by developing a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method. The applied method is a combination of the AHP for prioritizing the selected indicators and the TOPSIS tools in order to get Tehran's urban districts ranked based on their resilience levels. Data were mostly from the Statistical Center of Iran and Tehran Municipality's accessible data sources. The results clarify that Districts 6 and 22 are comparatively the most resilient districts, while District 1 is the only district with the lowest level of resilience. Such place-based assessments have an opportunity to track community performance over time and provide the tool to decision-makers in order to integrate resilience thinking into urban development and resilience-oriented urban planning.
C1 [Moghadas, Mahsa; Asadzadeh, Asad; Koetter, Theo] Univ Bonn, Inst Geodesy & Geoinformat, Urban Planning & Land Management Grp, Nussallee 1, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
   [Vafeidis, Athanasios] Univ Kiel, Inst Geog, Ludewig Meyn Str 14, D-24098 Kiel, Germany.
   [Fekete, Alexander] Cologne Univ Appl Sci, Inst Rescue Engn & Civil Protect, Betzdorfer Str 2, D-50679 Cologne, Germany.
C3 University of Bonn; University of Kiel
RP Moghadas, M (corresponding author), Nussallee 1, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.
EM m.moghadas@igg.uni-bonn.de
RI Vafeidis, Athanasios/Z-6053-2019; Fekete, Alexander/C-4071-2017
OI Fekete, Alexander/0000-0002-8029-6774; Vafeidis,
   Athanasios/0000-0002-3906-5544; Asadzadeh, Asad/0000-0002-1432-2663;
   Moghadas, Mahsa/0000-0002-2582-0932
CR Adger W.N., 2004, TYNDALL CTR CLIMATE
   [Anonymous], CIT RES IND
   [Anonymous], WORLD STAT POCK
   [Anonymous], HDB CONSTRUCTING COM
   [Anonymous], ADAPTATION STRATEGIE
   [Anonymous], 2012, RESILIENCE CAPACITY
   [Anonymous], SOCIAL INDICATORS RE
   [Anonymous], 15 WORLD C EARTHQ EN
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE IMPAC
   [Anonymous], COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], GEOD CARTOGR
   [Anonymous], MEASURING MEASURE MU
   [Anonymous], MIND RISK GLOBAL RAN
   [Anonymous], 2015, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1).
   [Anonymous], SUPERCITIES SUSTAINA
   [Anonymous], PREL AN TEHR PROF CO
   [Anonymous], 19 CIB WORLD BUILD C
   [Anonymous], 2016, P IDRC DAVOS 2016
   [Anonymous], TRENDS URB RES
   [Anonymous], DIS RISK MAN PROF TE
   [Anonymous], 2011, SEL FIND 2011 NAT PO
   [Anonymous], STRESSTEST STADT WIE
   [Anonymous], 2014, CITY RESILIENCE INDE
   [Anonymous], HAB 3 C
   [Anonymous], DESIGN USE COMPOSITE
   [Anonymous], 2016, ANAL EXISTING ASSESS
   [Anonymous], 2015, Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction 2015 -2030
   [Anonymous], STRATEGIC FOREST PLA
   [Anonymous], MEASURING URBAN DISA
   [Anonymous], INT MIGR URB I R IR
   [Anonymous], 2009, UNISDR TERM DIS RISK
   [Anonymous], CLIM ACT MEG C40 CIT
   Asadzadeh A, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V25, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.015
   Asadzadeh A., 2014, ENV MANAG SUSTAIN DE, V3, P123
   Asadzadeh A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.002
   Beccari Benjamin, 2016, PLoS Curr, V8, DOI 10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970
   Becker W, 2017, ECOL INDIC, V80, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056
   Birkmann J., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002
   Birkmann J., 2016, J EXTREME EVENTS, V3, P1650017, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737616500172
   Booysen F, 2002, SOC INDIC RES, V59, P115, DOI 10.1023/A:1016275505152
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Burton C.G., 2012, DEV METRICS COMMUNIT, P198, DOI [10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2, DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2]
   Burton CG, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P67, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.960039
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chelleri L, 2012, DOC ANAL GEOGR, V58, P287
   Cinelli M, 2014, ECOL INDIC, V46, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.06.011
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Cutter SL, 2016, GEOGR J, V182, P110, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12174
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2010, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V7
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   de Brito MM, 2018, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V22, P373, DOI 10.5194/hess-22-373-2018
   de Brito MM, 2016, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V16, P1019, DOI 10.5194/nhess-16-1019-2016
   DelSole T, 2013, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V139, P176, DOI 10.1002/qj.1961
   Eddy DM, 2012, VALUE HEALTH, V15, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.012
   Frazier TG, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.004
   Hwang C., 1995, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction
   Johnson C, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P29, DOI 10.1177/0956247813518684
   Khazai B., 2015, A Guide to Measuring Urban Risk Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice of Urban Indicators
   Koussis AD, 2003, J HYDROL ENG, V8, P1, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:1(1)
   Lee G, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P1293, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-1293-2013
   Li F, 2011, COMPUT RISK MANAG, P415, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-15243-6_48
   Martin-Caro J.A., 2015, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, V168, P583, DOI [DOI 10.2495/SD150321, 10.2495/SD150511, DOI 10.2495/SD150511]
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Nardo M., 2005, EUROPEAN COMISSION I
   Parsons M., 2016, The Australian natural disaster resilience index: Conceptual framework and indicator approach
   Poku-Boansi M, 2018, CITIES, V72, P252, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
   Prasad N, 2009, CLIMATE RESILIENT CITIES: A PRIMER ON REDUCING VULNERABILITIES TO DISASTERS, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-7766-6
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Rutter M, 2012, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL, V24, P335, DOI 10.1017/S0954579412000028
   SAATY RW, 1987, MATH MODELLING, V9, P161, DOI 10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
   Saaty T.L., 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI [10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
   Samuel M., 2015, International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Research, V1, P22
   Schipper E.L. F., 2015, Overseas Development Institute - Working, P30, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2430.0882
   Seifolddini F., 2014, Journal of Geography Geology, V6, P70, DOI [10.5539/jgg.v6n1p70, DOI 10.5539/JGG.V6N1P70, DOI 10.1080/00431672.1959.9926960]
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   Shih HS, 2007, MATH COMPUT MODEL, V45, P801, DOI 10.1016/j.mcm.2006.03.023
   Singh-Peterson L, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.004
   Tate E, 2013, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V103, P526, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2012.700616
   Thomas DSG, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.10.001
   THOR J., 2013, The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES), V2, P27
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   United Nations, 2005, Hyogo framework for action (HFA) 2005-2015. Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   World Bank, 2013, Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice, DOI [10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8865-5]
NR 88
TC 221
Z9 229
U1 57
U2 356
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD APR
PY 2019
VL 35
AR 101069
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
PG 14
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA HR3JW
UT WOS:000463034000010
OA Green Submitted, hybrid
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dwirahmadi, F
   Rutherford, S
   Phung, D
   Chu, C
AF Dwirahmadi, Febi
   Rutherford, Shannon
   Phung, Dung
   Chu, Cordia
TI Understanding the Operational Concept of a Flood-Resilient Urban
   Community in Jakarta, Indonesia, from the Perspectives of Disaster Risk
   Reduction, Climate Change Adaptation, and Development Agencies
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Article
DE community resilience; flood; climate change adaptation; disaster risk
   reduction; development; Jakarta
ID VULNERABILITY; FRAMEWORK; MANAGEMENT; HEALTH; PRONE; GOVERNANCE; CITY;
   COORDINATION; DEGRADATION; STRATEGIES
AB Climate change-related extreme events such as floods have and will continue to present a great challenge to disaster risk management. There is a pressing need to develop a robust management strategy via enhancing the resiliency of the community, particularly in the context of complex urban environments, like Jakarta. Resilience is conceptualized within specific contexts and uniquely tailored to the targeted setting, yet research regarding the operational concept of a flood-resilient community in the context of Jakarta remains limited. This paper will elaborate this operational concept through understanding the desirable features and influential barriers of a flood-resilient community through the lenses of three main stakeholder groups: disaster risk reduction (DRR), climate change adaptation (CCA), and development. It will also discuss the ways in which the synergies that exist across these groups can be enhanced. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were applied in this study, and multiple sources of data were used. The findings indicate that these groups share common views regarding the importance of human aspects being central to resilience building efforts. We argue there is an urgent need to shift the flood resilience building paradigm towards building community resilience from the people and to apply a collaborative governance approach to facilitate effective partnership between the actors involved.
C1 [Dwirahmadi, Febi; Rutherford, Shannon; Phung, Dung; Chu, Cordia] Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Environm & Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
C3 Griffith University
RP Dwirahmadi, F (corresponding author), Griffith Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Environm & Populat Hlth, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
EM f.dwirahmadi@griffith.edu.au; s.rutherford@griffith.edu.au;
   d.phung@griffith.edu.au; c.chu@griffith.edu.au
RI Chu, Christopher/HHN-4195-2022; Phung, Dung/ABC-9218-2021
OI Chu, Cordia/0000-0002-3683-5638; Rutherford,
   Shannon/0000-0002-5851-2987; Dwirahmadi, Febi/0000-0002-9367-3452
FU Griffith University International Post Graduate Scholarship (GUIPRS);
   Griffith Climate Change Response Program (GCCRP)
FX This research received funding from the Griffith University
   International Post Graduate Scholarship (GUIPRS) and Griffith Climate
   Change Response Program (GCCRP).
CR Abidin HZ, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P1753, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9866-9
   Adger W.N., 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007, P717
   Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Akmalah E, 2011, WATER INT, V36, P733, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2011.610729
   Aldunce P, 2014, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V23, P252, DOI 10.1108/DPM-07-2013-0130
   Alisha KC, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16162964
   Ameen RFM, 2017, HABITAT INT, V64, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.002
   [Anonymous], UN SAYS RED EC LOSSE
   [Anonymous], BNPB REKLAMASI TELUK
   [Anonymous], FLOODS JAK PROV REP
   [Anonymous], LIVING FLOODS KEY LE
   [Anonymous], PROV DKI JAK KAB KOT
   [Anonymous], NAT DIS 2018
   [Anonymous], 2018, GEOPHYS MONOGR SER
   [Anonymous], 2010, EST COMM BAS EARL WA
   [Anonymous], BUILDING RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], STATE WORLD 2009
   [Anonymous], ENV SCI
   [Anonymous], PAND PER KONT MENGH
   [Anonymous], MICROINSURANCE INNOV
   [Anonymous], RENC PEN BENC PROV D
   [Anonymous], 2011, DEF DIS RES DFID APP
   [Anonymous], CONV CLIM CHANG AD D
   [Anonymous], PER DAER PROP DAER K
   [Anonymous], 2013, IND POP PROJ 2010 20
   [Anonymous], 2018, Demographic Research, V12
   [Anonymous], LAP PERK KER DAN KER
   [Anonymous], STAT DAER PROV DKI J
   [Anonymous], AHOK YAKIN REKLAMASI
   [Anonymous], URBAN GOVERNANCE REA
   [Anonymous], BUILDING RESILIENCE
   [Anonymous], J SOS EKON KELAUT DA
   [Anonymous], 2008, Climate change and disaster risk reduction
   [Anonymous], RENC STRAT BAD PEN B
   [Anonymous], MENG JAK BANJ PENG B
   [Anonymous], 2016, CLIMATIC CHANGE, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10584-016-1661-x
   Becker A, 2015, COAST MANAGE, V43, P1, DOI 10.1080/08920753.2014.983422
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   BIERNACKI P, 1981, SOCIOL METHOD RES, V10, P141, DOI 10.1177/004912418101000205
   Burch S, 2010, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V3, P126, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01062.x
   Cagney KA, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0160824
   Capps KA, 2016, FRESHW SCI, V35, P429, DOI 10.1086/684945
   Cybriwsky R, 2001, CITIES, V18, P199, DOI 10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00004-X
   Davydov DM, 2010, CLIN PSYCHOL REV, V30, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003
   de Leon EG, 2017, CLIM DEV, V9, P471, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2016.1174659
   Delinom RM, 2009, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V407, P3129, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.10.003
   Devkota RP, 2018, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V11, pS186, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12192
   Djalante R., 2012, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V3, P166, DOI [10.1108/17595901211245260, DOI 10.1108/17595901211245260]
   Djalante R, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V62, P779, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0106-8
   Duijnhoven H, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P425, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00959-9
   Dulal HB, 2017, LOCAL ENVIRON, V22, P106, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2016.1168790
   Dwirahmadi F., 2013, Climate Adaptation Futures, P362
   Emerson K, 2012, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, V22, P1, DOI 10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Farhan AR, 2011, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V54, P391, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.12.003
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Forino G, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK SC, V6, P372, DOI 10.1007/s13753-015-0076-z
   Fu Q, 2018, STOCH ENV RES RISK A, V32, P2913, DOI 10.1007/s00477-018-1543-z
   Gaillard JC, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V45, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.009
   Garschagen M, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10082934
   Gernay T, 2016, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V161, P1801, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.782
   Ghimire U, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V155, P59, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02444-3
   Gollagher M, 2013, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V5, P2343, DOI 10.3390/su5062343
   Goode N, 2017, DISASTERS, V41, P171, DOI 10.1111/disa.12189
   Guleria S, 2012, J COAST CONSERV, V16, P101, DOI 10.1007/s11852-011-0178-8
   Henderson SEK, 2016, DISASTERS, V40, P432, DOI 10.1111/disa.12159
   Hirabayashi Y, 2013, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V3, P816, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE1911, 10.1038/nclimate1911]
   Holderness T., 2015, Social Media for Government Services, P115
   Idroes IC., 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P372, DOI [10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.11.011, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.11.011]
   Iman L.S., 2015, Urban development challenges, risks and resilience in Asian Mega Cities, P421
   Jabeen H, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P415, DOI 10.1177/0956247810379937
   Jha AK, 2012, CITIES AND FLOODING: A GUIDE TO INTEGRATED URBAN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8866-2
   Johnson R.B., 2004, ED RES, V33, P14, DOI [10.3102/0013189X033007014, DOI 10.3102/0013189X033007014, 10.3102/0013189x033007014]
   Kabir MH, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P1107, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.143
   Kafle Shesh Kanta, 2012, J Bus Contin Emer Plan, V5, P316
   Kahan JH, 2009, J HOMEL SECUR EMERG, V6
   Keogh DU, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P699, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9791-y
   Kita SM, 2017, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V22, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.010
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Lebel L, 2011, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V11, P45, DOI 10.1007/s10113-010-0118-4
   Liao KH, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V155, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.014
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Linnekamp F, 2011, HABITAT INT, V35, P447, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.003
   López-Marrero T, 2011, ENVIRON URBAN, V23, P229, DOI 10.1177/0956247810396055
   Maghsoudi A, 2018, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V21, P407, DOI 10.1080/13675567.2018.1437894
   Manyena SB, 2011, LOCAL ENVIRON, V16, P417, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2011.583049
   Marfai MA, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V75, P1127, DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1365-3
   Marshall J, 2005, NATURE, V437, P312, DOI 10.1038/437312a
   Maru YT, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V28, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.007
   Mayunga J. S., 2007, DRAFT WORKING PAPER
   McEvoy D, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P280, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787710
   McIntire D., 2001, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V10, P189, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09653560110395359, 10.1108/09653560110395359]
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mercer J, 2010, J INT DEV, V22, P247, DOI 10.1002/jid.1677
   Merz B, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P1697, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
   Merz B, 2010, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V10, P509, DOI 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
   Mitchell T., 2012, Resilience: A risk management approach
   Motsholapheko MR, 2011, PHYS CHEM EARTH, V36, P984, DOI 10.1016/j.pce.2011.08.004
   Mulyasari F, 2011, COMM ENV DISAST RISK, V6, P225, DOI 10.1108/S2040-7262(2011)0000006018
   Neuman W. L., 2014, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
   Nirupama N, 2013, NAT HAZARDS, V66, P51, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-0045-9
   O'Sullivan JJ, 2012, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V12, P2271, DOI 10.5194/nhess-12-2271-2012
   Oyane Jun., 2010, SENSHU SOCIAL CAPITA, V1, P105
   Padawangi R, 2015, PAC AFF, V88, P517, DOI 10.5509/2015883517
   Paterson DL, 2018, CLIN INFECT DIS, V67, P1450, DOI 10.1093/cid/ciy227
   Poortinga W, 2012, HEALTH PLACE, V18, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.09.017
   Rahmayati Y, 2017, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V32, P58
   Reed SO, 2013, ENVIRON URBAN, V25, P393, DOI 10.1177/0956247813501136
   Rigg C, 2013, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V15, P83, DOI 10.1080/14719037.2012.686231
   Rinne P., 2016, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V18, P4, DOI [10.1080/1523908X.2015.1021414, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1021414]
   Roberts E, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P1024, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2776
   Rose A., 2007, Environmental Hazards, V7, P383, DOI [10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ENVHAZ.2007.10.001]
   Sani Rasio Ridho, 2017, Journal of Asian Sociology, V46, P427
   Schelfaut K, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P825, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.02.009
   Scolobig A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V12, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.006
   Serrao-Neumann S, 2015, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V50, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.017
   Simanjuntak I, 2012, WATER POLICY, V14, P561, DOI 10.2166/wp.2012.119
   Sinaulan J. H., 2013, Developing Country Studies, V3, P16
   Sitinjak E, 2018, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V212, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.029
   Steinberg F, 2007, HABITAT INT, V31, P354, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.002
   Sudmeier KI, 2013, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V22, P366, DOI 10.1108/DPM-02-2013-0028
   Sunarharum T M., 2014, International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, V5, P230, DOI DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2014-0015
   Takagi H, 2016, URBAN CLIM, V17, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2016.05.003
   Taylor J, 2015, ENVIRON URBAN, V27, P621, DOI 10.1177/0956247815594532
   Taylor J, 2011, LOCAL SUSTAIN, V1, P329, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0785-6_34
   Texier Pauline., 2008, Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, V17, P358
   Texier-Teixeira P, 2017, IDENTIFYING EMERGING ISSUES IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, MIGRATION, CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: SHAPING DEBATES AND POLICIES, P81, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-33880-4_6
   The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), 2015, HUM COST WEATH REL D
   The-Jakarta-Post, 2018, The Jakarta Post
   Tyler S, 2012, CLIM DEV, V4, P311, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Vaismoradi M, 2013, NURS HEALTH SCI, V15, P398, DOI 10.1111/nhs.12048
   van Voorst R, 2016, HABITAT INT, V52, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.08.023
   Van Voorst R, 2015, HEALTH RISK SOC, V17, P246, DOI 10.1080/13698575.2015.1071785
   Vaneeckhaute LE, 2017, COMMUNITY DEV, V48, P735, DOI 10.1080/15575330.2017.1369443
   Vogel C, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002
   Ward PJ, 2013, ENVIRON POLIT, V22, P518, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2012.683155
   Wickes R, 2015, SOC SCI QUART, V96, P330, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12144
   Wijaya C.A., 2016, JAKARTA POST
   World Bank, 2016, Keeping Indonesia's Capital Safer From Floods
   Wu F, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V204, P344, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.067
   Yoseph-Paulus R, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P35, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2016.1184609
   Yuliadi D, 2016, INT J ADV SCI ENG IN, V6, P390, DOI [DOI 10.18517/ijaseit.6.3.836, DOI 10.18517/IJASEIT.6.3.836]
   Zhong S, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V626, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.041
NR 143
TC 28
Z9 30
U1 7
U2 54
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD OCT
PY 2019
VL 16
IS 20
AR 3993
DI 10.3390/ijerph16203993
PG 24
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA JK3XV
UT WOS:000494779100207
PM 31635410
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Meerow, S
   Neuner, FG
AF Meerow, Sara
   Neuner, Fabian G.
TI Positively Resilient? How Framing Local Action Affects Public Opinion
SO URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW
LA English
DT Article
DE resilience; adaptation; sustainability; vulnerability; framing
ID CLIMATE-CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY; ADAPTATION; CITIES; IMPLEMENTATION;
   ENGAGEMENT; PLANNERS; SUPPORT; SCIENCE
AB Cities face numerous environmental challenges. Local governments need the public's support to tackle these problems, and scholars and practitioners have suggested that framing initiatives around resilience, as opposed to sustainability, reducing vulnerability, or adaptation, may increase public support for local action. Resilience, they argue, has a better social connotation, is more positive, and less polarizing than related concepts. Empirical evidence supporting these claims is lacking. In three online survey experiments, we test whether the public is more likely to support policies when they are framed in terms of "resilience." We also examine public conceptualizations of these different terms and whether resilience has a more positive connotation. We find significant differences in policy support, perceived importance, and interpretations of the concepts. The study confirms that framing affects policy support, but complicates claims that resilience is inherently more appealing. These findings have implications for urban research and policymaking.
C1 [Meerow, Sara] Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Coor Hall,976 S Forest Mall, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
   [Neuner, Fabian G.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Polit & Global Studies, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State
   University; Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Meerow, S (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Geog Sci & Urban Planning, Coor Hall,976 S Forest Mall, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA.
EM sara.meerow@asu.edu
RI Neuner, Fabian/J-8032-2019; Meerow, Sara/J-8037-2019
OI Neuner, Fabian/0000-0001-9357-0552; Meerow, Sara/0000-0002-6935-1832
FU University of Michigan Rackham Graduate Student Research Grant
FX The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for
   the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article:This
   research was supported in part with funding from a University of
   Michigan Rackham Graduate Student Research Grant.
CR Anderies JM, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05178-180208
   Bahadur AdityaV., 2010, The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Berinsky AJ, 2012, POLIT ANAL, V20, P351, DOI 10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Beutel RG, 2014, INSECT MORPHOLOGY AND PHYLOGENY: A TEXTBOOK FOR STUDENTS OF ENTOMOLOGY, P117
   Boschetti F, 2017, SUSTAIN SCI, V12, P345, DOI 10.1007/s11625-017-0429-1
   Brand FS, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
   Campbell S, 1996, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V62, P296, DOI 10.1080/01944369608975696
   Campbell SD, 2016, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V82, P388, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Chong D, 2007, ANNU REV POLIT SCI, V10, P103, DOI 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
   Coppock A, 2019, POLIT SCI RES METH, V7, P613, DOI 10.1017/psrm.2018.10
   Cramer KJ., 2016, POLITICS RESENTMENT
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   de Bruijn K, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V70, P21, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.001
   Foss A, 2018, URBAN STUD, V55, P332, DOI 10.1177/0042098016651554
   Franco A., 2017, Journal of Experimental Political Science, V4, P161, DOI DOI 10.1017/XPS.2017.2
   Goetz EG, 2008, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V74, P222, DOI 10.1080/01944360802010251
   Hamin EM, 2014, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V80, P110, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2014.949590
   Handmer J., 2003, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V18, P55
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jabareen Y, 2013, CITIES, V31, P220, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2012.05.004
   Laurian L, 2016, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V18, P482, DOI 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1138403
   Lawrence E, 2010, URBAN AFF REV, V45, P412, DOI 10.1177/1078087409348588
   Lecheler S, 2010, EUR POLIT SCI REV, V2, P73, DOI 10.1017/S1755773909990233
   Leitch AM, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V26, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.006
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   LeRoy S., 2019, HIGH TIDE TAX PRICE
   Levin K, 2012, POLICY SCI, V45, P123, DOI 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
   Lubell M, 2005, URBAN AFF REV, V40, P706, DOI 10.1177/10780874042714137
   MacInnis B, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V128, P17, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1286-x
   McEvoy D, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P280, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787710
   McPhearson T, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V70, P566, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.054
   Meerow S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8070701
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Miller F, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Moser SC, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P337, DOI 10.1002/wcc.276
   Mulligan M, 2016, INT PLAN STUD, V21, P348, DOI 10.1080/13563475.2016.1155974
   Nelson TE, 1997, AM POLIT SCI REV, V91, P567, DOI 10.2307/2952075
   Pasek J, 2016, INT J PUBLIC OPIN R, V28, P269, DOI 10.1093/ijpor/edv016
   Porter JJ, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V35, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.004
   Schenker N, 2001, AM STAT, V55, P182, DOI 10.1198/000313001317097960
   Sharp EB, 2011, URBAN AFF REV, V47, P433, DOI 10.1177/1078087410392348
   Shaw K., 2013, PUBLIC POLICY ADMIN, V28, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0952076711432578, 10.1177/0952076711432578]
   Spence A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P656, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
   Stults Missy., 2017, Professional societies and climate change: An analysis of how urban-focused professional societies are integrating climate change into their member engagement activities
   Sudmeier-Rieux KI, 2014, DISASTER PREV MANAG, V23, P67, DOI 10.1108/DPM-12-2012-0143
   van der Vegt GS, 2015, ACAD MANAGE J, V58, P971, DOI 10.5465/amj.2015.4004
   Vogel C, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P349, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002
   Walsh B., 2013, Time
   Wang XH, 2014, URBAN AFF REV, V50, P806, DOI 10.1177/1078087414522388
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Whittemore A, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P2460, DOI 10.1177/0042098012474698
   Whittemore AH, 2021, J PLAN EDUC RES, V41, P48, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18774824
   Whittemore AH, 2019, URBAN AFF REV, V55, P1339, DOI 10.1177/1078087418754725
   Wiest SL, 2015, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V31, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.006
   Winthrop Rebecca, 2013, 10 BROOK CTR UN ED
   Wong-Parodi G, 2015, CLIM RISK MANAG, V10, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2015.07.002
   Woodruff SC, 2022, J PLAN EDUC RES, V42, P64, DOI 10.1177/0739456X18801057
   World Commission on Environment and Development and Gro Harlem Brundtland, 1987, Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, P1
   Zeemering ES, 2009, URBAN AFF REV, V45, P247, DOI 10.1177/1078087409337297
NR 62
TC 13
Z9 15
U1 0
U2 14
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
PI THOUSAND OAKS
PA 2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
SN 1078-0874
EI 1552-8332
J9 URBAN AFF REV
JI Urban Aff. Rev.
PD JAN
PY 2021
VL 57
IS 1
BP 70
EP 103
AR 1078087420905655
DI 10.1177/1078087420905655
EA FEB 2020
PG 34
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA PL8HH
UT WOS:000514265900001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Van Neste, SL
   Madenian, H
   Houde-Tremblay, E
   Cloutier, G
AF Van Neste, Sophie L.
   Madenian, Helene
   Houde-Tremblay, Emilie
   Cloutier, Genevieve
TI Resilient climate urbanism and the politics of experimentation for
   adaptation
SO URBAN GEOGRAPHY
LA English
DT Article
DE climate urbanism; climate adaptation; governance experiments; urban
   living lab; infrastructure; climate equity
ID GOVERNANCE; CITIES; POLICY; INFRASTRUCTURES; SUSTAINABILITY; STRUGGLES;
   AUTHORITY; CITY
AB Cities are increasingly pursuing actions to become more resilient in the face of climate change and to seize related economic growth opportunities. Recent contributions have argued that "climate urbanism" is emerging as a hegemonic trend that is structuring climate adaptation with a focus on the selective securing of vital infrastructure for growth, promoting an apolitical vision of resilience and exacerbating inequalities. Developing situated understandings of these dynamics and their contestation seems key. We analyse this trend of climate urbanism in a specific setting of climate adaptation experiment: living labs. We investigate and intervene on two key processes of the politics of climate experimentation - making for compelling urban projects and focusing on infrastructure reconfiguration - whereby living labs could challenge or, conversely, amplify negative trends of climate urbanism. Our research in Montreal shows the value of understanding the subjectivities of the practitioners involved and the fields of political struggles where adaptation lands. Although the negative trends of climate urbanism appear very resilient and living labs have important limitations, we believe they can be used to muddle through pathways for more debates, equity and justice in climate adaptation.
C1 [Van Neste, Sophie L.; Madenian, Helene] Inst Natl Rech Sci, Ctr Urbanisat Culture Soc, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
   [Houde-Tremblay, Emilie; Cloutier, Genevieve] Univ Laval, Ecole Super Amenagement Terr & Dev Reg, Quebec City, PQ, Canada.
C3 University of Quebec; Institut national de la recherche scientifique
   (INRS); Laval University
RP Van Neste, SL (corresponding author), Inst Natl Rech Sci, Ctr Urbanisat Culture Soc, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
EM sophiel.vanneste@inrs.ca
RI Cloutier, Geneviève/AIE-4942-2022; Van Neste, Sophie L./LTY-8356-2024;
   Madenian, Helene/KEJ-0117-2024
OI Van Neste, Sophie L./0000-0003-3319-4879; Cloutier,
   Genevieve/0000-0001-9697-3648; Madenian, Helene/0000-0001-8158-9563
FU Ouranos (via the Quebec governement's Climate Change Action Plan)
   [950-232808]; City of Montreal, Mitacs Acceleration, SSHRC; Canada
   Research Chair in Urban Climate Action [950-232808];  [CER-19-510]
FX We warmly thank all participants to the living lab for their time and
   commitment, as well as students, professors, partners and friends in the
   Labo Climat Montreal. We also wish to thank the anonymous referrees for
   their insightful comments. This research has been reviewed and approved
   by the INRS Ethics in research committee (CER-19-510).
CR Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   [Anonymous], 2016, The Sustainable Infrastructure Imperative. The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate
   Aylett A, 2015, CITIES GLOBAL GOVERN, P156
   Bracke Sarah., 2016, VULNERABILITY RESIST, P52, DOI [DOI 10.1215/9780822373490-004, DOI 10.2307/J.CTV11VC78R.8]
   Broto VC, 2015, ENVIRON PLANN D, V33, P460, DOI 10.1177/0263775815594297
   Bulkeley H, 2015, URBAN POLITICS OF CLIMATE CHANGE: EXPERIMENTATION AND THE GOVERNING OF SOCIO-TECHNICAL TRANSITIONS, P1
   Bulkeley H, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-SCI P, V19, DOI 10.1080/15487733.2023.2188726
   Bulkeley H, 2013, T I BRIT GEOGR, V38, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Broto VC, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P715, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2020.1850617
   Coaffee J, 2018, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V26, P403, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12233
   Collin JP, 2005, J URBAN AFF, V27, P307, DOI 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00238.x
   Concert'Action Lachine, 2021, GROUPES TRAVAIL THEM
   Coutard Olivier., 2015, Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South
   DAmours, IN PRESS
   de Moor J, 2021, SOC MOVEMENT STUD, V20, P312, DOI 10.1080/14742837.2019.1708311
   Ernstson H., 2019, Urban Political Ecology in the Anthropo-Obscene: Interruptions and Possibilities, P255
   Evans JP, 2011, T I BRIT GEOGR, V36, P223, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00420.x
   Evans J, 2016, ROUT RES SUSTAIN URB, P1
   Finewood MH, 2019, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V109, P909, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2018.1507813
   Fournier C., 2020, CONCRETISER LADAPTAT, P69
   Goh Kian., 2021, Form and Flow: The Spatial Politics of Urban Resilience and Climate Justice
   Guay E., 2019, NOUVEAUX CAHIERS SOC, V22, P198
   Henrique KP, 2021, PROG HUM GEOG, V45, P1169, DOI 10.1177/0309132520962856
   Hodson M, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN C-POLIT, V36, P1480, DOI 10.1177/2399654418765480
   Hölscher K, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043
   Hommels A, 2005, SCI TECHNOL HUM VAL, V30, P323, DOI 10.1177/0162243904271759
   Huitema D, 2018, POLICY SCI, V51, P143, DOI 10.1007/s11077-018-9321-9
   Immergluck D, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P546, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041
   Karvonen A., 2018, CITY PERMANENT EXPT
   Karvonen A, 2014, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V38, P379, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12075
   Leitner H, 2018, URBAN GEOGR, V39, P1276, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2018.1446870
   Long J, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P721, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2020.1841470
   Long J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P992, DOI 10.1177/0042098018770846
   Loorbach D, 2017, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V42, P599, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340
   Lopes AM, 2018, HUM ECOL REV, V24, P41
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Majoor SJH, 2018, PROG PLANN, V120, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.progress.2016.07.001
   Marvin S., 2018, Urban living labs: Experimenting with city futures
   McFadgen B, 2017, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V60, P1765, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2016.1256808
   Meerow S, 2020, CITIES, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102621
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Monstadt J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2191, DOI 10.1177/0042098019833907
   Nightingale AJ, 2017, GEOFORUM, V84, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.011
   Nightingale AJ, 2020, CLIM DEV, V12, P343, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495
   Ouranos, 2023, PORTRAITS CLIMATIQUE
   Ranganathan M, 2021, ANTIPODE, V53, P115, DOI 10.1111/anti.12555
   Robin E, 2021, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V45, P869, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12981
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Smith A, 2006, SOCIOLOGY, V40, P949, DOI 10.1177/0038038506067517
   Smith Neil, 2008, UNEVEN DEV, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.15.370.195
   Turnheim B., 2018, Innovating Climate Governance: Moving beyond Experiments, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781108277679.003
   Van Neste S. L., 2021, LADAPTATION CHANGEME, P585
   van Vliet M., 2014, ACTION RES CLIMATE C
   Ville de Montreal, 2021, LECOQUARTIER LACHINE
   Ville de Montreal, 2019, NOUVEAU PROJET LABO
   Voytenko Y, 2016, J CLEAN PROD, V123, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
   While A, 2010, T I BRIT GEOGR, V35, P76, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00362.x
   Zaidi RZ, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1218, DOI 10.1177/0042098013510957
   Zografos C, 2020, CITIES, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102613
NR 59
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 7
U2 11
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0272-3638
EI 1938-2847
J9 URBAN GEOGR
JI Urban Geogr.
PD JAN 2
PY 2025
VL 46
IS 1
BP 43
EP 63
DI 10.1080/02723638.2024.2336852
EA APR 2024
PG 21
WC Geography; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography; Urban Studies
GA S2G9M
UT WOS:001209158800001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dawson, RJ
AF Dawson, Richard J.
TI Potential pitfalls on the transition to more sustainable cities and how
   they might be avoided
SO CARBON MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Review
ID GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE ADAPTATION; ECOLOGICAL
   CONSEQUENCES; CHANGE IMPACTS; FLOOD RISK; LAND-USE; RESILIENCE; POLICY;
   SCALE; CITY
AB The urgent need to reconfigure urban areas so that they consume fewer resources, emit less pollution (including GHGs), are more resilient to the impacts of climate change, and are more sustainable in general, is increasingly being recognized. Now that many urban areas have set themselves on a trajectory to becoming sustainable cities, it is timely to point out some potential pitfalls that may be encountered along this transition. This review considers pitfalls that range from the practicalities of analyzing sustainability in cities through to more philosophical issues such as our understanding of urban sustainability. If the type of mitigative actions proposed in this artile to avoid these pitfalls are not taken, then well-meaning sustainability initiatives may result in undesirable side effects. However, a more fundamental shift in the way we engage with our cities is required if we are to realize a genuinely sustainable city.
C1 Newcastle Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England.
C3 Newcastle University - UK
RP Dawson, RJ (corresponding author), Newcastle Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Geosci, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Cassie Bldg, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England.
EM richard.dawson@newcastle.ac.uk
RI Dawson, Richard/D-6933-2011
FU UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through a Career
   Acceleration Fellowship [EP/H003630/1]; EPSRC [EP/G061254/1,
   EP/H003630/1, EP/G061254/2, EP/G013403/1] Funding Source: UKRI
FX Richard Dawson is a researcher in the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change
   Research and funded by the UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences
   Research Council through a Career Acceleration Fellowship
   (EP/H003630/1). The author has no other relevant affiliations or
   financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial
   interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials
   discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
CR Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Allenby B, 2005, SCIENCE, V309, P1034, DOI 10.1126/science.1111534
   Amatayakul W., 2001, J CLEAN PROD, V9, P395, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00082-2
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   [Anonymous], WELL PREP UK CLIM CH
   [Anonymous], 2010, Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the immesurable
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
   [Anonymous], ETHEKWINI MUN INT AS
   [Anonymous], 2003, The Challenge of Slums: Global Report on Human Settlements 2003
   [Anonymous], 2008, email response to Oxfam
   [Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE CHANGE 2007
   [Anonymous], 2005, 15 IHDP
   [Anonymous], 2009, AGR INVESTMENT INT L
   [Anonymous], 2007, Climate Change 2007: A Synthesis Report, P22
   [Anonymous], 2008, WORLD EN OUTL 2008
   [Anonymous], 2009, Policy guidance on integrating climate change adaptation into development co-operation
   [Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPT
   [Anonymous], 2010, WORLD URB PROSP 2009
   Balbus JohnM., 2000, HUMAN HLTH GLOBAL CL
   Barkin David., 1978, Desarrollo Regional y Reorganizacion Campesina: La Chontalpa Como Reflejo del Problema Agropecuario Mexicano
   Barnett J, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.004
   BARR S.L., 2004, SPATIAL MODELLING TE, P201
   Bauriedl S, 2011, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_1
   Beatley Timothy., 2000, Green Urbanism: Learning from European Cities
   Becken S, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P381, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.08.001
   Benenson I, 2004, GEOSIMULATION AUTOMA
   Berry B. J., 1964, PAPERS REGIONAL SCI, V13, P147
   Bicknell J., 2009, Adapting Cities to Climate Change: Understanding and Addressing the Development Challenges
   Blanco AVR, 2006, DISASTERS, V30, P140
   Blythe P., 2008, P IET ROAD TRANSP IN, P1, DOI [10.1049/ic.2008.0805, DOI 10.1049/IC.2008.0805]
   Breheny M., 2001, Cities for the New Millennium, P3951
   Bulkeley H., 2003, CITIES CLIMATE CHANG, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203219256
   Bulkeley H, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V7, P1, DOI 10.1162/glep.2007.7.2.1
   Bunce M, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P485, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.06.003
   Cassman KG, 2007, ENVIRON RES LETT, V2, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/011002
   Coaffee J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P4633, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.048
   Collingridge D., 1982, The Social Control of Technology
   Dawson RJ, 2009, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V95, P249, DOI 10.1007/s10584-008-9532-8
   Dawson R, 2007, PHILOS T R SOC A, V365, P3085, DOI 10.1098/rsta.2007.0008
   Dawson RJ, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P628, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.013
   Decker EH, 2000, ANNU REV ENERG ENV, V25, P685, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.685
   Dessai S, 2007, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V17, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.005
   Eames M., 2009, COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
   Erb KH, 2009, ECOL ECON, V69, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.025
   Ewing B., 2010, The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010
   Falkowski P, 2000, SCIENCE, V290, P291, DOI 10.1126/science.290.5490.291
   Fankhauser S, 1999, ECOL ECON, V30, P67, DOI 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00117-7
   Fisher B, 2008, ECOL APPL, V18, P2050, DOI 10.1890/07-1537.1
   Fowler HJ, 2003, WATER RESOUR RES, V39, DOI 10.1029/2002WR001778
   Gober P, 2010, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V100, P356, DOI 10.1080/00045601003595420
   Goklany I. M., 2007, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, V12, P755, DOI 10.1007/s11027-007-9098-1
   Graedel T.E. Braden R. Allenby., 2003, IND ECOLOGY
   Grenz J, 2007, GAIA, V16, P208, DOI 10.14512/gaia.16.3.12
   Grimm NB, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P571, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2
   Gusdorf F, 2007, ENERG POLICY, V35, P3483, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.022
   Hall J, 2006, P I CIVIL ENG-CIV EN, V159, P21, DOI 10.1680/cien.2006.159.6.21
   Hall JimW., 2009, Engineering Cities: How Can Cities Grow Whilst Reducing Emissions and Vulnerability?
   Hall JW, 2005, NAT HAZARDS, V36, P147, DOI 10.1007/s11069-004-4546-7
   Hall JW, 2003, P I CIVIL ENG-WATER, V156, P235
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Harms A.A., 2004, Engineering in time: The systematics of engineering history and its contemporary context
   Haughton G., 2003, SUSTAINABLE CITIES
   Hawksworth J, 2009, UK EC OUTLOOK NOVEMB, P20
   Hine D, 2010, WATER RESOUR RES, V46, DOI 10.1029/2008WR007620
   Hughes AL, 2009, INT J EMERG MANAG, V6, P248, DOI 10.1504/IJEM.2009.031564
   Hunt A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6
   Hunt DV, 2008, P I CIVIL ENG-ENG SU, V161, P77, DOI 10.1680/ensu.2008.161.1.77
   Hunt DVL, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P187, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.4.187
   Johnson J, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P1759, DOI 10.1021/es060736h
   Kabat P, 2005, NATURE, V438, P283, DOI 10.1038/438283a
   KATES RW, 1971, ECON GEOGR, V47, P438, DOI 10.2307/142820
   Kaye JP, 2006, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V21, P192, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2005.12.006
   Kennedy C, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1107
   Kenworthy JR, 2006, ENVIRON URBAN, V18, P67, DOI 10.1177/0956247806063947
   Kharrufa AS, 2010, INT J LEARN TECHNOL, V5, P42, DOI 10.1504/IJLT.2010.031615
   Kousky C, 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.clipol.2003.08.002
   Krings G, 2009, J STAT MECH-THEORY E, DOI 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/07/L07003
   Lempert R. J., SHAPING NEXT 100 YEA
   Lovan R.W., 2004, PARTICIPATORY GOVERN
   Lundie S, 2004, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V38, P3465, DOI 10.1021/es034206m
   Mannion AM, 1998, GEOGR J, V164, P168, DOI 10.2307/3060368
   Martens P., 2002, TRANSITIONS GLOBALIS
   McEvoy D, 2006, P I CIVIL ENG-MUNIC, V159, P185, DOI 10.1680/muen.2006.159.4.185
   McEvoy D, 2010, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V15, P779, DOI 10.1007/s11027-010-9233-2
   McKinney ML, 2006, BIOL CONSERV, V127, P247, DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005
   Morris C., 2003, British Food Journal, V105, P559, DOI 10.1108/00070700310497318
   Nicholls R.J., 1995, GEOJOURNAL, V37, P369, DOI [10.1007/BF00814018, DOI 10.1007/BF00814018]
   Patz JA, 2000, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V108, P367, DOI 10.2307/3454357
   PINKERTON T., 2009, Local Food: How to make it happen in your community
   Pugh C.D. J., 1996, Sustainability, the environment and urbanization
   Ratti C, 2006, ENVIRON PLANN B, V33, P727, DOI 10.1068/b32047
   Roberts D, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P397, DOI 10.1177/0956247810379948
   Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, 2007, URB ENV
   Schneider A, 2009, ENVIRON RES LETT, V4, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044003
   Seto KC, 2003, LAND ECON, V79, P106, DOI 10.2307/3147108
   Shimoda Y, 2003, BUILD RES INF, V31, P222, DOI 10.1080/0961321032000097647
   Su MR, 2010, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V408, P2425, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.009
   Suzuki H, 2010, ECO2 CITIES: ECOLOGICAL CITIES AS ECONOMIC CITIES, P1, DOI 10.1596/978-0-8213-8046-8
   The Government Office for Science, 2011, FOR FUT FOOD FARM FI
   Turner BL, 2007, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V104, P20666, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0704119104
   VANPELT MJF, 1995, INT J ENVIRON POLLUT, V5, P204
   VITOUSEK PM, 1994, ECOLOGY, V75, P1861, DOI 10.2307/1941591
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Walton J.S., 2005, Proceedings of the ICE - Engineering Sustainability, V158, P57, DOI [DOI 10.1680/ENSU.2005.158.2.57, 10.1680/ensu.2005.158.2]
   Wentz EA, 2006, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V30, P320, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.07.002
   Wilby R.L., 2007, BUILD ENVIRON, V33, P31, DOI 10.2148/benv.33.1.31
   Williams Katie., 2000, ACHIEVING SUSTAINABL, P30
   Wood FR, 2007, LOCAL ECON, V22, P40, DOI 10.1080/02690940601164815
   Yamamoto Y., 2006, SCI TECHNOLOGY TREND, V54, P65
   Zhao SQ, 2006, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V4, P341, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0341:ECORUE]2.0.CO;2
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
   [No title captured]
NR 134
TC 21
Z9 22
U1 0
U2 20
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OR14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 1758-3004
EI 1758-3012
J9 CARBON MANAG
JI Carbon Manag.
PD APR
PY 2011
VL 2
IS 2
BP 175
EP 188
DI 10.4155/CMT.11.8
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA V27ZD
UT WOS:000208650200015
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Dennis, M
   Armitage, RP
   James, P
AF Dennis, Matthew
   Armitage, Richard P.
   James, Philip
TI Social-ecological innovation: adaptive responses to urban environmental
   conditions
SO URBAN ECOSYSTEMS
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban; Social-ecological systems; Adaptive capacity; Resilience;
   Environmental governance
ID LAND-USE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN COMMONS; INNER-CITY;
   RESILIENCE; GOVERNANCE; CAPACITY; HEALTH; SYSTEMS; TRANSFORMABILITY
AB Novel approaches to natural resource management, particularly those which promote stakeholder participation, have been put forward as fundamental ingredients for establishing resilient, polycentric forms of environmental governance. This is nowhere more pertinent than in the case of the complex adaptive systems associated with urban areas. Decentralisation of urban green space management has been posited as an element thereof which, according to resilience thinking, should contribute to the adaptive capacity of cities and the ecosystem services upon which they rely. Implicit in this move towards increased adaptive capacity is the ability to manage through innovation. Although the importance of innovation towards system adaptability has been acknowledged, little work has thus far been carried out which demonstrates that innovative use of urban green space represents a form of adaptive response to environmental conditions. The current paper reports on research which maps examples of organised social-ecological innovation (OSEI) in an urban study area and evaluates them as adaptive responses to local environmental conditions which may contribute to system resilience. The results present OSEI as a coherent body of responses to local social and environmental deprivation, exhibiting diversity and adaptability according to individual contexts. The study therefore provides evidence for the importance of local stakeholder-led innovation as in the building of adaptive capacity in urban social-ecological systems.
C1 [Dennis, Matthew; Armitage, Richard P.; James, Philip] Univ Salford, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Coll Sci & Technol, Room 203 Cockroft Bldg, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England.
C3 University of Salford
RP Dennis, M (corresponding author), Univ Salford, Sch Environm & Life Sci, Coll Sci & Technol, Room 203 Cockroft Bldg, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England.
EM m.dennis@salford.ac.uk
RI Dennis, Matthew/MIP-6720-2025; Armitage, Richard/B-1639-2010
OI Armitage, Richard/0000-0002-7569-425X
CR AfSL (Action for Sustainable Living), FUND SEE WHO FUNDS O
   Alaimo K, 2008, J NUTR EDUC BEHAV, V40, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.12.003
   Andersson E, 2007, ECOL APPL, V17, P1267, DOI 10.1890/06-1116.1
   [Anonymous], 2012, SOCIAL INNOVATION BL
   [Anonymous], 2004, EC APPR CBD GUID
   [Anonymous], UK NAT EC ASS UND NA
   [Anonymous], WORLD URB PROSP 2007
   [Anonymous], MANCHESTER A HIST
   Armitage DR, 2009, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V7, P95, DOI 10.1890/070089
   Barthel S, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.01.001
   Barthel Stephan., 2013, Urban Studies, DOI DOI 10.1177/0042098012472744
   Becker G., 1990, The Biotope Area Factor as an Ecological ParameterPrinciples for Its Determination and Identification of the Target -Excerpt
   Berkley J., 2015, ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT, P201, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9682-8_11
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Biggs R, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/ES-03411-150209
   Bodin Ö, 2009, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V19, P366, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Breuste J, 2013, URBAN ECOSYST, V16, P675, DOI 10.1007/s11252-013-0337-9
   Brooks N., 2004, Adaptation Policy Framework for Climate Change, P165
   Carpenter SR, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Cash DW, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   CBD, 2012, CIT BIOD OUTL
   Colding J, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1039, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.006
   Colding J, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016
   Corrigan MP, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P1232, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.017
   de Vries S, 2003, ENVIRON PLANN A, V35, P1717, DOI 10.1068/a35111
   Dennis M, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V15, P22, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.009
   Ernstson H, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Ernstson H, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
   Folke C, 2005, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V30, P441, DOI 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Folke C, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P437, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0437:RASDBA]2.0.CO;2
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Fuller RA, 2007, BIOLOGY LETT, V3, P390, DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
   Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V83, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.003
   GOODMAN LA, 1961, ANN MATH STAT, V32, P148, DOI 10.1214/aoms/1177705148
   GOV, UK Internet
   Green G., 2013, LOCAL FOOD COMMUNITY
   Gunderson L.H., 2001, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Gunderson L, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
   Gunderson LH, 2000, ANNU REV ECOL SYST, V31, P425, DOI 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425
   Hynes HP, 2004, ACTA HORTIC, P171, DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.643.21
   Jackson LE, 2003, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V64, P191, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00230-X
   Kalnay E, 2003, NATURE, V423, P528, DOI 10.1038/nature01675
   Kazmierczak A., 2013, GROWING MANCHESTER P
   Kingsley J, 2009, LEISURE STUD, V28, P207, DOI 10.1080/02614360902769894
   Kinzig AP, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Krasny M.E., 2015, Civic ecology: Adaptation and transformation from the ground up, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/9780262-028653.001.0001
   Krasny M.E., 2009, Cities and the Environment, V2, P1
   Krasny ME, 2012, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V10, P267, DOI 10.1890/110230
   Kruuse A., 2011, 6 GRABS TOWN COUNTR
   Kuo FE, 2001, ENVIRON BEHAV, V33, P343, DOI 10.1177/00139160121973025
   Kuo FE, 1998, ENVIRON BEHAV, V30, P28, DOI 10.1177/0013916598301002
   Lambin EF, 2011, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V108, P3465, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1100480108
   Larsen SC, 2011, GEOFORUM, V42, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.10.003
   Lo C. P., 1997, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, V21, P259, DOI 10.1016/S0198-9715(97)01002-8
   Maas J, 2006, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V60, P587, DOI 10.1136/jech.2005.043125
   Maller C, 2006, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V21, P45, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dai032
   MEA, 2005, MILLENIUM ECOSYSTEM
   Metcalf SS, 2011, APPL GEOGR, V31, P1242, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.01.008
   NASA, 2015, MEAS VEG NDVI EVI FE
   Okvat HA, 2011, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V47, P374, DOI 10.1007/s10464-010-9404-z
   Olsson P, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11, DOI 10.5751/ES-01595-110118
   ONS (Office for National Statistics), 2001, CENS DIG BOUND DAT E
   ONS (Office for National Statistics), 2005, GEN LAND US DAT STAT
   ONS (Office for National Statistics), 2015, SUP OUTP AR SOA ONS
   Pauleit S, 2000, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00109-2
   Pudup MB, 2008, GEOFORUM, V39, P1228, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.012
   Rodima-Taylor D, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V33, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.011
   Rosol M, 2012, ANTIPODE, V44, P239, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00861.x
   Selman P., 1997, LOCAL ENVIRON, V2, P171
   Tidball KG, 2010, ENVIRON EDUC RES, V16, P591, DOI 10.1080/13504622.2010.505437
   Verburg P., 2010, LANDMOD, P1
   Walker B, 2002, CONSERV ECOL, V6
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Walker B, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
   Walker BH, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
NR 75
TC 19
Z9 23
U1 4
U2 98
PU SPRINGER
PI DORDRECHT
PA VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SN 1083-8155
EI 1573-1642
J9 URBAN ECOSYST
JI Urban Ecosyst.
PD SEP
PY 2016
VL 19
IS 3
BP 1063
EP 1082
DI 10.1007/s11252-016-0551-3
PG 20
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology; Environmental Sciences; Urban
   Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban
   Studies
GA DV1HB
UT WOS:000382670600003
OA hybrid, Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pijper, LK
   Breetzke, GD
   Edelstein, I
AF Pijper, Lauren K.
   Breetzke, Gregory D.
   Edelstein, Ian
TI Building neighbourhood-level resilience to crime: the case of
   Khayelitsha, South Africa
SO SOUTH AFRICAN GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL
LA English
DT Article
DE Crime; resilience; township; South Africa; Khayelitsha
ID SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION; VIOLENT CRIME; ALCOHOL OUTLETS; COMMUNITY;
   HOMICIDE; AREAS; RATES; POLITICS; CITY; ERA
AB South Africa is crippled with high rates of crime. Examining factors that may build neighbourhood-level resilience to crime is central to reducing the poverty gap and lowering inequality particularly in impoverished communities. By drawing on theories from environmental criminology in this study we quantify and spatially locate resilient neighbourhoods in the township of Khayelitsha located on the urban periphery of Cape Town in South Africa. We then examine the extent to which access to various built environment factors in the township is stratified based on neighbourhood-level resiliency. Contrary to expectations we found that the most resilient neighbourhoods in Khayelitsha most often experience a decrease in access to a range of built environment factors. Explanations for these findings are provided in the context of a uniquely South African township setting.
C1 [Pijper, Lauren K.; Breetzke, Gregory D.] Univ Pretoria, Dept Geog Geoinformat & Meteorol, Pretoria, South Africa.
   [Edelstein, Ian] Human Sci Res Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
   [Edelstein, Ian] Univ Cape Town, Safety & Violence Initiat, Cape Town, South Africa.
C3 University of Pretoria; Human Sciences Research Council-South Africa;
   University of Cape Town
RP Breetzke, GD (corresponding author), Univ Pretoria, Dept Geog Geoinformat & Meteorol, Pretoria, South Africa.
EM greg.breetzke@up.ac.za
OI Breetzke, Gregory/0000-0002-0324-2254
CR Aldrich DP, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P254, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550299
   Allen J, 2012, J CRIM JUST, V40, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.02.007
   Andresen MA, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V35, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.007
   [Anonymous], 2013, Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application
   [Anonymous], 2003, EC GEOGRAPHY, DOI DOI 10.1111/ECGE.2003.79.ISSUE-4
   [Anonymous], 2008, 4 CARRI
   Artz L., 2016, Optimus study South Africa: Technical report. Sexual victimisation of children in South Africa. Final report of the Optimus Foundation Study: South Africa
   Bernasco W, 2005, BRIT J CRIMINOL, V45, P296, DOI 10.1093/bjc/azh070
   Bonanno GA, 2013, J TRAUMA STRESS, V26, P392, DOI 10.1002/jts.21803
   Braga AA, 2014, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V51, P480, DOI 10.1177/0022427814521217
   BRANTINGHAM PL, 1993, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V13, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80212-9
   Breetzke GD, 2015, J CRIM JUST, V43, P444, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.09.001
   Breetzke GD, 2010, J CRIM JUST, V38, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.04.013
   Bruce D, 2010, S AFR CRIME Q, P9
   Burger Johan., 2018, VIOLENT CRIME FARMS
   CRITTENDEN KS, 2001, NAT HAZARDS REV, V2, P72, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2001)2:2(72)
   Cronje F., 2014, Digging for Development: The Mining Industry in South Africa and its Role in Socio-Economic Development
   Day P, 2012, AUST NZ J PUBL HEAL, V36, P48, DOI 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00827.x
   DuMont KA, 2007, CHILD ABUSE NEGLECT, V31, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.11.015
   DUNCAN OD, 1957, POP STUD-J DEMOG, V11, P27, DOI 10.2307/2172508
   Edelstein I., 2019, SEM I SEC STUD ISS P
   Elliott DS, 2006, GOOD KIDS FROM BAD NEIGHBORHOODS: SUCCESSFUL DEVELOPMENT IN SOCIAL CONTEXT, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521682215
   Flora C.B., 2004, Rural communities: Legacy and change, V2nd
   Gillespie K, 2013, CONTEXT MEANING MOB
   Gontsana M.-A., 2019, 2 CRIME HOTSPOTS STI
   Gruenewald PJ, 2006, ALCOHOL CLIN EXP RES, V30, P1184, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00141.x
   Harris MA, 2000, DIABETES CARE, V23, P1301, DOI 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1301
   Hipp JR, 2013, CRIME DELINQUENCY, V59, P616, DOI 10.1177/0011128710382264
   HIRSCHI T, 1983, AM J SOCIOL, V89, P552, DOI 10.1086/227905
   Jobes PC, 2004, AUST NZ J CRIMINOL, V37, P114, DOI 10.1375/000486504323020300
   KENNEDY LW, 1991, CAN J SOCIOL, V16, P397, DOI 10.2307/3340961
   Kwong Wong S., 2012, INT J LAW CRIME JUST, V40, DOI [10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.09.006, DOI 10.1016/J.IJLCJ.2011.09.006]
   Kynoch G, 2005, AFR AFFAIRS, V104, P493, DOI 10.1093/afraf/adi009
   Lancaster L., 2017, WHY ARE S AFRICANS U
   Livingston M, 2014, HOUSING STUD, V29, P1, DOI 10.1080/02673037.2014.848267
   Luthy-Kaplan K., 2015, EPIDEMIC CHILD RAPE
   Martinez R, 2010, CRIMINOLOGY, V48, P797, DOI 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00202.x
   McCord ES, 2007, AUST NZ J CRIMINOL, V40, P43, DOI 10.1375/acri.40.1.43
   ORegan C, 2014, COMMISSION REPORT
   Overall Chris, 2008, PositionIT, P37
   Pearson AL, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V91, P238, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.046
   Pernegger Li., 2007, Townships in the South African Geographic Landscape - Physical and Social Legacies and Challenges. Training for Township Renewal Initiative
   Phillips JA, 2006, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V43, P230, DOI 10.1177/0022427806286565
   Pinnock D., 2016, Gang town
   Platts-Fowler D., 2013, Neighbourhood resilience in Sheffield: getting by in hard times
   Porter JR, 2010, J CRIM JUST, V38, P942, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.011
   Pridemore WA, 2013, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V50, P132, DOI 10.1177/0022427810397952
   Raniga T, 2017, INT J SOC WELF, V26, P276, DOI 10.1111/ijsw.12243
   Rogers P, 2013, POLITICS-OXFORD, V33, P322, DOI 10.1111/1467-9256.12033
   Sampson RJ, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P918, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
   Sarkis J., 2009, HDB CORPORATE SUSTAI
   Shaw C. R., 1969, Behavior research fund monographs
   Smith CA, 2013, J INTERPERS VIOLENCE, V28, P121, DOI 10.1177/0886260512448845
   South African Police Services (SAPS), 2018, CRIM SIT RSA 12 MONT
   Statistics South Africa [SSA], 2011, STAT REL DAT SET
   Super GJ, 2016, PUNISHM SOC, V18, P325, DOI 10.1177/1462474516645685
   The World Economic Forum [WEFORUM], 2016, THES AR WORLDS 5 BIG
   Thompson SK, 2014, J RES CRIME DELINQ, V51, P88, DOI 10.1177/0022427813487352
   Tunstall H, 2007, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V61, P337, DOI 10.1136/jech.2006.049890
   Turner F., 2013, CITY SAYS VIOLENCE P
   van Hooijdonk C, 2007, SOC SCI MED, V64, P1326, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.10.041
   Ward CL, 2007, S AFR J PSYCHOL, V37, P165, DOI 10.1177/008124630703700112
   Weisburd D, 2009, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V25, P443, DOI 10.1007/s10940-009-9075-9
   Western Cape Department of Community Safety, 2016, HARMS RISKS ALC KHAY
   WONG S K., 2011, Western Criminology Review, V12, P43
   Wyche KF, 2011, AM J ORTHOPSYCHIAT, V81, P18, DOI 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01068.x
NR 66
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 2
U2 14
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0373-6245
EI 2151-2418
J9 S AFR GEOGR J
JI S. Afr. Geogr. J.
PD JUL 6
PY 2021
VL 103
IS 3
BP 342
EP 357
DI 10.1080/03736245.2020.1807398
EA AUG 2020
PG 16
WC Geography
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Geography
GA TJ7YU
UT WOS:000558958000001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Jin, TF
   Shao, YH
AF Jin, Tongfei
   Shao, Yuhan
TI Exploring community resilience based on co-produced micro-regeneration
   projects in China: Two case studies
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Community resilience; micro-regeneration; resourcefulness;
   transformation; production of space
ID POLICY
AB This paper attempts to answer the question: How can community micro-regeneration projects in Chinese cities be situated and contextualized as particular kinds of practices to build resilient communities? Amidst rapid urbanization and social transformation over the past four decades, historical areas in Chinese cities have faced neglect, exacerbating inequalities and marginalization. The emerging strategy of micro-regeneration, emphasizing public participation and co-production, addresses this issue by revitalizing small community spaces using local resources and empowering grassroots efforts. This research contextualizes micro-regeneration within the global discourse on community resilience, highlighting communities' agency and collaborative strength in adapting to change. Through the analysis of co-productive micro-regeneration cases in Beijing and Shanghai, this study offers insights into resourcefulness and the transformative potential of resilience, shedding light on China's urban regeneration shift toward co-production and heightened social focus.
C1 [Jin, Tongfei; Shao, Yuhan] Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, 1239 Rd Siping, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
C3 Tongji University
RP Jin, TF; Shao, YH (corresponding author), Tongji Univ, Coll Architecture & Urban Planning, 1239 Rd Siping, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China.
EM tongfei_jin@tongji.edu.cn; shaoyuhan@tongji.edu.cn
OI Jin, Tongfei/0000-0002-1086-4051
FX We would like to express our gratitude to all the interviewees who
   generously shared their insights, as well as Professor Yun Qian at
   Beijing Forestry University for his invaluable suggestions on this
   paper.
CR Baibarac C, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V198, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.157
   Bason C, 2010, LEADING PUBLIC SECTOR INNOVATION: CO-CREATING FOR A BETTER SOCIETY, P1, DOI 10.1332/policypress/9781847426345.001.0001
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Biggs R, 2012, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V37, P421, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836
   Bourdieu P., 1979, HDB THEORY RES SOCIO, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470755679.CH15
   Brown G, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN A, V44, P1607, DOI 10.1068/a44608
   Chen H. S., 2016, China City Planning Review, V25, P6
   Chen YW, 2020, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V146, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000550
   Cohen O, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P1732, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.12.009
   Cretney R, 2014, GEOGR COMPASS, V8, P627, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12154
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   De Carli B, 2016, BUILD RES INF, V44, P775, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1213523
   Derkzen P, 2008, J RURAL STUD, V24, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.010
   Emirbayer M, 1998, AM J SOCIOL, V103, P962, DOI 10.1086/231294
   Eraydin A., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P17, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-8_2
   Fei X., 1947, XIANGTU ZHONGGUO
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Gray D.E., 2004, Doing research in the real world
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hou J., 2022, Just urban design: The struggle for a public city
   Hou X., 2019, CHINESE LANDSCAPE AR, V35, P23, DOI 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0023
   Howell J., 2012, J COMP ASIAN DEV, V11, P271
   Hua X.H., 2022, Arch.-Tectural J, V3, P1
   Jin T. F., 2023, Shanghai Urban Planning Review, V5, P133, DOI [https://doi.org/10.11982/j.supr.20230521, DOI 10.11982/J.SUPR.20230521]
   Khew YTJ, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V13, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.013
   Lefebvre Henri., 1996, WRITINGS CITIES, P63
   Lefebvre Henri, 1992, PRODUCTION SPACE, DOI DOI 10.1027/1618-3169/A000129
   Li BQ, 2019, ENVIRON URBAN, V31, P249, DOI 10.1177/0956247818797276
   Liu J., 2016, City Planning Review, V40, P9, DOI DOI 10.11819/CPR20161103A
   Liu J. Y., 2020, World Architecture, V2, P6, DOI [http://doi.org/10.16414/j.wa.2020.02.002, DOI 10.16414/J.WA.2020.02.002]
   MacKinnon D, 2013, PROG HUM GEOG, V37, P253, DOI 10.1177/0309132512454775
   Meijer M., 2015, Urban Research Practice, V8, P183
   Meng B, 2018, FRONT ENG MANAG, V5, P307, DOI 10.15302/J-FEM-2018030
   Ostrom E., 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
   Petcou C., 2015, EphCemera, V15, P249
   Petrescu D, 2016, BUILD RES INF, V44, P717, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
   Pfefferbaum B. J., 2005, The trauma of terrorism: sharing knowledge and shared care, an international handbook, P305, DOI 10.1300/J146v09n03_01
   Pinho P., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P131, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5476-88, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5476-88]
   Robinson GM, 2016, GEOGR J, V182, P114, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12144
   Shanghai Peoples Congress, 2021, Regulations of Shanghai Urban Regeneration (2021)
   Shao YW, 2017, ASIAN GEOGR, V34, P71, DOI 10.1080/10225706.2017.1328606
   Shaw K, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P308
   Shen J. K., 2018, Landscape Architecture, V12, P65, DOI [http://doi.org/10.14085/j.fjyl.2018.12.0065.05, DOI 10.14085/J.FJYL.2018.12.0065.05]
   Shi W., 2014, ANIMAL, V8, P16
   Shirlow P, 2004, URBAN STUD, V41, P57, DOI 10.1080/0042098032000155687
   Tasan-Kok T., 2013, RESILIENCE THINKING, P39
   Trogal Kim, 2018, ARCHITECTURE RESILIE
   Wiek A, 2012, SUSTAIN SCI, V7, P5, DOI 10.1007/s11625-011-0148-y
   Wilson Geoff., 2012, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
   Wilson GA, 2015, ENVIRON VALUE, V24, P227, DOI 10.3197/096327114X13947900182157
   Xu J, 2020, URBAN STUD, V57, P525, DOI 10.1177/0042098019859232
   Yan W.T., 2017, Int. Urban Plan, V32, P22, DOI DOI 10.22217/UPI.2017.127
   Zhai BQ, 2013, CITIES, V35, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.003
   Zhao X., 2019, World Architecture, V7, P16
   Zhong XH, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061617
   Zou B., 2013, Planners, V29, P5
NR 56
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 19
U2 31
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0735-2166
EI 1467-9906
J9 J URBAN AFF
JI J. Urban Aff.
PD 2024 JUL 21
PY 2024
DI 10.1080/07352166.2024.2360485
EA JUL 2024
PG 18
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA YZ0A8
UT WOS:001272179900001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Childers, DL
   Bois, P
   Hartnett, HE
   McPhearson, T
   Metson, GS
   Sanchez, CA
AF Childers, Daniel L.
   Bois, Paul
   Hartnett, Hilairy E.
   McPhearson, Timon
   Metson, Genevieve S.
   Sanchez, Christopher A.
TI Urban Ecological Infrastructure: An inclusive concept for the non-built
   urban environment
SO ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE
LA English
DT Review
DE Urban Ecological Infrastructure; Ecosystem services; Hybrid
   infrastructure; Urban sustainability; Urban resilience
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; NITROGEN; CITIES; WETLANDS;
   AREAS; BLUE; PERSPECTIVES; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT
AB It is likely that half of the urban areas that will exist in 2050 have not yet been designed and built. This provides tremendous opportunities for enhancing urban sustainability, and using "nature in cities" is critical to more resilient solutions to urban challenges. Terms for "urban nature" include Green Infrastructure (GI), Green-Blue Infrastructure (GBI), Urban Green Space (UGS), and Nature-Based Solutions (NBS). These terms, and the concepts they represent, are incomplete because they tend to reduce the importance of non-terrestrial ecological features in cities. We argue that the concept of Urban Ecological Infrastructure (UEI), which came from a 2013 forum held in Beijing and from several subsequent 2017 publications, is a more inclusive alternative. In this paper we refine the 2013 definition of UEI and link the concept more directly to urban ecosystem services.
   In our refined definition, UEI comprises all parts of a city that support ecological structures and functions, as well as the ecosystem services provided by UEI that directly affect human outcomes and wellbeing. UEI often includes aspects of the built environment, and we discuss examples of this "hybrid infrastructure". We distinguish terrestrial, aquatic, and wetland UEI because each type provides different ecosystem services. We present several examples of both "accidental" UEI and UEI that was explicitly designed and managed, with an emphasis on wetland UEI because these ecotonal ecosystems are uniquely both terrestrial and aquatic. We show how both accidental and planned UEI produces unexpected ecosystem services, which justifies recognizing and maintaining both purposeful and serendipitous types of UEI in cities. Finally, we posit that by incorporating both "ecological" and "infrastructure", UEI also helps to bridge urban scientists and urban practitioners in a more transdisciplinary partnership to build more resilient and sustainable cities.
C1 [Childers, Daniel L.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
   [Bois, Paul] Unistra, UMR 7357, ENGEES, ICube,CNRS, Strasbourg, France.
   [Hartnett, Hilairy E.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Earth & Space Explorat, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [Hartnett, Hilairy E.] Arizona State Univ, Sch Mol Sci, Tempe, AZ USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, New York, NY USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [Metson, Genevieve S.] Linkoping Univ, Theoret Biol, Dept Phys Chem & Biol IFM, Linkoping, Sweden.
   [Metson, Genevieve S.] Linkoping Univ, Ctr Climate Sci & Policy Res CSPR, Linkoping, Sweden.
   [Sanchez, Christopher A.] Arizona State Univ, Global Inst Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ USA.
C3 Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Centre
   National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); CNRS - Institute for
   Engineering & Systems Sciences (INSIS); Universites de Strasbourg
   Etablissements Associes; Universite de Strasbourg; Arizona State
   University; Arizona State University-Tempe; Arizona State University;
   Arizona State University-Tempe; The New School; Cary Institute of
   Ecosystem Studies; Stockholm University; Linkoping University; Linkoping
   University; Arizona State University; Arizona State University-Tempe
RP Childers, DL (corresponding author), Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
EM dan.childers@asu.edu
RI Sanchez, Christopher/A-5267-2010; Metson, Genevieve/J-7791-2019;
   McPhearson, Timon/JOZ-3799-2023
OI Metson, Genevieve/0000-0002-8081-2126; Hartnett,
   Hilairy/0000-0003-0736-7844; McPhearson, Timon/0000-0002-9499-0791
FU U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB-1026865, DEB-1637590,
   DEB-1832016]; FORMAS, the Swedish research council for sustainable
   development [942-2016-69 992023]; RhinMeuse Water Agency; French
   Biodiversity Agency; ZAEU (French LTSER network); Urban Resilience to
   Extreme Weather-Related Events Sustainability Research Network (UREx
   SRN; NSF) [SES-1444755]; SETS Resilience project (NSF) [GCR-1934933];
   NATURA network (NSF) [Accel-Net 1927167]
FX The U.S. National Science Foundation supported this work through the
   Central Arizona-Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Program (Grant
   Nos. DEB-1026865, DEB-1637590, and DEB-1832016). G.S.M was supported by
   FORMAS, the Swedish research council for sustainable development (Grant
   #942-2016-69 992023). The RhinMeuse Water Agency and the French
   Biodiversity Agency supported the Ostwaldergraben work through the
   LumiEau-Stra Research Project. Additional research support was provided
   to P.B. by the ZAEU (French LTSER network). TM was supported by the
   Urban Resilience to Extreme Weather-Related Events Sustainability
   Research Network (UREx SRN; NSF Grant No. SES-1444755), SETS Resilience
   project (NSF Grant No. GCR-1934933) and NATURA network (NSF Grant No.
   Accel-Net 1927167).
CR Alberti M, 2018, URBAN PLANET KNOWLED
   Andersson E, 2015, ECOSYST SERV, V12, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.002
   Andersson E, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P445, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y
   [Anonymous], 2016, HDB URBANIZATION GLO
   [Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABLE RESILIEN
   Aronson MFJ, 2017, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V15, P189, DOI 10.1002/fee.1480
   Barbosa A, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V652, P1463, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.416
   BATTEN DF, 1995, URBAN STUD, V32, P313, DOI 10.1080/00420989550013103
   Benedict M., 2006, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Bettencourt LMA, 2009, METHODS SER, V7, P221, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-9663-1_8
   Bois P, 2019, ECOWISE, P151, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-0149-0_9
   Bois P, 2017, ECOSPHERE, V8, DOI 10.1002/ecs2.1756
   Childers DL, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P3774, DOI 10.3390/su7043774
   Cilliers S, 2013, URBAN ECOSYST, V16, P681, DOI 10.1007/s11252-012-0254-3
   Clinton N, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P40, DOI 10.1002/2017EF000536
   CohenShacham E., 2016, Nature-based Solutions to address global societal challenges, DOI 10.2305/iucn.ch.2016.13.en
   Depietri Y, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P91, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_6
   Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
   Elmqvist Thomas., 2018, URBAN PLANET KNOWLED
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz042
   Gomez-Baggethun Erik, 2013, P175
   Grimm NB, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P756, DOI 10.1126/science.1150195
   Grimm NB, 2018, RETHINKING ENV LINKI, V23
   Haase D, 2014, AMBIO, V43, P407, DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0503-1
   Hale RL, 2015, ECOSYSTEMS, V18, P62, DOI 10.1007/s10021-014-9812-2
   Hale RL, 2014, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V48, P6211, DOI 10.1021/es501039t
   Herrmann DL, 2017, PLANT SOIL, V413, P45, DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-2874-5
   Ioja IC, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P217, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.001
   Kabisch N, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
   Keeler BL, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P29, DOI 10.1038/s41893-018-0202-1
   Keeley M, 2011, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V54, P937, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2010.547681
   Koc CB, 2017, URBAN ECOSYST, V20, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11252-016-0578-5
   Kremer P, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V120, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.003
   Larsen L, 2015, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V13, P486, DOI 10.1890/150103
   Lewis O, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.012
   Li F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.079
   Li F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS1, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.151
   Locke DH, 2018, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V16, P203, DOI 10.1002/fee.1796
   Maes J, 2017, CONSERV LETT, V10, P121, DOI 10.1111/conl.12216
   McHarg I., 1992, DESIGN NATURE
   McPhearson T, 2016, NATURE, V538, P165, DOI 10.1038/538165a
   McPhearson T, 2013, ECOSYST SERV, V5, pE11, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.06.005
   Metson GS, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0120726
   Mitsch W.J., 2015, Wetlands
   Murphy JT, 2012, ECOL MODEL, V241, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.026
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Neuman M, 2010, J PLAN HIST, V9, P21, DOI 10.1177/1538513209355373
   Niemelä J, 2010, BIODIVERS CONSERV, V19, P3225, DOI 10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8
   Norton RA, 2017, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, V134, P353, DOI 10.1007/s10533-017-0365-2
   NSF Advisory Committee for Environmental Research and Education, 2018, SUST URB SYST ART LO
   Palta M, 2016, HUM ECOL, V44, P463, DOI 10.1007/s10745-016-9843-8
   Palta MM, 2017, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V15, P248, DOI 10.1002/fee.1494
   PICKETT JA, 2016, NAT PLANTS, V2
   Pickett STA, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS10, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.008
   Sanchez CA, 2019, THESIS
   Sanchez CA, 2016, ECOL ENG, V97, P658, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.002
   Steiner F.R., 2006, The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature
   Suchy AK, ECOSYSTEMS
   Suchy AK., 2016, THESIS
   Tzoulas K, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P167, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
   Walaszek M, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V637, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.325
   Weller NA, 2016, ECOL ENG, V97, P649, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.044
   Wigginton NS, 2016, SCIENCE, V352, P904, DOI 10.1126/science.352.6288.904
   World Water Assessment Programme (Nations Unies), 2018, UN WORLD WAT DEV REP
NR 64
TC 69
Z9 78
U1 14
U2 177
PU UNIV CALIFORNIA PRESS
PI OAKLAND
PA 155 GRAND AVE, SUITE 400, OAKLAND, CA 94612-3758 USA
SN 2325-1026
J9 ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP
JI Elementa-Sci. Anthrop.
PD NOV 18
PY 2019
VL 7
AR 46
DI 10.1525/elementa.385
PG 14
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA JZ5OP
UT WOS:000505151500001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Cox, S
AF Cox, Savannah
TI Bonding out the future: Tracing the politics of urban climate finance in
   Miami, Florida
SO JOURNAL OF URBAN AFFAIRS
LA English
DT Article
DE Cities; environment; finance
ID SEA-LEVEL RISE; RESILIENCE
AB Over the past decade, city governments have increasingly turned to financial markets to help pay for elements of their resilience plans. The techno-utopian zeal of the plans and related financing mechanisms has led some scholars to read both as diagnostic of the "post-political" urban condition. This paper engages these concerns through the case of the Miami Forever Bond, a novel $400 million bond that pays for an initial round of resilient infrastructure in Miami, Florida. Bringing social studies of finance and racial capitalism scholarship to bear on the case, I argue that the bond helps constitute and formalize a terrain of struggle over the city's future and its longstanding "infrastructural investments in whiteness." The case thus belies a straightforward reading of urban climate finance as diagnostic of the post-political urban condition. It also points to a need to revisit prominent modes of inquiry on, and recognition of, the politics of urban climate finance. Thus, in the conclusion I reflect on how the approach developed here can be used to (1) analyze actually existing urban politics as they increasingly transpire under the banner of climate finance and (2) aid in growing scholarly calls to pinpoint possibilities for climate-linked repair.
C1 [Cox, Savannah] Loughborough Univ, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, England.
C3 Loughborough University
RP Cox, S (corresponding author), Loughborough Univ, Epinal Way, Loughborough LE11 3TU, England.
EM s.cox@lboro.ac.uk
CR Ajibade I, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P2230, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2022.2062290
   Alliance (Cities Climate Finance Leadership Alliance), 2021, STAT CIT CLIM FIN RE
   [Anonymous], 1946, THE MIAMI HERALD
   [Anonymous], 1972, MIAMI TIMES     1027
   [Anonymous], 1972, MIAMI TIMES     1110
   August M, 2022, PROG HUM GEOG, V46, P527, DOI 10.1177/03091325211054963
   Bakkensen LA, 2019, SOUTH ECON J, V85, P1132, DOI 10.1002/soej.12327
   Barnett C, 2016, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V40, P1186, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12452
   Beveridge R, 2017, URBAN STUD, V54, P31, DOI 10.1177/0042098016671477
   Bigger P, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P36, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1749023
   Bigger P, 2020, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V3, P601, DOI 10.1177/2514848619876539
   Callon M, 1998, LAWS OF THE MARKETS, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03468.x
   Castree N, 2015, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V105, P378, DOI 10.1080/00045608.2014.985622
   Christophers B, 2018, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V1, P144, DOI 10.1177/2514848618770369
   Collier SJ, 2021, ECON SOC, V50, P275, DOI 10.1080/03085147.2021.1904621
   Collier SJ, 2009, THEOR CULT SOC, V26, P78, DOI 10.1177/0263276409347694
   Connolly N.D. B., 2014, WORLD MORE CONCRETE
   Conyers ZA, 2019, PROF GEOGR, V71, P278, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2018.1531037
   Cox S, 2023, GEOGR JUST SOC TRANS, P205
   Cox S, 2022, GEOGR J, V188, P294, DOI 10.1111/geoj.12437
   Cox S, 2022, ENVIRON PLANN A, V54, P295, DOI 10.1177/0308518X211054162
   Cox W., 2019, 15 ANN DEMOGRAPHIA I
   De Goede Marieke., 2005, Economic Sociology, V6, P19
   Fainstein S, 2015, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V39, P157, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.12186
   Feinberg A, 2023, J URBAN AFF, V45, P142, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2020.1851139
   Foucault M, 2008, MICHEL FOUCAULT-LECT, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230594180
   Garcia M, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101967
   García-Lamarca M, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN E-NAT, V5, P207, DOI 10.1177/2514848620973708
   Grove K, 2020, GEOFORUM, V117, P134, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.014
   Grove K, 2020, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V110, P1613, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1715778
   Grove Kevin., 2018, Resilience
   Hackworth J., 2007, The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism, DOI DOI 10.7591/9780801461590/HTML
   Harvey David., 2001, Geographische Revue, V2, P23, DOI DOI 10.1038/D-NB.INFO/1217929630/34
   Hauer M, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abfd5c
   Hauer ME, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P691, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2961, 10.1038/nclimate2961]
   Hilbrandt H, 2022, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V46, P896, DOI 10.1111/1468-2427.13106
   Hilbrandt H, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P1415, DOI 10.1177/0308518X20909391
   Ianelli J., 2017, MIAMI NEW TIMES
   Isbell M., 2017, MCI MAPS
   Jenkins Destin., 2021, The Bonds of Inequality
   Jones R, 2020, GEOFORUM, V114, P49, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.014
   Kallergis K., 2019, THE REAL DEAL
   Keenan JM, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P2043, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02734-1
   Knuth S, 2023, GEOGR JUST SOC TRANS, P66
   Langley Paul., 2008, EVERYDAY LIFE GLOBAL
   Lucero E, 2022, J URBAN AFF, V44, P1168, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2020.1785303
   McAlpine SA, 2018, POPUL RES POLICY REV, V37, P871, DOI 10.1007/s11113-018-9473-5
   Metayer N., 2017, New Florida Majority
   Miami Climate Alliance, 2018, COMMUNICATION
   Mouffe C, 2011, THINK ACTION, P1
   Phinney S, 2023, URBAN GEOGR, V44, P1584, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2022.2107257
   Platrisk P., 2019, PLAYBOOK 101 CITIES
   Ponder CS, 2021, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V111, P2112, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2020.1866487
   Ponder C.S., 2019, Geoforum, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2019.07.009
   Portes A., 1993, City on the edge: The transformation of Miami
   Preda A., 2001, Economic Sociology: European Electronic Newsletter, V2, P15, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1038/d-nb.info/112926436X/34, DOI 10.1038/D-NB.INFO/112926436X/34]
   Ranciere Jaques., 2001, Theory and Event, V5, DOI DOI 10.1353/TAE.2001.0028
   Robin E, 2022, T I BRIT GEOGR, V47, P393, DOI 10.1111/tran.12508
   Rose C.N., 2015, The struggle for Black freedom in Miami : civil rights and America's tourist paradise, 1896-1968
   Smiley D., 2017, Miami Herald
   Smiley David, 2016, Miami Herald
   Stein O., 1982, MIAMI HERALD    0329
   Stepick A, 2003, THIS LAND IS OUR LAND: IMMIGRANTS AND POWER IN MIAMI, P1
   Swyngedouw E., 2011, Philosophy-Supplements Only, V69, P253, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1358246111000300
   Swyngedouw E, 2010, URBAN LAND PERSPECT, P185, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3106-8_11
   Swyngedouw E, 2009, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V33, P601, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00859.x
   Taylor ZJ, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P1685, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.2000358
   Taylor ZJ, 2020, ENVIRON PLANN A, V52, P1131, DOI 10.1177/0308518X19896579
   Treuer G., 2017, THESIS U MIAMI
   Wakefield S, 2020, POLIT GEOGR, V79, DOI 10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102148
   Walter R, 2016, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V26, P123, DOI 10.1080/10511482.2014.1003190
   Warren-Myers G, 2018, RISKS, V6, DOI 10.3390/risks6020037
   Wdowinski S, 2016, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V126, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.03.002
   Webber S, 2022, ANTIPODE, V54, P934, DOI 10.1111/anti.12806
NR 74
TC 7
Z9 7
U1 1
U2 6
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0735-2166
EI 1467-9906
J9 J URBAN AFF
JI J. Urban Aff.
PD JAN 2
PY 2025
VL 47
IS 1
BP 70
EP 86
DI 10.1080/07352166.2023.2192941
EA MAY 2023
PG 17
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA R3A5E
UT WOS:000984090300001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fereshtehpour, M
   Najafi, MR
AF Fereshtehpour, Mohammad
   Najafi, Mohammad Reza
TI Urban stormwater resilience: Global insights and strategies for climate
   adaptation
SO URBAN CLIMATE
LA English
DT Article
DE Stormwater management; Climate change; Global best practices; Adaptation
   and resilience; Blue Green infrastructure; Design storm
ID BLUE-GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; CHANGING CLIMATE;
   WATER MANAGEMENT; CITIES; PRECIPITATION; GOVERNANCE; DRAINAGE; RAIN;
   MECHANISMS
AB Rapid urbanization combined with increasing extreme precipitation driven by climate change poses significant challenges to urban infrastructure. This study analyzes stormwater management practices across 11 cities in North America, Europe, and Australia, emphasizing strategies for climate change adaptation. Drawing on a review of published documents and interviews with city officials, we assess regulatory frameworks, policies, and design guidelines. This review identifies a critical gap in integrating stormwater management with emission reduction policies, essential for synergistic co-benefits and addressing both mitigation and adaptation challenges. This study examines the policies through the lens of blue-green infrastructure (BGI), identifying challenges such as adapting multifunctional designs to local contexts and establishing effective governance frameworks to maximize their potential. From a funding perspective, stormwater fees offer a transparent way to finance climate-resilient initiatives, with affordability and public acceptance addressed through incentives like stormwater credits. Regular updates to design storm criteria, guided by advancing climate science, are vital for long-term resilience. However, design storms should be a starting point, focusing more on adaptive, multifunctional structures based on the safe-to-fail paradigm. This study highlights the urgent need for holistic, integrated stormwater management approaches to enhance urban resilience and sustainability in a changing climate.
C1 [Fereshtehpour, Mohammad; Najafi, Mohammad Reza] Western Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Fac Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
C3 Western University (University of Western Ontario)
RP Najafi, MR (corresponding author), Western Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Fac Engn, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada.
EM mnajafi7@uwo.ca
RI Fereshtehpour, Mohammad/Y-3084-2018
FU City of Toronto; Toronto Water
FX This project was funded by the City of Toronto, with support and
   collaboration from Toronto Water. Special thanks to Natalie Salkauskis,
   Anum Dhalwani and Danielle MacKinnon for their constructive feedback,
   coordination and edits throughout this project.
CR Aaltonen T, 2013, J HIGH ENERGY PHYS, DOI 10.1007/JHEP02(2013)004
   Abbasi H, 2021, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V12, P2460, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2021.322
   Abebe Y, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102485
   Agustine V., 2023, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V1211
   Almaaitah T, 2021, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V3, P223, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2021.016
   Alves A, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V239, P244, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.036
   Andoh R.Y.G., 2002, 9 INT C URB DRAIN 9I, P1, DOI [10.1061/40644(2002)19, DOI 10.1061/40644(2002)19]
   [Anonymous], (40) New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Forensic Toxicology Laboratory Office of Chief Medical Examiner City of New York Screening for Drugs of Abuse in Urine, Whole Blood, Serum, and Vitreous Humor by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay E on the Dynex Dsx Microtiter Plate Analyzer Principle. New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, 2015 https://www.nyc.gov/assets/ocme/downloads/pdf/Immunoassays_DYNEX_ELISA_Screening_in_Blood_Urine.pdf (accessed 9-20-2022).
   [Anonymous], 46 Satyapal, S. U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Perspectives (US Department of Energy, 2020). Pg. 17. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2020/10/f79/fcto-satyapalhoc-oct8.pdf.
   [Anonymous], 2010, NYC Green Infrastructure Plan: A Sustainable Strategy for Clean Waterways [PDF]
   [Anonymous], 2012, The City of Copenhagen Cloudburst Management Plan 2012
   [Anonymous], 2011, Philadelphia 2011: State of the city
   [Anonymous], 2014, GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
   Axelsson C, 2021, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V64, P1408, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2020.1823346
   Balany F, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159057
   Barbosa AE, 2012, WATER RES, V46, P6787, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2012.05.029
   Beceiro P, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062537
   Beck HE, 2018, SCI DATA, V5, DOI 10.1038/sdata.2018.214
   Bello AP, 2022, J GEOPHYS RES-ATMOS, V127, DOI 10.1029/2022JD037873
   Bettini Y., 2016, Governance Structures and Strategies to Support Innovation and Adaptability
   Boguniewicz-Zablocka J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su122310189
   Borris M, 2013, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V68, P2082, DOI 10.2166/wst.2013.465
   Bush J, 2021, URBAN PLAN, V6, P20, DOI 10.17645/up.v6i1.3515
   Campbell A, 2024, Preprints, DOI 10.20944/preprints202403.0715.v2
   Campbell C.W., 2016, Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey 2016
   Cannon AJ, 2019, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V19, P421, DOI 10.5194/nhess-19-421-2019
   Centgraf S.C., 2005, P RIO5 WORLD CLIM EN, P17
   Chaffin BC, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.025
   Chang NB, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V70, P368, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.024
   Chen T, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151813317
   Cherqui F., 2024, Asset Management of Urban Drainage Systems: If Anything Exciting Happens, We've Done it Wrong!, DOI [10.2166/9781789063059, DOI 10.2166/9781789063059]
   Chikhi F, 2023, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V88, P2499, DOI 10.2166/wst.2023.312
   Choi C, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V291, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112583
   City of Copenhagen, 2012, The City of Copenhagen cloudburst management plan 2012
   City of Melbourne, 2017, Green Our City Strategic Action Plan
   City of Toronto, Wet Weather Flow Management Guidelines
   City of Toronto, 2021, Toronto Green Standard Review and Update: Report for Action
   City of Toronto, Wet Weather Flow Master Plan Implementation Update
   City of Toronto, 2017, Toronto Green Streets Technical Guidelines
   Climateatlas.ca, 2019, Projected Change in Mean Annual Precipitation
   Cook LM, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V159, P289, DOI 10.1007/s10584-019-02649-6
   Cornell University, 2015, New York State Rainfall Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Projections
   Cortés-Hernández VE, 2024, CLIM DYNAM, V62, P4673, DOI 10.1007/s00382-024-07232-z
   Crouch C, 2012, J EUR PUBLIC POLICY, V19, P405, DOI 10.1080/13501763.2011.640795
   D'Ambrosio R, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13243635
   Dahm R, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020313
   Dai LP, 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, V34, P652, DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1372273
   DEFRA, 2022, Climate Change Allowances for Peak Rainfall in England WWW Document
   DeGaetano A.T., 2015, Downscaled projections of extreme rainfall in New York State
   Deng HM, 2017, ENVIRON RES LETT, V12, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aa98d2
   Depietri Y, 2022, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V54, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2021.12.001
   Deser C, 2012, CLIM DYNAM, V38, P527, DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x
   Dhakal KP, 2016, ENVIRON MANAGE, V57, P1112, DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5
   Eckart K, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V607, P413, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254
   Ellis JB, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V183, P630, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.022
   Envirnmental Commissionar of Ontario (ECO), 2021, Urban Stormwater Fees: How to Pay for What We Need
   Everett G, 2023, URBAN DES INT, V28, P172, DOI 10.1057/s41289-021-00167-5
   Fadhel S, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13172337
   Fan XZ, 2020, ENVIRONMENTS, V7, DOI 10.3390/environments7070051
   Federation of Canadian Municipalities, 2022, Guide for Integrating Climate Change Considerations into Municipal Asset Management
   Fisher-Jeffes L, 2013, WATER SA, V39, P429, DOI 10.4314/wsa.v39i3.13
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Fratini CF, 2012, URBAN WATER J, V9, P317, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2012.668913
   Garin J., 2009, Clear Waters, V39, P10
   Geyler S, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11195510
   Ghofrani Z., 2017, In. J. Environ. Sustain., V6, DOI 10.24102/ijes.v6i1.728
   Gimenez-Maranges M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102061
   Giorgi F, 2015, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V40, P467, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021217
   Golden HE, 2018, WIRES WATER, V5, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1254
   Gonzalez J.E., 2019, New York City Panel on Climate Change 2019 Report Chapter 2: New Methods for Assessing Extreme Temperatures, Heavy Downpours, and Drought
   Goulden S, 2018, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V219, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.066
   Green A., 2019, Urban Stormwater and Flood Management: Enhancing the Liveability of Cities, P69, DOI DOI 10.11606/ISSN.2237-1095.V9P51-69
   Green Finance Institute, 2024, DC Stormwater Retention Credit Trading Program
   Gupta A, 2024, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V89, P382, DOI 10.2166/wst.2024.014
   Hathaway JM, 2024, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V10, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.SWENG-533
   Hawkins E, 2009, B AM METEOROL SOC, V90, P1095, DOI 10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
   Heidrich O, 2016, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V168, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.043
   Helmrich AM, 2022, SUSTAIN RESIL INFRAS, V7, P83, DOI 10.1080/23789689.2019.1708179
   Henderson H., 2023, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures, P1003
   Henstra D, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P1077, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2019.1634015
   Hettiarachchi S, 2022, CITIES, V128, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103789
   Humbal A., 2023, Climate Change and Urban Environment Sustainability, P151, DOI [10.1007/978-981-19-7618-6_9, DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-7618-6_9, 10.1007/978-981-19-7618-69]
   Hwang K, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12030918
   Karamouz M., 2015, EWRA C IST 24 27 JUN
   Kati V, 2016, LAND USE POLICY, V50, P537, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.031
   Keeley M, 2013, ENVIRON MANAGE, V51, P1093, DOI 10.1007/s00267-013-0032-x
   Khan MP, 2022, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V8, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000992
   Kim K, 2020, ATMOSPHERE-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/atmos11010022
   Kinney A, 2023, J AM WATER RESOUR AS, V59, P1128, DOI 10.1111/1752-1688.13123
   Kiv-Vainik M., 2022, Nature-Based Solut, V2, P100038, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022.100038, 10.1016/j.nbsj.2022, DOI 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2022]
   Köhler M, 2019, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/buildings9070157
   Kourtis IM, 2023, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V37, P2403, DOI 10.1007/s11269-022-03252-8
   Kourtis IM, 2022, WATER SUPPLY, V22, P4951, DOI 10.2166/ws.2022.152
   Kuller M, 2017, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V96, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.07.003
   Kundzewicz ZW, 2021, WATER POLICY, V23, P85, DOI 10.2166/wp.2021.330
   Kvamsås H, 2023, ENVIRON POLICY GOV, V33, P232, DOI 10.1002/eet.2017
   Lamb WF, 2022, CLIM POLICY, V22, P1, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2021.1990831
   Langeveld JG, 2022, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V4, P272, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2022.019
   Le Gat Y, 2025, STRUCT INFRASTRUCT E, V21, P539, DOI 10.1080/15732479.2023.2222030
   Leal Filho W., 2020, Handbook of Climate Change Resilience, DOI 10.1007978-3-319-93336-8
   Lee JS, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10062065
   Lee J, 2024, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V51, P939, DOI 10.1177/23998083231207535
   Lerer SM, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9110883
   Li C, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P11, DOI 10.1029/2018EF001001
   Li F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.079
   Liew SC, 2014, HYDROL PROCESS, V28, P3276, DOI 10.1002/hyp.9839
   Liu L, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11102024
   Lowe J. A., 2019, UKCP18 SCI OVERVIEW
   Lukito JA, 2019, INT J BUILD PATHOL, V37, P140, DOI 10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0019
   Lund NSV, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P1003, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0392-1
   Madonsela B, 2019, WATER-SUI, V11, DOI 10.3390/w11020292
   Madsen H.M., 2013, 8 INT WAT SEN URB DE, P1
   Maimone M, 2019, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V145, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001071, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001071]
   Markolf SA, 2021, CITIES, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102981
   Martel JL, 2021, J HYDROL ENG, V26, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002122
   Matsler M, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104145
   McDonald WM, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P2273, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2018.1539391
   Mekala GD, 2015, ENVIRON MANAGE, V55, P1354, DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0471-7
   Melbourne Water, 2007, Water Sensitive Urban Design Guidelines South Eastern Councils
   Met Office, 2022, UK Climate Projections: Headline Findings Met Office
   Milly PCD, 2008, SCIENCE, V319, P573, DOI 10.1126/science.1151915
   Minan J.H., 2005, San Diego L. Rev, V42, P1215
   Moore TL, 2017, WATER ENVIRON RES, V89, P1874, DOI 10.2175/106143017X15023776270692
   Mullapudi A, 2020, ADV WATER RESOUR, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103600
   Muller C, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7130
   Nazarpour S, 2023, WATER-SUI, V15, DOI 10.3390/w15050913
   Netusil N.R., 2021, The Coming Storm: How US Cities Are Managing Stormwater from Increasingly Extreme Rainfall Events
   Nodine TG, 2024, SCI REP-UK, V14, DOI 10.1038/s41598-024-53611-1
   NRC, 2022, Managing Stormwater to Improve Canadian Cities' Safety and Resilience, DOI [10.4324/9781003030720, DOI 10.4324/9781003030720]
   O'Donnell EC, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P964, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2017.1279190
   O'Keeffe J, 2016, HYDROL EARTH SYST SC, V20, P1911, DOI 10.5194/hess-20-1911-2016
   Parikh P, 2005, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V8, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.01.002
   Pendergrass AG, 2018, SCIENCE, V360, P1072, DOI 10.1126/science.aat1871
   Perera ACS, 2024, LAND USE POLICY, V140, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107093
   Peterson LA, 2021, J IND ECOL, V25, P1076, DOI 10.1111/jiec.13098
   Romero-Duque LP, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V728, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138780
   Plastrik Peter, 2019, Playbook 1.0: How Cities Are Paying for Climate Resilience
   Porse E, 2022, WATER POLICY, V24, P998, DOI 10.2166/wp.2022.024
   Poschlod B, 2021, ENVIRON RES LETT, V16, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0849
   Pratolongo P, 2019, COASTAL WETLANDS: AN INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM APPROACH, 2ND EDITION, P105, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-63893-9.00003-4
   Przestrzelska K, 2024, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V38, P5885, DOI 10.1007/s11269-024-03950-5
   Pui A, 2012, J HYDROL, V470, P138, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.08.041
   Qiao XJ, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101963
   Qiao XJ, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V196, P943, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.049
   Radcliffe J.C., 2018, INT SPONG CIT C CHIN, V1, P38
   Rentachintala LRNP, 2022, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V85, P1120, DOI 10.2166/wst.2022.017
   Rodak CM, 2019, WATER ENVIRON RES, V91, P1034, DOI [10.2175/106143016X14696400495938, 10.1002/wer.1173]
   Rosenberg EA, 2010, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V102, P319, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9847-0
   Rosenzweig B, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V99, P150, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.020
   Roy AH, 2008, ENVIRON MANAGE, V42, P344, DOI 10.1007/s00267-008-9119-1
   Sathurshan M, 2022, INFRASTRUCTURES-BASE, V7, DOI 10.3390/infrastructures7050067
   Schlef KE, 2023, J HYDROL, V616, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128757
   Scholten L., 2024, Asset Management of Urban Drainage Systems, P271, DOI [10.2166/97817890630590271, DOI 10.2166/97817890630590271]
   Schreiber C, 2019, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V80, P1022, DOI 10.2166/wst.2019.340
   Schroeer K, 2018, CLIM DYNAM, V50, P3981, DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3857-9
   Senge Nzams T., 2022, The UN's Sustainable Development Goal 13 in Berlin, Germany: Towards the Implementation of the"Sponge City"Concept for Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation
   Sharifi A, 2024, ADV ENG INFORM, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2024.102485
   Shrestha A, 2022, J HYDROL, V607, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127498
   Siehr SA, 2022, WIRES ENERGY ENVIRON, V11, DOI 10.1002/wene.447
   Sobota M., 2022, J. Water Land Dev., P130, DOI [10.24425/jwld.2022.143728, DOI 10.24425/JWLD.2022.143728]
   Soler NG, 2018, GEOFORUM, V89, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.010
   Spahr KM, 2021, J SUSTAIN WATER BUIL, V7, DOI 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000963
   Su J, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15097281
   Sun ZD, 2024, J CLEAN PROD, V447, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141646
   Tasca FA, 2018, WATER SCI TECHNOL, P287, DOI 10.2166/wst.2018.112
   Taysi H, 2022, J WATER CLIM CHANGE, V13, P684, DOI 10.2166/wcc.2021.241
   Thurston HW, 2003, J WATER RES PL-ASCE, V129, P409, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:5(409)
   Todorovic Z., 2016, NOVATECH 2016
   Tomson M, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106288
   Tousi EG, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V72, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103014
   U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2013, EPA 841R-13-004
   van Duin B, 2021, FRONT WATER, V3, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2021.671059
   van Vuuren DP, 2020, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V10, P329, DOI 10.1038/s41558-020-0732-1
   Veiga MM, 2021, WATER SUPPLY, V21, P1506, DOI 10.2166/ws.2021.024
   Venkataramanan V, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V246, P868, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.028
   Wang M, 2023, ENVIRON RES, V236, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2023.116701
   Wang R, 2022, ENVIRON MANAGE, V69, P558, DOI 10.1007/s00267-021-01565-9
   Wang SY, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13131774
   Water Utility Climate Alliance (WUCA), 2022, Scaling and Application of Climate Projections to Stormwater and Wastewater Resilience Planning
   Webber JL, 2022, WATER RES, V218, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118409
   [Whetton P. CSIRO BOM CSIRO BOM], 2015, Climate change in Australia technical report. Climate change in Australia information for Australia's natural resource management regions: technical report
   Wittwer G, 2013, ECON PAP, V32, P41, DOI 10.1111/1759-3441.12023
   Wu YW, 2020, WATER POLICY, V22, P574, DOI 10.2166/wp.2020.155
   Xiong LH, 2019, IRRIG DRAIN, V68, P152, DOI 10.1002/ird.2316
   Xu CQ, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105804
   Xu GY, 2017, ENTERP INF SYST-UK, V11, P719, DOI 10.1080/17517575.2015.1086493
   Xu MY, 2024, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V196, DOI 10.1007/s10661-024-12532-2
   Xu PC, 2024, URBAN CLIM, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101990
   Yan HX, 2020, FRONT WATER, V2, DOI 10.3389/frwa.2020.545051
   Yereseme AK, 2022, SUST WAT RESOUR MAN, V8, DOI 10.1007/s40899-022-00666-5
   Zabel A, 2024, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V242, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104929
   Zevenbergen C, 2018, WATER-SUI, V10, DOI 10.3390/w10091230
   Zhang DQ, 2017, URBAN WATER J, V14, P113, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2015.1076488
   Zhang KF, 2020, BLUE-GREEN SYST, V2, P383, DOI 10.2166/bgs.2020.018
   Zhang K, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V621, P915, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.281
   Zhang YX, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13010004
   Zhao JZ, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11071913
   Zheng XS, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V234, P1113, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.140
   Ziervogel G, 2016, S AFR GEOGR J, V98, P1, DOI 10.1080/03736245.2014.924867
NR 199
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 12
U2 12
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-0955
J9 URBAN CLIM
JI Urban CLim.
PD FEB
PY 2025
VL 59
AR 102290
DI 10.1016/j.uclim.2025.102290
EA JAN 2025
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA U9C1E
UT WOS:001414673900001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Schäfer, L
   Kleemann, J
   Spyra, M
AF Schaefer, Lotta
   Kleemann, Janina
   Spyra, Marcin
TI Allotment Garden Products as Contribution to Sustainable and Resilient
   Cities: An Analysis in Leipzig, Germany
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE citizen; diverse economy; food sharing; food systems; garden plot;
   resilience; sustainability; urban gardening; vegetables
ID COMMUNITY GARDENS; FOOD
AB The food supply and the consumption of resources are already central challenges for the growing world population and increasing demands. Urban areas in particular face problems of resilience and sustainability. The development of alternative food systems by, e.g., urban gardening, can contribute to meet targets of sustainable consumption, inclusive economy, and resilient food systems of cities. Our research presents insights into the available harvest of products from allotments. In addition, the interest and motivation of gardeners to distribute products from their allotments was investigated. The analysis was based on a structured and standardized questionnaire with more than 90 allotment gardeners in Leipzig. Data were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Our results showed that especially zucchinis, tomatoes, berries, and apples could be distributed to consumers; however, the greatest obstacle involves the legal framework to economically distribute products from these allotments. On the other hand, some respondents showed that income generation from allotment products is less important than the enjoyment of the garden and the charitable goal of action. They suggested an organized distribution system of surplus from allotments to particularly disadvantaged people. This paper encourages re-examination of the conventional urban-rural relations, the production-consumption relationships, and the norms of economic activity.
C1 [Schaefer, Lotta; Kleemann, Janina; Spyra, Marcin] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Geosci & Geog, Dept Sustainable Landscape Dev, Von Seckendorff Pl 4, D-06120 Halle, Saale, Germany.
   [Spyra, Marcin] Opole Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Architecture, Katowicka 48, PL-45061 Opole, Poland.
C3 Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg; Opole University of
   Technology
RP Kleemann, J (corresponding author), Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Geosci & Geog, Dept Sustainable Landscape Dev, Von Seckendorff Pl 4, D-06120 Halle, Saale, Germany.
EM janina.kleemann@geo.uni-halle.de
RI Kleemann, Janina/AAN-7171-2020; Spyra, Marcin/F-3130-2015
OI Spyra, Marcin/0000-0002-0551-9915; Kleemann, Janina/0000-0001-6316-6209
CR Amato-Lourenço LF, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P2785, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00636-x
   [Anonymous], 2017, LEIPZIGER GARTENFREU
   [Anonymous], STADT LEIPZIG KLEING
   [Anonymous], SHARECITY SHARECITY
   [Anonymous], VOLLIG KOSTENLOS
   [Anonymous], INN SHORT FOOD SUPPL
   [Anonymous], BUNDESKLEINGARTENGES
   Barbera F, 2016, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V8, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.027
   Barthel S, 2015, URBAN STUD, V52, P1321, DOI 10.1177/0042098012472744
   Bende C, 2020, GEOGR POL, V93, P211, DOI 10.7163/GPol.0170
   Braun B, 2018, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V62, P120, DOI 10.1515/zfw-2018-0001
   Brod A, 2020, ORTSBLATT LEIPZ 1008
   Bryla P, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11226408
   BUCKINGHAM S., 2003, Local Environmental Sustainability, P195
   Bundesinstitut fur Bau- Stadt- und Raumforschung, 2019, KLEING WAND INN VERD
   Bundesministerium fur Ernahrung und Landwirtschaft Landwirtschaft Klimaschutz und Klimaresilienz, LANDWIRTSCHAFT KLIMA
   Cabral M.I., URBAN GARDENING LEIP
   Canfora I, 2016, AGRIC AGRIC SCI PROC, V8, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.036
   Carpenter SR, 2001, BIOSCIENCE, V51, P451, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0451:CWCEAS]2.0.CO;2
   Cook R.I., 2006, STUDY ALLOTMENTS SMA
   Davies AR, 2017, GEOFORUM, V86, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.09.007
   Davies AR, 2017, AREA, V49, P510, DOI 10.1111/area.12340
   Davies Anna R, 2019, URBAN FOOD SHARING R
   Dinnie L., ENQUIRY LOCAL FOOD G
   Edmondson JL, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V705, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135930
   Egli Victoria, 2016, Prev Med Rep, V3, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.04.005
   Ericksen PJ, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.002
   European Union, NEW EUR BAUH
   Feldmann F., 2022, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V47, P19
   Ferris J, 2001, SOC POLICY ADMIN, V35, P559, DOI 10.1111/1467-9515.t01-1-00253
   Fladvad B, 2018, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V62, P201, DOI [10.1515/zfw-2017-0010, DOI 10.1515/ZFW-2017-0010]
   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011, Food Agriculture and Cities: Challenges of Food and Nutrition Security, Agriculture and Ecosystem Management in an Urbanizing World
   Franck KA, 2005, ARCHIT DESIGN, P5
   Garside P., 2003, LOCAL ENV SUSTAINABI, P114
   Gibson-Graham J.K., 2013, TAKE BACK EC ETHICAL
   Greiving S., RESILIENTE STADT ZUK
   Jones P., 2004, British Food Journal, V106, P328, DOI 10.1108/00070700410529582
   Kelfve S, 2020, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-01138-0
   Kost S., 2017, TRANSITORISCHE STADT
   Lange N., 2018, QUANTITATIVE METHODI
   Marchese D, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V613, P1275, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086
   Mbow C., CLIMATE CHANGE LAND
   Michelini L, 2018, ECOL ECON, V145, P205, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.009
   Morrow O, 2019, GEOFORUM, V99, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.003
   Nicholls E, 2020, SUSTAIN SCI, V15, P1585, DOI 10.1007/s11625-020-00792-z
   Nova P, 2020, GAC SANIT, V34, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.001
   OConnell J, 2013, GUARDIAN        0626
   OrganicLEA Community, 2007, GROW SELL ALL PROD R
   Patel R., 2016, Defining the Resilient City
   Payen FT, 2022, EARTHS FUTURE, V10, DOI 10.1029/2022EF002748
   Reinhardt G., 2020, Okologische Fussabdrucke von Lebensmitteln und Gerichten in Deutschland
   Rogge N, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10041085
   Romero-Lankao P, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.02.002
   Rosol M, 2020, ECON GEOGR, V96, P52, DOI 10.1080/00130095.2019.1701430
   Rosol M, 2018, Z WIRTSCHAFTSGEOGR, V62, P174, DOI 10.1515/zfw-2017-0005
   Schafer L., 2022, THESIS M LUTHER U HA
   Singh RK, 2020, ECOL PROCESS, V9, DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-00232-x
   Stadt Leipzig, AMT WAHL STAT OFF DA
   Suter G, 2022, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V18, P1117
   Tafel Deutschland e.V, 2022, TAF AKT ZAHL SOMM
   Tafel Deutschland e.V, ARM DEUTSCHL DRAM HO
   Turck M., 2016, Deskriptive Statistik, V6
   United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division, 2022, PROB POP PROJ BAS WO
   van der Jagt APN, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V233, P757, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.083
   Whatmore S., 1997, Globalising food: agrarian questions and global restructuring., P287
   Wilbanks T, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, P357
   Winter M, 2004, PROG HUM GEOG, V28, P664, DOI 10.1191/0309132504ph512pr
NR 67
TC 0
Z9 0
U1 1
U2 17
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAR
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 6
AR 5598
DI 10.3390/su15065598
PG 21
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA C0DD3
UT WOS:000958720600001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Miguez, MG
   Veról, AP
   Battemarco, BP
   Yamamoto, LMT
   de Brito, FA
   Fernandez, FF
   Merlo, ML
   Rego, AQ
AF Miguez, Marcelo Gomes
   Verol, Aline Pires
   Battemarco, Bruna Peres
   Tenorio Yamamoto, Lilian Marie
   de Brito, Fernanda Almeida
   Fernandez, Fernanda Freitas
   Merlo, Mylenna Linares
   Rego, Andrea Queiroz
TI A framework to support the urbanization process on lowland coastal
   areas: Exploring the case of Vargem Grande - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Lowland coastal areas; City expansion; Mathematical modeling;
   Multi-criteria indexes; Flood risk; Urban flood resilience
ID FLOOD RISK-MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES;
   URBAN; RESILIENT; INFRASTRUCTURE; CITIES
AB Urban growth usually triggers environmental imbalances. When the supporting capacity of the watersheds is surpassed, both the natural and the built environment degrade in a negative cycle. In this context, integrating a sustainable urban drainage approach with river restoration concepts, this work proposes a set of guidelines composing a framework to support the urban growth process in lowlands of coastal cities, combining social and natural demands, and improving city resilience to floods. Different tools including mathematical modeling and multi-criteria indexes were combined in this framework and then tested in an exploratory case study in the Vargem Grande district, an expanding coastal area in the west zone of Rio de Janeiro/Brazil. A computational hydrodynamic model -called Urban Flow-Cell Model has been used to provide information on impacts generated by the changes of the urban configuration in the region of interest. The Flood Risk Index and the Urban River Restoration Index were applied to assess risk and estimate environmental restoration effects quantitatively. The results for the applied framework show that sustainable drainage concepts in combination with river restoration measures can support the expansion of the city, meeting social and environmental demands. The expanding area considered in the case study could grow safely when oriented by the proposed framework, while the flooding results could be dramatic worsened in an uncontrolled development. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Miguez, Marcelo Gomes; Verol, Aline Pires; Battemarco, Bruna Peres] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Programa Engn Civil, Ave Athos Silveira Ramos 149,Bloco 1,2 Andar, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
   [Verol, Aline Pires; Rego, Andrea Queiroz] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, FAU, Programa Posgrad Arquitetura, Ave Pedro Calmon 550,Sala 433 Cidade Univ, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
   [Tenorio Yamamoto, Lilian Marie] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Escola Politecn, Ave Athos Silveira Ramos 149, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   [de Brito, Fernanda Almeida; Fernandez, Fernanda Freitas; Merlo, Mylenna Linares] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Fac Arquitetura & Urbanismo, Ave Pedro Calmon 550,Bloco D Terreo,Cidade Univ, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
C3 Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de
   Janeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; Universidade Federal do
   Rio de Janeiro
RP Veról, AP (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Programa Engn Civil, Ave Athos Silveira Ramos 149,Bloco 1,2 Andar, BR-21941909 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.; Veról, AP (corresponding author), Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, FAU, Programa Posgrad Arquitetura, Ave Pedro Calmon 550,Sala 433 Cidade Univ, BR-21941485 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
EM marcelomiguez@poli.ufrj.br; alineverol@fau.ufrj.br;
   brunabattemarco@poli.ufrj.br; lilian_yamamoto@poli.ufrj.br;
   fernandaalmeidadebrito94@gmail.com; nanda.f.fernandez@gmail.com;
   m.linaresmerlo@gmail.com; andrea.queiroz@ufrj.br
RI VEROL, ALINE PIRES/R-2750-2017; Miguez, Marcelo Gomes/A-3252-2013
OI VEROL, ALINE PIRES/0000-0001-7793-1143; Battemarco,
   Bruna/0000-0003-1388-4688; Miguez, Marcelo Gomes/0000-0003-4206-4013
FU Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil
   (CAPES) [001, 1681776]; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico
   e Tecnologico [303240/2017-2]
FX This work was supported by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal
   de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [Finance Code 001; 1681776]; Conselho
   Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [303240/2017-2].
CR ADB, 2016, Reducing disaster risk by managing urban land use: Guidance notes for planners
   Allen A., 2009, UCLS J SUSTAIN CITIE, P1, DOI [10.1080/0042098975394, DOI 10.1080/0042098975394]
   Andersen TK, 2013, GEOGR COMPASS, V7, P95, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12025
   [Anonymous], 2015, CAR MOS GREEN CORR R, V8-11
   Barbedo J, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06482-190254
   Chan FKS, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V187, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.217
   de Jong M, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
   Fletcher TD, 2015, URBAN WATER J, V12, P525, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2014.916314
   Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), 2010, SUSTAIN DEV URBAN IN, P1
   Gazzola P, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V214, P881, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.234
   Grizzetti B, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V61, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008
   Klijn F, 2015, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V20, P845, DOI 10.1007/s11027-015-9638-z
   Larsen JN, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT B: REGIONAL ASPECTS, P1567
   Li F, 2017, J CLEAN PROD, V163, pS12, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.079
   Liao K. H., 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, DOI [10.1016/1landurbplan.2016.01.014, DOI 10.1016/1LANDURBPLAN.2016.01.014]
   MacHarg I., 1969, Design with nature
   Mascarenhas FCB, 2002, WATER INT, V27, P208, DOI 10.1080/02508060208686994
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Merz B, 2014, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V14, P1921, DOI 10.5194/nhess-14-1921-2014
   Miguez M. G., 2007, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, V2, P153, DOI 10.2495/SDP-V2-N2-153-166
   Miguez M. G., 2018, Urban Agglomeration,, DOI [10.5772/intechopen.71658, DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.71658]
   Miguez MG, 2017, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V44, P925, DOI 10.1177/0265813516655799
   Miguez MG, 2017, WATER-SUI, V9, DOI 10.3390/w9060445
   Miguez MG, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000219
   Miguez MG, 2009, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V135, P100, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000012
   Nardini A, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8030198
   Ogie RI, 2018, URBAN CLIM, V24, P763, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.09.002
   Perales-Momparler S, 2015, J CLEAN PROD, V109, P174, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.039
   Poleto C., 2012, Drainage Systems, P55
   Qiao X. J., 2018, J CLEAN PROD, DOI [10.1016/jjclepro.2018.06.049, DOI 10.1016/JJCLEPRO.2018.06.049]
   Rodríguez-Sinobas L, 2018, J CLEAN PROD, V172, P402, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.070
   Rogers Richard., 1998, CITIES SMALL PLANET
   Romero-Lankao P, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8121224
   Roos MMD, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V74, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.007
   Sanders Brett F., 2017, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780199389407.013.127
   Schuch G, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V63, P539, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.042
   Schuetze T, 2013, WATER-SUI, V5, P593, DOI 10.3390/w5020593
   Sörensen J, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8080332
   Le TQ, 2019, AREA, V51, P804, DOI 10.1111/area.12543
   Verol A. P., 2018, 1 LAT AM C SUST DEV
   Yigitcanlar T, 2015, INT J ENVIRON SCI TE, V12, P341, DOI 10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x
   Zetter Roger., 2006, DESIGNING SUSTAINABL
   Zhang PD, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V214, P685, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.307
   Zhou QQ, 2014, WATER-SUI, V6, P976, DOI 10.3390/w6040976
   Zonensein J. M. G., 2008, 11 INT C URB DRAIN
NR 45
TC 18
Z9 21
U1 2
U2 33
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD SEP 10
PY 2019
VL 231
BP 1281
EP 1293
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.187
PG 13
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA IH7JO
UT WOS:000474680100107
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Heinzlef, C
   Barroca, B
   Leone, M
   Serre, D
AF Heinzlef, Charlotte
   Barroca, Bruno
   Leone, Mattia
   Serre, Damien
TI Urban resilience operationalization issues in climate risk management: A
   review
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
LA English
DT Review
DE Resilience; Urban environments; Risk management; Disaster risk reduction
   strategies
ID CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; CHANGE ADAPTATION; FLOODS;
   VULNERABILITY; VISUALIZATION; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; METAPHOR; BARRIERS
AB This paper presents a review of existing strategies and tools aiming at facilitating the operationalization of the concept of resilience into built environments. In a context of climate change, increased risks in urban areas and growing uncertainties, urban managers are forced to innovate in order to design appropriate new risk management strategies. Among these strategies, making cities resilient has become an imperative. However, resilience remains complex to integrate into the practices of urban planners and territorial actors. Its multitude of definitions and approaches has contributed to its abstraction and lack of operationalization. This review highlights the multitude of approaches and methodologies to address the bias of the lack of integration of the concept of resilience in climate risk management. The limit is the multiplication of these strategies which lead to conceptual vagueness and a lack of tangible application at the level of local actors. The challenge would then be to design a toolbox to concentrate the various existing tools, conceptual models and decision support systems in order to facilitate the autonomy and responsibility of local stakeholders in integrating the concept of resilience into risk management strategies.
C1 [Heinzlef, Charlotte] Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, CEARC, 11 Blvd DAlembert, F-78280 Guyancourt, France.
   [Barroca, Bruno] Univ Gustave Eiffel, Lab Urba, 16 Blvd Newton, F-77420 Champs Sur Marne, France.
   [Leone, Mattia] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Architecture, Via Toledo 402, I-80134 Naples, Italy.
   [Serre, Damien] Avignon Univ, UMR ESPACE, Avignon, France.
   [Serre, Damien] Univ Montreal, Ecole Urbanisme & Architecture Paysage, ARIACTON, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
C3 Universite Paris Saclay; Universite Gustave-Eiffel; Universite
   Paris-Est-Creteil-Val-de-Marne (UPEC); University of Naples Federico II;
   Avignon Universite; Universite de Montreal
RP Serre, D (corresponding author), Univ Paris Saclay, UVSQ, CEARC, 11 Blvd DAlembert, F-78280 Guyancourt, France.
EM charlotte.heinzlef@uvsq.fr; bruno.barroca@u-pem.fr;
   mattia.leone@unina.it; damien.serre@univ-avignon.fr
RI Leone, Mattia/L-4807-2018
OI LEONE, MATTIA FEDERICO/0000-0003-2434-509X
CR 100 Resilient Cities, CIT RES FRAM
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Alberti M., 2008, Urban Ecology, P143, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_9
   Alexander D.E, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, P1257, DOI [10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013, DOI 10.5194/NHESS-13-2707-2013, DOI 10.5194/NHESSD-1-1257-2013, DOI 10.5194/nhessd-1-1257-2013]
   Amundsen H, 2010, ENVIRON PLANN C, V28, P276, DOI 10.1068/c0941
   [Anonymous], 2010, Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners
   [Anonymous], 2013, HAUT COMITE FRANCAIS
   [Anonymous], 2022, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU14020606
   [Anonymous], 2016, ECOL SOC, DOI DOI 10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   Appelquist LR, 2014, CLIM RISK MANAG, V3, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2014.06.002
   Asprone D., 2014, SAFETY RELIABILITY R, P4069, DOI 10.1201/b16387-591
   Bach C, 2014, SAPIENS, V6, P1
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Bene C., 2012, 405 IDS, V2012, DOI [10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2040-0209.2012.00405.X]
   Béné C, 2018, CLIM DEV, V10, P116, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2017.1301868
   Boin A., 2007, J CCM, V15, P50, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-5973.2007.00504.X
   C40 Cities, 2017, C40 CIT TAK ACT INCR
   Campanella TJ, 2006, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V72, P141, DOI 10.1080/01944360608976734
   Cannon T, 2010, NAT HAZARDS, V55, P621, DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9499-4
   Cardona O., 2004, MAPP VULNERABILITY D
   Carpenter S, 2001, ECOSYSTEMS, V4, P765, DOI 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Chrislip D.D., 2002, JOSSEY BASS NONPROFI
   Cimellaro GP, 2010, ENG STRUCT, V32, P3639, DOI 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.08.008
   Coastal Resilience, COAST RES MAPP PORT
   Coles E., 2004, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, V19, P6
   Coltekin A., 2017, INT J CARTOGR, V3, P115, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23729333.2017.13029102, 10.1080/23729333.2017.1302910, DOI 10.1080/23729333.2017.1302910]
   Cutter S.L., 2008, 1 CARR
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Dilling L, 2015, WEATHER CLIM SOC, V7, P5, DOI 10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00001.1
   Disse M., 2020, Water Security, V9, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100059
   Djenontin INS, 2018, ENVIRON MANAGE, V61, P885, DOI 10.1007/s00267-018-1028-3
   Duit A, 2010, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V20, P363, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.006
   Dykes J., 2007, EXPLORING GEOVISUALI
   Emrich C.T., 2018, VULNERABILITY RESILI, P124
   Field CB, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P1
   Foster KA, 2012, URBAN AND REGIONAL POLICY AND ITS EFFECTS: BUILDING RESILIENT REGIONS, VOL 4, P24
   Fox-Lent Cate, 2015, Environment Systems & Decisions, V35, P209, DOI 10.1007/s10669-015-9555-4
   Ganor Michael, 2003, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE
   Godschalk DR, 2003, NAT HAZARDS REV, V4, P136, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136)
   Goncalves C., 2013, AESOP ACSP JOINT C, P16
   Gonzva M., 2017, EGU GEN ASSEMBLY C A, P17893
   Gupta J, 2010, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V13, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006
   Hallegatte S, 2019, CLIM RISK MANAG, V23, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2018.12.001
   Heinzlef C, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102762
   Heinzlef C, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1049, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1049-2020
   Heinzlef C, 2019, SAFETY SCI, V118, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.003
   Hernandez J., 2009, Espace geographique, V38, P124
   Hinkel J, 2011, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V21, P198, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002
   Holing CS, 1996, Engineering within Ecological Constraints, P31
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Jessin J, 2022, WATER-SUI, V14, DOI 10.3390/w14030359
   Johansson J, 2017, IEEE COMPUT GRAPH, V37, P54, DOI 10.1109/MCG.2016.49
   Kappes MS, 2012, NAT HAZARDS, V64, P1925, DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0294-2
   Kettle NP, 2014, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V44, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.08.013
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Knabb R.D., 2005, TROPICAL CYCLONE REP
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Kuhlicke C, 2011, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V14, P804, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.001
   Kunz M, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P2579, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-2579-2013
   Kurwakumire E., 2019, PROC ICA, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.5194/ICA-PROC-2-68-2019, 10.5194/ica-proc-2-68-2019]
   Kwan M.P., 2003, SPATIALLY INTEGRATED, V3, P27
   Laatabi A, 2022, ENVIRON MODELL SOFTW, V149, DOI 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105319
   Lamond JE, 2009, PROC INST CIV ENG-U, V162, P63, DOI 10.1680/udap.2009.162.2.63
   Leichenko R., 2015, J EXTR EVEN, P1550002, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737615500025
   Lemos MC, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P57, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004
   Lhomme S, 2013, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V13, P221, DOI 10.5194/nhess-13-221-2013
   Lhomme S, 2010, WIT TRANS ECOL ENVIR, V129, P661, DOI 10.2495/SC100561
   Longstaff P.H., 2005, Security, resilience, and communication in unpredictable environments such as terrorism, natural disasters, and complex technology
   Marschütz B, 2020, CLIM RISK MANAG, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2020.100223
   Marzouki A, 2017, DG.O 2017: THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH: INNOVATIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNMENT, P397, DOI 10.1145/3085228.3085240
   Measham TG, 2011, MITIG ADAPT STRAT GL, V16, P889, DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9301-2
   Mitigation Assessment Team Report Hurricane Sandy in New Jersey and New York, 2013, MIT ASS TEAM REP HUR
   Mozumder P, 2011, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V54, P37, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.008
   Nöllenburg M, 2007, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4417, P257
   Nones M, 2016, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V14, P195, DOI 10.1080/15715124.2016.1149074
   Opach T., 2013, CARTOGRAPHICA, V48, P113, DOI DOI 10.3138/CARTO.48.2.1840
   Ouyang M, 2012, STRUCT SAF, V36-37, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.12.004
   Papathoma-Köhle M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101103
   Peacock WalterGillis., 2010, Advancing the resilience of coastal localities: developing, implementing and sustaining the use of coastal resilience indicators: a final report, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.35146.80324
   Pelling M, 2011, ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE: FROM RESILIENCE TO TRANSFORMATION, P3
   Pescaroli G, 2017, J CONTING CRISIS MAN, V25, P56, DOI 10.1111/1468-5973.12118
   Pescaroli G, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160707003
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Prior T, 2014, J RISK RES, V17, P281, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2013.808686
   Reghezza-Zitt M, 2012, CYBERGEO, DOI 10.4000/cybergeo.25554
   Renschler C.S., 2011, COMMUNITY RESILIENCE, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.3355.1767, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.3355.1767]
   Robert B, 2008, INT J CRIT INFRASTRU, V4, P392, DOI 10.1504/IJCIS.2008.020158
   Rufat S, 2015, RESILIENCE IMPERATIVE: UNCERTAINTY, RISKS AND DISASTERS, P201
   Runhaar H, 2012, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V12, P777, DOI 10.1007/s10113-012-0292-7
   SADIN SR, 1989, ACTA ASTRONAUT, V20, P73, DOI 10.1016/0094-5765(89)90054-4
   Schneider F, 2014, SUSTAIN SCI, V9, P463, DOI 10.1007/s11625-013-0232-6
   Serre D., 2013, RESILIENCE URBAN RIS
   Serre D., 2022, The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies, P1, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_129-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-32811-5_129-2]
   Serre D, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V30, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.018
   Serre D, 2018, URBAN BOOK SERIES, P207, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-68606-6_13
   Serre D, 2016, E3S WEB CONF, V7, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/20160707002
   St. George Freemana Sarah, 2020, Water Security, V9, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.wasec.2019.100053
   Suárez M, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080774
   Tempels B, 2014, WATER INT, V39, P872, DOI 10.1080/02508060.2014.958797
   Toubin M, 2015, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V141, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000229
   Un-Habitat, 2017, Trends in Urban Resilience
   Undesa U., 2019, WORLD POPULATION PRO
   UNISDR, 2015, 10 ESS MAK CIT RES
   United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), 2018, Disaster Risk Profile Ghana
   Wagner Iwona, 2013, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V13, P113, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.06.002
   Walker B., 2004, Ecology and Society, V9, P5
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
   Weichselgartner J, 2015, PROG HUM GEOG, V39, P249, DOI 10.1177/0309132513518834
   Winderl Thomas., 2014, DISASTER RESILIENCE
   ZEVENBERGEN Chris., 2010, Urban flood management
NR 113
TC 14
Z9 15
U1 12
U2 82
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2212-4209
J9 INT J DISAST RISK RE
JI Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct.
PD JUN 1
PY 2022
VL 75
AR 102974
DI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102974
EA APR 2022
PG 15
WC Geosciences, Multidisciplinary; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences;
   Water Resources
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Geology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences; Water Resources
GA 5V5WB
UT WOS:000877298200004
OA Bronze, Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Lafortezza, R
   Chen, JQ
   van den Bosc, CK
   Randrup, TB
AF Lafortezza, Raffaele
   Chen, Jiquan
   van den Bosc, Cecil Konijnendijk
   Randrup, Thomas B.
TI Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article
DE Ecosystem services; Nature-based solutions; Urban ecosystems; Ecosystem
   resilience; Sustainability
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE; PUBLIC-HEALTH; AREAS;
   PROVISION; FRAMEWORK; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; POLLUTION; PEOPLE
AB Nature-based solutions (NBS) are increasingly applied to guide the design of resilient landscapes and cities to enable them to reach economic development goals with beneficial outcomes for the environment and society. The NBS concept is closely related to other concepts including sustainability, resilience, ecosystem services, coupled human and environment, and green (blue) infrastructure; however, NBS represent a more efficient and cost-effective approach to development than traditional approaches. The European Commission is actively engaged in investing in NBS as a driver in developing ecosystem services-based approaches throughout Europe and the world. The pool of knowledge and expertise presented in this Special Issue of Environmental Research highlights the applications of NBS as 'living' and adaptable tools to boost the capacity of landscapes and cities to face today's critical environmental, economic and societal challenges. Based on the literature and papers of this Special Issue, we propose five specific challenges for the future of NBS.
C1 [Lafortezza, Raffaele] Univ Bari A Moro, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Via Amendola 165-A, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
   [Lafortezza, Raffaele; Chen, Jiquan] Michigan State Univ, CGCEO Geog, 1405 S Harrison Rd,Manly Miles Bldg, E Lansing, MI 48823 USA.
   [van den Bosc, Cecil Konijnendijk] Univ British Columbia, Dept Forest Resources Management, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
   [Randrup, Thomas B.] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture Planning & Management, S-23053 Alnarp, Sweden.
C3 Universita degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro; Michigan State University;
   University of British Columbia; Swedish University of Agricultural
   Sciences
RP Lafortezza, R (corresponding author), Univ Bari A Moro, Dept Agr & Environm Sci, Via Amendola 165-A, I-70126 Bari, Italy.
EM raffaele.lafortezza@uniba.it
RI Randrup, Thomas/JCE-0718-2023; Chen, Jiquan/D-1955-2009; Konijnendijk,
   Cecil/AAC-4439-2019; Lafortezza, Raffaele/G-2104-2018; B. Randrup,
   Thomas/N-1650-2015
OI Chen, Jiquan/0000-0003-0761-9458; Konijnendijk,
   Cecil/0000-0003-4000-0622; Lafortezza, Raffaele/0000-0003-4642-8435; B.
   Randrup, Thomas/0000-0003-1368-3915
FU European Union [FP7-ENV.2013.6.2-5-60356, 603567]
FX This work was carried out under the research project "Green
   Infrastructure and Urban Biodiversity for Sustainable Urban Development
   and the Green Economy (GREEN SURGE)", funded by the European Union FP7
   programme FP7-ENV.2013.6.2-5-60356 (Grant Agreement No. 603567). We wish
   to express our thanks to Dr. Jose Domingo, Editor-in-Chief of
   Environmental Research, and his entire editorial team for supporting
   this Special Issue and providing excellent guidance throughout the
   review process.
CR [Anonymous], REMOTE SENS
   [Anonymous], 2016, NATUREBASED SOLUTION, DOI [DOI 10.1068/a35111, DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN]
   [Anonymous], 2016, Nature-based Solutions for Building Resilience in Towns and Cities: Case Studies from the Greater Mekong Subregion
   [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5
   [Anonymous], 1993, FOREST ECOSYSTEM MAN
   Bellamy CC, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.023
   Cariñanos P, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V155, P219, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.015
   Chen ES, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.007
   Chen JQ, 2015, ENVIRON RES LETT, V10, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085003
   Chen JQ, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1641, DOI 10.1007/s10980-014-0125-9
   Davies C., 2015, Green infrastructure: Planning guide project, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.1191.3688, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.1191.3688]
   Davies C, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V69, P93, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.018
   Davies HJ, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P97, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.020
   Denjean B, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.006
   Eggermont H, 2015, GAIA, V24, P243, DOI 10.14512/gaia.24.4.9
   Elmqvist T, 2015, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V14, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001
   European Commission, 2015, NAT BAS SOL REN CIT, DOI [10.2777/765301, DOI 10.2777/765301]
   European Commission (EC), 2013, COM249 EC
   Faivre N, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032
   Fan PL, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.043
   Ferreira ML, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V155, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.02.023
   Fini A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P443, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.032
   Gulsrud NM, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V161, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.005
   Jerome G, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P399, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.037
   Kabisch N, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5
   Kabisch N, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P362, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.004
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Lafortezza R., 2017, Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry, V1st, P179, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781315627106, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627106]
   Lafortezza R, 2019, ECOL INDIC, V96, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.014
   Lafortezza R, 2016, ENVIRON RES, V147, P576, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.018
   Lin ZH, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.016
   Liquete C, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V22, P392, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
   MacKinnon K, 2011, ORYX, V45, P461, DOI 10.1017/S0030605311001608
   Maes J, 2017, CONSERV LETT, V10, P121, DOI 10.1111/conl.12216
   Maes J, 2016, ECOSYST SERV, V17, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.023
   Mexia T, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023
   Nesshöver C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V579, P1215, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
   Nikolaidis NP, 2017, NATURE, V543, P315, DOI 10.1038/543315d
   Panno A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.016
   Pauleit S., 2017, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
   Peter BG, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P283, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.011
   Potschin M, 2016, EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428
   Raymond C.M., 2017, Report prepared by the EKLIPSE Expert
   Shao CL, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.001
   Sutherland WJ, 2014, ECOL SOC, V19, DOI 10.5751/ES-06082-190203
   Tomao A, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.006
   van den Bosch M, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P373, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.040
   van der Jagt APN, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.013
   Vieira J, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P306, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.006
   Vujcic M, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P385, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.030
   Wai KM, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P152, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.010
   Wai KM, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P753, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.036
   Wamsler C., 2017, NATURE BASED SOLUTIO
   Wamsler C., 2016, 32 UCL DIS STUD MAN
   Wild TC, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V158, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.043
   World Bank, 2008, Biodiversity, Climate Change, and Adaptation: Nature-based Solutions from the World Bank Portfolio
   Zölch T, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V157, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023
NR 57
TC 42
Z9 42
U1 20
U2 264
PU ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
PI SAN DIEGO
PA 525 B ST, STE 1900, SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4495 USA
SN 0013-9351
EI 1096-0953
J9 ENVIRON RES
JI Environ. Res.
PD AUG
PY 2018
VL 165
BP 431
EP 441
DI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA GL9JQ
UT WOS:000437551200050
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Liu, WY
   Zhou, J
   Li, XL
   Zheng, H
   Liu, YH
AF Liu, Wenyi
   Zhou, Jie
   Li, Xiaoli
   Zheng, Hao
   Liu, Yaohui
TI Urban resilience assessment and its spatial correlation from the
   multidimensional perspective: A case study of four provinces in
   North-South Seismic Belt, China
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban resilience assessment; Evolution analysis; Nighttime lights;
   Spatial correlation; North -South Seismic Belt; China
ID CARBON EMISSIONS
AB Modern cities are facing increasingly complex challenges, and assessing urban resilience is crucial to improve their ability to withstand various types of shocks and disasters, especially in the China's North-South Seismic Belt with frequent tectonic activities and natural disasters. To address this issue, this study determined the weights of the assessment system based on the entropy weight method, and evaluated the urban resilience of four provinces in China's North-South Seismic Belt in multiple dimensions from the perspectives of society, economy, infrastructure, and ecology. Furthermore, we systematically explored the spatiotemporal trends of urban resilience and its spatial correlation from 2011 to 2021. Lastly, the assessment results were validated and analyzed by four historical earthquake cases using national polar-orbiting partnership - visible infrared imaging radiometer suite (NPP-VIIRS) nighttime light data. The findings reveal that the average urban resilience index increased from 0.027 to 0.058 from 2011 to 2021, signifying a remarkable surge of 115.42%. Sichuan emerged as a consistent frontrunner in terms of urban resilience. Overall, the study area shows a spatial distribution pattern of higher urban resilience in the east and lower resilience in the west, due to the larger population and more developed economy in the east. However, the south has a higher average annual growth rate, while the north has a lower average annual growth rate. A notable observation is the gradual reduction in the coefficient of variation of urban resilience from 0.823 in 2011 to 0.751 in 2021, indicating a decline in the disparity of resilience levels. Meanwhile, Moran's I gradually increased from 0.2017 in 2011 to 0.4476 in 2021, signifying a progressive intensification in the spatial correlation of urban resilience and an evident propensity toward aggregation. By selecting shifts in the total nighttime light index (TNLI) during representative earthquake incidents as an indirect gauge of urban resilience levels, this study finds congruence with the assessment outcomes, thereby further substantiating the precision of the urban resilience evaluations. Policymakers should prioritize the allocation of resources to less resilient cities to improve their ability to withstand and recover from disaster events. The urban resilience assessment system in this study, despite its multidimensionality, may still not be able to fully cover all the factors affecting urban resilience. This study provides a significant decision-making basis for policymakers in urban development and disaster response, as well as a useful reference for building a more robust and sustainable urban future.
C1 [Liu, Wenyi; Liu, Yaohui] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Surveying & Geoinformat, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Jie; Liu, Yaohui] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Zhou, Jie] China Earthquake Adm, Key Lab Seism & Volcan Hazards, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China.
   [Li, Xiaoli] China Earthquake Networks Ctr, Beijing 100045, Peoples R China.
   [Zheng, Hao] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China.
C3 Shandong Jianzhu University; China Earthquake Administration; Institute
   of Geology, CEA; China Earthquake Administration; China Earthquake
   Administration; China Earthquake Networks Center, CEA; Beijing Normal
   University
RP Liu, YH (corresponding author), Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Surveying & Geoinformat, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China.
EM liuyaohui20@sdjzu.edu.cn
RI Zhou, Jie/KRP-4117-2024; Zheng, Hao/R-7048-2016; Liu,
   Yaohui/GYE-0883-2022
OI Liu, Yaohui/0000-0002-3041-3557; Liu, Wenyi/0000-0003-2069-0865; ZHENG,
   HAO/0000-0003-1504-0120
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42,201,077, 42,177,453];
   Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2021QD074]; China
   Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2023M732105]; Lhasa National
   Geophysical Observation and Research Station [NORSLS22-05]
FX This research was supported in part by the National Natural Science
   Foundation of China, grant numbers 42,201,077, and 42,177,453; the
   Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, grant number
   ZR2021QD074; the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, grant number
   2023M732105; the Lhasa National Geophysical Observation and Research
   Station, grant number NORSLS22-05.
CR Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   An Y, 2023, ENERGY REP, V10, P3545, DOI 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.09.085
   ANSELIN L, 1995, GEOGR ANAL, V27, P93, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
   Bai MH, 2023, FIRE-BASEL, V6, DOI 10.3390/fire6020062
   Benevolenza MA, 2019, J HUM BEHAV SOC ENVI, V29, P266, DOI 10.1080/10911359.2018.1527739
   Berkes F, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V61, P185, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.004
   Bhamra R, 2011, INT J PROD RES, V49, P5375, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826
   Bristow G, 2018, ANN REGIONAL SCI, V60, P265, DOI 10.1007/s00168-017-0841-6
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Chen ZQ, 2023, APPL GEOGR, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102841
   Chen ZQ, 2019, IEEE J-STARS, V12, P4275, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2916323
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   Fu HY, 2017, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/rs9050416
   Guo XA, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104168
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Indirli M, 2019, GEOGR ANTHROPOCENE, V2, P194
   Jalilibal Z, 2021, COMPUT IND ENG, V161, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107600
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Kong L, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, DOI 10.1007/s11356-022-20891-x
   Lee CC, 2021, ENERG ECON, V97, DOI 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105021
   Levin N, 2020, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V237, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111443
   Li CC, 2023, FRONT EARTH SC-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/feart.2023.1028712
   Li XY, 2022, NAT FOOD, V3, P38, DOI 10.1038/s43016-021-00432-4
   Li X, 2023, J CLEAN PROD, V397, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136449
   Li XD, 2023, J HYDROL, V616, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128774
   Li Z, 2022, RENEW ENERG, V184, P564, DOI 10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.112
   Lin YZ, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P39807, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-18235-2
   Liu Y, 2023, MAR POLICY, V148, DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105456
   Liu YH, 2023, LAND-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/land12071469
   Liu YH, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101591
   Liu YH, 2023, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V14, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2023.2173663
   Lu H, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103464
   Mavrouli M, 2023, MICROORGANISMS, V11, DOI 10.3390/microorganisms11020419
   Sharifi A, 2014, ENRGY PROCED, V61, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154
   Shi KF, 2023, GISCI REMOTE SENS, V60, DOI 10.1080/15481603.2022.2161199
   Shi KF, 2021, IEEE GEOSCI REMOTE S, V18, P2062, DOI 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3014956
   Shi YF, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15129250
   Wang CX, 2022, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V112, P56, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2021.1914538
   Wang H, 2023, ENVIRON IMPACT ASSES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107163
   Wang Y, 2023, INT J COMPUT SCI MAT, V17, P229, DOI 10.1504/IJCSM.2023.131439
   Wu LH, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su151410936
   Wu Z., 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, P4548, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174548, DOI 10.3390/su11174548]
   Xiong J, 2022, CATENA, V208, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105781
   Yu B, 2020, IEEE J-STARS, V13, P6454, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3035926
   Yuan Y, 2023, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/rs15133438
   Zhang SF, 2022, PURE APPL GEOPHYS, V179, P4095, DOI 10.1007/s00024-022-03079-9
   Zhang XQ, 2014, SCI WORLD J, DOI 10.1155/2014/797814
   Zhao M., 2019, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V11, P1971, DOI [10.3390/rs11171971, DOI 10.3390/rs11171971, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11171971]
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
   Zhao YH, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V851, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158037
   Zhou J., 2023, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
   Zhou R, 2023, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1133595
NR 53
TC 15
Z9 15
U1 56
U2 149
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD FEB
PY 2024
VL 101
AR 105109
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.105109
EA DEC 2023
PG 13
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA EB8M7
UT WOS:001136541400001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Shimpo, N
AF Shimpo, Naomi
TI Community garden management for resilient cities: A case study in
   suburban Tokyo during the COVID-19 pandemic
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban gardening; Crisis; Resilience; Governance; Urban green space
   planning
ID URBAN GARDENS; GOVERNANCE; JAPANESE; SPACE; AGRICULTURE
AB Numerous studies underscore the role of community gardens in sustaining food security, physical and mental health, and social networks during the COVID-19 pandemic, contributing to community resilience in different contexts of each country. Despite the rich history of urban gardening, Japan remains a geographical gap. This study conducted a mixed-method case study in suburban Tokyo and addresses the unique response of community gardeners to the pandemic within the Japanese context. The survey revealed that gardeners proactively established rules to navigate the crisis quickly through discussion and sustained their gardening activities. The findings also showed that their continuing activities helped the gardeners maintaining physical and mental health, and notably keeping their ikigai, sense of purpose in life in the unusual days. Thus, this study provided new evidence that community gardens may contribute to urban resilience, which indicates the significance of incorporating them into urban green space planning as a preparatory measure for future social crises.
C1 [Shimpo, Naomi] Univ Hyogo, Grad Sch Landscape Design & Management, Kobe, Japan.
   [Shimpo, Naomi] Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Landscape Planning & Hort, Awaji, Japan.
   [Shimpo, Naomi] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Int Cultural Studies, Sendai, Japan.
C3 University of Hyogo; Tohoku University
RP Shimpo, N (corresponding author), 954-2 Nojimatokiwa, Awaji, Hyogo 6561726, Japan.
EM shimpo.naomi@alumni.u-tokyo.ac.jp
OI Shimpo, Naomi/0000-0001-5271-6797
FU JSPS KAKENHI [JP19KT0007, JP21K14870]
FX I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the gardeners of
   Seseragi Noen for their cooperation in the survey. This work was
   sup-ported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19KT0007 and JP21K14870.
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Amirzadeh M, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104326
   [Anonymous], 2020, Sankei News
   [Anonymous], 2020, Town News
   Aptekar S, 2015, SOCIOL FORUM, V30, P209, DOI 10.1111/socf.12152
   Arup, 2017, City Resilience Index
   Barthel S, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018
   Bruckner HK, 2022, J AGRIC FOOD SYST CO, V11, DOI 10.5304/jafscd.2022.113.004
   Bustamante G, 2022, HEALTH PLACE, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102813
   Cattivelli V, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15032116
   Cattivelli V, 2022, LAND USE POLICY, V120, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106215
   Corley J, 2021, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V73, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101545
   Cover Rob, 2021, Soc Sci Humanit Open, V4, P100175, DOI 10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100175
   de Bell S, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V200, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103836
   Disaster Prevention Information, Information on Emergency Measures by Tokyo Metropolitan Government
   Drake L., 2014, Validating verdancy or vacancy? The relationship of community gardens and vacant lands in the U.S. Cities, V40, P133, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.008, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2013.07.008]
   Egerer M, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127483
   Fox-Kämper R, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.023
   Göttl I, 2020, INT J COMMONS, V14, P30, DOI 10.5334/ijc.961
   Guo X, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109449
   Hino City, 2020, Population Change
   Hume C, 2022, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-13591-1
   Iijima W, 2021, HIST SOC RES, P284, DOI 10.12759/hsr.suppl.33.2021.284-301
   Joshi N, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104418
   Kato Y, 2024, J URBAN AFF, V46, P1308, DOI 10.1080/07352166.2022.2110887
   Keshavarz N, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P8
   Kingsley J, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128062
   Kingsley J, 2022, HEALTH PLACE, V76, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102854
   Kingsley J, 2022, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V30, P466, DOI 10.1123/japa.2021-0207
   Kingsley J, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126640
   Kirby CK, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V212, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104110
   Kotsila P, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102865
   Lal R, 2020, FOOD SECUR, V12, P871, DOI 10.1007/s12571-020-01058-3
   Lawson L.J., 2005, CITY BOUNTIFUL CENTU
   Marchi V, 2022, CITIES, V126, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103707
   Marques P, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127268
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries, 2023, Crop statistics survey: Area survey-Data by City
   Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism, 2020, Utilization of parks and green in response to the New Normal
   Mori K, 2017, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V95, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.02.013
   Morimoto I, 2006, GROUP DECIS NEGOT, V15, P157, DOI 10.1007/s10726-006-9026-x
   Moser S, 2019, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V153, P21, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0
   Murata C, 2006, ARCH GERONTOL GERIAT, V43, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.archger.2006.01.002
   Murdad R, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14074155
   Nettle C, 2014, TRANSFORM ENV POLIT, P1
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Ponstingel Daria, 2022, Socioecol Pract Res, V4, P355, DOI 10.1007/s42532-022-00133-7
   Pourias J, 2016, AGR HUM VALUES, V33, P257, DOI 10.1007/s10460-015-9606-y
   Rodríguez-Izquierdo E, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104485
   Rosol M, 2010, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V34, P548, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00968.x
   Saeumel I, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127622
   Samus A, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127519
   Schmelzkopf K, 2002, URBAN GEOGR, V23, P323, DOI 10.2747/0272-3638.23.4.323
   Shimpo N., 2015, Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, V78, P629, DOI [10.5632/jila.78.629, DOI 10.5632/JILA.78.629]
   Shimpo N, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V38, P124, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.002
   Sia A, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V68, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127448
   Sioen GB, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14070748
   Soga M, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14010071
   Soga Masashi, 2017, Prev Med Rep, V5, P92
   Tanno K, 2009, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V67, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.10.018
   Theodorou A, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127091
   Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2020, M NEW COR INF TOK AL
   Tokyo Metropolitan Government, 2020, The 29th meeting of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government Task Force on New Coronavirus Infections: Tokyo Alert was activated
   Tokyo Open Data, 2023, Detailed announcement of COVID-19 patients
   van der Jagt APN, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V159, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.013
   Wamsler C, 2020, ROUT INT HANDB, P47
   WHO, 2022, Urban planning for resilience and health: key messages-summary report on protecting environments and health by building urban resilience
   Wirkkala KB, 2023, J HUNGER ENVIRON NUT, V18, P450, DOI 10.1080/19320248.2022.2065597
   Yap KKL, 2022, PEOPLE NAT, V4, P505, DOI 10.1002/pan3.10304
   Yokohari M, 2010, DISP, V46, P51, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2010.10557086
   Zheng H, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11030333
NR 71
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 16
U2 16
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD NOV
PY 2024
VL 251
AR 105148
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2024.105148
EA JUL 2024
PG 10
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA K9S7J
UT WOS:001347231000001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ma, L
   Ye, RN
   Ettema, D
   van Lierop, D
AF Ma, Liang
   Ye, Runing
   Ettema, Dick
   van Lierop, Dea
TI Role of the neighborhood environment in psychological resilience
SO LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
LA English
DT Article
DE Walkability; Social cohesion; Greenery; Mental health
ID PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; URBAN DESIGN; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE;
   SOCIAL-ENVIRONMENT; PUBLIC-HEALTH; OLDER-ADULTS; WALKABILITY; GREEN;
   SUPPORT; QUALITY
AB Psychological resilience of residents is an important but often neglected component of community and urban resilience. This study explores what neighborhood environment features contribute to better psychological resilience. Using a survey conducted in Greater Melbourne during a COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, we examined the role of the neighborhood physical and social environments in mitigating the psychological shock of the pandemic. Overall, we found that suburban residents are more resilient in mental health than those in the inner city. In particular, the mental health of residents living in middle-density suburbs is least likely to be severely impacted. We further found that neighborhood walkability, vegetation cover, and social cohesion all contribute to better psychological resilience. Walkability and social cohesion influence psychological resilience indirectly through affecting the perceived risks of COVID-19 infection and satisfaction with neighborhood during the lockdown, whereas neighborhood greenery has a direct and beneficial effect on psychological resilience. These findings imply that planning interventions to improve neighborhood walkability and greenness, and foster social cohesion may help improve the psychological resilience of local residents, and hence promote urban resilience. These findings also support middle-density development, which promotes walkability and proximity to nature, as well as a close-knit community.
C1 [Ma, Liang] Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
   [Ye, Runing] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia.
   [Ettema, Dick; van Lierop, Dea] Univ Utrecht, Dept Human Geog & Spatial Planning, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands.
C3 Peking University; University of Melbourne; Utrecht University
RP Ma, L (corresponding author), Peking Univ, Coll Urban & Environm Sci, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
EM liang.ma@pku.edu.cn; runing.ye@unimelb.edu.au; D.F.Ettema@uu.nl;
   d.s.vanlierop@uu.nl
RI Ye, Runing/AAZ-7320-2020; Ettema, Dick/IQS-9627-2023; Ma,
   Liang/L-1363-2016
OI van Lierop, Dea/0000-0002-0669-6403; Ma, Liang/0000-0002-3013-4726
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [42171190]; Peking
   University-Lincoln Institute Center for Urban Development and Land
   Policy
FX This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (Grant No.: 42171190) and The Peking University-Lincoln Institute
   Center for Urban Development and Land Policy. The authors also thank the
   editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. The
   analysis and interpretation and any errors are solely those of the
   authors.
CR Abraham A, 2010, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V55, P59, DOI 10.1007/s00038-009-0069-z
   Achterberg M, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-81720-8
   Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Adkins A, 2012, J URBAN DES, V17, P499, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2012.706365
   Aram F, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01339
   Astell-Burt T, 2019, JAMA NETW OPEN, V2, DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8209
   Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018, ABS cat. no. 4364055001
   Babbie ER., 2016, The Practice of Social Research, V14th
   Babcicky P, 2020, J RISK RES, V23, P695, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2019.1628096
   Banholzer Sandra., 2014, Reducing Disaster: Early Warning Systems for Climate Change, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8598-32, 10.1007/978-94-017-8598-3_2, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8598-3_2]
   Barros P, 2019, CITIES, V93, P263, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.015
   Bell S., 2009, GREENSPACE QUALITY L
   Browning CR, 2006, AM SOCIOL REV, V71, P661, DOI 10.1177/000312240607100407
   Butler MJ, 2020, BRAIN BEHAV IMMUN, V87, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.040
   Carpiano RM, 2007, HEALTH PLACE, V13, P639, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.09.001
   Costello A, 2009, LANCET, V373, P1693, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1, 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60929-6]
   Crime Statistics Agency, 2021, LAT CRIM DAT AR
   Currie G, 2010, TRANSPORTATION, V37, P953, DOI 10.1007/s11116-010-9280-2
   Cutter SL, 2008, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V18, P598, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Dadvand P, 2016, ENVIRON INT, V91, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029
   Delbosc A, 2011, J TRANSP GEOGR, V19, P1130, DOI 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.04.005
   Dodson J, 2008, HOUSING STUD, V23, P377, DOI 10.1080/02673030802015619
   Eachus P, 2014, PROC ECON FINANC, V18, P345, DOI 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00949-6
   Ewing R., 2007, Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change
   Fan YL, 2011, HEALTH PLACE, V17, P1202, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.008
   Fitzpatrick KM, 2020, J ANXIETY DISORD, V75, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102291
   Frank LD, 2010, BRIT J SPORT MED, V44, P924, DOI 10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701
   Frank LD, 2005, AM J PREV MED, V28, P117, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
   Giles-Corti B, 2013, SOC SCI MED, V77, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016
   Gollwitzer M, 2014, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V44, P673, DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2042
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Hamidi S, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P495, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1777891
   Jennings V, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16030452
   Jun HJ, 2015, APPL GEOGR, V62, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.014
   Kabisch N, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-08373-210239
   Kaczynski AT, 2007, LEISURE SCI, V29, P315, DOI 10.1080/01490400701394865
   Kearns A, 2015, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V43, P849, DOI 10.1002/jcop.21711
   Kerishnan PB, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126985
   Koohsari MJ, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V214, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104184
   Koohsari MJ, 2015, HEALTH PLACE, V33, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.02.009
   Kuzmyak JR, 2006, TRANSPORT RES REC, P145, DOI 10.3141/1977-19
   Kwok AH, 2016, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V19, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.013
   Leyden KM, 2003, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V93, P1546, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1546
   Ma L, 2022, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V88, P262, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2021.1950036
   Ma L, 2018, J TRANSP LAND USE, V11, P31, DOI 10.5198/jtlu.2018.1008
   Makarewicz C, 2018, CITIES, V74, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.001
   Manaugh K, 2011, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V16, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
   Mattes A, 2020, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-01176-8
   McNeill LH, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V63, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.012
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   National Institute of Health, 2021, PUBLIC HEALTH REP
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Pascal M, 2021, ENVIRON INT, V151, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106441
   Pfeiffer D, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P171, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1715824
   Pfeiffer D, 2016, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V82, P267, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2016.1166347
   Pieh C, 2020, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110186
   Pieraccini M, 2020, LEGAL PERSPECTIVES ON SUSTAINABILITY, P1, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4
   Qiu JY, 2020, GEN PSYCHIAT, V33, DOI 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213
   Rmandic S., 2020, POLICE RECORDED CRIM, V10, P22
   Roe J., 2021, RESTORATIVE CITIES U, DOI [10.5040/9781350112919, DOI 10.5040/9781350112919]
   Rogers SH, 2011, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V6, P201, DOI 10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4
   Sallis JF, 2016, LANCET, V387, P2207, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01284-2
   Sampson RJ, 1997, SCIENCE, V277, P918, DOI 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
   Sharifi F, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V207, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104004
   Sullivan G, 2013, J NERV MENT DIS, V201, P161, DOI 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827f636d
   Svensson SJ, 2021, J APPL SOC PSYCHOL, V51, P793, DOI 10.1111/jasp.12800
   Teo AR, 2015, J AM GERIATR SOC, V63, P2014, DOI 10.1111/jgs.13667
   Teotónio I, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102781
   Thomas J., 2017, National walkability index user guide and methodology
   Thombs BD, 2020, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V133, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110113
   Tidball K., 2013, Greening in the red zone: Disaster, resilience and community greening
   Tugade MM, 2004, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V86, P320, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
   van den Berg P, 2017, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V106, P309, DOI 10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.021
   Varma P, 2021, PROG NEURO-PSYCHOPH, V109, DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110236
   Wen M, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V63, P2575, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.025
   White RG, 2020, BJPSYCH OPEN, V6, DOI 10.1192/bjo.2020.79
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
   Yang DL, 2022, FRONT PSYCHOL, V13, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977609
NR 78
TC 19
Z9 19
U1 18
U2 83
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 0169-2046
EI 1872-6062
J9 LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN
JI Landsc. Urban Plan.
PD JUL
PY 2023
VL 235
AR 104761
DI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104761
EA MAR 2023
PG 12
WC Ecology; Environmental Studies; Geography; Geography, Physical; Regional
   & Urban Planning; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Geography; Physical Geography; Public
   Administration; Urban Studies
GA E0FJ3
UT WOS:000972393100001
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Song, Q
   Zhong, SY
   Chen, JY
   Yang, CM
   Zhu, Y
AF Song, Qing
   Zhong, Shengyuan
   Chen, Junyu
   Yang, Chuanming
   Zhu, Yan
TI Spatio-Temporal Evolution of City Resilience in the Yangtze River Delta,
   China, from the Perspective of Statistics
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE city resilience; spatio-temporal differences; decomposition of Gini
   coefficient; driving factor analysis; Yangtze River Delta; urban
   agglomeration
AB The development of resilient cities has become a critical global issue with respect to the stimulation of sustainable economic, social, and ecological advancement. The Yangtze River Delta region, which is the most densely populated region in China, is undergoing the fastest urbanization and is achieving the highest level of economic development in the country. Thus, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the evolution of spatiotemporal city resilience in this region. For this study, the resilience of 41 core cities in the Yangtze River Delta in China from 2010 to 2020 was evaluated through a combination of game weighting and fuzzy matter-element analysis. Subsequently, the spatiotemporal differences in city resilience were revealed via the Dagum Gini coefficient and the Kernel density model. Further, the driving factors of city resilience were analyzed by a geographic detector model. The results revealed the following: (1) The resilience of the cities under study experienced a gradual upward trend (with Shanghai being consistently in the lead) and significant differences occurred between them. (2) The Dagum Gini coefficient indicated that the resilience of cities in the western portion of the Yangtze River Delta was quite diverse. This phenomenon was primarily due to the differences between sub-regions, for which the differences between the southeast and northwest were the most prominent. (3) The Kernel density indicated the absolute differences across the entire Delta as well as the northern sub-region, and there was a significant polarization phenomenon in the southern and western sub-regions. (4) Driving factor analysis revealed that the driving force of the income levels of residents was stronger and more stable, the driving force of economic development level was weakened, and the driving force of medical and health conditions, the degree of openness, and energy utilization efficiencies were strengthened. Overall, the driving factors of city resilience became more diversified and complex. Consequently, the Yangtze River Delta needs to improve city resilience levels in the northwest region in order to promote its balanced development. Our results suggested that more attention should be allocated to the improvement of the livelihoods of urban residents, the adjustment of energy consumption structures, and the optimization of the provision of medical resources.
C1 [Song, Qing; Zhong, Shengyuan; Chen, Junyu; Yang, Chuanming; Zhu, Yan] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Junyu] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
C3 Suzhou University of Science & Technology; Tianjin University
RP Chen, JY (corresponding author), Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China.; Chen, JY (corresponding author), Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China.
EM jychen@usts.edu.cn
RI Zhong, Shengyuan/AAY-5071-2020
FU Key project of Jiangsu Social Science Fund [21WTA-017]; Social Science
   Foundation of Jiangsu Province [21GLC015]
FX This research was funded by Key project of Jiangsu Social Science Fund
   (21WTA-017); Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (21GLC015).
CR Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Briceno S., 2004, Natural Resources Forum, V28, P234
   Chen Jialiang, 2003, Fujian Computer, P15
   Chen M, 2022, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/buildings12030340
   Ge XC, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13126802
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Klein R.J.T., 2003, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V5, P35, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.HAZARDS.2004.02.001
   Korhonen J, 2015, ECOL ECON, V120, P83, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.006
   Liu L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su132212460
   Liu XL, 2021, NAT HAZARDS, V107, P2105, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04478-8
   Ma F, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12072593
   Melendez A, 2022, NAT HAZARDS, V111, P1121, DOI 10.1007/s11069-021-05118-5
   Moya J, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19095746
   Palmer R., 2018, ATHENS CITY RESILIEN
   Reynolds HL, 2022, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V20, P231, DOI 10.1002/fee.2446
   Sjöstedt M, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-08034-200423
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Tabibian M, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P1699, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2240
   Tang B, 2022, FRONT ENV SCI-SWITZ, V10, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1052930
   Wang HY, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V123, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107339
   Wang SJ, 2022, J GEOGR SCI, V32, P44, DOI 10.1007/s11442-022-1935-3
   Wang SY, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031409
   World Economic Forum, 2020, The Global Risks Report 2020
   [肖黎明 Xiao Liming], 2021, [中国农业资源与区划, Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning], V42, P119
   [徐少癸 Xu Shaogui], 2021, [地理科学, Scientia Geographica Sinica], V41, P33
   Xu WJ, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14074149
   Xun XL, 2020, NAT HAZARDS, V103, P557, DOI 10.1007/s11069-020-04000-0
   Yang J., 2020, CHINA RURAL WATER HY, V10, P131
   Yang QY, 2021, DISCRETE DYN NAT SOC, V2021, DOI 10.1155/2021/5558497
   Zhang H., 2021, MANAG REV, V33, P290
   Zhang MD, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0260214
   Zhang P., 2018, Urban Probl, V9, P27, DOI [10.13239/j.bjsshkxy.cswt.180904, DOI 10.13239/J.BJSSHKXY.CSWT.180904]
   Zhao RD, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104160
NR 33
TC 8
Z9 8
U1 6
U2 36
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JAN
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 2
AR 1538
DI 10.3390/su15021538
PG 22
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 8Q7UO
UT WOS:000927407700001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Salerno, GM
   Russo, AP
AF Salerno, Giacomo-Maria
   Russo, Antonio Paolo
TI Venice as a short-term city. Between global trends and local
   lock-ins
SO JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM
LA English
DT Article
DE Overtourism; resilience; short-term rentals; Venice; housing;
   depopulation
ID TOURISM; RESILIENCE; GENTRIFICATION; CITIES
AB This paper examines the ongoing transition of Venice towards a short-term city, posited as an urban form which accommodates the dwelling practices of temporary populations as tourists, at the expenses of a stable resident population. This shift is approached through the conceptual framework of resilience, which is also explored in its political and discursive dimensions. At the base of the emergence of a short-term city, we analyse the redistributive impacts of short-term rentals mediated by digital platforms and their influence on the housing market, but also the related entrenchments of a local policy agenda supporting the resilience of the industry itself above that of the city as a living organism. After illustrating the development of the hospitality sector in the city fabric over the last four decades and presenting the historical challenges that Venice has been facing in regard to its capacity to retain a stable population, we seek to unravel the debate on 'the future of Venice', which confronts local and global agents defending a 'conservationist' approach for Venice as an ineluctably tourist city, with social actors who claim for the defence of residence - and therefore for a ban on STR - as a necessary condition for a socially resilient alternative.
C1 [Salerno, Giacomo-Maria] Sapienza Univ Roma, Dept Civil Bldg & Environm Engn DICEA, I-00184 Rome, Italy.
   [Russo, Antonio Paolo] Univ Rovira & Virgili, Dept Geog, Vila Seca, Spain.
C3 Sapienza University Rome; Universitat Rovira i Virgili
RP Salerno, GM (corresponding author), Sapienza Univ Roma, Dept Civil Bldg & Environm Engn DICEA, I-00184 Rome, Italy.
EM giacomo-maria.salerno@uniroma1.it
RI Russo, Antonio/A-9456-2014
OI Russo, Antonio/0000-0001-8768-246X; SALERNO,
   GIACOMO-MARIA/0000-0001-5697-4830
FU Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR) [PRIN
   2017EWXN2F]; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
   (POLITUR project) [CSO2017-82156-R]; AEI/FEDER; Department of Research
   and Universities of the Catalan Government [2017SGR22]
FX Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR), PRIN
   2017EWXN2F; Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
   (POLITUR project. CSO2017-82156-R), AEI/FEDER, and Department of
   Research and Universities of the Catalan Government (2017SGR22).
CR Aalbers MB, 2019, TIJDSCHR ECON SOC GE, V110, P1, DOI 10.1111/tesg.12332
   Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Airbnb, 2018, HLTH TRAV HLTH DEST
   Sans AA, 2016, ASPECT TOURISM TEXT, V73, P209
   Arias-Sans A, 2017, CONTEMP GEOGR LEIS T, P247
   Barbiani E., 2004, Condizioni di competitivita delle strutture ricettive del Comune di Venezia e della regione turistica
   Barron KyleEdward Kung Davide Proserpio., 2017, SHARING EC HOUSING A
   Bernardello A., 2002, STORIA VENEZIA LOTTO, VII
   Bertocchi D, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12020512
   Bettini Stefano, 1978, Venezia: Nascita di una Citta
   Borelli C., 2019, GRANELLO SABBIA, V40
   Caserta S., 2002, Journal of Cultural Economics, V26, P245, DOI 10.1023/A:1019905923457
   CELATA F., 2017, Working paper
   Cellamare C., 2015, PRATICHE INSORGENTI
   Choay F., 1996, ALLEGORIA PATRIMONIO
   Cocola-Gant A, 2021, ENVIRON PLANN A, V53, P1671, DOI 10.1177/0308518X19869012
   Codagnone C., 2016, PASSIONS INTERESTS U
   Comune di Venezia, 1964, ATT CONV INT PROBL V
   Comune di Venezia, 2017, ANN TUR 2017
   Consorzio per la Ricerca e la Formazione (COSES), 2009, 11060 COSES
   Corona A., 2019, VENEZIA INSIDE AIRBN
   Corona A, 2020, CAMP SAN ZAN DEG SAN
   COSE, 2009, 14109 COSE
   COSES, 1979, TUR VEN
   COSGROVE D, 1982, J HIST GEOGR, V8, P145, DOI 10.1016/0305-7488(82)90004-4
   Costa N., 2003, CITIES AND VISITORS, P53
   Costa P., 1988, COSES, V32/, P21
   Cox M, 2017, DEVICES TOURISM SQUA
   D'Eramo M., 2017, Il selfie del mondo. Indagine sull'eta del turismo
   Davidson M, 2010, POPUL SPACE PLACE, V16, P395, DOI 10.1002/psp.584
   Davis RC, 2004, VENICE, THE TOURIST MAZE: A CULTURAL CRITIQUE OF THE WORLD'S MOST TOURISTED CITY, P1, DOI 10.1525/california/9780520238039.001.0001
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   De Marchi D., 2019, QUATTRO VENEZIE NORD
   DE RITA G., 1993, CITTA SPECIALE RAPPO
   Dianese M., 2020, IL GAZZETTINO
   Engel & Volkers, 2019, MARK REP VEN 2019
   Fabbri G., 2020, VENEZIA DOSSIER UNES
   Fabbri G., 2020, VENEZIA DOSSIER UNES
   Fava F., 2018, ENGRAMMA, V155
   Fregolent L., 2017, POSTMETROPOLITAN TER
   Frenken K., 2017, A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance
   Fullin M., 2020, IL GAZZETTINO
   Gainsforth S., 2019, AIRBNB CITTA MERCE S
   Garcia-López MA, 2020, J URBAN ECON, V119, DOI 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103278
   Gasparon M., 2020, IL GAZZETTINO
   Gheno M., 2016, LAB VENEZIA
   Ghiglione Giorgio., 2018, OCCUPY VENICE WE ARE
   Gössling S, 2021, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V29, P1, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708
   Grove K, 2013, RESILIENCE-ABINGDON, V1, P193, DOI 10.1080/21693293.2013.825463
   Gutiérrez J, 2017, TOURISM MANAGE, V62, P278, DOI 10.1016/j.tourman.2017.05.003
   INDOVINA F, 1988, CO S E S INFORMAZION, V32, P27
   James Henry., 1888, The Aspern Papers
   James Henry., 1909, Italian Hours
   Jonauskaite Domicele, 2016, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V45, P450, DOI [10.1002/col.22490, DOI 10.1002/2015GL067334]
   LANAPOPPI P, 2015, CARO TURISTA
   Lee D., 2016, Harvard Law & Policy Review, V10, P229, DOI DOI 10.1525/SP.2007.54.1.23
   Lefebvre H., 1970, La Revolution Urbaine
   Lew AA, 2014, TOURISM GEOGR, V16, P14, DOI 10.1080/14616688.2013.864325
   Mann Thomas., 1912, TOD VENEDIG
   Mehmood A, 2016, EUR PLAN STUD, V24, P407, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Meriläinen ES, 2020, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V19, P187, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2019.1682492
   Milano C, 2019, J SUSTAIN TOUR, V27, P1857, DOI 10.1080/09669582.2019.1650054
   Minoia P., 2017, TOURISM CITY TOWARDS, P261
   Momigliano A., 2020, NY TIMES
   Osservatorio Civico sulla Casa e sulla Residenzialita (OCIO), 2020, SQUIL TUR VEN
   Osservatorio Civico sulla Casa e sulla Residenzialita (OCIO), 2020, REG LOC TOUR POSS OL
   Osservatorio Civico sulla Casa e sulla Residenzialita (OCIO), 2019, FACT CHECK AFF TUR F
   Paidakaki A, 2018, HOUS THEORY SOC, V35, P432, DOI 10.1080/14036096.2017.1308434
   Paidakaki A, 2017, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V8, P275, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2015-0052
   Papautsky Elizabeth Lerner, 2020, BREAST CANCER RES TR, V184, P249, DOI [10.1007/s10549-020-05828-7, DOI 10.1007/S10549-020-05828-7, 10.1186/s13227-020-00166-7, DOI 10.1007/S10021-020-00587-4]
   Pardo D., 2019, TOURISM GEOPOLITICS
   Parsa N, 2020, BIOMED RES INT, V2020, DOI 10.1155/2020/8179795
   Picascia S., 2017, P ANN C ASS EUR SCH, P2212, DOI DOI 10.31235/OSF.IO/VS8W3
   Quaglieri-Dominguez A., 2020, CITY
   Quinn B, 2007, ANN TOURISM RES, V34, P458, DOI 10.1016/j.annals.2006.11.002
   RESET, 2015, AFF TUR VEN EC FAR E
   Richardson David M., DIVERSITY LTHTML ENT, V6, P93, DOI [10.1515/gps-2020-0067, DOI 10.1046/J.1472-4642.2000.00083.X, 10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x]
   Rossi R., 2018, ELDERLY WOMAN SICK S
   Russo A. P., 2002, THESIS
   Russo AP, 2009, EUR URBAN REG STUD, V16, P161, DOI 10.1177/0969776409102189
   Russo AP, 2002, ANN TOURISM RES, V29, P165, DOI 10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00029-9
   Salerno G. M, 2020, CRITICA EC TURISTICA
   Salerno G. M, 2018, OLTRE TORNELLI RIVIS
   Salerno G. M., 2019, GONDOLE ACCIAIO LAGU
   Scheppe W, 2009, MIGROPOLIS VENICE AT
   Schor JB, 2017, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V10, P263, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsw047
   Sequera J., 2018, Shaken, not stirred, V22, P843, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604813.2018.1548819
   Seraphin H, 2018, J DESTIN MARK MANAGE, V9, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.01.011
   Shaw K, 2012, LOCAL GOV STUD, V38, P281, DOI 10.1080/03003930.2011.642869
   Sigler T, 2016, URBAN STUD, V53, P705, DOI 10.1177/0042098014568070
   Srnicek N., 2017, Platform capitalism
   Tantucci E., 2018, NUOVA VENEZIA   0129
   Tantucci E., 2016, NUOVA VENEZIA   0531
   Vale LJ, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P191, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2014.850602
   Vale Lawrence J., 2005, The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster
   Van Der Borg J., 2017, FRAGILE RESILIENT CI
   Vianello M., 2016, Protest and resistance in the tourist city, P185
   Visentin F., 2019, VENICE ANAL TOURISM
   Wachsmuth D., 2017, SHORT TERM CITIES AI
   Wachsmuth D, 2018, ENVIRON PLANN A, V50, P1147, DOI 10.1177/0308518X18778038
   Yrigoy I, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2709, DOI 10.1177/0042098018803261
   Zanardi C., 2020, La bonifica umana. Venezia dallesodo al turismo
   Zannini A, 2014, LAB ITAL-POLIT SOC, P191, DOI 10.4000/laboratoireitalien.848
   Zannini Andrea., 2002, STORIA VENEZIA OTTOC, P1123
NR 104
TC 23
Z9 23
U1 2
U2 38
PU ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
PI ABINGDON
PA 2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0966-9582
EI 1747-7646
J9 J SUSTAIN TOUR
JI J. Sustain. Tour.
PD MAY 4
PY 2022
VL 30
IS 5
SI SI
BP 1040
EP 1059
DI 10.1080/09669582.2020.1860068
EA DEC 2020
PG 20
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Hospitality, Leisure, Sport &
   Tourism
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Social Sciences - Other Topics
GA 0K0TZ
UT WOS:000603947000001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fieger, P
   Prayag, G
   Dyason, D
   Rice, J
   Hall, CM
AF Fieger, Peter
   Prayag, Girish
   Dyason, David
   Rice, John
   Hall, C. Michael
TI Exploring CBD Retail Performance, Recovery and Resilience of a Smart
   City Following COVID-19
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE retail; recovery; resilience; COVID-19; smart city; pedestrian traffic
ID CITIES
AB The city of Christchurch, New Zealand, incurred significant damage due to a series of earthquakes in 2010 and 2011. The city had, by the late 2010s, regained economic and social normalcy after a sustained period of rebuilding and economic recovery. Through the concerted rebuilding effort, a modern central business district (CBD) with redesigned infrastructure and amenities was developed. The Christchurch rebuild was underpinned by a commitment of urban planners to an open and connected city, including the use of innovative technologies to gather, use and share data. As was the case elsewhere, the COVID-19 pandemic brought about significant disruptions to social and economic life in Christchurch. Border closures, lockdowns, trading limitations and other restrictions on movement led to changes in traditional consumer behaviors and affected the retail sector's resilience. In this study, we used CBD pedestrian traffic data gathered from various locations to predict changes in retail spending and identify recovery implications through the lens of retail resilience. We found that the COVID-19 pandemic and its related lockdowns have driven a substantive change in the behavioral patterns of city users. The implications for resilient retail, sustainable policy and further research are explored.
C1 [Fieger, Peter] Federat Univ, Sch Educ, Mt Helen, Vic 2351, Australia.
   [Fieger, Peter] Univ New England, Business Sch, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
   [Prayag, Girish] Univ Canterbury, UC Business Sch, Dept Management Mkt & Entrepreneurship, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
   [Dyason, David] Lincoln Univ, Fac Agribusiness & Commerce, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand.
   [Dyason, David] North West Univ, Sch Econ Sci, TRADE Res Ent, ZA-2520 Potchefstroom, South Africa.
   [Rice, John] Univ Sharjah, Coll Business Adm, POB 27272, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates.
   [Hall, C. Michael] Univ Canterbury, Dept Management Mkt & Entrepreneurship, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
   [Hall, C. Michael] Univ Oulu, Geog Res Unit, Oulu 90014, Finland.
   [Hall, C. Michael] Lund Univ, Dept Serv Management & Serv Studies, Campus Helsingborg, S-25108 Helsingborg, Sweden.
   [Hall, C. Michael] Univ Kajen, Ekon Hgsk, Linne Univ, Landgangen 6, S-39182 Kalmar, Sweden.
C3 Federation University Australia; University of New England; University
   of Canterbury; Lincoln University - New Zealand; North West University -
   South Africa; University of Sharjah; University of Canterbury;
   University of Oulu; Lund University; Linnaeus University
RP Fieger, P (corresponding author), Federat Univ, Sch Educ, Mt Helen, Vic 2351, Australia.; Fieger, P (corresponding author), Univ New England, Business Sch, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
EM p.fieger@federation.edu.au; girish.prayag@canterbury.ac.nz;
   david.dyason@lincoln.ac.nz; jrice@sharjah.ac.ae
RI Rice, John/AAO-4080-2021; Prayag, Girish/ABB-6081-2021; Dyason,
   David/F-3381-2019; Hall, Colin Michael/C-1439-2010
OI Prayag, Girish/0000-0001-6243-2747; Rice, John/0000-0002-3923-4424;
   Fieger, Peter/0000-0002-9509-6628; Dyason, David/0000-0002-4408-8281;
   Hall, Colin Michael/0000-0002-7734-4587
CR Taha VA, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13041710
   Appleyard B, 2022, J URBAN DES, V27, P39, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2022.1996914
   Boschma R, 2015, REG STUD, V49, P733, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
   Brusset X, 2022, INT J RETAIL DISTRIB, V50, P897, DOI 10.1108/IJRDM-09-2022-600
   Burnes B, 2016, PROD PLAN CONTROL, V27, P490, DOI 10.1080/09537287.2016.1147097
   Carmona M, 2022, J URBAN DES, V27, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2021.1951605
   Carmona M, 2019, J URBAN DES, V24, P1, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523
   Christchurch City Council, 2023, SMART CHRISTCH
   Christchurch City Council, 2014, CHRISTCH CENTR REC P
   Coca-Stefaniak A., 2015, J. Urban Regen. Renew., V9, P35
   Guimaraes PPC, 2018, MORAV GEOGR REP, V26, P160, DOI 10.2478/mgr-2018-0013
   Cruz-Cárdenas J, 2021, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121179
   Drechsler P, 2022, J URBAN DES, V27, P48, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2021.2006479
   Dyason D, 2021, TYDSKR GEESTESWET, V61, P350, DOI 10.17159/2224-7912/2021/v61n1a20
   Dyason D, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031779
   Enoch M, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P1091, DOI 10.1177/23998083211048497
   Garcia-Ayllon S, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph19010294
   Grashuis J, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12135369
   Hall C.M., 2016, Business and Post-Disaster Management: Business, Organisational and Consumer Resilience and the Christchurch Earthquakes
   Hall CM, 2021, ECONOMIES, V9, DOI 10.3390/economies9020046
   Hall MC, 2021, J SERV MANAGE, V32, P113, DOI 10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0151
   Hangebruch N, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14148303
   Kakderi C, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13116486
   Kang CD, 2016, HABITAT INT, V57, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.07.006
   Lashgari YS, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su141811463
   Lucas RE, 2002, ECONOMETRICA, V70, P1445, DOI 10.1111/1468-0262.00338
   McDonagh J., 2017, THESIS LINCOLN U LIN
   Nahiduzzaman KM, 2019, J URBAN PLAN DEV, V145, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000512
   New Zealand Government, 2023, HIST COVID 19 PROT F
   Ntounis N, 2023, CITIES, V134, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104182
   Orr AM, 2023, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V50, P660, DOI 10.1177/23998083221124600
   Pothukuchi K, 2005, ECON DEV Q, V19, P232, DOI 10.1177/0891242404273517
   Reilly W.J., 1929, THESIS U TEXAS AUSTI
   Rossolov A, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14020941
   Schollmann A., 2001, Tourism Geographies, V3, P300, DOI 10.1080/14616680110055420
   Sellars G., 2022, PROPERTY COUNCIL NZ
   Simmie J, 2010, CAMB J REG ECON SOC, V3, P27, DOI 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
   Soares JC, 2023, J MARK ANAL, V11, P82, DOI 10.1057/s41270-022-00156-9
   Trasberg T, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V87, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101601
   Tsavachidis M, 2022, J URBAN MOBIL, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100014
   VanSchaick J, 2008, RES URBAN SER, V1, P1
   Verisk New Zealand From Spending to Strategy, US
   Wang D, 2021, INT J TRANSP SCI TEC, V10, P197, DOI 10.1016/j.ijtst.2021.01.003
   White JT, 2023, URBAN STUD, V60, P1833, DOI 10.1177/00420980221143043
   Yigitcanlar T, 2015, AUST PLAN, V52, P27, DOI 10.1080/07293682.2015.1019752
NR 45
TC 1
Z9 1
U1 1
U2 14
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD MAY 19
PY 2023
VL 15
IS 10
AR 8300
DI 10.3390/su15108300
PG 16
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA H6RN6
UT WOS:000997213000001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hassankhani, M
   Alidadi, M
   Sharifi, A
   Azhdari, A
AF Hassankhani, Mahnoosh
   Alidadi, Mehdi
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
   Azhdari, Abolghasem
TI Smart City and Crisis Management: Lessons for the COVID-19 Pandemic
SO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH
LA English
DT Review
DE COVID-19; urban resilience; community well-being; crisis management;
   smart city
ID SOCIAL MEDIA; DISASTER; WELL; RESILIENCE; CITIES; FRAMEWORK;
   UNCERTAINTY; OUTBREAK; CHINA; TELEMEDICINE
AB COVID-19 shocked cities around the world and revealed the vulnerability of urban lives and functions. Most cities experienced a catastrophic disturbance that has lasted for a long time. Planning plays a critical role in responding efficiently to this crisis and enabling rapid functional recovery in the post-disaster era. Cities that have implemented digitalization initiatives and programs are likely to have more capacity to react appropriately. Specifically, digitalized cities could ensure the well-being of their residents and maintain continuity of urban functions. This research aims to analyze the role of technology in crisis management in the last two decades and provide appropriate policy recommendations for dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic. Systematic literature review and subjective content analysis are employed to investigate the effects of technology on community well-being and making cities more resilient in past crises. This study shows that different technology-driven policies and actions enable crisis management, enhance community well-being, and increase urban resilience. Technology has enhanced coping and recovery capacities by increasing participation and social connectedness, enhancing physical and mental health and maintaining the functionality of education and economic systems. These have been achieved through various solutions and technologies such as social media, telehealth, tracking and monitoring systems, sensors and locational applications, teleworking systems, etc. These solutions and technologies have also been used during the COVID-19 pandemic to enhance community well-being and sustain urban functions. However, technology deployment might have adverse effects such as social exclusion, digital divide, privacy and confidentiality violation, political bias and misinformation dissemination, and inefficient remote working and education. It is suggested that to mitigate these side effects, policymakers should liberate the process of digitalization, increase the accessibility to digital services, and enhance digital literacy.
C1 [Hassankhani, Mahnoosh] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Planning & Design, Tehran 1684613114, Iran.
   [Alidadi, Mehdi; Azhdari, Abolghasem] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Arts & Architecture, Tehran 1411713116, Iran.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.
C3 Iran University Science & Technology; Tarbiat Modares University;
   Hiroshima University; Hiroshima University; Hiroshima University
RP Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.; Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, Network Educ & Res Peace & Sustainabil NERPS, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.; Sharifi, A (corresponding author), Hiroshima Univ, Grad Sch Adv Sci & Engn, Hiroshima 7398511, Japan.
EM mahnoush.hasankhani@gmail.com; m.alidadi@modares.ac.ir;
   sharifi@hiroshima-u.ac.jp; abolghasem.azhdari@modares.ac.ir
RI Alidadi, Mehdi/HJZ-0235-2023; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI hassankhani, mahnoosh/0000-0002-4475-8919; Alidadi,
   Mehdi/0000-0001-5183-7829; Sharifi, Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613
FU Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research
FX This research was funded by Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change
   Research (Funder ID: https://doi.org/10.13039/100005536).
CR Abusaada Hisham, 2020, Int J Community Wellbeing, V3, P417, DOI 10.1007/s42413-020-00068-5
   Acuto M, 2020, NAT SUSTAIN, V3, P977, DOI 10.1038/s41893-020-00620-3
   Acuto M, 2020, ONE EARTH, V2, P317, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.004
   Aitsi-Selmi A, 2016, PREHOSP DISASTER MED, V31, P74, DOI 10.1017/S1049023X15005531
   Alexandrova A, 2013, J MORAL PHILOS, V10, P307, DOI 10.1163/174552412X628814
   Alkire S., 2015, The Capability Approach and Well-Being Measurement for Public Policy
   Allam Z, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105201
   Amit M, 2020, NAT MED, V26, P1167, DOI 10.1038/s41591-020-0927-z
   [Anonymous], 2015, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030
   Anthopoulos L.G., 2006, J E GOV, V2, P91, DOI 10.1300/J399v02n02_06
   Arroub A, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS NETWORKS AND MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (WINCOM), pP180
   Atif I., 2020, Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering, V5, P663, DOI DOI 10.1007/S41403-020-00164-0
   Augusterfer EF, 2015, INT REV PSYCHIATR, V27, P540, DOI 10.3109/09540261.2015.1082985
   Ayyagari A, 2003, TELEMED J E-HEALTH, V9, P89, DOI 10.1089/153056203763317693
   Azzaoui AEL, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V71, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102993
   Balogun AL, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101888
   Bartik A.W., 2020, NBER Working Paper No. 26989
   Belzunegui-Eraso A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12093662
   Bengtsson M., 2016, PLAN PERFORM QUALITA, V2, P8, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NPLS.2016.01.001
   Bertot JC, 2010, COMPUTER, V43, P53, DOI 10.1109/MC.2010.325
   Bird D, 2012, AUST J EMERG MANAG, V27, P27
   Boas I, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101905
   Cénat JM, 2020, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V65, P717, DOI 10.1007/s00038-020-01426-y
   Chao M, 2020, J ANXIETY DISORD, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102248
   Cheng JW, 2015, TELECOMMUN POLICY, V39, P515, DOI 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.006
   Chiu RLH, 2012, URBAN POLICY RES, V30, P359, DOI 10.1080/08111146.2012.737578
   CHRISTENSEN KS, 1985, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V51, P63, DOI 10.1080/01944368508976801
   Cocchia A, 2014, PROGR IS, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3_2
   Colding J, 2020, CITIES, V103, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102761
   Crook B, 2016, COMMUN RES REP, V33, P349, DOI 10.1080/08824096.2016.1224171
   Dameri RP, 2014, PROGR IS, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-06160-3
   Das D, 2021, URBAN GEOGR, V42, P408, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2020.1807168
   Davoudi S, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P307, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2013.787695
   Davoudi S, 2014, ENVIRON PLANN C, V32, P360, DOI 10.1068/c12269
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Der-Martirosian C, 2019, J TELEMED TELECARE, V25, P310, DOI 10.1177/1357633X17751005
   Donnelly N, 2015, NEW TECH WORK EMPLOY, V30, P47, DOI 10.1111/ntwe.12040
   Dreesen T., 2020, Promising practices for equitable remote learning: Emerging lessons from COVID-19 education responses in 127 countries
   Fan C, 2021, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V56, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102049
   Fang J, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V34, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.027
   Fernández-Güell JM, 2016, J URBAN TECHNOL, V23, P43, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2016.1164441
   Finau G, 2018, PAC JOURNAL REV, V24, P123, DOI 10.24135/pjr.v24i1.400
   Giest S, 2017, EUR PLAN STUD, V25, P941, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2017.1294149
   Ribeiro PJG, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101625
   Green N., 2017, N Z J Hum Resour Manag, V17, P1
   Hart J, 2009, COMPUT FRAUD SECUR, P14, DOI 10.1016/S1361-3723(09)70141-1
   Henkey T, 2018, URBAN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: PLANNING AND RESPONSE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P49, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805307-2.00004-4
   Henkey T, 2018, URBAN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT: PLANNING AND RESPONSE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, P33, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-805307-2.00003-2
   Hu R, 2020, J URBAN MANAG, V9, P276, DOI 10.1016/j.jum.2020.08.001
   Kankanamge N, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101571
   Kato S, 2008, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V51, P543, DOI 10.1080/09640560802117028
   Khirfan L, 2020, METHODSX, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100984
   Kitazawa K, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V52, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101926
   Lades LK, 2020, BRIT J HEALTH PSYCH, V25, P902, DOI 10.1111/bjhp.12450
   Lee IK, 2020, J HOSP INFECT, V105, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.02.022
   Lee JY, 2020, GEOGR COMPASS, V14, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12504
   Lee T, 2020, MEDIA INT AUST, V177, P47, DOI 10.1177/1329878X20949545
   Lee VJ, 2020, J TRAVEL MED, V27, DOI 10.1093/jtm/taaa039
   Levenda AM, 2020, CAN GEOGR-GEOGR CAN, V64, P344, DOI 10.1111/cag.12601
   Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299]
   Linders D, 2012, GOV INFORM Q, V29, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
   Lui CW, 2009, AUSTRALAS J AGEING, V28, P116, DOI 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2009.00355.x
   MacAskill K, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101200
   Madanian S, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/18310
   March A, 2017, URBAN PLANNING FOR DISASTER RECOVERY, P1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-804276-2.00001-3
   Matheus R, 2020, GOV INFORM Q, V37, DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.006
   Maybery D, 2009, RURAL SOC, V19, P326, DOI 10.5172/rsj.351.19.4.326
   McCrea R, 2014, RURAL SOC, V23, P270, DOI 10.1080/10371656.2014.11082070
   Mengist W, 2020, METHODSX, V7, DOI 10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
   Mohmmed AO, 2020, INNOV INFRASTRUCT SO, V5, DOI 10.1007/s41062-020-00326-7
   Murat M., CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC
   Naseem M, 2020, J PRIM CARE COMMUNIT, V11, DOI 10.1177/2150132720963634
   Norris FH, 2008, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V41, P127, DOI 10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
   Nussbaum M., 1993, QUALITY LIFE, P242, DOI 10.1093/0198287976.003.0020
   Okubo Toshihiro., 2020, COVID EC, V32, P1
   Palumbo R, 2020, INT J PUBLIC SECT MA, V33, P771, DOI 10.1108/IJPSM-06-2020-0150
   Papadopoulos T, 2020, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102192
   Parry D, 2018, J INT SOC TELEMED EH, V6, P4
   Pasipanodya EC, 2020, SPINAL CORD SER CASE, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41394-020-0309-2
   Picatoste J, 2018, J SCI TECHNOL POLICY, V9, P227, DOI 10.1108/JSTPM-04-2017-0014
   Prasad D, 2020, TELEMAT INFORM, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101466
   Qadir TF, 2016, LANCET PSYCHIAT, V3, P1016, DOI 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30323-6
   Rahiem M.D., 2020, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, V19, P1, DOI [DOI 10.26803/IJLTER.19.6.1, 10.26803/ijlter.19.6, DOI 10.26803/IJLTER.19.6]
   Rajput AA, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101622
   Rauws W, 2017, DISP, V53, P32, DOI 10.1080/02513625.2017.1316539
   Richardson HS, 2019, J HUM DEV CAPABIL, V20, P357, DOI 10.1080/19452829.2019.1631983
   Robeyns I., 2017, Well-being, freedom and social justice: The capability approach re-examined, DOI [10.11647/OBP.0130, 10.11647/obp.0130, DOI 10.11647/OBP.0130]
   Ryan M, 2020, INT J PERVASIVE COMP, V16, P383, DOI 10.1108/IJPCC-07-2020-0081
   Salway RJ, 2020, HEALTH AFFAIR, V39, P1601, DOI [10.1377/hIthaff.2020.00930, 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00930]
   Seifert A, 2020, J GERONTOL SOC WORK, V63, P674, DOI 10.1080/01634372.2020.1764687
   Sen Amartya., 1988, STANDARD LIVING
   Sharifi A., 2021, COVID-19: Systemic risk and resilience, P285
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13148018
   Sharifi A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13137140
   Sharifi A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V749, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12155918
   Sharifi A, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101936
   Sharifi A, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V233, P1269, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.172
   Sheth SA, 2020, STROKE, V51, P2268, DOI 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030154
   Stella A.B., 2021, J SPORTS MED PHYS FI, V61, P9
   Streitz N, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6439, P300, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-16917-5_35
   Sun SX, 2020, J MED INTERNET RES, V22, DOI 10.2196/19992
   Tedeschi C, 2021, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V15, P649, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2020.118
   Tommasi M, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563722
   UN-Habitat, 2020, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES
   van Hoof J, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15112473
   van Wyk B., 2020, Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning, P499, DOI 10.34190/EEL.20
   Vanolo A, 2014, URBAN STUD, V51, P883, DOI 10.1177/0042098013494427
   Vermiglio C, 2020, NEW METROPOLITAN PER, P113
   Watts G, 2020, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V2, pE395, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30169-2
   Wei E, 2020, HEALTH AFFAIR, V39, P1597, DOI [10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00929, 10.1377/hIthaff.2020.00929]
   White B., 2010, AUST ED COMPUT, V25, P27
   White SC, 2010, DEV PRACT, V20, P158, DOI 10.1080/09614520903564199
   Wong G, 2013, J ADV NURS, V69, P987, DOI 10.1111/jan.12092
   Woods JA, 2020, SPORTS MED HLTH SCI, V2, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.smhs.2020.05.006
   Yang SS, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V70, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102897
   Yates D, 2011, INT J INFORM MANAGE, V31, P6, DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.001
   Yellowlees P, 2008, J TELEMED TELECARE, V14, P277, DOI 10.1258/jtt.2008.080419
   Yigitcanlar T, 2019, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V45, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033
   Ylipulli J, 2020, TELEMAT INFORM, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101457
   Zandvoort M, 2019, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V62, P248, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2017.1409196
   Zangari S, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V742, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140496
NR 122
TC 65
Z9 67
U1 5
U2 184
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 1660-4601
J9 INT J ENV RES PUB HE
JI Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
PD AUG
PY 2021
VL 18
IS 15
AR 7736
DI 10.3390/ijerph18157736
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Public, Environmental & Occupational
   Health
GA TV8UV
UT WOS:000681992200001
PM 34360029
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Peixoto, JPJ
   Costa, DG
   Rocha, WDD
   Portugal, P
   Vasques, F
AF Peixoto, Joao Paulo Just
   Costa, Daniel G.
   Rocha, Washington de J. S. da Franca
   Portugal, Paulo
   Vasques, Francisco
TI On the positioning of emergencies detection units based on geospatial
   data of urban response centres
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart cities; Sustainable and resilient cities; Emergency detection;
   Sensors positioning; Urban infrastructure
ID SMART CITIES; CITY; MANAGEMENT; BENCHMARK
AB Urban areas have been subject to emergency situations with different causes and sometimes dramatic consequences. With the advent of smart cities technologies, multi-emergency detection units could be conceived and implemented taking advantage of affordable sensing technologies and efficient decision algorithms, allowing quick and distributed detection of emergencies. However, a recurrent problem has been the positioning and further deployment of such detection units in a way that the particularities of each target city are properly considered. In this sense, this article proposes the processing of geospatial data about existing urban infrastructure associated with some critical response after an emergency is detected, selecting hospitals, police stations, fire departments, and metro stations, in the target city. These infrastructures are then exploited to define the novel concept of mitigation zones, which indirectly express the perceived level of urban resilience to emergencies. Then, four positioning algorithms are proposed to exploit the mitigation zones considering a defined set of available detection units for deployment. Since the proposed approach is valid for any city, provided that geospatial data is available, it could be largely adopted to support different smart city systems, potentially bringing significant results in this area.
C1 State Univ Feira De Santana, PPGM UEFS, Feira De Santana, Brazil.
   [Costa, Daniel G.] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, INEGI, Porto, Portugal.
   Univ Porto, Fac Engn, INESC TEC, Porto, Portugal.
C3 Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana; Universidade do Porto; INESC
   TEC; Universidade do Porto
RP Costa, DG (corresponding author), Univ Porto, Fac Engn, INEGI, Porto, Portugal.
EM joao.just@ifba.edu.br; danielgcosta@uefs.br; danielgcosta@uefs.br;
   pportugal@fe.up.pt; vasques@fe.up.pt
RI Peixoto, João Paulo/KDN-4851-2024; Costa, Daniel/I-4928-2013; Vasques,
   Francisco/B-2494-2013; , Washington de Jesus/B-6184-2013; Portugal,
   Paulo/H-3286-2013
OI Costa, Daniel/0000-0003-3988-8476; Vasques,
   Francisco/0000-0003-3115-0901; Just Peixoto, Joao
   Paulo/0000-0003-3507-8249; , Washington de Jesus/0000-0002-2175-2792;
   Portugal, Paulo/0000-0002-6386-9753
FU national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) [EXPL/EEI-COM/1089/2021,
   UIDB/50022/2020]; Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel
   Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]
FX This work is financially supported by national funds through the
   FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) , under the project EXPL/EEI-COM/1089/2021. It is
   also supported by INEGI-LAETA (FCT project UIDB/50022/2020) . Finally,
   this work was financed in part by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de
   Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) -Finance Code 001.
CR Ahad MA, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102301
   Ahmed U, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103887
   Alablani I, 2020, SENSORS-BASEL, V20, DOI 10.3390/s20247191
   Alamdar F, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V56, P68, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.11.005
   [Anonymous], 2018, P 2018 IEEE INT SMAR, DOI DOI 10.1109/ISC2.2018.8656800
   [Anonymous], 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V97
   Ayeni B., 2017, CONCEPTS TECHNIQUES, DOI [10.4324/9781315105352, DOI 10.4324/9781315105352]
   Bezerra A, 2019, 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER SITUATIONAL AWARENESS, DATA ANALYTICS AND ASSESSMENT (CYBER SA), DOI 10.1109/cybersa.2019.8899714
   Campioni L, 2023, FUTURE GENER COMP SY, V139, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.future.2022.09.020
   Cardona OD, 2008, J EARTHQ ENG, V12, P48, DOI 10.1080/13632460802013495
   Chamoso P, 2018, WIREL COMMUN MOB COM, DOI 10.1155/2018/3086854
   Costa DG, 2022, IEEE ACCESS, V10, P61843, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3180033
   Costa DG, 2019, SMART CITIES-BASEL, V2, P46, DOI 10.3390/smartcities2010004
   Costa DG, 2018, SENSORS-BASEL, V18, DOI 10.3390/s18041080
   Dabberdt WF, 2000, ATMOS ENVIRON, V34, P4667, DOI 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00141-2
   Du R, 2019, IEEE COMMUN SURV TUT, V21, P1533, DOI 10.1109/COMST.2018.2881008
   Eremia M, 2017, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V181, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.357
   Fedele R, 2020, ALGORITHMS, V13, DOI 10.3390/a13100254
   Fernandez P, 2016, GEOMAT NAT HAZ RISK, V7, P1367, DOI 10.1080/19475705.2015.1052021
   Fonte CC, 2019, URBAN CLIM, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100456
   Francini M, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V53, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101906
   Gharaibeh A, 2017, IEEE COMMUN SURV TUT, V19, P2456, DOI 10.1109/COMST.2017.2736886
   Hondula DM, 2015, ENVIRON RES, V138, P439, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.033
   Huang HS, 2021, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101712
   Karray F, 2018, COMPUT NETW, V144, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2018.05.010
   Kim D, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103888
   Kontokosta CE, 2018, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V36, P272, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
   Li WW, 2020, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V34, P311, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1673397
   Lim CC, 2019, ENVIRON INT, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105022
   Mouratidis K, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104161
   Muñoz-Villamizar A, 2021, IFAC PAPERSONLINE, V54, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.079
   Mydlarz C, 2019, SENSORS-BASEL, V19, DOI 10.3390/s19061415
   Nguyen HT, 2022, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V183, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121866
   Oliveira F., 2022, IEEE 13 LAT AM S CIR, P1, DOI 10.1109/ISC255366.2022.9922105
   Santos PM, 2018, IEEE INTERNET THINGS, V5, P523, DOI 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2791522
   Senturk IF, 2019, INT SYM NETWO COMP
   Sun Y., 2017, BIG DATA SUSTAINABLE, DOI [10.1186/s40965-017-0037-0, DOI 10.1186/S40965-017-0037-0]
   Tagle M, 2020, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V192, DOI 10.1007/s10661-020-8118-4
   Tchuitcheu WC, 2020, INTERNET THINGS-NETH, V11, DOI 10.1016/j.iot.2020.100207
   Vargas-Munoz JE, 2021, IEEE GEOSC REM SEN M, V9, P184, DOI 10.1109/MGRS.2020.2994107
   Williams MD, 2017, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V107, pS193, DOI [10.2105/AJPH.2017.303954, 10.2105/ajph.2017.303954]
   Santana EFZ, 2018, ACM COMPUT SURV, V50, DOI 10.1145/3124391
   Zhou MC, 2022, INFORM SCIENCES, V600, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.ins.2020.03.008
NR 43
TC 11
Z9 11
U1 6
U2 32
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD OCT
PY 2023
VL 97
AR 104713
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104713
EA JUN 2023
PG 15
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA L8OK3
UT WOS:001025800300001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Amenta, L
   Qu, L
AF Amenta, Libera
   Qu, Lei
TI Experimenting with Circularity When Designing Contemporary Regions:
   Adaptation Strategies for More Resilient and Regenerative Metropolitan
   Areas of Amsterdam and Naples Developed in University Studio Settings
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE 'research by design'; resilient cities; wastescapes; adaptive reuse;
   urban metabolism; circular economy
AB This paper aims to demonstrate how 'research by design,' which is an approach bridging research, design, and planning, can help unpack the complexity of today's metropolitan challenges by considering the resource flows and processes that were omitted by traditional ways of planning. This is crucial for circular developments. By reporting the experience of two university design studios across Europe, this paper can contribute to a better understanding and imagination of desirable future scenarios of resilient regions. The experiments carried out in the Regional design studio: 'Spatial Strategies for the Global Metropolis' held at TU Delft are described alongside with the exercises carried out in the design studio 'Laboratory of Urbanism' of the MAPA Course, held at DiARC UNINA. Both courses focused on the regeneration of wastescapes as a fundamental part of holistic adaptation strategies for more resilient and circular regions. Climate change issues related to resilience thinking have been interwoven with other complex challenges such as the co-existence of wastescapes and land scarcity as well as spatial injustice. Through a 'research by design' approach, these different aspects are brought together to achieve a holistic approach for urban resilience.
C1 [Amenta, Libera] Univ Naples Federico II UNINA, Dept Architecture DiARC, I-80134 Naples, Italy.
   [Amenta, Libera; Qu, Lei] Delft Univ Technol TU Delft, Dept Urbanism, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
C3 University of Naples Federico II; Delft University of Technology
RP Amenta, L (corresponding author), Univ Naples Federico II UNINA, Dept Architecture DiARC, I-80134 Naples, Italy.; Amenta, L; Qu, L (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol TU Delft, Dept Urbanism, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
EM libera.amenta@unina.it; L.Qu@tudelft.nl
RI Amenta, Libera/ABB-6253-2020; Qu, Lei/AAB-4310-2020
OI Amenta, Libera/0000-0002-0885-2326; Qu, Lei/0000-0001-9758-9269
FU European Horizon 2020; European Union's Horizon 2020 research and
   innovation programme [688920]
FX This research is done within the framework of the European Horizon 2020
   funded research 'REPAiR: REsource Management in Peri-urban AReas: Going
   Beyond Urban Metabolism'. This project has received funding from the
   European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under
   grant agreement No 688920. This article reflects only the author's view.
   The Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the
   information it contains.
CR Amenta L., 2019, WASTESCAPES OPPORTUN
   Amenta L, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124740
   [Anonymous], 2015, WASTE WEALTH CIRCULA
   ARUP, 2016, The Circular Built Tool
   Baudoin Genevieve S., 2015, INTERPRETING SITE ST
   Berger Alan., 2006, DROSSCAPE WASTING LA
   Cardoso MA, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12062349
   Dabrowski M, 2019, URBAN PLAN, V4, P52, DOI 10.17645/up.v4i3.2162
   De Jong T., 1992, Kleine methodologie voor ontwerpend onderzoek, V1st
   Dehaene M., 2018, HORIZONTAL METROPOLI
   DONADIEU Pierre., 1998, Campagnes Urbaines
   Du N., 2010, INTEGRATING SURFACE
   Dutch Ministry of the Interior (Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties), 2018, NAT WOONA
   EC, 2014, COUNC EUR EC SOC COM
   EEA European Environment Agency, 2016, CIRC EC EUR DEV KNOW, V2
   Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2018, CIT CIRC EC FOOD
   Ellen MacArthur Foundation, MACARTHUR FDN WHAT I
   European Commission, 2012, LIV PLAN BOUND THE S
   European Environment Agency (EEA), 2016, 102016 EEA
   Ferrao P, 2013, SUSTAINABLE URBAN METABOLISM, P1
   Hein C., 2018, DESIGNING POST CARBO
   Huggett Richard., 2004, Physical Geography, A human perspective
   Kennedy C, 2007, J IND ECOL, V11, P43, DOI 10.1162/jie.2007.1107
   Longato D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11072101
   Mcrit, 2010, URB RUR NARR SPAT TR
   Metropoolregio Amsterdam (MRA), 2018, WON METR AMST 2017
   Mininni M., 2006, PIERRE DONADIEU CAMP
   Mininni M., 2012, Approssimazioni alla citta
   Neuman M, 2005, J PLAN EDUC RES, V25, P11, DOI 10.1177/0739456X04270466
   Neuman M, 2018, EUR PLAN STUD, V26, P1297, DOI 10.1080/09654313.2018.1464127
   Raworth K., 2017, Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist
   REPAiR, 2018, PROC MOD 2 PIL CAS A
   REPAiR, 2018, HDB RUN PULL DEL 54
   REPAiR, 2018, D 52 CAT SOL STRAT A
   REPAiR, 2018, D53 EC SOL NAPL
   REPAiR, 2017, INTR METH INT SPAT M, DOI [10.4233/uuid:af2e252f-e8ed-472e-a4e8-c4bb4285522e, DOI 10.4233/UUID:AF2E252F-E8ED-472E-A4E8-C4BB4285522E]
   Ricci L., 2012, Consilience, V7, P46, DOI 10.7916/consilience.v0i7.4582
   Roggema R, 2017, URBAN SCI, V1, DOI 10.3390/urbansci1010002
   Rosemann J, 2001, RESEARCH BY DESIGN PROCEEDINGS A, P63
   Steen K., 2017, Urban Living Labs A Living Lab Way of Working
   Steffen W, 2015, SCIENCE, V347, DOI 10.1126/science.1259855
   van den Boomen T., 2017, URBAN CHALLENGES RES
   van Timmeren A., 2014, The Concept of the Urban Metabolism (UM)
   van Timmeren A., 2013, ReciproCities. A Dynamic Equilibrium
   Wall R., 2004, ARCHIS, V2, P42
   Wandl A., 2012, P RSA EUROPEAN C 201
   Wandl A., 2019, TERRITORIES CROSS CA
   Wandl A, 2019, URBAN PLAN, V4, P63, DOI 10.17645/up.v4i3.2147
   Wandl DIA, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V130, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.010
   Williams J, 2019, URBAN STUD, V56, P2746, DOI 10.1177/0042098018806133
NR 50
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 7
U2 20
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA MDPI AG, Grosspeteranlage 5, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN
PY 2020
VL 12
IS 11
AR 4549
DI 10.3390/su12114549
PG 24
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA MC6JX
UT WOS:000543391800212
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Konstantinou, C
AF Konstantinou, Charalambos
TI Toward a Secure and Resilient All-Renewable Energy Grid for Smart Cities
SO IEEE CONSUMER ELECTRONICS MAGAZINE
LA English
DT Article
DE Smart cities; Computer security; Power systems; Power system stability;
   Resilience; Security; Renewable energy sources; Security; resiliency;
   renewable energy sources; future grid; smart city
AB The concept of smart cities is driven by the need to enhance citizens' quality of life. It is estimated that 70% of the world population will live in urban areas by 2050. The electric grid is the energy backbone of smart city deployments. An electric energy system immune to adverse events, both cyber and physical risks, and able to support the integration of renewable sources will drive a transformational development approach for future smart cities. This article describes how the future electric energy system with 100% electricity supply from renewable energy sources requires the "birth of security and resiliency" incorporated with its ecosystem.
C1 [Konstantinou, Charalambos] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
C3 State University System of Florida; Florida State University
RP Konstantinou, C (corresponding author), Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA.
EM ckonstantinou@ieee.org
RI Konstantinou, Charalambos/ACC-8592-2022
OI Konstantinou, Charalambos/0000-0002-3825-3930
CR Arghandeh R, 2016, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V58, P1060, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.193
   Bhusal N, 2020, IEEE ACCESS, V8, P18064, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968586
   Burdeau C.., 2016, BP EST COST 2010 GUL
   Chang R, 2012, IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M, V1, P24, DOI 10.1109/MCE.2011.2172084
   Founda D, 2009, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V67, P227, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2009.03.013
   Gritzalis D., 2019, Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. Book
   Kaur RK, 2019, IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M, V8, P10, DOI 10.1109/MCE.2018.2880852
   Li ZY, 2017, P IEEE, V105, P1367, DOI 10.1109/JPROC.2017.2687865
   Muyeen S.., COMMUNICATION CONTRO
   National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence-NIST, 2020, SEC IIOT CYB DERS
   Oil and Natural Gas Subsector Coordinating Council (ONG SCC), 2020, DEF IN DEPTH CYB NAT
   Ospina J, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P2545, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047374
   Smith R., 2014, Wall Street J
   Stouffer K., 2014, NIST special publication 800-82, revision 2: Guide to industrial control systems (ICS) security
   U. S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2020, GEN REN SOURC TOT AL
   Woodward M., 2018, Hurricane Michael caused 1.7 million electricity outages in the Southeast United States
   Yuan Y, 2012, IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M, V1, P20, DOI 10.1109/MCE.2012.2193691
   Zografopoulos I, 2021, IEEE ACCESS, V9, P29775, DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058403
   Zografopoulos I, 2020, IEEE COMP SOC ANN, P560, DOI 10.1109/ISVLSI49217.2020.00086
NR 19
TC 40
Z9 41
U1 2
U2 109
PU IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
PI PISCATAWAY
PA 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, NJ 08855-4141 USA
SN 2162-2248
EI 2162-2256
J9 IEEE CONSUM ELECTR M
JI IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag.
PD JAN 1
PY 2022
VL 11
IS 1
BP 33
EP 40
DI 10.1109/MCE.2021.3055492
PG 8
WC Computer Science, Hardware & Architecture; Engineering, Electrical &
   Electronic; Telecommunications
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Computer Science; Engineering; Telecommunications
GA XM6GX
UT WOS:000728924200012
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hong, WY
   Guo, RZ
   Li, XM
   Liao, CC
AF Hong, Wuyang
   Guo, Renzhong
   Li, Xiaoming
   Liao, Chuangchang
TI Measuring urban ecological network resilience: A disturbance scenario
   simulation method
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Ecological network; Network resilience; Disturbance; Scenario
   simulation; Shenzhen
ID LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY; SHENZHEN; LAND; CORRIDORS
AB Human disturbance of urban ecosystems is intensifying, as is ecological fragmentation. As such, effective connections between green spaces must be established and restored to form structurally resilient urban ecological networks. In this study, we focused on indicators of city-scale ecological network resilience. We constructed a network model, analyzed the disturbance simulation results, and identified key nodes. Shenzhen, a megacity in China was selected for empirical research. First, we used Floyd algorithm to extract least-cost paths and then generate the corridor network, constructing an ecological network model with 386 nodes and 4910 edges. Second, focusing on the nodes of the constructed ecological network, we adopted a selected attack strategy to conduct dynamic simulations, using two parameters, network efficiency and maximum connectivity, to evaluate the resilience of the ecological network to changes under various disturbance scenarios. The results showed that the ecological network structure in the study area was relatively stable, and the first 30 % of nodes substantially impacted network resilience. The outcomes reflect the state of urban ecosystems that have been disturbed by socio-economic systems and are practically important for formulating adaptive spatial planning and management policies.
C1 [Hong, Wuyang; Guo, Renzhong; Li, Xiaoming; Liao, Chuangchang] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Architecture & Urban Planning, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
   [Hong, Wuyang; Guo, Renzhong; Li, Xiaoming] Shenzhen Univ, Res Inst Smart Cities, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
C3 Shenzhen University; Shenzhen University
RP Li, XM (corresponding author), Shenzhen Univ, Res Inst Smart Cities, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China.
EM lixming@szu.edu.cn
RI Li, Xiaoming/GSD-8174-2022; Hong, Wuyang/AGP-3237-2022
OI hong, wuyang/0009-0005-7686-8329
CR Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Cooper GS, 2020, NAT COMMUN, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15029-x
   De Montis A, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104207
   FREEMAN LC, 1979, SOC NETWORKS, V1, P215, DOI 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   [傅丽华 Fu Lihua], 2019, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V74, P1409
   Gonzalez JR, 2008, ECOL MODEL, V211, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.028
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong WY, 2017, LAND USE POLICY, V62, P316, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.010
   Hong WY, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.028
   Huang LY, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V339, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130681
   Huang LY, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V69, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102865
   Ignatieva M, 2011, LANDSC ECOL ENG, V7, P17, DOI 10.1007/s11355-010-0143-y
   [焦敬娟 Jiao Jingjuan], 2014, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V33, P926
   Kang JM, 2021, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V26, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01472
   Kong FH, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V95, P16, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.001
   [林樱子 Lin Yingzi], 2021, [自然资源学报, Journal of Natural Resources], V36, P2193
   Liu GY, 2011, ECOL MODEL, V222, P2825, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.034
   Luo YH, 2021, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V210, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104066
   Luo YH, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V715, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136829
   Ng CN, 2013, APPL GEOGR, V42, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.04.015
   Oh K, 2011, J URBAN TECHNOL, V18, P39, DOI 10.1080/10630732.2011.648433
   Pascual-Hortal L, 2006, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V21, P959, DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2018, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V37, P1193
   [彭翀 Peng Chong], 2015, [城市规划学刊, Urban Planning Forum], P84
   Peng J, 2018, HABITAT INT, V71, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.11.010
   Pereira M, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P67, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.009
   Saura S, 2011, ECOL INDIC, V11, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.011
   Urban D, 2001, ECOLOGY, V82, P1205, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2
   Wang T, 2021, ECOL INDIC, V130, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108101
   Weber T, 2006, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V77, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.002
   Wei SM, 2020, HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS, V26, P782, DOI 10.1080/10807039.2018.1536521
   Wu Jian-sheng, 2012, Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, V23, P2543
   [吴康 Wu Kang], 2015, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V34, P711
   Yang J, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V717, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137151
   [于强 Yu Qiang], 2018, [农业机械学报, Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery], V49, P214
   Yu Q, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V84, P304, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.002
   Zeller KA, 2012, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V27, P777, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9737-0
   Zhao SM, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126479
NR 38
TC 39
Z9 41
U1 74
U2 267
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD DEC
PY 2022
VL 131
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104057
EA NOV 2022
PG 10
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA 9Q0RC
UT WOS:000944680500007
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Leal, W
   Icaza, LE
   Neht, A
   Klavins, M
   Morgan, EA
AF Leal Filho, Walter
   Icaza, Leyre Echevarria
   Neht, Alice
   Klavins, Maris
   Morgan, Edward A.
TI Coping with the impacts of urban heat islands. A literature based study
   on understanding urban heat vulnerability and the need for resilience in
   cities in a global climate change context
SO JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban heat island; Vulnerability; Cities; Climate change; Mitigation;
   Adaptation
ID NEW-YORK-CITY; SURFACE-TEMPERATURE; MITIGATION; GREEN; ADAPTATION;
   MORTALITY; STRATEGIES; EXAMPLE; DESIGN; EUROPE
AB The urban heat island (UHI) is a phenomenon whereby temperature levels in urban areas are higher than in surrounding rural settings. Urban heat islands are a matter of increasing concern, since they can affect communities by exacerbating air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions (due to the greater use of air conditioning) and the occurrence of heat-related illness, and may lead to higher levels of mortality. This paper provides a description of the phenomena of (UHI) and an analysis of how cities are vulnerable to it. It highlights the need for resilience and the variety of means by which the UHI can be tackled. It describes a set of trends in two regions in Germany and Australia, which illustrate the scope of the problem in the northern and southern hemispheres, and the scale of vulnerability. Then, existing UHI vulnerability assessments are analysed to highlight common features and differences. Based on this, we propose a classification of adaptability parameters to support vulnerability assessments. The paper also discusses current mitigation approaches mentioned in the literature, and how these address some vulnerabilities. It concludes that both a better understanding of the UHI phenomena and consideration of the particular context of each city is needed to make urban areas more resilient to UHI. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
C1 [Leal Filho, Walter] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Sch Sci & Environm, Chester St, Manchester M1 5GD, Lancs, England.
   [Icaza, Leyre Echevarria] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Architecture, Delft, Netherlands.
   [Neht, Alice] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Urban & Transport Planning, Fac Civil Engn, Mies van der Rohe Str 1, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
   [Klavins, Maris] Univ Latvia, Fac Geog & Earth Sci, Environm Sci Dept, Raina Bulv 19, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia.
   [Morgan, Edward A.] Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, 170 Kessels Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
   [Morgan, Edward A.] Griffith Univ, Climate Change Response Program, Gold Coast Campus,Parklands Dr, Southport, Qld 4222, Australia.
C3 Manchester Metropolitan University; Delft University of Technology; RWTH
   Aachen University; University of Latvia; Griffith University; Griffith
   University; Griffith University - Gold Coast Campus
RP Morgan, EA (corresponding author), Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, 170 Kessels Rd, Brisbane, Qld 4111, Australia.
EM w.leal@mmu.ac.uk; L.Echevarrialcaza@tudelft.nl; neht@isb.rwth-aachen.de;
   maris.klavins@lu.lv; ed.morgan@griffith.edu.au
RI Morgan, Edward/AAX-2372-2020; Leal, Walter/ACX-9082-2022
OI Morgan, Edward/0000-0002-9239-4320; Leal Filho,
   Walter/0000-0002-1241-5225
CR Ali JM, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V107, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.07.010
   [Anonymous], VULNERABILITY CLIMAT
   [Anonymous], 2012, City of Windsor Rep.
   [Anonymous], 2013, SPATIAL VULNERABILIT
   [Anonymous], OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030, DOI [10.1787/9789264040519-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264040519-EN]
   [Anonymous], SPECIAL REPORT
   Berardi U, 2014, APPL ENERG, V115, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.047
   Bi P, 2011, ASIA-PAC J PUBLIC HE, V23, p27S, DOI 10.1177/1010539510391644
   Birkmann J., 2013, GLOSSAR KLIMAWANDEL, V10
   Birkmann J, 2008, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V66, P5, DOI 10.1007/BF03184043
   Birkmann J, 2012, RAUMFORSCH RAUMORDN, V70, P293, DOI 10.1007/s13147-012-0172-0
   Bohle H.-G., 2001, IHDP NEWSLETTER UPDA, P435
   Bohle H.-G., 2008, VULNERABILITATSKONZE, P435
   Bowler DE, 2010, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V97, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006
   Buchin O, 2016, ENERG BUILDINGS, V114, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.038
   CANNON T, 2002, SOCIAL VULNERABILITY
   Cardona O.D., 2005, Indicators of disaster risk and risk management: Summary Report
   Chow WTL, 2012, PROF GEOGR, V64, P286, DOI 10.1080/00330124.2011.600225
   Colten CE, 2006, AM ANTHROPOL, V108, P731, DOI 10.1525/aa.2006.108.4.731
   Coutts A., 2014, IMPACTS HARVESTING S
   Coutts A. M., 2013, Determine the Microclimate Influence of Harvesting Solutions and Water Sensitive Urban Design at the Micro-Scale: Green Cities and Microclimate
   Coutts AM, 2013, BUILD ENVIRON, V70, P266, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.021
   Cutter SL, 2000, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V90, P713, DOI 10.1111/0004-5608.00219
   de Graaf RE, 2007, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V56, P165, DOI 10.2166/wst.2007.548
   Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir Technische Zusammenarbeit GmbH [GTZ], 2004, RIS GRUNDL KAT HANDR
   Echevarria Icaza L., 2017, A+BE Architecture and the Built Environment, V7, P231
   Emmanuel M.Rohinton., 2005, URBAN APPROACH CLIMA
   Feyisa GL, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V123, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.008
   FLEISCHHAUER M., 2004, KLIMAWANDEL NATURGEF
   Gago EJ, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V25, P749, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.057
   Gartland L., 2010, Heat islands: Understanding and mitigating heat in urban areas
   Gunawardena K.R., 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, P1
   Hallegatte S, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P1, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9981-8
   Harlan SL, 2006, SOC SCI MED, V63, P2847, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.07.030
   Hathway EA, 2012, BUILD ENVIRON, V58, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.013
   Hirano Y, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V26, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.018
   Hoshiko S, 2010, INT J PUBLIC HEALTH, V55, P133, DOI 10.1007/s00038-009-0060-8
   Hsieh CM, 2016, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V57, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.02.005
   Hsieh CM, 2010, BUILD SIMUL-CHINA, V3, P51, DOI 10.1007/s12273-010-0306-7
   Icaza L. E, 2016, TEMA J LAND USE MOBI, V9, P63, DOI DOI 10.6092/1970-9870/3741
   Icaza LE, 2016, CLIM CHANG MANAG, P123, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28591-7_7
   Icaza LE, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8040320
   Inostroza L, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0162464
   IPCC, 2007, CLIM CHANG GLOSS CON
   Jenerette GD, 2007, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V22, P353, DOI 10.1007/s10980-006-9032-z
   Kleerekoper L, 2012, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V64, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.004
   Knowlton K, 2007, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V97, P2028, DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2006.102947
   Kolokotsa D, 2013, SOL ENERGY, V95, P118, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2013.06.001
   Kozlowski M, 2016, INT J CLIM CHANG STR, V8, P80, DOI 10.1108/IJCCSM-05-2014-0064
   Lanza K, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V153, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.12.002
   Lee WV, 2014, NAT HAZARDS, V70, P1453, DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0884-7
   Liu H, 2008, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V144, P199, DOI 10.1007/s10661-007-9979-5
   Madrigano J, 2015, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V123, P672, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1408178
   Manik TK, 2015, [No title captured]
   Matthews T, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.010
   McGill W., 2007, Critical infrastructure protection: Elements of risk, P25
   Myhre G., 2013, Climate Change 2013
   Nice K.A., 2014, Development, V5, P919
   OKE TR, 1982, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V108, P1, DOI 10.1002/qj.49710845502
   Paulina W, 2015, PROCEDIA ENVIRON SCI, V26, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.05.006
   Peng SS, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P696, DOI 10.1021/es2030438
   Ramamurthy P, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V26, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.012
   Rebetez M, 2009, THEOR APPL CLIMATOL, V95, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00704-007-0370-9
   Reid CE, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V117, P1730, DOI 10.1289/ehp.0900683
   Riegel C., 2013, KLIMASCHUTZTEILKONZE
   Rizwan AM, 2008, J ENVIRON SCI, V20, P120, DOI 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4
   Robinson PJ, 2001, J APPL METEOROL, V40, P762, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0762:OTDOAH>2.0.CO;2
   Roos P. B., 2015, International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, V7, P13
   Rosenthal JK, 2014, HEALTH PLACE, V30, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.014
   Rosenzweig C., 2006, 86 AMS ANN M, P5
   Santamouris M, 2014, SOL ENERGY, V103, P682, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2012.07.003
   Santamouris M, 2013, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V26, P224, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.047
   Santamouris M, 2011, SOL ENERGY, V85, P3085, DOI 10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.023
   Scheffer M, 2001, NATURE, V413, P591, DOI 10.1038/35098000
   Serrao-Neumann S., 2015, ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS
   Steeneveld GJ, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.001
   Stewart ID, 2012, B AM METEOROL SOC, V93, P1879, DOI 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00019.1
   Synnefa A, 2008, J APPL METEOROL CLIM, V47, P2846, DOI 10.1175/2008JAMC1830.1
   Thywissen K., 2006, 22006 UNUEHS
   Turner BL, 2003, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V100, P8074, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN-ISDR), 2011, GLOB ASS REP DIS RIS
   van der Hoeven F, 2015, BUILD SERV ENG RES T, V36, P67, DOI 10.1177/0143624414541451
   Ven G. P., 1996, MAN MADE LOWLANDS HI
   Wang J, 2016, APPL GEOGR, V70, P26, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.02.010
   Ward K, 2016, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V569, P527, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.119
   Wolf T, 2013, WEATHER CLIM EXTREME, V1, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.wace.2013.07.004
   Wolf T, 2009, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V20, pS24, DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000362249.11577.19
   Yang JC, 2016, BUILD ENVIRON, V108, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.021
   Yang JC, 2015, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V47, P830, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.092
   Zebisch M., 2005, KLIMAWANDEL KLIMAANP
NR 90
TC 153
Z9 167
U1 9
U2 178
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI OXFORD
PA THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND
SN 0959-6526
EI 1879-1786
J9 J CLEAN PROD
JI J. Clean Prod.
PD JAN 10
PY 2018
VL 171
BP 1140
EP 1149
DI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.086
PG 10
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental;
   Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences
   & Ecology
GA FR3PH
UT WOS:000418978100103
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Menconi, ME
   Heland, L
   Grohmann, D
AF Menconi, M. E.
   Heland, L.
   Grohmann, D.
TI Learning from the gardeners of the oldest community garden in Seattle:
   Resilience explained through ecosystem services analysis
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Urban agriculture; Urban garden; Place attachment; Gardeners'
   perception; Nature-Based solutions; Urban green infrastructure
ID URBAN AGRICULTURE; HEALTH; POLICY; SCALE
AB Urban agriculture, which includes community gardens, provides ecosystem services but is continuously threatened by the densification of cities. Picardo Farm is the oldest community garden in Seattle. Its success and popularity inspired the municipality of Seattle to develop a city-wide public program called the P-Patch Community Gardening program. We evaluated the perceptions of Picardo Farm gardeners about the benefits provided by the farm and the reasons why this community garden is so resilient. Gardeners were asked three open-ended questions and their responses were evaluated for recurring keywords regarding ecosystem services. We found that gardeners' perceptions of ecosystem services vary, and they often underestimate ecosystem services related to regulation. We identified seven key topics from gardeners' responses: a sense of community, placemaking, food, health, place attachment, nature, and education. Furthermore, our results indicate that, in order to achieve resilience, community gardens require public institutions to build and empower cohesive communities of gardeners and gardens need to be placed in urban areas suitable for agricultural use.Y
C1 [Menconi, M. E.; Grohmann, D.] Univ Perugia, Dept AGr Food & Environm Sci, Perugia, Italy.
   [Heland, L.] Univ Washington, Fac Built Environm, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
C3 University of Perugia; University of Washington; University of
   Washington Seattle
RP Menconi, ME (corresponding author), Univ Perugia, Dept AGr Food & Environm Sci, Perugia, Italy.
EM mariaelena.menconi@unipg.it
RI Menconi, MariaElena/AAA-6368-2020; grohmann, david/O-3784-2018
OI Menconi, MariaElena/0000-0002-5573-9107
CR ACGA American Community Gardening Association, 2017, ANN REPORT
   Al-Mayahi A, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V38, P286, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.011
   Ambrose G, 2020, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V198, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103776
   Azunre GA, 2019, CITIES, V93, P104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006
   Bell S, 2016, URBAN ALLOTMENT GARDENS IN EUROPE, P1
   Campbell LK, 2016, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V19, P295, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.011
   Camps-Calvet M, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V62, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007
   Census Bureau U.S., 2019, QUICK FACTS SEATTL C
   Davies C, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V80, P406, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.020
   Drake L, 2014, CITIES, V40, P133, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.008
   Egerer M, 2018, BIOSCIENCE, V68, P25, DOI 10.1093/biosci/bix144
   Fox-Kämper R, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P59, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.023
   Fritz M, 2017, THEOR PRACT URB SUST, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5_14
   Hearn G, 2014, FUTURES, V62, P202, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2014.04.010
   Hou J, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V33, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.05.007
   Hou Jeffrey., 2009, Greening Cities, Growing Communities: Learning from Seattle's Urban Community Gardens
   Hucka J., 2019, 1973 1983 PICARDO 1
   Kim BF, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087913
   Kingsley J, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V49, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126640
   Langemeyer J, 2018, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V170, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.013
   Lawson L.J., 2005, CITY BOUNTIFUL CENTU
   Lin BB, 2020, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V60, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102006
   Lin BB, 2018, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V610, P570, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.091
   Lin BB, 2015, BASIC APPL ECOL, V16, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.baae.2015.01.005
   Lin CC, 2014, GEOFORUM, V53, P74, DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.02.008
   Martire KA, 2015, SCI JUSTICE, V55, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.01.002
   McDougall R, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P129, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1809707115
   MEA, 2005, MA CONC FRAM MEA EC, P25
   Menconi ME, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124681
   Murakami K., 2005, DO YOU KNOW THEYRE C
   Okvat HA, 2011, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V47, P374, DOI 10.1007/s10464-010-9404-z
   Pauleit S, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V40, P4, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.10.006
   Petrovic N, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V183, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.009
   Pole A, 2013, AGR HUM VALUES, V30, P85, DOI 10.1007/s10460-012-9391-9
   Salisbury A, 2015, J APPL ECOL, V52, P1156, DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.12499
   SDON, 2019, RUL PART
   SDON, 2019, P PATCH COMM GARD PI
   SDON, 2020, P PATCH PROGR
   SDON, 2019, COD COND
   SDON, 2018, P PATCH LIST
   Shashua-Bar L, 2009, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V92, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.04.005
   Stella G, 2019, LAND USE POLICY, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104216
   Teuber S, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126381
   Vejre H., 2016, Urban Agriculture Europe, P18
   Wakefield S, 2007, HEALTH PROMOT INT, V22, P92, DOI 10.1093/heapro/dam001
   Wolch JR, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P234, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
NR 46
TC 29
Z9 33
U1 3
U2 78
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD DEC
PY 2020
VL 56
AR 126878
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126878
PG 10
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban
   Studies
GA PG1OR
UT WOS:000599512600007
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Krueger, EH
   McPhearson, T
   Levin, SA
AF Krueger, Elisabeth H.
   McPhearson, Timon
   Levin, Simon A.
TI Integrated assessment of urban water supply security and resilience:
   towards a streamlined approach
SO ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
LA English
DT Article
DE risk; robustness; system dynamics modeling; capital portfolio approach
   (CPA); social-ecological-technological systems (SETS); New York City
ID NEW-YORK-CITY; ADAPTIVE CAPACITY; INFRASTRUCTURE; SYSTEMS; GOVERNANCE;
   CLIMATE; METRICS; POINT; INDEX
AB Urbanization and competing water demand, as well as rising temperatures and changing weather patterns, are manifesting as gradual processes that increasingly challenge urban water supply security. Cities are also threatened by acute risks arising at the intersection of aging infrastructure, entrenched institutions, and the increasing occurrence of extreme weather events. To better understand these multi-layered, interacting challenges of providing urban water supply for all, while being prepared to deal with recurring shocks, we present an integrated analysis of water supply security in New York City and its resilience to acute shocks and chronic disturbances. We apply a revised version of a recently developed, quantitative framework ('Capital Portfolio Approach', CPA) that takes a social-ecological-technological systems perspective to assess urban water supply security as the performance of water services at the household scale. Using the parameters of the CPA as input, we use a coupled systems dynamics model to investigate the dynamics of services in response to shocks-under current conditions and in a scenario of increasing shock occurrence and a loss of system robustness. We find water supply security to be high and current response to shocks to be resilient thanks to past shock experiences. However, we identify a number of risks and vulnerability issues that, if unaddressed, might significantly impact the city's water services in the mid-term future. Our findings have relevance to cities around the world, and raise questions for research about how security and resilience can and should be maintained in the future.
C1 [Krueger, Elisabeth H.; Levin, Simon A.] Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
   [Krueger, Elisabeth H.; Levin, Simon A.] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
   [Krueger, Elisabeth H.] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   [McPhearson, Timon] New Sch, Urban Syst Lab, New York, NY USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, Millbrook, NY USA.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden.
   [McPhearson, Timon] Royal Swedish Acad Sci, Beijer Inst Ecol Econ, Stockholm, Sweden.
C3 Princeton University; Princeton University; University of Amsterdam; The
   New School; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies; Stockholm University;
   Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; Beijer Institute of Ecological
   Economics
RP Krueger, EH (corresponding author), Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.; Krueger, EH (corresponding author), Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.; Krueger, EH (corresponding author), Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM e.h.krueger@uva.nl
RI Krueger, Elisabeth/AEW-8947-2022; McPhearson, Timon/JOZ-3799-2023;
   Levin, Simon/J-1218-2014
OI Krueger, Elisabeth/0000-0003-0630-3363; McPhearson,
   Timon/0000-0002-9499-0791; Levin, Simon/0000-0002-8216-5639
FU Princeton University's Dean for Research, High Meadows Environmental
   Institute, Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment; Office of
   the Provost; US National Science Foundation [1444755, 1927167, 193493];
   Office Of The Director; Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
   [1927167] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX Funding in support of this research was provided by Princeton
   University's Dean for Research, High Meadows Environmental Institute,
   Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, and the Office of the
   Provost (EHK). TM is supported by the US National Science Foundation
   through Grant Nos. 1444755, 1927167, and 193493. We thank Farah Hasan
   for contributing to the initial data compilation, and two anonymous
   reviewers for their constructive feedback.
CR Aboelnga HT, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12051299
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   Allen TR, 2019, PUBLIC WORKS MANAG P, V24, P110, DOI 10.1177/1087724X18798380
   Anderies JM, 2020, REG ENVIRON CHANGE, V20, DOI 10.1007/s10113-020-01654-1
   Anderies JM, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P14402, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1519071112
   Bloschl G., 2013, Climate Vulnerability: Understanding and Addressing Threats to Essential Resources, V5, P3, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-384703-4.00505-0, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-384703-4.00505-0]
   Boretti A, 2021, J OCEAN ENG SCI, V6, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.joes.2020.05.001
   Brelsford C, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11515-250223
   Brock WA, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0041010, 10.1371/journal.pone.0045586]
   Carpenter SR, 2015, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V112, P14384, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1511804112
   Carpenter SR, 2015, ECOL SOC, V20, DOI 10.5751/ES-07433-200210
   Chen L, 2016, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V39, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/39/1/012027
   Chester M, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-021-00016-y
   Cordes J, 2020, SPAT SPATIO-TEMPORAL, V34, DOI 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100355
   Csete ME, 2002, SCIENCE, V295, P1664, DOI 10.1126/science.1069981
   Dadson S, 2017, WATER RESOUR RES, V53, P6425, DOI 10.1002/2017WR020640
   Damkjaer S, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P513, DOI 10.1007/s13280-017-0912-z
   Depietri Y, 2018, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V148, P95, DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2194-2
   Di Baldassarre G, 2017, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V8, P1, DOI 10.5194/esd-8-225-2017
   Eaton TT, 2013, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V461, P158, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.093
   Flörke M, 2018, NAT SUSTAIN, V1, P51, DOI 10.1038/s41893-017-0006-8
   Garrick D, 2014, ANNU REV ENV RESOUR, V39, P611, DOI 10.1146/annurev-environ-013012-093817
   Grimm NB, 2017, ECOSYST HEALTH SUST, V3, DOI 10.1002/ehs2.1255
   Gunderson L. H., 2002, Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems
   Hanlon JW, 2017, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V75, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.014
   Haraguchi M, 2016, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V7, P133, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-03-2015-0015
   He CY, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-25026-3
   Hoekstra AY, 2018, ENVIRON RES LETT, V13, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aaba52
   Hölscher K, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V231, P843, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043
   Hsieh JL, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0125071
   Ishtiaque A, 2017, ECOL SOC, V22, DOI [10.5751/ES-09186-220305, 10.5751/es-09186-220305]
   Khan S, 2020, WATER-SUI, V12, DOI 10.3390/w12010166
   Klammler H., 2018, Environment Systems & Decisions, V38, P140, DOI 10.1007/s10669-017-9649-2
   Klinkhamer C, 2019, ARXIV 190201266, V1, P1
   Krueger EH, 2019, EARTHS FUTURE, V7, P1167, DOI 10.1029/2019EF001306
   Krueger E, 2019, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V56, P66, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.009
   Krueger EH, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6c2d
   Langmuir I, 1918, J AM CHEM SOC, V40, P1361, DOI 10.1021/ja02242a004
   Latham S, 2022, ENVIRON RES, V203, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111735
   Lemos MC, 2016, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V21, P52, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.004
   Levin S, 1999, Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons
   Levin SA, 2008, BIOSCIENCE, V58, P27, DOI 10.1641/B580107
   Levin SA, 2019, GLOBAL CHALLENGES, GOVERNANCE, AND COMPLEXITY: APPLICATIONS AND FRONTIERS, P16
   Lindskog F., 2003, ASTIN Bulletin, V33, P209, DOI [10.1017/S0515036100013441, DOI 10.2143/AST.33.2.503691]
   Hoang L, 2019, ECOL ENG, V135, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.04.029
   Liu JN, 2021, WATER-SUI, V13, DOI 10.3390/w13202939
   LUDWIG D, 1978, J ANIM ECOL, V47, P315, DOI 10.2307/3939
   Markolf SA, 2018, EARTHS FUTURE, V6, P1638, DOI 10.1029/2018EF000926
   McArdle A., 2014, Fordham Urb. LJ, V42, P91
   McDonald RI, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P96, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.022
   McKinley J., 2021, New York Times
   McPhearson T., 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, P5, DOI [10.1038/s42949-021-00017-x, DOI 10.1038/S42949-021-00017-X]
   Mukundan R, 2013, CATENA, V107, P80, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2013.02.002
   Mukundan R, 2019, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V21, P147, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.01.001
   Muneepeerakul R, 2020, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V117, P4617, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1916169117
   NYC DEP, 2021, ONE WAT NYC 2020 WAT
   NYC DEP, 2020, NEW YORK CIT DRINK W
   Octavianti T, 2021, WIRES WATER, V8, DOI 10.1002/wat2.1516
   Padowski JC, 2016, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V30, P4913, DOI 10.1007/s11269-016-1461-0
   Padowski JC, 2012, WATER RESOUR RES, V48, DOI 10.1029/2012WR012335
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Rao P.S. C., 2017, Decision Analysis Today, V36, P25
   Rasoulkhani K, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207674
   Revi A, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, P535
   Rodriguez-Iturbe I, 1999, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY, V455, P3789, DOI 10.1098/rspa.1999.0477
   Rosenberg DE, 2007, WATER RESOUR RES, V43, DOI 10.1029/2006WR005340
   Scheffer M, 2018, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V115, P11883, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1810630115
   Seager R, 2012, J CLIMATE, V25, P6721, DOI 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00518.1
   Solecki William., 2016, Journal of Extreme Events, V3, P1650020, DOI DOI 10.1142/S2345737616500202
   Soll David., 2013, EMPIRE WATER ENV POL
   Teale NG, 2017, INT J CLIMATOL, V37, P358, DOI 10.1002/joc.4709
   Walker B, 2012, RESILIENCE PRACTICE, DOI [10.5822/978-1-61091-231-0, DOI 10.5822/978-1-61091-231-0]
   Waters J, 2017, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V46, P42, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.011
   Yu DJ, 2020, ECOL SOC, V25, DOI 10.5751/ES-11887-250422
   Zhou WQ, 2021, NPJ URBAN SUSTAIN, V1, DOI 10.1038/s42949-020-00011-9
NR 75
TC 13
Z9 13
U1 17
U2 48
PU IOP Publishing Ltd
PI BRISTOL
PA TEMPLE CIRCUS, TEMPLE WAY, BRISTOL BS1 6BE, ENGLAND
SN 1748-9326
J9 ENVIRON RES LETT
JI Environ. Res. Lett.
PD JUL 1
PY 2022
VL 17
IS 7
AR 075006
DI 10.1088/1748-9326/ac78f4
PG 18
WC Environmental Sciences; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
GA 3C0PS
UT WOS:000828334900001
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Hao, HY
   Wang, Y
   Chen, JY
AF Hao, Haiyan
   Wang, Yan
   Chen, Jiayu
TI Empowering Scenario Planning with Artificial Intelligence: A Perspective
   on Building Smart and Resilient Cities
SO ENGINEERING
LA English
DT Review
DE Scenario planning; Smart city; Artificial intelligence; Urban resilience
ID CELLULAR-AUTOMATA; CITY; LESSONS
AB Scenario planning is a powerful tool for cities to navigate uncertainties and mitigate the impacts of adverse scenarios by projecting future outcomes based on present-day decisions. This approach is becoming increasingly important given the growing call for building resilient cities to face adverse future scenarios posed by emerging disruptive technologies and climate change. However, conventional scenario planning practices predominantly rely on expert knowledge and judgment, which may be limited in accounting for the complexity of future scenarios. Therefore, we explored the potential integration of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to assist scenario planning practices. We synthesized related studies from various disciplines (e.g., engineering, computer science, and urban planning) to identify the potential applications of AI in the three key components of scenario planning: plan generation, scenario generation, and plan evaluation. We then discuss the challenges and possible solutions for integrating AI into the scenario planning process and highlight the critical role of planning experts in this process. We conclude by outlining future research opportunities in this context. Ultimately, this study contributes to the advancement of scenario planning practices and aids the creation of more resilient cities that can thrive in an uncertain future. (c) 2024 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
C1 [Hao, Haiyan] Chinese Univ Hong Kong Shenzhen, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Div Computat Social Sci, Shenzhen 518172, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Yan] Univ Florida, Coll Design Construct & Planning, Dept Urban & Reg Planning, Gainesville, FL 32601 USA.
   [Chen, Jiayu] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China.
C3 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen; State University System
   of Florida; University of Florida; Tsinghua University
RP Hao, HY (corresponding author), Chinese Univ Hong Kong Shenzhen, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Div Computat Social Sci, Shenzhen 518172, Peoples R China.
EM haohaiyan@cuhk.edu.cn
RI CHEN, JY/LEM-6833-2024; Hao, Haiyan/AFK-0917-2022
FU Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) [UDF01003238]; University of
   Florida
FX This work is supported by the University Development Fund (UDF01003238)
   provided by the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) and graduate
   school fellowship program at the Univer-sity of Florida. Any opinions,
   findings, conclusions, or recommen-dations expressed in this material
   are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
   Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen) and University of Florida.
CR Abou Jaoude G, 2022, J PLAN LIT, V37, P467, DOI 10.1177/08854122221083546
   Ahmed M, 2019, P 2019 IEEE INT C SY
   Alonso L, 2018, UNIFYING THEMES COMP, P253
   Andrews C., 2022, AI PLANNING OPPORTUN
   Ange K., 2017, Next Generation Scenario Planning: A Transportation Practitioner's Guide
   As I., 2022, Artificial intelligence in urban planning and design: technologies, implementation, and impacts, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-823941-4.09991-1
   Asatiani A, 2021, J ASSOC INF SYST, V22, P325, DOI 10.17705/1jais.00664
   Avin U, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P403, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1746688
   Arrieta AB, 2020, INFORM FUSION, V58, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
   Barzel B, 2013, NAT PHYS, V9, P673, DOI [10.1038/NPHYS2741, 10.1038/nphys2741]
   Berberoglu S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V153, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.017
   Bhatia S, 2021, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, V35, P6750
   Bonabeau E, 2002, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V99, P7280, DOI 10.1073/pnas.082080899
   Bonnefon JF, 2020, Report
   Börjeson L, 2006, FUTURES, V38, P723, DOI 10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002
   Boulaguiem Y, 2022, ENVIRON DATA SCI, V1, DOI 10.1017/eds.2022.4
   Bruno E, 2019, Ardeth, V5, P220
   Chakraborty A, 2015, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V81, P18, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2015.1038576
   Chakraborty A, 2011, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V77, P251, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2011.582394
   ChatGPT Assistant, YouTube & Article Summary Powered by ChatGPT
   Chen B, 2020, SYMMETRY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/sym12020254
   Chen X, 2016, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1606.03657, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1606.03657]
   Crooks A, 2021, Urban Informatics
   Dan YZ, 2021, AUTOMAT CONSTR, V129, DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103808
   Dehkordi MAE, 2023, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V26, DOI 10.18564/jasss.5016
   Dong W, 2022, APPL ENERG, V308, DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118387
   Dongjie Wang, 2020, SIGSPATIAL '20: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, P497, DOI 10.1145/3397536.3422268
   Fang Z, 2022, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V36, P2035, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2022.2072849
   Fedorova S, 2021, arXiv
   Fremont DJ, 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 40TH ACM SIGPLAN CONFERENCE ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION (PLDI '19), P63, DOI 10.1145/3314221.3314633
   Gil Y, 2021, ACM T INTERACT INTEL, V11, DOI 10.1145/3453172
   Goodspeed R, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P777, DOI 10.1177/2399808317727004
   Goyal A, 2022, P ROY SOC A-MATH PHY, V478, DOI 10.1098/rspa.2021.0068
   Grattarola D, 2021, ADV NEUR IN, V34
   Guan XF, 2023, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101900
   Gunning D, 2019, SCI ROBOT, V4, DOI 10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120
   Ha S, 2021, SCI REP-UK, V11, DOI 10.1038/s41598-021-91878-w
   Han Y, 2020, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V162, P2257, DOI 10.1007/s10584-020-02802-6
   Hao HY, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2401.04849
   Hao HY, 2023, NAT HAZARDS REV, V24, DOI 10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1696
   Hao HY, 2023, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101914
   Hao HY, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V220, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104352
   Hartmann S, 2017, COMPUT SCI RES NOTES, V2702, P133
   He JL, 2018, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V32, P2076, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2018.1480783
   Hopkins L.D., 2007, Engaging the future: Forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects
   Hurtado P, 2023, trend report for planners
   Isola P, 2017, PROC CVPR IEEE, P5967, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2017.632
   Jaller M, 2021, Technical Report
   Javed AR, 2023, ELECTRONICS-SWITZ, V12, DOI 10.3390/electronics12041020
   Kamrowska-Zaluska D, 2021, LAND-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/land10111209
   Kavak Hamdi, 2018, Simulation Series, V50
   Kelly T, 2018, SIGGRAPH ASIA'18: SIGGRAPH ASIA 2018 TECHNICAL PAPERS, DOI 10.1145/3272127.3275065
   Kempinska K, 2019, APPL NETW SCI, V4, DOI 10.1007/s41109-019-0234-0
   KHAKEE A, 1991, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V19, P459, DOI 10.1016/0305-0483(91)90062-X
   Kim S, 2020, VISUAL COMPUT, V36, P911, DOI 10.1007/s00371-019-01701-x
   Kim Y, 2020, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101498
   Klosterman RE, 2013, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V79, P161, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2013.882647
   Kondor D, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-71867-1
   L10 Wasserman D, 2022, Artificial intelligence and planning practice
   L39 Owaki T, 2020, Commun Comput Inform Sci, V1332, P535
   L41 Tian R, 2021, P 2020 DIGITALFUTURE
   L6 Stojanovic M, 2014, Facta universitatis-Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, V12, P81, DOI DOI 10.2298/FUACE1401081S
   Lemoy R, 2017, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V62, P64, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.10.008
   Lempert R, 2020, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V86, P311, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2020.1727766
   Li SP, 2022, STRUCT SAF, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102254
   Li W, 2019, SCI ROBOT, V4, DOI 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw0863
   Liu XP, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V168, P94, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
   Maffei L, 2016, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V27, P338, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.022
   Mannion P, 2016, AUTON SYST, P47, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-25808-9_4
   Mehrabi N, 2021, ACM COMPUT SURV, V54, DOI 10.1145/3457607
   Mirza M, 2014, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1411.1784
   Murdoch WJ, 2019, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V116, P22071, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1900654116
   O'Neill BC, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V122, P387, DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2
   Oyama N, 2023, SCI REP-UK, V13, DOI 10.1038/s41598-023-32947-0
   Park JS, 2023, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, UIST 2023, DOI 10.1145/3586183.3606763
   Peng ZR, 2024, J PLAN EDUC RES, V44, P2263, DOI 10.1177/0739456X231180568
   Peregrino AA, 2021, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2110.13202, 10.48550/arXiv.2110.13202, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2110.13202]
   Peterson GD, 2003, CONSERV BIOL, V17, P358, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01491.x
   Pillkahn U., 2008, Using trends and scenarios as tools for strategy development: shaping the future of your enterprise
   Quan SJ, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P2500, DOI 10.1177/23998083221100550
   Quan SJ, 2019, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V46, P1581, DOI 10.1177/2399808319867946
   Quay R, 2010, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V76, P496, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2010.508428
   Radford A., 2016, ICLR
   Riahi K, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V109, P33, DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y
   Robbins S, 2020, AI SOC, V35, P391, DOI 10.1007/s00146-019-00891-1
   Rudin C, 2019, NAT MACH INTELL, V1, P206, DOI 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
   Rüttgers M, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-42339-y
   Sanchez TW, 2023, INT J URBAN SCI, V27, P179, DOI 10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538
   Sert E, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-68447-8
   Sharifi A, 2024, CITIES, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2023.104659
   Shen J, 2020, P 25 INT C COMP AID
   Sherman SA, 2022, J AM PLANN ASSOC, V88, P524, DOI 10.1080/01944363.2021.2004913
   Son TH, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V94, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104562
   Song B, 2021, P 2021 IEEE 1 INT C
   Spaniol Matthew J., 2023, Futures & Foresight Science, DOI 10.1002/ffo2.148
   Spaniol Matthew J., 2019, Futures & Foresight Science, V1, DOI 10.1002/ffo2.3
   Sun ST, 2021, IEEE J-STARS, V14, P10189, DOI 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3106481
   Taleb N., 2007, The New York Times
   van Leeuwen JP, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH MEDIA ARCHITECTURE BIENNALE CONFERENCE 2018 (MAB18), P128, DOI 10.1145/3284389.3284491
   Battaglia PW, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1806.01261
   Wang DJ, 2021, IEEE DATA MINING, P679, DOI 10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00079
   Wang HW, 2020, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V115, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102619
   Wang Y, 2022, J MANAGE ENG, V38, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001021
   Wang Y, 2021, ADV ENG INFORM, V50, DOI 10.1016/j.aei.2021.101371
   Wardekker JA, 2010, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V77, P987, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005
   Wilkinson A, 2013, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V80, P699, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.031
   Winter K, 2021, TRANSPORTATION, V48, P1931, DOI 10.1007/s11116-020-10116-w
   Wu AN, 2022, BUILD ENVIRON, V223, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109477
   Yan HN, 2020, TRANSPORT RES D-TR E, V89, DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102577
   Yang T, 2020, ANNU REV CONTROL, V49, P145, DOI 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.03.001
   Ye XY, 2022, ENVIRON PLAN B-URBAN, V49, P794, DOI 10.1177/23998083211023516
   Yildirim Y, 2021, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V28, P720, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2020.1870249
   Yu MG, 2021, INT T OPER RES, V28, P2414, DOI 10.1111/itor.12941
   Yu SW, 2021, REV GEOPHYS, V59, DOI 10.1029/2021RG000742
   Zhai YQ, 2020, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V34, P1475, DOI 10.1080/13658816.2020.1711915
   Zhang WW, 2020, LAND USE POLICY, V91, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.024
   Zhang ZY, 2023, WATER RES, V229, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2022.119498
   Zheng Y, 2023, NAT COMPUT SCI, V3, P748, DOI 10.1038/s43588-023-00503-5
   Zhou HY, 2021, ENVIRON POLLUT, V273, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116473
NR 119
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 13
U2 13
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2095-8099
EI 2096-0026
J9 ENGINEERING-PRC
JI Engineering
PD DEC
PY 2024
VL 43
BP 272
EP 283
DI 10.1016/j.eng.2024.06.012
EA DEC 2024
PG 12
WC Engineering, Multidisciplinary
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Engineering
GA U9F9L
UT WOS:001414773400001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Zhan, SY
   Zhang, XF
AF Zhan, Shuying
   Zhang, Xiaofan
TI Coupled Climate-Environment-Society-Ecosystem Resilience Coordination
   Analytical Study-A Case Study of Zhejiang Province
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE climatic-environmental-social-ecological system resilience; air
   pollution; entropy weighting method; coupled coordination degree
ID FRAMEWORK; POLICY
AB The aim of this paper is to evaluate the coupled coordination degree of climate, environmental, socio-economic, and ecosystem resilience in Zhejiang Province from 2010 to 2022 and to propose optimization strategies. With the increasing impact of global climate change, the need to explore the construction of resilient cities and sustainable development models has become increasingly pressing. Assessing the coupled coordination among climate, environment, socio-economic, and ecosystem resilience aids in suggesting more precise and effective social and ecological recovery strategies in the context of climate change. Zhejiang Province, serving as a model for China's urbanization development, demonstrates a balance between the natural environment, economic growth, and social development but still suffers from ecological and environmental pollution problems. In this study, an evaluation system was constructed utilizing the entropy weight method (EWM), and the coupled coordination among climate, environmental, socio-economic, and ecosystem resilience in Zhejiang Province was empirically analyzed over the period from 2010 to 2022. The results show that (1) the climatic-environmental, socio-economic, and ecological subsystems of cities in Zhejiang Province generally show an upward trend, despite fluctuations over different periods. (2) The climatic-environmental-social-ecological system resilience of the cities in Zhejiang Province increased as a whole, and six cities (Hangzhou: 0.805, Quzhou: 0.811, Huzhou: 0.827, Taizhou: 0.829, Wenzhou: 0.856, and Jinhua: 0.857) reached the "well-coordinated" level by 2022; however, the coupling coordination of Jiaxing City and Lishui City decreased from good to intermediate coordination. (3) The coupled coordination degree of climatic-environmental-social-ecological system resilience generally stagnated in each city during 2020-2022. Thus, the climate change adaptation strategy proposed in this study aims to enhance urban adaptive capacity to climate change impacts by controlling pollutant emissions, restoring ecosystems, optimizing industrial structures, and designing urban green spaces.
C1 [Zhan, Shuying; Zhang, Xiaofan] Shaanxi Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Art & Design, Xian 710021, Peoples R China.
C3 Shaanxi University of Science & Technology
RP Zhang, XF (corresponding author), Shaanxi Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Art & Design, Xian 710021, Peoples R China.
EM 221011036@sust.edu.cn; zhangxiaofan@sust.edu.cn
OI Zhan, Shuying/0009-0009-0289-4531
CR Alba-Patiño D, 2021, RESOUR CONSERV RECY, V174, DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105782
   Alcott B, 2005, ECOL ECON, V54, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.020
   [Anonymous], The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC
   [Anonymous], 2022, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability
   [Anonymous], 2014, AR5 Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change IPCC
   Ariken M, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V114, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106331
   [程真 Cheng Zhen], 2011, [环境科学学报, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae], V31, P686
   De Marco A, 2022, GLOBAL CHANGE BIOL, V28, P5062, DOI 10.1111/gcb.16278
   de Richter R, 2011, J PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO C, V12, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.05.002
   Du E, 2018, ENVIRON POLLUT, V242, P1476, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.041
   Elsen PR, 2023, ONE EARTH, V6, P632, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.014
   Fan YP, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V229, P289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.027
   Fang Z, 2022, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V831, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154967
   González-Quintero C, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11216073
   Hao ZB, 2023, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V30, P56946, DOI 10.1007/s11356-023-26284-y
   He Y, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14031579
   Hossain MS, 2020, INT J SUST DEV WORLD, V27, P40, DOI 10.1080/13504509.2019.1683645
   Hu ZN, 2021, GLOB ECOL CONSERV, V27, DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01583
   Jones SK, 2019, ECOSYST SERV, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100987
   Kelektsoglou K, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10124400
   Li HW, 2023, ENVIRON RES LETT, V18, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0a56
   Liang M, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su15097135
   Lin JH, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V309, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127077
   Liu Z.M., 2021, Prog. Geogr, V40, P95, DOI [10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.01.009, DOI 10.18306/DLKXJZ.2021.01.009]
   Lu Q, 2018, COMPUT ENVIRON URBAN, V68, P121, DOI 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.11.006
   Lyu X, 2023, ONE EARTH, V6, P964, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.07.004
   Maximillian J., 2019, Environmental and Pollution Science, P457, DOI [DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00025-2, 10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00025-2]
   Murdoch A, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V700, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134518
   Nguyen DH, 2022, ENVIRON TECHNOL INNO, V28, DOI 10.1016/j.eti.2022.102809
   Ochoa-Hueso R, 2021, ONE EARTH, V4, P951, DOI 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.06.011
   Prober SM, 2015, ECOL LETT, V18, P85, DOI 10.1111/ele.12381
   Ren ZB, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101154
   Samoli E, 2019, ENVIRON POLLUT, V249, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.050
   Schmidt A, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1233, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020
   Shen L, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14159794
   Sicard P, 2022, J FORESTRY RES, V33, P1703, DOI 10.1007/s11676-020-01272-x
   [孙洋洋 Sun Yangyang], 2024, [生态学报, Acta Ecologica Sinica], V44, P930
   Tachiiri K, 2021, PROG EARTH PLANET SC, V8, DOI 10.1186/s40645-021-00418-7
   UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2023, Emissions Gap Report 2023
   Viñals E, 2023, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V869, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161763
   Yang JL, 2019, REMOTE SENS ENVIRON, V233, DOI 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111395
   Yang YJ, 2019, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V21, P2577, DOI 10.1007/s10668-018-0139-6
   Ye YQ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V93, P930, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.031
   Yoro KO., 2020, Advances in Carbon Capture: Methods, Technologies and Applications., P3, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12819657-1.00001-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12819657-1.00001-3, 10.1016/B978-0-12-819657-1.00001-3, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-819657-1.00001-3]
   Zhang K, 2020, ATMOS ENVIRON, V232, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117511
   Zhao YL, 2023, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V186, DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113668
NR 46
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 30
U2 38
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
EI 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUL
PY 2024
VL 16
IS 13
AR 5746
DI 10.3390/su16135746
PG 34
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA YD6S3
UT WOS:001266593900001
OA gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wen, RK
   Yang, XJ
   Yang, L
   Weng, YY
   Kamboni, NK
   Jin, HX
   Chen, YR
   Jiang, ZW
AF Wen, Rikun
   Yang, Xingjian
   Yang, Ling
   Weng, Yuanyuan
   Kamboni, Nchimunya Kazimete
   Jin, Hexian
   Chen, Yongrong
   Jiang, Zhiwei
TI Urban open space resilience evaluation of air pollution disasters based
   on monitoring data of national monitoring stations in Hangzhou
SO HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience performance curve; resilience index; resilience properties;
   urban open space; environmental air monitoring data; air pollution
   disaster
ID VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; SEISMIC RESILIENCE; TERM
   EXPOSURE; SYSTEMS; RISK; MORTALITY; OZONE; SUSTAINABILITY; MANAGEMENT
AB Using air quality monitoring data of 2018, 2020 and 2021 from national monitoring stations in Hangzhou, the disaster cycles, with levels of ozone (O-3), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and coarse particulate matter (PM10) were determined. The damage to human health from pollutants, which represents the loss of open space functionality, was determined by a review of the literature. Using the theory of resilience evaluation, a correlation was established between pollutant concentrations and system functions, and resilience performance curves of different types of open spaces were constructed for the urban open space pollutant disaster cycle to evaluate the resilience and related properties for open space responses to O-3, PM2.5, and PM10 pollution disasters. The results indicate that open spaces in scenic and cultural areas are more resilient to pollution than residential areas and commercial transportation residential mixed zones. All open spaces were the most robust to PM10 and had the highest redundancy for O-3 and PM10, while had the lowest redundancy for PM2.5. All open spaces responded most rapidly to PM2.5, partly because of larger scale meteorological changes in cities. All open spaces had the strongest resilience to PM10 disasters, followed by O-3 disasters, with the worst resilience to PM2.5 disasters, with a resilience index range of [0.5, 1]. The results and methods can help enhance urban resilience by bringing new ideas and broadening urban resilience theory and research. The strategy of enhancing greenery in urban open spaces was found to significantly reduce the impact of air pollution disasters, thereby reducing human health damage to users of open spaces. This is significant for enhancing urban resilience and building urban health infrastructure.
C1 [Wen, Rikun; Yang, Ling; Weng, Yuanyuan; Kamboni, Nchimunya Kazimete; Jin, Hexian] Zhejiang Agr & Forest Univ, Coll Landscape Architecture, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Xingjian] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Coll Phys Sci & Technol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China.
   [Chen, Yongrong] Landscaping Dev Ctr Shangcheng Dist, Hangzhou, Peoples R China.
   [Jiang, Zhiwei] Hangzhou Ecol Environm Monitoring Ctr Zhejiang Pr, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
C3 Zhejiang A&F University; Southwest Jiaotong University
RP Wen, RK (corresponding author), Zhejiang Agr & Forest Univ, Coll Landscape Architecture, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
EM wenrk@zafu.edu.cn
RI Wen, Rikun/MFI-8269-2025
FU Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology Department 2021 Provincial
   Soft Science Research Project "Research on the Construction Mechanism of
   Urban Intelligent Open Space to Enhance Resilience" [2021C35026]
FX The authors thank the Zhejiang Provincial Science and Technology
   Department 2021 Provincial Soft Science Research Project "Research on
   the Construction Mechanism of Urban Intelligent Open Space to Enhance
   Resilience (2021C35026)" for supporting this research.
CR Agarwal J, 2015, CIV ENG ENVIRON SYST, V32, P5, DOI 10.1080/10286608.2015.1025065
   Agústsdóttir AM, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1669, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1795-6
   Ahmad D, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V99, P337, DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03743-9
   Aka FT, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P57, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2674-5
   Almenar JB, 2021, LAND USE POLICY, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898
   [Anonymous], AIR QUAL CLIM CHANGE, V52, P44
   Asprone D, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS96, DOI 10.1111/disa.12106
   Ayyub BM, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P340, DOI 10.1111/risa.12093
   Bernabei L, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V65, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102552
   Bozza A, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1729, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1798-3
   Bruneau M, 2003, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V19, P733, DOI 10.1193/1.1623497
   Bruneau M, 2007, EARTHQ SPECTRA, V23, P41, DOI 10.1193/1.2431396
   Chang SE, 2015, NAT HAZARDS, V78, P1827, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1803-x
   Chang SE, 2014, RISK ANAL, V34, P416, DOI 10.1111/risa.12133
   Chen YQ., 2018, THESIS ZHEJIANG IND
   Cimellaro GP, 2016, GEOTECH GEOL EARTHQ, V41, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30656-8
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2013, ENVIRONMENT, V55, P25, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.768076
   [丁镭 Ding Lei], 2021, [经济地理, Economic Geography], V41, P82
   Doberstein B, 2019, NAT HAZARDS, V98, P31, DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3529-z
   Dzhambov A, 2018, ENVIRON RES, V160, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.09.015
   Dzhambov AM, 2019, ENVIRON RES, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108708
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Ewbank R., 2016, MEASURING RESILIENCE
   Fagerholm N, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127257
   Fernández-Pablos E, 2021, FORESTS, V12, DOI 10.3390/f12050626
   Frantzeskaki N, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V64, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127262
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, GLOB POLICY, V10, P712, DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12758
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, BIOSCIENCE, V69, P455, DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz042
   Frantzeskaki N, 2019, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V93, P101, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.033
   Fu X, 2021, J CLEAN PROD, V289, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125146
   Gómez-Baggethun E, 2013, ECOL ECON, V86, P235, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
   Gotham KF, 2011, ECOL SOC, V16, DOI 10.5751/ES-04292-160312
   Gunawardhana M.R., 2013, The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses, V4, P133, DOI [10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v04i04/37186, DOI 10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/V04I04/37186]
   Haimes YY, 2005, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V11, P65, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:2(65)
   Hatala AR, 2020, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-08647-z
   He J., 2018, ECOL CITY GREEN ARCH, P23
   Henry D, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V99, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002
   Hill H, 2012, DISASTERS, V36, P175, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01256.x
   Hystad Perry, 2019, Environ Epidemiol, V3, pe040, DOI 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000040
   Irwin S, 2016, WATER-SUI, V8, DOI 10.3390/w8090377
   Jaung WG, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126827
   Jerrett M, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V360, P1085, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0803894
   Jim CY, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P51, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.007
   Katsouyanni K, 2001, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V12, P521, DOI 10.1097/00001648-200109000-00011
   Koren D, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11215942
   Krewski D, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P198, DOI 10.1056/NEJM200401083500225
   Lafortezza Raffaele, 2018, Environ Res, V165, P431, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.11.038
   Liang Y., 2020, RURAL STAFF, V669, P179
   Liu JY., 2005, REGIONAL RES DEV, P114
   Liu KX., 2021, ENV SCI J, V41, P3650, DOI [10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2021.0075, DOI 10.13671/J.HJKXXB.2021.0075]
   Liu Y., 2020, THESIS HEFEI U TECHN, DOI 10.27101/d.cnki.ghfgu.2020.001708
   Lizarralde G, 2015, DISASTERS, V39, pS76, DOI 10.1111/disa.12109
   Mahmoudi H, 2018, INTEGR ENVIRON ASSES, V14, P567, DOI 10.1002/ieam.4075
   MCEER, 2010, FRAM DEF MEAS DIS RE
   McGarigal K., 1995, USDA FOREST SERVICE, DOI [10.2737/PNW-GTR-351, DOI 10.2737/PNW-GTR-351]
   McMillen H, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8080775
   Medina S, 1997, ENVIRON RES, V75, P73, DOI 10.1006/enrs.1997.3773
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Modica M, 2016, WEB ECOL, V16, P59, DOI 10.5194/we-16-59-2016
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Hoa NT, 2016, CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR, V18, P1917, DOI 10.1007/s10098-016-1120-4
   Park J, 2013, RISK ANAL, V33, P356, DOI 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   Peng D., 2016, The Effect of Green Layout and Configuration Modeto the Concentration of Air Particulate Matter in Zhengzhou City
   Pokhrel S, 2019, ENVIRON RES COMMUN, V1, DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ab4565
   Pope CA, 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V287, P1132, DOI 10.1001/jama.287.9.1132
   Reinwald F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su131910606
   Rubin C.B., 2013, Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev., V55, P32, DOI [10.1080/00139157.2013.765317, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2013.765317]
   Rus K, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015
   Samet JM, 2000, HLTH EFFECTS I
   Schwartz J, 1999, EPIDEMIOLOGY, V10, P17, DOI 10.1097/00001648-199901000-00005
   Tao YB, 2012, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V120, P393, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1103715
   Tierney K., 2007, TR News, V250, P14, DOI DOI 10.17226/23168
   Venter ZS, 2020, ENVIRON RES LETT, V15, DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/abb396
   Villagra P, 2019, ENVIRONMENT, V61, P4, DOI 10.1080/00139157.2019.1615348
   Walker GR., 2015, DEV FORMAL FRAMEWORK
   Wang B., 2021, Environmental Protection Science, V47, P38, DOI DOI 10.16803/J.CNKI.ISSN.1004-6216.2021.0
   [王发曾 Wang Fazeng], 2004, [地理研究, Geographical Research], V23, P281
   Wang JX, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127180
   Wang Y, 2020, DEV BUILT ENVIRON, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.dibe.2019.100003
   Wei, 2020, THESIS NE FORESTRY U
   Wei Guo-ru, 2018, Huanjing Kexue, V39, P3014, DOI 10.13227/j.hjkx.201710174
   Wei YX, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V51, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101813
   WHO, 2006, Air quality guidelines: global update 2005: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide
   Wong TW, 2002, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V59, P30, DOI 10.1136/oem.59.1.30
   Xie Yuan-bo, 2014, Huanjing Kexue, V35, P1
   Xu JC., 2015, CHINA L SCI, P49
   Yang QY, 2005, ENVIRON RES, V99, P99, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2004.09.014
   Yu HL., 2012, NW FOREST I, V27, P238
   [曾贤刚 Zeng Xiangang], 2019, [中国环境科学, China Environmental Science], V39, P4025
   [张生玲 Zhang Shengling], 2017, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V27, P15
   Zhang YH, 2006, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V114, P1227, DOI 10.1289/ehp.9014
   Zhao LJ, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9112098
   Zhao Y., 2007, THESIS CHINA U GEOSC
   Zheng PL., 2019, CHINA ENVIRON SCI, V39, P1909, DOI [10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2019.0226, DOI 10.19674/J.CNKI.ISSN1000-6923.2019.0226]
   Zhou Y., 2021, COMPREHENSIVE UTILIZ, V39, P90
   Zhu HH., 2019, J ENVIRON HEALTH, V36, P946, DOI [10.16241/j.cnki.1001-5914.2019.11.002, DOI 10.16241/J.CNKI.1001-5914.2019.11.002]
NR 97
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 12
U2 90
PU TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
PI PHILADELPHIA
PA 530 WALNUT STREET, STE 850, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 USA
SN 1080-7039
EI 1549-7860
J9 HUM ECOL RISK ASSESS
JI Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess.
PD APR 21
PY 2022
VL 28
IS 3-4
BP 354
EP 386
DI 10.1080/10807039.2022.2053354
EA MAR 2022
PG 33
WC Biodiversity Conservation; Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA 0X9LG
UT WOS:000776301900001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pawlak, CC
   Love, NLR
   Yost, JM
   Fricker, GA
   Doremus, JM
   Ritter, MK
AF Pawlak, Camille C.
   Love, Natalie L. R.
   Yost, Jennifer M.
   Fricker, G. Andrew
   Doremus, Jacqueline M.
   Ritter, Matt K.
TI California's native trees and their use in the urban forest
SO URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
LA English
DT Article
DE Native trees; Urban forestry; Species ranges; Tree diversity; Species
   selection
ID ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CLIMATE; DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; STREET;
   VULNERABILITY; RESILIENCE; GROWTH; IMPACT; WATER
AB California's urban forest is composed of both native and non-native species. These trees improve the quality of life of urban residents and mitigate the effects of climate change by buffering local microclimates. A species' native status is often defined at the scale of the state's political boundaries, which doesn't reflect its actual native range. Here we define the list of 95 tree species native to California, create digital range maps for each species, provide native species lists for every city in California, and analyze trends in native tree species in the state's urban areas. We found that California's urban areas have relatively few tree species that are native within a given city's boundaries. Even though non-natives outnumber natives in all California cities, opportunities for more native tree diversity are slim as most cities have less than four native species that aren't already growing as urban trees. California's cities face a hotter and drier future, threatening existing urban forests and the benefits they provide residents. We explore different options for tree selection based on the goal of growing healthy and resilient urban forests into the future.
C1 [Pawlak, Camille C.; Love, Natalie L. R.; Yost, Jennifer M.; Ritter, Matt K.] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Biol Sci Dept, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
   [Pawlak, Camille C.; Love, Natalie L. R.; Yost, Jennifer M.; Fricker, G. Andrew; Doremus, Jacqueline M.; Ritter, Matt K.] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Urban Forest Ecosyst Inst, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
   [Fricker, G. Andrew] Calif Polytech Univ, Social Sci Dept, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
   [Doremus, Jacqueline M.] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, Dept Econ, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
   [Pawlak, Camille C.] 1 Grand Ave,Bldg 33, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
C3 California State University System; California Polytechnic State
   University San Luis Obispo; California State University System;
   California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo; California
   State University System; California Polytechnic State University San
   Luis Obispo; California State University System; California Polytechnic
   State University San Luis Obispo
RP Pawlak, CC (corresponding author), 1 Grand Ave,Bldg 33, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA.
EM cpawlak@calpoly.edu
RI Pawlak, Camille/KHZ-2913-2024
FU Britton Fund
FX The authors would like to thank all arborists and companies who
   contributed to the California Urban Forest Inventory, Dr. Jonathan
   Ventura for his research support, and Dr. David Kiel for helping edit a
   list of California native shrubs. This research was funded by The
   Britton Fund.
CR Abeyta D, 2013, The City of San Jose Tree Policy Manual and Recommended Best Management Practices
   Avolio ML, 2018, ECOL MONOGR, V88, P259, DOI 10.1002/ecm.1290
   Avolio ML, 2015, FRONT ECOL EVOL, V3, DOI 10.3389/fevo.2015.00073
   Avolio ML, 2015, URBAN ECOSYST, V18, P73, DOI 10.1007/s11252-014-0388-6
   Barrett Tyson, 2024, CRAN
   Bedsworth L., 2018, Statewide Summary Report. California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment
   Bontrager M, 2020, bioRxiv, DOI [10.1101/2020.11.01.364349, 10.1101/2020.11.01.364349, DOI 10.1101/2020.11.01.364349]
   Boshier D, 2015, ENVIRON EVID, V4, DOI 10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3
   Botkin D.B., 1997, Urban Ecosystems, V1, P3, DOI 10.1023/A:1014354923367
   Burge Dylan O., 2016, Madrono, V63, P3, DOI 10.3120/madr-63-02-3-206.1
   Burghardt KT, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P219, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01076.x
   CalFlora, Calflora: Information on California plants for education, research and conservation, with data contributed by public and private institutions and individuals, including the Consortium of California Herbaria
   Carper AL, 2014, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V43, P253, DOI 10.1603/EN13078
   Cavender-Bares JM, 2022, PLOS SUSTAIN TRANSF, V1, DOI 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000010
   City of Davis, 2002, Community Forest Management Plan
   City of El Monte, 2010, El Monte Urban and COmmunity Forestry Managment Plan
   City of Los Angeles, 2018, 2018 Biodiversity Report, City of Los Angeles
   Conway TM, 2015, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V138, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.007
   Corlett RT, 2013, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V28, P482, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.003
   Dickie IA, 2014, BIOL INVASIONS, V16, P705, DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0609-6
   Dudek, 2018, First Step: Developing an Urban Forest Management Plan for the City of Los Angeles
   Dymond CC, 2014, CAN J FOREST RES, V44, P1196, DOI 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0146
   Esperon-Rodriguez M, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P950, DOI 10.1038/s41558-022-01465-8
   ESRI, 2022, ArcGIS Pro (Version 10) [Computer software]
   Frankie Gordon, 2019, Journal of Pollination Ecology, V25, P16
   GBIF, 2022, GBIF GLOB BIOD INF F
   Griffin JamesR. William B. Critchfield., 1976, DISTRIBUTION FOREST
   Hauser DA, 2017, AM J BOT, V104, P1581, DOI 10.3732/ajb.1700291
   Huff Emily S., 2020, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V46, P185
   iNaturalist, 2022, California's Native Trees
   Jagemann SM, 2018, ENVIRON ENTOMOL, V47, P1152, DOI 10.1093/ee/nvy080
   Jepson Flora Project, 2022, Jepson eFlora [Computer software]
   Juzwik J, 2011, PLANT DIS, V95, P888, DOI 10.1094/PDIS-12-10-0944
   Kauffmann M.E., 2013, CONIFERS PACIFIC SLO, V1st ed.
   LandIQ, 2017, Land Use-2014-Land IQ [ds2677]
   Lesk C, 2017, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V7, P713, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE3375, 10.1038/nclimate3375]
   Little E.L., 1976, Atlas of United States Trees, V1
   Little E.L., 1971, ATLAS US TREES VOLUM, P1
   Little E.L., 1978, Atlas of United States trees, V5
   Little E.L., 1977, Atlas of United States Trees, V3
   Livesley SJ, 2016, J ENVIRON QUAL, V45, P119, DOI 10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567
   Lockwood JL, 2004, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V13, P445, DOI 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00116.x
   Love NLR, 2022, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V74, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127679
   Marris Emma., 2011, Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World, V1st
   Maryland Department of Environment Maryland Department of Natural Resources Maryland Department of Agriculture Maryland Department of Transportation & Chesapeake Bay Trust, 2022, Final Plan for Growing 5 Million Trees in Maryland
   McBride JR, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P348, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.020
   McCoy DE, 2022, ELIFE, V11, DOI 10.7554/eLife.77891
   McKinney ML, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P883, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
   McPherson E. G., 2002, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V1, P61, DOI 10.1078/1618-8667-00007
   McPherson E.G., 2016, Selecting Trees Fit for the Future
   Myers N, 2000, NATURE, V403, P853, DOI 10.1038/35002501
   Nitschke CR, 2017, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V167, P275, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.012
   Oksanen J., 2022, Vegan: Community Ecology Package
   Ordóñez C, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V131, P531, DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1394-2
   Ordóñez C, 2014, ENVIRON REV, V22, P311, DOI 10.1139/er-2013-0078
   Ordóñez C, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V116, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.007
   Paquette A, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V62, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127157
   Pebesma E, 2018, R J, V10, P439
   R Core Team, 2022, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
   R Core Team, 2023, Stats-package (4.3.0)
   Raupp Michael J., 2006, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, V32, P297
   Restaino CM, 2016, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V113, P9557, DOI 10.1073/pnas.1602384113
   Ritter M., 2018, California plants: A guide to our iconic flora, VFirst
   Rundel P.W., 2022, California desert plants, VFirst
   San Francisco Planning Department, 2014, San Francisco Urban Forest Plan
   Sawyer J.O., 2001, Trees and Shrubs of California
   Sax DF, 2002, GLOBAL ECOL BIOGEOGR, V11, P49, DOI 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00262.x
   SelecTree, 2022, SelecTree: A Tree Selection Guide
   Shapiro AM, 2002, DIVERS DISTRIB, V8, P31, DOI 10.1046/j.1366-9516.2001.00120.x
   Simpson B.J., 1999, A Field Guide to Texas Trees
   Spotswood E., 2017, Re-Oaking Silicon Valley: Building Vibrant Cities with Nature
   Suzi Katz Garden Design, 2022, California Native Plants Foster a Strong Sense of Place
   Tallamy D., 2009, Bringing Nature Home: How You Can Sustain Wildlife with Native Plants
   Tallamy DW, 2009, CONSERV BIOL, V23, P941, DOI 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01202.x
   U.S. Census Bureau, 2010, TIGER/Line and TIGER-related products electronic resource: Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing system
   Uchida K, 2021, TRENDS ECOL EVOL, V36, P123, DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.011
   Urban Forest Ecosystem Institute, 2022, California Urban Forest Inventory
   Wickham H., 2022, dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation [Computer software manual]
   Wood EM, 2020, ECOL APPL, V30, DOI 10.1002/eap.2149
   Wood SLR, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126972
NR 80
TC 2
Z9 2
U1 3
U2 16
PU ELSEVIER GMBH
PI MUNICH
PA HACKERBRUCKE 6, 80335 MUNICH, GERMANY
SN 1618-8667
EI 1610-8167
J9 URBAN FOR URBAN GREE
JI Urban For. Urban Green.
PD NOV
PY 2023
VL 89
AR 128125
DI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128125
EA OCT 2023
PG 10
WC Plant Sciences; Environmental Studies; Forestry; Urban Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Plant Sciences; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Forestry; Urban
   Studies
GA Y0LJ6
UT WOS:001102267800001
OA hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Chu, EK
AF Chu, Eric K.
TI Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state-society relations:
   The politics of community knowledge and mobilisation in Indore, India
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
DE climate change adaptation; community knowledge; innovations;
   state-society relations; urban governance; urban planning
ID GOVERNANCE; RESILIENCE; CITIES; INNOVATION; PARTICIPATION; JUSTICE;
   CITY; TRANSFORMATION; OPPORTUNITIES; COPRODUCTION
AB Current research on climate change adaptation in cities highlights the role of local governments in facilitating adaptation actions, but rarely assesses whether (and if so, how) local communities organise around emerging climate priorities to affect political change. This paper explores changing state-society relationships through the reconstitution of community collectives and advocacy organisations for advancing climate change adaptation in the Indian city of Indore. The paper shows that communities are indeed recognising the need for adaptation but are, at the same time, integrating adaptation actions with existing strategies for advocating development rights. Communities are also rebuilding alliances between municipal and local institutions for public service and infrastructure provision, which point to the centrality of community politics in urban climate adaptation processes. However, such mobilisations are often dependent on existing political networks and a legacy of advocacy around poverty alleviation needs, which sideline more transformative agendas around inclusiveness, equity, and resilient urban futures.
C1 [Chu, Eric K.] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C3 University of Amsterdam
RP Chu, EK (corresponding author), Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Social Sci Res, Dept Geog Planning & Int Dev Studies, Postbus 15629, NL-1001 NC Amsterdam, Netherlands.
EM e.k.chu@uva.nl
RI Chu, Eric/O-6464-2015
OI Chu, Eric/0000-0002-5648-6615
FU Center for International Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of
   Technology; David L Boren Fellowship of the US National Security
   Education Program
FX This research was partially funded by the Center for International
   Studies at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and by the David L
   Boren Fellowship of the US National Security Education Program.
CR Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Amin Ash., 2002, CITIES REIMAGINING U
   Anguelovski I, 2016, J PLAN EDUC RES, V36, P333, DOI 10.1177/0739456X16645166
   Anguelovski I, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V27, P156, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.010
   [Anonymous], 2009, IDS B
   [Anonymous], WAT DEM MAN STRAT IM
   [Anonymous], 2012, 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan:2013-2017
   [Anonymous], 2010, PLANNING COMPLEXITY
   [Anonymous], IND CIT RES STRAT CH
   [Anonymous], CURR OPIN ENV SUST
   [Anonymous], URBAN POVERTY CLIMAT
   [Anonymous], ENV QUALITY MANAGEME
   [Anonymous], 2003, DEEPENING DEMOCRACY
   [Anonymous], ACCCRN CIT PROJ CIT
   [Anonymous], URBAN OPPORTUNITIES
   Archer D, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P345, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.918868
   Ayers J, 2009, ENVIRONMENT, V51, P22, DOI 10.3200/ENV.51.4.22-31
   Aylett A, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P1386, DOI 10.1177/0042098013480968
   Bahadur A, 2014, ENVIRON URBAN, V26, P200, DOI 10.1177/0956247814522154
   Barrett S, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P1819, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.015
   Barros V, 2014, CLIMATE CHANGE 2014: IMPACTS, ADAPTATION, AND VULNERABILITY, PT A: GLOBAL AND SECTORAL ASPECTS, pIX
   Berkes F, 2013, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V26, P5, DOI 10.1080/08941920.2012.736605
   Brenner Neil., 2005, City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Theory, Policy, Action, V9, P101, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604810500092106
   Brosius JP, 1998, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V11, P157, DOI 10.1080/08941929809381069
   Bulkeley H, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V25, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009
   Bulkeley H, 2013, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V23, P914, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.010
   Bulkeley H, 2013, T I BRIT GEOGR, V38, P361, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Carmin J., 2013, Urban Climate Adaptation and Leadership: From Conceptual Understanding to Practical Action
   Carmin J, 2012, J PLAN EDUC RES, V32, P18, DOI 10.1177/0739456X11430951
   CASTELLS Manuel, 1983, The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements
   Chu E, 2017, CITIES, V60, P378, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
   Chu E, 2016, CLIM POLICY, V16, P372, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2015.1019822
   Chu E, 2016, ENVIRON PLANN C, V34, P281, DOI 10.1177/0263774X15614174
   Collins Kevin, 2009, European Environment, V19, P358, DOI 10.1002/eet.523
   Cook B., 2001, Participation: A new tyranny?
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   della Porta Donatella, 2015, Social Movements
   Dodman D, 2013, J INT DEV, V25, P640, DOI 10.1002/jid.1772
   Ensor J, 2015, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V6, P509, DOI 10.1002/wcc.348
   Ensor J, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P227
   Few R, 2007, CLIM POLICY, V7, P46, DOI 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637
   Fisher S, 2012, ENVIRON PLANN C, V30, P109, DOI 10.1068/c10186
   Forsyth T, 2013, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V4, P439, DOI 10.1002/wcc.231
   Friend R, 2013, URBAN CLIM, V6, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.09.002
   Fung A, 2006, PUBLIC ADMIN REV, V66, P66, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   González S, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P2055, DOI 10.1080/00420980500279778
   Harvey D, 2003, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V27, P939, DOI 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
   Healey P., 2004, Policy Studies, V25, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0144287042000262189, 10.1080/0144287042000262189]
   Himley M, 2008, GEOGR COMPASS, V2, P433, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00094.x
   Hughes S, 2014, ENVIRON POLIT, V23, P1023, DOI 10.1080/09644016.2014.921459
   Hughes S, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05929-180448
   Hunt A, 2011, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V104, P13, DOI 10.1007/s10584-010-9975-6
   Huq S, 2004, IDS BULL-I DEV STUD, V35, P15, DOI 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2004.tb00129.x
   Jamison A, 2010, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V1, P811, DOI 10.1002/wcc.88
   Karanth A, 2014, DEV PRACT, V24, P514, DOI 10.1080/09614524.2014.911246
   Kellert SR, 2000, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V13, P705, DOI 10.1080/089419200750035575
   Lane Marcus., 2005, J ENVIRON POL PLAN, V7, P141
   Magee T., 2013, A field guide to community based adaptation, DOI DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302290
   Marcuse Peter., 2009, City, V13, P185, DOI DOI 10.1080/13604810902982177
   McFarlane C, 2012, URBAN STUD, V49, P2795, DOI 10.1177/0042098012452460
   Meerow S, 2019, URBAN GEOGR, V40, P309, DOI 10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395
   Migdal JoelS., 2001, STATE SOC STUDYING S
   Mitlin D, 2008, ENVIRON URBAN, V20, P339, DOI 10.1177/0956247808096117
   Moore M, 2008, PUBLIC MANAG REV, V10, P3, DOI 10.1080/14719030701763161
   Moser SusanneC., 2011, Journal for Environmental Studies and Sciences, V1, P63, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13412-011-0012-5
   Nay JJ, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P357, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.912196
   O'Brien K, 2012, PROG HUM GEOG, V36, P667, DOI 10.1177/0309132511425767
   Paavola J, 2006, ECOL ECON, V56, P594, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.015
   Pahl-Wostl C, 2008, GLOBAL GOV, V14, P419, DOI 10.1163/19426720-01404003
   Parks BC, 2010, THEOR CULT SOC, V27, P134, DOI 10.1177/0263276409359018
   Pasquini L, 2015, CLIM DEV, V7, P60, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.886994
   Pelling M, 2005, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V15, P308, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.02.001
   Pelling M, 2015, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V133, P113, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0
   Reid H, 2014, CLIM DEV, V6, P291, DOI 10.1080/17565529.2014.973720
   Robinson J, 2011, INT J URBAN REGIONAL, V35, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
   Rodima-Taylor D, 2012, APPL GEOGR, V33, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.10.011
   Roggema R, 2012, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V4, P2525, DOI 10.3390/su4102525
   Rosenzweig C, 2010, NATURE, V467, P909, DOI 10.1038/467909a
   Roy A, 2011, PLAN THEOR, V10, P6, DOI 10.1177/1473095210386065
   Sharma Dipak Sharma Dipak, 2011, Archives of Applied Science Research, V3, P450
   Sharma D, 2010, ENVIRON URBAN, V22, P451, DOI 10.1177/0956247810377390
   Shi L, 2016, ROUT INT HANDB, P336
   Shi LD, 2016, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V6, P131, DOI 10.1038/NCLIMATE2841
   Sovacool BK, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P616, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2665
   Swyngedouw E, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P1991, DOI 10.1080/00420980500279869
   Swyngedouw E., 2004, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, V17, P25, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0955757042000203632, 10.1080/0955757042000203632]
   Taylor M, 2007, URBAN STUD, V44, P297, DOI 10.1080/00420980601074987
   Thaker J, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V123, P107, DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6
   Verma GD, 2000, HABITAT INT, V24, P91
   Watson V, 2009, URBAN STUD, V46, P2259, DOI 10.1177/0042098009342598
   While A, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P1325, DOI 10.1177/0042098013480963
   Whitehead M, 2013, URBAN STUD, V50, P1348, DOI 10.1177/0042098013480965
   Ziervogel G, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8090955
NR 93
TC 37
Z9 41
U1 5
U2 59
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD JUN
PY 2018
VL 55
IS 8
BP 1766
EP 1782
DI 10.1177/0042098016686509
PG 17
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA GF9EE
UT WOS:000432278100010
OA Green Published
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Storozum, M
   Lu, P
   Wang, SY
   Chen, PP
   Yang, RX
   Ge, QF
   Cao, JP
   Wan, JW
   Wang, H
   Qin, Z
   Liu, HW
   Park, E
AF Storozum, Michael
   Lu, Peng
   Wang, Sanying
   Chen, Panpan
   Yang, Ruixia
   Ge, Qifeng
   Cao, Jinping
   Wan, Junwei
   Wang, Hui
   Qin, Zhen
   Liu, Haiwang
   Park, Edward
TI Geoarchaeological evidence of the AD 1642 Yellow River flood that
   destroyed Kaifeng, a former capital of dynastic China
SO SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
LA English
DT Article
AB Rising global temperatures will increase the number of extreme weather events, creating new challenges for cities around the world. Archaeological research on the destruction and subsequent reoccupation of ancient cities has the potential to reveal geological and social dynamics that have historically contributed to making urban settings resilient to these extreme weather events. Using a combination of archaeological and geological methods, we examine how extreme flood events at Kaifeng, a former capital of dynastic China, have shaped the city's urban resilience. Specifically, we focus on an extremeYellow River flood event in AD 1642 that historical records suggest killed around 300,000 people living in Kaifeng. Our recent archaeological excavations have discovered compelling geological and archaeological evidence that corroborates these documents, revealing that the AD 1642 Yellow River flood destroyed Kaifeng's inner city, entombing the city and its inhabitants within meters of silt and clay. We argue that the AD 1642 flood was extraordinarily catastrophic because Kaifeng's city walls only partly collapsed, entrapping most of the flood waters within the city. Both the geology of the Yellow River floods as well as the socio-political context of Kaifeng shaped the city's resilience to extreme flood events.
C1 [Storozum, Michael] Fudan Univ, Inst Archaeol Sci, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China.
   [Storozum, Michael] Fudan Univ, Dept Cultural Heritage & Museol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China.
   [Storozum, Michael] Max Planck Inst Sci Human Hist, Dept Archaeol, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
   [Lu, Peng; Chen, Panpan] Henan Acad Sci, Inst Geog, Zhengzhou 450052, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Sanying; Ge, Qifeng; Cao, Jinping; Wan, Junwei] Kaifeng Inst Archaeol & Cultural Rel, Kaifeng 475000, Peoples R China.
   [Yang, Ruixia] UNESCO, Int Ctr Space Technol Nat & Cultural Heritage Aus, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Hui] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Archaeol, Beijing 100710, Peoples R China.
   [Qin, Zhen] Henan Univ, Sch Hist & Culture, Kaifeng 475001, Peoples R China.
   [Liu, Haiwang] Henan Prov Inst Cultural Rel & Archaeol, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China.
   [Park, Edward] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
   [Park, Edward] Nanyang Technol Univ, Asian Sch Environm, Singapore 639798, Singapore.
C3 Fudan University; Fudan University; Henan Academy of Sciences; Chinese
   Academy of Social Sciences; Henan University; Nanyang Technological
   University; National Institute of Education (NIE) Singapore; Nanyang
   Technological University
RP Storozum, M (corresponding author), Fudan Univ, Inst Archaeol Sci, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China.; Storozum, M (corresponding author), Fudan Univ, Dept Cultural Heritage & Museol, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China.; Storozum, M (corresponding author), Max Planck Inst Sci Human Hist, Dept Archaeol, D-07745 Jena, Germany.; Lu, P (corresponding author), Henan Acad Sci, Inst Geog, Zhengzhou 450052, Peoples R China.; Wang, SY (corresponding author), Kaifeng Inst Archaeol & Cultural Rel, Kaifeng 475000, Peoples R China.
EM mjstorozum@fudan.edu.cn; bulate_0@163.com; 125615966@qq.com
RI Lu, Peng/HNR-4786-2023; Park, Edward/JCD-7857-2023; Storozum,
   Michael/Q-4849-2017; QIN, ZHEN/GRR-1628-2022
OI Park, Edward/0000-0002-1299-1724
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [41971016, 41671014,
   41701014]; National Social Science Foundation of China [18CKG003]; Study
   of Environment Archaeology in Zhengzhou; Digital Environment Archaeology
   Specially-appointed Researcher of Henan, China; 65th China Postdoctoral
   Science Foundation [2019M651399]
FX The study is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
   (Grant Nos. 41971016, 41671014, 41701014), the National Social Science
   Foundation of China (Grant No. 18CKG003), the Study of Environment
   Archaeology in Zhengzhou, and the Digital Environment Archaeology
   Specially-appointed Researcher of Henan, China. The authors are grateful
   to the 65th China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M651399)
   for financial support. We are also thankful to members of Department of
   Cultural Heritage and Museology at Fudan University for useful
   discussions.
CR Aldrete G.S., 2007, FLOODS TIBER ANCIENT
   Baker VR, 2006, CATENA, V66, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2005.11.016
   CHANG SD, 1970, ANN ASSOC AM GEOGR, V60, P63, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1970.tb00704.x
   Chen YZ, 2012, AMBIO, V41, P682, DOI 10.1007/s13280-012-0290-5
   COSTA JE, 1983, GEOL SOC AM BULL, V94, P986, DOI 10.1130/0016-7606(1983)94<986:PROFPF>2.0.CO;2
   Dalan RA, 1996, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V23, P185, DOI 10.1029/95GL03689
   DODGEN RA, 1995, J URBAN HIST, V21, P716, DOI 10.1177/009614429502100602
   Ernstson H, 2010, AMBIO, V39, P531, DOI 10.1007/s13280-010-0081-9
   Ge Q. S, 2014, DAZHONG KAOGU, V10, P36
   Heiri O, 2001, J PALEOLIMNOL, V25, P101, DOI 10.1023/A:1008119611481
   Kidder T, 2012, GEOARCHAEOLOGY, V27, P324, DOI 10.1002/gea.21411
   Kidder TR, 2015, HOLOCENE, V25, P1627, DOI 10.1177/0959683615594469
   Leichenko R, 2011, CURR OPIN ENV SUST, V3, P164, DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Liao KH, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-05231-170448
   Liu, 2006, KAOGU KAIFENG ARCHAE
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mostern R, 2016, NAT CULT, V11, P121, DOI 10.3167/nc.2016.110201
   Nelson DW, 1982, SOIL SCI SOC AM, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.2.2-D.C29
   Qiu G, 1998, KAIFENG KAOGU FAXIAN
   Ramsey CB, 2013, RADIOCARBON, V55, P720, DOI 10.1017/S0033822200057878
   Reimer PJ, 2009, RADIOCARBON, V51, P1111, DOI 10.1017/S0033822200034202
   Salomon F, 2018, EARTH-SCI REV, V177, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.10.003
   Schoeneberger P. J, 1998, FIELD BOOK DESCRIBIN, V44
   Smith ME, 2010, CAMB ARCHAEOL J, V20, P229, DOI 10.1017/S0959774310000259
   Storozum MJ, 2018, HOLOCENE, V28, P1759, DOI 10.1177/0959683618788682
   Walder JS, 1997, WATER RESOUR RES, V33, P2337, DOI 10.1029/97WR01616
   Wang S, 2017, WENWU, V2017, P39
   Wu PF, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101289
   Wu QL, 2016, SCIENCE, V353, P579, DOI 10.1126/science.aaf0842
   Ye Y, 2016, SPRINGERPLUS, V5, DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-3642-y
   Zhang L, 2016, STUD ENVIRON HIST, P1
NR 31
TC 18
Z9 25
U1 3
U2 32
PU NATURE PORTFOLIO
PI BERLIN
PA HEIDELBERGER PLATZ 3, BERLIN, 14197, GERMANY
SN 2045-2322
J9 SCI REP-UK
JI Sci Rep
PD FEB 28
PY 2020
VL 10
IS 1
AR 3765
DI 10.1038/s41598-020-60169-1
PG 12
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA NF1JJ
UT WOS:000563058200008
PM 32111852
OA Green Published, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Naghibi, M
AF Naghibi, Maryam
TI Rethinking small vacant lands in urban resilience: Decoding cognitive
   and emotional responses to cityscapes
SO CITIES
LA English
DT Article
DE Emotions; Resilience; Design strategies; Interpretative Phenomenological
   Analysis; (IPA); Landscape elements; Small vacant lands (SVL)
ID SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GREEN SPACE; CITIES;
   SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; ENVIRONMENTS; PERCEPTIONS; AREAS
AB Urban sustainability and human well-being are increasingly influenced by the design and presence of green urban areas, which have been linked to fostering positive emotions among citizens. In light of this, this study investigates the transformation of small vacant lands (SVL) into resilient urban green spaces. The study explores the potential value of redesigning SVL into resilient spaces through design strategies. By considering the perceptions and preferences of residents, the research addresses the issues related to vacancy, limited spaces, social stress, and the impact of landscape composition and configuration on visitors' positive emotions. The research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of resilience strategies and to identify the key landscape elements that contribute to transforming SVL into valued small green spaces within the urban fabric. Methods include a comprehensive literature review, a survey, an experiment with EMOTIVE, and analysis using the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) method. The significance of this study lies in integrating field-based methods with EEG data in small-scale landscape contexts, providing a quantifiable measure of engagement with open spaces. This cross-disciplinary approach enhances the understanding of how minor urban landscape modifications can influence human behavior and well-being, especially when resources are limited. The findings provide insights for policy-driven design practices, stimulating design innovation, and offer urban planners effective strategies to refine park patterns, thereby enhancing human well-being and advancing urban sustainability.
C1 [Naghibi, Maryam] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Urbanism Dept, Delft, Netherlands.
C3 Delft University of Technology
RP Naghibi, M (corresponding author), Delft Univ Technol, Urban Design Sect, Julianalaan 134, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands.
EM m.naghibi@tudelft.nl
RI Naghibi, Maryam/HNI-3432-2023
OI Naghibi, Maryam/0000-0002-8822-6922
FX I would like to extend my sincere thanks to Mohsen Faizi and Ahmad
   Ekhlassi for their supervision during this period. Additionally, I
   express my sincere gratitude to Ashkan Farrokhi for his assistance in
   analyzing EEG data. I am also grateful to the Hub of Green Housing and
   Sustain-able Residential Complexes Technology and to Abbas Yazdanfar for
   providing the necessary equipment.
CR AbouKorin SAA, 2021, CITIES, V118, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103324
   Addas A., 2015, Landscape Department
   Addas A, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13020915
   Adger WN, 2003, ECON GEOGR, V79, P387
   Adibi A. A., 2005, Journal of Fine Arts, V22
   Afriyanie D, 2018, IOP C SER EARTH ENV, V145, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012120
   Ahern J, 2013, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V28, P1203, DOI 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
   Ahern J, 2011, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V100, P341, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Ai HS, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V146, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109881
   Allan P., 2011, Journal of Landscape Architecture, V6, P34, DOI [10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453, DOI 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723453]
   Anderies JM, 2014, BUILD RES INF, V42, P130, DOI 10.1080/09613218.2013.857455
   [Anonymous], 2014, CITY RESILIENCE INDE
   Aram F, 2019, HELIYON, V5, DOI 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01339
   Bahriny F, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13042036
   Banai R, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102929
   Banica A, 2020, J URBAN REG ANAL, V12, P53, DOI 10.37043/JURA.2020.12.1.4
   Beymer-Farris B.A., 2012, Resilience and the cultural landscape, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139107778, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139107778.003]
   Bolanis D, 2024, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V59, P947, DOI 10.1007/s00127-023-02575-0
   Bower I, 2019, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101344
   Burley BA, 2018, HEALTH PLACE, V54, P43, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.08.015
   Büyüközkan G, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V77, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
   Chang CY, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V85, P79, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.010
   Childers DL, 2019, ELEMENTA-SCI ANTHROP, V7, DOI 10.1525/elementa.385
   Chmielewski S, 2020, REMOTE SENS-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/rs12172792
   Collier MJ, 2013, CITIES, V32, pS21, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.010
   Cortesao J., 2019, P PLEA 2018 C HONG K
   Davoudi S, 2012, PLAN THEORY PRACT, V13, P299, DOI 10.1080/14649357.2012.677124
   Deng L, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126488
   Di Giuseppe E, 2021, ENERG BUILDINGS, V231, DOI 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110638
   Dimitrova DD, 2017, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V23, P54, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.012
   Dimoudi A, 2003, ENERG BUILDINGS, V35, P69, DOI 10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00081-6
   Elsadek M, 2020, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V55, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126846
   Elsadek M, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126446
   Feliciotti A, 2016, OPEN HOUSE INT, V41, P23
   Fields W., 2005, Urban Landscape Change in New Orleans, LA: The Case of the Lost Neighborhood of Louis Armstrong
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Franck K. A., 2007, Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life, P82
   Galantini ZDY, 2018, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V9, P48, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2016-0038
   Goodman RN, 2013, INT J PSYCHOPHYSIOL, V87, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.008
   Grafakos S, 2016, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V8, DOI 10.3390/su8050461
   Ha J, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V218, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104309
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hua JY, 2019, CITIES, V94, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.014
   Jazi SD, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14121446
   Junqueira JR, 2022, CITIES, V131, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104051
   Kang Youngeun, 2018, [Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture, 한국조경학회지], V46, P38, DOI 10.9715/KILA.2018.46.1.038
   Khatibi H, 2021, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V11, P493, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-03-2020-0049
   Kim G, 2020, CITIES, V102, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102730
   Kim M, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11010233
   Kong LQ, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V226, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104482
   Kremer P, 2013, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V120, P218, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.003
   Kronenberg J, 2020, CITIES, V106, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102862
   Laboy M., 2016, Enquiry: A Journal for Architectural Research, V13, P39, DOI [10.17831/enq:arcc.v13i2.405, DOI 10.17831/ENQ:ARCC.V13I2.405]
   Lak A, 2020, J ENVIRON PLANN MAN, V63, P2194, DOI 10.1080/09640568.2020.1714561
   Lee J, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10051513
   Lee S. J., 2015, P 8 C INT FOR URB, DOI [10.3390/ifou-D007.True, DOI 10.3390/IFOU-D007.TRUE, 10.3390/ifou- D007.True]
   Lee SW, 2008, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V85, P60, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.013
   Ling C, 2007, LANDSCAPE RES, V32, P285, DOI 10.1080/01426390701318171
   Lis A, 2022, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V228, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104556
   Liu QY, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127411
   Liu ZF, 2019, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V187, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.020
   Liu ZM, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11102964
   Lokman K, 2017, LANDSCAPE RES, V42, P728, DOI 10.1080/01426397.2017.1355446
   LOUKAITOU-SIDERIS ANASTASIA., 1996, Journal of Urban Design, V1, P91, DOI 10.1080/13574809608724372
   Luo S., 2021, Disclosing interstices open-ended design transformation of urban leftover spaces, DOI [10.7480/abe.2021.16.6070, DOI 10.7480/ABE.2021.16.6070]
   Mader A., 2011, The economics of ecosystems & biodiversity: TEEB manual for cities: Ecosystem services in urban management
   Mahmoudi S. A., 2006, Abadi Journal, V53
   MARTILLA JA, 1977, J MARKETING, V41, P77, DOI 10.2307/1250495
   Martin-Breen P., 2011, Resilience: A Literature Review Bellagio Initiative
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Seng Wong Meng, 2011, J. theor. appl. electron. commer. res., V6, P17, DOI 10.4067/S0718-18762011000200003
   Miao XY, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V86, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127996
   Moqdami K., 2001, Study report on landscape architecture of "Water, V3932G
   Mueller MAE, 2021, FRONT PSYCHOL, V12, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712065
   Mukherjee M, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V28, P854, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.027
   Muluneh MG, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101294
   Naghibi M, 2024, ENVIRON HEALTH INSIG, V18, DOI 10.1177/11786302241248314
   Naghibi M, 2023, URBAN DES INT, V28, P122, DOI 10.1057/s41289-022-00204-x
   Naghibi M, 2020, LANDSC ARCHIT ART, V16, P60, DOI 10.22616/j.landarchart.2020.16.06
   Newell JP, 2022, CITIES, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103664
   Nordh H, 2009, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V8, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003
   Nordh H, 2024, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V96, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102332
   Nordh H, 2011, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V10, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.003
   Nunes DM, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P282, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.078
   Pakzad J., 2007, Urban spaces design guide
   Permato E., 2014, Connecting community: Capturing and patterning orphan space
   Pickett STA, 2004, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V69, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Quigley M, 2018, J URBAN DES, V23, P581, DOI 10.1080/13574809.2018.1440176
   Rahnema S, 2019, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V39, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.12.007
   Rey-Valette H, 2017, ECOSYST SERV, V28, P311, DOI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.002
   Reyes-Riveros R, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127105
   Rezvani SMHS, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V78, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103612
   Ridzqo I. F., 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI [10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012028, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/248/1/012028]
   Roe J., 2013, Environmental Sciences, V1, P93, DOI [DOI 10.12988/ES.2013.3109, https://doi.org/10.12988/es.2013.3109]
   Rupp LA, 2022, CITIES, V125, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103669
   Salat S, 2011, PROCEDIA ENGINEER, V21, P1193, DOI 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2130
   Sevenant M., 2010, Experiences from case studies in rural and urban landscapes observed by different groups of respondents
   Sharifi A, 2023, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V99, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104910
   Sharifi A, 2017, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V9, DOI 10.3390/su9061032
   Silva JBE, 2013, PLAN PRACT RES, V28, P163, DOI 10.1080/02697459.2012.704734
   Sodoudi S, 2018, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V34, P85, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2018.06.002
   Spaans M, 2017, CITIES, V61, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
   Steeneveld GJ, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V121, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.001
   Sun FH, 2023, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V15, DOI 10.3390/su152416555
   Tabibian M, 2016, SCI IRAN, V23, P2081, DOI 10.24200/sci.2016.2273
   Tarek S., 2021, Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, V68, DOI [10.1186/s44147-021-00042-8, DOI 10.1186/S44147-021-00042-8]
   Tilley S, 2017, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V14, DOI 10.3390/ijerph14020151
   Ulpiani G, 2020, APPL THERM ENG, V178, DOI 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115644
   Ulrich R.S., 1983, BEHAV NATURAL ENV, P85, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-94
   ULRICH RS, 1984, SCIENCE, V224, P420, DOI 10.1126/science.6143402
   United Nations, 2024, Sustainable development goals: Take action for the sustainable development goals
   Vargas-Hernández JG, 2021, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V23, P1335, DOI 10.1007/s10668-020-00623-2
   Wardekker A, 2020, CITIES, V101, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102691
   Weeland J, 2019, HEALTH PLACE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102163
   Wong GKL, 2024, CLIM RISK MANAG, V43, DOI 10.1016/j.crm.2024.100589
   Wu JG, 2014, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V125, P209, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018
   Yeom S, 2021, BUILD ENVIRON, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108134
   Yuan S, 2023, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V230, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104616
   Zeng X, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14052481
   Zhang J, 2020, PERS INDIV DIFFER, V159, DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109870
   Zhang L., 2017, J URBAN ECOL, V3, DOI [10.1093/jue/jux015, DOI 10.1093/JUE/JUX015]
   Zhou CH, 2021, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V67, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102716
   Zhou XC, 2023, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V82, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127889
   Zhu JY, 2021, URBAN FOR URBAN GREE, V58, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126913
   Zhu SY, 2020, WIRES DATA MIN KNOWL, V10, DOI 10.1002/widm.1388
NR 125
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 40
U2 41
PU ELSEVIER SCI LTD
PI London
PA 125 London Wall, London, ENGLAND
SN 0264-2751
EI 1873-6084
J9 CITIES
JI Cities
PD AUG
PY 2024
VL 151
AR 105167
DI 10.1016/j.cities.2024.105167
PG 17
WC Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Urban Studies
GA H7T0U
UT WOS:001325419400001
OA Green Published, hybrid
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Wang, X
   Peng, WJ
   Xiong, HP
AF Wang, Xu
   Peng, Wenjun
   Xiong, Huaping
TI Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of rural resilience in
   the urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River,
   China
SO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
LA English
DT Article; Early Access
DE Rural resilience; Spatial-temporal evolution; Driving factors; Urban
   agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River; China
ID COMMUNITY RESILIENCE; LIVELIHOOD RESILIENCE; NATURAL DISASTERS;
   CLIMATE-CHANGE; VULNERABILITY; POLICY; FRAMEWORK; SOCIETY; REGION; AREAS
AB How to maintain the balanced stability and resilient development of rural systems is an important issue that needs urgent attention in the field of sustainable rural development at present. In this paper, the entropy method, spatial autocorrelation model, and Geodetector were used to explore the rural resilience level, spatial distribution characteristics, and driving factors of 31 cities in the urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (UAMRYR), and to put forward corresponding policy suggestions. The results are as follows: (1) From 2005 to 2020, rural resilience in the UAMRYR showed an upward trend with an average annual growth rate of 8.26%. The ranking of the three major urban agglomerations is Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomerations > Wuhan urban agglomerations > Poyang Lake urban agglomerations. (2) During the study period, the spatial distribution of rural resilience gradually developed from a negative correlation to a strong positive correlation and generally showed the characteristics of high in the west and low in the east. (3) The urbanization rate, the size and structure of the economy, the difference in consumption and income between urban and rural areas, the local fiscal revenue, and the number of village committees are the key factors affecting the level of rural resilience. On this basis, we proposed policy recommendations to improve the economic, social, and ecological resilience of rural areas in the UAMRYR. The findings of this paper are expected to provide insights into the policy formulation of China's rural revitalization strategy.
C1 [Wang, Xu; Xiong, Huaping] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China.
   [Wang, Xu] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Management Sci & Engn, Wuhan 430081, Peoples R China.
   [Peng, Wenjun] Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China.
C3 Wuhan University of Science & Technology; Wuhan University of Science &
   Technology; Hubei University of Technology
RP Peng, WJ (corresponding author), Hubei Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn Architecture & Environm, Wuhan 430068, Peoples R China.
EM wenjun325@126.com
OI Xiong, Huaping/0000-0001-9190-7801
FU Department of Education of Hubei Province Project of Humanities and
   Social Sciences [21Q027]
FX This work was supported by the Department of Education of Hubei Province
   Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 21Q027).
CR Adger WN, 2000, PROG HUM GEOG, V24, P347, DOI 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Amir AF, 2015, PROCD SOC BEHV, V168, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.217
   Anthopoulou T, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V52, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.006
   Ashkenazy A, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V59, P211, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.008
   Beel DE, 2017, J RURAL STUD, V54, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.002
   Buikstra E, 2010, J COMMUNITY PSYCHOL, V38, P975, DOI 10.1002/jcop.20409
   Cash C., 2014, South Africa Urban Forum, V25, P125, DOI DOI 10.1007/S12132-013-9204-2
   Cassidy L, 2012, ECOL SOC, V17, DOI 10.5751/ES-04963-170411
   Chaigneau T, 2022, NAT SUSTAIN, V5, P287, DOI 10.1038/s41893-021-00790-8
   Chen WX, 2022, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R, V29, P29202, DOI 10.1007/s11356-021-17768-w
   Chiang YC, 2014, LAND USE POLICY, V36, P510, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.026
   Cox RS, 2015, AM BEHAV SCI, V59, P220, DOI 10.1177/0002764214550297
   Cui ZZ, 2023, J RURAL STUD, V99, P92, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.03.007
   de Koning J, 2021, J RURAL STUD, V82, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.026
   Dumenu WK, 2016, ENVIRON SCI POLICY, V55, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.10.010
   Elmqvist T, 2019, NAT SUSTAIN, V2, P267, DOI 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1
   Fang YP, 2018, HABITAT INT, V76, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.05.004
   Faulkner JP, 2019, J RURAL STUD, V72, P240, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.030
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Folke C, 2016, ECOL SOC, V21, DOI 10.5751/ES-09088-210444
   Freshwater D, 2015, SOCIOL RURALIS, V55, P497, DOI 10.1111/soru.12090
   Heijman W, 2019, PAL ADV BIOEC-ECON, P195, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_11
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Hong B, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w
   Huang XJ, 2018, ECOL INDIC, V87, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.043
   Jamshed A, 2020, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V48, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101601
   Jurjonas M, 2018, OCEAN COAST MANAGE, V162, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.10.010
   Keogh DU, 2011, NAT HAZARDS, V59, P699, DOI 10.1007/s11069-011-9791-y
   Kim G, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229769
   Leykin D, 2013, AM J COMMUN PSYCHOL, V52, P313, DOI 10.1007/s10464-013-9596-0
   Li HB, 2022, J CLEAN PROD, V365, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132738
   Li YH, 2023, CHINA AGR ECON REV, V15, P66, DOI 10.1108/CAER-03-2022-0048
   Li YH, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13031080
   Li YH, 2019, J RURAL STUD, V68, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003
   Long HL, 2022, HABITAT INT, V121, DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102530
   Lu YH, 2023, J RURAL STUD, V97, P255, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.017
   Magis K, 2010, SOC NATUR RESOUR, V23, P401, DOI 10.1080/08941920903305674
   Marshall A, 2023, J RURAL STUD, V100, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.03.004
   McManus P, 2012, J RURAL STUD, V28, P20, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.003
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Quandt A, 2018, WORLD DEV, V107, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.02.024
   Quaranta G, 2014, EUR COUNTRYS, V6, P161, DOI 10.2478/euco-2014-0009
   Rapaport C, 2018, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V31, P470, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.020
   Roberts E, 2016, SOCIOL RURALIS, V56, P197, DOI 10.1111/soru.12075
   Salvia R, 2015, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V7, P11114, DOI 10.3390/su70811114
   Sánchez-Zamora P, 2019, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/su11061743
   Schouten MAH, 2012, ECOL ECON, V81, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.004
   Scott M, 2013, GEOGR COMPASS, V7, P597, DOI 10.1111/gec3.12066
   Skerratt S, 2013, J RURAL STUD, V31, P36, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.02.003
   Steiner A, 2015, J RURAL STUD, V40, P30, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.004
   van Oudenhoven FJW, 2011, MANAG ENVIRON QUAL, V22, P154, DOI 10.1108/14777831111113356
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Wang JF, 2010, INT J GEOGR INF SCI, V24, P107, DOI 10.1080/13658810802443457
   Wang L, 2021, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V13, DOI 10.3390/su13010097
   Wilson G, 2010, T I BRIT GEOGR, V35, P364
   Wilson GA, 2018, J RURAL STUD, V60, P130, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.03.016
   Wilson GA, 2018, LAND USE POLICY, V71, P372, DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.022
   Wilson S, 2013, ECOL SOC, V18, DOI 10.5751/ES-05100-180122
   Wu XH, 2023, J RURAL STUD, V97, P303, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.001
   Yang B, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V144, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109533
   Yang B, 2020, J RURAL STUD, V80, P427, DOI 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.020
   Yang M, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph191912294
   Zeng XJ, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V150, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110169
   Zhang MM, 2022, ECOL INDIC, V136, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108705
   Zhou JZ, 2021, SUSTAIN PROD CONSUMP, V28, P1645, DOI 10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.005
NR 65
TC 3
Z9 3
U1 34
U2 77
PU SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
PI HEIDELBERG
PA TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, D-69121 HEIDELBERG, GERMANY
SN 0944-1344
EI 1614-7499
J9 ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R
JI Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
PD 2024 MAR 11
PY 2024
DI 10.1007/s11356-024-32783-3
EA MAR 2024
PG 20
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA KI4H2
UT WOS:001179312700002
PM 38462568
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Fabbricatti, K
   Biancamano, PF
AF Fabbricatti, Katia
   Biancamano, Paolo Franco
TI Circular Economy and Resilience Thinking for Historic Urban Landscape
   Regeneration: The Case of Torre Annunziata, Naples
SO SUSTAINABILITY
LA English
DT Article
DE circular urban regeneration; historic urban landscape; resilience
   performance indicators; collaborative economy
ID VULNERABILITY; WASTE
AB The landscape, as an archive of the traces of the history of man and nature, can be considered a holistic indicator of sustainable, inclusive, safe, resilient cities as set out in Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. The UNESCO Recommendations on Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) reflect it as a dynamic/evolving system that changes over time to meet social needs: it requires to be managed in a sustainable way, not only as a resource to be preserved. The beauty of the landscape is a common element in the development policies of many small-medium European and Italian cities. However, the state of abandonment and decay, the lack of investments, of often emigrated skills are the detractors. The circular economy model applied to the HUL leads to the ability to maximize the value of settlements, activating social, economic and environmental synergies. The research identifies the relationship among Circularity, Productivity and Resilience as an effective key to achieve the goals of Agenda 2030. The methodological approach tested on the case study of Torre Annunziata, Naples has reached a system of resilience performance indicators to express the complex nature of HUL and define a scenario of circular regeneration, based on the recreation of a virtuous circuit between physical, environmental, social, economic systems.
C1 [Fabbricatti, Katia; Biancamano, Paolo Franco] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Architecture, I-80135 Naples, Italy.
C3 University of Naples Federico II
RP Fabbricatti, K (corresponding author), Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Architecture, I-80135 Naples, Italy.
EM katia.fabbricatti@unina.it; ing.pfb@gmail.com
RI fabbricatti, katia/AAH-1609-2021
OI fabbricatti, katia/0000-0002-0404-8074
CR Angrisano M, 2016, AESTIMUM, V69, P165, DOI 10.13128/Aestimum-20454
   [Anonymous], 2011, Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, including a glossary of definitions
   [Anonymous], CHART KRAK
   [Anonymous], SFIDE CITTA INTERCUL
   [Anonymous], 2000, EUR LANDSC CONV
   Biancamano P.F., 2018, J GLOB ENV ISSUE, V14, P56
   Cadell C., 2008, Regeneration in European cities, Making connections
   Cerreta M, 2012, EARTH SYST DYNAM, V3, P157, DOI 10.5194/esd-3-157-2012
   Chen XD, 2012, J IND ECOL, V16, P129, DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00422.x
   COUNCIL OF EUROPE (CoE), 2005, CONVENTION VALUE CUL
   Cutter SL, 2008, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V105, P2301, DOI 10.1073/pnas.0710375105
   De Medici S, 2018, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V10, DOI 10.3390/su10114305
   Diano D., 2015, BDC BOLL CENT CALZA, V15, P39, DOI [10.6092/2284-4732/3770, DOI 10.6092/2284-4732/3770]
   Evans G, 2005, URBAN STUD, V42, P959, DOI 10.1080/00420980500107102
   Ferrara AR, 2013, APPL RES QUAL LIFE, V8, P15, DOI 10.1007/s11482-012-9180-z
   Folke C., 2016, Resilience
   Folke C, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15, DOI 10.5751/es-03610-150420
   Fusco Girard L., 2013, BDC Boll. Del Cent. Calza Bini, V13, P9
   Gabrielli B., 2013, COMMUNICATION
   Girard LF, 2014, HOPUE HOUSING POLICI, V1
   Girard LF, 2017, QUAL INNOV PROSPER, V21, P223, DOI 10.12776/QIP.V21I1.779
   High Level Group and Stockholm Resilience Centre, 2016, RES THINK SUST INN R
   ICOMOS, 2011, WORLD HER CULT LANDS
   KirshenblattGimblett B, 2004, MUSEUM INT, V56, P52, DOI 10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x
   Massei G, 2014, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V146, P491, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.012
   Meerow S, 2016, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V147, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
   Mitchell N, 2009, COLD WAR HIST-ROUTL, P177
   Naudé W, 2009, OXF DEV STUD, V37, P249, DOI 10.1080/13600810903085800
   Nocca F., 2018, REGION, V5, P33, DOI DOI 10.18335/REGION.V5I1.160
   Onesti A., 2017, BDC, V2, P239
   Pinto M.R., 2015, BDC-Bollettino del Centro Calza Bini, V15, P71
   Pinto MR, 2019, ARCHIT HERIT DES, V4, P1120
   Pinto MR, 2013, TECHNE, V6, P169
   Raworth K., 2017, Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist
   Rockefeller Foundation ARUP., 2014, CIT RES FRAM
   Sessa S., 2011, FUNZIONALITA ARCMAP
   Stock J.H, 2005, INTRO ALLECONOMETRIA
   The Rockefeller Foundation and Arup, 2013, CIT RES IND
   Turvey R, 2007, DEV POLICY REV, V25, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2007.00368.x
   UNESCO, 2015, TRANSF OUR WORLD 203
   UNISDR, 2015, SEND FRAM 2015 2030
   United Nations, 2017, The New Urban Agenda. Adopted at the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Develop-Ment (Habitat III) in Quito
   Walker B, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
   Walker Brian, 2006, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World
NR 44
TC 17
Z9 18
U1 17
U2 72
PU MDPI
PI BASEL
PA ST ALBAN-ANLAGE 66, CH-4052 BASEL, SWITZERLAND
SN 2071-1050
J9 SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL
JI Sustainability
PD JUN 2
PY 2019
VL 11
IS 12
AR 3391
DI 10.3390/su11123391
PG 29
WC Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Environmental Sciences;
   Environmental Studies
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA IG4DG
UT WOS:000473753700161
OA Green Submitted, gold
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Xu, K
   Zhang, XF
   Bin, LL
   Shen, RZ
AF Xu, Kui
   Zhang, Xiaofeng
   Bin, Lingling
   Shen, Ruozhu
TI An improved global resilience assessment method for urban drainage
   systems: A case study of Haidian Island, south China
SO JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
LA English
DT Article
DE Resilience assessment; Urban drainage systems; Global analysis methods;
   SWMM
ID INDEX
AB Resilience assessment for urban drainage systems is a fundamental aspect of building resilient cities. Recently, some scholars have proposed the Global Resilience Analysis (GRA) method, which assesses resilience based on the functional performance of different system failure scenarios. Compared to traditional system dynamics methods, the GRA method considers the impact of internal structural failure on resilience but requires a large amount of computation. This research proposed an improved GRA method to enhance computational efficiency and practicality by reducing the number of system scenario simulations. Firstly, a hydrodynamic model of the drainage network of Haidian Island has been constructed using the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) and Python. Secondly, the GRA method was improved using cluster analysis and convergence analysis to reduce the simulation scenarios. Thirdly, a resilience assessment index was established through system function functions, and two types of resilience enhancement measures, centralized and distributed, were proposed. The results show: (i) resilience assessment increases the computational efficiency by 25% compared to the traditional GRA method; (ii) the resilience index of the existing drainage network within Haidian Island is less than the design value (0.7) in all failure scenarios, indicating a lower level of recovery capability; (iii) compared to the centralized strategy, which is only effective when the system failure level is less than 9%, the distributed strategy enhances the resilience of the urban drainage system at a higher failure level (77%).
C1 [Xu, Kui; Zhang, Xiaofeng] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Intelligent Constructio, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China.
   [Xu, Kui; Zhang, Xiaofeng] Tianjin Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China.
   [Bin, Lingling] Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China.
   [Shen, Ruozhu] Ningxia Capital Sponge City Construct & Dev Co Ltd, Guyuan 756000, Peoples R China.
   [Shen, Ruozhu] Beijing Capital Ecoenvironm Protect Grp Co Ltd, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China.
C3 Tianjin University; Tianjin University; Tianjin Normal University
RP Bin, LL (corresponding author), Tianjin Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China.
EM bll813@126.com
FU National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809192, 52379019]; State
   Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety Foundation
   [HESS-2227]; Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui
   Autonomous Re-gion, China [2022BEG02020]
FX The research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of
   China (51809192, 52379019) , State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic
   Engineering Simulation and Safety Foundation (HESS-2227) , Key Research
   and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Re-gion, China
   (2022BEG02020) . The authors acknowledge the assistance of anonymous
   reviewers. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CR Abd-Elaty I, 2023, J HYDROL-REG STUD, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101429
   Argyroudis SA, 2020, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V714, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136854
   Bertilsson L, 2019, J HYDROL, V573, P970, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052
   Cao FF, 2023, ECOL INDIC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110643
   Cavallo A, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V9, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.05.001
   Chen JL, 2021, J HYDROL, V601, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126601
   Diao KG, 2016, WATER RES, V106, P383, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.011
   Dong X, 2017, WATER RES, V124, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.038
   Gotangco CK, 2016, J FLOOD RISK MANAG, V9, P196, DOI 10.1111/jfr3.12222
   Haghbin S, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V339, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117799
   Henry D, 2012, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V99, P114, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2011.09.002
   Hosseini S, 2016, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V145, P47, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.08.006
   Johansson J., 2012, Risk and Interdependencies in Critical Infrastructures-A Guideline for Analysis, P49, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4471-4661-25, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-4661-2_5]
   Johansson J, 2013, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V120, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.027
   Juan-García P, 2017, WATER RES, V115, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.047
   Kotzee I, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V60, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.018
   Kuriqi A., 2021, Nature-Based Solutions for Flood Mitigation: Environmental and Socio-Economic Aspects, V107, DOI 10.1007/698_2021_773
   Kusumastuti RD, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.007
   Leandro J, 2020, WATER RES, V173, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115502
   Liu DD, 2012, WATER RESOUR MANAG, V26, P3743, DOI 10.1007/s11269-012-0100-7
   Liu D, 2022, J HYDROL, V612, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128134
   Liu WB, 2019, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V672, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.408
   Liu YH, 2023, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V90, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103649
   Moghadas M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V35, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069
   Mugume SN, 2015, WATER RES, V81, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.030
   Rezende OM, 2019, J HYDROL, V576, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.063
   Sun S, 2011, URBAN WATER J, V8, P13, DOI 10.1080/1573062X.2010.542819
   Thorndahl S, 2008, WATER RES, V42, P455, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.038
   Uddin MS, 2020, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V264, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110457
   Vojinovic Z, 2014, J HYDROINFORM, V16, P1044, DOI 10.2166/hydro.2014.223
   Wang MM, 2023, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V342, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118098
   Wang MM, 2021, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V288, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112472
   Wang Q, 2024, ECOL INDIC, V158, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111625
   Wu YW, 2022, J HYDROL, V613, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128349
   Wu YW, 2020, WATER POLICY, V22, P574, DOI 10.2166/wp.2020.155
   Zhang HM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V59, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102248
   Zhang QZ, 2020, WATER RES, V172, DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115527
   Zheng FF, 2018, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V144, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000919
NR 38
TC 4
Z9 4
U1 19
U2 32
PU ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
PI LONDON
PA 24-28 OVAL RD, LONDON NW1 7DX, ENGLAND
SN 0301-4797
EI 1095-8630
J9 J ENVIRON MANAGE
JI J. Environ. Manage.
PD JUN
PY 2024
VL 360
AR 121135
DI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121135
EA MAY 2024
PG 11
WC Environmental Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology
GA D5B5K
UT WOS:001296334700001
PM 38761623
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Pazhuhan, M
   Moradpour, N
   Hesarakizad, A
   Sharifi, A
AF Pazhuhan (Panahandeh Khah), Mousa
   Moradpour, Nabi
   Hesarakizad, Atefeh
   Sharifi, Ayyoob
TI District-based Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (DBRIC)
   for assessment of a Global South city
SO SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
LA English
DT Article
DE Community resilience; Contextualized assessment; DBRIC; Spatio-temporal
   changes; Tehran
ID DISASTER; FRAMEWORK; FLOODS
AB Assessing resilience at the community level is essential for evidence-based planning and policymaking. However, issues such as data availability and accessibility make community resilience assessment a challenging task. Development and implementation of resilience assessment models are particularly challenging in Global South cities that lack access to skilled personnel and updated databases. Using the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) model, developed for county-level resilience assessment in the United States, this article aims to create an urban district-level resilience index called District-based Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (DBRIC). We utilized DBRIC to measure the resilience of Tehran districts and examine how it has changed from 2006 to 2016. The selection of these years was primarily influenced by the data availability. The results show that 45.5% of the districts of Tehran experienced a decrease in the DBRIC index by up to -300%. The decline was particularly noteworthy in terms of social and community capital. Further, the results highlight relatively less resilient districts that require specific attention from planners and policy makers. The findings of the study can inform local planners and policymakers in their efforts towards enhancing resilience. They can also be of interest to policymakers in other Global South cities with similar conditions.
C1 [Moradpour, Nabi] Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Human Geog, Tehran, Iran.
   [Hesarakizad, Atefeh] Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Phys Geog, Tehran, Iran.
   [Sharifi, Ayyoob] Hiroshima Univ, IDEC Inst, Higashihiroshima, Japan.
C3 University of Tehran; University of Tehran; Hiroshima University
RP Moradpour, N (corresponding author), Univ Tehran, Fac Geog, Dept Human Geog, Tehran, Iran.
EM mpanahandehkhah@ut.ac.ir; n.moradpoor@ut.ac.ir
RI Pazhuhan, Mousa/AAH-5772-2019; Sharifi, Ayyoob/M-7584-2013
OI Pazhuhan (Pajoohan), Mousa/0000-0003-3664-9015; Sharifi,
   Ayyoob/0000-0002-8983-8613
CR Ainuddin S, 2012, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V2, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.07.003
   Alijani S, 2020, URBAN CLIM, V33, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100656
   Amirzadeh M, 2022, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V81, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853
   Asadzadeh A, 2015, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V14, P504, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.002
   Atrachali M, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V39, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101231
   Bhandari S, 2021, J MANAGE ENG, V37, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000909
   Birchall SJ, 2023, URBAN CLIM, V47, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101348
   BRANS JP, 1986, EUR J OPER RES, V24, P228, DOI 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
   Buck KD, 2023, NAT HAZARDS, V119, P1011, DOI 10.1007/s11069-022-05493-7
   Burton Christopher., 2012, The development of metrics for community resilience to natural disasters
   Carone MT, 2018, ENRGY PROCED, V147, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.051
   Carvalhaes TM, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V57, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102165
   Courtney C.A., 2008, COASTAL COMMUNITY RE
   Cui P, 2019, SOC SCI QUART, V100, P2059, DOI 10.1111/ssqu.12699
   Custer RL, 1999, J Career Techn Educ, DOI [10.21061/jcte.v15i2.702, DOI 10.21061/JCTE.V15I2.702]
   Cutter SL, 2020, ENVIRON HAZARDS-UK, V19, P10, DOI 10.1080/17477891.2018.1511405
   Cutter SL, 2016, ANN AM ASSOC GEOGR, V106, P1236, DOI 10.1080/24694452.2016.1194740
   Cutter SL, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V80, P741, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2
   Cutter SL, 2014, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V29, P65, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.08.005
   Datola G., 2019, INT C COMPUTATIONAL
   Datola G, 2019, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V11622, P108, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_9
   Derakhshan S, 2022, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V14, DOI 10.3390/su14116927
   Doan NAV, 2018, OMEGA-INT J MANAGE S, V80, P166, DOI 10.1016/j.omega.2017.08.017
   Ergu D., 2011, LECT NOTES EC MATH S, V648, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9_4, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19695-9_4]
   Feng XH, 2020, CITIES, V104, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102722
   GETIS A, 1992, GEOGR ANAL, V24, P189, DOI 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
   Ghoneim S. A., 2022, CIVIL ENG ARCHITECTU, V10, P2554, DOI [10.13189/cea.2022.100624, DOI 10.13189/CEA.2022.100624]
   Giannakis E, 2020, REG STUD, V54, P1200, DOI 10.1080/00343404.2019.1698720
   Harpe SE, 2015, CURR PHARM TEACH LEA, V7, P836, DOI 10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001
   He Z, 2021, BUILDINGS-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/buildings11110523
   Heinzlef C, 2020, NAT HAZARD EARTH SYS, V20, P1049, DOI 10.5194/nhess-20-1049-2020
   Hou JD, 2016, NAT HAZARDS, V84, pS97, DOI 10.1007/s11069-015-1931-3
   Hsu C.C., 2010, Encyclopedia of Research Design
   Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2022, WGII 6 ASS REP
   Javadpoor M, 2021, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V66, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102609
   Johns RA, 2020, LOCAL ENVIRON, V25, P697, DOI 10.1080/13549839.2020.1825356
   Johnson PM, 2020, RISK ANAL, V40, P1795, DOI 10.1111/risa.13508
   Khazai B., 2015, GUIDETO MEASURING UR
   Kuo SF, 2019, PLOS ONE, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0211451
   Li Y, 2023, SOC WORK PUBLIC HLTH, V38, P110, DOI 10.1080/19371918.2022.2097147
   Liu D, 2019, J CLEAN PROD, V241, DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118406
   Diaz-Sarachaga JM, 2019, CITIES, V93, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.018
   Mao XR, 2020, SCAND J TRAUMA RESUS, V28, DOI 10.1186/s13049-020-0700-9
   Maraña P, 2020, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V154, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119954
   Mareschal B, 2015, Visual PROMETHEE User Manual (Including Tutorials), DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.4004.3042, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.4004.3042]
   Mayunga J.S., 2007, SUMMER ACAD SOCIAL V, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV.ENERGY.32.051807.090348
   Mehryar S, 2022, URBAN CLIM, V41, DOI 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.101047
   Mei Y, 2016, COMPUT IND ENG, V100, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.cie.2016.08.016
   Mitchel A., 2005, The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 2: Spartial Measurements and Statistics
   Moghim S, 2019, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V230, P345, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.090
   Moradpour N, 2023, INT J DISASTER RESIL, V14, P154, DOI 10.1108/IJDRBE-01-2022-0001
   Nasrnia F, 2021, ENVIRON MONIT ASSESS, V193, DOI 10.1007/s10661-021-09341-2
   National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine(NAS), 2019, BUILD MEAS COMM RES
   Nguyen HL, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12197896
   Palmisano GO, 2022, LAND-BASEL, V11, DOI 10.3390/land11081181
   Parsons S., 2020, AUSTR NATURAL DISAST
   Pazhuhan M., 2016, SHAHRDARIHA MONTHLY, V4, P16
   Peng Y, 2015, ANN OPER RES, V234, P95, DOI 10.1007/s10479-012-1253-8
   Qin WM, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V89, P331, DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2967-3
   Ramyar R., 2019, HDB RESILIENCE SOCIO
   Saaty T.L., 1996, Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process
   Saaty T.L., 2000, The Analytic Hierarchy Process
   Saaty TL, 2015, INT J INF TECH DECIS, V14, P1171, DOI 10.1142/S021962201550025X
   Scherzer S, 2019, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V36, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101107
   Sharifi A, 2016, ECOL INDIC, V69, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023
   Shi T, 2021, GROWTH CHANGE, V52, P2364, DOI 10.1111/grow.12554
   Singh-Peterson L, 2014, INT J DISAST RISK RE, V10, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.07.004
   Soldati A, 2022, APPL SCI-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/app12031527
   Taherdoost H., 2019, INT J ACAD RES MANAG, V8, P1
   Vaidya OS, 2006, EUR J OPER RES, V169, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   von der Gracht HA, 2012, TECHNOL FORECAST SOC, V79, P1525, DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
   Wu X, 2020, SUSTAIN CITIES SOC, V61, DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102354
   Zebardast E., 2010, The Application of Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Urban and Regional Planning, P79
   Zhang MS, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12229735
   Zhong M, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI 10.3390/su12041521
NR 75
TC 9
Z9 9
U1 13
U2 46
PU ELSEVIER
PI AMSTERDAM
PA RADARWEG 29, 1043 NX AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
SN 2210-6707
EI 2210-6715
J9 SUSTAIN CITIES SOC
JI Sust. Cities Soc.
PD SEP
PY 2023
VL 96
AR 104563
DI 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104563
EA JUN 2023
PG 16
WC Construction & Building Technology; Green & Sustainable Science &
   Technology; Energy & Fuels
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
SC Construction & Building Technology; Science & Technology - Other Topics;
   Energy & Fuels
GA M1CH6
UT WOS:001027592200001
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Bouzarovski, S
   Salukvadze, J
   Gentile, M
AF Bouzarovski, Stefan
   Salukvadze, Joseph
   Gentile, Michael
TI A Socially Resilient Urban Transition? The Contested Landscapes of
   Apartment Building Extensions in Two Post-communist Cities
SO URBAN STUDIES
LA English
DT Article
ID ADJUSTMENTS
AB Even though social processes across the globe are increasingly being theorised through a resilience lens, this has rarely been the case within the domain of everyday life in the city. The resilience debate also remains highly geographically selective, as regions that have undergone far-reaching systemic change over the past 20 years-including the post-communist states of the former Soviet Union and eastern and central Europe (ECE)-generally remain omitted from it. In order to address such knowledge gaps, an investigation is made of the relationships between social resilience and micro-level socio-spatial change in the built environment of the post-communist city, by focusing on the institutional, spatial and economic underpinnings of apartment building extensions (ABEs) on multistorey residential buildings in the Macedonian capital of Skopje and the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. Both cities contain a wide variety of ABEs, whose reinforced concrete frame constructions often rival the host buildings in terms of size and function. By exploring the architectural and social landscapes created by the extensions, it is hoped to highlight their embeddedness in a set of policy decisions and coping strategies, as well as their controversial implications on the present and future use of urban space.
C1 [Bouzarovski, Stefan] Univ Birmingham, Sch Geog Earth & Environm Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England.
   [Salukvadze, Joseph] Tbilisi State Univ, Dept Human Geog, Fac Social & Polit Studies, GE-0128 Tbilisi, Georgia.
   [Gentile, Michael] Sodertorn Univ, Stockholm Ctr Hlth Soc Transit, SE-14189 Huddinge, Sweden.
   [Gentile, Michael] Umea Univ, Dept Social & Econ Geog, Umea, Sweden.
C3 University of Birmingham; Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University;
   Sodertorn University; Umea University
RP Bouzarovski, S (corresponding author), Charles Univ Prague, Dept Social Geog & Reg Dev, Fac Sci, Albertov 6, Prague 12843, Czech Republic.
EM s.bouzarovski@bham.ac.uk; joseph.salukvadze@tsu.ge;
   michael.gentile@geography.umu.se
RI Gentile, Michael/AAL-8027-2021
OI Bouzarovski, Stefan/0000-0002-0045-3400; Gentile,
   Michael/0000-0001-5224-788X
CR Adger WN, 2002, AMBIO, V31, P358, DOI 10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0358:MRLTAS]2.0.CO;2
   Alberti Marina, 2004, Urban Ecosystems, V7, P241, DOI 10.1023/B:UECO.0000044038.90173.c6
   Altas NE, 1998, BUILD ENVIRON, V33, P315, DOI 10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00050-4
   [Anonymous], TANKOGRAD RYSKA HEMM
   [Anonymous], REP POV HOUS SIT MAC
   [Anonymous], BEYOND SOVIETOLOGY E
   [Anonymous], PROG HUM GEOG
   [Anonymous], URBAN LIVELIHOODS PE
   [Anonymous], STRAT DORN REP MAK
   [Anonymous], P BUILD STOCK REACT
   [Anonymous], SOCIOECONOMIC POLITI
   [Anonymous], STORIA SISTEMA SOVIE
   [Anonymous], 2008, Doing Business
   [Anonymous], 2007, PAPERS LAND MANAGEME
   [Anonymous], HOUSING TRANSFORMATI
   [Anonymous], 2007, CREATIVE CITY CROSSI
   Awanyo L, 2009, ENVIRON PLANN C, V27, P302, DOI 10.1068/c0779b
   Bater JamesH., 1989, The Soviet Scene : A Geographical Perspective
   Boren T., 2005, M PLACES TRANSFORMAT
   Borén T, 2007, GEOGR ANN B, V89B, P95, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00242.x
   Bouzarovski S, 2011, CITIES, V28, P265, DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2010.05.002
   Buzar S., 2007, Energy poverty in Eastern Europe: hidden geographies of deprivation
   CARMON N, 1987, URBAN STUD, V24, P324, DOI 10.1080/00420988720080491
   Coaffee J, 2008, NEW SECUR CHALL, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230583337
   Colding J, 2007, LANDSCAPE URBAN PLAN, V81, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.10.016
   Domanski B., 1997, IND CONTROL SOCIALIS
   Feijten P, 2002, HOUSING STUD, V17, P773, DOI 10.1080/0267303022000009808
   Folke C, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P253, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   French R.A., 1995, PLANS PRAGMATISM PEO
   Gachechiladze Revaz., 1995, NEW GEORGIA SPACE SO
   Gallopin GC, 2006, GLOBAL ENVIRON CHANG, V16, P293, DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004
   GOSLING JA, 1993, URBAN STUD, V30, P1561, DOI 10.1080/00420989320081501
   Hall Peter., 2000, Cities of Tomorrow
   Harris ChauncyD., 1970, CITIES SOVIET UNION
   Littlewood A, 1997, URBAN STUD, V34, P1771, DOI 10.1080/0042098975240
   LUTHAR SS, 1993, DEV PSYCHOPATHOL, V5, P703, DOI 10.1017/S0954579400006246
   Mandic S, 2001, HOUSING STUD, V16, P53, DOI 10.1080/02673030020015128
   MCAULEY WJ, 1982, J MARRIAGE FAM, V44, P301, DOI 10.2307/351540
   Morton HenryW., 1984, The Contemporary Soviet City
   Murie A., 1976, HOUSING POLICY HOUSI
   OFER G, 1976, Q J ECON, V90, P219, DOI 10.2307/1884628
   Pelling M., 2003, VULNERABILITY CITIES
   Pickvance C., 2001, J HOUS BUILT ENVIRON, V16 pg, P7, DOI [10.1023/A:1011533211521, DOI 10.1023/A:1011533211521]
   Rossi P., 1955, WHY FAMILIES MOVE
   Salukvadze J., 2009, CITY CULTURE CITY PL, P159
   SEEK NH, 1983, URBAN STUD, V20, P455, DOI 10.1080/00420988320080811
   Smith A, 2005, RES POLICY, V34, P1491, DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   SOSNOVY T, 1959, SOV STUD, V11, P1
   Sykora L., 2008, CITY REGION PAPERS H, P283
   Szelenyi I., 1996, C7LT V SOCIALISM URB, P286
   Tipple A., 2000, EXTENDING THEMSELVES
   Turner S, 2009, URBAN STUD, V46, P1203, DOI 10.1177/0042098009103861
NR 52
TC 62
Z9 67
U1 1
U2 42
PU SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
PI LONDON
PA 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND
SN 0042-0980
EI 1360-063X
J9 URBAN STUD
JI Urban Stud.
PD OCT
PY 2011
VL 48
IS 13
BP 2689
EP 2714
DI 10.1177/0042098010385158
PG 26
WC Environmental Studies; Urban Studies
WE Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Environmental Sciences & Ecology; Urban Studies
GA 819GH
UT WOS:000294812900001
OA Green Submitted
DA 2025-04-22
ER

PT J
AU Ganin, AA
   Kitsak, M
   Marchese, D
   Keisler, JM
   Seager, T
   Linkov, I
AF Ganin, Alexander A.
   Kitsak, Maksim
   Marchese, Dayton
   Keisler, Jeffrey M.
   Seager, Thomas
   Linkov, Igor
TI Resilience and efficiency in transportation networks
SO SCIENCE ADVANCES
LA English
DT Article
ID TRAFFIC FLOW; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN; TRAVEL
AB Urban transportation systems are vulnerable to congestion, accidents, weather, special events, and other costly delays. Whereas typical policy responses prioritize reduction of delays under normal conditions to improve the efficiency of urban road systems, analytic support for investments that improve resilience (defined as system recovery from additional disruptions) is still scarce. In this effort, we represent paved roads as a transportation network by mapping intersections to nodes and road segments between the intersections to links. We built road networks for 40 of the urban areas defined by the U.S. Census Bureau. We developed and calibrated a model to evaluate traffic delays using link loads. The loads may be regarded as traffic-based centrality measures, estimating the number of individuals using corresponding road segments. Efficiency was estimated as the average annual delay per peak-period auto commuter, and modeled results were found to be close to observed data, with the notable exception of New York City. Resilience was estimated as the change in efficiency resulting from roadway disruptions and was found to vary between cities, with increased delays due to a 5% random loss of road linkages ranging from 9.5% in Los Angeles to 56.0% in San Francisco. The results demonstrate that many urban road systems that operate inefficiently under normal conditions are nevertheless resilient to disruption, whereas some more efficient cities are more fragile. The implication is that resilience, not just efficiency, should be considered explicitly in roadway project selection and justify investment opportunities related to disaster and other disruptions.
C1 [Ganin, Alexander A.] Univ Virginia, Dept Syst & Informat Engn, 151 Engineers Way,POB 400747, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA.
   [Ganin, Alexander A.; Marchese, Dayton; Linkov, Igor] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, 696 Virginia Rd, Concord, MA 01742 USA.
   [Kitsak, Maksim] Northeastern Univ, Dept Phys, 110 Forsyth St, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
   [Keisler, Jeffrey M.] Univ Massachusetts, Coll Management, 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125 USA.
   [Seager, Thomas] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, 781 S Terrace Rd, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA.
C3 University of Virginia; United States Department of Defense; United
   States Army; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; U.S. Army Engineer Research &
   Development Center (ERDC); ERDC - Risk Modeling; Northeastern
   University; University of Massachusetts System; University of
   Massachusetts Boston; Arizona State University; Arizona State
   University-Tempe
RP Linkov, I (corresponding author), US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, 696 Virginia Rd, Concord, MA 01742 USA.
EM igor.linkov@usace.army.mil
RI Ganin, Alexander/I-3210-2019; Linkov, Igor/AAH-5981-2019; KEISLER,
   JEFFREY/L-1727-2018; Seager, Thomas P/M-5662-2017
OI Ganin, Alexander/0000-0003-2193-0373; Linkov, Igor/0000-0002-0823-8107;
   Keisler, Jeffrey/0000-0002-9267-2327; Seager, Thomas
   P/0000-0001-7354-252X; Marchese, Dayton/0000-0002-7207-272X; Kitsak,
   Maksim/0000-0002-6862-6021
FU U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center; Defense Threat
   Reduction Agency, Basic Research Program; Virginia Transportation
   Research Council; Virginia Department of Transportation; NSF [1441352];
   Emerging Frontiers & Multidisciplinary Activities; Directorate For
   Engineering [1441352] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
FX This study was supported by the U.S. Army Engineer Research and
   Development Center and by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Basic
   Research Program (P. Tandy, program manager). A.A.G. was additionally
   supported by the Virginia Transportation Research Council and Virginia
   Department of Transportation. T.S. was supported by the NSF under grant
   no. 1441352.
CR 2009, 2009, 2009 NAT HOUS TRAV S
   Alderson DL, 2015, RISK ANAL, V35, P562, DOI 10.1111/risa.12333
   ALLEN WB, 1993, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V27, P439, DOI 10.1016/0191-2615(93)90016-4
   [Anonymous], 2017, PLANET DUMP
   [Anonymous], THESIS
   [Anonymous], 2010, 2010 CENS DAT
   [Anonymous], 2006, SIM C 2006 WSC 06 P
   [Anonymous], 2012, GROWTH URB POP OUTP
   Berezin Y, 2015, SCI REP-UK, V5, DOI 10.1038/srep08934
   Beverly K., 2010, FHWAHOP10023 TEX TRA, P100
   Calabrese F, 2013, TRANSPORT RES C-EMER, V26, P301, DOI 10.1016/j.trc.2012.09.009
   CAREY M, 1984, NETWORKS, V14, P439, DOI 10.1002/net.3230140307
   Cascetta E, 2007, PAP REG SCI, V86, P597, DOI 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00135.x
   Casey H.J., 1955, TRAFFIC QUARTELY, VIX, P23
   Chang SE, 2001, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V35, P475, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00003-3
   Cho E., 2011, KD11 17 ACM SIGKDD I, P1082
   Colak S, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10793
   Cox A, 2011, TRANSPORT POLICY, V18, P307, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.004
   D'Este G. M., 1999, Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, V14, P255, DOI 10.1111/0885-9507.00146
   DAGANZO CF, 1994, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V28, P269, DOI 10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7
   Flynn S. E, 2012, CRITICAL TRANSPORTAT
   FOTHERINGHAM AS, 1983, ENVIRON PLANN A, V15, P1121, DOI 10.1068/a151121
   Freckleton D., 2012, 91 ANN M TRANSPORTAT
   Ganin AA, 2016, SCI REP-UK, V6, DOI 10.1038/srep19540
   González MC, 2008, NATURE, V453, P779, DOI 10.1038/nature06958
   Greenshields B. D., 1934, P 14 ANN M HIGHW RES, V1
   Gross D., 2008, WILEY SERIES PROBABI, P49, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118625651.CH2
   Holling C.S., 1973, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V4, P1, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Holling C.S., 1996, Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience, DOI [DOI 10.17226/4919, 10.17226/4919]
   Hoogendoorn R, 2014, TRANSPORT RES REC, P113, DOI 10.3141/2422-13
   Jiang XM, 2003, J TRANSP ENG, V129, P230, DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:3(230)
   Kermanshah A, 2017, NAT HAZARDS, V86, P151, DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2678-1
   King D., 2016, TRANSP RES REC
   Li DQ, 2016, SPRINGER COMPLEX, P79, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-47824-0_4
   Lima A, 2016, J R SOC INTERFACE, V13, DOI 10.1098/rsif.2016.0021
   Linkov I, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P407, DOI 10.1038/nclimate2227
   Lomax T., 2011, 106555 UTCM TEX TRAN
   Majdandzic A, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10850
   Marchese D, 2017, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V51, P5867, DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b01912
   Melkote S, 2001, TRANSPORT RES A-POL, V35, P515, DOI 10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00005-7
   National Research Council (U. S.), 2007, METR TRAV FOR CURR P
   Ortuzar J.d. D., 1990, Modeling Transport
   Park Jeryang, 2011, Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, V7, P396, DOI 10.1002/ieam.228
   Renn A. M., 2011, COST CONGESTION VALU
   Richardson T., 2016, WASHINGTON POST
   Rodrigues VS, 2008, INT J PHYS DISTR LOG, V38, P388, DOI 10.1108/09600030810882807
   Sabyasachee M., 2013, TRB 92 ANN M COMP 13
   Sami Jarboui, 2013, [交通运输系统工程与信息, Journal of Transporation Systems Engineering & Information Technology], V13, P64
   Samuelsson A., 1997, Transport Logistics, V1, P139, DOI DOI 10.1163/156857097300151660
   Schrank D, 2015, URBAN MOBILITY SCORE
   Seager T. P., 2017, RESILIENCE AND RISK
   Sen C., 2014, ATLANTIC
   SIMONOVIC S.P., 2016, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, V6, P85, DOI [DOI 10.2495/SAFE-V6-N2-85-95, https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N2-85-95]
   SMULDERS S, 1990, TRANSPORT RES B-METH, V24, P111, DOI 10.1016/0191-2615(90)90023-R
   Sterbenz JPG, 2010, COMPUT NETW, V54, P1245, DOI 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.03.005
   Thiagarajan A, 2009, SENSYS 09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH ACM CONFERENCE ON EMBEDDED NETWORKED SENSOR SYSTEMS, P85
   Turnbull K., 2016, TRANSPORTATION RESIL
   Van Haaren R., 2012, ASSESSMENT ELECT CAR, P25
   Woods DD, 2015, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V141, P5, DOI 10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018
   Woodside A. G., 1989, Journal of Travel Research, V27, P8, DOI 10.1177/004728758902700402
   Yamashita T, 2004, ITSC 2004: 7TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, P465, DOI 10.1109/ITSC.2004.1398944
   Yan G, 2006, PHYS REV E, V73, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.046108
   Zhao JC, 2016, NAT COMMUN, V7, DOI 10.1038/ncomms10094
NR 63
TC 263
Z9 296
U1 32
U2 200
PU AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
PI WASHINGTON
PA 1200 NEW YORK AVE, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20005 USA
SN 2375-2548
J9 SCI ADV
JI Sci. Adv.
PD DEC
PY 2017
VL 3
IS 12
AR e1701079
DI 10.1126/sciadv.1701079
PG 8
WC Multidisciplinary Sciences
WE Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED); Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)
SC Science & Technology - Other Topics
GA FY3BB
UT WOS:000426690900002
PM 29291243
OA gold, Green Published, Green Submitted
HC Y
HP N
DA 2025-04-22
ER

EF